the occurrence of the Indo-Pacific bannerfish Heniochus acuminatus
Transcription
the occurrence of the Indo-Pacific bannerfish Heniochus acuminatus
Bull Mar Sci. 90(2):741–744. 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2013.1046 note Far away from home: the occurrence of the Heniochus acuminatus Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Sydney, Australia. 1 Instituto Laje Viva, Santos, SP, Brazil. Osmar J Luiz 1,2 * Eric J Comin 2 Joshua S Madin 1 2 Corresponding author email: <[email protected]>. * Date Submitted: 29 May, 2013. Date Accepted: 18 July, 2013. Available Online: 3 September, 2013. ABSTRACT.—The occurrence of the Indo-Pacific reef fish Heniochus acuminatus (Linnaeus, 1758) is confirmed for the southwestern Atlantic. A single adult individual was photographed in a marine reserve off the southeastern coast of Brazil. Two hypotheses explaining the species occurrence are discussed: an aquarium release on the Brazilian coast, and a long-distance dispersal from the Indian Ocean into the Atlantic via South Africa. Species invasion is a natural process that ultimately shapes the distribution of life on earth (Elton 1958). Nevertheless, two emblematic cases of unnatural, human-assisted reef fish invasions, the lionfish in the northwest Atlantic (Albins and Hixon 2008) and the Lessepian fishes in the Mediterranean Sea (Belmaker et al. 2013), have raised many questions about the detection of species outside their natural ranges and their ecological impacts. Here we provide the first photographic evidence of the longfin bannerfish, Heniochus acuminatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Perciformes: Chaetodontidae), in the Atlantic Ocean, which was recorded in the Laje de Santos Marine Park, a marine protected area located 36 km off the southeast coast of Brazil (Fig. 1). Heniochus acuminatus is native to the Indo-Pacific region, where it is widespread and ranges broadly into subtropical and warm temperate zones (Kuiter 2002). A single adult individual of approximately 20 cm total length was repeatedly observed and photographed over several days at a depth of about 15 m at the same reef area. The local setting is a transitional tropical-subtropical environment (Perry and Larcombe 2003), where the reef habitat consists of granitic boulders covered by patches of brown and red algae and a varied assemblage of sessile invertebrates, including sparsely spaced colonies of the scleractinian corals Madracis decactis (Lyman, 1859) and Mussismilia hispida (Verrill, 1902). This photographic record validates a poorly-documented sighting of H. acuminatus made approximately 500 km northeast of our study site (Moura 2000). Over the last decade, several Indo-Pacific reef fish species have been found along the coast of Florida (USA), presumably as a consequence of aquarium releases (Schofield et al. 2009). Despite the presence of three other Heniochus species in Florida, H. acuminatus remains unrecorded in the northwest Atlantic. It is Bulletin of Marine Science © 2014 Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science of the University of Miami 741 742 Bulletin of Marine Science. Vol 90, No 2. 2014 Figure 1. An adult individual of the Indo-Pacific bannerfish Heniochus acuminatus (approximately 20 cm TL) recorded in February 2013 in the Laje de Santos Marine Park, southeast Brazil and southwest Atlantic Ocean (24 15´S, 46 10´W). therefore unlikely that the individual found in Brazil results from secondary dispersal from an established invasive population in the Atlantic. Two other mechanisms explaining the species presence are possible: (1) an aquarium release on the Brazilian coast, which is plausible given the popularity of this species in the aquarium trade worldwide, or (2) a long-distance dispersal of larval and/or postlarval stage individuals from the Indian Ocean into the Atlantic via South Africa. Brazil is one of the five leading tropical aquarium fish exporters in the world (Gasparini et al. 2005). The availability of native aquarium species means that aquarium imports are uncommon, although imports do occur to supply specialized aquarium shops in major Brazilian cities. The observation of a single H. acuminatus adult, the lack of juveniles, and the proximity (approximately 150 km) of the Laje de Santos Marine Park to São Paulo, the largest city in Brazil, provides compelling evidence for the aquarium release hypothesis. However, this does not invalidate the dispersal hypothesis. Previous records of non-native aquarium vagrants on the Brazilian coast are non-existent, which suggests that cheaper and readily available native species are more popular than imported species. On the other hand, recent transoceanic occurrences of vagrant adults of species that are not associated with the aquarium trade have been detected in the southwest Atlantic (Luiz et al. 2004, Leite et al. 2009), suggesting that shore fishes do occasionally breach the barrier imposed by the mid-Atlantic oceanic expanse (Luiz et al. 2012). Heniochus acuminatus is very common in the southwest Indian Ocean and recorded far south off the east coast of South Africa, where it is found in great numbers (Heemstra and Heemstra 2004). Exchanges of tropical marine organisms between the Indian and Atlantic oceans around the tip of South Africa were Note 743 tightly constrained following the establishment of the Benguela upwelling system (about 2 Ma), which forms a cold-water barrier along the Atlantic coast of southern Africa (Rocha et al. 2005). However, dispersal of reef fishes from the Indian Ocean into the Atlantic has occurred, likely during warm interglacial periods (Rocha et al. 2005, Bowen et al. 2006). Planktonic larvae may be transported westward in warm gyres that bud off from the Agulhas Current and become entrained in the northward-moving Benguela Current. These fast-moving gyres are long lived and may facilitate the transport of warm-water species into the Atlantic (Rocha et al. 2005). Phylogeographic analysis of two reef fish species groups that have crossed from the Indian Ocean recently point to the existence of a dispersal route into the Atlantic. This route typically extends to the mid-Atlantic islands and often directly to the Brazilian coast (Rocha et al. 2005, Bowen et al. 2006). Current transport from Africa to Brazil is estimated to take about 70 d (Bowen et al. 2006), which is longer than the 40-d larval duration estimated for H. acuminatus (Wilson and McCormick 1999). However, association with floating rafts can greatly enhance long-distance oceanic crossings (Luiz et al. 2012). Juveniles of H. acuminatus have been observed swimming among floating seaweed mats in Indonesia (R Kuiter, Zoonetics, Australia, pers comm), and the presence of drifting kelp rafts of South African origin among the mid-Atlantic islands (Edwards and Glass 1987) confirms the availability of this dispersal route for raft-associated species. It is not currently possible to discern if the presence of H. acuminatus in Brazil is the result of human-assisted introduction or rare long-distance dispersal. In any case, the species is unlikely to become established, given the apparently low frequency of migration or release. If the bannerfish were to become established in Brazil, its presence is unlikely to have significant ecological impacts on native species. Being a planktivore, H. acuminatus will not consume native fishes and, because zooplankton is plentiful in the region, it is also unlikely to competitively displace native planktivores. Continuous monitoring of the individuals at the study site will provide important information on the fate of expatriated tropical marine fish species in Brazilian reefs. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank R Kuiter and G Allen for confirming the identification of the species, R Kuiter for providing unpublished information, and R Arévalo for the photograph used in this paper. We also thank JE Serafy and three anonymous reviewers for comments in the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Albins MA, Hixon MA. 2008. Invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans reduce recruitment of Atlantic coral-reef fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 367:233–238. http://dx.doi. org/10.3354/meps07620 Belmaker J, Parravicini V, Kulbicki M. 2013. Ecological traits and environmental affinity explain Red Sea fish introduction into the Mediterranean. Global Change Biol. 19:1373– 1382. PMid:23505033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12132 Bowen BW, Muss A, Rocha LA, Grant WS. 2006. Shallow mtDNA coalescence in Atlantic pygmy angelfishes (genus Centropyge) indicates a recent invasion from the Indian Ocean. J Hered. 97:1–12. PMid:16394255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esj006 744 Bulletin of Marine Science. Vol 90, No 2. 2014 Edwards AJ, Glass CW. 1987. The fishes of Saint Helena Island, South Atlantic Ocean. I. The shore fishes. J Nat Hist. 21:617–686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222938700770381 Elton C. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen: London. Gasparini JL, Floeter SR, Ferreira CEL, Sazima I. 2005. Marine ornamental trade in Brazil. Biodivers Conserv. 14:2883–2889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0222-1 Heemstra P, Heemstra E. 2004. Coastal fishes of Southern Africa. NISC/SAIAB: Grahamstown. Kuiter RH. 2002. Butterflyfishes, bannerfishes and their relatives: a comprehensive guide to Chaetodontidae e Microcanthidae. TMC Publishing: Chorleywood, UK. Leite JR, Bertoncini AA, Bueno L, Daros F, Alves J, Hostim-Silva M. 2009. The occurrence of Azores Chromis, Chromis limbata in the south-western Atlantic. Mar Biodiv Rec. 2:e145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755267209990637 Luiz OJ, Floeter SR, Gasparini JL, Ferreira CEL, Wirtz P. 2004. The occurrence of Acanthurus monroviae (Perciformes: Acanthuridae) in the south-western Atlantic, with comments of other eastern Atlantic reef fishes occurring in Brazil. J Fish Biol. 65:1173–1179. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00519.x Luiz OJ, Madin JS, Robertson DR, Rocha LA, Wirtz P, Floeter SR. 2012. Ecological traits influencing range expansion across large oceanic dispersal barriers: insights from tropical Atlantic reef fishes. P Roy Soc B, Biol Sci. 279:1033–1040. PMid:21920979. PMCid:PMC3259933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1525 Moura RL. 2000. Non-indigenous reef fishes in the southwestern Atlantic. Abstracts of the 9th Int Coral Reef Symp 1, 288. Perry CT, Larcombe P. 2003. Marginal and non-reef-building coral environments. Coral Reefs. 22:427–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0330-5 Rocha LA, Robertson DR, Rocha CR, Van Tassell JL, Craig MT, Bowen BW. 2005. Recent invasion of the tropical Atlantic by an Indo-Pacific coral reef fish. Mol Ecol. 14:3921–3928. PMid:16262848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02698.x Schofield PJ, Morris JA Jr, Akins L. 2009. Field guide to nonindigenous marine fishes of Florida. NOAA Tech Mem NOS NCCOS 92. Wilson ST, McCormick MI. 1999. Microstructure of settlement-marks in the otoliths of tropical reef fishes. Mar Biol. 134:29–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002270050522 B M S