Tarek Saab
Transcription
Tarek Saab
Dark Matter Searches with the CDMS II Experiment Tarek Saab University of Florida PPC 2013 July 9, 2013 The SuperCDMS Collaboration Fundamentals of WIMP Direct Detection particle nuclear theory Interaction Rate [events/keV/kg/day] o ' 2 4mr fA Large enhancement for heavy nuclei targets ⇡ m mN mr = m + mN “Reduced mass” of WIMP-nucleus system ER mN Ro2 /3 2 2 vmin /vo ) T (ER ) ' exp( p vmin = ER mN /(2m2r ) Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 2 dR o F (ER ) ⇢o T (ER ) p = 2 dER m mr vo ⇡ 2 F (ER ) ' exp structure local properties of DM halo “Form factor” (quantum mechanics of interaction with nucleus) Integral over local WIMP velocity distribution Minimum WIMP velocity required to produce a given recoil energy ER 3 Starting with very low differential interaction rates ... 2 Differential Rate @druD, mc = 100 GeVêc2 , s = 1.2¥ 10-45 cm-45 2 dR/dE [counts/100 kg/keV/year] for m = 100 GeV/c & !=1x10 cm r ! dRêdEr @countsê10kgêkeVêyearD dR/dEr 0.1 1.0 0.01 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.001 10-4 0 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 Ge Ar Si analysis threshold Xe 20 40 60 4 80 Ne Er @keVD 100 Er [keV] … we get threshold dependent total interaction rates … Total rate [counts/100 as a2 ,function of -45 cm2 Total Rateintegrated for different thresholds, mc kg/year] = 100 GeVêc s = 1. ¥ 10 RHEthreshL @countsê10kgêyearD threshold energy for m! = 100 GeV/c2 & !=1x10-45cm2 Xe Ge 1.00 Ar 0.50 R(Er) Si Ne 0.10 0.05 0 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 10 20 5 30 40 Ethresh @keVD Ethreshhold [keV] and strongly mass (mχ) dependent total interaction rates … Total integrated ratethresholds, [counts/100 as 2a, function of-45 cm2 Total Rate for different mckg/year] = 20 GeVêc s = 1. ¥ 10 RHEthreshLthreshold @countsê10kgêyearD energy for m! = 20 GeV/c2 & !=1x10-45cm2 Xe Ge Ar Si 10.0 1.00 5.0 0.50 R(Er) Ne 1.0 0.10 0.05 0.5 0 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 10 20 6 30 40 Ethresh @keVD Ethreshhold [keV] … making knowledge of the energy scale and efficiency at threshold very critical. Total integrated ratethresholds, [counts/100 as 2a, function of-45 cm2 Total Rate for different mckg/year] = 10 GeVêc s = 1. ¥ 10 RHEthreshLthreshold @countsê10kgêyearD energy for m! = 10 GeV/c2 & !=1x10-45cm2 Xe Ge 10.0 1.00 Ar 0.50 5.0 Si R(Er) Ne 1.0 0.10 0.05 0.5 0 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 10 20 7 30 40 Ethresh @keVD Ethreshhold [keV] … making knowledge of the energy scale and efficiency at threshold very critical. Total integrated ratethresholds, [counts/100 as 2a, function of-45 cm2 Total Rate for different mckg/year] = 10 GeVêc s = 1. ¥ 10 RHEthreshLthreshold @countsê10kgêyearD energy for m! = 10 GeV/c2 & !=1x10-45cm2 Xe Ge 10.0 1.00 Ar 0.50 5.0 Si R(Er) Ne 1.0 0.10 0.05 0.5 0 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 0 10 20 7 30 40 Ethresh @keVD Ethreshhold [keV] The CDMS II Detectors Ge/Si Anatomy of a particle interaction ✤ Electrons and holes, created by a particle interaction, are drifted across the crystal by an electric field of a few V/cm 0V Holes Electrons +3V Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 Ionization Sensors 9 Anatomy of a particle interaction ✤ High frequency “prompt” phonons are created and begin to propagate diffusively. Phonon Sensors 0V prompt phonons +3V Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 10 Anatomy of a particle interaction ✤ Luke phonons are created by the drifting charges, adding to the total energy of the system: ELuke = e "V Neh Ptot = Erecoil + ELuke Phonon Sensors 0V prompt phonons Luke phonons +3V Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 11 The ZIP detector ✤ Four independent phonon readout channels are instrumented on one surface, and two independent ionization channels are instrumented on the other. y 0V 1 cm ±3V PA PD x PC 4 Phonon channels PB z Qo Qi 2 Ionization channels 7.6 cm Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 12 Phonon Readout Al Al Al Al Fins Ge/Si Crystal W TES Broken Cooper Pairs Egap Al Egap W R [W] Phonons 3 2 1 0 40 60 80 100 120 T [mK] Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 13 Electron Recoil Discrimination Calibration γs Normalized Yield 30 Surface βs 20 10 Signal Region 0 -10 -20 Charge threshold Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 Calibration neutrons 14 -10 0 10 Normalized Timing Parameter (μs) 20 The CDMS-II Experiment The ZIP Detectors ✤ Z-sensitive Ionization and Phonon mediated ✤ Ge (~230 g) or Si (~106 g) crystals: 1 cm thick, 7.5 cm diameter ✤ Photolithographically patterned to collect athermal phonons and ionization signals ✤ Direct xy-position imaging ✤ Surface (z) event rejection from pulse shapes and timing ✤ 30 detectors stacked into 5 towers of 6 detectors Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 7.6 cm (3”) 1 cm 15 ✤ ✤ Surface events: 0.82 ✤ Cosmogenic neutrons: 0.04 ✤ Radiogenic neutrons: 0.057 Probability of 2 or more leakage events : ~23% Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 ts re su l “o ld ” Estimated backgrounds: Recoil Energy (keV) ar e ✤ Equivalent to 194.1 kg-d for a 60 GeV/c2 WIMP (10 -100 keV analysis energy range) Candidate 2 Tower 3, det 4 (T3Z4) Aug 5, 2007 se ✤ Normalized Ionization Yield (σ) 612 raw kg-days. Candidate 1 Tower 1, det 5 (T1Z5) Oct 27, 2007 Th e ✤ True Ionization Yield Results from the Ge detectors 16 Normalized Timing Parameter (µs) Recent results from the Si detectors 60 Data set: ✤ 2 n Estimated background from neutrons ✤ ✤ 140.23 kg-days in 8 Si detectors accumulated between July 2007 - Sep. 2008 < 0.13 expected events Neutrons 40 − ✤ 2 ✤ 20 0 Surface Events −20 20 40 60 Recoil Energy (keV) 80 Estimated background from surface events ✤ 0.47 events based on ✤ Phonon timing discrimination, optimized in 3 energy bins: 7-20, 20-30, 30-100 keV Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 17 100 Data selection efficiency WIMP Efficiency 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 20 100% Efficiency +Good Nuclear Recoil +Fiducial Volume +Phonon Timing 40 60 80 100 Recoil Energy (keV) 18 The Si Data: Before the timing cut Shades of blue indicate the three separate timing cut energy ranges. 7-20 keV Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 19 20-30 keV 30-100 keV The Si Data: After the timing cut Shades of blue indicate the three separate timing cut energy ranges. Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 20 The Si Data: Yield vs Timing Shades of blue indicate the three separate timing cut energy ranges. 25 Normalized Yield 20 15 10 Surface Event Distribution 5 0 Neutron Distribution −5 −10 −4 −2 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 0 2 4 Normalized Timing 21 6 8 The Si Data: Yield vs Timing Shades of blue indicate the three separate timing cut energy ranges. 25 Candidate 1 Candidate 2 Candidate 3 Normalized Yield 20 15 10 Surface Event Distribution 5 0 Neutron Distribution −5 −10 −4 −2 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 0 2 4 Normalized Timing 21 6 8 The Si Data: Three events Detector T4Z3 25 Normalized Yield 20 Candidate 1 Candidate 2 Candidate 3 15 10 5 Surface Event Distribution 0 Neutron Distribution −5 −10 −2 0 2 Normalized Timing 4 Detector T5Z3 25 Normalized Yield 20 15 10 5 Surface Event Distribution 0 Neutron Distribution −5 −10 −2 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 22 0 2 Normalized Timing 4 ST 10-41 10-5 DAMA 10-42 10-6 N1 00 CD EDE LWE I MS SS L T CRE SST II G e Optimal gap analysis sets a 10-43 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 limit for the SI cross-section of 2.4x10-41cm2 for a WIMP mass of 10 GeV/c2. WIMP Mass @GeVêc2 D Probability of background fluctuation resulting in three or more events anywhere in the signal region is 5.4%. 10-7 40 50 ✤ A profile likelihood analysis favors a WIMP+background hypothesis over the known background estimate at the 99.81% confidence level (~3!, p-value: 0.19%). ✤ The maximum likelihood is at a WIMP mass of 8.6 GeV/c2 and cross-section of 1.9x10-41cm2. We do not believe this result rises to the level of a discovery, but does call for further investigation. 23 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 ✤ WIMP-nucleon cross section @pbD ES NO WIMP-nucleon cross section @cm2 D CR XE ✤ 10-4 S2 ✤ 10-40 0 N1 Three events observed in a 140.23 kg-day exposure with an expected background of < 0.7 events. DAMA NO ✤ 10-3 XE so, … what are they? 10-39 A Closer Look DAMA 10-40 WIMP-nucleon cross section @pbD 10-3 10-4 CR N XE ES 1 ON ST 0 S2 10-41 10-5 DAMA NO 10-42 10-6 XE EDE LWE I 0 N1 CRE SST SS L T 0 WIMP-nucleon cross section @cm2 D 10-39 CD MS II G e 10-43 5 Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 WIMP Mass @GeVêc2 D 24 30 10-7 40 50 What do we do next? ✤ SuperCDMS @Soudan ✤ ✤ iZIP’s solve the problem of surface events observed in CDMS II iZIP Installation complete Nov. 8, 2011 ✤ 9 kg of Ge iZIP operating since March 2012 ✤ Expected to improve sensitivity to SI WIMP-nucleon interactions by a factor of ~10 over CDMS II results after 3 years of operation. Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 25 Crystal Bulk h+ -2V e0V Vacuum Surface Rejection with the iZIPs ✤ Since March 2012, 87,723 events (71,525 #s & 16,258 Pb recoils) were collected during the current Soudan run. Using information only from the charge channel we have a demonstrated rejection of < 1.7×10-5 with a 50% cut efficiency. Surface electron recoils (from Pb decay #s) 206Pb Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 26 recoils <0.6 surface events over a 0.3 ton-year exposure. Good enough for a 200 kg experiment run for 4 years at SNOLAB! Using Ge detectors to investigate low mass WIMPS ✤ CDMSlite ✤ Low mass searches require a lower energy threshold. This requires amplifying the signal without increasing the noise. ✤ e/h have “terminal velocity”corresponding to ~30 meV KE ✤ Under bias, O(10 eV) ≫ 30 meV. This “excess energy” is radiated as Luke phonons: ELuke = (e "V) Neh 0V prompt phonons Luke phonons ✤ Noise is independent of "V Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 +3V 27 CDMSlite in action ✤ Operating with a voltage bias of 69 V: ✤ Detector calibration with 252Cf produces activation lines in Ge of 1.3 keV and 10.4 keV ✤ Lines observed with an energy resolution of 3.3% and 1.3%, indicating successful amplification of phonon signal. ✤ We pay the price by giving up electron vs. nuclear recoil discrimination ✤ Expect to achieve a 170 eVee threshold (& hope to make it to 85 eVee) Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 28 Reach of SuperCDMS @ Soudan CDMSLite & II Ge DM -lit DAMA 70 T SL e1 T eL II G erC MS 10-4 lite ee eV S85 ee eV WIMP-nucleon cross section @cm2 D 10-3 CDMS Sup CD M CD 10-40 MS CD 10-39 SuperCDMS LT Co CR E Ge NT SS T 10-41 10-5 SuperCDMS Soudan Projections: CR E 10-6 threshold, ~170 eVee CDMSlite Anticipated Fall: iZIP low threshold, ~2 keVnr analysis Tarek Saab - PPC 2013 3 4 5 6 SS T 10-42 Anticipated Summer: first ultra-low 10-43 2 WIMP-nucleon cross section @pbD ✤ 7 8 9 10 WIMP Mass @GeVêc2 D 29 15 20 10-7 30 So, when are we going to see WIMPs for sure? ✤ To borrow a phrase from a very patient man: “The strongest of all warriors are these two — Time and Patience.” % Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace In others words, maybe soon, …… or maybe not. Tarek Saab - PPC 2013