Slides here - VTT Virtual project pages
Transcription
Slides here - VTT Virtual project pages
Learning by content creation Seija Ristimäki Pentti Viluksela Taru Koivulehto Topics • EVTEK University of Applied Sciences • Changes in learning environment and theoretical background • Projects in learning in EVTEK • Learning material creation as a student project – Case studies • Experiences from teacher´s and student´s point of view EVTEK UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES • EVTEK Institute of Technology • EVTEK School of Business and Administration • EVTEK Institute of Art and Design EVTEK Institute of Technology • 10 B.Sc. programmes in Finnish • 2 B.Sc. programmes in English • campuses in Vantaa and Espoo Degree Program in Media Technology • Two specialization areas – Graphic Media – Digital Media • 80 new students yearly • Adult education • Strong role of eLearning – educational applications, projects – student participation Changes in learning environment and theoretical background Changes in learning environment • Revolution of information • Complexity of the forthcoming problems • Solving of complex problems presumes adoption and understanding of huge amount of information for the learner especially in knowledge–rich areas • New requirements of the working life – E.g innovation, social skills,project working skills • New learning theories and models of human cognitive processes – Knowledge is not just remembering things • Requirements from the authorities – The law of The Universities of Applied Sciences in Finland presumes close collaboration with industry and working life Comment of a scientist • “Today´s educational systems are not flexible enough to solve the problems in working life tomorrow” • New approach is needed Learning theories • Modern understanding of learning tends to emphasize the active role of the learner – Constructivism – Collaborative learning – Problem-based learning – Project-based learning Learning by developing, LbD • Learning by doing real projects • Application of theory to practical problems • Intellectual research process • Problem solving • Developing of high level intellectual and practical skills • Collaborative learning, team working • Critical evaluation of the information • Less traditional class room teaching more practical problem solving,examination product development • Sharing of expertise Aims of LbD • Learning of: – the content, the subject area – social working, team working – search of information – problem solving – project work – critical information assessment – self assessment – self-direction Learning by teaching, LdL • Lernen durch Lehren (LdL) • Concept was developed by Jean-Pol Martin in the early eighties • Students to prepare and teach lessons or parts of lessons • Students do not only convey a certain content, but choose their own methodological and didactical approach http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_by_teaching Advantages in LdL • In university level research and teaching can be combined efficiently • Students work on the material more intensively and are more active • Next to subject-related knowledge students gain important key qualifications like – working in teams – planning abilities – reliability – presentation and moderation skills – self-confidence Disadvantages in LdL • The introduction of the method requires a lot of time. • Students and teachers have to work more than usual. • The danger of monotony if the teacher does not give didactic impulses. Monological, dialogical and trialogical learning metaphors • Monological – Knowledge acquisition metaphor of learning – “know that” conceptual knowledge emphasized – Knowledge and skills of individuals • Dialogical – Participation metaphor of learning – Interactive approach – Participation in a social community emphasized – “know how” – cognition – Collective work practices Source: Häkkinen Kai & al; KP-Lab project rationale, 2005 Trialogical learning • Knowledge creation metaphor of learning • Collaborative , systematic developing of new products and practices • Creative “scientific” approach • Discovery and innovation perspectives • “Know why and what for” • Individuals and organizations interact Source: Häkkinen Kai & al; KP-Lab project rationale, 2005 EVTEK approach Pedagogical strategy in EVTEK Media Technology • Diversified pedagogical solutions • Significant role of network based learning • Linking of research and development to teaching • Pedagogical solutions promote entrepreneurship Projects in the programs • Integrating project courses in the curriculum • Project based learning inside the course modules • A special Project method course in some programs • Some programs have no project courses Project types • ”Toy projects”, no real customer • Internal EVTEK projects • ”Free” customer projects • Semi-commercial customer projects • Commercial customer projects • Learning in working life -projects Customer projects • Real customer projects are a systematic part of learning • Motivation: real customer, real money • A path to entrepreneurship Why commercial customer projects? • Real customer is a motivation factor for students • Commitment of the customer, when paying • The student appreciates his/her work • Developing entrepreneur attitude • Company contacts for the teacher • Challenge in life ;-) • Extra money for students and school • Best marketing of EVTEK Learning by content creation Case studies PrintSim • Commet supported project of EGIN ( European Graphic Industries Competence Network) in 1992-1994. • digital multimedia learning material was developed to support learning with print simulator developed in the project by VTT In the beginning • The student´s knowledge of the subject area was minimal • The digital publishing platform was new both for the teachers and students • All the students did not know each other • The working concept was new for everybody • The aim was to develop a commercial multimedia product In the end • four CDs were published • The CDs were sold worldwide and they came into active use in many institutions ww / / p: htt w t .v t .f m/ i s int r p e/ t t / i Post Press Sim • EU-funded project • Multimedia learning material was developed about print finishing operations as a student project • Students as content creators and technical producers of the multimedia product The students learned • the facts and theories of the subject areas they were dealing with • applying technical tools and use of information technology which was very new for the students in the beginning • real project working in international environment • working in teams combing different kind of skills ( content writing, information technology, visual design) • language skill ( the final material was published in English) • solving unexpected problems • basics of pedagogical issues • enduring frustrations and occurred helpless feeling • a pilot project in the Leonardo da Vinci II program (EU) carried out between December 2000 and December 2003. • The aim of the project was to build a web-based system that supports the creation, management, updating and use of different types of training material, and to produce training material on digital printing http://www.vtt.fi/tte/customdp/ • Developing an eLearning content community that creates and shares eLearning content dealing with graphic and media communication technology • Student participated as content creators SELEAC team of EVTEK Taru Koivulehto Pentti Viluksela Chief editor, Materials Krista Timonen Content creator, Finishing Content creator and technical coordinator Vesa Heikkinen Content creator, Paper Seija Ristimäki Chief editor, Finishing Mari Ali-Raatikainen Content creator, Inks Learning results – Searching of information – Content itself ( subject areas in digital printing) – XML authoring – Writing – Visualization – English language – Peer review – Pedagogical aspects – Collaboration and working in international project Experiences Teacher´s point of view • Students are in general good – in searching information – in writing what they have learned – in visualization (e.g. making animations) – in managing the technical tools – i.e technical matters in general • Tutoring and mentoring is needed in conceptual things as – Pedagogy – Planning – Keeping the timetables Problems • How to support poor students ? • How to get the students committed to the timetables and quality requirements? • How to go over frustrations? • Salary matters in commercial customer projects • Writing and content creation is not the top favorite topic among industrial projects; motivation Student point of view • Traditional teaching vs. content creation lectures and theory not digested, forgotten quickly creation demands digesting information, easier to remember information structures and information is more relations can be fragmented structured and easier to relate to old/new information tasks are often finished without really trying, “copy/paste” creating content yourself can bring out the best in you, merely copying is not possible lack of motivation content creation of interesting topics motivates! Student point of view • students creating content should have: – initiative – linguistic abilities – be interested in learning – ability to piece together information – ability to sum up information! – ability to visually represent structures Student point of view • critic of content creation: – can feel tiresome compared to traditional methods – motivation problems – content quality suffers, if importance of structure and processing information not understood and maintained – requires verbal abilities --> not suitable to everyone – finding relevant, new and reliable information sources can take a lot of effort and frustrate students even before properly beginning Student point of view • What motivates students? – money – interesting subjects – opportunity to practice desired skills (animation, graphic design, image manipulation, www-design, software) – getting references for CV – hope of getting a job – getting good grades and credit units Student point of view • What did I learn? – new information – more thorough understanding of previous studies – project management – content management – verbal expression – utilization of xml – independent work Further thoughts Thank you. www.evtek.fi