ALL-CRAFT Technology for Low-Pressure Storage of Methane from
Transcription
ALL-CRAFT Technology for Low-Pressure Storage of Methane from
ALL-CRAFT Technology for Low-Pressure Storage of Methane from Biomass Peter Pfeifer Department of Physics, University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211 http://all-craft.missouri.edu 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 1/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Programmatic Overview 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 2/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Why alternative fuels? • • • • • • Reduce dependence on foreign oil Harness domestic renewable energy sources Create new opportunities for domestic agriculture Create clean air in cities Reduce transportation costs by improving energy efficiency Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Develop sustainable transportation in U.S. What are alternative fuels? • Ethanol (from corn, wood, …) • Natural gas* (NG; from domestic gas fields, deep-sea methane hydrate fields, landfills) • Biodiesel (from soybeans, vegetable oils, …) • Hydrogen* (from NG, water & electricity) • Electricity (from coal/nuclear/hydroelectric/solar/wind power plants) * ALL-CRAFT 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 3/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 How do alternative fuels work together? Next-generation clean vehicles: NG internal combustion engine Long-term goal: Hydrogen fuel-cell cars NG, methane Ready to go: NG from domestic (85%) & Canadian (~rest) fields In progress: Renewable methane from landfills & biomass In 10-20 years: Methane from deep-sea methane hydrate fields 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 4/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Who we are—Partners • MU (lead institution): Physics (Pfeifer, Project Leader), Chemistry (Atwood), Chemical Engineering (Suppes), Civil Engineering (Bowders), Office of Technology and Special Projects (Nixon), Office of Research (Coleman) • Lincoln University, Jefferson City • Midwest Research Institute (MRI), Kansas City • DBHORNE, LLC, Atlanta • Renewable Alternatives, LLC, Columbia • Missouri Biotechnology Association (MOBIO), St. Louis • Clean Vehicle Education Foundation, Washington, DC • Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources (Energy Center), Jefferson City • City of Columbia (Municipal Landfill), Columbia • Kansas City Office of Environmental Quality & Central Fleet, Kansas City 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 5/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 What we do • Develop low-pressure, high-capacity storage technologies for natural gas (NG), based on new adsorbent materials discovered at MU: — nanoporous carbon from waste corn cobs in Missouri (“sponge for NG”) — calixarene (“crystalline vacuum pump”) • Demonstrate low-pressure, flat-panel NG tank for — next-generation clean vehicles (NG internal combustion engines) — hydrogen fuel cell cars (no hydrogen infrastructure needed) — collection of NG from landfills (“pollutant to renewable energy”) — large-scale shipping of NG from Alaska and deep-sea methane hydrate fields (reduction of dependence on foreign oil) • Train students to become future leaders in alternative energy technology and build outreach programs for alternative energy innovations Funded by: – NSF Program “Partnerships for Innovation” – MU, MRI, Advanced Photon Source, DED/GAANN 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 6/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Current natural-gas vehicles / ozone, smog), NOx, particulate • Low emission of hydrocarbons ( matter. NG stored as compressed natural gas (CNG) in steel or composite cylinders at 250 atm (3600 psi). • Clean Cities Coalitions: – Los Angeles: 1500 CNG buses – Kansas City: 200 CNG public utility vehicles – U.S.: 300,000 CNG vehicles – worldwide: 4 million CNG vehicles 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 7/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Why are we not already driving NG-fueled cars? • High-pressure cylindrical/spherical tanks take up passenger or trunk space. CNG cylinders in transit bus: • Only NG passenger car in U.S.: Honda Civic GX; CNG tank in trunk: Goal: Develop low-pressure (34 atm, 500 psi), “flat-panel” tank, like gasoline tank. Store NG in nanoporous carbon; pores adsorb NG like a sponge: ANG tank 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 8/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Best flat-panel tank previously Atlanta Gas Light Adsorbent Research Group (AGLARG), 1997: © AGLARG 1997 © AGLARG 1997 © AGLARG 1997 Adsorbent: monolithic activated carbon from peach pit ALL-CRAFT: Monolithic carbon, with superior performance, from corncob. Missouri corn can supply raw material for NG tanks of all cars in the U.S. 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 9/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Performance of AGLARG tank • Target pressure for flat tank: 3.4 MPa (34 atm, 500 psi *); without adsorbent, pressure would have to be 15 MPa, much more than what a flat tank can bear • Troublesome maintenance of consistent quality of briquettes; binder blocks pores © AGLARG 1997 • DOE target capacity: 118 g/l (volume CH4 at 25 oC & 1 atm, per volume tank: 180) • ALL-CRAFT target: >100 g/l Achieved! *) 500 psi: pressure in NG pipelines 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 10/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Recovery of methane from landfills and biomass • Landfills: largest human-made source of methane (CH4) in U.S. Landfill gas (LFG): ~ 50% CH4, ~ 50% CO2 • CH4: 20 times more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 Capture CH4 at landfill; use as renewable energy; reduce energy “crisis” • Annual CH4 emission from landfills in U.S.: – Could power 4 million homes: $5 billion/yr – Greenhouse equivalent to emission from 100 million cars (2/3 of cars in U.S.) – If captured, equivalent to planting forest 2 x area of MO 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 11/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Current recovery of methane from landfills • Electricity generation (large sites: STL, KC, Columbia, …) • Direct heat (large/intermediate sites: STL, KC, Columbia, …) Opportunity: During high-flow periods, store in stationary tanks • Flare off (small sites) • Not captured (abandoned sites) Opportunity: Store in transportable tanks 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 12/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Bucky Katt’s and Rob Wilco’s perspective 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 13/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 NGVAmerica in NYT & WSJ (2/8/06), in response to the President’s State of the Union Address • 85% of NG is produced domestically; U.S. has huge amounts of NG • 25% of NG is used to generate electricity; replaceable by other fuels, freeing NG for transportation • Renewable NG in the form of biogas from landfills, sewage, farms, feedlots • NG produces less air pollution and greenhouse gases than gasoline and diesel • Even at today’s high prices, NG is cheaper than gasoline or diesel at the pump • NGVs are the pathway to hydrogen transportation; much of the hydrogen technology is based on NG technology • Other countries are far ahead of us 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 14/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 ALL-CRAFT Accomplishments January 2005 - June 2006 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 15/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 ALL-CRAFT tank 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 16/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 ALL-CRAFT tank, cont’d 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 17/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 ALL-CRAFT tank, cont’d 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 18/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Carbon production & methane storage capacity • Production of ~ 80 different carbons from corn cob, with variable activation procedures Starting material & final product • Search for maximum NG storage capacity • Capacity in: – M/V: gram of NG per liter of carbon – V/V: NG, as volume of gas at 25 oC and 1 atm, per volume of carbon – M/M: gram of NG per kilogram of carbon ALL-CRAFT, typical briquette (Sample B-21/k) 73-95 g/liter ALL-CRAFT, best performance (Sample B’-21/k) M /V 104-107 g/liter 110% of AGLARG 90% of DOE V / V 112-145 liter/liter 159-163 liter/liter M / M 170-220 g/kg 210-220 g/kg 130% of AGLARG AGLARG, ANG DOE best target performance 98 g/liter 118 g/liter 150 liter/liter 180 liter/liter 170 g/kg N/A 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 19/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Methane storage capacity, cont’d Gravimetric measurement of methane uptake on small samples: Pressuredifference measurement of methane uptake on 3.5” carbon briquettes (MRI test fixture): Gravimetric, Chem. Eng. Gravimetric, Physics Pressure difference Methane uptake on B-21/k with different instruments, M / M 221 g/kg (± 2%) 209 g/kg (± 2%) 198 g/kg (± 4%) NG storage capacity (g/liter), at 34 atm (500 psi) and 25 oC 180 160 140 120 90% of DOE target 83% of DOE target Best ALL-CRAFT carbon Best AGLARG carbon 100 80 60 40 20 0 DOE target CNG, at 250 atm (3600 psi) 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 20/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 How do we make carbon briquettes? 150-ton press Die & piston 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 21/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Road test of ALL-CRAFT tank on a Ford F-150 bifuel pickup: MRI, Kansas City: June-Sept. 2006—stay tuned © MRI 2005 © MRI 2006 Ford F-150 pickup for road test in Kansas City (MRI, 4/06 - 9/06) 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 22/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Mechanical design © MRI 2006 6 Al tubes holding 216 carbon briquettes 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 23/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 © MRI 2006 Schematic design 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 24/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 ALL-CRAFT tank on Ford F-150 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 25/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Application to methane recovery from landfills and biomass Premium for cars: minimize volume of tank Premium for landfills: minimize weight of tank 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 26/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Renewable NG from landfills Methane recovery in transportable tanks • Collect & purify methane at landfill • 40,000 lb carbon tank, with 17 wt% storage capacity (200 g methane/kg carbon), can store 6,800 lb of methane • Ship full tank on tractor trailer to central processing facility; discharge methane • Return empty tank to landfill • Example: Columbia landfill Flow rate Operated as “dry 250 cuft/min tomb,” 2005 15,000 lb/day Operated as 980 cuft/min bioreactor, 2020 57,000 lb/day One tank full in 0.45 days 0.12 days • Tanks of interest at small or abandoned landfills 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 27/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Other deployment Uniform methane delivery from landfill: • Collect & purify methane at landfill • During high-flow periods, store methane in 500 psi stationary tanks • Discharge tanks during low-flow periods Fueling station for garbage trucks: • Use methane from landfill to refuel CNG garbage trucks • Store methane in 500 psi stationary tanks, designed as fueling station • Of interest when there is no nearby NG station 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 28/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Columbia landfill Figure 1: Estimated Methane Collection Rates (Aquaterra March 2005 Report) 1200 "Dry Tomb" "Bioreactor" Methane Flowrate (Cubic Feet per Minute) 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 Time (Year) 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 29/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Columbia landfill, cont’d Methane flow rate vs. time 450 400 Methane (CFM) 350 300 "Phase 2" Added ? Gas Wells to the System "Phase 3" Added 8 Gas Wells to the System 250 200 150 100 50 0 Oct-95 Jul-96 Mar-97 Nov-97 Jul-98 Mar-99 Dec-99 Aug- Apr-01 Dec-01 Sep-02 May- Jan-04 Sep-04 May- Feb-06 00 03 05 Time (Month-Year) 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 30/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Columbia landfill, cont’d Percentage methane vs. time 70 60 Methane (%) 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fe Ju D A b- l- e p 96 96 c- r96 97 S Fe Ju D M e b- l- e a p- 98 98 c- y97 98 99 O c t99 M a r00 A Ja Ju N A u n- n- o p g- 01 01 v- r00 01 02 S Ja Ju N A e n- n- o p p- 03 03 v- r02 03 04 S Fe Ju e b- lp- 05 05 04 Time (month-year) 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 31/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006 Strategic and economic opportunities National level • NG fueled cars = next-generation clean vehicles/transportation 1. Reduce smog, respiratory disease, cardio-vascular disease, … 2. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 3. Reduce dependence on foreign oil now (not in 2040 as in H2 economy) 4. Harness domestic NG fields (Alaska), deep-sea methane hydrate fields (Oregon), renewable NG from landfills & biomass (Missouri, …) • Recovery of NG from landfills 1. Pollutant to energy, renewable energy 2. Economic growth in rural areas • Duplicate ALL-CRAFT success for hydrogen tanks State level • Produce NG/hydrogen tanks, from MO corn cob, for 10 million cars/year: $5 billion/yr • Produce & operate NG tanks, from MO corn cob, for 2,500 landfills: $5 billion/yr • Produce NG tanks, from MO corn cob, for large-scale NG shipping: $3 billion/yr 34th Annual Missouri Waste Management Conference 32/32 Lake Ozark, June 25-27, 2006