Fouquet and the Absent Frame: Pictorial and Textual Relationships
Transcription
Fouquet and the Absent Frame: Pictorial and Textual Relationships
Fouquet and the Absent Frame: Pictorial and Textual Relationships in the Hours of Etienne Chevalier Nick Herman The work of Jean Fouquet is in the midst of a critical re-evaluation. Recent reappraisals of his work, instigated by monographic exhibitions held in 1981 and 2003, 1 have increased our knowledge of the artist by great strides. Even so, his biography remains piecemeal and his few surviving works are hotly debated. The pith of these discussions concerns the sources of Fouquet's innovative images, which are situated at the junction of a trio of influences -Italian, Flemish, and natively French. Fouquet scholarship is problematic because the artist's career is difficult to contextualize. Unlike his Flemish contemporaries, his work does not insert itself easily within an ongoing pictorial tradition, and the singularity of his surviving works makes them as enigmatic as they are valuable. Compared to the atmosphere in which his Italian peers were operating, there is precious little synchronous literary evidence relating to the artistic climate in fifteenth century France. The fact that Fouquet practiced both the art of the book and that of the panel also adds to the interest of his work. Furthermore, Fouquet's development as a miniaturist seems far from linear, with his later works apparently displaying a certain regression, or at least a conscious re-evaluation, of his previous innovations. Nevertheless, endeavouring to reconstruct the artistic pathways of Fouquet's career is a worthy project. Tracing the origins of the various stylistic and iconographical influences employed by Fouquet is difficult, but can be of value if it is 51 52 53 Nick Herman Nick Herman undertaken carefully, for it is clear that art historical scholarship should serve to resurrect not only the most readily evidenced instances of creativity, but also those which, through lack of corroborating documentation, need to be surmised by other means. Unwritten networks of exchanges and ideas such as these are a critical part of the humanistic record, and are all the more important when dealing with so poorly documented an artist as Fouquet. Traditional scholarship has, in examining his work, reached its own avowed limits, and new means of analyzing Fouquet's production have recently been brought to the fore with some success. 2 Among the items that have long been securely attributed to Fouquet's hand are the forty-seven excised folios that once formed part of The Hours of Etienne Chevalier. Produced between 1452 and 1460 for Man~chal Chevalier, the treasurer of Charles VII of France, these miniatures have taken their place at the core of the artist's oeuvre, and are recognized as some of the most innovative works of fifteenth century manuscript illumination. 3 In this instance, Fouquet's originality stems from his ability to create a cohesive pictorial space within his miniatures; one that incorporates text, landscape, foliage and marginalia into a single unified composition. As has been noted time and again, the very format of the book of hours was conducive to experimentation since it was free from the constraints imposed on monumental painting. The Hours of Etienne Chevalier is a case in point. Previous to the recent monographic exhibitions, several scholars had attempted to explain more fully the sources of Fouquet's inventive spatial solutions, beginning with Otto Pacht's seminal discussion of the artist's style, published in 1941.4 John White and Charles Sterling, recognizing the degree to which the innovations introduced in the Hours of Etienne Chevalier betray cisalpine influences, each suggest that these would not have been possible prior to the artist's stay in ltaly. 5 Thus, the circumstances of Fouquet's sparsely documented journey to Italy acquire considerable importance when examining the artist's use of pictorial innovations hitherto unseen in France. In this vein, several further studies have focused on specific incidents of Italian ate influence in Fouquet's work, using The Hours of Etienne Chevalier as starting point. 6 The most complete and successful survey of this kind was undertaken by Mark Evans, who in his 1998 essay Jean Fouquet and Italy, recognized direct Italian prototypes for many of Fouquet's unusual or arcane stylistic elements. 7 The adoption of the so-called "text placard," to use Evans' own terminology attributed in an earlier article of his to Fouquet's initial training in France, is revealed as one of Fouquet's most novel pictorial concepts. 8 Evans identifies two principal models for the inclusion of text within the miniature in Fouquet's work. The first, which has easily identifiable prototypes in earlier French illumination, is characterized as relatively orthodox; in twenty-two of the forty-seven full-page miniatures that survive from The Hours of Etienne Chevalier, Fouquet chose to include a small strip of text running along the bottom edge of the illumination, contiguous to the image's border (figure 1). This was, by the 1450s, a fairly common solution to the problem of integrating text into full-page miniatures. The Boucicaut Master, the Rohan Master, and the Limbourg Brothers had each used a similar device earlier in the century. 9 The remaining twenty-five miniatures, however, demonstrate a highly innovative concern on behalf of Fouquet to integrate the initial and text within the content of the illustration itself. 10 In these instances, a historiated initial, along with several lines of text, is depicted as an illusionistic placard existing within the rational pictorial space of the miniature (figure 2). Within the picture, the threedimensional tablet of text is always realistically supported, either by a topographical feature, small iron hooks, or caryatid figure s; it never floats unexplainedly before the picture plane. Where possible (Christ Before Pilate, The Entombment, The Contrapposto 2006 54 55 Nick Herman Nick Herman Consecration of Saint Nicholas), a shadow seemingly cast by the panel is depicted, further stressing its integration within the optical reality of the scene. Unfortunately, subsequent alterations to these sections of the manuscript have obscured the original text, and, in some cases, the historiated initials, but the figurative aspects of the illusionistic device survive intact. The originality of the spatial solutions arrived at in The Hours of Etienne Chevalier seems all the more remarkable when viewed in the context of what is presumed to be Fouquet's ensuing commissions, the miniatures of the Grandes Chroniques de France (BNF. FR. 6465), those of the double volume of Josephus' Antiquites Judai"ques (BNF. FR. 247), and La Guerre des Juifs (BNF. NAF. 21013), each of which has solicited lengthy debates regarding authorship. Images such as The Coronation of Louis VI from the Grandes Chroniques, display a lack of one-point perspective in favour of a more multifocal view. Certain scholars, including Philippe Lorentz, have seen the variations in Fouquet's approach to perspective evident in these later works as an indication of his changing attitude towards Albertian perspective; that it was merely one of several possible conceptions of space. 11 Others have posited that as the memories of his Italian sojourn faded, Fouquet reverted to more traditional northern concepts of spatiality.12 The more likely cause for discrepancies between each of these three works, though, is their varying character and differing circumstances of production. The Hours of Etienne Chevalier was not a unique commission, as the remarkably similar and slightly ulterior Hours of Jean Robertet (Pierpont Morgan Library, ms. M. 834) attest, and there would have been no need to abandon the apparently successful spatial approach that had been devised. The Melun Diptych (Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten, Antwerp and Gemaldgalerie, Berlin), essentially a large-scale version of the double-paged Etienne Chevalier Presented to the Virgin and Child from The Hours of Etienne Chevalier, ought to be viewed as a proclamation of the artist's confidence in his analogous, miniaturized composition, which predates the larger work. Fouquet's work as an illustrator of monumental histories, however, was far different from these earlier, more intimate commissions. Proportionally, his share of the total work in both the Grandes Chroniques and the twin-volumed Josephus was far lower than in his previous commissions, including, of course, his panel paintings. Accordingly, the former were a less suitable platform for experimentation. The great French-language histories were primarily textual monuments, the Gallic equivalents of Virgil ian war epics, where there could be no discussion of pictorial precedence. Despite the changes apparent in his later work, Fouquet's intentions in The Hours of Etienne Chevalier remain clear. In the second category of miniatures singled out by Evans, text is wholly subservient to image, and the devotional message of the prayer book evolves into a primarily visual one. Fouquet effectively introduced an entirely new conception of the page in French manuscript illumination. The process of "depaginization", which arguably began over a century prior with the work of Jean Pucelle, had evolved to its fullest potential by reducing the text to an epigraphical monument within the image. 13 Such was the case, not only with the aforementioned text placard motifs, but also in the dedicatory inscriptions that run along the architraves depicted in several of the miniatures (The Visitation, Etienne Chevalier Presented to The Virgin and Child, The Marriage of The Virgin). Thus, an item that previous generations of illuminators had relegated to marginal banderoles or textual colophons actually became incorporated into the very image of biblical and celestial architecture, further contributing to the synthesis of hitherto disparate elements that individuates Fouquet's work in The Hours of Etienne Chevalier. Contrapposto 2006 56 57 Nick Herman Nick Herman These meta-textual motifs can be interpreted as predecessors of illusionistic devices used to similar ends in later decades. They are in fact harbingers of what Victor Stoichita characterized as parergon, 14 illusionistic elements that are "neither simply exterior nor simply within" the image, to borrow from Jacques Derrida's definition of the literary term. 15 Regardless of superscribed terminology, the painter and his audience were evidently pleased with the results of such creative subordination of the calligrapher's text. A closely subsequent commission, the aforementioned Hours of Jean Robertet, made use of the same device. Soon emulated with a lesser level of understanding by members of Fouquet's workshop, the motif of the text placard became widespread in late fifteenth century French manuscript illumination. Examples directly inspired by Fouquet's models include books of hours variously attributed to Jean Colombe and Jean Bourdichon, and the so-called Hours of Mary Stuart (Washington, private collection and BNF. L. 1405), which was produced by Angevin illuminators. 16 In terms of its negation of the page as a platform for two-dimensional texts, the text placard was essentially the direct precursor of pictorial inversions practiced by the Bruges-Ghent school of illumination in the final thirty years of the fifteenth century. Though Stoichita saw the Master of Mary of Burgundy himself as the instigator of such a tradition, in compartmentalizing the self-reflexive image as a fundamentally Flemish innovation he ignored its earlier, evidently French prototypes. Though its subsequent iterations can be chronicled readily, the origins of such a highly creative model of text integration within the pictorial field are difficult to trace. Evans' short article in Scriptorium attempts to locate the sources of Fouquet's innovate illusionistic device in the production of the Bedford and Boucicaut master workshops active in Paris in the 1420s and 1430s. The author cites two specific manuscripts that seem to contain a precedent for Fouquet's text Contrapposto placards. 17 The first is a book of hours associated with the Boucicaut Master and his workshop, now at the Bibliotheque Nation ale (lat. 10538), which contains a miniature of King David Praying to God the Father. Between the two principal sections of the miniature, the block of text, clearly written by a separate artisan without giving thought to the illustrator's intentions, is clumsily framed off. This approach to framing the text differs fundamentally from the text placards of Fouquet. The earlier master sought to isolate the block of text from the surrounding image, and in doing so had no desire to include it logically within the principal image. The text, clearly, is seen as an impediment to the illustration, as evidenced by the awkward semicircular extension of the frame in order to include the protruding serif from the q in quoniam. The second manuscript cited by Evans is The Sobieski Hours, produced by the circle of the Bedford Master, and currently in the Royal Library at Windsor (figure 3). At first glance, the Last Judgment page that he discusses has closer parallels to Fouquet's work, though in this case as well the treatment of the text block is entirely different from what is found in The Hours of Etienne Chevalier. In The Sobieski Hours miniature, the figure s surrounding the block of text ignore it completely and almost seem to purposely avoid interacting with it. Compare this Last Judgment to Fouquet's miniature of the Lamentation, in which two attendant angels each support the text placard with one hand while brandishing instruments of the passion in the other. In this miniature, the textual block actually takes on an added level of significance, since it is interpreted as an additional instrument of the passion, a duplicate lid of Christ's tomb. Unlike the earlier Parisian examples, Fouquet's spatial constructions and the relationships between the various planes in his images, were always deliberate, never accidental or forced. 18 This rational physical space, a distinguishing feature of Fouquet's earliest miniatures, was accompanied by a cohesive narrative structure that continued not only between vari- 2006 58 59 Nick Herman ~us miniatures, but within each miniature as well, as the particular case of the Lamentation attests. Just as the underlying geometry of his images was always carefully planned, so too were their various iconographical elements. Such an approach recalls Panofsky's observations regarding Van Eyck's work and the increase in disguised symbolism that accompanied the illusionistic revolution of the fifteenth century. 19 As the Albertian notion of the image as window flourished, embraced by both Flemish and Italian painters alike, it became necessary to eliminate iconographical elements that did not corroborate a parallel temporal rationality. In this sense, Fouquet's bas-de-pages are entirely different from those of his predecessors, not only in terms of their integration into the spatial structure of the miniature, but also by their subject matter. Only events that could plausibly be concurrent with the principal scene are depicted as actually taking place in the lower part of the page. Such is the case with the parables ofthe blacksmith's wife and the carpenters, shown below the scenes of Christ Before Pilate and The Carrying of the Cross (figure 4 ), respectively. Other symbolic episodes that occurred at markedly different times are depicted as bas-re~iefs, either carved in stone or cast in bronze, effectively servmg as sculptural mementoes or premonitors of important events. The disguised symbolism in Fouquet's work, and its concordance with Panofsky's hypothesis, becomes all the more apparent when the artist's "historicazation" of architecture is examined. Like Van Eyck, Fouquet was able to consider architectural styles with a greater degree of objectivity than had been done in the past. This ability to distinguish precise gradations in history through the filter of building styles is, in Panofsky's view, a distinguishing element of Renaissance thought. In the case of the French painter, this keen sense of historicity was likely engendered by his visit to the cantieri of early Renaissance Florence, and the diminished but still dis- Contrapposto Nick Herman cernible grandeur of Eugenius the fourth's Rome. Both Roman and early Renaissance architectural forms, juxtaposed wit~ late Gothic elements, make their appearance in The Hours of Etienne Chevalier, thirty years before the new Italian style became actualized in structures north of the alps. Recently, Alexander Nagel and Christopher Wood have challenged the integrity of Panofsky's concept of historicity,20 but in a certain sense Fouquet's work provides an exception to their findings. In various miniatures, such as the Presentation of Etienne Chevalier to the Virgin and Child and the Fountain of the Apostles (figure 5), anachronisms are indeed created by the presence of two competing architectural styles, but have definite symbolic meaning. In the latter, the font from which the Apostles draw baptismal water is late gothic in style while the architectural backdrop for the scene is classical in flavour. The chief sacrament of the new covenant, baptism, flows from the Gothic, the most genuine of Christian architectural styles. The same is true of the Virgin's throne in the presentation miniature; its gothic qualities enforce Mary and the Christ child's status as emblems of the new covenant. The most overt example of the painter's historical lucidity, however, occurs in the miniature of the Marriage of the Virgin, where the temple of Solomon is depicted in the guise of a Roman triumphal arch. His addition oftorquated columns and an inner cella, however, implies an exoticism that would be appropriate to such a structure. Thus, the ancient architecture of Rome, suitably modified, is equated with the ancient architecture of the Holy Land. Such an approach implies knowledge not just of variations in style, but also of variations in age. These observations, which deserve to be treated at greater length elsewhere, are for the moment only of interest inasmuch as they relate to Fouquet's sense of historical appropriateness as a logical concomitant of his efforts to achieve perspectival verisimilitude. 2006 60 61 Nick Herman Nick Herman The tendency to integrate text creatively within the illustration was the natural product of the tension between word and image that had always existed in illustrated books of hours. In the particular case of The Hours of Etienne Chevalier, it seems as though Fouquet, whom we know had achieved sufficient fame in his lifetime to warrant the insertion of his miniatures into already complete books of hours, wished to exercise total artistic control over the pages he was responsible for creating. Such was the case with another, concurrent commission that Fouquet undertook around 1455 - his tipped-in additions to The Hours of Simon de Varye. In this instance, the three folios painted by Fouquet were left entirely free of text, allowing his pictorial compositions to cover the entire page. A similar approach was taken in The Hours of Etienne Chevalier, where the artisans responsible for the remainder of the book's rather orthodox batarde text and foliate borders left the pages intended for Fouquet blank. The varying size and placement of the text placards in The Hours of Etienne Chevalier, and their deviation in style from the plain text pages, demonstrate that they were not first written by a scribe and then transferred over to the illustrator, as had been the case with earlier books of hours. 21 Both the strips of text and, more significantly, the illusionistic placards that appear in Fouquet's images were added during the painterly process, entirely under his direction, as they correspond tightly to his artistic vision. This interpretation fits well within our knowledge of Fouquet as a precociously self-aware creative individual; the same man who included an enamel self-portrait medallion in the frame of his now dismembered Melun Diptych, itself a product of Etienne Chevalier's patronage. If Fouquet's innovative solutions for incorporating text into the fabric of his images are bound up with his sense of artistic self-reflexivity, then it would seem appropriate to look to Italy for explanation. In Italy the status of the artist as an independent creative entity had been evolving for some time when Fouquet arrived there in the mid 1440s. 22 Leon Battista Alberti, the Florentine architect, had published his treatise On Painting in 1436, a work that championed the emancipation of the painter from the status of an artisan towards that of a creative, original individual. Under the influence of Alberti's publication and the work of artists such as Ghiberti and Brunelleschi, the use of scientific perspective was becoming widespread in Tuscany. Fouquet's well thought-out sense of mass and proportion, together with the rational physical spaces that his characters inhabit, all undeniably indicate encounters with the work of Tuscan contemporaries such as Masolino, Masaccio, and, most importantly, Fra Angelico together with his pupil Benozzo Gozzoli. 23 The precious mention of Fouquet's name in the work of another influential Italian architect, Antonio Filarete's Treatise on Architecture, confirms that he was active in Rome as well, and furthermore that he was well-respected enough to paint a portrait, now lost, of Pope Eugenius IV. 24 Evidently, Fouquet was able to insert himself into the predominant artistic currents of the day, even as a newcomer in a distant land. It is interesting to note, moreover, that Filarete, writing in the mid-1460s, was among the first to codify the distinction in architecture between the maniera antica of the Romans and the maniera moderna, by which he meant gothic. Such a historicizing approach, we have seen, is a hallmark of the miniatures Fouquet produced for The Hours of Etienne Chevalier. Evans keenly points out several direct linkages between Roman art and the works of Fouquet as a history painter, notably in his depiction of Caesar crossing The Rubicon from the Histoire Ancienne, now in the graphic arts collection of the Louvre (RF 29493), which recalls almost exactly figure s of Bacchus found in Late Imperial sarcophagi. 25 In terms of architecture, Fouquet is even more explicit in his allusions to Rome. His illustration of The Coronation of Charlemagne takes Contrapposto 2006 62 63 Nick Herman Nick Herman place in a perfectly accurate rendition of the interior of Old Saint Peter's basilica. 26 These sorts of historicizing references present in Fouquet's later work serve to confirm his ongoing use of motifs gleaned from his Italian journey, and tend to disprove the notion that such experiences faded progressively from the miniaturist's artistic vocabulary as he grew older. Of a more intimate nature than his large scale Histories, the decorative program devised for Etienne Chevalier was subtle and refined, as would befit the private tastes of such an educated patron. Consequently, the stylistic references to Italian art are less monumental but more generally diffused. The putti and grotesques that literally prop up the text placards in several of the miniatures are doubtless a pictorial adaptation of contemporary trends in Florentine sculpture, for they enjoy no precedent in Northern painting. The source for these caryatid figure s may have been the sarcophagus of Giovanni de' Medici in the Old Sacristy of San Lorenzo in Florence, a work of around 1434 that had been attributed to Brunelleschi's assistant II Buggiano (figure 6)_27 In fact, a work such as this, itself drawing on Roman funerary monuments, may have been the prime example for Fouquet's text placard innovation. A further Florentine source may be detected in Fra Angelico's trompe l'oeil painting of a crucifix panel in his San Marco altarpiece, completed in the early 1440s, and no doubt seen by Fouquet himself. 28 Essentially, Fra Angelico's illusionistically rendered devotional panel serves as a parergon to the sacra conversazione, a sort of intermediate break between the main image and its audience. The conceptual and pictorial leap involved in using the devotional text placard as a parergon for miniatures of the Passion is not a large one. Based on the manifold connections to Italian art throughout The Hours of Etienne Chevalier many scholars have pointed out that it seems most convincing to attribute Fouquet's illusionistic rendering of text within the pictorial space of his miniatures to his Italian experiences, coupled with his own unquestionable skill as a conscious synthesizer of numerous predominant European artistic currents. More convincing than these direct linkages, though, should be the notion that Fouquet's innovative concept of manuscript illustration, and his consequent reordering of traditional workshop practice, were the products of his cisalpine experiences. It is precisely for this reason that Fouquet's work in subsequent secular volumes, which were proportionally far less under his control, do not exhibit such traits. If anything, the pictorial oddity identified by Evans in both the Parisian books of hours he proposes as prototypes for Fouquet's work signals the growing dominance of the miniaturist, struggling to find painterly solutions whilst being held back by conservative workshop practices that maintained the division of labour between scribe and illustrator. Fouquet's importance, therefore, lay in his ability to seek out a novel solution to a problem that had existed in French manuscript illumination for some time by invoking the experiences of his unique Italian journey. 2 3 See, for the 1981 exhibition held at the Louvre: Nicole Reynaud, Jean Fouquet: Catalogue (Paris: Editions de Ia Reunion des musees nationaux, 1981 ), and, for the 2003 exhibition held at the Bibliotheque Nationale: Fran~;ois Avril, ed. Jean Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme siec/e (Paris: BNF/Hazan, 2003). Nicole Reynaud, "Image et texte dans les Heures d'Etienne Chevalier," 64-69, and Marie-Therese Gousset, "Fouquet et l'art de geometrie," 76-86, both in Jean Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme siecle, ed. Fran~;ois Avril (Paris: BNF/ Hazan, 2003). Millard Meiss, French Painting in The Time of Jean de Berry: The Late Fourteenth Century and The Patronage of The Duke (London: Phaidon, 1967), 144-5, and: Charles Sterling and Contrapposto 2006 64 65 Nick Herman Nick Herman 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Claude Schaefer, The Hours of Etienne Chevalier (London: Thames and Hudson, 1972), 8. Otto Pacht, "Jean Fouquet: A Study of His Style," Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes IV (1940-1 ): 85-102. John White, The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space (New York: Harper and Row, 1967), 225. Sterling and Schaefer, 8. See Michel Laclotte, "A propos de Fouquet: des putti et un boeuf," in Napoli, /'Europa: Richerche di Storia deii'Arte in onore di Ferdinanda Bologna, eds. Francesco Abbate and Fiorella Sricchia Santoro (Cantazaro: Meridiana, 1995), 95100, and; Fiorella Sricchia Santoro, "Jean Fouquet en ltalie," in Jean Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme siecle, ed. Franc;:ois Avril (Paris: BNF/Hazan, 2003), 50-63. Santoro's survey deals more particularly with supposed evidence of Fouquet's activity in Italy, as opposed to he Italian influences in his French work. Mark L. Evans, "Jean Fouquet and Italy:' ... buono maestro, maxime a ritrare del naturale"' in Illuminating The Book: Makers and Interpreters, Essays in Honour of Janet Backhouse, eds. Michelle P. Brown and Scot McKendrick (London: British Library, 1998), 163-90. Mark L. Evans, "An Illusionistic Device in the Hours of Etienne Chevalier," Scriptorium (1981 ): 81-3. Evans, 81. Specifically, The Boucicaut Hours, The Rohan Hours, and The Tres Riches Heures de Jean, Due de Berry all make use of a similar type of textual border. For a more detailed study of the subject, see David Byrne, "Manuscript Ruling and Pictorial Design in the Work of the Limbourgs, the Bedford Master, and the Boucicaut Master," Art Bulletin 66 (1984), 118-36. The twenty-one miniatures that sport text placards are, as numbered in Sterling and Schaefer: 1, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,36,37,38,40,41,42,44,and45. Philippe Lorenz, "Jean Fouquet et les peintres des anciens Pays-Bas," in Jean Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme siecle, ed. Franc;:ois Avril (Paris: BNF/Hazan, 2003), 41. White, 226. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By citing Jean Pucelle, I make reference to his continuation of the principal narrative by means of allegorical bas-depage illustrations in The Hours of Jeanne d'Evreux and the Belleville Breviary, but also his innovative removal of frames surrounding certain scenes, such as the Crucifixion and Annunciation in The Hours of Jeanne d'Evreux. I do not, however, mean to imply that Fouquet's innovations were necessarily contingent upon those of Pucelle. Rather, both painters, faced with similar challenges, arrived at related conclusions. Victor Stoichita, L'instauration du tableau: Metapeinture a J'aube des Temps modernes (Paris: Meridiens Klincksieck, 1993), 23. Jacques Derrida, La Verite en Peinture (Paris: Flammarion, 1978), 63. Likewise quoted in Stoichita, 24. Avril, ed., 402-407. Evans, "An Illusionistic Device," 81. Gousset, 77. Erwin Panofsky, Early Netherlandish Painting (New York: Harper and Row, 1953), 131-148. Alexander Nagel and Christopher S. Wood, "Interventions: Toward a New Model of Renaissance Anachronism," Art Bulletin LXXXVII no. 3 (September 2005), 403-415. Jonathan Alexander, Medieval /1/uminators and Their Methods of Work (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), 40. Evans, "Jean Fouquet and Italy," 169. Sricchia Santoro, 54. AntonioAverlino, called Filarete, Trattato diArchitettura, eds. A. M. Finoli and L. Grassi (Milan: Edizioni il Polifio, 1972), 265. Evans, "Jean Fouquet and Italy," 175. Avril ed., 219. Evans, "Jean Fouquet and Italy," 174. Evans, 172. Contrapposto 2006 1 Fouquet, Jean, The Ascension, Hours of Etienne Chevalier, 1452-1469, tempera and gold leaf on parchment, 19.4 x 14.6 em, Robert Lehman Collection, 1975 (1975.1.2490) (photo: Frangois Avril, ed. Jean Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme siecle (Paris: BNF/Hazan, 2003)) 2 Fouquet, Jean, The Lamentation, Hours of Etienne Chevalier, 1452-1469, tempera and gold leaf on parchment, 19.4 x 14.6 em, Robert Lehman Collection, 1975 (1975.1.2490) (photo: Frangois Avril, ed. Jean Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme siecle (Paris: BNF/Hazan, 2003)) 66 67 3 The Last Judgment, The Sobieski Hours, 1420-1425, tempera and gold leaf on parchment,28.9 x 20 x 6.5 em, Windsor, Royal Library (RCIN 1142248) (photo: Mark L. Evans, "An Illusionistic Device in the Hours of Etienne Chevalier," Scriptorium (1981): 8183) 68 4 Fouquet, Jean, The Carrying of the Cross, Hours of Etienne Chevalier, 1452-1469, tempera and gold leaf on parchment, 19.4 x 14.6 em, Robert Lehman Collection, 1975 (1975.1.2490) (photo: Franc;ois Avril, -~d. Jean. Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme s1ecle (Pans: BNF/Hazan, 2003)) 69 6 Attributed to II Buggiano, Sarcophagus of Giovanni de' Medici, c. 1430, marble, Florence, San Lorenzo (source: Mark L. Evans, "Jean Fouquet and Italy: ' ... buono maestro, maxi me a ritrare del naturale"' in Illuminating The Book: Makers and Interpreters, Essays in Honour of Janet Backhouse, eds. Michelle P. Brown and Scot McKendrick (London: British Library, 1998), 163-90) 5 Fouquet, Jean, The Fountain of the Apostles, Hours of Etienne Chevalier 1452-1469, tempera and gold leaf on parchment, 19.4 x 14.6 em, Robert Lehman Collection, 1975 (1975.1.2490) (photo: Franc;:ois Avril, ed. Jean Fouquet: Peintre et enlumineur du xveme siecle (Paris: BNF/Hazan, 2003)) 70 71