110705 Mamak 3rdPV Monitoring Report V1

Transcription

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM – Executive Board
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 1
MONITORING REPORT
Version 3.1, 11/04/2011
Mamak Landfill Waste Management Project – Turkey
GS Project ID: GS440
3rd Periodic Verification, Monitoring Period 01/04/2010 – 31/03/2011
SECTION A. General description of the project activity
A.1.
Brief description
scription of the project activity:
1. Purpose of the project activity and the measures taken to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions:
Landfill gas is a significant source of global warming as it
contains a high share of the greenhouse gas methane.
The Mamak Landfill
dfill Waste Management Project contributes
to a reduction of the global warming as it involves the
extraction of landfill gas (LFG), at the Mamak landfill site in
Ankara in order to avoid the uncontrolled release of landfill
gas in the atmosphere. The captured
capt
gas is furthermore used
for the purpose of electricity generation in engines,
substituting mainly fossil fuel fired power capacity of the
Turkish grid.
Additionally the generation of greenhouse gases is reduced by
avoiding waste to be deposited and thus avoiding the
generation of the greenhouse gas methane. For this purpose an
anaerobic digester has been constructed where biogas for the
production of electricity is generated.
Figure 1:: Mamak LFG project
2. Brief description of the installed technology and equipments:
The proposed
ed project activity involves:
• gradual covering of the landfill area
• a gas extraction system which can support gas engines for electricity generation
• a flaring system
• a leachate drainage system
• an anaerobic digester
• gas engines (utilisation of the recovered
recovered LFG and the biogas produced by the anaerobic
digester)
3. Relevant dates for the project activity (e.g. construction, commissioning, continued operation
periods, etc.).
01/06/2006:
Operational start of the first landfill gas booster
01/05/2007:
Start of the crediting period
16/04/2009:
Start of operation of the anaerobic digester
For the future the operation of a gasifier is planed which will also be included in the project activity.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 2
4. Total emission reductions achieved in this monitoring period
484,240 tCO2e
A.2.
Project Participants
ITC Invest Trading & Consulting A.G., Turkish
Turki Ankara Branch, Turkey
A.3.
Location of the project activity:
The project is located in the Mamak district,
district, Ankara Province, Central Anatolia region locate, Turkey
Turkey.
The GSP coordinates are 39°52’59.36”
52’59.36” E / 32°55’50.72”
32
N.
A.4.
Technical description of the project
Description of the LFG activity
Figure 2:: Energy generation equipment
The landfill
andfill gas is collected with the horizontal channels and vertical wells in the landfill. This system
also helps to carry out the collection of the leachate that will be discharged to the ASK
ASKĐ channel after
collection. These two different methods horizontal and vertical collection are explained in detail below:
The
he first one is the collection of the LFG with series of vertical wells, which helps the collection of the
LFG from deep points in the landfill body. Wells are drilled till to 30-35
30 35 m deep and then HDPE pipes
are installed to the holes. After the installat
installation
ion of each well, the collected LFG via wells will be
transferred to the main collection system.
The second system is the horizontal collection system, which intercept LFG migrating offsite in the
subsurface. Vertical wells are installed at the horizontal pipe to convey the gas.
Active gas collection system is applied for degassing of the landfill. The main
ain pipe is connected to the
intake pipe of the landfill gas blower and the outgoing pipe from the blower is then finally connected to
the LFG utilization system.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 3
Description of implemented technology of digester:
The currently implemented technology for digester is wet digestion involving mesophilic bacteria at
specific operating conditions and in absence of oxygen. The residence time is expected to be aro
around 15 20 days. Methane produced during the digestion of organics is transferred with pipes to a gas holder.
As shown on the following sketch, the digesters and gas holder are designed to prevent physical leakage
of biogas better than conventional digester
diges technology:
Membrane certified
for biogas applications
(Double membrane)
High quality connection
between membrane
and concrete
Pipe for biogas collection
To gas holder and
booster 4 for being
sent to engines
Input of shredded
waste + water
Anaerobic digester , with thick walls
(high quality constructed impermeable tank)
Figure 3:: Anaerobic Digester
To prevent leakage, advanced methods were implemented during the installation of the digesters,
requiring high quality specialized impermeable materials.
materials. A proven and reliable technology developed
by ITC has been applied in the connection points between membrane and concrete, enabling a 100% gas
leakage free operation.
Both quality of the material is certified and assured methods are applied delicately
delicately to connect the
materials. Therefore, all the risks for leakage are prevented steadily and the choice of option 3 in the
methodology AM0025 is justified a posteriori (see also the calculation in section E2).
).
A.5.
Title, reference and version of the baseline
baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the
project activity:
The reference for the Baseline and Monitoring are the following approved methodologies:
• Approved consolidated baseline methodology ACM0001 “Consolidated methodology for
landfill gas project
ject activities” Version 08.11;
• Approved baseline and monitoring methodology AM0025 “Avoided emissions from organic
waste through alternative waste treatment process” Version 102
1
http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/F533IMIDQ5RYD9I7V715HJFL8G0LH6
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 4
Used tools:
• “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing
containin methane”,
”, Version 013
• “Tool to calculate baseline, project and/or leakage emissions from electricity consumption
consumption”,
version 014.
• “Tool to determine methane
emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste
disposal site", Version 045
A.6.
Registration
ration date of the project activity:
activity
Registration date:
27/04/2009
A.7.
Crediting period of the project activity and related information (start date and choice of
crediting period):
Start of Crediting Period:
01/05/2007
Length of the crediting period: 7 years, renewable
A.8.
Name of responsible person(s)/entity(ies):
Contact information of the persons/entity responsible for completing the monitoring report form :
Hinrich Bornebusch
[email protected]
Vincent Layec
[email protected]
Orbeo,
CO2 operations – Monitoring, Verification and Review
Am Wassermann 36
50829 Cologne, Germany
T:
F:
W:
2
+49 (0)221 5000 39-30
+49 (0)221 5000 39-99
http://www.orbeo.com
http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/42ZTMKAOWN3OV4BNK9B95WYUXM9GR4
http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/42ZTMKAOWN3
3
http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/tools/am
PAmethodologies/tools/am-tool-06-v1.pdf
4
http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/tools/am-tool-05-v1.pdf
5
http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/tools/am-tool-04-v4.pdf
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 5
SECTION B. Implementation of the project activity
B.1.
Implementation status of the project activity
At the moment of preparation of this third monitoring report, phase I and II (LFG recovery system) are
implemented, as well as the first stage of phase III, the anaerobic digester. Unfortunately, the rest of
phase III, the gasifier system, has not yet been implemented.
This is why the project participant would like to mention that the implementation
implementation of stages 2 and 3 of
phase III will be slower than expected at the time of PDD writing due to fact that the operation of this
alternative waste treatment technology is unexpectedly complex. The digester has been built as
announced in the PDD. But instead
stead of expected 6 MW (4 engines) in first and second stage of Phase III
the Anaerobic Digester fed only 2 engines of 1.4 MW each (2.8 MW) at the beginning and from May
2010 on only on engine of 1.4 MW.
The main reason for this deviation is that the complete
complete feeding system of this technology, with several
types of bacteria involving high requirements on operating conditions, cannot be operated at full
capacity. For this reason the project participant thinks about test another technology of digester
digester, but
there is no decision so far.
The gasifier did not start operating in 2010 as expected and is postponed because the technology is still
at an experimental stage.
16 engines have been bought as part of the total project activity and the total capacity – 22.4 MW – is
still consistent with the total capacity of stage 1, phase III of the PDD. As less biogas than expected is
available and can only feed 1 engine, and as it is better not to leave any engine out of operation, 115
engines instead of 12 are connected to the landfill gas recovery system (ACM0001), resulting therefore
in an effective capacity of 21 MW instead of 16.8 MW. A summary of the shifts of connections of
engines (and respectively of capacity) is summarized in the following table:
Date
Before 13/11/2008
From 13/11/2008
From 26/01/2009
From 21/04/2009
From 01/05/2010
Engines allocated Engines allocated
to LFG
to biogas
[capacity MW]
[capacity MW]
12 (16.8 MW)
0 (0.0 MW)
14 (19.6 MW)
0 (0.0 MW)
16 (22.4 MW)
0 (0.0 MW)
14 (19.6 MW)
2 (2.8 MW)
15 (21.0 MW)
1 (1.4 MW)
Total number of
engines
[capacity
capacity MW
MW]
12 (16.8 MW)
14 (19.6 MW)
16 (22.4 MW)
16 (22.4 MW)
16 (22.4 MW)
Table 1:: Summary of capacity history
With the start of operation of the anaerobic digester in April 2009,, a gasholder has been installed to
store the biogas temporarily before it is sent to the booster and to avoid its accumulation inside the
digester and thus improve the safety of the site.
Two months later, in June 2009, two bigger gas holders were made available
ailable for the landfill gas itself.
The biogas and landfill gas are stored in different gas holders so that the separation between the two
methodologies of the project is clearly visible onsite. And high tech membranes certified for biogas
applications aree chosen in order to avoid any physical leakage.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 6
These gas holders also aim at improving the “LFG usage” (ID.50 monitored for Gold Standards, see
section D.2)) by softening the natural fluctuations of LFG generation from the site and thus reducing the
necessity
essity of flare operations. With this addition, the project participant ensure a more sustainable
operation, both from environmental as from economical point of view. Also the moment when power is
delivered to the grid can be optimized so that the project owner secures his power sell revenues even
when the conditions of the electricity market have become more difficult.
The most important milestones are included in the following table:
No
Date
1
01/02/2006
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
01/06/2006
22/10/2006
01/05/2007
12/05/2007
12/12/2007
12/12/2007
08/06/2008
20/08/2008
10
20/08/2008
11
12
13
14
15
20/08/2008
13/11/2008
26/01/2009
31/03/2009
01/04/2009
16
16/04/2009
Event
Starting date of the project activity (board
(board decision on investment decision based
on VER revenues)
Booster-1
1 was started to operate
Engines 1-3
3 were started to operate
Start of crediting period and therefore start of first monitoring period.
Engine 4 was started to operate
Booster 2 was started to operate
Engines 5-8
8 were started to operate
Engines 9, 10 were started to operate by Booster-2
Booster
Booster 3 was started to operate
Engines 9, 10 were started to operate by Booster-3.
Booster 3. See also item dated on
21/04/2009, when these 2 engines, still fed only with LFG will be connected
again to Booster 1 and 2 respectively.
Engines 11, 12 were started to operate by Boos
Booster-3
End of first monitoring period
Beginning of second monitoring period
Start
tart of operation of digester (with monitoring accordingly) and of a small gas
holder for biogas.
•
17
21/04/2009
18
19
20
06/06/2009
31/03/2010
01/04/2010
21
01/05/2010
22
01/08/2010
Start of delivery of digester biogas into Booster 4 for electricity generation in
engines 15 and 16 (therefore not connected any longer to booster
boos 3).
• The former flare of booster 3 is also taken out and installed at booster 4
instead.
• Engines 9 and 10 (still fed in with land fill gas only) are disconnected from
booster 3 and connected instead to booster 1 and 2 respectively (see also on
item dated
dat from 20/08/2008).
Start of operation of the two gas holders dedicated to landfill gas.
End of second monitoring period
Start of the third monitoring period (the period of this present report)
Engine
ngine 15 was connected to the LFG system. From now on the Anaerobic
Digester feeds just one engine (engine 16)
Electricity protocols are conducted via online sy
system.
tem. There is a distance reading
system by law
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 7
23
24
25
26
27
28
28
The Deputy Manager of the World Bank madee a speech to visit Mamak in “The
Investment Advisory Council”
19/11/2010 A national TV made a program for the prime time news at Mamak
24/11/2010 The project was awarded with good practice by Dubai Awards
Company
ny has the Quality (9001:2008), Environment (14001:2005) and Health &
07/02/2011
Safety (18001:2008) Certificates
11/02/2011 –
Shutdown of one of the Anaerobic Digester
21/03/2011
17/02/2011 Forestation studies has been initiated
31/03/2011 End of the third
thi monitoring period
06/10/2010
Table 2: project history and events
B.2.
Revision of the monitoring plan
N/A
B.3.
Request for deviation applied to this monitoring period
N/A
B.4.
N/A
Notification or request of approval of changes
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 8
SECTION C. Description of the monitoring system
A monitoring manual has been developed that covers all the procedures required as per the approved
methodology
ethodology ACM0001 and AM0025 and validated monitoring plan. To guarantee the accuracy of the
monitoring data periodic calibration of the installed monitoring equipment are carried out according to
definitions included in the monitoring plan of the registered PDD and in accordance with the
requirements of the manufacturer. All data are registered and processed electronically.
ectronically. At each booster
station a server unit receives all data sent from the meters and data in real time is saved to an internal
memory every 30 minutes. Every day the server creates a file with all half-hourly
hourly data saved. The server
also automatically
ally calculates every 30 minutes the normal flow of landfill gas captured and of the biogas
produced by the digester; the gas flow is multiplied with the real gas formula normating the gas flow to
standard temperature and pressure. Temperature and pressure are real time values. The data stored at the
booster station server are transferred once per month to a computer and a back up hard drive. In case of
failures of the data recording system, no emission reduction will be claimed for that period. A logbook
will
ill be written and will be registered the period without data recording.
The original data from the electricity meter are taken by a distance reading carried out by the Grid
Company. The electricity data can be seen on a web page of PNUM6. ITC has a password
passw
and username
to follow the electricity data. The Grid Company submits monthly a protocol to the project owner
owner. The
monthly electricity data are transferred to the excel sheet used for the emission reduction calculations.
The calculation of GS VERs for the third verification period is carried out through a separate
spreadsheet. The project owner is ITC and therefore responsible for the operation and the monitoring of
the project activities.
Roles and responsibilities
The general manager with overall ccompetencies is Mr. Erdoğan Göğen.
en. The environmental manager and
chief of monitoring is Mrs. Tugba Kırer. The chief monitor is responsible for a sound monitoring
system, for the implementation of the calibration procedures and for data storing.
Trainings
Ass trainings refer to GS Sustainable Development Indicator 6 a list of trainings can be found in section
D.2 Sustainable Parameters.
Involvement of Third Parties
Support and consultancy regarding the Gold Standard VER obligations is provided by OneCarbon
International
nternational B.V., a company purchased by Orbeo.
Internal audits and control measures
There are daily checks if the data from the day before was stored successfully on the servers in the
booster station. Three times a day the operating hours of the engines
engines are checked. Aggregation of data
and cross checks takes place periodically.
6
http://dgpys.teias.gov.tr/dgpys/
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 9
Troubleshooting procedures
The monitors are responsible for keeping all monitoring data electronically or in hard copy.
Furthermore, a logbook will be written continuously where
where observations and all other information
necessary to document are included. In case of failure of the monitoring equipment the chief monitor
will be informed who will inform the carbon consultant Orbeo (formerly OneCarbon International B.V.)
Monitoring Points
Figure 4: Monitoring Points
F
Fstack
T
P
E
H
Overview of monitoring points - Legend
(volume) Flow [m³/h]
CH4, CO2, O2
Gas concentration [%]
Flow of stack gas
N2O, CH4
Gas concentration [%]
Temperature [°C]
Waste Amount
Total Amount of waste [t]
Pressure [mbar]
Waste composition
(of food, paper, etc)
Electricity [MWh]
Landfill gas flow
Operation (hours)
Electricity flow
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 10
SECTION D. Data and parameters
D.1.
Data and parameters determined at registr
registration
ation and not monitored during the
monitoring period, including default values and factors
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value(s) :
Indicate what the data are used
for (Baseline/ Project/ Leakage
emission calculations)
Additional comment:
ID.2 / GWPCH4
tCO2e/tCH4
Global Warming Potential of methane
Kyoto Protocol
21
Data is used for Baseline and Leakage emission calculation
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
ID.3 / GWPN2O
tCO2e/tN2O
Global Warming Potential of N2O
Kyoto Protocol
310
Data is used for Project emission calculation
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
ID.4 / DCH4
tCH4/m3CH4
Density of methane
ACM0001 ‘Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for
landfill gas project activities’ version 08.1’
0.0007168
Data is used for Baseline emission calculation
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
ID.13 / φ
Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties
“Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from dumping
waste at a solid waste disposal site” version 04
0.9
Data is used for Baseline and Leakage emission
on calculation
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 11
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
ID.14 / OX
Oxidation factor (reflecting the amount of methane from SWDS
that is oxidized in the soil or other material covering the waste)
IPCC 2006
06 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
(Volume 5 / page 3.15)7
0
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
ID.15 / F
Fraction of methane in the SWDS gas (volume fraction)
IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
0.5
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
ID.16 / DOCf
Fraction of degradable organic carbon (DOC) that can decompose
0.5
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
ID.17 / MCF
Methane correction factor
0.8
Data is used for Baseline and Leakage emission calculation.
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
ID.18 / DOCj
%
Fraction of degradable organic carbon (by weight) in waste type j
(adapted from Volume 5, Table2.4 and Table 2.5)
7
http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_3_Ch3_SWDS.pdf
nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_3_Ch3_SWDS.pdf
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 12
Value(s) :
Waste type j
Wood and wood products
Pulp, paper and cardboard
Food, food waste, beverages and tobacco
Non-food organics
DOCj
(% wet waste)
43
40
15
20
Additional comment:
Data are used for Baseline and Leakage emission calculation
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
ID.19 / kj
%
Decay rate of the waste
(Volume 5, Table 3.3)
Value(s) :
Type j
Wood, wood products and straw
Pulp, paper and cardboard
Food, food waste, sewage
age sludge, beverages and tobacco
kj
0.02
0.04
0.06
Non-food
food organics, putrescible garden and park waste
0.05
Additional comment:
Data are used for Baseline and Leakage emission calculation
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
ID.20 / CEFgrid
tCO2e/MWh
Emission factor for the production of the electricity in the project
activity
Registered PDD, calculated ex-ante
ante according to the “Tool to
calculate
te emission factor for an electricity system” version 01,
EB35 Annex 12.
0.636
Data are used for Baseline and Project emission calculation
Value(s) :
Additional comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Value(s) :
WH2S
Nm3 H2S / Nm3 LFG
Value for sulphide content (determined ex-ante)
ante) for SDI.2
Registered PDD
0.005
Data are used for the Gold Standard SDI-parameter
parameter SDI.2
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 13
Additional comment:
D.2.
Data and parameters monitored
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Measured /Calculated /Default:
Source of data:
Value(s) of monitored
parameter:
Monitoring equipment (type,
accuracy class, serial number,
calibration frequency, date of
last calibration, validity)
Measuring/ Reading/ Recording
frequency:
Calculation method (if
applicable):
QA/QC procedures applied:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
ID.21 / LFGtotal,y
m³
Total amount of landfill gas captured.
measured
measured continuously through volume flow meters.
57,509,689 m³
Baseline emission calculation
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MP1; x=1,2,3
The calibration of the monitoring equipment was carried out
according to the information provided in the PDD:
• Regular maintenance and testing regime
• Records of calibration and maintenance will be archived.
The accuracies of the measurements are 0.075% (ABB) or 0.04%
(SMAR)
For detailed information regarding type, serial numbers, calibration
details please refer to “Annex 2 – Table of monitoring devices”.
Please note that the measurements of the flow rate of the gas and the
measurements of the volumetric fraction of methane in the gas refer
to the same basis, which is a wet basis. However the ggaseous stream
is expected to be quite dry. The related parameters are: ID. 21, ID.
22, ID. 23 and ID. 28.
The monitoring system works with continuous measurement
devices. It is programmed to automatically save hal
half hourly values.
The data are stored automatically at the booster stations and
transferred once per month to a computer and a back
back-up hard drive.
Additionally every day it is checked if the server unit recorded the
data from the day before successfully in a file.
N/A
Cross check with flow to PGUs and Flares (ID.22 & ID.23)
ID.22 / LFGflare,y
m³
Amount of landfill gas flared.
measured
0 m³
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 14
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MP4; x=1,2 (There is no flare at booster 3)
according to the information
mation provided in the PDD:
(SMAR)
calibr
to the same basis, which is a wet basis. Howeverr the gaseous stream
22, ID. 23 and ID. 28.
devices. It is programmed to automatically save
ave half hourly values.
back-up hard drive.
N/A
Cross check with total flows and flows to PGUs (ID.21 / ID.23)
ID.23 / LFGelectricity,y
m³
Amount of landfill gas combusted to produce electricity
Measured
57,792,272 m³
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MP3; x=1,2,3
(SMAR)
to the same basis, which is a wet basis. However the gaseous stream
is expected to be quite dry. The related parameters are: ID.21, ID.
22, ID. 23 and ID. 28.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 15
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
devices. It is programmed
ed to automatically save half hourly values.
back-up hard drive.
N/A
Cross check with total flows and flows to flares (ID.21 / ID.22)
ID.24 / Temperature
°C
Temperature of the landfill gas
Measured
The temperature is measured to determine the norm flow of the
landfill gas and it is monitored separately using a temperature meter.
/
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MPj; x=1,2,3; j=1,3,4
The accuracies of the measurements are 0.1% (NOVA
(NOVA-Z) or 0.5%
(ELIMKO / WIKA)
The monitoring system works with continuous
inuous measurement
devices. It is programmed to automatically save half hourly values.
back-up hard drive.
N/A
ID.25 / Pressure
mbar
pressure of the landfill gas
Measured
The pressure is measured to determine the norm flow of the landfill
gas and it is monitored separately using a pressure meter.
/
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 16
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MPj; x=1,2,3; j=1,3,4
The accuracies of the measurements are 0.1% (ABB), 0.2%
(WIKA), 0.25% and 0.5% (KELLER)
devices.
vices. It is programmed to automatically save half hourly values.
back-up hard drive.
Additionally every day it is checked if the server unit recorded
recor
the
N/A
ID.26 / Tflare
°C
Temperature in the exhaust gas of the enclosed flare
Measured
The temperature is measured is measured in continuous by
thermocouple. Measurement of temperature above 500 °C in the
exhaust gas stream in the flare indicated that the flare is operating in
a reliable way.
/
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MP5; x=1,2 (There is no flare at Booster 3)
• Replaced or calibrated according to the supplier’s manual
The accuracies
ccuracies of the measurements are 0.5% (ELIMKO).
The monitoring system works with
ith continuous measurement
back-up hard drive.
Additionally every day it is checked
cked if the server unit recorded the
N/A
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 17
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
ID.27 / ηflare,h
%
Flare efficiency in ho ur h
Calculated with ID.22 and ID.26
The flare efficiency is calculated using data from flow meter of LFG
flared and from thermocouple which measure the temperature in the
exhaust gas of the enclosed flare.
90% default value as per methodological tool “Tool to determine
project emissions from flaring containing methane”
N/A
For each 30 minutes the real time value of the temperature mea
measured
by thermocouple in the flare is recorded.
According to the methodological tool “Tool to determine project
emissions from flaring gases containing methane”, the determination
has to be hourly. The flare efficiency is:
- 0% when the flare temperature is below 500°C (if any of the two
values per hour is below 500°C)
- 50 % when the flare temperature is above 500 °C but the norm
flow to flare does not meet the manufacture’s specifications.
The norm flow according the manufacture specification is
265 Nm3 < LFGflare <1,125 Nm3.
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
ID.28 / wCH4
% (m³ CH4 / m³ LFG)
Methane fraction in the landfill gas
Measured
The methane fraction in the LFG is measured continuously by a gas
analyser.
The average value of this monitoring period is 48.53 %
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MP2, x=1,2,3
according
ding to the information provided in the PDD:
The accuracies of the measurements are 2%.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 18
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
to the same basis, which is a wet basis. However the ga
gaseous stream
22, ID. 23 and ID. 28.
back-up hard drive.
N/A
ID.29 / Operation of the energy plant
hours/year
measured
The amount of hours is registered
istered by a counting device in each
power generation unit.
/
Used for crosscheck of the baseline emission calculation
Monitoring Points: L.Bx.MP6.i, x=1,2,3 and i=1...14.
A.MP7.i, i=15...16.
The system in place is related too the three shifts policy guaranteeing
24 hour support. So once per shift the totalized values are recorded
manually.
N/A
ID.30 / ECPJ,j,y
MWh
Amount
mount of electricity consumed from the grid as a result of the
project activity
measured
measured by electricity meters of the grid company
7.24 MWh.
Taking to account the (variable) TDL factor the electricity
consumption used for the project emission calculation is 7.34 MW.
project emission calculation
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 19
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
Monitoring Point: MP8.2
• Maintenance and calibration of equipment
ment is carried out
according to recognised procedures
The Turkish grid company is responsible for this.
The consumed electricity is measured continuously by electricity
meters operated by the Turkish grid companyy who is the owner of
the meter. The amount is determined by a distance reading system,
reported and invoiced every month by the grid company.
N/A
ID.31 / TDLj,y
%
Average technical transmission and distribution losses for providing
electricity in year y.
/
The value is provided by the grid company. In the absence of the
data from the relevant years, most recent figures are used but not
older than 5 years.
Between 0% and 1.7%
/
In this monitoring period the Grid company calculated the TDL
factor monthly and use the factor directly for the cr
creation of the
monthly reports
N/A
ID.32 / SGa,y
m³/year
Stack gas volume flow rate.
measured
measured by an external laboratory
1,906 Nm³/s (average flow)
Project emission calculation
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 20
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
Monitoring Points: A.MP3 and A.MP5
• Calibration is under the responsibility
ity of the third party
laboratory that is performing the quarterly analysis.
The monitoring of the stack gases takes places quarterly by an
independent laboratory.
N/A
ID.33 / MCN2O,a,y
tN2O/m³
Concentration of N2O in stack gas
measured
The concentration is 0 ppm
Monitoring Points: A.MP3
• Calibration is under the responsibility of the third party
independent laboratory. The concentrations are measured during
normal operation in order to be representative. The average
concentrations are determinedd on hourly base taking into account the
operating hours of the engines
N/A
ID.34 / MCCH4,a,y
m³/year
Concentration of CH4 in stack gas
measured
The concentration is 0 ppm
Monitoring Points: A.MP3
• Calibration is under the responsibility of the third party
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 21
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
ing
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
independent laboratory. The concentrations
centrations are measured during
normal operation in order to be representative. The average
concentrations are determined on hourly base taking into account the
operating hours of the engines
N/A
ID.38 / Wx
tonnes
Total amount of organic waste prevented from disposal and fed into
the anaerobic digester in year x.
measured
The waste quantity is measured
ed on a calibrated weight balance
installed on the conveyor belt and the data is aggregated on daily
basis, according to the internal procedure PRO-008
008 of the project
owner and made available to the DOE.
Total amount is 21,197 t.
Monitoring Point: A.MP1
• The weighbridge installed on the conveyor belt to measure
the waste quantity is calibrated according to supplier’s
manual. No recalibration
alibration is required for this type of
balance.
The accuracies of the measurements are 0.2%.
Continuous measurement, daily reading and manually transferred to
the ERs spreadsheet calculation
/
Residual waste of the Anaerobic Digester
tonnes
Total amount residual waste from the digestion process that are
finally disposed in the landfill.. The assumption is that the
composition of the residual waste is the same than the waste fed into
the Anaerobic Digester. This is a very conservative
servative approach,
because the residues are mainly inert material generating less
emission than fresh waste.
measured
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 22
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
The residual waste is weighted through a dedicated balance.
Total amount is 12,531 t.
Leakage emission calculation
the waste quantity is calibrated according
rding to supplier’s
manual. No recalibration is required for this type of
balance.
The accuracies of the measurements are < 0.1%.
For detailed information regarding type, seriall numbers, calibration
The residual waste is collected in a container. When
hen the container is
full, it is carried to the landfill. The truck is weighted before the
unload and the results of the weighbridge is transferred to the ERs
spreadsheet calculation
/
ID.39 / Pn,j,x ; ID.40 / Z
%;n
Weight fraction of the waste type j in the sample n collected during
the year x;
Number of samples collected during the year x
measured
The collected sample is weighted through a dedicated
balance.
food waste 79.6%; textiles 0.8%; paper 9.2%;
%; garden and park waste
3.1%; wood 4.7%; glass, metal
tal and other inert wastes 2.
2.7%.
Baseline and Leakage emission calculation
the waste quantity is calibrated according
rding to supplier’s
manual. No recalibration is required for this type of
balance.
The accuracies of the measurements are < 0.1%.
For detailed information regarding type, seriall numbers, calibration
Composition analysis is performed weekly by ITC employees
according to the internal procedure PRO-006
006 of the project
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 23
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
participant
ant and made available to the DOE. The sampling is
statistically significant as the uncertainty range at a confidence level
of 95% is significantly below 20%, (the requirement as per the
“Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of
waste att a solid waste disposal site”, Version 04).
/
P1
%
physical leakage factor from a digester (fraction)
default
Three options are provided by the methodology AM0025 v.10 for
quantifying this fraction and therefore the potential project
emissions from the anaerobic digester. In this project advanced
technology is used so option 3, applying a physical leakage factor of
zero was chosen.
The technology implemented is presented in section A.4. Supportive
documents were made available to the verifying DOE.
0%
/
/
/
ID.45 / MBy
t CO2e
Methane produced in the landfill in the absence of the project
activity in year y.
calulated
The value has beenn determined according to the methodological tool
“tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of
waste at a solid waste disposal site” using the default values
established by the tool and parameters as ID.38 / Wx ; ID.39 / Pn,j,x, ;
ID.40 / Z
3,377 t CO2e
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 24
frequency:
applicable):
/
/
/
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
ID.46 / EGtotal ; ID.48 / EGd,y
MWh
Amount of electricity provided
ided to the grid as a result of the whole
project activity;
Amount of electricity generated utilising biogas and LFG
Source of data:
measured
readings of electricity meters done by the grid company (ID.46);
Manual readingss of the electricity meters of each PGU (Power
Generation Unit, ID.48)
103,605.64 MWh. Because the gasification part is not operational so
far, this value is identical with the amount of electricity generated
utilising biogas and LFG
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
Monitoring Point: MP8.1 (ID.46);
L.Bx.MP7.i, x=1,2,3, i=1...14 and A.MP6.i, i=15...16 (ID.48)
• Maintenance and calibration of equipment is carried out by
the grid company (ID.46).
• Maintenance and calibration of equipment is carried out
according to the instructions of the manufacturer (ID.48)
Continuous measurement. The readings of the grid meter are done
monthly. The readings at the PGUs are recorded once per shift
manually. The system in place is related to the three shifts policy
guaranteeing 24 hour support.
N/A
ID.49 / AF
%
Methane destroyed due to regulatory or other requirements
Default
/
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 25
parameter:
frequency:
applicable):
Fixed as 0 (for first crediting period)
/
/
/
Sustainability monitoring parameters
According to the requirements of the Gold Standard, the project activity must use at least 65 % of the
LFG for electricity generation. Additionally the GS requires that the project activity
activity is assessed against a
matrix of sustainable development indicators. The contribution of the proposed project activity to the
sustainable development of the country is based on indicators of local/global environmental
sustainability, social sustainability
ity & development and economic & technological development. Below
the specific parameters are discussed:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
ID.50 / LFG Usage
%
Amount of LFG applied to the engines compared to the total amount
of LFG captured. The Gold Standard requires that at least 65% or
LFG is used for electricity generation.
Calculated
Calculated with ID. 22 and ID. 23
01 May 07 – 31 Mar 08
Total amount of Fraction of
Landfill gas
LFG used
for the
destroyed in
engines
generation
[Nm3 LFG]
LFG
of electricity
26,316,642.92 24,308,054.68
92.37 %
01 Apr 08 – 31 Mar 09
01 Apr 09 – 31 Mar 10
01 Apr 10 – 31 Mar 11
45,843,453.73
54,556,112.58
57,792,272.48
Period
frequency:
Total amount
of Landfill gas
captured
[Nm3 LFG]
/
/
45,768,097.46
54,552,112.58
57,792,272.48
99.84 %
99.99 %
100,00%
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 26
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
parameter:
The percentage of LFG used for the generation of electricity is
calculated
ated by dividing the amount of landfill gas used in engines by
the total amount of landfill gas captured.
SDI.1 / Water Quality
documents
Treatment of water at ASKI water treatment plant:
One of the main sources of pollution from landfills is the
uncontrolled drainage of leachate (baseline situation). With the
implementation of the project activity the leachate will be collected.
The collection of the leachate may be demonstrated to the DOE by
official documents or other proofs which are available.
The leachate is collected and transferred to the ASKI water
treatment plant. Official documents are presented during the on
on-site
visit. Additionally the leachate collection system may be ob
observed
by the DOE during the on-site visit.
/
Documents
For illustrative reasoning and for showing the progress achieved in
each specific period the following information iss presented:
Period
Meters of additional installed
drainage pipes [m]
app. 22,550 m
01 Apr 08 – 31 Mar 09 app. 22,250 m
01 Apr 09 – 31 Mar 10 app. 15,300 m
01 Apr 10 – 31 Mar 11 app. 9,000 m
01 May 07 – 31 Mar 08
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
SDI.2 / Air Quality
Nm³ H2S
Destruction of H2S in engines: Landfills generally are sources for
odours which for a large share can be attributed
ed to the release of
H2S. There is the general scientific understanding that it is not
possible to directly measure odours in an objective way. Thus it was
decided to define sulphides as a key parameter representing odour.
Between 0-1% of volume of the landfill
dfill gas is known to contain
/
/
/
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 27
Source of data:
parameter:
sulphides. The avoidance of odours works very efficiently.
Calculated
Amount of sulphides destroyed:
Period
01 May 07 – 31 Mar 08
frequency:
applicable):
Amount of LFG Amo
Amount of sulphides
destroyed [Nm3] destroyed [Nm3]
25,984,602.06
129,923.01
01 Apr 08 – 31 Mar 09
01 Apr 09 – 31 Mar 10
45,823,253.72
54,553,712.58
229,116.27
272,768.56
01 Apr 10 – 31 Mar 11
57,792,272.48
288,961.36
/
/
The amount of destroyed sulphides for the period covered by this
monitoring report is calculated according to the approach presented
in the PDD as follows: Vsulphide destroyed=VLFG destroyed * 0.005,
where “V” represents the volume in Nm3. A conservative approach
of 0.5% is set for the sulphide content.
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
SDI.4 / Soil condition
documents
One of the main mechanisms for soil contamination due tto landfill
activities is the uncontrolled drainage of leachate. As leachate will be
collected and transferred to the treatment plant the contamination of
the soil layers beneath the landfill will be reduced significantly.
Another mechanism for soil degradation
tion is erosion. By terracing
erosion will be reduced.
/
Documents
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 28
parameter:
The monitoring of the drainage system is already covered by the
parameter SDI.1 / Water Quality. Terracingg is shown to the DOE
during the on site visit. Progress is also documented by photos from
earlier stages. Rehabilitation studies are almost performed.
For illustrative reasoning and for showing the progress achieved in
each specific period the following information is presented:
01 May 07 – 31 Mar 08
Approximate area at the landfill which
is terraced additionally [m²]
app. 50,000 m²
01 Apr 08 – 31 Mar 09
01 Apr 09 – 31 Mar 10
app. 61,600 m²
app. 76,600 m2
01 Apr 10 – 31 Mar 11
app. 47,670 m2
Period
Measuring/
suring/ Reading/ Recording
frequency:
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Measured /Calculated
/Default:
Source of data:
/
/
/
SDI.6 / Employment
documents
List and attendance of trainings
/
The number of trainings and attendance of employees will be monitored by
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 29
parameter:
documents.
Training and attendance certificates are available to the DOE during the onon
site visit. In addition to the 3 trainings that took
took place before the start of the
crediting period, the 10 trainings that were held during the period covered
by the first verification and the 9 trainings covered by the second
verification, the following 21 trainings have been organised during this
third pperiod
eriod (if not mentioned explicitly, the trainings took place in
Ankara):
Date
Type of Training
15/16
16 Apr 10 First Aid Training
5-88 May 10 IFAT, China
14 May 10 ICCI 2010, Istanbul
Attendees
Training Entity
25 ITC staff IDEAL Consultancy
2 ITC staff IFAT
1 ITC staff ICCI
18 May 10 Health and Safety Training
32 ITC staff ÇASGEM
20 May 10 Fire Fighting Training
34 ITC staff GLORAN
24 May 10
TTGV Workshop for innovative
Technologies
8 Jun 10 Turkish Belgian Business Forum
2 ITC staff TTGV
2 ITC staff BE
BELGIUM EMBASSY
10-13
13 Jun 10 AGROPRO, Istanbul
1 ITC staff CNR
10-13
13 Jun 10 REW Recycling Fair, Istanbul
4 ITC staff IFO
21 Jun 10
Project to develop Turkey’s national
acting plan for Climate Change
2 ITC staff
2-4
4 Sep 10
International Energy Turk Seminar;
Izmir
zmir Fair
1 ITC staff Izmir
28 Sep 10
Carbon Markets & Climate Finance
Turkey, Istanbul
1 ITC staff
1 Oct 10 Fire Fighting Training
4/5
5 Nov 10
IWES 2. Waste Management
Symposium & Exhibition, Istanbul
UNDP / M
Ministry of
E
Environment & Forestry
G
Greenpower
C
Conferences
18 ITC staff GLORAN
1 ITC staff IWES
24 Dec 10 Health and Safety Training
20 ITC staff
certified healt
health and
safety expert of ITC
27 ITC staff
certified healt
health and
53 ITC staff
certified healt
health and
08 Jan 11
Public Relations Training for
Security
13 Jan 11 Health and Safety Training
14 Jan 11 Fire Fighting Training
16 ITC staff ITC PR Manager
59 ITC staff
certified healt
health and
135 ITC staff GLORAN
Technical Professional Training for
5 Feb 11
Operators
2 ITC staff IMMB
26 Feb 11
Technical Professional Training for
Operators
10 ITC staff IMMB
28 Mar 11
Health and Safety Training for
Maintenance Team
14 ITC staff
certified healt
health and
Please refer to Annex 3 for some additional photos taken during the
trainings.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 30
Indicate what the data
are used for (Baseline/
Project/ Leakage
Monitoring equipment
(type, accuracy class,
serial number, calibration
frequency, date of last
calibration, validity)
Measuring/ Reading/
Recording frequency:
applicable):
QA/QC procedures
applied:
parame
/
/
/
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data:
SDI.7 / Livelihood of the poor
documents
Creation of formalized jobs: The project activity created a large
number of formalized jobs. This is especially important taking into
account that many of the current employees did not hhave access to
social security before working at Mamak landfill.
/
Documents, A list of employees who did not have access to social
security is available for the on-site visit. Additionally the DOE may
interview employees during the on-site visit.
parameter:
Period
Number of people employed by ITC with access
to social security in specific period who did not
have social security before working at ITC
01 May 07 – 31 Mar 08 49
01 Apr 08 – 31 Mar 09
20
01 Apr 09 – 31 Mar 10
15
01 Apr 10 – 31 Mar 11 9
frequency:
applicable):
/
/
/
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 31
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
/Default:
Source of data:
parameter:
SDI.9 / Human and institutional capacity
documen
documents
Procedures and contents of awareness campaign: For a holistic waste
treatment system a proper waste management plan is necessary.
Optimally this includes both recycling but also avoidance of waste and
thus raising awareness. Campaigns will be documented as e.g. areas
where such campaigns took place and how citizens were approached
and what type of information was accessible to them.
Raising awareness is a key element for improved waste treatment. The
approach chosen by the project owner includes
includes both the delivery of
information material but also door-to-door
door door education and school
education. Part of the documentation could be find below and in Annex
3 of this report.
report
/
Documents
ITC carried on Packaging Waste Management Plans in two
municipalities in Ankara: Yenimahalle and Mamak Municipalities.
Since the previous report period, another municipality has signed
contract for separate collection of packaging wastes.
wastes. Therefore, since
May 2010, packaging wastes of Gölbaşı
Gölba ı Municipality have also been
collected separately by ITC.
Figure 5:: explaining the importance of recycling for Mamak and Gölba
Gölbaşı
Municipalities.
To collect wastes from the
the municipalities, inside and outside containers
(Figure
Figure 6: Outside and inside containers
ontainers for packaging waste
collection
collectionwere
distributed. A total of 5,197 inside containers were
placed at schools, universities, administrations,
administrations, etc. Total of 731 outside
containers were placed on the streets, mostly at junction points. Those
containers attract the attention of people and increase awareness on
waste management.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 32
Figure 6: Outside and inside containers
ontainers for packaging waste collection
In Yenimahalle Municipality, the plan has reached its 4th stage (out of 6
stages), and 128,905 homes have been informed on the importance of
recycling.
In Mamak Municipality, the plan has reached its 2nd stage (out of 6
recycling.
In Gölba
Gölbaşıı Municipality, the plan has reached its 2nd stage (out of 3
recycling.
Municipality
Number of Houses Reached
Yenimahalle
128,905
Mamak
39,479
Gölbaşı
6,694
TOTAL
175,078
Table 3: Number of houses informed
Currently, the total amount of homes reached (175,078) indicates almost
15% of Ankara’s city-population.
The project received also many visitors from schools and universities to
contribute to the awareness
awareness about waste management.
Period
Number of onsite
visitors
(from schools,
administrations,
universities, etc.)
Number of
people informed
(by presentations
at schools,
universities, etc.)
TOTAL
01/04/2010 –
31/03/2011
4,235
7,235
11,470
Table 4:: Number of people reached with regards to awareness programmes
Indicate what the data are
used for (Baseline/ Project/
Leakage emission
calculations)
Please refer to Annex 3 for the detailed list of visits and additional
photos.
Sustain
Sustainability
monitoring parameters
/
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 33
accuracy class, serial
number, calibration
frequency, date of last
calibration, validity)
Measuring/ Reading/
applicable):
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
/Default:
Source of data:
parameter:
/
/
SDI.10 / Employment (quantity)
Documents
Number of jobs created
/
Documents
A large number of jobs were created by the project activity. For
documentation job contracts will be archived.
Job contracts are available during the on-site visit.
01 May 07 – 31 Mar 08
Number of people
employed by ITC in specific period as
per end of March of the year.
211
01 Apr 08 – 31 Mar 09
01 Apr 09 – 31 Mar 10
180
211
01 Apr 10 – 31 Mar 11
215
Period
Indicate what the data are
used for (Baseline/ Project/
Leakage emission
calculations)
Measuring/ Reading/
applicable):
Please note that all jobs were created explicitly by the project activity
and that in the baseline situation the Mamak landfill would not have
been built as the installation and operationn of the landfill would not be
possible without the revenues from the sales of the voluntary emission
reductions issued by the Gold Standard.
/
/
/
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 34
SECTION E. Emission reductions calculation
E.1.
Baseline emissions calculation
Since ID.49/AF is zero for the first crediting period the baseline emissions are calculated based on the
following formula:
BE y = MB y + ( MD project , y * GWPCH 4 ) + BEelec, y
Where:
BEy
MBy
MDproject,y
BEelec,y
GWPCH4
(Equation 2)
Baseline
eline emissions in year y (tCO2e)
The methane produced in the landfill from the fresh waste in the absence of the project
activity in year y, calculated as per AM0025 (tCO2e)
The amount of methane destroyed/combusted during year y, in tonnes
tonnes of methane in
project scenario calculated as per ACM0001 (tCH4)
Is the baseline emissions from the electricity generated utilizing the LFG and biogas in
the project activity and exported to the grid (tCO2e/year)
Global Warming Potential
Potential value of methane for the first commitment period is 21
tCO2e/tCH4
Baseline emissions covered by AM0025:
MB y = BECH 4, SWDS , y
BECH4,SWDS, y =ϕ ⋅ (1 − f ) ⋅ GWPCH4 ⋅ (1− OX) ⋅
(Equation 3)
y
16
−k ( y−x)
−k
⋅ F ⋅ DOCf ⋅ MCF⋅ ∑∑Wj, y ⋅ DOCj ⋅ e j
(1 − e j )
12
x=1 j
(Equation 4)
Where:
BECH4, SWDS,y
ϕ
f
f
GWPCH4
OX
F
DOCf
MCF
8
Methane emissions avoided during the
the year y from preventing waste disposal at the
solid waste disposal site (SWDS) during the period from the start of the project activity
8
to the end of the year y (tCO2e)
Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties (0.9)
(
Fraction of methane captured at the SWDS and flared, combusted or used in another
manner
Fraction of methane captured at the SWDS and flared, combusted or used in another
manner
Global Warming Potential of methane valid for the commitment
commitment period (tCO2e/tCH4)
Oxidation factor (reflecting the amount of methane from SWDS that is oxidised in the
soil or other material covering the waste)
Fraction of methane in the SWDS gas (volume fraction) (0.5)
Fraction of degradable organic ca
carbon (DOC) that can decompose
Methane correction factor
As for the date start of the project activity, it is relevant
rel
to choose the start date of the part of the project related
to this methodology AM0025, so the start of phase III. Therefore x=1 from 01/04/2009 to 31/03/2010 and x=2
from 01/04/2010 to 31/03/2011
/2011 (both days included) in the calculation presented to the DOE.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 35
Wj,x
Amount of organic waste type j prevented from disposal in the SWDS in the year x
(tons)
Fraction of degradable organic carbon (by weight ) in the waste type j
Decay rate for the w
waste type j
Waste type category (index)
Year during the crediting period: x runs from the first year of the operation9 (x=1) to
the year y for which avoided emissions are calculated (x=y)
DOCj
ki
J
X
With
z
W j , x = Wx ⋅
∑p
n =1
n, j, x
(Equation 5)
z
Where:
Wx
Pn,j,x
Z
Total amount of organic waste prevented from disposal and fed into the anaerobic digester
in year x (tons, ID. 38)
Weight fraction of the waste type j in the sample n collected during the year x (%, ID. 39)
Number of samples collected during the
th year x (ID. 40)
Baseline emissions covered by ACM0001:
Since no credits are claimed for the thermal energy produced by the project activity and no methane is
sent to a pipeline the methane destroyed by the project activity is calculated based on the ffollowing
formula:
MD project , y = min MD flared , y + MDelectricity , y , MDtotal , y
(Equation 6)
(
Where:
MDproject,y
MDflared,y
MDelectricity,y
MDtotal,y
)
The amount of methane destroyed/combusted during year y, in tonnes of methane in
project scenario (tCH4)
Quantity of methane destroyed by flaring (tCH4), in year y
Quantity of methane destroyed by generation of electricity (tCH4), in year y
Quantity of methane captured, measured by totalmeter, (tCH4), in year y
The methane destroyed by electricity generation is calculated based on the following
following formula:
MDelectricity , y = LFGelectricity , y * wCH 4 , y * DCH 4
(Equation 7)
Where:
MDelectricity,y
LFGelectricity,y
wCH4,y
Is the quantity of methane destroyed by generation of electricity (tCH4/year)
Is the quantity of normalized landfill gas fed into electricity generator (Nm3/year
calculated with ID. 23 – ID. 25)
Is the average fraction of methane in the landfill gas (fraction, ID. 28)
9
The exact description in the “Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal
site” version 04 is “x runs from the first year of the first crediting period”.
In order to be consistent with the description of BECH4,SWDS,y making reference to “start of the project activity” and with regards
to the previous footnote, the calculation has been made with x starting with the operation of the anaerobic
anaerobic digester on
01/04/2009.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 36
DCH4
Is the methane density expressed in tonnes of methane per cubic meter of methane
(tCH4 / m3CH4 , ID. 4 - fixed)
The methane destroyed
royed by flaring is calculated based on the following formula:
MD flared , y = ( LFG flare, y ∗ wCH 4 , y ∗ DCH 4 ) − ( PE flare, y / GWPCH 4 )
Where:
MDflared,y
LFGflare,y
wCH4,y
DCH4
PEflare,y
GWPCH4
(Equation 8)
Quantity of methane destroyed by flaring (tCH4), in year y
Quantity of the landfill gas fed to the flares during the year measured
measured in cubic meters
(Nm3/yr calculated with ID. 22, ID. 24, ID. 25),
Is the average fraction of methane in the landfill gas (fraction, ID. 28)
Methane density expressed in tonnes of methane per cubic meter of methane (tCH4 /
m3CH4 , ID. 4 - fixed))
Project emissions from flaring residual gas stream in year y (tCO2e) determined
following the procedure described in the “Tool to determine project emissions from
flaring gases containing methane”
Global Warming Potential meth
methane (tCO2e/tCH4 , ID. 2 fixed)
Project emissions from flaring:
According to equation 8 the project emissions from flaring are subtracted directly from the amount of
methane destroyed. The project emissions PEflare,y are calculated according to the formula
formul below. Half
hourly (more exact than required) values for LFGflared,h are used but hourly values for ηflare,h are used as
required in the “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane “Version
01, EB 28 Annex 13.
GWPCH 4 
 17520
PE Flare , y =  ∑ TM RG ,t * (1 − η flare , h ) *

1000 
 t =1
Where:
TMRG, t
ηflare, h
GWPCH4
(Equation 9)
Mass flow rate of methane in the residual gas in the half hour t (kg CH4, calculated with
ID. 04, ID. 22, ID. 24, ID. 25). As the temperature of the residual gas is below 60°C a
correction of the measured flow rate
rate from wet to dry basis is not necessary.
Flare efficiency in hour h (% , ID. 27)
Global warming potential of methane (tCO2e/tCH4, ID. 2 fixed)
A default value of 90% is used when the flare temperature > 500°C and norm flow to flare is according
the manufactures specification of the installed flares: 265 Nm³ < LFGflare < 1,125 Nm³.
A default value of 50% is used when the flare temperature > 500°C but the norm flow to flare does not
meet the manufacturer’s specifications.
A default value of 0% is used, when the flare temperature < 500°C.
The baseline emissions from electricity generation are calculated based on the following formula:
BE elec , y = EGd , y * CEFd
(Equation 10)
Where:
BEelec,y Is the baseline emissions from the electricity generated utilising the LFG and biogas iin the
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 37
EGd,y
CEFd
project activity and exported to the grid (tCO2/year)
is the amount of electricity generated utilising the LFG and biogas collected in the project
activity and exported to the grid during year y (MWh, ID. 46)
is the carbon emission factor
factor for the displaced electricity source in the project scenario
(tCO2e/MWh, ID. 20 fixed)
Table 5:: Baseline Emission
ACM0001
AM0025 Elec. (both meth.)
MDflared,y MDelectricity,y MDProject,y BEMD
EGd,y
BEel
Total BE
BEMB
(tCO2e) (tCO2e) (MWh) (tCO2e) (tCO2e)
(tCH4)
(tCH4)
(tCH4)
Apr-10
0
1,703
35,513.6
281.4 9,516 6,052.2
41,847.2
E.2.
May-10
0
1,789
37,321.0
281.4
9,192
5,845.9
43,448.4
Jun-10
0
1,752
36,535.5
281.4
8,996
5,721.4
42,538.3
Jul-10
0
1,768
36,886.4
281.4
9,263
5,891.2
43,059.0
Aug-10
0
1,784
37,206.6
281.4
9,092
5,782.7
43,270.7
Sep-10
0
1,645
34,319.8
281.4
8,222
5,229.5
39,830.7
Oct-10
0
1,699
35,439.8
281.4
8,608
5,474.5
41,195.7
Nov-10
0
1,641
34,220.3
281.4
8,352
5,312.1
39,813.9
Dec-10
0
1,553
32,396.6
281.4
8,514
5,415.1
38,093.2
Jan-11
0
1,640
34,443.3
281.4
8,708
5,538.5
40,263.3
Feb-11
0
1,392
29,229.3
281.4
7,273
4,625.4
34,136.0
Mar-11
0
1,596
33,512.3
281.4
7,869
5,004.5
38,798.2
Apr-Dec 2010
0
15,334
15,230 319,839.5
2,532.7 79,756 50,724.8
373,097.0
Jan-Mar 2011
0
4,628
4,628 97,184.9
844.2 23,850 15,168.4
113,197.5
Total
0
19,962
19,858 417,024.4
3,376.9 103,606 65,893.2
486,294.5
Project emissions calculation
PE y = PE elec , y + PE a , y
Where:
PEy
PEelec,y
PEa,y
(Equation 11)
is the project emissions during the year y (tCO2e)
is the emissions from electricity consumption on-site
on site due to the project activity in year
y (tCO2e)
Is the emissions from the anaerobic digestions process in year y (tCO2e)
Note that the gasifier is not operational (cf. Section B.1 )
The project emissions from energy consumption are calculated according to the following approach:
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 38
PE elec , y = EC PJ , j , y * CEFd * (1 + TDL j , y )
Where:
PEelec,y
(Equation 12)
is the emissions from electricity consumption on-site
site due to the project activity in year y
(tCO2e)
Is the quantity of electricity consumed by the project electricity source (MWh/year,
ID.30)
is the carbon emission factor for the displaced electricity source in the project scenario
(tCO2e/MWh, ID.20, fixed)
Average technical transmission and distribution losses for providing electricity in year y
(ID.31)10
ECPJ,j,y
CEFd
TDLj,y
From the anaerobic digester, the following project emission is expected:
PE a , y = PE a ,l , y + PE a ,s , y
Where:
PEa,y
PEa,l,y
PEa,s,y
(Equation 13)
Is the emissions from the anaerobic digestions process in year y (tCO2e)
Is the CH4 leakage from the anaerobic digester in year y (tCO2e)
Is the total emissions of N2O and CH4 from stacks of the anaerobic digestion pprocess
in year y (tCO2e)
Project emissions from physical leakage are chosen to be 0 in the PDD according to option 3 of the
methodology AM0025. This assumption needs now to be justified a posteriori, as the digester has been
constructed.
The technology implemented is presented in section A.4 and it guarantees indeed a high level of
impermeability. Supportive documents made available to the verifying DOE demonstrates that only
technology suppliers certified for biogas applications have been contracted in order to ensure the
complete leak tightness.
Emissions from stack gases are calculated as follows:
(
)
PE a , s , y = SGa , y ,engine * MC N 2O ,a , y ,engine + SGa , y , flare * MC N 2O ,a , y , flare * GWPN 2O
(
)
+ SGa , y ,engine * MCCH 4 ,a , y ,engine + SGa , y , flare * MCCH 4 ,a , y , flare * GWPCH 4
(Equation 14)
Where:
PEa,s,y
SGa,y,engine
SGa,y,flare
10
is the total emissions of N20 and CH4 from stacks of anaerobic digestion process in
year y (tCO2e)
is the total volume of stack gas from the engines of the anaerobic digestion in year y
(m3/year)
is the total volume of stack gas from the flare of the anaerobic digestion in year y
The Grid company calculates now a month
monthly value. For higher accuracy the monthly value is taken for this
report.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 39
MCN20,a,y,engine
MCN20,a,y,flare
MCCH4,a,y,engine
MCCH4,a,y,flare
(m3/year)
is the yearly average
ave
concentration of N2O in the stack gases of the engine (tN2O/m3)
is the yearly average concentration of N2O in the stack gases of the flare (tN2O/m3)
is the yearly average concentration of CH4 in the stack gases of the engine (tCH4/m3)
is the yearly average concentration of CH4 in the stack gases of the flare (tCH4/m3)
Important: during this monitoring period, the total volume of stack gas from the flare of the anaerobic
digestion is taken as 0 m3/year because the monitored flow sent to flare in the booster 4 was exactly 0.
For this reason, no monitoring of the concentration of CH4 and of N2O in the stack of the flare could
take place.
Equation 14 became:
(
PE a ,s , y = SGa , y ,engine * MC N 2O ,a, y ,engine * GWPN 2O + MCCH 4 ,a , y ,engine * GWPCH 4
)
Table 6: Project Emission
Elec. (both meth.)
AM0025
ECPJ,j,y *
PEelec PE a,l,y PE a,s,y PEAM0025
(1+TDL)
[tCO2e] [tCO2e] [tCO2e] [tCO2e]
[MWh]
E.3.
Total PE
[tCO2e
tCO2e]
Apr-10
10
0.39
0.25
0
0
0
0.25
May-10
10
0.46
0.29
0
0
0
0.29
Jun-10
10
0.72
0.46
0
0
0
0.46
Jul-10
10
0.77
0.49
0
0
0
0.49
Aug-10
10
0.07
0.05
0
0
0
0.05
Sep-10
10
0.97
0.61
0
0
0
0.61
Oct-10
10
0.88
0.56
0
0
0
0.56
Nov-10
10
0.46
0.29
0
0
0
0.29
Dec-10
10
1.09
0.69
0
0
0
0.69
Jan-11
11
0.63
0.40
0
0
0
0.40
Feb-11
11
0.46
0.29
0
0
0
0.29
Mar-11
11
0.45
0.28
0
0
0
0.28
Apr-Dec
Dec 2010
5.80
3.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.69
Jan-Mar
Mar 2011
1.54
0.98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.98
Total
7.34
4.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.7
Leakage calculation
According to the PDD, the project activity does not
not result in a change of transport emissions and does
not involve RDF or stabilised biomass, so there is no leakage emissions associated to it.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 40
The project activity involves residues from the digestion process that are finally disposed in the landfill.
According
cording to the methodology AM0025, the associated hypothetical emissions are calculated according
to the “Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal
site” with a quantity of input waste Wx,j equal to the quantity
antity of residues (as if the digestion process
would not have decomposed anything, for conservativeness). The complete and detailed calculation is
part of a dedicated worksheet of the excel workbook. This approach is unfortunately significantly more
conservative
rvative than the real leakage emissions, but the project participant might elaborate alternative
monitoring solution in the future monitoring periods in order to demonstrate that the residues of the
digester are mainly inert material generating less emission
emissi than fresh waste.
Table 7: Leakage Emission
LE ACM0001
LE AM0025
(tCO2e)
(residues from digester, tCO2e)
Apr-10
0
170.8
E.4.
total LE
(tCO2e)
170.8
May-10
0
170.8
170.8
Jun-10
0
170.8
170.8
Jul-10
0
170.8
170.8
Aug-10
0
170.8
170.8
Sep-10
0
170.8
170.8
Oct-10
0
170.8
170.8
Nov-10
0
170.8
170.8
Dec-10
0
170.8
170.8
Jan-11
0
170.8
170.8
Feb-11
0
170.8
170.8
Mar-11
0
170.8
170.8
Apr-Dec 2010
0
1537.2
1537.2
Jan-Mar 2011
0
512.4
512.4
Total
0
2049.6
2049.6
Emission
ssion reductions calculation / table
The ER can be calculated according to the following formula:
ER y = BE y − PE y − L y
Where:
ERy
BEy
PEy
Ly
Emission reductions in year y (tCO2e/year)
Baseline emissions in year y (tCO2e/year)
Project
ct emissions in year y (tCO2e/year)
The leakage in year y (tCO2e/year)
(Equation 1)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 41
Table 8: Emission Reduction
Total BE
(tCO2e)
Total PE
(tCO2e)
LE
(tCO2e)
Total ER
(tCO2e)
Apr
Apr-10
41,847.2
0.25
170.8
41,676.1
May
May-10
43,448.4
0.29
170.8
43,277.3
Jun
Jun-10
42,538.3
0.46
170.8
42,367.0
Jul
Jul-10
43,059.0
0.49
170.8
42,887.7
Aug-10
Aug
43,270.7
0.05
170.8
43,099.9
Sep-10
Sep
39,830.7
0.61
170.8
39,659.2
Oct
Oct-10
41,195.7
0.56
170.8
41,024.3
Nov-10
Nov
39,813.9
0.29
170.8
39,642.8
Dec
Dec-10
38,093.2
0.69
170.8
37,921.7
Jan-11
Jan
40,263.3
0.40
170.8
40,092.1
Feb-11
Feb
34,136.0
0.29
170.8
33,964.9
Mar-11
Mar
38,798.2
0.28
170.8
38,627.1
Apr-Dec
Dec 2010 373,097.0
3.69
1,537.2
371,556.0
Jan-Mar
Mar 2011 113,197.5
0.98
512.4
112,684.2
Total 486,294.5
4.7
2,050
484,240.2
Table 9: Yearly Vintages
Year
Baseline
Emission
(tCO2e)
Project
Emission
(tCO2e)
Leakage
Emission
(tCO2e)
Emission
Reduction
(tCO2e)
01 Apr 10 - 31 Dec 10
373,097.0
3.7
1537.2
371,556.0
01 Jan 11 - 31 Mar 11
113,197.5
1.0
512.4
112,684.2
486,294.5
4.7
2049.6
484,240.2
Total
The Emission Reductions for the period from 01 April 2010 – 31 March 2011 therefore are
484,240 tCO2e
E.5.
Comparison of actual emission reductions with estimates in the PDD
The ex-ante estimated volume in the PDD is 625,198 tCO2e in 2010 and 643,760 tCO2e in 2011; based
on this a total of 629,838 tCO2e could be extrapolated for this period of 12 months (9 months of 2010
and 3 months of 2011). The ex-post
post achievements are lower due to the slower start of phase III and the
low performance of the Anaerobic Digester, but still consistent with performance monitored during the
previous year of operation.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 42
Item
Emission reductions
(tCO2e)
E.6.
Values applied in ex-ante
calculation of the registered PDD
Actual values reached during the
monitorin
monitoring period
629,838 tCO2e
484,240 tCO2e
Remarks on difference from estimated value in the PDD
The actual emission reduction achieved is lower to the expectations stated in the registered PDD due to
the delay of the implementation
entation of the gasifier and the problems with the anaerobic digester (cf. section
B.1.)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 43
ANNEX 1
ASKI
AM
ACM
B1
CDM
DOE
EB
FAR
GHG
GS
ID
IPCC
ITC
LFG
MP
PDD
PGU
QA / QC
SDI
STP
SWDS
tCO2e
TEDAŞ
UNFCCC
VER
Definitions and acronyms
: Local municipal waste water treatment plant
: Approved Methodology
: Approved Consolidated Methodology
: Booster 1
: Clean Development Mechanism
: Designated Operational Entity
: Executive board, UNFCCC
: Forward Action Request
: Greenhouse Gases
: Gold Standard
: PDD Identification code of a parameter
: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Climat Change
: ITC Invest Trading & Consulting A.G.
: Landfill gas
: Monitoring point
: Project Design Document
: Power Generation Unit
: Quality Assurance / Quality Control
: Sustainable development indicator
: Standard temperature
temp
and pressure
: Solid Waste Disposal Site
: tones of CO2 equivalents
: Turkish Electricity Transmission Company
: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
: Verified Emission Reductions
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 44
ANNEX 2
Table of monitoring devices
Due to calibration and maintenance there could be more than one de
device
vice in use at one monitoring point during the monitoring period. The following list is sorted
according to the monitoring points and includes the history of each point in chronological sequence.
ID
No.
Monitoring
Point Number
Measurement
Producer
Model
Serial No.
Date of
Installation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ID.21
ID.21
ID.21
ID.22
ID.22
ID.22
ID.22
ID.32*
ID.23
ID.23
ID.23
ID.23
ID.23
ID.32*
L.B1.MP1
L.B2.MP1
L.B3.MP1
L.B1.MP4
L.B1.MP4
L.B2.MP4
L.B2.MP4
A.MP4
L.B1.MP3
L.B1.MP3
L.B2.MP3
L.B2.MP3
L.B3.MP3
A.MP2
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
Flow
ABB
ABB
ABB
SMAR
ABB
SMAR
ABB
ABB
SMAR
ABB
SMAR
SMAR
ABB
ABB
2600T
2600T
2600T
LD301
2600T
LD301
2600T
2600T
LD301
2600T
LD301
LD301
2600T
2600T
6408005052
6408005056
6408005053
2048887-00
6407022942
249765
6407029726
6408024742
U324889/204886-05
6409029297
249763
U324889/204886-05
6408005051
6408024735
03/03/2008
03/03/2008
20/08/2008
21/08/2008
19/08/2010
19/09/2008
18/09/2010
15/04/2009
21/08/2008
19/08/2010
22/09/2008
10/09/2010
20/08/2008
15/04/2009
15
ID.24
L.B1.MP1
Temperature
ELIMKO
MKO
RT02-1K09-70-Ü-Tr
08/3856
10/03/2010
16
ID.24
L.B1.MP1
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1K09-16-U-Tr
09/23185
10/03/2011
17
ID.24
L.B2.MP1
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1K08-70-Tr
10/10217
16/03/2010
18
ID.24
L.B2.MP1
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P08-30
08/5297
15/03/2011
19
ID.24
L.B3.MP1
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1K08-70-Tr
10/10218
16/03/2010
20
ID.24
L.B3.MP1
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P08-30
08/5292
15/03/2011
Maximal
Date of DeDe
calibration
Installation
period
19/08/2010
18/09/2010
19/08/2010
10/09/2010
10/03/2011
15/03/2011
15/03/2011
CALIBRATION DATES
5y
5y
5y
2y
5y
2y
5y
5y
2y
5y
2y
2y
5y
5y
Date of 1st
calibration
18/02/2008
18/02/2008
18/02/2008
19/08/2008
13/09/2007
18/09/2008
09/11/2007
30/08/2008
19/08/2008
16/12/2009
18/09/2008
07/09/2010
19/02/2008
30/08/2008
A
10/03/2010
A
17/02/2011
A
15/03/2010
A
20/10/2010
A
15/03/2010
A
17/02/2011
Date of 2nd
calibration
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 45
21
ID.24
L.B1.MP3
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P06-7,5-Tr
08/33889
18/02/2010
22
ID.24
L.B1.MP3
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P06-7,5-Tr
08/33891
04/02/2011
23
ID.24
L.B2.MP3
Temperature
ELIMKO
LIMKO
RT03-1P06-7,5-Tr
08/33885
18/02/2010
24
ID.24
L.B2.MP3
Temperature
WIKA
TR760
CC023F069US
04/02/2011
25
ID.24
L.B2.MP3
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P08-5-U-Tr
08/14624 T
02/03/2011
26
ID.24
L.B3.MP3
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P08-5-U-Tr
08/14623
18/02/2010
27
ID.24
L.B3.MP3
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P06-7,5-Tr
08/33887
04/02/2011
28
ID32*
A.MP2
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P06-7,5-Tr
08/33894
04/03/2010
0802-01120
02/03/2011
04/02/2011
A
04/02/2010
A
20/10/2010
04/02/2011
A
04/02/2010
02/03/2011
A
02/03/2010
A
25/02/2011
A
04/02/2010
A
20/10/2010
A
02/03/2010
10 y
25/02/2011
04/02/2011
02/03/2011
29
ID32*
A.MP2
Temperature
NOVA-Z
Z
ODE-RTD-OR03B1H09-ÜHT
30
ID.24
L.B1.MP4
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT103-1PO8-50
08/14625 T
06/02/2010
04/02/2011
A
04/02/2010
31
ID.24
L.B1.MP4
Temperature
NOVA-Z
Z
ODE-RTD-OR03B1H09-23/10
0801-00550
04/02/2011
21/02/2011
10 y
05/11/2008
32
ID.24
L.B1.MP4
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P06-7,5-Tr
08/33889
21/02/2011
A
17/02/2011
33
ID.24
L.B2.MP4
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT103-1PO8-50
08/14624 T
06/02/2010
04/02/2011
A
04/02/2010
34
ID.24
L.B2.MP4
Temperature
NOVA-Z
Z
0801-00549
04/02/2011
21/02/2011
10 y
12/09/2008
35
ID.24
L.B2.MP4
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT103-1PO8-50
08/14625 T
21/02/2011
A
17/02/2011
36
ID.32*
A.MP4
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1K09-16-U-Tr
09/23186
18/02/2010
04/02/2011
A
04/02/2010
37
ID.32*
A.MP4
Temperature
NOVA-Z
Z
0801-00554
04/02/2011
21/02/2011
10 y
05/11/2008
38
ID.32*
A.MP4
Temperature
ELIMKO
RT03-1P06-7,5-Tr
08/33885
21/02/2011
A
17/02/2011
39
40
41
42
43
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
L.B1.MP1
L.B1.MP1
L.B2.MP1
L.B2.MP1
L.B3.MP1
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
KELLER
KELLER
KELLER
KELLER
KELLER
PR-23
PR-23
PR-23
PR-23
PR-23
130340
130341
138899
145076
138896
28/10/2009
15/09/2010
11/02/2010
09/02/2011
12/02/2010
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
15/09/2009
09/06/2010
09/02/2010
17/09/2010
09/02/2010
15/09/2010
09/02/2011
09/02/20
09/02/2011
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 46
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.32*
ID.32*
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.25
ID.32*
ID.32*
L.B3.MP1
L.B1.MP3
L.B1.MP3
L.B2.MP3
L.B2.MP3
L.B2.MP3
L.B3.MP3
L.B3.MP3
A.MP2
A.MP2
L.B1.MP4
L.B1.MP4
L.B1.MP4
L.B2.MP4
L.B2.MP4
A.MP4
A.MP4
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
KELLER
WIKA
WIKA
KELLER
WIKA
KELLER
KELLER
ABB
KELLER
KELLER
KELLER
KELLER
KELLER
KELLER
WIKA
KELLER
KELLER
PR-23
S-10
S-10
PAA-21S
S-10
PAA-21S
PAA-21S
2600T
PAA-21S
PAA-21S
PAA-21S
PAA-21S
PAA-21S
PAA-21S
S-10
PAA-21S
PAA-21S
145075
2603LPI/S452L
2603LPH/S475L
100692
J035T/4103360
128863
100715
6410030690
128874
129074
100741
70170
128865
128863
2603LPJ/S476L
128873
128874
09/02/2011
18/03/2010
14/06/2010
12/01/2010
05/05/2010
12/03/2011
08/03/2010
04/03/2011
20/03/2010
09/02/2011
25/09/2009
05/05/2010
18/03/2011
13/03/2010
09/02/2011
12/02/2010
09/02/2011
61
ID.26
L.B1.MP5
Temperature
ELIMKO
TC02-1S4Y1050/10-R1/2-Tr
08/26236
62
ID.26
L.B2.MP5
Temperature
HAASE
PT-RH-PT 5.0
63
64
65
66
ID.28
ID.28
ID.28
ID.28
L.B1.MP2
L.B2.MP2
L.B3.MP2
L.B3.MP2
CH4, CO2, O2
CH4, CO2, O2
CH4, CO2, O2
CH4, CO2, O2
SIEMENS
SIEMENS
SIEMENS
SIEMENS
67
ID.32* A.MP16.m15
Temperature
68
ID.32* A.MP16.m16
Temperature
69
ID.32* A.MP16.m16
Temperature
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
10 y
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
12 m
17/09/2010
15/03/2010
09/06/2010
05/05/2009
12/03/2010
09/02/2011
04/03/2010
01/12/2010
09/02/2010
17/09/2010
05/05/2009
18/03/2010
04/03/2011
09/02/2010
09/06/2010
09/02/2010
09/02/2011
23/08/2008
A
02/03/2010
2007000740/920-1
07/08/2009
N/A
10/12/2007
ULTRAMAT 23
ULTRAMAT 23
ULTRAMAT 23
ULTRAMAT 23
N1-T4-0144
N1-X4-365
N1-W9-722
N1-A0-772
15/08/2008
28/12/2009
21/03/2009
23/02/2011
6-12 m
6-12 m
6-12 m
6-12 m
03/03/2010
24/02/2010
03/03/2010
09/02/2011
ELĐIMKO
IMKO
RT03-1K09-16-U-Tr
09/23185
18/02/2010
01/05/2010
A
04/02/2010
ELĐIMKO
IMKO
RT03-1P09-8-U-Tr
09/23188
18/02/2010
04/02/2011
A
04/02/2010
NOVA-Z
Z
0801-00548
04/02/2011
10 Y
12/09/2008
14/06/2010
05/05/2010
05/05/201
12/03/2011
04/03/2011
/03/2011
09/02/2011
05/05/2010
18/03/2011
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
02/2011
23/02/2011
04/03/2011
23/02/2011
04/02/2011
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 47
70
71
72
73
74
75
ID.32*
ID.32*
ID.32*
ID.32*
ID.32*
ID.32*
A.MP16.m15
A.MP16.m16
A.MP16.m15
A.MP16.m16
A.MP16.m16
A.MP16.m16
Flow
Flow
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
Pressure
ABB
ABB
ABB
ABB
ABB
ABB
2600T
2600T
261GSFJT821
261GSFJT82H
261GSFJT82H
261GSFJT82H
6408035887
6408035883
261GS6505018202
261GS6505018200
261GS6505025454
261GS6505018203
15/04/2009
15/04/2009
17/09/2009
01/12/2009
12/04/2010
15/03/2011
76
ID.38
A.MP1
Waste Amount
SEG
KN4
A0819003
10/08/2009
77
ID.38
A.MP1
Waste Amount
SEG
KN4
A0928005
25/10/2010
78
ID.39
A.MP1
Dikomsan
DT-600
2779
79
ID.39
A.MP1
Dikomsan
DT-600
ISXKDT070763
Waste
Composition
Waste
Composition
Caption:
A: If there is no difference
fference within 6 months, calibration interval is 1 year;
year
m: months;
y: year;
N/A: calibration is not required
01/05/2010
01/05/2010
05/2010
12/04/2010
15/03/2011
5Y
5Y
12 m
12 m
12 m
17/12/2008
18/12/2008
01/06/2009
01/06/2009
25/03/2010
04/02/2011
25/10/2010
N/A
16/07/2009
N/A
18/10/2010
23/10/2007
N/A
22/10/2007
14/04/2010
N/A
14/04/2010
08/04/2010
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 48
ANNEX 3
Additional information regarding the Gold Standard monitoring parameters
In this Annex there are some additional information regarding
regarding the Gold Standard parameters additional
to them already given in section D.2.
SDI.6 / Employment (job quality)
Below there are two photos taken during an in house training and a fire fighting training
training:
Figure 7: In house training
Figure 8: Fire Fighting training
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 49
SDI.9 / Human and institutional capacity
Additional to the information given in section D.2 you will find some here photos of the visits in
schools and further below the complete detailed table of all site visits raising the general awareness.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 50
No. DATE
NAME OF INSTITUTION
1 04/03/10 GAZI UNIVERSITY
MALTEPE ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
YENİMAHALLE ATATÜRK
04/05/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
İBN-İİ SİNA ELEMENTARY
04/06/10
SCHOOL
SİNCAN INDUSTRIAL
04/07/10 VOCATIONAL HIGH
SCHOOL
AHMET VEFİK PAŞA
04/07/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SUBJECT OF VISIT
NUMBER OF
VISITORS/
ATTANDEES
SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
7
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
40
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
50
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
20
7 04/08/10
TEVFİK İLERİ ELEMENTARY SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
100
8 04/08/10
ULUBATLI HASAN
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
34
2 04/05/10
3
4
5
6
9 04/09/10 ÇEKİRDEK PRESCHOOL
HALİDE EDİP ADIVAR
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BATUHAN LEMENTARY
11 04/12/10
SCHOOL
EMİN SAĞLAMER
12 04/13/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HOOL
13 04/13/10 AHMET HIZAL
10 04/09/10
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
EXPLANATION
GU Society Volunteers'
Dönence
nence Project, student
volunteers
40
70
30
20
25
80
40
Site visit arranged by Ankara
Metropolitan Municipality,
BUKSAŞ
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 51
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
04/14/10 ÇEKİRDEK PRESCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
HAKAN KAMİL
04/19/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SCHOO
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
YENIMAHALLE ATATÜRK SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
04/20/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SİNCAN KOÇ ELEMENTARY SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
04/21/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY,
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
04/22/10
DEPARTMENT OF
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
MATHEMATICS
ULUBATLI HASAN
04/27/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
ULUBATLI HASAN
04/28/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
04/28/10 SYRIAN DELEGATION
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
ANKARA UNIVERSITY,
04/29/10
SOCIETY VOLUNTEERS
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
HASANALAN ANATOLIAN SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
04/29/10
TEACHERS' HIGH SCHOOL SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
İHSAN SELAHATTİN ARAS SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
05/05/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
NEDİM İNAL ELEMENTARY
05/05/10
RECYCLING
SCHOOL
ATATÜRK SANITARY
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SCHOOL
MÜNEVVER ÖZTÜRK
05/11/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
MÜNEVVER ÖZTÜRK
05/12/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
ULUBATLI HASAN
05/13/10
ELEMENTARY
RY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
ULUBATLI HASAN
05/14/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
YÜCETEPE ELEMENTARY
05/17/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
FERİDE BEKÇİ ELEMENTARY SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
05/18/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
EMİN SAĞLAMER
05/24/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
EMİN SAĞLAMER
05/25/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SOFUOĞLU ELEMENTARY SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
05/25/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
BİLKENT ELEMENTARY
05/26/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
12
80
70 students, 10 parents
23
30
3
University students, visited the
site for an environment
project.
50
50
12
70
Mr. Erdoğan Göğen gave a
presentation.
Başak Çelik, Ph.D., gave a
presentation.
30
27
230
25
45
45
50
50
70
15
80
80
60
40
Training at school.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 52
BİLKENT ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ULUBATLI HASAN
38 05/27/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SOFUOĞLU ELEMENTARY
39 06/01/10
SCHOOL
40 06/01/10 NENEHATUN PRESCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
RECYCLING
41 06/03/10 NENEHATUN PRESCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
37 05/27/10
42 06/04/10 MAMAK MUNICIPALITY
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
WORLD
ENVIRONMENT DAY
06/04/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
PAKİZE ERDOĞU
06/07/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
BİLKENT ELEMENTARY
ENTARY
06/10/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
EMİN SAĞLAMER
06/14/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
TELSİZLER ELEMENTARY
06/16/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
METU CIVIL
IL ENGINEERING SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
06/17/10
DEPARTMENT
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
METU CIVIL ENGINEERING SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
06/24/10
DEPARTMENT
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
METU CIVIL ENGINEERING SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
07/01/10
DEPARTMENT
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
LİDER ÇOCUK (LEADER
07/07/10 CHILD) AGRICULTURE
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
CAMP
EMİN SAĞLAMER
10/06/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
ŞHT. PİYADE ER
10/18/10
MURATOĞLU İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/18/10 ÇAĞDAŞ İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/18/10 CENGİZHAN İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/18/10 HARMANYOLU İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/19/10 MİMAR SİNAN İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/19/10 BARBAROS İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/19/10 KÜRŞAD BEY İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
40
30
63
35
46
50
43 06/04/10 GÖLBAŞI MUNICIPALITY
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
WORLD ENVIRONMENT DAY,
WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF
THE MAJOR, PRESENTATION
OF ACTIVITIES AND SITE VISIT
STAND (Suna Ercan, Barış
Aybirdi)
60
60
92
60
40
50
PRESENTATION
50
PRESENTATION
50
PRESENTATION
20
PRESENTATION
20
EU TEACHERS, PRESENTATION
25
60
22
29
25
25
25
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 53
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/20/10 AŞIK VESYEL İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/20/10 DANİŞMENT ÇİÇEKLİ İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/20/10 ULVİYE FENMEN İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/20/10 TALİP YENER İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/21/10 ADNAN MENDERES İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
MEHMET SÜNDÜS İÇLİ
10/21/10
İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/21/10 KOÇ İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/21/10 DR. YILDIZ YALÇINLAR İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/22/10 SİRKELİ İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/22/10 GÜMÜŞOLUK İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/22/10 AYYILDIZ İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/22/10 ALTINOVA İ.Ö.O
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
MUNICPALITY REUNION - SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
10/18/10
AMASYA, KÜTAHYA,
ÜTAHYA, BİTLİS SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10/27/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
11/06/10 LIONS
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
11/08/10 GAZİ COLLEGE
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
11/09/10 GAZİ COLLEGE
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
BİLKENT UNIVERSITY,
MANAGEMENT
11/09/10
INFORMATION
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
ADMINISTRATION
ATATÜRK GIRLS'
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SCHOOL
HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY,
11/11/10 BIOLOGY EDUCATION
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
DEPARTMENT
A.Ü. AGRICULTURAL
WATERING AND
11/30/10
AGRICULTURE
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
DEPARTMENT
61 10/19/10 MÜJGAN KARAÇALI İ.Ö.O.
25
62
25
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
28
25
25
23
24
25
25
25
12
25
25
13
PRESENTATION BY DR. ÇELİK
50
25
PRESENTATION BY DR. ÇEL
ÇELİK
50
75
26
PRESENTATION BY MS. ERCAN
20
COMMENIUS PROJECT,
ITALIAN+SPANISH GROUP
30
PRESENTATION BY MS. ERCAN
40
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 54
SAMANYOLU ELEMENTARY SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
İBN-İİ SİNA ELEMENTARY SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
84 12/08/10
SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
GOP NECLA İLHAN İPEKÇİ SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
85 12/17/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
86 12/21/10 SEVGİ PRESCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
87 12/22/10 SEVGİ PRESCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
CEBECİ GIRLS'
88 12/23/10
RECYCLING
VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
ALTINDAĞ ALİ ERSOY
89 12/24/10
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
METU ENVIRONMENTAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
90 12/28/10
ENGINEERING
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
91 12/29/10 BÜYÜK COLLEGE
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
92 01/06/11 ŞAZİYE TEKIŞIK PRESCHOOL
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
HİTİT UNIVERSITY,
93 01/12/11
BIOLOGY DEPT.
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
CUMHURİYET ANATOLIAN
94 01/17/11
RECYCLING
HIGH SCHOOL
ORTATEPE ELEMENTARY
95 01/18/11
RECYCLING
SCHOOL
AYŞE ZEKİ SAYAN
96 01/18/11
RECYCLING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BAŞKENT ANATOLIAN HIGH
97 01/18/11
RECYCLING
SCHOOL
ABİDİNPAŞA INDUSTRIAL
RECYCLING
98 01/19/11
VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
BÜYÜKELÇİ NAZIM BELGER
99 01/19/11
RECYCLING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ŞEHİTLİK ELEMENTARY
100 01/19/11
RECYCLING
SCHOOL
DEMİRLİBAHÇE ATA
101 01/20/11
RECYCLING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DEMİRLİBAHÇE
102 01/20/11
RECYCLING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
YAVUZ SULTAN SELİM
103 01/20/11
RECYCLING
ANATOLIAN HIGH SCHOOL
ABİDİNPAŞA ELEMENTARY
104 01/21/11
RECYCLING
SCHOOL
AHMET HIZAL
105 01/21/11
RECYCLING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ABİDİNPAŞA ANATOLIAN
106 01/21/11
RECYCLING
HIGH SCHOOL
KUVAYI MİLLİYE
107 01/21/11
RECYCLING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
83 12/03/10
100
50
40
40
40
210
TRAINING AT SCHOOL, BAŞAK
ÇELİK, PhD.
50
38
30
PRESENTATION BY MR.
KANTUR AND MR. GÖĞEN
PRESENTATION BY DR. ÇELİK,
TREE PLANTATION
25
30
400
PRESENTATION, Dr. Başak
Çelik
300
In-class
class training, Hakkı Coşğun
400
In-class
class training, Hakkı Coşğun
200
250
750
400
300
650
100
700
400
450
700
Çelik
Çelik
In-class
class training, Hakkı Coşğun,
Dr. Başak Çelik
Training at school ceremony,
Dr. Başak Çelik
In-class
Dr. Başak Çelik
In-class
class training, Hakkı
Hak Coşğun,
Dr. Başak Çelik
Çelik
In-class
Dr. Başak Çelik
In-class
Dr. Başak Çelik
Training at school ceremony,
Dr. Başak Çelik
Training
ng at school ceremony,
Dr. Başak Çelik
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 55
YAHYA ÖZSOY HEARING
108 02/22/11 IMPAIRED ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
KAVAKLIDERE
109 02/23/11
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ÜMİTKÖY ANATOLIAN
110 02/24/11
HIGH SCHOOL
HARZEMŞAHLAR
111
03/02/11 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
İSMAİL ENDERUNİ
112 03/03/11
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ÇEŞME ELEMENTARY
113
03/04/11 SCHOOL
ALİ KUŞÇU ELEMENTARY
114
03/04/11 SCHOOL
SIDIKA ALTIN ELEMENTARY
115
03/15/11 SCHOOL
116
03/16/11
ÇEKİRDEK PRESCHOOL
117 03/22/11 GÜRÇAĞ COLLEGE
AÜ AGRICULTURAL
FACULTY
AHMET HIZAL
119 03/23/11
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
118 03/23/11
120 03/24/11 TOKİ GÖKSU PRESCHOOL
YENİMAHALLE
121 03/25/11 MUNİCİPALITY
PARTNERING PROJECT
YAHYA ÖZSOY HEARING
122 03/29/11 IMPAIRED ELEMENTARY
EMENTARY
SCHOOL
OSMAN HAMDİ BEY
123 03/29/11
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SALİH ALPTEKİN
124 03/31/11
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
125 03/31/11 HAYAT COLLEGE
126 03/31/11
AÜ AGRICULTURAL
FACULTY
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
30
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
10
RECYCLING
600
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
RECYCLING
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
40
60
40
160
35
10
30
10
40
50
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
16
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
30
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
SITE TECHNICAL TRIP
Table 10:: Site visits raising general awareness
30
100
35
30
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
EB 54
Report
Annex 34
Page 56
----History of the document
Version
Date
Nature of revision
01
EB 54, Annex 34
28 May 2010
Initial adoption.
Decision Class: Regulatory
Document Type: Guideline, Form
Business Function: Issuance

110705 Mamak 3rdPV Monitoring Report V1

Transcription

Similar documents

PIIKANI NATION

metabolon - QUESTOR Centre

Europe Trip - Bergen Arts and Science Charter School

Trip to Chudleigh`s Farm

Chemtrade Logistics Inc.

Fauquier County Environmental Services

Landfill Tours - Waste Management

View Flyer - Tottenham Hotspur

Oak Farm Quarry and Landfill Himley, Dudley, West