Logo Subclasses

Transcription

Logo Subclasses
Logo Subclasses
A brief introduction
Logo Subclasses
logo
[lo·go]
1. a concept that is in line with a positive
representation of a group and their beliefs.
2. a graphic representation or symbol of a company
name, trademark, abbreviation, etc.
3. a mark uniquely designed for ready recognition.
4. a name, symbol, or trademark designed for easy
and definite recognition.
Logo Subclasses
Cars
Circles
Cars
Crosses
Cars
Animals
Cars
Shields
Cars
Wings
Cars
Angular Shapes
Cars
Squares
Cars
Letters
Cars
Logo Subclasses
Circles
Crosses
Animals
Shields
Wings
Angular Shapes
Squares
Letters
Logo Subclasses
Circles
Crosses
Animals
Shields
Wings
Angular Shapes
Squares
Letters
NO
03
Professor Per Mollerup
[1942-
]
Professor of Communication Design at
Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne
&
Professor at Oslo National Academy of the Arts, Oslo.
Marks of [1997]
Excellence
03
Profe
[1942
-
ssor
]
Per M
oller
Profe
s
Swin sor of Com
burne
m
&
Unive unicatio
n
rsity
of Te Design a
Profe
chno
t
ssor
logy,
at Os
Melb
lo Na
ourne
tiona
l Aca
demy
of the
Arts,
Oslo.
up
03
Profe
[1942
Logo Subclasses
-
ssor
]
Per M
oller
Profes
Swin sor of Com
burne
m
&
Unive unicatio
n
rsity
of Te Design at
Profes
chno
sor at
logy,
Oslo
Melbo
Natio
ur ne
nal Ac
adem
y of th
e Arts
, Oslo.
“A new definition of trademarks and
a way of classifying them according
to selected qualities.
up
03
Profe
[1942
Logo Subclasses
“A new definition of trademarks and
a way of classifying them according
to selected qualities.
A new Taxonomy of Trademarks.
-
ssor
]
Per M
oller
Profes
Swin sor of Com
burne
m
&
Unive unicatio
n
rsity
of Te Design at
Profes
chno
sor at
logy,
Oslo
Melbo
Natio
ur ne
nal Ac
adem
y of th
e Arts
, Oslo.
up
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Non-graphic marks
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Letter marks
Non-graphic marks
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Figurative marks
Non-figurative marks
Letter marks
Non-graphic marks
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Figurative marks
Descriptive marks
Metaphoric marks
Found marks
Non-figurative marks
Letter marks
Non-graphic marks
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Figurative marks
Descriptive marks
Metaphoric marks
Found marks
Non-figurative marks
Letter marks
Name marks
Abbreviations
Non-graphic marks
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Figurative marks
Descriptive marks
Metaphoric marks
Found marks
Non-figurative marks
Letter marks
Name marks
Proper names
Descriptive names
Metaphoric names
Found names
Artificial names
Abbreviations
Non-graphic marks
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Figurative marks
Descriptive marks
Metaphoric marks
Found marks
Non-figurative marks
Letter marks
Name marks
Proper names
Descriptive names
Metaphoric names
Found names
Artificial names
Abbreviations
Initial abbreviations
Non-initial abbreviations
Non-graphic marks
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Figurative marks
Descriptive marks
Metaphoric marks
Found marks
Non-figurative marks
Letter marks
Name marks
Proper names
Descriptive names
Metaphoric names
Found names
Artificial names
Abbreviations
Initial abbreviations
Acronyms
Non
acronyms
Non-initial abbreviations
Non-graphic marks
Logo Subclasses
13
06
AdamsMorioka
[1994-
]
AdamsMorioka is a graphic design firm with offices in Beverly Hills,
California and New York City, founded by Sean Adams and Noreen
Morioka. Their work ranges from corporate identities, identity systems,
print campaigns and environmental graphics, to motion and digital
projects, animation and websites.
Logo Design
Workbook
[2004]
06
Adam
[1994
-
sMo
]
r ioka
Adam
s
Califo Morioka
is
rn
Morio ia and N a graphic
e
k
print a. Their w w York C design firm
ity, fo
camp
ork ra
with
u
a
proje
cts, a igns and nges from nded by S offices in
e
nima
e
tion a nvironme corporate an Adam Beverly H
ills
ntal g
s
nd w
ebsit
raphic identities, and Nore ,
es.
en
id
s, to
motio entity sy
stem
n and
s,
digita
l
Per Mollerup’s Taxonomic tree of trademarks
Trademarks
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Letter marks
Non-graphic marks
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Graphic marks
Picture marks
Letter marks
Word marks
Non-graphic marks
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Picture marks/Symbol
Letter marks/Monogram
Word marks/Logotype
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Picture marks/Symbol
The symbol is the most iconic portion of a logo. At
times this logo may exist without the wordmark.
The letters and words could be taken away
and you would still know what brand it is.
Letter marks/Monogram
Word marks/Logotype
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Picture marks/Symbol
The symbol is the most iconic portion of a logo. At
times this logo may exist without the wordmark.
The letters and words could be taken away
and you would still know what brand it is.
Letter marks/Monogram
A design of one or more letters, usually the initials
of a name, used to identify a company, publication,
person, object or idea.
The picture and words could be taken away
and you would still know what brand it is.
Word marks/Logotype
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Picture marks/Symbol
The symbol is the most iconic portion of a logo. At
times this logo may exist without the wordmark.
The letters and words could be taken away
and you would still know what brand it is.
Letter marks/Monogram
A design of one or more letters, usually the initials
of a name, used to identify a company, publication,
person, object or idea.
The picture and words could be taken away
and you would still know what brand it is.
Word marks/Logotype
A wordmark uses the company name with propriety
letterforms.
The letters and pictures could be taken away
and you would still know what brand it is.
Logo Subclasses
3
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Picture marks/Symbol
Advantages
The benefit of utilising a symbol alone follows the
idea - “a picture is worth a thousand words.” The
symbol is easier to read on an object such as a
computer or hat, than a word mark.
Disadvantages
If the symbol is separated from the word mark and
the mark doesn’t have any equity it may be difficult
to recognise and may be mistaken for another
brand - in the worst case, a competitor.
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Letter marks/Monogram
Advantages
The letter-mark solves both mnemonic and legibility
issues. It also remains easier to fit to a design than
using the whole name or word-mark.
Disadvantages
Letter-marks are often masquerading as logos.
Generic initials, treated in clever ways may look
better on towels and glasses than on a corporate
business card. Initials woven together have very
little meaning. Most letter-marks depend on largescale audience contact, high advertising spend and
repeated viewing for recognition.
Designers using letter-marks often try to make the
letters form a pictorial association with the product
or service, thus suggesting more about
the company and giving it a secondary meaning.
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Word marks/Logotype
Advantages
The proliferation of logos in the world has made
recognition of symbols very difficult. Using the entire
name sidesteps the problem with recognition.
When asked if the Mobil logo belongs to Mobil,
most people would agree that it does.
Disadvantages
If not handled skilfully, a word-mark alone may be
generic and lack mnemonic value. It is also limited
to words that can be spoken phonetically, no silent
letters or exotic ways of pronouncing etc.
That typeface could be bought, modified or
created, but should normally only be used when
displayed as a logo. To overuse the typeface
elsewhere minimizes the power it should have.
Quite often when using a word-mark the designer
will try to convey some of what the company does.
If the company is involved in liquids, they may add
the sense of waves flowing through the letters.
The focus remains on the word/name but there is
a secondary element, which helps suggest more
about the brand.
How does this help
designers?
How does this help
designers?
It gives us options.
How does this help
designers?
A starting point.
How does this help
you
in this assessment?
How does this help
you
in this assessment?
It doesn’t.
AdamsMorioka’s Taxonomic tree of logos
Logos
Picture marks/Symbol
Advantages
The benefit of utilising a symbol alone follows the
idea - “a picture is worth a thousand words.” The
symbol is easier to read on an object such as a
computer or hat, than a word mark.
Disadvantages
If the symbol is separated from the word mark and
the mark doesn’t have any equity it may be difficult
to recognise and may be mistaken for another
brand - in the worst case, a competitor.
3 Picture marks/Symbols
3 Picture marks/Symbols
Don’t start here.
3 Picture marks/Symbols
Start here.
3 Picture marks/Symbols
Association lists.
3 Picture marks/Symbols
Use these.
Find more words.
3 Picture marks/Symbols
Sketch out ideas.
Don’t be precious
Next week
Three unique approaches
circled in red
Thank you