IPC-6013C Qualification and Performance Specification for Flexible
Transcription
IPC-6013C Qualification and Performance Specification for Flexible
DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY IPC-6013C Qualification and Performance Specification for Flexible Printed Boards Final Draft for Industry Review – October 2012 A standard developed by IPC DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Qualification and Performance Specification for Flexible Printed Boards 1 SCOPE 1.1 Statement of Scope This specification covers qualification and performance requirements of flexible printed boards. The flexible printed board may be single-sided, double-sided, multilayer, or rigid-flex multilayer. All of these constructions may or may not include stiffeners, plated-through holes, and blind/buried vias. The flexible or rigid-flex printed board may contain build up HDI layers. The printed board may contain embedded active or passive circuitry with distributive capacitive planes, capacitive or resistive components conforming to IPC-6017. The rigid section of the printed board may contain a metal core or external metal heat frame, which may be active or nonactive. Revision level changes are described in 1.7. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this specification is to provide requirements for qualification and performance of flexible printed boards designed to IPC-2221 and IPC-2223. 1.3 Performance Classification, Board Type, and Installation Usage 1.3.1 Classification This specification recognizes that flexible printed boards will be subject to variations in performance requirements based on end-use. These performance classes (Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3) are defined in IPC-6011. 1.3.2 Printed Board Type Performance requirements are established for the different types of flexible printed boards, classified as follows: Type 1 - Single-sided flexible printed boards containing one conductive layer, with or without stiffeners. Type 2 - Double-sided flexible printed boards containing two conductive layers with plated-through holes, with or without stiffeners. Type 3 - Multilayer flexible printed boards containing three or more conductive layers with plated-through holes, with or without stiffeners. Type 4 - Multilayer rigid and flexible material combinations containing three or more conductive layers with plated-through holes. Type 5 - Flexible or rigid-flex printed boards containing two or more conductive layers without plated-through holes. 1.3.3 Installation Uses Use A Capable of withstanding flex during installation. Use B Capable of withstanding continuous flexing for the number of cycles as specified on the procurement documentation. Use C High temperature environment (over 105 °C [221 °F]). Use D UL Recognition. See UL 94 and UL 796F. 1.3.4 Selection for Procurement For procurement purposes, performance class and installation usage shall be specified in the procurement documentation. The documentation shall provide sufficient information to the supplier so that the supplier can fabricate the flexible printed boards and ensure that the user receives the desired product. Information that should be included in the procurement documentation is shown in IPC-D-325. Note: If the drawing specifies the requirement in words, designators are not required. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY The procurement documentation shall specify the thermal stress test method and the number of cycles (in relation to reflow profiles in IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.27) to be used to meet the requirement of 3.6.1. Selection shall be from those depicted in 3.6.1.1, 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3. If not specified (see 5.1), the default shall be per Table 1-2. During the selection process, the user should take into consideration the following when determining the appropriate thermal stress test method: Wave solder, selective solder, hand solder assembly processes (see 3.6.1.1) Conventional (eutectic) reflow processes (see 3.6.1.2) Lead-free reflow processes (see 3.6.1.3) PC-6016, a sectional performance specification for HDI printed boards, was cancelled by the IPC. Relevant HDI conformance and acceptance criteria has been transferred to this revision of this specification. 1.3.4.1 Selection (Default) The procurement documentation shall specify those requirements that are a result of the selection process within this specification. This includes all references to “AABUS”. If the requirement selection is not made in accordance with the procurement documentation, Ordering Data (see 5.1), Customer Drawing and/or supplier control plan (SCP), then the default requirement in Table 1-1 shall apply. Table 1-1 Default Requirements Category Default Selection Performance Class Class 2 Installation Usage Use A Material Final Finish Fabricator defined Finish X (Electrodeposited tin lead, fused or solder coated) Minimum Starting Foil 1/2 oz. for all internal and external layers Copper Foil Type Plated Component Hole Diameter Tolerance Plated Via Hole Diameter Tolerance Fabricator defined (±) 100 µm [3,937 µin] (+) 80 µm [3,150 µin], (-) no requirement, (may be totally or partially plugged) Non-plated Hole Diameter Tolerance (±) 80 µm [3,150 µin] Conductor Width tolerance Class 2 requirements per para. 3.5.1 Conductor Spacing tolerance Class 2 requirements per para. 3.5.2 Dielectric Separation Fabricator defined; Finished product within 80% of selected thickness Lateral Conductor Spacing 100 µm [3,937 µin] minimum Marking Ink Contrasting color, nonconductive Solder Mask Solder Mask, specified Not applied, if not specified Class T of IPC-SM-840 if class not specified Solderability Test Category 2 of J-STD-003, tin-lead solder per 3.3.6 Isolation (Shorts) Testing Per IPC-9252 Qualification not specified See IPC-6011 Profile tolerance Thermal Stress Test 0.5 mm [0.0197 in] for all external edges IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.8, Condition A or Condition C for polyester flexible material per 3.6.1 1.3.5 Material, Plating Process and Final Finish DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY 1.3.5.1 Laminate Material Laminate material is identified by numbers and/or letters, classes and types as specified by the appropriate specification listed in the procurement documentation. 1.3.5.2 Plating Process The copper plating process used to provide the main conductor in the holes is identified by a single number as follows: 1 - Acid copper electroplating only 2 - Pyrophosphate copper electroplating only 3 - Acid and/or pyrophosphate copper electroplating 4 - Additive/electroless copper 5 - Electrodeposited Nickel underplate with copper electroplating Note: Pyrophosphate copper electroplating is no longer in use. 1.3.5.3 Final Finish and Coatings The final finish/coating can be one of the finishes/coatings specified below or a combination of several platings and is dependent on assembly processes and end-use. If required, the thickness shall be specified in the procurement documentation. If not specified, the thickness shall be as listed in Table 3-2. Coating thickness may be exempted in Table 3-2 (i.e., tin-lead plate or solder coating). Designators for final finish are as follows: S T X TLU b1 G GS GWB-1 GWB-2 N NB OSP HT OSP ENIG ENEPIG DIG NBEG IAg ISn C SMOBC SM SM-LPI SM-DF SM-TM Y Solder Coating Electrodeposited Tin-Lead, (fused) Either Type S or T Electrodeposited Tin-Lead (unfused) Lead-free Solder Coating Gold Electroplate for Edge Printed Board Connectors Gold Electroplate for Areas to be Soldered Gold Electroplate for areas to be wire bonded (ultrasonic) Gold Electroplate for areas to be wire bonded (thermosonic) Nickel for Edge Printed Board Connectors Nickel as a Barrier to Copper-Tin Diffusion Organic Solderability Preservative High Temperature OSP Electroless Nickel Immersion Gold Electroless Nickel/Electroless Palladium/Immersion Gold Direct Immersion Gold Nickel Barrier/Electroless Gold Immersion Silver Immersion Tin Bare Copper Solder Mask over Bare Copper Solder Mask over Non-Melting Metal Liquid Photoimageable Solder Mask over Non-Melting Metal Dry Film Solder Mask over Non-Melting Metal Thermal Mask Solder Mask over Non-Melting Metal Other (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (Table 3-2) (3.2.8) (3.2.8) (3.2.8) (3.2.8) (3.2.8) (3.2.7.11) 1.4 Terms and Definitions The definition of all terms used herein shall be as specified in IPC-T-50 and as defined in 1.4.1 through 1.4.10. 1.4.1 As Agreed Upon Between User and Supplier (AABUS) Indicates additional or alternate requirements to be decided between the user and the supplier in the procurement documentation. Examples include contractual requirements, modifications to purchase documentation and information on the drawing. Agreements can be used to define test methods, conditions, frequencies, categories or acceptance criteria within a test, if not already established. 1.4.2 Button Plating A selective plating technique in which copper is plated only in the hole barrel and a portion of the outer layer pads. This method is utilized to avoid plating less ductile electrolytic copper on the outer layer layers DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY of flex circuitry. 1.4.3 Coverlay Film and adhesive made from separate layers of generically different chemistries. 1.4.4 Coverfilm Film made from i) a homogeneous, single component; ii) separate layers of generically similar chemistries; or iii) as a composite blend 1.4.5 Covercoat Material deposited as a liquid onto the circuitry that subsequently becomes a permanent dielectric coating. NOTE: Covercoats may have reduced performance in tight bend radius applications. 1.4.6 Cover Material A thin dielectric material used to encapsulate circuitry, most commonly for flexible circuit applications. 1.4.7 Target Land The land on which the microvia ends and makes connection. 1.4.8 Capture Land The land where the microvia starts, and varies in shape and size based on use (i.e., component mounting, via entrance conductor, etc.) 1.4.9 Microvia A microvia is defined as a blind structure (as plated) with a maximum aspect ratio of 1:1 when measured in accordance with Figure 1-1, terminating on or penetrating a target land, with a total length of no more than 250 µm [0.00984 in] measured from the structure’s capture land foil to the target land. Figure 1-1 Microvia Definition Note: X/Y = Microvia Plating Aspect Ratio, with X < 254 µm [0.00984 in] and aspect ratio < 1:1. 1.4.10 Core A single-sided, double-sided or multilayer board or flex circuit that is used as a carrier for HDI layers and meets the requirements of one of the following performance specifications: IPC-6012, IPC-6013, IPC-6015 or IPC-6018. 1.5 Interpretation ‘‘Shall,’’ the imperative form of the verb, is used throughout this standard whenever a requirement is intended to express a provision that is mandatory. Deviation from a ‘‘shall’’ requirement may be considered if sufficient data is supplied to justify the exception. The words ‘‘should’’ and ‘‘may’’ are used whenever it is necessary to express nonmandatory provisions. ‘‘Will’’ is used to express a declaration of purpose. To assist the reader, the word ‘‘shall’’ is presented in bold characters. 1.6 Presentation All dimensions and tolerances in this specification are expressed in hard SI (metric) units and parenthetical soft imperial (inch) units. Users of this specification are expected to use metric dimensions. All dimensions greater than or equal to 1.0 mm [0.0394 in] will be expressed in millimeters and inches. All dimensions less than 1.0 mm [0.0394 in] will be expressed in micrometers and microinches. 1.7 Revision Level Changes Changes made to this revision of the IPC-6013 are indicated throughout by gray-shading of the relevant subsection(s). Changes to a figure or table are indicated by gray-shading of the Figure or Table header. 2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY The following specifications form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein. If a conflict of requirements exists between IPC-6013 and the listed applicable documents, IPC-6013, with the exception of IPC-6011, shall take precedence. 2.1 IPC1 IPC-T-50 Terms and Definitions for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits IPC-CF-152 Composite Metallic Materials Specification for Printed Wiring Boards IPC-D-325 Documentation Requirements for Printed Wiring IPC-A-600 Acceptability of Printed Boards IPC-TM-650 Test Methods Manual2 2.1.1 Microsectioning 2.1.1.2 Microsectioning-Semi or Automatic Technique Microsection Equipment (Alternate) 2.3.15 Purity, Copper Foil or Plating 2.3.38 Surface Organic Contaminant Detection List 2.3.39 Surface Organic Contaminant Identification Test (Infrared Analytical Method) 2.4.1 Adhesion, Tape Testing 2.4.2.1 Flexural Fatigue and Ductility, Foil 2.4.3 Flexural Fatigue, Flexible Printed Wiring Materials 2.4.3.1 Flexural Fatigue and Ductility, Flexible Printed Wiring 2.4.18.1 Tensile Strength and Elongation, In-House Plating 2.4.20 Terminal Bond Strength, Flexible Printed Wiring 2.4.22 Bow and Twist 2.4.28.1 Adhesion, Solder Resist (Mask) Tape Test Method 2.4.36 Rework Simulation, Plated-Through Holes for Leaded Components 2.4.41.2 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion - Strain Gage Method 2.5.7 Dielectric Withstand Voltage, PWB 2.5.5.7 Characteristic Impedance and Time Delay of Lines on Printed Boards by TDR 2.6.1 Fungus Resistance Printed Wiring Materials 2.6.3 Moisture and Insulation Resistance, Printed Boards 2.6.4 Outgassing, Printed Boards 2.6.7.2 Thermal Shock and Continuity, Printed Boards 2.6.8 Thermal Stress, Plated-Through Holes IPC-QL-653 Qualification of Facilities that Inspect/Test Printed Boards, Components and Materials DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY IPC-SM-840 Qualification and Performance of Permanent Solder Mask IPC-2221 Generic Standard on Printed Boards Design IPC-2223 Sectional Design Standard for Flexible Printed Boards IPC-2251 Design Guide for the Packaging of High Speed Electronic Circuits IPC-4101 Specification for Base Materials for Rigid and Multilayer Printed Boards IPC-4103 Specification for Base Materials for High Speed/High Frequency Applications IPC-4202 Flexible Bare Dielectrics for use in Flexible Printed Wiring IPC-4203 Adhesive Coated Dielectrics Films for Use in Fabrication of Flexible Printed Wiring IPC-4204 Metal-Clad Flexible Dielectrics for Use in Fabrication of Flexible Printed Wiring IPC-4552 Electroless Nickel/Immersion Gold Plating for Electronic Interconnections IPC-4553 Specification for Immersion Silver Plating for Printed Circuit Boards IPC-4562 Copper Foil for Printed Wiring Applications IPC-4563 Resin Coated Copper Foil for Printed Boards Guideline IPC-4761 Design Guide for Protection of Printed Board Via Structures IPC-4781 Qualification and Performance Specification of Permanent, Semi-Permanent and Temporary Legend and/or Marking Inks IPC-4811 Specification for Embedded Passive Device Resistor Materials for Rigid and Multilayer Printed Boards IPC-4821 Specification for Embedded Passive Device Capacitor Materials for Rigid and Multilayer Printed Boards IPC-6011 Generic Performance Specification for Printed Boards IPC-6017 Qualification and Performance Specification for Printed Boards Containing Embedded Passive Devices IPC-7711/21 Rework and Repair Guide IPC-9252 Requirements for Electrical Testing of Unpopulated Printed Boards IPC-9691 User Guide for the IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.25, Conductive Anodic Filament (CAF) Resistance Test (Electrochemical Migration Testing) 2.2 Joint Industry Standards3 J-STD-003 Solderability Tests for Printed Boards J-STD-006 Requirements for Electronic Grade Solder Alloys and Fluxed and Non-Fluxed Solid Solders for Electronic Soldering Applications 2.3 Other Publications 2.3.1 American Society for Testing and Materials4 ASTM B 488 Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Gold for Engineering Uses DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY ASTM B 579 Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Tin-Lead Alloy 2.3.2 Underwriters Lab5 UL 94 Tests for Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Devices and Appliances UL 796F Flexible Materials Interconnect Constructions 2.3.3 National Electrical Manufacturers Association6 NEMA LI-1 Industrial Laminate Thermosetting Product 2.3.4 American Society for Quality7 H1331 Zero Acceptance Number Sampling Plans 2.3.5 AMS8 SAE-AMS-QQ-A-250 Aluminum Alloy, Plate and Sheet SAE-AMS-2424 Plating, Nickel Low-Stressed Deposit 2.3.6 American Society of Mechanical Engineers9 ASME B46.1 Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay) 2.3.7 Federal8 QQ-S-635 Steel 1. www.ipc.org 2. Current and revised IPC Test Methods are available through the IPC Web site (www.ipc.org/html/testmethods.htm). 3. www.ipc.org 4. www.astm.org 5. www.ul.com 6. www.nema.org 7. www.asq.org 8. www.sae.org 9. www.asme.org 3 REQUIREMENTS 3.1 General Flexible printed boards furnished under this specification shall meet or exceed the requirements of IPC-6011 and the specific performance class as required by the procurement documentation. Descriptions and purposes of test coupons are documented in IPC-2221. Although conformance to the detailed requirements may be determined by examination of specific quality control coupons, these requirements apply to all coupons or sample flexible printed boards and to deliverable flexible printed boards. These requirements are also based on the assumption that the flexible printed board was designed to the appropriate IPC design standard. 3.2 Materials Used in this Specification All materials used in construction of the flexible printed board shall comply with applicable specifications and the procurement documentation. The user has the responsibility to specify on the procurement documentation materials capable of meeting the requirements of this specification and end item use. Note: When possible, material call-out information should be reviewed with the supplier so as to obtain concurrence that the part will meet the requirements of this specification and, if necessary, to update the procurement documentation accordingly. 3.2.1 Laminates and Bonding Materials Metal-clad laminates, unclad laminates, and bonding material (prepreg) should be selected using IPC-4101, IPC-4103, IPC-4202, IPC-4203, IPC-4204, or NEMA LI 1-1989. Embedded device materials shall be selected from IPC-4811 or IPC-4821 and should be as specified in the procurement documentation including dielectric, conductive, resistive and insulating characteristics as applicable. The specification sheet number, metal cladding type and metal clad thickness (weight) should be as specified in the procurement documentation. When there are specific requirements, it is necessary to specify those requirements on DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY the material procurement documentation. 3.2.1.1 Flexible Material Options At the supplier’s option, flexible metal-clad dielectrics and adhesive coated dielectric films may be manufactured using individual components per IPC-4562, IPC-4202, and IPC-4203. In addition, materials per IPC-4204 may be substituted where individual components are specified. 3.2.2 External Bonding Materials The material used to adhere external heat sinks or stiffeners to the flexible printed board should be selected from IPC-4101, IPC-4202, IPC-4203, IPC-4204, or as specified on the procurement documentation. 3.2.3 Other Dielectric Materials Photoimageable dielectrics should be specified on the procurement documentation. Other dielectric materials may be specified on the procurement documentation. 3.2.4 Metal Foils Copper foil should be in accordance with IPC-4562. Foil type, foil grade, foil thickness, bond enhancement treatment, and foil profile should be specified on the master drawing if critical to the function of the flexible printed board. Resin coated copper foil shall be in accordance with IPC-4563. 3.2.4.1 Resistive Metal Foil Resistive metal foil shall be specified in the procurement documentation. 3.2.5 Metal Planes/Cores Metal planes and/or metal core substrates shall be specified on the master drawing as shown in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 Internal or External Metal Planes Material Specification Alloy Aluminum SAE-AMS-QQ-A-250 As Specified Steel QQ-S-635 As Specified Copper ASTM-B-152 or IPC-4562 As Specified Copper-Invar- Copper IPC-CF-152 As Specified Copper-Moly- Copper IPC-CF-152 As Specified Other As Specified As Specified 3.2.6 Base Metallic Plating Depositions and Conductive Coatings The thickness of the plating/final finish coatings shall be in accordance with Table 3-2. The copper plating thickness for the surface, PTHs, via holes, blind and buried vias shall be as specified in Table 3-3, Table 3-4, Table 3-5 and Table 3-6. The thickness for specific use platings shall be as specified in Table 3-2. The plating thickness for final finishes or combinations there-of selected from those listed in 1.3.4.3 shall be as specified in Table 3-2. Fused tin-lead plating or solder coating only requires visual coverage and acceptable solderability testing per J-STD-003. Coverage of platings and metallic coatings does not apply to vertical conductor edges. Conductor surfaces may have exposed copper in areas not to be soldered within the limits of 3.5.4.7. 3.2.6.1 Electroless Copper Depositions and Conductive Coatings Electroless depositions and conductive coatings shall be sufficient for subsequent plating processes and may be either electroless metal, vacuum deposited metal, or metallic or non-metallic conductive coatings. 3.2.6.2 Electrodeposited Copper When copper plating is specified, electrodeposited copper platings shall meet the following criteria. Frequency of testing shall be determined by the manufacturer to ensure process control. a) When tested as specified in IPC-TM-650, Method 2.3.15, the purity of copper shall be no less than 99.50%. b) When tested as specified in IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.18.1, using 50 - 100 µm [1,969 - 3,937 µin] thick samples, the tensile strength shall be no less than 248 MPa [36,000 PSI] and the elongation shall be no less than 18%. 3.2.6.3 Fully Additive Electroless Copper Depositions Additive/electroless copper platings applied as the main conductor metal shall meet the requirements of this specification. Deviations shall be AABUS. 3.2.7 Final Finish Depositions and Coatings - Metallic and Non-Metallic 3.2.7.1 Electrodeposited Tin The allowance of and the requirements for use of electrodeposited tin shall be AABUS. It is recommended that the user refer to JEDEC/IPC JP002 for guidance on potential mitigation practices DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY that may delay the onset of, or prevent, tin whisker formation. 3.2.7.2 Electrodeposited Tin-Lead Tin-lead plating shall meet the composition (50-70% tin) requirements of ASTM B-579. Fusing is required unless the unfused option is selected wherein the thickness specified in Table 3-2 (Code T) applies. 3.2.7.3 Hot Air Solder Leveling (HASL)/Solder Coating The solder coating shall be as specified on the master drawing and the bath or pot used for coating shall meet the requirements of J-STD-006. HASL is the process for solder coating that involves dipping a printed board into solder and using hot air to level the resultant solder surface. 3.2.7.3.1 Eutectic Tin-Lead Solder Coating The solder used for conventional, lead-bearing coatings shall be in accordance with the requirements of 3.2.7.3, except the thickness shall be in accordance with Table 3-2 (Code S). 3.2.7.3.2 Lead-Free Solder Coating The solder used for lead-free solder coating shall be in accordance with the requirements of 3.2.7.3, except the thickness shall be in accordance with Table 3-2 (Code b1). 3.2.7.3.3 Deviations to these requirements shall be AABUS. 3.2.7.4 Electrodeposited Nickel Nickel plating thickness shall be as specified in Table 3-2 (Code NB). When used as an undercoat or barrier layer for gold or other metals, the thicknesses shall be as specified in Table 3-2 (Code NB). 3.2.7.5 Electrodeposited Gold Electrodeposited gold plating shall be in accordance with ASTM-B-488. Purity and hardness shall be specified in the procurement documentation. The thickness shall be as specified in Table 3-2 (Code G, GS, GWB-1 and GWB-2). Note: Industry investigations have shown that a gold-tin intermetallic phase forms under normal soldering process parameters when the weight percent of gold in the solder joint reaches the 3-4% range. Refer to IPC-J-STD-001 and IPC-HDBK-001 for further information on gold removal to prevent the formation of brittle solder joints resulting from high concentrations of gold dissolving into the solder joint. 3.2.7.6 Electroless Nickel Immersion Gold (ENIG) ENIG plating deposit shall be in accordance with IPC-4552. Deposit thickness range shall be in accordance with IPC-4552 and as specified in Table 3-2 (Code ENIG). Measurement methodology shall be by XRF Spectrometry in accordance with Appendix 4 of IPC-4552. Frequency of sample thickness measurement for Class 1 and Class 2 shall be in accordance with IPC-4552 and for Class 3 location and extent of sampling shall be AABUS. Caution: Immersion gold thicknesses above 0.125 µm [4,925 µin] can indicate an increased risk of having compromised the integrity of the nickel undercoat due to excessive corrosion. Due to the influence of the design pattern and chemistry process variability, acceptance of the solderability coupon may not represent the part. Correlation of thickness measurements across the pattern is strongly encouraged to demonstrate uniformity of the coating thickness. 3.2.7.7 Electroless Nickel/Electroless Palladium/Immersion Gold (ENEPIG) Electroless nickel shall be in accordance with IPC-4552. Electroless palladium (alloyed or non-alloyed) shall be in accordance with ASTM-B-679. Immersion gold shall be in accordance with IPC-4552. The thicknesses shall be as specified in Table 3-2 (Code ENEPIG) and may be measured by XRF Spectrometry. Allowable thickness cited in Table 3-2 could skew to the lower or higher part of the range for optimum connector or solderable surface metallurgy. Unlike nickel, palladium is more resistant to immersion gold, hence the reduced thickness requirement for gold (coverage only). Measurement location and extent shall be AABUS. 3.2.7.8 Immersion Silver Immersion silver plating shall be in accordance with IPC-4553. Pad size for thickness measurements shall be in accordance with IPC-4553 and as specified in Table 3-2 (code IAg). 3.2.7.9 Immersion Tin Immersion tin plating deposit shall be in accordance with IPC-4554. Deposit thickness range shall be in accordance with IPC-4554 and as specified in Table 3-2 (code ISn). Measurement methodology shall be by XRF Spectrometry in accordance with Appendix 4 of IPC-4554. Frequency of sample thickness measurement for Class 1 and Class 2 shall be in accordance with IPC-4554 and for Class 3 location and extent of sampling shall be AABUS. 3.2.7.10 Organic Solderability Preservative (OSP) OSPs are anti-tarnish and solderability protectors applied to copper to withstand storage and assembly processes in order to maintain solderability of surfaces. The coating DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY storage, pre-assembly baking and sequential soldering processes impact solderability. Specific solderability shelf-life and soldering cycle requirements, if applicable, shall be specified in the procurement documentation. This applies to both standard and high-temperature OSP formulations. 3.2.7.11 Other Metals and Coatings The allowance of and the requirements for use of other depositions as a final finish per 1.3.5.3 such as bare copper, palladium and rhodium shall be AABUS. Table 3-2 Final Finish and Coating Requirements Code Finish Thickness Applicable Acceptability Specification Marking Code1 S Solder Coating over Bare Copper Coverage & Solderable2 J-STD-003 J-STD-006 b0 b1 Lead-Free Solder Coating over Bare Copper Coverage & Solderable2 J-STD-003 J-STD-006 b1 T Electrodeposited Tin-Lead (fused) - minimum Coverage & Solderable2 X TLU G GS GWB-1 Either Type S or T Electrodeposited Tin-Lead Unfused minimum Gold for edge printed board connectors and areas not to be soldered - minimum Gold Electroplate on areas to be soldered – 3 maximum Gold Electroplate for areas to be wire bonded (ultrasonic) – minimum Electrolytic nickel under gold for areas to be wire bonded (ultrasonic) - minimum Gold Electroplate for areas to be wire bonded (thermosonic) - minimum GWB-2 Electrolytic nickel under gold for areas to be wire bonded (thermosonic) - minimum J-STD-003 J-STD-006 As indicated by code J-STD-003 8.0 µm [315 µin] J-STD-006 Class 1 and Class 2 0.8 µm [31.5 µin] b3 b3 ASTM-B-488 b4 0.45 µm [17.72 µin] ASTM-B-488 b4 0.05 µm [1.97 µin] ASTM-B-488 b4 3.0 µm [118 µin] None b4 ASTM-B-488 b4 None b4 None N/A N/A Class 3 1.25 µm [49.21 µin] Class 1 and Class 2 0.3 µm [11.8 µin] Class 3 0.8 µm [31.5 µin] 3.0 µm [118 µin] Class 1 2.0 µm [78.7 µin] N Nickel - Electroplate for edge printed board connectors - minimum NB Nickel-Electroplate as a barrier4 - minimum 1.3 µm [51.2 µin] None OSP Organic Solderability Preservative Solderable7 None b6 7 None b6 HT OSP High Temperature OSP Electroless Nickel - minimum ENIG ENEPIG Class 2 and Class 3 2.5 µm [98.4 µin] Solderable 3.0 µm [118 µin] b4 5 IPC-4552 Immersion Gold - minimum 0.05 µm [1.97 µin] Electroless Nickel - minimum Electroless Palladium - minimum 3.0 µm [118 µin] 0.05 µm [2.0 µin] Coverage and 7 Solderable IPC-4552 None b4 N/A None b4 Immersion Gold – minimum b4 DIG Direct Immersion Gold (Solderable Surface) Solderable5 None b4 IAg Immersion Silver Immersion Tin IPC-4553 IPC-4554 b2 ISn Solderable6 Solderable7 b3 DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Code Finish Thickness Applicable Acceptability Specification Marking Code1 C Bare Copper AABUS AABUS N/A Note 1. These marking and labeleing codes represent the codes for surface finish categories established in IPC/JEDEC-J-STD-609. Note 2. Hot Air Leveling (HAL) or Hot Air Solder Leveling (HASL) processes are considered to have a degree of difficulty in their control. This, coupled with pad sizes and geometries placing additional challenges on such processes, places the creation of a practical minimum thickness outside the scope of this specification. See also 3.3.6. Note 3. See notation in 3.2.7.5. Note 4. Nickel plating used under the tin-lead or solder coating for high temperature operating environments act as a barrier to prevent the formation of copper-tin compounds. Note 5. See also 3.2.7.6. Note 6. Surface measurements, when required for immersion silver thickness, require a unique pad size for both thin and/or thick silver deposits. See IPC-4553 for detailed measurement requirements. Note 7. See 3.3.6. Table 3-3 Surface and Hole Copper Plating Minimum Requirements for Through-Holes1 Copper – average2,3 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Type 2 12 µm [472 µin] 12 µm [472 µin] 12 µm [472 µin] Type 3, 4 ≤ 6 layers and less than 1.5 mm [0.059 in] printed board thickness 25 µm [984 µin] 25 µm [984 µin] 25 µm [984 µin] Type 3, 4 > 6 layers or greater than or equal to 1.5 mm [0.059 in] printed board thickness 35 µm [1378 µin] 35 µm [1378 µin] 35 µm [1378 µin] AABUS 5 µm [197 µin] 12 µm [472 µin] 10 µm [394 µin] 20 µm [787 µin] 10 µm [394 µin] 10 µm [394 µin] 20 µm [787 µin] 20 µm [787 µin] 30 µm [1181 µin] 30 µm [1181 µin] 30 µm [1181 µin] AABUS 5 µm [197 µin] 12 µm [472 µin] Minimum Wrap4 Copper (Min. Thin Areas) Type 2 Type 3, 4 ≤ 6 layers Type 3, 4 > 6 layers5 Minimum Wrap4 Note 1. Does not apply to microvias (see 1.4.9). Note 2. Copper plating (1.3.5.2) thickness shall be continuous and extend or wrap from hole walls onto outer surfaces. Copper plating thickness should only be measured in PTH areas when checking minimum thickness requirements. Refer to IPC-A-600 for discussion on copper plating thickness for hole walls. Note 3. See 3.6.2.12. Note 4. Wrap copper plating for filled PTHs and vias shall be in accordance with 3.6.2.12.1. Note 5. For printed boards having a drilled hole diameter < 0.35 mm [0.0138 in] and having an aspect ratio >3.5:1, the minimum thin area copper plating in the hole shall be 25 µm [984 µin]. Table 3-4 Surface and Hole Copper Plating Minimum Requirements for Buried Vias > 2 Layers, and Blind Vias1 Copper – average2,4 Thin areas4 Wrap3 Class 1 20 µm [787 µin] 18 µm [709 µin] AABUS Class 2 20 µm [787 µin] 18 µm [709 µin] 5 µm [197 µin] Class 3 25 µm [984 µin] 20 µm [787 µin] 12 µm [472 µin] Note 1. Does not apply to microvias (see 1.4.9). Note 2. Copper plating (1.3.5.2) thickness shall be continuous and extend or wrap from hole walls onto outer surfaces. Refer to IPC-A-600 for discussion on copper plating thickness for hole walls. Note 3. Wrap copper plating for filled PTHs and vias shall be in accordance with 3.6.2.12.1. Note 4. See 3.6.2.12. Table 3-5 Surface and Hole Copper Plating Minimum Requirements for Microvias (Blind and Buried)1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Copper – average2,4 12 µm [472 µin] 12 µm [472 µin] 12 µm [472 µin] Thin areas4 10 µm [394 µin] 10 µm [394 µin] 10 µm [394 µin] AABUS 5 µm [197 µin] 6 µm [236 µin] Wrap3 Note 1. See 1.4.9 for definition of microvia. Note 2. Copper plating (1.3.5.2) thickness shall be continuous and wrap from hole walls onto outer surfaces. Refer to IPC-A-600 for discussion on copper plating thickness for hole walls. Note 3. Wrap copper plating for filled microvias shall be in accordance with 3.6.2.12.1 or 3.6.2.12.3. Note 4. See 3.6.2.12. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Table 3-6 Surface and Hole Copper Plating Minimum Requirements for Buried via cores (2 layers) Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Copper – average1,3 13 µm [512 µin] 15 µm [592 µin] 15 µm [592 µin] Thin areas3 11 µm [433 µin] 13 µm [512 µin] 13 µm [512 µin] AABUS 5 µm [197 µin] 7 µm [276 µin] Wrap2 Note 1. Copper plating (1.3.5.2) thickness shall be continuous and extend or wrap from hole walls onto outer surfaces. Refer to IPC-A-600 for discussion on copper plating thickness for hole walls. Note 2. Wrap copper plating for filled buried via cores shall be in accordance with 3.6.2.12.1 or 3.6.2.12.3. Note 3. See 3.6.2.12. 3.2.8 Polymer Coating (Solder Mask) When permanent solder mask coating is specified, it shall be a polymer coating conforming to IPC-SM-840. 3.2.9 Fusing Fluids and Fluxes The composition of the fusing fluids and fluxes used in solder coating applications shall be capable of cleaning and fusing the electrodeposited tin-lead plating and bare copper to allow for a smooth adherent coating. The fusing fluid shall act as a heat transfer and distribution medium to prevent damage to the bare laminate of the flexible printed board. The type and composition of the fusing fluid shall be optional to the flexible printed board manufacturer. Note: Fusing fluid compatibility should be confirmed with end users’ cleanliness requirements due to the diverse interactions experienced at assembly soldering. 3.2.10 Marking Inks Marking inks shall be permanent, nonnutrient (fungistatic) polymer inks and shall be specified in the procurement documentation. Marking inks shall be applied to either the flexible printed board or to a label applied to the flexible printed board. Marking inks and labels must be capable of withstanding fluxes, cleaning solvents, soldering, and cleaning and coating processes encountered in later manufacturing processes. If a conductive marking ink is used, the marking shall be treated as a conductive element on the flexible printed board and shall conform to IPC-4781. 3.2.11 Hole Fill Insulation Material Material used for hole fill for flexible printed boards shall be as specified on the procurement documentation. 3.2.12 Heatsink Planes, External Thickness and materials for construction of heatsink planes and insulation material shall be as specified in the procurement documentation. 3.2.13 Via Protection Materials for accomplishing via protection method shall be as specified in the procurement documentation. The IPC-4761 design guideline for via protection provides information on material selection and considerations. 3.2.14 Embedded Passive Materials Embedded passive materials are defined as materials and processes which add capacitive, resistive and/or inductive functionality within the printed board, and which may be used with conventional core materials for the manufacture of flexible printed boards. These include laminate materials, resistive metal foils, plated resistors, conductive pastes, protectant materials, etc. Embedded passive materials shall be selected from IPC-4811 or IPC-4821 or as specified in the procurement documentation. 3.3 Visual Examination Finished flexible printed boards shall be examined in accordance with the following procedure. They shall be of uniform quality and shall conform to 3.3.1 through 3.3.9. Visual examination for applicable attributes shall be conducted at 3 diopters (approx. 1.75X). For feature sizes less than or equal to 0.010 in in size, visual examination shall be conducted at 4 – 10X. If the acceptable condition of a suspected defect is not apparent, it should be verified at progressively higher magnifications (up to 40X) to confirm that it is a defect. Dimensional requirements such as spacing or conductor width measurements may require other magnifications and devices with reticles or scales in the instrument, which allow accurate measurements of the specified dimensions. Contract or specification may require other magnifications. 3.3.1 Profile 3.3.1.1 Edges, Rigid Section Nicks or crazing along the edge of the printed board, edge of cutouts and edges of non-plated holes are acceptable provided the penetration does not exceed 50% of the distance from the edge to the nearest conductor or 2.5 mm [0.0984 in], whichever is less. The distance between the haloing penetration and the nearest conductive feature shall not be less than the minimum lateral conductor spacing, or 100 µm [3,937 µin] if not specified. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Edges shall be clean cut and without metallic burrs. Nonmetallic burrs are acceptable as long as they are not loose and/or do not affect fit and function. Panels that are scored or routed with a breakaway tab shall meet the depanelization requirements of the assembled flexible printed board. 3.3.1.2 Edges, Flexible Section The trimmed edges of the flexible printed board or the flexible section of finished rigid-flex printed boards shall be free of burrs, nicks, or delamination in excess of that allowed in the procurement documentation. Tears shall not be allowed in Type 1 or Type 2 flexible printed boards or within the flexible sections of Type 3 or Type 4 flexible printed boards. When nicks and tears occur as a result of tie-in tabs to facilitate circuit removal, the extent of these imperfections shall be AABUS. Minimum edge to conductor spacing shall be as specified in the procurement documentation. 3.3.1.3 Transition Zone, Rigid Area to Flexible Area The transition zone is the area centered on the edge of the rigid portion from which the flex portion extends. The inspection range is limited to 3.0 mm [0.118 in], centered on the transition, which is the edge of the rigid portion (see Figure 3-1). Visual imperfections inherent to the fabrication technique (i.e., adhesive squeeze-out, localized deformation of dielectric and conductors, protruding dielectric materials, crazing, or haloing) shall not be cause for rejection. Imperfections in excess of that allowed shall be AABUS, or as so stated on the procurement documentation. Figure 3-1 Transition Zone 3.3.2 Construction Imperfections Imperfections include those characteristics that are both internal and external within the printed board but are visible from the surface. 3.3.2.1 Measling Measling is acceptable for Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 end product. Measled areas in laminate substrates exceeding 50% of the spacing between non-common conductors are a process indicator for Class 3 end product, indicating a variation in material, equipment operation, workmanship or process that is not a defect. Although process indicators should be monitored as part of the process control system, disposition of individual process indicators is not required and affected product should be used as is. Note: Measling is an internal condition which does not propagate under thermal stress and has not been conclusively shown to be a catalyst for CAF growth. Delamination is an internal condition which may propagate under thermal stress and may be a catalyst for CAF growth. The IPC-9691 user’s guide for CAF resistance testing and IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.25, provide additional information for determining laminate performance regarding CAF growth. Users who wish to incorporate additional criteria for measle conditions may consider incorporating the provisions of IPC-6012, Class 3A which does not allow measles for Class 3 product. 3.3.2.2 Crazing Crazing is acceptable for all classes of end product provided the imperfection does not reduce the conductor spacing below the minimum and there is no propagation of the imperfection as a result of thermal testing that replicates the manufacturing process. For Class 2 and Class 3, the distance of crazing shall not span more than 50% of the distance between adjacent conductors. 3.3.2.3 Delamination/Blister Delamination and blistering is acceptable for all classes of end product provided the area affected by imperfections does not exceed 1% of the printed board area on each side and does not reduce the spacing between conductive patterns below the minimum conductor spacing. There shall be no propagation of imperfections as a result of thermal testing that replicates the manufacturing process. For Class 2 and Class 3, the blister or delamination shall not span more than 25% of the distance between adjacent conductive patterns. Refer to DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY IPC-A-600 for more information. 3.3.2.4 Foreign Inclusions Translucent particles shall be acceptable. Other particles trapped within the printed board shall be acceptable, provided the particle does not reduce the spacing between adjacent conductors to below the minimum spacing specified in 3.5.2. 3.3.2.4.1 Foreign Inclusions Between Flexible Printed Board and Stiffener Opaque foreign material determined to be located between the flexible printed board and stiffener shall be acceptable provided the bulge or height of non-conductive foreign material is no larger than 100 µm [3,940 µin]. It shall not be larger than 5% of the bonding area of the stiffener. There shall be no contact with a component hole or printed board outline. No threadlike non-conductive foreign material may protrude from the outline edge greater than 1.0 mm [0.040 in]. Opaque foreign material shall not reduce the spacing between adjacent access openings below the minimum spacing specified in 3.5.2. 3.3.2.5 Weave Exposure There shall be no weave exposure on the printed board for Class 3. Weave exposure or exposed/ disrupted fibers are acceptable for Class 2 and Class 1 provided the imperfection does not reduce the remaining conductor spacing (excluding the area(s) with weave exposure) below the minimum. Refer to IPC-A-600 for more information. 3.3.2.6 Exposed/Disrupted Fibers Exposed/disrupted fibers are acceptable for all Classes provided the imperfection does not bridge conductors and does not reduce the remaining conductor spacing below the minimum. 3.3.2.7 Scratches, Dents, and Tool Marks Scratches, dents, and tool marks are acceptable, provided they do not expose conductors or disrupt fibers greater than allowed in 3.3.2.4 and 3.3.2.5 and do not reduce the dielectric spacing below the minimum specified. Dents or tool marks that cause delamination, changes in physical size of the conductor, or reduces conductor width or spacing shall be rejectable. 3.3.2.8 Surface Microvoids Surface microvoids are acceptable, provided they do not exceed 0.8 mm [0.0315 in] in the longest dimension, bridge conductors, or exceed 5% of the total flexible printed board area per side. 3.3.2.9 Color Variations in Bond Enhancement Treatment Mottled appearance or color variation in bond enhancement treatment is acceptable. Random missing areas of treatment shall not exceed 10% of the total conductor surface area of the affected layer. 3.3.2.10 Pink Ring There is no existing evidence that pink ring affects functionality. The presence of pink ring may be considered an indicator of process or design variation but is not a cause for rejection. The focus of concern should be the quality of the lamination bond. 3.3.2.11 Coverlay and Coverfilm Separations The coverfilm shall be uniform and free of coverfilm separations, such as wrinkles, creases, and soda strawing. Nonlamination shall be acceptable, provided such imperfections do not violate 3.3.2.4 and all of the following: a) At random locations away from conductors, if each separation is no larger than 0.80 x 0.80 mm [0.0315 x 0.03 15 in] and is not within 1.0 mm [0.0394 in] of the board edge or the coverfilm opening. The total number of separations shall not exceed three in any 25 mm x 25 mm [0.984 in x 0.984 in] of cover-film surface area. b) The total separation shall not exceed 25% of the spacing between adjacent conductors. c) There shall be no coverfilm nonlamination along the outer edges or covercoat openings of the coverfilm that reduces the seal below minimum edge to conductor spacing. 3.3.2.12 Covercoat Requirements 3.3.2.12.1 Covercoat Coverage Covercoat coverage manufacturing variations resulting in skips, voids, and misregistration are subject to the following restrictions: a) Metal conductors shall not be exposed or bridged by blisters in areas where covercoat is required. Touch up, if required to cover these areas with covercoat, shall be of a material that is compatible and of equal resistance to soldering and cleaning as the originally applied covercoat. b) In areas containing parallel conductors, covercoat variations shall not expose adjacent conductors unless the area between the conductors is purposely left blank as for a test point or for some surface mount devices. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY c) Covercoat need not be flush with the surface of the land. Misregistration of a covercoat-defined feature shall not expose adjacent isolated lands or conductors (see Figure 3-2). d) Covercoat is allowed on lands for plated-through holes to which solder connections are to be made, provided the external annular ring requirements for that class of products are not violated. Covercoat shall not encroach upon the barrel of this type of plated-through hole. Other surfaces, such as edge flexible printed board connector fingers and surface mount lands, shall be free of covercoat, except as specified. Covercoat is allowed in plated-through holes and vias into which no component lead is soldered, unless the procurement documentation requires that the holes be completely solder filled. Covercoat may tent or plug via holes as specified by the procurement documentation. Test points that are intended for assembly testing must be free of covercoat unless coverage is specified. Figure 3-2 Unacceptable Covercoat Coverage e) When a land contains no plated-through holes, as in the case of surface mount or ball grid array (BGA) lands, misregistration shall not cause encroachment of the covercoat on the land or lack of solder-resist-definition in excess of the following: 1) On surface mount lands, misregistration shall not cause encroachment of the covercoat over the land area greater than 50 µm [1,970 µin] for a pitch ≥ 1.25 mm [0.04921 in]. Encroachment shall not exceed 25 µm [984 µin] for a pitch < 1.25 mm [0.04921 in], and encroachment may occur on adjacent sides, but not on opposite sides of a surface mount land. 2) On BGA lands, if the land is solder-mask-defined, misregistration may allow a 90° breakout of the covercoat on the land. If clearance is specified, no encroachment of the covercoat on the land is allowed, except at the conductor attachment. 3) On BGA lands connected to via holes, which have coverlayer dams required, the dam shall be continuous without missing peeling or cracked coverlayer, allowing a bare metal path between the BGA land and the via. f) Blistering shall be allowed to the following extent: 1) Class 1: Does not bridge between conductors. 2) Class 2 and Class 3: Two per side, maximum size 0.25 mm [0.00984 in] in longest dimension, does not reduce electrical spacing between conductors by more than 25%. g) Pits and voids are allowed in nonconductor areas, provided they have adherent edges and do not exhibit lifting or blistering in excess of allowance in 3.3.2.12.1(f). h) Coverage between closely spaced surface mount lands shall be as required by procurement documentation. i) When design requires coverage to the flexible printed board edge, chipping or lifting of covercoat along the flexible printed board edge after fabrication shall not penetrate more than 1.25 mm [0.04291 in] or 50% of the distance to the closest conductor, whichever is less. 3.3.2.12.2 Covercoat Cure and Adhesion The cured covercoat shall not exhibit tackiness or blistering in excess of that permitted in 3.3.2.11.1(f). When tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.28.1, the maximum percentage of cured covercoat lifting from Coupon G identified in IPC-2221 shall be in accordance with Table 3-3. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Table 3-3 Covercoat Adhesion Maximum Percentage Loss Allowed Surface Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Bare Copper 10 5 0 Gold or Nickel 25 10 5 Base Laminate 10 5 0 Melting Metals (Tin-lead plating, fused tin-lead, and bright acid-tin) 50 25 10 3.3.2.12.3 Covercoat Thickness Covercoat thickness is not measured, unless specified on the procurement documentation. If a thickness measurement is required, instrumental methods may be used or an assessment may be made using a microsection of the parallel conductors on Coupon E identified in IPC-2221. 3.3.2.13 Solder Wicking/Plating Penetration Solder wicking or other plating penetration shall not extend into a bend or flex transition area and shall meet the conductor spacing requirements. Solder wicking or other plating penetration shall not exceed the limits specified in Table 3-4. Wicking shall be measured from the machined edge of the cover opening. Do not include squeeze-out in the measurement. Table 3-4 Solder Wicking/Plating Penetration Limits Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 AABUS 0.5 mm [0.0197 in] maximum 0.3 mm [0.0118 in] maximum See Figure 3-3, which displays penetration limits, defined as m1 and m2. Figure 3-3 Solder Wicking and Plating Penetration 3.3.2.14 Stiffener Bonding Mechanical stiffeners, which are bonded to the flexible area of the printed board with either a thermo-setting adhesive or a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) to provide structural support, do not require void free lamination. Voids between the stiffener and the flex circuit are common due to the irregular topography of the flex circuitry. Voids between the stiffener and the flex circuit are acceptable so long as the bonded stiffener meets the peel strength requirements of 3.10.16. Adhesive squeeze-out shall not reduce the available annular ring below the minimum solderable annular ring requirements. 3.3.3 Plating and Coating Voids in the Hole Plating and coating voids shall not exceed that allowed by Table 3-6. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Table 3-6 Plating and Coating Voids Visual Examination Material Copper Finish Coating Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Three voids allowed per hole in not more than 10% of the holes One void allowed per hole in not more than 5% of the holes None Five voids allowed per hole in not more than 15% of the holes Three voids allowed per hole in not more than 5% of the holes One void allowed per hole in not more than 5% of the holes Note 1. For Class 2 product, copper voids shall not exceed 5% of the hole length. For Class 1 product, copper voids shall not exceed 10% of the hole length. Circumferential voids shall not extend beyond 90° of the circumference. Note 2. For Class 2 and 3 product, finished coating voids shall not exceed 5% of the hole length. For Class 1, finished coating voids shall not exceed 10% of the hole length. Circumferential voids shall not extend beyond 90° for Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3. 3.3.4 Lifted Lands When visually examined in accordance with 3.3, there shall be no lifted lands on the deliverable (nonstressed) flexible printed board. 3.3.5 Marking If required, each individual flexible printed board, qualification flexible printed board, and set of quality conformance test circuit strips (as opposed to each individual coupon) shall be marked. This marking is required in order to ensure traceability between the flexible printed board /test strips and the manufacturing history and to identify the supplier (i.e., logo). If size or space does not permit marking individual flexible printed boards, bagging or tagging is permitted. The marking shall be produced by the same process as used in producing the conductive pattern or by use of a permanent fungistatic ink or paint (see 3.2.10), LASER marker, or a vibrating pencil marking on a permanently attached label or metallic area provided for marking purposes. Conductive markings, either etched copper or conductive ink (see 3.2.10), shall be considered as electrical elements of the circuit and shall not reduce the electrical spacing requirements. All markings shall be compatible with materials and parts, legible for all tests, and in no case affect flexible printed board performance. Marking shall not cover areas of lands that are to be soldered (see IPC-A-600 for legibility requirements). In addition to this marking, the use of bar code marking is permissible. When used, date code shall be formatted per the supplier’s discretion in order to establish traceability as to when the manufacturing operations were performed. For lead-free end product, the labeling requirements of J-STD-609 shall be met. 3.3.6 Solderability Only those flexible printed boards that require soldering in a subsequent assembly operation require solderability testing. Flexible printed boards that do not require soldering do not require solderability testing and this shall be specified on the master drawing, as in the case where press-fit components are used. Flexible printed boards to be used only for surface mount do not require hole solderability testing. When required by the procurement documentation, accelerated aging for coating durability shall be in accordance with J-STD-003. The category of durability shall be specified on the master drawing; however, if not specified, Category 2 shall be used, which does not require accelerated aging for coating durability. Specimens to be tested shall be conditioned, if required, and evaluated for surface and hole solderability using J-STD-003. When solderability testing is required, consideration should be given to flexible printed board thickness and copper thickness. As both increase, the amount of time to properly wet the sides of the holes and the tops of the lands increases proportionately. Note: Accelerated aging (steam aging) is intended for use on coatings of tin/lead, tin/lead solder, or tin, but not other final finishes. 3.3.7 Plating Adhesion Flexible printed boards shall be tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.1, using a strip of pressure sensitive tape applied to the surface and removed by manual force applied perpendicular to the circuit pattern. There shall be no evidence of any portion of the protective plating or the conductor pattern foil being removed, as DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY shown by particles of the plating or pattern foil adhering to the tape. If overhanging metal (slivers) breaks off and adheres to the tape, it is evidence of overhang or slivers, but not of plating adhesion failure. 3.3.8 Edge Board Contact, Junction of Gold Plate to Solder Finish Exposed copper/plating overlap between the solder finish and gold plate shall meet the requirements of Table 3-7. The exposed copper/plating or gold overlap may exhibit a discolored or gray-black area, which is acceptable (see 3.5.4.4). Table 3-7 Edge Board Contact Gap Max. Exposed Copper Gap Max. Gold Overlap Class 1 2.5 mm [0.0984 in] 2.54 mm [0.0984 in] Class 2 1.25 mm [0.04921 in] 1.25 mm [0.04921 in] Class 3 0.8 mm [0.0315 in] 0.8 mm [0.0315 in] 3.3.9 Workmanship Flexible printed boards shall be processed in such a manner as to be uniform in quality and show no visual evidence of dirt, foreign matter, oil, fingerprints, tin/lead, or solder smear transfer to the dielectric surface, flux residue, and other contaminants that affect life, ability to assemble, and serviceability. Visually dark appearances in non-plated through holes, which are seen when a metallic or nonmetallic semiconductive coating is used, are not foreign material and do not affect life or function. Flexible printed boards shall be free of defects in excess of those allowed in this specification. There shall be no evidence of any lifting or separation of platings from the surface of the conductive pattern, or of the conductor from the base laminate in excess of that allowed. There shall be no loose plating slivers on the surface of the flexible printed board. A chip of coverlay or covercoat adhered to exposed adhesive that does not fall off when rubbed with isopropyl impregnated applicator shall be acceptable for Class 1 and Class 2 product. No visible substance should be observed to be adhered to the adhesive in Class 3 product. 3.4 Dimensional Requirements Inspection of dimensional requirements shall be as defined herein unless otherwise agreed upon between user and supplier. The printed board shall meet the dimensional requirements specified in the procurement documentation. All dimensional characteristics such as, but not limited to, printed board periphery, thickness, cutouts, slots, notches, holes, scoring and edge board contacts to connector key area shall be as specified in the procurement documentation. However, in the event that dimensional tolerances are not specified in the procurement documentation, the applicable feature tolerances of the IPC-2220 design series shall apply. Printed board dimensional locations of basic or bilateral tolerance as defined in the procurement documentation shall be inspected in accordance with the applicable AQL classification as specified in Table 4-3. Automated inspection technology is allowed. Supplier in-process certification of features of accuracy to reduce inspection is allowed provided the method is documented and demonstrates capability to meet the specified requirements. The supplier may provide a statement of certification of accuracy based on the suppliers sampling plan which includes a process data collection and recording system. In the event that the supplier does not have a process certification system for dimensional accuracy the AQL levels of Table 4-3 shall apply for each production lot. 3.4.1 Hole Size, Hole Pattern Accuracy and Pattern Feature Accuracy The hole size tolerance, hole pattern accuracy and feature location accuracy shall be as specified in the procurement documentation. Finished hole size tolerance shall be verified on a sample basis across all hole sizes applicable to the design. The number of measures per hole size shall be determined by the manufacturer to adequately sample the quantity of holes within the population. Only specific dimensioned holes, to include both non-plated through and plated-through, shall be inspected for hole pattern accuracy to meet board dimensional requirements of 3.4. Unless required by the master drawing, hole pattern accuracy for other nonspecifically dimensioned holes, such as plated-through holes and vias, need not be checked as they are database supplied locations and are controlled by annular ring requirements to surface or internal lands. If required by master drawing, hole pattern accuracy may be certified by a statement of qualification or by AQL sampling per 3.4. Pattern feature accuracy shall be as specified in the procurement documentation. Pattern feature accuracy may be DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY certified through a statement of qualification or by AQL sampling per 3.4. However, in the event that any of these characteristics are not specified in the procurement documentation, the applicable IPC-2220 design series shall apply. Automated inspection technology is allowed. Nodules or rough plating in plated-through holes shall not reduce the hole diameter below the minimum limits defined in the procurement document. 3.4.2 Annular Ring and Breakout (External) The minimum external annular ring shall meet the requirements of Table 3-8. The measurement of the annular ring on external layers is from the inside surface (within the hole) of the plated hole, or unsupported hole, to the outer edge of the annular ring on the surface of the printed board as shown in Figure 3-4. When breakout occurs and meets the requirements of Table 3-8, the plated-through hole shall meet the requirements of 3.6.2.1 and 3.6.2.2. When breakout is permitted at the conductor/land intersection it shall be in accordance with Figure 3-6 (conformance is defined as dimension A being larger than dimension B). The finished printed board with the related breakout shall meet the electrical requirements of 3.8.2 (see Figures 3-5 and 3-6). Unless prohibited by the customer, the employment of filleting or ‘‘tear drops’’ to create additional land area at the conductor junction shall be acceptable for Class 1 and Class 2 and in accordance with general requirements for lands with holes detailed in IPC-2221. Employment of filleting or ‘‘tear drops’’ in Class 3 product shall be AABUS. Figure 3-4 Annular Ring Measurement (External) Note 1: See Figure 3-5 and 3-6 for land breakout and conductor width reduction at land. Note 2. Minimum lateral spacing shall be maintained. See Figure 3-5 and 3-6 for visual examples of land breakout and conductor width reduction at land. Note 3. See 3.6.2.10 regarding annular ring requirements for functional and nonfunctional lands. Figure 3-5 Breakout of 90° and 180° Figure 3-6 Conductor Width Reduction DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Table 3-8 Minimum Etch Annular Ring1 Characteristic Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Not greater than 90° breakout of hole from land when visually The minimum annular ring shall assessed and a 50 µm Not greater than 180° breakout [1,970 µin] annular ring for at least be 50 µm [1,970 µin]. 2 of hole from land when visually 270° of the circumference. The minimum external annular ring assessed.2 EXTERNAL The land/conductor junction shall may have 20% reduction of the PTHs The land/conductor junction shall not be reduced below the minimum annular ring in isolated allowable width reduction in areas due to defects such as pits, not be reduced below the allow3.5.3.1. The conductor junction dents, nicks, pinholes, or splay in able width reduction in 3.5.3.1. should never be < 50 µm [1,970 the annular ring of isolated areas. µin] or the minimum line width, whichever is smaller. Not greater than 90° breakout of hole from land when visually assessed. Not greater than 180° breakout of hole from land when visually The land/conductor junction shall assessed. not be reduced below the There shall be no evidence of Microvia Capture allowable width reduction in The land/conductor junction shall Land breakout. 3.5.3.1. not be reduced below the allowable width reduction in The conductor junction should 3.5.3.1. never be less than 50 µm [1,969 µin] or the minimum line width, whichever is smaller. 90° Hole breakout is allowed Hole breakout is allowed provided provided the land/conductor INTERNAL the land/conductor junction is not The minimum internal annular junction is not reduced below the 3 Ring shall be 25 µm [984 µin]. PTHs reduced below the allowable width allowable width reduction in reduction in 3.5.3.1 3.5.3.1 90° hole breakout is allowed Hole breakout is allowed provided provided the land/conductor the land/conductor junction is not junction is not reduced below the reduced below the allowable width allowable width reduction in reduction in 3.5.3.1 There shall be no evidence of 3.5.3.1. Microvia Target Land breakout. When microvia overshoot occurs When microvia overshoot occurs at target land, dielectric thickness at target land, dielectric thickness below the target land shall not below the target land shall not reduce the dielectric spacing reduce the dielectric spacing below that specified in 3.6.2.17. below that specified in 3.6.2.17. The minimum annular ring shall be 150 µm [5,906 µin]. Not greater than 90° breakout Not greater than 90° breakout of hole from land when visually of hole from land when visually The minimum external annular assessed.2 assessed.2 EXTERNAL ring may have a 20% reduction Unsupported holes The land/conductor junction shall The land/conductor junction shall of the minimum annular ring in isolated areas due to defects such not be reduced below the not be reduced below the as pits, dents, nicks, pinholes or allowable width reduction in allowable width reduction in splay in the annular ring of isolated 3.5.3.1. 3.5.3.1. areas. 3.4.2.1 Solderable Annular Ring (External) Adhesive squeeze-out, solder mask misregistration, and/or coverlay on land areas are permitted; however, the minimum solderable annular ring shall meet the requirements of Table 3-9. When examined in accordance with 3.3, the measurement of the annular ring on external layers is from the inside surface (within the hole) of the plated or unsupported hole to the outer edge of the annular ring on the surface of the flexible printed board. If breakout occurs it shall not be allowed within the conductor/land intersection and the plated-through hole shall meet the requirements of 3.6.2.1 and 3.6.2.2. 3.4.2.1.1 Solderable Annular Ring (External - Capture Land to Microvia) Capture lands shall provide evidence of land at a minimum. Breakout is not allowed, unless the design and procurement documentation specify (i.e., landless microvia). DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY 3.4.2.1.2 Solderable Annular Ring (Evidence of Land Edge) Allowance Certain flexible printed boards are designed to have solderable annular ring on one side of the hole only. For example, some Type 1 and Type 5 flexible printed boards are manufactured with dual sided access (back bared). They depend on either the coverlay or substrate to anchor the pad to the flexible printed board. Similarly other flexible printed board designs, including those with PTHs, may limit access hole diameter to minimize solder volume or maximize dielectric between holes. These types of flexible printed boards are designed with a smaller access opening (minor access) on the component side and a larger access opening (major access) on the solderable side of unsupported holes as shown in Figure 3-7. Unless otherwise specified in the procurement documentation, the solderable annular ring requirement shall maintain evidence of land edge for 360° at the smaller access openings. Figure 3-7 Major and Minor Access Holes for Flexible Printed Boards with Tangency Allowance 3.4.2.2 Squeeze-Out of Adhesive of Coverlay and Ooze-Out of Covercoat Squeeze-out (j) of coverlay adhesive or ooze-out of covercoat on the foil surface, as shown in Figure 3-8, shall meet the requirements of Table 3-9. On the land area, as shown in Figure 3-8, the minimum solderable annular ring (k) shall meet the requirements of Table 3-10. Note: Missing material or skips in the bead of adhesive squeeze-out at coverlay edges are permissible as shown in Figure 3-9. Surface finish is not required to be present in these areas, but shall meet the requirements of 3.5.4.7. Figure 3-8 Squeeze-Out of Cover Film Adhesive and Ooze-Out of Covercoat DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Figure 3-9 Missing material or skips in the bead of adhesive squeeze-out at coverlay edges 1. Coverfilm 2. Conductors with access lands 3. Edge of access hole in machined Coverfilm 4. Squeeze-out of adhesive of coverlay 5. Flaking or skips in the bead of adhesive squeeze-out Table 3-9 Allowable Squeeze-Out of Coverlay Adhesive and Ooze-Out of Covercoat Class 70.0 µm [2,756 µin] Foil and Below Above 70.0 µm [2,756 µin] Foil 1 and 2 ≤ 300 µm [11,810 µin] ≤ 500 µm [19,690 µin] or AABUS 3 ≤ 200 µm [7,870 µin] ≤ 400 µm [15,750 µin] or AABUS Table 3-10 Minimum Solderable Annular Ring on Land Area Class Solderable Annular Ring 1 2 3 A solderable annular ring for at least 240° of the circumference. A 50 µm [1,970 µin] solderable annular ring for at least 270° of the circumference. A 50 µm [1,970 µin] solderable annular ring for 360° of the circumference. 3.4.2.3 Stiffener Access Hole Registration of the stiffener to the flexible printed board shall not reduce external annular ring requirements below that specified in 3.4.2. 3.4.3 Bow and Twist (Individual Rigid or Stiffener Portions Only) Unless otherwise specified in the procurement documentation, when designed in accordance with IPC-2221 and IPC-2223, the rigid or stiffener portions of the flexible printed board shall have a maximum bow and twist of 0.75% for applications that use surface mount components and 1.5% for all other applications. For any product grouped in pallet arrays for assembly purposes, bow and twist requirements of the array will need to be AABUS. Bow, twist, or any combination thereof shall be determined by physical measurement and percentage calculation in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.22, which describes four procedures used to determine bow and twist of either cut to size panels or finished flex or rigid-flex printed boards including single-sided, double-sided and multilayer. 3.4.4 Array Sub-Pallets Additional tooling holes, conductive patterns and areas for coupons may be added by the supplier within the non-part portion of the sub-pallet. ‘‘Keep-out’’ zones for any supplier-added features or other restrictions on the array sub-pallet shall be documented in the design. 3.5 Conductor Definition All conductive areas on flexible printed boards, including conductors, lands, and planes, shall meet the visual and dimensional requirements of 3.5.1 through 3.5.4.8. The conductor pattern shall be as specified in the procurement documentation. Verification of dimensional attributes shall be performed in accordance with IPC-A-600. AOI inspection methods are allowed. Internal conductors are examined during internal layer processing prior to multilayer lamination. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY 3.5.1 Conductor Width and Thickness When not specified on the master drawing the minimum conductor width shall be 80% of the conductor pattern supplied in the procurement documentation. When not specified on the master drawing, the minimum conductor thickness shall be in accordance with 3.6.2.13 and 3.6.2.14. 3.5.2 Conductor Spacing The conductor spacing shall be within the tolerance specified on the master drawing. Minimum conductor spacing may be reduced in isolated areas per Table 3-11. Minimum spacing between the conductor and the edge of the flexible printed board shall be as specified on the master drawing. If minimum spacing is not specified, the allowed reduction in the nominal conductor spacings shown in the engineering documentation due to processing shall be 20% for Class 3 and 30% for Class 1 and Class 2 (minimum product spacing requirements as previously stated apply) (see Figure 3-10). Table 3-11 Conductor Spacing Requirements Class 1 & Class 2 Class 3 Minimum conductor spacing may be reduced an additional 30% due to conductor edge roughness, spikes, etc. Minimum conductor spacing may be reduced an additional 20% due to conductor edge roughness, spikes, etc. Figure 3-10 Unnecessary Copper Between Conductor and Nodule of Conductor 3.5.3 Conductor Imperfections The conductive pattern shall contain no cracks, splits, or tears. The physical geometry of a conductor is defined by its width x thickness x length. Any combination of defects specified in 3.5.3.1 and 3.5.3.2 shall not reduce the equivalent cross-sectional area (width x thickness) of the conductor by more than 20% of the minimum value (minimum thickness x minimum width) for Class 2 and Class 3 and 30% of the minimum value for Class 1. The total combination of defect area lengths on a conductor shall not be >10% of the conductor length or 25 mm [0.984 in] for Class 1 or 13 mm [0.512 in] for Class 2 or Class 3, whichever is less. 3.5.3.1 Conductor Width Reduction Allowable reduction of the minimum conductor width (specified or derived) due to misregistration or isolated defects (i.e., edge roughness, nicks, pinholes, and scratches), which expose base material, shall not exceed 20% of the minimum conductor width for Class 2 and Class 3 and 30% of the minimum conductor width for Class 1. Note: The allowable reductions assume that the manufacturer at front end tooling (CAM) understands their etch allowance and adds a producibility compensation to the original artwork design. 3.5.3.2 Conductor Thickness Reduction Allowable reduction of the minimum conductor thickness due to isolated defects (i.e., edge roughness, nicks, pinholes, depressions, and scratches) shall not exceed 20% of the minimum conductor thickness for Class 2 and Class 3 and 30% of the minimum conductor thickness for Class 1. 3.5.4 Conductive Surfaces 3.5.4.1 Nicks and Pinholes in Ground or Voltage Planes Nicks and pinholes are acceptable in ground or voltage planes for Class 2 and Class 3 if they do not exceed 1.0 mm [0.0394 in] in their longest dimension and there are no more than four per side per 625 cm2 [96.88 in2]. For Class 1, the longest dimension shall be 1.5 mm [0.0591 in] with no more than six per side, per 625 cm2 [96.88 in2]. 3.5.4.2 Solderable Surface Mount Lands Defects along the edge of the land or internal to the land shall not exceed the requirements in 3.5.4.2.1 through 3.5.4.2.2. 3.5.4.2.1 Rectangular Surface Mount Lands Defects such as nicks, dents, and pin holes along the external edge of the land shall not exceed 20% of either the length or width of the land for Class 2 or Class 3 printed boards, or 30% for Class 1, and shall not encroach the pristine area, which is defined by the central 80% of the land width by DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY 80% of the land length as shown in Figure 3-11. Defects internal to the land shall not exceed 10% of the length or width of the land for Class 2 or Class 3 printed boards, or 20% for Class 1, and shall remain outside of the pristine area of the surface mount land. Electrical test probe ‘‘witness’’ marks within the pristine area for Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 are considered cosmetic in nature and are acceptable provided the requirements for final finish are met. 3.5.4.2.2 Round Surface Mount Lands (BGA Pads) Defects such as nick, dents and pin holes along the edge of the land shall not radially extend towards the center of the land by more than 10% of the diameter of the land for Class 1, 2 or 3 printed boards and shall not extend more than 20% around the circumference of the land for Class 2 or Class 3 printed boards or 30% for Class 1 as shown in Figure 3-12. There shall be no defects within the pristine area which is defined by the central 80% of the land diameter. Electrical test probe ‘‘witness’’ marks within the pristine area for Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 are considered cosmetic in nature and are acceptable provided the requirements for final finish are met. 3.5.4.3 Wire Bond Pads (WBP) The wire bond pad shall have a final conductor finish as specified in 1.3.5.3 for ultrasonic (GWB-1) and thermosonic (GWB-2) wire bonding of gold electroplate or electroless nickel/immersion gold (ENIG), or as specified in the procurement documentation. The final finish coating thickness shall be per Table 3-2 for the applicable coating used. The pristine area shall consist of the central 80% of the pad width by 80% of the pad length of the wire bond pad as shown in Figure 3-11. The maximum surface roughness in the pristine area of the wire bond pad shall be measured in accordance with an applicable test method as agreed upon between user and supplier and shall be 0.8 µm [32 µin] RMS (Root-Mean-Square). If using IPC Method 2.4.15, it is recommended that the roughness-width cutoff identified in Method 2.4.15 be adjusted to approximately 80% of the maximum length of the wire bond pad in order to obtain the RMS value within the pristine area. There shall be no pits, nodules, scratches, electrical test probe ‘‘witness’’ marks, or other defects in the pristine area that violate the 0.8 µm [32 µin] RMS roughness requirement. For more information on surface roughness, refer to ASME B46.1. Figure 3-11 Rectangular Surface Mount Lands Figure 3-12 Round Surface Mount Lands 3.5.4.4 Board Edge Connector Lands On gold or other noble metal-plated edge flexible printed board connector lands, except as noted below, the insertion or contact area shall be free of the following: a) Cuts or scratches that expose nickel or copper. b) Solder splashes or tin-lead plating. c) Nodules or metal bumps that protrude above the surface. Pits, dents, or depressions are acceptable if they do not exceed 150 µm [5,910 µin] in their longest dimension and there are not more than three per land and do not appear on more than 30% of the lands. The imperfection limits do not apply to a band 150 µm [5,910 µin] wide around the perimeter of the land, including the insertion area. 3.5.4.5 Dewetting For tin, tin/lead reflowed, or solder coated surfaces, dewetting on conductors, areas of solder connection, and ground or voltage planes is allowed to the extent listed below: a) Conductors and planes not intended for solder connection for all classes. b) Individual areas of solder connection: Class 1, 15%; Class 2 and Class 3, 5%. 3.5.4.6 Nonwetting For tin, tin/lead reflowed or solder coated surfaces, nonwetting is not permitted on any con- DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY ductive surface where a solder connection will be required. 3.5.4.7 Final Finish Coverage Final finish shall meet the solderability requirements of J-STD-003. 3.5.4.7.1 Exposed Copper (Areas not to be soldered) Exposed copper on areas not to be soldered is permitted on 5% of the surfaces for Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3. Coverage does not apply to vertical conductor edges. 3.5.4.7.2 Tin-Lead under Solder Mask (Areas not to be soldered) Solder mask overlap or encroachment onto tin lead or solder on areas not to be soldered is acceptable provided the overlap does not exceed 150 µm [5,906 µin]. 3.5.4.8 Cap Plating of Filled Holes When cap plating of the filled hole is specified on the procurement documentation, plating voids exposing the via fill are not allowed, unless covered by solder mask. Visually discernable depressions (dimples) and protrusions (bumps) over filled holes are acceptable. 3.5.4.9 Copper Filled Microvias Visually discernable depressions (dimples) and protrusions (bumps) over copper filled microvias are acceptable. 3.5.4.10 Conductor Edge Outgrowth There shall be no evidence of outgrowth on edges of conductors that have been solder coated or tin-lead plated and fused when tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.1 (see IPC-2221). 3.5.4.11 Nonfunctional Lands A fabricator shall not remove nonfunctional lands without specific approval of the design activity or unless allowed on the master drawing. 3.6 Structural Integrity Flexible printed boards shall meet structural integrity requirements for thermally stressed evaluation coupons specified in 3.6.2. Although the A and B or A/B coupons are assigned for this test, the allowance for the usage of printed boards to establish acceptance criteria for the product shall be AABUS. Areas selected from printed boards shall contain holes and copper features so that all criteria within this specification can be evaluated. Microsections selected from printed boards shall be removed from opposite panel corners, shall be inspected in the x and y axis, and shall each have three (3) holes minimum. The production flexible printed board and all other coupons in the quality conformance test circuitry that contain plated-through holes shall be capable of meeting the requirements of this section. Structural integrity shall be used to evaluate test specimens from Type 2 through Type 4 flexible printed boards by microsectioning techniques. Characteristics not applicable to Type 2 flexible printed boards (i.e., requirements for innerlayer separations, innerlayer inclusions, and inner foil cracks) are not evaluated. Dimensional measurements that are only possible through the use of microsectioning techniques are also defined in this section. Blind and buried vias shall meet the requirements of plated-through holes. Refer to IPC-2221 for appropriate coupon design of blind and buried vias for plated hole evaluation. The evaluation of all properties and requirements shall be performed on the thermally stressed coupon and all requirements must be met; however, per supplier election, certain properties and conditions as defined below may be evaluated in a coupon(s) that has not been thermally stressed: Copper voids Plating folds/inclusions Burrs and nodules Glass fiber protrusion Wicking Final coating plating voids Etchback Negative etchback Plating/coating thickness Internal and surface copper layer or foil thickness Laminate (rigid) Annular Ring 3.6.1 Thermal Stress Testing Test coupons or printed boards shall be thermally stressed. Per the applicable criteria listed in 1.3.3, one or more of the following Test Methods shall be required. Consideration should be given to low temperature laminate material and bond ply (thermal plastics). DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY 3.6.1.1 Thermal Stress Testing, Method 2.6.8 Test coupons or printed boards shall be thermally stressed in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.8, Test condition A. 3.6.1.2 Thermal Stress Testing, Method 2.6.8 Test coupons or printed boards shall be thermally stressed in accordance with IPC TM-650, Method 2.6.8, Test condition B. 3.6.1.3 Thermal Stress Testing, Method 2.6.27 (230 °C)Test coupons or printed boards shall be thermally stressed in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.27, 230° C reflow profile. 3.6.1.4 Thermal Stress Testing, Method 2.6.27 (260 °C)Test coupons or printed boards shall be thermally stressed in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.27, 260° C reflow profile. 3.6.1.5 Deviations to Thermal Stress Testing Deviations to these requirements shall be AABUS. 3.6.1.6 Microsection Requirements Following stress, test coupons or printed boards shall be microsectioned. Microsectioning shall be accomplished per IPC-TM-650, Method 2.1.1 or 2.1.1.2, on test coupons or printed boards. Evaluation of all applicable holes and vias, including blind and buried, for all such structures found on the finished printed board shall be inspected in the vertical cross section in accordance with Table 4-3. The grinding and polishing accuracy of the microsection shall be such that the viewing area of each of the holes is within 10% of the drilled diameter of the hole. Plated-through holes shall be examined for foil and plating integrity at a magnification of 100X ± 5%. Referee examinations shall be accomplished at a magnification of 200X ± 5%. Each side of the hole shall be examined independently. Examination for laminate thickness, foil thickness, plating thickness, lay-up orientation, lamination and plating voids, etc., shall be accomplished at magnifications specified above. For foils less than 3/8 oz., higher magnifications may be required to confirm minimum thickness requirement. Plating thicknesses below 1.0 µm [39.4 µin] shall not be measured using metallographic techniques. Microvias shall be examined for plating integrity and interconnection integrity at a magnification of 200X ± 5%. Referee examinations shall be accomplished at a magnification of 400 - 500X. Each side of the hole shall be examined independently. The grinding and polishing accuracy of the microsection shall be such that the viewing area of the microvia is within 10% of the drilled hole diameter for three microvias. For copper filled microvias, the grinding and polishing accuracy is not required. Note: Alternate techniques used to supplement microsection evaluation shall be AABUS. 3.6.2 Requirements for Microsectioned Coupons or Production Boards When examined in microsection, the coupons shall meet the requirements of Table 3-12 and 3.6.2.1 through 3.6.2.18. 3.6.2.1 Plating Integrity Plating integrity in the plated-through holes shall meet the requirements detailed in Table 3-12. For Class 2 and Class 3 product, there shall be no separation of plating layers (except as noted in Table 3-12), no plating cracks, and internal interconnections shall exhibit no separation or contamination between plated hole wall and internal layers. Metal core or thermal planes, when used as electrically functional circuitry, shall meet the above requirements when made from copper; but those made from dissimilar metals may have small spots or pits at their junction with the hole wall plating. Those areas of contamination or inclusions shall neither exceed 50% of each side of the interconnection, nor occur in the interface of the copper cladding on the core and the copper plating in the hole wall when viewed in the microsection evaluation. 3.6.2.2 Plating Voids Any copper plating thickness less than that specified for minimum thin areas in Table 3-2 shall be considered a void. Allowances for plating voids are established in Table 3-12 for all Classes of end product. For Class 2 and Class 3 product, the following criteria shall also be met: a) There shall be no more than one plating void per test specimen, regardless of length or size. b) There shall be no plating void in excess of 5% of the total flexible printed board thickness, excluding stiffeners. c) There shall be no plating voids evident at the interface of an internal conductive layer and the plated-through hole wall. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY d) Circumferential plating voids greater than 90° are not allowed. Conductor finish plating or coating material between the base material and copper plating (i.e., behind the hole wall copper plating) is evidence of a void. Any plated hole exhibiting this condition shall be counted as having a single void for panel acceptance purposes. If a void is detected during evaluation of a microsection which meets the above criteria, resample in accordance with Table 4-2 using samples from the same lot to determine if the defect is random. If the additional test coupons or production boards have no plating voids, the product which the test coupon or production boards represent are considered acceptable; however, if a plating void is present in the microsections, the product shall be considered nonconforming. Table 3-12 Plated-Through Hole Integrity After Stress Property Copper voids Plating folds/inclusions Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Three voids allowed per One void allowed per test One void allowed per test hole. Voids in the same specimen, provided the specimen, provided the plane are not allowed. additional microsection additional microsection No void shall be longer criteria of 3.6.2.2 are met criteria of 3.6.2.2 are met than 5% of flexible printed board thickness. No circumferential voids greater than 90° are allowed The minimum copper thickness in Table 3-3 through Table 3-6 must be met. For positive etchback, measurements should follow the topography of the dielectric. When negative etchback results in folds in the copper plating, the copper thickness shall meet the minimum requirements as measured from the face of the internal layer; negative etchback limits shall not be exceeded. See Figure 3-20. Sample must be microetched to evaluate. Burrs1 and nodules Allowed if minimum hole diameter is met. The minimum copper thickness in Table 3-3 through Table 3-6 must be met Allowed if minimum hole diameter is met. The minimum copper thickness in Table 3-3 1 Glass fiber protrusion through Table 3-6 must be met Wicking (maximum copper plating 205 µm [8,070 µin], 180 µm [7,090 µin], 160 µm [6,300 µin], penetration including 80 µm [315 provided the additional provided the additional provided the additional µin] etchback microsection criteria microsection criteria microsection criteria allowance) of 3.6.2.9 are met of 3.6.2.9 are met of 3.6.2.9 are met 175 µm [6,890 µin], 150 µm [5,910 µin], 130 µm [5,120 µin], Wicking (maximum copper plating provided the additional provided the additional provided the additional penetration including 50 µm [1,968 microsection criteria microsection criteria microsection criteria µin] smear removal allowance) of 3.6.2.9 are met of 3.6.2.9 are met of 3.6.2.9 are met Interplane inclusions (inclusions at Allowed on only one side the interface between internal of hole wall at each None allowed lands and through-hole plating) land location on 20% of each available land Internal foil cracks2 “C”cracks allowed on only one side of hole, None allowed provided it does not extend through foil thickness External foil cracks2 (type ‘‘A’’ ‘‘B’’ “D” cracks not allowed ‘‘A’’ ‘‘D’’ and ‘‘B’’ cracks not allowed and ‘‘D’’ cracks) and ‘‘B’’ cracks allowed ‘‘A’’ cracks allowed Barrel/Corner cracks2 (type ‘‘E’’ None allowed and ‘‘F’’ cracks) Interplane separation (separation Allowed on only one side at the interface between internal of hole wall at each land None allowed lands and through-hole plating) location on 20% of each available land Separations along the vertical Allowed (see Figure 3-13), provided it does not extend edge of the external land(s) beyond the vertical edge of the external copper foil Plating Separation Allowed at knee, maximum None allowed length 130 µm [5,120 µin] Acceptable, provided dimensional and plating requirements are met Hole wall dielectric/ plated barrel separation Lifted lands after thermal stress or Allowed, provided the finished flexible printed board meets the visual criteria of 3.3 rework simulation Note 1. As measured from the end of the protrusion into the hole. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Note 2. Copper crack definition: See Figure 3-14. “A” crack = A crack in the external foil. “B” crack = A crack that does not completely break plating (minimum plating remains). “C” crack = A crack in the internal foil. “D” crack = A crack in the external foil and plating - complete break in foil and plating. “E” crack = A barrel crack in plating only. “F” crack = A corner crack in the plating only. Figure 3-13 Separation at External Foil Figure 3-14 Crack Definition 3.6.2.3 Flexible Laminate Integrity For Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 flexible printed boards, there shall be no adhesive voids outside of any thermal zone (see Figure 3-15) in excess of 0.50 mm [0.0197 in]. Boundary line voids that overlap into a thermal zone shall not be in excess of 50.0 µm [0.00197 in]. Multiple voids between two adjacent PTHs in the same plane shall not have a combined length which exceeds these limits. 3.6.2.4 Rigid Laminate Integrity Laminate cracks in a thermal zone (Figure 3-15) are acceptable with the exception that cracks between two uncommon conductors in either the horizontal or vertical direction shall not decrease the minimum dielectric spacing. Boundary line cracks that overlap into a thermal zone shall not be in excess of 80 µm [3,150 µin] for Class 2 or Class 3 products, and 150 µm [5,906 µin] for Class 1 products. Multiple cracks between two adjacent PTHs in the same plane shall not have a combined length which exceeds these limits. Figure 3-15 Typical Microsection Evaluation Specimen Note 1. Thermal zones are defined by a 0.08 mm [0.0031 in] perimeter around the entirety of each via or through-hole structure (including internal and external lands). Note 2. Laminate anomalies or imperfections outside of the thermal zones are not evaluated on specimens which have been exposed to thermal stress or rework simulation. Note 3. Delamination/Blistering is evaluated regardless of whether any portion of the anomaly is within or without a thermal zone. Note 4. Plating Voids. Note 5. Laminate anomalies or imperfections in the non-evaluation areas are not evaluated on specimens which have been exposed to thermal stress or rework simulation. 3.6.2.5 Delamination or Blistering For Class 2 and Class 3 there shall be no evidence of delamination or blistering. For Class 1, if delamination or blistering is present, evaluate the entire board per 3.3.2.3. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY 3.6.2.6 Etchback (Type 3 and Type 4 Only) When specified on the procurement documentation, flexible printed boards shall be etched back for the lateral removal of adhesive, resin and/or glass fibers from the drilled hole wall prior to plating. The etchback shall be between 5 µm [197 µin] (copper exposed) and 80 µm [3,150 µin] (maximum material removed) with a preferred depth of 13 µm [512 µin], unless in contact with a fluoropolymer (see 3.6.2.6.1). Shadowing is permitted on one side of each land (see Figure 3-16). When no etchback is specified and the printed board manufacturer elects to use etchback, the manufacturer s hall be qualified to perform etchback through demonstration of qualification test coupons or printed boards. Note: Due to the various materials used in the construction of rigid-flex printed boards, varying degrees of etchback amongst the various materials is to be expected in the finished product. Adhesiveless constructions exhibit minimal etchback at the flexible dielectric to metal interface. Caution: Etchback greater than 50 µm [1,970 µin] may cause folds or voids in the plating, which then may not meet the required copper thickness. Figure 3-16 Etchback Depth Allowance The combination of dielectric removal from etchback, wicking and random tears or drill gouges resulting from hole formation and/or hole cleaning shall not exceed the sum of the maximum allowable etchback and the maximum allowable wicking. Measurement for maximum dielectric removal is depicted in Figure 3-17. Figure 3-17 Maximum Dielectric Removal Resulting From Etchback 3.6.2.6.1 Etchback of Fluoropolymer Dielectrics When in contact with a fluoropolymer layer, etchback shall be between a negative etchback of 25 um and a positive etchback of 50 um. 3.6.2.7 Smear Removal 3.6.2.7.1 Smear removal on Non-Fluoropolymer Laminates (Type 3 and Type 4 Only) Smear removal is removal of resin debris that results from the formation of the hole. Smear removal shall be sufficient to meet the acceptability criteria for plating separation (see Table 3-12). Smear removal shall not be etched back greater than 25 m [984 in]; random tears or drill gouges which produce small areas where the 25 m [984 in] depth is exceeded shall not be DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY evaluated as smear removal. Smear removal is not required of Type 1 and Type 2 printed boards (see Figure 3-18). 3.6.2.7.2 Resin Smear on Fluoropolymer Laminates Allowable resin smear shall be 25% of the vertical inner layer actual measured thickness for Type 3 and 4 printed boards. There is no requirement for Type 1 and Type 2 printed boards. Resin removal (etchback) caused by smear removal shall meet the requirements of Table 3-12. Two or three point plating connection is not required. a. If fluoropolymer resin smear is greater than 25% of the actual measured layer thickness, then further referee testing is required for acceptance by resampling and preparing two additional sets of microsections from the same panel and evaluating using the criteria in above. For the panel to be accepted, both microsections shall meet the acceptance criteria. b. Smear that is fully detached shall meet minimum copper thickness requirements of Table 3-3 through Table 3-6 as measured from the end of the smear to the inside of the finished hole wall. c. Smear that is partially detached from the layer interface shall meet the minimum requirements per items a and b above. Figure 3-18 Smear Removal Allowance 3.6.2.8 Negative Etchback Negative etchback shall not exceed the dimensions in Figure 3-19 when measured as shown in Figure 3-19. Negative etchback shall not be allowed when etchback has been specified on the procurement documentation. When negative etchback results in folds or inclusions in the copper plating, the copper thickness shall meet the minimum requirements as measured from the face of the internal layer as shown in Figure 3-20. Note: Dimension “X” within Figure 3-19 depicts the most prevalent amount (70 – 80% of the total thickness) of etched internal copper foil. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Figure 3-19 Negative Etchback Figure 3-20 Plating Folds/Inclusions – Minimum Measurement Points Note 1. Minimum measurement points. Folds that are not enclosed are acceptable if minimum thickness is met where indicated. Note 2. Enclosed folds (inclusions) acceptable if minimum thickness is met where indicated. Note 3. Measure copper plating between lines on inclusions (must meet minimum thin area requirement). Note 4. Areas with the appearance of plating folds where there is no plating demarcation evident between the void and the inside edge of the plating. The thickness measurement of A - B shall comply with the minimum plating thickness in 3.6.2.14. 3.6.2.9 Wicking (Copper Plating) When etchback is specified on the master drawing, the maximum copper plating penetration, when measured from the edge of the drilled hole, shall not exceed the values in Table 3-12, which is the sum of copper wicking and etchback allowances (see Figure 3-16), or shall not violate the minimum conductor spacing below the minimum requirements in 3.5.2. See also 3.6.2.10.1 regarding minimum conductor spacing. When etchback is not specified on the master drawing (smear removal only), the maximum copper plating penetration, when measured from the edge of the drilled hole, shall not exceed the values in Table 3-12, which is the sum of copper wicking and smear removal allowances (see Figure 3-18), or shall not violate the minimum conductor spacing below the minimum requirements in 3.5.2). 3.6.2.10 Annular Ring and Breakout (Internal) Internal annular ring, if not determined by alternate techniques that are AABUS, shall be measured by microsection to verify conformance to Table 3-8 as shown in Figure 3-21. Measurements for internal annular ring are taken at the copper hole wall plating/internal land interface to the outer most tip of the internal land as shown in Figure 3-21. Negative etchback is evaluated per 3.6.2.8 and Figure 3-19. External pads of vias produced as sequentially laminated structures may be evaluated in-process prior to additional lamination(s) (see 3.4.2). When sequentially produced vias are evaluated in-process their compliance shall be documented. Lands not associated with a sequential via structure shall be evaluated as internal annular ring at microsection. Microsection analysis is performed per 3.6.2. Unless prohibited by the customer, the employment of filleting or ‘‘tear drops’’ to create additional land area at the conductor junction shall be acceptable for Class 1 and Class 2 and in accordance with general requirements for lands with holes detailed in IPC-2221. Employment of filleting or ‘‘tear drops’’ in Class 3 product shall be AABUS. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Figure 3-21 Annular Ring Measurement (Internal) Note: The printed board design may have nonfunctional lands of varying sizes for conductor routing spacing constraints. The functional lands shall meet the minimum annular ring requirement. Non-functional lands which are less than the functional land diameter are not required to meet the minimum annular ring requirement. Note: Consideration should be given to how the microsection cut is ‘‘clocked,’’ or rotated. Misregistration can occur randomly as opposed to orthogonally and therefore an orthogonal cut will not guarantee that a microsection view will portray hole breakout, if it exists. See Figure 3-22 and Figure 3-23 for an example of how breakout may or may not be detected within a microsection based on the rotation. For Class 2 printed boards, if internal annular ring breakout is detected in the vertical cross section, but the degree of breakout cannot be determined, internal registration may be assessed by nondestructive techniques other than microsection, such as special patterns, probes, and/or software, which are configured to provide information on the interpolated annular ring remaining and pattern skew. Techniques include, but are not limited to the following: The optional F coupon. Custom designed electrically testable coupons. Radiographic (x-ray) techniques. Horizontal microsection. CAD/CAM data analysis as correlated to pattern skew by layer. Note: Microsectioning or statistical sampling shall be used to verify correlation of the approved technique, and a calibration standard established for the specific technique employed. Figure 3-22 Microsection Rotations for Breakout Detection Figure 3-23 Comparison of Microsection Rotations 3.6.2.10.1 Breakout (Internal) Conditions If misregistration to the point of breakout is detected in vertical micro-sections, the concerns are that: a) The conductor width minimum may be compromised at the land junction and, DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY b) There is insufficient electrical spacing. Note: Electrical spacing may be further compromised due to the combined copper plating penetration of both etchback and wicking. The extent and direction of misregistration shall be determined. Actual printed boards or appropriate test coupons shall then be tested to determine compliance. This may be accomplished by the techniques listed in 3.6.2.10. 3.6.2.10.2 Microvia to Target Breakout at the target land is allowed up to 180°. Breakout, if it occurs, shall neither reduce the intended contact area (at the target land) below that specified on the applicable slash sheet nor reduce the minimum electrical spacing below that specified on the procurement documentation. Note: If using an ablation-type process, tangency may be required as a minimum (due to potential reduction in dielectric separation). The extent and direction of misregistration shall be determined. Actual printed boards or appropriate test coupons shall then be tested to determine compliance. This may be accomplished by the techniques listed in 3.6.2.10. 3.6.2.11 Lifted Lands Lifted lands, with the exception of blind microvias, are allowed on the thermally stressed microsection. 3.6.2.12 Plating/Coating Thickness Based on microsection examination or the use of suitable electronic measuring equipment, plating/coating thickness shall meet the requirements of Table 3-2 through Table 3-6 or be as specified on the procurement documentation. Measurements in the plated-through hole shall be reported as an average thickness per side of the hole. Isolated thick or thin sections shall not be used for averaging. Isolated areas of reduced copper thickness due to glass fiber protrusions shall meet the minimum thickness requirements of Table 3-3 through Table 3-6 as measured from the end of the protrusion to the hole wall. If copper thickness less than the minimum specified in Table 3-3 through Table 3-6 is detected in isolated areas, it should be considered a void and resampled in accordance with Table 4-2 using samples from the same lot to determine if the defect is random. If the additional test coupons or printed boards have no isolated areas of reduced copper thickness, the product which the test coupons or printed boards represent are considered acceptable; however, if reduced copper thickness is present in the microsections, the product shall be considered nonconforming. 3.6.2.12.1 Copper Wrap Plating Copper wrap plating minimum as specified in Table 3-3 through Table 3-6 shall be continuous from the filled plated hole onto the external surface of any plated structure and extend by a minimum of 25 µm [984 µin] where an annular ring is required (see Figure 3-24 and Figure 3-25). Reduction of surface wrap copper plating by processing (sanding, etching, planarization, etc.) resulting in insufficient wrap plating is not allowed (see Figure 3-26). Note: Cap plating, if required, over filled holes is not considered in wrap copper thickness measurements. Figure 3-24 Surface Copper Wrap Measurement (Applicable to all filled plated-through holes) DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Figure 3-25 Wrap Copper in Type 4 PCB (Acceptable) Note: Dimension lines and arrows indicate where wrap copper has been removed. Figure 3-26 Wrap Copper Removed by Excessive Sanding/Planarization (Not Acceptable) 3.6.2.12.2 Copper Cap Plating of Filled Holes When copper cap plating of filled holes (resin, conductive ink, copper, etc.) for solderable lands (attachment of surface mount devices) is specified by the procurement documentation (see also Figure 3-27), the requirements in Table 3-13 and the following shall apply. The cap protrusion (bump) and depression (dimple) shall be measured as shown in Figure 3-28 and Figure 3-29. Voids over resin filled holes are not allowed as shown by example in Figure 3-30. Separation of copper cap plating to fill material is acceptable. Separation of the cap plating to underlying plating shall not be acceptable. Table 3-13 Cap Plating Requirements1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Copper Cap – Minimum Thickness AABUS 5 µm [0.0002 in] 12 µm [472 µin] Filled via Depression (Dimple) - Maximum AABUS 127 µm [0.005 in] 76 µm [0.003 in] Filled Via Protrusion (Bump) - Maximum AABUS 50 µm [0.002 in] 50 µm [0.002 in] Note 1: Does not apply to copper filled microvias. Figure 3-27 Copper Cap Thickness Figure 3-28 Copper Cap Filled Via Height (Bump) DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Figure 3-29 Copper Cap Depression (Dimple) Figure 3-30 Copper Cap Plating Voids 3.6.2.12.3 Plated Copper Filled Microvias (Blind and Buried) When specified by procurement documentation, microvias shall be completely filled with copper, except that voids shall be acceptable provided they are completely encapsulated, in total do not exceed 25% of the area of the filled microvia, and copper plating adjacent to encapsulated voids shall meet the requirements for thin area plating in Table 3-5 within areas defined by dimensions “X” and “Y” in Figure 1-1 and as shown in Figure 3-31, and shall not include plating from subsequent plating steps. Voids not fully encapsulated within these limits are not acceptable, as shown in the example in Figure 3-32. Figure 3-31 Example of Acceptable Voiding in a Copper Filled Microvia Note 1: Copper cap plating. Note 2: Void/Cavity. Figure 3-32 Example of Nonconforming Void in Copper Filled Microvia Note 1: Copper cap plating. Note 2: Void/Cavity. Microvias that are copper filled are exempt from copper wrap requirements when overplated with 5 µm [0.0002 in] minimum copper. Separation of the overplate to underlying plating and copper fill shall not be acceptable. The requirements for minimum surface conductor thickness (3.6.2.15) shall apply. Requirements for protrusions (bumps) or depressions (dimples) in blind, copper filled microvias in the microsection evaluation shall be AABUS. There are no requirements for buried copper filled microvias. 3.6.2.13 Microvia Contact Dimension The microvia to target land contact dimension shall not be reduced by more than 50% of the capture land hole diameter as defined in Figure 3-33 and Table 3-14. For Class 1 and Class 2 product, any inclusions on the surface of the target land shall not be considered part of the contact area. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY The length defined in Note 1 of Figure 3-33 is exempt from the requirements of Table 3-15. The microvia contact dimension may be determined by another method AABUS. Figure 3-33 Microvia Contact Dimension Note 1. Contact Dimension at Target Land Note 2. Microvia Diameter at Capture Land Minimum Contact Dimension Allowable Inclusions within the Minimum Microvia Contact Dimension Table 3-14 Microvia Contact Dimension Class 1 Class 2 50% Total One, Not to Exceed 10% of Note 2 (Dimension 2) Class 3 50% Continuous No inclusions within the 50% contact area 3.6.2.14 Minimum Internal Layer Copper Foil Thickness If the internal conductor thickness is specified by a foil weight, the minimum internal copper thickness after processing shall be in accordance with Table 3-15 for all classes. This table is based on minimum copper foil thickness allowances per IPC-4562 followed by two successive scrubbings. Each scrub is expected to remove a specific amount of copper and is represented in the table by a variable processing allowance reduction. When the procurement documentation specifies a minimum copper thickness for conductors, the conductor shall meet or exceed that minimum thickness. 3.6.2.15 Minimum Surface Conductor Thickness The minimum total (copper foil plus copper plating) conductor thickness after processing shall be in accordance with Table 3-16 and the following. a) When the procurement documentation specifies a minimum copper thickness for external conductors, the specimen shall meet or exceed that minimum thickness. b) When the copper thickness associated with the area of a land is locally reduced resulting in a stepped thickness, the minimum total (copper foil plus copper plating) thickness shall be maintained within the minimum annular ring requirement or the minimum land feature size tolerance whichever is less greater. c) Where selective (button) plating is performed, the minimum copper foil thickness requirements of Table 3-15 apply. When pattern or panel plating is performed, all lands and conductors must meet the minimum copper foil thickness requirements of Table 3-16. d) The minimum surface conductor thickness after processing values given in Table 3-16 are determined by the following equation: Minimum Surface Conductor Thickness = a + b - c Where: a = Absolute copper foil minimum (IPC-4562 nominal less 10% reduction). b = Minimum copper plating thickness (10 µm [394 µin] for Type 2; 20 µm [787 µin] for Type 3 and 4 < 6 layers; 30 µm [1,181 µin] for Type 3 and 4 > 6 layers). c = A maximum variable processing allowance reduction. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Table 3-15 Internal Layer Foil Thickness after Processing Weight Minimum Final Finish after Processing (µm) [µin] Absolute Cu Min. (IPC-4562 Maximum Variable Processing less 10% reduction) (µm) Allowance Reduction1(µm) [µin] [µin] 1/8oz. [5.10] 4.60 [181] 1.50 [59] 3.1 [122] 1/4 oz. [8.50] 7.70 [303] 1.50 [59] 6.2 [244] 3/8 oz. [12.00] 10.80 [425] 1.50 [59] 9.3 [366] 1/2 oz. [17.10] 15.40 [606] 4.00 [157] 11.4 [449] 1 oz. [34.30] 30.90 [1,217] 6.00 [236] 24.9 [980] 2 oz. [68.60] 61.70 [2,429] 6.00 [236] 55.7 [2,193] 3 oz. [102.90] 92.60 [3,646] 6.00 [236] 86.6 [3,409] 4 oz. [137.20] 123.50 [4,862] Above 4 oz. [137.20] IPC-4562 value less 10% reduction 6.00 [236] 6.00 [236] 117.5 [4,626] 6 µm [236 µin] below minimum thickness of calculated 10% reduction of foil thickness in IPC-4562 Note 1. Process allowance reduction does not allow for rework processes for weights below 1/2 oz. For 1/2 oz. and above, the process allowance reduction allows for one rework process. Table 3-16 External Conductor Thickness after Plating1,2 Weight3,4 1/8 oz. Minimum Surface Conductor Maximum Absolute Cu Plus minimum Plus minimum Thickness after Processing (µm) [µin] Variable Min. Plus minimum plating for plating for Processing (IPC-4562 less plating for Type 2 Type 3, 4 Type 3, 4 Allowance 5 10% reduction) (10 µm) [394 µin] ≤ 6 layers > 6 layers 6 Type 3, 4 Type 3, 4 5 5 Reduction Type 2 (µm) [µin] (20 µm) [787 µin] (30 µm) [1181 µin] ≤ 6 layers > 6 layers (µm) [µin] 4.60 [181] 14.60 [575] 24.60 [967] 34.60 [1,362] 1.50 [59] 13.1 [516] 23.1 [909] 33.1 [1,303] 1/4 oz. 7.70 [303] 17.70 [697] 27.70 [1,091] 37.70 [1,484] 1.50 [59] 16.2 [638] 26.2 [1,031] 36.2 [1,425] 3/8 oz. 10.80 [425] 20.80 [819] 30.80 [1,213] 40.80 [1,606] 1.50 [59] 19.3 [760] 29.3 [1,154] 39.3 [1,559] 1/2 oz. 15.40 [606] 25.40 [1,000] 35.40 [1,394] 45.40 [1,787] 2.00 [79] 23.4 [921] 33.4 [1,315] 43.4 [1,709] 1 oz. 30.90 [1,217] 40.90 [1,610] 50.90 [2,004] 60.90 [2,398] 3.00 [118] 37.9 [1,491] 47.9 [1,886] 57.9 [2,280] 2 oz. 61.70 [2,429] 71.70 [2,823] 81.70 [3,217] 91.70 [3,610] 3.00 [118] 68.7 [2,705] 78.7 [3,098] 88.7 [3,492] 3 oz. 92.60 [3,646] 102.60 [4,039] 112.60 [4,433] 122.60 [4,827] 4.00 [157] 98.6 [3,882] 108.6 [4,276] 118.6 [4,669] 123.50 [4,862] 133.50 [5,236] 143.50 [5,650] 153.50 [6,043] 4.00 [157] 129.5 [5.098] 139.5 [5,492] 149.5 [5,886] 4 oz. Note 1: The values in this table assume a single plating operation. Note 2. When selective (button) plating is performed, refer to 3.6.2.15. Note 3. Starting foil weight of design requirement per procurement documentation. Note 4. For copper foil above 4 oz., utilize the formula provided in 3.6.2.15. Note 5. Reference: Min. Cu Plating Thickness Type 2 = (10 µm) [394 µin] Type 3 and 4 < 6 layers = (20 µm) [787 µin] Type 3 and 4 > 6 layers = (30 µm) [1,181 µin] Note 6. Process allowance reduction does not allow for rework processes for weights below 1/2 oz. For 1/2 oz. and above, the process allowance reduction allows for one rework process. 3.6.2.16 Metal Cores All metal core printed boards, which have clearance between the PTHs and the metal core, shall require a horizontal microsection prepared to view the metal core/hole fill insulation. Specimens shall have been subjected to thermal stress in accordance with 3.6.1 prior to microsectioning. Wicking, radial cracks, lateral spacing, or voids in the hole-fill insulation material shall not reduce the electrical spacing between adjacent conductive surfaces to <100 µm [3,937 µin]. Wicking and/or radial cracks shall not exceed 750 µm [29,530 µin] from the plated-through hole edge into the hole-fill. (see Figure 3-34). DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Figure 3-34 Metal Core to Plated-Through Hole Spacing 3.6.2.17 Dielectric Spacing The minimum dielectric spacing shall be specified on the procurement documentation. Figure 3-35 provides an example of a measurement technique for minimum dielectric spacing. Note: Minimum rigid dielectric spacing may be specified to be 30 µm [1,181 µin]; however, low profile copper foils should be used and the voltages employed should be taken into consideration so as not to cause breakdown between layers. If the minimum dielectric spacing and the number of reinforcing layers are not specified, the minimum dielectric spacing shall be 90 µm [3,543 µin] and the number of reinforcing layers shall be selected by the supplier to ensure the minimum dielectric spacing. When the nominal rigid dielectric thickness on the drawing is less than 90 µm [3,543 µin], the minimum rigid dielectric spacing is 25 µm [984 µin] and the number of reinforcing layers may be selected by the supplier. Products designed for transmission line impedance applications may have special requirements and measurement methods specified within the procurement documentation. Figure 3-35 Measurement of Minimum Dielectric Spacing 3.6.2.18 Material Fill of Blind and Buried Vias and Microvias Non-copper material fill in blind, buried and microvia structures are subject to the following requirements: Fill (other than copper) shall be 50% minimum for Class 2 and Class 3. They may be completely void of fill material for Class 1. Fill material within the blind via shall be planar with the surface within +/- 0.076 mm [0.003 in]. When cap plating is specified, fill material within the blind via shall meet the dimple/bump requirements of Table 3-13. 3.6.2.19 Nail Heading No evidence exists that nail heading affects functionality. The presence of nail heading may be considered an indicator of process or design variation but is not a cause for rejection. 3.7 Solder Mask Requirements When solder mask is required on printed boards, it shall meet the qualification/conformance requirements of IPC-SM-840. If a solder mask performance class is not specified for Class 1 or Class 2, IPC-SM-840 Class T shall be used. For Class 3 board performance, IPC-SM-840 Class H shall be used. The following other conformance requirements apply: 3.7.1 Solder Mask Coverage Solder mask coverage manufacturing variations resulting in skips, voids, and misregistration are subject to the following restrictions: DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY a. Metal conductors shall not be exposed in areas where solder mask is required. Touch up, if required to cover these areas with solder mask, shall be of a material that is compatible to and of equal resistance to soldering and cleaning as the originally applied solder mask. b. In areas containing parallel conductors, solder mask variations shall not expose adjacent conductors unless the area between the conductors is purposely left blank as for a test point or for some surface mount devices. c. Conductors under components shall not be exposed or shall be otherwise electrically isolated. If the component pattern is not readily apparent, the area covered by a component shall be shown in the procurement document. d. Solder mask need not be flush with the surface of the land. Misregistration of a solder mask defined feature shall not expose adjacent isolated lands or conductors. e. Solder mask is allowed on lands for plated-through holes to which solder connections are to be made provided the external annular ring requirements for that Class of products are not violated; mask shall not encroach upon the barrel of this type of plated-through hole. Other surfaces such as edge board connector fingers and surface mount lands shall be free of solder mask except as specified. Solder mask is allowed in plated-through holes and via holes into which no component lead is soldered unless the procurement document requires that the holes be completely solder filled. Solder mask may tent or plug via holes and may be required for that purpose. Test points that are intended for assembly testing must be free of solder mask unless coverage is specified. f. When a land contains no plated-through holes, as in the case of surface mount or ball grid array lands, misregistration shall not cause encroachment of the solder mask on the land or lack of solder-mask-definition in excess of the following: 1) on surface mount lands misregistration shall not cause encroachment of the solder mask over the land area greater than 50 µm [1,970 µin] for a pitch of 1.25 mm [0.04921 in] or greater; and encroachment shall not exceed 25 µm [984 µin] for a pitch less than 1.25 mm [0.04921 in]; encroachment may occur on adjacent sides but not on opposite sides of a surface mount land. 2) on ball grid array lands, if the land is solder-mask defined, misregistration may allow a 90° breakout of the solder mask on the land; if clearance is specified, no encroachment of the solder mask on the land is allowed except at the conductor attachment. g. Pits, voids and bubbles are allowed in nonconductor areas provided they have adherent edges and do not exhibit lifting or blistering in excess of allowance in 3.7.2. h. Coverage between closely spaced surface mount lands shall be as required by procurement documentation. i. When design requires coverage to the board edge, chipping or lifting of solder mask along the board edge after fabrication shall not penetrate more than 1.25 mm [0.04921 in] or 50% of the distance to the closest conductor, whichever is less. 3.7.2 Solder Mask Cure and Adhesion The cured solder mask coating shall not exhibit tackiness, delamination, or blistering to the following extent: a. Class 1 does not bridge between conductors. b. Class 2 and Class 3 two per side, maximum size 0.25 mm [0.00984 in] in longest dimension, does not reduce electrical spacing between conductors by more than 25%. Rework and touch up, if required to cover these areas with solder mask, shall be of a material that is compatible to and of equal resistance to soldering and cleaning as the originally applied solder mask. When tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.28.1, the maximum percentage of cured solder mask lifting from the G coupon or production printed board shall be in accordance with Table 3-17. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Table 3-17 Solder Mask Adhesion Maximum Percentage Loss Allowed Surface Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Bare Copper 10 5 0 Gold or Nickel 25 10 5 Base Laminate 10 5 0 Melting Metals (Tin-lead plating, fused tin-lead, and bright acid-tin) 50 25 10 3.7.3 Solder Mask Thickness Solder mask thickness is not measured unless specified in the procurement documents. If a thickness measurement is required, instrumental methods may be used or assessment may be made using a microsection of the parallel conductors on the E coupon. 3.8 Electrical Requirements When tested as specified in Table 4-3 and Table 4-4, the flexible printed board shall meet the electrical requirements detailed in the following paragraphs. 3.8.1 Dielectric Withstanding Voltage Applicable coupons tested as outlined below shall meet the requirements of Table 3-18, without flashover, sparkover, or breakdown between conductors or conductors and lands. The dielectric withstanding voltage test shall be performed in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.5.7. The dielectric withstanding voltage shall be applied between common portions of each conductor pattern and adjacent common portions of each conductor pattern. The voltage shall be applied between conductor patterns of each layer and the electrically isolated pattern of each adjacent layer. Table 3-18 Dielectric Withstanding Test Voltages Voltage for spacing 80 µm [3,150 µin] or greater Voltage for spacing 24 to 80 um [0.0010 in to 0.00315 in] Voltage for spacing < 24 um [0.0010 in] Time Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 No requirements 500 Vdc +15, -0 500 Vdc +15, -0 No requirements 250 Vdc +15, -0 250 Vdc +15, -0 No requirements AABUS AABUS No requirements 30 sec +3, -0 30 sec +3, -0 3.8.2 Electrical Continuity and Isolation Resistance Flexible printed boards shall be tested in accordance to IPC-9252. Electrical continuity and isolation resistance testing for sub-lamination is not required. 3.8.2.1 Continuity Flexible printed boards and qualification test boards shall be tested in accordance with the procedure outlined below. There shall be no circuits whose resistance exceeds the values established in the procurement documentation. Specialized circuitry consisting of long runs of very narrow conductors, or short runs of very large conductors may increase or decrease these values. The acceptability criteria for these specialized conductors must be specified in the procurement documentation. A current shall be passed through each conductor or group of interconnected conductors by applying electrodes on the terminals at each end of the conductor or group of conductors. The current passed through the conductors shall not exceed that specified in IPC-2221 for the smallest conductor in the circuit. For qualification as referenced in 4.1.1 and 4.1.2, the test current shall not exceed one ampere. Boards with designed resistive patterns shall meet the resistance requirements specified on the master drawing. 3.8.2.2 Isolation Resistance Printed boards or qualification test boards shall be tested in accordance with the following procedure. The isolation resistance between conductors shall meet the values established in the procurement documentation. The voltage applied between networks must be high enough to provide sufficient current resolution for the measurement. At the same time, it must be low enough to prevent arc-over between adjacent networks, which could induce defects within the product. For manual testing, the voltage shall be 200 volts minimum and shall be applied DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY for a minimum of five seconds. When automated test equipment is used, the minimum applied test voltage shall be the maximum rated voltage of the printed board. When not specified, use the default value of 40 volts DC. 3.8.3 Circuit/Plated-Through Hole Shorts to Metal Substrates Printed boards shall be tested in accordance with 3.8.1 except that polarizing voltage of 500 volts (DC) shall be applied between conductors and/or lands and the metallic heatsink in a manner such that each conductor/land area is tested (e.g., using a metallic brush or aluminum foil). The board shall be capable of withstanding 500 volts (DC) between circuitry/plated-through holes and the metal core substrates. There shall be no flashover or dielectric breakdown. 3.8.4 Moisture and Insulation Resistance (MIR) Test coupons shall be tested in accordance with the procedure outlined below. The test coupon shall not exhibit subsurface imperfections in excess of that allowed in 3.3.2. Insulation resistance shall meet the minimum requirements shown in Table 3-20 (at 500 volts DC). Non-component flush printed boards shall have a minimum requirement of 50 MΩ for all classes. Insulation resistance requirements in the as-received condition are detailed in special requirement section (see 3.10.9). Table 3-19 Insulation Resistance Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 As received Maintain electrical function 500 MΩ 500 MΩ After exposure to moisture Maintain electrical function 100 MΩ 500 MΩ The moisture and insulation resistance for printed boards shall be performed in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.3. When Test Method A within IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.3 is required per the procurement documentation, conformal coating in accordance with IPC-CC-830 shall be applied to the external conductors prior to chamber exposure. Final measurements shall be made at room temperature within two hours after removal from the test chamber. All layers have a 100 ± 10 volts DC polarizing voltage applied during chamber exposure. Mealing of the conformal coating shall not extend more than 3 mm [0.12 in] from the edge of the test coupon or production printed board. 3.8.4.1 Dielectric Withstanding Voltage After MIR A dielectric withstanding voltage test shall be performed after moisture and insulation resistance in accordance with 3.8.1. 3.9 Cleanliness Type 4 and Type 5 flexible printed boards requiring permanent solder mask coating shall be tested and evaluated in accordance with 3.10.11. 3.9.1 Cleanliness Prior to Solder Mask Application When a printed board requires a permanent solder mask coating, the uncoated boards shall be within the allowable limits of ionic and other contaminants prior to the application of solder mask coating. When noncoated printed boards are tested per 3.9, the contamination level shall not be greater than 1.56 µg/cm2 of sodium chloride equivalence. 3.9.2 Cleanliness After Solder Mask, Solder, or Alternative Surface Coating Application When specified, printed boards shall be tested per 3.9 and meet the requirements in the procurement documentation. 3.9.3 Cleanliness of Inner Layers After Oxide Treatment Prior to Lamination When specified, inner layers shall be tested per 3.9 and meet the requirements of the procurement documentation. 3.10 Special Requirements When specified on the procurement documentation, some or all of the special requirements listed in this section (3.10) shall apply. A notation in the procurement documentation will designate which are required. 3.10.1 Outgassing When specified, flexible printed boards shall be tested in accordance with the procedure outlined below. The degree of outgassing shall not result in a Total Mass Loss (TML) of more than 1.0% and Collectible Volatile Condensable Material (CVCM) of less than one tenth of one percent (0.1%). Mass loss shall be determined on test coupons or production printed boards of representative substrates when tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.4. In lieu of testing, outgassing data from a NASA or OEM database shall be acceptable. 3.10.2 Organic Contamination Noncoated printed boards shall be tested in accordance with the procedure outlined below. Any visual evidence of organic residue shall constitute a failure. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY The printed board shall be tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Methods 2.3.38 or 2.3.39. The first is a qualitative method in which very pure acetonitrile is dripped across the test coupon or production printed board and collected on a microscope slide. It is dried and compared with a slide having dried, uncontaminated acetonitrile on it for visual evidence of organic residue. If evidence of organic contamination is detected by this test, Method 2.3.39 is used to determine the nature of the contaminant by the use of infrared spectrophotometric analysis using the Multiple Internal Reflectance (MIR) method. 3.10.3 Fungus Resistance Completed printed boards or representative wiring sections from the lot shall not support fungus growth when tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.1. 3.10.4 Vibration The test coupon or production printed board shall pass the circuitry test in 3.8.2 following the vibration test procedure below and shall not exhibit bow or twist in excess of that allowed in 3.4.3 following testing. The printed boards shall be subjected to both a cycling and resonance dwell test with the flat surface of the board mounted perpendicular to the axis of vibration in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.9. Cycling Test – The cycling test shall consist of one sweep from 20 to 2000 Hz performed in 16 minutes. Input acceleration over the 20 to 2000 Hz frequency range shall be maintained to 15 Gs. Resonance Dwell – Test coupons or production printed boards shall be subjected to a 30 minute resonance dwell with 25 Gs input or a maximum of 100 Gs output measured at the geometric center of the test coupon or production printed board. The test coupons or production printed boards shall be restrained from movement by fixturing on all four sides. 3.10.5 Mechanical Shock The test printed boards shall pass the circuitry test in 3.8.2 after being subjected to mechanical shock testing as follows. The mechanical shock test shall be performed in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.5. The printed boards shall be subjected three times to a shock pulse of 100 Gs with a duration of 6.5 milliseconds in each of the three principal planes. The test coupons or production printed boards shall be restrained from movement by fixturing on all four edges. 3.10.6 Impedance Testing Requirements for impedance shall be specified on the procurement documentation. Impedance testing may be performed on a test coupon or a designated circuit in the production wiring. Time domain reflectometers (TDR) are used for electrical testing, but for large impedance tolerances (± 10%), mechanical measurements from a microsection utilizing a special test coupon can be used to calculate and verify impedance values. See IPC-2251 for the equations for calculating impedance from the test coupon and IPC-TM-650, Method 2.5.5.7, for the methodology using the TDR technique. 3.10.7 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) When boards that have metal cores or reinforcements with a requirement to constrain the thermal expansion in the planar directions, the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion shall be within ± 2 ppm/°C for the CTE and temperature range specified on the procurement documentation. Testing shall be by the strain gauge method in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.41.2. Testing of boards less than 1.5 mm [0.060 in] thick and other methods of determining the CTE shall be AABUS. 3.10.8 Thermal Shock When specified on the procurement documentation, flexible printed boards or test coupons shall be tested in accordance with the procedure outlined below. The specimen shall be tested for thermal shock in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.7.2, except the temperature range shall be -65 +125 °C [-85 to 257 °F]. Microsection evaluation in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.7.2, is not required. Following removal from the test chamber, the specimen shall meet the circuitry requirements of 3.8.2. The resistance value shall not vary by more than ± 10%. 3.10.9 Surface Insulation Resistance (As Received) Test coupons shall be tested in accordance with the procedure outlined below. The insulation resistance shall be no less than that shown in Table 3-19. Test coupons or production boards should be conditioned at 50 ± 5 °C [122 ± 9 °F] with no added humidity for a period of 24 hours. After cooling, the insulation resistance test shall be performed in accordance with the ambient temperature measurements specified in IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.3. 3.10.10 Metal Core (Horizontal Microsection) When specified, metal core printed boards which have clearance between the plated-through holes and the metal core shall require a horizontal microsection prepared to view the DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY metal core/hole fill insulation. Test coupons or production boards shall have been subjected to thermal stress in accordance with 3.6.1 prior to microsectioning. Wicking, radial cracks, lateral spacing or voids in the hole-fill insulation material shall not reduce the electrical spacing between adjacent conductive surfaces to less than 100 µm [3,937 µin]. Wicking and/or radial cracks shall not exceed 75 µm [2,953 µin] from the plated-through hole edge into the hole-fill. 3.10.11 Ionic (Resistivity of Solvent Extract) When specified, printed boards or test coupons shall be tested for ionic contamination in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.3.25, paragraph 4 Resistance of Solvent Extract Method. When flexible printed boards are tested per this section, the contamination level shall not be greater than an equivalent of 1.56 µg/cm2 of sodium chloride. Equivalent test methods may be used in lieu of the method specified; however, it shall be demonstrated to have equal or better sensitivity and employ solvents with the ability to dissolve flux residue or other contaminants as does the solution presently specified. 3.10.12 Rework Simulation 3.10.12.1 Through Hole Components When specified, printed boards or test coupons shall be tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.36 and then microsectioned and examined in accordance with 3.6. Lifted lands are allowed. 3.10.12.2 Surface Mount Components When specified, 100% surface mount printed boards shall be tested in accordance with the procurement documentation. 3.10.13 Bending Test The bending test shall conform to Figure 3-34, unless otherwise agreed to by the user. The bending test requirements shall be as specified on the appropriate document/drawing. See IPC-2223 for guidance on minimum bend radii. The following parameters shall be specified as a minimum: Direction of bend (a) Degree of bend (b) Number of bend cycles (c) Diameter of mandrel (d) Points of application to be specified by user Bend cycle is defined as taking one end of the specimen and bending it around a mandrel and then bending back to the original starting position, traveling 180° in one direction and 180° in the opposite direction. A bend cycle may also be defined as bending (using opposite ends) the ends toward each other (bend the same direction) and then bending them back to the original starting position, with each end traveling 90° in one direction and 90° in the opposite direction. Figure 3-34 Bending Test The specified number of bend cycles shall be performed with the mandrel placed in contact with the specimen on one side and then again with the mandrel placed in contact with the specimen on the opposite side. After completion of the bending test in both directions, the flexible or rigid-flexible printed board shall be tested for electrical defects in accordance with 3.8 and shall meet the requirements of 3.3. 3.10.14 Flexible Endurance Flexible endurance testing shall be carried out using IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.3.1; as an alternate, IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.3 may be used. Flexible endurance testing can also be accomplished with DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY special test equipment specific to the circuit application. The outline length of the coupon may be deviated from in order to accommodate the test method fixture and circuit design. Accordingly, the final configuration of the coupon should be determined with regard for the end product application and by user/supplier agreement. The flexibility endurance test requirements shall be specified in the appropriate document/drawing. The following parameters shall be specified as a minimum: Number of flex cycles Diameter of the bend mandrels or separation of the loop-defining plates Flexing rate Points of application Travel of loop The method for determining end of life is an electrical discontinuity during monitoring, or passing the predetermined number of flex cycles without electrical discontinuity. 3.10.15 Bond Strength (Unsupported Lands) When flexible printed boards are tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.20, the unsupported land shall withstand 1.86 kg pull or 35 kg/cm2 [498 PSI], whichever is less, after subjection to five cycles of soldering and unsoldering. Calculations of land area of the unsupported hole do not include the area occupied by the hole. 3.10.16 Bond Strength (Stiffener) Using a sharp instrument (i.e., scalpel or razor blade), cut a pattern approximately 13 mm [0.512 in] wide by 76 mm [2.99 in] long through the flexible printed board to the stiffener so that approximately half way through the peeling operation the sample will be perpendicular to the pull. Pull the flexible printed board at a rate of 57 mm/minute [2.24 in/minute]. Take readings at the beginning, middle, and end of the pull and average these readings to determine acceptability. The peel strength between the flexible printed board and the stiffener shall be a minimum of 1.4 kg per 25 mm [0.984 in] width when bonded with thermoset adhesive and 0.38 kg per 25 mm [0.984 in] width when bonded with pressure sensitive adhesive. 3.10.17 Destructive Physical Analysis Lot acceptance shall require the destructive physical analysis (DPA) of a representative printed board per lot. The DPA printed board shall be selected from a single common inspection lot from a panel that has previously passed acceptance testing for structural integrity after stress in accordance with Table 4-3. Each DPA printed board shall be thermally stressed, microsectioned and inspected in accordance with 3.6. DPA microsections shall include a minimum of three holes of each applicable PTH and via structure, including blind and buried, found on the finished printed board. Disposition of lots where DPA has failed shall be AABUS. 3.11 Repair Repair of bare flexible printed boards shall be AABUS for each set of procurement documentation (see IPC-7711/21A). 3.11.1 Circuit Repair Allowance of circuit repairs on Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 flexible printed boards shall be AABUS. As a guideline, there should be no more than two circuit repairs for each 0.09 m2 [0.969 ft2] or less of layer area per side. Circuit repairs on any impedance-controlled circuits shall not violate the impedance requirement and shall have the agreement of the user. Circuit repairs shall not violate the minimum electrical spacing requirements. 3.12 Rework Rework is permitted for all classes. The touch-up of surface imperfections in the base material or removal of residual plating materials or extraneous copper will be permitted for all products when such action does not affect the functional integrity of the printed board. 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS 4.1 General General Quality Assurance Provisions are specified in IPC-6011 and each sectional specification. The requirements specific to flexible printed boards are contained in this specification and include the Qualification Testing, Acceptance Testing and Frequency of Quality Conformance Testing. 4.1.1 Qualification Qualification is AABUS (see IPC-6011). The qualification should consist of capability analysis assessments (see IPC-9151), pre-production samples, production sample, or test coupons (see IPC-6011) that are produced by the same equipment and procedures planned for the production printed boards. Qualification should include those applicable tests as referenced in Table 4-3 and Table 4-4. Qualification as agreed by the user may consist of documentation that supplier has furnished similar product to other users or to other similar specifications. 4.1.2 Sample Test Coupons If test coupons are used in lieu of actual production lots, the following information is DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY provided based on previous use of standardized test coupons. Sample test coupons may be used for qualification or for ongoing process control. Master drawings, databases, or artwork are available from IPC. For each type (see 1.3.2) the master drawing and artwork is listed as follows: Type 1 Master Drawing IPC-100041 within IPC-A-41 artwork. Type 2 Master Drawing IPC-100042 within IPC-A-42 artwork. Type 3 Master Drawing IPC-100043 within IPC-A-43 artwork. Type 4 Master Drawing IPC-100043 within IPC-A-43 artwork. Type 5 Master Drawing IPC-100043 within IPC-A-43 artwork. Note: IPC-100001 is the universal drilling and profile master drawing. Table 4-1 specifies test coupons A through H from IPC-A-41, IPC-A-42, and IPC-A-43 to be used from the test specimen for qualification and process capability evaluations. Equivalent production printed board coupon descriptions can be found in IPC-2221. 4.2 Acceptance Testing and Frequency Acceptance testing and frequency shall be performed as specified in Table 4-3 to the requirements of this specification and IPC-6011 using either quality conformance coupons and/or production printed boards. The quality conformance test coupons are described in IPC-2221 which indicates the purpose of the coupon and its frequency on a manufacturing panel. When ‘‘Sample’’ is indicated in Table 4-3, use the C=0 Zero Acceptance Number Sampling Plan specified in Table 4-2. 4.2.1 C=0 Zero Acceptance Number Sampling Plan The C=0 Zero Acceptance Number Sampling Plan shall be in accordance with the requirements of ASQ H1331. The C=0 Zero Acceptance Number Sampling Plan provides greater or equal protection for the Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (L.T.P.D.) protection at the 0.10 ‘‘consumer risk’’ level. The Index Values at the top of each sample size column associates to the A.Q.L. level. For a lot to be accepted, all samples (shown in Table 4-2) shall conform to the requirements. Disposition of rejected lots shall be fully documented. 4.2.2 Referee Tests Two additional microsection sets from the same panel may be prepared and evaluated for microsection defects that are considered to be isolated, random in nature, or caused by microsection preparation. For acceptance, both referee sets must be defect free. 4.3 Quality Conformance Testing Quality Conformance Testing shall be performed and consist of inspections specified in Table 4-4 in a facility which meets the requirements of IPC-QL-653, unless otherwise specified by the user. Class 3 testing results may be extended to reliability test and evaluation for Class 2. 4.3.1 Coupon Selection Two sets of test coupons of the most complex pattern of each type of material processed during the inspection period shall be selected from lots that have passed acceptance testing. Table 4-1 Qualification Testing TEST Visual Examination Profile Requirement Paragraph TYPE 1 & 5 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 & 4 3.3 3.3.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Edges, Rigid Section 3.3.1.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Edges, Flexible Section 3.3.1.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Transition Zone, Rigid Area to Flexible Area 3.3.1.3 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board 3.3.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Construction Imperfections Haloing 3.3.1.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Measling 3.3.2.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Crazing 3.3.2.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Foreign Inclusions 3.3.2.4 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Weave Exposure 3.3.2.5 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Scratches, Dents, & Tool Marks 3.3.2.6 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Surface Microvoids 3.3.2.7 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Color Variations in Bond Enhancement Treatment 3.3.2.8 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Pink Ring 3.3.2.9 N/A N/A N/A Coverfilm Separations 3.3.2.10 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY TEST Covercoat Requirements Requirement Paragraph 3.3.2.11 TYPE 1 & 5 Entire Board TYPE 2 Entire Board TYPE 3 & 4 Entire Board Covercoat Coverage 3.3.2.11.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Covercoat Cure & Adhesion 3.3.2.11.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Covercoat Thickness 3.3.2.11.3 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Solder Wicking/Plating Penetration 3.3.2.12 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Stiffener 3.3.2.13 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Plating & Coating Voids in the Hole 3.3.3 N/A Entire Board Entire Board Lifted Lands 3.3.4 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Marking 3.3.5 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Solderability 3.3.6 A, B, A/B, C A, B, A/B, C A, B, A/B, C Plating Adhesion 3.3.7 C C C Edge Board Contact, Junction of Gold Plate to Solder Finish 3.3.8 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Workmanship 3.3.9 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Dimensional Requirements Hole Size & Hole Pattern Accuracy Etched Annular Ring (External) 3.4 3.4.1 3.4.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Solderable Annular Ring (External) 3.4.2.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Squeeze-out of Adhesive of Coverlayer & Ooze-out of Cover Coat 3.4.2.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Stiffener Access Hole 3.4.2.3 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board 3.4.3 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Bow & Twist (Individual Rigid or Stiffener Portions Only) Conductor Definition 3.5 Conductor Imperfections 3.5.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Conductor Spacing 3.5.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Conductor Imperfections 3.5.3 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Conductor Width Reduction 3.5.3.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Conductor Thickness Reduction 3.5.3.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board 3.5.4 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board 3.5.4.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Conductor Surfaces Nicks & Pinholes in Ground or Voltage Planes Surface Mount Lands (Rectangular) 3.5.4.2.1 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Surface Mount Lands (Round) 3.5.4.2.2 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Wire Bond Bads 3.5.4.3 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Edge Connector Lands 3.5.4.4 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Dewetting 3.5.4.5 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Nonwetting 3.5.4.6 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Final Finish Coverage 3.5.4.7 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Conductor Edge Outgrowth 3.5.4.8 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Structural Integrity 3.6 Thermal Stress Testing 3.6.1 A, B, or A/B A A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Requirements for Microsectioned Coupons 3.6.2 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Plating Integrity 3.6.2.1 N/A A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Plating Voids 3.6.2.2 N/A A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Laminate Integrity (Flexible) 3.6.2.3 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Laminate Integrity (Rigid) 3.6.2.4 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Delamination or Blistering 3.6.2.5 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Etchback 3.6.2.6 N/A N/A A, B, or A/B Smear Removal 3.6.2.7 N/A N/A A, B, or A/B Negative Etchback 3.6.2.8 N/A N/A A, B, or A/B Wicking (Copper Plating) 3.6.2.9 N/A N/A A, B, or A/B Annular Ring (Internal) 3.6.2.10 N/A N/A A, B, or A/B Plating/Coating Thickness 3.6.2.12 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Requirement Paragraph TEST Minimum Layer Copper Foil Thickness 3.6.2.13 TYPE 1 & 5 A, B, or A/B TYPE 2 A, B, or A/B TYPE 3 & 4 A, B, or A/B Minimum Surface Conductor Thickness 3.6.2.14 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Metal Cores 3.6.2.15 A, B, or A/B N/A A, B, or A/B Dielectric Thickness 3.6.2.16 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Material Fill of Blind Buried Vias 3.6.2.17 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Electrical Requirements 3.8 Dielectric Withstanding Voltage 3.8.1 E E E Circuitry 3.8.2 D, H D, H D, H Continuity 3.8.2.1 D, H D, H D, H Isolation Resistance(Circuit Shorts) 3.8.2.2 D, H D, H D, H Circuit/Plated-Through Hole Shorts to Metal Substrates 3.8.3 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Moisture & Insulation Resistance 3.8.4 E E E Cleanliness 3.9 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Special Requirements 3.10 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Outgassing 3.10.1 Organic Contamination 3.10.2 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Fungus Resistance 3.10.3 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Impedance Testing 3.10.6 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) 3.10.7 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Thermal Shock 3.10.8 D D D Surface Insulation Resistance (As Received) 3.10.9 E E E Ionic (Resistivity of Solvent Extract) 3.10.11 Entire Board Entire Board Entire Board Rework Simulation 3.10.12 N/A A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Bending Flexibility 3.10.13 H H H Flexible Endurance 3.10.14 H H H Bond Strength (Unsupported Lands) 3.10.15 A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B A, B, or A/B Bond Strength (Stiffener) 3.10.16 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Repair Circuit Repair 3.11 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required 3.11.1 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required 3.12 Only as Required Only as Required Only as Required Rework Table 4-2 C=0 Sampling Plan for Equipment Classes per Lot Size Lot Size Class 1 1 2.5 1 4.0 Class 2 1 6.5 1 1 2.5 Class 3 1 4.0 1 1 1.0 ** 2.51 4.01 1-8 5 3 2 1.5 ** 5 3 0.10 ** 5 3 9-15 5 3 2 8 5 3 ** 13 5 3 16-25 5 3 3 8 5 3 ** 13 5 3 26-50 5 5 5 8 5 5 ** 13 5 5 51-90 7 6 5 8 7 6 ** 13 7 6 91-150 11 7 6 12 11 7 125 13 11 7 151-280 13 10 7 19 13 10 125 20 13 10 281-500 16 11 9 21 16 11 125 29 16 11 501-1,200 19 15 11 27 19 15 125 34 19 15 1,201-3,200 23 18 13 35 23 18 192 42 23 18 3,201-10,000 29 22 15 38 29 22 294 50 29 22 10,001-35,000 35 29 15 46 35 29 345 60 35 29 Note 1. Index Value is associated to the A.Q.L. value. If a particular product is determined to be ‘‘critical’’ by the user and a smaller index value is required, the user shall designate the requirement in the procurement document and should state the ‘‘critical’’ requirement on the master drawing. **Denotes inspect entire lot. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Table 4-3 Acceptance Testing and Frequency Sample Inspection Material Requirement and Method Production Section Board Test Frequency Test Coupon By Board Class 1 3.2.1 -3.2.14 1 Class 2 1 Class 3 1 Manufacturer’s Certification Remarks Verifiable Certificate of Compliance or SPC Program VISUAL Edges, Rigid Section 3.3.1.1 X Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Per Board Edges, Flex Section 3.3.1.2 3.3.1.3 X Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Per Board Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Transition Zone, Rigid Area to Flex Are Construction Imperfection 3.3.2 X X 3.3.3 Plating and Coating Voids in Hole Marking and Traceability X 3.3.5 X (Retained Coupons) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Sample (1.0) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per Board Per Board Per Panel Applicable to Types 2, 3 & 4 Only Per Board Edge Board Contact, Junction of Gold Plate to Solder Finish 3.3.8 X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per Panel Lifted Lands 3.3.4 X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per Board Workmanship 3.3.9 X Plating Adhesion Covercoat Cure and Adhesion Solder mask cure and adhesion Cleanliness 3.3.7 X C X G 3.7.2 X G 3.9 X 3.3.2.11.2 Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per Board PHYSICAL Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per panel (1 coupon) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per panel (1 coupon) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per panel (1 coupon) N/A N/A Sample (4.0) Per lot Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Sample (2.5) Per Panel SOLDERABILITY Surface 7 Hole Dimensional: Flexible Printed Board 3.3.6 3.3.6 3.4 Hole Size and Hole Pattern Accuracy 3.4.1 Etched Annular Ring (External) 3.4.2 Solderable Annular Ring (External) Bow and Twist (Individual Board or Stiffener Portion Only) Conductor Imperfection M X Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) A/B or S DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per Panel Per Board Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per Board CONDUCTOR DEFINITION (INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL LAYERS) 3.5 Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) X Per Board 3.4.2.1 3.4.3 X X X X Per Board Per Board Per Board DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY 3.5.3.1 Conductor Width Reduction 3.5.3.2 Conductor Thickness Reduction Conductor Spacing X X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per Board Per Board 3.5.2 X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per Board Nicks or Pinholes in Ground or Voltage Planes 3.5.4.1 X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per Board Surface Mount Lands 3.5.4.2 X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Minimum 10 evaluations per panel Edge Connector Lands Dewetting/Nonwetting/ Final Finish Coverage 3.5.4.4 X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per Board 3.5.4.5 3.5.4.6 3.5.4.7 X Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per Board Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) 3.5.4.8 Conductor Edge Outgrowth X Per Board 6 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AFTER STRESS TYPES 3-4 (MICROSECTION) A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) 3.6.2.3 3.6.2.4 A/B 3.6.2.6 Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) 3.6.3.7 Flexible and Rigid Laminate Integrity Etchback, Smear Removal and Negative Etchback (Type 3 and Type 4 Only) 3.6.2.1 3.6.2.9 Plating Integrity and Wicking Plating Voids 3.6.2.2 Per panel 5 Per panel 5 A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per panel 5 A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per panel 5 Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per Panel A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per panel 5 A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per panel 5 A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per panel 5 A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per panel 5 A/B Sample (2.5) Sample (1.5) Sample (0.1) Per panel 5 A/B Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (4.0) Per panel 5 2 A/B Annular Ring and Breakout (Internal) 3.6.2.10 3.6.2.10.1 Plating/Coating Thickness 3.6.2.12 Minimum Layer/Copper Foil Thickness 3.6.2.13 Minimum Surface Conductor Thickness 3.6.2.14 Metal Cores 3.6.2.15 Dielectric Thickness 3.6.2.16 Material Fill of Buried Vias 3.6.2.17 Laminate Integrity (Flexible) STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AFTER STRESS TYPE 2 (MICROSECTION) Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) A/B 3.6.2.3 3,5 6 Plating Integrity Plating Voids 3.6.2.1 3.6.2.2 Plating/Coating Thickness 3.6.2.12 Minimum Surface Conductor Thickness 3.6.2.14 Dielectric Thickness 3.6.2.16 A/B Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per panel A/B Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per panel A/B Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) A/B Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per panel A/B Sample (6.5) Sample (4.0) Sample (2.5) Per panel ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS Continuity Isolation Resistance SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 3.8.2.1 3.8.2.2 X X Per panel Sample (2.5) 2 Sample (2.5) 2 2 100% 2 100% 100% 100% 2 2 Per panel 4 DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Dielectric Withstand Voltage 3.8.1 Circuits/Plated-Through Hole Shorts to Metal Substrates 3.8.3 Insulation Resistance (As Received 3.10.9 Moisture Insulation Resistance 3.8.4 Thermal Shock 3.10.8 Ionic (Resistivity of Solvent Extract) 3.10.11 Organic Contamination 3.10.2 Fungus Resistance 3.10.3 Outgassing 3.10.1 Impedance Testing 3.10.6 Repair X Only Applicable When Imposed by Contract 3.11 Circuit Repair 3.11.1 Rework 3.12 3.10.7 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE Note 1. Numbers in parentheses are the AQL level. Note 2. For Type 1 and Type 2 flexible printed boards, visual or AOI inspection may be used in lieu of electrical testing. Note 3. For Class 2 product, the degree of breakout following evaluation of vertical cross sections may be assessed by methods other than horizontal microsection. Note 4. Measurement location must be larger than collimated source. Note 5. For each manufacturing panel, when utilizing the A/B coupon design, the two A/B coupons shall be selected from opposite corners of the panel and evaluated in opposing axes (one in the “Y” axis and the other in the “X” axis). Structural integrity sample can be used as ½ of the registration pair. Note 6. All via structures shall be represented in the thermally stressed evaluations. Note 7. Hole solderability testing not required for Type 2 double-sided printed boards without plated-through holes. The A coupon is considered inactive for new designs. Usage of the “A” coupon for hold solderability testing shall be AABUS. Table 4-4 Quality Conformance Testing Inspection Rework Simulation Bond Strength (Unsupported Lands) Bond Strength (Stiffener) Dielectric Withstanding Voltage Moisture and Insulation Resistance Requirement and Method Section 3.10.12 Test Coupon Test Frequency Type 1, 5 Type 2 - 4 B or A/B Class 1 Not required 3.10.15 B or A/B As required Not required 3.10.16 3.8.1 Board E Board E Not required Not required 3.8.4 E E Not required Class 2 Two coupons per QTR Two coupons per QTR AABUS Two coupons per QTR Two coupons per QTR Class 3 Two coupons per month Two coupons per month AABUS Two coupons per month Two coupons per month 5 NOTES 5.1 Ordering Data The procurement documentation should specify the following: a. Title, number, issue, revision letter, and date of current applicable master drawing. b. Specific exceptions, variations, additions or conditions to this specification that are required by the user. c. Part Identification and Marking instructions. d. Information for preparation for delivery, if applicable. e. Special tests required and frequency. 5.2 Superseded Specifications This specification supersedes and replaces IPC-6013B. DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY APPENDIX A Appendix A presents the performance requirements of IPC-6013C in an abbreviated form and alphabetical order. Special conditions, lengthy requirements, and tutorial information may be shortened or partially omitted in this appendix. See the referenced paragraph in this appendix for the full specification requirements. Requirement Requirement Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Characteristic Inspection Paragraph The minimum annular ring 3.4.2 and Etched Annular Ring (External Not greater than 180° Not greater than 90° Table 3-7 Plated-Through Holes) breakout of hole from land breakout of hole from land shall be 50 µm [1,968 µin]. when visually assessed. when visually assessed and a 50 µm [1,970 µin] annular ring for at least 270° of the circumference. Etched Annular Ring (External The minimum annular ring 3.4.2 and Not greater than 90° Not greater than 90° Table 3-7 Unsupported Holes) breakout of hole from land breakout of hole from land shall be 150 µm [5,906 µin ]. when visually assessed. when visually assessed. Etched Annular Ring (Internal Plated-Through Holes) Bending Test Bond Strength (Stiffener) Hole breakout is allowed 90 ° hole breakout is The minimum annular ring provided the land/ allowed provided the land/ shall be 25 µm [984 µin]. conductor junction is not conductor junction is not reduced below the allow- reduced below the allowable width reduction in able width reduction in 3.5.3.1. 3.5.3.1. As specified in appropriate document/drawing. Peel strength between the flexible printed board and the stiffener shall be ≥1 .4 kg per 25 mm [0.984 in] width. Bond Strength (Unsupported As per IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.20, unsupported land shall withstand 1.86 kg Lands) pull or 35 kg/cm2 [498 PSI], whichever is less, after subjection to five cycles of soldering and unsoldering. Bow & Twist (Individual Rigid or Surface applications: 0.75% bow & twist (or determined by user and supplier). Stiffener Portion Only) All other applications: 1.5% bow & twist (or determined by user and supplier). Characteristic Inspection for Material 2 2 Circuit Repair No more than two repairs for each 0.09 m [0.969 ft ]; no impedance or minuimum electrical spacing req. violated. Circuitry Testing conducted in accordance with IPC-9252. Circuits/Plated-Through Hole Metal core flexible printed board shall withstand 500 volts DC between Shorts to Metal Substrates circuitry/ plated-through holes and metal core substrates w/o flashover or dielectric breakdown. Cleanliness Type 4 & Type 5 flexible printed boards shall be tested and evaluated in accordance with 3.10.11. Coefficient of Thermal If have metal cores/reinforcements with a req. to constrain thermal expansion in Expansion planar directions, CTE shall be within ± 2 ppm/ °C for CTE & temp range spec on master drawing; testing w/ strain gauge method, according to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.41.2 unless AABUS. Color Variations in Bond Mottled appearance/color variation accept; Random missing areas of treatment shall not be >10%. Enhancement Treatment Conductor Definition Meet visual & dimension req., pattern & thickness as specified in procurement documentation. Conductor Edge Outgrowth No outgrowth on edges of conductors that have been solder coated or electrodeposited tin-lead plated and fused when tested according to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.1. Conductor Imperfections Cross-sectional area of Cross-sectional area of conductor not reduced >20% conductor not reduced of minimum value; total defect not >10% of conductor >30% of minimum value. or 13.0 mm [0.512 in] (whichever is less). No cracks, splits or tears. 3.4.2 and Table 3-7 3.10.13 3.10.16 3.10.15 3.4.3 3.2 3.11.1 3.8.2 3.8.3 3.9 3.10.7 3.3.2.8 3.5 3.5.4.8 3.5.3 DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Conductor Spacing Conductive Surfaces Conductor Thickness Reduction Conductor Width Reduction Construction Imperfections Continuity Covercoat Coverage Minimum conductor spacing may be reduced an additional 50% due to conductor edge roughness, spikes, etc. Minimum conductor spacing may be reduced an additional 20% due to conductor roughness, spikes, etc. Reduction of conductor Reduction of conductor thickness not > 20% of minimum. thickness not > 30% of minimum. Reduction of conductor Reduction of conductor width not > 20% of minimum. width not > 30% of minimum Measling, crazing, blistering and delamination. No circuits with resistance > the values established in the procurement documentation; current passed through for evaluation will not be > values in IPC-2221 for smallest conductor of circuit. Conductors not exposed where covercoat required. Blistering does not bridge Two per side, max size 0.25 mm [0.00984 in] in long between conductors. est dim, spacing between conductors not reduced by more than 25%. Covercoat Cure and Adhesion Max % loss allowed: Bare Copper - 10 Gold or Nickel - 25 Base Laminate - 10 Melting Metals - 50 Max % loss allowed: Bare Copper - 5 Gold or Nickel - 10 Base Laminate - 5 Melting Metals - 25 Max % loss allowed: Bare Copper - 0 Gold or Nickel - 5 Base Laminate - 0 Melting Metals -10 3.5.2 3.5.4 3.5.3.2 3.5.3.1 3.3.2 3.8.2.1 3.3.2.11.1 3.3.2.11.2 Covercoat Requirements See 3.3.2.11.1 through 3.3.2.11.3. Covercoat Thickness Coverfilm Separations Not measured unless required by procurement documentation. Uniform coverfilm, free of separations. Nonlamination good if according to 3.3.2.4, not > 0.80 x 0.80 mm [0.0315 x 0.0315 in], not > 3 in 25 x 25 mm [0.984 x 0.984 in] space, not > 25% of spacing between conductors. 3.3.2.11.3 3.3.2.10 Crazing Imperfection does not reduce the conductor spacing below the minimum and there is no propagation of the imperfection as a result of thermal testing that replicates the manufacturing process. For Class 2 and Class 3, the distance of crazing shall not span more than 50% of the distance between adjacent conductors. 3.3.2.2 Delamination/Blistering Acceptable for all classes of end product provided the area affected by imperfections does not exceed 1% of the board area on each side and does not reduce the spacing between conductive patterns below the minimum conductor spacing. There shall be no propagation of imperfections as a result of thermal testing that replicates the manufacturing process. For Class 2 and Class 3, the blister or delamination shall not span more than 25% of the distance between adjacent conductive patterns. Solder connection: 15% Solder connection: 5% 3.3.2.3 Dewetting Dielectric Thickness Dielectric Withstand Voltage Dimensional Requirements Edge Board Contact, Junction of Gold Plate to Solder Finish 3.3.2.11 Conductors and planes are permitted. The minimum dielectric spacing shall be specified on the procurement documentation. See Table 3-15; the dielectric withstanding voltage test shall be performed in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.5.7. As specified in procurement documentation. Copper: 2.5 mm [0.0984 in] Copper: 1.25 mm [0.04921 in] Copper: 0.8 mm [0.031 in] Gold: 2.5 mm [0.0984 in] Gold: 1.25 mm [0.04291 in] Gold: 0.8 mm [0.031 in] 3.5.4.5 3.6.2.16 3.8.1 3.4 3.3.8 Edge Connector Lands No cuts or scratches that expose nickel or copper; Pits, dents, or depressions accept if not exceed 0.15 mm [0.00591 in] in longest dimension with no more than 3 per land, and not appear in > 30% of lands. 3.5.4.4 Edges, Flexible Section Free of burrs, nicks, or delamination in excess of that allowed in the procurement documentation (except if a result of tie-in tabs to facilitate circuit removal). Tears shall not be allowed in Type 1 or Type 2 flexible printed boards or in the flexible sections of Type 3 or Type 4 flexible printed boards. 3.3.1.2 DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Edges, Rigid Section Accept if penetration not > 50% of distance from edge to nearest conductor or 2.5 mm [0.0984 in], whichever is less. Electrical Requirements Etchback (Type 3 & Type 4 Only) Final Finish Coverage 3.3.1.1 3.8 Between 5 µm [197 µin] (copper exposed) and 80 µm [3,150 µin] (maximum material removed). Exposed copper beyond termination areas or beyond required solder fillet areass allowed up to 5%. 3.6.2.6 3.5.4.7 Shall meet requirements of J-STD-003. Flexible Endurance As specified in appropriate document/drawing, according to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.3. 3.10.14 Foreign Inclusions Translucent particles trapped within the printed board shall be acceptable. Other par- ticles trapped within the printed board shall be acceptable provided the particle does not reduce the spacing between adjacent conductors to below the minimum spacing specified in 3.5.2. 3.3.2.4 Fungus Resistance Haloing No fungus growth when tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.1. Does not penetrate more than 2.5 mm [0.0984 in] or 50% of distance to closest conductor, whichever is less. As specified in procurement documentation. 3.10.3 3.3.1.1 As specified in procurement documentation; TDR used for electrical testing, but for large impedance tolerances (± 10%), mechanical measurements from a microsection utilizing a special test coupon. Surface Insulation Resistance As received: 500 MΩ As received: Maintain (As Received) electrical function After exposure to After exposure to After exposure to moisture: 100 MΩ moisture: 500 MΩ moisture: Maintain electrical function Ionic (Resistivity of Solvent Testing in accordance to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.3.25, with contamination level 2 Extract) of <1.56 µg/cm of sodium chloride. Isolation Resistance (Circuit Isolation resistance between conductors shall meet values established in the Shorts) procurement documentation; 200 volt minimum for manual testing for at least 3.10.6 Hole Size and Hole Pattern Accuracy Impedance Testing 3.4.1 3.10.9 3.10.11 3.8.2.2 five seconds; for automated tests, use the maximum rated voltage of the printed board; if not specified, use the default value in Table 1-1. Laminate Integrity (Flexible) No laminate voids in Zone B (see Figure 3-16) in excess of 50 µm [1,968 µin]. 3.6.2.3 Laminate Integrity (Rigid) See section 3.6.2.4 and Figure 3-14. 3.6.2.4 Lifted Lands Marking No lifted lands on the deliverable (non-stressed) flexible printed board. Conductive marking must be compatible with materials, and not reduce electrical spacing requirements. Manufacturer’s Certification. Material 3.3.4 3.3.5 Measling shall be acceptable. Measled areas in laminate substrates Measling Metal Cores Minimum Layer/Copper Foil Thickness Minimum Surface Conductor Thickness Moisture and Insulation Resistance exceeding 50% of the spacing between non-common conductors are a process indicator for Class 3 end product, indicating a variation in material, equipment operation, workmanship or process that is not a defect. 3.3.2.1 Wicking, radial cracks, lateral spacing, or voids in the hole-fill insulation material shall not reduce electrical spacing between adjacent conductive surfaces to < 100 µm [3,937 µin]. Shall be in accordance with Table 3-12. 3.6.2.15 Shall be in accordance with Table 3-13. 3.6.2.14 No measling, blistering or delamination in excess of that allowed in 3.3.2; insulation resistance meet requirements of Table 3-16; moisture & insulation resistance testing according to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.3. 3.6.2.13 3.8.4 DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Negative Etchback Not to exceed 25.0 µm Not to exceed 25.0 µm Not to exceed 13.0 µm [984 µin] if etchback not [984 µin] if etchback not [512 µin] if etchback not specified on procurespecified on procurespecified on procurement ment documentation. ment documentation. documentation. Maximum size 1.0 mm [0.0394 in]. Nicks and Pinholes in Ground Maximum size 1.5 mm or Voltage Planes [0.0591 in]. Nonwetting For tin, tin/lead reflowed, or solder coated surfaces, only allowed outside minimum solderable area or annular ring requirement. Organic Contamination Tested according to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.3.38 or 2.3.39, with no positive id of organic contamination. Outgassing Testing in accordance to procurement documentation; not resulting in a Total 3.6.2.8 3.5.4.1 3.5.4.6 3.10.2 3.10.1 Mass Loss (TML) of more than 1.0% and Collectible Volatile Condensable Material (CVCM) of less than 0.1%. Pink Ring Plating Adhesion Plating/Coating Thickness Plating and Coating Voids in the Hole Plating Integrity Plating Voids Repair Requirements for Microsectioned Coupons Acceptable. No portion of protective plating or conductor pattern foil shall be removed. Testing in accordance with IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.1. Shall meet requirements of Table 3-2 or as specified in procurement documenta tion, isolated areas of reduced copper thickness shall be measured and evaluated to the copper plating void rejection criteria specified in 3.3.3. Copper: 3 voids per hole Copper: 1 void per hole in Copper: none in ≤10% of holes. ≤5% of holes. Finish Coating: 3 voids Finished Coating: 1 void Finish Coating: 5 voids per hole in ≤5% of holes. per hole in ≤5% of holes. per hole in ≤15% of holes. No separation of layers (except as noted in Table 3-11). Areas of contamination or inclusions not to exceed 50% of each side of the inter- connection or occur in the interface of the copper cladding on the core and the copper plating in the hole wall. Meet requirements No more than 1 void per specimen, regardless of established in Table 3-11. length or size. No plating void in excess of 5% of total flex printed board thickness. No plating voids evident at internal layer and PTH hole wall interface. AABUS. See Table 3-11 and 3.6.2.1 through 3.6.2.18 3.3.2.9 3.3.7 3.6.2.12 3.3.3 3.6.2.1 3.6.2.2 3.11 3.6.2 Resin Fill of Blind and Buried Vias No fill requirement for blind vias. Buried vias shall be 60% filled with the laminating resin or similar via filling material for Class 2 and Class 3. Buried vias may be completely void of fill material for Class 1. 3.6.2.17 Rework Scratches, Dents, and Tool Marks Smear Removal (Type 3 & Type 4 Only) Does not affect functional integrity of board. Not expose conductors or disrupt fibers > allowed in 3.3.2.4 and 3.3.2.5, and do not reduce dielectric spacing below minimum. Shall be sufficient to completely remove resin from surface of the conductor interface (see Figure 3-16). 3.12 3.3.2.6 Solder Wicking/Plating Migration Solderability Solderable Annular Ring (External) Special Stiffener Stiffener Access Hole Structural Integrity 500 µm [19,685 µin] maximum 300 µm [11,811 µin] maximum 100 µm [3,937 µin] maximum Solderability testing and accelerated aging will be in accordance to J-STD-003. Meet requirements of Table 3-9. As specified in procurement documentation. When bonded with thermoset adhesive, the total area of voids shall not exceed 10% of the total area of stiffener. When bonded with other adhesive types, the total area of voids shall not exceed 1/3 of the total area of the stiffener. Shall not reduce external annular ring requirements below that specified in 3.4.2. Shall meet structural integrity requirements for thermally stressed (after solder float) evaluation coupons specified in 3.6.2. 3.6.2.7 3.3.2.12 3.3.6 3.4.2.1 3.10 3.3.2.13 3.4.2.3 3.6 DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INDUSTRY CONSENSUS REVIEW ONLY Surface Microvoids Not exceed 800 µm [31,500 µin] in longest dimension, bridge conductors, nor exceed 5% of printed area. Surface Mount Lands Defects along edge of land not >20%; internal Defects along edge of land not >30%; internal defects not >10%. defects not >20%. Thermal Shock Testing/evaluation according to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.7.2, with temp range between -65 to 125 °C [-85 to 257 °F]. Thermal Stress Testing Specimens conditioned by baking at 120 to 150 °C [248 to 302 °F] for six hours, depending on thickness and according to IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.8. After microsectioning, plated-through holes shall be examined for foil and plating at 100X ± 5%. Referee examinations made at 200X (± 5%). Transition Zone, Rigid Area to Imperfections in excess of that allowed shall be AABUS, or as so stated on the Flexible Area procurement documentation. Visual Finished product shall be examined, be of uniform quality, and conform to 3.3.1 through 3.3.9. There shall be no weave Acceptable if does not reduce conductor spacing Weave Exposure exposure on the printed below minimum. Workmanship board Shall be free of defects and of uniform quality - no visual of dirt, foreign matter, oil, fingerprints. 3.3.2.7 3.5.4.2 3.10.8 3.6.1 3.3.1.3 3.3 3.3.2.5 3.3.9