Mercedes-benz SlK (2004-2011)
Transcription
Mercedes-benz SlK (2004-2011)
Which? works for you Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Jul 2004 Class: Sports/convertibles New price: £31,285 - £54,368 Used price: From £6,225 On sale: Performance: Ride comfort: handling: ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ Boot & Storage: Safety: ★★★ ★★★ Reliability: ★★★★ Total score: 77% Solid and secure folding hard-top roof. Powerful engines and strong brakes. Reasonable boot. Poor visibility, roof-up. Expensive to buy and run. Thirsty engines. Recommended models in the range Which? Car Top Choice Model SLK 200K 2dr Tip Auto New price: £32,845 Used price: £9,750 Fastest Model SLK 55 2dr Tip Auto New price: £54,368 Used price: £14,695 4.9 secs 0-62mph: Most Efficient Model SLK 200K Grand Edition 2dr New price: £33,615 Used price: £11,895 Combined fuel economy: 36.2 mpg Cheapest Model to buy new SLK 200K 2dr New price: Overview The Mercedes-Benz SLK was one of the first roadsters with a metal folding hard-top roof, and has been since refined ever-further to combine a highly comfortable roof-up ride with proper sports car thrills top-down. The larger-engined version are more exciting, but the SLK is a good long-distance cruiser and some of its optional gadgets are very tempting. Buying second-hand, few used SLKs of this 2004-2011 generation can be found outside of the Mercedes-Benz dealer network, which isn’t such a bad thing – dealers can confirm the service record and there are useful guarantees with used cars that you won’t necessarily find at independent retailers. That said, prices tend to be high. The SLK was updated in 2008, with a new-look nose and some engine improvements. If you fancy the wind in your hair as you’re driving, but are worried that you might get chilly, the SLK’s Airscarf option could be what you need – a vent pumping out hot air at neck level to keep both driver and passenger cosy. Other tempting options include nappa leather and an AMG body styling kit (if you don’t go for the SLK 55 AMG itself). The SLK is a joy to drive, with steering and handling to match its sporty image. Its cabin is well designed, and although it’s narrow, the seats will accommodate people up to 6ft 6in tall. The entry-level supercharged 200K model is just about powerful enough to have fun, though it’s not as quick as a basic Audi TT. Mercedes-Benz has an average reliability rating overall, but this generation SLK is one of the better-performing models, scoring four stars in the latest Which? Car Survey. The most commonly reported issues are with the rainwater seals, ventilation system and springs. £31,285 Cheapest Model to buy used SLK 350 2dr Used price: £6,225 Cheapest Model to Run (new) SLK 200K Grand Edition 2dr New price: £33,615 Running costs: £23,490 (3 years/36,000 miles) Owner’s View Tremendous fun to drive. Excellent handling, superb performance with all the sensible gadgets you’d need, e.g. Airscarf. Smooth gearbox and surprisingly economical considering the 3.5 litre engine. It’s superb engineering, especially the folding roof mechanism. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles On the road How we test The SLK gives a lively ride, as you’d expect in a sports car like this, but it is comfortable for long journeys. Entry-level versions use the 1.8 supercharged engine (200K) which we tested; it’s sufficient to have some fun. Performance ★★★★★ The 1.8 supercharged engine (badged 200K) may seem like the poor man’s option but it provides plenty of power. From 2008, power went up from 163bhp to 184bhp, a useful boost. This engine remains smooth at all revs. The manual transmission isn’t that nice to use, as it doesn’t appreciate being rushed and requires quite a lot of effort to shift between gears; most Mercedes buyers prefer an automatic gearbox anyway, and this is invariably smooth and intuitive. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Ride comfort Acceleration (37-62mph) 4.9 secs 4.2 secs 3.3 secs We use the sophisticated electronic timing equipment to record standing-start and in-gear acceleration, and repeat each test several times. Ride comfort Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ The sporty, stiff chassis strikes a good balance for a sports car, and it’s sufficiently comfortable over long distances despite its firmness. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Performance Rating ★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ Ride comfort is assessed by our laboratory experts who have driven hundreds of thousands of miles in a myriad of different models. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles On the road continued... How we test Handling ★★★★★ Handling There’s little body roll when cornering, and directional stability is very good – the SLK achieved a high speed through our emergency obstacle avoidance test without losing control. The communicative steering helps here, and it’s geared quite highly so small inputs result in big changes in direction, great for a sporting car such as this. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ On-the-limit handling is explored well away from public roads to ensure a fair test. Our obstacle avoidance test is one of the harshest tests in the industry.. Brakes ★★★★★ Brakes Stopping power in the SLK isn’t a problem, and the brake pedal is perfectly weighted. The average stopping distance from 62mph in our tests was 38m. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Braking distance (62-0mph) 38.0m 34.5m 35.5m Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ The Which? Car braking test measures stopping distance from 62-0mph and is repeated ten times in quick succession to highlight any brake fade issues. Refinement and noise ★★★★ Refinement and noise You can tell Mercedes-Benz engineers spent quite a lot of time ensuring the SLK remains quiet. With the hood up, it’s easy to forget you are in a convertible car – although there is a hint of wind rustle around the windows. The engine stays pretty quiet at all times, even at high revs. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Cruising noise 70dB 70dB 70dB Rating ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ The Which? Car experts use a decibel meter to record interior sound levels at common UK motorway speeds, and combine this with subjective assessments to arrive at an overall score. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles On the road continued... How we test Cabin and controls ★★★★ Cabin and controls The SLK’s seats are well designed and comfortable, although if you want leather trim you’ll have to spend extra. Instruments are clear and the controls are simple to use although the radio can be a bit baffling at times. The cabin has a suitable display of opulence although things will appear quite bare without spending some money on options such as the upgraded stereo, wood-and-leather gearknob and wood-and-leather steering wheel. Even cupholders cost extra. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) ★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ Rating Visibility and parking ★★★★ Visibility in the SLK is quite poor. The pillars are necessarily large (to contain the electric folding mechanism) but this makes the windows quite small and there are noticeable blind spots fore and aft. Optional parking sensors can help with parking, and the 10.4m turning circle is quite good in this class. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Turning circle 10.4m 10.3m 10.4m Rating ★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★ We penalise cars with difficult controls, and we look for things like backlit light switches and easy-to-use heating and ventilation adjustments. Visibility and parking Visibility is a major issue for motorists today, so each car gets a 360-degree swivel view test to reproduce the driver’s eye view and any obscured areas. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles Comfort and practicality How we test As a two-seat roadster, the SLK isn’t going to be immensely practical, but it does have a decent-sized boot - when its roof is up - and excellent seats. It’s comfy for long journeys, and we love the optional ‘Airscarf’ neck-level heating system. Getting in and out Getting in and out ★★★★ The SLK sits low on the road and it can be a struggle to climb in and out of. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Seat space and comfort Rating ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★ Mercedes-Benz seems to be particularly proficient on seat comfort. The SLK’s seats are firmly padded, but comfortable over long distances. Side support is quite good too, although if you want soft leather and power adjustment for the seats you’ll need deep pockets. The driving position is suitable for drivers up to 6’ 6” and the seats are height-adjustable. The SLK is quite narrow inside though, so if two tall people are sitting in it they might be rubbing elbows. If there’s one option you must have, it’s the‘Airscarf’ seat ventilation system. This blows warm air around your neck, reducing stiffness on long journeys. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Rating ★★★ ★★★ ★★ We take measurements all around the driver and passenger’s door apertures and note the height of the seat, door sills and step down onto the car floor. The best cars don’t require too much bending or stretching to get in and out. Seat space and comfort We assess seat comfort subjectively, using our road testers’ expert knowledge and experience from thousands of different cars. And we measure the head-, legand elbowroom on offer in every seat, to see how well the car caters for people of all shapes and sizes. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles Comfort and practicality continued... How we test Boot and storage ★★★ Boot and storage The 240-litre boot is quite good by two-seat roadster standards, but the folding roof lives in the boot once folded, reducing capacity to 175 litres. Cabin storage is limited, with a small glovebox and few cubbies. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Heating and ventilation Boot space (seats up/down) 240 litres / litres 240 litres / litres 240 litres / 240 litres Rating ★★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★★★ Climate control is standard in the SLK. The engine warmed up swiftly from -10deg C in our tests, and the air conditioning system is powerful and effective. The ‘Airscarf’ system channels warm air to the neck area of both seats, and it’s a worthwhile option as it allows comfortable motoring even in low external temperatures. Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Carmakers give official stats for boot space, but our tests are more realistic. We load the boot up with measuring blocks only as far as the rear window line, so that luggage is well secured and won’t obscure rear visibility. We repeat the test with the rear seats up, and folded down (where possible). Heating and ventilation Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ Feel sorry for the tester who has to warm each car up from a frosty -10 degrees in our climate chamber. Starting with a cold engine, we measure how long it takes to warm up the front and rear of the cabin. Diesel cars usually take longer. We also check the effectiveness of air conditioning, where fitted. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles Running costs and depreciation How we test The SLK’s expensive purchase price is offset somewhat by great residual (resale) values; it’s still quite thirsty, though. Insurance groups for the SLK start in Group 16, rising to Group 19 for the SLK 55 AMG; VED (road tax) and BIK company car tax are reasonable for the SLK 200K, though the top-banded SLK 55 AMG’s another matter. Servicing at Mercedes main dealers is expensive, too. Fuel consumption The 30.4mpg figure we measured for the SLK 200K is a bit disappointing, especially considering it had a manual gearbox. Mercedes’ claim is for 36.2mpg, so we were a long way off this. Both SLK 280 and SLK 350 are said to return under 30mpg, and you’ll be lucky to see the claimed 23.5mpg in the SLK 55 AMG. Petrol (combined mpg, claimed) 23.5 mpg - 36.2 mpg Diesel (combined mpg, claimed) - Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Urban (claimed/measured) 22.4 mpg/21.6 mpg 20.8 mpg/20.8 mpg 18.2 mpg/18.7 mpg Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Extra urban (claimed/measured) 43.5 mpg/42.2 mpg 42.2 mpg/41.5 mpg 36.2 mpg/34.9 mpg Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Motorway (measured) 31.7 mpg 32.5 mpg 26.6 mpg Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Combined (claimed/measured) 32.5 mpg/30.4 mpg 30.4 mpg/31.0 mpg 26.7 mpg/26.4 mpg Fuel consumption We test fuel economy under strict lab conditions – using realistic test cycles – to reveal the facts behind the figures. Our figures rarely match manufacturer claims as, unlike the official mpg test, we measure economy with both a hot and cold engine, and on the motorway. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles Running costs and depreciation continued... How we test Emissions Emissions Carbon dioxide emissions start from 184g/km for the SLK 200K manual and 187g/km for its automatic counterpart, but all other versions put out more than 200g/km - 288g/km, from the SLK 55 AMG. Petrol (CO2, claimed) 184g per km - 288g per km Diesel (CO2, claimed) - Model tested petrol 1.8 (163bhp) manual 2-door (2006) petrol 3.0 (231bhp) manual 2-door (2008) petrol 3.5 (272bhp) manual 2-door (2007) Emissions (claimed/measured) 209g per km/219g per km 225g per km/215g per km 255g per km/253g per km While testing fuel economy, we also collect exhaust gases to enable us to measure the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted. We also check whether particulate filters are effective at removing sooty emissions from diesel engines. Safety Safety and security We rate cars for safety using Euro NCAP crash test scores (where available), alongside our own comprehensive safety checklist. Uniquely, we also feed in results from our accident avoidance test – after all, it’s far better to steer around a crash than rely on the airbags... Euro NCAP score No results available. Which? safety rating Security Active (crash avoidance) Passive (crash safety) Child Pedestrian - Security Theft of car: Theft from car: ★★★★★ ★★★ Security scores come from the security experts at Thatcham, who break into hundreds of cars each year. Most modern cars are very difficult to drive away, but are still too easy to steal from. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles Which? Car Survey results About our survey The Which? Car Survey is the UK’s most robust reliability and owner satisfaction survey. In 2015, drivers told us about 58,000 cars, covering more than 484 million miles in the previous 12 months (that’s equivalent to driving to the moon and back a hundred times). This unique feedback allows us to rate satisfaction and reliability for hundreds of new and used cars. Note: Star ratings below are from 1-5 (1 is very poor and 5 is very good). Percentages shown under ‘Most common faults’ indicate the proportion of owners reporting each problem in the past 12 months. Brand Sample size: 2,292 people Mercedes-Benz ratings Overall owner satisfaction for this brand Brand reliability Dealer Servicing & repair Model: Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sample size: 86 people Ownership ratings Overall owner satisfaction for this range Ease of driving Comfort Dash layout and controls Practicality Value for money Running costs In-car technology - Everyone who takes part in the Which? Car survey tells us about their car and the dealers who sell and service it. We analyse this feedback across all cars to give top-level satisfaction ratings for each brand, including the brand’s reliability record over the last eight years. All star ratings are out of five. Model ownership ratings ★★★★ ★★★★ Dealer Sales Service Driving enjoyment 83% Brand ratings These show how owners score this car in 12 different areas, from performance to heating. Owners’ ratings are subjective – so may differ from Which? Car test scores – but they give a good idea of what the car is like to live with. Where relevant, cars are scored against other cars in the same class (e.g. for space). 83% ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★ - Owner’s View A joy and pleasure to drive. What motoring used to be all about. Owner’s View Secure folding hard-top, excellent seats and a good boot, but SLK 200 needs more power. Which? Car review Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004-2011) Sports/convertibles Which? Car Survey results continued... About our survey Reliability ratings Reliability ratings Overall Reliability Petrol cars Reliability Breakdowns Average annual repair cost Diesel cars Reliability Breakdowns Average annual repair cost All cars Reliability Breakdowns Average annual repair cost ★★★★ Up to 3 years old 4-8 years old - - - - - - - - - ★★★★ 2% £203 We split reliability into breakdowns (including failure to start), faults (where parts need replacing) and problems (minor issues e.g. squeaks and loose trim). Where the car has been on sale for some time, and we have numerous survey responses from owners, we also split scores by the age of car and fuel type. Star ratings are out of five – the more stars, the more reliable the car. Most common faults Breakdowns: Percentage of cars suffering a breakdown in last 12 months Average annual repair cost: Average annual cost of repairs (not servicing), in past 12 months Most common faults Up to 3 years old - - - 4-8 years old - - - Rainwater seals Springs Ventilation - Other Exhaust System Fuel System Failure rate: The proportion of owners reporting this problem in the last year 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% Want to know what’s most likely to go wrong as the car gets older? These are the five most common faults reported by owners, grouped by age into new, recent and older cars. A score of 40% means four out of 10 owners reported problems with that part of the car over the previous 12 months. Engine electrics and non-engine electrics (e.g. windows, stereo) cause more headaches than mechanical parts in most modern cars.