Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and
Transcription
Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and
Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and Evaluation of Efficacy of a Unani Formulation in its Management by QUTUBUDDIN Dissertation submitted to the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bangalore In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MAHIRE TIB (MD Unani) in MOALAJAT (Medicine) Under the guidance of Dr. Mohd Anwar Department of Moalajat National Institute of Unani Medicine Bangalore 2012 I Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE I hereby declare that this dissertation entitled “Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and Evaluation of Efficacy of a Unani Formulation in its Management” is a bonafide and genuine research work carried out by me under the guidance of Dr. Mohd Anwar, Reader, Department of Moalajat, National Institute of Unani Medicine, Bangalore. Date: Place: Bangalore Qutubuddin II National Institute of Unani Medicine (Dept. of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India) Kottigepalya, Magadi Main Road, Bangalore-91 Telephone: 080-23584260, Ext: 262, Telefax: 080-23580725 CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and Evaluation of Efficacy of a Unani Formulation in its Management” is a bonafide research work done by Qutubuddin in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mahire Tib (MD Unani) in Moalajat (Medicine) under my supervision and guidance. Dr. Mohd Anwar Reader Department of Moalajat Date: National Institute of Unani Medicine Place: Bangalore Bangalore III National Institute of Unani Medicine (Dept. of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India) Kottigepalya, Magadi Main Road, Bangalore-91 Telephone: 080-23584260, Ext: 262, Telefax: 080-23580725 ENDORSEMENT BY THE HOD AND HEAD OF THE INSTITUTION This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and Evaluation of Efficacy of a Unani Formulation in its Management” is a bonafide research work done by Qutubuddin under the guidance of Dr. Mohd Anwar, Reader, Department of Moalajat, National Institute of Unani Medicine, Bangalore. Prof. Mansoor Ahmad Siddiqui Prof. M. A. Jafri Head Director Dept. of Moalajat National Institute of Unani Medicine National Institute of Unani Medicine Bangalore Bangalore Date: Date: Place: Bangalore Place: Bangalore IV COPYRIGHT Declaration by the Candidate I hereby declare that the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka shall have the right to preserve, use and disseminate this dissertation / thesis in print or electronic format for academic / research purpose. Date: Place: Bangalore Qutubuddin ©Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka V Acknowledgement ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All praises be to “Almighty Allah” the lord of the world, the most beneficent and merciful and peace be upon his Prophet Mohammed (SAWS). Through the grace of Almighty Allah, the uphill task on my shoulder has been accomplished. The completion of this dissertation is not only fulfilment of my dreams but also of my parents who have sacrificed a lot for me in completion of this course. The writing of a dissertation is obviously not possible without the support and company of numerous people. It is a pleasant aspect that I have now the opportunity to express my gratitude for all of them. It gives me immense pleasure to express my deep sense of gratitude and sincere respect to my teacher and guide, Dr. Mohd Anwar, Reader, Department of Moalajat, National Institute of Unani Medicine, Bangalore, for his sustained sincerity, precious guidance, vigorous suggestion, constructive criticism, extra efforts and immense help without which I could not be able to complete this dissertation. I acknowledge his intelligent, diligent and serious help in transforming these would be fantastic ideas into comprehensive and logical statements which are in front of you as a dissertation. I express my sincere thanks to Prof. M A Siddiqui, HOD Department of Moalajat, NIUM Bangalore, for providing necessary facilities to carry out the work smoothly. I extend my profound respect and regards for his guidance, suggestions, moral and material support. I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude and obligation to Director NIUM, Prof. M. A. Jafri for kindly permitting me to do this study and providing the best possible facilities that led to successful completion of my project. I am very thankful to all my teachers, Dr. Tanzeel Ahmad, Dr. Aleemuddin Quamri, and Dr. Abdul Nasir Ansari Reader, Lecturers, Department of Moalajat for their kind support, guidance and valuable suggestions. I wish to acknowledge my deep sense of gratitude to my esteemed teachers Dr. Abdul Wadood, Dr. Ghulamuddin Sofi, Dr. Nasreen Jahan, Dr. Najeeb Jahan, Dr. Arish Sherwani, Dr. VI Acknowledgement Abdul Haseeb Ansari, and from different Department of NIUM, and Clinical Registrars Dr. Shakeel Ansari and Dr. Mohd Azam, for his help during compilation of the dissertation work. I am also highly obliged to my colleagues who gave me moral and friendly support whenever I felt exhausted. Dr. Mohammad Ali, Dr. Md Razaur Rasheed. Dr Abdur Rasheed, Dr. Mushta Ali, Dr. Nadim Ahmad, Dr. A H A Fazeena, Dr. Firoz Khan, Dr. Farhan Hussain, Dr. Mateen Ahmad, Dr. Mujassam, Dr. Azeez, Dr. Zahid, Dr. Athar and Dr. Raudas deserve all of my praises. I also express my thanks to all my seniors especially Dr. Mohd Nayab, Dr. Abdul Azeez Faris, Dr. Shamim Akhtar, Dr. Rafiuddin, Dr. Shamim Rather, Dr. Nusrath Fatima, Dr. Akhtar Hussain Jamali as well as juniors Dr. Asim Khan, Dr. Mohd Yasir, Dr. Aslam, Dr. Sheeraz, Dr. Imtiyaz, Dr. Nasimul Hasan, Dr. Sarfaraz, Dr. Humaira Tabassum, Dr. Arshid, Dr. Kamal, Dr. Sadique and Dr. Shamim who helped me in every step to complete this dissertation. I would fail in my duty if I do not express my heartfelt and sincere thanks to to Dr. Renuka BN, Pathologist Hospital Laboratory for her kind support, advice and showing practical interest in my laboratory work. I owe my sincere thanks to hospital laboratory staff, Biochemist, Mrs. Sanjeeda Tabassum, Mr. Haneef, and Mr. Zaki and for helping me in my laboratory work. I would like to thank pharmacy staff Dr. Nafees Khan, Chief Pharmasist, Mr. Fazil, and Mr. Kashif for providing best quality drugs. I express my intense sense of thanks to library staff Mr. Ehtisham and Mr. Mudassir for their co-operation during literature survey, keeping the required books handy and out of the way support at the hour of desperate need. To Ahmadi Begam and Sharfuddin Khan my beloved parents, my role models: First, I’d like to thank you for bringing me into this world, instilling good values and beliefs in me, providing me with all the necessities of life, and with an education. Thank you for your neverending support, wisdom, prayers, and encouragement, for being a listening ear, for giving me advice- be it warranted or not, for being an outlet for my emotions, for making me laugh, and for VII Acknowledgement wiping my tears. Thank you for ingraining the faith of almighty Allah in my heart. For without him, all of this would be null and void. Thank you for making me the person I am, because without you I wouldn’t be where I am today. My hope is that one day I become even half as good a parent as each of you has been to me. May Allah bless you with the best of this life and the hereafter- Aameen. I owe a debt of gratitude to my sisters Mohsina Khatoon, Nasira Khatoon, Rabiya Khatoon and my younger brothers Naseer, Raees and Zubair for their indispensable aid, moral support, encouragement, unfailing courtesy and everlasting love that served a source of my inspiration, strength, determination and enthusiasm at each and every front of my life to transfer my dreams into reality. My acknowledgment would remain incomplete without making a special mention for the sustained encouragement and sympathy that I received from my dearest friends, Dr. Abu Bakar, Dr. Shaikh Haneef, Dr. Waris Ali, Dr. Mohd Asif, Dr. Noor Muzammil, Paigam, Shuaib, Mahmood, Shamsheer, without which this dissertation would never have seen the light of the day. Last but not the least; I convey my heartfelt gratitude to all the patients, without whose co-operation, this study would not be possible. It is not possible to acknowledge individually all of my friends and colleagues who helped me in various ways and in different aspect of the study, nevertheless, I am grateful to all of them and at the same time I express my apology for all those whom I could not mention by their names. Lastly, I pray to Almighty Allah to show me the right path, the path of those whom He has favoured and not the path of those who earn His anger or those who go astray-Aameen. Date: 5-03-2011 Place: Bangalore Qutubuddin VIII List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used A. D. ADA ALT AST AT B.C BT CRF cu mm dl DLC Dr ECG ed IRS IU/L e.g. et al. etc. FBS F GHI Hb HDL HTN ICMR Anno Domini (after the birth of Christ) American diabetes association Alanine amino transferase Aspartate amino transferase After treatment Before Christ Before treatment Case Report Form cubic millimeter Deciliter Differential Leucocytes Count Doctor Electro cardiogram Edition Insuline receptor substrates International Unit per Liter Exempli grati (for example) Et alii or et alia (and others) et cetera Fasting Blood Sugar Female Glucagon-like peptide Haemoglobin Hight Density Lipoprotien Hypertension Indian council of medical research IDDM IDF i.e. IFG IHD Kg KFT LFT LDL M MODY mg/dl mg n NIDDM ns OGTT OPD p PNM PPBS S SES SEM S. No. Tab. TLC TNF Vol. YNM IX Insulin Dependent Diabetes mellitus International Diabetes Federation idest (that is) Impaired Fasting Glucose Ischemic Heart Disease kilogram Kidney Function Test Liver Function Test Low Density Lipoprotein Male Maturity onset diabetes of young milligram per deciliter milligram Total Number Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes mellitus Not Significant Oral glucose tolerance test Out Patient Department Probability of error Print Not Mention Post Prandial Blood Sugar Significant Socioeconomic Status Standard Error of Mean Serial Number Tablet Total Leucocyte Count Tumour necrosis factor Volume Year Not Mentioned List of Contents S. No. Topic Page No. 1 Introduction 1-5 2 Aims & Objectives 3 Review of Literature 7-59 4 Materials and Methods 60-66 5 Observations and Results 67-90 6 Discussion 91-101 7 Conclusion 102-103 8 Summary 104-108 9 Bibliography 109-122 10 Annexure 123-140 6 X List of Tables S. No. Titles Page No. 1 Distribution of Patients According to Age 67 2 Distribution of Patients According to Sex 68 3 Distribution of Patients According to Religion 69 4 Distribution of Patients According to Marital Status 70 5 Distribution of Patients According to Family History 71 6 Distribution of Patients According to Socio Economic Status 72 7 Distribution of Patients According to Diet 73 8 Distribution of Patients According to Mizaj 74 9 Distribution of Patients According to Duration of Illness 75 10 Distribution of Patients According to Treatment History 76 11 Effect on Polyuria 77 12 Effect on Polydipsia 78 13 Effect on Polyphagia 79 14 Effect on Tiredness 80 15 Effect on Progressive weakness 81 16 Effect on Dizziness 82 17 Effect on Unexplained Weight Loss 83 18 Effect on Pruritus 84 19 Effect on FBS 85 20 Effect on PPBS 86 21 Effect on Urine Sugar 87 XI Titles S. No. Page No. 22 Effect on HbA1c 88 23 Effect of Test drug on safety parameters 89 24 Effect of Control drug on safety parameters 90 List of Figures S. No. Titles Page No. 1 Distribution of patients according to Age 67 2 Distribution of patients according to Gender 68 3 Distribution of patients according to Religion 69 4 Distribution of patients according to Marital Status 70 5 Distribution of Patients According to Family History 71 6 Distribution of patients according to Socio Economic Status 72 7 Distribution of Patients According to Diet 73 8 Distribution of patients according to Mizaj 74 9 Distribution of Patients According to Duration of Illness 75 10 Distribution of Patients According to Treatment History 76 11 Effect on Polyuria 77 12 Effect on Polydipsia 78 13 Effect on Polyphagia 79 14 Effect on Tiredness 80 15 Effect on Progressive weakness 81 XII S. No. Titles Page No. 16 Effect on Dizziness 82 17 Effect on Unexplained Weight Loss 83 18 Effect on Pruritus 84 19 Effect on FBS 85 20 Effect on PPBS 86 21 Effect on Urine Sugar 87 22 Effect on HbA1c 88 XIII Introduction Introduction Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes mellitus) commonly known as diabetes, is one of the world’s oldest known diseases. The prevalence of diabetes is rapidly rising all over the globe at an alarming rate.1 It is estimated that 20% of global burden of DM resides in South East Asia Region (SEAR), is likely to triple by 2025 increasing from present estimates of about 30 million to 80 million.2 The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates the total number of diabetic subjects to be around 40.9 million in India and this is further set to rise to 69.9 million by the year 2025.3 Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes mellitus) is a state of chronic hyperglycemia, classically associated with excessive thirst, increased urine volume, and weight-loss. It is a complex and a multifarious group of disorders that disturbs the metabolism of carbohydrates, fats and proteins. It results from shortage or lack of insulin secretion or reduced sensitivity of the tissue to insulin. The term Ziabetus is a Greek word which means “to run through” or “Siphon”, is characterized by hyperglycaemia, glycosuria, increased appetite, excessive thirst and gradual loss of body weight. The concept of Ziabetus also exists in ancient world; it is proved by the discovery of Eberes papyrus, written about 1550 BC. Eberes papyrus contains descriptions of various diseases including a polyuric state resembling Ziabetus Shakari. Aretaeus was the first to use the term “Ziabetus” in connection with this ailment, which means “to run through” or “Siphon” and provided the accurate description of the symptoms of Ziabetus for the first time. After Arsyatoos, Jalinoos described Ziabetus as a rare disease, and referred to the ailment as “Diarrhoea Urinosa (Diarrhoea of Urine)”, and “Dipsakos (the thirsty disease)”. After that, during the Arabic era Ibne Sina 1 Introduction described accurately the clinical features of the disease and mentioned two specific complications of the disease, namely gangrene and the collapse of sexual function. In present era due to resemblance in clinical features of the disease, Ziabetus Shakari has been correlated with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Mellitus is a clinical syndrome characterized by hyperglycaemia due to absolute or relative deficiency of insulin. Lack of insulin whether absolute or relative, affects the metabolism of carbohydrate, protein, fat, water and electrolytes. Chronic hyperglycaemia leads to complications of Diabetes and affects most characteristically the eye, the kidney, the nervous system, the cardiovascular system. It also causes recurrent infections and Diabetic foot. There are various types of diabetes mellitus; among them Type 1 or insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and Type 2 Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are two major types. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: It is characterized by β cell destruction, which usually leads to an absolute deficiency of insulin. Most cases of Type 1 Diabetes are immunemediated characterized by autoimmune destruction of the β cells in the Islets of Langerhans of the pancreas, destroying them or damaging them sufficiently to reduce insulin production. However, some forms of Type 1 Diabetes are characterized by loss of the β cells without evidence of autoimmunity. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: It is characterized by insulin resistance and usually has relative (rather than absolute) insulin deficiency. The specific etiology of this form of Diabetes is not known, but many factors like hereditary, age, obesity, diet, sex, sedentary life style, socio-economic status, hypertension and various types of stresses are supposed to be involved in the etiology of Diabetes Mellitus. Most patients of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus are obese, and obesity itself causes some degree of insulin resistance. It occurs more frequently in 2 Introduction women with the history of GDM (Gestational Diabetes Mellitus) and in individuals with hypertension or dyslipidemia and its frequency varies in different racial/ethnic subgroups. Classically, the age of onset of Type 2 Diabetes is above 40 years. However, in Indians it has been found to be a decade earlier than in the west. Occasional patients might develop Type 2 Diabetes in the second decade of life. Obesity is not a common feature in Type 2 Diabetes in India. Only about 50% of cases have a BMI > 25 kg / m2 while, 15-20 % of the patients are underweight. Diabetes mellitus is now one of the most common non-communicable diseases. It is a silent killer that kills one person every 10 seconds, and kills about 3.2 million every year worldwide. At least one in ten deaths among adults between 35-64 years old is attributable to Diabetes. Further, it is the fourth or fifth leading cause of death in most developed countries and there is substantial evidence that it is epidemic in many developing and newly industrialized nations. Diabetes Mellitus leads to complications like blindness, renal failure, coronary artery disease, gangrene and coma. Due to these dreadful complications, Diabetes has become a global problem despite tremendous advances in modern sciences. Owing to dreadful complications of Diabetes Mellitus and lack of relatively safe and effective drug for its management, search for better and safe therapeutic agent becomes a thrust area for research, in every field of medical science. As far as the Unani system of medicine is concerned, Diabetes Mellitus is being treated since Greco-Arab period. Unani physicians described many safe and effective drugs as mentioned in standard Qarabadeen, but most of the agents have not been evaluated on scientific parameters. 3 Introduction However, lifestyle management measures may be insufficient or patient compliance difficult, rendering conventional drug therapies necessary in many patients. As an alternative approach, Unani drugs with antihyperglycemic activities are increasingly sought by diabetic patient and physicians. These drugs should have a similar degree of efficacy without the troublesome side effects associated with these treatments. Hence, Alternative treatments for diabetes have become increasingly popular for the last several years. Presently, there is growing interest in herbal remedies due to the side effects associated with the oral hypoglycemic agents for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. So the traditional herbal medicines especially Unani medicines are used which are obtained mainly from plants, play important role in the management of diabetes mellitus. Several drugs such as biguanides and sulfonylureas are being prescribed to reduce hyperglycemia in diabetes mellitus. But these drugs develop some serious side effects and quite expensive therefore, long term use of these drugs could not be possible. Management of diabetes without any side effect is still a challenge to medical fraternity. Thus search of new antidiabetic drugs are quite necessary to overcome this problem. In Unani literature specially in Al Qanoon fil Tib, Zakhira Khwarzam Shahi, Sharahe Asbab wal Alamat, Jamiul Hikmat, Bayaze Kabeer there are enough evidence regarding the effective use of various herbal drugs for diabetes mellitus since long, yet these drugs need clinical evaluation in the light of modern parameters. Therefore, it is one of the areas which have to be given priority in scientific researches in Unani Medicine. In recent years extensive researches has been carried out to explore the efficacy of Unani drugs and many studies revealed that some of the drugs possess 4 Introduction potent hypoglycemic properties. From the long list of such drugs, the formulation consisting of Satte Gilo (Tinospora cardifolia) Tabasheer (Bambusa bambos) and Maghze Kanwal Gatta (Nelumbo nucifera) has been selected for the study.4 Hence, a Randomized single blind with standard controlled study was envisaged. The patients were randomly allocated in test and control group. The test group was treated with the Unani formulation (3 gram) whereas control group was given Diabecon 2 tablet twice a day for the period 45 days. All the patients were advised strict dietary control and 45 minutes brisk walk daily. Every fortnightly assessment was recorded on CRF, specially designed for the study. The efficacy of test formulation was evaluated on the basis of standard parameters based on subjective parameters such as polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, tiredness, progressive weakness, dizziness, unexplained weight loss and pruritus and objective parameters such as fasting blood sugar, post prandial blood sugar, urine sugar and HbA1c. Apart from efficacy parameters, safety parameters such as haemogram, AST, ALT, blood urea, serum creatinine, and ECG were also carried out before and after treatment, in order to assess the toxicity of the test formulation, if any. At the end of study the data were analyzed statistically. The efficacy of the test drug was compared with the standard drug Diabecon. 5 Objective OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a Unani formulation in the management of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) 6 Disease Review Historical Background Ancient Period Clinical features similar to diabetes mellitus were described 3000 years ago by the ancient Egyptians. They were the first to write documents about diseases proved by discovery of Eberes papyrus in graves of Thabes in 1862 by Georg Eberes which was written in near about 1550 BC. It contained descriptions of a polyuric state resembling diabetes mellitus.5,6,7,8 Buqrat known as Hippocrates (460 BC) mentioned a disease with excessive urinary flow and wasting of body.9 The first known clinical description of diabetes appears to have been made by Aulus Cornelius Celsus (30 BC-50 AD); but it was Aretaeus of Cappadocia (2nd century AD) who provided a detailed and accurate account and introduced the name "diabetes" from the Greek word for "siphon". Aretaeus comments that life does not last very long, for great masses of flesh are liquefied into urine.8,10 Jalinoos (131-201) defined diabetes as “Diarrhoea Urinosa” (diarrhoea of urine) and “dipsakos” (thirsty disease). He described it as a disease specific to kidneys because of weakness in their retentive ability and secondly had seen only two cases therefore termed it a rare disease. He believed that diabetics’ urine was unchanged drink which may have accounted for a different aroma.7,9,11 Chinese (Chang Chung-Ching in 229 AD) and Japanese (Li Hsuan) literature explained a disease with sweet urine which attracted dogs and insects. Such patients were more prone to develop boils and tuberculosis.7,11 During 5th and 6th century, sweet taste of urine in polyuric patients was also described in Sanskrit (Indian) literature by Susruta, Charaka and Vaghbata and 7 Disease Review disease was named “Madhumeha”. They described that urine of these patients tasted like honey (madhu), sticky to touch and ants are strongly attracted to it. Ibne Sina (980-1037), who termed the disease “aldulab” (water wheel) and “zalqul Kulliya” (diarrhea of the kidneys), terms that Jalinoos and others had used, added to the complications of the disease those of mental troubles, impotence, gangrene, and furunculosis. Ibne Sina was first who wrote differentiating feature of Diabetes associated with emaciation form other causes of polyuria.7,9,12 The term "diabetes" was first coined by Araetus of Cappodocia (81-133AD). Later, the word mellitus (honey sweet) was added by Thomas Willis (Britain) in 1675 after rediscovering the sweetness of urine and blood of patients.5,8,12,13,14 Diagnostic period: In 1674, Dr. Thomas Willis, personal physician to the late English King Charles II, described the sweet taste of urine from diabetics "as if imbued with honey and sugar" hence, the name "mellitus" is Latin for honey. In 1766 Mathew Dobson proved that the sweet taste of diabetic urine was due to sugar. He made the crucial observation of the excess of sugar in blood.5,15 It was only in 1776 that Dobson (Britain) firstly confirmed the presence of excess sugar in urine and blood as a cause of their sweetness. In modern time, the history of diabetes coincided with the emergence of experimental medicine. An important milestone in the history of diabetes is the establishment of the role of the liver in glycogenesis, and Claude Bernard (France) in 1857 pointed out that diabetes is basically caused by excess glucose production.7 Diabetes: A Disease of the Pancreas Cawley was the first to suggest a relationship between the pancreas and diabetes, an association subsequently confirmed in various other diseases of the pancreas. These 8 Disease Review initial clinical observations were confirmed in 1889, when Oscar Minkowski (18581931) and Joseph Mering (1849-1908) showed that pancreatectomized dogs developed diabetes, which could be reversed by the subcutaneous implantation of pancreatic fragments.12 The specific role of the pancreas was further refined after Paul Langerhans (18491888) described in 1869 the unique morphologic features of the pancreatic islands that were subsequently named after him. In 1909, Eugene L. Opie (1873-1971) reported hyaline degeneration of the islands in diabetic patients, a finding subsequently confirmed in a series of experimental studies that led Edward Sharpey-Schafer to suggest in 1916 that the islands of Langerhans produced a glucoseregulating hormone that he termed insulin. The race for isolating the hypothesized hormone was now on. Frederick Banting (1891-1941) and Charles Best (1892-1978) finally did so in 1922. They called it insulin. The endocrine nature of diabetes was now clearly established. The stage of diabetes as a disease of the kidneys was over.12 Insulin Era The reversal of metabolic changes of diabetes by injection of a potent extract of pancreatic islands was demonstrated. In December 1921, Banting and Macleod got success in isolation of insulin; a milestone event. They got Noble prize for that in 1923. On 11th Jan 1922, 14 year old diabetic boy named Leonard Thombson was treated with insulin first time. In 1923, Eli Lilly begins commercial production of insulin (Isletin Insulin). In 1925, Home testing for sugar in urine through Benedict’s solution was introduced. In 1926, John Jacob Abel purified insulin, isolated its crystalline structure and hence chemically identified. In 1927, an oral medication 9 Disease Review “horment” or “glukohorment” was developed as a replacement for insulin, but dropped out due to its side effects. In 1928, Wintersteiner and his colleagues described insulin as a protein composed of amino acids. In 1930s, Insulin was further refined to Protamine zinc insulin, a long-acting insulin. Insulin therapy soon became backbone of management that enabled individuals affected by this disease to live an almost-normal life. It soon became apparent that insulin did not cure diabetes. As people began to live longer, they experienced complications that had not previously been seen. In 1936 Himsworth proposed two types of diabetes as insulin sensitive and insulin insensitive, former being due to insulin deficiency. This observation laid the foundation for the concept of impaired insulin action, which is now known to be a crucial factor in pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. In 1923, Collip found that onion has a hypoglycemic effect in fasting and depancreatized animals. The first oral hypoglycemic agent sulfonylurea was discovered in 1942 by M.J. Janbon. Franke and Fuchs in Berlin applied it clinically. In 1979, Type 1 or Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM) and type 2 or Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM) diabetes were formally recognized by American Diabetes Association (ADA). National Diabetes Data Group and World Health Organization (WHO) developed diagnostic criteria for diagnosis of diabetes using an oral glucose tolerance test which were updated in 1997 by ADA, and then revised in 2003. Latest developments Today Researchers are working on an insulin patch. A sensor-computer-pump system (implantable pump) that mimics insulin response of normal pancreas is being developed to function as an “artificial pancreas”. Genetic engineering is being used to manipulate cells so they secrete more insulin e.g. insulin sensitizers. Pancreatic or islet cell transplantation is also underway. Oral-Lyn is an oral spray formulation of human insulin. Its clinical use has been started in Ecuador in 2005. Inhaled insulin 10 Disease Review (Exubera) is one of the greatest breakthroughs in 2006 for people who must take short-acting insulin. Taiwan scientists Sung et al. reported the success in early tests of an oral insulin solution in diabetic rats. The use of Rituximab in turning off the immune attack on beta cells is under research. Another under way study is testing whether Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or MMF plus Daclizumab (DZB) can slow or arrest the autoimmunity of type 1 diabetes.7 11 Disease Review Diabetes Mellitus Every cell in the human body needs energy in order to function. The body’s primary energy source is glucose, a simple sugar resulting from the digestion of foods containing carbohydrates. Glucose from the digested food circulates in the blood as a ready energy source for any cell that needs it. Diabetes mellitus is a condition in which the pancreas no longer produces enough insulin or when cells stop responding to the insulin that is produced, so that glucose in the blood cannot be absorbed into the cells of the body.16 Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia, glycosuria and negative nitrogen balance and it is mainly due to lack of insulin secretion in beta cells of pancreas and desensitization of insulin receptors for insulin. Lack of insulin affects the metabolism of carbohydrate, protein and fat, and can cause a significant disturbance of water and electrolyte homeostasis.17 It is not a single disease entity but rather a group of metabolic disorders sharing the common underlying feature of hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia in diabetes results from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or, most commonly, both. The chronic hyperglycemia and attendant metabolic dysregulation of diabetes mellitus may be associated with secondary damage in multiple organ systems, especially the kidneys, eyes, nerves, and blood vessels.18 It is characterized by increased fasting and postprandial concentrations of glucose. It is the commonest metabolic disorder.19,20,21 Diabetes mellitus is a complex disorder of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats that leads to premature death, usually due to heart attack and stroke. Many experts think that although diabetes is commonly considered a disease of sugar, it is more accurately a vascular disease that severely affects blood vessels throughout the body.22 12 Disease Review Concepts of Ziabetus The word Diabetes is derived from Greek word “Diabanmo” Which means “passing through” or “to run through” or Siphon” is characterized by excessive thirst, excessive urination, presence of sugar in urine, increased appetite, gradual loss of body weight etc.23,24,25 Ziabetus is mentioned in most of the Unani literature like Al Qaanon, Al Hawi, Kamilul Sana’ah etc. Unani Atibba considered that Ziabetus is a disease of kidneys. Arab Atibba had described Ziabetus by some other terms also like Moattasha, Atsha, Intesae Anmas, Zalaqul kulliya, Dolab, Dawwarah, Barkar, Barkarya, Qaramees etc.23,26,27,28,29 According to Unani medicine, Ziabetus Shakari is a disease in which the consumed water is passed out through the kidney immediately after intake by the patient. It is like to Zalqul Meda wal Ama, in which the food passes rapidly through the stomach and intestine without proper digestion.24 In this disease patient has excessive thirst and takes plenty of water and passes all the water he consumed without any metabolic change.30 In this disease Mizaj of kidneys become Haar so they absorb water from blood and send to the urinary bladder immediately due to weakness in Quwate Masika (retentive power). It also been described that the kidneys attract the watery substance of blood, but the urinary bladder does not attract any thing. So kidneys attract the water from the circulation, liver, stomach and intestines because of which patient has the immoderate thirst (polydipsia).26,27,30 13 Disease Review Prevalence The prevalence of diabetes is rapidly rising all over the globe at an alarming rate.1 It is estimated that 20% of global burden of DM resides in South East Asia Region (SEAR) area, is likely to triple by 2025 increasing from present estimates of about 30 million to 80 million.2 The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates the total number of diabetic subjects to be around 40.9 million in India and this is further set to rise to 69.9 million by the year 2025.3 It is a global problem and number of those affected is increasing day by day. If the prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DMT2) continues to increase at the current rate, the global burden of this disease will swell between 2000 to 2030 from 171 million to 366 million patients.31 This global pandemic principally involves type 2 diabetes, to which several factors contribute, including greater longevity, obesity, unsatisfactory diet, sedentary lifestyle and increasing urbanisation. Many cases of type 2 diabetes remain undetected. However, the prevalence of both types of diabetes varies considerably around the world, and is related to differences in genetic and environmental factors. The prevalence of known diabetes in Britain is around 2-3%, but is higher in the Middle and Far East (e.g. 12% in the Indian subcontinent). A pronounced rise in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes occurs in migrant populations to industrialised countries, as in Asian and Afro-Caribbean immigrants to the UK. Type 2 diabetes is now being observed in children and adolescents, particularly in some ethnic groups, such as Hispanic and Afro-Americans.32 Survey of large number of people from rural as well as urban population of India, reported that prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is lower in rural population compared to the urban population. The prevalence rate of diabetes mellitus for persons above the age of 25 years was 3.77%. The prevalence in males 14 Disease Review was 4.58% and in females it was 2.66%. Impaired fasting glucose was 2.82% in male and 2.78 % in female. The maximum prevalence was observed in the age group of 56 to 65 in both males and females.33 The highest rate of growth is expected to occur in developing countries. Of people with diabetes, 9 out of 10 have type 2 diabetes. The five countries with the largest numbers of people with diabetes are India, China, the United States, Russia, and Germany. Worldwide 3.8 million deaths are directly attributable to diabetes. The disease also is contributing factor in many deaths due to cardiovascular disease.16 Type 1 diabetes is more common in Caucasian populations, and in Northern Europe its prevalence in children has doubled in the last 20 years, with a particular increase in children under 5 years of age. In Europe and North America the ratio of type 2 to type 1 is approximately 7:3.17 15 Disease Review Classification of Ziabetus 1. According to the presence or absence of sugar in the urine, Ziabetus is divided into two types:34 A) Ziabetus Sada (Diabetes insipidus), which is also called Ziabetus gair shakari. It is characterized by excessive thirst and excessive urination but there is no sugar in the urine. B) Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes mellitus), which is characterized by excessive thirst and urination and presence of sugar in the urine. 2. According to the khiffat and shiddat (intensity) of the sign and symptom it is also divided into two types:34,35 A) Ziabetus Haar: Acute symptoms of the Ziabetus with abrupt onset occur like excessive thirst (polydipsia) and increase urination (polyuria) with the symptom and sign of other sue mizaj haar like heat in flanks and dryness or the body, due to sue mizaj haar sada of kidneys. B) Ziabetus Barid: In which the thirst and frequency of urine is comparatively less. In the light of present science, the vast majority of cases of diabetes fall into one of two broad classes: Type 1 diabetes is characterized by an absolute deficiency of insulin caused by pancreatic Β cells destruction. It accounts for approximately 10% of all cases. This type of diabetes formerly called juvenile diabetes.21 Type 2 diabetes is caused by a combination of peripheral resistance to insulin action and an inadequate secretary response by the pancreatic β cells. Approximately 80% to 90% of patients have type 2 diabetes.18,19,21,36,37 16 Disease Review The American Diabetes Association classification scheme for diabetes mellitus is summarized and clinical diabetes is divided into four general subclasses: type 1, primarily caused by autoimmune pancreatic β cells destruction and characterized by absolute insulin deficiency; type 2, characterized by insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency; other specific types of diabetes (associated with identifiable clinical conditions or syndromes); and gestational diabetes mellitus.38 In addition to these clinical categories, two forms of pre-diabetes impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose have been defined to describe intermediate metabolic states between normal glucose homeostasis and overt diabetes. Both impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose significantly increase the future risk for development of diabetes mellitus and in many cases is part of the disease's natural history. Patients with any form of diabetes may require insulin therapy; for this reason, the previously used terms insulin dependent diabetes (for type 1) and non insulin dependent diabetes (for type 2) have been eliminated.38 Etiologic Classification of Diabetes Mellitus18,19,30,40 1. Type 1 Diabetes β cells destruction, leads to absolute insulin deficiency 2. Type 2 Diabetes Insulin resistance with relative insulin deficiency 3. Genetic Defects of β Cell Function Maturity onset diabetes of young (MODY), caused by mutations in: Hepatocyte nuclear factor [HNF]-4α (MODY1) Glucokinase (MODY2) Hepatocyte nuclear factor [HNF]-1α (MODY3) Insulin promoter factor [IPF-1] (MODY4) 17 Disease Review Hepatocyte nuclear factor [HNF]-1β (MODY5) Neurogenic differentiation factor [Neuro D1] (MODY6) Mitochondrial DNA mutations 4. Genetic Defects in Insulin Processing or Insulin Action Defects in proinsulin conversion Insulin gene mutations Insulin receptor mutations 5. Exocrine Pancreatic Defects Chronic pancreatitis Pancreatectomy Neoplasia Cystic fibrosis Hemochromatosis Fibrocalculous pancreatopathy 6. Endocrinopathies Growth hormone excess (acromegaly) Cushing syndrome Hyperthyroidism Pheochromocytoma Glucagonoma 7. Infections Cytomegalovirus Coxsackievirus B 8. Drugs Glucocorticoids 18 Disease Review Thyroid hormone β adrenergic agonists 9. Genetic Syndromes Associated with Diabetes Down syndrome Kleinfelter syndrome Turner syndrome 10. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus The term gestational diabetes mellitus describes women with abnormal glucose tolerance that appears or is first detected during pregnancy. Women with known diabetes before conception are not classified as having gestational diabetes. Gestational diabetes mellitus usually appears in the second or third trimester, when pregnancy-associated insulin antagonistic factors reach their peak. After delivery, glucose tolerance reverts to normal. However, within 10 years, type 2 diabetes develops in most women with prior gestational diabetes; on occasion, pregnancy can precipitate type 1 diabetes as well.39 Although patients with gestational diabetes generally present with mild, asymptomatic hyperglycemia, rigorous treatment is indicated to protect against hyperglycemia-associated fetal morbidity. Insulin is often required.36,38 19 Disease Review Physiology Unani Concepts The concept of Quwa is unique one in Tibb. The Quwa is a property of the body with which phenomenon of the life is manifested. The Quwa provide the basis for the different bodily functions. Each and every organ furnished with a power, Quwat (power) through which specific physiological functions are performed by that particular organ. These Quwa are specific for a particular tissue or organ on which the specific functions of that organ depend. The organ is the seat of Quwa (faculties) and Quwa give rise to functions.41,42 There are three major division of the Quwa (faculties) of the body. 1. Al Quwa at Tabi’yah (Natural faculties). 2. Al Quwa an Nafsaniyah (Psychic or mental faculties). 3. Al Quwa al Haywaniyah (Vital faculties). Al Quwa at Tabi’yah are those which are responsible for ingestion, digestion, absorption transformation (metabolism) and assimilation of ghiza (food) and excretion of waste products and preservation of the race also. According to the function Quwa at Tabi’yah have been divided by Ali Ibne Abbas into three faculties: Quwate Ghaziyah (nutritive faculty), Quwate Murabbiyah (growth faculty) and Quwate Muwallida (reproductive faculty). Quwate ghaziyah (nutritive faculty) is that which is responsible for ingestion, digestion, absorption transformation (metabolism) and assimilation of ghiza (food) and excretion of waste products. According to the function this faculty divided into four Quwa; Quwate Jazibah, Quwate masika, Quwate hazimah or Quwate 20 Disease Review mughayirah (power of digestion and transformation) and Quwate dafi’ah (power of propulsion and excretion). 1) Quwate Jaziba This is the power which absorbs the Akhlat and runs into the cells with help of various enzymes, hormones or simply through natural forces. 2) Quwate Masika This is the power which retains the Akhlat inside the cells for their Istahalah (metabolism). 3) Quwate Mughayirah This is the power which transforms the materials such as phosphorylation of glucose after entering the cells. 4) Quwate Dafi’ah The power which helps the cells and tissues to expel out the waste products produce in the course of istahalah (metabolism). Each and every organ furnished with a Quwat (power) as previously discussed through which specific physiological functions are performed. The organs of Quwate Hazima (A’zae Hazm) include Banqaras (pancreas) along with oral cavity, salivary glands, esophagus, stomach, intestines, liver and spleen. Liver is considered the main centre of Quwate Tabi’yah. According to the Abu Sahl Masihi each of the above four Quwa are in two folds, one is found in the gastrointestinal tract and liver, other in all the cells of the body. So the Quwa of all the cells of body absorb the food materials and Ruh and metabolize and transform them into various compounds and replace the wear and tear by producing the Quwat (energy) for the proper functioning of the body.41,42,43,44 21 Disease Review Above description of Quwa and its function described in Umoore Tabi’yah specially in the context of digestion and absorption of food materials from the GIT and transportation of it toward the tissues, absorption and retention of materials by the help of different Quwa into the cells can clearly understood. Attibbae Qadeem (Ancient physicians) had not described the exact physiology due to lack of advancement in the sciences, like today physicians can. Today phathophysiology of diabetes almost stabilized, role of pancreas and insulin and its peripheral resistance are revealed in the context of development of disease along with other causes in lesser extent. According to the modern Medicine Physiology are described below: Normal insulin physiology Normal glucose homeostasis is tightly regulated by three interrelated processes, glucose production in the liver, glucose uptake and utilization by peripheral tissues, chiefly skeletal muscle and actions of insulin and counter-regulatory hormones, including glucagon on glucose.45 Insulin and glucagon have opposing regulatory effects on glucose homeostasis. During fasting states, low insulin and high glucagon levels facilitate hepatic gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis while decreasing glycogen synthesis, thereby preventing hypoglycemia. Thus, fasting plasma glucose levels are determined primarily by hepatic glucose output. Following a meal, insulin levels rise and glucagon levels fall in response to the large glucose load. Insulin promotes glucose uptake and utilization in tissues. The skeletal muscle is the major insulinresponsive site for postprandial glucose utilization, and is critical for preventing hyperglycemia and maintaining glucose homeostasis.18,21,45 22 Disease Review Insulin Biosynthesis, Secretion and Action Biosynthesis: Insulin is produced in the beta cells of the pancreatic islets. It is initially synthesized as a single-chain 86-amino-acid precursor polypeptide, preproinsulin. The mature insulin molecule and C peptide are stored together and cosecreted from secretory granules in the beta cells is a useful marker of insulin secretion and allows discrimination of endogenous and exogenous sources of insulin in the evaluation of hypoglycemia.18,19 Secretion: Glucose is the key regulator of insulin secretion by the pancreatic beta cell, although amino acids, ketones, various nutrients, gastrointestinal peptides, and neurotransmitters also influence insulin secretion. Glucose levels 70 mg/dL stimulate insulin synthesis, primarily by enhancing protein translation and processing. Glucose stimulation of insulin secretion begins with its transport into the beta cell by a facilitative glucose transporter. Glucose phosphorylation by glucokinase is the ratelimiting step that controls glucose-regulated insulin secretion. Insulin secretory profiles reveal a pulsatile pattern of hormone release, with small secretory bursts occurring about every 10 min, superimposed upon greater amplitude oscillations of about 80-150 min. Incretins are released from neuroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract following food ingestion and amplify glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and suppress glucagon secretion. The Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), most potent incretin, are released from L cells in the small intestine and stimulates insulin secretion only when the blood glucose is above the fasting level. Action: Once insulin is secreted into the portal venous system, 50% is removed and degraded by the liver. Unextracted insulin enters the systemic circulation where it binds to receptors in target sites. Insulin binding to its receptor stimulates intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, leading to receptor autophosphorylation and the recruitment 23 Disease Review of intracellular signaling molecules, such as insulin receptor substrates (IRS). IRS and other adaptor proteins initiate a complex cascade of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions, resulting in the widespread metabolic and mitogenic effects of insulin. As an example, activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3′-kinase (PI3-kinase) pathway stimulates translocation of a facilitative glucose transporter to the cell surface, an event that is crucial for glucose uptake by skeletal muscle and fat. Activation of other insulin receptor signaling pathways induces glycogen synthesis, protein synthesis, lipogenesis, and regulation of various genes in insulin-responsive cells.18,19,21 24 Disease Review Aetiology and Pathogenesis Unani physicians Majoosi, Ibne Sina and Samarqandi described some underline etiopathogenesis in detail. It was supposed that the disease is related to kidney. The important etiological factors mentioned in Unani are following: Zofe Gurda (Weakness of Kidney) Water cannot be retained properly due to weakness in kidney and its Quwate masika (retentive faculty) and kidney are unable to metabolize the water which is coming from liver.23,26,27,46 Ittesae Gurda wa Majrae Bole (Dilatation of Kidney and Tubule) Water cannot be retained for long/required time due to dilatation of Gurda wa Majrae Baul (Dilatation of Kidney and Tubule) so it passed out rapidly (polyuria).24,27,46 Baroodate Badan, Jigar wa Gurda Sometime Ziabetus develops due to excessive exposure of cold of whole body or liver or kidney, which leads to sue mizaj barid (cold derangement in temperament).24,27,35,47 Sue Mizaj Haar Gurda (Hot derangement in temperament of Kidney) Kidneys absorb water in very excess amount from circulation due to excessive hotness or derangement in temperament so they cannot retain much amount of fluid and pass in the form of urine frequently (polyuria) and patient drinks water frequently (polydipsia) to overcome his thirst.26,45,46 Sue Mizaj Barid Gurda (Cold Derangement in Temperament of Kidney) Sometime Ziabetus develops due to excessive exposure of cold to kidneys which may leads to sue mizaj barid (cold derangement in temperament).23,27 25 Disease Review According to the modern Medicine etiology and pathogenesis are described below: I. predisposing factors Susceptibility of diabetes increase in following population, specially type 2 diabetes mellitus:18,36,38,49,50,53,57,58 Peoples who are 45 years or over Peoples who are overweight Peoples who have IGT (impaired glucose tolerance) Peoples who have a family history of diabetes Peoples who are physically inactive habitually Peoples who had gestational diabetes Peoples who are hypertensive Peoples who are dyslipidemic II. Pathogenesis A) Type1 diabetes mellitus This form of diabetes results from a severe lack of insulin caused by an immunologically mediated destruction of β cells. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which islet destruction is caused primarily by T lymphocytes reacting against as yet poorly defined β cell antigens. As in all autoimmune diseases, genetic susceptibility and environmental factors play important roles in the pathogenesis.18,19,21,49, i) Mechanisms of β Cells Destruction Although the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes is abrupt, this disease in fact results from a chronic autoimmune attack on β cells that usually starts many years before the disease becomes evident. The classic manifestations of the disease (hyperglycemia 26 Disease Review and ketosis) occur late in its course, after more than 90% of the β cells have been destroyed. Following mechanisms contribute to β cells destruction: ■ T lymphocytes react against β cell antigens and cause cell damage. These T cells include (1) CD4+ T cells of the TH 1 subset, which cause tissue injury by activating macrophages, and (2) CDR+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which directly kill β cells and also secrete cytokines that activate macrophages. ■ Locally produced cytokines damage β cells. Among the cytokines implicated in the cell injury are IFN-y, produced by T cells, and TNF and IL-1, produced by macrophages that are activated during the immune reaction. ■ Autoantibodies against islet cells and insulin are also detected in the blood of 70% to 80% of patients. The autoantibodies are reactive with a variety of β cell antigens, including GAD. ii) Genetic Susceptibility Type 1 diabetes has a complex pattern of genetic associations, and putative susceptibility genes have been mapped to at least 20 loci. Many of these associations are with chromosomal regions, and the particular genes involved are not known yet. Of the multiple loci that are associated with the disease, by far the most important is the class II MHC (HLA) locus; according to some estimates, the MHC contributes about half the genetic susceptibility, and all the other genes combined make up the other half.18,19,21,49 iii) Environmental Factors There is evidence that environmental factors, especially infections, are involved in triggering autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes and other autoimmune diseases. Epidemiologic studies suggest a role of viruses." Seasonal trends that often 27 Disease Review correspond to the prevalence of common viral infections have long been noted in the diagnosis of new cases, as has the association between coxsackieviruses of group B and pancreatic diseases, including diabetes. Other implicated viral infections include mumps, measles, cytomegalovirus, rubella, and infectious mononucleosis.18,19,21 B) Type 2 diabetes mellitus The pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes remains enigmatic. Environmental factors, such as a sedentary life style and dietary habits, clearly play a role, as will become evident when obesity is considered. Nevertheless, genetic factors are even more important than in type 1 diabetes. i) Insulin resistance: A decreased ability of peripheral tissues to respond to insulin. ii) β cell dysfunction that is manifested as inadequate insulin secretion in the face of insulin resistance and hyperglycemia. In most cases, insulin resistance is the primary event, and is followed by increasing degrees of β cell dysfunction i) Insulin Resistance One of the main conditions exhibited in type II diabetes is insulin resistance. Although the causes may diverse due to the genetics aspects, it is commonly exhibited throughout diverse ethnic backgrounds. It is also affected by the environment in the form of diet and exercise; hence it plays a key role in type II diabetes. Insulin resistance is defined as resistance to the effects of insulin on glucose uptake, metabolism, or storage. Insulin resistance is a characteristic feature of most patients with type 2 diabetes and is an almost universal finding in diabetic individuals who are obese. The role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes can be gauged from the findings that (1) insulin resistance is often detected 10 to 20 years before the onset of diabetes in predisposed individuals (e.g. offspring of type 2 diabetics) and (2) in prospective studies, insulin resistance is the best predictor for 28 Disease Review subsequent progression to diabetes. Insulin resistance leads to decreased uptake of glucose in muscle and adipose tissues and an inability of the hormone to suppress hepatic gluconeogenesis. It is recognized that insulin resistance is a complex phenomenon.18,19,21,49,50,61 ii) Obesity and Insulin Resistance The association of obesity with type 2 diabetes has been recognized for decades, visceral obesity being a common phenomenon in the majority of type 2 diabetics. The link between obesity and diabetes is mediated via effects on insulin resistance. Insulin resistance is present even in simple obesity unaccompanied by hyperglycemia, indicating a fundamental abnormality of insulin signaling in states of fatty excess. The risk for diabetes increases as the body mass index (a measure of body fat content) increases. Central obesity (abdominal fat) is more likely to be linked with insulin resistance than are peripheral (gluteal/subcutaneous) fat depots.18,19,21,49,50 29 Disease Review Clinical Features In Unani literature some clinical features of Ziabetus are commonly described:24,27,30,35,47 Increased frequency of micturition Excessive thirst (which cannot be easily quenched by drinking water) Dryness of mouth and whole body Ants and flies are attracted to the urine The onset of type 1 diabetes is usually quite dramatic with weight loss, polyuria, and polydipsia. Often, it is precipitated by an infection or other severe physical stress because patients lack the reserve of endogenous insulin secretion to overcome the effects of counter-regulatory hormones on glucose metabolism. Severe dehydration and ketoacidosis may be present. Type 2 usually has an insidious onset. The body will attempt to dilute the high level of glucose in the blood, a condition called hyperglycemia, by drawing water out of the cells and into the blood stream in an effort to dilute the sugar and excrete it in the urine. It is not unusual for people with undiagnosed diabetes to be constantly thirsty, drink large quantities of water, and urinate frequently as their bodies try to get rid of the extra glucose. This creates high levels of glucose in the urine. Patients may complain of blurring of vision, myopia, episodes of recurrent skin infections, or monilial vaginitis (females) or balanitis (males). Occasionally, patients may present with evidence of chronic diabetic complications (neuropathy, nephropathy, or retinopathy) but without symptoms related to glucose intolerance. Symptoms such as polyuria, polydipsia, and polyphagia may only develop in situations of increased insulin resistance such as pregnancy, infection, or steroid use.51,52,53,54,56,57,57,58,61 30 Disease Review Complications Complication of Ziabetus is specially enumerated by Ismail Jurjani, that is the Zooban (Emaciation of the body), develops due to excessive dehydration of the body which cannot overcome by intake of water.27 Further, Ibne Sina elucidated other specific complication of diabetes, such as collapse of the sexual functions and diabetic gangrene.7,23 Both complication are develops as a sequel of neuropathy.58 In the light of present etiepathology, complications of diabetes can be divided into two types:58,59,63,64 Acute complications Chronic complications I. Acute Complications Diabetic ketoacidosis Nonketotic hyperosmolar coma Hypoglycaemia Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Nonketotic Hyperosmolar Coma Diabetic ketoacidosis and nonketotic hyperosmolar coma are potentially fatal complications of diabetes. The distinction between ketoacidosis and nonketotic diabetic coma is not absolute; mild ketonemia may be present in patients with a hyperosmolar state. Diabetic ketoacidosis is more common in type 1 diabetes and occurs in up to 5% of type 1 diabetes patients per year. II. Chronic Complications 58,59,63,64 Macrovascular complications Microvascular complications 31 Disease Review A. Macrovascular Disease i) Coronary Artery Disease and Stroke Myocardial infarction and stroke occur more frequently, at an earlier age, and with greater severity in diabetic men and women than in nondiabetic persons. Even patients with impaired glucose tolerance are at a greater risk for the development of atherosclerosis. Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of mortality in people with diabetes. Because of autonomic neuropathy, myocardial ischemia or frank infarction in diabetes may be asymptomatic; it may present as diabetic ketoacidosis or be diagnosed incidentally by a routine electrocardiogram.18,19,20,58,59 ii) Peripheral Vascular Disease Involvement of large or medium-sized blood vessels in the lower limbs is a common complication of diabetes. A diagnosis of arterial insufficiency is suggested by a history of claudication. Physical examination reveals absent or weak peripheral pulses. Patients with peripheral vascular disease often cannot supply the increased blood flow needed to heal foot infections, such as cellulitis and ulcerations. The inability to heal these infections leads to osteomyelitis, gangrene, and amputations.18,19,20,58,59 B. Microvascular Disease i) Diabetic Retinopathy Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of blindness. However, with yearly ophthalmologic examinations and preventive eye care, significant vision loss is prevented in all but a small fraction of patients. Diabetic retinopathy has two stages: Background retinopathy and Proliferative retinopathy. Background retinopathy may progress to the proliferative stage and cause vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, 32 Disease Review and vision loss. In addition to retinopathy, cataracts and glaucoma are more prevalent in the diabetic population.18,19,20,58,59 ii) Diabetic Nephropathy Diabetic nephropathy is often present along with retinopathy, and occurs in approximately one third of patients. The specific lesion of diabetic nephropathy is nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson lesion), visible on light microscopy as a rounded hyaline mass at the center of the glomerular lobules. More common, but less specific, is diffuse glomerulosclerosis with thickening of the glomerular basement membrane and an increased mesangial matrix. Microalbuminuria (20 to 300 mg per 24 hours) is signs of future development of gross proteinuria. Progressive nephropathy results in heavy proteinuria and the development of nephrotic syndrome, which typically progresses to renal failure and the need for hemodialysis within 5 years. iii) Diabetic Neuropathy Diabetic neuropathy affects both the peripheral and the autonomic nervous systems. a) Peripheral Neuropathy Distal, symmetric polyneuropathy is the most common form of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. It usually occurs in a stocking-glove distribution with numbness, tingling, burning, and/or pain in the feet and lower legs. Tendon reflexes and response to sensory stimuli, particularly vibration, are decreased. Patients with peripheral neuropathy are at risk for long-term complications of infection and amputation, especially if peripheral vascular disease coexists. Focal peripheral neuropathies include mononeuropathies and entrapment syndromes. Examples of focal neuropathies are femoral and cranial nerve palsies, especially the 33 Disease Review third nerve. Carpal tunnel syndrome is an example of an entrapment syndrome and is more common in diabetic patients.18,19,20,58,59 b) Autonomic Neuropathies Autonomic neuropathies can affect nearly all organs, more notably the skin, the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems. Diminished sweating of the feet can result in drying, cracking, and ulcer formation. Diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy may present with postural hypotension (without compensatory tachycardia). Gastroparesis presents as early satiety, vomiting after meals, and increasing frequency of hypoglycemic episodes. Patients may also experience alternating bouts of diarrhea and constipation (enteropathy). Bacterial overgrowth secondary to stasis may contribute to diarrhea. Impotence, with preserved libido, is a common manifestation of diabetic autonomic neuropathy and affects 75% of diabetic men 60 to 65 years old. Neurogenic bladder may also occur.18,19,20,58,59 34 Disease Review Diagnostic Criteria The diagnosis of diabetes is established by noting elevation of blood glucose by any one of three criteria: 1. A random glucose >200 mg/dl, with classical signs and symptoms 2. A fasting glucose >126 mg/dl on more than one occasion 3. HbA1c >6.5 % An abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), in which the glucose is > 200 mg/dl 2 hours after a standard carbohydrate load. Individuals with fasting glucoses greater than 110 mg/dl but less than 126 mg/dl, or OGTT values greater than 140 mg/dl but less than 200 mg/dl are considered to have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).16,36,37,38,39,60 35 Disease Review Management Physical Activity Physical activity is an essential component of a healthy life-style and important to achieve a better self-management of diabetes mellitus.16,19,20,38,50 Nutritional Therapy for Diabetes: Emphasis should be placed on maintenance of desired weight and glucose, lipid and blood pressure goals. Loss of 10% of current weight was shown to improve diabetes control. Strategies may be aimed at improving food selection (e.g., reducing dietary fats and saturated fats), spreading meals throughout the day, and incorporating regular exercise habits. If dietary and behavioural intervention is not successful, an antidiabetic agent may be needed.58,62 Diet: A well-balanced, nutritious diet remains a fundamental element of therapy. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends about 45–65% of total daily calories in the form of carbohydrates; 25–35% in the form of fat of which < 7% are from saturated fat, and 10–35% in the form of protein. In patients with type 2 diabetes, limiting the carbohydrate intake and substituting some of the calories with monounsaturated fats, such as olive oil, rapeseed (canola) oil, or the oils in nuts and avocados, can lower triglycerides and increase HDL cholesterol. In obese individuals with diabetes, an additional goal is weight reduction by caloric restriction.58,62 The current recommendations for both types of diabetes continue to limit cholesterol to 300 mg daily, and individuals with LDL cholesterol more than 100 mg/dl should limit dietary cholesterol to 200 mg daily. 36 Disease Review High protein intake may cause progression of kidney disease in patients with diabetic nephropathy; for these individuals, a reduction in protein intake to 0.8 kg/day or about 10% of total calories daily is recommended. Dietary fiber: Plant components such as cellulose, gum, and pectin are indigestible by humans and are termed dietary "fiber." Insoluble fibers such as cellulose or hemicellulose, as found in bran, tend to increase intestinal transit and may have beneficial effects on colonic function. In contrast, soluble fibers such as gums and pectins, as found in beans, oatmeal, or apple skin, tend to retard nutrient absorption rates so that glucose absorption is slower and hyperglycemia may be slightly diminished. Although its recommendations do not include insoluble fiber supplements such as added bran, the ADA recommends food such as oatmeal, cereals, and beans with relatively high soluble fiber content as staple components of the diet in diabetics. High soluble fiber content in the diet may also have a favorable effect on blood cholesterol levels. 58,62 Artificial and other sweeteners: Aspartame (NutraSweet) consists of two major amino acids, aspartic acid and phenylalanine, which combine to produce a sweetener 180 times as sweet as sucrose. A major limitation is that it is not heat stable, so it cannot be used in cooking. Saccharin (Sweet 'N Low), Sucralose (Splenda), Acesulfame potassium (Sweet One), and rebiana (Truvia) are other "artificial" sweeteners that can be used in cooking and baking. Fructose represents a "natural" sugar substance that is a highly effective sweetener, induces only slight increases in plasma glucose levels, and does not require insulin for its metabolism. However, because of potential adverse effects of large amounts of fructose on raising serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol, it does not 37 Disease Review have any advantage as a sweetening agent in the diabetic diet. This does not prevent, however, ingestion of fructose-containing fruits and vegetables or fructose-sweetened foods in moderation. 58,62 Micronutrients: Two minerals commonly mentioned in relation to diabetes are chromium and magnesium. Chromium deficiency has been related, hypothetically, to development of diabetes in humans for many years, but persuasive studies in Western people are not available for recommendation of chromium supplementation for diabetic individuals. The chromium replacement has beneficial effect on glycemic control is for people who are chromium deficient as a result of long-term chromium-deficient parenteral nutrition. However, it appears that most people with diabetes are not chromium deficient, and thus chromium supplementation cannot be routinely recommended. Similarly, although magnesium deficiency may play a role in insulin resistance, carbohydrate intolerance, and hypertension, the available data suggest routine evaluation of serum magnesium levels only in patients at high risk for magnesium deficiency. Magnesium should be repleted only if hypomagnesemia is demonstrated. The magnesium question is controversial, and the ADA held a consensus conference in 1992 and recommended measuring serum magnesium in persons at risk for magnesium deficiency. Potassium loss may be sufficient to warrant dietary supplementation in patients taking diuretics. Nutritional recommendations for adults with diabetes Fat: 20–35% of total caloric intake Saturated fat < 7% of total calories <200 mg/day of dietary cholesterol 38 Disease Review Minimal trans fat consumption Carbohydrate: 45–65% of total caloric intake (low-carbohydrate diets are not recommended) Protein: 10–35% of total caloric intake (high-protein diets are not recommended) Other components: Fiber-containing foods may reduce postprandial glucose excursions nonnutrient sweeteners Treatment in Unani medicine Tadabeer: Ziabetus Haar: Hammame Garm, Fasde Basalique35 Ziabetus Barid: Tabreed wa Tarteeb, Stay in cold and wet air, Cold Aabzan23,27,46,35 Mufradat: Aabe Kaddu Biriyan, Aabe Khayar with Isapghol, Aabe Anaar Tursh, Aabe Toot, Aabe Aalubukhara, Rubbe Anaar, Arqe Gulab, Arade Jaw etc. Murakkabat: Qurse Gulnar, Qurse Tabasheer, Qurse Kafoor, Qurse Ziabetus etc.23,27,35 39 Drug review Gilo Introduction: Gilo is a well known drug in Unani medicine. The plant is a climbing shrub growing in deciduous and dry forest. Gilo was included in the Bengal pharmacopoeia of 1844 and the Indian pharmacopoeia of 1868.65 The Satte Gilo (starch) is obtained from the roots and stems of the plant are similar to Arrow-root in appearance and effect. It is used in the treatment of various diseases, particularly common fever, malarial fever, Diabetes, cuts and wounds. Botanical Name: Tinospora cordifolia66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73 Family: Menispemaceae66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73 Distribution: Found throughout tropical India,74 Maynmar, Andman and Ceylon. Ascending to the altitude of 900 meter.74,75 Vernacular Names:65,66,67,71,76,77 Assamese: Siddhilate, Amarlata Bengali: Gulancha, Giloe, Gurach, Gadancha, Guluncha, Ningilo, Golancha Bombay: Ambravel, Gharol, Giroli, Guloe, Gulwel Burmese: Singomoni Ceylon : Chintil China: K`uan chu Hsing English: Gulancha Tinospora French : Culancha Gujarati: Galac, Garo, Gado, Galo, Gulo, Gulwel Hindi: Ambarvel, Giloe, Gurcha, Gurach, Gulancha, Gubel, 40 Drug review Gurudvel, Gulvel Kannada: Amrutoballi, Amrulballi, Madhuparne, Uganiballi Kashmiri: Amrita, Gilo, Bark Kumaon: Gulancha, Guracha Malayalam: Amrytu, Peyamarytam, Sittamrytu Marathi: Ambarvel, Gharol, Giroli, Gulvel, Guloe Nepali: Gurjo Persian: Gulbel Punjabi: Batindu, Gilo, Garham, Garum, Gilo-Gularish Sanskrit : Amrita, Amritalata, Chakrangi, Dhira, Guluchi, Kundalli Sikkim : Gurjo Sindhi: Sutgilo Tamil: Amridavalli, Kaipruchindil, Chindal, Seendal, Sindil Silam, Kodi, Amudam, Asasi, Kunali, Sadi, Telegu: Thippateega, Guduchi, Madhuka, Manpala, Somida Urdu: Gilo Uriya: Guluchi, Gulochi Mahiyat (Morphology): Botanical Description: Gilo is succulent glabrous deciduous climbing shrub pealing of ash coloured bark. The flowers are small and yellow or greenish-yellow in colour. The fruits are small and red in colour. Stem: The stem is succulent, croky and grooved with long pendulous fleshy roots from the branches.78 Leaves: The leaves are simple, alternate, extipulate, membranous and 7-8 nerved.65,78 41 Drug review Flowers: The flowers are small and yellow or greenish-yellow in colour. There are axillary and terminal racemes or racemose panicles. Flowering in April. 65,78 Fruit: The fruits are drupe, ovoid, glossy, succulent, pea-sized and red coloured on maturity.65,78 Macroscopic Studies Macroscopically the stems are succulent, soft, possessing long, filiform, aerial root arising from branches. Bark warty, creamish white or grey brown; wood soft, perforated. Dried sample consists of 5 to 10cm long conical pieces, light in weight; bark light and papery, brittle, dark brown; wood with longitudinal surface ridges, and radially divided into wedge shaped pieces in cross-sections. Pieces difficult to fracture when fully dried and can be torn only by twisting; odourless; taste bitter.79 Microscopic Studies Transverse section shows cork, cortex and vasculature. The cork tissue is broken at some places due to tenticele cortex is wide. The outer zone of cortex consists of 3 to 5 rows of irregularly arranged tangentially elongated chlorenchymatous cell. Several secretory cells found scattered in the cortex. Vascular zone is composed of discrete vascular strands, with 10 to 12 or more wedge shaped strip of phloem, alternating with wide medullary rays.80 Seeds: The seeds are curved.65,78 Part Used: Leaf, stem, stem bark and root.66,74,77,81,82 Mizaj: Har1 Yabis1 Har1 Ratab1 23,27,27,47 23,47 Murakkabul Quwa47 Af’al (Actions): 1. Dafae Bukhar (Antipyretic)23,30,27,47,65,67,69,73,77,86 42 Drug review 2. Musakkine Alam (Analgesic)73,69,86 3. Muqawie Bah (Aphrodisiac)65,69,71,81,83,84,86,88,89 4. Qabiz (Astringent)65,69,76,90 5. Mudirre Baol (Diuretic)65,66,67,68,76,85 6. Dafae Suaale (Antitussive)83,89 7. Kasire Riyah (Carminative)84 8. Dafe Atshak (Antisyphilitic) 66,6975,76,78,90 9. Dafae Sozak (Useful in gonorrhea)69,70,77,85,87,88,89,90 10. Ma’ane Naubat (Antiperiodic)65,66,69,79,83,84,85 11. Mussaffie Dam (Blood purifier)76,78,85,89,90 12. Qatile Kirmeshikam (Antihelminthic)76,77,85,90 13. Mukhrije Balgham84 14. Muqawwie Meda76,85,90 15. Mushtahi (Appetizer)84,88 16. Muhallile Awram (Anti-inflammatory)69,73,76,77,89 17. Mowallide Mani (Spermatogouge)84,88 18. Mudire Haiz (Amenogouge)85 Istemaal (Uses): 1. Tape Damwi 83,84 8. Yarqaan65,69,70,77,84,88,89 2. Tape Safrawi 83,84,88 9. Kirme Shikam81,85,65,76 3. Alam69,77,83,89 10. Is’hale Muzmin65,69,71,76,77,84,87,90 4. Zo’fe Bah81,84,88 11. Qillate Mani84,88 5. Aatshak66,69,75,77,78 12. Hararate Jigar88 6. Sozaak69,70,71,85,87,88 13. Ghashi84,88 7. Bawaaseer65,67,69,77,84 14. Hirqatul Baol85 43 Drug review 15. Shozishe Dil wa Jigar83 16. Niqris66,68,69,77,86 17. Zo’fe Ishteha84,88 Ethnobotanical Actions: 1. Hypoglyceamic65,67,68,69,77,82,86 11. Alterative69,91 2. Hypocholesterolimic68 12. Antispasmodic69,91 3. Immunostimulant 68,69,77 13. Antiviral69 4. Tonic65,67,68,69,70,75,78,83,89,91 14. Antiulcer68 5. Antiinflammatory73,86,91 15. Stimulant91 6. Antacid83,86 16. Bronchodialator68 7. Antioxidant68,69 17. Lipolytic69 8. Deobstruent69 18. Nutritious83 9. Antibacterial 69,77 19. Hepatoprotective69 10. Antiallergic68 Ethnobotanical Uses: 1. Fever65, 66,67,76,77,82,87,91 12. Escherichia68,69,77 2. Intermittent fever66,75 13. Fracture68,77 3. Diabetes65,67,68,69,77,82,91 14. Giddiness77 4. Debility65,66,75,77,78 15. Inflammation73,76,86,91 5. Dyspepsia65,66,77,79 16. Nausea68,69,77,78 6. Anemia67,69,77 17. Vomiting67,77 7. Diarrhea83,84 18. Rheumatism65,68,69,70,75,79,87 8. Cough66,67,68,77,83,84,88 19. Leucorrhoea68,82,91 9. Dysentery65,69,71,76,77,87 20. Stress68,77 10. Dysuria69,77 21. Hypertension65 11. Erysipelas65,68,69,77 22. Snake bite67,69,75,77 44 Drug review 23. Tuberculosis69,77,84 25. Filaria77 24. Spermatorrhoea69,82 Miqdare khuraq (Dose): Up to 2 Masha of Satte Gilo83 Muzir Asrat (Adverse effects): Various Unani physicians stated that Gilo has almost no side effect84 except Muqi.85 Musleh (Correctives): Tabasheer and Dana Heel.83,84,85 Bitter83 Taste: Badal (Substitute): Gilo83,84 Murakkabat: Safoofe Satte Gilo81 Lauq Motadil93 Arqe Badawar Shikai81 Safoofe Ziabetus94 Arqe Gilo81,95 Fawakehe Satte Gilo94 Lauq Sapistan93,94 Keemiyai ajza (Chemical constituents): A variety of constituents have been isolated from Tinospora cordifolia plant and their structures were elucidated. They belong to different classes such as alkaloids, diterpenoid lactones, glycosides, steroids, sesquiterpenoid, phenolics, aliphatic compounds and polysaccharides.66,71,77,78 The stem contains alkaloidal constituents, including berperine; bitter principles, including berbrin, columbin, chasmenthin, palmerin, tinosporin, tinosporol, tinosporid, tinosporon, tinosporic acid, tinosporidine, columbin, chasmanthin, giloin, giloin1,2-substituted pyrrolidine, norclerodanediterpene-O-glocoside,cordifolide, unosporin cordifol, cordifolone, magnoflorine, tembitarine, cordifoliosides A and tinosporol.66,71,77,78 45 Drug review Scientific Reports Hypoglycemic activity: The methanol extract of Tinospora cordifolia stem was found to exhibit a signifying hypoglycemic and antioxidant activity in alloxan induced diabetic rats.96 Oral administration of the water extract of Tinospora cordifolia root caused a significant reduction in blood glucose, brain lipid level, hepatic glucose-6phosphatase, serum acid phosphatase, alkaline and lactate dehydrogenase and increase in body weight, total haemoglobin and hepatic hexokinase in alloxanized diabetic rats. 97 Tinospora cordifolia shows hypoglycemic activity possibly by stimulating endogenous insulin secretion by altering the cell membrane permeability. 98 The petroleum ether extract of Tinospora cartdifolia stem administered to rats significantly decreased the glucose, triglycerides and body weight, and increased the HDL-cholesterol levels. 99 Compound tinosporaside isolated from the n-butanol fraction of the stem of T. cordifolia exhibited significant antihyperglycemic activity in streptozotocin-model which is comparable to metformin.100 Various studies demonstrate amelioration of experimental diabetic neuropathy and gastropathy in rats, reduction of blood sugar in alloxan-induced hyperglycemic rats and rabbits, significant reduction in blood glucose and brain lipids, increase in glucose tolerance in rodents, increase in glucose metabolism, inhibitory effect on adrenaline-induced hyperglycemia by pyrrolidine derivative, and significant hypoglycemic effect in normal and alloxan diabetic rabbits following administration of T. cordifolia.101,102,103,104 46 Drug review Anti Allergic Activity In a clinical study, 100% relief was reported from sneezing in 83% of the patients on treatment with T. cordifolia,. Thus T. cordifolia significantly decreased all symptoms of allergic rhinitis and was well tolerated.105 Cardioprotective Activity A dose-dependent reduction in infarct size and in serum and heart lipid peroxide levels were observed with prior treatment with T. cordifolia in ischemia-reperfusioninduced myocardial infarction in rats.106 The stem extract has been normalize alterations in the lipid metabolism caused by diabetes mellitus in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats indirectly benefiting the heart.107 Hepatoprotective The hepatoprotective action of T. cordifolia was reported in one of the experiment in which goats treated with T. cordifolia have shown significant clinical and hematobiochemical improvement in CCl4 induced hepatopathy. Extract of T. cordifolia has also exhibited in vitro inactivating property against Hepatitis B and E surface antigen in 48-72 Hours.108 Anti-stress and tonic property The anti-stress and tonic property of the plant was clinically tested and it was found that it brought about good response in children with moderate degree of behaviour disorders and mental deficit. It has also significantly improved the I.Q. levels. 109 Antispasmodic The aqueous extract of the stem antagonizes the effect of agonists such as 5 hydroxytryptamine, histamine, bradykinin and prostaglandins E1 and E2 on the rabbit 47 Drug review smooth muscle, relaxes the intestinal, uterine smooth muscle and inhibits the constrictor response of histamine and acetylcholine on smooth muscle. 109 Anti-inflammatory The alcoholic extract of T. cordifolia has been found to exert anti-inflammatory actions in models of acute and subacute inflammation. 110 Antineoplastic Activity Intraperitoneal injection of the alcoholic extract of T. cordifolia has been shown to Dalton's lymphoma (DL) bearing mice stimulated macrophage functions like phagocytosis, antigen-presenting ability and secretion of Interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and Reference Nutrient Intake (RNI) as well as slowed tumor growth and increased lifespan of the tumor-bearing host. 111 Osteoprotective Activity Rats treated with T. cordifolia showed an osteoprotective effect, as the bone loss in tibiae was slower than that in controls. Serum osteocalcin and cross-laps levels were significantly reduced. This study demonstrates that extract of T. cordifolia has the potential for being used as antiosteoporotic agent.112 Antifertility Activity Oral administration of 70% methanolic extract of T. cordifolia stem to male rats at a dose level of 100 mg/d for 60 days did not cause body weight loss but decreased the weight of testes, epididymis, seminal vesicle and ventral prostate in a significant manner.113 Anti Ulcer Activity Treatment with a formulation containing T. cordifolia has been shown to reduce ulcer index total acidity,with an increase in the pH of gastric fluid in pylorus-ligated rats and in the ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury in rats.114 48 Drug review Anti Leprotic Activity T. cordifolia is used for its kushtahara (anti-leprotic) properties, along with wide use in kandu and visarpa (types of skin disorders) and has been shown to exert antileprotic activity in a combination formulation.115 Diuretic Activity In a scientific study on rats and human volunteers, T. cordifolia was found to have diuretic effects.116 It was also found effective in modulation of morphology and some gluconeogenic enzymes activity in diabetic rat kidney. 117 49 Drug review Tabasheer Introduction: Tabasheer is a well known drug in Unani medicine. It is obtained from the stem’s internodes of Bambusa bambos, a genus of large erect some-times climbing plants, known as bamboos, found in tropical, sub tropical and moist part of Asia, Africa and America. Approximately 33 species occurs in India. Bambusa bambos syn. B. arundinacea is a graceful, spinous bamboo, distributed throughout the moist part of India, upto an altitude of 1250 meter, particularly near river banks and on the hills of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. It possesses property like Mufarreh Qalb, Mubarrid, Muqawwie qalb wa jigar and Muqawwie meda and mainly used in the treatment of various diseases, particularly in palpitation, fever and dyspepsia. Botanical Name: Bambusa bambos68,69,71,73,76 Family: Gramineae68,69,71,73,76 Vernacular Names:76,77,78,91 Arabi: Tabasghir, Qasab Assami: Kotoha, Bnah, Kata, Koto, Kotoha Bengali: Bans, Behurbans, Ketua, Kutuasi, Bansha English: Spiny Bamboo, Thorny Bamboo, Bamboo Gujrati: Toncor, Wans, Gemeiner Bambos, Bans Hindi: Bans, Kanta Bans, Kattang, Magarbans, Malbans Kanada: Biduri Malyalam: Illi, Kampu, Kaniyaram, Karmmaram, Mula, Mulmulam, Pattil, Tejanam, Trinadhavajan, Valiyamula, Venu Mungil, Moongil Marathi: Dougi, Kalak, Mangda, Padhai, Conogui, Kanaki, Vellu, Bans, Bambu 50 Drug review Punjabi: Magar Tamil: Onteveduru, Ambal, Ambu, Aril, Iraivarai, Kalai, Kambul, Mulai, Bongu, Kuluaimungil, Masukkaram, Miruttusam, Nettil, Tattai, Panai, Valai, Vanu, Viyal, Vindil, Mungil, Mangal, Moongilanisi, Moongiluppu Telgu: Bongu, Bonguveduru, Kichaakmu, Amskaramu, Mudusuveduru, Petiveduru, Trinadhvajamu, Veduru, Bonga, Vedurubeeam, Vederuppu Botanical description: Leaves: Linear or linearlanceolate, 7-18 cm in length and 2-20 mm in width.66,67,68 Rhizomes: Short stout, knotty; culms dense, reaching 24-30 m in height and 15-17 cm in diameter, green hollow, purplish green when young, turning golden yellow, with prominent nodesand long internodes, lower once rooting.67,68,77,78 Flowers: It flowers gregariously once in 30-45 years, occurs in large penicles, sometimes occupying the whole stem. Flowering in the summer season and fruits later on.68,78 Distribution: A common bamboo found throughout India, up to an altitude of 1250 meter particularly near the river banks, in Central and South India on the Nilgiri66 Also cultivated in many places in North West India and Bengal. It is also found in Sri Lanka, Malasia, Peru and Myanmar.67,71 Cultivation: It is cultivated only in the lower Himalayas and in the valleys of Ganges and Indus.77,78 Part Used: Leaf, roof, shoot, seed and tabasheer.77,78 51 Drug review Tabasheer The bamboo manna or tabasheer is the siliceous secretion found in the internodes of the stems.68,118 It is a white camphor like crystalline in appearance, slightly sticky to the tongue and sweet in the taste. 77,118,119 It is consist of irregularly shaped fragments of an opaque white or bluish opalescent colour, the larger pieces are about an inch in diameter, concavo-convex, and have evidently drived their form from the joint of the bamboo in which the deposit has collected.70 Chemical constituent Tabasheer- Silica 90.56%, Potash 1.10%, peroxide of Iron 0.90%, Almina 0.40% Moiture 4.87%.66,77 Taste: Sweet Mizaj: Sard3 Khushk3 83 Sard2 Khushk3 23,120 Musleh: Mastagi, Honey and Unnab. 23,120 Badal: Tukhme Khurfa biriyan, Simaq, Gile Makhtoom and Sandal safed.23,83,84,85,88 Murakkabat: Habbe Jadwar93,121 Habbe Paan94 Khameera Marwareed93,123 Habbe Amber Momiyai95 Jawarish Anarain93,95,123 Habbe Ghafis94 Jawarish Ood Tursh93,95,121 Dawaul Misk Sada94,123 Jawarish Tamrhindi95,121 Dawaul Misk Motadil94,123 Safoofe Kushta Qalai,93,123 Dawaul Misk Jawaharwali94,123 Qurse Sartaan Kafoori93 Safoofe Teen94,95 Jawarish Tabasheer95,121,122,123 52 Drug review Doses: 3.5-7 Masha, 1-3 gm67,78 Af’al: 1. Qabiz (Astringent)23,83,92,124 2. Mufarreh Qalb83,84,88 3. Mubarrid (Cooling effect)23,90 4. Muqqawwie Qalb wa Jigar (Tonic for heart and liver)23,66,84,85,88,90,120,124,125 5. Muqqawwie Meda23,83,85,124 6. Mussakkine Astash23,83,84,88,90,120,125 Ethanobotanical Actions: 1. Hypoglycaemic118 7. Antiinflammatory77 2. Emmenagogue66,68,71,91,126 8. Ulcer healing77 3. Anthelmintic66,68,91 9. Antinfertility77 4. Blood purifier68 10. Stimulant66,91 5. Febrifuge66,68 11. Antispasmodic66 6. Analgesic77 12. Sedative66 Actions of Tabasheer: 1. Tonic67,70,71 5. Expectorant67 2. Cooling67,70 6. Carminative67 3. Aphrodisiac67,71,77 7. Antipyretic71,77 4. Astringent66,68,70,90 Ethnobotnical Uses: 1. Haematemesis66,70,71,126 5. Gonorrhea66,68,91 2. Haemoptysis66 6. Palpitation66 3. Cold and cough66,67,70,71,126 7. Vomiting66 4. Ulcer77,78 8. Thread worms66 53 Drug review 9. Leukoderma78 10. Ring worm78 Uses of Tabasheer: 1. Fever66,68,71,77 2. Cough67,71 3. Asthma66,67,77 4. Leprosy66,77,78,91 5. Anaemia77 6. Burning sensation77 7. Snake and Scorpion bite66,77 8. Thirst66,70 9. Urinary infection67 10. Debilitating diseases66,67 11. Aphthous70 12. Bilious dyspepsia70 13. Bronchitis68 14. Tuberculosis70 54 Drug review Kanwal Gatta Introduction: The Kanwal Gatta (Nelumbo nucifera) is a fresh-water plant that grows in semitropical climates. It originated in India and used as food and a medicinal herb for over 1,500 years. It is cultivated extensively in Southeast Asia, primarily for food and rarely for the medicinal purpose. All parts of the plant are utilized, but the primary reason for its current widespread cultivation is to collect the rhizomes and seeds. It possess properties like astringent, cardiotonic, febrifuge, hypotensive, tonic and vasodilating activities and mainly used for the treatment of Hiddate Dam, Zarbatus Shamsh and Amraze Safravi. Vernacular Names:65,66,71,76,86,119,127 Arabic : Nilufer, Ussulneelufir Assamese: Podum Bengali: Padma, Kamal, Pankaj, Kombol, Swet Padma Burmese: Pa-dung-ma Deccan: Kungwelka-gudda English: Sacred lotus, Egyptran, or phythogoreen been, Indian lotus Chinese Waterlily, Egyptian lotus French : Nelumbo German: Pactige nelumbo Gujarati: Suriyakamal Hindi: Kamala, Kanwal Kannad: Kamala, Tavaregadde, Tavaribija, Taveri Kashmiri: Pamposh Khasi: Soh-lapudong 55 Drug review Malyalam: Thamara, Santhamra, Arvindam Marathi: Kamal Mundari: Salukid ba, U palba, Kombol Ba Oriya: Pudamj Panjabi: Kanwal, Pamposh, Kanwalkakri, Bhe or phe (Root) Persian : Nilufer, Nilufu, Bey Khaeelufir Sanskrit: Ambuja, Padma, Pankaja, Kamla, Kamlam, Swet Kamla Shatapatra Sinbalese: Nelum Sindhi: Pabbon (plant), Beh (root) Paduro (Seeds), Nilofir (drug) Tamil: Ambal, Thamarai, Shivapputamaraver Telgu: kalung, Cerra-tameara Botanical Name: Nelumbo nucifera66,67,68,72,73,89 Family: Nymphaeceae66,67,68,72,73,89 Distribution: An aquatic herb found throughout the India, and Pakistan also found in Persia, Sri Lanka, China, Cochin China, Japan, Malay Islands, Philippines, and throughout Nepal, tropical Australia upto an altitude of 1800 meter.72 Description: It is large aquatic herb with stout creeping yellowish white or whitish brown coloured rhizome sending out roots at the nodes. The leaves are two types arial and floating both of which are orbiculare, large peltate, entire, glaucous and leathery. On drying they become membranous. The diameter is 0.3 to 0.6 meter or more.67,77 Flowers: Flower is white or red, fragrant having diameter 10-25 cm; peduncles coming from the nodes of the stem. Sepals, petals and stamens numerous and spirally arranged. 56 Drug review Fruits: An aggregate of indehiscent nut-lets, which remain loosely embedded in the cavity of the enlarge spongy torous seeds having three cotyledons, green large top shaped, 5-10 cm. in diameter and spongy.65,66,67 Ajzae Musta’mala (Parts used): Flowers, filaments, anthers, stalks, seeds, leaves and roots i.e. entire plants66. Maghz.92 Mizaj (Temperament): Sard Tar (Maghe Kham)83,88,90 Sard Khushk (Maghe Pukhta)83 Af’al (Actions): 1. Musakkine Atash67,83,84,85,88,90 8. Mudirre Baul (Diuretic)72,83,85 2. Musakkine Safra67,84,85,88,90,92 9. Nafae Ishal 3. Qate Safra83 (Antidiarrhoeal)72,84 4. Musaffie Dam83 10. Mughallize Mani92 5. Qabiz83,88,90 11. Dafe Bukhar66,67,84 6. Nafe Juzam83 12. Habisud Dam84 7. Dafe Qai (Anti emetic) 67,72,83 13. Muqawwie Bah84 Istemaal (Uses): 1. Qai67,83,91 8. Amraze Chashm66,67,120 2. Zarbatus Shams83 9. Amraze Jild66,67,72,120 3. Ishal72,83,85,88 10. Sual120 4. Jiryan83,85,92 11. Shaqeeqa (Migraine) 120 5. Sailan85 12. Fasade Dam83 6. Bukhar66,67,83 13. Atsh83,84,85,88,90 7. Zo’fe Bah83 14. Juzam83 57 Drug review 15. Bawaseer Damvi84 Ethnobotanical Actions: Seeds; 1. Demulcent66 2. Nutritive66 Filament and flower; 1. Cooling66,67,72,128 4. Expectorant66 2. Sedative66 5. Tonic66 3. Astringent66,128 6. Antidote to Snake66 Ethnobotanical Uses: 1. Insomnia119 7. Dysentery66,72,119 2. Haemorrhage119 8. Fever67 3. Haematemesis119 9. Piles67,72 4. Haematuria119 10. Menorrhagia66 5. Bloody stools119 11. Leprosy66,67 6. Uterine haemorrhage119 External Uses: 1. Burning Skin66 2. Cephalgia66 Miqdare Khuraq (Dose): 3-5 Masha92 Muzir Asrat (Adverse effects): Der Hazm84 Musleh (Correctives): Shahad,84,88 Nabat Safed83 Badal (Substitute): Tukhme Amla, Sharbate Aalubukhara84 Keemiyai ajza (Chemical constituents): The leaves contain following alkaloids: 1. Nuciferine76,127,128 3. Non nuciferine and the 2. Roemerine72,127 flavanoid quercetin72,76,127 58 Drug review 4. Isoquercetin72 6. Leukoanthocyanidin72 5. Nelumbin72 The flower contains: 1. Quercetin66,72,76 2. Luteolin and their glycosides72,76 3. Kaempferol glycosides72 4. Robinine76 Scientific Reports: The antidiabetic activity of methanolic extract of Nelumbo nucifera was carried out which showed that it decreased the blood sugar levels significantly.129 The antioxidant activity of crude polysaccharides was carried which showed that crude polysaccharides have distinct antioxidant capacity when compared with vitamin C as the positive control.131 It was found that natural products from Nelumbo nucifera rhizomes were have potencies to counter oxidation, inhibit key HIV-1 enzymes and affect immune regulation. Most chemically synthetic HIV-1 inhibitors could not deal with the mutant virus. Natural products with multiple anti- HIV-1 effects may circumvent this disadvantage. Therefore, the present investigation may be importance to anti HIV-1 drug development and application of natural products in HIV-1 therapy.129,130 It was found that both white and pink Nelumbo nucifera flower extracts showed effective antiplatelet activity in a dose-dependent manner with maximum activity at 500μg/ml concentration. Furthermore, the antiplatelet activity of white flowers was relatively high compared to the pink flowers.132 59 Methodology Methodology The present study entitled as “Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and Evaluation of Efficacy of a Unani Formulation in its Management” has been carried out at the department of Moalajat in National Institute of Unani Medicine (NIUM), Bangalore. Before starting study, the protocol was submitted for ethical clearance. Accordingly Institutional Ethical Committee had approved the protocol. Subjects were selected from OPD of NIUM Hospital, after clinical examination with detail history of the disease and necessary haematological, biochemical investigations. Clinical symptoms, history and investigations were recorded on the prescribed Case Report Form (CRF) designed for the study with specific inclusion criterion. The clinical study was started by enrolling eligible patients into Test and Control groups by random allocation. This study stretched from September 2010 to February 2012. A total of 50 patients were screened for the study. During screening, 10 patients did not fulfil inclusion criteria so not included in the study, remaining 40 patients were randomly allocated into Test (Group A) and Control (Group B) groups respectively by lottery method. But 4 patients from Test group and 5 patients from Control group were lost the follow-up, leaving behind dropouts 16 patients in Test and 15 patients in Control group who completed the course of treatment. Statistical analysis was done on 31 patients who completed the course of treatment. All the patients were kept under strict observation. 1. Criteria for Selection of Subjects a) Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed cases of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) with blood sugar level: Fasting blood sugar (FBS) > 126mg/dl Post Prandial blood sugar (PPBS) > 200mg/dl 60 Methodology HbA1c Patients between 35-65years of age of either sex. Patients ready to participate in the study and ready to follow the instructions. Patients having ALT, AST, Serum creatinine and Blood urea within normal >7% limit. b) Exclusion Criteria: Patients below 35 and above 65 years of age. Patients of Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (Type I). Patients of Gestational Diabetes. Patients of Malnutrition related diabetes mellitus. Complicated cases of Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetic ketoacidosis, retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, liver disease) Pregnancy and lactation. Advanced liver, kidney, cardiac, pulmonary diseases. Patients who fail to follow up. Patients who fail to give written consent. 2. Selection of subjects: After the screening, during the selection of the patients, complete history including general physical and systemic examination was carried out and recorded on a prescribed case report form which was designed according to the objectives of the study. A detailed history was recorded regarding their chief complaints with duration, age, sex, religion, marital status, occupation, address, socioeconomic status on the basis Kuppaswamy’s socioeconomic scale. Personal history, treatment history, past history of any disease and family history were also recorded in a predesigned 61 Methodology proforma. After history taking, general physical examination was done with special emphasis on height (in cm), weight (in kg), pulse rate/minute, blood pressure in mm of Hg, peripheral pulses, presence of carotid, subclavian or vertebral bruit. Any other positive finding during general physical examination was recorded in CRF. Likewise, a careful systemic examination of cardiovascular system, respiratory system, renal system, gastrointestinal system was also done to look for any findings of other serious illness. After that detailed examination specific to the diabetes mellitus was carried out in all the patients. During examination, common and uncommon manifestations of diabetes were also assessed like, dehydration, sweet smells of ketones in breath in diabetic ketoacidosis, skin infections with boil and abscesses, acanthosis nigricans in the axillae and groins, necrobiosis lipoidica on the shin and eruptive xanthomata.56 Physical Examination 1. Pinprick sensation, sensation to light touch, and pain sensation. 2. Vibration sense. 3. Motor disturbances (decreased deep tendon reflex, weakness and atrophy of interossei muscles); the patient has trouble picking up all small objects, dressing, and turning pages in a book. 5. Diplopia, abnormalities of visual fields. 6. Evidence of dehydration (tachycardia, hypotension, dry mucous membranes, sunken eyeballs, poor skin turgor). 7. Clouding of mental status. 8. Tachypnea with air hunger (Kussmaul’s respiration). 9. Fruity breath odour (caused by acetone). 62 Methodology 3. Assessment of Mizaj Determination of Mizaj was done on the basis of assessment of different parameters mentioned in classical Unani literature. These parameters have been shown in the table attached with the case record form in the annexure. 4. Informed consent Patients coming under the inclusion criteria mentioned above were given the information sheet having details regarding the nature of the study, the drug to be used, method of treatment etc and explained verbally also about study. Patients were given enough time to go through the contents of informed consent sheet. They were given the opportunity to ask any question and if they agreed to participate in the study, they were asked to sign the informed consent form. 5. Investigations Certain investigations were carried out with the aim to exclude the patients with pathological conditions mentioned under exclusion criteria and to assess the efficacy of treatment group and to establish the safety of the test drug. Following investigations were done in each and every case before and after the treatment to evaluate the safety of the Unani formulation. Hb%, TLC, DLC, Urine routine and microscopy AST ALT Blood Urea, Serum Creatinine, Serum Uric Acid ECG Following investigation were done on each and every follow up as: 0 day, 15 th day, 30th day and 45th day for the diagnosis and evaluation of the efficacy of the drugs. FBS 63 Methodology PPBS Urine sugar HbA1c (done on 0 day and 45th day of follow up) 6. Method of Collection of Data Through clinical study of patients visiting Moalajat OPD, NIUM, Bangalore. a) Subjective parameters: Polyuria Polydipsia Polyphagia Tiredness Progressive weakness Dizziness Unexplained weight loss Pruritus b) Objective parameters: Fasting blood sugar Post prandial blood sugar Urine sugar HbA1c 7. Study design The study was designed as a randomized single blind with standard controlled clinical trial. 8. Sample size The sample size was fixed as 40 patients. 64 Methodology 9. Allocation of subjects into groups Forty patients were randomly allocated by using simple randomization method into two groups comprising 20 patients in each of Test (Group A) and Control (Group B) group respectively. 10. Duration of protocol The treatment period in both Test and Control groups was determined as 45 days. 11. Follow up during treatment: Patients were kept under strict observation and advised to come forth weekly in OPD for the assessment of disease till the completion of study. 45 days study was divided into three visits of follow up, which were made at an interval of 15 days. At every visit, patients were asked about the progression or regression in their symptoms, and subjected to assess the clinical findings; and were investigated for FBS, PPBS and urine for sugar. 12. Test drug: The ingredients of test formulation are given below. 1. Satte Gilo (Tinospora cardifolia) 2. Tabasheer (Bambusa bambos) 3. Magaze Kanwal Gatta (Nelumbo nucifera) 13. Control drug: Diabecon 14. Method of preparation, dosage and mode of administration of test drug The ingredients were provided by pharmacy of National Institute of Unani Medicine. Proper identification of the ingredients was done by chief pharmacist, National Institute of Unani Medicine, to make certain their originality and authenticity. The drugs were cleaned by weeding out superfluous material and impurities. All the ingrediants were taken in equal quantity and pulverised to make a fine powder, after 65 Methodology that tablet were prepared by automated tablet making machine. The tablets were prepared for exact quantification of drug dose and for patient convience to use. Each patient in Test group was given test drug in the dose of 3 gm twice a day in the form of tablet (4 tablets twice a day each tablet weighing 750 mg of test drug). 15. Administration of standard control drug The control drug Diabecon was purchased from the market and 2 tablets were advised orally twice a day in Group B. 16. Withdrawal criteria a) Failure to follow the protocol b) Any adverse reaction or adverse event c) Drug defaulters 17. Adverse drug documentation No adverse event or reaction was noted during the test or control drug administration. 18. Methods The GCP (Good Clinical Practice) was adopted and regular monitoring was done as per prescribed proforma. 19. Documentation The case record form and consent forms were submitted to the Dept. of Moalajat after completion of the study. 20. Statistical analysis: The results were analyzed statistically by Friedman test, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, Wilcoxon matched pairs test, Repeated measures ANOVA with post test, Paired and unpaired ‘t’ tests and data was analyzed by using instat graph pad and difference in the treatment groups were considered significant at p<0.05. 66 Results Table No. 1 Distribution of Patients According to Age No. of patients S. No. Age Control Group Test Group Total No. of Patients 1 35-45 7 9 16 52.61 2 46-55 4 3 7 22.58 3 56-65 4 4 8 25.81 4 Total 15 16 31 100 Figure No. 1 Distribution of Patients According to Age 52.61 22.58 35-45 Years 46-55 Years 67 25.81 56-65 Years Percentage (%) Results Table No. 2 Distribution of Patients According to Sex No. of patients S. No. Total No. of Patients Percentage (%) Sex Control Group Test Group 1 Male 8 12 20 64.52 2 Female 7 4 11 35.48 3 Total 15 16 31 100 Figure No. 2 Distribution of Patients According to Sex 35.48 Male Female 64.52 68 Results Table No. 3 Distribution of Patients According to Religion No. of patients S. No. Religion Control Group Test Group Total No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Muslim 13 9 22 71 2 Hindu 2 7 9 29 4 Total 15 16 31 100 Figure No. 3 Distribution of Patients According to Religion 71 29 Hindu Muslim 69 Results Table No. 4 Distribution of Patients According to Marital Status No. of patients S. No. Marital Status Control Group Test Group Total No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Married 15 16 31 100 2 Unmarried 0 0 0 0 3 Total 15 16 31 100 Figure No. 4 Distribution of Patients According to Marital Status 120 100 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 Married Unmarried 70 Results Table No. 5 Distribution of Patients According to Family History S. No. No. of patients F. H. of Diabetes Control Group Test Group Total No. of patients Percentage (%) 1 Present 8 7 15 48.4 2 Absent 7 9 16 51.6 3 Total 15 16 31 100 Figure No. 5 Distribution of Patients According to Family History 48.4 Present Absent 51.6 71 Results Table No. 6 Distribution of Patients According to Socio-economic Status No. of patients Percentage 0 Total No. of Patients 0 3 3 6 19.36 Lower Middle (III) 4 7 11 35.49 4 Upper Lower (IV) 6 6 12 38.72 5 Lower (V) 2 0 2 6.45 6 Total 15 16 31 100 S. Socioeconomic Control Test No. Status Group Group 1 Upper (I) 0 2 Upper Middle (II) 3 (%) 0 Figure No. 6 Distribution of Patients According to SES 6.45 Lower(V) Upper Lower (IV) 38.72 Lower Middle(III) 35.49 Upper Middle(II) Upper(I) 19.36 0 72 Results Table No. 7 Distribution of Patients According to Diet No. of patients Diet Control Group Test Group Total No. of patients Percentage (%) 1 Vegetarian 1 3 4 12.9 2 Mixed 14 13 27 87.1 3 Total 15 16 31 100 S. No. Figure No. 7 Distribution of Patients According to Diet 12.9 Vegetarian Mixed 87.1 73 Results Table No. 8 Distribution of Patients According to Mizaj No. of patients S. No. Mizaj Control Group Test Group Total Percentage No. of Patients (%) 1 Damvi 3 4 7 22.58 2 Balghami 12 10 22 71 3 Safravi 0 2 2 6.42 4 Saudavi 0 0 0 0 5 Total 16 31 100 15 Figure No. 8 Distribution of Patients According to Mizaj 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 71 22.58 6.42 Damvi 0 Balghami Safravi 74 Saudavi Results Table No. 9 Distribution of Patients According to Duration of Illness S. No. Duration Total No. of No. of patients Percentage (%) Control Group Test Group Patients 1 <1 Year 6 8 14 45.16 2 1-2 Years 4 3 7 22.58 3 3-5 Years 4 5 9 29.03 4 6-10 Years 1 0 1 3.23 5 Total 15 16 31 100 Figure No. 9 Distribution according to duration of Illness 50 45.16 45 40 35 29.03 30 22.58 25 20 15 10 3.23 5 0 <1 Year 1-2 Years 3-5 Years 75 6-10 Years Results Table No. 10 Distribution of Patients According to Treatment History S. No. Treatment Type No. of patients Total No. of Patients Percentage (%) 1 Allopathic Control Group 7 Test Group 8 15 48.39 2 Ayurvedic 0 1 1 3.23 3 Unani 7 4 11 35.48 4 None 1 3 4 12.9 5 Total 15 16 31 100 Figure No. 10 Distribution of Patients According to Treatment History 12.9 Allopathic Ayurvedic 48.39 Unani None 35.48 3.23 76 Results Table No. 11 Effect on Polyuria (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Polyuria 0 day 15th day 30th day Control 2{1, 3} 2{1, 3} 1{1, 2} Test 2{1, 3} 2{1, 3} 2{1, 2}* 45th day 1{1, 2}* 1.5{1, 3}* n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Wilcoxon matched pairs for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. * p<0.05 significant with respect to 0 day. Figure No. 11 Effect on Polyuria (Median score) 2.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 1.5 1 0 Day 15th Day 1 30th Day 1 45th Day 0.5 0 Control Test 77 Results Table No. 12 Effect on Polydipsia (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Polydipsia 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 2{1, 3} 2{1, 3} 1{1, 2}* 1{1, 2}* Test 2{1, 3} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 3}* 1{1, 3}** n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Friedman test with post test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. * p<0.05 significant with respect to 0 day. ** p<0.001 extremely significant with respect to 0 day. Figure No. 12 Effect on Polydipsia (Median score) 2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2 2 0 Day 1 1 1 1 1 15th Day 30th Day 45th Day Control Test 78 Results Table No. 13 Effect on Polyphagia (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Polyphagia 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 1} 1{1, 1} Test 1{1, 3} 1{1, 3} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} n = 15 inCcontrol group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Wilcoxon matched pairs for intra-group comparison (p>0.05) and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. Figure No. 13 Effect on Polyphgia (Median score) 1 0.8 0 Day 0.6 15th Day 0.4 30th Day 0.2 45th Day 0 Control Test 79 Results Table No. 14 Effect on Tiredness (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Tiredness 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 2{1, 3} 2{1, 3} 2{1, 3}* 1{1, 2}** Test 2{2, 3} 2{2, 3} 2{1, 3}* 1{1, 3}*** n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Wilcoxon matched pairs for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. *p<0.05 with respect to day 0, **p<0.01 with respect to 0 day, ***p<0.001 with respect to 0 day. Figure No. 14 Effect on Tiredness (Median score) 2.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Day 1.5 1 1 1 15th Day 30th Day 45th Day 0.5 0 Control Test 80 Results Table No. 15 Effect on Progressive Weakness (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Progressive Weakness 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 2{1, 4} 2{1, 3} 2{1, 3}* 1.5{1, 3}* Test 2{1, 3} 2{1, 3} 1{1, 3} 1{1, 2}* n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Friedman test with post test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. * p<0.05 significant with respect to 0 day. Figure No. 15 Effect on Progressive Weakness (Median score) 2.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 0 Day 1.5 1 1 1 15th Day 30th Day 45th Day 0.5 0 Control Test 81 Results Table No. 16 Effect on Dizziness (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Dizziness 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 1{1, 3} 1{1, 3} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} Test 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Friedman test with post test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. Figure No. 16 Effect on Dizziness (Median score) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0 Day 0.6 15th Day 0.5 30th Day 0.4 45th Day 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Control Test 82 Results Table No. 17 Effect on Unexplained Weight Loss (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Unexplained Weight Loss 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 1} 1{1, 1} Test 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 1}** n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Friedman test with post test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. **p<0.001 is with respect to 0 day. Figure No. 17 Effect on Unexplained Weight Loss (Median score) 1.2 1 0.8 0 Day 15th Day 0.6 30th Day 0.4 45th Day 0.2 0 Control Test 83 Results Table No. 18 Effect on Pruritus (Median rating with Range in brackets) Group Assessment day Pruritus 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 1} 1{1, 1} Test 1{1, 3} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} 1{1, 2} n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Friedman test with post test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. Figure No. 18 Effect on Pruritus (Median score) 1.2 1 0.8 0 Day 15th Day 0.6 30th Day 0.4 45th Day 0.2 0 Control Test 84 Results Table No. 19 Effect on FBS (Mean ± SEM) Group Assessment day FBS 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 190.28±13.27 200.27±19.569 193.2±123.88 185.2±15.238 Test 186.31±12.14 191.18±19.86 162.56±12.32 174.43±14.92 n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Friedman test with post test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. Figure No. 19 Effect on FBS (Mean) 250 200 200.27 190.28 193.2 185.2 191.18 186.3 174.43 162.56 0 Day 150 15th Day 30th Day 100 45th Day 50 0 Control Test 85 Results Table No. 20 Effect on PPBS (Mean ± SEM) Group Assessment day PPBS 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 292.9±10.65 285.8±25.08 294.3±25.98 285.9±21.45 Test 281.8±19.11 269.3±220.82 245.8±15.53 266.7±18.23 n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Repeated measures ANOVA with post test in control group and Friedman test with post test in test group for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. Figure No. 20 Effect on PPBS (Mean) 300 290 294.3 292.9 285.8 285.9 281.8 280 269.3 270 266.7 0 Day 15th Day 260 245.8 250 30th Day 45th Day 240 230 220 Control Test 86 Results Table No. 21 Effect on Urine Sugar (Mean ± SEM) Group Assessment day Urine Sugar 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Control 1.033±0.226 0.766±0.233 0.733±0.223 0.333±0.159* Test 0.687±0.187 0.575±0.196 0.406±0.1894 0.218±0.101** n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Wilcoxon matched pair test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison. * p<0.05 significant with respect to 0 day. **p<0.001 highly significant with respect to 0 day. Figure No. 21 Effect on Urine Sugar (Mean) 1.2 1.033 1 0.8 0.766 0.733 0 Day 0.687 0.575 15th Day 0.6 30th Day 0.406 0.333 0.4 45th Day 0.218 0.2 0 Control Test 87 Results Table No. 22 Effect on HbA1c (Mean ± SEM) Group Assessment day HbA1c 0 Day 45th Day Control 9.11±0.357 8.41±0.308* Test 8.818±0.257 8.3±0.283* n = 15 in Control group and 16 in Test group. Statistical tests used are Wilcoxon matched pair test and for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test for inter-group comparison test. * p<0.05 significant with respect to 0 day. Figure No. 22 Effect on HbA1c (Mean) 9.2 9.11 9 8.8 8.8 8.6 0 Day 8.41 8.4 8.3 8.2 8 7.8 Control Test 88 45th Day Results Table No. 23: Effect of Test drug on safety parameters; n = 16 S. No. Safety parameters BT AT Mean SEM Mean SEM 1 Hb (gm %) 13.03 ±0.265 13.33 ±0.304 2 TLC (cells/cu mm) 9125 ±435.56 8737.5 ±455.42 3 DLC (cells/cu mm) Polymorphs 60.72 ±1.343 58.75 ±1.526 Lymphocytes 34 ±1.242 35.31 ±1.425 Eosinophils 3.43 ±0.341 3.38 ±0.239 Monocytes 2.31 ±0.254 2.31 ±0.198 Basophils 0 ±0 0.19 ±0.136 5 Blood Urea (mg/dl) 27.25 ±1.540 25.63 ±1.732 6 Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.894 0.91 ±0.156 7 Serum Uric Acid (mg/dl) 4.25 ±0.243 4.53 ±0.449 8 AST (IU/L) 23.87 ±2.38 20.81 ±1.826 9 ALT (IU/L) 29.87 ±4.055 27.5 ±3.144 ±0.019 Tests used = Paired t test was used in all parameters except in serum creatinine where Mann Whitney test was used. 89 Results Table No. 24: Effect of Control drug on safety parameters; n = 15 S. No. Safety parameters BT AT Mean SEM Mean SEM 12.91 ±0.354 12.61 ±0.428 8733.33 ±477.16 7926.6 ±448.30 Polymorphs 60 ±1.589 58.6 ±1.946 Lymphocytes 34.66 ±1.389 36.6 ±1.841 Eosinophils 3.6 ±0.327 3.2 ±0.279 Monocytes 2.13 ±0.291 1.46 ±0.274 Basophils 0 ±0 0.2 ±0.145 5 Blood Urea (mg/dl) 25.13 ±1.257 22.5 ±1.014 6 Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.84 0.88 ±0.034 7 Serum Uric Acid (mg/dl) 4.013 ±0.275 4.32 ±0.228 8 AST (IU/L) 19.6 ±1.726 19.53 ±1.077 9 ALT (IU/L) 25.07 ±2.211 21.8 ±1.509 1 Hb (gm %) 2 TLC (cells/cu mm) 3 DLC (cells/cu mm) ±0.029 Tests used = Paired t test used in all parameters except Eosinophils and Serum creatinine. Mann Whiteny Test was used for Eosinophils while Wicoxon matched Pair test for Serum creatinine. 90 Discussion Discussion Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes mellitus Type II) is a rising pandemic and has become threat to the World population. It is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality. It has serious economical effects on society. In the United States, diabetes is the leading cause of blindness among working age adults, nontraumatic loss of limb, and it is also the fifth-leading cause of death. Once considered a disease of wealthy nations, type II diabetes now constitutes a truly global affliction. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) anticipates that the worldwide incidence of diabetes among those aged 20 to 79 years will increase by around 70% in the next 20 years. Billions of people are suffering from type II diabetes throughout the world. Hence obviously it is a subject of interest to scientists and health care providers. Type II diabetes is recognized as a failure in the regulation mechanism to maintain plasma glucose in an appropriate concentration level in response to endogenous glucose production or diet input. Type II diabetes patients typically exhibit symptoms of insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. Initially the body is able to adapt to maintain glucose concentration with high levels. The present study was a randomized single blind standard controlled trial, accomplished to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a Unani formulation in the management of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes mellitus type 2) on scientific basis and modern parameters. The study was conducted at National Institute of Unani Medicine Hospital, Bangalore for a period of 18 months from September 2010 to February 2012. A total of 50 patients were registered for the study. A total 40 patients were randomly assigned into Test (Group A) and Control (Group B) groups respectively, but 4 patients from Test group and 5 patients from Control group were lost to followup, leaving behind 16 patients in Test and 15 patients in Control group who finally 91 Discussion completed the course of treatment. Statistical analysis was done only for those patients who completed the course of treatment. Patients of Group A were given an Unani formulation consisting of Satte Gilo (Tinospora cardifolia) Tabasheer (Bambusa bambos) and Maghze Kanwal Gatta (Nelumbo nucifera) for oral administration 2 tablet twice a day while patients of Group B were treated with the standard drug, Diabecon 2 tablet twice a day for a period of 45 days. The severity of 8 different signs and symptoms (polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, tiredness, progressive weakness, dizziness, unexplained weight loss, pruritus) was rated on a 4 point scale (1, absent; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, severe). The scores were reckoned for each patient at each assessment point on 0, 15th, 30th and 45th day. At every visit, patients were asked about the progression or regression in their symptoms, and subjected to assess the clinical findings; and were investigated for FBS, PPBS and urine for sugar. The observations and results concerning demography and assessment parameters obtained from the trial have been illustrated in tables and figures. They are discussed in the following paragraphs consecutively to draw presumption and to turn up at a conclusion. According to the age maximum number of patients, 16 (52.63%) were observed in age group of 35-45 years, while 7 (22.58%) patients in 46-55 years, and 8 (25.81%) patients in 56-65 years of age group. This data suggested that the disease is more prevalent in the age group of 35-45 (Table No. 1). In this study, the highest incidence of 20 (64.5%) was observed in male patients while 11 (35.5%) in female patients (Table No. 2). This study suggested a male preponderance among the patients of Ziabetus Shakari. This finding is in conformity with the study showed prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China that 92 Discussion prediabetes were 9.7% (10.6% among men and 8.8% among women) and 15.5% (16.1% among men and 14.9% among women), respectively, accounting for 92.4 million adults with diabetes (50.2 million men and 42.2 million women) and 148.2 million adults with prediabetes (76.1 million men and 72.1 million women).133 Out of total patients, 22 (71%) patients were Muslim followed by 9 (29%) Hindu patients (Table No. 3). No compelling data is available that demonstrates the distribution of disease among different religious communities in the society. This study however reflects a predominance of Muslims among the patients of Diabetes mellitus. However the predominance of Muslim patients (71%) in present study may be absolutely due to the fact that majority of patients attending NIUM hospital are from Muslim community which is reflected in my study. There is no persuasive data is available to demonstrate the existence of this disease among different religious communities in the society or is likely reason may be that there is no any relation of this existence. As far as the Marital Status of diabetes mellitus patients is concerned, all 31 (100%) patients were married (Table No. 4). As this disease usually occurs in the 4 th and 5th decade, therefore all the patients were married. Out of 40 patients, 14 (45.16%) were having the disease since <1 year, 7 (22.58%) since 1-2 years, 9 (29.03%) since 3-4 years and 1(3.23%) since 6-10. (Table No. 10) As far as the family history of diabetes is concerned, 48.4% patients had positive family history (Table 5). This finding is in conformity with the finding described by Jali MV, Kamber S.135 This study indicates that there is a strong association between heredity and diabetes mellitus. Further stronger the family history greater is the tendency of getting diabetes. Similarly, positive family history is use as a risk factor and screening tool shown in study of Vadez R.136 93 Discussion As it is evident from Table No. 6 that the highest incidence of 11 (35.48%) was in lower middle and upper lower class each (III, IV), followed by 6(19.35%) in upper middle class (II), 2 (6.45%) in lower class (V), and 0 (0%) in upper class (I) respectively. The present study demonstrates that diabetes mellitus is more prevalent among the middle socioeconomic class. This finding is not in accordance with the findings suggested by Connolly V. et al134 who proved in their epidemiological study by the finding, suggests that exposure to factors that are implicated in the causation of diabetes is more common in deprived areas (high SES) in comparison to low SES. This may be due to the small sample size of study and the subject only confined to the patients attending our hospital those are mostly belonging to middle and lower class socioeconomic status. Out of the total of 31 patients, 3 (9.68%) patients were vegetarian while 28 (90.32%) patients had mixed dietary habits (Table No. 7). The maximum numbers of patients had mixed dietary habits. The present study demonstrates that diabetes mellitus is more common in people consuming mixed diets. As the person consuming mixed diet are prone to develop obesity and obesity is one of the important risk factor for development of the diabetes. The study demonstrated relation between Mizaj of the patients and the disease. It is determined as per the proforma enclosed with the case record form especially designed for the study in the light of parameters mentioned in classical Unani literature. A maximum of 22 (71%) patients were found having Balghami mizaj followed by 7 (22.58%) patients having Damvi, 2 (6.42%) patients having the Safravi and 0 (0%) patients having the Saudavi mizaj (Table No. 8). It indicates that the disease is more prevalent in Balghami mizaj patients. 94 Discussion The median scores of polyuria in both groups were compared statistically using Friedman test for intra group comparison and Kruskall Wallis test with post Dunn’s Multiple comparison test for intergroup comparison, it was found that the difference between the median scores of Test group at 15th day and at baseline was not significant (p>0.05) while significant (p<0.05) at 30th day and 45th day. While in the case of Control group, the difference of median scores was not significant (p>0.05) at 15th day and 30th day while significant (p<0.05) on 45th day when compared with respect to baseline score. Results are summarised in table No 11. The response of the test drug on polyuria may be due to the Qabiz (astringent) property of Tabasheer23,83,92,124 and Satte Gilo65,69,76,90 with overall effect of antidiabetic effect of test drug which is discussed below. The median score of the polydipsia in Test group was 2 (1, 3) on baseline, 1 (1, 3) on 15th day, 1 (1, 3) on 30th day and 1 (1, 3) on 45th day; whereas in Control group, the median score was 2 (1, 3) on 0 day , 2 (1, 3) on 15th day, 1 (1, 2) on 30th day and 1 (1, 2) on 45th day. When the median scores of polydipsia in both groups, Test and Control, were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for intergroup comparison. It was found that the difference between the median scores of Test group and Control group at 30th day and 45th day compared with baseline was significant (p<0.05). Results are summarised in table No 12.The effect may be due to Musakkine Atash property of Tabasheer23,83,84,88,90,120,125 and Kanwal Gatta67,83,8485,88 described by Ibne Sina, Ibne Hubl, Najmul Ghani, Kabeeruddin and Kritikar Basu. In the assesment of polyphagia, median score in group A (Test group) was 1(1, 3) on 0 day, 1(1, 3) on 15th day, 1(1, 2) on 30th day and 1 (1, 2) on 45th day; whereas in group B (Cotrol group) the median score was 1 (1, 2) on 0 day ,1 (1, 2) on 15th day, 1 95 Discussion (1, 1) on 30th day and 1 (1, 1) on 45th day. When the median scores of polyphagia in both Groups, A and B were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for intergroup comparison. It was found that the difference between the median scores of Test and Control group at any one of the assesment days compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05) (Table No 13). Although the result was not statistically significant in polyphagia due to very less patient have had the symptom, even though who had it, were in mild degree; the test and control drug showed some effect on polyphagia clinically which may be due to over all improvement. The median score of tiredness in group A (Test group) was 2 (2, 3) on 0 day, 2 (2, 3) on 15th day, 2 (1, 3) on 30th day and 2 (1, 3) on 45th day; whereas in group B (Control group) median was 2 (1, 3) on 0 day, 2 (1, 3) on 15th day, 2 (1, 3) on 30th day and 2 (1, 3) on 45th day. When the median scores of tiredness in both Groups, A and B, were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for intergroup comparison. The result was significant on 30th day of assesment with comparision to the base line in Control group and Test group, and at 45th day result found very significant (p<0.01) with comparision to base line in Control group and hightly significant (p<0.001) in Test group. Results are summarised in table No 14. This effct may be due to Muqawwi Aam (general tonic) property of Gilo65,67,68,69,70,75,78,83,89,90,91 and Kanwal Gatta,66 described by Kabiruddin, Nadkarni, James A. Duke, Kritikar and Basu, Battacharjee SK. The median score of progressive weakness was calculated on 0 day, 15th day 30th day and 45th day as 2 (1, 3) , 2 (1, 3), 2 (1, 3) and 1 (1, 2) in Test group respectively, while 96 Discussion the same was observed as 2 (1, 4), 2 (1, 3) , 2 (1, 3) and 1.5 (1, 3) on 0 day, 15th day, 30th day and 45th day respectively in Control group. When the two groups were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests for intergroup comparison. It was found that the difference between the median scores of Control group at 30th day and 45th day with baseline was significant (p<0.05), while in Test group on 45th day compared with baseline was significant (p<0.05). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Results are summarised in table No 15. The results indicate that both the test and control drugs are effective in reducing progressive weakness. The improvement in progressive weakness may be due to the Muqawwi Aam (general tonic) property of Gilo65,67,68,69,70,75,78,83,89,90,91 and Kanwal Gatta66 described by Kabiruddin, Nadkarni, James A. Duke, Kritikar and Basu and Battacharjee SK. The median score of Dizziness was calculated on 0 day, 15th day 30th day and 45th day as 1 (1, 2) , 1 (1, 2), 1 (1, 2) and 1 (1, 2) in Test group respectively, while the same was observed as 1 (1, 3), 1 (1, 3) , 1 (1, 2) and 1 (1, 2) on 0 day, 15th day, 30th day and 45th day respectively in Control group. When the two groups were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests for intergroup comparison. It was found that the difference between the median scores of Test group and Control group at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Results are summarised in table No 16. Although the result was not statistically significant in Dizziness due to very less patient have had the symptom, even though who had it, were in mild degree; the test and control drug showed some effect on Dizziness clinically which may be 97 Discussion due to over all improvement in patients of diabetes. In the assesment of unexplained weight loss, median score in group A (Test group) was 1(1, 2) on 0 day, 1(1, 2) on 15th day, 1(1, 2) on 30th day and 1 (1, 1) on 45th day; whereas in group B (Cotrol group) the median score was 1 (1, 2) on 0 day ,1 (1, 2) on 15th day, 1 (1, 1) on 30th day and 1 (1, 1) on 45th day. When the median in both group were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for intergroup comparison. It was found that the difference between the median scores of Test and Control group at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05) in Control group while in Test group was significant (p<0.01) at 45th day. Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05) (Table No 17). The median score of pruritus was calculated on 0 day, 15th day 30th day and 45th day as 1 (1, 3), 1 (1,2), 1 (1, 2) and 1 (1, 2) in Test group respectively, while the same was observed as 1 (1, 2), 1 (1, 2) , 1 (1, 1) and 1 (1, 1) on 0 day, 15th day, 30th day and 45th day respectively in Control group. When the two groups were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests for intergroup comparison. It was found that the difference between the median scores of priritus in Test group at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Although the result was not statistically significant in pruritus due to very less patient have had this symptom but clinicaly both groups (Test and Control) are showed adequate improvement (Table No 18). The Mean ± SEM score for FBS in Test group was on 0 day, 15th day 30th day and 45th day as 186.31±12.14, 191.18±19.86, 162.56±12.32 and 174.43±14.92 respectively, while the same was observed as 190.28±13.27, 200.27±19.569, 98 Discussion 193.2±123.88 and 185.2±15.238 on 0 day, 15th day, 30th day and 45th day respectively in Control group. When Mean ± SEM score of FBS in both Groups, Test and Control, were compared statistically by using Friedman test with post test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison it was found that the difference between the Mean ± SEM score of Test and Control groups at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). Although the result was not statistically significant in FBS, but both the test drug and control drug managed the blood sugar level and reduced it upto some extent and prevent further hyperglycemia, which can be perceived by the Mean ± SEM score of FBS on base line and 45th day (Table No 19). The Mean ± SEM score for PPBS in Test group was on 0 day, 15th day 30th day and 45th day as 281.8±19.11, 269.3±220.82, 245.8±15.53 and 266.7±18.23 respectively, while the same was observed as 292.9±10.65, 285.8±25.08, 294.3±25.98 and 285.9±21.45 on 0 day, 15th day, 30th day and 45th day respectively in Control group. When Mean ± SEM score of PPBS in both Groups, Test and Control, were compared statistically by using Repeated measures ANOVA with post Test in Control group and Friedman test with post test in Test group for intra-group comparison and KruskalWallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison, it was found that the difference between the Mean ± SEM score of PPBS in Test group and Control group both at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). Although the result was not statistically significant in PPBS, but the test drug and control drug both were manage the sugar level and reduce it upto some extent and prevent further hyperglycemia, which can perceived by the Mean ± SEM score of PPBS on base line and 45th day summarised in table No 20. 99 Discussion The Mean ± SEM score of urine sugar was calculated on 0 day, 15th day 30th day and 45th day as 0.687±0.187, 0.575±0.196, 0.406±0.1894 and 0.218±0.101 in Test group respectively, while the same was observed as 1.033±0.226, 0.766±0.233, 0.733±0.223 and 0.333±0.159 on 0 day, 15th day, 30th day and 45th day respectively in Control group. When the two groups were compared statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests for intergroup comparison. It was found that the difference between the median scores of Control group at 45th day with baseline was significant (p<0.05), while in Test group on 45th day compared with baseline was very significant (p<0.01). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). The response of the test drug on urine sugar may be due to the qabiz (astringent) property of the Tabasheer and Satte Gilo with overall effect of antidiabetic effect of test drug (Table No 21). The Mean ± SEM score for HbA1c in Test group was 8.818±0.257 on baseline and 8.3±0.283 on 45th day, whereas in Control group the Mean ± SEM score of HbA1c was 9.11±0.357 on 0 day and 8.41±0.308 on 45th day. When Mean ± SEM score of HbA1c in both Groups, Test and Control, were compared statistically by using Wilcoxon matched pair test for intra-group comparison and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple pair comparison test for inter-group comparison it was found that the difference between the Mean ± SEM score of Test and Control groups at 45th day compared with baseline was significant (p<0.05) (Table No 22). During the normal practice of diabetes, physician always observes that the patients of well estabilish/developed diabetes, who are not taking any pharmacological treatment and not following control diet and regulre exercise, always develope hyperglycemia and its complication after few days or months. In this study we can see that the 100 Discussion treatments which were given in Test group and Control group both managed the blood sugar level and reduced it upto some extent and prevents further hyperglycemia. So we conclude that the test drug have antidiabetic effect. It is supported by several experimental studies, demonstrating the hypoglycemic activity of Gilo.96,97,98,99 Further more Kanwal Gatta have antioxidative property studied by Wang L. et al. Diabetes mellitus is characterized by oxidative stress, which in turn determines endothelial dysfunction. It has been reported that anti-oxidative property of the drug potentially protects the vasculature through improvements in plasma lipid levels and platelet function.137 The management of Ziabetus depends upon the controlled diet and regular exercise very much, along with pharmacological treatment. The response of the drug is also dose dependent, while, in this study, fixed dose of the drug were given which was chalked out earlier at the time of the protocol designing. In the light of the above discussion it can be concluded that test drug is safe and effective in relieving symptoms and controlling glycaemic index in the patient of diabetes mellitus. Safety and Tolerability: The safety of both test drug and control drug was evaluated by some standard safety parameter i.e. Haemogram, AST, ALT, Blood Urea, Serum Creatinine, and ECG which done before and after the treatment and were analyzed statistically which showed no significant difference in any of these parameters. No any obnoxious adverse effect was observed during and after the study in either group. Both the test formulation and standard drug are safe and fairly well accepted by the patients proved by this study. 101 Conclusion Conclusion The present study was conducted at National Institute of Unani Medicine Hospital, Bangalore for a period of 18 months from September 2010 to February 2012. Diagnosed patients of Ziabetus Shakari, belonging to the age group of 35-65 years of either sex were registered as per protocol and were randomly divided into Test and Control groups by random allocation. Patients of Test Group were advised Unani formulation, consisting of Gilo (Tinospora cardifolia), Tabasheer (Bambusa bambos) and Maghze Kanwal Gatta (Nelumbo nucifera) orally twice a day while in Control group, the standard drug Tab. Diabecon was administered twice a day. Duration of treatment in both Test and Control groups was 45 days and follow up was done fortnightly. All the patients were advised planed diet and regular brisk walk for 30-40 minutes. Patients were kept under strict observation and assessment of the efficacy of treatment of test and control drug was carried out on the basis of subjective and objective parameters. As evident from observations and results, patients treated with Unani formulation and Control drug both showed significant deference on some subjective parameters like Polyuria, Polydipsia, Tiredness, Progressive weakness and Unexplained Weight loss; while there was no effect on other subjective parameters such as Polyphagia, Dizziness and Pruritus. The objective parameters were also assessed and analyzed in both groups. There was no significant difference in both groups on parameters of FBS PPBS but significant difference was observed on Urine Sugar in Test Group and Control group, Test group showed slightly quicker results. There was also significant difference on parameter HbA1c in both groups equally. The safety markers i.e. Haemogram, AST, ALT, Blood Urea, Serum Creatinine and ECG remained within normal limit during the study. On the basis of above results and observation it may be 102 Conclusion concluded that the test drug is effective in reducing the symptoms of Ziabetus Shakari, and control the Urine Sugar and reduce the HbA1c levels. Further, no obnoxious side effect was observed in Test group during and after the study and overall compliance to the treatment was good. On the basis of these results it can be concluded that the Unani formulation is safe and can be used in the treatment of Ziabetus Shakari. The management of Ziabetus is depends upon the controlled diet and regular exercise very much, along with pharmacological treatment. The response of the drug is also dose dependent, while in this study fixed dose of the drug were given, which was chalked out earlier at the time of the protocol designing. However, long term study with a bigger sample size is required to elucidate further pharmacological actions of the test formulation. 103 Summary Summary Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes mellitus) is a serious chronic metabolic disorder that has a significant impact on the health, quality of life and life expectancy of patients, as well as on the health care system. It is a multi-systemic illness associated with a variety of short-term and long term complications. The short term complications include hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. The long-term complications of untreated or ineffectively treated diabetes include retinopathy, nephropathy and peripheral neuropathy. In addition, diabetic patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke. However, lifestyle management measures may be insufficient or patient compliance difficult, rendering conventional drug therapies necessary in many patients. As an alternative approach, Unani drugs with antihyperglycemic activities were increasingly sought by diabetic patient and physicians. Unani drugs with antidiabetic activity have been researched extensively in India. These drugs should have a similar degree of efficacy without the troublesome side effects associated with these treatments. Keeping all this in the mind, a protocol of single blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the National Institute of Unani Medicine, Bangalore, to evaluate the efficacy of a Unani formulation in the management of Ziabetus Shakari. The formulation consisting of Satte Gilo (Tinospora cardifolia) Tabasheer (Bambusa bambos) and Maghze Kanwal Gatta (Nelumbo nucifera) was selected. Before starting the treatment, the protocol was put forth for the ethical clearance, which was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. Cases were selected on the basis of Laboratory diagnosis and as per inclusion and exclusion criteria in the research protocol. The protocol therapy duration was 45 days. Total 40 patients were randomly allocated into Test (Group A) and Control (Group B) groups respectively. But 4 104 Summary patients from Test group and 5 patients from Control group were lost to follow-up, leaving behind 16 patients in Test and 15 patients in Control group who completed the course of treatment. Summary of demographic data, effects of treatment on different subjective and objective parameters are as follows: Demographic data Age: Out of total 31 patients, 16 (52.63%) patients were observed in age group of 3545 years, 7 (22.58%) patients in 46-55 years, and 8 (25.81%) patients in 56-65 years of age group. Sex: The incidence was observed as 20 (64.5%) in male patients while 11 (35.5%) in female patients. Marital status: All 31 (100%) patients were married. Religion: The highest 22 (71%) patients were Muslim followed by 9 (29%) patients were Hindu. Dietary Habit: Out of total 31 patients, 3 (9.68%) patients were vegetarian while 28 (90.32%) patients recorded of having mixed diet. Socio-Economic Status: The highest incidence of 22 (71%) was in lower middle and upper lower class [11 (35.48%) in each class III and IV], followed by 6 (19.35%) in upper middle class (II), 2 (6.45%) in lower class (V), and 0 (0%) in upper class (I) respectively. Family History of Diabetes Mellitus: Positive family history of diabetes mellitus was in 48.4% patients and negative in 51.6% patients. Mizaj: A maximum of 22 (71%) patients were found having Balghami mizaj followed by 7 (22.58%) patients having Damvi, 2 (6.42%) patients having the Safravi and 0 (0%) patients having the Saudavi mizaj. 105 Summary Effect of Test and Standard Drugs on Subjective Parameters: Effect on Polyuria: The median scores of polyuria in both Test and Control were compared, the difference between the median scores of Test group at 15th day and at baseline was not significant (p>0.05) while significant (p<0.05) at 30th day and 45th day. In Control group, the difference of median scores was not significant (p>0.05) at 15th day and 30th day while significant (p<0.05) on 45th day when compared with respect to baseline score. Effect on Polydipsia: When the median scores of polydipsia in both groups, Test and Control, were compared statistically at 30th day and 45th day with baseline was significant (p<0.05). Effect on Polyphagia: when the median scores of polyphgia of Test and Control group were compared statistically on 15th day, 30th day and 45th day with baseline, were not significant (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Effect on Tiredness: The median score of tiredness in both Groups, A and B, were compared. The result show significant on 30th day of assesment with comparision to the base line in Control group and Test group, and at 45th day result comes very significant (p<0.01) with comparision to base line in Control group highly significant (p<0.001) in Test group. Effect on Progressive weakness: It was found that the difference between the median scores of progressive weakness in Control group at 30th day and 45th day with baseline was significant (p<0.05), while in Test group on 45th day compared with baseline was also significant (p<0.05). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Effect on Dizziness: It was found that the difference between the median scores of 106 Summary Dizziness in Test group and Control group at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Effect on Unexplained weight loss: It was found that the difference between the median scores of unexplained weight loss in Test and Control group at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05) in Control group while in Test group was significant (p<0.01) at 45th day. Intergroup comparison was also not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Effect on Pruritus: It was found that the difference between the median scores of pruritus in Test group at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). Objective Parameters: Effect on FBS: The Mean ± SEM score for FBS in Test group was 186.31±12.145 on baseline and 174.43± 14.919 on 45th day, whereas in Control group the Mean ± SEM score of FBS was 190.286± 13.27 on baseline and 185.2 ± 15.238 on 45th day. The baseline and 45th day comparision of mean scores for FBS in Test and Control group not found significant difference statistically. Effect on PPBS: The Mean ± SEM score for PPBS in Test group was 281.8 ± 19.113 on baseline and 266.7 ± 18.226 on 45th day, whereas in Control group the Mean ± SEM score of PPBS was 292.9± 45.377 on 0 day and 285.9 ± 21.449 on 45th day. When Mean ± SEM score of PPBS in both Groups, Test and Control, were compared statistically, it was found that the difference between the Mean ± SEM score of Test group and Control group both at 45th day compared with baseline was not significant (p>0.05). 107 Summary Effect on Urine sugar: The Mean ± SEM score of urine sugar was calculated on 0 day, 15th day 30th day and 45th day as 0.687±0.187, 0.575±0.196, 0.406±0.1894 and 0.218±0.101 in Test group respectively, while the same was observed as 1.033±0.226, 0.766±0.233, 0.733±0.223 and 0.333±0.159 on 0 day, 15th day, 30th day and 45th day respectively in Control group. When the two groups were compared statistically found that the difference between the median scores of Control group at 45th day with baseline was significant (p<0.05), while in Test group on 45th day compared with baseline was very significant (p<0.01). Intergroup comparison was not significant at 45th day (p>0.05). Effect on HbA1c: The Mean ± SEM score for HbA1c in Test group was 8.818±0.257 on baseline and 8.3±0.283 on 45th day, whereas in Control group the Mean ± SEM score of HbA1c was 9.11±0.357 on 0 day and 8.41±0.308 on 45th day. When Mean ± SEM scores of HbA1c in both Groups, Test and Control, were compared statistically, it is found that the difference between the Mean ± SEM score of Test and Control groups at 45th day compared with baseline was significant (p<0.05). 108 Bibliography Bibliography 1. Huizinga MM, Rothman RL. Addressing the diabetes pandemic: A comprehensive approach. Indian J Med Res 2006; 124: 481-4. 2. Park K. Park’s Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 20th ed. Jabalpur India: Banarasidas Bhanot; 2009: 341-345. 3. Sicree R, Shaw J, Zimmet P. Diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. International Diabetes Federation, 3rd ed. Belgium: 2006; 15-103. 4. Firozuddin MS. Romoozul Atibba. Vol. II. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; 2009: 262. 5. Jani DK, Nesari MT, Vijayakumar D, Loriaux, Lynn D. Diabetes and the Ebers Papyrus: 1552 BC. The Endocrinologist 2006; 16(2): 55-6. 6. Barthold SW. Unsung heroes in the battle against diabetes. ILAR: 2004; 45; 227-30. 7. Singh M, Kumar N, Sood S, Makkar B, Arora V. Historical Milestones in Diabetes. Australasian Medical Journal 2010; 3, 13, 860-864. 8. Savona-Ventura C. The History of Diabetes Mellitus, A Maltese perspective. e-book. 2003: 1-7. 9. Sanders LJ. From Thebes to Toronto and the 21st century: An incredible journey. Diabetes Spectrum 2002; 15: 56-60. 10. Gemmill CL. The Greek Concept of Diabetes. Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med September 1972; 48, 8, 1033-1036. 11. Kirchhof M, Popat N, Malowany J. A historical perspective of the diagnosis of diabetes. UWOMJ 2008; 78(1): 7-11. 109 Bibliography 12. Eknoyan G, Nagy J. A history of diabetes mellitus or how a disease of the kidneys evolved into a kidney disease. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease April 2005; 12, 2, 223-229. 13. Henschen F. On the term diabetes in the works of Aretaeus and Galen. Med Hist 1969; 13(2): 190-2. 14. Ahmed AM. History of diabetes mellitus. Saudi Medical Journal 2002; 23 (4): 373-8. 15. Rengachary SS, Xavier A, Manjila S, Smerdon U, Parker B, Hadwan S. et al. The legendary contributions of Thomas Willis (1621–1675): the arterial circle and beyond. J Neurosurg 2008; 109:765-75. 16. Longe JL. The Gale Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine. Vol II, 2nd ed. Farmington Hills USA: Gale Group; 2005: 617-623. 17. Edwards CRW, Toft AD, Walker BR. Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine. 19th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2004: 642-63. 18. Vinay K, Abbas A, Nelson F. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005: 1189-1205. 19. Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper L. Dennis. Harrison’s Principal of Internal Medicine. Vol. II, 17th ed. New York: McGraw Hill’s; 2008: 2275-95. 20. David HH, Herbert L. Dupont. Kelley’s Textbook of Internal Medicine. 4th ed. Vol. II. New York: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 2000: 2642-45. 21. Becker KL, Ronald C. Principles and Practice of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 2002: 1086-94, 1106-11. 22. Goodman HM. Basic Medical Endocrinology. 3rd ed. e-Book: 2002: 178-81. 110 Bibliography 23. Ibne Sina. Al Qanoon Fit Tib (Urdu translation by Kantoori GH). New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; 2009: 1031-33, 353-54. 24. Ibne Sina. Al Qanoon Fit Tib (Arabi). 1st ed. Vol. III, Part 2. New Delhi: Jamia Hamdard; 1408H: 263-64, 783-85. 25. Khan M Ajmal. Haziq. New Delhi: Jasem Book Depot; 1983: 387-90. 26. Majoosi A. Kamilus Sana (Urdu translation by Kantoori GH) Vol. I. Lucknow: Munshi Nawal Kishore; 1889: 469-70. 27. Jurjani AHI. Zakhira Khawarzam Shahi (Urdu translation by khan HH) Vol. II, Part 6. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; 1996::540-41. 28. Ibne Zohar. Kitabut Taiseer (Urdu translation by CCRUM). New Delhi: CCRUM; 1986: 160-63. 29. Ibne Hubal B. Kitabul Mukhtarat Fil Tib (Urdu translation by CCRUM). Vol. III. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2005: 326-8. 30. Razi MZ. Kitabul Havi. (Urdu translation by CCRUM). Vol. 10. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2002: 181-87. 31. Wild S, Rogli G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1047-1053. 32. Berrens M, Kahn R, Nolan J, Pramming S, Riazza RA. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications, Report of a WHO Consultation, Part 1. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance; 1999: 2-10. 33. Sajeeth CI, Manna PK, Manavalan R, Jolly CI. Antidiabetic activity of a polyherbal formulation esf/ay/500 in streptozotocin induced diabetic male 111 Bibliography albino rats: a research. International Journal of Drug Formulation & Research. Aug-Sep. 2010; Vol. 1(1) 2229-5054. 34. Qarshi MH, Jameul Hikmat. Vol. II. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; 2011: 864-70. 35. Khan MA. Romooze Aazm (Farsi). Vol. I. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2006: 13941. 36. Hui D, Leung A, Padwal R. Approach to Internal Medicine. 3rd ed. Houston USA: Springer; 2001: 337-42. 37. Ghosh AK, Wittich CK, Rhodes DJ. Mayo Clinic Internal Medicine Review. 8th ed. Canada: Mayo Foundation Scientific Press; 2008: 234-39. 38. Goldman L, Dennis A. Cecil Text book of Medicine. 23th ed. Vol. II. USA: Saunders Elsevier Publication; 2003: 1424-33 39. Foster C, Mistry NF, Peddi PF, Sharma S. The Washington Manual of Medical Therapeutics. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010: 794-797. 40. Lloyed RV. Endocrine Pathology Differential Diagnosis and Molecular Advances. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science Business Media; 2010: 367, 368, 372-75. 41. Kirmani NBA. Kulliyate Nafeesi (Urdu translation by Kabeeruddin) Vol. I. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; YNM: 103, 106-8, 114-18. 42. Ahmed SI. Introduction to Al Umur Attabiyah. 1st ed. New Delhi: Saini Printers; 1980: 146, 162-72. 43. Azmi AA. Basic Concepts of Unani Medicine. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jamia Hamdard; 1995: 131 112 Bibliography 44. Maseehi AS. Kitabul Miya (Fit Tib) (Urdu Translation by CCRUM). New Delhi: CCRUM; 2008: 127-133. 45. Davies A, Blakeley AGH, Kidd C. Human Physiology. 1st ed. London: Harcout Puplisher; 2001: 451-56. 46. Khan AM, Rzaq MA, Ahad MA. Mojizul Mahsha (Arabi). New Delhi: Mujtabai; 1415: 387-78. 47. Samarqandi N. Sharah Asbab (Urdu translation by Ayyub M.). Vol. III. New Delhi: Aijaz Pulishing House; YNM: 38-48. 48. Khan MA. Akseere Azam (Urdu translation by Kabeeruddin M.). Vol. II. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; 2011: 705-709. 49. Souhami RL, Moxham J. Textbook of Medicine. 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, Medical division of Pearson limited; 2004: 979-80, 984-86, 994-95. 50. Wilson, Foster, Kronenberg HM, Larsen PR. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Saunders Company; 2003: 142768. 51. Stephen J. McPhee, Maxine A. Papadakis, Tierney LM. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment. San Francisco, USA: McGraw Hill’s; 2010: 97, 1104-9. 52. Shah Siddharth N. API Text Book of Medicine. Vol. II. 8th ed. Mumbai: The Association of Physicians of India; 2008: 1043-69 53. Dale DC, Federman DD. APC Medicine. Web MD; 2005: Chapter-6, 17801815. 54. Walter Siegenthaler. Differential Diagnosis in Internal Medicine.19th ed. Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag Rüdigerstrasse Stuttgart; 2007: 38-40. 113 Bibliography 55. Warrell DA, Cox TM, Firth JD, Edward J, Benz MD. Oxford Textbook of Medicine. 4th ed. New York, USA: Oxford Press; 2003: 1305-42. 56. Douglas G, Nicol F, Robertson C. Macleods’s Clinical Examination. 12th ed. China: Elsevier; 2009: 94-95 57. Ferri FF. Practical Guide to the Care of the Medical Patients. USA: Mosby Ink; 5th ed. 2001: 212-32. 58. Godlee EF, Tivery D. BMJ Clinical Evidence. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2004: 386-88. 59. Shils ME, Olson JA, Shike M, Ross AC. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease. 9th ed. USA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1999: 54-58. 60. Ledigham JGG, Warrel DA. Concise Oxford Textbook of Medicine. Landon: Oxford University Press; 2000: 734-37. 61. Corwin EJ. Handbook of Pathophysiology. 3rd ed. Columbus, Ohio: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 558-567. 62. Essential of nutrition 63. Petit W, Adamec C. The Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases and Disorders. New York: Facts on File, Inc; 2005: 60-67. 64. Torre DM, Lamb GC, Ruiswyk JJV, Schapira RM. Kochar's Clinical Medicine for Students. 5th ed. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009: 379-90. 65. Raghunathan K, Mitra R. Pharmacognosy of Indigenous Drugs. Vol. II. New Delhi: CCRAS; 806-12, 321-30. 66. Nadkarni KM. Indian Plants and Drugs. New Delhi: Srishti Book Distributers; 2005: Vol. 1, 1220-21, 173-4, 844-45. 114 Bibliography 67. Kirtikar KR, Basu BD. Indian Medicinal Plants with Illustrations. Vol. I. 2nd ed. Dehradun: Oriental Enterprises; 2003: 77-80, 116-20, 172-74 68. Anonymous. The Wealth of India. Vol. I A-F, II G-Ph, III Pi-Z. New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 2003: 207-8, 33-35, 215-16. 69. Duke JA, Godwin MJB. Handbook of Medicinal Herbs. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press 2002: 361. 70. William D. Pharmacographia Indica- A history of the principal drugs of vegetable origin. Vol. I & III. New Delhi: Published by Srishti book distributors; 2005: 54-56, 586-91. 71. Chopra RN, Nayar SL, Chopra IC. Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants. New Delhi: NISCAIR, CSIR; 2005: 244-45, 33, 244-45. 72. Khare CP. Indian Medicinal Plants. 1st ed. New Delhi: Springer Science; 2007, 80-81, 435-36. 73. Rastogi RP, Mehrotra BN. Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. I & II. New Delhi: Central Drug Research Institute; 1999: 288-89, 679-80. 74. Squire Peter Wyatt. British Pharmacopoeia. Vol. 4. Delhi: Asiatic Publishing House; 2009: 1216. 75. Bentley Robert. Medicinal Plants. Vol. I. Delhi: Asiatic Publishing House Laxmi Nagar; 2002: 243-45. 76. Anonymous. The Unani Pharmacopeia of India. Vol. I Part-1& IV. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2007: 30-31, 66-67. 77. Sharma PC, Yelne MB, Dennis TJ. Database on Medicinal Plants Used in Ayurveda. Vol. III. New Delhi: CCRAS: 2005: 256-60. 78. Behl PN. Srivastava G. Herbs Useful in Dermatological Therapy. 2nd ed. New Delhi: CBS Publisher and Distributor; 2002: 36-37, 136-37. 115 Bibliography 79. Nasreen S, Radha R, Jayashree N, Rajendran A. Assesment of Quality of Tinospora cardifolia (Willd). (Menispermaceae): Pharmacognostical and Phyto-Physicochemical profile. Internation Journal of Comprehensive pharmacy 2010; 0976-8157. 80. Soni H, Nayak G, Patel SS, Mishra K, Singh RP & Singhai AK. Pharmacognostic studies of the leaves of Tinospora cardifolia. IJPI’s Journal of Pharmacognosy and Herbal Formulation 2011; 2229-6840. 81. Anonymous. Qarabadeen Sarkari. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2006: 99, 121-22. 82. Anonymous. Medicinal Plants in Folklores of Northern India. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2001: 485. 83. Ghani N. Khazainul Advia. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; YNM: 395-6, 1075, 789-90. 84. Hakeem HMA. Bustanul Mufradat. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; 2002: 98, 459, 489-90, 210-11. 85. Rafeequddin M. Kanzul Adviyae Mufrada. Aligarh: University Publication Unit, Sarfaraz House; 1985: 481-82, 594-95. 86. Kulkarni PH, Shahida Ansari. The Ayurvedic Plants. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications; 2004: 221, 313. 87. Handa SS, Rakesh DD. Compendium of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Asia. Vol. II. Trieste, Italy: ICS UNIDO; 2006: 126, 133. 88. Gulam Nabi M. Makhzane Mufradat wa Murakkabat. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2007: 191, 203. 89. Bhattacharjee SK. Handbook of Medicinal Plants. 4th ed. Jaipur: Pointer Publishers; 2004: 352, 235-36. 116 Bibliography 90. Kabeeruddin M. Makhzanul Mufradat. New Delhi: Idara Kitabul Shifa; 2007: 292, 336, 354-55. 91. Joy PP, Thomas J, Mathew S, Skaria BP. Medicinal Plants. Ernakulam, Kerla: Agricultural University-Aromatic and Medicinal Plant Research Station; 1998: 81, 187, 200. 92. Abdul Hakeem HM. Mufradate Azeezi. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2009: 33, 104, 101. 93. Khan S. Bayaze Khas Almaroof Ilajulamraz. New Delhi: Aijaz Pulishing House; 2006: 252, 281, 282 302, 352, 362, 392, 485, 631, 776. 94. Kabeeruddin. Bayaze Kabir. Vol 2, Part 2. Hyderabad: Hikmat Book Depo; 1935: 27, 38, 55, 56, 57, 72, 74, 71, 78. 95. Hakeem M Said. Hamdard Pharmacopoeia of Eastern Medicine. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Indian Books Centre; 1997: 80, 81, 86, 92, 107, 125, 128, 130, 158, 202, 247. 96. Sivakumar V, Dhana Rajan MS. Hypoglycemic and antioxidant activity of Tinospora cardifolia in experimental diabetes. International Journal of Pharmacceutical Sciences and Research 2011; 2(3): 608-613. 97. Stanely P, Prince M and Menon VP: Hypoglycemic and other related actions of Tinospora cordifolia roots in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacology 2000; 70 (1): 9 -15. 98. Stanely Mainzen Prince P, Menon VP, Gunasekaran G. Hypolipidaemic action of Tinospora cordifolia roots Ethnopharmacology 1999; 64: 53–7. 117 in alloxan diabetic rats. J Bibliography 99. Dinesh D, Vaneeta J, Sunil S, Kumar HR. Evaluation of antiobesity activity of Tinospora cardifolia stems in rats. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy 2011; 2(1) 306-311 100. Maurya R, Wazir V, Tyagi A, Kapil RS. Clerodane diterpenoids from the Tinospora cardifolia. Phytochemistry 1995; 38: 659. 101. Grover JK, Rathi SS, Vats V. Amelioration of experimental diabetic neuropathy and gastropathy in rats following oral administration of plant (Eugenia jambolana, Mucuna pruriens and Tinospora cordifolia) extracts. Indian J Exp Biol 2002; 40: 273–6. 102. Raghunathan K, Sharma PV. The aqueous extract of T. cordifolia caused reduction of blood sugar in alloxan induced hyperglycemic rats and rabbits. J Res Ind Med. 1969; 3: 203-9. 103. Gupta SS, Verma SC, Garg VP, Rai M. Antidiabetic effect of Tinospora cordifolia. I: Effect on fasting blood sugar level, glucose tolerence and adrenaline induced hyperglycemia. Indian J Med Res.1967; 55: 733-45. 104. Wadood N, Wadood A, Shah SA. Effect of Tinospora cordifolia on blood glucose and total lipid levels of normal and alloxan-diabetic rabbits. Planta Med. 1992; 58: 131-6. 105. Badar VA, Thawani VR, Wakode PT, Shrivastava MP, Gharpure KJ, Hingorani LL. et al. Efficacy of Tinospora cordifolia in allergic rhinitis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005; 96: 445-9. 106. Rao PR, Kumar VK, Viswanath RK, Subbaraju GV. Cardioprotective activity of alcoholic extract of Tinospora cordifolia in ischemia-reperfusion induced myocardial infarction in rats. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005; 28: 2319-22 118 Bibliography 107. Nagaraja PK, Kammar KF, Devi S. Efficacy of Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) extracts on blood lipid profile in streptozotocin diabetic rats: Is it beneficial to the heart? Biomedical Research 2008; 19: 92-6. 108. Mehrotra R, Katiyar CK, Gupta AP. Hepatoprotective composition and composition for treatment of conditions related to hepatitis Band E infection. US Patent 2000; 749296 109. Singh SS, Pandey SC, Srivastava S, Gupta VS, Patro B, Ghosh AC. Chemistry and medicinal properties of Tinospora cardifolia. Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2003; 35: 83-91. 110. Wesley JJ, Christina AJ, Chidambaranathan N. Effect of alcoholic extract of Tinospora Cordifolia on acute and subacute Inflammation. Pharmacologyonline. 2008; 3: 683-7. 111. Singh N, Singh SM, Shrivastava P. Immunomodulatory and antitumor actions of medicinal plant Tinospora cordifolia are mediated through activation of tumor-associated macrophages. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2005; 26: 145-62. 112. Kapur P, Jarry H, Wuttke W, Pereira BM, Seidlova-Wuttke D. Evaluation of the antiosteoporotic potential of Tinospora cordifolia in female rats. Maturitas. 2008; 59: 329-38. 113. Gupta RS, Sharma A. Antifertility effect of Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) stem extract in male rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 2003; 41: 885-9. 114. Bafna PA, Balaraman R. Anti-ulcer and anti-oxidant activity of pepticare: A herbomineral formulation. Phytomedicine. 2005; 12: 264-70. 119 Bibliography 115. Asthana JG, Jain S, Mishra A, Vijaykant MS. Evaluation of antileprotic herbal drug combinations and their combination with Dapsone. Indian Drugs. 2001; 38: 82-6. 116. Nayampalli SS, Ainapure SS, Samant BD, Kudtarkar RG, Desai NK, Gupta KC. A comparative study of diuretic effects of Tinospora cordifolia and hydrochloro-thiazide in rats and a preliminary phase I study in human volunteers. J Postgrad Med. 1988; 34: 233-6. 117. Nagaraja PK, Kammar KF, Devi S. Modulation of morphology and some gluconeogenic enzymes activity by Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) in diabetic rat kidney. Biomed Res. 2007; 18: 179-83. 118. Evans WC. Treas and Evans Pharmacognosy. 15th ed. London: Saunders Publishers; 2004: 37-38. 119. Prajapati ND, Kumar U. Agro’s Dictionary of Medicinal Plants. Agrobios: Jodhpur: 2005, 224. 120. Daood Antaki. Tazkete Ulul Albaab (Arabi). Vol. 1. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2008, 430-31. 121. Arzani MA. Qarabadeene Qadri. New Delhi: Aijaz Publishing House: 1998: 160, 197, 203, 205, 208, 437. 122. Anonymous. National formulary of Unani Medicine. Vol. 4. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2007: 57. 123. Anonymous. Qarabadeen Majeedi. 9th ed. New Delhi: Ajanta Offset & Packaging Ltd; 2000: 43, 45, 54, 63, 119, 124, 125, 127, 128, 182, 325. 124. Ibraheem Almaghribi AS. Kitabul Fath Fil Tadawi (Urdu Translation). New Delhi: NCPC Printers; 2007: 122-123. 120 Bibliography 125. Hubl Baghdadi. Al Mukhtarat Fit Tib. Vol. II. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2005: 162. 126. Anonymous. Medicinal Plants in Folklores of Southern India. New Delhi: CCRUM; 2001: 52. 127. Prajapati ND, Purohit SS, Sharma AK. A Handbook of Medicinal Plants. 1st ed. Jodhpur: Agrobios; 2009: 360. 128. Satyavati GV, Gupta AK. Medicinal Plants of India. Vol-2. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 1987: 325-28. 129. Rafiullah MRM, Ali M, Pillai KK, Singh S. Antidiabetic Activity of Nelumbo nucifera extract in Normal and Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Rats. Hippocratice Journal of Unani Medicine June 2008; Vol. No. 2, 69-78. 130. Jiang Y, Bun Ng T, Liu Z, Wang C, Li N, Qiao W, Liu F. Imonoregulatory and anti-HIV-1 Enjyme activities of antioxidants components from lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn) rhizome. Bioscience Reports Immediate Publication Nov 2010; 20100062. 131. Wang L, Yen JH, Liang HL, Wu MJ. Antioxidant Effect of Methanolic Extracts from Lotus Plumle and Blossom (Nelumbo nucefera). Journal of food and drug Analysis 2003; Vol. 11, 1: 60-66. 132. Durairaj B, Dorai A. Antiplatele activity of white and pink Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn flowers. Razilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2010; 46, 3. 133. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, et al. Prevalence of Diabetes among Men and Women in China. The New England Journal of Medicine 2010; 362: 12, 1090. 134. Connolly V, Unwin N, Sherriff P, Bilous R, Kelly W. Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased 121 Bibliography prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54: 173–177. 135. Jali MV, Kamber S. Prevalence of the family members of the known diabetics. Int J Diab Dev Ctries October 2010; IP: 59.183.135 136. Valdez R. Detecting Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Family History as a Risk Factor and Screening Tool. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology July 2009; Volume 3, Issue 4, 137. Sena CM, Louro T, Matafome P, Nunes E, Monteiro P, Seiça R. Antioxidant and Vascular Effects of Gliclazide in Type 2 Diabetic Rats Fed High-Fat Diet: Physiol. Res. 2009: 58: 203-209. 122 Annexure ANNEXURE I PATIENT’S CONSENT FORM I …………………………………………………....exercising my free power of choice, hereby give my consent to be included as a subject in the clinical trial of Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakari (Diabetes Mellitus Type II) and Evaluation of Efficacy of a Unani Formulation in its Management. I understand that I may be treated with these drugs for the disease, I am suffering from. I have been informed to my satisfaction, by attending physician the purpose of the clinical trial and the nature of drug treatment and follow up including the laboratory investigation to monitor and safeguard my body function. I am also aware of my right to drop out of the trial at any time during the course of the trial without having to give the reason for doing Date: ……………………. Signature of Patient………………… Signature of Doctor………………… 123 Annexure ANNEXURE II NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF UNANI MEDICINE KOTTEGEPALYA MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE. Clinical Study of Ziabetus Shakri (diabetes Mellitus Type II) and Evaluation of Efficacy of a Unani Formulation in its Management CASE REPORT FORM S. NO. ……………..…OPD/ IPD NO. ……….………. C. R. NO………….….……… Ñame……………...................................... Father’s name ………………………………. Age/Sex …………………………..………Religion …………………………………..... Marital status ………………….…………Occupation.................................................... Address ………………….……………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………… …. Date of starting of treatment: …………………..……….. Date of completion of treatment: …………….…………. Chief Complaints: Polyuria Polydipsia Polyphagia Tiredness Progressive weakness Dizziness Unexplained weight loss Pruritus Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N H/O Present illness: ………………………………………………………………………………………… …. ………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………… History of past illness: 124 Annexure 1. DM……………………………………. 2 .HTN…………………………………... 3. Liver diseases ………………………... 4. Renal diseases……………………..….. 5. Cardiovascular Diseases……………… Family history: Father.............................................. Brother.................…………...…… Son…………….. ………………... Mother…………………… Sister……………………... Daughter…………………. Personal history: 1. Appetite: Good / Fair / Poor. 2. Diet: Veg. / Non Veg / Mixed. 3. Addiction: Smoking / Alcoholism / Pan Chewing / others............................... 4. Sleep: Good / fair / poor 5. Bowel habit: Day / Night…….……… 6. Bladder habit: Day / Night……........... 7. Psychological status: ………………… 8. Physical work: Sedentary /Mild/Moderate/Hard work Social history: Upper class/Upper Middle class/Lower Middle Class/……………………………. Upper Lower class/Lower class……………………………………………………. Occupational history: 1. Name of work ……………………2. Nature of work ………………………… Treatment history: Allopathic/Unani/Ayurvedic/Homeopathic………… Name of the medicine: …………………………. H/O Allergy …………………………………………………………………………….. Gynecological and Obstetrical History: 1. Age of menarche............. 2. Duration of cycle............... 3. Amount of flow............... 4. Duration of menses............ 5. Dysmenorrhoea............... 6. Gravida.............................. 7. Parity............................... 8. Abortion............................ 9. Last delivery.................... 10. LMP................................ 11. H/O Contraceptives................... GENERAL PHYSICAL EXAMINATION 1. Built ……….. 2. Body weight……… 3. Height............ 4. Pallor.......... 5. Cyanosis …… 6. Clubbing of finger ……………… 7. Icterus ……….. 8. Edema 9. Arcus Senilis...... 10. Xanthelasma………...…............ 11. Lymphadenopathy …………………..................... 12. Cervical lymph node……………………….……… 125 Annexure Vitals: 13. Pulse: a.Rate ………… b.Rhythm…………..........c.Volume…………................................ d.Character................................... e.Synchronicity...................................... 14. Blood Pressure:Systolic……… Diastolic………………………….......... 15. Temperature………………………….. 16. Respiratory rate................................... SYSTEMIC EXAMINATION: 1. Nervous system: Higher mental functions…………………………………… Motor functions……………………………………………. Sensory functions………………………………………….. Reflexes……………………………………………………. 2. Cardiovascular System: Inspection…………………………………………………. Palpation…………………………………………………... Percussion…………………………………………………. Auscultation………………………………………...……… 3. Respiratory system: Inspection………………………………………………….. Palpation…………………………………………………… Percussion…………………………………………………. Auscultation……………………………………………..… 4. Digestive system: Inspection……………………...…………………..……… Palpation………………………...………………….……… Percussion…………………..……….…………………….. Auscultation…………………………...………….……….. LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS: BLOOD: Hb % ………………….…. TLC ……………………………. DLC (P …………… L………….: E …………B……………. ESR: ………………..…. Blood Sugar (Fasting) ……………………… Blood Sugar (P.P.) ……………...………….. HbA1c…………………. URINE: Urine Routine and Microscopic: Urine for Sugar and ketone bodies ECG………………………………………………………..…….. 126 Annexure LFT……………………………………………………………….. KFT: ……………………………………………………………… Diagnosis………………………………………………………….. Treatment…………………………………………………………. PARAMETER FOR ASSESMENT: Assessment of efficacy: A. Clinical Parameter: S.No. Sbjective Parameter 1. Polyuria 2. Polydipsia 3. Polyphagia 4. Tiredness 5. Progressive weakness 6. Dizziness 7. Unexplained weight loss 8. Pruritus 0 day 15th day 30th day 45th day Grading Nil: 0 Mild: + Moderate: ++ Severe: +++ B. Laboratory Parameter: S.No. Objective Parameter 0 day 15th day 127 30th day 45th day Annexure 1. Blood sugar (F) 2. Blood Sugar (P.P.) 3. HbA1C 4. Urine for sugar Nil: 0 Mild: + Moderate: ++ Severe: +++ Assessment of Safety Parameter: S.No. Objective Parameter Before Treatment Routine 1. Urine Microscopic Urine for Ketone bodies 2. Haemogram Hb% TLC DLC 3. KFT Blood Urea S. Creatinine 4. LFT AST ALT 5. ECG 128 After Treatment Annexure Date of starting treatment… …… Follow up: 0…... 30…….60 days Date of completion of treatment: ……………. Result... ……………………. Signature of PG scholar ……………………. Signature of supervisor ……………………. 129 Annexure ANNEXURE III Assessment of Mizaj (Temperament) parameters DAMVI (Sanguine) BALGHAMI (Phlegmatic) SAFRAVI (Bilious) SAUDAVI (Melancholic) Complexion Ruddy(Reddish /brown) 1 Chalky (Whitish) .75 Pale (Yellowish) .5 Purple (Black) .25 Build Muscular & Broad 1 Fatty & Broad .75 Muscular & Thin .5 Skeletal .25 Touch Hot & Soft 1 Cold Soft Hot & Dry .5 Cold & Dry .25 Hair Black & lusty, thick, Rapid Growth. 1 Black & thin. Slow Growth. .75 Brown & Thin. Rapid Growth .5 Brown & Thin. Slow Growth. .25 1 Dull .75 Hyperactive .5 Less Active .25 Cold & Dry 1 Hot & Dry .75 Cold & Moist .5 Hot & Moist .25 Spring 1 Summer .75 Winter .5 Autumn .25 Sleep Normal (6-8 hrs.) 1 In excess .75 Inadequate .5 Insomnia .25 Pulse Normal (70-80/min) 1 Slow (60-70) .75 Rapid (80-100) .5 Slow (60-70) .25 Emotions Normal 1 Calm quiet Angry .5 Nervous .25 Movement Diet (most liked) Weather (most liked) Active & .75 & .75 Total = Range of temperament in numbers: Sanguine: 7.5-10……………….. : Phlegmatic: 5.10-7.50…………… Bilious: 2.51-5.00……………… : Melancholic: 0.00 – 2.50………… Balghami Safravi Saudavi Damvi ANNEXURE IV Kuppuswamy’s Socioeconomic Status Scale (Modified for 2007) 130 ; Annexure Score Card A. Education 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score Professional Graduate or post graduate Intermediate or post high school diploma High school certificate Middle school certificate Primary school certificate Illiterate B. Occupation Professional Semi professional Clerical, shop owner, farmer Skilled worker Semiskilled worker Unskilled worker Unemployed C. Family income per month (in Rs.) >19575 9788-19574 7323-9787 4894-7322 2936-4893 980-2935 ≤979 Total Scores 26-29 16-25 11-15 5-10 ≤5 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Score 10 6 5 4 3 2 1 Score 12 10 6 4 3 2 1 Socioeconomic status Upper (I) Upper Middle(II) Lower Middle (III) Upper Lower(IV) Lower (V) 131 Key to Master chart KEY TO MASTER CHART Ab Absent Ly Lymphocyte Ba Basophile M Male Bal Balghami Mo Monocyte CR No. Central Register M.S Marital status Number Occ Occult Crt Crystals Plent Plenty d Day Po Polymorph Dam Damwi Pus Pus cells D/Ill Duration of illness S. Serum DLC Differential leukocyte SES Socioeconomic status count Saf Safravi Eo Eosinophil TLC Total leukocyte count Epi Epithelial cell Tr Trace F Female Veg Vegetarian F/H Family history W White Blood Cell Hb% Haemoglobin % 132 S.E.S Mental status Adiction F/H T/H Mizaj Islam House Wife Islam House Wife Islam Silk Merchant Islam Cooli Islam Painter Islam House Wife Islam Officer BSNL Islam Machenic Islam Silk Merchant Hindu House Wife Islam Electrician Islam House wife Islam Driver Islam House Wife Hindu House wife Dietary Habits F F M M M F M M M F M F M F F Duration of Illness Sex 65 45 60 55 43 52 64 45 48 45 36 45 46 36 62 Past History Age 111626 116307 115279 123251 9159 115616 11115 119264 11745 6607 120961 120400 120415 119426 20247 Occupation C. R. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Religion Serial No. Master Chart (Control Group) DM DM DM DM HTN DM DM DM DM DM DM NS NS NS NS 10 Months 6 Months 2 Years First Diag. 2 Years 7 Years 5 Months 3 Years 1 Years 3 Years 6 Months 5 Years 2 Years 3 Years 3 Months N Veg N Veg N Veg. N Veg N Veg N Veg N Veg N Veg N Veg N Veg N Veg N Veg. N Veg. N Veg Veg. UL UL LM Lower LM UL UM LM UM UL UL LM UL Lower UM Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd Mrd NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS DM NS DM DM DM DM HTN DM HTN DM DM NS NS Allopath Unani Allopath None Allopath Unani Unani Unani Allopath Allopath Unani Allopath Unani Allopath Unani Bal Bal Bal Bal Bal Dam Bal Dam Bal Bal Bal Bal Bal Bal Dam 133 Master Chart (Control Group) Sujective Parameters Polyuria Polydipsia Polyphagia Tiredness Progressive weakness 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 4 3 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 15 d 30 d 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 134 Dizziness Unexplained Wt loss 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 15 d 30 d 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pruritus 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Master Chart (Control Group) Objective Parameters FBS PPBS HbA1c Urine Sugar 0d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0d 45 d 0d 15 d 30 d 45 d 249 148 133 280 227 144 172 164 261 205 163 168 155 256 128 223 127 103 286 144 151 167 291 298 158 201 284 180 305 86 221 142 153 214 174 142 168 238 241 154 256 245 183 280 87 307 116 121 198 187 151 191 248 152 116 238 231 182 235 105 321 233 274 382 290 268 266 263 314 311 274 295 281 370 252 323 144 152 392 235 268 265 321 385 246 323 342 337 448 107 279 192 191 318 264 157 261 345 385 301 411 471 317 404 119 311 198 145 340 296 238 289 339 271 181 372 463 301 342 203 7.1 8.3 7.6 11.6 9.3 8.6 9 9.4 10.3 10.1 9.1 10 8.9 10.9 6.5 7.9 7.5 7.3 9.5 9 7.8 7.8 10.1 8.2 7.9 10.5 10.2 8.1 8.1 6.3 1 2 0 1.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 135 Master Chart (Control Group) Safety Parameters DLC Hb% TLC BT AT BT AT 12.4 13.9 14 14.1 15.3 12.5 14 12 14.5 10.4 13.1 12.6 12.3 11.1 11.5 11.2 12.7 13.5 11.7 14.7 12.3 14.1 10.5 13.5 8.7 14 13.9 14.4 12 12 9,600 6200 9700 5500 11000 7600 9400 6800 7200 8700 10000 11,100 7200 11000 10000 9100 10100 9800 9400 8900 6700 8300 5050 8200 7200 9400 5250 5000 8900 7600 Po Ly Eo Mo BU Ba BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT 60 73 55 70 61 53 60 57 59 57 65 65 50 59 56 55 58 54 67 58 55 66 54 60 48 54 79 58 52 61 34 25 39 27 33 40 34 36 34 43 31 28 42 35 39 40 38 40 28 38 39 30 42 34 48 39 18 37 43 35 4 1 4 3 4 4 4 4 6 2 2 4 5 4 3 3 3 5 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 4 1 5 3 2 3 0 2 0 2 3 2 3 1 4 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 0 3 1 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 20 28 25 29 22 32 23 30 31 25 22 27 29 16 18 SC BT AT SUr BT AST AT BT AT BT AT 21 0.9 0.7 5 2.8 14 14 20 0.9 0.8 4.10 3.10 16 13 16 0.8 0.8 3.4 3.9 18 16 17 1 0.8 2.8 5.70 21 21 26 0.90 1.1 3.2 4.7 37 29 29 0.9 0.9 2.4 4.00 30 20 25 0.9 0.8 5.3 5.5 23 20 27 0.8 1 4.4 3.5 22 24 22 1 0.9 3.2 4.4 18 23 20 0.9 0.7 2.6 3.9 14 17 20 0.8 0.8 5.5 5.4 16 16 25 0.7 1 4.8 4.4 12 17 28 0.7 1 4.60 4.80 17 22 21 0.8 1.1 3.5 5.1 14 21 21 0.6 0.8 5.4 3.6 22 20 136 ALT 20 23 19 18 48 35 28 25 15 19 32 19 28 19 28 UR BT 18 N 12 N 22 N 26 N 36 N 25 N 18 N 19 N 26 Alb Tr 19 N 23 N 15 N 27 N 23 N 18 N UM AT BT ECG AT N N N N N 1-2 W N N N N N N N2-3 Crystal N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Occ W N N N N N N N N N N N N BT AT N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Serial No. C. R. No. Age Sex Religion Occupation Past History Duration of Illness Dietary Habits S.E.S Mental status Adiction F/H T/H Mizaj Master Chart (Test Group) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 112583 119461 118671 181326 118053 3529 117254 9863 113347 5011 124446 4491 380 119238 122820 124545 48 56 45 50 35 45 48 65 39 45 57 63 38 43 42 40 M M M F M M F M F F M M M M M M Islam Hindu Hindu Hindu Hindu Islam Islam Islam Hindu Islam Islam Hindu Islam Islam Islam Hindu Silk Merchant Machenic Pujari House wife Oil Filler House wife Shop keeper Welding House wife House wife Carpenter Peon Mechanic NGO Work Tailor Shop keeper DM DM NS DM DM DM DM DM DM HTN NS HTN DM DM DM NS 8 Months 2 Years 3 Years 1 Yr 4 Months 7 Months 5 Years 6 Months 6 Months 3 Years 3 Months 5 Years 6 Months 6 Months 4 Years 1 Year N Veg Veg Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. N Veg. Veg LM LM UL UL LM UL UL UM LM LM UL UM UL LM LM UM Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Married Pan Chewing NS NS NS Smoking NS NS NS NS NS Tobc Chew NS Tobc Chew NS Tobc Chew NS DM NS NS DM NS NS NS NS NS DM DM NS DM DM NS DM None Allopath Allopath Allopath Ayurvedic Unani Allopath None Allopath Allopath None Allopath Allopath Unani Unani Unani Dam Bal Bal Dam Bal Bal Dam Dam Bal Bal Bal Saf Bal Bal Saf Bal 137 Master Chart (Test Group) Sujective Parameters Polyuria Polydipsia Polyphagia Tiredness Progressive weakness Dizziness Unexplained Wt loss Pruritus 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0 d 15 d 30 d 45 d 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 138 Master Chart (Test Group) Objective Parameters FBS PPBS HbA1c Urine Sugar 0d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0d 15 d 30 d 45 d 0d 45 d 0d 15 d 30 d 45 d 228 180 179 136 283 261 238 197 10 7.3 2 1 2 1 191 141 117 140 283 195 168 243 9.3 8 0.5 0 0 0 187 370 157 198 389 442 305 394 9 9.3 0.5 2 0 0 191 160 147 179 263 202 193 277 8.3 8.5 1 0 0 0 191 149 192 180 288 186 210 253 7.1 6.5 1 0.5 1.5 0.5 172 183 175 180 347 265 247 296 10.2 9.1 0 0.5 0 0 183 284 169 166 311 396 259 265 8.8 8 1 2 0 0 209 175 164 187 290 245 253 296 8.1 9,2 0.5 0.2 0 0 176 128 145 133 200 226 180 242 8.3 7.8 0 0 0 0 141 122 130 125 229 199 243 204 9 8.6 0 0 0 0 127 113 114 113 242 205 212 153 7.2 6.7 0 0 0 0 153 151 163 224 232 263 242 315 9 9.9 0 0 0 0 173 199 158 205 237 305 281 301 10 9.4 0.5 0 0 0 151 136 148 150 245 220 220 210 8.3 7.9 0 0 0 0 342 360 326 360 490 430 437 430 10.6 10.1 2 2 2 1 166 208 117 115 180 269 246 192 7.9 6.7 2 1 1 1 139 Master Chart (Test Group) Safety Parameters Hb% BT AT TLC Po Ly DLC Eo Mo BU Ba SC SUr AST ALT UR BT AT 8200 7700 68 58 28 37 2 2 2 3 0 0 36 28 0.9 3.7 4.9 23 22 27 31 N 13.8 6900 8200 60 54 32 40 8 4 0 2 0 0 18 17 0.9 0.9 3.8 4.9 16 16 18 15 13.3 12.5 8100 8900 67 70 28 26 3 3 2 1 0 0 32 28 0.8 12.9 12 9900 9900 66 62 30 32 3 4 1 2 0 0 24 18 0.8 0.6 14.1 14 7200 7600 55 50 40 41 3 5 2 4 0 0 21 18 0.90 0.6 4.7 12.4 10900 9900 54 50 39 44 4 4 3 2 0 14.5 14.6 14 12 BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT BT AT 1 AT BT AT N N N N N N N N 2-3 W N N N N 1-2 Crt N N N N N N N N N 3.8 25 33 42 50 N N 2-3 CrT N N N 0 24 37 0.8 0.8 4.50 4.60 21 25 23 19 N N N NN N N 10000 62 57 32 36 3 4 3 3 0 0 36 31 0.9 14.8 14.9 8400 1 1 5 3 BT 17 14 23 19 9700 3.4 ECG 2.50 19 17 31 23 12.3 11.6 1 UM 3.6 3.6 20 12 16 15 N N N N N N 7900 64 59 32 36 3 3 1 2 0 0 33 19 0.7 4.9 4.4 21 14 23 22 N N N N N N 13.6 11.8 11300 12900 53 58 41 38 3 2 3 2 0 0 22 18 0.9 0.7 4.2 4.1 30 23 21 20 N N N N N N 11.2 12.5 10700 10400 66 70 28 23 4 3 2 4 0 0 27 20 0.9 0.8 3.2 2.3 36 22 38 28 N N N N N N 11.5 12.1 8300 5900 62 58 30 32 4 5 4 2 0 2 29 38 1.1 1.5 5.8 8.9 51 35 80 59 N N N Occ W N N 11.8 14.1 11300 9800 57 63 37 33 3 2 3 2 0 0 22 31 0.9 5.1 18 14 14 23 N N N N N N 13.4 15 1 3.9 12000 9400 61 62 33 33 3 3 3 2 0 0 26 25 0.8 0.8 4.3 16 25 28 30 N N N 2-3 W N N 13.3 14.6 8500 8000 61 63 33 32 3 3 3 2 0 0 27 26 0.9 6.3 8.1 32 30 46 42 N N N 0-1 W N N 12.9 14.5 6200 5400 58 54 38 41 2 3 2 2 0 0 38 32 0.9 1.1 2.4 4.1 17 13 30 22 N N N N N N 12.8 12.9 8400 7900 50 52 43 41 4 4 3 2 0 1 21 24 0.9 5.2 20 18 18 22 N N N N N N 140 1 1 4.3 3