Executive Summary of IFOA
Transcription
Executive Summary of IFOA
Executive Summary of IFOA Integrated Form of Agreement www.HansonBridgett.com Courtesy of Joel Darrington & Dawn Balzarano of Hanson Bridgett LLP Purpose: To provide a legal relationship among Owner, design team and construction team that aligns them on what is best for the Project as a whole, by promoting the Five Big Ideas: • 1. Increase relatedness of Project team; 2. Collaborate, really collaborate; Project Governance 3. Manage the Project as a network of commitments; • Project led by a "Core Group" of project representatives of O/A/C and other designated team members. Decisions of Core Group by consensus, with Owner breaking impasses. • "Senior Management Group" of senior executives from Core Group member firms provides leadership, mentoring and assistance in dispute resolution. 4. Optimize the whole Project, not the pieces; and 5. Tightly couple learning with action. Team Formation • • Owner, Architect and CM/GC sign one agreement; key trades & designers may also sign. O/A/C and the selected designers and trades form an "IPD Team" subject to terms of IFOA. Compensation • Cost-plus with an "Estimated Maximum Price" (EMP) that triggers "pain/gain – sharing." • • Intensive involvement of CM/GC and major trades with design team from beginning. • IPD Team attempts to validate Owner's business case by attempting to find one or more design solutions that meets business case parameters. If the business case (as amended) is validated, the parties set an "Expected Cost" based upon current best practice. During design phase, the team sets an aggressive Target Cost as a stretch goal to drive innovation and contain costs. • • IPD Team performs “Joint Site Investigation” to understand site and determine what additional information should be pursued at a reasonable cost, so as to lower contingencies. Use of "Target Value Design"—a discipline that requires project values, cost, schedule, life-cycle analysis Zero RFI goal: No RFI's to initiate an inquiry. RFI's only used to document solutions resulting from in-person communication between responsible designer and inquiring IPD Team member. Project Planning • Core Group establishes communication protocols to facilitate effective, efficient communication. • IPD Team shares a common "IPD Team Contingency" for design and construction errors and other unexpected costs that would not result in a Change Order. Architect, CM/GC and selected members of IPD Team place their profit in an "At-Risk Pool." If the Project overruns the EMP, cost overruns are funded from the At-Risk Pool first, then by Owner or insurance. Owner limits liability of Risk Pool members to the At-Risk Pool. Aggregate Project savings typically put into the pool. • Design Methodology Risk/Reward ("Pain/Gain") Sharing • and constructability to be basic design criteria; uses the Target Cost to drive innovation in design to maximize cost savings and add value. Design clusters of designers and builders are organized around major building systems or components to achieve integration. Risk Pool Members agree on a plan for funding, administering and disbursing the At-Risk Pool and any aggregate cost savings (e.g., profit amounts, shares in pool, performance metrics, etc.). Team uses Lean "pull" planning to increase planning reliability, with an Owner-approved Milestone Schedule and supporting phase schedules, "look ahead" schedules and "make ready" work plans (e.g., Last Planner System™). Team members required to talk directly about conditions of satisfaction, constraints, and to make reliable promises about when performance will occur. Construction Methodology • Goal is production of defect-free work at the least cost and in the least time necessary. • 5S Plan: Sort, Set, Shine, Standardize, Sustain. "A place for everything; everything in its place." • CM/GC will implement a "Built-in Quality Plan" to provide for quality measures, effective hand-offs, inspections and measures to control quality at the moment of work. Improvement • Continuous improvement program and Project evaluations based on agreed criteria.