MAGAZINE
Transcription
MAGAZINE
Volume 5, Issue 3 August 2010 MAGAZINE 9 2 S R LD $6.95 US $8.95 Canada Photo by Nadine Kinney Todd Mullin’s Interceptor August 2010 Volume 5 Issue 3 4 EDITORIAL 6 LDRS 29, DAY ONE By Neil McGilvray Photos by Mark Canepa, Doug Gerard, Dave Hanson, Nadine Kinney, Ray LaPanse, Neil McGilvray, and Jim Norton 10 LDRS 29, DAY TWO By Neil McGilvlray Photos by Mark Canepa, Doug Gerard, Dave Hanson, Nadine Kinney, Ray LaPanse, Neil McGilvray, and Jim Norton 18 LDRS 29, DAY THREE By Neil McGilvray and Mark Canepa Photos by Mark Canepa, Doug Gerard, Dave Hanson, Nadine Kinney, Ray LaPanse, Neil McGilvray, and Jim Norton 42 LDRS 29, DAY FOUR By Neil McGilvray and Mark Canepa Photos by Mark Canepa, Doug Gerard, Dave Hanson, Nadine Kinney, Ray LaPanse, Neil McGilvray, and Jim Norton 54 LDRS 29, DAY FIVE AND SIX By Neil McGilvray and Mark Canepa Photos by Mark Canepa, Doug Gerard, Dave Hanson, Nadine Kinney, Ray LaPanse, Neil McGilvray, and Jim Norton 62 ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS FLY ROCKET-BUILDINGS AT LDRS 29 By Gary McGavin Photos by Gary McGavin ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 3 Even tied down, the shade cover can’t resist the wind 6 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 Day One of any LDRS is typically a slow day. Initially, most people use Day One to get set up and settled in. Historically the rockets to leave the pads are relatively few compared to the onslaught of the subsequent days. Day One is the only time when the fliers are batting a thousand, as virtually no one has flown. The typical Day One small number of projects being flown standard would remain safe for another year and may have set a new record low due to the incessant winds and dust. Yet at LDRS 29, the anticipation of the coming days kept the enthusiasm high. The Day One down time gave all the fliers some extra time to prep and evaluate their projects. LDRS 29 Day One was otherwise a total blowout in every sense of the word. Twenty-five-plus mph winds screamed out of the west all day long. There were gusts that measured even higher, making any attempt to put a rocket on the pad impossibility. On the positive side, the temperatures were pleasant, in the mid-80s, and the skies were void of any clouds. However, the constant sandblasting threw a wet blanket on the Tripoli Rocketry Association’s premier event for 2010. Weather delays give you a moment to pause and appreciate the good times, when the weather is your friend. When scheduling a long-term event like LDRS, the organizers select their date a year or more in advance and run with it. The goal is always to provide the fliers with the best flying conditions possible. Mother Nature can be cruel and crush the best-laid plans. Every LDRS has its challenges, and this year’s was no exception. There are normally two mountains of challenges for the organizers to climb. One is the weather. All the organizers and fliers can do is deal with it and make lemonade out of lemons. If you wait long enough, something has got to give. Six days ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 7 Day Two at LDRS 29 began to look eerily like Day One. For the casual observer there was little or no action. It was another day where the weather conspired against ROC and LDRS 29. Seventy-two pads stood waiting for extended periods, waiting for something to fly. The strong west-northwest winds from Day One had subsided into periods of relative calm, with prolonged gusts of over 25 mph. If you hit the lull just right, you could place a 6,000-foot flight right back on the pads. Hit the lull wrong, and you could be chasing your now paint-less rocket across the dusty, wind-ravaged playa of the Lucerne Dry Lake Bed. The flight line was packed with eager rocketeers, and the parking area and pits extended over a quarter of a mile long and were three to four deep already. Go Fever had not spread throughout the camp yet. Most of the fliers were simply opting to wait it out. After all, how long can the wind blow over twenty miles an hour? Rocket prepping began in earnest, as the fliers knew they had only five days left to show off their projects. The theme of LDRS 29 was “It’s all about the rockets,” and the fliers wanted to put the theme into practice. Launch Director and ROC President Wedge Oldham said, “We are a go for launching. The winds are well within acceptable limits. All we need is some fliers to step up to the pads and load their rockets. We’ll take care of the rest.” Sharpe Entertainment, the production company for the Discovery Science Channel, spent most of the day getting B-roll video footage. At any given moment you could see one of our beloved fellow rocketeers hamming it up in their best Hollywood hero poses or explaining why their project was going either beat or work better than every other project at LDRS 29. Oh, the humanity when a camera is thrust in a rocketeer’s face. 10 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 As the morning wore on, strange sounds could be heard at the flight line. This was California, and it was a prime location for an earthquake. But no, this was much more subtle. If you listened closely enough, you could detect the sound of footsteps approaching the pads, and the owners of the feet were carrying rockets, no less. Indeed, they were actually going to launch them. By all accounts, LDRS 29 was going to happen, and rockets were going to fly. Hopefully (there’s that word again), this steady momentum would pick up speed and force, like an avalanche coming down the mountain. The launching train had left the station and was slowly gathering steam. During Day Two, the low-power projects were flying at rate of two to every high-power project leaving the ground. It didn’t matter; the sounds of a countdown followed by a crackling whoosh was all most needed to move prepped rockets closer to the pads and to start the process of making others ready for flight. This was LDRS, and the heavy hitters were not going to let it go down as Little Dainty Rocket Ships. All you needed to do was take a stroll through the pit area, and it was clear the movers and shakers would make their way to the flight line. While it is fun and sometimes controversial to address the moniker of LDRS, the reality of the launch is more in line with the Rocketry Organization of California’s theme. It really was “all about the rockets.” Rocketry is a hobby where the mere fact you are launching a rocket sets you apart from 99% of the population. It levels the playing field with regard to every other aspect of life. It doesn’t matter if you are a doctor, a lawyer, or an Indian chief. When you are on the flight line, everyone is equal; everyone is a rocketeer. Day Two saw 136 low- and mid-power flights leave the ground. To launch these 136 flights, 140 motors were consumed in clusters and stages. These flights consisted of 7 A-powered models, 7 B-motor projects and 35 Cboosted kits. There were 14 D-class rockets, 7 E-motor craft, 18 F-driven rockets, and 48 of the popular transitional G-motor flights. The sheer number of these low- and mid-powered flights clearly demonstrates the popularity of these classes. While many rocketeers use the low- and mid-power motors as stepping stones to bigger projects, there will always be a contingency of fliers who simply enjoy launching in this class. There is always the thrill of planning, building, and launching a rocket, regardless of its power plant. H motors once again showed their popularity with 31 flights made into varying wind conditions during the day. Curt Von Delins let Barney roll on an H-123 for two successful flights. John also launched his RTFM3 on an H-170 Metalstorm motor. Andy Tyron turned in a good flight and recovery with his H-180-powered Plain Jaine. Larry Pritchard boosted American Spirit with an H-170. Andrew Rosenstraten cracked off his Goblin with an H-400. An H-180 was calling Chris Spurgeon’s name to be the power plant of his 38 Special. John Barlow kicked up some sand with his Hpowered Burj Dubai. Flight line looking east ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 11 “Crazy” Jim Hendrickson watches as Ray LaPanse holds the rail as Neil McGilvray loads his rocket on the pad with Bob Utley guilding it. 18 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 After the past two days of high winds, sandblasting conditions, and limited big rocket flying, Day Three was a welcome relief. Good things come to those who wait. The strong winds of the past two days abated enough for LDRS 29 to finally look like LDRS. The crowd had swelled to over a third of a mile long and four to five double rows deep. Estimated attendance of fliers and spectators was well over 2,000. The dirt path serving as a road into the launch site was in a constant dusty haze from the incoming and outgoing traffic. Those in attendance would witness the best flying of the event. The sun was high and bright as the rocket-launching day started early with high-powered flying machines streaking off the desert floor just after 7:00 A.M. The pit area was wide awake with a sense of high anticipation in the air. This would be the first of two full days of DSC taping with the Myth Busters’ Kari Byron on site. DSC would virtually take over the cadence of the launch. They required specific information and had to shoot from specific angles to comply with the script. While some may question the legitimacy of doing this at the country’s biggest launch of the year, in the end all the rockets scheduled to fly did fly. The rocketeers worked with the production crews so the yin and the yang of running a launch and taping it for television became one. Right from the start of the launch, while rockets up through the J, K, and L range were being launched with regularity, the away cell was finally buzzing with activity it hadn’t seen in the past two days, with the Wildman-sponsored N-10,000 drag race. During Friday night the leadership of ROC was able to cobble together the needed seven pads to handle these 65pound 6–inch-diameter fire-breathing monsters. DSC cameras were prominent, and the prerequisite interviews slowed the liftoff time from 9:00 to after 10:30. Further out on the range, teams were assembling to put on one of the biggest displays of high-power rocketry California has ever seen. The production crew golf carts would be busy, criss-crossing the playa all day long in search of the perfect sound bite. Other large and small projects were constantly surrounded by camera crews, sound men, and producers as the day went on. DSC was everywhere; in the camp area where the rockets were being prepped and at the pads where the rockets were being launched. When the DSC arrived, any progress resembling a rocket launch came to a screeching halt. Not that a screeching halt is a bad thing. Each individual or team made up their mind how they wanted to interact with DSC, and all of the rocketeers involved put their best foot forward and were true to the hobby. While every rocketeer or spectator who was interviewed by DSC may have hoped for stardom or at least some air time in the upcoming show, there was an unspoken truth everyone knew in their hearts and very few mentioned. We will keep this secret between us; there is no reality in reality television. Every inch of tape rolled at LDRS 29 was in support of a script the production company was to work around. Over 800 hours of video had to be compressed and edited to one hour, with commercials, dedicated to the largest launch in the country. Six days and well over 1,000 flights would be compressed into a preconceived vision of what would entertain John Q. Demographic. Concessions would have to be made in the interest of selling commercial time and making advertisers happy. After all, without them there would not be a show. The time and effort the rocketeers of LDRS 29 put into participating with the DSC effort will ultimately be a good thing. Those who were there have formed an informal bond and kinship with others who had a chance to get in front of the camera ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 19 The Numbers Game of LDRS 29 By Bob Utley A) 1,192,221 1) most flown motor (282) B) 1349 2) number of cert attempts C) 1511 3) number of night flights D) C class 4) percentage of research NS of total motors burned E) 120 5) number of rockets flown F) 6) most NS motor flown 50 G) 12 7) number of motors used H) P class 8) number of research motors flown I) .66% 9) percentage of windy days J) 16% 10) total number of NS burned K) 95 11) average temperature Match the left column with the correct answers on the right, or guess. 34 ROCKETS Magazine August 2010 Answer on page 63. ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 35 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 37 38 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 Tripoli Prefect Listing Alabama Kentucky Ohio Washington (Central Alabama) Christopher Short (850) 554-6531 (Huntsville) Walt Stafford (256) 829-0869 (Birmingham) Carl Hicks (205) 924-9612 (Blue Grass) Darryl Hankes (270) 299-2424 (Northern Ohio) Chris Pearson (440) 449-2246 (T-Town Tripoli) Art Upton (419) 841-1051 (Mid Ohio) Mark Mazzon (740) 625-5027 (Puget Sound) Brad Wright (425) 246-0781 (Blackhole Amateur Rocketry) Harold Kellams (509) 536-5381 Louisiana Paul San Soucie (225) 622-1219 Alaska Oklahoma (Anchorage) Steven Cords (907) 344-8225 Maine Arizona (Cherryfield) Richard Willey (207) 546-2677 (Maine) Philip Hathaway (207) 532-9805 (Tulsa) Hal Ellis (918) 492-0599 (Oklahoma) Steven Sanders (405) 375-3656 Oregon (Paradise Valley) Mark Clark (623) 877-6814 (Phoenix) Bob Heninger (623) 505-3964 (Tuscon) Eric Burch (520) 975-6450 Neil McGilvray (410) 884-4151 (Oregon) Gary Fillible (503) 843-3137 (Portland) Greg Clark (503) 443-3705 California Massachussettes Pennsylvania (Los Angeles) Rick Magee (805) 584-6934 (Anaheim) Richard O’Neil (909) 646-9126 (Mojave Desert) Kevin Metzler (661) 256-3261 (Central California) Jack Garibaldi (209) 986-5829 (AERO-PAC) Robert Briody (408) 379-1057 Colorado (Colorado) James Russell (303) 425-7184 (North Colorado) Joe Hinton (303) 449-9344 Connecticutt (SE Connecticutt) Rob Bazinet (860) 974-3994 (Connecticutt) Christian Colby (203) 753-1974 Delaware Darren Wright (302) 777-3036 Florida Maryland Steven Schwab (508) 645-2405 Michigan (Michigan) Ken Zeuner (248) 348-2348 (Jackson) Scott Miller (269) 370-7929 (Michiana) Wayne Dennis (269) 236-6625 (U. Michigan) William Bertoldi (906) 774-0419 Minnesota (S Minnesota) David Donvan (507) 281-5683 (Minnesota) Dave Leininger (763) 433-9198 (Twin Cities) Ky Michaelson (952) 884-5870 Missouri (St Louis) Bruce Weidner (636) 227-7999 (Columbia Missouri) Mark Grant (573) 442-2612 Montana (Heartland Organization of Rocketry) Kevin Trojanowski (402) 292-4101 Georgia Nevada Hawaii (Hawaii) Michael Masuda (808) 737-1384 Idaho Dale Emery (406) 256-6425 Nebraska (Northern Nevada) Kevin Turner (775) 934-8948 (Las Vegas) John Sbare (702) 243-5514 New Hampshire (Granite State) Brian McCarthy (603) 880-1606 (Idaho) Vern Knowles (208) 939-1076 New Jersey Illinois (New Jersey) Lawrence Zupnyk (856) 547-9437 (North Jersey) Dennis Lappert (973)362-1246 (Chicago) Robert Justus (847) 541-0739 (Quad Cities) Stephen Wilson (309) 791-0866 (Central Illinois) Gary Buck (217) 841-4777 (Peoria) Patrick Hibbs (309) 243-9369 Indiana (Brazil) Michael Hedges (812) 446-3160 (Fort Wayne) Mark Rogers (765) 584-4671 (Lafayette) Vic Barlow (765) 414-2848 Iowa (Iowa) Jeff Barnes (319) 862-0159 Kansas (Kansas) Bob Brown (316) 634-1107 (Mo-Kan) Martin Cox (816) 734-0585 Rhode Island Timothy Hetland (401) 847-9522 South Carolina Thomas Henderson (828) 466-1870 (Tampa) John Mackiewicz (727) 934-4783 (South Florida) John Schultz (305) 284-8205 (Ft Myers) Harold Sasloe (239) 267-0172 (West Palm) Allen Bycheck (561) 798-0691 (Space Coast) Gary Dahlke (321) 634-5102 (Atlanta) www.Tripoliatlanta.info (Pittsburgh) Christine Rial (724) 733-7679 (Philadelphia) Philip Stein (215) 635-0118 Texas (Austin) Thomas Montemayor (512) 251-9082 (Waco) Marlin Philyaw (254) 753-8532 (Freeport) Michael Martin (713) 419-9064 (Amarillo) Pat Gorzelik (806) 488-2756 (North Texas) Dave McGuire (972) 393-1341 (Central Texas) Rick Van Voorhis (512) 990-9331 (San Antonio) David Lee Jones (210) 684-2868 (Houston) John Etgen (Hill Country Tripoli) Art Applewhite (830) 896-6331 Utah Wisconsin (Green Bay) Frank Nobile (262) 677-2992 (Wisconsin) Daniel Byra (262) 637-5552 (Manitowoc) Eric Cayemberg (920) 629-9541 Tripoli International Australia Rudolf Horvat 03 5229 6334 Canada (Southern Ontario) Jim Smith (416) 486-8548 (Toronto) Anthony Cesaroni (941) 360-3100 (Alberta) Max Baines (403) 327-3532 (Quebec) Pierre Laurendeau (514) 645-9902 (Eastern Ontario) Bill Wagstaff (613) 836-6027 (New Brunswick) Mark Roberts (506) 454-1845 Israel Gregory Pribush 972 7 865 6837 Italy Stefano Figini 39 024121055 Spain Jose Luis Cortijos 34 93 322 2881 Sweden Rolf Orell 46 8346127 Switzerland (Utah) William Spillman (801) 571-5349 (Tooele) David Urbanek (801) 779-2116 Juerg Thuering 41 17511113 Virginia The Netherlands (Central Virginia) Michael Showalter (540) 727-7676 (East Virginia) Ed Rowe (757) 566-8012 (Tripoli Western Virginia) Charles Neff (540) 885-3138 Ramon Peeters United Kingdom (United Kingdom) Cath Bashford 44 20 77381544 (English Midlands) Paul Lavin 44 1582 713765 New Mexico (White Sands) Hugh Malcom (505) 434-5441 (Las Cruces) Russell Payne (505) 525-1682 (Albuquerque) Dennis Floyd (505) 836-3601 New York (Albany) John Sicker (518) 399-7984 (Long Island) Michael Mooney (631) 447-2947 (Syracuse) Richard Pitzeruse (315) 468-3706 (Western New York) Debra Koloms (315) 955-6930 North Carolina (Charlotte) Ralph Roberts (704) 568-1070 (East North Carolina) Alan Whitmore (919) 929-5552 (North Carolina) Michael Gunter (336) 643-1289 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 39 Subscription Form Rockets Magazine subscription is not included in your Tripoli membership fees. Name:_______________________________________ Address:_____________________________________ City:________________________________________ State:_________________________ Zip:__________ Email:_______________________________________ Check if this is a renewal (US Rates only) 6 issues $6.95 each $41.70 9 issues $6.95 each $62.55 12 issues $6.95 each $83.40 15 issues $6.95 each $104.25 18 issues $6.95 each $125.10 Total ______ Mail Check and Subscription form to: Liberty Launch Systems 11554 Sullnick Way Gaithersburg, MD 20878 www.rocketsmagazine.com 40 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 LCO table with TRA BoD member Robin Meredith calling the action. Mark Clark watching Robin’s back 42 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 Day Four of LDRS 29 was open early and ran late. The conditions previously gracing the dry lake bed had started to go into hiding, and the fury of the desert began to rear its ugly head. The wind had shifted to the north and varied between dead calm and gusts to over twenty. DSC was back at the launch in full force. Day Four would be known as odd-roc day. With the scripted and nonscripted drag races out of the way, it would be time to turn the cameras to the odd rocs and special projects. Some of the folks who would be written into the script had already been visited at home by the production crews. Much of the attention would be leaning in their direction. These fine folks would ultimately represent rocketry on national television. This would be their last major onslaught of videotaping with their host, Kari Byron. Kari would only be on site for two days to participate in and observe the activity rocketeers are dedicated and passionate about. She got to witness firsthand what makes your average rocketeer tick. Now, that is a scary thought! One can only hope the final portrayal of rocketry will be flattering and show the world who rocketeers are and what rocketeers do in a positive light. Teams of cameramen, soundmen, producers, and makeup artists would be scurrying around the expansive flight line all day long. The focus would still be to keep with the script, but if something looked interesting, they would have a camera on it. You never know what was going to make the final cut and what would end up on the floor. As with the previous days, the normal pace of launching would slow to a crawl due to the DSC filming. In the end this didn’t present any real issues, as all the rocketeers involved graciously worked with the folks at DSC. ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 43 Looking out at the range from the flight line as Odyssey takes to the sky 54 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 Day 5 of LDRS 29 was a history-making event. While this was not the first time California had hosted a research rocket launch, it would be the first time that more than 10,240 Ns would be flown as a single motor at a research launch. The commercial days of LDRS 29 saw motors greater than 10,240 Ns being flown with regularity, thanks to some productive negotiation with the California State Fire Marshall’s office, the governing body for rocket motors in the Golden State. LDRS 29 would be the litmus test for all future California commercial and research launch impulse limits. All research launches provide the opportunity for success and failure, by the very nature of experimental, or research, motors. There were many aggressive projects planned for the next two days, and the crowd at LDRS 29 was strapped in and ready for anything research had in store for them. Research launches in California have been a scarcity, and it was the hopes of ROC to bring this exciting and demanding aspect of rocketry out of the shadows and into the bright light of day for all to experience and enjoy. It has been years since the TRA BOD allowed the comingling of research motors with commercial motors on the same launch site. The change in policy has been a great success, not only for the research fliers to showcase their projects, but also for the vendors. In years past on research days the flight line would turn into a virtual ghost town. The old exclusionary rules would shoo away many of our fellow rocketeers. As the competency of rocket-motor building increased, so did the realization that commercial motors and research motors had a place on the same field. The increases in competency and reliability of the modern research motor can be attributed primarily to the new TRA President, Dr. Terry W. McCreary, and his book. Experimental Composite Propellant An Introduction to Properties and Preparation of Composite Propellant Design, Construction, Testing and Characteristics of Small Rocket Motors has explained clearly to many budding rocket-motor builders the basics of doing it right and doing it safely. The results speak for themselves. Those who have participated in research launches know that success and failure are separated only by the simple act of pushing the launch button. In past years there was a combination of failure scenarios. Failure in rocketry is not an affirmation of one’s skill or lack of it. The results of any project can be traced back to the weak link, and the lessons learned are priceless. Research launches are where every facet of what makes a rocketeer good at his or her craft will be tested: motors, airframes, electronics, and—most important of all—recovery. Can you get it back safely? Success and failure in all of these categories will be applied to make the next project work better than the last and exceed the expectations of all those daydreams and sleepless nights. The weather was perfect for launching. The sky was clear, and the northerly wind was much lighter than the previous days. As the afternoon progressed, the wind did increase, which is standard for this part of the country The first big project of the day was Gerald Meux’s N-powered eighty-pound, ten-inch-diameter Nike Smoke. Gerald was on pins and needles as he launched his second N motor of the event. He made the most of this flight and nailed the thirteen-second boost and the recovery. To make the flight more special, Gerald had his mother in attendance, only to show rocketry can be a mother-and-son activity as much as it is considered to be a father–and-son bonding opportunity. Young Gerald Meux, Jr. was very busy at LDRS. On Saturday, the 24-year-old Minnesotan had participated in the N- ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 55 By Gary L. McGavin, AIA, Professor of Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Thirty-three Cal Poly Pomona department of architecture students participated in the LDRS 29 event at Lucerne Dry Lake by flying models of their favorite buildings on highpower rocket motors. The buildings ranged from the Leaning Tower of Pisa) to the Dubai Sail Building. The students flew Friday afternoon and all day Saturday. One student remained until Sunday to fly his building, achieving his Level 1 certification. The student participation was part of an elective advancedstructures class in the five-year professional architecture degree program at Cal Poly Pomona. The advancedstructures class is the culmination of four previous structures courses, in which the students examine systems engineering. Our students sincerely appreciate the LDRS 29 Board and ROC staff for allowing them to participate in this event. The students also appreciate the technical support provided by Jack Garibaldi at “What’s Up Hobbies” over the years, as the course has grown. The LDRS 29 student rocket-building teams consisted of: 1. Burge Dubai 1 World’s Tallest Building: John Barlow, Julian Liang, Marvi Mazo, Leonardo Micolta, and Hector Romero 2. Burge Dubai 2: Miguel Heman from 2008; unfortunately, Miguel had to leave for work and wasn’t able to fly 3. Chrysler Building: Leslie Cervantes, Marshall Ford, Alex Hernandez, Matt Russell, and Jillian Schroettinger 4. CN Tower: Justin Hebenstreit, Nathan Houck, Annie Slaton, Sandeesh Sidhu, and Tyler Tucker 5. Dubai Sail: Clovis Chavarria from 2008 (attained his Level 1 certification) 6. Leaning Tower of Pisa: Kelly Saguini from 2008, flying as a true leaning tower 7. Swiss RE aka “the Gherkin”: Sean Aung, Bernardo Hernandez, Candice Jordan, Thanh Lam, Carlo Mantovani, and Dat Vu 8. Russia Tower: Allison Klute and Kit Li 9. Taipei 101: Omied Arvin, Marissa Buchman, Martin Cerna, Loismae De Villa, Nika Imani, and Christian Isidro 10. Torre Agbar: Greg Sagherian—the service core in this building is offset from the center The flying of rocket-buildings began in our advancedstructures course in 2004, following the Discovery Channel’s airing of Rocketry Challenge, including the “Flying Port-aPotty.” Prior to 2004, our students approached the course, as one would expect, examining normal advanced-structures topics as they related to architecture. The Flying Port-aPotty opened our students’ eyes to a much more enjoyable way to examine topics in advanced structures. In previous 62 ROCKETS MAGAZINE AUGUST 2010 years, we have flown on our own at Lucerne Dry Lake. By happenstance, we ran into Wedge Oldham, buying a hamburger in town in May at an ROC, (Rocketry Organization of California), event, and discussed the possibility of our students’ flying at LDRS 29. Wedge recalled one of our 2008 students attempting to get his Level 1 certification at an ROC event in November 2008 (which failed due to a nosecone separation). Wedge encouraged the class to consider participating, and the students unanimously approved the suggestion the next week in class. Most of the architecture students have never built and flown any rockets prior to this class. We start with basic lectures on the physics of rocket flight and move on to more complex topics, including determining the center of pressure and the center of gravity with the transfer-of-static-moments method. The students start their rocket projects by building simple commercially available kits. Then they progress to scratch designing and building small prototypes of their rocket-buildings, in order to work out the bugs before moving on to designing and constructing their final high-power rocket-buildings. Their buildings must be approximately six feet tall (so as to avoid a low polar moment) and weigh no more than five pounds with a Cesaroni Pro38 G-185 motor in place. The students are all required to fine-tune their dynamic balance with a full-scale swing test before flight day. The instructor allows the students quite a bit of artistic license in their interpretation of their rocket-buildings, which are seldom completely accurate scale models. The Leaning Tower of Pisa is one exception to this rule, as it really was a scale model, and it proved to be a crowd favorite on Saturday. When the class arrived at LDRS 29 Friday afternoon, the winds were low. By late afternoon, when the students were all registered and ready to fly, this had changed dramatically. Winds on most normal” rockets have relatively little impact compared to rocket-buildings, with their big flat sides. On Friday, everybody flew with Cesaroni Pro38 G-185s. These have high impulses to get the rocket off of the launch rods quickly, but they burn for only about six-tenths of a second. The mid-power motor confirms their basic flight stability before moving on to the high-power motors. The Discovery Science Channel (DSC) interviewed several student teams and did some group preflight filming. ROC members were extremely helpful to the students. An ROC member volunteered to accompany each team to the launch pad on Friday and assisted them in getting their rocketbuildings ready for launch. They explained each step and showed the students exactly how to arm their motors. The DSC also accompanied the teams to the launch pads and filmed several launches. In addition to the high winds, the flights suffered from low altitudes on the G-185s. Many of the student rocket-buildings exceeded the five-pound weight limit set for the course (G185s are safe by the 5:1 factor up to about seven pounds).
Similar documents
Hanger 11 Harpoon - ROCKETS Magazine
(South Florida) John Schultz (305) 284-8205 (Ft Myers) Harold Sasloe (239) 267-0172 (West Palm) Allen Bycheck (561) 798-0691 (Space Coast) Gary Dahlke (321) 634-5102
More information