SAS16-Day 2 Show Daily_SAS15 Show Daily Template
Transcription
SAS16-Day 2 Show Daily_SAS15 Show Daily Template
May 17, 2016 Day 2 Event Schedule LISA NIPP Adm. John M. Richardson, chief of naval operations, speaks during the Service Chiefs' Update panel May 16 at the Navy League’s 2016 Sea‐Air‐Space Exposition. At his left are Gen. Robert B. Neller, com‐ mandant of the Marine Corps; Adm. Paul F. Zukunft, commandant of the Coast Guard; Paul N. Jaenichen, maritime administrator; and moderator Bradley Peniston, Defense One deputy editor. Service Chiefs Stress Partnerships, Need to Accelerate Acquisition By OTTO KREISHER, Seapower Special Correspondent The nation’s top naval and maritime leaders listed an array of concerns about their abilities to carry out their missions, with a lot of the focus on tight budgets, limited resources, the need to speed up the acquisition process and improve how they retain, educate and train their vital personnel. In the opening session of the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space Exposition at National Harbor, Md., May 16, the leaders of the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard and Maritime Administration also stressed the importance of building and strengthening partnerships — with their fellow services, with the rest of the federal government, with international allies and partners, and with industry and academia. Asked about one of the most pressWWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG ing security challenges they face — China’s aggressive claims to the South China Sea — Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. John M. Richardson; Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Robert B. Neller and Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Paul F. Zukunft stressed the importance of adherence to the rules and norms of international conduct that allow all nations to use the global maritime commons. Zukunft added to that by urging the next administration to fight for ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which every president since Ronald Reagan has supported, but which the Senate has refused to approve. Richardson noted the increasing demands on the global maritime and information networks, which he said created greater requirement for partnerships, starting with the Navy’s ■ 7:45‐8:45 a.m.: Congressional Breakfast, Potomac CD ■ 9 & 11 a.m., 1 & 3 p.m.: Cooking demonstrations, NAVSUP Booth 1305 ■ 9‐10:30 a.m.: Information Warfare: Security Challenges & Solutions in the Maritime Domain, Potomac AB ■ 9:30‐10 a.m.: T‐AGS 66 Moon Pool Launch and Retrieval System, NAVSEA Booth 1227 ■ 9:30‐10:30 a.m.: Additive Manufacturing, NAVAIR Booth 2327 ■ 10‐10:30 a.m.: Expeditionary Mo‐ bile Base, NAVSEA Booth 1227 ■ 10‐11 a.m.: Leveraging Partnerships Within DoD to Enhance Expeditionary Readiness in the Naval Construction Force, NECC Booth 2815 ■ 10:30‐11:00 a.m. DDG 51 Pro‐ gram Update, NAVSEA Booth 1227 ■ 10:30‐11:30 a.m.: PEO (U&W) Programs, NAVAIR Booth 2327 ■ 10:30‐11:30 a.m.: Making Distributed Lethality a Reality – Raytheon Solutions, Chesapeake 7 ■ 10:30‐11:30 a.m.: Department of Navy Additive Manufacturing: Current Status, Planned Projects & Future Efforts, National Harbor 12 ■ 10:30‐11:30 a.m.: Warfighter Insights & Energy Efficiency’s Role in Emergent Technologies, National Harbor 13 ■ 10:45‐11:30 a.m.: IW Type Command, IW Pavilion 2639 ■ 10:45 a.m.‐noon: FMS Continued on page 3 Continued on page 3 SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 1 Paxton: USMC Will Need End Strength ‘North of 186,800’ By OTTO KREISHER, Seapower Special Correspondent To meet all the manpower demands created by current operations, the rise of near peer competitors and the requirement for new capabilities, such as cyber and information warfare, the Marine Corps believes it will need an end strength “somewhat north of 186,800,” the Corps’ No. 2 officer said May 16. Speaking to reporters after his Sea Services Luncheon keynote address at the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space Exposition at National Harbor, Md., Gen. John M. Paxton Jr., the assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, said the size and composition of the future Corps is being studied in a process labeled Force 2025. Two committees are studying those force structure issues from opposing viewpoints, and their suggestions will be examined by a high-level group in coming months, Paxton said. Then some of the proposed concepts will be tested in exercises at Camp Lejeune, N.C., and Twentynine Palms, Calif., and by the designated experimental battalion, which is Third Battalion Fifth Marines. Although the Corps is slated under current budget projections to drop to 182,000 Marines, Paxton said “we’d like to get north of 186,8[00].” A Marine force study review nearly a decade ago said the Corps needed 186,800 Marines. But that was before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the emergence of cyber, information warfare and other new requirements, he said. Although Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Robert B. Neller has said providing the new skills could require cuts to the conventional warfighting units, Paxton said, “cutting the conventional forces is not a given.” The higher end strength would give the Corps the Marines it will need for its expanding Special Operations Force, the new skills and for conventional forces, he said. While Force 2025 looks at organizational factors, a rewrite of Expeditionary Force 21 will deal with operational issues, Paxton said. In his keynote address, Paxton noted the new challenges From page 1 Improvements – Enabling the Enterprise, Cherry Blossom Ballroom ■ 10:45 a.m.‐noon: Strengthen Naval Power At & From Sea roundtable, Potomac D ■ 11‐11:30 a.m.: Unified Build Strategy for Submarines, NAVSEA Booth 1227 ■ 12:15‐1:45 p.m.: Sea‐Air‐Space Luncheon with Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, Potomac AB ■ 1‐2 p.m.: Navy MWR: Fitness and Library Programs, NAVFAC Booth 1145 WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG LISA NIPP Gen. John M. Paxton Jr., assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, during his keynote address at the Sea Services Luncheon, said the emergence of two “near peer competitors,” the growiing importance of cyber and the con‐ tinuing threat of terrorist organizations creates challenges in technology, equipment and manpower. the Corps faces, with the emergence of two “near peer competitors,” meaning Russia and China, the growing importance of cyber and the continuing threat of terrorist organizations. That creates challenges in technology, equipment and manpower, which creates a challenge to get the resources needed to obtain them, he said. ■ 2‐3 p.m.: PEO (A) Platforms, NAVAIR Booth 2327 ■ 2‐2:45 p.m.: SPAWAR Update, IW Pavilion 2639 ■ 2‐3 p.m.: Achieving High‐Velocity Learning at Every Level roundtable, Potomac C ■ 2‐3:15 p.m.: Strengthening Our Navy Team for the Future roundtable, Potomac D ■ 3‐3:45 p.m.: Navy Cyber Resilience & Cyber Security, IW Pavilion 2639 ■ 3‐4 p.m.: Precision Strike Weapons, NAVAIR Booth 2327 ■ 3‐3:45 p.m.: Designing and Delivering the Future, IW Pavilion 2639 ■ 3:30‐4 p.m.: LCS Mission Package Update, NAVSEA Booth 1227 ■ 3:30‐4:30 p.m.: Energy Capability Gaps & Warfighter Needs, National Harbor 13 ■ 3:30‐4:45 p.m.: Recruit, Train, Retain: Manpower in the 21st Century roundtable, Potomac C ■ 3:30‐4:45 p.m.: Transnational Organized Crime roundtable, Potomac D ■ 6‐7:30 p.m.: Sea‐Air‐Space Reception, Exhibit Hall ■ 7:45‐10 p.m.: Sea‐Air‐Space Banquet w/Adm. John M. Richardson, Potomac AB SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 3 Partnerships, Promoting R&D Critical to Future Capabilities By DAISY R. KHALIFA, Seapower Special Correspondent A panel of military of experts drawn from industry as well as the militaries of Canada, the United Kingdom and Romania discussed expanding global partnerships while advocating for more scientific collaboration and industry partnerships within and between allied nations at a May 16 Sea-Air-Space roundtable. The panelists all took time to emphasize the strategic and economical importance of ties with international allies and partners in a modern and digital era, a pursuit further reinforced by ongoing research and development in military labs and with academia on a global level, and the defense community’s critically important partnerships and collaborations with industry. “In order for me to do my job, there has to be a very close partnership with the operational community as well as the scientific and technical community,” said John Burrow, the U.S. Navy’s deputy assistant secretary for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E). Burrow said Navy RDT&E works with the Office of Naval Research to try to identify established relationships and to work with international partners to identify emerging science and technology that has military applications — technologies both to address gaps seen in military R&D today and also to advance military capability. “I think you would all agree that the emerging capabilities both in the scientific and technological worlds are worldwide now,” said Burrow. “We have to able to identify and understand the military application associated with it, adapt it, prototype it and use it to help make some very critical decisions on future capabilities.” Joining Burrow for the roundtable discussion, “Expanding & Strengthening Our Networkd of Partners,” were Adm. Sir Philip Andrew Jones, First Sea Lord of the U.K. Royal Navy; William E. Taylor, program executive officer, Land Systems Marine Corps; Retired U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Paul Sullivan, executive director, Defense Related Research Units and Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University; Vice Adm. Mark Norman, commander of the Royal Canadian Navy; Rear Adm. Alexandru Mirsu, chief of Romanian Naval Forces Staff; retired U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Joseph Dyer, a consultant in technology, aerospace and defense; and, Jim Young, U.S. Navy account manager for Google Inc.’s Department of Defense team. Vice Adm. John Aquilino, deputy chief of naval operations, Operations, Plans & Strategies, served as moderator. Jones said the requirement to expand and strengthen the network of partners is critically important to the Royal Navy. “[This] is something that underpins the Royal Navy and drives our thinking forward,” said Jones. “It is absolutely fundamental and I believe it needs to be for all navies who have an ambition to evolve into the future using partnerships.” He said it is “an exciting time” for the Royal Navy, which has invested in a whole range of high-end capabilities, introducing new nuclear-deterrent systems, and modernizing much of the rest of the fleet and the Royal Marines’ capability. He said to in order to optimize military capabilities and to address increasing global military challenges, navies must work closely with international partners by combining capabilities as effectively as possible, and through the pursuit of innovative and novel technologies. “Despite the considerable investment that is being made, it is very clear to me that as you go forward — and we see this in common with many other navies — we have to respond to a growing number of global security challenges, and do so with resources which are finite in terms of both money but also people and skill resources,” Jones said. 4 SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 From page 1 tight ties with the Marine Corps and their joint commitment to “use our resources as creatively as possible.” Somewhat surprisingly, the CNO did not mention the chronic budgetary strains on the Navy, but spoke at length about the need to improve the way the Navy adapts to rapidly changing technology, with better ways to educate its Sailors and leaders. Neller said the Corps currently is meeting its global demands, but “the depth of the force, the bench, is stressed,” after 15 years of war and dropping end strength. He also noted the severe readiness problems with Marine aviation, which is struggling with aging tactical aircraft as it waits for more F-35B Lightning II strike fighters. Neller also expressed concern about the ability to recruit and train enough Marines for the future fight. Zukunft was surprisingly “bullish” on the Coast Guard’s condition, noting that his procurement budget doubled in the current year, enabling the service to expand its National Security Cutter program to nine ships, to build 58 Fast Response Cutters and upgrade its command-and-control and fixedwing aircraft systems. He said the Coast Guard this summer would award the biggest ship construction program in its history, for the Offshore Patrol Cutters. Maritime Administrator Paul N. Jaenichen issued a dire warning on the state of the Merchant Marine fleet, saying the 79 U.S.-flag ships are the fewest in history and the sharp drop in licensed mariners threatened the ability to conduct a military sealift mission if a conflict lasted more than four months. The three service leaders emphasized the need to accelerate the acquisition process to keep up with technological advances and advocated more willingness to experiment and to fail in the hope of getting new systems into use quicker. But while sharing in the commitment to restrain their requirements, Neller told the industry representatives in the audience that when the services pay for new equipment, “it has to work” and come on time. WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG Cyber Command Aims for ‘Speed, Agility, Precision’ By NICK ADDE, Seapower Special Correspondent Commanders know they no longer should assume that they possess a cyber capability greater than their potential adversaries. Less clear is how they should adapt to this change. The Fleet Cyber Command has the answer. “The plan is being revised,” said Vice Adm. Jan E. Tighe, commander of Fleet Cyber Command/10th Fleet. Speaking May 16 at the Navy League’s States Sea-Air-Space Exposition at National Harbor, Md., Tighe outlined a “shift from information dominance to information warfare.” Recognizing that China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and terrorist organizations probably have the capability to inflict at least some damage on cyber systems, the command she oversees will “now [focus] more on speed, agility and precision,” and the “ability to maneuver rapidly,” Tighe said. “The margin of victory is razor thin, and we cannot accept anything short of victory on any day. We will fight to defend our networks, and stay ahead of our adversaries,” Tighe said. Citing the fictional story depicted in the movie “The Martian,” Tighe described how its characters worked together to resolve many problems one step at a time. “We will overcome with the same attitude and approach,” she said. The cyber network will operate as a warfighting platform. Cyber warriors will operate, maintain and defend it using the same tools they use every day. Support for users will be tailored to those users. “Every user that has fingers on a keyboard” will play a role as well, Tighe said. Keys to success include greater involvement on the part of commanders, and sustained recruitment to ensure that the right people are brought in to learn and operate the systems. As the process keeps evolving, the distinction between cyber and electromagnetic warfare will become less divided and distinct. Cultural biases already are starting to disintegrate, particularly at the command level, given the increased awareness in the TOBY JORRIN Vice Adm. Jan E. Tighe tells expo attendees dur‐ ing a briefing at the IW Pavilion that the cyber network will operate as a warfighting platform . importance of the cyber security mission, Tighe said. Younger Sailors, who grew up with an IT presence virtually their entire lives, will help accelerate the learning process as well, Tighe said. Upgrades Keep Navy Air-to-Air Weapons on Cutting Edge By WILLIAM MATTHEWS, Seapower Special Correspondent One of the missiles is 8 years old, the other is pushing 30. But steady technology upgrades have kept these two Navy air-to-air weapons on the cutting edge. The younger one is the AIM-9X Block II. The older is the AIM-120D AMRAAM — advanced medium-range air-to-air missile. The 9X Block II was introduced in 2008, but did not go into full rate production until 2015. It’s the latest member of the Sidewinder missile family that dates back to the mid-1970s. The 9X Block II can do things its predecessors could hardly have imagined. For example, it is equipped with a 360-degree engagement capability and a data link, said Capt. Jim Stoneman, chief of the Navy’s Air-to-Air Missiles Program Office. That enables a pilot to fire the missile first and then aim it at a target. “The pilot can shoot and then pass more information to the missile” via the data link to vector the missile to a target, Stoneman said during a briefing May 16 at the 2016 Sea-Air-Space Exposition. The missile’s 360-degree capability enables it to engage targets — even those behind WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG the aircraft, he said. On some planes, such as the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, pilots will be able to aim the missiles using sights built into their helmets. Although the Sidewinder was developed as a shortrange missile meant for close-in kills, the Block II’s range has been “about doubled,” Stoneman said, making it into a “beyond-visual-range” weapon. A Block III version of the 9X is on the drawing board, but for now remains unfunded, Stoneman said. The AIM-120D is the latest version of the AMRAAM, which the Navy and Air Force have used since 1987. The D model also features a data link that enables a pilot to fire the missile and then send it targeting information, Stoneman said. It has an improved Global Positioning System guidance system and enhanced anti-jamming capabilities to shield in the midst of enemy electronic warfare. After several years of testing, the 120D is now making its way to the fleet, Stoneman said. Software upgrades are under way, and those should further increase the capability of the “Delta” model, he said. For now, there are no plans for a follow-on missile, he said. SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 5 NAVAIR Leverages Simulation for Aircraft Training By EVAMARIE SOCHA, Seapower Special Correspondent While other programs have seen spending flatten, roughly $800 million to $900 million more in training simulators have come from program manager sponsors’ pockets, the head of Naval Air Systems Command’s (NAVAIR’s) Training Systems Division said during a May 16 briefing. Meanwhile, Live-Virtual-Constructive still is developing to fill in the gaps that simulation training leaves behind, said Capt. Erik Etz, commanding officer of the division and also of Naval Support Activity in Orlando, Fla. The NAVAIR Training Systems Division will see about $1.2 billion in spending this year, Etz said. Training funding tends to have an ebb and flow, he said during his address at the 2016 Sea-Air-Space Exposition at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center at National Harbor, Md., but NAVAIR remains “at the forefront of simulation and training” across aviation, surface and undersea operations and cross-warfare, Etz said. There has not been a corresponding increase in flight-hour budgets, Etz said, which remains costly and logistically difficult, so more money is good as more operations training is done in simulation. A former F/A-18 pilot, Etz noted “the precious time in aircraft ... is valuable to execute like you would want to fight,” so basic operation and KATE PATTERSON Capt. Erik Etz, head of Naval Air Systems Command’s Training Systems Division, tells an audience at the command’s booth on the expo floor that “the precious time in aircraft ... is valuable to execute like you would want to fight.” handling are done with simulation. He said, for instance, about 70 percent to 80 percent of student training on the P8A Poseidon upgrade from the P-3 Orion is done on a simulator. To that end, Etz said solutions under Live-Virtual-Constructive, or LVC, still are in initial stages. LVC is a set of measures to address gaps in simulators’ designs. “We all recognize that (LVC) needs to engage the user across all service platforms,” Etz said. “I believe the efforts in that area will continue.” “Intelligent tutoring,” for instance, is one method being deployed. It includes algorithms that analyze how a student is learning and making deci- sions, Etz said, and adapts the training program accordingly. In other NAVAIR news: ■ Multipurpose Reconfigurable Training Systems have seen a considerable drop in cost, Etz said, a boon to undersea programs training. ■ Research and technology developments are looking at gaming devices as potential solutions as new Sailors, with fresh experience from video games, come in. ■ More immersive training steps may be next for E-Sailor, a program looking to provide early Sailor training via tablets. Etz said this program still is in prototype but remains positive about its future. Video Game Proficiency Helps Young Sailors Adapt Quickly By EVAMARIE SOCHA, Seapower Special Correspondent Hours wasted on video games? Not for the newest Sailors, whose hours of video play make them fast adapters to the Navy’s trainers and simulators, the head of Naval Air Systems Command’s (NAVAIR’s) training division said May 16. “The current generation has taken to training technology, thanks to video games,” said Capt. Erik Etz, commanding officer of Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division and the Naval Support Activity in Orlando, Fla. Such fresh Sailors understand how to execute the systems with ease, 6 SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 fleet commanders report and pick up on the training fast, making them proficient faster in their duties and operations. So fast, in fact, NAVAIR’s research and technology arm is looking at current gaming devices as potential training sets, Etz said during his talk at the 2016 Sea-Air-Space Exposition at the Gaylord National Resort & Conference Center, National Harbor, Md. NAVAIR already is using “intelligent tutoring,” technology that uses algorithms to analyze how the trainee makes a decision and is learning and adapts to fill in any gaps. Naval Support Activity Orlando is the hub for simulation and training, to include the Army and Marine Corps. WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG Navy Looking at Ways to Harness More Power By WILLIAM H. McMICHAEL, Seapower Special Correspondent Steve Markle had to manually regulate electric power from two diesel generators when he was qualifying as the engineering officer of the watch aboard the USS Orion back in 1986. That task is now automated on the Navy’s newer ships. The future, however, is demanding much more capability. Markle, a retired commander who now is the program manager of the Navy’s Electric Ships Office, is challenging industry to come up with technology that can generate far more power than currently demanded, and keep it flowing and evenly dispersed on the next generation of ships — particularly the warships that will carry the electromagnetic railgun. “What we need to do is to look at a new way so that we can use the installed power on the ship and put it anywhere we need it,” Markle said May 16 during briefing to industry representatives at the 2016 Sea-Air-Space Exposition. That need is at the heart of developing integrated power and energy systems, or IPES. “We’re integrating energy storage with a power system … that’s the future,” Markle said. What he also wants to see developed is a 20-to-30megawatt gas turbine generator that will fit in a warship of less than 10,000 tons — a medium surface combatant — and is shorter than the 50-foot-long generator on DDG 1000, the Zumwalt. “Something on the order of 40 feet,” he said. A ship’s power system, Markle explained afterward, “is driven by what the combat capability of the ship requires.” Ships that will be getting advanced weapons and sensors will obviously require far more electrical power than is currently widely generated. “But it’s got to be the right power,” Markle said. Some ships, he said, put as much as 80 percent of their power into reduction gears that turn the shaft. For instance, a DDG 51 destroyer sends the equivalent of about 75 megawatts installed power to the gears. Three separate 3megawatt gas turbine generators power everything else — lights, galley, weapons systems and radars, he said. Future ships will have a much greater appetite for electricity, Markle said. “Radars today are megawatt-size,” he said. “Radars tomorrow are going to be multi-megawatt. Railgun: teens, 20s of megawatts of power.” Meanwhile, development of the futuristic railgun is moving quickly. “We want to have this ready in the 2020 timeframe,” said Cmdr. Carl Carney of the Office of Naval Research, another exhibitor. Specific industry questions on what Markle wants to see proposed will be addressed at the American Society of Naval Engineers Advanced Machinery Technology Symposium, being held May 25 and 26 at Villanova University, and at the Naval Surface Warfare Command Industry Day taking place Aug. 3 in Philadelphia, Markle said. “Will it be viable?” Markle said. “Industry needs to tell me that. Right now, I think it is.” KATE PATTERSON Benjamin Moyd, intelligence analyst with NGA, discusses the Proteus, a dual‐mode underwater vehicle, with Karl Lindman, a Huntington Ingalls Industries engineer, in the Huntington Ingalls Industries exhibit at the Sea‐Air‐Space Exposition May 16. 8 SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG LISA NIPP U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Mathias Winter, speaks during the International Naval Leadership Panel: Naval Technology 2025 & Beyond panel May 16. At his right are Dr. Nicholas Joad, Rear Adm. Harris Chan and Adm. Bento Costa Lima Leite De Albuquerque Junior. At his left are Dale Reding, Rear Adm. José Joaquin Amézquita and Jamie Watson. International Naval Panel Stresses Collaboration To Solve Common Science and Technology Concerns By OTTO KREISHER, Seapower Special Correspondent A panel of naval officers and civilian officials from the United States and five partner nations cited lists of similar issues and concerns about the science and technology problems confronting their services and stressed the importance of collaboration among friendly nations to expedite solutions. In a panel at the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space Exposition at National Harbor, Md., nearly all the officials listed cyber and electronic warfare as crucial issues, but some added more exotic concerns such as enhancing human performance, use of autonomous systems in place of shrinking numbers of service-age citizens, and space and information systems. Introducing the panel, Rear Adm. Mathias Winter, director of the Office of Naval Research (ONR), said science and technology cannot solve every problem but collaboration in science and technology was important so “when we have a complex problem to solve, we’re not starting from zero.” The visiting officials, from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Singapore and the United Kingdom, all mentioned the value of collaboration to help resolve the emerging problems their navies face, with several emphasizing the importance of their relations with the U.S. Navy. Jamie Watson, a former Royal Australian Naval Reserve officer, said Australia “can’t begin to match the scale” of the U.S. science and technology programs, “but we can be a partner,” and avoid replicating efforts on common problems. Rear Adm. Harris Chan of Singapore said, “as we listen to others, we see we have the same problems. … Collaboration is key to everything we do.” Dale Reding from the Canadian Ministry of Defence said success in collaboration “boils down to one thing — trust. You have to trust your partners” to not only cooperate but “trust them to critique” your programs. Rear Adm. José Joaquin Amézquita of the Columbian Navy, agreed with the overall view, but added: “We are open to cooperation. We need to cooperate. But we need action.” Winter agreed with that view. Winter followed his colleagues with a detailed description of ONR’s extensive $2.1 billion a year science and technology program, which is divided into efforts aimed at short-term solutions to urgent operational problems to longterm basic research that may contribute to systems 20 years in the future. Next-Gen Jammer to Complete Critical Design Review in March By DANIEL P. TAYLOR, Seapower Special Correspondent The Next-Generation Jammer is on track to complete its critical design review (CDR) next March, and the program is just about to delve into the subsystems in the next month in preparation for that, the program manager said during a briefing May 16. Capt. John Bailey said at the SeaAir-Space Exposition that before the WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG system-wide CDR can be completed, the program must first do a CDR for all the subsystems, such as the array and the power generation and every other aspect of the system. “This year we are completing our subsystem CDRs — as early as next month, actually,” Bailey said. “We’ll be doing those individual subsystem CDRs starting about next month all the way through next year.” He said that should lead up to the system-wide CDR wrapping up in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, or more specifically around March. Raytheon is the lead on the NextGeneration Jammer program after winning the competition in 2013 to replace legacy ALQ-99 systems used on EA-18G electronic attack aircraft. The company was awarded a $1 billion engineering and manufacturing development contract earlier this year. The Navy hopes to field the pod in 2019. SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 9 Call for Movement on National Maritime Strategy By WILLIAM H. McMICHAEL, Seapower Special Correspondent There are but 79 merchant ships that fly the U.S. flag — a 25 percent decline over the past four years. China has thousands. “We no longer command trade,” Don Marcus, president of the International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, said May 16 during a roundtable discussion on the National Maritime Strategy at the 2016 Sea-AirSpace Exposition, being held at the Gaylord Convention Center at National Harbor, Md. “No doubt, we have the world’s most powerful Navy,” Marcus said. “[But] we’re totally unprepared, at this point, to project not only forces overseas in a logistical sense, but also to protect our economic well-being. “We’re no longer the world’s greatest trading nation,” he said. “That honor falls to China. And to paraphrase Sir Walter Raleigh, ‘those that command trade command the riches of the world.’” What’s needed, the four panelists and the moderator, Maritime Administrator Paul N. “Chip” Jaenichen, agreed, is a new National Maritime Strategy. Such a policy, which will include recommendations for growing the U.S. maritime industry and ensur- LISA NIPP Jim Dwyer, left, director of planning, Maryland Port Administration, speaks during the National Mar‐ itime Strategy Roundtable May 16. To his left are Thomas Wynne, vice president and general counsel, Interlake Steamship Co.; Phillip Shapiro, president and chief executive officer, Liberty Shipping; and Donald Marcus, international president, International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots. ing the availability of U.S.-flagged vessels, has been written and reviewed. It is now in the “government interagency review process,” Jaenichen said. Translation, he said: It’s stalled at the Office of Management and Budget. “We’re about a year overdue at this point,” Jaenichen said. “We’re still hoping to get that out for public comment later this year.” Merchant Mariners are a key element in the U.S. military’s overseas logistics chain. U.S.-flag, privately owned ships have moved more than 50 percent of all military cargo during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to the Department of Transportation. The decline in the number of those ships has a palpable effect, Jaenichen said. “When our presence on the high seas declines, [the nation] forfeits its ability to project power,” Jaenichen said. “It also takes away our ability to influence the outcomes globally — not to mention the ability to make sure we can secure our national interests through our ability to project and sustain our armed forces, anywhere on Earth.” Third Navy Operational Squadron in Transition to E-2D By RICHARD R. BURGESS, Seapower Managing Editor The Navy’s third operational carrier airborne early squadron (VAW) has begun transition to the Northrop Grumman-built E-2D Advanced Hawkeye radar warning aircraft. Jay Muhall, director for Global Business Development for E-2/C-2 programs manager, told Seapower May 16 at the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space Expo at National Harbor, Md., said that VAW-126 “has turned in the keys” to its E2C Hawkeyes and its personnel are in training awaiting delivery of their new aircraft. VAW-126 is following VAW-125, the first squadron to take the E-2D on a carrier deployment, and VAW-121, which also has completed its transition. Each E-2D squadron is equipped with five aircraft, compared with four E-2Cs before the transition. Muhall said that Northrop Grumman’s St. Augustine, 10 SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 Fla., facility has delivered 23 E-2Ds to the Navy and will deliver another this month. Six were delivered in 2015 and five are scheduled for delivery in 2016. The Navy has a requirement for 75 E-2Ds, of which 51 are under contract. The company is building the first E-2D for the Japanese Air Self Defense Force and expects to build at least four more. About two years is required to build an E-2D from contract award to delivery. The company has built a state-of-the-art training facility at Naval Station Norfolk, Va., the home of the first E-2D squadrons. Northrop Grumman is producing the equivalent of block software upgrades to the E-2D every 18 to 24 months, similar in concept to the way the Navy upgrades its submarine mission systems or the way Lockheed Martin refreshes the Aegis Combat System. Called the Delta System Software Configuration, the second upgrade is now finished with developmental testing and will go through operational test this year. WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG Jones Act ‘Force Multiplier’ for Homeland Security By DAISY R. KHALIFA, Seapower Special Correspondent Maritime and homeland security experts discussed the longstanding advantages of the Jones Act in the mission to protect the nation’s borders during a May 16 roundtable at the Sea-Air-Space Exposition. Among the panelists were Paul N. “Chip” Jaenichen, maritime administrator, U.S. Maritime Administration; Rear Adm. Mark E. Butt, assistant commandant for capability, U.S. Coast Guard; and J. Ryan Hutton, acting deputy executive director, Admissibility & Passenger Programs, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The Jones Act — also known as the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 — requires that all cargo shipped between U.S. domestic ports be carried on vessels that are U.S. built, owned, crewed and operated. Furthermore, the Jones Act serves as a cornerstone, through the Maritime Security Program, of the nation’s sealift and surge capability in times of conflict, providing vessels and crew, as needed, to bolster military requirements. “The Maritime Administration’s broader mandate is to ensure that our nation has the capacity and capability to forward deploy our armed forces and to be able to sustain them once they arrive in theater,” Jaenichen said. “Not only is [our mission] about making sure there are enough mariners to be able to forward deploy our armed forces … 50 percent of our active mariner pool comes from the Jones Act coastwise trade. When it comes to national security, the Jones Act is an absolute cornerstone of the U.S. national strength of homeland security.” In addition to the nation’s sealift readiness program, the Jones Act is considered an integral part of the nation’s border protection, Jaenichen said. He said with so much of the nation’s coastline and inland waterways exposed, it is crucial that the vessels and the crews that travel along and through them pose no threat. Jones Act crews protect against that particular vulnerability, he said. “The Jones Act achieves a number of things,” he said. “Most obvious, it supports the robust shipbuilding industry along with the Merchant Marine, which are integral to being able to make sure that we have active support of every branch of our armed forces. Without the Jones Act currently in place, we would also be faced with the impossible prospect of [monitoring vessels] throughout our U.S. waterways.” Hutton said CBP’s Office of Field Operations is responsible for “everyone and everything that enters the U.S.” He said 387 million people came through U.S. points of entry last year, and explained how the agency uses a “layered approach” in managing potential threats for meeting the extensive demands faced by CBP staff. “The Jones Act is a huge part of that,” Hutton said. “If we allowed foreign-flag vessels, that would be one more operational level that we would have to address. If you eliminate the Jones Act, that would be a huge security role for us operationally. It is important for us and we look at the Jones Act as a force multiplier.” Immersive Training Spencer Ashford with Marine Corps Systems Command tests out the Augmented Immersive Team Trainer at the Sea‐Air‐Space Exposition May 16. Augmented Im‐ mersive Team Training, or AITT, is an augmented reality training system that integrates with the U.S. Marine Corps’ ground combat team training instrumentation sys‐ tem, Instrumented Tactical Engage‐ ment Simulation System to display virtual indirect fire effects, aircraft, vehicles and/or role players onto actual terrain, according to the Office of Naval Research. Augmented reality, a technology that combines virtual information with a real‐world view, is the en‐ abling capability for AITT. KATE PATTERSON WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 13 KATE PATTERSON Sea‐Air‐Space Exposition attendees gather around a model of an America‐class amphibious assault ship at the Huntington Ingalls Industries booth on the exposition exhibit floor May 16. Navy EOD Forces in Demand Around the World By PETER ATKINSON, Seapower Deputy Editor While Navy explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) technicians remain dispersed and engaged around the world, their focus is returning to the maritime environment. Where the service had been doing “all things EOD” during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as those operations have wound down, underwater, surface and littoral missions are gaining prominence, Lt. Bryan Bond, Global Force Management Action Officer with Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), said during a briefing at the NECC booth on the Sea-Air-Space exhibit floor. Bond noted that the “Navy has made major strides in the underwater environment” as unmanned underwater vehicle and remotely operated vehicle technologies have continued to improve and more systems are unveiled. In the maritime environment, he said, “we’re able to clear chokepoints so that our ships and Navy forces can get through these different areas of the world. … We are getting back to the standard Navy EOD environment of countering naval mines.” 14 SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 17, 2016 Countering improvised explosive devices, however, remains an integral part of the Navy EOD mission, he said. “EOD forces are all over the world,” said Bond, who has spent the past eight years in the EOD field and served tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. “We strategically emplace our forces so that we can clear the path for our unconventional and conventional military forces.” Demand is such for Navy EOD forces that Bond said not all requests for their services can be filled — and unless the current budget climate improves, that is a situation that is likely to continue. “EOD is very important, so we’re very busy,” he said. “We have deployed as many EOD technicians as we can. Right now, we have approximately 700 personnel deployed all over the world. We’re supporting all the forces. We support the Army, we support Marines, we support the Air Force. “We are also embedded with all the special operations units, Navy SEALS as well as Army Special Operations. We’re there to make sure we can clear any explosive hazards so they can go in and do their job safely.” WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG Navy’s Great Green Fleet Comes to Sea-Air-Space By CNIC Public Affairs Sea-Air-Space 2016 (SAS) attendees approaching the entrance to the Gaylord Convention Center’s main exhibit space at National Harbor, Md., this year will find a 25-foot section of hull from an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer standing next to a solar-powered Marine Corps unmanned aerial system (UAS), and a banner which reads “Power. Presence.” All of these are pieces of an exhibit highlighting the Department of the Navy’s Great Green Fleet (GGF) — the year-long showcase of ways the Navy and Marine Corps are transforming their energy use to be better warfighters. Military personnel, industry representatives, and other SAS attendees who visit the GGF display will learn how the Navy and Marine Corps are deploying next-generation energy capabilities that boost combat effectiveness, increase operational flexibility, and better protect our Sailors and Marines. Across the Department of the Navy, activeduty, Reserve and civilian personnel are encouraged to make energy efficiency the new normal in operations, to create a more effective fighting force. In 2009, Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus announced five goals designed to transform the Navy and Marine Corps’ energy culture and infrastructure to increase combat capability and enhance energy security. One of these goals was to sail the Great Green Fleet by 2016. In January, Mabus stood on the carrier pier at Naval Air Station North Island, Calif., and, flanked by the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis and Arleigh Burke-class guidedmissile destroyer USS Stockdale, launched the GGF. The centerpiece of the GGF — the Stennis Strike Group (JCSSG) — deployed using energy-efficient technologies and operational procedures, and running its escort ships on an advanced alternative fuel blend. But the GGF isn’t just the JCSSG. In fact, the GGF has grown to encompass a service-wide initiative to increase combat capability and flexibility by integrating energy efficiency and alternative energy into operations. Around the world, platforms, aircraft, amphibious and expeditionary forces, and shore installations are seeing positive results as they participate in the GGF. During an Oceania Maritime Security Initiative tasking, Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS William P. Lawrence reduced its average fuel burn rate by 40 percent from 2015. Weeks later, the JCSSG participated in the annual Foal Eagle exercise, where expeditionary forces utilized the new NETC2V2 command and control system. This latest version includes energy-efficient technologies that, when used in conjunction with new operational procedures, can reduce its energy use by as much as 30 percent. Aboard the Stennis, emergency lights — known as battle lanterns — are being converted to more energy efficient Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs). LEDs are rated for 100,000 hours of life, drastically reducing the number of replacement bulbs the ship need carry and the man hours spent on maintenance. And these are just a few examples of the energy transformation happening in the Navy and Marine Corps. While some of these innovations may sound minor, the total impact on operational capabilities is significant. The Navy and Marine Corps’ mission is to provide the global presence necessary to ensure stability, deter potential adversaries, and present options in times of crisis. Diversifying supplies and optimizing energy use helps ensure they have the energy they need, when and where they need it. And, it means there can be fewer fuel convoys on the road and less time ships are tied to oilers, reducing risks to Sailors and Marines and increasing combat capability. Saab Gets Positive Feedback on Sea Wasp Testing By JOHN C. MARCARIO, Seapower Special Correspondent The U.S. Navy, along with two other government agencies, has provided “extremely good” early feedback on Saab’s new remotely operated vehicle, Sea Wasp, according to Burt Johansson, the company’s sales director for underwater systems. Sea Wasp is designed to locate, identify and neutralize improvised explosive devices specifically in the confined areas and challenging environmental conditions of ports and harbors. In January, representatives from the U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group 2, the FBI Counter-IED Unit and the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division’s Counter-Terrorist Operations Maritime Response Unit met with a team of Saab employees from the United States, Sweden and the United Kingdom for four days of Sea Wasp training in Charleston, S.C. Since then, the agencies have been testing the system independently of one another. WWW.SEAPOWERMAGAZINE.ORG During a May 16 brief at the Sea-Air Space Exposition, Johansson said there has been no set date for prototype testing to end, but he expects it to be sometime this year. The agencies have expressed some concerns with the system in terms of handling and dealing with human and machine interface. Developed over 18 months with the U.S. Underwater Hazardous Device Team, the Sea Wasp is designed for operation by a two-man team. It is piloted from the surface using a control console on-board the support vessel, or from a control vehicle ashore using a power-supplying, fiber-optic tether. “There’s always going to be changes, but our experience in the commercial world comes in handy here,” Johansson said. The Navy currently disposes and handles underwater improvised explosive devices with a team of specialized swimmers. The Sea Wasp is designed to in essence take the man out of minefield. The contract for Sea Wasp was for three prototypes. SEA‐AIR‐SPACE SHOW DAILY / MAY 16, 2016 15