Song Giang 2 Hydro Power Project CDM Project Design Document

Transcription

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.
CDM – Executive Board
page 1
Song Giang 2 Hydro Power Project
CDM Project Design Document
CDM Project Design Document
Version 1.1
page 2
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD)
Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006
CONTENTS
A.
General description of project activity
B.
Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology
C.
Duration of the project activity / crediting period
D.
Environmental impacts
E.
Stakeholders’ comments
Annexes
Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity
Annex 2: Information regarding public funding
Annex 3: Baseline information
Annex 4: Monitoring plan
SECTION A. General description of project activity
A.1
page 3
Title of the project activity:
Song Giang 2 Hydro Power Project
Version 1.1
November 15, 2006
A.2.
Description of the project activity:
The Song Giang Hydropower Project involves the construction of a 30 MW power plant
consisting of 2 units of 15 MW each on the on downstream of Giang stream which is a branch of
Cai river under Khanh Trung commune, Khanh Vinh district, Khanh Hoa province. The
estimated annual gross power generation is about 99.3 million kWh and about 98.31 million
kWh will be fed to the national grid. The project will result in a small reservoir with area of only
2 ha and so the power density rate of 1500 W/m2, very much higher than the level of 10 W/m2.
The objective of the Song Giang 2 Hydropower Project is to generate renewable electricity
utilizing hydroelectric resources in the Giang river and sell the generated power to Vietnam
General Power Company.
The project’s contributions to the sustainable development of local area as well as the host
country are as follows:
−
The project will generate renewable energy based electricity. This hydro power will
support partly with increasing electricity demand in Khanh Hoa province and Vietnam. During
last 15 years the electricity demand of country is continuously increasing with an annual growth
rate about 13-14%. It is obvious that the investment in the power generation sector in Vietnam is
a great burden to the state budget which could not be effectively met with. During the summer
2005, the Northern areas were short of about 10GWh per day with frequent blackouts in the
cities, thereby causing a big loss to the industry. This problem may occur during 2006 and
expected to be recurring. To mobilize the investment resources, the Government encourages all
enterprises to invest into power generation and the proposed project is a good response to this
need.
−
Khanh Hoa is fairly developed province in the South of Vietnam with natural area of
5,198.2 km2, population by the end of 2004 of 1,111,300 people and GDP of about 11771.4
billion VND (about 740 million USD) in 2004. When the proposed project comes into operation,
average 12.36 billion VND (tax) per year will be added to the local budget, make up 0.105 % of
the province’s GDP of 2004. In addition, it will contribute to completion of traffic system in the
area by newly constructing or improving roads; create favourable conditions to local people
living and production, goods transport, travel and exchange between areas in the territory and
reduce the cultural and economic gap between ethnical groups and areas in the region; especially
more jobs during the period of construction and operation will be created on-site; demands on
food and supplies will promote agricultural goods items and commercial services among local
communities; the local economic structure will be growing from rice cultivation to husbandry
and aquaculture. These will largely push forward economic development and improve living
standard of the province and nearby communes. In addition, the proposed project will supply
electricity to nearby communes directly from plant since the project is planned to share a part of
page 4
electricity generated for self use to these communes. Thus the proposed project will contribute
the solution of basic needs -roads and electricity - for above mentioned communes.
−
The project activity will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emission by avoiding electricity
generation and CO2 emissions from the national electricity grid. Total expected CO2 emission
reductions from the proposed project have been estimated to a total of 572,106 tCO2 during the
crediting period of 10 years.
−
The project will stimulate and accelerate the development of renewable energy
technologies in order to reduce GHGs emissions, to protect the environment, to conserve the
country energy resources while responding to increasing energy demand and energy resource
diversification imperatives necessary for national sustainable economic growth. It is congruent
with energy policies of Vietnam; therefore it satisfies the sustainable development criteria for
CDM project, established by Designated National Authority (DNA) of Vietnam.
A.3.
Project participants:
Participants in the project activity are the following:
Name of Party involved
((host) indicates a host Party)
Private and/or public
entity(ies) project
participants (as applicable)
Vietnam (Host)
Song Giang Hydro Power
Joint – Stock Company
AND
Kindly indicate if the Party
involved wishes to be considered
as project participant (Yes/No)
No
RCEE Energy and
Environment JSC
Denmark
Ministry of Foreign
Affairs
Yes
The contact for CDM project activity is:
RCEE Energy and Environment JSC
Address: Lane 62, Nguyen Chi Thanh Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
Phone:
84 4 7733686
Fax:
84 4 7734022
Email: [email protected]
A.4.
Technical description of the project activity:
The Song Giang 2 Hydropower Project will be located on downstream side of Giang river which
is a branch of Cai river under Khanh Trung commune, Khanh Vinh district, Khanh Hoa
province. This project is located a spot 50 km Northwest of Nha Trang city, Vietnam. It is a run
page 5
– off – river plant, grid connected hydro power station of 2 units of 15 MW each with an average
annual power output of about 99.3 million kWh and about 98.31 million kWh of power will be
fed to the national grid. When Song Giang 1 hydro power plant will be constructed on upstream
side then average annual power output of the plant will be increased up to 118.24 million kWh
so about 116.46 million kWh of power will be fed to the grid. The project will include a very
small reservoir with area of only 2 ha and so power density rate is 1500 W/m2, very much higher
than the level of 10 W/m2
The main design parameters of the Song Giang 2 Hydropower plant are shown in the following
table:
Table 1: Main parameters of the Song Giang 2 Hydropower plant
No
Description
Unit
Value
I
Catchment
1
Catchment area for flood calculation
km2
123
2
Mean annual rainfall
mm
2,350
3
Mean annual discharge (Q0)
m3/s
5.96
4
Total volume of mean annual flow
106 m3
188
II
Reservoir
1
Normal water level (MNDBT)
m
415
2
Minimum operating level (MOL)
m
410
3
Checked flood water level (p = 0.2)
m
421.92
4
Storage at MNDBT (Wtb)
103 m3
160.0
5
Area of reservoir surface at MNDBT
ha
Active storage (Whi)
3
6
III
1
10 m
80.0
m3/s
1,232 (1,462)
Discharge through powerhouse
Insurance discharge
Q (p = 1 %)
Q (p = 0.2 %)
2
IV
2
3
Maximum discharge Qmax
1,581 (1,920)
3
m /s
10.93
Head
1
Maximum head (Hmax)
m
256.22
2
Minimum head (Hmin)
m
310.21
3
Rated head (Htt)
m
338.46
page 6
V
Energy indicator
1
Insured capacity
MW
7.03
2
Installed capacity
MW
30
3
Mean annual energy (E0)
6
4
Number of hour uses installed capacity
VI
10 kWh
99.3
Hour
4000
Head works
Project grade
1
Grade III
Concrete
Gravity dam
Type
2
Crest elevation
m
422.7
Crest length
m
86.1
Crest width
m
5
Height
m
24.1
Spillway
Type
Free
Length of spillway sill
m
Number of spillway sill
VII
1
1
Elevation of sill
m
Flood discharge:
3
P = 1%
1,232
P = 0.2%
1,581
Water passage
Intake
Elevation of sill/width/height
1 x 3.5 x 3.5
m
Dimension of plane valve (nxbxh)
435.0/5.5/18.2
1x2.2x2.5
Headrace tunnel
Dimension of tunnel (bxh)
m
2.2x2.5
Length of tunnel
m
4175
Slope
3
415
m /s
Dimension (number of bay x B x H)
2
40
Pressurized well
0.006
4
5
page 7
Inner diameter
m
6.0
Elevation of maximum water level
m
427.7
Elevation of minimum water level
m
400.12
Height
m
47.0
Length
m
1,124.1
Diameter
m
1.6
Thickness
mm
Penstock
10 - 26
Powerhouse
No of unit
02
Installed capacity
MW
Turbine type
30
Pelton – vertical axis
VIII Discharge canal
Width of canal bottom
m
3.3
Slope of canal bottom
0;0.15
Length
m
147.3
Project lay-out is shown as following:
2 ha
Giang river
30 MW
page 8
Figure 1: Project lay-out
A.4.1. Location of the project activity:
A.4.1.1.
Host Party(ies):
Socialist Republic of Viet Nam
A.4.1.2.
Region/State/Province etc.:
Khanh Hoa province
A.4.1.3.
City/Town/Community etc:
Khanh Vinh district
A.4.1.4.
Detail of physical location, including information allowing the
unique identification of this project activity (maximum one page):
The Song Giang 2 Hydropower Project will be located on downstream side of Giang river which
is a branch of Cai river under Khanh Trung commune, Khanh Vinh district, Khanh Hoa
province. This project is located a spot 50 km Northwest of Nha Trang city, Vietnam. All of
works and reservoir will be located on land of Khanh Trung commune, Khanh Vinh district.
The project location is shown below:
page 9
Location of the project
Picture 1: Khanh Hoa province map
page 10
Location of the project
Picture 2: Viet Nam map
page 11
A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity:
The project belongs to the large scale CDM projects category. The project activity belongs to the
scope number 1: Energy industries (renewable -/non-renewable sources) as per the sectoral
scopes related approved methodologies and DOEs (version 05 May 05|10:09) provided in the
UNFCCC CDM website, http://cdm.unfccc.int/DOE/scopes.html#1
A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity:
Main equipments used in the Song Giang 2 hydro power plant are shown in the following table:
Table 2: Main equipments used in this hydro power plant
Main equipments
Symbols
Units
Values
1. Turbine
+ Type
Dipper turbine
+ Quantity
Set
02
D1
m
2.0
Highest
Hmax
m
356.22
Lowest
Hmin
m
310.21
Htt
m
331.69
Ntb
MW
15.46
n
rpm
375
+ Wheel diameter
+ Water post (the loss is calculated)
Calculation
+ Required capacity at Htt
+ Speed
2. Generator
+ Type
synchronized, upright axis – 3
phases
%
0.85
MW
15.46
+ Required electricity pressure
KV
10.5
+ Required circle
rpm
375
%
97
Set
02
+ Capacity value: Cosϕ
+ Required capacity
+Efficiency equivalent
additional load, Cosϕ =0.8
+ Quantity
Nmf
to
100%
3. Speeder
+ Type
+ Adjustment method
Electricity-waterpost with a
microprocessor PDI and oil
pressure device
Automatic, adjusting
page 12
+ Oil pressure
MPa
6.3
m
1.15
MPa
4.64
4. Turbine valve
+ Diameter
Do
+ Oil pressure equipment
The equipment manufacturers are still not identified because the project sponsor is calling for
tender. But the equipment will be imported from leading manufacturers of hydro power plants
and well-known supplier with successful similar projects in the world.
A.4.4
Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:
Table 3: Emission reduction of the proposed project during the crediting period
Year
Time
1
2009 (only one month)
2
2010
57,211
3
2011
57,211
4
2012
57,211
5
2013
57,211
6
2014
57,211
7
2015
57,211
8
2016
57,211
9
2017
57,211
10
2018
57,211
11
2019 ( 11 months)
52,443
Annual average emission reduction
Total emission reduction during the first
crediting period of 10 years
A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:
There is no public funding provided for the proposed project.
Annual estimation of
emission reductions,
tCO2 eq
4768
57,211
572,106
page 13
SECTION
B.B.Application
of of
a baseline
and
monitoring
methodology
SECTION
Application
a baseline
and
monitoring
methodology
B.1.
Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the
project activity:
Baseline Methodology:
Baseline Methodology ACM0002 version 06 “Consolidated baseline methodology for gridconnected electricity generation from renewable sources”, which was approved by Executive
Board in its 16th meeting and revised in its 24th meeting, is applied to the proposed project.
Monitoring Methodology
Monitoring Methodology ACM0002 version 06 “Consolidated monitoring methodology for
grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources”, which was approved by CDM
Executive Board in its 16th meeting and revised in its 24th meeting, is applied to the proposed
project.
B.2
Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project
activity:
The baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0002 is applied because of following reasons:
+ The project will generate renewable energy based electricity from a hydropower
sources. The project will increase a very small reservoir having power density rate of 1500
W/m2, much higher than the level of 10 W/m2.
+ The project is not an activity that involves switching from fossil fuels to renewable
energy at the site of the project.
+ The national electricity grid is clear defined and information on the characteristics of
the national electricity grid is available.
B.3.
Description of the sources and gases included in the project boundary
As described in the methodology, the project boundary includes:
+ The physical site of the Song Giang 2 hydropower plant as well as its reservoir area.
+ The project site and all power plants (in the baseline) connected physical to the national
electricity grid.
page 14
Giang river
Construction of
access roads,
foundations,
substation,
transmission
lines
Song Giang 2
hydro power
plant
Vietnam National
Electricity grid
Transmission
and distribution
of power
End user
Transport of
project equipment
materials
Construction of
project equipment
This is a renewable energy project so emission of the project is zero. The main emissions
potentially giving rise to leakage in the context of electric sector project are emission arising due
to activities such as:
+ Power plant construction,
+ Fuel handling (extraction, processing and transport) and
+ Land inundation.
Emission gases in the project boundary include:
+ Emission gases from decay of vegetation cover in the reservoir area when it is stored
water: CH4, CO2, SO2 .etc.
+ Emission gases from production and transportation of construction materials (as:
cement, brick .etc): CO2, SO2, NOx .etc.
However, project participants do not need to consider these emission sources as leakage in
applying methodology ACM0002.
B.4.
Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified
baseline scenario:
The baseline scenario is that electricity delivered to the national grid by the project would have
otherwise been generated by the operation of grid-connected power plants and by the addition of
new generation mainly based on coal and oil resources.
page 15
The selection of the national electricity grid for the baseline is conservative because of the
following reasons: if the coal or oil fired power plants will be substituted by the proposed
project, the baseline emission factor will be 1177.91 gCO2 per kWh or 800 gCO2 per kWh2
respectively. But the national grid’s emission factor (NGEF) is only 580.61 gCO2 per kWh (see
below); hence NGEF is much less than coal or oil emission factors.
Calculation of baseline emission factor of the national electricity grid
Following the methodology, the baseline emission factor (EF) is calculated as a combined margin
(CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM) factors
according to the following three steps:
•
Step1: Operating Margin emission factor (EFOM)
•
Step2: Build Margin emission factor (EFBM)
•
Step3: Calculate the baseline emission factor EF
Step1: Operating Margin emission factor (EFOM)
The Simple OM method can be used in the project because of the two following reasons:
+ Dispatch data is available only in Vietnam Dispatching Center, currently these data is
confidential and can not be accessed. So Dispatch Data Analysis based OM method can not be
selected.
+ Low-cost/must run resources in Vietnam constitute less than 50% of total grid generation
in average of the five most recent years
Table 4: Rate of low cost/must-run sources based on generation3
Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Average
Rate of low cost/must-run
sources generation, %
59.43
48.25
47.24
38.53
34.53
45.6
The Simple OM emission factor (EFOM,simple,y) is calculated as the generation-weighted average
emissions per electricity unit (tCO2/MWh) of all generating sources serving the system, not
including low-operating cost and must-run power plants:
EF_OMy =
∑i, j Fi, j,y * COEFi, j
∑ j GEN j,y
Where: Fi ,j, y is the amount of fuel i (in a mass or volume unit) consumed by relevant
power sources j in year(s) y,
1
Baseline calculation for Vietnam national electricity grid, Vietnam DNA
Appendix B of the simplified M&P for small scale CDM project activities (UNFCCC, 2003b)
3
Master Plan of Electricity Expansion for period of 2001-2010 with perspective to 2015 – Electricity Corporation
of Viet Nam
2
page 16
j refers to the power sources delivering electricity to the grid, not including lowoperating cost and must-run power plants, and including imports to the grid,
COEFi,j y is the CO2 emission coefficient of fuel i (tCO2 / mass or volume unit of
the fuel), taking into account the carbon content of the fuels used by relevant power sources j
and the percent oxidation of the fuel in year(s) y, and
GENj,y is the electricity (MWh) delivered to the grid by source j.
The CO2 emission coefficient COEFi is obtained as
COEFi = NCVi * EFCO2,i * OXIDi
Where: NCVi is the net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel
i,
OXIDi is the oxidation factor of the fuel
EFCO2,i is the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i.
(Ex-ante) the full generation – weighted average for the most recent 3 years for which data are
available at the time of PDD submission is used to calculate the Simple OM emission factor.
Table 5 shows electricity outputs and fuel consumptions of thermal power source in 3 years
2003, 2004 and 2005.
Table 5: Electricity outputs and fuel consumptions of thermal power sources in 2003 – 20054
Fuel type
2004
2005
Coal (OXID = 0.98 – IPCC)
GWh
6,521
6,435
8,408
5
kt
3,541
3,415
4,255
COEF = 26.8 TC/TJ –IPCC
kt CO2
7,852
7,573
9,436
Gas (OXID = 0.99 – IPCC)
GWh
11,692
21,440
25,291
NCV = 8500 kcal/m3 – Vietnam
Million m3
2,618
4,963
5,645
COEF = 15.3 TC/TJ – IPCC
kt CO2
5,175
9,809
11,157
Diesel oil (OXID = 0.99 – IPCC)
GWh
338
336
235
NCV = 10200 kcal/kg – Vietnam
kt
98
98
68
COEF = 20.2 TC/TJ – IPCC
kt CO2
307
307
213
Fuel Oil (OXID = 0.99 – IPCC)
GWh
1,419
319
1,054
NCV = 9800 kcal/kg – Vietnam
kt
375
89
249
EF = 21.1 TC/TJ – IPCC
kt CO2
1,191
283
791
Imported electricity
GWh
0
0
0
NCV = 5500 kcal/kg-Vietnam
6
4
2003
Master Plan of Electricity Expansion for period of 2001-2010 with perspective to 2015 – Electricity Corporation
of Viet Nam
5
Net calorific value
6
Carbon emission factor
page 17
Total CO2 emission from Vietnam grid
kt CO2
14,524
17,972
21,597
Total thermal electricity output generated
GWh
19,970
28,530
34,988
Thus, the “Operating Margin” emission factor will be
14,524 * 10 9 17,972 * 10 9 21,597 * 10 9
+
+
19,970 * 10 6 28,530 * 10 6 34,988 * 10 6
=
= 658.17 gCO2 / kWh
3
EFOM
Step2: Build Margin emission factor (EFBM)
The Build Margin emission factor EFBM,y is given as the generation-weighted average emission
factor of a sample of power plants m, as follows:
∑ Fi,m, y * COEFi,m
EFBM , y =
i ,m
∑ GEN m, y
m
Where Fi,m,y, COEFi,m and GENm,y are analogous to the variables described for the simple
OM method above for plants m.
For the proposed project, Option 1 shall be chosen: Calculate the Build Margin emission factor
EFBM, y ex-ante based on the most recent information available on plants already built for sample
group m at the time of PDD submission. The sample group m consists of either the five power
plants that have been built most recently; or the power plant capacity additions in the electricity
system that comprise 20% of the system generation (in GWh) and that have been built most
recently. Sample group that comprises the larger annual generation should be used.
The difference between (1) the five power plants that have been built most recently and (2) the
power plant capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the system
generation (in GWh) and that have been built most recently in 2005 is shown in the following
tables:
Table 6: the difference between (1) and (2) in 2005 7
The five power plants
Name
Outputs
GWh
Name
Capacity
MW
Outputs
GWh
1. Cao Ngan, coal
100
604.5 1. Cao Ngan, coal
100
604.5
2. Na Duong, coal
110
604.5 2. Na Duong, coal
110
604.5
3. Phu My 2.2&3, gas
1466
9462 3. Phu My 2.2&3, gas
1466
9462
4. Phu My 2.1& 2.1MR
&4, gas
1435
7010 4. Phu My 2.1& 2.1MR
&4, gas
1435
7010
5. Can Don, hydro
7
Capacity
MW
20% of the system generation
78
266
Source: Master Plan of Electricity Expansion for period of 2001-2010 with perspective to 2015 - EVN
Total
page 18
3189
17,947
3111
17,681
In 2005, total electricity outputs of the Vietnam national electricity system was 53,439 GWh and
its 20% was 10,688 GWh.
Based on the results in table 6, the five power plants that have been built most recently comprise
the larger annual generation, and hence it is used. They are shown in details in the following
table:
Table 7: Five power plants that have been built most recently at the time of 20058
Plants
Capacity
MW
Outputs
GWh
1. Cao Ngan, coal
100
604.5
314.5 kt Coal
2. Na Duong, coal
110
604.5
314.5 kt Coal
3. Phu My 2.2&3, gas
1466
4. Phu My 2.1& 2.1MR &4, gas
9462
1435
7010
5. Can Don, hydro
78
266
Total
3189
17,947
Fuel consumption
Emission
kt CO2
697
697
3
4862
3
2771
2460 Million m gas
1402 Million m gas
- -
0
9028
Thus, the “Build Margin” emission factor will be
EFBM =
9,028 * 10 9
17,947.10 6
= 503.04 gCO2/kWh
Step3: Calculate the baseline emission factor EF
The baseline emission factor EF is calculated as the weighted average of the Operating Margin
emission factor (EFOM) and the Build Margin emission factor (EFBM):
EF = wOM*EFOM + wBM*EFBM
Where the weights wOM and wBM, by default, are 50%
So the baseline emission factor will be:
EF = 0.5*658.17 + 0.5*503.04 = 580.61 gCO2/kWh
B.5.
Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below
those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity (assessment
and demonstration of additionality):
a. Description of emission reductions
The CO2 emission reduction will be calculated on basic of the substitution of the mix of power
supplied from traditional electricity plants to the national grid.
Thus the implementation of the proposed project activity will generate a total emission reduction
of 572,106 tCO2 during the crediting period (10 years).
8
Source: Master Plan of Electricity Expansion for period of 2001-2010 with perspective to 2015 - EVN
page 19
b. Demonstration and assessment the additionality of the proposed project.
According to the methodology ACM0002 version 06, the additionality of the proposed project
will be demonstrated and assessed by using the “Tool for demonstration and assessment of
additionality” agreed by the CDM Executive Board. It includes the following steps:
Step 0: Preliminary screening based on the starting date of the project activity
The crediting period of the project activity will start after the registration of the project activity,
so this step does not apply to the project activity.
Step 1: Identification of alternatives to the project activity consistent with current laws and
regulations
Sub-step 1a: Define alternatives to the project activity
In absence of the proposed project, there is no any other potential power source expected to
develop at the site because of the poor potential of other renewable energy resources (solar,
wind, etc). Projects based on coal, gas and diesel will also not be implemented due to difficult
transportation of fuels. In addition, the project sponsor also did not propose to develop any other
power project alternatives like coal-fired or wind or solar power plant since they have no
background and expertise. Hence there is only the following alternative:
+ Continuation of the current situation: this alternative is most likely to dominate. This
means an equivalent amount of power would be supplied by different power plants (dominated
by fossil fuel resources) to the national grid and an equivalent amount of emissions would be
generated at thermal power plants. This alternative is thus a part of the baseline scenario.
Sub-step 1b: Enforcement of applicable laws and regulations
All alternatives are in compliance with the laws and regulatory requirements in Vietnam.
Step 2: Investment analysis
Sub-step 2a: Determine appropriate analysis method
The proposed project activity generates financial and economic benefits other than CDM related
income and hence the simple cost analysis (Option I) can not be applied. As there is only one
alternative scenario among the remaining two options, Option III was chosen.
Sub-step 2b – Option III: Apply benchmark analysis
The identified financial indicator is Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR)
The relevant benchmark is the recommendation of the Asia Development Bank9: “The EIRR of
independent projects in Vietnam should be at least 12%” and the minimum EIRR criterion of
12% the project participants.
Sub-step 2c: Calculation and comparison of financial indicators
Revenue of the proposed project comes only from the electricity sale in the case of the absence
the revenue from CER credits. Financial analysis by the project participants has concluded that
9
ADB’s Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of Projects
page 20
EIRR of the project is 10.10 % based on very optimistic assumptions. Such assumptions are
described as following:
+
A significant assumption is that average electricity price is 3.8 Cent/kWh. This is the
high price among the range of electricity purchase price by Electricity of Vietnam (EVN-Who is
responsible for national grid management) who has already committed with project’s sponsor.
+
The equipment costs is calculated at basic price level
+
A series of risks of project, country, currency (electricity outputs decrease, country
inflation with minimum rate of 5%, oil price growth, etc) are not taken into consideration.
Therefore, this EIRR of 10.10 % can be regarded as very optimistic figure. But it is less than the
benchmark of 12%, it hence can be concluded that the proposed project is unlikely to be
financially attractive.
Step 3: Barrier analysis
Beside the economic/financial barrier in Step 2, the proposed project has faced the following
three barriers which also would prevent it from being carried out if it is not registered as CDM
project:
1. Policy barrier
Investment cost of the proposed project was calculated in the Feasibility Study based on specific
guides in Circulars, Decisions issued by ministries, the government. This Feasibility Study report
has been considered and approved related authorities such as ministries, the government, banks,
funds and Khanh Hoa People’s Committee. But when the proposed project came into preparation
phase, some of these Circulars and Decisions have been changed. This has resulted in the
increased investment cost and hence renders the project non-feasible as mentioned Sub-step 2c
above. Old and new guidelines and related project investment cost are shown in the following
tables:
page 21
Table 8: Old and new guides used to calculate investment cost of the proposed project
Content
Old
New
1. Guides on the
establishment
and
management of budget
proposed for invested
projects.
Circulars No 09/2000/TT-BXD dated
July 17, 2000; No 06/2003/TT-BXD
dated April 14, 2003 and No
07/2003/TT-BXD dated June 17,
2003 by Ministry of Construction.
Circular No 04/2005/TTBXD issued by Ministry of
Construction on April 01,
2005.
2. Standard and norm
on cost estimates of
construction
and
installation works.
Decisions No 1242/1998/QD-BXD
dated November 25, 1998; No
31/2002/QD-BXD dated November
12, 2002; No 17/2004/QD-BXD dated
July 05, 2004 and No 05/2005/QDBXD dated January 24, 2005 by
Ministry of Construction.
Decision No 24/2005/QDBXD dated July 29, 2005
by
Ministry
of
Construction.
3. Cost breakdown for
estimates of machines
shift and equipments
cost.
Decisions No
1260/1998/QD-BXD
dated September 18, 1998; No
10/2001/QD-BXD dated June 11,
2001 and No 38/2002/QD-BXD
Dated December 27, 2002 by
Circular No 06/2005/TTBXD dated April 15, 2005
by
Ministry
of
Construction.
on cost estimate of
invested construction
project management.
Decision No 15/2001/QD-BXD dated
July 20, 2001 and Circular No
07/2003/TT-BXD dated June 17,
2003 by Ministry of Construction.
Decision No 10/2005/QDBXD dated April 15, 2005
by
Ministry
of
Construction.
on cost estimate of
project design and
consulting services.
Decisions No 12/2001/QD-BXD Decision No 11/2005/QDdated July 20, 2001 and No 15/2001/ BXD dated April 15, 2005
QD-BXD dated July 20, 2001 by by Ministry of Construction
6. Adjustment in labour
cost according to basic
salary
in
budget
estimated for invested
projects.
Circular No 03/2005/TT-BXD dated Circular No 16/2005/TTMarch 04, 2005 by Ministry of BXD dated October 13,
Construction.
2005 by Ministry of
Construction.
(Basic salary is 290,000 VND/month)
(Basic salary is 350,000
VND/month)
page 22
Table 9: Old and new investment cost of the project
Investment cost
Old
New
1. Construction and assembly cost, billion VND
183.29
194.79
2. Equipment cost, billion VND
130.34
139.74
3. Other cost, billion VND
28.61
35.89
4. Contingency cost, billion VND
34.22
37.04
376.46
407.46
12.90
11.48
Feasibility (>12%)
Unfeasibility (<12%)
5. Total investment cost
6. EIRR, %
7. The proposed project
In addition, the project is also facing the policy barrier due to the following three issues:
− Lack of Renewable Energy policy (and policy for technologies with less GHG emission)
still exists. No incentives are available for renewable energy projects for its category.
− Now, there is only one electricity buyer for grid connected plans in Viet Nam is that
EVN and especially, in transmission EVN is absolute monopolist. Hence it makes the
negotiation of Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) very difficult.
− Discrimination between state-own and private enterprises still exists. This makes the
access to credit sources difficult for private investors and Song Giang Hydro Power Joint _ Stock
Company is not an exception.
2. Investment barrier
Before the change in the policies as described above, the project was feasible and hence met the
conditions of the funds, banks and financing sources which will provide the loan to investor. But
since the change in the policies has rendered the project non-feasible, it is difficult for
convincing the bank to continue with the loan provided for the project.
In addition, Vietnam is a developing country and being in the process of national
industrialization and modernization, resulting in implementation of large infrastructure projects.
The current consumption and the future demand as forecasted necessitate implementation of
many new power plants (associated with huge capital investment) to meet the projected
electricity demand for the country. Therefore, only power plants having favourable and attractive
financial indicators attract the attention from Vietnam investors, banks and financial institutions.
3. Road barrier
To carry out the project, investor must construct a new road of 8 km in length. This is a tortuous
road. It is constructed based on side of hills from centre of Khanh Trung commune to the project
site so construction of the road will meet many difficulties. Estimated cost is about 24 billion
VND.
Step 4: Common practice analysis
Sub-step 4a: Analyze other activities similar to the proposed project activity
page 23
In order to test whether a credible claim can be made that there are real, prohibitive barriers to
development of a project such as the Song Giang 2 Hydro Power Project – third level hydro
power project10, hence it is necessary to investigate third level hydro power plants which is
under operation or construction in Vietnam. Such hydro power plants are shown in the following
table:
Table 10: Hydro power plants (3 – 30 MW) developed in Vietnam11
No Plant name Capacity Elec.
Load
Co.
Sponsor
USD/ EIRR13
12
MW
outputs factor time
kW
GWh
%
year
0 Song
30
99.3
37.8
2008
850
10.10 Song Giang
Giang 2
Hydro Power
project
Joint – Stock
Company
1 Nam Mu
11
46.4
48.2
2004
>12 Song Da
Construction
Corporation
2 Na Loi
9
39.7
50.4
2005
>12 Song Da
Construction
Corporation
6 Nam Dong
22
91.6
47.5
2007
755
18.06 Northern Power
Development and
Investment
Company
3 Suoi Sap
11.8
62.8
60.7
2006 868.9
19.94 Truong Thanh
Construction
Company
4 Suoi Vang
10
41.9
47.8 <2004
>12 Vietnam General
Power Company
5 Ry Ninh
9
39.4
50.0
2004
>12 Song Da
Construction
Corporation
8 H’chan
12
66
62.8
2006
907
19.76 Power Company
No3
H’mun
16.2
64.5
45.5
2007 1016
12.31 Lam Son Company
under Ministry of
Defence
9 Ea Krong
28
112
45.7
2007 1050
12.20 MienTrung Power
Rou
Development and
10
According to Vietnam standard (209/2004/ND-CP dated December 16, 2004), hydro power plants whose capacity
is under the range of 3 – 30 MW are ranked among third level hydro power projects.
11
Draft of Master Plan of Electricity Expansion for period of 2006-2015 with perspective to 2025 - Electricity of
Vietnam and interviews to hydropower plants sponsor shown in table above
12
Commissioning time
13
According to our calculation
10
Ban Coc
page 24
18
80.6
51.1
2009 937.6
Investment
Company
15.48 Hanoi Construction
Corporation
Sub-step 4b: Discuss any similar options that are occurring
Hydro power projects shown in table 10 could overcome the prohibitive barriers that the
proposed project faces because of the following two main reasons:
+ They possess good economic and technical indicator such as low specific investment
cost, high plant load factor and especially high EIRR (above 12%). These indicators demonstrate
their feasibility.
+ Especially, most of these projects are invested and constructed by big state-owned
companies who have access to huge capital sources.
Step 5: Impact of CDM registration
If the proposed project will be registered as a CDM project, it can obtain benefits to overcome its
barriers as following:
+
A significant impact is that an additional revenue source from CDM will improve the
project’s EIRR indicator from 10.10 % to 12.11% (with CER price of 8.1 USD/tCO2). This
increase in EIRR has already made the project feasible and hence convinced the project sponsor.
Especially, the project sponsor can convince banks, funds, others financing sources to obtain
loans.
+
The CDM revenues is the only income the Project Developers will receive in Euro – a
strong currency and is the only revenue that can be used to offset the foreign exchange risks that
are being incurred for the purchase of the plant’s equipments (to the tune of 18.33 % of the
equipment cost)
+
CDM projects has the potential to assist the country in achieving sustainable
development by promoting environmentally friendly investment from industrialized country
governments and businesses, thus they are encouraged by the government. Incentive policies for
CDM projects have been already submitted by CNA (Vietnam DNA) to the government for
consideration.
+
Sale of CER from the proposed project may be possibly lead to access international funds
besides the domestic financing sources.
So, the impacts of registration can be clearly demonstrated for the proposed project as a CDM
activity. The allied benefits and incentives derived from the project activity will alleviate the
economic and financial hurdles (as mentioned in Step 2) and other barriers (as mentioned in Step
3) and thus enable the project activity to be undertaken.
B.6.
Emission reductions:
Emission reduction of the project
page 25
The proposed project activity reduces carbon dioxide through substitution of grid electricity
generation with fossil fuel fired power plants by renewable-hydro electricity. The emission
reduction ERy by the project activity during a given year y is calculated as the difference
between baseline emissions (BEy), project emissions (PEy) and emissions due to leakage (Ly),
as per the formulae given below:
ERy = BEy – PEy – Ly
According to the formulae, emission reduction of the project activity is calculated and is shown
in below table:
Table 11 : Emission reduction of the project activity
Year (y)
Project
Leakage
emission emission (Ly)
(PEy) tCO2
tCO2
Baseline
emission (BEy)
tCO2
Emission
reduction
(ERy), tCO2
2009 (only one month)
0
0
4767.5
4767.5
2010
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2011
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2012
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
Up to and including
2012
0
0
176,399.3
176,399.3
2013
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2014
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2015
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2016
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2017
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2018
0
0
57,210.6
57,210.6
2019 (11 months)
0
0
52,442.5
52,442.5
Total emission reduction
during the first crediting
period of 10 years
0
0
572,106
572,106
*For conservative calculation
The emission factor of the national grid is calculated based on gross power generation. It means
that the grid’s emission factor is calculated as: EF = total emission/gross power output. This
emission factor is less than emission factor calculated by net power output, because net power
output is less than gross power output by parasitic use and loss load (about 1% gross output). In
contrary, the calculation uses only net electricity output of the project activity that is certainly
less than plant gross output.
page 26
B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices:
This is a hydro power project with installed capacity is 30 MW. According to the EB regulations
for CDM projects then the project belongs to the large scale CDM projects category. So baseline
and monitoring methodology ACM0002 is applicable to the project activity.
B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:
Data / Parameter:
Reservoir area
Data unit:
M2
Description:
Surface area at full reservoir level
Source of data used:
Feasibility Study Report
Value applied:
20000
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement
methods and
procedures actually
applied :
Reservoir area that is necessary to calculate power density rate of the
project. According to the EB’ guidelines, then the leakage of the project
are estimated base on the value.
Reservoir area is calculated by technical consulting Unit of the project.
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Emission factor
Data unit:
gCO2/kWh
Description:
Emission factor of national grid of Vietnam
Source of data used:
Master Plan of Electricity Expansion for period of 2001-2010 with
perspective to 2015 – EVN and calculation of RCEE
Value applied:
580.61
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement
methods and
procedures actually
applied :
The factor is calculated based on the baseline methodology ACM0002
Any comment:
B.6.3
Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:
page 27
Baseline emission
The baseline emissions (BEy) are the product of the baseline emissions factor (EFy) calculated
above, times the electricity supplied by the project activity to the national grid (EGy), as per the
formulae given below:
BEy = EGy * EFy
Where:
EFy = 580.61 gCO2/kWh - Baseline emission factor (calculated in B4)
EGy - Net electricity outputs supplied to the national grid by the proposed project
Project emission
The proposed project has power density rate of 1500 W/m2, much higher than the level of 10
W/m2. So the project emission (PEy) is zero.
Leakage
The main emissions potentially giving rise to leakage in the context of electric sector project are
emission arising due to activities such as power plant construction, fuel handling (extraction,
processing and transport) and land inundation. Project participants do not need to consider these
emission sources as leakage in applying this methodology. Project activities using this baseline
methodology shall not claim any credit for the project on account of reducing these emissions
below the level of the baseline scenario. So emissions due to leakage also are zero.
Emission reduction
The proposed project activity reduces carbon dioxide through substitution of grid electricity
generation with fossil fuel fired power plants by renewable-hydro electricity. The emission
reduction ERy by the project activity during a given year y is calculated as the difference
between baseline emissions (BEy), project emissions (PEy) and emissions due to leakage (Ly),
as per the formulae given below:
ERy = BEy – PEy - Ly
B.6.4
Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions:
Summary of the above calculations is shown in below table:
Table 12: Summary of the calculated parameters
Parameters
Unit
Value
1. Capacity addition
MW
30
2. Annual net electricity generation
GWh
98.31
3. Baseline carbon emission
−
The “approximate operating margin”
gCO2/kWh
658.17
−
The “build margin”
gCO2/kWh
503.04
−
Baseline emission factor
gCO2/kWh
580.61
−
page 28
tCO2
57,210.6
4. Total project carbon emission per year
tCO2/year
0
5. Total leakage carbon emission per year
tCO2/year
0
6. Total CO2 emissions reductions per year
tCO2/year
57,210.6
7. Total CO2 emission reductions during the
crediting period of 10 years
tCO2
572,106
Total baseline carbon emission per year
The above calculation is based on the average annual flow in the Giang River. The flow and thus
the production of the Song Giang 2 Hydro power plant can vary +/- 25%. This means that the
maximum expected generation of CER in a single year will be 71,500 t CER/year and the lowest
will be 42,900 t CER/year. The actual emission reductions in each year will be established expost by multiplying the electricity production with the baseline emission factor.
B.7
Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:
The methodology requires monitoring of the following:
• Electricity generation from the proposed project activity which is supplied to the national
grid.
• Data needed to recalculate the Operating Margin emission factor, based on the Simple
operating margin method chosen consistent with ACM0002 baseline methodology.
• Data needed to recalculate the Build Margin emission factor consistent with ACM0002
baseline methodology.
• The surface area of reservoir at the full reservoir level.
B.7.1
Data and parameters monitored:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
Electricity quantity
GWh
Electricity will supply to the national grid by the project
Hydro power plan and electricity bill
98.31
Directly measured by electronics equipments
QA/QC procedures for this are planned.
be applied:
page 29
These data will be directly used for calculation of emission reductions. Sales
record to the grid and other records are used to ensure the consistency.
The value used in the calculation is based on the average flow in the Giang
River. The actual production can vary with +/- 25%
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
calculating expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description of
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Surface area of reservoir
M2
Surface area of reservoir at the full reservoir level
Feasibility Report Study
20,000
It is calculated by technical consulting unit of the project
QA/QC procedures for this are planned.
These data will be directly used for calculation of power density rate
Any comment:
B.7.2
Description of the monitoring plan:
+
No monitoring for leakage.
+
For emission reduction:
The generated electricity from the project is sold to the National electricity utility (EVN), for the
complete project lifespan, for which the promoter has entered into a long term power purchase
agreement (PPA) with the national power utility. Thus throughout the project cycle (crediting
period) and beyond, the electricity generated from the project will be monitored by both the
project proponent and the third party (EVN).
The generated electricity, before entering into the grid, at the grid interconnection point will be
measured by digital, kilowatt hour (kWh) meter on monthly basis and will be documented both
on paper as well as in electronic form. The generation records will be signed by the officials
from project proponent and third party (EVN). This generation record will form the basis of
payment by EVN to the project proponent. Such records will be maintained and would be made
available on demand throughout the crediting period of the project.
To address all O&M issue, the project proponent will appoint the RCEE Energy and
Environment JSC to monitor required parameter(s) after commissioning. RCEE will station a
person in charge at the project site and will be a participant for monitoring the generation of
page 30
electricity. All the data collected will be recorded and preserved throughout the crediting period
of the project.
No additional CDM related training is required at any level as the monitoring data required for
the verification are taken from the regular digital meters and cross checked with the log books
and receipt of sale of electricity.
Project Proponent / Management
Song Giang HP JSC
Project Manager In Charge
Figure 3: Reporting structure
B.8
Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology and
the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies)
Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology
June 15, 2006
Name of person/entity determining the baseline
RCEE Energy & Environment Joint – Stock Company (Website: www.rcee.org.vn)
The individuals developing the baseline are:
Mr. Nguyen Ba Hai – [email protected]
Dr. Nguyen Van Hanh – [email protected]
page 31
SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period
C.1
Duration of the project activity:
C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity:
Starting date of construction: 01 December 2006
Starting date of operation: 01 December 2009
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:
30 years
C.2
Choice of the crediting period and related information:
C.2.1. Renewable crediting period
Not Applicable
C.2.1.1.
Starting date of the first crediting period:
C.2.1.2.
Length of the first crediting period:
Not applicable
Not applicable
C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:
10 years
C.2.2.1.
Starting date:
C.2.2.2.
Length:
01/12/2009
10 years
page 32
SECTION D. Environmental impacts
D.1.
Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary
impacts:
D.1.1. Environmental impacts
The area being occupied by the project is only natural forest land (it is mainly poor forest,
brushwood, treeless hill and pebble areas). There are neither households nor places of cultural
and historical interest in the project area.
The project comprises a diversion powerhouse including dam, penstocks and powerhouse
buildings, all of them are located on land of Khanh Trung commune, Khanh Vinh district, Khanh
Hoa province.
Mean annual discharge arriving to dam site is 5.96m3/s corresponding to a total annual flow of
188x106 m3. Due to sloping and narrow topographical conditions, the reservoir will be small
compared with total flow discharge therefore it can not regulate the flow between seasons but
only on a day-to-day basis.
With such a small regulated storage, the powerhouse will generate power from the natural flow
arriving at the dam site. During the dry season when average daily flow is smaller than designed
discharge, the powerhouse will operate on daily regulation mode to generate power in several
hours. During flood season when the average daily discharge is larger than designed discharge,
the powerhouse will operate at its maximum capacity (installed capacity), redundant discharge
will be allowed to pass by spillway.
Due to the fact that the Song Giang project will make use of difference in natural head water to
generate power, headwork components comprises the dam which will divert the flow to intake
structure then to the tunnel 4175m long to fore-bay and to penstock before entering turbines
housed situated inside the powerhouse.
Since the storage created by the reservoir is small, the reservoir will be similar to a large river
section of 500m in length; therefore it will not cause submergence of land, nor any infrastructure
or vegetation of forest land areas.
Table 13: Summary of land occupation of the project
No.
14
Description
Unit
Amount
1
Compensated water level
m
422
2
Total area of reservoir (compensated by water-level)14
ha
3.52
1- Forestry land (natural forest)
ha
2.68
This is the maximum area of the reservoir during the wet season. The 2 ha mentioned earlier is the size of the
reservoir under normal hydrological situation
page 33
- Poor forest
ha
1.36
- Sapling forest
ha
1.32
2- River, stream, pebble areas
ha
0.84
3
Heading area (poor forest)
ha
1.0
4
Power lines
ha
41.1
1- Forestry land (natural forest)
ha
39.0
- Poor forest
ha
26.5
- Mixed forest
ha
10
- Unused land
ha
2.5
2- River, stream, pebble areas
ha
0
3- Farm land ( occupied forest land)
ha
2.1
- Cashew trees
ha
1.6
- Crops
ha
0.5
Powerhouse
ha
2.0
- Mixed forest
ha
2.0
Total
ha
47.62
5
6
(Source: Survey results in Junuary/2005- Electricity Construction & Consultancy Company No.4)
a. Construction period
Impacts on water environment
The construction of a dam will create only a small reservoir, area 2 ha, land occupied mainly
river, streams and pebble areas. Since it can only regulate between days, Giang river will not be
affected in quality and quantity, content of dissolved oxygen as well as other chemical content as
pH, turbidity, etc... will not be changed. Water environment will be the least affected by the
project construction.
Impacts on air environment
Dusts and noise will be generated in the period, but populated areas are so far from the project
site that it will not impact on the life of the inhabitants.
The project will use water to generate power therefore it will not impact on air environment.
Impacts on biological system:
As the data on the above table shows, the total occupied area of the project is 47.62 ha (in which
comprises of forest land, farm land, river, stream and pebble area), however those are mainly
poor forest areas and unused land so impacts of biological system are insignificant.
page 34
For fauna, construction and activities of workers will impact on animal system in the area. But
when the plant comes into operation, water reservoir makes climate conditions in the area are
better than before so biological system will grow faster and better then animals will return.
b. Operation period
Impacts on water and air environment
Since the reservoir can only regulate between days, Giang river will not be affected in quality
and quantity, content of dissolved oxygen as well as other chemical content as pH, turbidity,
etc... will not be changed.
Impacts on natural resources and biological systems
When the project is available during dry season, discharge on the river is small, most of the
inflow will flow through dam to tunnel, penstock down to powerhouse, this river section is
almost dried, and the flow will be formed by streams from two banks.
However, the area from dam site to powerhouse is found with no population or any cultivated
land area of local resident. Therefore bad impacts on economic and production activities will be
minimal.
D.1.2. Social and economic impacts
+ Negative impacts:
The main negative impact is land occupation of 47.62 ha. Those are mainly poor forest area and
unused land so impacts of biological system are insignificant.
+ Positive impacts:
Khanh Hoa is fairly developing province in the South of Vietnam with natural area of
−
5,198.2 km2, population by the end of 2004 of 1,111,300 people and GDP of about 11771.4
billion VND (about 740 million USD) in 2004. When the proposed project comes into operation,
average 12.36 billion VND (tax) per year will be added to the local budget, make up 0.105 % of
the province’s GDP of 2004. In addition, it will contribute to completion of traffic system in the
area by newly constructing or improving roads and bridges; create favourable conditions to local
people living and production, goods transport, travel and exchange between areas in the territory
and reduce the cultural and economic gap between ethnics and areas in the region; especially
more jobs during the period of construction and operation will be created on-site; demands on
food and supplies will promote agricultural goods items and commercial services among local
communities; the local economic structure will be growing from rice cultivation to husbandry
and aquaculture. These will largely push forward economic development and improve living
standard of the province and nearby communes. In addition, the proposed project will supply
electricity to nearby communes directly from plant since the project is planned to share a part of
electricity generated for self use to these communes. Thus the proposed project will contribute
the solution of basic needs -road and electricity - for above mentioned communes.
page 35
D.1.3. Environment and social impact assessment and comparison
As regards the environment and social assessment, the project sponsor, in the feasibility study
document, has given the following impact assessment table:
Table 14: Environment and social impact assessment and comparison
No
Activities which may impact on
environment
Project duration
Construction period
Operation period
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
I
Natural environment
1
Water Environment
O
-
++
-
2
Air Environment
O
-
+
-
3
Vegetation cover
O
-
++
O
4
Animal systems
O
--
+
O
5
Land
O
--
O
-
II
Economic – social environment
1
Economic activity
++
O
++
O
2
Agriculture
O
O
O
O
3
Transportation
O
-
++
O
4
Trade and service
++
O
+
O
5
Life level of inhabitants
O
O
+
O
6
Culture
O
-
++
O
Note:
- : Minimal or temporary adverse impacts
-- : Strong or long – term adverse impacts
+ : Minimal or temporary profitable impacts
++ : Strong or long – term profitable impacts
O : None
D.1.4. Mitigation solutions
a. Construction period
Waste collection system: The wastes generated during the construction period will be handled in
a most hygienic way and shall be disposed in a planned manner.
page 36
After construction of headwork, intake, powerhouse and access road, the areas will be cleaned,
including replantation of tree and create supporting slopes to prevent sliding and erosion. Dump
of solid waste materials will be levelled to grow trees.
Waste water treatment system: quantity of waste water is limited, mainly caused by sand/soil
washing and hence no impacts to environment are forecasted.
Water quality of Giang River will not be changed when the Song Giang 2 plant is constructed.
However to ensure water quality of Giang River, local residents shall be adequately informed on
how to keep the water source clean including its importance.
Minimising noise and dust: During the construction, water will be sprayed in and around
construction areas.
The cultivated land area to be occupied for reservoir component shall be compensated
satisfyingly.
Reservoir area shall be cleaned before it is stored water
Capacity building to workers on protection of forest and wild beasts
Capacity building to workers on safety at work and it supplies workers with equipments at work.
Medicine and health equipments are stored to meet demands of workers on common epidemic
diseases as: malaria, fever, digestion disease…etc
b. Operation period
Protection methods: Instrumentation observing permeability, dam deformation will be provided
together with fire fighting devices.
Environmental observation station will be constructed in downstream of powerhouse to observe
climate patterns, water quality in project area when the reservoir is available.
Forecasting impacts on environment and proposing mitigation methods will be continuous
efforts applied by the project activity to mitigate impacts to the environment.
D.2.
If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host
Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental
impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party:
Director of Khanh Hoa province Department of Natural Resources and Environment confirmed
that
Song Giang Hydro Power Joint – Stock Company (Project sponsor) submitted the
registration document on environmental standard conformation of the Song Giang Hydropower
Project on Giang river, Khanh Vinh district, Khanh Hoa province on May 6th, 2005.
Project sponsor has the responsibility to strictly implement all the contents stated in this
registration document on environmental standard conformation.
page 37
The registration document on environment standard conformation is the basic for the State
Environmental Management Authorities to inspect the environmental protection of the project.
After completing all project’s articles on environment, the project sponsor has to report in
written on environmental monitoring results to Department of Natural Resources and
Environment for management and inspecting.
SECTION E. Stakeholders’ comments
E.1.
Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:
According to the regulation of International Cooperation Department of Ministry of Natural
Resources and Environment, which was designated as a Clean Development Mechanism
National Authority (CNA) in Vietnam, the following organizations are the stakeholders of the
proposed project, whose comments should be involved:
−
Song Giang Hydro Power Joint Stock Company
−
The People’ committee of Khanh Hoa province (local authorities)
−
Department of Natural Resources and Environment of Khanh Hoa province
All documents related to the project were sent to the organizations mentioned above to receive
their comments.
Beside these comments, following the international CDM modalities, the comments of
commune’s representatives were colleted. These comments were received by project sponsor
during meetings with the communes’ representatives. The proposed project is solely located in
Khanh Trung commune. Communes’ representatives at these meetings were:
Chairman of Commune’s Council. The members of Council are elected by commune
people voting. So the Council really represents the people’s opinion.
Chairman of Commune’s People Committee (CPC). CPC is lowest administration level
in the Vietnamese administrative hierarchy. The Chairman of CPC is elected by the Council so
he well represents the commune’s interest.
Local side:
−
Chairman of Commune’s People Committee.
−
Deputy Chairman of Commune’s People Committee
−
Party secretary of communes
−
Deputy Party secretary of communes
page 38
Project sponsor side:
-
Mr. Dinh Xuan Hai Sang – General Director
-
Mr. Tran Van Nghia –Manager of Finance department
-
Ms. Tran Thi Thanh Hai – Manager of general co-ordinator office
E.2.
Summary of the comments received:
All organizations understood that the project contributes to sustainable development and
environment protection of Vietnam, especially increase in local budget and reduction of poverty;
hence they fully support the project and respond with their comments promptly.
The comments of the Communes representative are summarized as follow:
−
The proposed hydropower project is a clean industrial project in this mountainous and
remote area and will contribute to socio-economic development of commune and region.
−
The good impacts are expected from infrastructure improvement such as road, electricity
access, irrigation, also from better contact and exchange possibilities. (These will improve
people knowledge (including Vietnamese language efficiency) and market access).
−
Forest conservation, environment protection.
−
Project sponsor is requested to coordinate with local authorities to:
Plan, re-allocate cultivation land to farmers, and create favourable condition for affected peoples
exploiting virgin land into new cultivating land, all with preferential policy.
Construct new public welfare works such as primary school, small clinic, potable water system...
viewing peoples life stability and improvement.
E.3.
Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
The organization’s comments are carefully reviewed. All of them are positive comments.
The project sponsor is committed to create jobs for commune people.
page 39
Annex 1
CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
Organization:
Song Giang Hydro Power Joint – Stock Company
Street/P.O.Box:
Number 7 Nguyen Chanh street, Loc Tho ward, Nha Trang city, Khanh
Hoa province
Building:
City:
Nha Trang city
State/Region:
South area
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Viet Nam
Telephone:
+ 84 – 058 - 524814
FAX:
+ 84 – 058 – 524814
E-Mail:
URL:
Represented by:
Title:
Managing director
Salutation:
Mr
Full Name:
Dinh Xuan Hai Sang
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
+ 84 – 058 – 524814
Direct tel:
+ 84 – 058 - 524814
Personal E-Mail:
[email protected]
Organization:
RCEE Energy and Environment Joint – Stock Company
Street/P.O.Box:
Land 62, Nguyen Chi Thanh street, Ha Noi, Viet Nam
Building:
City:
Ha Noi
State/Region:
Northern area
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Viet Nam
Telephone:
+ 84 – 4 – 7733686
FAX:
+ 84 – 4 – 7734022
E-Mail:
[email protected]
URL:
http://www.rcee.org.vn
Represented by:
Title:
Project coordinator
Salutation:
Ms.
Full Name:
Le Thi Bao Ngoc
Department:
Mobile:
+ 84 – 914309414
Direct FAX:
+ 84 – 4 – 7734022
Direct tel:
+ 84 – 4 – 7733686
Personal E-Mail:
[email protected]
page 40
Organization:
Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Street/P.O.Box:
Asiatisk Plads 2
Building:
City:
Copenhagen
State/Region:
Postfix/ZIP:
DK- 1448
Country:
Denmark
Telephone:
+45 33 92 00 00
FAX:
+45 32 54 05 33
E-Mail:
[email protected]
URL:
www.um.dk
Represented by:
Title:
Head of Department
Salutation:
Mr.
Full Name:
Geert Aagaard Andersen
Department:
Environmental Secretariat
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
+ 45 33 92 19 97
Direct tel:
+45 33 92 01 56
Personal E-Mail: [email protected]
page 41
page 42
Annex 2
INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING
Not applicable
page 43
Annex 3
BASELINE INFORMATION
VIETNAM ELECTRICITY GRID DATA
Table 15: Electricity output of the Vietnam grid during 2001 – 2010
No
Source
Cap. Co. time15
Electricity output, GWh
MW
Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
I Hydropower
1 Da Nhim
160
1964
1096
915
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
2 Thac Ba
108
1973
401
364
414
414
414
414
414
3 Tri An
400
1989
2179
1675
1658
1658
1658
1658
1658
4 Hoa Binh
1920
1994
8447
8010
8067
8067
8067
8067
8067
5 Thac Mo
150
1995
926
665
882
882
882
882
882
6 Vinh Son
66
2000
215
240
201
201
201
201
201
7 Song Hinh
70
2000
441
320
350
350
350
350
350
9 Ham Thuan
300
2001
923
910
907
907
907
907
907
10 Da Mi
175
2001
401
540
575
575
575
575
575
8 Yaly
360 2000-2001
2975
3200
3558
3558
3558
3558
3558
11 Can Don
78
2003
266
266
266
266
266
12 Se San 3
260 2005-2006
568
1137
1137
13 Bac Binh
35
2006
44
144
14 Se San 3A
100
2006
141
441
15 Srok Phu Mieng
54
2006
72
243
16 Tuyen Quang
342 2006-2007
225
1296
17 Dai Ninh
300 2007-2008
272
18 A Vuong 1
170
2007
115
19 Quang Tri (Rao Quan)
70
2007
71
20 Ban La
300
2008
21 Srepok 3
180
2008
15
Commissioning time
2008
1005
414
1658
8067
882
201
350
907
575
3558
266
1137
144
441
243
1296
1143
715
271
328
198
2009
1005
414
1658
8067
882
201
350
907
575
3558
266
1137
144
441
243
1296
1143
715
271
1055
598
2010
1005
414
1658
8067
882
201
350
907
575
3558
266
1137
144
441
243
1296
1143
715
271
1055
598
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Plei Krong
Cua Đat
Buon Kuop
An Khe + Ka Nak
Dong Nai 4
Dong Nai 3
Ban Chac
Ha Song Ba
Se San 4
Thuong Kon tum
Con river 216
Tranh river 2
Total hydropower
II
Coal power
II.1 Coal
1
Uong Bi
2
Ninh Binh
3
Pha Lại 1
4
Pha Lai 2
5
Na Duong
6
Cao Ngan
7
Cam Pha
8
Uong Bi 1&2
9
Hai Phong
10
Quang Ninh
11
Expansion Ninh Binh
12
Nghi Son
Total coal power
II.2 Gas power
16
page 44
110
97
280
163
270
240
200
250
330
220
70
120
2008
2008
2009-2010
2009
2009-2010
2009-2010
2010
2010-2011
2010-2011
2010-2011
2010
2010
175
165
575
405
432
175
135
120
18,004 16,839 17,883 17,883 18,451 19,502 21,602 24,139 26,768
100
1976
105
1977
440
1986
600
2002
110
2004
100
2005
300
2005
600 2005-2009
300
2006
1200
2007,2008
300
2008
600
2009,2010
Option 1: But it have already replaced by the proposed project
999
2219
950
2130
2430
1007
1887
3627
838
1365
3627
605
734
1024
3627
604,5
604,5
1000
814
3,218
5,510
6,521
6,435
8,408
225
337
3551
500
500
1300
1855
545
419
390
3472
500
500
1800
2006
2275
330
424
373
3512
500
500
1800
2125
3512
1878
334
386
331
3196
500
500
1800
2095
3343
2811
1681
1405
8,813 11,692 14,958 18,048
575
405
1348
695
906
794
748
544
473
414
112
239
32,179
387
332
3203
500
500
1800
3424
3203
3369
1684
3369
21,771
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Ba Ria
378
Phu My 1
1090
Phu My 2-1
930,4
Phu My 4
450
Phu My 2.2
720
Phu My 3
720
Ca Mau
720
Nhon Trach
1200
O Mon 1
600
O Mon 2
750
Total gas power
II.3 FO power
1
Hiep Phuoc
375
2
Thu Đuc
165
3
Can Tho
33
4
O Mon 1
600
Total FO power
II.4 DO power
1
Turbine gas Thu Duc
70
2
Turbine gas Can Tho
140
Total DO power
Total thermal power
III Imported
TOTAL
Baseline emissions factor data
Year
OM
BM
Emission factors
page 45
1999
2001,2002
2003,2005
End 2004
9/2004
1/2004
2005
2007-2009
2005-2006
2009-2010
2001
1972
1999
2005,2006
1992
1999
1644
1074
2375
2210
4160
2314
1205
5926
4561
992
6475
6538
935
6623
7010
1305
6450
7669
1277
6308
7500
1291
6381
7586
1175
5807
6904
1178
5819
6919
7435
9462
9262
9222
9335
9444
9462
1261
4494
4395
1736
4446
3512
3343
5,093
4046
4795
3043
1533
8,684 11,692 21,440 25,291 29,180 30,438 35,894 36,747
4055
6406
3049
4598
41,486
2122
881
236
2100
950
210
1100
97
222
97
222
91
25
1,419
319
99
27
3305
3,431
91
25
3,260
101
27
2156
2,284
100
27
3,239
98
123
833
1,054
127
116
116
276
325
45
45
45
48
47
47
43
465
280
293
291
190
107
105
106
97
741
605
338
336
235
155
152
153
140
12,291 18,059 19,970 28,530 34,988 40,432 45,713 51,132 55,051
434
434
30,295 34,898 37,853 46,413 53,439 59,934 67,315 75,705 82,253
43
97
140
63,513
434
96,126
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
885
102
780
569
727.3
483
631
516
617.3
503.0
585
606
613
197
613
109
633
267
641
282
493.56
674.65
605.2
573.5
560.2
595.79
404.74
361.25
449.56
461.17
page 46
Table 16: Fuel consumptions for electricity generation during 2001 – 2010
No
Source
I
Hydropower
II
Thermal power
Cap.
Com. time
MW
Year
Fuel consumption
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
II.1 Coal power, kt
1 Uong Bi
100
1976
427
406
430
358
314
96
179
181
165
165
2 Ninh Binh
105
1977
413
393
416
347
304
93
173
175
160
160
3 Pha Lại 1
440
1986
1272
1220
1081
782
587
193
223
214
190
190
4 Pha Lai 2
600
2002
1081
1614
1614
1614
1580
1545
1563
1422
1425
5 Na Duong
100
2004
314 314,5
260
260
260
260
260
6 Cao Ngan
100
2005
314,5
260
260
260
260
260
7 Cam Pha
300
2005
445,0 578,5
801,0
801,0
801,0
801,0
8 Uong Bi 1&2
600
2005,2009
362,2 825,5
892,7
945,6
932,3 1523,7
9 Hai Phong
300
2006
10 Quang Ninh
1200
2007-2008
11 Expansion Ninh Binh
300
2008
12 Nghi Son
600
2009, 2010
Total coal
II.2 Gas power, Mm
1 Ba Ria
242,5 1012,4 1562,8 1487,6 1425,3
146,8
835,7 1250,9 1499,2
148,6
748,0
749,4
625,2 1499,2
2,112 3,100 3,541 3,415 4,255 4,128
5,493
6,947
8,302
9,958
281
284
259
259
3
340
1999
431
486
265
218
206
287
page 47
2 Phu My 1
1090
2001, 2002
3 Phu My 2-1
930,4
2003, 2005
4 Phu My 4
450
End 2004
5 Phu My 2.2
715
9/2004
718,5
1/2004
7 Ca Mau
720
2005
8 Nhon Trach
300
2007-2009
9 O Mon 1
600
2005, 2006
10 O Mon 2
750
2009, 2010
6 Phu My 3
Total gas
301
832
1185
1295
1325
1290
1262
1276
1161
1164
665
648
1168
1517
1402
1534
1500
1517
1381
1384
1933
2460
2408
2398
2427
2455
2460
252
899
879
889
809
811
347
702
959
1281
839
1148
1920
6,667
7,934
8,172
9,279
1,397 1,966 2,618 4,963 5,645 6,418
II.3 FO power, kt
1 Hiep Phuoc
375
2001
552
546
286
2 Thu Đuc
165
1972
246
266
27
27
27
29
28
28
25
25
3 Can Tho
33
1999
66
59
62
62
34
8
7
8
7
7
4 O Mon 1
600
2005, 2006
188
487
747
Total FO
II.4
864
871
375
89
249
524
782
36
32
32
DO power, kt
1 Turbine gas Thu Duc
70
1992
80
95
13
13
13
14
14
14
13
13
2 Turbine gas Can Tho
140
1999
136
82
85
85
55
31
31
31
28
28
216
177
98
98
68
45
45
45
41
41
Total DO
page 48
Annex 4
MONITORING INFORMATION
PLEASE REFER TO SECTION B7
page 49
Annex 5
STAKEHODERS’S COMMENT
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIET NAM
KHANH HOA PROVINCE
Independence - Freedom - Happiness
PEOPLE’S COMMITEE
------------------------------------------------------------No: 6879/UBND
Ref. Assistance to Song Giang
Nha Trang, November 10, 2006
Hydropower JSC for CDM project
implementation
To: International Cooperation Department –
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
(Viet Nam’s Clean Development Mechanism Designated National Authority)
As proposed by Song Giang Hydropower Joint Stock Company in Note No. 235/CVCTCPSG dated October 30, 2006 on CDM approval for Song Giang 2 Hydropower Project,
following are comments from Khanh Hoa Province People's Committee (Khanh Hoa PPC):
Song Giang 1 & 2 Hydropower Project located in Khanh Vinh district, Khanh Hoa
province is within the national general plan for small and medium hydropower plants approved
by the Ministry of Industry (MoI); at the same time, the Province People's Committee and the
Ministry of Industry have agreed to permit Song Giang Hydropower Joint Stock Company to be
the project investor. This hydropower project meets local socio-economic requirements with
high feasibility. At present, Song Giang Hydropower Joint Stock Company is carrying out the
construction of Song Giang 2 hydropower plant.
Khanh Hoa PPC proposes the Department of International Cooperation – Ministry of
Natural Resources and Environment to consider and approve Song Giang Hydropower Joint
Stock Company to develop CDM project for Song Giang 2 Hydropower Project in accordance
with the state’s current regulations.
With best regards,
Attn:
-
As above
MONRE
MoI
Province People's Committee
DOI, DONRE
Song Giang Hydropower JSC (No. 7,
Nguyen Chanh, Nha Trang)
- Archive: VP – HB.
Dienluc 235 (SONGGIANGCDM)
ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE'S
COMMITTEE
SIGN ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT
VICE-PRESIDENT
(Signed & sealed)
Nguyen Trong Hoa
page 50
SONG GIANG HYDROPOWER
JOINT STOCK COMPANY
-------------------------------No: 212/CV - CTCPSG
page 51
------------------------------
Nha Trang, July 17, 2006
Ref. CDM application for Song
Giang 1 & 2 Hydropower Project
To: International Cooperation Department –
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
(Viet Nam’s Clean Development Mechanism Designated National Authority)
Song Giang Hydropower Joint Stock Company in co-operation with RCEE Energy and
Environment Joint Stock Company has developed the CDM Project Design Document (PDD) of
Song Giang 1 & 2 Hydropower Project.
We with pleasure submit the Project Idea Note/ PDD of this project for your consideration.
If this the project document meets all of your requirements, we hope to get your Approval Letter
for this Project so that Song Giang Hydropower Joint Stock Company can be able to carry out
the next steps.
With best regards,
List of attached documents:
1. Project Idea Note - English
2. Project Idea Note - Vietnamese
3. Company’s letter sent to International
Cooperation Department
4. Company’s letter sent to the Province
People’s Committee
5. Province People’s Committee letter
submitted to the International Cooperation
Department.
Attn:
− As above
− RCEE Energy and Environment JSC.
− Company Office (copy)
JOINT STOCK COMPANY
Director
Dinh Xuan Hai Sang
page 52
page 53
JOINT STOCK COMPANY
-------------------------------No: 213/CV - CTCPSG
------------------------------
Nha Trang, July 17, 2006
Ref. CDM application for Song
Giang II Hydropower Project
To: Khanh Hoa People’s Committee
Song Giang Hydropower Joint Stock Company in co-operation with RCEE Energy and
Environment Joint Stock Company has developed CDM Project for Song Giang II Hydropower
Project.
We with pleasure submit the CDM project development study document for your
consideration. If the project document meets all of your environmental requirements in
accordance with the local development, we hope to get your Approval Document so that Song
Giang Hydropower Joint Stock Company can be able to carry out the next steps.
With best regards,
JOINT STOCK COMPANY
Attn:
Director
− As above
− Company Office (copy)
Dinh Xuan Hai Sang
page 54
page 55
KHÁNH HOÀ PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM
SERVICES OF RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
Independence – Freedom – Happiness
No. 662/TMMT
----------o0o---------
Nha Trang, May 10, 2005
CERTIFICATION
OF DOCUMENTATION REGISTERED FOR
MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
Sông Giang 2 Hydro-power Project
Khánh Trung commune, Khánh Vĩnh district, Khánh Hòa province
THE DIRECTOR
OF THE SERVICES OF RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
OF KHÁNH HÒA PROVINCE
CERTIFIES
Article 1:
Mr. Đinh Xuân Hải Sang, Vice-Director of Sông Giang Hydropower Joint-Stock Company
(Liaison address: 05 Nguyễn Chánh, Lộc Thọ, Nha Trang, Khánh Hoà), submitted a
documentation registering the meeting of environmental standdards on May 06, 2005. This is the
Sông Giang 2 Hydro-power Project at Khánh Trung commune, Khánh Vĩnh district,
Khánh Hoà province.
Article 2:
The Investor shall be responsible for carrying out correctly all the following contents and
requirements stated in the documentation registered for meeting environment standards:
Carrying out the plan for supervising the environmental quality of the whole project area
during construction and operation of the plant according to the contents in the Documentation
registered for meeting environmental standards.
Article 3:
The documentation registered for meeting environmental standards shall serve as basis for State
environmental protection agencies to double-check the Investor’s performance in environmental
protection.
Article 4:
In case of alterations or needed supplements of alternatives and equipment, the Investor must
report in writing to State environmental protection agencies for inspection.
page 56
p.p. SERVICES OF
RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT OF
KHÁNH HOÀ
Mai Đức Chính
Director
(signed and stamped)
c.c.
− Sông Giang Hydropower Joint-Stock Company
− Services of Planning and Investment
− Filing system
page 57
page 58
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM
Independence, Freedom, Happiness
MINUTES OF REFERING OPINION OF PEOPLE’ MEETING
(Attn: the influences on economy – society and environment
of Song Giang hydropower project No.2)
The meeting takes place on October 25, 2006 at Khanh Trung district, Khanh Vinh
commune, Khanh Hoa province, between representative of the Investor of Soâng Giang
Hydropower project No.2 and representative of Khanh Trung commune’s people, referring to the
socioeconomic and environmental influences of Soâng Giang hydropower works No.2 with
capacity of 30MW.
I.
Representative of Khanh Trung commune’s people and administration
1.
Mr. Cao Xuan Quang - President of commune
2.
Mr. Nguyan Ngọc Huong – Vice - president of commune
3.
Mr. Cao Ty Den – Secretary of commnue
4.
Mr. Cao Xuan Thuy – Deputy secretary of commune
II.
Sông Giang Hydropower Joint-Stock Company
1. Mr. Đinh Xuân Hải Sang – Director
2. Mr. Traàn Vaên Nghóa – Manager of Finance – Accounting Department
3. Ms. Traàn Thò Thanh Haûi – Manager of General Department
Mr. Đinh Xuân Hải Sang – representative of Investor – Sông Giang hydropower joint –
stock company stated at the meeting with feasible points and influences on economy – society
and environment of the project. After discussing and questioning, the meeting approved of the
proposal as follows:
1. Socioeconomic influences
a. Positive points
- As there are no residential areas in this project scope, the project has no influence to
residents. And there is no influence on potentiality of economic development in Khanh
Trung commune.
- The cultural life in Khanh Trung commune will be gradually improved, education quality
will be developed, hence intellectual standards of the people will also be improved.
- Creating jobs for people in area.
- Creating premise for building infrastructure. Industrialization and modernization will
become to shorten.
b. Limited points
Crowding around construction area and the long lasting execution time (about 3 years)
can lead to negative actions such as hunting the wild animals, stealing and social evils if there is
no good measure of management.
page 59
2. Environmental influences
a. Positive points
- There are influences on the climate in area. However, these are inconsiderable.
- After hoaring water, hydrogeological system of reservoir is stable, humidity in small area
is improved and stable. Botanical systems that like humidity will improve and creat
conditions for animals, birds living near the reservoir ( especially the species that like water).
- This project can make biology system near the reservoir gradually plentiful, creat the
good landscape for developing green tourism. This is appropriate to the direction of
developing tourist in Khaùnh Hoaø province .
b. Limited points
- When the works is constructed, there are waste water arising such as domestic waste water,
waste water drained from construction and cleaning machines…
- Water quality may have changed (based on the DO contain in water).
- There are influences of exhaust emmisions, smokes, dusts, noises in the period of
construction in project scope. However, these effects will just happen in the period of
construction.
3. Effects on the actual state of land utilization
This project will make 2.68 ha of forest land be sunk and the purpose of land
utilization be changed.
Conclusions:
1. All the reprentatives of Commune supported the policy of works
construction with the contents presented in the Report of the Investor.
2. Suggestion: the project should be quickly carried out and put into effect so
that the living standards of people will be soon improved.
On behalf of
Sông Giang Hydropower Joint-Stock Company
Director
Đinh Xuân Hải Sang
(sign and stamp)
On behalf of
Khanh Trung commune’s people
Vice president
Nguyễn Ngọc Hường
( sign and stamp)
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
Annex 6
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
No
Documents
1
Document No 6879/UBND dated 10/11/2006 from the People’s Committee of Khanh
Hoa Province sent to Department of International Cooperation - Ministry of Natural
Resources and Environment.
2
Request No.212/CV-CTCPSG dated 17/7/2006 from Song Giang Hydro Power Joint
Stock Company send to Department of International Cooperation - Ministry of Natural
Resources and Environment.
3
Document No 213/CV-CTCPSG dated 17/7/2006 from Song Giang Hydro Power Joint
Stock Company send to Khanh Hoa People Committee on CDM application for Song
Giang 2 hydro power project.
4
Document 662/ TNMT dated 10/5/2005 of Department of Natural Resources and
Environment - Khanh Hoa province confirmed on registration for environment
standard and satisfaction of Song Giang 2 hydro power project
5
Working minute with people committee – Stake holder comment.

Song Giang 2 Hydro Power Project CDM Project Design Document

Transcription

Similar documents

the kyoto protocol mechanisms - CDM

Look around you, it couLd save your Life

1.1MB

CDM for Local Governments : An innovative approach for

Experience with CDM Project Campaigns