BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014
Transcription
BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014
BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 8 May 2015 Document Approval By signing below all acknowledge that they have read this document and are satisfied with the contents herein; Approvers Role Name And Surname Signature Date BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 3 2 PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................................. 4 3 LEGISLATION OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 5 4 SPATIAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 8 10.1 Willowmore Spatial Budget ................................................................................................................ 69 10.2 Willowmore Spatial Plan .................................................................................................................... 69 11 STEYTLERVILLE SPATIAL PLANNING............................................................................. 73 11.1 Steytlerville Spatial Budget ................................................................................................................. 73 11.2 Steytlerville Spatial Plan ..................................................................................................................... 73 12 RIETBRON SPATIAL PLANNING .................................................................................... 76 12.1 Rietbron Spatial Budget ...................................................................................................................... 76 5 SURROUNDING SDF ALIGNMENT .................................................................................... 56 12.2 Rietbron Spatial Plan .......................................................................................................................... 76 6 SECTOR PLANS ................................................................................................................ 57 13 CONCLUSION AND IMPLEMENTATION........................................................................ 78 7 THE BAVIAANS SDF SPATIAL VISION ................................................................................ 58 14 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................ 79 8 SPATIAL GOALS ............................................................................................................... 58 9 MUNICIPAL SPATIAL FRAMEWORK PLAN ........................................................................ 60 9.1 Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................ 60 9.2 Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................... 61 9.3 Settlements ....................................................................................................................................... 61 9.4 Settlement Order and Function .......................................................................................................... 62 9.5 Economic Activity............................................................................................................................... 67 9.6 Social Facilities ................................................................................................................................... 67 9.7 Baviaanskloof Human Settlement....................................................................................................... 67 10 WILLOWMORE SPATIAL PLANNING ............................................................................. 69 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 MAPS Map 1: Average Annual Rainfall ......................................................................................................................... 9 Map 2: Winter Minimum Temperature............................................................................................................... 9 Map 3: Summer Maximum Temperature ............................................................................................................ 9 Map 4: Soils ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Map 5: Hillshade .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Map 6: Vegetation Types.................................................................................................................................. 13 Map 7: biomes ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Map 8: Ground Water ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Map 9: Aquatic Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................. 16 Map 10: Terrestrial Biodiversity ....................................................................................................................... 17 Map 11: Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Map 12: Biophysical Synopsis ........................................................................................................................... 19 Map 13: Economic Activity ............................................................................................................................... 22 Map 14: Social Facilities ................................................................................................................................... 23 Map 15: Municipal Land Ownership ................................................................................................................. 24 Map 16: Socio-Economic Synopsis .................................................................................................................... 25 Map 17: Municipal Boundary Change ............................................................................................................... 26 Map 18: Broad Land Cover ............................................................................................................................... 29 Map 19: World Heritage Site ............................................................................................................................ 31 Map 20: Bulk Water Resources......................................................................................................................... 31 Map 21: Infrastructure Map ............................................................................................................................. 34 Map 22: Human Settlement Pattern ................................................................................................................. 37 Map 23: Ownership Willowmore ...................................................................................................................... 40 Map 24: Willowmore Zoning Map .................................................................................................................... 43 Map 25: Willowmore Spatial Synopsis .............................................................................................................. 44 Map 26: Steytlerville Ownership ...................................................................................................................... 47 Map 27: Steytlerville Zoning Map ..................................................................................................................... 49 Map 28: Steytlerville Spatial synopsis ............................................................................................................... 50 Map 29: Rietbron Spatial Synopsis. .................................................................................................................. 53 Map 30: Municipal Spatial Framework Plan ...................................................................................................... 68 Figure 1: Willowmore Human Settlement Areas ............................................................................................... 69 Figure 2: Human Settlement Areas ................................................................................................................... 73 ANNEXURES Annexure A: HSP Housing Programme Summary Annexure B: Implementation Framework 80 81 TABLES Table 1: Access to Water Table 2: Access to Sanitation Table 3: SBM Solid Waste Site Assessment Table 4: Public Transport Facilities Table 5: Population Distribution (2011) Table 6: Housing demand per income group Table 7: Housing and Land Demand Summary Table 8: 5 Year Housing and Land Demand Summary Table 9: Willowmore Housing Projects (HSP) Table 10: Willowmore IDP Projects Table 11: Willowmore Social Facilities Assessment Table 12: Steytlerville Housing Projects (HSP) Table 13: Steytlerville IDP Projects Table 14: Steytlerville Community Facilities Table 15: Rietbron IDP Projects Table 16: Rietbron Social Facility Assessment Table 17: Sector Plans Table 18: SPC: Core 1 and 2 Table 19: SPC: Settlement Table 20: SPC: Buffer and Intensive Agriculture Table 21: Settlement Order and Function Table 22: SPC Land USe Management Guidelines Table 23: Willowmore Spatial Budget Table 24: Steytlerville Spatial Budget Table 25: Rietbron Spatial Budget 31 32 32 33 35 35 35 36 38 39 42 45 46 48 51 52 57 60 61 61 62 63 69 73 76 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 1 INTRODUCTION This report sets out the framework within which the Baviaans Municipality will undertake spatial planning for the next five years. It records the participation process followed, identifies the key spatial issues, sets out the Municipality’s Spatial Vision and establishes an implementation framework to achieve the Vision . KEY SPATIAL INTERVENTIONS CONCRETE ROAD UPGRADE -Upgrading of the concrete section of R329 between Willowmore and Steytlerville to a tarred surface SPATIAL VISION A municipality where the integrated and efficient settlements of Willowmore, Steytlerville and Rietbron provide residents with equitable access to basic services, housing and social facilities within a region where a growing tourism and agricultural economy, based on the sustainable use of the arid region/karoo resources as well as the Baviaanskloof World Heritage Site, provides economic opportunities for all. SPATIAL ISSUES The spatial issues relevant to the municipality have been identified: Land use management and capacity to mainstream spatial planning A human settlement strategy and hierarchy (where should scarce resources be allocated and investment made) The need for a Dedicated Baviaanskloof Regional Development Strategy (The identification of a human settlement focal point) Land provision for services and facilities Human settlement demand and supply within Willowmore, Steytlerville and Rietbron Commonage development planning (The identification of a commonage land as well as the possible identification of additional areas) Land reform and acquisition Transportation route upgrading Nature reserve expansion Climate Change Adaption (Identify the areas that will be susceptible to the effects of climate change as well as those areas which could assist to mitigate these effects. Agriculture and heritage resource protection Integration and compaction of urban areas to effectively eradicate the legacy of apartheid spatial planning. FARM WANHOOP PURCHASE -Purchasing of the Farm Wanhoop in order to secure the long term sustainability of Water Supply to Willowmore BAVIAANSKLOOF HUMAN SETTLEMENT - Development and acceptance of a human settlement development process and plan for the western part of the Baviaanskloof. POVERTY ALEVIATION - Implementation of the “Path out of poverty” initiatives being implemented in Rietbron - Including the upgrading of Road MR611/R306. GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENACE- Maintenance of the gravel road network. GROUND WATER PROTECTION - Protect the ground water resources particularly in the west and north west. KEY REQUIREMENTS Bulk Services Upgrading - Upgrading of the bulk services capacity to enable human settlement development. HOUSING BACKLOG - Accurate determination of the housing backlog and ‘real need’ for housing. 3 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 2 PARTICIPATION The participation processes undertaken have been aligned the closing stages of the 2014 IDP process as well as with the starting stages of the 2015 IDP process. 2.1 PHASE 1 PARTICIPATION This phase introduced the project to the public and other stakeholders, invited registration as interested and affected parties and request the identification of spatial issues that should be taken into account in the formulation of the SDF. 2.2.2 DRAFT DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY An electronic version of the document was made available on both the Setplan and Baviaans Municipality Websites. The municipality distributed hardcopies of the document to the Ward Councillors. Hardcopies of the document were also made available for public viewing at the following venues: Willowmore Library, Steytlerville Library, Rietbron Library, Baviaanskloof Library Municipal Offices (at Reception) 2.1.1 NEWSPAPER NOTICES 2.2.3 OPEN DAYS The SDF process was introduced to the public by means of a newspaper advert that was placed in the Advertiser on 8 May 2014. The advert set out the public meeting dates and made it known that the SDF project had commenced and that comment could be submitted. DP process Integration Open Days were held, where the proposals contained in the Draft document were displayed and residents were afforded the opportunity to discuss or comment thereon. Members of the Project Team, together with representatives of the Municipality were in attendance. A Background Information Document(BID) which included a comment sheet and a request to register as an Interested and Affected Party was made available at the IDP/Budget feedback sessions. 2.1.2 IDP PUBLIC MEETINGS 10 February 2015 – Rietbron Community Hall: 17h00. 11 February 2015 – Willowmore Town Hall: 18h00 17 February 2015 – Saaimanshoek School Hall: 17h00 18 February 2015 – Steytlerville Town Hall: 17:00 The SDF process was discussed at the following IDP meetings as follows: 15 May 2014 Steytlerville Town Hall 18h00 19 May 2014 Vuyolwethu Community Hall, Steytlerville 18h00 20 May 2014 Hillview Library, Willowmore 18h00 21 May 2014 Rietbron Community Hall 18h00 26 May 2014 Willowmore Town Hall 18h00 27 May 2014 Saaimanshoek, Baviaanskloof 18h00 2.1.3 SECTOR DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENT The IDP Representative Forum has been accepted as being the forum through which the sector departments would be engaged. In addition to this individual consultations were held with some of the key departments, including East Cape Parks, Department of Agriculture (Baviaans Office). 2.2 PHASE 2 PARTICIPATION This phase made the draft SDF document available for comment. 2.2.1 PUBLIC N OTICE: A notice setting out the background to the project as well as the request for comment or input for all interested parties was placed in public places and on municipal notice boards within the study area. Notices were placed in the Die Advertiser on 23 January 2015 and email notification was sent to registered Interested and Affected Parties. The closing day for comment was 27 February 2015. 4 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 3 LEGISLATION OVERVIEW 3.1 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996 The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The Bill of Rights enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom. Section 24: Everyone has the right to an environment which is not harmful to their health or well-being. Section 26. (1): Everyone has the right to have access to adequate housing. Section 152 spells out the objectives of local government as insuring access to at least basic services and facilitating economic development within a framework of financial sustainability. 3.2 THE NATIONAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE (NSDP) (2006) The National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP), adopted in 2005, establishes a spatial framework for allocating public investment to different parts of the country in such a manner that the greatest measure of benefits could be obtained from such investment. This is done through an in-depth understanding of the national space economy. Key points include: Economic growth is a prerequisite for the achievement of poverty alleviation. Government has a constitutional obligation to provide basic services to all citizens wherever they reside. Beyond basic services, government spending on fixed investment should be focused on localities of economic growth and/or economic potential. In localities with low demonstrated economic potential, government should, beyond the provision of basic services, concentrate primarily on human capital development. Future settlement and economic development opportunities should be channelled into activity corridors and nodes. 3.3 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2030) The National Development Plan for 2030 (2011) puts forward three scenarios to create approximately 11 million jobs by 2030, and reduce unemployment to about 6% by 2030. The first scenario is a baseline scenario, the second is a solid minerals scenario, and the third is a scenario that aims to create a diversified dynamic economy. The third scenario, which is the preferred scenario, aims to attract more substantial investments in strengthening municipal infrastructure and services, education systems, and generate better access to capital for new and expanding firms. The NDP accentuates the need for poverty and inequality reduction, through putting in place the fundamental incentives and policy directives needed to grasp opportunities such as education and public transport, and to broaden opportunities through specific business incentives. Communal farming, tenure security, education and skills development, as well as improved levels of accessibility through public transport are all emphasized as key strategies to transform urban as well as rural spaces. It accepts the need to support centres of competitiveness, but also argues for unlocking potentials in lagging regions. The Plan sets out 3 key targets relating to human settlement: 1. More people living closer to their places of work 2. Better quality public transport 3. More jobs in or close to dense urban townships As well as the associated actions required in achieving these goals: Clear strategy for densification of cities through land-use planning. Stop building houses on poorly located land and shift greater resources to informal settlement upgrading, provided that they are in areas close to jobs. Massive investment to ensure safe, reliable and affordable public transport Provide incentives to move jobs to dense townships Focused strategy on the housing gap market, involving banks, subsidies and employer housing schemes. In particular, taking steps to ensure that women are not discriminated against in terms of home ownership and financing. The commission proposes a differentiated rural development strategy: “Agricultural development based on successful land reform, employment creation and strong environmental safeguards. To achieve this, irrigated agriculture and dry land production should be expanded, beginning with smallholder farmers where possible. Quality basic services, particularly education, health care and public transport. Well-functioning and supported communities will enable people to develop the capabilities to seek economic opportunities. This will enable people to contribute to developing their communities through remittances and the transfer of skills, which will contribute to the local economy. In areas with greater economic potential, industries such as agro-processing, tourism, fisheries and small enterprise development should be developed.” The Plan calls for the recognition of the role informal settlements play in the housing economy as well as for the enhancement of existing national programmes for informal settlement upgrading. The NDP proposes the development of legal instruments to regularize informal settlements through the use of special zones in land-use management schemes for example. Community organizations must also be encouraged and funding arrangements must ensure that resources are channelled into public infrastructure, facilities and spaces and not just into housing. With regard to climate change adaption the Plan notes that that the strengthening of the nation’s resilience needs to be “South Africa’s primary approach. This would involve decreasing poverty and inequality by enhancing the levels of education, health care, employment, skills development and enhancing ecosystems integrity’’. 3.4 MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS ACT (ACT 32 OF 2000) Chapter 5 provides for the preparation of IDPs: S26(e) lists an SDF as a core component of an IDP and requires that the SDF provides basic guidelines for a municipal land use management system S24(1) requires that municipalities should align their planning with national and provincial planning, as well as those of affected municipalities S27 requires a district municipality to adopt a framework for integrated development planning that is binding to the local and district municipality. This framework should: identify relevant national and provincial legislation, 5 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 identify matters that require alignment between local and district planning specify principles to be applied determine procedures for coordination and amendment of the framework 3.8 NATIONAL HERITAGE RESOURCES ACT (25 OF 1999) 3.5 LOCAL GOVERNMENT: MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS (GN R796 OF 2001) The National Heritage Resources Act (Act 25 of 1999 - NHRA) introduced an integrated system for the identification, protection and management of heritage resources nationally, provincially and at municipal level. The Act establishes a legal obligation on those involved in rural land use planning and management to give attention to, and respond to, heritage considerations both at site and landscape levels. These obligations are addressed later in this document. S2(4) requires that an SDF should: give effect to the DFA principles; set out objectives that reflect the desired spatial form of the municipality; contain strategies and policies to achieve the objectives and which should indicate desired patterns of land use; address the spatial reconstruction; provide strategic guidance regarding the location and nature of development; set out basic guidelines for a land use management system in the municipality; set out a capital investment framework for the municipality's development programs; contain a strategic assessment of the environmental impact of the SDF; identify programs and projects for the development of land within the municipality; be aligned with the spatial development frameworks reflected in the integrated development plans of neighbouring municipalities; and provide a plan of the desired spatial form of the municipality, which should: indicate where public and private land development and infrastructure investment should take place; indicate desired or undesired utilisation of space in a particular area; delineate an urban edge; identify areas for strategic intervention; and indicate priority spending areas. 3.6 DEVELOPMENT FACILITATION ACT, 1995 Promote the integration of social, economic, institutional and physical aspects of land development. Promote integrated land development in rural and urban areas in support of each other. Promote the availability of residential and employment opportunities in close proximity to or integrated with each other. Optimise the use of existing resources relating to agriculture, land, minerals, bulk infrastructure, roads, transportation and social facilities. Promote a diverse combination of land uses, also at the level of individual erven or subdivisions of land. Discourage the phenomenon of urban sprawl in urban areas and contribute to the development of more compact towns and cities. Contribute to the correction of historically distorted spatial patterns of settlement in the Republic and to the optimum use of existing infrastructure in excess of current needs. Encourage environmentally sustainable land development practices and processes. 3.7 NATIONAL WATER ACT (36 OF 1998) The National Water Act (Act 36 of 1998 as amended – NWA) is founded on the principles of sustainable use of water for the benefit of all users. To these ends the NWA puts in place measures for the integrated management of all aspects of water resources by water catchment management agencies. The Act and subsequent policy has significant impacts on rural areas as water is the critical component to rural development and water availability plays an important role in regional differences. Close collaboration is therefore needed between provincial and local government and the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry when considering rural development proposals. 3.9 MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ACT (56 OF 2003) To secure sound and sustainable management of Municipal financial affairs, and in particular the management and disposal of public assets, particularly land. 3.10 SUBDIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND ACT 70 OF 1970 Application Regulations regarding the subdivision of agricultural land for development within a municipality: Subject to the provisions of section 2 a Surveyor-General shall only approve a general plan or diagram relating to a subdivision of agricultural land (d) any subdivision of any land in connection with which a surveyor has completed the relevant survey and has submitted the relevant sub-divisional diagram and survey records for examination and approval to the surveyor-general concerned prior to the commencement of this Act.‖ and a Registrar of Deeds shall only register the vesting of an undivided share in agricultural land referred to in section 3 (b), or a part of any such share referred to in section 3 (c), or a lease referred to in section 3 (d) or, if applicable, a right referred to in section 3 (e) in respect of a portion of agricultural land, if the written consent of the Minister in terms of this Act has been submitted to him. no undivided share in agricultural land not already held by any person, shall vest in any person; no part of any undivided share in agricultural land shall vest in any person, if such part is not already held by any person; no lease in respect of a portion of agricultural land of which the period is 10 years or longer, or is the natural life of the lessee or any other person mentioned in the lease, or which is renewable from time to time at the will of the lessee, either by the continuation of the original lease or by entering into a new lease, indefinitely or for periods which together with the first period of the lease amount in all to not less than 10 years, shall be entered into; no portion of agricultural land, whether surveyed or not, and whether there is any building thereon or not, shall be sold or advertised for sale, except for the purposes of a mine as defined in section 1 of the Mines and Works Act, 1956 (Act 27 of 1956); and no right to such portion shall be sold or granted for a period of more than 10 years or for the natural life of any person or to the same person for periods aggregating more than 10 years, or advertised for sale or with a view to any such granting, except for the purposes of a mine as defined in section 1 of the Mines and Works Act, 1956;[Para. (e) substituted by s. 2 of Act 12 of 1979 and by s. 2 (1) (a) of Act 33 of 1984.] 3.11 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT NO.107 OF 1998 Establishes principles for decision-making on matters affecting the environment. Development must be socially, environmentally and economically sustainable. Equal access to environmental resources, benefits and services to meet basic human needs. The utmost caution should be used when permission for new development is granted 6 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 3.12 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROTECTED AREAS ACT, 2003 (ACT 57 OF 2003) Provide for the protection and conservation of ecologically viable areas representative of South Africa’s biological diversity and its natural landscapes and seascapes. Of particular importance for spatial planning is the fact that the Act (Chapter 2) makes provision for a System of Protected Areas in South Africa. These include nature reserves, wilderness areas, protected environment, world heritage sites, forest areas and mountain catchment areas. 3.13 THE NATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT ACT, 2009 (ACT 5 OF 2009) The purpose of the act is to provide for the transformation and restructuring of the national land transport system of the country. Chapter 4 of the Act sets out general principles for transport planning and its relationship with land use and development planning. “Land transport planning must be integrated with the land development and land use planning processes, and the integrated transport plans required by this Act are designed to give structure to the function of municipal planning mentioned in Part B of Schedule 4 to the Constitution, and must be accommodated in and form an essential part of integrated development plans, with due regard to legislation applicable to local government, and its integrated transport plan must form the transport component of the integrated development plan of the municipality.” 3.14 NATIONAL HOUSING ACT, 1997 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1997) To provide for the facilitation of a sustainable housing development process and to lay down general principles applicable to housing development. Prioritise the housing needs of the poor. Provide as wide a choice of housing and tenure options as is reasonably possible. Be economically, fiscally, socially, and financially affordable and sustainable. Be based on integrated development planning. Consider and address the impact on the environment. Socially and economically viable communities. Safe and healthy living conditions. Racial, social, economic, and physical integration in urban and rural areas. Effective functioning of the housing market and level playing fields. Higher densities and the economical utilisation of land and services. Community and recreational facilities in residential areas. 3.15 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE HUMAN SETTLEMENTS (BREAKING NEW GROUND) (BNG) (2004) A mix of safe and secure housing and tenure types. Reliable and affordable basic services, educational, entertainment, health, welfare and police services within a multi-purpose cluster concept. Compact, mixed land use, diverse, life-enhancing environments with maximum possibilities for pedestrian movement and transit. Low-income housing in close proximity to areas of opportunity. Integrated, functional and environmentally sustainable human settlements, towns, and cities. 3.16 COMPREHENSIVE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2009 (CRDP) The strategic objective of the CRDP is to achieve social cohesion and development among rural communities. Coordinated and integrated broad based agrarian transformation An improved land reform programme Strategic investments in economic and social infrastructure. Rietbron has been included as a focus area of the CRDP. 3.17 SPATIAL PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT ACT (NO 16 OF 2013) The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, Act 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA) was approved by the National Assembly on 5 August 2013. This Act seeks to: provide a framework for spatial planning and land use management in the Republic; to specify the relationship between the spatial planning and the land use management system and other kinds of planning; to provide for the inclusive, developmental, equitable and efficient spatial planning at the different spheres of the Government; to provide a framework for the monitoring, co-ordination and review of the spatial planning and land use management system; to allow for policies, principles, norms and standards for spatial development planning and land use management; to address past spatial and regulatory imbalances; to promote greater consistency and uniformity in the application procedures and decision-making by authorities responsible for land use decisions and development applications; to provide for the establishment, functions and operations of Municipal Planning Tribunals; and to provide for the facilitation and enforcement of land use and development measures. The Act identifies Municipalities as the primary land use regulators and requires district and local municipalities to align their spatial development frameworks and land use schemes as required by the MSA. This policy is fundamentally about the need to move away from a housing-only approach to a more holistic development of human settlements, including the provision of social and economic infrastructure. Sustainable Human Settlements comprise Safe and secure environments. Adequate access to economic opportunities. 7 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4 SPATIAL ANALYSIS The spatial issues that had a direct impact on the formulation of the SDF have been identified from the . outcomes of the participation phase and of an analysis of the available spatial information. In this regard the Municipal IDP (2014) formed the key source document. The information is been grouped into three broad spatial themes, being Built Environment, Socio-economic and Biophysical, which when combined create a comprehensive spatial analysis. The key spatial elements of these three themes are addressed in the sections to follow. Spatial Issues: Agriculture and heritage resource protection A human settlement strategy and hierarchy (where should scarce resources be allocated and investment made) Land use management and capacity to mainstream spatial planning Land provision for services and facilities Dedicated Baviaanskloof regional development strategy (The identification of a human settlement focal point) Human settlement demand and supply within Willowmore, Steytlerville and Rietbron Commonage development planning (The identification of a commonage land as well as the possible identification of additional areas) Land reform and acquisition Transportation route upgrading Integration and compaction of urban areas to effectively eradicate the legacy of apartheid spatial planning. Climate Change Adaption (Identify the areas that will be susceptible to the effects of climate change as well as those areas which could assist to mitigate these effects. 8 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1 BIOPHYSICAL This section of the report addresses the opportunities and constraints offered by the municipality’s natural resources, including temperature, rainfall, biodiversity (terrestrial and aquatic) topography, vegetation and the agricultural resource. 4.1.1 CLIMATE The Municipality falls within the transition zone between the summer and winter rainfall regions and is therefore subject to erratic temperature and rainfall fluctuations. Internationally, the area is classified as predominantly arid with occurrences of semi-arid in the south. Approximately 56% of the rain falls in summer (October to March). There is a drop in rainfall during mid-summer (January). The average annual rainfall in the western part is between 77 and 250mm per year, while the eastern part has an average of between 260 and 500mm per year. Small patches on the higher lying mountains of the Baviaanskloof have higher averages of between 510 and 750mm per year. Refer to Map 1. The highest average maximum summer temperatures are between 32 and 33 degrees Celsius and are found in the area surrounding Rietbron. Cooler summer temperatures are found on the higher lying areas. Refer to Map 3. The lowest average winter temperatures of below zero degrees Celsius are found to the south of Rietbron, while average temperatures between 2,8 and 4 degrees Celsius are found in the central areas to the south of Steytlerville, through Willowmore and Vondeling. The higher lying areas have more moderate minimum temperatures. Refer to Map 2. MAP 2: WINTER MINIMUM TEMPERATURE MAP 1: AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFALL MAP 3: SUMMER MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE 9 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.1.1 C LIMATE C HANGE 4.1.1.1.2 C LIMATE C HANGE AND B IODIVERSITY ‘Climate change is defined as a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability over comparable time periods.’ (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) An appropriate climate change response for the biodiversity sector would be for the establishment of protected areas in the form of stewardship agreements undertaken with land managers. These stewardship agreements should include future proposed areas for agriculture (including biofuels) and incorporate principles of landscape planning that can incorporate both adaptation and mitigation components. As neither the SBDM or the municipality have a dedicated climate change response strategy it has been necessary to interpret available information and make assumptions with regard to the potential climate change impacts and possible mitigation measures. Based on the available information the potential climate change scenario for the Municipality can be summarised as follows: Higher temperatures and an increased intensity of droughts (Although an article in the Rapport Newspaper on 24 August 2014 that the minimum temperatures in June have been lower than the months average for the previous 50 years). This may lead to the following secondary effects: o A higher number of hotter days o A lower number of colder days o An increase in water requirements for crops and stock o A higher reliance on ground water sources The amount of rainfall/precipitation will generally remain the same, while the intensity thereof may increase. The following secondary effects may be: o Increased flood damage to farming and road infrastructure o Higher flooding risk for lower lying settlement areas o Lower average flows in rivers. Although the above climatic changes are expected not to be dramatic, well planned and timeous mitigation should negate potential effects on the economic and social development of the Municipality. The potential impacts of the above climate change are addressed in each of the relevant sections: 4.1.1.1.1 C LIMATE C HANGE AND W ATER R ESOURCES Measures required to improve water management in general, and to adapt to climate change in particular, include: Ensure that existing and proposed requirements for water expressed in provincial and local planning instruments, particularly in the WSDPs, are realistic and achievable in terms of the availability of water as described in strategies and plans prepared by DWA. Develop and implement a programme of water conservation and demand management, including: o Promote and, where necessary, provide incentives and technical support for rainwater harvesting in all use sectors. o Encourage and promote the recycling of water in industrial processes. Improve monitoring of water sources Improve the operation and maintenance, and, where necessary, the rehabilitation and upgrading of waste water treatment works to ensure that effluent discharged into water resources or otherwise into the environment meets prescribed quality standards. Ensure that IDPs and WSDPs include appropriate measures to address water-related disasters. Promote the establishment of CMAs for WMAs and development a catchment management strategy. Increase the use of recycled water. (CES, 2011) Key programmes such as Working for Wetlands and Working for Water should increasingly supported, given their indirect benefit to ecosystem protection and restoration in adapting to climate change (and in mitigation). (CSIR, 2011) 4.1.1.1.3 C LIMATE CHANGE AND A GRICULTURE 4.1.1.1.3.1 LAND REFORM AND L AND MANAGEMENT Careful land use planning must not only take place, but also be effectively implemented and enforced. Potentially productive land needs to be put to good use for improved and sustainable food and cash crop production, job creation, associated secondary economic activities (e.g. processing) and thus improved incomes and poverty reduction. Properly managed ecologically-based farming will ensure the rehabilitation and recovery of the land resources. The conversion to game farming should continue to be supported, since it is more profitable and ecologically friendly if practiced sensitively. 4.1.1.1.3.2 WATER FOR PRODUCTION Increased irrigation is potentially a “big win” strategy in the face of increasingly erratic rainfall and rising temperatures (irrespective of annual rainfall trends). Crops need moisture at specific times, this can be guaranteed with irrigation. Irrigated crops are also much more resilient to temperature increases and heat stress than non-irrigated crops. The above is subject to the availability of additional irrigation water. 4.1.1.1.3.3 AGRICULTURAL AND NUTRITIONAL DIVERSIFICATION Greater crop diversity and mixed farming (crops and livestock) offer considerable protection against farming risk, including climatic hazard risk. Farms growing only one crop are highly sensitive to climatic hazards. Larger farming enterprises with a range of different crop types, or even cultivars of the same crop with differing drought resistance traits, are much less likely to suffer complete crop losses. Warming trends in the could enable opportunities for new crops. Mixed farming enterprises are more resilient during a crisis since they are able to sell livestock for cash to buy food when crops have failed. 4.1.1.1.3.4 CROP AND LIVESTOCK IMPROVEMENT Crop and tree varieties and livestock breeds suited to future warmer and harsher climatic conditions must be identified, sourced, and made available to local farmers. Where necessary, breeding programmes should be strengthened. The focus should be on drought-resistant and short-cycle maize, drought-resistant fodder, hardy vegetables (e.g. some of the indigenous species), hardy forestry varieties, hardy biofuel species/varieties, hardy indigenous livestock breeds (optimised for production and quality). Disease resistance will also be increasingly important. 4.1.1.1.3.5 INFRASTRUCTURE AND MARKETS FOR AGRICULTURE Modern agriculture is highly dependent on information, connectivity and physical infrastructure. Adequate and functional transport, telecommunications, energy, market and produce storage infrastructure are absolutely essential for the development from subsistence to semi-commercial and commercial farming, or any other ruralbased livelihood. Equally, access to safe water, sanitation, energy services, schools, etc. is essential for rural development. (One World Sustainable Investments, ?) 10 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS The soils are predominantly shallow (less than 300 mm) with deep alluvial soils occurring in major river valleys. The topsoil texture varies from loamy sand to sandy clay loam. Clay pan soils with an abrupt or clear transition to the subsoil occur. The soils are mostly well drained. The Table Mountain and Witteberg Groups give rise to acid, nutrient-poor soils. Refer to Map 4 MAP 4: SOILS 11 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.3 TOPOGRAPHY The terrain is dominated by the broad, level to somewhat broken, Steytlerville plain. This plain is bordered by the Baviaanskloof and Kouga mountain chains with their intermontane valleys to the south, and the Grootrivier mountain ranges and intermontane valleys to the north. The area surrounding Rietbron is dominated by a nearly level plain, bordered by the Droëkloof, Gras, Boesmanspoort and Grootrivier mountains to the south and southeast. MAP 5: HILLSHADE 12 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.4 VEGETATION 21 Vegetation types in Baviaans Municipality covering 772706.3ha - These are listed in the adjoining table. Although there are no critically endangered ecosystems there are two Endangered ecosystems (Albany Alluvial Vegetation and Humansdorp Shale Renosterveld), which together make up 0,4% of the municipal area. MAP 6: VEGETATION TYPES Vegetation Types Vegetation Types Name Size Albany Alluvial Vegetation 4987.7ha (0.65%) Baviaanskloof Shale Renosterveld 11878ha (1.54%) Eastern Inland Shale Band Vegetation 4737.2ha (0.61%) Eastern Lower Karoo 15314.4ha (1.98%) Gamtoos Thicket 38768ha (4.5%) Groot Thicket 149213.7ha (19.31%) Grootrivier Quartzite Fynbos 34805.4ha (4.5%) Humansdorp Shale Renosterveld 23.2ha (0%) Kouga Grassy Sandstone Fynbos 123155.1ha (15.94%) Kouga Sandstone Fynbos 48247.8ha (6.24% y) Lower Karoo Gwarrieveld 12977.3ha (1.68%) North Swartberg Sandstone Fynbos 1637.1ha (0.21%) Prince Albert Succulent Karoo 1947ha (0.25%) South Swartberg Sandstone Fynbos 1918.7ha (0.25%) Southern Karoo Riviere 26301.3ha (3.4%) Steytlerville Karoo 78636.2ha (10.18%) Sundays Thicket 7745.3ha (0.1%) Suurberg Shale Fynbos 342.9ha (0.04%) Uniondale Shale Renosterveld 59826.1ha (7.74%) Willowmore Gwarrieveld 149486.1ha (19.35%) (SANBI, n.d.) 13 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.5 BIOMES There are 4 Ecological Biomes within the municipality being the Albany Thicket, Fynbos, Nama-Karoo and Succulent Karoo. The Nama-Karoo biome makes up about 4% of the municipal area, while the other three make up about 30% each. MAP 7: BIOMES 14 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.6 GROUND WATER AND RIVERS The areas with the highest ground water yield are to be found to the south of Rietbron, north of Steytlerville and west of Cambria just to the south of the Baviaanskloof eastern entrance. The only area within the Municipality with naturally high quality potable water is in the Baviaanskloof. The area around Rietbron and to the west of Willowmore are the areas with the highest ground water utilisation. There are twelve river/streams within the municipality. RIVERS Baviaanskloof Gamtoos Groot Groot-Vlei Heuningklip Kouga Kraai Olifants Plessis Sandpoort Unknown Witkoppies se Loop WETLANDS There are 1317 wetlands covering 2152.5ha (0.3%) of the municipal area (SANBI, n.d.) MAP 8: GROUND WATER 15 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.7 AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY The Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan’s (ECBCP) aquatic biodiversity data is reflected on the plan below. It ECBCP has also set out land use guidelines to be followed within each of the biodiversity categories. Of particular significance is the fact that the area of highest ground water abstraction is not highlighted as significant from an aquatic biodiversity perspective. In addition it is important to note that the area surrounding Willowmore (North West and East) is significant from an aquatic biodiversity perspective. MAP 9: AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY TRANSFORMATION THRESHOLD ABLMC Description of CBAs ABLMC Transformation Threshold ABLMC 1 Critically important river subcatchments; Priority primary catchments for E1 estuaries. Less than 10% of total area of subquaternary catchment ABLMC 2a Important subcatchments; Primary catchment management areas for E2 estuaries. Less than 15% of total area of subquaternary catchment ABLMC 2b Catchments of free flowing rivers important for fish migration Less than 20% of total subquaternary catchment (SANBI, n.d.) RIVER/WETLAND THRESHOLDS River criterion used Buffer width (m) Mountain streams and upper foothills of all 1:500 000 rivers 50 Lower foothills and lowland rivers of all 1: 500 000 rivers 100 All remaining 1: 50 000 streams 32 (SANBI, n.d.) 16 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.8 TERRESTRIAL BIODIVERSITY The ECBCP sets out terrestrial biodiversity management classes and identifies appropriate land uses which will enable the biodiversity to maintain it desired state. What needs to be noted is that the Municipal Nature Reserve situated to the east of Willowmore is not represented on the ECBCP data. This needs to be rectified when the settlement planning is undertaken. Notwithstanding this, the land surrounding Willowmore is largely suitable for development. On the other hand the land surrounding Steytlerville, except the land to the south is classified as BLMC 2. The ECBCP land use guidelines are restrictive within this biodiversity category. LAND USE OBJECTIVES Biodiversity Land Management Class Land Use BLMC 1 BLMC 2 BLMC 3 BLMC 4 Conservation Yes Yes Yes Yes Game farming No Yes Yes Yes Communal livestock No Yes Yes Yes Communal livestock ranching No No Yes Yes Dry land cropping No No Conditional Yes Irrigated cropping No No Conditional Yes Dairy farming No No Conditional Yes Timber No No Conditional Yes Settlement No No Conditional Yes (SANBI, n.d.) PROTECTED AREAS Name Category Size Baviaanskloof Nature Reserve Provincial Nature Reserve 144853.2hs (18.75% of municipality) Swartberg East Nature Reserve State Forest Nature Reserve 3.5ha (0% of municipality) Swartberg-Oos Mountain Catchment Area Mountain Catchment Area 1436.5ha (0.19% of municipality) 3 reserves in Baviaans Municipality covering 146293.2ha (18.9% of municipality) (SANBI, n.d.) MAP 10: TERRESTRIAL BIODIVERSITY 17 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.9 AGRICULTURE As an arid region the Municipality has a significant area where extensive small stock farming is practiced, while limited cultivation occurs in the Baviaanskloof Valley. The cultivation along the Groot River Valley has ceased due to the brak water characteristics of the area. Due to the climate the agricultural industry is vulnerable to the effects of overgrazing and to climate change. Map 11: Agriculture PRIMARY GOODS PRODUCTS ROUTES AND NMBM Market (R329) Baviaanskloof Route (Western Portion - R332) N9 R306 Rietbron AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL Low land capability (Little cultivation) Better grazing capacity to the north east ACTIVITY Extensive small stock farming Limited cultivated lands (Baviaanskloof) IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE LAND CARE Climatic conditions Overutilisation Erosion Control 18 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.1.10 BIOPHYSICAL SYNOPSIS There are significant portions of the Municipality that are proclaimed nature reserves (Including the Baviaanskloof component of the World Heritage Site). These areas and the proposed ecological linkages between them need to be accommodated in the spatial planning of the Municipality, while land use management within and surrounding these areas needs to be managed to reduce any potential negative impacts. Ground water resource conservation is also a priority within this water scarce municipality. World Heritage Site 10km Buffer (Basic Assessment Process – DEA) Protected Areas Expansion possibilities Private nature reserves 5km Buffer (BIA – DEA) Linkages into WC and EC (Groendal) Rivers and Dams Ground Water Utilization Primary water source Heavy and over-utilized catchments - Rietbron Water Management Areas Fish to Tsitsikamma Gouritz Sustainable Initiatives MAP 12: BIOPHYSICAL SYNOPSIS Land Use Baviaans Hartland Stewardship initiatives 19 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.2 SOCIO ECONOMIC 4.2.1 POPULATION The population increase from the last census can primarily be attributed to the inclusion of the former DMA areas together with the three settlements. It is a youthful population with most of the population is resident in Ward 3 (Willowmore).The projected growth is approximately 460 persons by 2031. The two noticeable trends are a movement of the youth to cities outside the Municipality and a movement of older (Retired) persons from the farms to the settlements. POPULATION Increase partly due to DMA incorporation Growth Rate of 0,5% (STATSSA) ±464 addtionional persons by 2031 Increase in female headed households Youthful population Focus on providing play parks, recreation and education facilities Sport plays an important role in the community Population 2001 Census 2011 Census No. of Households Difference 2011 Census 2001 Census Difference Steytlerville SP 1835 722 1113 540 209 331 Vuyolwetho SP DISTRIBUTION 2182 1,699 483 656 436 220 Steytlerville 4017 2421 1596 1196 645 551 Willowmore SP 3285 2733 552 852 651 201 Hillview 4393 3,654 739 1084 822 262 Willowmore 7678 6387 1291 1936 1473 463 Rietbron SP 119 41 Jacobsville 1065 336 Rietbron 1184 377 Baviaans Rural 4882 5316 -434 1097 1531 -434 17761 14124 2453 4606 3649 580 Total Most people live in Ward 3 - Willowmore. TRENDS People in the youth category are declining – there is a tendency that the youth are leaving the countryside to find better job opportunities in cities Older people, who are no longer economically active and instead depend on any type of pension, return to the area 20 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.2.2 EMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY Most of the residents in the Municipality are unemployed and live in poverty. There is a high dependency on social grants (particularly child care grants) - Approximately 77% of households receive a grant. The leading economic sectors are community, social and personal services, agriculture and finance with agriculture being the dominant employer. POVERTY Gini Coefficient has worsened (Worse income distribution) People in poverty have increased (48% Poverty Level) High Grant Dependence – 77.9% of HH’s receive a grant High level of child care grants FREE BASIC SERVICES Indigent Support Policy 2013/14 ± 2523 households received Indigent support. EMPLOYMENT 63.2% of the potentially economically active population are not working The potential economic active labour force accounts for 62.4% of the total population The leading sectors (Gross Value Added) are Community, social and personal services (Inclusive of general government services), Agriculture and Finance (which includes Real Estate) Agriculture is the dominant employer EDUCATION Low literacy levels and substantial lack of skills Need to focus on vocational /technical training (Agric subjects) 21 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.2.3 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY Most of the economic activity is centred around the Baviaanskloof World Heritage Site as well as along the identified tourism routes, particularly Routes T1 and T2. Although heritage plays a significant role in the economy the Municipality does not comply with the provisions of the Heritage Resources Act - Heritage Registers and Policy. The potential mining area to the north of Rietbron may provide additional economic opportunities to this settlement. Sustainable resource use needs to be a priority given that a significant component of the economy is dependent on the biophysical environment. TOURISM Baviaanskloof Wilderness Heritage site Natural resources of the Baviaanskloof and Karoo Rural Landscape form the basis of the Tourism industry Heritage also plays a role in the economy ACTIVITY Willowmore and Steytlerville High activity in Baviaanskloof and along Tourism Route (T2) – Steytlerville to Fullarton via Fullarton MINING Possible Uranium and Molybdenum Ore mining to the north of Rietbron in the Beaufort West Municipality. VULNERABILITY Reliance on limited sectors No climate change response strategy Non-compliance with the Heritage Resources Act (Heritage registers and policy) MAP 13: ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 22 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.2.4 SOCIAL FACILITIES Social and community facilities are generally located in the larger settlements were the majority of the population reside. The facilities in the Baviaanskloof are however dispersed and in most cases are locate on privately owned land. This dispersed pattern does not enable the operational and travel cost advantages of a central location. HOSPITAL The shortest route to hospital from Steylerville is via the R329 and the DR01870 gravel road to Jansenville - This route needs to be prioritised for maintenance and possible upgrading. BAVIAANSKLOOF Dispersed social and community facilities MAP 14: SOCIAL FACILITIES 23 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.2.5 LAND REFORM MAP 15: MUNICIPAL LAND OWNERSHIP There is no public owned land within the municipality, which can easily be targeted for land reform projects as these areas are predominantly nature reserve or form part of the municipality’s commonage network. What is noticeable is that the largest settlement of Willowmore has the smallest commonage area of the main settlements. The land ownership pattern within the settlements is similar, where the majority of the properties are privately owned, while the commonages make up the majority of the publicly owned land. There are currently no unsettled land claims. This is however likely to change given that a new window has been opened for the submission of new land claims. OWNERSHIP Little public owned land outside the Nature Reserves and Parks Transfer of Transnet properties LAND CLAIMS There are currently no are no outstanding land claims 24 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.2.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYNOPSIS MAP 16: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYNOPSIS 25 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3 BUILT ENVIRONMENT 4.3.1 MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY CHANGE The primary spatial change to the municipality since the preparation of the previous SDF(2007) is the incorporation of a 42 1359ha portion of the former District Management Area, which includes the settlements of Rietbron, Vondeling and Millar. This addition is only slightly mitigated by the reallocation of 26 981ha (Cambria) to Kouga Municipality. REDEMARCATION Increase of 39400ha Significant operations and management impact: Additional Settlement – Rietbron, Vondeling and Millar Increased roads length Long distances to the isolated settlements Absence of adequate spatial planning information and records MAP 17: MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY CHANGE 26 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.2 LAND USE MANAGEMENT 4.3.2.1 S PATIAL P LANNING AND L AND U SE M ANAGEMENT A CT (N O 16 OF 2013) The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, Act 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA) was approved by the National Assembly on 5 August 2013. This Act seeks to: provide a framework for spatial planning and land use management in the Republic; to specify the relationship between the spatial planning and the land use management system and other kinds of planning; to provide for the inclusive, developmental, equitable and efficient spatial planning at the different spheres of the Government; to provide a framework for the monitoring, co-ordination and review of the spatial planning and land use management system; to allow for policies, principles, norms and standards for spatial development planning and land use management; to address past spatial and regulatory imbalances; to promote greater consistency and uniformity in the application procedures and decision-making by authorities responsible for land use decisions and development applications; to provide for the establishment, functions and operations of Municipal Planning Tribunals; and to provide for the facilitation and enforcement of land use and development measures. The Act identifies Municipalities as the primary land use regulators and requires district and local municipalities to align their spatial development frameworks and land use schemes as required by the MSA. This means that the municipality needs to redraft the SDF and adopt appropriate scheme regulations which will be aligned with the SPLUMA requirements. These processes are underway. In addition the municipality needs to establish the required capacity to deal with the additional land use planning requirements. As SPLUMA essentially devolves the planning functions which have currently been undertaken at provincial level to the local municipalities new capacity and planning structures need to be established within the municipality. In this regard the municipality needs to decide whether it will establish its own Planning Tribunal, a joint tribunal together with surrounding municipalities or whether it would prefer the District Municipality to perform this function. In addition to the establishment of a Tribunal the Act makes provision for the delegation of certain land use planning and management decision to officials in order to speed up the development. Key to the implementation of SPLUMA is the availability of Registered Professional Planning staff within the Municipality and also within the District. 4.3.2.1.3 SPLUMA R EGULATIONS The Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform has published the draft regulations made in terms of section 54 (1) read with section 54 (2) (b) of the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 16 of 2013, for public comment before 4 September 2014. These Regulations set out the practical arrangements related to the implementation of SPLUMA. 4.3.2.1.1 C OMMENCEMENT OF THE A CT SPLUMA’s commencement was to be staggered with Sections 1 to 32 and Sections 55 to 61 of the Act coming into operation first to allow municipalities to translate their current structures, procedures and instruments into the new spatial planning and land use management system provided for in the Act as soon as possible. While Sections 33 to 52 of the Act would be brought into operation at a later stage, as these sections require all spheres of government to create new spatial planning and land use management regulations, instruments, structures and procedures. Sections 1 to 32 and 53 to 61 of SPLUMA - 1 April 2014. Sections 33 to 52 of SPLUMA - 1 September 2014 The Department of RDLR has however requested the Honourable Minister to postpone the commencement dates until next year in order for the various local municipalities to gain the necessary capacity to fulfil their roles in terms of the new legislation. It is expected that this commencement date could be July 2015, unless circumstances force an earlier promulgation. 4.3.2.1.2 I MPLICATIONS OF SPLUMA Local municipalities are placed at the forefront of land use management. "… we have confirmed our understanding of municipalities (local municipalities) as the primary land use regulators. So, all land use applications will go to a municipality in whose area the land is located," - Rural Development and Land Affairs Minister Gugile Nkwinti. Provincial and National governments would perform key support and monitoring functions to ensure municipalities discharged their mandate. 27 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.2.2 L AND U SE M ANAGEMENT S YNOPSIS The Municipality do not have adequate capacity or resources to mainstream spatial planning or to give effect to its extended land use management mandate that will take effect when the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act comes into operation. CHALLENGES Lack of adequately trained staff Ineffective zoning and cadastral records No easy access to information The zoning regulations are outdated No zoning map for Rietbron Different zoning schemes apply in different areas Current land use trends, for example densification are not addressed holistically Lack of funding to mainstream SDF implementation and implement SPLUMA Land Use policies/bylaws required 28 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.3 RURAL LAND USAGE MAP 18: BROAD LAND COVER The broad land cover applicable to the municipality is reflected below. It is clear that most of the municipality is covered with natural vegetation. 29 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.4 HERITAGE 4.3.4.1 H ERITAGE M ANAGEMENT Heritage makes a significant contribution to the economy through tourism and therefore needs to be conserved in terms of the provisions of The National Heritage Resources Act (Act 25 of 1999 - NHRA). This Act prescribes that spatial planning and management must take heritage considerations into account both at site and landscape levels. The municipality is required to undertake the preparation of a heritage inventory in terms of Section 30(5) of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999). Some of the relevant Sections of the Act are set out below: Section 25: Registration of local conservation bodies The registered local conservation bodies will form a capacity and knowledge base which the municipality can utilise to ensure that the requirements of the NHRA are adhered to. The municipality to establish a working relationship with the registered local conservation bodies. Section 30(5): Heritage register The municipality need to compile a comprehensive heritage register of all local heritage resources within its jurisdiction and submit this to SAHRA for approval . Section 34: Structures older than 60 years and guidelines of built environment component No person may alter or demolish any structure or part of a structure which is older than 60 years without a permit issued by the relevant provincial heritage resources authority. A heritage overlay zone to be prepared once the heritage register has been completed. Section 38: Spatial Planning actions which will result in development listed in Section 38 need to be considered by the heritage resource authority Listed Activities: (a) the construction of a road, wall, power line, pipeline, canal or other similar form of linear development or barrier exceeding 300m in length; (b) the construction of a bridge or similar structure exceeding 50 m in length; (c) any development or other activity which will change the character of a site— (i) exceeding 5 000 m2 in extent; or (ii) involving three or more existing erven or subdivisions thereof; or (iii) involving three or more erven or divisions thereof which have been consolidated within the past five years; or (iv) the costs of which will exceed a sum set in terms of regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources authority; (d) the re-zoning of a site exceeding 10 000 m2 in extent; or (e) any other category of development provided for in regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources authority, Some Implications and Responsibilities for Municipal Spatial Planning and Spatial Planning Authorities A local authority is responsible for the identification and management of Grade III heritage resources and heritage resources which are deemed to fall within their competence in terms of this Act. At the time of the compilation or revision of a town or regional planning scheme or a spatial development plan, or at any other time of its choosing, or at the initiative of a provincial heritage resources authority where in the opinion of a provincial heritage resources authority the need exists, a planning authority shall compile an inventory of the heritage resources which fall within its area of jurisdiction and submit such inventory to the relevant provincial heritage resources authority, which shall list in the heritage register those heritage resources which fulfil the assessment criteria. A planning authority must at the time of revision of a town or regional planning scheme, or the compilation or revision of a spatial plan, or at the initiative of the provincial heritage resources authority where in the opinion of the provincial heritage resources authority the need exists, investigate the need for the designation of heritage areas to protect any place of environmental or cultural interest. 4.3.4.2 B AVIAANSKLOOF W ORLD H ERITAGE S ITE This World Heritage Site is one of eight protected areas in the Cape Floral Region. Baviaanskloof means “Valley of Baboons” in and Dutch, this conservation area is approximately 200-250 square km wide. The Baviaanskloof nature reserve is home to seven out of South Africa's eight biomes, it is characterised by distinct plant and animal ecosystems and micro-habitats. The plant life found in this region includes: Fynbos, Forest, Grassland, succulent Karoo, subtropical Thicket, Savanah and Nama-Karoo. This nature conversation area is home to over 1000 plant species, some of which are threatened and the mountains found throughout the site provide much activity for visitor's (i.e. hiking, rock and mountain climbing, bird watching etc.). An exclusive feature of the Baviaanskloof nature reserve, are the genetically distinct, ancient cycads. Two surviving species of this ancient cycad are found in this area. Over 50 mammal species, 300 bird species, reptiles and amphibians are also found here. Baviaanskloof is an important meeting point for diverse cultures: San cultural artefacts and paintings, Stone Age archaeology is found throughout Baviaanskloof. It is because of the reasons mentioned above that Baviaanskloof was awarded World Heritage status. The Baviaanskloof Nature Reserve was declared a World Heritage site by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) in 2004 because it occupies less than 0.5% of the surface area of the African continent, but is home to almost 20% of the continents fauna and flora. Approximately 70% of the fynbos species is endemic, making this nature reserve a conservation “hottest hotspot”. The site is considered to be of outstanding universal value because of its unique Fynbos biome, it is also designated as one of the World Centres of Plant Diversity. 30 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 Access to Water 2001 2011 Piped water inside dwelling 1488 3203 Piped water inside yard 1852 1003 Piped water on community stand: distance less than 200m from dwelling 228 53 Piped water on community stand: distance greater than 200m from dwelling 111 1 TABLE 1: ACCESS TO WATER MAP 19: WORLD HERITAGE SITE The primary spatial implication of the proclamation of the World Heritage Site is that land use within 10km of the site will be subjected to an environmental assessment process (Basic Assessment, which will be considered by the National Department of Environmental Affairs). It is envisaged that the extent of the World Heritage Site will be expanded to the West and East. 4.3.5 INFRASTRUCTURE This section has been primarily sourced from the Baviaans IDP (2013_2014). 4.3.5.1 B ULK W ATER S UPPLY Baviaans Municipality is the Water Services Authority (WSA) that has the executive authority to provide water services as Water Services Provider (WSP) within its area of jurisdiction. The Water Services Development Plan (WSDP) has been reviewed and adopted on 29 March 2012; there is a budget on the plan available to ensure that all households have access to basic water. Most of the households, (98.7%), in Baviaans have water on site, i.e. inside dwelling or inside yard compared to 85.9% in Cacadu and 49.4% in the Eastern Cape. The majority of households in the Baviaans make use of the local water scheme as operated by the Local Municipality (82%) followed by a borehole (12. 9%). The Environmental Health Department of Cacadu District Municipality monitors water quality on a monthly basis. There are currently bulk water supply constraints in Willowmore and Steytlerville. Refer to Table 2: Access to Sanitation MAP 20: BULK WATER RESOURCES 31 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.5.2 S ANITATION The Baviaans Municipality aims towards water borne sanitation for all households. All formal areas/towns in Willowmore and Steytlerville have water-borne sewage systems, connected either to an underground sewer reticulation network or to a septic / conservancy tank. The ability to deliver this level of service is directly related to solving the bulk water supply in this area. Table 2 provides an indication of the level of access to sanitation services within the municipality. Sanitation 2001 2011 Flush toilet (connected to sewerage system) 1215 3323 793 475 20 3 Pit latrine with ventilation (VIP) 218 116 Pit latrine without ventilation 443 166 Bucket latrine 754 167 None 437 213 Flush toilet (with septic tank) Chemical toilet TABLE 2: ACCESS TO SANITATION Based on the above information 78% of households have a flush toilet connected to a sewerage system, while 11% of households have a flush toilet with a septic tank and 0,02% of households have VIPs. Contrary to the statistics above, there are only 9 remaining buckets in Steytlerville (These are to be eradicated by November 2014). There are some households however, that have buckets in addition to septic tanks. 4.3.5.3 E LECTRICITY Most areas of the Municipality have access to electricity. An Electricity Master Plan has been developed for Willowmore and Steytlerville. Eskom directly supplies electricity to Rietbron and the Vuyolwethu area in Steytlerville. There are bulk supply shortages in Willowmore and Saaimanshoek. Solar electricity supply is currently being investigated for the western component of the Municipality, including the settlement of Vondeling. A small hydro-electric power station was constructed on the right bank of the Kouga Dam. This has the capacity to generate 3600 kVA of power when operational. This facility was decommissioned. The reasons for decommissioning are not clear. 4.3.5.3.1 S USTAINABLE E NERGY In 2012, the Eastern Cape Provincial Executive Council adopted the Eastern Cape Sustainable Energy Strategy which focuses on improved provincial energy security and self-sufficiency, improved access to energy among the poorest in the province, and the need to stimulate a green and low-carbon economy underpinned by decent and sustainable jobs. The strategy sets out a vision for the province – that “the Eastern Cape should provide the most enabling environment for sustainable energy investment and implementation in the country”. In support of this vision the strategy pursues goals of job creation and skills development, ensuring energy justice, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting the development of a renewable energy generation and manufacturing industry in the province.The Eastern Cape has significant resource potential in terms of renewable energy generation, with exceptional wind conditions by international standards, good solar conditions, as well as substantial potential for energy from the biomass and biofuels sectors. The province plays a large role in the South African National Department of Energy’s Integrated Resources Plan (IRP), which envisages 17.8 GW of new Renewable Energy (RE) generation capacity over the next 20 years. Of the 2459.3 MW that has been allocated to date, the Eastern Cape accounts for 36% (876 MW) of the total, constituted by 10 wind farms and one solar photovoltaic farm. The Sustainable Energy Strategy places emphasis on the potential role of small and rural energy systems in enterprise and local economic development. In support of this, mini- and micro generation, including bio-energy systems are being encouraged. The scope of renewable energy cuts across all spheres of government, and across business, labour and civil society. (ECDEDEA, The Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 2014) 4.3.5.3.2 M UNICIPAL R ESPONSE Alternative and renewable energy options have been considered in the Electricity Master Plans for Willowmore and Steytlerville e.g. the old diesel engines and solar farms for the commonages in Willowmore and Steytlerville. Solar geysers have been installed on most of the RDP households in the Baviaans Municipality during the 2010/2011 financial year. The Sarah Baartman District Municipality is coordinating the RED process to which the Municipality is a signatory. Given that it can be expected that renewable applications will be submitted within the municipal due to its potential for the development of renewable energy (Wind, bio-mass and Solar) projects. The municipality therefore needs to ensure that it can respond appropriately to the specific needs of these applications. In this regard the resources and information made available by the Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism are of assistance. The SDF should identify the appropriate land use principles to ensure the development of these projects are sustainable and do not have a negative impact on the other resources of the municipality. 4.3.5.3.2.1 SOLAR PROJECTS ON THE COMMONAGES The Baviaans Municipality has indicated that the development of solar farms on the commonages around the settlements would be desirable. Although no formal projects have been proposed as yet it needs to be kept in mind that these solar farms can sterilise significant portions of land from use as commonage. This will in turn increase the need to expand the existing commonage area for conventional commonage usage. 4.3.5.4 S OLID W ASTE M ANAGEMENT The Baviaans Municipality has an approved Integrated Waste Management Plan (IWP). A regular waste removal service is provided to all households and commercial properties within the major towns of the Municipal area, except to households in rural areas. The farming areas of the Baviaans Municipality do not receive a waste removal service. An assessment has been conducted on the status quo of all the waste disposal sites in the CDM area, which was used in the compilation of an Integrated Waste Management Plan (IWMP) for the District. The results of the afore-mentioned assessment for Baviaans are reflected in the Table 3. Waste Site Name Registration / permit status Site suitability Estimated lifespan Infrastructure Operation & management Willowmore Not registered Inadequate Good Inadequate Inadequate Steytlerville Not registered Adequate Adequate Good Adequate Rietbron Not registered Inadequate Inadequate Inadequate Inadequate TABLE 3: SBM SOLID WASTE SITE ASSESSMENT 32 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 Consultants have been appointed to undertake the registration of the Steytlerville, Willowmore and Rietbron landfill sites. This is expected to take place by mid-2015. The Miller and Vondeling disposal sites cannot be regarded as legal waste disposal facilities. The sites are very small and can be regarded as a hole in the ground used for waste disposal purposes. Less than 0.1 tons of waste is disposed of per day at these sites. The sites are not managed in accordance with proper waste disposal practices at all. The sites are not suitably located either. The sites should be dealt with as illegal dumping areas and should therefore be cleared by the Municipality. The waste should be taken to the nearest legalised and formal waste disposal site. A suitable centralised disposal facility should be identified and established for the disposal of waste generated in these settlements (KV3 Engineers, 2008). pathways) Scholar transport School busses Functional Good Roads forum Yes Quarterly meetings Good TABLE 4: PUBLIC TRANSPORT FACILITIES 4.3.5.7 T ELECOMMUNICATIONS 4.3.5.5 R OAD N ETWORK The most important transportation distributor is the R329 which links Steytlerville in the east to Willowmore in the west. This route links with the R75 through Noorspoort enabling access to Port Elizabeth, Jansenville and Graaff Reinet. In the west it runs into the N9, which is an important transport link between the Western and Eastern Cape. These roads are particularly important for the development of agriculture and tourism in the area. The MR411 (secondary road) links Willowmore (Ward 3) to Rietbron (Ward 4). There are approximately 1300km of gravel roads and 130km of surfaced roads within the municipal area. The provision and maintenance of roads covers the functional areas of the Department of Roads and Public Works and the Local Municipality. (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) The upgrading of the cement road portion between Steytlerville and Willowmore has been highlighted as a critical spatial intervention which will enable increased economic development. The road network is reflected on Map 21 Ward 1 There is access to telecommunication services. The cellular network is mostly good except in the Baviaanskloof part of Ward 1 and 40 km outside of Willowmore (approaching from Willowmore). The SAPD is in the process of erecting towers, which MTN is interested in utilising to provide cellular network for this area, this is, however, a long-term project. There is no reception of ETV and SABC1. Ward 2 There is only access to telecommunication services in the town area of Ward 2. The cellular network is mostly good except in the rural part of Ward 2. There is no reception of ETV and SABC1. Ward 3 There is access to telecommunication services. The cellular network is mostly good except in Fullarton, where it is barely accessible. There is reception of ETV and SABC1. 4.3.5.6 P UBLIC T RANSPORT Ward 4 The public transport facilities within the municipality are set out in Table 4 SERVICE EXISTENCE FUNCTIONALITY CONDITION Taxi Rank 1 in Willowmore Functional Good Bus shelters 7 n/a n/a Vehicle Testing Station 1 in Willowmore Functional Good Marine Transport None n/a n/a Landing strips Two) Functional Good Rail roads Rail road from PE to Willowmore through rural areas – station in Willowmore Functional for cargo Good Weigh bridge management None n/a n/a Non-motorised systems (bicycles None n/a n/a There is access to telecommunication services in Rietbron. The cellular network is mostly good, except in the Fullarton and Miller parts of Ward 4 and 30 km outside of Willowmore (approaching from Willowmore towards the Grootrivier valley). There is no reception of ETV, SABC 1 and SABC3. The cellular coverage is depicted on Map 21 33 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 MAP 21: INFRASTRUCTURE MAP 34 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6 HUMAN SETTLEMENT This section of the report briefly assesses the status of human settlement development. It focusses on the impact of population growth, the resulting need for new human settlement areas as well as providing a brief summary of the bulk services capacities and constraints. 4.3.6.1 P OPULATION D ISTRIBUTION Based on historic growth figures some growth is expected. SATSSA indicates that the growth between 2001 and 2011 was 0,5% and in the absence of more accurate information, this document assumes that this low growth will continue. Infrastructure and human settlement areas will be required to support this growth Table sets out the expected growth till the year 2031 and the resulting housing demand for the three main settlements. Urban Housing and Associated Land Demand Summary - Growth projected to 2031 Based on the above figures Willowmore is home to the majority of the residents, while a significant percentage of the population, almost 30%, reside in the smaller rural settlements and on farms. The population distribution of the Municipality is reflected in the table below: Area Household Increase till 2031 (Hh) Housing Waiting List (Backlog) 2014 (Hh) Total Land Requirement for Growth only (@ 30 Units Per ha) - Till 2031 Total Land Requirement for Backlog only (@ 30 Units Per ha) Willowmore 70 527 597 3 25 Steytlerville 43 656 699 2 31 Rietbron 14 189 203 1 9 126 1372 1498 6 64 Baviaans Population Distribution Area Rural Areas Extent (ha) Population 1160361 4882 Steytlerville 2467 4017 % of Households Total 27 23 1097 1196 % of Total Persons/Household 24 4.5 26 3.4 Totals Willowmore Total Housing Need by 2031 (Hh) 2174 7678 43 1936 42 4.0 1829 1184 7 377 8 3.1 1160361 4882 100 1097 100 4.5(Average) Notes: 1 The Rietbron Housing Backlog/Waiting List figures were provided by Baviaans Municipality on 16 March 2015. 4 Total Housing Demand at 2031 = Housing Waiting List + Projected Growth till 2031 TABLE 5: POPULATION DISTRIBUTION (2011) 5 Land Requirement = Total Housing Demand/30 (Units per ha) + 40% for non-residential uses 4.3.6.2 H OUSING AND L AND D EMAND 8 Hh = Households Rietbron Total The Human Settlement Plan has identified the need to undertake detailed investigations to provide accurate information with regard to the status of the housing need in the Municipality. In particular the raw information relating to backlog figures needs to be supplemented by the addition of accurate information with regard to the demand for middle and social or rental housing. The Housing Sector plan provides a preliminary feel of this in Table 6 below. Income per month Demand for housing R0 – R3 500 (full subsidy ownership) High demand (Approximately 80% of demand) R3 500 – R6 999 (Middle income subsidy) Undetermined but the Municipality has expressed that there is a demand and land has been identified for this type of housing (Feasibility study needed) R7 000 – R15 000 (Social rental) Demand undetermined but Municipality has expressed that there is a demand (Feasibility and study needed). TABLE 6: HOUSING DEMAND PER INCOME GROUP TABLE 7: HOUSING AND LAND DEMAND SUMMARY (Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements, 2014) 4.3.6.2.1 H OUSING D ELIVERY C HALLENGES The Housing Sector plan identifies the challenges that impact on housing delivery. The challenges that are spatial in nature or can be resolved through spatial interventions are briefly set out below. The Municipality does not have a dedicated housing department, but has appointed a Building inspector and Housing AdministratorThe full spectrum of housing needs is to be catered for; i.e. lowincome, subsidy housing, multi-storey developments, affordable housing. Lack of subsidized houses for the middle income groups (R35000 - R7000) and (R8500 – R15 000) Bulk Infrastructure Upgrading is Required - The delivery of housing is inhibited by the lack of bulk services (Water, sewer and electricity) Inaccurate housing backlog figures (A process is currently underway to update the housing backlog and housing demand figures) (Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements, 2014) (Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements, 2014) 35 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.3 H OUSING DELIVERY In formulating the housing delivery programme for the 5 year period of this SDF, the following factors have been considered: Bulk Infrastructure: Integrate the housing demand figures into the services development plans Undertake the necessary bulk services upgrades to enable the provision of housing. Smaller infill projects should be launched, which can be accommodated within the existing services capacities and can deal with those highest on the on the housing needs list first. Alternative housing typologies An investigation needs to be launched to determine the feasibility of the provision of alterative housing typologies in BLM. 20% of all new subsidy housing areas are to be allocated to provision of rental stock and alternative housing types (This guideline needs to be tested against the outcome of the investigation referred to in the previous bullet.. Beneficiaries and surrounding communities need to be consulted and participate in all housing related matters. Spatial Layout Planning Low-income subsidized residential areas where freestanding dwellings are erected on individual stands should not be developed at gross densities of higher than a gross density of 20 units per hectare (The erven should not be smaller than 250m2) All housing developments must contribute to the formulation of compact and integrated nodes - i.e. infill development on vacant land and underutilised land should be prioritised. All housing developments are to comply with legislative processes, policy and requirements. Proactively identify and access land needed for future housing Housing Demand Establish the real need for housing (The Backlog) and prioritise the beneficiaries in terms of the real need. Included in the above is a survey of current housing ownership, a more accurate determination of the population growth and effect of migration and a focus on the identification of persons who will be able to take responsibility for the house once received. The present planning is badly inhibited by the lack of properly developed and maintained demand and project database. Annexure A summarises the municipality’s housing delivery programme as set out in the Housing Sector Plan (Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements, 2014). In the current year’s budget the municipality will primarily be undertaking feasibility assessments to enable projects to proceed. The challenges to housing delivery are discussed in the following section. In summary the housing delivery programme of the municipality will be inhibited in the short term (1 to 3 years) by the lack of bulk services. It can therefore be expected that the actual delivery of the houses, in larger projects, will only be feasible after 2 to 3 years. Notwithstanding this the opportunity now exists to undertake the necessary pre-feasibility and feasibility studies to enable timeous delivery of approved (Legislative approval town planning and environmental authorisation) human settlement land to coincide with the availability of bulk services. In addition the municipality can focus on the identification and implementation of smaller infill projects that can be accommodated within the current services capacity limits. Of particular importance to achieve effective infill development is the connection of the older parts of the settlements into the full sewer reticulation system. Although this will enable the potential of infill development it will require additional water and sewer treatment and reticulation capacity. Based on the above the following assumptions guide the identification of human settlement land in the three major settlements: Bulk services will become available in two years for larger housing projects. The entire housing backlog cannot be addressed within 5 years. It is assumed that this will be undertaken within 5 years, once bulk services are available i.e. only land to accommodate 60% of the ‘housing backlog’ will be accommodated in this SDF. The population growth is accepted to be 0,5% and the housing demand for 5 years of growth will be included in the human settlement land provision of this SDF. 4.3.6.3.1 F IVE Y EAR L AND D EMAND Based on the above assumptions and the projections set out in Table 7, the land demand for the following five years is set out in . Urban Housing Demand and Supply Summary - Growth projected to 2031 Area 5 Year Land Demand for Growth Only (ha) Total 5 Year Land Demand (Growth and 60% of Backlog Combined) Willowmore 1 15 Steytlerville 1 18 Rietbron 1 5 Totals 2 38 TABLE 8: 5 YEAR HOUSING AND LAND DEMAND SUMMARY The above figures are based on the goal of addressing 60% of the housing backlog in 5 years once the bulk services have been upgraded.. In order to achieve this while also accommodating the expected minimal growth the municipality will need to provide 38ha on which human settlement can occur at a density of at least 30 units per hectare (Nett Density - This density would apply to the residential area only and not be calculated over the entire development area). 66ha are required to address the total backlog together with 5 years of growth. 36 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.4 H UMAN S ETTLEMENT P ATTERN The dispersed nodal spatial pattern is evenly spread across the municipal area. The lack of a formally identified formal settlement within the Baviaanskloof is currently hindering human settlement and social facility development in that region. A proposal has been made for the development of state owned farm (known as Bosdorp) adjoining Sewefontein for this purpose. SUB-DISTRICT (ADMINISTRATIVE) CENTRE Willowmore LOCAL CENTRE (SECONDARY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE) Steytlerville SUB-LOCAL CENTRE Rietbron Baviaanskloof RURAL SETTLEMENT Vondeling Fullarton RURAL PLACES Baroe Mount Stewart Millar Studtis Sandvlakte Sewefontein Zaaimanshoek FARM WORKER ACCOMMODATION MAP 22: HUMAN SETTLEMENT PATTERN 37 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.5 W ILLOWMORE Willowmore was established on the farm, The Willows, as a trading centre in 1864. It was initially named WillowMoore after William Joseph Moore who emigrated to the Cape of Good Hope as a member of the British Settler program. In earlier times the town also had a thriving Jewish community evidenced by: the synagogue, Jewish graves and the rabbi's house. The town of Willowmore was founded in 1864, when the Moore family donated land to the Dutch Reformed Church. Willowmore was officially established in 1874. The municipality was formally established in 1884 and in the year 2000 the town become part of the Baviaans Municipality which includes Steytlerville and Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area. The main economic activity of this area is stock and game farming followed closely by tourism. Willowmore is one of the biggest mohair producing areas in the world. This town is also considered a gateway to the Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area- a World Heritage Site. Unlike other Karoo towns which have problems with water supply Willowmore has a strong water source from the boreholes on farm Wanhoop situated 20km from town. Willowmore is also the site where the Anglo-Boer war broke out; during this period Willowmore was British territory. In January 1901 the Boer military descended on the town and by 17 October 1901, the British had surrendered. Remnants of the British fort can be found outside of the town, this fort was established to deter 'Boer Rebels' who had threatened to destroy the building of the railway. The town boasts a number of tourists’ attractions such as; hiking trails, mountain biking, hunting, 4X4 trails, bird watching, historic sites, restaurants, a 9-hole golf course, shebeens and an air-field. GAP / needed before construction of new housing units- CRU projects. Unconfirmed projectFeasibility study must determine needed number of units in each node. Undetermined demand for GAP housing projects. Proposed project - middle income Rectification 373 PHP Funding needed for verification study Funding from DOHS - Undeter mined Unconfirmed projectFeasibility study must determine needed number of units in each node. Undetermined need for special needs projects. Special need project (15 destitute) Priority TABLE 9: WILLOWMORE HOUSING PROJECTS (HSP) 4.3.6.5.4 R ESIDENTIAL DENSITY The residential densities for the areas of Willowmore vary between 2 units per hectare and 15 units per hectare. Hillview and Lovemore have densities of 15 and 11 units per hectare respectively. Strategies need to be put in place to ensure that the average density is increased without negatively affecting the amenity and heritage value of the settlement. 4.3.6.5.5 SDF 2007 H UMAN S ETTLEMENT A REAS 4.3.6.5.1 P OPULATION Willowmore has 7678 residents, who at 3,96 persons per household constitute 1938 households. These make up 42% of the total number of households in the municipality. (Census 2011 Figures) The areas identified for human settlement expansion are set out on Map 25 These areas have been briefly addressed in the Human Settlement Plan. 4.3.6.5.2 H OUSING AND L AND D EMAND Areas 1 and 2: These areas are situated to the north of the node and are owned by the Municipality. The areas will form a natural extension of the existing urban framework and infrastructure. Based on growth projections (Refer to Paragraph 4.3.6.1) there will be an increase of 70 households by 2031, which combined with a housing waiting list of 527 gives a total housing demand of almost 600 households. Given the above a total of 28 additional hectares of suitable land is required to address this shortfall by 2031. Area 3: The area is situated in the centre of the node and is characterized by dilapidated structures and vacant properties. The ownership of the properties needs to be investigated and appropriate initiatives launched to formalize and service these properties. 4.3.6.5.3 H OUSING P ROJECTS Area 4 and 5: The area is situated to the west of the node and adjacent to the N9 route. The area is made up of private and municipal owned properties, most of which are vacant. Should the need arise; these properties can be utilized for residential and or business development. The northern portion of area 4 is to be utilized for the development of a park and recreational area. Area 5 is currently utilized for a Department of Transport Road Camp. It is proposed that the road camp be relocated to the southern industrial area where it is more compatible with the surrounding land uses. The projects identified in the HSP for Willowmore are set out in Table 9: Project Units Project Type Status Challenge Existing 18m2 units 30 PFHP Feasibility study needed including tachey survey Undecided way forward PFHP Procurement. Feasibility study assessments including tachey survey needed before construction of new housing units Funding for external sewer was problematic Priority Unconfirmed project. Feasibility study assessments including tachey survey Undetermined demand for Priority Down Proposed project 88 - CRU Priority/ Blocked Area 6: The area surrounds a cemetery. It is unlikely that the cemetery will be permitted to expand due to its close proximity to a water feature. The area surrounding the cemetery can be utilized for residential development. An alternative land use is therefore required. Area 7: The area consists of vacant residential erven as well as a large privately owned portion of land adjoining the N9 route. This area can possibly be utilized for the development of middle income housing. Area 8 and 12: The area is situated at the southern access point to the node. The area is suitable for the development of a business (Filling Station and associated uses) as well as residential uses. The negative impact of business development in this area on the existing central business area should be considered and alternative 38 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 uses identified. The potential residential usage will require extensive bulk services upgrading, particularly sewerage. Area 9: The area is situated to the south of the town and is identified for the development and expansion of the industrial area. There is little demand for industrial uses and the possible relocation of industry to the area surrounding the waste water treatment works needs to be considered. Area 10: This area consists of a large number of unserviced erven as well as a large vacant stand to the south west of the node. These areas can be serviced and sold for higher income residential stands should the need arise. The above areas have been identified in the absence of detailed feasibility studies (Land ownership confirmation, engineering etc.). These studies are now required to ensure the suitability of the land parcels for the proposed use. The above human settlement development proposals need to be reconsidered in the light of the latest needs and spatial goals of the municipality. 4.3.6.5.6 W ILLOWMORE IDP P ROJECTS The IDP projects that are planned to take place within Willowmore are reflected in Table 10. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Parking for heavy vehicles at the vehicle testing station (truck stop, phase in project – 3years) Solar geysers for RDP houses, R140 000 over 3 years Re-vamping of Vine & Augustine streets Pavements for: o Victoria o Knysna, o Ferreira, o Wehmeyer o Johanna Streets Upgrade electricity capacity Cricket pitch Road signs & street names Animal health Bucket & septic tank eradication Maintenance of reception area at testing station Demolishing of swimming pool Grading behind 7th Avenue Rectification of houses 373 Community Hall for Lovemore Willowmore tourism project Shading / shelter for local hawkers Willowmore Nursery-cropping, Dept. Agriculture Expansion of Willowmore Clinic, Dept. Health TABLE 10: WILLOWMORE IDP PROJECTS 39 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.5.7 L AND O WNERSHIP The municipality owns large portions of land in and surrounding the settlement. In general terms these land parcels are large enough to accommodate the future housing demand. OWNERSHIP Ownership in Willowmore No. of Erven Hectares % Municipal 429 1238.8690 61.07% Private/Other 2185 768.0513 1.07% State 13 21.6090 31.86% Total 2627 2028.5293 100% (Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements, 2014) MAP 23: OWNERSHIP WILLOWMORE 40 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.5.8 S OCIAL AND E CONOMIC Prison and Place of Safety - 0 0 - 4.3.6.5.8.1 Solid Waste Disposal Site and Recycling Depot 1 1 0 - Community Hall- large 1 1 0 - CRIME Ward 3 has the highest level of crime in the Baviaans municipal area. Drug related offences have more than doubled over the period 2003 to 2011 and sexual crimes increased from ten to seventeen cases. By comparison to the low population density, the crime rate is high, which could imply serious social ills and the need to put strategies in place to curb substance abuse and facilitate rehabilitation. Improved street lighting (highmast lights) should also considered at crime hot spots (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) SOCIAL SERVICES Community Hallmedium/small (fringe areas) - 1 0 - 4.3.6.5.8.2 Children’s Home - 0 0 - SOCIAL A ND C OMMUNITY FACILITIES An assessment of the available social facilities is set out below (The applicable shortfalls have been highlighted): FACILITY CSIR GUIDELINES REQUIREMENTS CURRENT PROVISION Home for the Aged - 0 0 - CURRENT SHORTFALL (2014) FUTURE SHORTFALL (2031) ICT Access Point 1 1 0 - Post Office/Agency with post boxes 1 1 0 - HEALTH AND EMERGENCY SERVICES Community Health Care 1 1 0 - Post Boxes - 1 0 - Primary Health Care 1 1 0 - SASSA Office (Social Service Office) 1 1 0 - Fire Station 1 1 0 - Social Grant Pay Point 1 1 0 - Fire bakkie pump deployment point - 0 0 - Cemetery (medium) - 3 0 - Police Station 1 1 0 - ABET/Skill Training - 0 0 - Special Education - 0 0 - Secondary School 1 1 0 - SOCIAL AND CULTURAL (PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES) 0 0 - EDUCATION Community Performing Arts Centre - Museum- medium/small - 0 0 - Primary School 1 1 0 - Local Library 1 0 1 - 1 6 6 - 0 0 - Grade R Class at Primary School 7 Mobile Library Small crèche/Early Childhood Development Centre 3 1 2 2 ECD Resource Hub and Care Centre 1 0 1 - CIVIC Home Affairs- small office 1 0 1 - Thusong Centre (community-based “onestop” development centres) 1 0 1 - Labour Office 1 0 1 - RECREATION PROVISION (SPORTS AND PARKS) Magistrate’s Court ( A magistrates court is provided in Steytlerville - There is therefore no need to provide an additional one) Municipal Office - 1 0 - Grassed surface (2 football fields equivalent) 1 Sports Complex (grouping of fields and/or sports complexes) 1 Subject to detailed Investigation at LSDF/Precinct Plan Level 41 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 Grassed field (2 football fields equivalent) with 500seat stand 1 Cricket Oval 1 Athletics/Cricket Stadium (grassed field and athletics track and stand- 3000 + seats) 1 Households in the older part of Ward 3 are reliant on septic tanks, while the more recent established, 373, Vaalblok suburbs (subsidy housing) are connected to a waterborne system that channels the effluent into the Waste Water Treatment Works constructed to the north of Willowmore. The sewerage system can only be upgraded when the bulk water infrastructure has been adequately addressed. 4.3.6.5.9.3 4.3.6.5.9.4 Combi-court surface (x2) 1 Combi-court surface (x4) 1 Community Pool 1 Swimming Pool (25m to 33m pool) 1 District park - Community park with play equipment 1 Urban Park 1 Local/Neighbourhood Park (includes play equipment) 1 Play Equipment at other facilities - R OADS AND STORMWATER The primary roads in the town are tarred, while the majority are surfaced with gravel. Stormwater is managed in open channels and via surface drainage. No formal storm water management system is present. SOLID W ASTE DISPOSAL The landfill site is situated to the north of Willowmore, it is not registered. 4.3.6.5.9.5 Subject to detailed Investigation at LSDF/Precinct Plan Level CEMETERIES There is a need to provide additional cemeteries as the existing areas are almost full. 4.3.6.5.9.6 E LECTRICITY Electricity is supplied by ESKOM. The whole town has access to electricity. There is however a shortage of Bulk Electricity Supply in Willowmore as the Municipality currently exceeds the Maximum Demand and pays monthly penalties to Eskom. 4.3.6.5.9.7 T ELECOMMUNICATIONS Effective telecommunications is available in the settlement. There is access to telecommunication services. There is reception of ETV and SABC1. TABLE 11: WILLOWMORE SOCIAL FACILITIES ASSESSMENT 4.3.6.5.9 B ULK S ERVICES 4.3.6.5.9.1 WATER The Willowmore bulk water supply is derived solely from boreholes and fountains situated on the farm Wanhoop. Bulk infrastructure for water supply needs to be upgraded before additional houses can be built. Willowmore Alternative Water Supply For the past fifty (50) years, the Willowmore community received its water from the farm, Wanhoop. In 1983 the then Willowmore Municipality sold the farm, but the water rights of the farm remained with the Municipality. To secure water for Willowmore for the next 50 years it will be most effective to buy the farm back from the current owner. This will also secure the safety of the current and future investments on the farm made by DWAF (R40.6 million). The Baviaans Municipality is currently upgrading the water works to the value of R6 million. The farm can also due to its proximity to the N9 and the R332 as well as the Baviaanskloof is a World Heritage Site be used for the development of tourism facilities and as a training centre for local people. In addition the farm has a grazing capacity of ±120 small stock and can be used to accommodate the small farmers currently operating on the Willowmore commonage which is overgrazed. 4.3.6.5.9.2 SEWERAGE All of the formal areas/town have water-borne sewage systems, connected either to an underground sewer reticulation network or to a septic / conservancy tank. 42 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.5.10 W ILLOWMORE Z ONING M AP The Willowmore Zoning Map is outdated and needs to be revised in order to meet the requirements of SPLUMA MAP 24: WILLOWMORE ZONING MAP 43 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.5.10.1 WILLOWMORE S PATIAL SYNOPSIS Willowmore is the largest of the settlements and performs the function of a Sub-district Centre. Land has been identified on which human settlement can occur to address the backlog. These areas, identified during previous SDF process need to be re-assessed to confirm suitability and potentially indicate the potential housing/ownership mix for the dwellings. All human settlement is currently inhibited by the need to upgrade bulk serve infrastructure. COMPACTNESS EFFICIENCY HOUSEHOLDS BULK WATER Ground water sources Upgrade bulk supply Wanhoop additional supply investigation 1837 households Backlog ± 509 Rectification projects Verify previous settlement areas ELECTRICITY AND Ground water sources Need to connect 85 houses Upgrade to main supply needed Appropriate densification Implement an Urban Edge/Settlement Limit Keep the settlement compact Pedestrian paths AMENITIES Cemetery expansion required. ROADS AND STORMWATER No Stormwater Master Plan Additional access road from southern residential areas required LAND USAGE Proposed southern business area to be re-thought due to potential impact on existing businesses Investigate the relocation of the industiral area to the south of the town Investigate off street parking in the central area PHYSICAL AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION Identify potential infill sites Eliminate apartheid buffer zones/areas SANITATION Water-borne sewage and conservancy or septic tanks COMMONAGE Commonage Management Plans Required Mapping of camps Additional land required MAP 25: WILLOWMORE SPATIAL SYNOPSIS SOLID WASTE Not authorised Consultant appointed to resolve. 44 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.6 S TEYTLERVILLE The farm Doorspoort, central to the heartland of Willowmore, Uitenhage and Jansenville was bought from the Cape Government in 1875 in order to build a church and establish a town. By 1880 September the sale of residential stands began. The town is named after Reverend Steytler, who pioneered the establishment of a New Dutch Reformed Congregation. The architecture of the town is characteristic of the Victorian and Edwardian era. Steytlerville Project Units Project Type Status Challenge The wide main road was designed for the time when ox wagons were the main form of transport. Steytlerville had a brief diamond rush in 1910, a 4-carat diamond was found on farm Springbokvlakte. This operation was suspended later on that year due to title deed restrictions. Steytlerville lies on the eastern part of Baviaanskloof and it is one of the Karoo's most popular towns. The economic activities in Steytlerville include: wool and mohair production - Angora goats and Dorper sheep; ostrich and goat farming. Existing 18m2 units 94 PFHP Feasibility study needed including tachey survey of study area before construction Undecided way forward Incomplete project 72 Greenfield PFHP Feasibility study assessments including tachey survey needed before construction of new housing units Funding Proposed project - Feasibility study assessment for community residential unit (CRU). Unconfirmed project. Undetermined demand for CRU projects. Proposed project - GAP Unconfirmed project- Feasibility study must determine needed number of units in each node. Undetermined demand for GAP housing projects. The urban residential areas in Steytlerville are fragmented consisting of the central and the newer residential area to the west of the node. No industrial land uses are approved and business uses are concentrated in a linear pattern along the main road (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) 4.3.6.6.1 P OPULATION Based on the Census 2011 figures Steytlerville has a population of 4017 persons and at a household density of 3,36 persons per household is home to 1196 households. 4.3.6.6.2 H OUSING AND L AND D EMAND P Based on the growth figures adopted in the Housing Sector Plan there will be an increase of 43 households by 2031, which combined with a housing waiting list of 656 gives a total housing demand of almost 700 households. Given the above a total of 33 additional hectares of suitable land is required to address this shortfall by 2031. 4.3.6.6.3 H OUSING P ROJECTS The housing projects as set out in the Housing Sector Plan are reflected in Table 12. These projects are planned to accommodate 253 households if those attributed to rectification initiatives are excluded. housing- 4.3.6.6.4 R ESIDENTIAL D ENSITY The gross residential density of the older portion of Steytlerville is 2,25 dwellings per hectare, while in Vuyolwethu it is 10,85 units per hectare. The density of the older portion needs to be increased without detracting from the aesthetic and heritage value of the settlement. middle income Rectification 503 PFHP Funding needed for verification study Funding from DOHS P The development proposals contained in the SDF 2007 for specific areas are discussed below. Incomplete project 87 PFHP Stop structure completed. Geo tech needed and funds for it. P Area 1: The area is situated at the western access to the node and adjoins the R329 route. It consists of both municipal and privately owned properties. As these sites are centrally located along the main road and between the older town and newer residential developments, this area is suitable for the development of business opportunities, either as the conversion of residential property or in the form of a business hive or formal sites which are sold or leased. Care should be taken to ensure that the heritage value of existing structures is not lost during the conversion of the usage of buildings. Previously blocked projects and funding Special need project (15 destitute) - Undetermined Unconfirmed project- Feasibility study must determine needed number of units in each node. Undetermined need for special needs projects. 4.3.6.6.5 SDF 2007 H UMAN S ETTLEMENT A REAS TABLE 12: STEYTLERVILLE HOUSING PROJECTS (HSP) 45 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 Area 2: The area adjoins the R329 and is currently being developed for subsidy housing. Area 3: The area is situated to the south of the node on primarily municipal owned erven. The area is to be investigated for industrial use. The majority of the erven within this area fall within the buffer zone surrounding the new sewerage treatment works. The properties within this buffer zone can no longer be utilized for residential purposes. Area 4: This area is situated within the existing urban extent and is characterized by mixed residential buildings and vacant land. This area is suitable for residential infill development consisting of mixed housing types. It is proposed that a feasibility study be undertaken to determine the viability of a urban renewal and housing project in the area. The urban part of the settlement falls within a radius of 1,5km from the centre. There is therefore no need for a formal public transport system within the settlement. 4.3.6.6.6.4 4.3.6.6.6.5 4.3.6.6.6.6 Area 6: This area is situated on the property which accommodated the golf course and club house. The site has good vistas of the surrounding mountains and would be suitable for the development of a housing estate or suburb. The servicing of this form of development will require the upgrading of the applicable bulk services and linking infrastructure. A feasibility investigation is to be undertaken on the site to identify the opportunities and constraints associated with such a development proposal. 4.3.6.6.6.7 4.3.6.6.6 B ULK S ERVICES S UMMARY 4.3.6.6.6.1 WATER In the urban areas of Ward 2, the bulk water supply is derived solely from nine boreholes situated north of the town. It is not envisaged that there will be water supply shortfalls in Steytlerville within the next 20 years, provided that the Erasmuskloof project gets underway and is completed. There are two reservoirs currently in use, both are situated in Vuyolwethu. (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) 4.3.6.6.6.2 SEWERAGE The remaining 37 buckets toilets in Steytlerville still need to be eradicated. Households in the older part of Steytlerville are reliant on septic tanks, while the more recent established Volstruis Valley, Victoria- & Bosman Street (subsidy housing) is connected to the waterborne system which is channelled into the Waste Water Treatment Works constructed to the south of the town. A number of erven situated to the south of the settlement fall within the buffer zone surrounding the Waste Water Treatment Works. Alternative land use needs to be sought for these properties. SOLID W ASTE DISPOSAL The Landfill site situated to the north of Steytlerville will be formalised and is in the process of being licensed. The current site will be rehabilitated and refurbished (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) Area 5: The area will make a logical extension to the existing residential development and can be supported by an extension of the existing service infrastructure. This area is to be investigated to determine its viability to accommodate additional housing. Areas 7 and 8: are situated to the west of the town and would form a natural extension to the adjoining suburbs. The infrastructure requirements for such development would be able to integrate easily into the existing infrastructure. An investigation into the viability of accommodating additional middle income housing on these locations is to be investigated. R OADS AND STORMWATER The primary roads in the town are tarred, while the majority are surfaced with gravel and in good condition. The process of maintaining and upgrading roads is hampered by budget constraints. Storm water is managed in open channels and via surface drainage. In this regard a stormwater management berm has been constructed to the west of the town to prevent structural damage as a result of overland flow through the town. The location of the berm limits urban expansion to the west. E LECTRICITY The municipality supplies electricity except in Ramaphosa and Vuyolwethu. Bulk electricity is inadequate and requires upgrading from 1.5 kVA – 2.5 kVA. There are only a few households and businesses in the town area which use rota meters, the rest of the houses in Ward 2 all have pre-paid meters. (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) T ELECOMMUNICATIONS Good telecommunications are available in the settlement. 4.3.6.6.7 S TEYTLERVILLE IDP P ROJECTS The IDP projects identified in the IDP for Steytlerville are set out in the table below: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Cricket pitch Road signs & street names Speed bumps / pedestrian signs at entrances of Steytlerville town (in front of P. Baartman church and zebra crossing lines only when entering SV from WM side). Animal health Bucket & septic tank eradication Waste disposal sites Recreational facility for youth, Steytlerville – renovate Pietie Fourie Bld Community Hall, Golden Valley renovate Pietie Fourie Bld Child & Youth care centre for vulnerable children, Steytlerville – Dept Social Development, Education & BM Day hospital in Steytlerville TABLE 13: STEYTLERVILLE IDP PROJECTS The sewerage system can only be upgraded once the Erasmuskloof water project is completed. (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) 4.3.6.6.6.3 PEDESTRIAN M OVEMENT 46 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.6.8 L AND O WNERSHIP The municipality owns large amounts of land within and surrounding the settlement. There is therefore sufficient municipal owned land in order to meet the demand for human settlement expansion. OWNERSHIP Ownership in Steytlerville No. of Erven Hectares % Municipal 89 2322.9627 44.71% Private/Other 1564 2861.8914 55.08% State 13 11.0006 0.21% Total 1666 5195.8547 100% (Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements, 2014) MAP 26: STEYTLERVILLE OWNERSHIP 47 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.6.9 S OCIAL AND E CONOMICS 4.3.6.6.9.1 SOCIAL AND C OMMUNITY FACILITIES An assessment of social and community facilities has been undertaken. The outcome is set out in following table. The shortfall is highlighted. FACILITY CSIR GUIDELINE REQUIREMENTS CURRENT PROVISION CURRENT SHORTFALL (2014) FUTURE SHORTFALL (2031) HEALTH AND EMERGENCY SERVICES Primary Health Care 1 1 (Clinic is too small) 0 - Mobile/Periodic Health Clinic - 1 (Not currently staffed) 0 - Police Station - 1 0 - SAPS Contact Point - 0 0 - Fire bakkie pump deployment point - 0 0 - SOCIAL AND CULTURAL (PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES) Museum- small - 0 0 - Local Library 1 0 0 - Mobile/Periodic Library - 0 0 - CIVIC Post Office/Agency with post boxes 1 1 0 - Post Boxes - 1 0 - SASSA Office (Social Service Office) 1 1 0 - Social Grant Pay Point 1 0 0 - Cemetery 1 3 0 - ABET/Skill Training - 0 0 - Special Education - 0 0 - Secondary School 1 1 0 - Primary School 1 2 0 - Grade R Class at Primary School 1 2 0 - Small crèche/Early Childhood Development Centre 1 0 0 - EDUCATION RECREATION PROVISION (SPORTS AND PARKS) Level surface playing field 1 Mobile/Periodic Home Affairs Office - 0 0 - Grassed surface (2 football fields equivalent) 1 Mobile/e-Gov Integrated Service 1 0 1 - Grassed field (2 football fields equivalent) with 500seat stand 1 Labour Office 1 0 1 - Single hard surface court 1 Solid Waste Disposal Site and Recycling Depot 1 1 0 - Combi-court surface (x2) 1 Community Pool 1 SOCIAL SERVICES Community Hallmedium/small (fringe areas) - 1 0 - Local/Neighbourhood Park (includes play equipment) 1 Children’s Home - 0 0 - Play Equipment at other facilities - 1 0 - TABLE 14: STEYTLERVILLE COMMUNITY FACILITIES 1 0 - 4.3.6.6.9.2 Home for the Aged ICT Access Point 1 Subject to detailed Investigation at LSDF/Precinct Plan Level Subject to detailed Investigation at LSDF/Precinct Plan Level CRIME 48 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 There is a Police Station and the town has a low level of crime which is likely to have a positive impact on local economic development. (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) 4.3.6.6.10 S TEYTLERVILLE Z ONING M AP The Steytlerville Zoning Map is outdated and needs to be revised in order to meet the requirements of SPLUMA. Map 27: Steytlerville Zoning Map 49 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.6.11 S TEYTLERVILLE SPATIAL S YNOPSIS Steytlerville is the second largest settlement and currently has a housing backlog of 853 households. Bulk service infrastructure needs to be upgraded to enable the necessary human settlement development to address this. Physical integration can be achieved through infill on underutilized land. The stormwater master plan proposals need to be considered together with the need to increase the capacity of the cemeteries. HOUSEHOLDS 1295 households Backlog ± 853 Rectification projects Verify previous settlement areas ELECTRICITY Eskom – Vuyolwethu Upgrade main transformer Connections to 99 houses BULK WATER COMPACTNESS EFFICIENCY Ground water sources Water Upgrading Required = Erasmuskloof project (ESKOM, pumpsations and 20km pipeline) – 3-4 years to completion AND AMENITIES Increased burial capacity at Cemeteries required. ROADS AND STORMWATER PHYSICAL AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION Identify potential infill sites Eliminate apartheid buffer zones/areas Stormwater Master Plan SANITATION Water-borne sewage and conservancy or septic tanks COMMONAGE Commonage Management Plans Required Mapping of camps Additional land required SOLID WASTE MAP 28: STEYTLERVILLE SPATIAL SYNOPSIS Not authorised Consultant appointed to resolve. 50 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.7 R IETBRON Rietbron was established in 1910, it lies in the heart of the Karoo on the R306 between Beaufort West and Willowmore. There are less than 20 permanently occupied houses in the older part of the settlement, the rest are vacation or weekend houses. The town was established due to the farming community’s need for a church, school and other social facilities, these include: the Agriculture Association the school, the church, the Woman's and Tennis Club. It was upon these facilities that the town was built. Rietbron has a vibrant mohair industry the animals farmed for this practice are Angora goats, Merino and Dorper sheep. This town is also well known for its Karoo lamb. In 1973 prospecting for uranium was done on Ryskuil farm, but when the prices of this mineral dropped the prospecting came to halt. In 2004 prospecting resumed on farm Ryskuil and surrounding farms. Rietbron also hosts an annual sports festival which is held in March, it is the town’s main event. Rietbron’s main attractions are: the ACVV hall built in 1922, which was later converted into museum; the NG Kerk- Dutch Reformed Church, hunting and camping, the Beervlei dam; Die Bron a well after which Rietbron is named; the library and the Kanniedood aloe – which is endemic to the Karoo. Rietbron was part of the previous District Management Area and was incorporated into BLM after the elections of 18 May 2011. Thus, the Spatial Development Framework 2007 did not include this area. The financial implications for the incorporation of this area into the SDF must be considered. 4.3.6.7.1 P OPULATION The current population is 1184 persons who make up 378 households at a density of 3.13 persons per household. 4.3.6.7.2 H OUSING AND L AND D EMAND The number of households is expected to increase by 14 by the year 2031 and together with a housing waiting list of 203 households equates to a housing demand of 217 houses. Given this 9ha of suitable land is required to accommodate this demand. 4.3.6.7.3 H OUSING P ROJECTS A housing project initiated by the SBDM to accommodate approximately 300 beneficiaries has not commenced due an inability to identify sufficient beneficiary numbers. No layout plan has been prepared. 4.3.6.7.4 R ESIDENTIAL D ENSITY 4.3.6.7.5.4 R OADS AND STORMWATER The condition of internal gravel roads is good. The process of maintaining and upgrading roads is however hampered by budget constraints (Baviaans Municipality, 2014) 4.3.6.7.5.5 SOLID W ASTE DISPOSAL Consultants have been appointed to deal with the formalizing of the solid waste site at Rietbron 4.3.6.7.5.6 E LECTRICITY Eskom supplies electricity. Bulk capacity needs to be upgraded. 4.3.6.7.5.7 T ELECOMMUNICATIONS There is access to telecommunication services in Rietbron. 4.3.6.7.6 R IETBRON Z ONING M AP No zoning information is available for the settlement. In addition the cadastral information is inaccurate and incomplete. A process needs to be followed to accurately establish the cadastral boundaries of the registered erven in the settlement. This will enable an accurate land audit to establish ownership of the land parcels. 4.3.6.7.7 R IETBRON IDP P ROJECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sewerage system: Manenza Square Waste disposal sites Upgrading of caravan park Anti-Poverty Site – Siyazondla: Dept Agriculture Heritage educational programme: Cultural Affairs Rietbron – Training of artists in sewing & design Jacobsville has a density of 14 units per hectare, while the older part of town has a density of less than 1 unit per hectare. Residential development needs to be undertaken within the existing urban fabric to ensure a more acceptable average density. World Book Day No land ownership information can be mapped as the surveyor general information is not accurately reflected for this settlement. Road signs & street names 4.3.6.7.5 B ULK S ERVICES 4.3.6.7.5.1 Animal health TABLE 15: RIETBRON IDP PROJECTS WATER The main water supply comes from boreholes, which is augmented from mountain streams and current water supply shortfalls exist. Contamination of groundwater due to poor sanitation in erstwhile DMA. 4.3.6.7.5.2 SEWERAGE Regular removal of sanitation from houses with septic tanks. 4.3.6.7.5.3 IRRIGATION W ATER MIG funds will be used to establish an underground grey water irrigation system at the sport field in Rietbron 51 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.7.8 S OCIAL AND E CONOMIC ICT Access Point 1 1 0 - 4.3.6.7.8.1 Post Office/Agency with post boxes 1 1 0 - There is a police station in Rietbron and the level of crime is low. 4.3.6.7.8.2 Post Boxes - 1 0 - SASSA Office (Social Service Office) 1 0 1 - Social Grant Pay Point 1 0 1 - Cemetery 1 2 0 - CRIME SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES The social and community facilities provision is reflected in Table 16 and the shortfalls have been highlighted. FACILITY CSIR GUIDELINE REQUIREMENTS CURRENT PROVISION CURRENT SHORTFALL (2014) FUTURE SHORTFALL (2025) HEALTH AND EMERGENCY SERVICES EDUCATION Primary Health Care 1 1 0 - ABET/Skill Training - 0 0 - Mobile/Periodic Health Clinic - 0 0 - Special Education - 0 0 - Police Station - 1 0 - Secondary School 1 1 0 - SAPS Contact Point - 0 0 - Primary School 1 1 0 - Fire bakkie pump deployment point - 0 0 - Grade R Class at Primary School 1 1 0 - Small crèche/Early Childhood Development Centre 1 1 0 - SOCIAL AND CULTURAL (PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES) Museum- small - 1 0 - Local Library 1 1 0 - Mobile/Periodic Library - 0 0 - CIVIC Mobile/Periodic Home Affairs Office - 0 0 - Mobile/eGov Integrated Service 1 0 1 - Labour Office 1 0 1 - Solid Waste Disposal Site and Recycling Depot 1 2 0 - SOCIAL SERVICES Community Hallmedium/small (fringe areas) - 2 0 - Children’s Home - 0 0 - Home for the Aged - 0 0 - RECREATION PROVISION (SPORTS AND PARKS) Level surface playing field 1 Grassed surface (2 football fields equivalent) 1 Grassed field (2 football fields equivalent) with 500-seat stand 1 Single hard surface court 1 Combi-court surface (x2) 1 Community Pool 1 Local/Neighbourhood Park (includes play equipment) 1 Play Equipment at other facilities - Subject to detailed Investigation at LSDF/Precinct Plan Level TABLE 16: RIETBRON SOCIAL FACILITY ASSESSMENT 52 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.7.9 R IETBRON S PATIAL S YNOPSIS Rietbron is the smallest of the primary settlements and consist of about 360 households. There is a severe lack of social facilities, which forces residents to travel to Willowmore for basic needs. The apartheid spatial legacy is very evident and needs to be eradicated through infill and connecting land uses and development. HOUSEHOLDS 360 households Backlog not known ELECTRICITY Eskom BULK WATER Ground water source Bulk Water Upgrading Required VACANT LAND PARCELS PHYSICAL AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION Identify potential infill sites Eliminate apartheid buffer zones/areas COMPACTNESS EFFICIENCY Appropriate densification Implement an Urban Edge/Settlement Limit AND AMENITIES No bank or Post Office Upgrade rugby field ROADS AND STORMWATER Upgrade access road (R306) – From Willowmore and to potential mining area No Stormwater Master Plan SANITATION Water-borne sewage and conservancy or septic tanks EIA and Licences to be obtained SOLID WASTE Not authorised Consultant appointed to resolve. MAP 29: RIETBRON SPATIAL SYNOPSIS. 53 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.3.6.8 B AVIAANSKLOOF The primary spatial planning issue within the Baviaanskloof region is to meet the residents basic needs (shelter/housing, water, sanitation etc) as well as to provide appropriate community and social services. These needs must be met in a manner where the Municipal and sector departments resources can be focused in a sustainable manner. SUSTAINABLE LAND USE HUMAN SETTLEMENT Living Lands and Baviaans Hartland Initiative (Agreement Nov 2011) Goal to live off the land in a sustainable manner Communal nature reserves Cultivation in the valleys Alluvial fans and wetland rehabilitation Rehabilitated thicket – Carbon Credits Agri-tourism in the valleys Nature – tourism in the mountains Low accessibility to markets and facilities Small dispersed settlements and groups of farm worker settlements Mostly on private land Road upgrade ECONOMY Tourism Agriculture SOCIAL Potential impact of dangerous game introduction on the human settlement and safety Increased need for social facilities TRENDS Shift from agriculture to game reserve/tourism activities Nature reserve expansion Increasing tourism activity Relocation of people due to changes to nature based activities HUMAN SETTLEMENT STRATEGY The area is unique and needs specific attention – possibly a regional SDF (SPLUMA) There is a need identify the location for focused resource investment (housing, facilities and services) Participation of all the roleplayers (Livinglands, 2014) 54 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 4.4 SUMMARY The spatial planning issues identified in the preceding phases are listed below: Identify the key agricultural areas to be protected Implications of SPLUMA (Implementation of the SDF) Land Use policies (Taverns, etc.) Address heritage resource protection Rietbron Integration Land Use Management - Zoning Map Identify potential infill areas Look at growth directions Human Settlement Strategy and Hierarchy (Where should scarce resources be allocated and investment made – Implement CDM hierarchy) Baviaanskloof Regional development (Incorporate initiatives into the SDF) – Hartland Focused resource investment within a settlement hierarchy. Access (Road upgrades) Keep the settlements compact Initiative Identify Urban Settlement Limits around the settlements Establish an appropriate density for new residential development Identify pedestrian pathways Electricity to Vondeling (Off-Grid = Solar) Landfill sites at Steytlerville, Willowmore and Rietbron Climate Change Adaption Provision and expansion of cemeteries. Spoornet Property (CDM) – Transfers and policy re services and housing provision Human Settlement Verify the relevance of the 2007 SDF settlement areas. Verify the housing need (Differentiate between various subsidy forms and income levels) Look at the impact of the lack of bulk services provision. Social Facilities provision (Particularly schools, parks and sportsfields) Quantify the area of land needed for human settlement Extension of commonages Mapping Identify areas of possible expansion Identify potential conflict areas re biodiversity etc Water supply from the farm Wanhoop – Acquisition of the Property. Identify and prioritise the Road upgrades Set out the possible nature reserve expansion areas and map potential implications 55 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 5 SURROUNDING SDF ALIGNMENT A key component of this SDF is to ensure alignment between this municipality’s spatial proposals and those of the surrounding municipalities. These alignment issues are identified below. 5.1 KOUGA LM Baviaans Mega Reserve Planning Domain and conservation area affect Kouga Municipality. Access road via Hankey and Patensie into the Baviaanskloof. Baviaanskloof tourism route between Patensie and Willowmore in the Western Cape (gravel and 4x4 routes). Tourism routes between the Western Cape and Kouga Municipalities (Langkloof) and the N2 via Humansdorp (tarred roads). Thyspunt electricity lines between Kouga and the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality. Longmore Forest forestry area between Kouga Municipality and the NMBM. Linear development along the Kromme River from St Francis into Koukamma Municipality. Shared spatial planning resources between Kouga and Koukamma. Coastal Management integrated with Koukamma Municipality and the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality. 5.2 CAMDEBOO LM N9 tourism route from Middelburg to Western Cape via Graaff-Reinet and Aberdeen. R75 road between Graaff-Reinet to Jansenville is main linkage with the coast and NMBM. Area Based Focus Area 5 between Graaff-Reinet and Jansenville. R61 linkage between Graaff-Reinet and Beaufort West. Mountain Zebra Camdeboo Corridor Project. R72 linkage between the NMBM, Sundays River Valley and Ndlambe Municipality. Greater Addo Elephant Park Planning Domain. Coastal Management between Ndlambe, Sundays River Valley, NMBM and Ngqushwa Municipalities. Possible municipal boundary demarcation amendment at Groendal on the western side of the NMBM. R75 between Uitenhage and Jansenville via Sundays River Municipality. Acquisition and installation of the Erasmuskloof Water Augmentation plan for Steytlerville. 5.6 GEORGE LM N9 Rail Swartberg East Nature Reserve Acquisition of the Farm Wanhoop 5.7 PRINCE ALBERT LM Minor gravel road linkages Extensive agriculture 5.8 BEAUFORT WEST LM Proposed Mining to the north of Rietbron R306 from Willowmore through Rietbron to Beaufort West Extensive agriculture 5.3 IKWEZI LM R75 road between Graaff-Reinet to Jansenville is main linkage with the coast and NMBM. Darlington dam access from the R75 into Greater Addo Elephant Park, near Wolwefontein. R75 dual function as tourism route, high truck volumes making use of road transport and serve agricultural functions. R338 - Wolwefontein to Klipplaat (Also part of the access route to Steytlerville from NMBM) 5.4 KOUKAMMA LM N2 Garden Route linkage between NMBM and the Western Cape, primarily a tourism route. Langkloof alternative route key function for transport of produce to Western and Eastern Cape. Koukamma Municipality affected by the Baviaans Mega Reserve Domain. Spatial planning capacity and support from Kouga Municipality. Coastal Management integrated with Kouga and Bitou Municipalities. 5.5 SUNDAYS RIVER VALLEY LM N2 between the Coega IDZ and Buffalo City IDZ. 56 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 6 SECTOR PLANS Sector Plan Status SDF Implications Water Services Development Plan A Draft Water Services Development Plan was prepared by Uhambiso For the purposes of the SDF, the Census 2011 data was used to indicate the level of water and Consulting in George. Contact: Mr Andre de Kock sanitation services in the District. The recommendations of the WSDP will be incorporated in SDF. Integrated Transport Plan Engineering Advise and Services are in the process of reviewing the ITP The ITP provides a summary of roads and transport projects taking place at LM level, provincial and maintenance plans of all roads in the District. Draft document will level (DRPW) and national level (SANRAL). Spatial implications will be incorporated during June be available during June 2014. Contact: Cary Hastie 2014. Electricity Master Plan Source from Bennie Arends Integrated Waste Management Plan Baviaans Municipality has an IWMP.. Prepared in November 2008 by The Integrated Waste Management Assessment reflected in the CDM IDP indicating the status KweziV3. In need for review. Contact: Mr Howard Skweza at the CDM quo of existing waste disposal sites and reflects spatially where priority intervention is required. (Tel. 041-5087314). Also see CDM IDP. Refer to SDF maps. Disaster Management Plan Disaster Management Plans under review for the LM’s. Contact: During the Drafting of the CDM SDF the need to spatially reflect climate change implication in the Mandisa Nohashe (Tel. 041-5087125) Disaster Management Plan was identified including flood areas, flood lines and possible drought areas. Housing Sector Plans The Housing Sector Plan for the Baviaans Municipality was reviewed by The SDF reflects the latest housing information obtained from the HSP and the Census 2011 data. GIBB. The final draft dated February 2014 was used in the preparation of the SDF. CDM Area Based Plan The Baviaans ABP was prepared in August 2008. To be determined. The spatial implications of the ABP were incorporated in the SDF maps. EC Biodiversity Conservation Plan, EMP and Climate Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Project No 2005-012, August The EC Biodiversity Conservation Plan 2007 was incorporated in the SDF maps. The need for the Change 2007 preparation of an EMP was identified. Climate change implications to be addressed in the DMP. Institutional Plans including: Workplace skills plan, These institutional plans were not sourced as part of the SDF Drafting Institutional Plans has limited spatial implications and are not reflected spatially in the SDF. Human Resources Strategy and the Employment Equity process. Plan LED Management Plan and Action Plan IDP p. 160-169 Spatial implications in LED Action Plan to be incorporated into SDF Tourism Master Plan Baviaans Tourism Master Plan The spatial implications of the Tourism Routes and Tourism Focus areas contained in the Baviaans Tourism Master Plan were incorporated into the Baviaans SDF maps. TABLE 17: SECTOR PLANS 57 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 7 THE BAVIAANS SDF SPATIAL VISION The effective provision of engineering services to the smaller and isolated settlements will require the consideration of alternative and environmentally sound solutions. The spatial vision statement has taken the key spatial elements from the Municipality’s Vision and Mission (As recorded in the latest IDP) and set these out in a long term spatial vision statement for the Municipality. 8.1.4 APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF SOCIAL FACILITIES A municipality where the integrated and efficient settlements of Willowmore, Steytlerville and Rietbron provide residents with equitable access to basic services, housing and social facilities within a region where a growing tourism and agricultural economy, based on the sustainable use of the arid region/Karoo resources as well as the Baviaanskloof World Heritage Site, provides economic opportunities for all. This Spatial Vision Statement can be expanded into three primary spatial goals: Spatial Goal 1: Integrated and Efficient Settlements Spatial Goal 2: Tourism and Agricultural Development Spatial Goal 3: Sustainable Resource Use Spatial Goal 4: Mainstream Spatial Planning Which will focus all spatial planning and land use management. These goals are briefly expanded upon below. 8 SPATIAL GOALS The identified spatial goals align with national planning directives and principle. These goals will guide the development of objectives and strategies in later chapters 8.1 SPATIAL GOAL 1: INTEGRATED AND EFFICIENT SETTLEMENTS The municipality will consist of an interconnected hierarchy of integrated and efficient settlements within which people are able to advance themselves as much as possible. To achieve this, the following principles will be applied. 8.1.1 MINIMUM VIABLE SETTLEMENT SIZE It is also not viable for a full level of community and social facilities to be provided within each of the settlements. 8.1.5 SETTLEMENT HIERARCHY AND FUNCTION The proposed settlement hierarchy for the municipality is aligned with the settlement hierarchy set out in the Sarah Baartman District Municipality SDF. 8.1.6 COMPACTNESS AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION The Baviaans settlements will be compact as well as functionally and socially integrated 8.1.6.1 W ALKING DISTANCE The settlements are currently at a pedestrian scale, where public transport is not required for access to services and facilities within the settlement. Where possible urban development should take place within a walking distance of 20 minutes or 1000m from facilities to ensure ease of access. 8.1.6.2 F UNCTIONAL I NTEGRATION All social and commercial function and facilities will be located in close proximity to the residents as well as to each other, while 50% of these should be within walking distance. In addition, development should integrate the necessary social and community facilities needed for the additional households, while also making allowance for the need for alternative ownership and residential typologies. 8.1.6.3 S OCIO E CONOMIC I NTEGRATION The various socio-economic groups will be sensibly integrated by means of an effective socio-economic gradient in order not to have a negative impact on the existing housing market. This will through varied housing typologies enable integrated human settlements Given the remoteness of some of the settlements it is recognised that the conventional approach to determining a viable settlement size does not apply. Given this the principle of nodal development and focused resource allocation was applied to establish a desirable hierarchy, which includes the identification of a new settlement area in the Baviaanskloof. In order to achieve a viable size and appropriate economies of scale this new settlement is intended to accommodate all the current housing need within the area. 8.1.6.4 E FFECTIVE DENSITY INCREASE 8.1.2 EFFECTIVE ALLOCATION OF SCARCE RESOURCES 8.1.6.5 URBAN EDGE - S ETTLEMENT GROWTH LIMIT To effectively meet the needs of the majority of the residents, scarce municipal resources cannot be evenly spread across all settlements. Most of the resources should be allocated to where the benefit will be felt by the most people. An urban edge/settlement growth boundary will focus human settlement development onto the appropriate land in order to protect available natural resources. No urban development will be permitted beyond this boundary. 8.1.3 APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF ENGINEERING SERVICES The urban edge delimitation will include surrounding commonages, engineering services and facilities etc. while the settlement growth boundary will identify the desired limit for human settlement development. This also implies that the level of services delivered will not be the same in all of the settlements. Basic services will be provided in all the settlements, while higher levels of services will be supplied to the higher order settlements. 8.1.6.6 U RBAN RESTRUCTURING New residential development within the settlements will contribute to the achievement of an average gross density of 12-15 dwelling units per hectare. All new development should achieve densities of at least 15 units per hectare and preferably higher. The apartheid spatial patterns will be eliminated by means of effective social and functional integration through infill development. The municipality will make use of existing vacant and underutilized land parcels within the existing urban settlements before additional land on the periphery is utilised for human settlement purposes. 58 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 8.2 SPATIAL GOAL 2: TOURISM AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT 8.3.4 USE OF APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY The agricultural and tourism sectors of the economy have grown as a result of the investment in strategic road infrastructure and the protection of land currently utilised for agricultural purposes. Alternative and appropriate technologies are utilised to reduce the demand on non-renewable fuel energy and scarce resource. Green building technologies are utilised in new human settlement developments i.e. appropriate building orientation, construction materials, rain water harvesting etc. 8.2.1 EFFECTIVE LINKAGES TO MARKETS AND TO SERVICES All the primary road linkages between the agricultural production areas and the tourism activity areas are upgraded to at least a high quality gravel road, while the following are upgraded to tarred secondary road standard: Willowmore to Steytlerville cement road - R329 The road to Beaufort West through Rietbron - R306 The western Baviaanskloof access road (Till the entrance to the reserve)- R332 8.2.2 PROTECTION OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL A GRICULTURAL LAND The land used for agriculture has been mapped and is subject to land development guidelines that ensure that there is minimal loss due to human settlement development. 8.2.3 COMMONAGE EXPANSION The commonages of the settlements have been expanded to enable residents to participate in cultivation and stock farming activities. The settlement growth boundary has effectively protected the identified commonage area from human settlement encroachment. 8.3 SPATIAL GOAL 3: SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE USE The municipality ensures that the basic needs of the residents as well as the poor are met through sustainable resource use. The environmental integrity of its natural resource is maintained. 8.3.1 ADOPTING THE CURRENT PROTECTED AREA NETWORK The protected area network together with the proposed ecological linkages is acknowledged in the spatial plan and the appropriate land use management guidelines implemented. The areas that have been identified for protected area expansion have been mapped and are subjected to similar land use management guidelines as for the protected area. 8.3.5 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY PRODUCTION Green energy production developments (Solar and wind) are supported in principle provided that any negative impacts on the tourism and agricultural economy are avoided. These developments, particularly wind energy production facilities, have a high visual impact on the surrounding area and should be located away from existing and future tourism focus area - Preferably outside of the 10km ‘buffer’ surrounding the World Heritage Site. 8.4 SPATIAL GOAL 4: MAINSTREAM SPATIAL PLANNING Effective spatial planning and land use management is mainstreamed in all of the Municipal Departments and has been integrated into the land use management components of all of the sector departments operating within the Municipality. Effective participation by all residents in spatial planning is achieved through the availability of information as well as through a knowledgeable citizenry. 8.4.1 SPATIAL INFORMATION The municipality has an integrated and effective land information management system which contains updated and accurate land information (Cadastral, ownership, zoning, SDF etc.) This system has been integrated with the Land Use Management System required in terms of the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act (SPLUMA). 8.4.2 EXPERTISE AND CAPACITY The Municipality has accessed the necessary capacity and resources to effectively undertake its spatial planning and land use management mandate as set out in SPLUMA. This takes the form of both appropriate appointments and partnerships with surrounding municipalities and/or the CDM. 8.4.3 PARTICIPATION The participation requirements with regard to SPLUMA are adhered to fully in all spatial planning and land use management actions. The residents also participate effectively as a result of focused capacity building and information dissemination. 8.3.2 IDENTIFY AREAS SUSCEPTIBLE TO CLIMATE CHANGE The areas susceptible to flooding are mapped as well as the potential temperature changes identified geographically. In addition to this the areas which can assist to mitigate the potential impact of climate change are identified and the appropriate land use management guidelines have been implemented to protect them. The spatial implications of the climate change adaption strategies of other economic sectors (Particularly agriculture) have been accommodated in the spatial planning of the Municipality 8.3.3 GROUND WATER PROTECTION The areas which are subjected to high ground water abstraction have been identified and the appropriate land use management guidelines set in place to protect those resources and catchments. 59 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 9 MUNICIPAL SPATIAL FRAMEWORK PLAN Land use planning has, in the past, been focused on a socio-economic approach. This has meant that the need for housing, agriculture, access was dealt with within the physical constraints of the natural environment. Recent land use planning has elevated the role of biodiversity (ecosystems and their associated services) as a resource upon which much of the economy of the municipality is based. The result is that the maintenance of a fully functional ecological fabric is important for the continued provision of the goods and services necessary to sustain human wellbeing. The rural component of this SDF therefore focusses on “mainstreaming” biodiversity into the spatial planning of the municipality. This is achieved by: Delineation and rationalisation of the land management classes and guidelines contained in the Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan (2007) into Spatial Planning Categories (SPC’s). The corresponding SPC’s are set out in Table 18 to Table 20 Delineating (Mapping) of the rural landscape into these SPCs. Refer to Map 30 Setting out guidelines for appropriate land use within each SPC.- Refer to Table 22 Please note that these SPCs do not confer development rights nor do they take away existing lawful land use rights 9.1 BIODIVERSITY The municipal spatial framework plan makes provision for protecting, enhancing and expanding the biodiversity footprint through: Management, expansion and linkage of the Baviaanskloof Nature Reserve and World Heritage Site. Management and expansion of informal conservation (i.e. Stewardship areas and Conservancies), especially within identified Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and proposed biodiversity corridors given their linkage and climate change adaption function. The biodiversity footprint dominates the southern part of the municipality and is centred on the Baviaanskloof Nature Reserve and its linkages to the Kammanassie and Groendal Nature Reserves. These areas are significant from both a terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity perspective. . Baviaans Municipality - Definition of SPCs Land Use Management CORE 1 AREAS Core 1 Areas are those parts of the urban and rural landscape required to meet biodiversity patterns or ecological processes (i.e. critical biodiversity areas). These include habitats classified as highly irreplaceable, critically endangered, or endangered terrestrial (land) and aquatic (rivers and wetlands) habitats. These also include areas currently not yet exhibiting high levels of biodiversity loss, but which should be protected and restored in order to ensure biodiversity pattern and ecological process targets/thresholds can be met in the most efficient way possible. These also include essential biological corridors vital to sustain their functionality, but exclude intensive agriculture and any commercial plantations within the Mountain Catchment and Informal Conservation Areas. Three components make up Core 1 Areas: (i) Formal Protected Areas (ii) Informal Conservation Network comprising of Stewardship Areas, Conservancies, Private Nature Reserves and Municipal Nature Reserves: (iii) Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBA), including Critical Ecological Support Areas (CESAs) as identified through a systematic conservation planning process that have no formal conservation status. These comprise terrestrial or aquatic habitats, remnants or features that must be conserved to meet national biodiversity pattern or process thresholds. CORE 2 AREAS Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) include areas currently not yet exhibiting high levels of biodiversity loss, but which should be protected and restored in order to ensure biodiversity pattern and ecological process targets can be met in the most efficient way possible. Core 2 includes areas that buffer or provide ecological support to terrestrial or aquatic CBAs, river and ecological corridors not classified as essential and Mountain Catchment Areas. Designate areas of the landscape of highest conservation importance, whether currently protected or not. Inform expansion of the Protected Area network. Delineate areas that must be maintained in, or restored to, a natural state in order to sustain biodiversity patterns and processes and the functionality of eco-system services. Identify areas of land that could serve as biodiversity offset receiving areas. In combination with Core 2 Areas, Core 1 Areas spatially define the biodiversity ‘core’ of the municipality. Management of Core 2 Areas serves to restore and sustain eco-system functioning, especially ecological processes (i.e. rivers and seep clusters and their respective buffers) in support of wetlands and rivers in Critical Biodiversity Areas. Through protecting riparian corridors the role of such corridors in climate change adaption is enhanced, especially in arid climatic areas. TABLE 18: SPC: CORE 1 AND 2 60 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 9.2 AGRICULTURE The Municipality has significant areas where extensive small stock farming is practiced, with limited cultivation occurring in the Baviaanskloof Valley (Western portion). These areas need to be protected and have therefore been classified in terms of the Spatial Planning Categories as Buffer and Intensive Agriculture. The areas were additional cultivation can be practiced need to be identified and feasibility studies undertaken to determine the economic viability of their use. In this regard the reason why the cultivation practices along the Groot River Valley ceased needs to be established and measure put in place to ensure that this is revitalised if economically viable. Due to the remoteness of the area from agricultural markets the maintenance and upgrading of access routes NMBM Market (R329) and Baviaanskloof Route (Western Portion - R332) - to the active agricultural areas needs to be prioritised. In particular the cement road section between Willowmore and Steytlerville needs to be upgraded to a formal tarred surface. Baviaans Municipality - Definition of SPCs Land Use Management BUFFER AREAS Buffer Areas include areas designated as “Other Natural Areas”, which are located in extensive agricultural landscapes where livestock farming is the dominant land use, often reflecting areas highly impacted by grazing. Refer to Table 20. 9.3 SETTLEMENTS At a municipal planning scale the urban areas are classified as Settlement SPC’s. Refer to Table 19. Baviaans Municipality - Definition of SPCs SETTLEMENT SPC This category includes all settlements, and all forms of new human settlement. To develop and manage existing and new settlements on a sustainable basis. Where possible existing settlements (i.e. particularly rural settlements) should be used to accommodate nonagricultural rural development activities and facilities for reasons of; local economic development; consolidating, integrating and reinforcing settlement structure; improving service delivery; strengthening rural-urban linkages; promoting socio-economic development; and increasing thresholds for service delivery and social facilities. TABLE 19: SPC: SETTLEMENT Land Use Management Manage for sustainable development of current land use in the area. Protect existing agricultural activity (i.e. livestock production) to ensure food security, contribution to the regional economy, maintenance and management of rural areas and contributing to the working and cultural landscapes. Facilitate agricultural diversification and nonagricultural opportunities (e.g. game farming, tourist facilities) and “value-adding” to the primary product. Accommodate space extensive and nuisance urban uses, and extensive agricultural uses (e.g. waste water treatment plants, piggeries, abattoirs, etc.). Enhance biodiversity through innovative agricultural practices (e.g. veld management). Minimize fragmentation of remaining natural habitats and corridors. Reverse lost biodiversity in order to reinstate buffer zones and corridors. Rehabilitate degraded areas (e.g. over-grazing). INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE SPC The Intensive Agriculture SPC comprises a consolidation of the existing and potential intensive agricultural footprint (i.e. homogeneous farming areas made up of cultivated land and production support areas). Consolidating and protecting the existing and potential agricultural footprint and landscape. Facilitating sustainable agricultural development, land and agrarian reform, and food security. The Intensive Agriculture SPC includes: (i) Irrigated crop cultivation (annual and perennial) (ii) Dry land crop cultivation including tillage of non-irrigated crops (annual and perennial) (iii) Commercial plantation areas TABLE 20: SPC: BUFFER AND INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE 61 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 9.4 SETTLEMENT ORDER AND FUNCTION Rietbron, Baviaanskloof (West) Sub-Local Centre It is not possible to rank or structure the rural settlements without an in-depth study relating to their housing needs, potential for development and feasibility for service provision. With this in mind it is imperative that the necessary studies be undertaken to enable the formulation of a rural settlement structure. The settlement order and functioning of the settlements has been aligned with the Sarah Baartman District The settlement functioning and planning priority for the settlements is set out in Table 21. The function and priorities set out in these table is to guide development, social and community facilities provision as well as infrastructure investment. Settlement Function Spatial Planning Priority Willowmore Sub-District Centre Settlement Function Spatial Planning Priority Municipal-scale administrative centre Municipal-scale service centre for commercial and social goods and services. Residential development covering limited range of economic bands (Middle-income – Low-income). Potential for value-adding agro-industrial processes. Potential for event-related tourism events. Land Management & Administration -CBD Revitalization and associated planning. Sustainable Human Settlement Programme and infrastructure investment - Public-funded settlement development only in relation to defined need (Backlog and growth associated with current population trends and economic development potential) Urban development at higher densities in integrated human settlements. Maintenance and upgrade of existing infrastructure. Steytlerville Local Centre Settlement Function Spatial Planning Priority Local-scale administrative centre. Local-scale service centre for commercial and social goods and services. Residential development covering limited range of economic bands (Middle-income – Low-income). Potential for value-adding agro-industrial processes. Potential for event-related tourism events. Limit urbanization (sustainability) – Focus on infrastructure and settlement backlogs and natural growth patterns. Urban aesthetics and land use management (to support local tourism) – CBD regeneration. Maintenance and upgrade of urban level of service infrastructure. Environmental management (to support local tourism). Identify adequate commonage land to enable food security and economic activity associated with stock. Minor administrative functions. Minor service centre for social goods and services. Focused support of local economic initiatives- agriculture-based. Prevent urban expansion beyond the planned accommodation for backlogs in human settlements (Focus on the formalisation of informal dwellings and back yard shacks) and infrastructure. Areas where higher order facilities should be focused in first instance. Maintenance and upgrade of existing infrastructure. Basic level of service extension with provision for higher levels of service where feasible and sustainable. Local planning to maximise use of existing resources. Identify adequate commonage land to enable food security and economic activity associated with stock. Vondeling, Fullarton Rural Settlements Settlement Function Spatial Planning Priority Primarily residential and livelihood subsistence function. Some provision of limited social goods and services. Basic level of service extension. Local land use schemes to be negotiated. Prevent urban expansion beyond the current planned for. Accommodation of backlogs in infrastructure and settlement (formalisation of the informal dwellings only). Identify adequate commonage land to enable food security and economic activity associated with stock. Baroe, Mount Stewart, Millar, Studis, Sandvlakte, Rural Place Settlement Function Spatial Planning Priority Primarily residential and livelihood subsistence function. Some provision of limited social goods and services. Basic level of service extension. Local land use schemes to be negotiated. Prevent urban expansion beyond the current planned for. Accommodation of backlogs in infrastructure and settlement (formalisation of the informal dwellings only). Identify adequate commonage land to enable food security and economic activity associated with stock. Table 21: Settlement Order and Function 62 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 TABLE 22: SPC LAND USE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FORM AND SCALE CORE 1 AREAS While the majority of areas of significant biodiversity value are within protected areas, other areas also manifesting as Core 1 occur in pastoral farming areas and require the following land-use considerations: “Wilderness” and pristine natural areas being essentially ‘no-go’ areas from a development perspective. Accordingly they should, as far as possible, remain undisturbed by human impact. Conservation areas (formal and informal) being restricted to uses as identified in approved integrated conservation development frameworks (e.g. Protected Areas Management Plans. Activities in agricultural areas (i.e. pastoral farming) within Core 1 Areas should be subject to: Lower impact practices Lower than standard stocking rates Resting cycles (i.e. rotational grazing) Wetland and river bank protection and use setback to avoid overgrazing, trampling and destabilization Avoiding areas containing red data species Limiting “value-adding” to nature-based tourism Restricting expansion of pastoral footprint Furthermore, in all Core 1 Areas, land use be subject to the following: Conservation management activities such as alien clearing, research and environmental education should be encouraged. Biodiversity-compatible uses (i.e. low impact) including: Non-consumptive low-impact eco-tourism activities such as recreation and tourism (e.g. hiking trails, bird and game watching, and visitor overnight accommodation). Harvesting of natural resources (e.g. indigenous plants for medicinal, culinary or commercial use), subject to an Environmental Management Plan, which demonstrates the sustainability of harvesting the specific resource. No development is permissible in proclaimed Wilderness Areas. Fine-scale environmental sensitivity mapping to inform the placement of essential buildings or structures in Core 1 Areas. Where buildings and structures in Core Areas are justifiable, “touch the earth lightly” construction principles should be applied to ensure that development is in harmony with the character of the surrounding landscape and to ensure the maintenance of its natural qualities. Wherever possible, structures associated with activities in Core 1 Areas should preferably be located in neighbouring Buffer Areas. The receiving environment and aesthetic qualities of an area must be the determinant of the scale and form of development. Where structures associated with biodiversity-compatible activities are located in Core 1 areas, these should preferably be located on currently disturbed footprints. Good management practices, with small low density footprints, appropriate technology and design concepts (e.g. Enviro-loos, temporary structures, green architecture and use of natural resources). Restrict development in Mountain Catchment Areas given the importance of the Baviaainskloof and Kouga Mountains as water catchment areas and ensure good management practices in these catchments insofar water run-off/yield and quality (e.g. natural run-off and decreased sediment loading). Temporary structures to be preferred (e.g. wooden structures, tents and canopy structures), with units carefully dispersed or clustered to achieve least impact. Raised boardwalks preferred or alternatively porous materials and design concepts. Stringent management programs for resource harvesting informed by determination of carrying capacity and a management plan to ensure appropriate harvesting techniques and volumes, as well as access. Where Core areas are identified on land that has no formal conservation status (e.g. private farm), no further loss of natural habitat should occur through intensive or extensive agricultural expansion. Given the often high visual or aesthetic value of these landscapes, no large-scale eco-tourism developments to be permitted. Land consolidation should be encouraged and sub-division discouraged. Conservation initiatives (e.g. Stewardship, Conservancies) be promoted to expand the conservation footprint on private land. Incentivising consolidation of the conservation estate by: Introducing limited low density eco-housing development rights 63 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FORM AND SCALE Financial incentives (ito. the Property Rates Act) Other incentives (e.g. resource economic approaches) Restricting new urban and rural settlement development subject to Settlement SPC criteria. CORE 2 AREAS Biodiversity – compatible and low impact conservation land uses as per Core 1 Areas, but allowing for a limited increase in scale of development in less sensitive areas provided ecological processes are not disrupted. To be informed by environmental sensitivity mapping, transformation thresholds and cumulative impacts. Biodiversity offsets may be necessary in this case. As for Core 1 Areas, also recognising the following: Sensitive siting of renewable energy generation installations (e.g. solar) given that Core 2 areas comprise a significant component of tourism viewsheds (i.e. the foothills) which frame the Grootrivier Valley and Baviaanskloof Valley as well as the tourism routes which traverse these foothills Siting of such renewable energy installations be in accordance with the proposed Provincial Guidelines in this regard. Where existing agricultural activities (e.g. pastoral) occur in Core 2 Areas, it should be subject to: - Lower impact practices Lower than standard stocking rates Resting cycles (i.e. rotational grazing) Wetland and river bank protection and use setback to avoid over-grazing, trampling and destabilization Avoiding areas containing red data species Limiting “value-adding” to nature-based tourism. As for Core 1 Areas, also recognising the following: Requirement for achieving limited development footprints of low density to inform the scale and form of renewable energy installations. Incentivise consolidation of the conservation estate by: - Introducing limited low density eco-housing development rights Financial incentives (i.t.o. the Property Rates Act) Other incentives (e.g. resource economic approaches) Restricting further extensions of intensive or extensive agriculture. BUFFER AREAS Activities and uses directly relating to the primary agricultural enterprise Farm buildings and activities associated with the primary agricultural activity, including a homestead, agricultural buildings and worker accommodation Additional dwelling units, including: - Units approved under the agricultural-land policy equating to 1 additional non-alienable dwelling unit per 10ha to a maximum of 5 per agricultural unit. - Units permissible in terms of eco-housing development (i.e. in lieu of consolidation of conservation properties). Location of primary agricultural activities (e.g. livestock production) to be informed by the exclusion of steep slopes, wetlands, floodplains of rivers and streams (and associated buffers), as well as areas of remnant vegetation. Development in support of primary cultivation (e.g. product handling and processing) to be located within or peripheral to the farmstead precinct or as distinct clusters at farm outposts. Development associated with farm diversification or “value adding” should; Development of the primary agricultural enterprise (e.g. livestock production) to comply with existing guidelines for extensive agriculture, including; carrying capacity as per Departmental guidelines per farm property; veld management and soil erosion control; and agricultural setback on wetlands, rivers and streams as per Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (No 43 of 1983) Building development to reflect the style, scale, form and the significance of the farmstead precinct or farm outpost, their 64 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES LOCATIONAL CRITERIA Additional land uses to facilitate diversification and “value adding” including; small-scale holiday accommodation (farmstay, B&B, guesthouse, boutique hotel); restaurant, lifestyle retail, venue facility; farmstall and farmstore; home occupation; local product processing (e.g. cheese-making); and tourist & recreational facilities (e.g. hiking trail, 4x4 routes). No fragmentation of farm cadastral unit, with spot zoning and consent uses employed to accommodate non-agricultural uses. not result in excessive expansion and encroachment of building development and land use into the farm area; and not be located in visually exposed areas given the extensive landscape of extensive farming areas. Development (i.e. farm diversification or “value-adding”) to be located within or peripheral to the farmstead precinct or outposts and should be accommodated in re-used, converted or replaced farm buildings (i.e. existing footprint) or to target disturbed areas. FORM AND SCALE buildings and setting. In the absence of existing farmsteads or outposts, development to reflect compact and unobtrusive nodes, conforming to local vernacular in terms of scale, form and design. Development design (e.g. resort) to maintain and enhance the dominance of the agricultural landscape, continuation of green spaces, riverine corridors, and dominant landscape features (e.g. ridge lines) Location of additional development to be informed by existing farm road access and existing on-line or off-grid services network. On-farm settlement of farmworkers, using existing housing stock. INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE SPCs Activities and uses directly related to the primary agricultural enterprise. Farm buildings and associated accommodation, etc.). structures (e.g. homestead, barns, farm worker Additional dwelling units approved under the policy of 1 additional non-alienable dwelling unit per 10ha, up to a maximum of 5 per farm. The location of agricultural activities will be dictated by local onfarm agro-climatic conditions (e.g. soils, slope, etc.), but wetlands, floodplains and important vegetation remnants to be kept in a natural state. Ancillary activities should be located within or peripheral to the farmstead precinct (preferably in re-used or replaced farm buildings and disturbed areas), not on good or moderate soils, and linked to existing farm road access and the services network. Farming to be undertaken in accordance with existing guidelines regarding slope, setbacks around wetlands and streams, etc. (as per CARA Regulations). Facilities for ancillary on-farm activities should be in scale with and reinforce the farmstead precinct, enhance the historic built fabric and respect conservation-worthy places. Landscaping should complement existing planting patterns. Ancillary rural activities of appropriate scale that do not detract from farming production, that diversify farm income, and add value to locally produced products, e.g.; small-scale rural holiday accommodation (e.g. farmstay, B&B, guesthouse, boutique hotel); restaurant, rural lifestyle retail; function venue facility; farmstall and farmstore; home occupation (farm product processing); local product processing); and rural recreational facilities (e.g. riding school). Fragmentation of farm cadastral unit should be prevented, and consent uses and spot zoning employed for managing ancillary on-farm activities. Consolidation of cadastral units should be promoted, especially where farms have conservation-worthy natural remnants and offer potential ecological corridor opportunities. Ancillary on-farm activities in an Intensive Agriculture SPC will be impacted on by surrounding farming activities (e.g. dust generation, spray drift, etc.), and such impacts should not be grounds for restricting farming production. 65 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 LAND USES AND ACTIVITIES LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FORM AND SCALE Non-agricultural related land uses and activities associated with rural development initiatives should, where-ever possible, be located in existing settlements. Preference should be given to settlements along dominant routes and accessible to bulk services corridors. The SDF and its urban edge component to define areas suitable for the expansion of existing settlements. Visual impact considerations should be taken into account, especially within settlement gateways and visually sensitive landscapes. New buildings and structures should conform to the massing, form, height and material use in existing settlements. Large scale resorts and tourist and recreation facilities should not be accommodated within Intensive Agriculture SPCs as they detract from the functionality and integrity of a limited irrigated agricultural footprint. Intensive-feed farming should not be accommodated in Intensive Agriculture SPCs due to its operational impacts (e.g. odour and traffic) and utilisation of scarce irrigable land. Nurseries in Intensive Agriculture SPCs should limited to those propagating local crop types. SETTLEMENT SPCs Agricultural activities of excessive scale and non-agricultural activities not suited for location in the Intensive Agricultural and Buffer 1 and 2 Areas to be located within settlements or their “fringe areas”. These activities include: - Off-farm residential development for farm worker accommodation (e.g. in “agricultural suburbs”) and rural dwellers. Agricultural industry (e.g. wine bottling plant) and regional product processing (e.g. abattoir, tannery). Institutions (e.g. jail or rehabilitation centre). Agricultural colleges and schools. Large-scale tourist accommodation (e.g. hotel) and facilities (e.g. waterpark). Service trades. Footloose business, including farming co-operatives, agricultural requisites and filling stations. Where new settlements need to be established, consideration needs to be given to; New settlements should be restricted to servicing of geographically isolated farming areas or areas demonstrating a high farm-worker population (e.g. Baviaanskloof); Amendment of existing settlement urban edges be in accordance with the municipal SDF.. environmental impact (e.g. wastestream management) ; visual impact, especially on the rural landscape; availability and sustainability of the provision of bulk services historical settlement patterns and form; and natural landscape and topographical form as design informants. When accommodating development in existing settlements the following principles should be adhered to; retain the compact form of smaller settlements; maintain and enhance public spaces; reinforce the close relationship of settlements to the regional route structure; integrate new development into the settlement structure; respect and cultural places and heritage; and respect local vernacular. 66 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 9.5 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY The economic activity is primarily located in the two main settlements. This activity is then linked by tourism routes along which tourist facilities are located. The maintenance of these routes is vital to the continued viability of these tourist facilities as well of the agricultural sector. The Grootrivier (T3) and Baviaanskloof (T1) routes are priorities from an accessibility perspective. At a municipal scale the upgrading of the concrete section of R329 between Willowmore and Steytlerville will have a significant impact on the economy of the Municipality and is highlighted as key spatial planning intervention. 9.6 SOCIAL FACILITIES Sustainable human settlements cannot be achieved without the provision of adequate social facilities. To be cost effective the provision of these facilities needs to be tailored to the size and characteristics of each settlement. In August 2012 the CSIR Guidelines for the Provision of Social Facilities in South African Settlements were published. This guideline document seeks to provide a quantitative and rational framework for the provision of key social facilities for various levels of settlements to support the planning process and provide support to the social facility investment plans. Firstly the guide provides an indication of which facilities can be expected to be provided in settlements of different sizes. The provision largely relates to meeting basic needs within a framework of the operational viability/cost efficiency of each facility type and indicates where mobile or periodic services would be a more appropriate level of service. Secondly, the guideline is a compendium of knowledge regarding appropriate access distances to facilities, as well as the number of people who are typically required to be living within this access distance to support the facility in question. These guidelines are to be used when evaluating the provision of community and social facilities in the proposed human settlement areas. determine the most effective methods to deliver services and housing in the Kloof. These are briefly set out below: An accurate needs assessment (Both for housing and associated community and social services. The ability of the Municipality and other associated Departments (Health, Sports and Recreation, etc.) to render the required services on a sustainable basis The availability and sustainable provision of bulk services (Especially water) The possible impact on the ground water resources of the area The impact on the socio-economic environment of the area as well as on the individual beneficiaries and surrounding land owners. (Including and assessment of the potential impact on the World Heritage Site) The evaluation of alternative settlement options i.e. Alternative locations and service provision methods. (The Bosdorp location should not be accepted as the desired location for focussed human settlement without the evaluation and assessment of alternatives) The establishment of an inter-departmental forum, which will be tasked with the formulation of a human settlement proposal for the Western Kloof region. Public participation and transparency. The establishment of an interdepartmental forum to source funding for, manage and drive the formulation of human settlement strategy for the Kloof is prioritised. 9.7 BAVIAANSKLOOF HUMAN SETTLEMENT The Baviaanskloof is the only area within the Municipality where adequate basic services are not available to residents. The provision of adequate housing, social and community facilities is therefore a priority but is currently encumbered by the following factors: The presence of small dispersed settlements and groups of farm workers. The current provision of community facilities is dispersed, which reduces the advantages of a central location and therefore increases the need to travel. During flood episodes communities are isolated. The area is isolated from any main service center. The economy and employment is based on agricultural and tourism activity. The conversion of agriculture to nature reserve/biodiversity activity reduces employment activity unless there is a conversion to and focus on tourism activities. Some settlements are situated within areas, which have been and may in the future be re-populated with dangerous game. The proximity to a World Heritage Site. The lack of bulk services. The Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs through the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency (ECPTA) have identified the need to establish a suitable settlement area as a focus for their accommodation and settlement relocation needs. To this end the ECPTA have initiated a process to deproclaim the area on which some workers housing is located (Known as Bosdorp) so that it will no longer form part of the Nature Reserve. During the public participation process numerous concerns and issues were raised which need to be taken into consideration when undertaking the necessary pre-feasibility and feasibility assessments to 67 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 MAP 30: MUNICIPAL SPATIAL FRAMEWORK PLAN 68 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 The un-highlighted areas highlighted represent those areas which can be accessed to address the longer term (i.e. Beyond 2031) human settlement land needs. What must be noted is that that the Phase 1 settlement areas have been prioritised for subsidy housing. This could include a component of GAP and social housing depending on the demand identified. It is accepted that the demand for upper-middle and higher income dwelling units will be met by the proposed private land development initiatives (e.g. Area 14) and the development of and subdivision of vacant erven within the settlement.. 10 WILLOWMORE SPATIAL PLANNING 10.1 WILLOWMORE SPATIAL BUDGET The following bullets summarise the housing demand for Willowmore: A total of 597 units are required by 2031 (This figure includes the entire backlog/waiting list figure of 527 households) Approximately 28 ha of land is required to meet this total demand. If it is assumed that 60% of the backlog/waiting list will be eradicated during the validity period of this SDF (Once the necessary bulk services have been installed) then approximately 337 units need to be built in the next 5 years. For the 5 year period of this SDF approximately 15 ha needs to be made available. The areas and the anticipated dwelling unit yield are reflected in the table below: Phasing 1 2 Area Area (Ha) Possible Hh yield @ 30perha HS 13 11.85 355.49 HS 16 1.45 43.58 HS 17 1.20 36.13 HS 2 2.14 64.24 HS 3 3.61 108.44 HS 4 14.79 443.56 NHS 5 1.55 46.51 NHS 6 3.38 101.26 HS 18 2.79 83.65 NHS 7 15.71 471.39 NHS 9 39.71 1191.38 TOTAL 150.62 4518.70 Possible Hh yield Sub-Total 607.88 233 TABLE 23: WILLOWMORE SPATIAL BUDGET The Human settlement areas highlighted in yellow fall within the area already serviced with full waterborne sanitation. These areas will be prioritised for development (Feasibility assessments to commence immediately). These Phase 1 Human Settlement Areas can potentially yield 607 dwelling units if developed at a density of at least 30 units per hectare. Human Settlement Area 4 has been identified as an alternative to Area 13. Should the full yield not be achieved on Area 13 then Area 4 should be prioritised. FIGURE 1: WILLOWMORE HUMAN SETTLEMENT AREAS 10.2 WILLOWMORE SPATIAL PLAN The spatial proposals reflected on the following pages form the Willowmore Spatial Plan. This plan forms the framework within which urban development takes place. To give effect to these proposals detailed precinct plans and layout planning action s will need to be undertaken. 69 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 70 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 71 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 72 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 proposed private land development initiatives and the development of existing vacant erven within the settlement. The figure below highlights the Phase 1: human Settlement areas. 11 STEYTLERVILLE SPATIAL PLANNING 11.1 STEYTLERVILLE SPATIAL BUDGET The following bullets summarise the housing demand for Steytlerville: A total of 699 units are required by 2031 (This figure includes the entire backlog/waiting list figure of 656 households) Approximately 33 ha of land is required to meet this total demand. If it is assumed that 60% of the backlog/waiting list will be eradicated during the validity period of this SDF then approximately 406 units need to be built once the services backlogs have been eliminated.. For the 5 year period of this SDF approximately 18 ha needs to be made available. The areas and the anticipated dwelling unit yield for each is reflected in the table below: Phasing Area Area (ha) Possible Hh yield @ 30perha HS 4 2.54 76 HS 6 7.85 236 HS 8 2.37 71 HS 11 1.05 32 HS 5 10.25 308 HS 1 1.81 54 HS 7 3.77 113 HS 2 4.85 145 HS 3 2.73 82 HS 10 8.83 265 TOTAL 46.05 1382 Possible Hh yield Subtotal 1 414 2 967 TABLE 24: STEYTLERVILLE SPATIAL BUDGET The Human Settlement areas highlighted in yellow fall within the area already serviced with full waterborne sanitation and are prioritised for development. Phase 1 Human Settlement Areas can potentially yield 414 dwelling units if developed at a density of at least 30 units per hectare. The feasibility assessments for these areas should be commences as soon as possible to enable the quantification of the bulk services requirements as well as to establish the overall feasibility of development. The areas without highlighting have been earmarked for human settlement development in the period beyond 2031.The full development of Phase 1 (Yellow) will enable the Municipality to meet the housing demand projected to 2031.What must be noted is that that the Phase 1 settlement areas have been prioritised for subsidy housing. This could however include a component of GAP and social housing depending on the demand. It is accepted that the demand for upper-middle and higher income dwelling units will be met by the FIGURE 2: HUMAN SETTLEMENT AREAS 11.2 STEYTLERVILLE SPATIAL PLAN The various spatial proposals reflected on the following pages when combined to form the Steytlerville Spatial Plan. This plan forms the framework within which urban development takes place. To give effect to these proposals detailed precinct plans and layout planning action s will need to be undertaken. 73 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 74 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 75 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 12 RIETBRON SPATIAL PLANNING 12.1 RIETBRON SPATIAL BUDGET The following bullets summarise the housing demand for Rietbron: A total of 203 units are required by 2031 (This includes an assumed housing backlog of 189 units) Approximately 10 ha of land is required to meet this total demand. If it is assumed that 60% of the backlog/waiting list will be eradicated during the validity period of this SDF then approximately 117 units need to be built in the next 5 years. For the 5 year period of this SDF approximately 5 ha needs to be made available. The areas and the anticipated dwelling unit yield for each is reflected in the table below: Phasing 1 Area Area (ha) Possible Hh yield @ 30perha Possible Hh yield Subtotal HS 1 10 300 300 TABLE 25: RIETBRON SPATIAL BUDGET Area 1 forms a natural extension to the area already serviced with full waterborne sanitation. These areas will be prioritised for development (Feasibility assessments to commence immediately). These Phase 1 Human Settlement Areas can potentially yield 300 dwelling units if developed at a density of at least 30 units per hectare and meet the housing need to beyond 2031. This area has been prioritised for subsidy housing, but should include a component of GAP and social housing depending on the demand identified. It is accepted that the demand for upper-middle and higher income dwelling units will be met by the many vacant erven within the town. The subdivision of these erven should be encouraged to prevent the unnecessary expansion of the urban area. This subdivision should be focussed on the areas closest to the bulk sewer network. 12.2 RIETBRON SPATIAL PLAN The combined spatial proposals form the Rietbron Spatial Plan. This plan will form the framework within which urban development takes place. To give effect to these proposals detailed precinct plans and layout planning action s will need to be undertaken 76 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 77 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 13 CONCLUSION AND IMPLEMENTATION The Spatial Development Framework presented in this report gives spatial expression to the Baviaans Municipality’s service delivery and development agenda as set out in the Municipal IDP. It also is aligned with the surrounding local municipal and district spatial frameworks as well as with the National Development Plan imperatives. The Framework establishes a settlement development framework that will address the future needs of all residents by creating a logical network of settlements within which the necessary social and community services can be provided. In addition to the delivery of human settlement land, accompanied by the necessary bulk services the following key spatial interventions have been identified for implementation during the planning period of this plan: The upgrading of the concrete section of R329 between Willowmore and Steytlerville The purchasing of the Farm Wanhoop in order to secure the long term sustainability of Water Supply to Willowmore The development and acceptance of a human settlement strategy for the western part of the Baviaanskloof: The implementation of the “Path out of poverty” initiatives being implemented in the Rietbron. Maintenance of the rural gravel road network Ground water protection across the municipality, but particularly within the western and north western sectors, needs to be prioritised to ensure the long term sustainability of the agricultural sector. KEY SPATIAL INTERVENTIONS CONCRETE ROAD UPGRADE -Upgrading of the concrete section of R329 between Willowmore and Steytlerville to a tarred surface. FARM WANHOOP PURCHASE -Purchasing of the Farm Wanhoop in order to secure the long term sustainability of Water Supply to Willowmore. The following requirements and inputs are however required to enable the above intervention to be effective: Bulk Services upgrades are required before any of the larger human settlement areas can be implemented. The housing backlog and the associated real need for housing needs to be established - This will ultimately guide housing delivery beyond the planning term of this SDF. The implementation framework, which identifies the key actions that need to be undertaken to give effect to the proposals contained in this Spatial Framework is attached as Annexure B. KEY REQUIREMENTS BAVIAANSKLOOF HUMAN SETTLEMENT - Development and acceptance of a human settlement development process and plan for the western part of the Baviaanskloof. POVERTY ALEVIATION - Implementation of the “Path out of poverty” initiatives being implemented in Rietbron Bulk Services Upgrading - Upgrading of the bulk services capacity to enable human settlement development. GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENACE- Maintenance of the gravel road network. HOUSING BACKLOG - Accurate determination of the housing backlog and ‘real need’ for housing. GROUND WATER PROTECTION - Protect the ground water resources particularly in the west and north west. 78 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 14 BIBLIOGRAPHY South African Council for Planners, 2014. Feedback on SPLUMA. SACPLAN Bullietin, March, p. 9. STATSSA, 2012. Census 2011 Statistical Release - P0301.4/Sensus South Africa, Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. Baviaans Municipality, 2009. Water Services Development Plan 2009/2010, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2013. Integrated Development Plan 2013-2014 - Final, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2013. Motivation Report: To Purchase the FArm Wanhoop, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2014. IDP Steering Committee Minutes 6 March 2014, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2014. Ward 1 Ward Based Development Plan, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2014. Ward 2 Ward Based Development Plan: 2013-2014, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2014. Ward 3 Ward Based Development Plan: 2013-1014, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2014. Ward 3 Ward Based Development Plan: 2014-1015, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, 2014. Ward 4 Ward Development Plan 2013-2014, s.l.: s.n. Baviaans Municipality, n.d. Ward 3 Ward Based Development Plan 2013-1014, s.l.: s.n. CES, C. a. E. S., 2011. CHDM Climate Change Response Framework Specialist Report: Water Resources, s.l.: CHDM. CSIR, 2011. CHDM Climate Change Response Strategy Spaeialist Report: Biodiversity, s.l.: CHDM. CSIR, 2012. CSIR Guidelines for the Provision of Social Facilities in South African Settlements, s.l.: CSIR. DRDLR, 2013. Guidelines for the Development of Municipal Spatial Development Frameworks, s.l.: s.n. Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements, 2014. Baviaans Local Municipality Housing Sector Plan Review 20142019, s.l.: s.n. ECDEDEA, The Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 2014. Eastern Cape Sustainable Energy. [Online] Available at: http://greenenergy-ec.co.za [Accessed 05 August 2014]. http://adrianfrith.com, 2014. http://census2011.adrianfrith.com. [Online] Available at: http://census2011.adrianfrith.com/place/267 KV3 Engineers, 2008. Integrated Waste Management Plan for the Baviaans Municipality - November 2008, s.l.: s.n. Livinglands, 2014. Livinglands. [Online] Available at: www.livinglands.co.za [Accessed Friday September 2014]. Local Government Business Network, 2014. Local Government Business Network. [Online] Available at: www.lgbn.co.za [Accessed 1 July 2014]. One World Sustainable Investments, ?. CHDM Climate Change Response Framework Specialist Report: Agriculture (Commercialand Subsistance), rural Livelihoods and Food Security, s.l.: CHDM. Republic of South Africa, 2014. South Africa Government online. [Online] Available at: www.gov.za [Accessed 1 July 2014]. SANBI, n.d. East Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan, s.l.: s.n. 79 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 ANNEXURE A: HSP HOUSING PROGRAMME SUMMARY Annexure E HSP Housing Projects Programme\Municipal Housing Projects from HSP.pdf 80 BAVIAANS SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2014 - 2020 ANNEXURE B: IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK 81