Ford Mondeo (2000-2007)
Transcription
Ford Mondeo (2000-2007)
Which? works for you Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Sep 2000 Class: Large cars New price: - Used price: From £925 On sale: Performance: Ride comfort: handling: ★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ Boot & Storage: Safety: ★★★★ ★★★ Reliability: ★ Total score: 42% Good to drive. Refined and spacious. Plenty of choice of cheap used examples. Reliability is very poor. Poor rearward visibility. Awkward cabin layout. Recommended models in the range Which? Car Top Choice Model 1.8 Zetec 5dr New price: Used price: £1,695 Fastest Model 3.0 V6 ST220 5dr New price: Used price: £2,095 7.5 secs 0-62mph: Most Efficient Model 2.0TDCi 115 Titanium 4dr New price: Used price: £1,825 Combined fuel economy: 50.5 mpg Cheapest Model to buy new New price: Overview The 2000-2007 Mondeo is good to drive and second-hand prices are looking really tempting, especially petrol models. It’s a good all-rounder as a large family car - if not the most upmarket in image. The Mondeo is fun to drive and affordable, so no wonder it continues to be a big hit with the British public. The suspension is well-balanced, steering is responsive and the six-speed transmission (certain models only) is well suited to the engines. When pushed hard, it’s capable of delivering good performance. Inside, the driver has a clear view of switches and dials, with all important instruments easy to read and use. However, the cabin layout could still be improved. With the doors closed it’s difficult to reach the controls that adjust the front seats. And the lid of the central storage compartment gets in the way when using the handbrake. But noise levels are low, even at high speeds, and there’s plenty of head- and leg-room in the cabin as well as generous boot space. Reliability is now a big problem with the Mondeo. Almost one in five cars suffered a breakdown in the last year, say owners in the latest Which? Car survey, and average repair costs are high. Problems with the springs affect almost one in four cars, while other problem areas including the exhaust, air con, battery, steering and brakes. - Cheapest Model to buy used 2.0 LX 4dr Auto Used price: £925 Cheapest Model to Run (new) New price: Running costs: (3 years/36,000 miles) Owner’s View Tough, reliable, practical, problem-free, reasonable cost of spares. Some cars you wish you had never bought, but this one I like so much, I will keep it till it falls to bits. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars On the road How we test The Mondeo is great to drive, with well balanced suspension and responsive steering. When pushed hard, it delivers impressive performance too. Performance Performance ★★★ The Mondeo’s 1.8 SCi direct injection engine can feel a bit underpowered and has to be worked hard to achieve anything like sporty performance. However, the engine runs smoothly with little vibration throughout the rev range. The six-speed transmission (not available in the 1.8, 2.0 145PS or 2.0 TDCi 115PS) is well suited to the performance characteristics of the engine although fifth and sixth gears are essentially economy gears for cruising at speed. The gear change could be smoother. The 2.0 petrol option isn’t quite so high-tech, and although it offers a little more performance over the 1.8 SCi, it’s not enough to offset the inferior fuel economy and emissions. There will be plenty of used diesels around, and they make good choices. Fuel economy is much improved over the petrol variants, and there’s lots of urge available from really low revs in the 2.0 TDCi 130PS we tested, making it a pleasantly flexible drive. It’s a bit noisier than the petrols though. Model tested Acceleration (37-62mph) diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate 6.2 secs (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) 7.0 secs petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch 7.0 secs (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) 5.7 secs Ride comfort Rating ★★★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ The Mondeo’s suspension is very well balanced. All bumps are well absorbed and even when driving on poor surfaces, the car holds the road well. Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Rating ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ We use the sophisticated electronic timing equipment to record standing-start and in-gear acceleration, and repeat each test several times. Ride comfort Ride comfort is assessed by our laboratory experts who have driven hundreds of thousands of miles in a myriad of different models. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars On the road continued... How we test Handling ★★★★ Handling Steering is light and responsive and the car has a slight tendency to understeer in corners, which is preferable to oversteer. ESP helps keep the car on the road when swerving suddenly at high speed in some Mondeos, in which it was fitted as an option - try to find a Mondeo which has this feature. The ESP stability control package also included traction control, which prevents wheel spin under hard acceleration. Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★ Brakes ★★★★★ Brakes The brakes are responsive and easy to judge. Brake assist came as standard and helps the driver to fully apply the car’s brakes when needed. ABS anti-lock brakes ensure predictable stopping from speed. Model tested Braking distance (62-0mph) diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate 39.8m (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) 39.7m petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch 40.2m (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) 39.6m Rating ★★★★ Refinement and noise ★★★★★ Cabin noise is fairly hushed, even at high speeds. And like the Mondeo’s bodywork, everything inside is built to a high standard too, keeping annoying rattles and squeaks to a minimum. Cruising noise 69dB 68dB 182dB 67dB The Which? Car braking test measures stopping distance from 62-0mph and is repeated ten times in quick succession to highlight any brake fade issues. ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★ Refinement and noise Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) On-the-limit handling is explored well away from public roads to ensure a fair test. Our obstacle avoidance test is one of the harshest tests in the industry.. Rating ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ The Which? Car experts use a decibel meter to record interior sound levels at common UK motorway speeds, and combine this with subjective assessments to arrive at an overall score. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars On the road continued... How we test Cabin and controls ★★★ Cabin and controls The driver has a clear view of switches and dials and all the important instruments are easy to see and use. However, it’s not easy to spot the controls for front and rear fog lights. Electric windows are fitted with automatic obstruction and closing systems — to stop them closing on a child’s hand, for example. There are a couple of drawbacks with design and layout. With the doors closed it’s difficult to reach the controls that adjust the front seats. And the lid of the central storage compartment gets in the way when using the handbrake. Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Rating ★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★ Visibility and parking Rear visibility is poor. Non-adjustable rear head restraints and broad roof pillars obstruct the view. Electronic rear parking sensors were available as an optional extra, and are worth having. Heated door mirrors were standard-fit, and offer improved visibility on cold mornings. Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Turning circle 11.8m 11.8m 11.8m 11.8m Rating ★ ★ ★★ ★ We penalise cars with difficult controls, and we look for things like backlit light switches and easy-to-use heating and ventilation adjustments. Visibility and parking Visibility is a major issue for motorists today, so each car gets a 360-degree swivel view test to reproduce the driver’s eye view and any obscured areas. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars Comfort and practicality How we test The Mondeo is comfortable and spacious. There’s plenty of head- and leg-room in the cabin and generous boot space. However, the low seating position in the back means larger passengers may feel a bit cramped. Getting in and out ★★★★ Getting in and out of the Mondeo is easy. The interior lights come on in the front when you press the ‘unlock’ button on the remote key, which is handy at night. However, the door hinges are a little too weak to hold the doors open when parked facing uphill; they’re likely to close by themselves. Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Seat space and comfort Rating ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ We take measurements all around the driver and passenger’s door apertures and note the height of the seat, door sills and step down onto the car floor. The best cars don’t require too much bending or stretching to get in and out. Seat space and comfort ★★★★ The front seats are well designed and comfortable. The driver’s seat is fully adjustable and generous head-room makes the cabin feel spacious. There’s plenty of rear leg-room, although the low back seats can be uncomfortable for taller adult passengers. Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Getting in and out Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ We assess seat comfort subjectively, using our road testers’ expert knowledge and experience from thousands of different cars. And we measure the head-, legand elbowroom on offer in every seat, to see how well the car caters for people of all shapes and sizes. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars Comfort and practicality continued... How we test Boot and storage Boot and storage ★★★★ The boot is easily accessible and spacious and it’s no trouble to fold the rear seats forward to increase space further. Hatchback models have a very large opening, making them easy to load and unload, while the boot’s sensible shape means it’s easy to fit bulky items inside. However, there are no cubby holes in the boot to safely stow smaller items. The glove box is large, and there are plenty more practical storage compartments in the cabin. Model tested Boot space (seats up/down) diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate 535 litres / 870 litres (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) 535 litres / 870 litres petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch 455 litres / 830 litres (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) 455 litres / 770 litres Heating and ventilation Rating ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ Carmakers give official stats for boot space, but our tests are more realistic. We load the boot up with measuring blocks only as far as the rear window line, so that luggage is well secured and won’t obscure rear visibility. We repeat the test with the rear seats up, and folded down (where possible). Heating and ventilation ★★★ The heating system warms the cabin up quickly. Heated front seats were available as an optional extra, for those particularly chilly mornings. A good air conditioning system was fitted as standard and includes dust and pollen filters for allergy sufferers. Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Rating ★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★★★ Feel sorry for the tester who has to warm each car up from a frosty -10 degrees in our climate chamber. Starting with a cold engine, we measure how long it takes to warm up the front and rear of the cabin. Diesel cars usually take longer. We also check the effectiveness of air conditioning, where fitted. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars Running costs and depreciation How we test The Mondeo is affordable to buy and to run. It depreciated (lost its value) quickly from new, so makes a shrewd, good-value used buy. Overall, insurance costs are reasonable; the Mondeo starts at group 8 for a 1.8 16v LX 4dr model, but rises to group 16 for the 3.0 V6 and some 2.2 TDCi models. Ford worked hard to ensure that Mondeo servicing costs were low so that it could attract fleet business. and as the Mondeo was sold in such large numbers, it’s easy and cheap to find parts and keep an older one on the road. It’s not a car that needs expensive specialist attention: most independent mechanics should be able to work on one. Fuel consumption There’s a wide choice of engines, ranging from the entry-level 1.8-litre petrol (37.2 mpg combined fuel economy) to the rapid 3.0 V6 petrol, not known for its fuel efficiency (27.2mpg combined). Choosing the ‘SCi’ 1.8 over the standard 1.8 engine should gain 2mpg, but the 1.8 SCi is only offered with higher-spec trim levels, making it an expensive choice and, besides, we only managed 30.5 mpg in our tests. Ford claimed 30.7mpg combined for its 2.0 145 PS petrol engine; the best we recorded was 26.1mpg. The diesels make more sense, with the 130 PS 2.0 TDCi returning 47.1mpg according to Ford’s figures. However, our tests showed these should be taken with a pinch of salt, as our average economy was 35.1mpg. Petrol (combined mpg, claimed) 26.4 mpg - 39.2 mpg Diesel (combined mpg, claimed) 37.2 mpg - 50.5 mpg Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Urban (claimed/measured) 34.4 mpg/34.4 mpg -/24.4 mpg 28.5 mpg/27.7 mpg 24.5 mpg/23.7 mpg Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Extra urban (claimed/measured) 58.9 mpg/58.9 mpg -/47.9 mpg 49.6 mpg/47.9 mpg 47.0 mpg/43.5 mpg Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Motorway (measured) 37.2 mpg 31.4 mpg 37.2 mpg 30.1 mpg Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Combined (claimed/measured) 47.1 mpg/42.2 mpg -/32.8 mpg 39.2 mpg/36.7 mpg 35.3 mpg/31.4 mpg Fuel consumption We test fuel economy under strict lab conditions – using realistic test cycles – to reveal the facts behind the figures. Our figures rarely match manufacturer claims as, unlike the official mpg test, we measure economy with both a hot and cold engine, and on the motorway. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars Running costs and depreciation continued... How we test Emissions Emissions The diesels make most sense tax-wise, fitting into lower bandings for VED. Watch out for the faster petrols, however: the 2.5-litre puts out 238g/km and 244g/km with an auto gearbox, and the 3.0 V6 emits a top-whack 249g/km of carbon dioxide. Petrol (CO2, claimed) 173g per km - 254g per km Diesel (CO2, claimed) 148g per km - 203g per km Model tested diesel 2.0TDCi (130bhp) manual 5-door estate (2002) petrol 1.8 (125bhp) manual 5-door estate (2000) petrol 1.8SCi (130bhp) manual 5-door hatch (2003) petrol 2.0 (145bhp) manual 4-door saloon (2001) Emissions (claimed/measured) 159g per km/182g per km -/204g per km 173g per km/182g per km 192g per km/208g per km While testing fuel economy, we also collect exhaust gases to enable us to measure the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted. We also check whether particulate filters are effective at removing sooty emissions from diesel engines. Safety Safety and security Euro NCAP score ★★★★ Here is the video of the 2000-2007 Ford Mondeo saloon Euro NCAP frontal crash test. Please enable JavaScript to access this content. Adult occupant Child protection Pedestrian protection We rate cars for safety using Euro NCAP crash test scores (where available), alongside our own comprehensive safety checklist. Uniquely, we also feed in results from our accident avoidance test – after all, it’s far better to steer around a crash than rely on the airbags... Security ★★★★ - ★★★ Which? safety rating Active (crash avoidance) Passive (crash safety) Child Pedestrian - Security Theft of car: Theft from car: ★★★★ ★★★ Security scores come from the security experts at Thatcham, who break into hundreds of cars each year. Most modern cars are very difficult to drive away, but are still too easy to steal from. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars Which? Car Survey results About our survey The Which? Car Survey is the UK’s most robust reliability and owner satisfaction survey. In 2015, drivers told us about 58,000 cars, covering more than 484 million miles in the previous 12 months (that’s equivalent to driving to the moon and back a hundred times). This unique feedback allows us to rate satisfaction and reliability for hundreds of new and used cars. Note: Star ratings below are from 1-5 (1 is very poor and 5 is very good). Percentages shown under ‘Most common faults’ indicate the proportion of owners reporting each problem in the past 12 months. Brand Sample size: 5,747 people Ford ratings Overall owner satisfaction for this brand Brand reliability Dealer Servicing & repair Model: Ford Mondeo (2000-2007)Sample size: 307 people Ownership ratings Overall owner satisfaction for this range Ease of driving Comfort Dash layout and controls Practicality Value for money Running costs In-car technology - Everyone who takes part in the Which? Car survey tells us about their car and the dealers who sell and service it. We analyse this feedback across all cars to give top-level satisfaction ratings for each brand, including the brand’s reliability record over the last eight years. All star ratings are out of five. Model ownership ratings ★★★ ★★★ Dealer Sales Service Driving enjoyment 79% Brand ratings These show how owners score this car in 12 different areas, from performance to heating. Owners’ ratings are subjective – so may differ from Which? Car test scores – but they give a good idea of what the car is like to live with. Where relevant, cars are scored against other cars in the same class (e.g. for space). 77% ★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★ - Owner’s View It is a brilliant ‘work horse’ with loads of room to move pieces of furniture, garden waste, etc. Owner’s View Comfortable and easy to drive. Good for long distances - not tiring. Which? Car review Ford Mondeo (2000-2007) Large cars Which? Car Survey results continued... About our survey Reliability ratings Reliability ratings Overall Reliability Petrol cars Reliability Breakdowns Average annual repair cost Diesel cars Reliability Breakdowns Average annual repair cost All cars Reliability Breakdowns Average annual repair cost ★ Up to 3 years old 4-8 years old - - - - - - - - - ★ 19% £332 We split reliability into breakdowns (including failure to start), faults (where parts need replacing) and problems (minor issues e.g. squeaks and loose trim). Where the car has been on sale for some time, and we have numerous survey responses from owners, we also split scores by the age of car and fuel type. Star ratings are out of five – the more stars, the more reliable the car. Most common faults Breakdowns: Percentage of cars suffering a breakdown in last 12 months Average annual repair cost: Average annual cost of repairs (not servicing), in past 12 months Most common faults Up to 3 years old - - - 4-8 years old - - - Springs Exhaust System Air Con Mechanical braking Steering Failure rate: The proportion of owners reporting this problem in the last year 23% 16% 12% 9% 9% Want to know what’s most likely to go wrong as the car gets older? These are the five most common faults reported by owners, grouped by age into new, recent and older cars. A score of 40% means four out of 10 owners reported problems with that part of the car over the previous 12 months. Engine electrics and non-engine electrics (e.g. windows, stereo) cause more headaches than mechanical parts in most modern cars.
Similar documents
Ford c-Max (2003-2010)
148g per km/171g per km 170g per km/178g per km 171g per km/174g per km
More information