use of advanced processes yields big savings and better
Transcription
use of advanced processes yields big savings and better
USE OF ADVANCED PROCESSES YIELDS BIG SAVINGS AND BETTER WATER QUALITY FOR SOMERTON JAMES A. MATTHEWS, PE SR. VICE PRESIDENT, ENVIRONMENTAL WATER JOSE PALOMARES, OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR Somerton, Arizona WWTP Location YUMA , AZ 7 Miles from US Border SBR Expansion Option u Based on Budget could Expand from 0.8 to 1.2 MGD = 0.4 MGD for $6.2M u Required Upgrading Existing Electrical Service and Generator u Required Doubling Blower Capacity u Required Expansion of Drying Beds Original 30 HP PD Blowers Original Drying Beds Original 0.8 MGD SBR Facility Capacity Expansion Option Alternative Approach Converts Process to 4-Stage Continuous Flow BNR Alternative Approach Converts Process to 4-Stage Continuous Flow BNR u Increased Capacity by 1.0 MGD for $7.6M u Reduced energy consumption u Reduced land use u New energy efficient turbo blowers u New energy efficient Aerostrip diffusers u New automated solids dewatering system Somerton WWTP Expansion u Continuous Flow BNR Allowed for: – Capacity Expansion to 1.8 MGD less than Budget – Over all Reduction in Plant Energy Consumption & Demand – Blower HP Reduction from 180 to 100 HP – New Aeration Diffusers 33% Better Eff. – New Dewatering Facility Reduces Odors & O&M Energy Efficient Blowers Rotary Lobe Blowers vs. High-Speed Turbo Blowers Capital Cost ($) Additional Rotary Lobe New High-Speed Turbo $55,000 $104,500 Aeration Power Cost ($/year) Evaluated Condition Flow MGD Estimated Savings/yr Break-Even Start-up 0.9 $6,000 8.3 years Design Average Day Flow 1.8 $14,000 3.6 years Energy Efficiency Air Diffusers u Existing EDI Fine Bubble Diffusers vs. Aerostrip Ultra-fine Bubble Diffusers Capital Cost ($) Expand Exist. EDI New Aerostrip $37,500 $92,500 Aeration Power Cost ($/year) Evaluated Condition Flow MGD Estimated Savings/yr Break-Even Start-up 0.9 $15,500 3.6 years Design Average Day Flow 1.8 $31,000 1.8 years Energy Efficient Air Diffusers 60 33% Better Transfer = 33% Less Air Required! Oxygen Transfer Eff. % 50 Aerostrip Ultra-Fine 40 EDI Fine Bubble 30 20 10 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Gassing Rate (SCFM/sf) 3.5 4 4.5 5 So How is Performance? Water Quality Comparison SBR vs. BNR Average Effluent Quality by Parameter Year BOD In/Out TSS In/Out Total Nitrogen In/Out 2007 312 / 16 164 / 16 <10 2008 247 / 14 167 / 15 <7 2009 316 / 13 161 / 10 <7 2010 337 / 9 164 / 9 <8 2011 322 / 5 166 / 6 <8 2012 347 / 2 166 / 3 <8 Renovated Plant Start-up Mid April 2011 Power Comparison SBR vs. BNR Total kWh 85000 80000 75000 70000 New Plant On-line 65000 60000 55000 50000 45000 40000 Total kWh Power Comparison SBR vs. BNR Billed Amount $9,000 $8,500 $8,000 $7,500 New Plant On-line $7,000 $6,500 $6,000 $5,500 $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 Billed Amount New 50 HP K-Turbo Blowers New Clarifiers New Dewatering Building New Twin Screw Presses Aerial View of WWTP