Presentation
Transcription
Presentation
Biomimetic Millirobots Ron Fearing Dept. of EECS UC Berkeley http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ronf/Biomimetics.html Berkeley IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Outline Biomimetic Millirobots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Motivation and Overview 13 gram autonomous ornithopter Flight + Ambulation Fabrication and Design of Millirobots Compliant Ambulating Millirobots Compliant Nanofibers for Adhesion Conclusions IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots 1991 K.S.J. Pister, M.W. Judy, S.R. Burgett, and R.S. Fearing, `` Microfabricated Hinges: 1 mm Vertical Features with Surface Micromachining’’ IEEE Transducers `91 , San Francisco, CA June 1991. R.S. Fearing, ``Control of a Micro-Organism as a Prototype Micro-Robot'', 2nd Int. Symp. on Micromachines and Human Sciences, Nagoya, Japan, Oct. 8-9, 1991 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Current UCB Millirobot Platforms MEDIC crawler DASH + CLASH (Birkmeyer 2009,2011) winged DASH (2009-2010) Big RoACH (2009) DynaRoACH (2010) OctoRoACH (2011-) IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic BOLT hybrid Millirobots (2010-) Bipedal Ornithopter for Locomotion Transition Advantages of Milli-Size robots (Mobility)(Intelligence)(Multiplicity) = Capability larger smaller N*small=large mobility CPU MIPS no change multiplicity N/A sensing no change no change* O(N2) O(N2) communication * down to ~ 0.1 gram for temp, pressure,light, accel, chemical, camera, radiation, sound, EM, humidity, etc (assume MEMS sensors) IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Motivation for Mobile Millirobots Exploring and tagging for situational awareness + + Key: + survivor Void Networks in Collapsed Structures as a Guide for RF relay tag the Development of Rescue Millirobots crawler large numbers of disposable robots could more quickly map out a IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots complicated environment than a few large robots Access to tight spaces: Locomotion tradeoffs: flight vs. ambulation K. Peterson and R. Fearing, ``Experimental Dynamics of Wing Assisted Running for a Bipedal Ornithopter Hybrid crawler’’ IROS 2011 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Outline Biomimetic Millirobots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Motivation and Overview 13 gram autonomous ornithopter Flight + Ambulation Fabrication and Design of Millirobots Compliant Ambulating Millirobots Compliant Nanofibers for Adhesion Conclusions IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Ornithopter Power/Weight Budget Air-Hogs-V-Wing-Avenger ornithopter component mass battery (60 mAh) 1.6 grams CPU+electronics 1.4 grams DC motor 1.6 grams air frame+wings 7.8 grams Total 12.4 grams motor + 1.6 grams 0.6/1.2 watts LiPo Battery 1.6 grams 400 sec Flight control of iBird, (Baek, BioRob 2010) Power loading: 10 grams/watt (thrust) cruise: 3 m/sec Structure 7.8 grams CPU 1.4 grams 300 mW IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Battery technology limits flight time to ~5 minutes Autonomous Ornithopter Light Seeking IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Autonomous Ornithopter Light Seeking S. Baek et al. Flight Control for Target Seeking by 13 gram Ornithopter, IROS 2011 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Outline Biomimetic Millirobots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Motivation and Overview 13 gram autonomous ornithopter Flight + Ambulation Fabrication and Design of Millirobots Compliant Ambulating Millirobots Compliant Nanofibers for Adhesion Conclusions IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Hybrid: Ornithopter with Legs • Total Mass: 11.4 grams • Bipedal – takes advantage of flapping wings to provide dynamic stability • Capable of hovering flight • Can transition from horizontal locomotion to hovering flight in ~1 meter driven legs K. Peterson and R. Fearing, ``Experimental Dynamics of Wing Assisted Running for a Bipedal Ornithopter Hybrid crawler’’ IROS 2011 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Outline Biomimetic Millirobots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Motivation and Overview 13 gram autonomous ornithopter Flight + Ambulation Fabrication and Design of Millirobots Compliant Ambulating Millirobots Compliant Nanofibers for Adhesion Conclusions IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Rapid Prototyping of Crawler 1) 2D layout 2) flexure cuts 3) polymer hinge material 4) laminate 5) part outlines 6) remove parts 7) fold individual parts 8) assemble 9) install actuators and wire ``Fast Scale Prototyping Process for Folded Millirobots’’, A.M. Hoover and R.S. Fearing IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation Pasadena, May 2008. IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Crawling Robot Concept 5X scale model (cardboard prototype) miniRoACH 2.4 gram autonomous crawler Hoover Steltz Fearing IROS 2008 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Outline Biomimetic Millirobots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Motivation and Overview 13 gram autonomous ornithopter Flight + Ambulation Fabrication and Design of Millirobots Compliant Ambulating Millirobots Compliant Nanofibers for Adhesion Conclusions IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots 5 gram Medic Robot (remote vision processing) 802.15.4 Radio Camera LED mount Front-extended hull submitted to ICRA 2012 Kohut et al ICRA 2011 Rubber pads for higher friction Oct 2010 –Medic Z: 5.8 grams Image Proc 2.2- CPU+ Zigbee +Flash + gyro IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots DASH Robot Birkmeyer, Peterson, Fearing, IROS 2009 CLASH. Birkmeyer IROS 2011 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Dynamic Steering Hoover et al BioRob 2010 Steering by drive frequency, leg stiffness change (swap) IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots OctoRoACH Navigation to Target Source light sensor steering control system cell phone camera as light sensor (Karras) OctoRoACH platform (Pullin) Pullin, Kohut, and Fearing (submitted ICRA 2011) IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots 21 Experiment Result- Light Seeking Heading (degrees) Heading vs. Time Light tracking control system using cell phone camera input on OctoRoACH (Karras and Pullin) 25 15 5 -5 -15 -25 0 5 10 15 Time (seconds) 20 Estimated heading from horizontal position in image. Smooth terrainlimited by narrow field of view of camera optics IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots 22 Outline Biomimetic Millirobots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Motivation and Overview 13 gram autonomous ornithopter Flight + Ambulation Fabrication and Design of Millirobots Compliant Ambulating Millirobots Compliant Nanofibers for Adhesion Conclusions IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Natural Gecko Hair Structure UCB LDPE/PP (on smooth metal, plastic,glass) Unique gecko adhesive properties (Autumn 2007): P 1. anisotropic attachment P 2. high pulloff to preload ratio P 3. low detachment force P 4. material independence / van der Waals adhesion P 5. self-cleaning P 6. anti-self adhesion P 7. non-sticky default state P? 8. no residue IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Key Design Principles 1. Rough Surface Compatibility Spatula Seta Lamella J. Lee et al. Langmuir 2009 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Material limit for synthetic gecko adhesion 30 N/sq.cm. in shear on glass Gillies and Fearing, Langmuir 2011 IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Outline Biomimetic Millirobots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Motivation Fabrication and Design of Millirobots Compliant Ambulating Millirobots Compliant Nanofibers for Adhesion Power for Compliant Drive Conclusions and Principles IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Principles for Biomimetic Millirobots Go with the flow: •compliant grasping with local equilibria •compliance- passive matching to surface topology •passive stabilization: SLIP model in legged locomotion Dynamics •high power to weight ratio •high frequency to average out disturbances •low internal dissipation Find nominal equilibria- perturb to steer IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots Acknowledgements Biomimetic Millisystem lab members Current and Former Graduate Students Dr. Stan Baek Dr. Aaron Hoover Andrew Pullin Kevin Peterson Nick Hohut Jaakko Karras Fernando Garcia Bermudez Sponsors: National Science Foundation DARPA DSO ARL IROS 2011 Workshop: Biomimetic Millirobots