Energy Efficient Vivariums
Transcription
Energy Efficient Vivariums
Energy Efficient Vivariums Peter Rumsey, P.E., Rumsey Engineers, Inc Glen Berry, NCARB, Design for Science Why Vivariums? Rapid Growth in Vivarium Construction and Use High Energy Intensity – Typically 1.5 to 2.5 more energy intensive than traditional labs High Steam Usage High Air Change Rates Criterion #1: Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Excellent reference manual for planning and design of vivarium facilities. The Guide was written in 1996. Page 32: “The guideline of 10-15 air changes per hour has been used for secondary enclosures for many years and is considered an acceptable general standard.” The Guide does not mention ventilated cage racks, as they did not exist as a tried/tested/proven product for animal holding in 1996. Criterion #2: NIH Design Guidelines Another excellent reference manual for the planning and design of vivarium facilities. Published in 2003 Does acknowledge ventilated cage racks as an acceptable form of housing rodents. Page F.70: “The air-handling system design should comply with the requirements described in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.” Page F.71: “If microenvironments are employed for animal holding, the minimum ventilation requirement may be reduced to 10 air changes per hour plus the sum of the microenvironment airflow.” Concept #1: Understand the difference between primary and secondary barriers. science laboratories: The chemical fume hood is the primary barrier, and is the primary method of capture and containment of volatile chemical fumes. BSL3/4 labs: The biological safety cabinet is the primary barrier, and is the primary method of capture and containment of airborne pathogens. vivaria: the ventilated cage rack is the primary barrier of rodents, and is the primary method of controlling air change rate, temperature, and humidity of the housing environment. In all of the above, the room is the secondary barrier, and should always be thought of as such. The room cannot and should not provide the same level of capture/containment as the primary barrier. Building Basics Location – 30 miles south of San Francisco on coast Size – 115,000 sf – 15,000 s.f. vivarium on ground floor (~50 double sided 144 count cage racks) Purpose - Biomedical Research Cost – approximately $610/sf Minimum LEED Silver and 30% energy savings Lab Space – Daylight Simulation Vivarium Vivarium Floor Layout ~15K sf Mechanical Basement Floor Cage Wash Area Holding Rooms Loading Dock Open Cage Racks Ventilated Cage Racks Concept #2: The secondary barrier (the room) envelope does not need to provide the same level of capture and containment as the primary barrier. Then (Lab planning and design): 10-12 air changes per hour Now: 6 air changes or 1 cfm/sf with even lower rate for unoccupied mode. Then (vivarium planning and design): 10-15 air changes per hour Now: still 10-15. Has not addressed the role of the ventilated cage rack as the primary barrier. Perhaps we can allow the equipment to solve the energy consumption problem, by reducing the effective envelope for which the air change rate is required. Similar to the function of a chemical fume hood or biological safety cabinet…… HVAC Systems Dedicated AHU – 40,000 CFM Chilled Water System Two fans one for redundancy One 300 ton – peak use full building One 100 ton – peak use vivarium only Generator - 600 kW Back-up for all Vivarium uses except steam AHU, Lights, Chiller, Pumps, Open Cage versus Ventilated Cage Air Change Rates Typical Open Cage Rack Holding Rooms 15 to 20 Air Changes per hour (approx. 3-4 cfm/sf) Ventilated Cage Rack Holding Rooms 10 air changes per hour (approx. 2 cfm/sf) Vivarium Options Considered In Schematic Design Option 1 - All Open Cage Racks in Holding Rooms AHU: 49,000 cfm AHU and Chiller Costs: $613k Option 2 – 50% Open Cage Racks/50% Ventilated Cage Racks AHU: 40,000 cfm AHU and Chiller Costs: $482k Option 3 – 100% Ventilated Cage Racks AHU: 36,000 cfm AHU and Chiller Costs: $442k Vivarium Options Costs Option All Open Cage Racks 50% Open / 50% Ventilated All Ventilated Cage Racks Vivarium HVAC Costs $819,000 $723,000 $663,000 Selected Option CFD Analysis Purpose Determine Optimal Placement of Supply and Return Diffusers in Open Cage Rack Rooms CASE A Return Supply CFD Results – 1000 cfm, 55 deg F CASE B Return Supply CFD Results – 1000 cfm, 55 Deg F CASE C Return Supply CFD Results – 1000 cfm, 55 Deg F CFD Results – 850 cfm, 55 Deg F STEAM SYSTEM ANALYSIS Getinge Cage Tunnel Washer Cage and Rack Washer Steam Load Summary Equipment Tunnel Washer Cage & Rack Washer Regular Steam Peak 2400 600 Ave - Clean Steam Peak - Ave - Medium Sterilizer (26 x 37.5 x 60") LSR Sterilizer - - 335 800 185 450 Autoclave - 1st floor - - 60 56 Autoclave - 2nd floor - - 60 56 Medium Autoclave - 3rd floor - - 335 185 Autoclave - 4th floor - - 60 56 Autoclave - - 60 56 Autoclave Glasswasher (future) - - 60 300 56 - 3000 - 2,070 1090 TOTAL Comments 1000 lbs/hr dryer Can find alt. equip 10% lower steam, such as Getinge 700LS 10% additional savings possible 10% additional savings possible Can find alt. equip 10% lower steam, such as Getinge 700LS 10% additional savings possible 10% additional savings possible 10% additional savings possible 60% OF STEAM DEMAND IS IN THE WASHERS Tunnel Washer Manufacturer High Pressure Steam Use (lbs/hr) Steam Requirements if supplemented with 140 deg F Hot Water Getinge 1200 600 - 950 No IWT Technoplast 661 Not recommended No LYNX 1400 Not recommended Yes Steris 1300 Not recommended Yes Can use low pressure steam Cage and Rack Washer Manufacturer High Pressure Steam Use (lbs/hr) HP Steam Requirements if supplemented with 140 deg F Hot Water Getinge 800 400 Yes IWT Technoplast 600 Not recommended No LYNX 1200 600 Yes Steris 1400 Not recommended No Can use low pressure steam Other Strategies for Lower Energy Use in Vivariums Improved venting strategies for ventilated cage rack systems Improved fans on ventilated cage racks Unoccupied or lower occupancy turn down Autoclaves improvements Low energy lighting Demand Controlled ventilation Others?? Conclusion (food for thought) Let the primary barrier (fume hood, BSC, ventilated cage rack) define the envelope for air change rate and environmental controls. Reduce the secondary barrier (the room) air change rate to lower levels that save energy and still provide a safe working environment. Animal Holding Rooms: Use Ventilated Cage Racks Room - 6+ air changes per hour occupied Room - 4+ air changes per hour unoccupied Thank You www.RumseyEngineers.com www.designforscience.com