May 3, 2016 Regular Council

Transcription

CITY OF MARTENSVILLE
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7-2016
TUESDAY – MAY 3, 2016
AGENDA
1.
2.
CALL TO ORDER:
Meeting called to order at 5:00 P.M.
ADOPT AGENDA:
Adopt agenda dated May 3, 2016
MINUTES:
A) REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING NO. 6-2016
April 19, 2016
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5:00 PM
DELEGATIONS:
4.
CORRESPONDENCE:
Acknowledge List of Correspondence to Council.
5.
COMMITTEE REPORTS: Accept Committee Reports and Recommendations
A) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE: none
B) RCMP REPORT TO COUNCIL: none
C) CITY MANAGERS REPORT:
none
6.
FINANCE:
A) EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION: Approve Expenditure Appropriation No. 7-2016
B) BANK RECONCILIATION: March 2016
7.
MOTIONS:
A) Recreation and Parks Master Plan
Council will be asked: to approve the proposal to move ahead with a Recreation & Parks Master Plan
8.
BYLAWS:
Zoning Bylaw Amendment 9-2016 – rezoning of FUD to R1
9.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
10. IN-CAMERA ITEMS:
A) RCMP
B) Wastewater Strategy
11. ADJOURNMENT:
A) NOTICES & MOTIONS: Council members raise notice of issues or bring motions to the floor.
B) ADJOURN:
TUESDAY APRIL 19, 2016
MINUTES
PRESENT: Mayor Kent Muench, Councillors: Darren MacDonald, Travis Wiebe, Jamie
Martens, Bob Blackwell, Terry Kostyna, City Manager Scott Blevins, Director of Infrastructure &
Planning Joe Doxey, Community Economic Development Manager Dillon Shewchuk, Director of
Corporate Services Leah Sullivan, Director of Recreation & Community Service Dave Bosch
REGRETS: Deputy Mayor Tyson Chillog
LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall
RECORDING SECRETARY: City Clerk Carla Budnick,
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Kent Muench called the meeting to order at 5:01 P.M.
RES: #87/04192016 (Martens/Wiebe)
AGENDA
“That we adopt the agenda, dated April 19th, 2016”
CARRIED
RES: #88/04192016 (MacDonald/Kostyna)
MINUTES – APRIL 5, 2016
“That we accept the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting No. 5-2016 dated
April 5th, 2016.”
CARRIED
DELEGATIONS
A)
Staff Sergeant Howard Nodwell – Traffic Services
Mayor Muench welcomed Staff Sergeant Nodwell who was in attendance to speak about the
Traffic Services Detachment which will be based out of Martensville. When the program
originally began there were 6 members that has now increased to a total of 30 members which
consist of 10 Saskatoon Police Officers and 20 RCMP, 8 members from Saskatoon, 6 members
from Rosetown and 6 members from Lanigan. There are three components Traffic Services focus
on Education, Engineering and Enforcement. Nodwell noted the main focus of their work will be
on highways but they will also be able to assist municipality if needed. The 10 Saskatoon Police
Officers and 8 RCMP members will be based out of the Martensville office. Councillor Blackwell
welcomed Traffic Services to Martensville.
Mayor Muench thanked Staff Sergeant Nodwell for attending.
MINUTES
RES: #89/04192016 (Wiebe/Blackwell)
CORRESPONDENCE
“That we acknowledge and file the Correspondence List, as attached hereto and forming part
of these minutes.”
CARRIED
RES: #90/04192016 (MacDonald/Martens)
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE – APRIL 12, 2016
“That we accept the Committee of the Whole minutes dated April 12, 2016”
CARRIED
RES: #91/04192016 (Wiebe/Martens)
MANAGERS REPORT
“That we accept the Managers Report dated April 19, 2016”
CARRIED
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION
“That we authorize Expenditure Appropriation No. 6-2016, in the amount of $485,688.33 as
attached hereto and forming part of the minutes.”
CARRIED
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
“That we approve the amendments to policies #16/90 Annual Holiday/Flexible EDO’s, #63/02
Police Criminal Record Check and #80/11 City Supplied Clothing/Personal Protective
Equipment and that we rescind policy #71/06 Criminal Record Check Fee for Service”
CARRIED
RES: #94/04192016 (MacDonald/Wiebe)
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT/ MARTENSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT
“That we grant a Special Event Permit to the Martensville Fire Department to block off a
portion of 3rd Street North from the North Ridge Centennial Community Centre to 10th
Avenue North from 7:00 am to 10:30 am for a Car Show on Saturday June 4th, in accordance
with their application as attached hereto and forming part of these minutes.”
CARRIED
MINUTES
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT/ ADOBE INN 12TH ANNIVERSARY
“That we grant a Special Event Permit to the Adobe Inn for their 11th Anniversary Celebration
with beer gardens to be held June 11th – from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. (music to end at 1:00
a.m.) at the Adobe Inn, in accordance with their application as attached hereto and forming
part of these minutes.”
CARRIED
RES: #96/04192016 (Blackwell/Wiebe)
2016 SASK LOTTERIES GRANT
“That we accept the proposed funding application proposal as attached.”
CARRIED
RES: #97/04192016 (Wiebe/Kostyna)
SKATE PARK RFP
“That we accept the Request for Proposal from New Line Skateparks for the Skatepark
Conceptual Design for the price of $8,550.00 plus GST.”
CARRIED
RES: #98/04192016 (Martens/Kostyna)
PARKS MAINTENANCE STANDARDS POLICY
“That we adopt the proposed Parks Maintenance Standards Policy as attached and forming
parts of these minutes.”
CARRIED
RES: #99/04192016 (Blackwell/Wiebe)
KINSMEN PARK MASTER PLAN
“That we adopt the proposed Kinsmen Park Master Plan as proposed by Crosby Hanna &
Associates”
CARRIED
MINUTES
RES: #100/04192016 (MacDonald/Kostyna)
DISCRETIONARY USE – 900 & 950 9TH STREET NORTH
“That we grant a Development Permit to Saskatoon Kart Racers Club (c/o Jason
McCumber) to utilize shipping containers on MR25 & MR 26 civically known as 900 & 950
9th Street North, as shown on the drawings dated April 14, 2016, subject to conformance to
the National Building Code.”
CARRIED
SHALE PURCHASE FOR MR5
“That we authorize the purchase of extra shale for MR5 in the amount of $4,026.95 plus
taxes.”
CARRIED
RES: #102/04192016 (MacDonald/Wiebe)
BYLAW NO. 7-2016 (FIRST READING):
“That Bylaw 7-2016, being a Zoning Bylaw Amendment, be read for the first time”
DEFEATED
IN-CAMERA
“That Council go in-camera at 5:42 P.M.”
CARRIED
IN-CAMERA
A)
B)
RCMP (were unable to attend)
Strategic Plan
RES: #104/04192016 (Martens/Wiebe)
RESUME REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
“That we resume the April 19, 2016 Regular Council Meeting at 6:35P.M.”
CARRIED
MINUTES
ADJOURN
“That we adjourn this meeting at 6:36 P.M.”
CARRIED
______________________
MAYOR
_______________________
CITY CLERK
TUESDAY May 3, 2016
INCOMING - CORRESPONDENCE
DATE
COMPANY
ITEM
April 21, 2016
April 28, 2016
SREDA
RM of Corman Park
Growing the Economy, Growing Together
Discretionary Use - Little Loon Wireless
OUTGOING - CORRESPONDENCE
BANK RECONCILIATION
FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2016
BALANCE AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2016
PLUS:
INTEREST REVENUE:
Credit Union
Pertpetual Care Interest
$
6,285,149.07
$
$
1,085,667.01
7,370,816.08
$
$
1,329,606.34
6,041,209.74
$
$
6,412,549.85
17.50
$
$
15,693.16
6,428,260.51
$
$
387,280.77
6,040,979.74
$
230.00
6,041,209.74
6,753.12
2.48
CASH RECEIPTS:
Taxes
TIPPS
76,000.35
333,378.00
Utilities
Pre-Authorized Payments
221,933.54
50,112.79
$
6,755.60
$
996,675.72
$
82,235.69
409,378.35
272,046.33
General Revenue
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS:
SaskPower
SaskEnergy
Stale dated cheques - written off
$315,251.04
62,525.16
16,115.75
3,594.78
SUB-TOTAL:
LESS: A/P AND PAYROLL:
A/P MARCH 2016
GST & PST Remittance
Payroll #5 (Feb 14-27)
Payroll #6 (Feb-28-Mar 12)
1,136,872.24
383.31
73,309.67
82,031.17
1,292,596.39
34,458.64
Debenture- Sewage Forcemain
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS:
GG-Debit machine
MAP-DEBIT Machine
SW-Debit Machine
Canada Post
82.94
62.05
35.00
2,371.32
$
2,551.31
ADJUSTED GENERAL LEDGER BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2016:
BALANCE AS PER THE BANK STATEMENTS:
Credit Union Balance
Perpetual Care Account
PLUS: OUTSTANDING DEPOSITS:
MARCH 2016
EFT pymts
In Bank in March posted in April
SUB-TOTAL:
OUTSTANDING CHEQUES:
LESS: MARCH 2016
OTHER:
Bank charges
UB Posted in April 6-7334-0
ADJUSTED BANK STATEMENT BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2016:
5,820.00
$
$
24,057.47
18,107.93
-26,472.24
387,280.77
80.00
150.00
Proposal of Services
City of Martensville
Recreation and Parks
Master Plan
April 25th, 2016
Cover Letter
Scott Blevins
City Manager
City of Martensville
Box #970 , 37 Centennial Drive South
Martensville, Saskatchewan
Canada, S0K 2T0
P: (306) 931 – 2166 EXT#24
April 25th, 2016
RE: Recreation and Parks Master Plan
Mr. Blevins;
RC Strategies is privileged to provide this proposal of services for a Recreation and
Parks Master Plan for the City of Martensville.
The team we have established for this project includes experts in parks and recreation
planning, research, public engagement, graphic design, and architecture. All of these
skill sets are needed to deliver the best possible product to the City.
We have recent, relevant experience working in similar-sized communities throughout
western Canada developing useful strategic master plans, balancing community
priorities, and focusing both programming and facility development discussions.
Our team also developed the Recreation and Parks Master Plan for the City of
Saskatoon (2015) providing us familiarity with the area.
We are excited about the opportunity to work in Martensville and we look forward
to discussing our approach with you further. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Michael Roma
Partner, RC Strategies
10315 109th Street NW
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T5J 1N3
P: (780) 441 – 4263
C: (780) 691 – 8486
F: (780) 292 – 3584
E:[email protected]
Table of Contents
1:Introduction
1
2: Team Profiles
2
RC Strategies
2
aodbt interior design + architecture
2
Team Members
3
3: Related Experience and References
4
4: Proposed Approach
5
5: Steering Committee Engagement
8
6: Team Involvement and Fees
9
Appendices
A: RC Strategies Detailed Firm Information
11
B: aodbt architecture + interior design Detailed Firm Information
20
1
Introduction
The City of Martensville offers an exceptional quality of life due in part to the
recreation facilities and programs it offers to residents. The City provides services to
a population of over 9,000 residents; a population that has grown rapidly at about
7% annually over the past decade. In addition to its fast growth, Martensville is a
young city as 75% of its residents are under the age of 45.
The City has already demonstrated a commitment to quality of life through investment
in recreation facilities, parks, and the provision of leisure opportunities to local and
non-local users. The provision of these services and environments currently occurs
through a combination of City-operated spaces, direct programming, and partnering
with the public (e.g. schools) and non-profit sectors (e.g. community associations/
organizations). The City facilitates parks, trails, and recreation programs and facilities
under the guidance of City Council and Administration.
This project, entitled a “Recreation and Parks Master Plan,” will ultimately assist City Council
and Administration in making decisions regarding the future of parks, trails, and recreation
infrastructure and program provision. The Plan will be built upon sound research;
existing City strategic planning (to ensure overall congruence with other City departments);
the strategic planning of other partner organizations (such as the City of Saskatoon); and an
inventory and assessment of existing indoor and outdoor recreation and parks resources.
These planning foundations will provide an understanding to all stakeholders of what is
necessary to sustain and enhance existing service levels while considering new areas
of service that may be in demand.
Perhaps the most important aspect of the process will be the engagement of the public and
key recreation and parks stakeholders in both needs identification and strategic planning.
Achieving a high level of engagement through statistically reliable surveys, in-person
interviews, and group visioning will allow the study team to gather quality feedback
from recreation providers and parks users. Public engagement is instrumental in
formulating a strategic direction that is accurate, pertinent, and representative of all
community members. As well, effective public engagement will ultimately enable
implementation of the Plan to occur in an efficient and effective manner.
Although a major element of the Master Plan is the identification of new and/or
upgraded indoor and outdoor facilities and programs, management tools and
guidelines are required to help municipal Administrators and Councillors provide
parks, trails, and recreation services and make decisions. These management tools
and guidelines will help to optimize the use of local resources and create enhanced
benefit in the community.
1
2
Michael Roma
RC Strategies
Project Manager
Robert Parks
RC Strategies
Stephen Slawuta
RC Strategies
Ryan Schwartz
RC Strategies
Lauren Hawkins
RC Strategies
Team Profile
The team that we have established for this planning exercise includes extensive
expertise and experience in a variety of disciplines. It includes experts in recreation
planning, research, public engagement, graphic design, and architecture. Collectively
we have over 40 years of recreation planning and consultation experience and have
conducted over 25 recreation-related planning and consultation exercises over the
last calendar year alone.
RC Strategies
RC Strategies was formed in 1998. The firm is very hands-on and has conducted
comprehensive public engagement programs and related parks and recreation planning
exercises for communities ranging in size from 200 to over 800,000. There are currently five
full-time employees in the firm, with specialists in recreation, culture,and parks planning as
well as public participation, engagement,and graphic design. The firm has two operating
partners—Michael Roma and Robert Parks. Current and past clients throughout western
Canada include urban and rural municipalities, non-profit groups,and the private sector.
The small size of the firm enables us to be nimble, flexible, and adaptive to changing
project conditions without formal and costly change orders. This allows RC Strategies to
focus on achieving a goal of complete client satisfaction. RC Strategies will be responsible
for leading the project team, liaising with the client group, and overall project logistics
and reporting.
aodbt architecture + interior design
aodbt architecture + interior design has been offering a full complement of quality
architectural and interior design services since 1980 to a wide variety of private, public,
and non-profit clients in Saskatchewan and across western Canada. aodbt is dedicated to
delivering practical and creative solutions to a full range of architectural and interior design
challenges for a broad range of clients throughout the prairie region. Saskatchewan roots
mean we are a family-friendly workplace with dedicated, hardworking staff.
Dallas Huard
aodbt
2
Team Members
Stephen Slawuta
Michael Roma (Project Manager)
Stephen Slawuta has extensive experience as a recreation and
culture facilitator, programmer, and participant. His past involvement
in KidSport, professional sport, municipal recreation, and ongoing
research through RC Strategies have exposed Stephen to understand
both the benefits as well as the barriers to recreation and culture
that many Albertans face. Stephen has conducted numerous
project consultation programs and is excellent at generating
project related research.
RC Strategies
RC Strategies
Michael has fourteen years of experience in recreation and
culture planning throughout western Canada. His familiarity
with municipal government and the dynamics associated with
community service provision as well as his understanding of how
recreation fits into broader community visioning and growth
makes him a catalyst for successful, realistic, and implementable
strategic planning and an effective project manager.
Ryan Schwartz
Michael brings a “business minded” perspective to recreation
planning while realizing the intricacies of public resource provision.
His involvement in all levels of recreation planning from Master
Planning to detailed feasibility analyses as well as his experience
working for both rural and urban municipalities and non-profit
organizations ensures that all planning perspectives are valued
and considered. Michael is the President of the Alberta Recreation
and Parks Association (ARPA) Board and a member of the Leisure
Information Network Board. Michael is active in his own recreation
and culture community as a participant and coach and truly believes
in the benefits that recreation have on his own quality of life.
RC Strategies
Ryan recently graduated from the University of Alberta with a
Bachelor of Arts in Recreation, Sport, and Tourism. Ryan has been
with RC Strategies since 2014 and was a CIS athlete and student
participant at the National Recreation Framework discussions in
Toronto in 2014.
Lauren Hawkins
RC Strategies
Michael will act as the project manger for this exercise. He played
the same role in the development of the 2015 City of Saskatoon
Recreation and Parks Master Plan.
Lauren Hawkins has over four years of experience in the field of
graphic design, working in both the online and print media spheres.
She also has excellent fine arts skills and is an accomplished illustrator
and painter. Lauren graduated from NAIT in 2008, receiving her
Digital and Interactive Media Diploma with honors. In 2013,
she graduated from Grant MacEwan University, receiving her
Diploma in Design and Illustration with honors along with the
Dean’s Medal for Academic Excellence.
Robert Parks
RC Strategies
Robert Parks is certified as both a Certified Management
Consultant (CMC) and a member of the International Association
of Public Participation (IAP2). Robert’s professional experience in
facilitating and analyzing a number of consultation processes of
varying nature enable him to tailor group engagement to best
extract desired information, as well as present it in a way that is
easy to understand and logical. Both in a staff and consultant role,
Robert has worked with municipalities on facility pricing work and
market demand. Much of this work was with the City of Edmonton
where he developed a pricing process. Robert is also involved with
the ARPA and is on the University of Alberta Board of Governors.
Dallas Huard
aodbt
Dallas possesses a rare mix of excellent client skills, design focus,
and technical expertise that makes him a valuable asset to the team.
A Partner and Principal Architect with the aobdt since 2008,
Dallas has been working with a variety of clients to provide innovative
design solutions for healthcare, recreation, education, commercial,
and residential projects. His personable approach and friendly demeanor
encourages collaborative discussion and creative design exchanges.
Dallas works out of aobdt’s Saskatoon office and lives in Warman.
3
3
Related Experience
and References
RC Strategies have successfully completed the following related Recreation
Planning projects. For a more detailed list of projects, please refer to the
detailed firm information provided in Appendix A or visit the RC Strategies
website (www.rcstrategies.ca).
Recreation and Parks Master Plan
for the City of Saskatoon (2015)
Other Recent
Master Plan Projects
Reference Contact: Mike Libke
Phone Number: (306) 975 – 2289
City of Lacombe Recreation
and Cuture Master Plan (2013)
Project Description: Recreation and Parks Master Plan, including indoor and outdoor
recreation, with similar consultation techniques and desired recommended strategic
direction proposed herein. An Implementation Plan was also developed upon
completion of the Master Plan.
Town of Sundre
Master Recreation Plan (2014)
Town of Vulcan Regional
Recreation Strategic Plan (2015)
County of Northern Lights
Recreation and Culture
Master Plan (2016)
Athabasca County Recreation
Needs Assessment and
Master Plan (Ongoing)
Town of Canmore Recreation
Grande Prairie Region Joint
Recreation Master Plan (Ongoing)
Town of Blackfalds Recreation, Culture,
and Parks Needs Assessment and Master Plan (2016)
Reference Contact: Sean Barnes
Phone Number: (403) 885 – 6240
Project Description: Overall recreation facilities and services master plan, including
indoor and outdoor recreation, with similar consultation techniques and desired
recommended strategic direction. Blackfalds is also a rapidly growing municipality
with young demographics and a population exceeding 9,000.
Woodlands County Recreation
City of Fort St.John Parks and
Recreation Master Plan (Ongoing)
Vermilion Regional Recreation Master Plan (2016)
Reference Contact: Shawn Bell
Phone Number: (780) 581 – 2406
Project Description: Development of a Regional Recreation Master for the Town
and County, including partner stakeholders such as Lakeland College and the local
Agricultural Society. An extensive research program led to informed strategic directions.
4
4
Proposed Approach
We have developed the following work plan broken into five phases. Each of
the phases will build upon both primary and secondary data collected and will
engage key recreation stakeholders in the City at key strategic points in the process.
Estimated timing for each phase is also presented.
Task
Description
Phase 1: Data Collection, Inventory and Mapping (6 – 8 Weeks)
Project Initiation Meeting
A project initiation meeting will be held at the beginning of the process providing
the client committee with a detailed breakdown of the work plan, a schedule of
stakeholder involvement, a list of required background information, and an overview
of stakeholder roles and responsibilities in the planning process.
Community Description
After the project initiation meeting and upon review of the all background information,
a community description will be completed to set the context of the needs assessment
and master plan process. Developing this at the early stages of the project will enable
the entire study team to become reacquainted with the community and will provide all
stakeholders with a common starting point for planning.
Population and Demographics Analysis
Review of City demographics and population projections (where available).
Policy and Background Planning Review
Policy review of existing parks and recreation planning processes, including partnership
arrangements utilized by the City. Will enable the team to understand the local context
as well as enable further recommendations and/or policies to incorporate familiar
concepts and semantics. Review of existing City Strategic Planning on an overall basis
will ensure buy-in from all stakeholders and “tie-in” recreation and parks needs to
overall community priorities. Review of other pertinent documentation of a provincial
and national scope (such as the Framework for Recreation in Canada 2015: Pathways to
Wellbeing, Canada Sport for Life, etc.).
Best Practices Review
Best practices review will position the City amongst comparable municipalities in
Saskatchewan and will explain the current state of municipally supported recreation facilities
and service provision throughout these similar municipalities. This comparison will indicate
per unit facility provision ratios and service delivery research. Comparable municipalities will
be defined by the client.
Trends Analysis
Review of pertinent trends in parks and recreation delivery, participation, and infrastructure
through sources such as the SPRA, Leisure Information Network, and the Benefits Hub
(to name a few).
Indoor Facility Assessment
Review of recreation facilities in scope, including life cycle assessment data where
available and utilization.
5
Task
Description
Outdoor Facility Assessment
Review of trails and park spaces and amenities in scope, including an overall
assessment of parks, open space, and trails throughout the City.
Program and Service Delivery Assessment
Review of current City recreation programming will be inventoried and assessed based
on City staff input and needs assessment data.
Phase 2: Public Engagement and Stakeholder Input (8 Weeks)
Public Mailout Survey and Web Survey
(Assumes use of City website.)
A statistically representative public survey (mail out methodology supplemented
by a web version).
Public Engagement Event
(1 of 2)
Initial public event, potentially “piggy backing” other established community events
such as Buster Days or Monster Garage Saleto drive traffic and input; intended to gather
initial input into the planning process.
Stakeholder Interviews
(Up to 25)
Interviews with key stakeholders, such as City Administration, Elected Officials,
facility operators, community association representatives, administrators from other
municipalities, representatives of sport groups,representatives from other sectors
(health, education, justice, etc.) to gather perspectives on recreation, parks, and trails.
Student Survey
Survey of students in the City to gather youth perspectives on recreation and parks.
Stakeholder Group Survey
Survey of organized stakeholder groups (as identified by the client) throughout the City
including agricultural groups, sport groups, community associations, service clubs, etc.
Phase 3: Needs Assessment (4 Weeks)
Needs Assessment Summary Report
The Needs Assessment Summary Report will include all of the data collected to this
point and provide background information for the development of the Draft Master
Plan including the vision and goals as well as each of the other Plan components.
The Needs Assessment Summary Report will include key areas of future focus including
service delivery enhancements as well as specific community priorities for indoor and
outdoor recreation amenities.
Visioning Workshop
A visioning workshop will be facilitated addressing the background information
collected through the needs assessment process. Products of this workshop will include
a Master Plan vision and goals and establish Master Plan expectations of stakeholders.
Key strategic direction for all Master Plan recommendations will be discussed and
developed by key stakeholders ultimately involving the community in the interpretation
of data and strategic direction associated with the Plan. Attendees of the visioning session
may include other key project stakeholders (such as Elected Officials, group representatives,
regional partners, etc.) as identified by the steering committee.
Phase 4: Analysis and Evaluation (6 – 8 Weeks)
Management Tools and Guidelines
(Service Delivery, Promotions and Marketing,
Classification, Partnering, etc.)
Presentation of intangible management tools and guidelines including review and
recommendations related to approach to delivering services, consolidation and adjustment
(if required) to all the protocols in place (funding approaches, etc.), provision targets for
resident access to recreation amenities and programs, decision making processes related
to sustaining/viability of existing facilities, land acquisition methods, recreation resource
provision and maintenance guidelines for different land use categories, partnership protocol,
promotions and marketing approach, strategies for supporting delivery agents
(volunteer groups), etc.
Future Program Emphasis
Future direction related to program and opportunity delivery and specific areas of
focus to guide efforts of the City and other delivery agents.
6
Task
Description
Future Indoor Priorities
Future direction related to sustaining existing (within the scope of the Plan) and
developing new (if deemed necessary through GAP analysis) recreation facilities.
Future Outdoor Priorities
Future direction related to sustaining existing and developing new parks and open
space resources including trails.
Financial Impacts and Funding Strategy
Presentation of financial impacts of Plan implementation including reference to
external sources of funding (partnerships) where required.
Conclusion, Next Steps, and Action Plan
Plan summary, overview of next steps associated with Plan implementation and an
overview of role, responsibilities and associated impacts to all stakeholders.
Phase 5: Final Report (4 Weeks)
Draft Master Plan
Preparation of draft Plan for Project Steering Committee review.
Public Engagement
(2 of 2)
Public review events (2), hosted in a similar fashion to the input events, with invitations
to those who participated in early research.
Web Review Survey
(Assumes use of City website.)
Follow up web based public feedback collection process (assumes use of City website).
Final Master Plan
Finalizing the Master Plan, including graphically produced document and associated
presentation materials.
Final Presentation
Presentation of the Master Plan to City Council and associated stakeholders.
* Total Timeline: 28 – 32 Weeks
7
5
Steering Committee
Engagement
We expect the project steering committee to be engaged in strategic decision
making related to the project. We foresee the steering committee to meet no less
than 4 times as outlined below:
1.
Initial Project Start-up
2.
Needs Assessment Summary/Visioning Session
3.
Draft Plan Review (1 of 2)
4.
Draft Plan Review (2 of 2)
Although these would be the minimum requirement for formal meetings, we would
also expect the committee to provide key insight as to which community groups and
stakeholders should be involved in the process; timely review of survey instruments prior
to distribution; and direction related to the planning context within Martensville. For all
of the aforementioned areas of assistance, we would develop draft instruments for data
collection and would ask that the committee provide direction prior to facilitation.
Our goal is to rely on the familiarity of the steering committee with the community
without overtaxing committee members. Our prescribed process will also ensure
that the steering committee, and potentially other key members of the community,
is engaged during data interpretation and the setting of initial strategic direction for
the draft Plan (visioning session).
8
6
Team Involvement and Fees
The following fee schedule has been developed based on the methodology proposed.
We are open to revising our approach if desired.
Task
Per Hour Rates
Michael
Roma
Robert
Parks
Stephen
Slawuta
aodbt
Ryan Schwartz/
Lauren Hawkins
Total
Special
Disbursements
$200
$150
$125
$150
$100
$ CAD
$ CAD
Phase 1: Data Collection, Inventory and Mapping
Project Initiation Meeting
2
Community Description
2
Population and Demographics Analysis
2
2
2
$1,000
8
$1,450
2
6
$1,000
Policy and Background Planning Review
2
6
$1,000
Best Practices Review
2
4
16
$2,500
Trends Analysis
2
4
8
$1,700
Indoor Facility Assessment
8
4
$3,200
Outdoor Facility Assessment
8
8
$2,400
Program and Service Delivery Assessment
4
4
$1,700
Sub Total Days
32
2
14
10
60
118
—
Sub Total Fees
$6,400
$300
$1,750
$1,500
$6,000
$15,950
$0
8
4
Phase 2: Public Engagement and Stakeholder Input
Public Mailout Survey and Web Survey
4
12
30
$5,600
Public Engagement Event
2
8
8
$2,400
Stakeholder Interviews
4
4
4
8
$3,900
Student Survey
2
4
4
8
$2,300
Stakeholder Group Survey
2
4
4
16
$3,100
Sub Total Days
14
32
12
8
70
136
—
Sub Total Fees
$2,800
$4,800
$1,500
$1,200
$7,000
$17,300
$0
Needs Assessment Summary Report
4
4
4
4
$2,300
Visioning Workshop
4
4
$1,200
8
Phase3: Needs Assessment
Sub Total Days
8
4
4
0
8
24
—
Sub Total Fees
$1,600
$600
$500
$0
$2,700
$5,400
$0
9
Michael
Roma
Robert
Parks
Stephen
Slawuta
aodbt
Ryan Schwartz/
Lauren Hawkins
Total
Special
Disbursements
$200
$150
$125
$150
$100
$ CAD
$ CAD
Management Tools and Guidelines
12
2
8
$3,700
Future Program Emphasis
4
4
$1,300
Future Indoor Priorities
8
8
Future Outdoor Priorities
8
8
Financial Impacts and Funding Strategy
4
4
Conclusion, Next Steps, and Action Plan
4
4
Task
Per Hour Rates
Phase4: Analysis and Evaluation
16
$5,000
$2,600
4
$1,900
$1,300
Sub Total Days
40
2
36
20
0
98
—
Sub Total Fees
$8,000
$300
$4,500
$3,000
$0
$15,800
$0
8
2
8
$3,700
Phase5: Final Report
Draft Master Plan
8
Public Engagement
2
8
8
$2,400
Web Review Survey
4
8
4
$2,400
Final Master Plan
8
2
8
$3,250
Final Presentation
4
4
Sub Total Days
26
22
10
4
28
90
—
Sub Total Fees
$5,200
$3,300
$1,250
$600
$2,800
$13,150
$0
$24,000
$9,300
$9,500
$6,300
$18,500
$67,600
$0
36%
14%
14%
9%
27%
100%
—
Sub Total Fees (Phases 1 – 5)
Percentage Breakdown (Phases 1 – 5)
2
2
$1,400
Including Landscape and Architectural Expertise…
Total Fees (Excluding GST and PST)
$67,600
Total Project Administration and Disbursements (5% of Fees; Excluding GST and PST)
$3,380
Total Project Upset Value (Excluding GST and PST)
$70,980
* Assumes monthly Project Steering Committee meetings and email progress reports.
* Does not include costs associated with household survey printing and postage.
Total
Hours
Total
Fees
Total
Disbursements
Total
Upset Value
Completion
Date
Phase 1
118
$15,950
$797
$16,747
6 weeks
23.6%
Phase 2
136
$17,300
$865
$18,165
10 weeks
25.6%
Phase 3
24
$5,400
$270
$5,670
4 weeks
8%
Phase 4
98
$15,800
$790
$16,590
8 weeks
23.4%
Phase 5
90
$13,150
$657
$13,807
6 weeks
19.5%
Total Project
466
$67,600
$3,379
$70,979
32 weeks
100%
Fee Summary
10
19.5%
Phase 5
23.4%
23.6%
Phase 1
25.6%
Phase 4
8%
Phase 3
Phase 2
A
RC Strategies
Detailed Firm Information
About RC Strategies
Consolidated research provides
insights and answers to many
questions such as:
• What are the community’s
development priorities?
• How effective are
our programs?
• Who is using our services?
• What level of facility
utilization can be expected
in the future?
Services Include:
• Complete public
engagement/public
participation planning
• Focus/discussion group
design and facilitation
• Personal interviews
• Survey design and
administration
(phone, mail out, web)
• Survey tabulation
and analysis
• Town hall meetings
• Open houses
• Design charrettes
• Workshops
• World cafés
• Issue specific mailouts
and fliers
• Special presentations
• Social media applications
RC Strategies Inc is a multi-disciplinary consulting firm specializing in community
development, public engagement,and wellness infrastructure.
This multi-faceted company is able to provide a broad range of services to local
and senior-level governments, non-profit, and private sector groups in an efficient,
practical and professional manner. The firm provides clients access to services
including needs assessment, development market and feasibility analysis, business
case assessment and planning, strategic master planning, parks and open space
design, and facility design.
RC Strategies’ goal is to provide quality solutions and project outcomes that are
realistic, sustainable, unique, and which truly reflect the values of the communities
the firm serves.
Please visit the firm’s website at www.rcstrategies.ca. Should you have any
questions contact Michael Roma at (780) 441 – 4263 or at [email protected].
Consultation Services
Clearly identifying resident and market demands can be a difficult task. It involves
analysis of sometimes disparate community needs, projected shifts in demographics,
and the overall population and recognition of broad trends in participation and
service provision. Identifying community needs and distinguishing real market need
can only be achieved through a combination of primary and secondary research and
a review and analysis of current and past community planning initiatives.
Professionals at RC Strategies have planned and implemented innumerable primary
research programs throughout western and northern Canada. Many of these public
participation/consultation processes have been associated with broad community and
regional planning initiatives. In addition to their extensive experience, RC Strategies
has a team member with International Association for Public Participation
(IAP2) certification.
RC Strategies has proven methodologies for collecting information from the public and
stakeholders. Expert interpretation of the data and application of its meaning will serve
to enhance community development and planning objectives.
11
Leisure Facility Feasibility,
Tourism Resource, Market Studies,
and Planning Research
Projects Completed in 2010 – 2015
• Strathcona County Multi-Purpose Agricultural
Facility Feasibility Study
• YMCA of Northern Alberta Facility
Space Assessment
• University of Alberta Community Ice Arena Business Case
Leisure and recreation facility development is a complex and time
consuming process. Accurately defined needs and operational
forecasts are vital for facility success. RC Strategies has extensive
experience in working with municipalities across western and
northern Canada in facilitating public consultation, analyzing
the results, applying activity trends, and analyzing community
demographics (current and future) in order to develop successful
facility plans.
• Canadian Native Friendship Centre Business Case
• Skate Canada: Alberta – NWT/Nunavut Training Centre
Business Case
• Varscona Theatre Business Plan
• Northside Community Facility Study (RRC)
• Arts Common Business Case
• City of St. Albert Community Support Centre Business Case
Services Include:
• Breton Community Facility Feasibility Study
• Community leisure, recreation, and tourism needs assessment
• Stony Plain Community Centre Feasibility Study
• Leisure, recreation and tourism provision market analysis
• Strathmore Library Facility Needs Assessment
• Leisure, recreation and tourism infrastructure planning
• City of Edmonton MacEwan West Campus Business Case
• Feasibility analysis
• Red Deer County Springbrook Community Centre
Feasibility Study
• Detailed construction and operational costing
• Hope Bridges Community Arts Feasibility Study
• Business plans
• Punjab United Sports and Heritage Association Legacy
Project Business Case
• Funds sourcing strategies
• Marketing and promotional strategies
• Plebiscite/referendum strategies
• Town of Vermillion Community Facility Needs Assessment
and Feasibility Study
• Regional partnership development process
• North Edmonton Gymnastics Club Business Case
• Negotiating and structuring joint-use,
joint-development agreements
• MacDonald Island Park Expansion Business Case
• Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Anzac Multi-use
Facility Feasibility Study
• Volunteer program planning
• TransAlta Tri-Leisure Centre Expansion Feasibility Study
• Beaver Hills Initiative Tourism Assessment
Projects Ongoing in 2016
• Town of Beaumont Aquafit Expansion Feasibility Study
• Northlands Arena Strategic Plan and Business Case
• Brazeau County Multi-Purpose Ag Facility Consultation
• City of Chestermere Recreation Facility Feasibility Study
• Bon Accord Observation Park Business Case
• City of Red Deer Ice Facilities Plan
• St. Albert Soccer Association Strategic Planning
• Vermilion Community Social Needs Assessment
• Spruce Grove Agricultural Facility Feasibility
• City of Richmond Community Services Facilities Strategic Plan
• City of Chestermere Recreation and Leisure Centre
Feasibility Study
12
Recreation, Trails, Parks,
and Open Space Design
and Master Planning
Projects Completed in 2010 – 2015
• Tri-Region Event Hosting Strategy
• Crowsnest Pass Recreation Master Plan
• City of Leduc Telford Recreational Lands Plan
• Kelowna Volunteer Program
In planning for parks and open spaces in a community there are
a number of factors to consider. Municipal development plans,
development policy and levy assessment, parks and open space
classification systems, land inventory, and creative design have to
be addressed to understand the current and future state of parks
and open space in a community.
• Regional Recreation Corporation of the Regional
Municipality of Wood Buffalo Strategic Plan
Public consultation, needs assessment and trends analysis
supplement these factors and allow for an holistic approach to
community planning that merges open space systems with all
sectors of the community.
• Town of Sundre Master Recreation Plan
• Valleyview Community Facility Strategic Planning
• City of Lethbridge Recreation and Culture Master Plan
• City of Saskatoon Facility Development Framework
• Penhold–Bowden Regional Trail Concept Plan
• Beaver Regional Partnership Recreation
and Culture Master Plan
• Town of Rimbey Recreation, Parks and Trails Master Plan
Services Include:
• City of Lacombe Recreation and Culture Master Plan
• Master plan development
• City of Wetaskiwin Recreation Master Plan
• Community needs assessment
• Leduc County Recreation Facility Study
• Detailed construction and operational costing
• Leduc Parks, Open Spaces and Trails Master Plan
• Parks planning
• Strathcona County Trails Strategy
• Trail systems planning
• Blackfalds FCSS Community Needs Assessment
• Interpretive/educational features planning
• City of Medicine Hat Recreation Master Plan
• Human and natural heritage resource planning
• City of Brooks Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan
• Town of Beaumont Community Services Needs Assessment
Projects Ongoing in 2016
• Parkland County Park Improvement Plan
• City of Calgary Sports Field Strategy
• City of St. Albert Recreation and Culture Master Plans
• Township of Langley Recreation, Culture,
and Parks Master Plan
• Ortona Gymnastics Club Strategic Plan
• Regional District of Central Kootenay Recreation
Master Plans
• Wheatland County Needs Assessment
• City of Saskatoon Recreation and Parks Master Plan
• North Peace Region Recreation Needs Assessment
• City of Edmonton Open Space Master Plan
• Town of Vulcan Recreation Strategic Plan
• Parkland County Fire Services Master Plan
• Town of Vermilion Recreation Master Plan
• Town of Canmore Recreation Master Plan
• Red Deer County Regional Tails Concept Plan
• Grande Prairie Regional Recreation Master Plan
• Town of Blackfalds Needs Assessment Master Plan
• Athabasca County Recreation Master Plan
• County of Northern Lights Recreation and
Culture Master Plan
13
The People
The Team Approach
Michael Roma, MBA
When a client retains the services of RC Strategies, they access a network of
consulting, engineering, architectural, and market research professionals
and expertise developed over a combined 25 years of consulting experience.
Teaming with other complementary firms allows RC Strategies to develop
highly efficient and effective project teams. Each team member is carefully
selected based on past experience, merit and firm core competencies.
This team approach ensures that the client receives the best value
for their investment.
Michael Roma has consulted for the past fourteen years since
completing a Masters of Business Administration at the University
of Alberta, specializing in Leisure and Sport Management.
Michael’s background in finance and experience in recreation
programming assist him in developing accurate operational cost
analyses and measuring real vs. market need. Michael’s active volunteer
involvement for ARPA and other advisory boards ensures a broad
perspective in finding solutions to client problems.
Robert Parks, MBA, CMC
Ryan Schwartz, BA
Robert Parks has extensive experience in stakeholder consultation
and facilitation; he has consulted in the public, private, and nonprofit sectors. Robert is adept at designing and completing the
necessary primary and secondary research to further any project.
He then is able to translate the research finding into strategies
and actionable objectives. Robert’s background in education
coupled with his formal business training provides value for all
clients with whom he works.
Ryan Schwartz recently graduated from the University of Alberta
with a Bachelor of Arts in Recreation, Sport, and Tourism. Ryan has
been with RC Strategies since 2014 and was a CIS athlete and student
participant at the National Recreation Framework discussions in
Toronto in 2014.
Lauren Hawkins
Lauren Hawkins is a skilled graphic designer who specializes in
print design, illustration and corporate identity and branding.
She obtained a diploma from NAIT in Digital Media in 2010 and a
diploma in Design and Illustration from Grant MacEwan University
in 2013. Lauren believes in clean, simple, elegant design and
approaches all of her work with a keen eye for detail.
Stephen Slawuta, BA
Stephen Slawuta has extensive experience as a recreation and
culture facilitator, programmer, and participant. His involvement
in KidSport and ongoing research through RC Strategies have
exposed Stephen to understand both the benefits as well as
the barriers to recreation and culture that many Albertans face.
Stephen has conducted numerous project consultation programs
and is excellent at generating project related research.
14
Michael Roma, MBA
President; Leisure and Sport Management
Professional Experience
Phone
RC Strategies Inc.
Partner
2007 – Present
Randall Conrad and Associates Ltd.
Consultant
2002 – 2007
Lakeland College
Educational Liaison
2001
Lakeland College
Recreation Technician
1998 – 2000
(780) 441 – 4263
Email
[email protected]
Office Address
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T5J 1N3
Education
Masters of Business Administration
University of Alberta
Specializing in Leisure and Sport Management
2002
Bachelor of General Studies
Athabasca University
1999
Business Management Advanced Diploma
Lakeland College
1999
Business Management Diploma
Lakeland College
1998
Membership Affiliations
Alberta Recreation and Parks Association (ARPA)
President
Leisure Information Network (LIN)
Board Member
15
P: (708) 441 – 4262
F: (780) 426 – 2734
W: www.rcstrategies.ca
Robert Parks, B.Ed, MBA, CMC
Partner; Public and Stakeholder Consultation
Phone
RC Strategies Inc.
Partner
2011 – Present
RC Strategies Inc.
Senior Associate
2008 – 2011
(780) 441 – 4266
Email
[email protected]
EPCOR2008
Manager, Stakeholder Consultation
Banister Research and Consulting Inc.
Senior Associate
2006 – 2008
Office Address
Meyers Norris Penny LLP
Senior Consultant
2005 – 2006
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T5J 1N3
City of Edmonton
Marketing Consultant
2001 – 2005
Education
Certificate in Public Participation The International Association for Public Participation
2011
Certified Management Consultant Designation
Institute of Certified Management Consultants of Alberta
2002
Master of Business Administration
1999
Bachelor of Education, Secondary Studies
1987
University of Alberta Board of Governors
University of Alberta Alumni Council
International Association for Public Participation (IAP2)
Professional Development Committee Member
16
P: (708) 441 – 4262
F: (780) 426 – 2734
Stephen Slawuta, BA
Senior Associate; Public and Stakeholder Consultation
Phone
(780) 441 – 4267
RC Strategies Inc.
Senior Associate
2011 – Present
Edmonton Oilers Hockey Club
Game Day Media Relations
2008 – Present
KidSport Society of Alberta
Fund Development Manager
2012
KidSport Society of Alberta
Northern Regional Manager
2008 – 2011
Office Address
Edmonton Oil Kings Hockey Club
Marketing Supervisor
2006 – 2008
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T5J 1N3
Edmonton Oilers Hockey Club
Client Services Representative
2004 – 2006
Email
[email protected]
Education
Bachelor of Arts in Recreation, Sport, and Tourism
2011
Diploma in Physical Education and Sport Administration
Mount Royal College
2004
Recreation for Life Foundation
Board Member
2013
KidSport Edmonton Bids for Kids
Committee Member
2013
The Banff Centre Building Personal Leadership Program
2012
World Junior Hockey Championships Media Relations Team
2012
Alberta Sport, Recreation, Parks, and Wildlife Foundation
Sport Leadership Conference
2011, 2009
Canadian Sport Policy Renewal
Alberta Delegation
2011
17
P: (708) 441 – 4262
F: (780) 426 – 2734
Ryan Schwartz, BA
Associate; Public and Stakeholder Consultation
Phone
RC Strategies Inc.
Associate
2015 – Present
City of Edmonton
Recreation Technician
2014
(780) 441 – 4268
Email
[email protected]
Education
Bachelor of Arts in Recreation, Sport, and Tourism
Office Address
2015
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T5J 1N3
Related Experience
National Recreation Framework Implementation and Monitoring Working Group
2015 – Present
National Recreation Roundtable
Student Delegate
2014
City of Edmonton
Youth Programs
2013 – 2014
University of Alberta Athletics
Football Academy
2011 – Present
North Vancouver Recreation Commission
Sports Instructor
2007 – 2011
18
P: (708) 441 – 4262
F: (780) 426 – 2734
Lauren Hawkins
Graphic Designer
Phone
RC Strategies Inc.
Graphic Designer
2013 – Present
Base Corp Learning Systems
New Media Designer
2010 – 2013
(780) 428 – 8001 EXT#324
Email
[email protected]
Education
Diploma with Distinction in Design and Illustration
Grant MacEwan University
2013
Certificate with Distinction in Design Foundations
Grant MacEwan University
2011
Diploma with Distinction in Digital and Interactive Media Design
The Northern Alberta Institute of Technology
2010
Bachelor of Arts
2007 – 2008
Educational Awards
Grant MacEwan University’s Deans’ Medal
for Academic Excellence
2013
Louise McKinney Post-Secondary Scholarship 2009, 2010,
2011, and 2012
Mad Hatter’s Gala 2009 and 2010 Scholarship 2012
ARAMARK Canada Ltd. Scholarship 2012 and 2013
Alberta Research Council Higher Education Scholarship 2007, 2009,
and 2011
Alexander Rutherford Scholarship
for High School Achievement
2007
University of Alberta Faculty of Arts
Academic Excellence Scholarship
2007
University of Alberta Academic Excellence Scholarship
2007
19
Office Address
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T5J 1N3
P: (708) 441 – 4262
F: (780) 426 – 2734
B
aodbt Office Awards
2010 Samuel McLeod Business
Award: Environment
aodbt Prince Albert Office Location
2010 Samuel McLeod Business
Award: Business of the Year
2010 Samuel McLeod
Business Award: Job Creation
aodbt
architecture + interior design
Detailed Firm Information
Established in 1980, aodbt architecture + interior design has built on its legacy as a
firm of specialized individuals working as a team through all stages of the design and
construction process. Our passion is for our work; our focus is on our clients. With this
philosophy, aodbt grew to be one of the largest architectural firms in the province.
aodbt now has over 50 staff - the majority work out of the Saskatoon office, several in
Prince Albert, with smaller satellite offices in Moose Jaw and Melfort.
By using its size and range of specialization and assigning a principal architect to
each client, aodbt creates the perfect combination of size and skills for each client
and each project. Clients in all sectors have come to appreciate the dedication,
enthusiasm and personal commitment of a small company approach, supported
by the capacity, dependability and specialization of a large organization.
2000 Canadian Mental
Health Association:
Workplace Excellence Award
Sustainable design, now very much top of mind, is nothing new to aodbt.
Sustainable design should be embraced by all members of a project—and be a
mindset that pervades all aspects of a building’s development. At aodbt, sustainable
design begins with overall conceptual design that considers factors such as the siting
of the building, use of natural daylight to reduce electricity, shading techniques,
light coloured materials, and appropriately sized engineering systems. A testament
to aodbt’s world standards is the Saskatchewan Forest Centre, the only building in
Saskatchewan to achieve the international GOLD certification for a LEED (Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design) building.
LEED® Certified Projects
Other high-profile, award-winning projects include Wanuskewin Heritage Park ($4 million);
the Canadian Light Source Synchrotron facility ($14 million); University of Saskatchewan
Thorvaldson Spinks Building ($22 million); and the InterVac International Vaccination
Centre ($110 million). aodbt has received the Premier\’s Award of Excellence in Design for
the Saskatchewan Provincial Court House in Prince Albert, Assante Wealth Management
and Suncorp Valuations.
2005 Saskatchewan Work
and Family Balance Awards:
Outstanding Achievement in
Fostering Work and Family Balance
aodbt architecture + interior design,
Saskatoon, SK
LEED® Silver
Ecole St Anne School,
Prince Albert, SK
LEED® Silver
Forest Centre,
Prince Albert, SK
LEED® Gold
Our methods and inspired design also build relationships. Clients appreciate—
and trust —aodbt’s attention to detail, thorough project management, and ability
to transform essential needs into an inspired, yet highly functional, exhibit of
architectural excellence. The respect and teamwork through aligned vision includes
all members and stakeholders of the project. Now known as Integrated Project Design,
this coordinated, unified approach—as opposed to a top-down, often confrontational
approach to designing and building—is very much in practice at aodbts, and orchestrated
by the Project Architect.
It is passion controlled by process, using a consistent methodology which typically
involves site visits and meetings with all members of the project team. Communication
is the key. The result is buildings that are functional, inspiring, efficient, and a sustainable
asset to their owners and occupants.
20
Project Awards
2000 Saskatchewan Masonry Award
Artistic Award of Merit
Ahtahkakop School, SK
Award of Excellence
Saskatoon Co-Op 51st Gas Bar, Saskatoon, SK
Architectural Award of Merit
Melfort City Hall, Melfort, SK
2013 Saskatchewan Masonry
Award of Excellence
Western College of Vetrenairy Medicine, Saskatoon, SK
aodbt LEED® Projects in
Design + Construction
Award of Merit
Irene and Les Dube Centre for Mental Health, Saskatoon, SK
College Park School, Lloydminster, SK
LEED® Silver Target
Award of Merit
Humboldt Collegiate Institute, Humboldt, SK
Stobart Community School, Duck Lake, SK
2012 ASHRAE Technology Award Honorable Mention, Category 1:
Commercial Building—Existing, Outstanding Achievement
in Design and Operation of an Energy Efficient Building,
aodbt Saskatoon Office
Ecole Centennial, Swift Current, SK
Ecole St Thomas School, Lloydminster, AB
2011 Lieutenant Governor’s Heritage Architecture Excellence
Award for Interior Conservation/Sympathetic New Construction
Holy Trinity Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Prince Albert, SK
Hudson Bay School, Hudson Bay, SK
2011 Premier’s Design Award of Merit
International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Humboldt Collegiate Institute, Humboldt, SK
Mistawasis Health Centre, Mistawasis First Nation, SK
Langenburg School, Langenburg, SK
Assante Financial Corporation + Regency Advisors, Saskatoon, SK
Pinegrove Correctional Centre, Prince Albert, SK
Suncorp Valuations, Saskatoon, SK
Prince Albert Penetentiary Correctional Centre, Prince Albert, SK
Presidential Award of Excellence
Bethlehem Catholic Highschool, Saskatoon, SK
Saskatoon Co-Op Administration Building
LEED® Certified Target
2007 Premier’s Design Award of Excellence
Saskatchewan Provincial Courthouse, Prince Albert, SK
Saskatoon Police Services Headquarter, Saskatoon, SK
Artistic Award of Excellence—Spinks Addition to Thorvaldson,
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Synergy Credit Union, Lloydminster, SK
University of Saskatchewan Childcare Centre, Saskatoon, SK
Intuitional Award of Excellence—AAFC Research/Agriculture
Canada, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Warman Middle Years School, Warman, SK
Structural Award of Excellence
Battlefords Credit Union, North Battleford, SK
220 Wall Street, Saskatoon, SK
LEED® Gold Target
21
Dallas Huard, SAA, MRAIC, A.T.
Principal, Architect
About
Phone
Dallas received his Master of Architecture (in 2007) from Montana State University (MSU)
where he was recognized as the outstanding masters’ student by the faculty. In 2003,
Dallas also earned a diploma in architectural technology from SIAST Palliser Campus in
Moose Jaw. This combination of education and his engaging personality makes Dallas a
well rounded designer. He has knowledge of design and construction yet has the ability
to engage and assist an owner group over the course of the entire project. Dallas is the
recipient of many awards recognizing his achievements while attending college/university.
While at Montana State University, Dallas was recognized in June issue of Architectural
Record, an popular architecture magazine, for his design to rebuild housing lost in New
Orleans to Hurricane Katrina. In 2006 Dallas was awarded the HATCH Space Outstanding
Architect Award for his fourth year urban design project, and as noted he was voted,
by the faculty at MSU, as the outstanding masters’ student. In addition he has been
recognized, as selected by faculty at MSU, for his scholarship and leadership each year
while at MSU.
Dallas’ 13 years of architectural experience has provided him with opportunities to
work on projects in both the public and private sectors. Dallas possesses the rare mix of
excellent client skills and technical expertise. His technical abilities allow him to quickly
and clearly create design drawings, models, or three dimensional presentations, while his
communication skills allow him to explain these concepts to the client to assist them in
making design decisions. Dallas brings an institutive design sense and well-versed in
working on projects that involve multiple stakeholders.
Dallas was the Principal Architect on the Martensville Athletic Pavilion. He worked closely with
Sprung Structures to develop innovative solutions to maximize the potential of the structure.
These innovations included working with local authorities to explore new opportunities
related to the national building code such as building classifications, developed unique
approaches to bringing natural daylight into the building and worked closely with the
engineers to develop the best systems for the building. His personable approach and friendly
demeanor encourages collaborative discussion and creative design exchanges. Dallas has an
intuitive design sense that results in functional, yet creative solutions.
22
(306) 244 – 5101
Email
[email protected]
Office Address
235 Avenue D N
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Canada, S7L 1M7
P: (306) 244 – 5101
F: (306) 244 – 0301
W: www.aodbt.com
Dallas Huard, SAA, MRAIC, A.T.
Principal, Architect
Project Experience
Phone
• Martensville Athletic Pavilion, Martensville, SK
(306) 244 – 5101
• Alfred Jenkins Field House, Prince Albert, SK
Email
• Kerry Vickar Centre, Melfort, SK
• Morinville Recreation Centre Feasibility Study, Morinville, AB
[email protected]
• Lac La Ronge Recreation Facility Expansion Feasibility Study, Lac La Ronge, SK
• Sprung School Preliminary Design Study, Ministry of Education, AB
• Prairie Spirit School Division, Warman/Olser/Martensville Stage One Feasibility Studies, SK
• Prairie Spirit School Division Facility Code Reviews, Various, SK
• Prairie Spirit School Division Valley Manor School Addition, Martensville, SK
• Sprung Pool Preliminary Design Study, Barrhead, AB
• Langenburg K – 12 School, Langenburg, SK
Office Address
235 Avenue D N
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Canada, S7L 1M7
P: (306) 244 – 5101
F: (306) 244 – 0301
W: www.aodbt.com
• Stobart K – 12 Community School, Duck Lake SK
• Martensville High School Addition, Martensville, SK
• Warman High School, Warman, SK
• University of Saskatchewan International Vaccine Centre, Saskatoon, SK
Education
Architecture and Building Technologies Diploma
SIAST, Palliser Campus
2003
Bachelor in Environmental Design
Montana State University Bozeman
2006
Master of Architecture
Montana State University Bozeman
2007
Saskatchewan Association of Architects
Member
Royal Architectural Institute of Canada
Member
Architectural Heritage and Building Renovation
Member
23
ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT
BYLAW NO. 9-2016
A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF MARTENSVILLE TO AMEND BYLAW 1-2015, KNOWN AS THE
ZONING BYLAW.
The Council of the City of Martensville, in the Province of Saskatchewan, enacts to amend Bylaw No. 1-2015 as follows:
(1) The Zoning District Map referred to in Section 7 is amended by:
(a)
Zoning the east half of Proposed Block 201 and all of Block 208 from “FUD – Future Urban Development” to “R1 Residential”.
b)
The above area is shown on the sketch map which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw.
This Bylaw shall come into force on when this bylaw is adopted by Council.
Read a first time this 3rdrd day of May, A.D. 2016
________________________
MAYOR
________________________
CITY CLERK
ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT
BYLAW NO. 9-2016
Map Attachment for Bylaw 9-2016
This map forms part of Bylaw 9-2016.
______________________________
City Clerk
(SEAL)

May 3, 2016 Regular Council

Transcription

Similar documents

Explore summer fun with our river recreation maps.

Youth Sports Programs

Ski Trip to Mad River Mountain with ODR

Palisades Recreation Center

Park Services Manager - Willamalane Park and Recreation District

Proceeds go to support NJROTC scholarships and the Port

Program Registration Form - Saddleback Valley Unified School District

May 2016 Newsletter

The Middle Way 3-days Meditation Program