PCDS Bulletin May 2007 - Primary Care Dermatology Society
Transcription
PCDS Bulletin May 2007 - Primary Care Dermatology Society
Forthcoming Meetings 18 June 2007 Essential Acute Dermatology for General Physicians & GPs RSM, London Contact: [email protected] 18 - 21 May 2007 British Association of Skin Camouflage - Training Day Contact: [email protected] COMMITTEE ELECTION AND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Just a reminder to those of you who haven’t already booked a place - the AGM is being held in Bristol on 9th and 10th June. It is also your opportunity to vote for a new committee or even perhaps stand for election. The Society needs new and fresh minds to take us forward and we therefore ask that you consider whether you could give the Society some of your valuable time and expertise for the coming years. Get your form back to Carol in the PCDS Secretariat office to be sure of a place. Stephen Kownacki Chairman PCDS 19 - 20 May 2007 PCDS Skin Surgery Meeting Durham Marriott Contact: [email protected] 4-7 July 2007 BAD Birmingham Contact: [email protected] 20 May 2007 Walk for Skin 2007 Southampton, Cardiff, Cheddar, Manchester, Windsor, London & Birmingham Contact: [email protected] or www.walkforskin.org.uk 31August – 3 September 2007 British Association of Skin Camouflage - Training Day Contact: [email protected] 28 September 2007 PCDS South & East Meeting King’s Fund, London Contact: [email protected] 9 June 2007 PCDS Dermoscopy Workshop Bristol Contact: [email protected] 9 - 10 June 2007 PCDS South & West and AGM Bristol Contact: [email protected] I probably shouldn’t mention it… but I don’t like the look of that mole” Cartoon by S J Russell – PRIVATE EYE issue 1173, p.18 29 September 2007 PCDS Basic Dermatology Day RCP, London Contact: [email protected] 2-3 November 2007 PCDS Skin Surgery Meeting Litchdon Medical Centre, Barnstaple Contact: [email protected] 10 - 11 November 2007 PCDS Scottish Meeting Carnoustie, near Dundee Contact: [email protected] PCDS Gable House, 40 High Street, Rickmansworth, Herts WD3 1ER T01923 711678 F 01923 778131 [email protected] www.pcds.org.uk Company 5254647 VAT 875 1544 06 MAY 07 Misdiagnosing the three common red scaly rashes STE P H E N HAYE S czema/dermatitis, psoriasis and tinea are easily diagnosed when present in ‘typical’ forms, but variants of these common rashes abound, foxing even the experts at times. This is a précis of a talk I gave recently in Southampton about diagnostic pointers and pitfalls from my practice. There is some statement of the obvious, no apology for this as first principles and awareness of common pitfalls can increase our diagnostic accuracy. E Listen to the patient, she is telling you the diagnosis Something I like about dermatology is that old fashioned medical knowledge and skill can often get us where we want to go without special tests. Beware the tendency to skip the history and go straight to the rash, hoping for a spot diagnosis. Wrong! It’s just as important to take a proper history first for skin as for chest or gut problems, if not more so. History - diagnostic pointers Atopic eczema is itchy, often starts in infancy, and may run in the family along with hay fever and asthma. Various forms of eczema (discoid, asteatotic, allergic and irritant) can occur at any age, but are always itchy. Contact dermatitis, whether allergic or irritant, is likely to come with a history, like the lady in my surgery recently whose facial dermatitis began when she applied a ‘hypoallergenic’ face cream’ (Fig 1). I was amazed to read it contained benzoate, acrylate, parabens, various plant extracts and plankton! I would call that hyperallergenic! Psoriasis is uncommon before puberty, may have a family history and usually doesn’t itch. Fungal infections can start at any age and often give a history of starting in one place and spreading out with a leading edge and central clearing. Look carefully - with a lens! Having taken a history you may view the rash. Where possible, have the patient strip to underwear for a clear view of the whole rash (and take a sneaky peek for hidden skin cancers on the back, especially in Continued on page 4 THIS ISSUE... Editorial page 3 Red scaly rashes page 4 Clinical Update Manchester 07 report page 6 Getting under the skin of Psoriasis page 8 FIG 1 North & Midlands report Liverpool 07 page 12 New DH guidance page 15 PCDS bursary page 15 E D ITO R IAL - STE P H E N HAYE S IN ACNE TREATMENT T he second last day of March was pleasantly warm in southern Hampshire and I planted out nine standard apple trees. These were rare old varieties (Cornish Gillyflower, Adam’s Pearmain, Court Pendu Plat etc).* I had grafted them on to large growing rootstocks several years Tetralysal 300 is proven as effective as Minocycline2 • Cost saving of 33%1 • Recommended over minocycline based on side effect profiles by European acne experts3 • Recommended for first line treatment of LYM/16/0307d acne by Prodigy4 PRESCRIBING INFORMATION Tetralysal 300 Presentation: Capsule containing lymecycline 408mg (equivalent to 300mg tetracycline base). Indications: Acne and treatment of infections caused by tetracycline-sensitive organisms. Dosage and administration: Adults – One capsule daily for at least 8 weeks for the treatment of acne. For other infections, usual dose is 1 capsule b.d. Not recommended for use in children. Contra-indications: Renal insufficiency. Hypersensitivity. Children under 12 years. Pregnancy and lactation. Warnings and precautions: Prolonged use of broad spectrum antibiotics may result in the appearance of resistant organisms and superinfection. Exercise care in hepatic impairment. Tetracyclines may rarely cause photosensitivity. May cause exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Can cause weak neuromuscular blockade so use with caution in Myasthenia Gravis. Interactions: The absorption of tetracyclines may be affected by the simultaneous administration of calcium, aluminium, magnesium, bismuth and zinc salts, antacids, bismuth containing ulcerhealing drugs, iron preparations and quinapril. These products should not be taken within two hours before or after taking Tetralysal 300. Absorption of Tetralysal 300 is not significantly impaired by moderate amounts of milk. Concomitant use of oral retinoids may increase the risk of benign intracranial hypertension. Tetracyclines may increase the effects of anticoagulants. Concomitant use of diuretics should be avoided. Concurrent use of tetracyclines and oral contraceptives has been associated with a few cases of pregnancy or breakthrough bleeding (not reported for Tetralysal 300). Undesirable effects: Rarely anaphylaxis & dysphagia. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea. A few cases of oesophagitis, oesophageal ulceration and pancreatitis Reducing the cost of effective acne treatment have been reported. Overgrowth of nonsusceptible organisms may cause candidiasis, pseudomembranous colitis (Clostridium difficile overgrowth), glossitis, stomatitis, vaginitis, or staphylococcal enterocolitis. Transient increases in liver function tests, hepatitis, jaundice and hepatic failure have been reported rarely. Bulging fontanelles in infants and benign intracranial hypertension in juveniles and adults have been reported. Presenting features were headache and visual disturbances including blurring of vision, scotomata and diplopia. Permanent visual loss has been reported. Skin rashes, photosensitivity, erythematous, and maculo-papular rashes, pruritis, bullous dermatoses, exfoliative dermatitis. Teeth discoloration – usually only obvious after repeated doses. MA Number: PL 10590/0019. Package quantities and cost: Available in packs of 28 capsules £7.16 and 56 capsules £14.26. Legal category: POM. Full prescribing information is available from: Galderma (UK) Ltd, Meridien House, 69-71 Clarendon Road, Watford WD17 1DS. Telephone: 01923 208950. Fax: 01923 208999. Date of revison: May 2006. References: 1. MIMS March 2007. 56 capsule packs. 2. Bossuyt L et al. Lymecycline in the treatment of acne: an efficacious, safe and cost-effective alternative to minocycline. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13:130-5. 3. Dreno B et al. European recommendations on the use of oral antibiotics for acne. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14: 391-9. 4. www.prodigy.nhs.uk Date of preparation: March 2007 ago, hoping to use them to plant community orchards. Of course, this ‘good idea’ never got off the ground as I was too busy, nobody was very interested and perhaps it wasn’t such a good idea anyway. The trees were overcrowded in their nursery and nearby fast growing poplars in our orchard shelter belt were blocking out the light. The trees had run out of time, and had to be planted out by the spring or dug up and destroyed. Ideally my wife would have helped me (as the great English apple expert Lawrence Hills wrote ‘it takes two to plant a tree, and they should take their time over it, for they cannot have anything more important to do with the time saved by haste’) but she was too busy redecorating the newly spare bedroom for an imminent guest, so I planted the trees alone. I planted them into a neglected, scrubby part of our smallholding. I should have cleared the land of nettles, couch grass and other weeds and ploughed it last winter, but never got round to it. I gave the trees a double handful of compost and a gallon of water each and hacked down some weeds. I would have sprayed weedkiller but it was too windy, I’ll try to find time later. And what, dear reader, does the above have to do with the PCDS and/or UK dermatology? It struck me as a parallel with the current rolling out of multiple untested reforms which are well intentioned but badly timed and causing potential conflicts of interest. Locally, reflecting the national scene, we have private sector involvement, practice based commissioning, the NICE skin cancer guidance, imminent new guidance for GPwSIs, ‘musical desks’ at the PCT as managers dance in circles to the tune of the mad pipers of Westminster, and doubts about secure funding and support of the all-important hospital dermatology team. Some of the ideas being implemented might on paper deliver improvements, given good care and good luck (which is what my trees need) but ‘ideally we wouldn’t be starting from here’. But as with my imperfectly planted apple trees, we ARE starting from here. We must use our hearts, brains and relationships to make the best of it for our patients. We’re GPs - that’s what we do! Your Society goes from strength to strength and is running more conferences in 2007 than any previous year. We aim to be, perhaps already are, the number one UK provider of dermatology education for GPs, and also to honestly represent our patients’ and our colleagues’ needs during times of sometimes chaotic and questionably managed change. Our membership has passed 850, I would like to see it pass 1,000 by our 2008 AGM. May I strongly encourage every member to come to one conference this year. These are excellent opportunities to meet like-minded colleagues and hear expert speakers on relevant subjects. Hope to see you at the AGM in Bristol in June. The society would like to acknowledge support from the following members of the corporate membership scheme. Kindest regards, Stephen Hayes Editor *www.fruitwise.net Consult the Summary of Product Characteristics before prescribing. Information about adverse event reporting can be found at www.yellowcard.gov.uk. Adverse events should also be reported to Galderma (UK) Ltd. 3 Misdiagnosing the thre e common red scaly rashes Continued from page 1 FIG 2 - ANKLE ECZEMA MISDIAGNOSED AS CELLULITIS FIG 3 - GRANULOMA ANNULARE MISDIAGNOSED AS FUNGAL FIG 4 - HAND FUNGUS FIG 5 - PSORIASIS MISDIAGNOSED AS FUNGUS FIG 6 - FLEXURAL PSORIASIS 4 sun damaged patients.) Vesicles are a useful sign of eczema, they may be tiny and are often missed unless looked for in a good light with a lens. Sterile pustules which fade to brown macules occur in palmo plantar psoriasis but clear fluid filled vesicles point strongly to eczema. Vesicles were visible in this very angry discoid type eczema, (Fig 2) which had failed to respond to 3 courses of oral antibiotics after being misdiagnosed as cellulitis. It cleared completely with a week of potent steroid. Excoriations are typical in eczema - they are caused by scratching. Lichenification, a thickening of the skin creases, is caused by chronic rubbing. Both are caused by the itch of severe eczema and are notably absent in psoriasis and fungus. If treatment has been applied, the redness, scale and vesicles may go but the lichenification will fade last. Annular lesions often lead to a ‘spot diagnosis’ of ringworm. Colleagues often send me ringworm that won’t respond to antifungal - usually because it’s granuloma annulare (GA) (Fig 3). I point out in my clinic letter that GA is a dermal process, so is never scaly, whereas tinea is epidermal, so produces scale. GA also doesn’t itch and tends to be indolent, while fungus often advances rapidly and itches. The illustrated case was referred after failing to respond to oral terbinafine. All that rings isn’t ringworm, and ringworm doesn’t always ring! Think about scale Always look for presence or absence of scale, note how much, how big, and how well organised. Hand fungus (Fig 4) often has very fine scale in the skin creases on a background of red, with no vesicles. This case was misdiagnosed and treated as eczema which made it worse - mycology grew trichophyton rubrum and the patient was quickly cured with oral terbinafine. This rash on the ankle (Fig 5) with large well organised scale on a deep red background was confirmed as psoriasis by my consultant mentor, who commented on how much foot psoriasis he saw misdiagnosed as fungus. It responded to calcipotriol after failed antifungal treatment. On reflection, I don’t know how I got this wrong - just goes to show how much we all need CME, audit, and our senior colleagues. Eczema scale is scanty as the fundamental eczematous process doesn’t produce much scale and it’s mostly scratched off due to the itch, whereas psoriasis produces superabundant scale which forms big flakes and sheets. Emollients may remove scale (a useful treatment) but it doesn’t get scratched off as in eczema and can be very thick. An important exception to the above is flexural psoriasis, which gets misdiagnosed a lot as it doesn’t look like psoriasis elsewhere. Flexural psoriasis occurs in axillae, groin, natal cleft, umbilicus and wherever opposing folds of skin touch, moisture collects and any scale tends to get rubbed off. There may be fine scale at the edge if you look carefully. I’m often asked ‘why isn’t this candidal intertrigo getting better with Nystatin?’ Answer - because it’s flexural psoriasis. Diagnostic pointers are a well defined edge, no pustules or satellite lesions, a history of psoriasis and psoriasis elsewhere. Again, the ‘undress the whole patient’ manoeuvre pays off when the rash is atypical at the presenting site but present in typical form elsewhere. (Fig 6) This patient with a flexural rash under an apron fold had umbilical psoriasis and subtle nail pitting which pointed to the diagnosis. She was better in a week of medium strength steroid after failure to respond to imidazole. Rashes in disguise Animal ringworm, as in this horse acquired case (Fig 7), can be so inflammed and pustular it is mistaken for staphylococcal infection. Ask about animal contact and take specimens for mycology as well as ordinary culture. Another common pitfall is putting steroid on a rash thinking it is eczema only for the patient to come back worse a week later because the rash was fungal. Steroid alters the immune response and the tinea goes wild - tinea incognito. The patient may be fooled as the steroid relieves the itch, but the rash spreads fast (Fig 8). This mistake is forgivable, but ALWAYS tell the patient to come back if they aren’t better soon. It can be easy to confuse scabies and eczema - classically, a child is given hydrocortisone for his ‘eczema’ and returns in 2 weeks - it’s worse and now his sister has it. Always think of scabies with new-onset ‘eczema’ in a child and - you guessed, undress the whole patient! Scrotal nodules and burrows between fingers or in the natal cleft may give the game away. Primum non nocere! As my old mate Hippocrates says, ‘first do no harm’. Oral antifungals are great drugs, but have a range of potential side effects and interactions. Fungus and psoriasis both affect nails, but so do other things. I saw a patient whose GP was perplexed that his fungal toenails hadn’t improved despite 6 months of itraconazole. Turned out he was a semi-professional footballer, careful examination showed ridged and tatty nails with subungual haematomas. The problem was repeated minor trauma due to kicking. It is wise to prove fungus mycologically before starting prolonged oral therapy it could be hard to defend prescribing an expensive and relatively toxic drug which had no prospect of doing the patient any good due to the wrong diagnosis (Fig 9). Why you can’t always win As my teacher Professor Eugene Healy (a very clever man) says “the genes for eczema and psoriasis are widely distributed and there’s nothing to say you can’t have both rashes in the same patient at the same time or different times”. They may even intereract. This patient (Fig 10) shows typical psoriasis (extensor surface, unscratched, clear border) and eczema (flexor surface, poorly defined edge, excoriated) present at once. This unilateral foot rash (Fig 11) was biopsied as I couldn’t decide between eczema and psoriasis. The histopathologist couldn’t tell either, giving ‘eczematous psoriasis’ (or was it psoriasiform dermatitis?). Don’t worry, it happens! Misdiagnosis is very easy in dermatology; I hope the above observations and tips may help colleagues avoid some of the more common pitfalls with these three common rashes which have so much clinical overlap. FIG 7 - HORSE RINGWORM FIG 8 TINEA INCOGNITO FIG 9 - FOOTBALLER’S TOENAILS FIG 10 - ECZEMA & PSORIASIS SAME PATIENT FIG 11 - PSORIASIFORM ECZEMA 5 CLINICAL UPDATE Meeting for non-consultant career grade doctors held at the SAS Radisson Manchester Airport on 8 - 9 March 2007 I attended this meeting sponsored by LEO Pharma in March. It was well attended with 134 delegates. The venue for the meeting at Manchester airport was easy to get to and delegates came in roughly equal numbers by plane, train and own transport. It was interesting to eat in a restaurant overlooking the runaway and watch planes arriving and leaving the gates. The meeting started at 11.00am on the Thursday which gave people time to travel that day. The entrance lobby was on the third floor, connected to the airport terminal by a futuristic corridor, while the meeting rooms were on the lower levels. Several delegates from Ireland and Scotland commented on the “smoke fug” in the entrance lobby emanating from the bar which was right beside the check in desks. Already in both these countries smoking in public places is banned. Roll on July 1st! The meeting was attended by a few PCDS members but the vast majority were Staff Grades, non GP Clinical Assistants and Associate Specialists. 6 The meeting opened with Dr Robin Graham Brown giving a review of paediatric dermatology with a lot of anecdotes from his own clinical experience - a big topic to try to cover. He mentioned that Malignant Melanoma occasionally occurs in children under the age of ten. He also said that in his experience Lichen Planus in children was relatively common and was often atypical. Dr Shernaz Walton from Hull gave a review of Drug Reactions. She described the different mechanisms which can cause a reaction, their clinical presentations and which drugs can cause what type of reaction. She reminded us that HIV causes a 100 fold increase in the frequency of drug reactions. After lunch Dr Chris Lovell gave an entertaining and very informative talk entitled “Something Lurking in the Compost Heap” on the hazards to the skin from plants. Common ivy (Hedera Helix) is felt to be an under reported cause of dermatitis. Tea tree oil has been linked to several different types of dermatitis including a bullous variety and there has been provocation of linear IgA disease. Dr Lovell recommended a CD produced jointly by Kew and Guys and St Thomas’ Hospital entitled Poisonous Plants and Fungi. Dr Jane Sansom from Bristol gave a very good summary on the causes, investigations and treatment of the red face as well as updating us on the patch testing fragrance batteries. After the tea break Dr Chris Dobson from Preston talked about Dermatopathology. He covered the problems of biopsying, the limitations of histology, sampling errors, the way skin lesions evolve and why an early biopsy is usually better, the variability of certain stains and what to do when there was a discrepancy between your original diagnosis and the pathology report. The day finished with Dr Ian Coulson talking about “Fat and other Fascinomas” - a neglected area of dermatology. He went through the different types of fat disorders in a logical and very helpful way. The evening meal was taken in the same room where the meeting had been held after being rapidly transformed by the hotel staff. There was no formal entertainment after the meal on this occasion and I recollected that last year we had been unexpectedly serenaded by the Three Waiters who had seemed to be ordinary waiters and who burst into opera after the meal. The Friday morning started with a discussion of the current political situation from Dr Julia Schofield entitled “Dermatology services: threats and opportunities”. She gave an excellent summing up of the unsettled state of dermatology at the present time. She was followed by the president of the Royal College of Physicians, Professor Next was Professor John McGrath Ian Gilmore, who spoke on “Liver Dysfunction, Drugs and the Skin”. He talked about the variety of enzyme systems which led to patients dealing with drugs differently. He highlighted the importance of taking a careful drug history, including over the counter drugs, when dealing with a suspected drug from St Johns, London talking on Genodermatoses. He explained the complex genetics of the commoner genoderamotoses. He spoke on a variety of other recent developments including prenatal diagnosis for severe inherited skin disease. He showed how the filaggrin reaction. Usually the culprit drug has been started in the previous 6 weeks. After the coffee break Dr Richard Parslaw from Liverpool talked about Leo’s mutations found in Ichthysosis Vulgaris has led to the revelation that filaggrin mutations are a major factor in the Psoriassist campaign and about prescribing in dermatology especially as regards the problems of topical treatments and how to overcome steroid phobia. Dr Paul Yesudian from Chester gave a very good summary of the treatments used in Sarcoidosis, including a list of unusual treatments which in some cases had been found to be beneficial. He said there has been no randomised control trials for this condition at all. After lunch Dr Diane Williamson, from development of Atopic Dermatitis. The meeting closed with a Question and Answer session on SAS and NCCG issues with Dr Sue Jackson and Dr Libby Stewart answering questions on contracts and the current negotiations which are taking place. This was a very comprehensive update meeting. Congratulations to the organising committee of Dr Sue Jackson, Dr North Wales gave a very comprehensive lecture on “Difficult Leg Ulcers”. She Glenda Hill and Dr Sue Welsh. Dr Elizabeth Ogden covered this cinderella topic very well, with many pointers as to diagnosis and treatment. Poisonous Plants and Fungi ISBN 190034792X 2nd edition 2002 7 Getting under the skin of… A PCDS Ireland Educational Meeting. Kindly sponsored by an educational grant from FOREST LABORATORIES, the makers of Exorex Radisson SAS Hotel, Athlone. Saturday 26 November 2006 Athlone, County Westmeath, and capital of the Midlands was the location for the twelfth meeting of the Irish branch of the Primary Care Dermatology Society. Athlone is situated on the Shannon, the longest river in the British Isles and the new Radisson Hotel on the riverside was the venue of choice for the meeting. It is built on the site of the old Athlone Woollen Mills, which was destroyed in a fire in the 1940s, and employed was Andrew McCormack, father of Athlone’s most famous son; the singer John McCormack. T he topic on this occasion was Psoriasis and things got off to an unusual start with a presentation by a patient. Brian Donnelly is originally from Co Tyrone but lives in Dublin and is a lecturer in English at University College Dublin. Brian’s psoriasis, which he describes as ‘the affliction of the well’ began when he was a young boy, initially presenting on his knees and elbows. He described how he felt ‘unclean’ and was preoccupied with self-image. However his GP, whom he likened affectionately to Dr Finlay of television fame, reassured him by scraping off some of Brian’s scales and placing them on his own tongue! (We commend this doctor’s empathy but cannot endorse the practice of tasting patient’s scales! Editor) Brian’s psoriasis became more severe when he reached his 30s and he began treatment at Hume Street Hospital, Dublin under the care of Dr Sarah Rogers who continues as his Consultant. Brian’s initial treatment was with topical applications, later moving to PUVA. However, on stopping this he developed erythroderma and required a week’s treatment as an in-patient. Brian then started on cyclosporin which he found very good until, after a number of years it stopped working. For the past four years he has been on infliximab, a ‘biological’ which is given as an intravenous infusion in a day ward once every eight weeks. He felt that his psoriasis had impacted only minimally on his life. Stephen Kownacki is a GP in the UK who has also worked for 20 years as a Clinical Assistant in Dermatology at Northampton 8 General Hospital and spoke on the Primary Care Management of Psoriasis. The condition characterised by epidermal hyperproliferation (every 10 days instead of 6 weeks) causing thickened red scaly patches, affects 2% of the population, the incidence peaking in the third decade. Early onset, (associated with HLA cw6) is more severe than later onset (no HLA association). In women it improves during pregnancy and tends to get worse at the menopause. The most common presentation is plaque psoriasis (90%) with sharply demarcated salmon-pink lesions with silvery scale affecting extensor surfaces, sacrum and scalp. Treatment is topical, including using emollients, calcipotriol/ betamethasone (Dovobet) and coal tar (Exorex). Flexural psoriasis is smooth, red, non scaling, in submammary, perineal and axillary areas. It is more common in the elderly and is well demarcated helping to distinguish it from candida and eczema. Treatment is again with emollients, clobetasone (Eumovate) and calcitriol (Silkis). The guttate variety (Latin: gutta a drop) tends to affect the young, involves trunk, upper arms and thighs and can be associated with a streptococcal infection. It often clears spontaneously but can be treated with 1% coal tar (Exorex). Recurrent attacks may warrant a tonsillectomy. Psoriasis may also be confined to the scalp; treatment is with Cocois to remove the scales (wash out with Fairy Liquid) and topical steroid +/calcipotriol. Psoriasis affecting the nails is difficult to treat though calcipotriol applied in the nail fold occasionally helps. Because of its visibility, psoriasis often affects patients more than other more serious though less visible conditions, such as heart disease. As ‘cure’ is not an option, Dr Kownacki emphasised matching treatment to individual patient Hume Street Hospital until its closure and now at St Vincent’s Hospital. In her talk, entitled ‘What’s New in Dermatology’, she spoke first about her recent move to a new department in St Vincent’s and about the changed economic climate which discouraged in-patient treatment (the Celtic Tiger notwithstanding) except in critical situations (erythroderma, widespread pustular psoriasis and unstable plaque psoriasis). requirements, citing the case of a lady who was concerned only by a small patch of disease on her upper sternum and not by extensive involvement of other less visible areas of her body. The second part of the meeting began with a talk by Dr Sarah Rogers, Consultant Dermatologist in Dublin, for many years at She went on to discuss the newer systemic agents beginning with methotrexate (MTX) which is administered weekly by the patient. It can cause marrow depression and hepatic fibrosis, this latter aggravated by alcohol consumption so regular monitoring is essential. Fumaric Acid Continued over page 9 $ISCOVERTHE PERSONBENEATH Continued from page 9 s#LINICALLYPROVENTREATMENT Esters (FAE) cause immunosuppression (monitor lymphocyte count) but are not affected by alcohol. Azothioprine causes hypertension and renal damage and is used mainly as a rescue drug. An important advantage of these treatments is that Psoriatic Arthropathy, occurring in up to 10% of FORPSORIASIS s%ASYFORPATIENTSTOAPPLY s$ILUTEFOROPTIMALTOLERABILITY s.OSTRONGODOUR 10 meeting would not have been possible, were on hand at registration and during coffee with informative displays. They also sponsored the excellent lunch which followed the meeting. Dr Ronan O’Sullivan, South Terrace Medical Centre, Cork, Ireland. Á "/" %X Infliximab has to be administered intravenously and can cause anaphylaxis. Etanercept is given weekly subcutataneously, does not cause anaphylaxis and can therefore be administered by the patient as can Adalimumab (fortnightly). All of these are also effective in the associated arthropathy. They are hugely expensive and, as with the earlier drugs, resistance can develop; though this can be delayed by the concomitant use of MTX. They can also reactivate dormant TB necessitating pre-treatment screening. !LOGICALFIRSTLINE TREATMENT FORPSORIASIS Cases of SLE have been found in association with Infliximab and there is a theoretical risk of lymphoma with these drugs. The final speaker was Dr Johnny Loughnane, a GP from West Limerick with a special interest in Dermatology. He presented a series of case studies, inviting the delegates to choose from a list of differential diagnoses including Bowen’s disease, seborrhoeac dermatitis, Lichen (simplex and planus), pityriasis (rosea and versicolor) and fungal infection. This lively presentation, which included a discussion of problem cases, brought proceedings to a close. The meeting was chaired by Dr Hilda O’Shea, secretary of PCDS Ireland. Representatives from the main sponsors FOREST LABORATORIES and co-sponsors 3M Healthcare, LEO Pharma and SCHWARZ PHARMA without whose generous help the WW#UTANEOUS%MULSION 0REPARED#OAL4AR P S L RESTOR E H X EPSO E R RIATICSKIN O 2EFERENCES 'OODFIELD - ET AL * $ERMATOLOG 4REAT 4ZANEVA 3 ET AL "R*$ERMATOL %XOREX ,OTION WW #UTANEOUS %MULSION 0RESCRIBING )NFORMATION 0LEASE REFER TO 3UMMARY OF 0RODUCT #HARACTERISTICS BEFORE PRESCRIBING 0RESENTATION #UTANEOUS EMULSIONCONTAININGPREPAREDCOALTARWWINANEMOLLIENTBASECONTAININGACOMPLEXOF ESTERIlEDESSENTIALFATTYACIDS5SES4REATMENTOFPSORIASISOFTHESKINANDSCALP$OSAGEAND !DMINISTRATION!PPLYTWOORTHREETIMESDAILYTOAFFECTEDAREASASATHINLAYER-ASSAGEGENTLY ANDLEAVETODRY-AYBEDILUTEDWITHWATERFORUSEINCHILDRENUNDERYEARSANDTHEELDERLY #ONTRAINDICATIONS3ENSITIVITYTOCOALTARORANYOFTHEINGREDIENTS0RESENCEOFFOLLICULITISAND ACNEVULGARIS0HOTOSENSITIVECONDITIONS)NmAMEDORBROKENSKIN7ARNINGSAND0RECAUTIONS $ISCONTINUEUSEIFIRRITATIONOCCURS!VOIDEXPOSURETODIRECTSUNLIGHTAFTERAPPLICATION!PPLYWITH CAUTIONTOFACEANDUSEWITHCARENEAREYESANDMUCOUSMEMBRANES$ONOTAPPLYTOGENITALOR RECTALAREAS5SEWITHCAREINPREGNANCYANDLACTATIONAVOIDDURINGlRSTTRIMESTER3IDE%FFECTS 3KINIRRITATIONACNELIKEERUPTIONSANDPHOTOSENSITIVITYMAYOCCUR!NYPOSSIBLEINCREASEDRISK OF SKIN CANCER ASSOCIATED WITH COAL TAR PRODUCTS IS UNPROVEN BUT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ,EGAL #ATEGORY '3, "ASIC .(3 #OST AND 0ACKAGING 1UANTITIES ML a ML a -ARKETING!UTHORISATION(OLDERAND.UMBER&OREST4OSARA,TD"ALDOYLE)NDUSTRIAL%STATE 'RANGE2OAD$UBLIN)RELAND0,$ATEOF0REPARATION*ULY&ORFURTHER INFORMATIONORTOREQUESTACOPYOFTHE3UMMARYOF0RODUCT#HARACTERISTICS30#PLEASE CONTACT&OREST,ABORATORIES5+,TD"EXLEY+ENT$!.85+4EL )NFORMATIONABOUTADVERSEEVENTREPORTINGCANBEFOUNDAT WWWYELLOWCARDGOVUK!DVERSEEVENTSSHOULDALSOBEREPORTEDTO&OREST ,ABORATORIES5+,TD4EL %%8/$ECEMBER7"2 cases is also benefited; however, efficacy wanes with time as resistance develops. The most recent development has been the introduction of the biologicals which are manufactured using recombinant technology. PCDS North & Midlands Meeting Friday 2 March 2007 Crowne Plaza Hotel, Liverpool Liverpool T he meteorologists tell us that Spring begins on the 1st of March. So, on a beautiful Spring day, the PCDS gathered on the banks of the Mersey for an excellent day’s meeting. However, all was not immediately well. Liverpool, currently a building site in preparation for becoming European City of Culture in 2008, has a prolonged rush hour that meant several delegates arrived rather later and more flustered than they had hoped to. 12 It is hoped that not too many missed the opening act - Dr Mark Goodfield presenting a thought-provoking study on the issue of compliance in dermatology prescribing. We all know that compliance can be patchy, but an overall figure of around 69% of patients actually adhering to their regime shows the scale of the problem. The real eye-opener, however, is that there is a negative correlation between compliance and disease severity. We have a lot of work to do to change these figures for the better. Dr Nick Craven then gave a presentation based on his experiences of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and StevensJohnson Syndrome. Whilst many of us are unlikely to have to deal with such a devastating condition - knowing that there is someone who has the experience and the enthusiasm to help in such an eventuality is actually rather reassuring! The morning workshops were an interesting mix - more than one delegate was torn between the topics on offer. Dr Christy Chou’s basic skin surgery course was well received and Dr Goodfield popped up again to discuss difficult psoriasis. I attended Dr Leslie Millard’s workshop on Body Dysmorphic Disorder. I think we all see cases of this and this presentation helped me, at least, to feel slightly less at sea when thinking about the issues concerned. It would make an interesting full presentation at a future meeting. Immediately before lunch is not the ideal slot to present, but Dr Colm O’Mahony provided both a tour de force and many delegates highlight of the conference. His talk, on HIV and the skin, was, in turn, erudite, amusing, educational, entertaining and inspiring. Both HIV and syphilis are easily detected and, if caught early, are eminently treatable (curable in the case of syphilis). We have to get over the old reticence about testing for these diseases - after all, we routinely test for far worse conditions without the recourse of extensive pre-test counselling. Lunch provided an opportunity for gossip, perusing the pharmaceutical stands and a bracing stroll on the banks of the Mersey. I must say, I took the last option and acquainted myself with the ‘Three Graces’ - the buildings that line the Liverpool Pier Head. Suitably fed, watered and refreshed the afternoon session kicked off with Dr Niamh Leonard’s presentation on ‘Making sense of histology reports’. In recent years, reports have become longer and longer. I’m sure I am not alone in finding them increasingly impenetrable. Dr Leonard helped to make sense of the changes and also showed the importance of the information provided. We, for our part, need to provide as much information as possible to help our pathology colleagues out. Like so many things in life, what you get out of a report depends on what you put into the request form. Next was the turn of Dr Anne Field who managed to demystify the oral cavity her ‘Suspicious Oral Lesions’ was concise and clear. The sections on pre-malignant lesions and oral manifestations of systemic disease were particularly illuminating. Into the final straight - the second round of workshops brought a Dr Chou masterclass for the nimble fingered surgeons wanting to extend their skills. Dr Tom Poyner ran through current thinking on acne treatments and Dr Liz Ogden made everyone itch with a workshop on infestations and infections - I’ll treat my fish tank with more respect in future now I know all about fish tank granuloma… The imminent Friday evening rush hour caused the audience to noticeably thin for the last presentation of the day - this was a shame because Dr Sue MacDonald Hull gave an excellent talk on hair and scalp problems - never an easy thing to condense into 45 minutes and it is to her credit that not only did she keep to time, but also covered an awful lot of ground. I, for one, will look into the treatment of alopecia a little more deeply in future. Many thanks to Dr Ogden for arranging the course, to Carol and Siobhan at PCDS headquarters for their organisational skills and to Dr Jane Rakowski for being an excellent chairperson. All in all, an excellent day’s education - the traffic wasn’t too bad on the way home either! Julian Peace 13 Launch of new DH guidance on 26 April I mplementing care closer to home - convenient quality care for patients Parts 1-3 and National Guidelines for the accreditation of GPwSIs: In Part 3 commissioners are reminded of the definition of the GP or PhwSI which emphasises the core generalist role of the GP or pharmacist, their ability to provide a service beyond the scope of the core role and the requirement to have demonstrated appropriate skills and competencies to deliver services without direct supervision. The document then outlines the steps required to accredit a GP and PhwSI service with detailed information about the accreditation panel and the process of accreditation. At the same time, new guidance for the accreditation of GPwSIs in dermatology will be launched (National Guidelines for the accreditation of GPwSIs: Dermatology and skin surgery). This replaces the 2003 guidance and is the first of the speciality specific frameworks to be refreshed. This guidance has been developed in parallel with Implementing care closer to home - convenient quality care for patients Parts 1-3 and together the frameworks should ensure quality care for patients with skin disease and those requiring skin surgery. The link to this is: http://www.pcc.nhs.uk/uploads/pwsis/gpwsis_dermatology.pdf It is not clear yet whether the accreditation process will be mandatory but it does seem likely. In response to a recent parliamentary question Rosie Winterton responded ‘The Department is currently considering options to mandate primary care trust compliance with the guidelines.’ Clinicians and commissioners should make themselves familiar with this suite of documents so that patients can be reassured that, whoever the clinician and whatever the location of the service, quality care is provided by competent accredited clinicians. Julia Schofield, Consultant Dermatologist (member of DH PwSI Steering Group) ENBREL– FOR MODERATE TO SEVERE PLAQUE PSORIASIS 7 0 . 4 0 . 6 2 Dermatology and skin surgery The 26 April saw the launch, by the Department of Health, of new commissioning guidance for Primary Care Trusts (Implementing care closer to home - convenient quality care for patients Parts 1- 3 http://www.pcc.nhs.uk/173.php) which seeks to set standards for high quality patient care wherever the service is delivered. The general public involved in the consultation process prior to the publication of the 2006 White Paper (Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: a New Direction for Community Services) made clear that whilst ‘Care Closer to Home’ was a good idea, it must not be delivered at the expense of quality of care. The Department of Health has responded to this by publishing this new suite of documents which includes details of accreditation processes for Practitioners with a Special Interests(PwSIs). Part 1 reminds commissioners that quality care close to home can be provided by a whole range of health care professionals provided that they demonstrate the correct competencies and sit within tight clinical governance frameworks. This includes Hospital Consultants, Non Consultant Care Grade (NCCG) doctors, GPs and Pharmacists with a Special Interest, Specialist nurses, Health care Scientists and other health care professionals. Part 2 summarises the commissioning cycle in the context of assessing needs, reviewing current service provision, deciding priorities, designing services, shaping the structure of the supply, managing the demand and ensuring appropriate access to care, clinical decision making and managing performance. Patient and public involvement in service development is emphasised as is patient and public feedback once the service is in place. Bursary The committee has agreed to make a further limited sum available on a discretionary basis to help more PCDS members to access dermatology education they would not otherwise be able to receive. The bursary, or bursaries, will be used to attend courses, diplomas or other legitimate dermatological training/education activity which can be expected to benefit skin patients in the community. Applicants should in the first instance write to Carol Singleton at the PCDS Secretariat, Gable House, 40 High Street, Rickmansworth, Herts WD3 1ER and include in no more than 500 words what activity they wish to pursue, how much they wish to apply for, how this will benefit patient care and why they wish the PCDS to assist them. All replies will be treated in the strictest confidence. 15 Enbrel is now recommended by NICE for the treatment of adults with severe plaque psoriasis who meet NICE guidance criteria1 HELPING YOU TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE www.wyeth.co.uk Full NICE guidance, ‘Etanercept and Efalizumab for the treatment of adults with psoriasis’ is available from www.nice.org.uk ABBREVIATED PRESCRIBING INFORMATION. Before prescribing Enbrel® please refer to full Summary of Product Characteristics. Presentation: Enbrel Pre-filled Syringe: Enbrel 25 mg or 50 mg solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. Each pre-filled syringe contains either 25 mg or 50 mg etanercept. Enbrel Powder: Enbrel 25 mg and 50 mg powder and solvent for solution for injection. Each vial contains either 25 mg or 50 mg etanercept and each pre-filled syringe contains 1 ml water for injections. Enbrel Paediatric: Enbrel 25 mg/ml powder and solvent for solution for injection for paediatric use. Each vial contains 25 mg etanercept and each pre-filled syringe contains 1 ml bacteriostatic water for injections. Uses: Adults: Moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in combination with methotrexate, when response to DMARDS, including methotrexate (unless contraindicated), has been inadequate. Enbrel can be given as monotherapy in the case of intolerance to methotrexate or when continued treatment with methotrexate is inappropriate. Severe, active and progressive RA without prior methotrexate treatment. Enbrel alone or with methotrexate has been shown to reduce the rate of progression of joint damage measured by X-ray and to improve physical function. Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PP) who failed to respond to, or who have a contraindication to, or are intolerant to other systemic therapy including cyclosporine, methotrexate or PUVA. Active and progressive psoriatic arthritis (PsA) when response to DMARDS has been inadequate. Enbrel has been shown to improve physical function in PsA patients, and to reduce the progression rate of peripheral joint damage as measured by X-ray in patients with polyarticular symmetrical subtypes of PsA. Severe active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) when response to conventional therapy has been inadequate. Children aged 4-17 years (25 mg only): Active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) when inadequate response to, or intolerant of methotrexate. Dosage: By subcutaneous injection. Adults: RA – 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly. PP - 25 mg twice weekly for up to 24 weeks, or 50 mg twice weekly for up to 12 weeks followed by 25 mg twice weekly for a further 12 weeks if needed. Discontinue if no response after 12 weeks. For re-treatment: 25 mg twice weekly for up to 24 weeks. AS and PsA – 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly. Children aged 417 years: JIA in children aged 4-17 years – 0.4 mg/kg (maximum dose 25 mg) twice weekly with an interval of 3 – 4 days. Contra-indications: Hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients, sepsis or risk of sepsis, active infections. Enbrel Paediatric: Must not be given to premature babies or neonates as the bacteriostatic water for injections contains benzyl alcohol. Warnings and Precautions: Enbrel should be initiated and supervised by specialist physicians experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of RA, PsA, AS or PP. Use carefully in patients predisposed to, or with history of, infection due to underlying diseases other than RA (e.g. advanced or poorly controlled diabetes) or with history of blood dyscrasias, pre-existing or predisposition to CNS demyelinating disease or congestive heart failure. Concurrent administration of Enbrel and anakinra has been associated with increased risk of serious infections and neutropenia, and is therefore not recommended. Whether treatment with Enbrel might influence the development and course of malignancies and active and/or chronic infections is unknown, however with current knowledge, a possible risk for the development of lymphomas or other malignancies in patients treated with a TNF-antagonist cannot be excluded. Enbrel has not been studied in combination with other systemic therapies or phototherapy for the treatment of psoriasis. Monitor closely if patient develops new infection during treatment. Discontinue treatment if serious infection or allergic reaction develops or if blood dyscrasias are confirmed. Discontinue temporarily if significantly exposed to varicella virus. Live vaccines should not be given concurrently with Enbrel. Treatment with Enbrel may result in the formation of autoantibodies. Enbrel is not recommended for the treatment of Wegener’s granulomatosis. JIA patients (indication approved for Enbrel 25 mg strength only) should have received all vaccines recommended in current immunization guidelines prior to starting Enbrel. Enbrel Paediatric: Contains benzyl alcohol as an excipient, which may cause toxic reactions and anaphylactic reactions in infants and children up to 3 years old. Pregnancy & Lactation: Enbrel is not recommended in pregnant or breast-feeding women. Undesirable Effects: Adults: Very common side effects reported with clinical trial and post marketing experience include infections and injection site reactions. Common adverse events were allergic reactions, pruritus, autoantibody formation and fever. Uncommon side effects have included serious infections, thrombocytopenia, angioedema, urticaria and rash. Rare reports of lupus-like syndrome, CNS demyelinating events, seizures, serious allergic reactions, elevated liver enzymes, cutaneous vasculitis, anaemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, pancytopenia and tuberculosis. Aplastic anaemia has been reported very rarely. In clinical trials serious adverse events occurred with a frequency similar to placebo and methotrexate. These included: serious infections, malignancies, asthma, heart failure, MI and ischaemia, chest pain, syncope, cerebral ischaemia, hyper- and hypotension, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, GI haemorrhage, bursitis, confusion, depression, dyspnoea, abnormal healing, renal insufficiency, kidney calculus, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), membranous glomerulonephropathy, polymyositis, thrombophlebitis, liver damage, leucopenia, paresis, paresthesia, vertigo, allergic alveolitis, angioedema, scleritis, bone fracture, lymphadenopathy, ulcerative colitis, intestinal obstruction, eosinophilia, haematuria and sarcoidosis. Rate of new malignancies was similar to that expected for the population studied. Fatalities associated with serious infections, pancytopenia, and aplastic anaemia have also been reported. Paediatrics (25 mg only): Generally as for adults, except the following were more common: headaches, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In addition the following were reported as severe events: varicella, appendicitis, gastroenteritis, depression/personality disorder, cutaneous ulcer, oesophagitis/gastritis, group A streptococcal septic shock, type I diabetes mellitus and soft tissue and post operative wound infection. Legal Category: POM. Package Quantities: Enbrel Pre-filled Syringe: Each carton contains 4 pre-filled syringes containing either 25 mg or 50 mg of Enbrel and 8 alcohol swabs. Enbrel Powder: Each carton contains either 4 vials of Enbrel 25mg powder or 4 vials of Enbrel 50mg powder, 4 pre-filled syringes of water for injections, 4 needles, 4 vial adaptors and 8 alcohol swabs. Enbrel Paediatric: Each carton contains 4 vials of Enbrel 25 mg powder. 4 pre-filled syringes of bacteriostatic water for injections, 8 empty plastic syringes, 20 needles and 24 alcohol swabs. Basic NHS Cost: 25 mg (all presentations): £357.50 per carton. 50 mg (all presentations): £715 per carton. European Marketing Authorisation Number: Enbrel Pre-filled Syringe 25 mg: EU/1/00/126/013. Enbrel Pre-filled Syringe 50 mg: EU/1/99/126/017. Enbrel Powder 25 mg: EU/1/99/126/003. Enbrel Powder 50 mg: EU/1/99/126/010. Enbrel Paediatric 25 mg: EU/1/99/126/012. For full prescribing information and details of other side effects see Summary of Product Characteristics. Full prescribing information is available on request from: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Huntercombe Lane South, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 0PH. Telephone: 01628 415330. Date of Prescribing Information: 24 Jan 07. Code no. ZAPI049. Doc ID 42874. Information about adverse event reporting can be found at www.yellowcard.gov.uk. Adverse events should also be reported to Wyeth on 01628 415330. 1. NICE technology appraisal No. 103, July 2006. Date of Preparation: February 2007. ZENB1330/0207