June 16, 2015 - City of Hesperia

Transcription

HESPERIA CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HOUSING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
WATER DISTRICT
AGENDA
Regular Joint Meetings
1st and 3rd Tuesday
Date: June 16, 2015
REGULAR MEETING
Time: 5:30 P.M.
6:30 P.M.
(Closed Session)
(Regular Meeting)
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Eric Schmidt, Mayor
Bill Holland, Mayor Pro Tem
Russ Blewett, Council Member
Mike Leonard, Council Member
City of Hesperia
-------
Council Chambers
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia, CA 92345
Mike Podegracz, City Manager
City Clerk’s Office: (760) 947-1007
Eric L. Dunn, City Attorney
Agendas and Staff Reports are
available on the City Website
www.cityofhesperia.us
Paul Russ, Council Member
Documents produced by the City and
distributed less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting, regarding items on the agendas, will be made
available in the City Clerk’s Office located at
9700 Seventh Avenue during normal
business hours.
NOTE: In compliance with the Americans with Disability Act, if you need
special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
Clerk’s Office at (760) 947-1007 or (760) 947-1056. Notification 48 hours
prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility.
City Council
Meeting Agenda
June 16, 2015
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
HESPERIA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT
As a courtesy, please silence your cell phones, pagers, and other electronic devices while the meeting is
in session. Thank you.
Prior to action of the Council, any member of the audience will have the opportunity to address the legislative
body on any item listed on the agenda, including those on the Consent Calendar. Comments are limited to three
(3) minutes for Public Comments, Consent Calendar and New Business and five (5) minutes for Public Hearings.
PLEASE SUBMIT A COMMENT CARD TO THE CITY CLERK WITH THE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER NOTED.
CLOSED SESSION - 5:30 PM
Roll Call
Mayor Eric Schmidt
Mayor Pro Tem Bill Holland
Council Member Russell Blewett
Council Member Mike Leonard
Council Member Paul Russ
Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation:
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)2
1. Two (2) cases
Conference with Real Property Negotiators – Property Negotiations
Government Code Section – 54956.8
1. Negotiating Parties: Curtis and Barbara McWatters and City of Hesperia
Location: 11215 Choiceana Avenue
Under Negotiations: Terms
2. Negotiating Parties: Lisa Wagner and City of Hesperia
Location: APN 0357-591-54
Under Negotiations: Price and terms
Conference with Labor Negotiator
Government Code Section 54957.6
1. Negotiations between the City of Hesperia and the San Bernardino Public
Employees Association (SBPEA) and non-represented employees with the
City's Negotiator. (Staff person: Brian D. Johnson, Assistant City Manager /
Management Services)
CALL TO ORDER - 6:30 PM
City of Hesperia
Page Printed on 6/10/2015
City Council
Meeting Agenda
A.
Invocation by Mark Marcos of United Methodist Church
B.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
C.
Roll Call
June 16, 2015
Mayor Eric Schmidt
D.
Agenda Revisions and Announcements by City Clerk
E.
Closed Session Reports by City Attorney
ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Employee of the Month for June to Martin Malabicky,
Maintenance Worker Pipeline by Jeff Ozanne, Maintenance Crew Supervisor
2. Presentation by Nancy S. Jackson, Public Affairs Manager for Southern
California Edison
3. Community Events Calendar by Rachel Molina, Community Relations and
Media Coordinator
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Please complete a “Comment Card” and give it to the City Clerk. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per
individual. State your name for the record before making your presentation. Disclosure of your address is
optional, but very helpful for the follow-up process.
Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Council is prohibited from taking action on oral requests. However,
Council/Agency/Authority/Commission/Board Members may respond briefly or refer the communication to staff.
The Council/Agency/Authority/Commission/Board may also request the City Clerk to calendar an item related to
your communication at a future meeting.
1) City Council
2) Fire District
3) Water District
JOINT CONSENT CALENDAR
1.
Page 9
Consideration of the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesday,
June 2, 2015
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Draft Minutes from the
Regular Meeting held Tuesday, June 2, 2015.
Staff Person:
City of Hesperia
City Clerk Melinda Sayre-Castro
City Council
Meeting Agenda
Attachments:
2.
Page 15
June 16, 2015
Draft Min CC 2015-06-02.pdf
Warrant Run Report (City - Successor Agency
Community Development Commission - Fire - Water)
-
Housing
Authority
-
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll
report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community
Redevelopment
Agency,
Hesperia
Housing
Authority,
Community
Development Commission, Fire District, and Water District.
Staff Person:
Assistant City Manager/Management Services Brian Johnson
Attachments:
SR Warrant Run 6-16-2015
Attachment 1 - Warrant Run
3.
Page 17
Treasurer’s Cash Report for the period ended April 30, 2015
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Council/Board accept the Treasurer’s Cash Report
for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment
Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission,
Fire District, and Water District.
Staff Person:
Attachments:
SR Treasurer's Report 6-16-2015
Attachment 1 - Investment Reports
4.
Page 27
Amend and Increase Contract with Safeway Sign Company for Purchase of
Traffic Signs
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute
an increase in the current contract and to execute an amendment to contract
number 2010-11-086 with Safeway Sign Company, thereby extending the
contract for an additional year (Fiscal Year 2015-16) and increasing the
contract authority by an additional $65,000 with a new not-to-exceed amount of
$263,000.
5.
Page 29
Staff Person:
Director of Public Works Dale Burke
Attachments:
SR Safeway Sign Company Contract 6-16-2015
Granicus, Inc. New Contract
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute
a three-year maintenance and licensing contract with Granicus Inc. for an
amount not to exceed $124,200.
City of Hesperia
Staff Person:
Interim IT Manager Sean Boal
Attachments:
SR Granicus Contract 6-16-2015
City Council
6.
Page 31
Meeting Agenda
June 16, 2015
CompuCom Systems Inc. Agreement
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager enter into
a five-year agreement with CompuCom Systems Inc. for an amount not to
exceed $290,000 for licensing of all Microsoft operating systems.
7.
Page 33
Staff Person:
Interim IT Manager Sean Boal
Attachments:
SR CompuCom Agreement 6-16-2015
Bid Consideration of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements - Year 1
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council reject the bids for Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements - Year 1 (C.O. No. 7400), do not award a
contract, and allow staff to combine the Year 1 project with the Year 2 project,
and advertise the combined projects for bid.
Staff Person:
Director of Development Services Scott Priester
Attachments:
SR Award Contract ADA Improvements 6-16-2015
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Please complete a “Comment Card” and give it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Comments are limited to
five (5) minutes per individual. State your name for the record before making your presentation. Disclosure of
your address is optional, but very helpful for the follow-up process.
WAIVE READING OF ORDINANCES
Approve the reading by title of all ordinances and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall
be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
PUBLIC HEARING
8.
Page 35
Continuation of appeal (APP14-00002) of the Planning Commission's decision
to
deny
Revised
Tentative
Tract
TTR14-00001;
Applicant:
Frontier
Communities; APNs: 0405-042-07 & 08
Recommended Action:
At the request of the applicant, this item was continued from the City Council
meetings of January 20, 2015, February 17, 2015, and April 21, 2015. Frontier
Communities has requested a fourth continuance. Staff has no objection to this
request, and recommends that this item be continued to September 15, 2015.
Staff Person:
Senior Planner Daniel Alcayaga
Attachments:
SR Frontier Homes Appeal Continuance 6-16-2015
NEW BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
City of Hesperia
City Council
9.
Page 37
Meeting Agenda
June 16, 2015
Consideration of Single-serve Alcohol Sales Ordinance
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the
Ordinance No. 2015-04 entitled:
City
Council
consider
whether
to
introduce
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Hesperia, California, prohibiting
the sale of single-serve alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption and
declaring the same a public nuisance..
Staff Person:
City Attorney Eric Dunn
Attachments:
SR Single-serve Alcohol Sales Ordinace 6-16-2015
Proposed Ordinance 2015-04
Attachment 2 - Single-Serve Alcoholic Beverages Article
10.
Page 45
Installation of traffic control measures along Main Street between Cottonwood
Avenue and 11th Avenue
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to Staff regarding
appropriate traffic control measure along Main Street to enhance public safety.
Staff Person:
City Engineer John Leveillee
Attachments:
SR Intersection Control Measures 6-16-2015
Attachment 1 - Option 1 Aerial
Attachment 2 - Option 2 Aerial
11.
Page 51
Animal Control Hayden Bill (SB 1785)
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report on the
Hayden Bill and its status.
Staff Person:
Director of Development Services Scott Priester
Attachments:
SR Hayden Bill 6-16-2015
Attachment 1 - Senate Bill 1785
12.
Page 67
Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget Adoption
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council/Board/Commissions adopt the
following Resolutions approving the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget for the City of
Hesperia, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission,
Hesperia Fire Protection District, and Hesperia Water District:
1) City of Hesperia Resolution No. 2015-017
adopting the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget.
City of Hesperia
City Council
Meeting Agenda
June 16, 2015
2) City of Hesperia Resolution No. 2015-018
adopting the GANN Appropriations Limit.
3) Hesperia Housing Authority Resolution HHA
2015-04 adopting the Fiscal Year 2015-16
Budget.
4) Hesperia Community Development Commission
Resolution CDC 2015-05 adopting the Fiscal
Year 2015-16 Budget.
5) Hesperia Fire Protection District Resolution
HFPD 2015-09 adopting the Fiscal Year 201516 Budget.
6) Hesperia Fire Protection District Resolution
HFPD
2015-10
adopting
the
GANN
Appropriations Limit.
7) Hesperia Water District Resolution HWD 201507 adopting the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget.
8) Joint Resolution No. 2015-019, CDC 2015-06,
HHA 2015-05, HFPD 2015-11, and HWD 2015
-08 adopting the Financial Policies
Staff Person:
Attachments:
SR FY 15-16 Budget Adoption 6-16-2015
Resolutions Adopting Budget
Joint Resolution 2015-19, 06, 05, 11, 08
Exhibit A - Financial Policies
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COMMENTS
The Council may report on their activities as appointed representatives of the City on various Boards and
Committees and/or may make comments of general interest or report on their activities as a representative of the
City.
CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY/STAFF REPORTS
The City Manager, City Attorney or staff may make announcements or reports concerning items of interest to the
Council and the public.
ADJOURNMENT
City of Hesperia
City Council
Meeting Agenda
June 16, 2015
I, Melinda Sayre-Castro, City Clerk of the City of Hesperia, California do hereby certify that I caused to be posted
the foregoing agenda on Wednesday, June 10, 2014 at 5:30 p.m. pursuant to California Government Code
§54954.2.
_____________________________
Melinda Sayre-Castro,
City Clerk
Documents produced by the City and distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting regarding items on the
agenda will be made available in the City Clerk's Office during normal business hours.
City of Hesperia
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Page 8
City of Hesperia
Meeting Minutes - Draft
City Council
Tuesday, June 2, 2015
City Council Chambers
9700 Seventh Ave.
Hesperia CA, 92345
3:00 PM
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING AGENDA
HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
HESPERIA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT
Roll Call: All Members Present
Mayor Eric Schmidt
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments
NEW BUSINESS
1. Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget Workshop
Sponsors:
Budget Presentation given by Brian Johnson, Assistant City Manager and Scott Priester, Director of
Development Services.
Presentation given, no action taken.
ADJOURNMENT
4:43 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
Roll Call: All Members Present
City of Hesperia
Page 9
Mayor Eric Schmidt
Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation:
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)2
1. Three (3) cases
Conference with Legal Counsel - Conference involving closed session with Victor Valley Wastewater
Reclamation Authority
Discussion will concern:
Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation (Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(b))
1. One (1) case
City Council Representative on Joint Powers Agency Board: Council Member Blewett, Mayor Pro
Tem Holland, and Council Member Russ
Conference with Labor Negotiator
Government Code Section 54957.6
1. Negotiations between the City of Hesperia and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association
(SBPEA) and non-represented employees with the City's Negotiator. (Staff person: Brian D. Johnson,
Assistant City Manager/ Management Services)
A. Invocation by Gary Barnhart of River of Life Church
B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
C. Roll Call: All Members Present
Mayor Eric Schmidt
D. Agenda Revisions and Announcements by City Clerk
None
E. Closed Session Reports by City Attorney
No reportable action taken. VVWRA closed session update was offered. Labor Negotiations was not
discussed.
ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Community Events Calendar by Rachel Molina, Community Relations and Media Coordinator
City of Hesperia
Page 10
Movies in the Park begin 6/13 with the Lego Movie, Cat adoption special at Animal Control, and Victor Valley
Museum holding special “Walk to Hesperia” display.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Richard Kerr, Mayor of Adelanto, thanked the City Council for supporting events in Adelanto and announced
upcoming events.
Jerry Pike, commented on the definition of an Emu and an animal control case.
Cari Thomas, commented on the "Don't Trash Our Desert Campaign" and invited theCouncil to participate.
Holly Burroughs, commented on traffic enforcement.
Paul Thomas, commented on livestock zoning.
Kim Jones, thanked Scott Priester for returning her call and commented on the Animal Shelter.
JOINT CONSENT CALENDAR
Item no. 5 pulled by Mayor Schmidt
A motion was made by Blewett, seconded by Russ, that item nos 1-4 and 6 be approved. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Aye:
Abstain:
5 - Schmidt, Leonard, Holland, Blewett and Russ
0
1. Consideration of the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesday, May 19, 2015
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held
Tuesday, May 19, 2015.
Sponsors:
City Clerk Melinda Sayre-Castro
2. Warrant Run Report (City - Successor Agency - Housing Authority - Community Development
Commission - Fire - Water)
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City,
Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing
Authority, Community Development Commission, Fire District, and Water District.
Sponsors:
3. Amend and Increase Contract with Cannon Pacific Services, Inc. for Street Sweeping Services
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an increase in the
current contract with Cannon Pacific Services, Inc. and to execute an amendment to contract
City of Hesperia
Page 11
number 2012-13-045 thereby extending the contract for an additional year (Fiscal Year 2015-16)
and increasing the contract authority by an additional $160,000 with a new not-to-exceed amount of
$562,514.
Sponsors:
Director of Public Works Dale Burke
4. 2015 Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2015-23, accepting the appropriation of
$25,419.00 from the US Department of Justice, for the purpose of partially funding operational
overtime, training and equipment.
Sponsors:
Captain Nils Bentsen
5. Creation of a Public Entity under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act to replace the existing Agreement
for the Victor Valley Transit Authority (VVTA)
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2015-22, approving the Joint Powers
Agreement (JPA) between the County of San Bernardino and the cities of Adelanto, Barstow,
Hesperia, Victorville, and the Town of Apple Valley creating the Victor Valley Transit Authority
(VVTA).
Sponsors:
City Engineer John Leveillee
A motion was made by Leonard, seconded by Holland, that item no 5 be approved. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Aye:
Abstain:
5 - Schmidt, Leonard, Holland, Blewett and Russ
0
Request by Mayor Schmidt that a summary history to accompany executed contract.
6. Administrative Correction of Funding Account Number
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Board of Directors of the Fire District approve an administrative
correction for the previously approved purchase of a replacement ambulance in the amount of
$170,000 from account number 200-55-521-0000-8420 to account number 502-55-521-0000-8420
Sponsors:
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Council Member Blewett, addressed comments made during public comments including livestock, zoning, and
traffic policing and Eagle Scouts.
Council Member Leonard, commented on vacation, thanked staff for hard work, thanked meeting attendees, and
commented on traffic police in proposed FY 2015-16 budget.
Council Member Russ commented traffic police proposed in FY 2015-16 budget, requested that staff research a
synthetic drug ordinance.
City of Hesperia
Page 12
Mayor Pro Tem Holland commented on Council Member Russ's request for staff to research synthetic drugs,
animal keeping matrix, Don't Trash Our Desert Campaign and shelter operations in response to public comment
and the budget.
Mayor Schmidt commented on the definition of an Emu, accessing information, customer service and returning
phone calls, budget workshop, public safety personnel, Don't Trash Our Desert Campaign event, Sunset Hills
Foundation,sponsoring of Eagle Scout foundation in Hesperia and thanked staff on budget workshop efforts.
CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY/STAFF REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Schmidt closed the meeting in memory of Sabrina Gordon at 7:40 p.m.
By: _____________________________
Melinda Sayre-Castro, City Clerk
City of Hesperia
Page 13
Page 14
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
Mayor and Council Members
City Council, as Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment
Agency
Chair and Commissioners, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Commissioners, Community Development Commission
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Fire Protection District
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District
FROM:
BY:
Brian D. Johnson, Assistant City Manager/Management Services
Anne Duke, Deputy Finance Director
Robert Worby, Financial Analyst
SUBJECT:
Warrant Run Report (City – Successor Agency – Housing Authority –
Community Development Commission – Fire – Water)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City,
BACKGROUND
The Warrant Run totals represented below are for the period May 16, 2015 through May 29,
2015.
Agency/District
City of Hesperia
Successor Agency
Housing Authority
Community Development Commission
Fire
Water
Totals
Accounts Payable*
Payroll
$635,971.48 $221,575.61
0.00
0.00
3,703.01
2,985.83
13,085.24
2,605.01
2,812.94
0.00
898,885.28
87,254.38
$1,554,457.95 $314,420.83
Page 15
Wires
$0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
Totals
$857,547.09
0.00
6,688.84
15,690.25
2,812.94
986,139.66
$1,868,878.78
City of Hesperia
WARRANT RUNS
05/16/2015 - 05/29/2015
FUND #
W/E
5/22/2015
FUND NAME
W/E
5/29/2015
WARRANT
TOTALS
YEAR-TO
DATE
TOTALS *
Wires
PRIOR FY YTD
DATE
TOTALS
Accounts Payable
100
201
204
207
251
253
254
256
257
260
263
300
302
400
401
402
403
502
504
600
800
801
802
804
807
815
200
GENERAL
MEASURE I - ARTERIAL
MEASURE I - RENEWAL
LOCAL TRANSPORT-SB 325
CDBG
CDBG - RLF
AB2766 - TRANSIT
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS GRANT
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROG
DISASTER PREPARED GRANT
STREETS MAINTENANCE
DEV. IMPACT FEES - STREET
DEV. IMPACT FEES - FIRE
2004 STREETS
CITY DEBT SERVICES
WATER RIGHTS ACQUISITION
2013 REFUNDING LEASE REV BONDS
FIRE STATION BUILDING
CITY WIDE STREETS - CIP
RANCHERO RD UNDERCROSSING
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
TRUST/AGENCY
AD 91-1 AGENCY
TRUST-INTEREST BEARING
CFD 2005-1
PLAN REVIEW TRUST - FRONTIER
CITY
FIRE
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
124,149.63
4,275.70
3,068.24
2,342.06
19,296.68
132,421.21
30,968.98
316,522.50
$
2,812.94
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
64,487.61
23,461.56
39.27
37,181.51
9,295.31
792.59
17.65
171,633.19
12,540.29
319,448.98
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
188,637.24
27,737.26
3,068.24
2,381.33
56,478.19
9,295.31
792.59
17.65
304,054.40
43,509.27
635,971.48
2,812.94
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
3,703.01
3,703.01
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
4,600.97
4,600.97
$
$
8,484.27
8,484.27
WATER OPERATING
WATER CAPITAL
SEWER OPERATING
SEWER CAPITAL
WATER
$
$
$
$
$
60,643.65
2,619.54
63,263.19
$
$
$
$
$
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TOTAL
$
390,902.61
$
City
RDA
Successor Agency
Housing Authority
Community Development Commission
Fire
Water
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
221,575.61
2,985.83
2,605.01
87,254.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
PAYROLL TOTAL
$
314,420.83
$
160
161
162
173
REDEVELOP OBLIG RETIREMENT - PA1
REDEVELOP OBLIG RETIREMENT - PA2
REDEVELOP OBLIG RETIREMENT-HOUSING
SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATION
SUCCESSOR AGENCY
$
$
$
$
$
370
HOUSING AUTHORITY
HOUSING AUTHORITY
$
$
170
700
701
710
711
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
17,154,778.83
1,931,195.46
626.43
432,713.49
42,888.27
40,000.00
63,643.54
225,802.52
19,555.23
1,065,151.89
800,250.42
775,896.06
271,919.82
1,445,420.65
532,019.01
43,059.00
645.95
6,544,281.92
438,908.50
40,321.81
18,873.80
1,531,871.68
42,305.00
33,462,129.28
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,347,271.06
7,250.00
1,794,335.56
539,000.00
350,324.70
3,801.92
80,000.00
68,876.38
106,083.91
11,794.59
809,175.81
1,735,134.43
182,267.71
825,745.09
640,056.32
1,339,575.48
154,299.17
998,019.71
28,404.22
6,498,910.30
251,804.09
16,150.40
122.01
1,401,162.80
34,189,565.66
$
-
$
9,464,288.89
$
9,572,882.65
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
7,485,378.58
633,556.81
3,317,844.90
11,436,780.29
$
$
$
$
$
7,439,462.38
647,077.91
13,925,611.59
25,673.29
22,037,825.17
3,703.01
3,703.01
$
$
-
$
$
88,939.49
88,939.49
$
$
122,169.40
122,169.40
$
$
13,085.24
13,085.24
$
$
-
$
$
216,514.38
216,514.38
$
$
276,633.42
276,633.42
687,746.70
147,875.39
835,622.09
$
$
$
$
$
748,390.35
150,494.93
898,885.28
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
7,418,361.28
107,374.52
2,534,326.62
10,060,062.42
$
$
$
$
$
6,494,815.14
914,064.15
2,132,178.90
129,000.00
9,670,058.19
1,163,555.34
$
1,554,457.95
$
-
$
64,728,714.75
$
75,869,134.49
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
221,575.61
2,985.83
2,605.01
87,254.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,473,187.52
67,842.86
60,100.91
2,159,305.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,696,394.27
66,790.22
57,902.16
2,241,540.84
-
$
314,420.83
$
-
$
7,760,436.74
$
8,062,627.49
-
REG. PAYROLL
* The year to date totals for this Warrant Report are for the 2014-15 fiscal year starting July 1; no checks were issued on June 28-30, 2014.
Page 16
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
City Council, as Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment
Agency
Chair and Commissioners, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Commissioners, Community Development Commission
FROM:
BY:
Brian D. Johnson, Assistant City Manager/Management Services
Anne Duke, Deputy Finance Director
Robert Worby, Financial Analyst
SUBJECT:
Treasurer’s Cash Report for the period ended April 30, 2015
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the Council/Board accept the Treasurer’s Cash Report for the City,
BACKGROUND
This report is presented to the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 53646 (b)
setting forth the City’s investment portfolio.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The Treasurer’s Cash Reports are presented on the following pages for each agency.
FISCAL IMPACT
These reports reflect cash balances as of April 30, 2015.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
Provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
City of Hesperia Investment Report
Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency Investment Report
Hesperia Housing Authority Investment Report
Community Development Commission Investment Report
Hesperia Fire Protection District Investment Report
Hesperia Water District Investment Report
Page 17
Page 2 of 3
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members
Treasurer’s Cash Report
June 16, 2015
CITY OF HESPERIA
FUND
VALUE
General Fund (100 & 800)
Redevelopment Agency Admin (150)
AB27666 - Transit (254)
AB3229 Supplemental Law (255)
AD No. 91-1 (802)
Beverage Recycling Grant (256)
CFD 2005-1 (807)
City Wide-Capital Projects (504)
Community Dev Block Grant (251, 252, & 253)
Development Impact Fund (300-304)
Disaster (260)
Fire Station Building (502)
Gas Tax Fund (205)
Gas Tax Swap (206)
Local Transportation SB325 (207)
Measure I - Renewal (204)
2004 Streets Debt Serv 1993A Ref(400)
Neighborhood Stabilization Prog (257)
Public Works Street Maint (263)
Township (507)
Trust Fund (801, 803-806, & 815)
2012 Water Rights Acquisition (402)
2013 Refunding Lease Rev Bonds (403)
$
7,855,127.40
(167,130.43)
142,849.81
29,754.34
736,660.77
(11,775.32)
1,729,991.91
(129,222.02)
390,519.83
3,014,251.25
15,770.81
5,346,890.71
350,916.02
107,810.61
(139,390.95)
2,273,522.18
3,303,560.71
1,368,591.04
747,044.28
92,614.15
1,357,555.99
5,910.59
66,845.89
TOTAL CITY FUNDS
$
28,488,669.57
FUND
VALUE
Successor Agency Administration (173)
Redevelop Oblig Retirement - PA1 (160)
Redevelop Oblig Retirement - PA2 (161)
Redevel Oblig Retirement-Housing (162)
$
12.95
1,747,239.07
6,826.34
384,029.24
TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUNDS
$
2,138,107.60
Page 18
Page 3 of 3
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members
Treasurer’s Cash Report
June 16, 2015
FUND
VALUE
Hesperia Housing Authority Fund (370)
VVEDA Housing Authority (371)
$
6,095,191.69
1,700,137.75
TOTAL HOUSING AUTHORITY FUNDS
$
7,795,329.44
FUND
VALUE
Community Development Commission Fund (170)
$
FIRE
FUND
VALUE
Fire District Fund (200)
$
(239,555.19)
WATER
VALUE
FUND
Water Operating (700)
$
Water Capital (701)
7,318,996.82
(13,173,383.69)
Sewer Operating (710)
8,656,563.73
Sewer Capital (711)
3,846,629.22
TOTAL WATER FUNDS
1
Page 19
$
6,648,806.08
173,147.94
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Dale Burke, Public Works Director
Scott Smith, Maintenance Crew Supervisor/Traffic
SUBJECT:
Amend and Increase Contract with Safeway Sign Company for Purchase of
Traffic Signs
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an increase in
the current contract and to execute an amendment to contract number 2010-11-086 with
Safeway Sign Company, thereby extending the contract for an additional year (Fiscal Year
2015-16) and increasing the contract authority by an additional $65,000 with a new not-toexceed amount of $263,000.
BACKGROUND
The City of Hesperia has contracted with Safeway Sign Company for the past three (3) years to
provide traffic signs and related materials. Safeway Sign Company was awarded a three (3)
year contract for service during Fiscal Year 2011-12 which is scheduled to expire on June 30,
2015. Safeway Sign Company has requested a one (1) year extension to the contract, agreeing
to hold their prices at the current Fiscal Year rates. Safeway Sign Company was unable to
provide one (1) item at the current rate (line item No. 35 – sign back straps). This item is
available, if needed, from various vendors; therefore this item will be removed from the contract.
Safeway Sign Company has provided exceptional customer service over the past three (3)
years.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Approval of the contract amendment will increase the not-to-exceed amount of $198,000 by
$65,000 for a new total not-to-exceed amount of $263,000. The increase is necessary to
continue maintaining traffic signs and replacing the street name signs in area three (3) for
upcoming Fiscal Year 2015-16.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this service has been allocated in the proposed Fiscal Year 2015-16 budget in
account number 263-29-310-3150-7400.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Provide alternative direction to staff.
Page 27
Page 2 of 2
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Amend and Increase Contract with Safeway Sign Company for Purchase of Traffic Signs
June 16, 2015
ATTACHMENT(S)
None.
Page 28
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Sean Boal, Interim IT Manager
Courtney Pascoe, Information Systems Technician
SUBJECT:
Granicus, Inc. New Contract
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a three-year
maintenance and licensing contract with Granicus Inc. for an amount not to exceed $124,200.
BACKGROUND
The City has utilized the Granicus Software Suite for online video streaming and archiving
services since 2007 and the Legistar Management Suite for electronic agenda materials and
public online portal since 2013. Granicus is a well-respected leader in digital governing that
maintains technologies that assist staff in efficiently creating and delivering content, providing
information to Hesperia residents in an easily accessible manner. The City is satisfied with both
products and associated services.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The Granicus Software Suite provides voting software, live video streaming and video archiving
of the City Council, Planning Commission, and soon, City Council Advisory Committee and
Public Safety Advisory Committee meetings. This web hosted service is provided for a monthly
service fee of $2,470. The Legistar Management Suite provides an electronic agenda solution
and an online portal for the public to access all City Council agenda materials. This web hosted
service is provided for a monthly fee is $980.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the first year of this contract is included in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget, within
the City Manager Department. The remaining years will also be budgeted in the City Manager
Departmental budget, for each respective year.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
ATTACHMENT(S)
None.
Page 29
Page 30
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Sean Boal, Interim IT Manager
Courtney Pascoe, Information Systems Technician
SUBJECT:
CompuCom Systems Inc. Agreement
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager enter into a five-year
agreement with CompuCom Systems Inc. for an amount not to exceed $290,000 for licensing of
all Microsoft operating systems.
BACKGROUND
Microsoft licensing is the base foundation of computer applications for all the City’s servers and
workstations. The licensing enables the City to continue to utilize products and be in
compliance of Microsoft’s Enterprise Agreement.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Prior to entering into the Enterprise agreement with Microsoft, all Microsoft licenses were
purchased individually for each computer. Entering into an Enterprise agreement provides a
cost savings to the City through reduced rates of between 50% to 80% per license. Over a fiveyear period a total estimated savings of $504,885 will be realized. This is possible by
leveraging the existing pricing contract utilized by the County of Riverside and the State of
California.
The $290,000 requested represents a contract amount of $245,000 with a $45,000 contingency
amount. The contingency will allow the City to add additional product licenses to the contact as
business needs require.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the first year of this agreement is included in the City Manager Department FY
2015-16 Budget and funding for future years will continue to be budgeted in the City Manager
Department.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
ATTACHMENT(S)
None
Page 31
Page 32
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Scott Priester, Director of Development Services
David Burkett, Project Construction Manager
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements – Year 1
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council reject the bids for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Improvements – Year 1 (C.O. No. 7400), do not award a contract, and allow staff to combine the
Year 1 project with the Year 2 project, and advertise the combined projects for bid.
BACKGROUND
Agencies of both the Federal and State government have passed regulations related to ADA. In
order to comply with these regulations, the City will need to make modifications to existing
infrastructure, including public buildings. Staff has begun an evaluation of City-owned facilities
and improvements within public right of way to identify any improvements that may be needed
to meet the requirements of the ADA regulations and a Transition Plan to guide these
improvements is under development.
Concurrent with this internal evaluation, staff has identified work that can be initiated
immediately in order to reduce the number of modifications that will ultimately need to be done.
The Council has indicated support for this approach by allocating Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funding in the FY 2014-15 budget and staff is requesting additional funding
in the proposed FY 2015-16 budget. Supplemented with additional Measure I funding, staff has
been able to select multiple locations within City right of way to begin the process of modifying
existing facilities. This will be a multi-year program to bring the City into compliance with the
regulations. Additional ADA projects will be brought before the City Council in future fiscal years.
On June 17, 2014 the City Council approved the FY 2014-15 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) that contained the ADA Improvements – Year 1 Project, C.O. No. 7400 and included
funding for commencement of work. Funding is being requested in the proposed FY 2015-16
budget for additional work.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Staff issued a public “Notice Inviting Sealed Bids” for construction of the project and advertised
for bids beginning on May 12, 2015. In addition, a “Call for Bids” was sent to 22 contractors. On
June 4, 2015 bids were received, opened, and publicly read from the following two bidders:
RG General Engineering
Jitney Company, Inc.
Yucaipa, CA
Corona, CA
Page 33
$ 63,035
$102,697
Page 2 of 2
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Award Contract, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements – Year 1
June 16, 2015
However, prior to the bid opening date staff held a mandatory pre-bid meeting to provide details
on the project to potential bidders. Any potential bidder for this project was required to attend
this meeting in order to be considered a responsive bidder. One of the contractors that
submitted a bid for this project (Jitney Company) did not attend that pre-bid meeting.
Considering the fact that the pre-bid meeting was mandatory, the City would not be allowed to
accept the bid from the contractor who did not attend the pre-bid meeting. Subsequently, the
City has only one responsive bid submitted for this project.
According to Federal regulations, when procuring a public works by sealed bids, 24 CFR Part
85.36(d)(2)(i) requires the submittal from two or more responsive and responsible bidders that
are willing and able to compete effectively for the project. In order to utilize CDBG funds
(Federal funds) on this project, the City will have to rebid the project (i.e. new advertisement for
the solicitation of bids, new bid documents with revised dates for pre-bid meeting, bid opening
date, etc.) to ensure that at least two responsible and responsive bids are submitted.
Staff is recommending that the two bids received for the ADA Improvements – Year 1 project be
rejected and that the Year 1 project be combined with the Year 2 project and that both projects
be bid as a combined single project during FY 2015-16.
In order to attract more than one responsive bidder, staff will be combining the Year 1 project
funded in the FY 2014-15 budget with the Year 2 project that is proposed in the FY 2015-16
budget. Staff believes that a project that is approximately $340,000 total in size and scope as
opposed to the stand-alone Year 1 project of $90,000 will attract more bidders. It is anticipated
that the combined project will be advertised for bids no later than August/September 2015.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with rejecting the bids.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
ATTACHMENTS
None
Page 34
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Scott Priester, Development Services Director
John Leveillee, City Engineer
Dave Reno, Principal Planner
Daniel S. Alcayaga, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:
Appeal (APP14-00002) of the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Revised
Tentative Tract TTR14-00001; Applicant: Frontier Communities; APNs: 0405042-07 & 08
RECOMMENDED ACTION
At the request of the applicant, this item was continued from the City Council meetings of
January 20, 2015, February 17, 2015, and April 21, 2015. Frontier Communities has requested
a fourth continuance. Staff has no objection to this request, and recommends that this item be
continued to September 15, 2015.
Page 35
Page 36
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
FROM:
BY:
Eric Dunn, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
Proposed Single-serve Alcohol Sales Ordinance
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council consider whether to introduce Ordinance No. 2015- 04
entitled:
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Hesperia, California, prohibiting the sale of
single-serve alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption and declaring the same a public
nuisance.
BACKGROUND
Council Member Blewett requested the City Attorney’s office to prepare an ordinance that would
prohibit the sale of single-serve containers of alcohol. Several cities in California have adopted
such bans, including Victorville, San Bernardino, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, and Redlands.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The proposed ordinance would address public nuisances that may arise from the sale of singleserve alcoholic beverages. Single-serve alcoholic beverages are defined as any alcoholic
beverage packaged and sold individually as a single serving. This definition excludes multiple
cans or bottles packaged together, as well as bottles or containers of wine of at least 750 ml or
bottles or containers of distilled spirits of at least 375 ml. Studies show a correlation between the
consumption of single-serve alcoholic beverages and higher gang crime within the area.
California Government Code Section 38771 permits the legislative body of a city to declare what
constitutes a nuisance. According to California Civil Code Section 3479, a nuisance is
“[a]nything which is injurious to health, including, but not limited to, the illegal sale of controlled
substances, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of
property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, or unlawfully
obstructs the free passage or use, in the customary manner, of any navigable lake, or river, bay,
stream, canal, or basin, or any public park, square, street, or highway.”
The article attached as Exhibit 2 to this staff report cites studies that demonstrate a link between
single-serve alcohol sales and higher gang crime, which in turn interferes with the enjoyment of
property nearby and is injurious to the health, safety and welfare of the general public.
01071.0001/254629.2
Page 37
Page 2 of 2
Staff Report to the City Council
Single-Serve Alcohol Sales Ordinance
June 16, 2015
The ordinance may be enforced administratively or criminally in the same way as any other
municipal code violation. Administrative citations may be given after reasonable notice.
FISCAL IMPACT
The ordinance may result in additional enforcement costs for City code enforcement staff or
Sheriff’s Department staff.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
Provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Ordinance 2015-04
2. Article: Single-Serve Alcoholic Beverages
01071.0001/254629.2
Page 38
ORDINANCE NO. 2015-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING THE SALE OF SINGLESERVE
ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES
FOR
OFF-SITE
CONSUMPTION AND DECLARING THE SAME A PUBLIC
NUISANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Hesperia has the authority, under its police power, to enact
regulations for the public peace, morals and welfare of the City pursuant to California Constitution,
Article XI, Section 7; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 38771 permits the legislative body of a
city to declare what constitutes a nuisance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges nuisance conditions are offensive or annoying
to the senses, detrimental to property values and community appearance, an obstruction to or
interference with the comfortable enjoyment of adjacent property or premises (both public and
private), and/or are hazardous or injurious to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public; and
WHEREAS, nuisance and criminal activities such as drug dealing, public drunkenness,
loitering and other behaviors that negatively impact neighborhoods occur with disproportionate
frequency at and around the premises of on-site and off-site sale alcohol uses; and
WHEREAS, studies indicate a correlation between consumption of single-serve alcoholic
beverages and higher gang crime.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds sale of single-serve alcoholic beverages by
establishments selling for off-site consumption constitutes a public nuisance and is a threat to the
public peace, safety and welfare of the City; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF HESPERIA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 8.32.100 is hereby added to the Hesperia Municipal Code to read as
follows:
Section 8.32.100 -- Single-serve alcoholic beverages.
A.
For purposes of this section, “single-serve alcoholic beverages” means any alcoholic
beverage packaged and sold individually as a single serving. Common examples would be a 12 or
24 ounce can of beer or 32 or 40 ounce bottle of beer or malt liquor. Multiple cans or bottles
packaged together do not fall within this definition, nor do bottles or containers of wine of at least
750 ml or bottles or containers of distilled spirits of at least 375 ml.
B.
It is unlawful and hereby declared a public nuisance for an establishment selling
alcohol for off-site consumption to sell single–serve alcoholic beverages, wine of less than 750 ml in
size, or distilled spirits of less than 375 ml in size.
SECTION 2.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
Page 39
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrase, or portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3.
This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 4.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hesperia,
California, at a regular meeting held on this__ th day of _____________, 2015.
______________________________
Eric Schmidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
_____________________________
Eric Dunn, City Attorney
Page 40
Attachment 2
Single-Serve Alcoholic Beverages
Alcohol that is packaged for immediate consumption
can lead to public drinking, crime and violence
What are Single-Serves?
Alcoholic beverages that are packaged for consumption
by a single individual at a given time are known as
“single-serves.” These products may contain beer, distilled spirits or alcoholic energy drinks, which, in addition to alcohol, usually contain caffeine as well as other
stimulants.1 However, the most common single-serve
items are bottles and cans of beer, ranging in size from
16 to 40 ounces. Such items often have higher alcohol
content than regular beer, making them more potent.
Problematic Packaging
Single-serve alcoholic beverages are considered problematic for a number of reasons. First is that excessive
amounts of alcohol are being packaged for consumption
by a single individual. This is especially true of the high
alcohol content beer known as malt liquor. With 6 percent alcohol content being standard, a 40 ounce bottle
of this kind of product is equivalent to five shots of
whiskey. Since it sells for as little$1.39 a bottle, it is the
cheapest way for someone to get drunk.2 This makes it a
favorite among the homeless and other serial inebriates,
including those receiving public assistance, according
to research.3
Secondly, single-serve products are routinely offered
for sale cold and ready to be consumed. This frequently
Since Hispanic customers prefer lemon with some types of
beer, one San Bernardino store offers fresh lemons so that
the product can be consumed immediately after purchase.
(Sign reads: don’t forget the lemons)
24 ounce cans of beer are the most common type of singleserve alcoholic beverages being sold in San Bernardino,
but 32 and 40 ounce bottles are also found in many supermarkets and convenience stores.
leads to public intoxication and a wide range of associated problems including driving under the influence,
public urination, litter, and other disruptive behavior.
According to research, such problems are reported on a
regular basis by residents living in the proximity of retailers that sell single-serves. In addition, there are also
reports of crimes of violence,
including gang-related activities, resulting in personal injury
A 40 ounce
and/or property damage.4, 5, 6
Underage Drinking
bottle of
malt liquor
is equal to
five shots
of whiskey.
Last but not least, it should be
noted that the single-serve cans
and bottles of beer are very
popular with youth including
minorities, to whom these
products are specifically marketed. This includes several advertising campaigns featuring African American music video stars promoting
malt liquor in 40-ounce containers. In addition, since
these products are typically priced low, they are more
affordable for young people who have less disposable
income.7, 8 As a consequence, these products may tend
to increase problems related to underage drinking.
These are known to include poor academic performance, high-risk sexual practices and an increased likelihood of drinking problems developing later in life.9
Page 41
Single Serve Alcoholic Beverages
Page 2
Crime & Violence
The connection between crime, violence and alcohol
availability has been well documented by scientific research.10, 11, 12 Furthermore, there is new evidence indicating that the consumption of single-serve alcoholic beverages may also play a part. For example, a 2006 study of
Riverside crime statistics that found a correlation between
such sales and higher gang crime. According to Dr.
Robert Nash Parker, the author of the study, such products are a central part of the activities of gang members.
“They sip 40-ouncers, they party, they get their courage
up," it was noted in the report.13
Through GIS mapping studies, city officials in San Bernardino have also established a correlation between the
sales of single-serve alcoholic beverages and the prevalence of crime. As noted on the map at right, reports from
police of Part 1 property crime clearly demonstrate that
such crime is clustered around alcohol licensees known as
“Package Stores,” most of which are currently selling single serves.
Single-Serve Sales in the City of San Bernardino
To identify the extent of the problem in the City of San
Bernardino, a survey was conducted by the County Department of Public Health, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention Program (ADAPP). As part of this effort, some
165 retailers licensed to sell alcoholic beverages were
studied and data related to the sales of single-serves were
collected. These included the different sizes and types of
such items being sold as well as the amount of shelf space
Hip-hop artists Meth & Red doing a rap video ad for St. Ides
Malt Liquor, a brand that targets African American youth.
allocated for them. Results of the survey, which
was conducted in October
of 2008, showed that
these products are a staple
in gas stations, convenience and liquor stores
throughout the city, with
over 88 percent of them
having such items on their
shelves. Other results of
the survey are listed in the
table below.
88 % of retailers
surveyed in the
City of San Bernardino were
found to be currently selling
single–serves.
Research Finding:
Single-Serves in the City of San Bernardino
• Of the 165 off – sale alcohol licensees that were surveyed, a total
• Most super markets and many AM/PM type stores also sold singles
of 146 had alcoholic single serve items for sale. These stores included pharmacies, discount stores and some gas stations and midsize markets.
shrink-wrapped in packages of 2 or 3 24oz. containers.
• It was noted that retailers located further south (central or down-
the most frequently observed size was the 24 oz can. All of the
super markets and many of the smaller off – sale stores also sold
alcohol in 32 oz and 40 oz size glass containers.
town San Bernardino) and south west (Westside San Bernardino)
of the city had the malt liquor products more prominently displayed in the cooler section at, or above, eye level. In the northern
parts of the city the malt liquor had less shelf space and was often
displayed below eye level.
• All the major alcohol brands were being sold in single serve con-
• It was noted that approximately 10% of the stores had special ads/
• All of the stores that sold singles had the items in various sizes, but
tainers. Super markets that catered to the Hispanic community also
included favorite Mexican beer brands Modelo and Tecate in 24 oz
single cans.
• Most of the stores had between 6 and 8 cooler sections available
for display of beverages. Of these, between 1 to 2 cooler sections
usually had single serve products on display for sale.
• All the stores sold the higher alcohol content malt liquor in single
displays to promote single serve items such as barrels of ice or
posted ads offering 2 for a reduced price. One store had a handwritten sign posted on the cooler door that stated you had to buy 2
singles at a time.
• One Hispanic super market had a special plastic container affixed
to the cooler door that stated in Spanish: Don’t forget the lemons!
• Stores that were visited between the hours of 2 pm to 5 pm were
serve containers. Alcohol was also available in regular beer, lite
beer and lite malt liquor.
observed to have customers buying single-serve items. Such customers were mostly males from 25 to 45 years old.
Page 42
Page 3
City of San Bernardino: Part-1 Violent Crime in Proximity of ABC Licensed Package Stores
GIS mapping of the Central portion of the City of San Bernardino shows how often violent crimes (red dots) occur within a onehalf mile radius (indicated by the blue circles) from ABC licensed alcoholic retailers (blue triangles). Data collected by San Bernardino Police Department in 2007. Note: Part-1 crimes are a category of crimes that are generally considered more serious.
Page 43
Page 4
Future Directions
Although sales of single-serves are widespread in San
Bernardino, it is actually illegal for some of the city’s retailers to be selling products packaged in this way. This is
because of restrictions placed on these businesses by the
city at the time their alcohol license was issued. Known as
a Conditional Use Permit, such regulations are intended to
ensure the public’s health and safety, and all retailers are
required to comply with the restrictions imposed by them.
However, as demonstrated by the survey cited previously,
at least some of the city’s retailers have been failing to
meet this obligation.
to deal with problem businesses. These may include a
stronger conditional use permitting process for any new
businesses and what is known as a “Deemed Approved”
ordinance for those already in existence. In addition, there
is another initiative currently under way to encourage voluntary removal of single-serve products from the shelves
by retailers who are not currently required to do so by the
law. Coordinated by the Office of the Mayor through the
Operation Phoenix program, such action is expected to
reduce crime and improve the local business climate.
In response to this problem, the Office of the City Attorney launched an enforcement campaign in May, 2009 to
bring local alcohol retailers into compliance with all regulations. This campaign has been successful with cited
businesses removing the banned products from their
shelves. However, enforcement alone can not solve the
problem, as many retailers are exempt from the ban, having been in business before it went into effect. Therefore,
public officials feel that additional regulations are needed
After being cited for violating the restriction against selling
single serve alcoholic beverages, a local convenience store
removed the items from their shelves and posted a sign indicating they were no longer allowed to sell such items.
References
1. Alcohol, Energy Drinks, and Youth: A Dangerous Mix, Marin
Institute Report, 2007
2. “Liquid crack: Malt liquor is the cheapest high you can get. It
sells for as little as $1.39 for a 40-ounce bottle, which is equal to
five shots of whiskey.” Metroactive, Sonoma County Independent, October, 1997
3. Bluthenthal, R. N.; Brown-Taylor, D; Guzmán-Becerra, N; Robinson, P. L; Characteristics of Malt Liquor Beer Drinkers in a
Low-Income, Racial Minority Community Sample. Alcoholism:
Clinical & Experimental Research, March, 2005
4. Normal looks at single serve alcohol ban, The Daily Vidette,
2/14/2008
5. City Samples Single-Serve Alcohol Laws, RedOrbit News,
12/15/2005
6. Council aims to widen sales ban of single containers of beer in
D.C., Examiner.com, Jun 19, 2008
7. D. Coate and M. Grossman. "Effects of alcoholic beverage
prices and legal drinking ages on youth alcohol use," Journal of
Law and Economics 31(1988):145-171.
8. M. Grossman, D. Coate, and G. M. Arluck, "Price sensitivity of
alcoholic beverages in the United States: Youth alcohol consumption," in Control Issues in Alcohol Abuse Prevention:
Strategies for States and Communities (Greenwich, CT: JAI
Press, 1987), 169-198
9. Grant, B.F., and Dawson, D.A. (1997). “Age of onset of alcohol
use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: Results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic survey.” Journal of Substance Abuse, 9: 103-110.
10. Scribner, R.A., MacKinnon, D.P. & Dwyer, J.H. (1995). The
risk of assaultive violence and alcohol availability in Los Angeles County. American Journal of Public Health, (85)3, 335-340.
11. Scribner, R.A., Cohen, D., Kaplan, S., & Allen, S.H. (1999).
Alcohol availability and homicide in New Orleans: Conceptual
considerations for small area analysis of the effect of alcohol
outlet density. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60, 310-316.
12. Fewer liquor stores, less violence (2003). Prevention File, 18
(1), 2.
13. Parker, R.N., Alcohol and Violence: Connections, Evidence and
Possibilities for Prevention, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs,
SARC Supplement 2, May 2004.
This Issue Briefing was developed by the Coalition for a Drug-Free San Bernardino with
technical assistance from the Institute for Public Strategies: www.publicstrategies.org
1881 Commercenter East, Suite 138, San Bernardino, CA 92408. Phone:(909) 266-1660
Page 44
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
FROM:
BY:
John Leveillee, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Installation of traffic control measures along Main Street between Cottonwood
Avenue and 11th Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to Staff regarding appropriate traffic
control measure along Main Street to enhance public safety.
BACKGROUND
On May 11, 2014 a traffic collision occurred at the intersection of Main Street and Balsam
Avenue. Unfortunately, the collision resulted in several fatalities. Although the incident was
deemed “not correctable” by normal traffic control devices, there was a public outcry regarding
the perceived safety of the intersection. The Balsam Avenue intersection is located along a
curved section of Main Street between the intersections of Cottonwood Avenue and 11th Avenue
in a high speed section of Main Street.
Collision reports were examined for the Balsam Avenue intersection along with those collisions
that occurred in the vicinity of the intersection since 2002. There have been 50 reported
collisions that have occurred at or near the intersection, many of these occurring at the
driveways west of the intersection. 14 of the 50 incidents resulted in injuries and 2 of the
incidents resulted in fatalities, including the incident on May 11, 2014.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Balsam Avenue is a local roadway, and is not designated as an arterial highway. It creates a
three-way intersection at Main Street and as such would not typically be a candidate for a traffic
signal. Main Street is a Major Arterial Highway as indicated on the City’s adopted General Plan
Circulation Element.
There are two other three-way intersections on Main Street between Cottonwood Ave and 11th
Avenue which are similar in alignment to the Balsam Avenue intersection. These occur at
Locust Avenue, and Hickory Avenue. There is over ¾ of a mile between the Cottonwood Ave
and 11th Ave intersections on Main Street and the speed limit for this portion of Main Street is 50
mph, with vehicles often exceeding the posted speed limit. Given the higher speeds and heavy
traffic volumes along this corridor, executing left turn movements from the side streets or even
from the two-way left turn pocket, can be a difficult movement for motorists to execute and
requires the utmost in patience.
Page 45
Page 2 of 3
Staff Report to Mayor and Council Members
Traffic Control Measures on Main Street at Balsam Avenue
June 16, 2015
There is a hierarchy to traffic control measures which control left turn movements. The first is to
install signage which prohibits left turn movements from the side streets and driveways onto
Main Street. This solution is easily disregarded by motorists, and without additional enforcement
this would not enhance the safety of the roadway. The next solution is to construct a two-way
left turn pocket in the center median area which allows a safe haven for those vehicles turning
left into side streets and driveways. This roadway feature is already in place on Main Street. The
third option is to construct a raised center median along the corridor which completely
eliminates left turn movements. This is the only improvement which eliminates the conflicting left
turn movement and has the potential to greatly enhance the safety of the corridor. The negative
effect of the raised center median is the forced right-in, right-out movement to businesses along
the corridor and it would force more traffic to utilize the traffic signals at Cottonwood Avenue and
11th Avenue. The raised center median would also prevent police and fire vehicles from utilizing
the existing two-way left turn lane during emergency calls. The installation of a traffic signal is
another measure which could be utilized if the majority of the collisions occur at an intersection.
Given the high number of collisions which have occurred at the driveways away from the
Balsam Avenue intersection, this option would not be an effective counter-measure.
Staff is proposing three options for consideration:
1) Install a raised center median along Main Street at the intersection with Balsam Avenue
extending to the east and west along Main Street from the intersection approximately
600 feet. The length of the raised center median would be adjusted to eliminate the left
turn movement in and out of the driveways with the highest number of collisions. A
protected left turn pocket could be included to accommodate the east-bound Main Street
to north-bound Balsam Avenue movement.
2) Install a raised center median from Cottonwood Ave to 11th Ave per the adopted street
section for a Major Arterial Highway. This would improve the safety of the intersections
and driveways along the corridor between these major intersections.
3) Do nothing. This would ensure that businesses along the corridor are not
inconvenienced; however it does nothing to address the safety concerns.
The Public Safety Advisory Committee considered this matter on April 14, 2015, after which it
recommended that the City Council consider option 2.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff has hired a consultant to assist with the preparation of a Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Grant to cover the majority of the costs associated with either the first or
second option. Staff and the consultant are confident that the grant application will be
successful given the collision history along the corridor.
The cost for the first option would be approximately $100,000 with the second option costing
approximately $350,000. Since the City is planning on reconstructing this section of Main Street
in the Summer of 2015, the center median improvements could be incorporated into those
improvements.
Page 46
Page 3 of 3
Staff Report to Mayor and Council Members
Traffic Control Measures on Main Street at Balsam Avenue
June 16, 2015
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Provide alternate direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Option 1 Aerial
2. Option 2 Aerial
Page 47
4
ATTACHMENT 1
1 " = 250 '
Option 1
SMOK
E
TREE S
T
T
HICKO
RY C
LOCUST AVE
BALSAM AVE
SPRUCE ST
WALNUT ST
DATE: 6/9/2015
FILE: Y:\ALL_GIS_COH\COH\Engineering\John\Main Street Exhibits\Main Street Option 1.mxd
Page 48
HICKO
RY AV
E
MAIN ST
4
ATTACHMENT 2
1 " = 500 '
TRAVIS
ST
T
TREE S
T
LOCUST AVE
HICKO
RY C
SPRUCE ST
JUNIPER ST
SMOK
E
BALSAM AVE
ARROYO AVE
HAWTHORNE AVE
Option 2
MAIN ST
ELEVE
NTH AV
E
JUNIPE
R ST
YUCCA ST
ORANGE ST
T
OLIVE ST
DATE: 6/9/2015
FILE: Y:\ALL_GIS_COH\COH\Engineering\John\Main Street Exhibits\Main Street Option 2.mxd
TENTH
AVE
HICKO
RY AVE
COTTONWOOD AVE
WALNU
TS
Page 49
Page 50
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report on the Hayden Bill and its
status.
BACKGROUND
The City Council, at its May 19, 2015 meeting, received information on animal control issues,
and laws governing operations of animal shelters, specifically Senate Bill (SB) 1785, which
requirements have been suspended since 2004. In response, Council requested staff provide
information on SB1785, known as the “Hayden Bill.”
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The Hayden Bill was approved by the State legislature during the 1998 Legislative session, and
became effective July 1, 1999. Its purpose was to address “stray animals,” and in so doing it
significantly expanded rights and duties of publicly-funded animal shelters through amendments
to the California Penal (P), Civil (C), and Food and Agricultural (F&A) codes (see attachment).
More than thirteen changes were made to then-existing law. Among those were the following
key items (the language below is taken directly from the Hayden Bill):
1. Provided a list of animal records that were to be kept for three (3) years (F&A Code
32003);
2. Allowed nonprofit rescue/adoption groups to obtain animals to be killed, but can’t
demand an animal before the hold period is up, nor be given priority over adoption of the
same animal. A shelter can’t kill if a nonprofit has requested the animal, and can be required
to pay the same adoption fee (F&A Code 31108, 31752-31754);
3. Required shelters to maintain lost/found lists, and provide names/addresses of other
area shelters (F&A Code 32001);
4. Required shelters to check for owner-identification on strays (P Code 597.1(l));
5. Allowed judges to prohibit convicted animal abusers from owning animals (P Code
597.1);
6. Provided for pre/post-seizure hearings (P Code 597.1);
7. Provided for holding period for “working people”: Four (4) days plus the impoundment
day, if available at least one weekday evening until 7 p.m., or one weekend day, or; 6 days if
the shelter does not have “user-friendly hours” (F&A Code 31108, 31601-31681, 3175231753);
Page 51
Page 2 of 2
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
June 16, 2015
8. Provided for holding "owner-relinquished” pets rather than killing immediately (F&A
Code 31754);
9. Provided for feral cat disposition similar to other animals, allowed killing after threeday hold if a temperament evaluation confirms it is feral (F&A Code 31752.5).
In 2000, the mandates under the Hayden Bill were challenged by cities/counties for
reimbursement as an “unfunded mandate.” In 2004, the mandates were suspended by the
Legislature, due in part to the reimbursement cost to agencies (totaled $23 million). The
Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) latest published report (2009) noted that other methods to
these mandates were more successful in animal care, including mandatory spay-neuter, and
curtailing backyard and professional breeding. Increasing animal hold periods did not increase
adoptions, but only prolonged the inevitable.
The Hayden Bill continues to be suspended, and is subject to the Legislature’s funding review
with each annual budget.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact from this report.
ALTERNATIVES
ATTACHMENTS
1. Senate Bill (SB) 1785
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
CITY OF HESPERIA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 16, 2015
TO:
Chair and Commission, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Commission, Community Development Commission
FROM:
BY:
Brian D. Johnson, Assistant City Manager-Management Services
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council/Board/Commissions adopt the following Resolutions
approving the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget for the City of Hesperia, Hesperia Housing Authority,
Community Development Commission, Hesperia Fire Protection District, and Hesperia Water District:
1) City of Hesperia Resolution No. 2015-017 adopting the Fiscal Year
2015-16 Budget.
2) City of Hesperia Resolution No. 2015-018 adopting the GANN
Appropriations Limit.
3) Hesperia Housing Authority Resolution HHA 2015-04 adopting the
Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget.
4) Hesperia Community Development Commission Resolution CDC
2015-05 adopting the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget.
5) Hesperia Fire Protection District Resolution HFPD 2015-09 adopting
the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget.
6) Hesperia Fire Protection District Resolution HFPD 2015-10 adopting
the GANN Appropriations Limit.
7) Hesperia Water District Resolution HWD 2015-07 adopting the Fiscal
Year 2015-16 Budget.
8) Joint Resolution No. 2015-019, CDC 2015-06, HHA 2015-05, HFPD
2015-11, and HWD 2015-08 adopting the Financial Policies
BACKGROUND
In compliance with the City Council’s policy direction, staff has prepared the Fiscal Year 2015-16
Budget for the City of Hesperia, the Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development
Commission, the Hesperia Water District, and the Hesperia Fire Protection District Board’s
consideration and action. A comprehensive review of the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Proposed Budget took
place during a Public Workshop on June 2, 2015.
Page 1 of 2
- 1 -1Page 1 of 2
Page 67
- 1 -1
Page 2
Staff Report
June 16, 2015
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The City Council/Board/Commission’s expenditure plan and related resources to fund the Fiscal Year
2015-16 Budget have been presented and staff is available to answer questions that the legislative
bodies may have.
Financial Policies
Resolutions are included to adopt the annual Financial Policies for the City. These policies, which
follow current practices, will serve as guidelines for the financial management of the City; particularly
in the area of budgeting, accounting for capital improvements, revenue, management of budgeted
reserves, transfers of available budget within a fund, fiscal management, capital assets exceeding
$5,000, and long-term debt management.
Staff requests authority to make technical corrections, minor edits, etc. to the FY 2015-16 Proposed
Budget document to be incorporated into the final FY 2015-16 Budget as approved by the City
Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
See Fiscal Year 2015-16 Proposed Budget.
ALTERNATIVE
Provide alternate direction to staff.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 2015-017
2. Resolution No. 2015-018
3. Resolution HHA 2015-04
4. Resolution CDC 2015-05
5. Resolution HFPD 2015-09
6. Resolution HFPD 2015-10
7. Resolution HWD 2015-07
8. Joint Resolution No. 2015-019, CDC 2015-06, HHA 2015-05, HFPD 2015-11, and HWD 2015-08
9. Exhibit A Financial Policies
Page 68
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-017
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared the proposed operating and capital budget for
Fiscal Year 2015-16 for the City of Hesperia; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the Fiscal Year 2015-16 proposed budget and held a
public workshop concerning its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the final budget document will be the City’s official Program of Services for the City
of Hesperia for Fiscal Year 2015-16.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
In all respects, the facts as set forth in this Resolution are true and correct.
Section 2. To accept, approve, and adopt the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget as
proposed and presented by staff and as adjusted by Council direction, as the official budget
document and Program of Services for the City of Hesperia for Fiscal Year 2015-16, which
includes:
Section 2a. City General Fund expenditures of $27,522,987 with total resources
(revenue, budgeted reserves, and transfers) of $27,609,607.
Section 2b. Other City funds expenditures of $22,122,260 are from the following funds,
exclusive of transfers:
Fund No.
204
205
207
251
253
254
256
257
260
263
300
304
400
402
403
502
504
Fund Name
Expenditure
Measure I - Renewal
Gas Tax
Local Transportation Fund (LTF)
CDBG Administration
CDBG Revolving Loan
Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Fund
Beverage Recycling Grant
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP)
Disaster Preparedness Grant
Street Maintenance Fund
Development Impact Fee (DIF) - Streets
DIF - Public Services
2004 Streets Debt Service
Water Rights Acquisition
2013 Civic Plaza Refinancing
Fire Capital
City Streets Projects
Total
$ 4,283,000
520,438
1,077,500
1,314,792
311,185
80,000
115,892
586,797
18,183
3,325,310
750,000
2,255
4,646,475
1,449,550
776,600
129,000
2,735,283
$22,122,260
Page 69
Resolution No. 2015-017
Page 2
Section 3.
That the City Manager and department head staff shall have the authority
to transfer funds as incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget and consistent with the
policy adopted by the City Council.
Section 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 16th day of June 2015.
Eric Schmidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Page 70
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 ARTICLE XIIIB LIMIT
(GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION)
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (Proposition 4) was passed by voters in
1979; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB sets a limit on the annual spending or appropriations levels of the
state, local governments, and schools according to changes in inflation and population, the base
year levels being set in Fiscal Year 1978-79; and
WHEREAS, said limit is known as the Gann Appropriations Limitation and must be adopted
annually by the governing body of each jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, said annual limitation is established by multiplying either the increase of the
jurisdictional change in per capita income or assessed valuation, whichever is greater, by the
change in population; and multiplying the resulting figure by the previous fiscal year’s limitation;
and
WHEREAS, upon incorporation, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) set the
base Gann Appropriations Limitation for the City of Hesperia at $12,000,000; and
WHEREAS, said limitation has been properly adjusted for the City of Hesperia each fiscal year,
including Fiscal Year 2015-16, by the Management Services Department according to the
State’s formula as shown in Attachment 1; and
WHEREAS, it is required that each jurisdiction’s governing body adopt their adjusted Gann
Appropriations Limitation on an annual fiscal year basis.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. In all respects, the facts as set forth in this resolution are true and correct.
Section 2. Approves the annual Fiscal Year 2015-16 Article XIIIB Limit (Gann
Appropriations Limitation) of $76,469,105 for the City of Hesperia.
Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
Eric Schmidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Page 71
CITY OF HESPERIA AND HESPERIA FIRE DISTRICT
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS (GANN LIMITS)
FISCAL YEARS 1989/90 through 2015/16
Fiscal
Year
1988/90
1989/90
1990/91
1991/92
1992/93
1993/94
1994/95
1995/96
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
2001/02
2002/03
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Change In
Factor 1
Factor 2
Per Capita Calculation
Population
Income
of Factor
- incorporation - LAFCO base amount
0.0000
0.0498
1.0498
1.0550
1.0421
1.099416
1.0829
1.080477
1.170049
1.0525
1.079359
1.136025
1.0392
1.150802
1.195913
1.0177
1.124327
1.144228
1.0120
1.0071
1.019185
1.0132
1.0467
1.060516
1.0042
1.0467
1.051096
1.0181
1.0415
1.060351
1.0138
1.0453
1.059725
1.0209
1.0491
1.071026
1.0189
1.0782
1.098578
1.0286
0.9873
1.015537
1.0362
1.0231
1.060136
1.0309
1.0328
1.064714
1.0759
1.0526
1.132492
1.0520
1.0396
1.093659
1.0705
1.0442
1.117816
1.0246
1.0429
1.068555
1.0106
1.0062
1.016866
1.0050
0.9746
0.979473
1.0065
1.0251
1.031763
1.0068
1.0377
1.044756
1.0061
1.0512
1.057612
1.0049
0.9977
1.002589
1.0083
1.0382
1.046817
City
Balance
City Gann
Limit
Fire
District
Balance
Fire
District
Gann Limit
Total
Gann
$12,000,000
12,597,600
13,850,003
16,205,182
18,409,492
22,016,151
25,191,496
25,674,795
27,228,531
28,619,800
30,347,034
32,159,511
34,443,672
37,839,060
38,426,965
40,737,809
43,374,116
49,120,839
53,721,448
60,050,694
64,167,469
65,249,718
63,910,337
65,940,321
68,891,546
72,860,526
73,049,162
$12,000,000
12,597,600
13,850,003
16,205,182
18,409,492
22,016,151
25,191,496
25,674,795
27,228,531
28,619,800
30,347,034
32,159,511
34,443,672
37,839,060
38,426,965
40,737,809
43,374,116
49,120,839
53,721,448
60,050,694
64,167,469
65,249,718
63,910,337
65,940,321
68,891,546
72,860,526
73,049,162
76,469,105
$2,937,542
3,229,581
3,778,768
4,292,775
5,133,785
5,874,221
5,986,918
6,349,222
6,673,642
7,076,403
7,499,041
8,031,668
8,823,414
8,960,503
9,499,352
10,114,093
11,454,129
12,526,911
14,002,782
14,962,743
15,215,105
14,902,785
15,376,142
16,064,317
16,989,814
17,033,801
$2,937,542
3,229,581
3,778,768
4,292,775
5,133,785
5,874,221
5,986,918
6,349,222
6,673,642
7,076,403
7,499,041
8,031,668
8,823,414
8,960,503
9,499,352
10,114,093
11,454,129
12,526,911
14,002,782
14,962,743
15,215,105
14,902,785
15,376,142
16,064,317
16,989,814
17,033,801
17,831,272
$15,535,142
17,079,584
19,983,950
22,702,267
27,149,936
31,065,717
31,661,713
33,577,753
35,293,442
37,423,437
39,658,552
42,475,340
46,662,474
47,387,468
50,237,161
53,488,209
60,574,968
66,248,359
74,053,476
79,130,212
80,464,823
78,813,122
81,316,463
84,955,863
89,850,340
90,082,963
94,300,377
Page 72
RESOLUTION HHA 2015-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE HESPERIA HOUSING
AUTHORITY, CITY OF HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL
FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Hesperia Housing Authority has prepared the
proposed operating budget for Fiscal Year 2015-16; and
WHEREAS, the Hesperia Housing Authority Commission has received the Fiscal Year 2015-16
proposed budget and held a public workshop concerning its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the final budget document will be the Commission’s official Program of Services for
the Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2015-16.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF HESPERIA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 2. To accept, approve, and adopt the Fiscal Year 2015-16 budget as proposed
and presented by staff and as adjusted by Commission direction, as the official budget
document and Program of Services for the Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2015-16, which
includes: budget expenditures totaling $819,564, with revenue of $1,386,241, budgeted
reserves of $75,329 for VVEDA Housing Authority Fund 371, and transfers of $0 for total
resources of $1,461,570.
Section 3. That the Commission and department head staff shall have the authority to
transfer funds as incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget and consistent with the policy
adopted by the Commissioners.
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Commission shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
Eric Schmidt, Chairman
ATTEST:
Melinda Sayre-Castro, Secretary
Page 73
RESOLUTION CDC 2015-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Hesperia Community Development Commission has
prepared the proposed operating budget for Fiscal Year 2015-16; and
WHEREAS, the Hesperia Community Development Commission has received the Fiscal Year
2015-16 proposed budget and held a public workshop concerning its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the final budget document will be the Commission’s official Program of Services for
the Hesperia Community Development Commission for Fiscal Year 2015-16.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA AS FOLLOWS:
and presented by staff and as adjusted by Commission direction, as the official budget
document and Program of Services for the Hesperia Community Development Commission for
Fiscal Year 2015-16, which includes: budget expenditures totaling $563,605, with revenue of
$621,159.
Section 3. That the Commission and department head staff shall have the authority to
transfer funds as incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget and consistent with the policy
adopted by the Commissioners.
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Commission shall certify to the passage and
Eric Schmidt, Chairman
ATTEST:
Page 74
RESOLUTION HFPD 2015-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY OF HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
THE ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Executive Director has prepared the proposed operating budget for Fiscal Year
2015-16 for the Hesperia Fire Protection District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the Fiscal Year 2015-16 proposed budget and
held a public workshop concerning its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the final budget document will be the District’s official Program of Services for the
Hesperia Fire Protection District for Fiscal Year 2015-16.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 2. To accept, approve and adopt the Fiscal Year 2015-16 budget as proposed
and presented by staff and as adjusted by Board direction, as the official budget document and
Program of Services for the Hesperia Fire Protection District for Fiscal Year 2015-16 which
includes: appropriated expenditures totaling $9,984,121 and estimated revenue of $9,995,641
and budgeted reserves of $0, for total resources of $9,995,641.
Section 3. That the Executive Director and department head staff shall have the
authority to transfer funds as incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget and consistent
with the policy adopted by the District’s Board of Directors.
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors shall certify to the passage and
Eric Schmidt, Chair
ATTEST:
Page 75
RESOLUTION HFPD 2015-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT, HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 ARTICLE XIIIB LIMIT (GANN APPROPRIATIONS
LIMITATION)
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (Proposition 4) was passed by voters in
1979; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB sets a limit on the annual spending or appropriations levels of the
state, local governments, and schools according to changes in inflation and population, the base
year levels being set in Fiscal Year 1978-79; and
WHEREAS, said limit is known as the Gann Appropriations Limitation and must be adopted
annually by the governing body of each jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, said annual limitation is established by multiplying either the increase of the
jurisdictional change in per capita income or assessed valuation, whichever is greater, by the
change in population; and multiplying the resulting figure by the previous fiscal year’s limitation;
and
WHEREAS, said limitation has been properly adjusted for the Hesperia Fire Protection District
fiscal year, including Fiscal Year 2015-16, by the Management Services Department according
to the State’s formula as shown in Attachment 1; and
WHEREAS, it is required that each jurisdiction’s governing body adopt their adjusted Gann
Appropriations Limitation on an annual fiscal year basis.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HESPERIA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 2. Approves the annual Fiscal Year 2015-16 Article XIIIB Limit (Gann
Appropriations Limitation) of $17,831,272 for the Hesperia Fire Protection District.
Section 3. That the Board Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
Eric Schmidt, Chair
ATTEST:
Page 76
CITY OF HESPERIA AND HESPERIA FIRE DISTRICT
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS (GANN LIMITS)
FISCAL YEARS 1989/90 through 2015/16
Fiscal
Year
1988/90
1989/90
1990/91
1991/92
1992/93
1993/94
1994/95
1995/96
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
2001/02
2002/03
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Change In
Factor 1
Factor 2
Per Capita Calculation
Population
Income
of Factor
- incorporation - LAFCO base amount
0.0000
0.0498
1.0498
1.0550
1.0421
1.099416
1.0829
1.080477
1.170049
1.0525
1.079359
1.136025
1.0392
1.150802
1.195913
1.0177
1.124327
1.144228
1.0120
1.0071
1.019185
1.0132
1.0467
1.060516
1.0042
1.0467
1.051096
1.0181
1.0415
1.060351
1.0138
1.0453
1.059725
1.0209
1.0491
1.071026
1.0189
1.0782
1.098578
1.0286
0.9873
1.015537
1.0362
1.0231
1.060136
1.0309
1.0328
1.064714
1.0759
1.0526
1.132492
1.0520
1.0396
1.093659
1.0705
1.0442
1.117816
1.0246
1.0429
1.068555
1.0106
1.0062
1.016866
1.0050
0.9746
0.979473
1.0065
1.0251
1.031763
1.0068
1.0377
1.044756
1.0061
1.0512
1.057612
1.0049
0.9977
1.002589
1.0083
1.0382
1.046817
City
Balance
City Gann
Limit
Fire
District
Balance
$12,000,000
12,597,600
13,850,003
16,205,182
18,409,492
22,016,151
25,191,496
25,674,795
27,228,531
28,619,800
30,347,034
32,159,511
34,443,672
37,839,060
38,426,965
40,737,809
43,374,116
49,120,839
53,721,448
60,050,694
64,167,469
65,249,718
63,910,337
65,940,321
68,891,546
72,860,526
73,049,162
$12,000,000
12,597,600
13,850,003
16,205,182
18,409,492
22,016,151
25,191,496
25,674,795
27,228,531
28,619,800
30,347,034
32,159,511
34,443,672
37,839,060
38,426,965
40,737,809
43,374,116
49,120,839
53,721,448
60,050,694
64,167,469
65,249,718
63,910,337
65,940,321
68,891,546
72,860,526
73,049,162
76,469,105
$2,937,542
3,229,581
3,778,768
4,292,775
5,133,785
5,874,221
5,986,918
6,349,222
6,673,642
7,076,403
7,499,041
8,031,668
8,823,414
8,960,503
9,499,352
10,114,093
11,454,129
12,526,911
14,002,782
14,962,743
15,215,105
14,902,785
15,376,142
16,064,317
16,989,814
17,033,801
Page 77
Fire
District
Gann Limit
$2,937,542
3,229,581
3,778,768
4,292,775
5,133,785
5,874,221
5,986,918
6,349,222
6,673,642
7,076,403
7,499,041
8,031,668
8,823,414
8,960,503
9,499,352
10,114,093
11,454,129
12,526,911
14,002,782
14,962,743
15,215,105
14,902,785
15,376,142
16,064,317
16,989,814
17,033,801
17,831,272
Total
Gann
$15,535,142
17,079,584
19,983,950
22,702,267
27,149,936
31,065,717
31,661,713
33,577,753
35,293,442
37,423,437
39,658,552
42,475,340
46,662,474
47,387,468
50,237,161
53,488,209
60,574,968
66,248,359
74,053,476
79,130,212
80,464,823
78,813,122
81,316,463
84,955,863
89,850,340
90,082,963
94,300,377
RESOLUTION HWD 2015-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA
WATER DISTRICT, CITY OF HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the General Manager has prepared the proposed operating and capital budget for
Fiscal Year 2015-16 for the Hesperia Water District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the Fiscal Year 2015-16 proposed budget and
held a public workshop concerning its adoption; and
WHEREAS, the final budget document will be the District’s official Program of Services for the
Hesperia Water District for Fiscal Year 2015-16.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA
WATER DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS:
and presented by staff and as adjusted by Board direction, as the official budget document and
Program of Services for the Hesperia Water District for Fiscal Year 2015-16 which includes:
water expenditures of $16,359,629, and water revenues and budgeted reserves or total
resources totaling $16,890,455, and also sewer expenditures of $3,184,400, and sewer revenue
and budged reserves or total resources totaling $3,752,223, for combined estimated District
resources of $20,642,678 and appropriated expenditures of $19,544,029.
Section 3. That the General Manager and department head staff shall have the authority
to transfer funds as incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget and consistent with the
policy adopted by the District’s Board of Directors.
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors shall certify to the passage and
Eric Schmidt, Chair
ATTEST:
Page 78
JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 2015-19
RESOLUTION CDC NO. 2015-06
RESOLUTION HHA NO. 2015-05
RESOLUTION NO. HFPD 2015-11
RESOLUTION NO. HWD 2015-08
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA,
CALIFORNIA,
COMMISSIONERS
OF
THE
HESPERIA
HOUSING
AUTHORITY, COMMISSIONERS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT, AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT ADOPTING FINANCIAL POLICIES.
WHEREAS, the City of Hesperia wishes to establish a comprehensive set of financial policies
that will serve as a guideline for operational and strategic decision making related to financial
matters; and
WHEREAS, financial policies are intended to establish guidelines for the City’s overall planning
and management; and
WHEREAS, such policies will allow the City to maintain and enhance a sound fiscal condition;
and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, COMMISSIONERS OF THE HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY,
COMMISSIONERS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, AND THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE HESPERIA WATER DISTRICTS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The recitals are true and correct and adopted as findings.
Section 2. That the City Council approves the Financial Policies (Exhibit A).
Section 3. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, or word in the Resolution is held
to be invalid by decision of any court of competent jurisdiction or action of State legislation,
such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Resolution.
Section 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution
and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
_________________________________________
Eric Schmidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Page 79
EXHIBIT A
To Resolutions:
Resolution No. 2015-019, CDC 2015-06, HHA 2015-05,
HFPD 2015-11 and HWD 2015-08
City of Hesperia
FINANCIAL POLICIES
FISCAL YEAR 2015/16
Page 80
Fiscal Year 2015/16 Adopted Budget
Financial Policies
CITY OF HESPERIA
Financial Policies
I.
BUDGETING POLICY
 The City will adopt an annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1st no later than
June 30th of the same calendar year.
 The adopted budget will be balanced with current year operating expenditures fully funded
by current year revenues.
 Fund balance reserves for the General Fund, Water District, and Fire District will be used
only for non-recurring expenditures such as capital projects, studies, etc. and not for ongoing operations. In the event that fund balance reserves are used for recurring
(operational) expenditures, the City Council will be notified prior to adoption of the annual
budget.
 The City Manager is authorized to implement programs as approved in the adopted
budget.
 A First Quarter and Mid-Year budget review will be conducted for the City Council to
determine the status of projected revenues, expenditures, and other financial situations,
along with consideration of needed budget amendments. A Third Quarter review is
included in the presentation of the upcoming fiscal year’s proposed budget. An internal
Fourth Quarter appropriation review is conducted and budget amendments are presented
to the City Council as needed.
II.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICY
 The City will identify the estimated costs and potential funding sources for each capital
project prior to its submittal to the City Council for approval.
 Capital projects involve the purchase or construction of major capital assets such as land;
equipment; infrastructure; building or permanent improvements including additions,
replacements, and major alterations; having a long life expectancy; and costing $5,000 or
more.
 Capital projects are funded by a variety of funding sources, which are often restricted for a
specific purpose. Prior to a capital project being included in the annual budget, a
determination must be made that the project is an appropriate use of the funds and that
there is sufficient funding available.
III.
REVENUE POLICY
Recurring expenditures will be funded by recurring revenue. Recurring expenditure
increases that exceed recurring revenue growth should not be approved. Any new or
expanded programs should be required to identify new funding sources and/or offsetting
reductions in expenditures. In addition:
 The City shall use a conservative approach in projecting revenues.
 One-time revenues may be used for one-time expenditures or enhancement of reserves.
 The City shall update its user fees and charges periodically to recover costs of providing
that service for which a fee is charged.
Page 81
1
Financial Policies
III.
REVENUE POLICY (Continued)
 All potential grants shall be carefully reviewed for matching requirements, maintenance of
effort requirements, and on-going future expenditures requirements.
 Intergovernmental grants will be evaluated to determine the long term operating and
maintenance costs associated with the grant.
 The City will maintain water and sewer rate structures which are adequate to ensure that
these enterprise funds remain firmly and separately self-supporting, including the costs of
operation, capital replacement, cost allocation plan, and debt service.
IV.
RESERVE POLICY
Adequate reserve levels are a necessary component of the City’s overall financial
management strategy. It is the responsibility of the City Council to maintain a sufficient level
of reserve funds to provide for the orderly provision of services to the citizens of the City of
Hesperia. The City Council has the authority to decide the circumstances under which the
reserves can be used. The City Manager and the Assistant City Manager-Management
Services may, from time to time, make recommendations as to the level of reserve funds
necessary for prudent fiscal management. Reserve levels shall be reviewed at least annually
during the budget process to ensure that they are consistent with the conditions faced by the
City. All uses of reserves require a resolution of the City Council or will be incorporated in the
annual adopted budget.
The reserve policies for the General Fund, Hesperia Water District (Enterprise Fund), and
Hesperia Fire Protection District (Special Revenue Fund) require that a minimum of ten
percent (10%) of current fiscal year operations budget (expenditures) be reserved. Cash
reserves is a calculation of the ratio of cash and cash equivalents to the total individual fund
balance, as reported in the most recently completed Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR). The specific purpose of the reserves is to provide funding to meet operational
appropriation requirements in the event that either the City, Water District, or Fire District
experiences shortfalls in the level of anticipated revenues or unanticipated expenses.
V.
TRANSFER AUTHORITY
The following criteria establish the transfer authority for appropriations as set forth in the
fiscal year budget.
 Division Managers can make transfers between line items in the same program.
 Department Directors can make transfers between divisions within the same fund.
 Transfers between departments, within the same fund, will require the City Manager
approval.
 Transfers between the capital expenditure classification and the operating expenditure
classifications will require the City Manager approval.
 Transfers between different funds can only be made with an approved City Council
resolution.
 The Finance Division will review all budget transfers and make recommendations to the
City Manager.
Page 82
2
Financial Policies
VI.
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
 An independent firm of certified public accountants will perform an annual financial and
compliance audit according to General Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) that will be
incorporated into the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).
 Annually, the City will seek the Governmental Finance Officers Association (GFOA)
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting and the Certificate of
Achievement for Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards.
VII.
INVESTMENTS
 The City will continue to have a written investment policy approved by City Council
resolution annually. The policy for investments in priority order is safety, liquidity, and
yield.
 The City Council will receive reports on the cash position and performance of City
investments on a monthly basis.
VIII.
CAPITAL ASSETS
 Assets exceeding the value of $5,000 are considered capital assets.
 All assets will be maintained at a level that protects capital investment and minimizes
future maintenance costs.
IX.
DEBT MANAGEMENT
 The City will not issue long-term debt to finance current operations. Debt financing should
only be used for long-term capital improvement projects or purchases of capital assets,
such as water rights, that have a useful life exceeding the term of the financing. In
addition, identified revenue sources shall be identified to allow for the principal, interest,
and other related payments (debt service) of the long-term debt.
 The City will seek to maintain a high credit rating through sound financial practices as a
basis for minimizing borrowing costs.
 The City will monitor all forms of debt. Annually, the status of all long-term debt will be
reported to the City Council in the annual budget.
 The City will diligently monitor its compliance with bond covenants and continuing
disclosures.
Page 83
3
Financial Policies
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED THIS 16th day of June 2015.
___________________________________
Mayor
I, Melinda Sayre-Castro, City Clerk of the City of Hesperia, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolutions was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Hesperia, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of June
2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_________________
Page 84
4

June 16, 2015 - City of Hesperia

Transcription

Similar documents

June 2010 - Hesperia Chamber of Commerce

New CBS Radio Seminar Flyer

STUDIO GIANNANTONIO LO MAGNO DOTTORE

Marty Tripes V-Shock presents the Marty Tripes Vintage Days Event

Retail Site Assessment

Patriot Press October 3, 2013

SN-Aug2014 - Desert News Post

Business Case Logistics