Land use practices in the Kimbe bay catchment
Transcription
Land use practices in the Kimbe bay catchment
Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of the coral reefs in Kimbe Bay Jon Brodie1 and Emre Turak2 1. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia 2. CORMEC, 1 r Francois Villon, 95000, Cergy, France Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Report No. 04/01 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Summary The report concludes that there is damage to coral reefs in Stettin Bay from sedimentation particularly in the inshore south western section of the Bay, from Kimbe Town to Walindi with less damage inshore further north of Walindi and to the east of Kimbe Town. Reefs further offshore are damaged but not primarily from land-based sources but via bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish damage. The greatest sources of above-natural sediment export to Stettin Bay are from logging and oil palm plantation development in the plant crop stage. Other sources exist such as gardens, mature oil palm plantations, urban and small crops but these are of lesser significance. Natural sources of sediment to the Bay include episodic catastrophic events such as landslides and volcanic eruptions and associated lava/ash flows but the effects of these will also have been exacerbated by deforestation and agricultural development. Sediment exports associated with logging will have peaked in the 1980s, the peak logging period, and be now falling with the reduction of logging activity in the Stettin Bay catchment. Oil palm new development and replanting continues and is now a large source. There is no clear evidence that nutrients (specifically nitrogen) runoff is causing problems but any such problems may be masked by the more acute damage caused by sedimentation. A monitoring program to measure loads of sediments and nutrients entering Kimbe Bay from different land uses could assist in resolving this issue. The reefs being damaged from sedimentation are fortunately not the premier dive sites for tourism but are important parts of the coral reef biodiversity of the Bay. Given it is difficult to implement management in the logging industry, assistance should be given to the Oil Palm industry to help manage new developments focussing on the plant stage of development as well as attempting to improve environmental management in logging. • Coastal reefs were surveyed at 16 locations including 29 sites in Stettin Bay in late November early December 2003, in order to assess current status and possible effects from land runoff. • With the exception of one, all reefs showed varying degrees of damage and degradation. Coastal and near shore reefs showed the maximum amount of degradation. The main causes appeared to be; coral bleaching, crown of thorns starfish and siltation. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page i Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 • Highest level of degradation appears to be in the Southwest corner of the bay, on coastal and nearshore reefs from Kimbe to Numondo. Reefs along the west coast of the bay showed lesser degradation and reefs at the East around Hoskins peninsula showed the least degradation. • On the heavily degraded coastal and nearshore reefs fine sediment and silt smothered the surface of dead corals, possibly severely interfering with recruitment and hence the recovery capacity of the coral communities. • Further offshore where there was still coral mortality but none or low levels of silt, various age cohorts of coral recruits were apparent. • It is clear in our opinion that a number of inshore reefs in Kimbe Bay, particularly in the south-western section, have been severely damaged by sedimentation in recent times. The damage may be exacerbated by other factors such as bleaching and crownof-thorns starfish in a synergistic way. There is no clear evidence of nutrient enrichment effects, but these may be disguised by the mortality caused by sedimentation, bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish, and cannot be completely ruled out. • The area of clear damage from sedimentation is the area from the mouth of the Dagi River westward to Walindi and to a lesser extent from Walindi to Talasea. Reefs in most other areas of Stettin Bay have not been damaged by terrestrial sediment discharge although many of them have been damaged by other factors such as bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish. • The modelled estimates of sediment and nutrient loads reinforced by anecdotal and observational evidence suggest the most significant additional loads of sediment above natural originate from logging operations and the plant stage of oil palm plantation development. • A principal factor in the concentration of reef damage from sedimentation in the south west section of Kimbe Bay is the poor flushing, low wave action and generally still conditions in this area. As a result of this low energy regime sediment deposited on reefs remains for extended periods and is not removed by wave action as occurs in other parts of Kimbe Bay. • Sedimentation from land runoff is not the only threat to coral reef health in Kimbe Bay. In many other parts of Kimbe Bay damage from bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish were evident. At one site damage from a ship grounding was observed. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page ii Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Contents Page Summary ....................................................................................................................................i 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Kimbe Bay......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Stettin Bay ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Background.........................................................................................................................17 2.1 General land use status and history in Kimbe Bay Catchment Area............................................... 17 2.2 Potential runoff ‘pollutants’ from the land uses present in KBCA ................................................. 28 2.3 Potential modes of delivery............................................................................................................. 29 2.4 Habitat modification in wetlands, mangroves, streams & effects on marine fauna ........................ 30 2.5 Other impacts & potential impacts on marine ecosystems & synergism with land runoff ............. 33 3. Methodology .......................................................................................................................33 3.1 Land use information collection...................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Mapping .......................................................................................................................................... 33 3.3 Reef surveys .................................................................................................................................... 34 4. Marine survey results.........................................................................................................36 4.1 Community types ............................................................................................................................ 36 4.2 Status of reef biota........................................................................................................................... 41 4.3 Reef damage and sediment levels ................................................................................................... 44 5. Land use results..................................................................................................................48 5.1 Logging ........................................................................................................................................... 48 5.2 Oil palm........................................................................................................................................... 50 5.3 Copra ............................................................................................................................................... 54 5.4 Subsistence gardens......................................................................................................................... 55 5.5 Small crops...................................................................................................................................... 55 5.6 Sewage Treatment Plants ................................................................................................................ 56 5.7 Oil/Hydrocarbon storage ................................................................................................................. 56 5.8 Oil palm mills and refinery ............................................................................................................. 56 5.9 Natural sources of sediment ............................................................................................................ 57 6. Budgets/modelling ..............................................................................................................57 6.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 57 6.2 Model basis ..................................................................................................................................... 58 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page iii Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 6.3 Model calculations for suspended solids......................................................................................... 59 6.3.1 Logging................................................................................................................................................................. 59 6.3.2 Oil palm plantation planting stage ....................................................................................................................... 60 6.3.3 Oil palm plantation juvenile and mature stage..................................................................................................... 60 6.3.4 Oil palm smallholder juvenile and mature stage .................................................................................................. 60 6.3.5 Rainforest (including both primary and secondary forest) ................................................................................... 61 6.3.6 Gardens, small crops, copra................................................................................................................................. 61 6.3.7 Suspended sediments summary ............................................................................................................................. 62 6.4 Model calculations for nitrogen ...................................................................................................... 63 6.4.1 Logging................................................................................................................................................................. 63 6.4.2 Oil palm plantation planting................................................................................................................................. 63 6.4.3 Oil palm plantation mature................................................................................................................................... 63 6.4.4 Oil palm small holders mature ............................................................................................................................. 64 6.4.5 Forest.................................................................................................................................................................... 64 6.4.6 Gardens, small crops, copra................................................................................................................................. 64 6.4.7 Fertiliser losses..................................................................................................................................................... 64 6.4.8 Sewage STP discharges ........................................................................................................................................ 65 6.4.9 Septic and pit sewage systems............................................................................................................................... 65 6.4.10 Nitrogen summary............................................................................................................................................... 66 6.5 Sediment and nutrient losses from different land uses............................................................ 67 7. Conclusions .........................................................................................................................77 7.1 Overall............................................................................................................................................. 77 7.2 Likely loads/sources of SS, nutrients .............................................................................................. 77 7.3 Oceanographic factors..................................................................................................................... 78 7.4 Other reef damaging factors ............................................................................................................ 78 7.5 Effects of reef damage on Stettin Bay resources............................................................................. 78 8. Monitoring program options.............................................................................................82 8.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 82 8.2 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 82 8.2.1 Sources and loads ................................................................................................................................................. 82 8.2.2 Transport and exposure ........................................................................................................................................ 83 8.2.3 Biological effects .................................................................................................................................................. 83 8.3 Interpretation................................................................................................................................. 84 9. Recommendations ..............................................................................................................85 9.1 Logging practices ......................................................................................................................... 85 9.2 Land use practices in oil palm. ................................................................................................... 85 9.3 STPs ............................................................................................................................................... 86 9.4 Monitoring program ..................................................................................................................... 86 Acknowledgements & contributors ......................................................................................87 10. References .........................................................................................................................89 Appendix 1. The effect of land use on water quality and aquatic ecosystems ..................99 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page iv Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 1. Introduction The ‘Land use practices in the Kimbe Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of the marine ecosystems in the Bay’ project was established jointly by New Britain Palm Oil Limited (NBPOL) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC). Its objective was to investigate whether current land uses in the Kimbe Bay Catchment Area (KBCA) cause runoff of pollutants to the marine environment and, as a result, cause or contribute to the damage to marine ecosystems (particularly coral reefs) in Kimbe Bay . The project was commissioned as a result of previous reports (e.g Munday, 2003), which indicated coral damage within Kimbe Bay. The project was carried out by Jon Brodie, Principal Research Scientist, Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University and Emre Turak, independent consultant on coral reef studies, with the assistance of the large number of people noted in the Acknowledgements. 1.1 Kimbe Bay Kimbe Bay is a large bay on the north coast of New Britain Island (Figure 1) in the West New Britain Province of Papua New Guinea (PNG). The bay is approximately 120 km across and is divided into Stettin Bay in the west and Commodore Bay in the east (Figure 1). Extensive areas of coral reef occur in the Bay (Maragos, 1994; Turak and Aitsi, 2002) (Figure 2) which form the basis of a dive tourism business (based at Walindi Plantation Resort) and the resource base for local fishing industries. The KBCA is made up of two small rivers (Kapiura, Dagi) and a large number of small streams. Kimbe Bay is in latitude 5ºS and thus in the doldrums with a weak and variable wind climate. SE winds are common but the Bay is sheltered from these by the main longitudinal range of New Britain and they produce only minor waves in the available fetch. Ocean swells approach the bay from the NW at times but the SW of Stettin Bay is sheltered from these. The waves do break on the reefs and shores of eastern Stettin Bay on the Hoskins Peninsula and in Commodore Bay. Tidal range in the Bay is small – approximately one metre, and thus tidal currents are weak. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 1 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 1 Kimbe Bay Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 2 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 The bay is too far north to regularly experience cyclones but this can happen infrequently such as in Cyclone Justin in 1997. Unusual wind conditions such as from the NE occur occasionally and have been noted to pool warm water in the SW of the Bay and perhaps thus be responsible for coral bleaching in that area (Max Benjamin, pers. com.) Overall the bay is very calm with a low wave climate and weak wind and tidal generated current regime. River plumes from the major rivers entering the Bay are likely to dispense evenly in the Bay in low wind conditions as shown by the example from the Kapiura River (Figure 3), which discharges into Commodore Bay, observed from satellite images or with SE winds dispense to the west and north-west. Coriolis forces will also tend to drive river plumes to the west in Stettin bay but these forces are weak in this region. In the Bay plumes from the Dagi River are most likely to disperse offshore and into the SW and W of the Bay. The KBCA is made up of two small rivers (Kapiura, Dagi) and a large number of small streams covering an area of approximately 3000 km2. Geology and soils in the catchment are dominated by the presence of several active or recently active volcanoes (Figure 4). The landscape is active with visible landslips on the steeper slopes and active river channels. Rainfall is high (3000 – 4000 mm see Figure 5) and distinctly seasonal with monthly rainfall in the December to April period above 500 mm. The KBCA has a relatively large coastal plain and then the ranges and individual volcanic cones rise to 2000m around the rim of the watershed (Figure 6). The catchment was until recent times primarily forested with lowland and montane rainforest, coastal freshwater swamps of several types and coastal mangroves. Most of the KBCA has been logged (Figure 7), particularly in the period 1965 – 1990, although logging continues to the present day. The coastal plain and lower slopes of the range which forms the boundary of the KBCA has been gradually planted to oil palm since the 1960s. The total area of oil palm is now approximately 60,000 ha split between the plantations of NBPOL with 29,000 ha (Figure 8), Hargy Oil Palms Limited (HOPL) with 10,000 ha and smallholders with a total of approximately 18,000 ha (Ian Orrel, pers. com.). There are three active volcanoes in East Kimbe Bay, Mt Ulawana, Lolobau and Mt Pago and Turak and Aitsi (2002) stated that these will undoubtedly have an influence on coral (both in distribution and condition) and noted that the dark volcanic sand around two of the volcanoes appeared incompatible with coral growth. Mt Pago erupted on the 28 July 2002. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 3 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Given the time available for this preliminary assessment of the situation, the study focussed on Stettin Bay, the site of existing reports on reef degradation. Oceanic and physical conditions on the eastern side of Kimbe Bay (i.e. Commodore Bay) appear to be quite different to the west and extrapolation of the results of the current assessment to that area should be carried out with care. However it was considered that by studying the Stettin Bay Catchment Area (SBCA) and the reefs in Stettin Bay conclusions could be drawn that, with care, would be relevant to the whole of Kimbe Bay. Figure 2 Reefs of Kimbe Bay Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 4 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 3 River plume from the Kapiura River Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 5 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 1.2 Stettin Bay Stettin Bay (Figure 9) is largely composed of open water (scattered with patch reef) with depth of approximately 400 – 600m but also has a narrow shelf adjacent to the land with depths of less than 200m. Reefs in the Bay can be conveniently divided into three groups – (1) the fringing reefs adjacent to the coast (Figure 10), generally within 500m of the shore and in water depths of less than 50m (2) the barrier reefs generally just inshore of the 200m isobath and within about 10km of the coast (Figure 11) (3) the patch (atoll) reefs towards the centre of the Bay (Figure 12) rising out of deep (generally > 400m) water. Seagrass beds and algal meadows are located in shallow water (less than 10m) adjacent to the coast in parts of the Bay. Mangrove forests can be found in some islands close to the shore (Figure 13), especially in the SW section of the Bay, and fringing the shoreline in parts of the Bay (Sheaves, 2002). The Bay is also known for its megafauna including dugongs, orcas, pilot whales, sharks, tunas and billfish. The population of Stettin Bay is now 70,000, having risen quickly over the last three decades. The town and port of Kimbe lies on the coast on the southern shore of Stettin Bay and has a population of approximately 25,000. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 6 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 4 Active volcano (Mount Pago) in Kimbe Bay catchment Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 7 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 5 Stettin Bay catchments and rainfall Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 8 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 6 Kimbe Bay elevation and major rivers Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 9 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 7 Logged areas Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 10 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 8 NBPOL plantation areas Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 11 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 9 Stettin Bay Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 12 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 10 Fringing reefs near Walindi Figure 11 Barrier reefs near Hoskins Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 13 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 In recent years studies of the status of the reefs of Kimbe Bay have revealed loss of coral cover and reef degradation (Jones et al., 1999; 2000; Munday, 2000; 2003; Turak and Aitsi, 2002). This has been widely attributed to the effects of land runoff, crown of thorns starfish and coral bleaching (Jones et al., 2001 Munday, 2003; Selig et al., 2003; Wilkinson, 2002) with sedimentation caused by oil palm plantation runoff (Selig et al., 2003) coral bleaching over the last three years (Jones et al., 2001) and drought initiated erosion (Munday 2003) being specifically mentioned. Turak and Aitsi (2002) concluded that the whole of Kimbe Bay has coral reefs in good condition which support reef fish populations which are rich in coral diversity and very attractive to visitors. A number of coral reef studies carried out in Stettin Bay in the last ten years have drawn attention to the continual decline in reef health. Several bleaching events, crown of thorns starfish (COTS) predation, and increased sedimentation from land runoff have been cited as possible causes for this decline. Maragos (1994) and Turak and Aitsi (2002) noted the overall good health of reefs in western Kimbe Bay, despite bleaching at many sites. However Maragos (1994) did point out that some inshore reefs were exposed to heavy sedimentation as well as fishing pressure and Munday (2003) stated that coral mortality in the bay is related to reef position and that inshore reefs are more likely to experience significant impacts of terrestrial origin (logging, agriculture and natural erosion) as well as to suffer more substantially from coral bleaching. Jones et al., (2001) looking at the effects reef closure, noted from 1997 to 2000 a decrease in total hard and soft coral cover and an increase of total algae cover on 8 reefs on the western coast of Stettin Bay near Walindi resort and concluded that the decline in coral cover was largely due to a series of coral bleaching events in September 1998, April 1999 and March 2000. Munday (2003) reported a serious decline in the abundance of acroporid corals and coral-dwelling fishes in Kimbe Bay from 1996 to 2003. And noted that this decline was most severe on inshore reefs. He also listed coral bleaching, COTS and coastal sedimentation as possible causes for this decline. Turak and Aitsi (2002) reporting on surveys carried out at the eastern side of Kimbe Bay, noted high coral mortality in the western part of Commodore Bay due to active crown of thorns and, in the South, sedimentation on a length of fringing reef (restricted to the immediate coastal area) which they associated with development of oil palm plantations. In general Turak and Aitsi (2002) concluded that reefs in the Kimbe Bay were in Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 14 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 12 Patch (Atoll) reef Figure 13 Mangroves in south west Stettin Bay Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 15 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 good condition and showed little current evidence of natural or human associated stress. Volcanic activity is present in the area and may be the main cause of natural disturbance to coral reefs in the whole bay (Turak and Aitsi 2002). They also noted that the reef and coral communities in their study area appear to be primarily structured by volcanism. Oil palm plantations are seen by some as a threat to freshwater and estuarine fish fauna in the KBCA (Jenkins, 2000). Sheaves (unpublished- Mahonia supplied report) found the coastal habitats of Kimbe Bay to have high densities of fish suggesting a healthy ecosystem and (Beger et al., 2003) found a reduction in fish species on fringing reefs in the KBCA to be a result of both natural and anthropogenic processes. Jenkins (2000) found elevated river temperatures, depressed pH, increased turbidity and high algal counts in one stream in an oil palm area and attributed this to irrigation demands and nitrogenous fertiliser leaching. However with an average rainfall up to 4m (see introduction) irrigation is not practised in oil palm and in his assessment of mangroves systems Sheaves (unpublished- Mahonia supplied report) found no apparent evidence of contamination. The oil palm industry in general in PNG is seen by one author as a threat to social and environmental values (Anderson, 2003). Huber (1994) in his general review of the status of PNG coral reefs notes that large-scale agricultural projects for oil palm, copra and rubber have contributed to increased sediment loads on downstream coral reefs. He also notes that urban drift and increasing coastal population have contributed to soil erosion from intensified subsistence and market gardening thus contributing to the sedimentation problems. Turak and Aitsi (2002) believed that good management of potential land based threats can protect these reefs for the future. The objectives of the ‘Land use practices in the Kimbe Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of the marine ecosystems in the Bay’ project are as follows: 1. Provide an assessment of land use practices in the Kimbe Bay Catchment Area by inspection and assess their potential to deliver pollutants to the marine environment. 2. Assess the condition of reefs in Kimbe Bay in relation to their potential exposure to landsourced pollutants. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 16 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 3. Use the western part of Kimbe Bay i.e. Stettin Bay as a focussed study area. 4. Provide advice on the design of further long-term studies including monitoring. 5. Provide advice on changes in land use practices and land use management which could reduce pollutant discharge to the marine environment. 2. Background 2.1 General land use status and history in Kimbe Bay Catchment Area (KBCA) The information in this section was gathered during the 18 days spent by the authors in Kimbe Bay from written material (reports, records) and through interview with relevant people. It should be used as only a guide to this type of statistics and subject to further refinement and correction as better data and estimates become available. The catchment area of Kimbe Bay (KBCA) is made up of two small rivers (Kapiura, Dagi) and a large number of small streams. The Stettin Bay catchment area (SBCA) was chosen for focussed study of land export of sediments and nutrients and reef damage. SBCA is defined in this study to include individual catchments from the Golo River in the east to Lake Dakataua in the north west, including the Golo, Gavuvu, Tapipu, Ko, Ganuka, Dagi catchments and the many small catchments on the eastern side of the Willaumez Peninsula with total area estimated to be approximately 75,000 ha (Keu, 2003 estimates ‘more than 70,000 ha’ for this basin). The Kapiura and Kulu Rivers also drain country behind (ie to the south of) Stettin Bay but discharge to other bays, the Kapiura to Commodore Bay and the Kulu to Riebeck Bay (Figure 1). Geology and soils in the catchment are dominated by the presence of several active or recently active volcanoes e.g. Mt. Pago (Figure 4). The soils are young, either unweathered or with low/moderate weathering, with low clay content but some allophane and halloysite (Bleeker, 1983). Typical of tropical rainforest, soils have low nutrient status overall, with significant, for example, nitrogen content only present in the top five cm, falling rapidly to very low content by 500 cm (Bleeker and Healy, 1980; Bleeker, 1983; Keu, 2003)(Table 4). Inceptisols with medium nutrient content are also common in PNG and specifically in the Kimbe region. The landscape is active with visible landslips on the steeper slopes and active river channels. Rainfall is high (2881 - 4224mm, Figure 5). The Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 17 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 catchment was until recent times primarily forested with lowland and montane rainforest, coastal freshwater swamps of several types (including sago palm swamps) and coastal mangroves. Much of the Kimbe Bay region has been logged, mostly since 1961. Anecdotal records (Mark Tegal pers. com.) suggest that 10,000 cubic metres per month (cmm) of timber was extracted in the period 1961 to 1973 and 20,000 cmm in the period 1973 to 1990 from the Kimbe Bay region and the Kulu catchment (Figure 14). This translates into approximately 400 ha of worked forest per month from 1961 to 1973 (4800 ha per year) and 800 ha from 1973 to 1990 (9600 ha per year). In the period since 1990 logging activity has fallen substantially with current rates of approximately 3,500 cmm, equivalent to 1700 ha per year. Figure 14 Progressive area of logging in PNG (from Bun et al., 2004) Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 18 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Our initial estimates of logging in the SBCA were that the total logging areas in the SBCA were about one quarter those of the whole Kimbe Bay region i.e 1200 ha/year from 1961 to 1973, 2400 ha/year from 1973 to 1990 and 400 ha/year from 1990 to 2003. This gives a total logged area of 56,000 ha over the last 30 years, 75% of the catchment area. A more detailed analysis of logging activity was carried out by Simon Lord (NBPOL) based on volumes of logs harvested and exported by the Stettin Bay Lumber Company (SBLC) in the period 1999 – 2002 obtained from the Dami Forestry Office (Table 1). This suggests, based on 30 cubic metres of log per hectare, that SBLC have been actively logging approximately 3,191 – 4,263 (mean 3500) hectares per annum in undulating terrain. This figure is obviously greatly in excess of the original estimate of 400 hectares/year. Lord suggests that these figures, combined with the estimates for the period before 1999 based on Tegal (see above), give a logging history for the SBCA as follows: 1961-73 = 12 year x 1200 = 14,400 ha 1973-90 = 17 years x 2400 = 40,800 ha 1990-2000 = 10 years x 400 = 4,000 ha 2001 – 04 = 4 years x 3500 = 14,000 ha totalling 72,800 ha which represents 100% of the catchment area. However logging by the SBLC is certainly not only occurring in the SBCA and the estimates of 3,500 hectares per year in the 1999 – 2003 period are an over-estimate of the logging occurring in the SBCA. Table 1 Total SBLC harvest SBLC - Volume of logs harvested & exported 1999-2002 1999 2000 2001 2002 TTL Volume logs harvested (c. metres) 117,947 95,761 95,735 127,910 TTL Volume logs exported (c. metres) 82,776 62,770 69,686 82,867 Source: Dami Forests Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 19 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 To try and get better logging figures for just the SBCA and thus separate this figure from logging occurring in other parts of the Kimbe region outside of the SBCA, Walain Ulaiwi (The Nature Conservancy) carried out a more detailed analysis. Logging data from the Stettin Bay Lumber Company (SBLC) for the years 2001 – 2004 inclusive within the SBCA were collated and are shown in Table 2. The cutting areas listed Amelei/Kaskas Umsipel; Manseng; KorokoManseng; Amelei/Mendrip Umipeli; Kulu Dagi; Avit/Opun; Marapu; Bunga Kulu Dagi; Koroko/Manseng; Gimomi K. Manseng; Gimoni Oga; Gimoni; Gimoni/Marapu; Ania Kapiura are those identified by Ulaiwi to lie mostly within the SBCA. Logging in the SBCA provides only a proportion of the logging carried out by the SBLC, approximately one half in 2001 and 2002 as can be seen by comparing Table 2 (SBCA logging) with Table 1 (total SBLC harvest). Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 20 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Table 2 SBLC monthly and yearly production (cubic metres) in Stettin Bay Catchment Area, 2001- 2004. March April May 1497 Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 3140 4772 1795 3747 3695 4772 6794 4208 11002 3465 1795 4810 1301 2111 3747 4740 3758 8498 3695 3695 3332 7027 3204 417 3621 4095 2346 6441 48495 5215 5364 1678 5216 5364 2931 2931 39703 8565 19822 8565 19822 21273 2385 1497 4000(est) 4000(est) 1470 2624 0 1975 2385 357 0 1385 1852 0 1437 1826 0 2468 1635 2624 504 1975 3140 5870 562 6432 2047 762 3983 2793 2001 Not available Aug. 1470 2003 2002 July Not available 12550 June 357 2121 3237 3263 4103 2551 3851 4269 3779 4745 2793 4899 6252 3465 2450 2121 2450 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research 3851 4269 3779 4899 6252 Total 53010 1678 17617 17617 Unavailable Feb. Unavailable Jan. 8725 Nil production Year 2004 Cutting Area Amelei/Kaskas Umsipel Manseng Koroko Manseng Amelei/Mendip Umipeli Kulu Gagi Avit/Opun 2001 Total Kulu Dagi Marapu 2002 Total Marapu Bunga Kuku Dagi Bunga Koroko/Manseng Gimomi K. Manseng Gimoni Oga 2003 Total Gimomi K. Manseng Gimomi Gimomi/Marapu Ania Kapiura Various 2004 Total 5000(est) 5000(est) 83652 Page 21 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Approximately 30 cubic metres of timber are extracted per hectare of logged forest in New Britain (Mark Tegal, pers. com.) and the timber volumes in Table 1 thus translate to the following logged areas in Table 3. Table 3 Area logged 2001 – 2004 Year Cubic metres harvest Hectares logged estimate 2001 53010 1767 2002 48495 1616 2003 39703 1323 2004 83625 2788 Mean of 4 years 1874 However inspection of Ulaiwi’s figures also suggests that some of the cutting areas listed are outside of the SBCA e.g. Kulu Dagi and Ania Kapiura and that the mean figure of 1900 ha in the period 2001 – 2004 may also be an overestimate of SBCA logging. Given the uncertainty in the logging data for the SBCA (with three estimates for recent years being 400, 1800 and 3500 ha/year) modelling will be based on the 1800 ha/year figure but recognizing that this is likely an overestimate. On these estimates the cumulative rate of logging in the SBCA would be: 1961-73 = 12 year x 1200 = 14,400 1973-90 = 17 years x 2400 = 40,800 1990-2000 = 10 years x 400 = 4,000 2001 – 04 = 4 years x 1800 = 7,200 totalling 66,400 ha which represents 87% of the catchment area. Logging concession areas are shown in Figure 15. Almost all logging for primarily timber extraction purposes was selective with specific species and types targeted. In the period 1985 to 1994 about 2000 ha was clear felled. Logging was also carried out before the establishment of cash crops but this, of course, involved clear felling. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 22 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 In 1987 Judge Thomas Barnett’s commission of Enquiry into the Papua New Guinean Forestry Sector (1987-1989) (Barnett (1989) found a large number of environmentally damaging practices. Largely as a result The Papua New guinea logging code of practice (1996) was introduced in 1997 but unfortunately even today many logging operation do not adhere to this code of practice. For example Forests monitor and ICRAF (Individual and Community Rights Advocacy Forum Inc.(1999) case study of logging operation in Vanimo timber area (Sandaun Province, PNG) showed 14 out of the 24 Key criteria to be totally ignored. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 23 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 15 Logging concession areas Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 24 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Considerable areas of the coastal plain and lower slopes of the range which forms the boundary of the KBCA has been gradually planted to oil palm (Figure 8) since the late 1960s. The total area of oil palm is now approximately 60,000 ha split between the plantations of NBPOL with 29,000 ha, Hargi PL with 10,000 ha and smallholders with a total of approximately 18,000 ha (Ian Orrel, pers. com.). From analysis of recent Landsat images Selig et al. (2003) estimate plantations to cover 86,808 ha in the Kimbe Bay region but this includes the catchment of the Kulu River and the western side of the Willaumez Peninsula and also copra plantations which make up the difference to the 60,000 ha estimate. In the SBCA NBPOL has (very) approximately 13,000 ha and small holders may have 11,000 ha. NBPOL plantation areas are shown on Figure 8. As the oil palm gets taller it reaches a height where it is no longer practically possible to harvest the fruit (cutting the fruit is manual) and the palms at this stage are cut and replanting occurs. The average age for this process is 18 - 20 years. Thus in a mature plantation region such as Kimbe Bay both development of new plantations (from copra plantations (Figure 16) or primary or secondary forest areas (Figure 17) and replanting of old oil palm plantations (Figure 18) are occurring simultaneously. It is estimated that approximately 1,500 ha/year of new and replant oil palm is being planted each year by NBPOL (current for 2003). This figure would have been less in the first 20 years of development in Kimbe Bay before replanting commenced. Assuming a figure of 800 ha/year of new plantings gives us the total 29,000 ha of NBPOL plantations over 36 years. In the SBCA an estimate will give a current planting rate (new and replant) of 650 ha/year. Considerable areas of cocoa were observed in the KBCA but no figure could be obtained for total area. Other small cash crops include vanilla and remnants of the once extensive copra plantations. Fruit and vegetables (bananas, sweet potato, cassava, taro, pawpaw) are grown for local markets and for subsistence domestic use. Population is now approximately 70,000 (see earlier) having risen quickly over the last three decades. The town and port of Kimbe lies on the coast on the southern shore of Stettin Bay and has a population of approximately 25,000. Two solid waste disposal sites have been in use serving Kimbe town in recent times, one at Wandoro used for the last 20 years and one at Dagi in use for the last year. The sites are used for waste from Kimbe but no separation of Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 25 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 waste is performed. The current system serves 4,000 houses, 200 businesses, 32 restaurants and local schools and the hospital. Hospital medical waste is disposed of near the hospital in Sandermo Creek. Of the approximately 4000 houses in Kimbe town 60-70% are served by septic systems and the remainder (1,200 -1,600 by the Sewage Treatment Plant (STP). The STP east of the town consists of two sequential aerobic lagoons with no pre-treatment before the first lagoon. Discharge from the second lagoon (stocked with Tilapia sp fish) flows immediately to a drain and then about 150m to the sea. The STP serves about 1,500 houses, the high school and the hospital for an equivalent population of about 9,000. Figure 16 Oil palm development on old copra lands Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 26 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 17 Oil palm development on forest lands Figure 18 Oil palm replanting on old oil palm plantations (Togulo) Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 27 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 2.2 Potential runoff ‘pollutants’ from the land uses present in KBCA Soil erosion, sediment production and export to the sea are natural processes and will have been occurring in the Kimbe Bay area long before commercial logging, oil palm plantation development and commercial cropping began. However modern logging, cropping development, urban development and road construction increase erosion rates and sediment inputs to streams, and hence the ocean, dramatically above the natural background rate. The principal contaminants likely to be increased over natural from the land use activities in the SBCA are suspended sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus and litter. Suspended sediment is mobilised through soil erosion and will have increased due to soil exposure during logging (particularly on roads, log dragging/skidding and loading and operations areas), cropping (particularly on roads, in the soil preparation, planting and replanting stage and by stream bank erosion) and gardening (also particularly in the preparation and planting stage). Some loss of landscape ability to trap sediments will also have occurred through the loss of riparian vegetation and wetlands associated with agricultural, urban and industrial development. Nitrogen and phosphorus compounds will also be lost at increased rates due to increased soil erosion and reduced trapping. This increased nutrient load will primarily be present as the particulate forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. Nitrogen and phosphorus content of surface soils of various land uses in the SBCA have been reported by Keu (2003) and reproduced in Table 4 (summarised from Table 5.0 in Keu, 2003). Table 4 Nitrogen and phosphorus content of SBCA soils (from Keu, 2003) Land use Total P % Total N % Range Mean Range Mean Rainforest 0.037-0.241 0.118 0.52-0.80 0.65 Food garden 0.224-0.404 0.302 0.61-0.94 0.79 Village oil palm 0.194-0.286 0.246 0.45-0.60 0.52 Plantation oil palm 0.152-0.359 0.224 0.27-0.51 0.38 (mechanised) Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 28 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figures from soil surveys of all 29,000 ha of NBPOL oil palm plantings give Total N as 0.33% (mean ) with a range 0.19-0.65. and P (Olsen method of extraction) as <0.1% Additional nitrogen will be lost from fertiliser application on crops. Nitrogen is used on oil palms in plantation cultivation at about 100 kg/ha/year and as in many crop systems up to 50% losses of applied nitrogenous fertiliser may occur (Nelson, 2003). Recent research in Kimbe suggests that approximately 20 kg/ha/year of N is lost by leaching below the root zone of the palm (ie at 1.5m) (Nelson, 2003). Phosphorus fertiliser is not generally applied in oil palm cultivation in the SBCA except for a small quantity at replanting (180 kg / ha) and thus will not represent an large addition source of phosphorus export. Nitrogen and phosphorus compounds will also be present in the sewage treatment plant (STP) effluent from the plant in Kimbe and from septic system effluent drainage throughout the region. A proportion of the septic effluent is likely to reach streams or the ocean directly through subsurface water flows. Their is some pesticide usage in the KBCA primarily of the herbicides glyphosate and gramoxone but these pesticides in the quantities used and given their biodegradability capacity pose little threat of reaching the marine environment in significant quantities. Litter is likely to be a noticeable issue especially near Kimbe town and possibly from the waste disposal facilities. The area affected is likely to be relatively small and restricted to areas near human habitation. 2.3 Potential modes of delivery Material will be delivered to the marine environment from the land in the SBCA through surface runoff via rivers and streams and through subsurface flows either indirectly via streams or directly to the ocean. Subsurface flows will only transport material in solution such as nitrate and soluble pesticides. There is visible evidence of direct discharge of groundwater to the ocean in the Talasea area. Most of the loads of materials in overland flow will occur during the largest flow events. This is similar to rivers worldwide (Walling and Webb, 1985) as in these events concentrations peak during the period of greatest water flow. In addition this period of high river flow will Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 29 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 provide the minimum trapping of dissolved and suspended material in the catchment and the maximum dispersal in the marine environment. Flood plumes from rivers such as the Dagi will transport material towards the centre of Stettin Bay. Most suspended sediments and other particulate matter will be deposited close to the coast and material transported well offshore will be dissolved eg nitrate or colloidal. Biological activity in the river plume will convert land-supplied nutrients to phytoplankton and bacteria and these will also travel well offshore (Devlin et al., 2001). Small streams will not have the capacity to carry material offshore and loads from these systems will be retained close to the coast. With catchment clearing and ‘hardening’ i.e. formation of surface conditions with no infiltration capacity – roads, compacted soils, concrete, houses, and increased drainage less infiltration (and often evapo-transpiration) occurs and greater surface water runoff results. With higher runoff comes increased stream volumes and velocities and greater levels of gully and bank erosion. 2.4 Habitat modification in coastal wetlands, mangroves, streams & effects on marine fauna The natural vegetation on river banks and floodplains including riparian vegetation, freshwater wetlands and mangroves, plays an important role in trapping material transported down rivers and preventing much of the material reaching coastal waters. These vegetation communities are normally heavily disturbed in the development of land for agriculture, being cleared, drained and hydro logically modified. The communities are also important habitat for estuarine and marine species significant in coastal fisheries and especially as juvenile habitat. Widespread removal of riparian and wetland vegetation has occurred in the Stettin Bay catchment with oil palm, copra and small crops being planted up to the streambank in many cases (e.g. Figure 19) and to some extent in wetlands. Newer oil palm plantation developments have retained significant areas of riparian buffer zone e.g. in Figure 20 on Hark Creek. An assessment of the state of riparian areas along a number of streams within palm growing areas has recently been carried out by NBPOL and riparian width, type of vegetation and land use quantified. The results are listed in Table 5. Many riparian areas have a significant component of gardens which negates some of the protective value of the riparian strip. However most areas surveyed did have oil palm development set back some distance from the stream. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 30 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Quantification of the effects on loads to the marine environment of the removal of riparian communities is difficult but estimates can be made and have been used in the model in Section 5. Figure 19 Streambank erosion Hark Creek Figure 20 Riparian buffer re-established Ru Creek Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 31 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Table 5 State of riparian areas in the Lameki and Ganuka oil palm plantation areas Other Residential Small holders Small holders mature Vegetation Young Areas Cash crop OP Tall 32.2m 18.9m 42º N-O O-P P-Q Q-R R-S A-B B-C C-D D-E E-F F-G G-H H-I I-J J-K K-L L-M 27 25 25 40 15 5 5 5 2 5 5 20 30 20 20 15 10 20 10 5 10 5 30 20 30 5 26.4m 2.8m 30º 13 10 16 1 13 12 7 7 6 10 7 8 5 5 5 5 130m 7.5m 15º 20º 40º 37º 80º 30º 2 2 5 5 4 6 3 3 10 10 30 3 5 2 5 3 10 18 20 35 50 27 27 30 67 30 40 27 70 12.2 2.6 35.3 4.2 3.9 4.3 31.8 5.8 60º 28º 25º 20º 15º 6 10 5 6 5 125 180 240 260 125 200 400 2 4 3 3 2 5 13 40 20 50 10 50 40 20 20 60 40 60 Trees 80 5 20 20 10 25 15 15 10 5 6 10 5 Trees 3 Abandone d in use 2 25º 27º 24º 80º 50º 30º 34º 40º 45º 27º 60º 65º Garden 5 short 45m 30º 36 15 17 17 22 17 22 17 10 15 22 17 Garden 80 n2-n3 150 25 15 20 10 20 30 30 15 18 35 20 grass 3 45 grass 2 Slope Average 5 n1-n2 B-C C-D D-E E-F F-G G-H H-I I-J J-K K-L L-M M-N Average Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R Ganuka R 230 230m Average 1112-13A 1112-13A 1112-13A 1112-13A 1112-13A 30º River A-B Average Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Lameki R Zone Areas Water course Dagi R 20 25 20 10 10 25 2 20 10 20 16 20 5 5 15 5 5 20 10 25 45 25 40 50 50 6 12 42 5 2 2 5 5 3 3 4 6 4 5 6 7 25 13 10 90 75 70 50 88 48 30 40 22 8 25 25 5 48 2 5 5 10 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research 5 20 30 0.5 8 12 4 10 60 30 30 90 2 10 20 2 5 20 0.83 0.75 Page 32 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 2.5 Other impacts & potential impacts on marine ecosystems & synergism with land runoff A complication in any study to determine whether land runoff of contaminants from agricultural development is damaging coastal reefs is that coral reefs are subject to a range of impacts besides possible pollution. Currently the major anthropogenic impacts on reefs worldwide are associated with global climate change and coral bleaching; destructive fishing methods; outbreaks of the coral-eating crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci); shipping impacts (oil spills, groundings, anti-fouling paint impacts); coral diseases; as well as pollution from terrestrial runoff (McClanahan, 2002). ‘Natural’ impacts may also occur such as cyclone damage and volcanic activity damage and natural sedimentation events associated with landslides. Determining which of the impacts is the principal cause of a damaged reef is difficult. The impacts also occur synergistically. Current theory holds that many water quality impacts are the result of an acute mortality caused by, for example, bleaching, followed by lack of reef and coral recovery caused by chronic water quality degradation (Kinsey, 1988; Wolanski et al., 2003; Fabricius et al., 2003, Fabricius, 2005). Such synergisms are quite likely in parts of Kimbe Bay (the south west area particularly) where acute damage from bleaching and crownof-thorns starfish are combined with chronic poor water quality and sedimentation. 3. Methodology 3.1 Land use information collection Information on land use was collected through interview with personnel associated with the different industries and land uses on the SBCA including logging, saw mills, oil palm plantations, smallholder oil palm, oil palm research workers, fishing, local government and tourism. Where possible written reports were accessed and, whatever their status, these are cited in the report and listed in the references. 3.2 Mapping Geographical information used in the report and to prepare the maps included was provided by NBPOL (Severina Betitis), TNC (Shannon Seeto) and the Oil Palm Industry Corporation (OPIC) (Frank Lewis). Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 33 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 3.3 Reef surveys The first objective of the surveys was to establish both the seaward and along-the-coast extent of influence of land based sources of sedimentation as well as recording all possible types of impacts on the coral reefs within this zone. Based on the bathymetry and associated probable hydrodynamic profile in addition to distance from shore and potential maximum loads of rivers flowing into the bay, the extent of influence was assumed to be as far as the 200 m depth contour. This is the edge of the coastal shelf area and reefs beyond that are in deep water. Sixteen reefs were surveyed (Figure 21), 13 of them at two depths making a total of 29 sites. This included 7 coastal fringing reefs, 3 mid shelf reefs, 5 shelf edge (outershelf) reefs and one offshore patch (semi atoll) reef. In order to interpret level of impacts and how reefs in different parts of the bay vary in their susceptibility and capacity for recovery, the main reef coral community types were described. Survey methods for this are outlined in Turak and Aitsi (2002) and further detail can be found in DeVantier et al., (1998, 2000). The survey basically entailed site lists of coral species and their abundance. Large areas of reef can be surveyed in relatively limited times using this methodology. In addition for each species data was collected on levels of damage and size distribution. Site biological characteristics such as cover estimates of major benthos and physical characteristics such as reef structure and ranking of sediment levels were recorded. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used in Statistica software package to define the major community types present. The distance measure used was Squared Euclidean Distance and the clustering strategy was Wards Sum of Squares, after Done (1982), who demonstrated their effectiveness in defining recurrent assemblages within the present type of data set. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 34 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 13 N 10 Km 12 8 6 3 14 10 Stettin Bay Walindi Walindi 15 2 Hoskins Hoskins 4 1 9 11 7 5 16 Kimbi Kimbe Figure 21 Distribution of identified community types in Stettin Bay (colours linked to Figure 22) Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 35 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 4. Marine survey results As a result of surveys two main coral community types were recognized with each having two subtypes (Figure 22). In addition there is a third distinctive community found in a different type of habitat, though it is representative of only two reef locations and shows characteristics between the other two types (Table 6). There was a strong link between community type and reef status, particularly damage level and siltation rates. Moderately damaged coastal reefs with some silt High damage 1 3 A1 6 A 2 Very damaged coastal reefs with high silt 7 A2 16 5 Offshore reefs with low damage and no silt 8 14 B1 15 9 Offshore reefs with none to low damage and no silt Low damage B 11 12 B2 4 Coastal reefs with low to high damage and sand and silt C 10 13 0 200 400 600 Linkage Distance Figure 22 Dendrogram of cluster analysis that identifies two main community types with two subtypes each and an indistinct cluster of intermediate type. 4.1 Community types Community type A is characteristic of coastal and nearshore (Figure 21) reefs where branching Porites was relatively more common, as well as Astreopora and the fleshy algae Padina (Figures 23 and 24). A large colony of Plerogyra simplex was recorded in this community type (Figure 25). Acroporid coral were rare in this community type where dead hard coral cover was the highest (Figure 26) and silt levels high (Table 6). The large and hardy favid Diploastrea heliopora was most common on these reefs, though colonies were Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 36 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 mostly either severely damaged or dead (Figure 27). Hard coral species richness was relatively lower, especially in subtype A2 (Table 6). Community type B was found on mostly shelf edge and offshore reefs as well as one nearshore reef on Hoskins peninsula where the reef front dropped to clear well flushed deep water (Figure 21). Reefs in this group had lowest dead coral cover and lowest silt levels (Table 6). Pocilloporids and acroporids, particularly Anacropora and Acropora species were most common on reefs with this community type. The agaricid coral Pavona cactus in some locations formed extensive stands covering substantial tracts of reef. Coral species richness was high with subtype B2 having the highest value (Table 6). The main outstanding characteristic of tentative community type C was that the reef with this type appeared subjected to powerful surge from offshore swells as well as being relatively shallow with coarse terrigenous sand, perhaps of volcanic origin (Figure 21). They typically had characteristics somewhere in between types A and B. Though silt levels were relatively high and live hard coral cover low (Table 6), perhaps because of the wave action, shallow water areas were relatively cleaner and some new coral recruitment was visible. No particularity in terms of coral species richness and abundance, though Acropora diversity was higher than other coastal reefs. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 37 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Table 6 Physical and biological characteristics of sites found in two main and 5 sub community types. Community type Number of sites A A1 3 B A2 4 B1 3 B2 4 C C 2 Site Max. depth (m) Min. depth (m) Slope (degrees) Hard Substratum (%) 16 6 37 78 19 7 27 84 20 3 35 82 23 6 47 87 12 5 14 78 Benthos Hard coral (%) Soft Coral (%) Macro-algae (%) Turf-algae (%) Coralline algae (%) Dead coral (%) 11 1 13 22 5 33 12 3 2 22 10 35 32 2 1 12 13 13 28 7 4 13 13 11 10 3 2 15 8 23 Substratum Continuous pavement (%) Large blocks (%) Small blocks (%) Rubble (%) Sand (%) 58 12 8 16 7 68 10 6 5 11 63 10 8 12 7 73 8 6 11 4 53 13 13 8 15 Silt (rank 1-5) 3.0 3.0 1.2 1.3 3.0 28 23 30.0 29.8 4.0 4.0 2.8 2.5 121 158 8 30.3 3.5 2.5 150 Visibility (m) Water temperature Reef development (1-4) Exposure to waves (1-4) Average no. of species 7 8 30.2 30.3 3.7 3.7 1.5 1.7 131 73 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 38 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 23 Padina at Site 6 Figure 24 Padina at Site 1 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 39 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 25 Plerogyra simplex colony at Site 6 Figure 26 Dead fungid corals on Anacropora ruble at Site 6 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 40 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 27 Silt damaged Diploastrea heliopora at Site 2 4.2 Status of reef biota Zooxanthelate scleractinian corals formed the greatest part of coral biodiversity that was recorded and also was responsible of a large portion of bottom cover. No species of the azooxanthelate scleractinian the dendrophyllid genus Tubastrea was recorded. This was quite unusual, though very few Tubastrea was recorded on the eastern side of the bay during surveys in late 2002 (Turak and Aitsi, 2002). Non-scleractinian hard coral species records were also very low, in numbers as well as abundance. There was little of the fire coral Millepora. However this coral is quite susceptible to bleaching and may have been severely affected by the several bleaching events in the bay. There was very little of blue coral Helliopora and the organ pipe coral Tubipora musica. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 41 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 80 70 60 Percent cover 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 3 6 West coast mid shelf Coralline Algae 2 5 7 16 SW corner Coastal Turf Algae 8 14 15 4 Offshore and shelf edge Macro Algae 9 11 12 shelf edge and low damage 10 13 Sand & strong surge Soft Coral Figure 28 Percent cover of other major reef benthos grouped in community sub-types Overall soft coral diversity was low, though some genera were quite common and abundant at a limited number of sites. The most common were the alcyonid corals, in particular Sinularia sp. Clavularia was abundant at a couple of sites, where at one site they were observed to be spawning. Nephtheid diversity and abundance was low and xeniid’s were totally absent. With an exception of a couple of sites where there were a number of large colonies overall gorgonian fan coral diversity and abundance was low (Figure 28). Sponge diversity and abundance was overall moderate with some sites having higher abundance of particularly rope (or string) and tubular growth forms. Tridacnid giant clams numbers were very low and the larger species were never seen. Of the fleshy macro algae Padina was the most abundant at several sites. At some reef flat sites a number of seagrass species (Figure 29) were recorded, Enhalus (Figure 30) having the highest abundance score for one site. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 42 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 29 Seagrass at site 1 Figure 30 Enhalus sp seagrass at Site 5 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 43 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Interestingly two coastal reefs, one with coral community type A and most damaged of all reefs visited, and the other with type B and relatively clean, had the highest numbers of large fish including commercially targeted species. The shelf edge reefs furthest offshore also had relatively higher fish numbers and diversity. Midshelf and coastal reefs had low to moderate diversity. 4.3 Reef damage and sediment levels Overall damage levels were relatively high, for example in comparison to sites surveyed in east Kimbe Bay (Turak & Aitsi, 2002). Close to half the sites surveyed showed moderate to severe damage (Figure 31). However the visual evidence of damage to reefs in Stettin Bay (Figures 26, 27, 54) has been occurring over the last 10 to 15 years and is a result of several events, some acute, some chronic and some of them quite severe. As a result it was not possible to record total injury level to coral colonies. Since species of colonies that were totally killed, especially after a certain time usually cannot be identified. Therefore such mortality is severely underestimated in the graph in Figure 31. Increasing colony damage 1 0.8 0.7 Increasing site damage Proportion of species damaged 0.9 0.6 0.5 Serious damage 0.4 Moderate damage 0.3 Minor damage 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Average damage per species Figure 31 Levels of damage at survey sites Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 44 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 On the other hand percent cover estimates of dead coral, which has been killed in the not-toodistant past and could possibly be attributable to damage causing events, shows much clearer evidence and trends in reef degradation (Figure 32). Surveys reported in average ~ 40% of hard coral cover of which at the time of surveys in average about half was dead. Lowest live hard coral cover (avg. ~10%) and highest level of dead hard coral cover was found in coastal and midshelf reefs, particularly in the southwest corner of Stettin Bay (Figure 32). 80 70 5 60 Percent cover 40 3 30 2 20 1 10 Rank of silt levels 4 50 0 0 1 3 West coast mid shelf 6 2 5 7 16 SW corner Coastal Dead Hard Coral 8 14 15 Offshore and shelf edge Live Hard Coral 4 9 11 12 shelf edge and low damage 10 13 Sand & strong surge Silt / fine sediment Figure 32 Ranking of silt levels in relation to percent of live and dead coral cover. There was a strong positive relation between rank estimates of silt levels and dead hard coral cover (Figure 33). Offshore and shelfedge reefs with low silt levels had proportionally lower dead coral cover and midshelf and coastal reefs with high silt levels had proportionally high dead coral cover. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 45 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 5 2 16 4 13 R 2 = 0.6015 5 Silt level 3 3 1 6 10 2 7 11 8 9 15 1 14 12 4 0 20 40 60 Percent dead coral cover Figure 33 Silt ranking and percent dead coral cover. Numbers are sites that were surveyed There also appeared to be a difference in size class distribution of coral colonies between sites near and offshore, and community types (Figure 33). Highly damaged coastal reefs in the SW corner of Stettin Bay with community type A2 and high silt levels had proportionally more smaller colonies (<10cm) and less large colonies (>50cm). Medium size colonies (10-50 cm) were perhaps marginally lower than in other community types (Figure 34). This was somewhat similar for community type C. On the other hand all other community types (A1, B1 and B2) had a relatively lower proportion of small colonies and community types B1 and B2 had higher proportions of large colonies. Reefs near Kimbe Town (Site 5) showed widespread litter accumulation (Figure 35) probably reflecting a combination of stormwater discharge and discards from ships and boat traffic. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 46 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 10.2 Type C 10.1 13.2 13.1 12.2 12.1 11.2 11.1 Type B2 9.2 9.1 4.2 4.1 15 Type B1 14 8.2 8.1 16 5.1 5.1 Type A2 7.2 7.1 2.2 2.1 6.2 6.1 Type A1 3.2 3.1 1.2 1.1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Proportion of population >50 cm 10-50 cm <10 cm Figure 34 Proportion of size classes for each site grouped in community types Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 47 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 35 Litter on reef near Kimbe Town 5. Land use results 5.1 Logging Logging in the SBCA started in the coastal plain areas, moved to the lower slopes of the surrounding ranges and is now carried out in residual primary forest areas, in oil palm development areas and in plantation forest areas (Mark Tegal, pers. com.). In the 1990s major logging activity moved out of the SBCA to the south coast and other areas of West New Britain as shown in Figure 14 (adapted from Bun et al., 2004). Logging has been primarily selective. There are no soil erosion measurements or measured losses of suspended sediment from logging operations in the SBCA and estimates for modelling will have to use data from similar situations elsewhere. Logging, even selective logging as compared to clear felling, causes great increases in soil erosion in tropical forest areas compared to undisturbed forest (Douglas, 1999). The main sources of erosion are the logging roads (Figure 36), skid trails (the paths used by bull dozers Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 48 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 to drag logs to the road) and landings (or yardings), the log storage and loading areas (Sidle et al., 2004; Ziegler et al., 2000; Baharuddin et al., 1995; Rice, 1981; Motha et al., 2003). Roads act as linearly connected systems and large volumes of high velocity overland flow may travel down slope to stream networks. Traffic increases sedimentation on unpaved roads (Ziegler et al., 2001). Roads have a seven fold higher conveyancy efficiency than agricultural land in South East Asia and although were found to occupy only 0.5% of land, contributed the same sedimentation rates as agricultural land which occupied 12% of the catchment area (Ziegler et al., 2000). Over 60% of gully erosion and 67% of slump erosion in logged areas is due to roads (Rice, 1981). Figure 36 Steep newly formed roads in the Goruru area In Palawan (Philippines) erosion rates measured from cut forest plots were four times the rate from virgin forest and the rate from road surfaces was 240 times the virgin forest rate (Hodgson and Nixon, 1988; 2000). The suspended sediment load in streams in catchments with logging was 100 times that in the stream draining virgin forest. Suspended sediment loads increase dramatically in streams in logged areas compared to streams in undisturbed catchments. In California total suspended solids in a river increased from between 89 -212 % over natural in a six year period (1963-86) (Lewis, 1998). Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 49 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 After logging ceases remnant erosional landforms such as haulage road gullies, road culvert collapses and eroding skid trails continue to contribute to an above-natural sediment load (Chappell et al., 1999). In a study in a small catchment in Borneo (Malaysia) Chappell et al. (1999) measured suspended sediment fluxes of 1600 tonnes/km2/year during logging and in the first year post logging and 592 tonnes/km2/year six years after logging compared to 312 tonnes/km2/year in an undisturbed control catchment. Chappell et al. (2004) in a review of studies comparing logged catchments against controls in south-east and southern Asia reported the following ranges of control versus logged: 300/1600; 100/431; 54/2600; 70/1400 tonnes/km2/year i.e. increases of erosion in the range 4 – 50 times. Baharuddin et al., (1995) measured surface erosion on small plots on logging roads and skid trials in Malaysia. In the first year after logging soil losses were 1330 tonnes/km2/year from logged roads and 1010 tonnes/km2/year from skid trails but by the second year post-logging rates had dropped to 310 and 210 tonnes/km2/year respectively. Logging operations cause the construction of a large road and trail network. Sidle et al., (2004) found roads represented 3.2% by area of their study catchment in Malaysia, skid trails 6.5% and landings 1.5% for a total of 11%. Pinard et al., (2000) found skid trails covered 11.9% of a logging study area in Sabah. Similar figures (total 11.7%) had been found by Rice (1981) in Pacific Rim steeplands. In Papua New Guinea there are, on average, 122 linear metres of roads for every hectare of logging (i.e. 5% by area) excluding landings (Mark Tegal, pers. comm.). Logging may also exacerbate the occurrence of landslides. Although they are a feature of an unstable landscape such as in Kimbe, their frequency may be increased through landscape disturbance. In Oregon a total of 186 landslides were found after storm events in February 1996 and of these 114 were in logged areas. 68 were road-related and 3 originated in natural forest (Arial Landslide Survey, 1996). A case study in Vanimo, PNG showed sediment in streams to be a direct result of logging roads (Forests Monitor & ICRAF, 1999). 5.2 Oil palm Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) is the most productive crop of any of the vegetable oil producing crops producing between 10 and 35 tonnes of FFB and on average 3 tonnes of oil per ha per year (Corley, 2003) or 0.3 ha of land needed to produce one tonne of oil (0.3 ha/tonne). This Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 50 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 compares to other crops such as rapeseed (1.7 ha/tonne), sunflower (2.1 ha/tonne), soyabean (2.6 ha/tonne), coconut (3.0 ha/tonne) and cotton (5.4 ha/tonne) (Henson, 2003). The conversion of tropical forests to oil palm plantations has been the most widespread land use change in a number of SE Asian countries over the last 50 years including Malaysia and Indonesia but more recently PNG. Few studies have been published on the effects of the conversion of tropical forests to oil palm plantations but impacts on soil erosion and water ecosystems are likely to be much greater on slopes greater than 20% (Sidle, 2002). Sidle (2002) notes that ‘most impacts appear to occur during the land clearance process and in the initial 2-3 years following plantation establishment, with much rapid storm runoff and sediment produced on roads and connected disturbed areas (e.g. terrace cuts) within the plantation’. A study of the conversion of forest land to oil palm plantation in one case and to cocoa in the second in Pahang, Malaysia is described in Douglas (1999) using data from the Malaysian Drainage and Irrigation Department. Douglas notes: ‘Predictable, clear-felling and replacing the forest cover with cocoa and oil palm resulted in marked increases in stream sediment loads. In catchment B (selected for oil palm), clearfelling was followed by an annual sediment load of 414 tonnes/km2/year in contrast with values of 20, 25 and 39 tonnes/km2/year for the three preceding years. Substantial increases were also recorded in catchment A (selected for cocoa), ranging from 10 to 35 tonnes/km2/year prior to logging but rising to 50 and 125 tonnes/km2/year following clearfelling. Clearfelling was immediately followed by the planting of cocoa and oil palm in catchments A and B, respectively. By the time the oil palms were two years old, sediment loads had returned to predevelopment levels reflecting the effectiveness of the ground cover crop that was established. In contrast, sediment levels in the catchment planted with cocoa had not returned to near predevelopment levels some three years after planting clearly indicating that the shade trees that were planted did not provide as effective a cover as do ground crops’. Keu (2003) determined average annual soil losses from different land uses in the SBCA using the Universal Soil Loss equation (USLE). The results are for hillslope erosion only and do not include gully and streambank components. The results do not also include periods of catastrophic loss during episodic floods or return interval above three years. The results are reproduced in Table 7 summarised from Table 17.0a, 17.0b and 17.0c in Keu (2003). Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 51 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Table 7 Estimated soil losses under different land uses (from Keu, 2003) Land use Average annual soil loss (tonnes/ha/year) Rainforest (Kulungi) Zero Rainforest (Kimbe) Zero Rainforest (Morokea) Zero Coconut plantation (Numondo) – some slope 2.81 Oil palm plantation (Numondo) – some slope 1.40 Oil palm plantation (Bebere) – low slope 0.70 Oil palm plantation (Mosa) – low slope 2.1 Village oil palm (Kulungi) – some slope 1.8 Food garden (Kimbe) – high slope 5.3 Food garden (Morokea) – lower slope 2.3 These losses are relatively low and may be compared to the measured losses in other tropical systems and from PNG cited in Keu (2003), Tables 19.0 and 20.0. The estimates of Keu (2003) do not include an analysis of the different potential losses in the plant stage of oil palm (bare earth, no canopy, Figure 37) versus the juvenile plantation stage (cover crop established but canopy not closed, Figure 38) versus mature plantation (canopy closed and some cover crop and trash retention on surface, Figure 39). As the focus of Keu’s study was sustainability within the plantation it also considers primarily losses from hillslope erosion and not drain, gully or stream bank erosion or catastrophic loss in major floods. In oil palm there are 50 linear metres of roads for every ha (2%) (NBPOL Standard policy on roads within plantations). Oil palm roads are surfaced two years after development NBPOL roads conform to the standards set out by the Norwegian standards (Akre, 2004). Most of the oil palm grown in the SBCA is grown on ‘coarse textured soils that are freely draining, have high hydraulic conductivity and are located in areas of high rainfall. Consequently nitrogen losses are likely to be very high due to one or a combination of leaching, surface run-off and denitrification.’ (Orrel, 2003). Fertiliser accounts for 60% of the fixed costs of oil palm production (Simon Lord and Ian Orrel, pers.com.) and thus efforts to make fertiliser use more efficient and minimise losses off-farm present powerful opportunities for both agronomic and environmental improved performance. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 52 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 37 Bare earth in oil palm development stage Figure 38 Juvenile oil palm Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 53 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 39 Mature oil palm plantation Significant nitrate concentrations above natural have been detected in the ground and surface waters within oil palm plantations in the KBCA (Nelson, 2003). The sites sampled included still surface water at Haella containing 0.03 mg/L NO3-N in the dry season and 1.12 mg/L in the wet, creek water at Haella containing 0.06 mg/L in the dry season and 0.43 mg/L in the wet, creek water at Dami containing 0.29 mg/L in the dry season and 0.26 mg/L in the wet and bore water at Garu with 1.34 mg/L in the dry season and 2.76 mg/L in the wet. None of these values are outrageously elevated but are indicative of some level of fertiliser contamination. 5.3 Copra Copra exists as residual plantation areas throughout the KBCA and SBCA but is being slowly replaced in many places by oil palm. Soil erosion from these established coconut areas are probably low with Keu (2003) estimating potential losses of 2.8 tonnes/ha/year from a plantation at Numondo – see Table 7 which can be compared to his estimate for mature oil palm of 1.4 t/ha/year. Inorganic fertilisers and pesticides are not commonly used on the plantations. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 54 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 5.4 Subsistence gardens Slash and burn shifting gardening has been practiced in the SBCA for many thousands of years. However recent population increases due to both increasing local indigenous population and settlement from other parts of PNG have sharply increased the area of gardens. Gardens are also being planted on much steeper slopes as flat land become scarce (due to increasing use of land for oil palm, other cash crops, urban and industrial development and roads) such as on the range behind Kimbe town (Figure 40). Soil erosion from garden areas may be considerable on steep slopes with Keu (2003) estimating potential losses of 5.3 tonnes/ha/year from a garden area at Kimbe – see Table 7. However gully erosion/ landslips are probably also common as can be seen in Figure 40 and soil loss from these events will be much higher than from the general hillslope losses estimated by Keu. Inorganic fertilisers and pesticides are not commonly used on the gardens. Figure 40 Eroded slopes and gardens behind Kimbe Town 5.5 Small crops The principal small cash crops observed were cocoa and vanilla. No estimates were available as to area but as both are grown as a small tree crop, cocoa directly and vanilla as a vine attached to and shaded by a small tree soil erosion will only be significant at planting. As grown in West New Britain both crops are minimal users of fertilisers and pesticides. Sidle Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 55 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 (2002) notes that ‘ the conversion of native forests to permanent agriculture and other plantations (e.g. coffee, rubber, fruit trees) has also created problems for soil and water conservation (in South-east Asia). …..Where crops are grown as a monoculture, soils are typically more susceptible to erosion compared to forest cover’. 5.6 Sewage Treatment Plants One small sewage treatment plant (STP) is located in Kimbe to the east of the town. The STP consists of two sequential aerobic lagoons with no pre-treatment before the first lagoon. Discharge from the second lagoon (stocked with Tilapia sp fish) flows immediately to a drain and then about 150m to the sea. The rest of the population in the catchment is served by septic or pit toilets. 5.7 Oil/Hydrocarbon storage Storage of hydrocarbon fuels occurs at the port of Kimbe with BP and Shell having storage facilities. The facilities are only partially bunded and present some risk of spillage to the marine environment. No overt oil pollution was observed in coastal waters adjacent to these facilities. 5.8 Oil palm mills and refinery Several oil palm mills occur in the Stettin bay catchment including Numundo, Kumbango and Mosa and one refinery at Kumbango all operated by NBPOL. While mills and refineries generate considerable organic waste, NBPOL facilities have advanced programs of waste treatment and recycling which minimise releases to the off-facility environment (Lord et al., 2002; 2003). One example of this is the composting of Empty Fruit Bunches (EFB) and Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) together to produce a fine humus-like compost suitable for spreading back on plantation fields (Lord et al., 2002). Similarly EFB and Palm Kernel Cake (PKC) have been composted to produce a nursery potting mix for use in the oil palm nurseries (Lord et al., 2003). However not all mills have been converted to this zero effluent discharge system yet. All water released from these mills is however subjected to checks and pollution control devises under the Government DEC regulation for water use and NBPOL’s own standards under ISO 14001 (1996). While mill effluent may still be a problem for freshwater habitats in streams it is unlikely to be a major threat to marine habitats. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 56 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 5.9 Natural sources of sediment Soil erosion, sediment production and export to the sea are natural processes. Erosion occurs across hillslopes, in gullies and on streambanks. These forms of erosion occur gradually in ‘normal’ weather conditions but catastrophic events such as cyclonic rain-driven floods, landslides and volcanic eruptions can cause massive soil loss in a short period. Landslides are a natural process on steep forested slopes in South-east Asia and PNG and may be relatively common (Day, 1980; Douglas, 1999). In normal conditions many observations and measurements have shown that soil losses from rainforested slopes are low (Sinun et al., 1992; Douglas, 1999). Areas of bare earth are uncommon and eroding gullies rare. The main source of sediment in rainforest streams is probably derived from eroding stream banks (Douglas, 1999). Large proportions of total river sediment loads are transported during severe storm events, for example, Hatch found that 57% of the sediment transported from a natural forest plot in Sarawak over a 12 month period was lost in a single month (cited in Douglas, 1999). Seismicity is a major landslide trigger and in PNG 40-67% of fluvial sediment discharge was derived from earthquake-induced landslides (Adams, 1980). Similarly Sheng (1990) showed that 88% of soil loss from a forest control plot occurred in six storms in studies in Thailand and many other similar case studies are reviewed in Douglas (1999). Kimbe Bay will be prone to such extreme events due to its active volcanoes, earthquakes, high rainfall, steep slopes and young, unconsolidated soils (Keefer, 1994). These episodic events in the KBCA will lead to enhanced runoff of sediment. Separating this natural pattern of periodically enhanced sediment input from increased sediment input due to logging and agricultural activities is difficult. 6. Budgets/modelling 6.1 Background Budget modelling is a valuable tool to estimate the patterns of delivery, catchment sources and relative amounts from different land uses of contaminants from a catchment area to the ocean. The models used can vary from sophisticated numerical models based on extensive water quality and land use information where available (see for example Alexander et al., 2002); to models based on catchment process information, land use data and limited direct Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 57 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 water quality data (see for example Brodie et al., 2003); to very simple models based on export coefficients for different land uses and essentially no water quality data (see for example Moss et al., 1993). In the case of SBCA only estimates of land use in any particular year are available, export coefficients for each land use are not available from local data but can be estimated from similar situations in comparable parts of the world and no reference water quality data is available. Under these circumstances the model becomes more of an example of what could be done with better data and the interpretation of the results of the modelling must be used in association with other data to have explanatory power. 6.2 Model basis For this report the SBCA has been modelled for 2003 for suspended solids and total nitrogen discharge to the ocean. The land uses in 2003 have been extracted from the information discussed in Section 2.3 and summarised in Table 8. Table 8 2003 land uses in the Stettin Bay catchment Land use Area (ha) Logging 1,900 Logged area in recovery 3,600 Oil palm plantation planting 650 Oil palm plantation mature 13,000 Oil palm small holder mature 11,000 Primary and secondary forest (some logged in past) 30,000 Gardens, small crops, copra 15,000 Total 76,550 A simple model is used which only assumes overall erosion rates, not individual rates for hillslope, gully and streambank. Nitrogen modelling uses soil analysis of %N with data from local soils, estimated fertiliser losses from known fertiliser application rates and human sewage calculated discharges. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 58 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 6.3 Model calculations for suspended solids 6.3.1 Logging The assumptions for logging operations are: In the current year: 1. 1,900 ha area per year (2003) 2. 10% of logged area is bare earth including roads, skid trails and yardings ie 190 ha (See Section 5.1 for 10% of area). 3. Erosion rates on gentle to moderate slopes on bare earth are 200 tonnes/ha/year (i.e. 2000 tonnes/km2/year for the whole logging area similar to values found by, for example Chappell et al., 1999). 4. Delivery ratio (ie proportion of eroded material which reaches the river mouth) is 0.7. This high delivery ration is justified by the shortness of the rivers and the intensity of major flow events (Chappell et al., 2004). Thus 38,000 tonnes per year of erosion (190 x 200tonnes /ha/year) and delivery to the ocean of 26,600 tonnes Recovery period: 1. Assume two year recovery to secondary forest status (e.g as in Baharuddin et al., 1995) 2. Thus 3,600 ha recovering on a rotational basis, 1,800 in first year of recovery and 1,800 ha in second year. 3. For first year of recovery (year after logging) assume 50 tonnes/ha erosion on the disturbed areas (old bare earth, 10% of logged area); for second year of recovery assume 30 tonnes/ha erosion on the disturbed area (estimates of erosion in postlogging situation from Baharuddin et al., 1995; Chappell et al., 2004) 4. Delivery ratio same as for logging (0.7) Thus in first year recovery soil loss is 1,800 x 0.1 x 50 = 9,000 tonnes. In second year of recovery soil loss is 1,800 x 0.1 x 30 = 5,400 tonnes. Total loss in recovering areas = 14,400 tonnes with delivery to ocean of 10,100 tonnes. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 59 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 6.3.2 Oil palm plantation planting stage Assumptions are: 1. 650 ha per year (2003) 2. Of the 650 ha approximately 32% is covered by logging debris pushed into windrows. (Fig 15 / Fig 18) leaving 68% primarily bare earth. Therefore bare earth total is 68% of 650 ha = 442 ha. This bare earth stage lasts for approximately six months and is the period of maximum risk of catastrophic soil loss (see Sidle, 2002; Douglas, 1999). 3. Erosion rates on gentle or no slope are 100 tonnes/ha/year giving six months erosion at this rate. 4. Second half of year is after considerable growth of the cover crop (Figures xc) and erosion rates in this period assumed to be 50 tonnes/ha/year on the non-windrow area. 5. Delivery ratio of 0.5 based on low slope land and more catchment trapping. Thus 22,100 tonnes per year of erosion (100 x 442 x 1/2) in the first 6 months and 11,000 tonnes in the second 6 months giving a total of 33,100 tonnes and delivery to the ocean of 15,000 tonnes 6.3.3 Oil palm plantation juvenile and mature stage Assumptions are: 1. 13,000 ha per year (2003) 2. Erosion rates on gentle or no slope are 6 tonnes/ha /year including streambank, gullies and floods 3. Delivery ratio of 0.1 based on low slope land and high rates of catchment trapping due to extensive ground cover and riparian buffer strips. Thus 78,000 tonnes per of erosion (6 x 13,000) and delivery to the ocean of 7,800 tonnes 6.3.4 Oil palm smallholder juvenile and mature stage Assumptions are: 1. 11,000 ha per year (2003) Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 60 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 2. Erosion rates on gentle or no slope are 4 tonnes/ha/year 3. Delivery ratio of 0.1 based on low slope land and high rates of catchment trapping due to extensive ground cover and riparian buffer strips. Thus 44,000 tonnes per year of erosion (4 x 11,000) and delivery to the ocean of 4,400 tonnes 6.3.5 Rainforest (including both primary and secondary forest) Assumptions are: 1. 31,400 ha per year (2003) 2. Erosion rates are 2 tonnes/ha/year including streambank, gully and flood erosion (i.e. 200 tonnes/km2/year which can be compared to values of 312 tonnes/km2/year in Chappell et al., 1999 and 300, 100, 54 and 70 tonnes/km2/year from 4 studies cited in Chappell et al., 2004) 3. Delivery ratio of 0.05 based high rates of catchment trapping due to forest cover and these areas being in back of the catchments Thus 62,800 tonnes per year of erosion (2 x 31,400) and delivery to the ocean of 3,140 tonnes. 6.3.6 Gardens, small crops, copra Assumptions are: 1. 15,000 ha per year (2003) 2. Erosion rates are 4 tonnes/ha/year including streambank, gully and flood erosion. 3. Delivery ratio of 0.2 based on moderate slopes and moderate trapping Thus 60,000 tonnes per year of erosion (4 x 15,000) and delivery to the ocean of 12,000 tonnes. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 61 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 6.3.7 Suspended sediments summary Table 9 Suspended sediment losses and discharge to the ocean Area (ha) Erosion in 2003 (tonnes) SS Discharge to ocean (tonnes) % of total SS discharge Logging 1,800 38,000 26,600 34% Post logging 3,600 14,400 10,080 13% Oil palm plantation planting 650 48,100 15,000 19% Oil palm plantation mature 13,000 78,000 7,800 10% Oil palm small holder mature 11,000 44,000 4,400 6% Primary and secondary forest 31,400 62,800 3,140 4% Gardens, small crops, copra 15,000 60,000 12,000 15% Total 76,450 345,300 79,020 Land use Logging Post logging Logging and post logging Oil palm plantation planting Oil palm cultivation Oil palm plantation mature Oil palm small holder Natural forest Natural forest Gardens, small crops, copra Gardens, small crops, copra a. b. Figure 41 a. SS delivery to ocean modelled from different land uses and practices b. Modelled SS delivery to ocean from individual land uses Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 62 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 It is also possible to make an estimate (albeit crude) of pre-development sediment loads from the catchment. If we assume the whole of the catchment ie 76,000 ha was exporting suspended sediment at the rate of present primary and secondary forest we obtain an estimate of 7,600 tonnes for the whole catchment in the period before say about 1900. Thus sediment loads have increased by about 8 times since then. This is a similar factor as found in many catchments worldwide (without major dams) due to the introduction of modern agricultural and urban development (Walling and Fang, 2003). 6.4 Model calculations for nitrogen 6.4.1 Logging Assumptions are: 1. 36,700 tonnes SS delivered to ocean from logging and logged recovery areas 2. Soil nitrogen content of 0.65% (Keu, 2003 for rainforest soils) Thus 0.65 x 36,700/100 = 240 tonnes N/year delivered to ocean 6.4.2 Oil palm plantation planting Assumptions are: 1. 15,000 tonnes SS delivered to ocean from new developments 2. Soil nitrogen content of 0.65% (Keu, 2003 for rainforest soils) Thus 0.65 x 15,000/100 = 98 tonnes N/year delivered to ocean 6.4.3 Oil palm plantation mature Assumptions are: 1. 7,800 tonnes SS delivered to ocean from mature plantations 2. Soil nitrogen content of 0.35% (Keu, 2003 gives 0.38% and recent NBPOL survey 0.33%) Thus 0.35 x 7,800/100 = 27 tonnes N/year delivered to ocean Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 63 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 6.4.4 Oil palm small holders mature Assumptions are: 1. 4,400 tonnes SS delivered to ocean from oil palm smallholders 2. Soil nitrogen content of 0.5% (Keu, 2003) Thus 0.5 x 4,400/100 = 22 tonnes N/year delivered to oceans 6.4.5 Forest Assumptions are: 1. 3140 tonnes SS delivered to ocean from logging areas 2. Soil nitrogen content of 0.65% (Keu, 2003) Thus 0.65 x 3140/100 = 20 tonnes N/year delivered to ocean 6.4.6 Gardens, small crops, copra Assumptions are: 1. 12,000 tonnes SS delivered to ocean from gardens etc 2. Soil nitrogen content of 0.8% (Keu, 2003) Thus 0.8 x 12,000/100 = 96 tonnes N/year delivered to ocean 6.4.7 Fertiliser losses Assumptions are: 1. 13,000 ha of plantation using 100 kg N/ha/year 2. 11,000 ha of small holder using 40 kg N/ha/year 3. 50% of fertiliser lost from field 4. 10% of applied fertiliser reaches ocean (from similar studies in north Queensland) Thus oil palm plantation usage is 1,300 tonnes and delivery to ocean of 130 tonnes. Small holder usage is 440 tonnes and delivery to ocean of 44 tonnes. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 64 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 6.4.8 Sewage STP discharges Assumptions are: 1. Kimbe STP treats sewage from approximately 9,000 residents who each excrete 5 kg of nitrogen per year to the STP i.e. total of 47 tonnes of N. 2. STP removes 33% of the N and delivers 67% of the N to ocean. Thus 31 tonnes of N discharged to ocean. 6.4.9 Septic and pit sewage systems Assumptions are: 1. 70,000 as per your earlier statement persons in Stettin Bay catchment not on STP. Each excretes 5 kg of N per year giving total of 350 tonnes of N. 2. With dispersed nature of much of the settlements good absorption and trapping in soil should occur and delivery ratio will be low, say 10%. Thus 35 tonnes of N discharged to the ocean. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 65 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 6.4.10 Nitrogen summary Table 10 Delivery of nitrogen to the ocean from various land uses Source Delivery of Delivery Land Delivery Delivery N to ocean % of total use of N to % of total lumped ocean (tonnes) (tonnes) Logging and 240 32 Logging 240 32 98 13 Oil palm 321 43 27 4 22 3 130 17 44 6 20 3 Natural 20 3 96 13 66 9 post logging Oil palm plantation planting Oil palm plantation mature Oil palm small holder mature Oil palm plantation fertiliser Oil palm small holder fertiliser Forest Forest Gardens, small 96 13 crops, copra Other crops Kimbe STP 31 4 Septic/pit 35 5 Sewage sewage Total 743 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research 743 Page 66 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Logging Oil palm Natural forest Gardens, small crops, copra Sewage Figure 42 Sources of nitrogen export to sea from various land uses 6.5 Sediment and nutrient losses from different land uses The modelling in Sections 6.3 and 6.4, observational evidence collected during November/ December 2003, anecdotal evidence and previous research (e.g. Keu, 2003) in total show that the largest sources of increased-over-natural suspended sediments export to Stettin Bay are logging and oil palm plantation development, particularly in the plant stage. Enhanced soil erosion and increased sediment exports from logging will have started in the 1950s, risen through the 1960s and 1970s, peaked in the 1980s and be declining through the 1990s and 2000s. Sediment exports from oil palm plantation development, including small holder development, will have started in the 1960s, reached a plateau in the 1970s and remained relatively stable through to the present as new land is developed for oil palm and existing plantations are cut and replanted on the 20 year cycle. Other sources of above-natural sediment export include gardens on steep slopes, mature oil palm plantations, small crop areas (copra, vanilla, cocoa), urban development and roads but these are individually less significant. In logging areas soil loss from roads is a major issue with roads built on steep slopes (Figure 36) subject to severe erosion. This problem continues for some years after the harvesting of logs has finished and roads are seldom surfaced. Surfacing roads can lead to a 20 fold reduction in erosion (Foltz, 2003). Improvements to logging practices which, among other things, seek to minimise soil erosion and sediment delivery to waterways have been Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 67 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 developed. One system known as reduced-impact logging (RIL) (e.g. Bolz et al., 2003) includes the following practices related to erosion minimisation (Pinard et al., 1995): 1. Include optimising skid trail networks given a knowledge of the exact location of each tree to be felled. 2. Minimise stream crossings 3. Minimise skid trail earthworks 4. Maintain canopy cover over skid trails 5. Construct water-bars on unused haulage roads 6. Careful supervision of all forestry operations 7. Enrichment planting of trees in areas where natural regeneration has been poor RIL techniques, as practiced in a Sabah, Malaysia, pilot programme, include the following: 1:5,000 or 1:10,000 Mapping; pre-selection and marking of marketable timber; Pre-harvest cutting of climber vines; slope and riparian restrictions on logging; Weather restrictions on logging; Lowering the impact of access roads through planning; Use of directional felling techniques; Planning of skid trails; No use of bulldozer blades on skid trails (Pinard et al., 2000). Research into RIL methods have shown that they can reduce impacts to the soil from heavy logging machinery by 25%. In some RIL experiments in lowland tropical forests, the amount of damage to the soil and to advanced regeneration was reduced by about 50% relative to conventional logging (Holmes et al., 2002). PNG has formally adopted a Logging Code of Practice (LCOP) in 1996 (PNG 1996) however there is widespread cynicism about its implementation (Taupa, 2003; PNG Eco-forestry Forum, 2004). On-ground studies of its implementation in Vanimo Timber Area (Forests Monitor Limited & ICRAF, 1999), Manus (Pwesei, 2001) and Aitape (Barcelona Field Studies Centre, 2005) found numerous violations of the LCOP standards. Some studies have been carried out in the Kimbe Bay area (FAO, 1998) with the Stettin Bay Logging Company into logging practices and comparison to the LCOP but little quantitative information on area of roads and skid trails and hence potential soil erosion is available from these. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 68 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 In oil palm plantation developments on moderate and high slopes eg parts of Talasea soil loss from roads is also significant (Figure 43) but in oil palm roads are surfaced within two years of operations. However even surfaced roads can lose large amounts of soil in high rainfall events (Figure 44). Methods such as grassing such roads, as is being trialled near Dami (Figure 45) or more rapid laying of road surface metal may reduce this problem. A number of factors contribute to high soil losses in the plant stage of oil palm plantation development and similarly when the crop is replanted after the 20 year crop cycle. Most significant is a period of bare earth lasting from the clearing of the land (forest, old copra land, old oil palm land) until the cover crop is well established and the juvenile oil palm trees also begin to produce a significant canopy. This stage lasts for approximately six months and is the period of maximum risk of catastrophic soil loss. Such losses can be seen in the images from the Kulu-Dagi Project area (note not discharging to Stettin Bay) flood where massive soil loss occurred (Figures 44, 46). Losses from the plant stage will be greatly increased if plantings occur on high slopes. The outstanding example of this potential situation was observed in the Talasea area where a small area of high slope land was recently planted (Figure 47). Planned developments in the Goruru area are also on very steep slopes (Figure 36). Growing oil palm on terraced steep slopes may also be undesirable from a productivity perspective due to soil fertility problems (Hamdan et al., 1999). It is clear that methods to minimise soil losses in the plantation development stage will have the most significant effects on overall sediment exports for this crop. These include promoting rapid cover crop establishment (Marfo-Ahenkora and Nuertey, 1999) (Figure 48), retaining vegetation buffer strips on streams and drains, planting vegetation buffers on constructed drains (such as the Guatamala grass already in use) and leaving steeper slopes unplanted as buffers as practiced in the Waississi development (Figure 49). Smallholder oil palm development appears to pose less of a soil erosion threat as less mechanized clearing is used, more ground cover retained and there is less clearing of ground cover in the mature crop stage. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 69 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 43 Plantation road erosion in Talasea area Figure 44 Erosion in flooding in Kulu-Dagi Project area Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 70 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 45 Grassed road trial near Dami Figure 46 Flooding in the Kulu-Dagi Project area Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 71 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 47 Oil palm development on extreme slopes in Talasea Figure 49 Forest strips on slopes left undeveloped (background) in Waississi Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 72 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 i. 2nd June, 2004 vi. 6th July 2004 ii. 9th June, 2004 vii. 12th July 2004 iii. 16th June, 2004 viii. 19th July 2004 iv. 23rd June 2004 ix. 26th July 2004 v. 28th June 2004 x. 2nd Aug 2004 Figure 48 Cover crop growing NBPOL trials (i – x shown at weekly intervals over a 9 week period) Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 73 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 In mature oil palm plantations soil erosion is far less of an issue than in the plant or replant stage. Canopy closure, moderate ground cover and vegetated drain banks reduce erosion and sediment loss. Stream bank erosion is still an issue as plantations have been planted right to the streambank (Figure 19) or coastline (Figure 50). Practices to restore a streambank vegetation buffer are now being implemented in replanting schemes as seen on Ru Creek (Figure 20) where two rows of mature oil palms next to the creek are being left while the rest of the plantation is cleared and replanted. The intercropping of oil palm and beef grazing as practiced at Numundo also leads to good ground cover and potentially low erosion rates in the mature phase (Figure 51). However anecdotal reports suggest that massive soil erosion occurred in the establishment phase of this development when bare earth was present (a satellite image available to NBPOL also shows the bare earth zone). The potential for such losses in the development stage can still be seen in the intercrop areas at present under development (Figure 52). Streams in the intercrop development, while grassed have little riparian tree or shrub buffers. Soil losses from subsistence and market gardens on steep slopes are also an issue in the Stettin Bay catchment. With increasing population and increased areas of oil palm development on flat lands pressure for garden development on steep lands increases. This is very noticeable on the hills behind Kimbe Town (Figure 40) where significant landslips are obvious. Stormwater flows from Kimbe urban area are an obvious source of litter to the inshore marine environment (Figure 35) but not an easy issue to practically address. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 74 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 50 Oil palm planted to coastline Figure 51 Beef and oil palm intercropping Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 75 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 52 Beef/oil palm intercropping new development Table 11 Delivery of suspended solids and nitrogen to the ocean from various land uses Land use % of total Delivery of N to SS ocean (%) Logging 34% 23% Post logging 13% 9% Oil palm plantation planting 19% 13% Oil palm plantation mature 10% 4% Oil palm small holder mature 6% 3% Primary and secondary forest 4 3% Gardens, small crops, copra 15% 13% Oil palm plantation fertiliser 17% Oil palm small holder fertiliser 6% Kimbe STP 4% Septic/pit sewage 5% Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 76 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 7. Conclusions 7.1 Overall It is clear in our opinion that a number of inshore reefs in Stettin Bay, particularly in the south-western section, have been severely damaged by sedimentation in recent times. The damage may be exacerbated by other factors such as bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish in a synergistic way. There is no clear evidence of nutrient enrichment effects, but these may be disguised by the mortality caused by sedimentation, bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish, and cannot be completely ruled out. The presence of thick sediment layers covering reefs in this area implies that even if sedimentation was not the primary cause of coral mortality the presence of the sediment layer will prevent any recovery of these reefs through coral recruitment and juvenile growth. The area of clear damage from sedimentation is the area from the mouth of the Dagi River westward to Walindi and to a lesser extent from Walindi to Talasea. Reefs in most other areas of Stettin Bay have not been damaged by terrestrial sediment discharge although many of them have been damaged by other factors such as bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish. 7.2 Likely loads/sources of SS, nutrients The modelled estimates of sediment (and nutrient) loads from Section 6 reinforced by anecdotal and observational evidence suggest that the most significant loads of sediment originate from primary logging operations and then oil palm new developments . Oil palm plant and replant activity remains at a high levels and is most likely to remain a source of increased-above-natural suspended sediment exports. Episodic events such as the 1998 wet year following the dry (drought) 1997 (with fires in the catchment) and the volcanic eruption of 2002 and associated ash flows will cause large spikes in delivery but these are seminatural. However the potential impact of these natural episodic events has been exacerbated by logging and cropping development in the catchments. It is the additional chronic delivery of sediment due to soil disturbance from logging and agriculture which is likely to be responsible for the damage to reefs seen in south western Stettin Bay. Losses will be especially severe on plant areas of high slope as seen at Talasea (Figure 47). The major sedimentation damage to the reefs appears to have occurred since Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 77 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 1994 as Maragos (1994) noted some sedimentation damage in 1994 but generally healthy reef conditions. 7.3 Oceanographic factors A principal factor in the concentration of reef damage from sedimentation in the south west section of Stettin Bay is the poor flushing, low wave action and generally still conditions in this area. This area is (1) sheltered from the south easterly wind regime (2) subject to a low ocean wave climate as waves from the north west do not propagate around Cape Hollman on the Willaumez Peninsula (3) has a low tidal range and resulting small tidal currents and (4) is sheltered from wave action by the line of barrier reefs stretching from Walindi to east of Kimbe town. As a result of this low energy regime sediment deposited on reefs remains for extended periods and is not removed by wave action as appears to occur in other parts of Kimbe Bay. 7.4 Other reef damaging factors Sedimentation from land runoff is not the only threat to coral reef health in Kimbe Bay. In many other parts of Kimbe Bay damage from bleaching and crown-of-thorns starfish (Figure 53 and 54) were evident. At one site damage from a ship grounding was observed (Figure 55). 7.5 Effects of reef damage on Stettin Bay resources Major damage caused by land-sourced sedimentation is restricted to near shore reefs in the west and south-west section of Stettin Bay. Fortunately these are not the premier dive sites for tourism (Figure 56), which are generally further offshore. These reefs are however an important component of the coral reef biodiversity of Kimbe bay and deserve some level of protection from such impacts. The effect of loss of reef on fisheries resources is probably real but difficult to quantify given the data available from Kimbe Bay. Overseas loss of reef associated with sedimentation (McClanahan and Obura, 1997) has led to algal dominance of reefal areas and reductions in fish biomass and diversity (McClanahan et al., 1999). Similar patterns of fisheries effects are likely in Kimbe Bay. Munday (2003) notes the serious decline in the abundance of coraldwelling fishes in Kimbe bay associated with declines in the abundance of acroporid corals. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 78 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 53 Crown of thorns starfish scars at Site 4 Figure 54 Dead coral at Site 7 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 79 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 55 Ship grounding scar off Kimbe Town Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 80 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Figure 56 Premier dive sites in Kimbe Bay Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 81 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 8. Monitoring program options 8.1 Background To detect reef damage due to poor water quality, monitoring of reefs using standard ‘reef health’ methods may be used. However it is often very difficult to separate the various possible causes of the damage and change eg bleaching, destructive fishing, natural change, cyclones and coral disease. If it is suspected that water quality is an issue then a monitoring program to measure sources of the pollutants, their transport to the reef areas and thus the exposure of the reefs to pollutants should be established. Such a monitoring program will complement the monitoring program set up to detect biological effects on the reef system. 8.2 Methods 8.2.1 Sources and loads Generally land-based pollutants are delivered to the marine environment through essentially a point source. The point source may consist of a pipe carrying sewage effluent or industrial wastewater or even more commonly be a river, stream or drain carrying pollutants from a catchment area. As all of these can be sampled at a single point, monitoring is, in principle, straightforward. However important considerations in the design of the monitoring program are: 1. The pattern of flow. Effluent pipes often have fairly regular flows and so can be monitored at any time. In contrast rivers and streams, especially in the tropics, have very variable flows. Most pollutants are transported in the wet season and sampling of rivers and streams must be concentrated at this time. 2. Pollutants to be measured. As the range of possible pollutants from a catchment or wastewater discharge is large it is essential to narrow the range of pollutants measured to those likely to be the cause of the problem. Pollutants which can stress coral reefs include suspended sediment, nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus compounds), toxic metals (eg lead, cadmium and copper), petroleum hydrocarbons (lubrication oils and fuels), pesticides, organochlorine wastes and organic matter. It is prohibitively expensive to sample and analyse Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 82 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 for all these materials. It is thus essential to target for analysis only those pollutants which may be causing the problem and have a known source in the catchment area. 3. Estimate loads. The actual amount (mass) of pollutant being discharged is important to know as well as the concentration of the pollutant in the water. To measure loads it is necessary to know the volume of the discharge as well as the concentration of the pollutant at a number of times through the discharge event. 4. Catchment source identification. To be able to manage the pollutants it will probably be necessary to identify the actual source areas or activities within the catchment which result in the majority of the pollutants. This may involve monitoring ‘up the catchment’ as well as at the river or stream mouth. ‘Proxy’ data may also be of use such as pesticide sales in the catchment, fertiliser use data and sewage treatment plant discharges to the river. 8.2.2 Transport and exposure As pollutants are discharged into the marine environment from an outfall or river processes occur which cause the pollutant concentrations to decrease. The processes include sedimentation, evaporation and biological and chemical transformations as well as simple dilution through mixing with seawater. It is often important to know whether sufficient pollutant (either load or concentration) is reaching the reef system to cause biological effects. Monitoring pollutants in the marine environment whether in the water column or perhaps in sediment or biota is far more complex than monitoring point source discharges. The threedimensional nature of the marine water body means that many samples are required to characterise what is happening. Thus a much more rigorously designed sampling program is necessary to generate conclusive results. Hydrodynamic modelling may be of use in predicting transport, dilution, dispersion and sedimentation but such models are also complex and need competent design. Some simple techniques such as sediment traps on coral reefs may give comparative information on sources and exposure of reefs to sediment. 8.2.3 Biological effects The actual reef monitoring program must also focus on indicators which are relatively specific to water quality impacts. Many traditional reef monitoring indicators such as coral cover and fish counts are not very useful in detecting water quality impacts. Indicators such as Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 83 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 coral recruitment, recruit survivorship, algal abundance and dynamics, immunoassay methods and photosynthetic performance (PAM) may be more useful indicators for many pollutants. 8.3 Interpretation Monitoring must focus not just on change in the system in question but also the causes of the change. If pollution is to be managed then the sources of the pollutants must be identified. Thus an integrated water quality monitoring program should measure sources, transport and effects so that an assessment of management options can be made. Management initiatives to solve water quality problems can also be tested through such an integrated program to assess their effectiveness. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 84 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 9. Recommendations 9.1 Logging practices Given that logging will continue in the SBCA, albeit at levels lower than in the past, and in the wider Kimbe Bay region it would be desirable to ensure that future logging in the area is carried out under reduced-impact logging (RIL) practices. Other environmentally beneficial practices, such as enhanced natural reforestation, have been trialled in West New Britain (KGIDP, 1993) and could be promoted in the Kimbe region. Overall the following practices within the RIL framework are likely to minimise sediment delivery to the marine environment: (a) 1:5,000 or 1:10,000 Mapping; pre-selection and marking of marketable timber; (b) Include optimising skid trail networks given a knowledge of the exact location of each tree to be felled. Lowering the impact of access roads through planning; (c) Slope and riparian restrictions on logging; (d) Weather restrictions on logging; (e) Minimise stream crossings; (f) Minimise skid trail earthworks. No use of bulldozer blades on skid trails; (g) Maintain canopy cover over skid trails; (h) Construct water-bars on unused haulage roads; (i) Careful supervision of all forestry operations; (j) Enhanced natural reforestation. Enrichment planting of trees in areas where natural regeneration has been poor. 9.2 Land use practices in oil palm. Accepting that oil palm is an expanding agricultural entity in the SBCA it would be prudent to examine current practices with a view to developing sustainable programs from an economic, social and environmental perspective. The following are possible areas for research initiatives: (a) Buffer management, auditing of buffer condition, buffers as traps for sediments (and nutrients) as well as for biodiversity; (b) Avoid small areas of steep land; Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 85 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 (c) Cover crop planting pattern research to get better coverage of the cover crop in the shortest possible time in the critical time for bare earth soil erosion; (d) Investigate methods of leaving more of the windrowed material in the plant stage on the bare earth in the planting rows; (e) Road management. Metal roads as soon as possible or use grassed roads where appropriate; (f) Vegetate drains as soon as possible eg Guatemala grass, natural shrub growth; (g) In-field streams (drains) to have remnant or planted low buffer strips; (h) Vegetate streams in oil palm/cattle intercrop areas (Numondo). May need temporary exclusion of cattle to do so; (g) Restore buffer zones along the sea and near major streams and on steep slopes in the crop replant process. 9.3 STPs Better sewage treatment facilities for Kimbe town. Reuse of effluent on land rather than release to marine environment. 9.4 Monitoring program A monitoring program to establish to link between land development, increased loads of sediments and nutrients in streams, delivery of suspended sediments and nutrients to reefs and the effects on reefs should be established. This program should consist of elements including (1) measurement of SS and nutrients in flow conditions in the Kimbe Bay catchment stream network (2) mapping the extent of river plume influence in Kimbe Bay (3) measurement of sedimentation rates on selected reefs. Measurement of other reef condition indicators (eg coral cover, coral diversity, coral recruitment, fish diversity) should be integrated with other reef health monitoring planned for Kimbe Bay. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 86 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Acknowledgements & contributors TNC Alison Green – Marine Science Coordinator, Asia Pacific - Project initiation, project administration, marine survey assistance Paul Lokani – Director, Melanesia Program - Project initiation, project administration Shannon Seeto – Project administration, GIS information, project information Joe Aitsi – marine surveys Stephen Keu – landuse and infrastructure information, reports Annisah Sapul – Rainfall data Norma Dobunaba - Project administration NBPOL Simon Lord – Head of Technical Services - Project organization, transport provision, extensive information about the oil palm industry, hospitality, coordination of data from NBPOL Jamie Graham – Project manager, Kulu-Dagi Inland Cove Project - Tour of Kulu-Dagi project, information on floods, information on the development stage of oil palm plantations, hospitality Harry Brock – Station manager - Tour of Waississi project Tony Aromo – NBPOL Environment Manager - Environmental management information for the NBPOL operations Walter Tangole – Assistant Manager, Sapun Plantation Jack Kaeka – Supervisor, Daliavu Plantation Thomas Betitis – Agronomist – Soils information, oil palm cultivation research and information Severina Betitis – Precision agriculture officer – GIS information, geographic information on the NBPOL operations Phillip Vovola – Plant scientist – Tour of Talasea area, oil palm cultivation information John Giru – Superintendent, NBPOL Security - Tour of Talasea area Nick Thompson – Managing Director – Project discussions Charlie Ross- Consultant to NBPOL on Best Practice Environmental Management Other organizations Joe Loga – Boat driver and dive supervisor – Walindi Plantation Resort Paul Nelson – Oil Palm Research Association (OPRA) Ian Orrel – Oil Palm Research Association Peter Dam – Forcert – sustainable forestry Shane Richie – Sustainable forestry Bill McKibbin - Mastamak Limited – Forestry and survey Frank Lewis – Oil Palm Industry Coorporation (OPIC) Otto Pukam – OPIC Nabary Teaku – Kimbe Water Board Simeon Dakama – Provincial Housing manager Mark Tegal – Sawmill operator Alois Ragas – Kimbe Town Authority Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 87 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 George and Gina – Curtain University Titus Waluka – Local councillor, Talasea area Max Benjamin – Walindi Resort Phillip Munday – James Cook University Marcus Sheaves – James Cook University Zoe Bainbridge- Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Mike Webb - CSIRO Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 88 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 10. References Adams, J. (1980). Contemporary Uplift and Erosion of the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin 91(1): 2-4 & (2):1-114. Aitkenhead, J.A. & McDowell, W.H. (2000). Soil C:N ratio as a predictor of annual riverine DOC flux at local and global scales. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14, 127-138. Akre, B. (2004). Forest road construction policies, guidelines and codes of practice. Access: http:// www.fao.org/docrep/x0622e/x0622eof.htm. Alexander, R.B., Johnes, P.J., Boyer, E.W. & Smith, R.A. (2002). A comparison of models for estimating the riverine export of nitrogen from large watersheds. Biogeochemistry 57/58, 295-339. Anderson, T. (2003). A Grand Deceit: The World Bank’s claims of ‘good governace’ in Papua New Guinea. Report to the ACF and the Centre for Environmental Law and Community Rights, University of Sydney. Arial Landslide Survey (1996). Arial Landslide Survey of Mapleton Ranger District (14/02/96). Association of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics. Access: http://members.efn.org/~jpreed/landsl.html. Baharuddin, K., Mokhtaruddin, A.M. & Nik Muhamad, M., (1995). Surface runoff and soil loss from a skid trail and a logging road in a tropical forest. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 7(4), 558-569. Barcelona Field Studies Centre, (2005). Tropical rainforest case study: Papua New Guinea. Barnett, T.E. (1989). Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Aspects of the Timber Industry, Final Report. Government of Papua New Guinea. Waigani, Port Moresby. Beaulac, M.N. & Reckhow, K.H. (1982). An examination of land use – nutrient export relationships. Water Resources Bulletin 18, 1013–1024. Beger, M., Jones, G. P. & Munday, P. L. (2003). Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: a comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes. Biological Conservation 111, 53-62. Biggs, J., Thorburn, P., Weier, K.L., Hopp, M.L. (2001). Nitrate in groundwaters in Mackay and Burdekin regions. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 23, 77-83. Bleeker, P. (1983). Soils of Papua New Guinea. CSIRO and Australian National University Press, Canberra. 352pp. Bleeker, P. & Healy, P. (1980). Analytical data of Papua New Guinea soils. CSIRO Land Use Research Technical Paper No. 40, CSIRO, Canberra. 464pp. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 89 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Bohl, H.P., Mitchell, D.C., Penny, R.S., Roth, C.H. (2000). Nitrogen losses via subsurface flow from sugar cane on floodplain soils in the Australian wet tropics. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 22, 302-307. Boltz, F., Thomas P. H. & Douglas R.C. (2003). Economic and Environmental Impacts of Conventional and Reduced-Impact Logging in Tropical South America: A Comparative Review. Forest Policy and Economics. 5/1. pp. 69-81 Brodie, J.E. (1995). Nutrients and eutrophication in the Australian marine environment. In: Zann, L. and Sutton, D.C. (Eds.) The State of the Marine Environment Report for Australia, Technical Annex 2, DEST Report, Canberra, 1995. p. 1 –29. Brodie, J.E. (2002). Keeping the wolf from the door: managing land-based threats to the Great Barrier Reef. In: Moosa et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Coral Reef Symposium. October, 2000, Bali, Indonesia. 2, 705-714. Brodie, J.E., Hicks, W.S., Richards, G.N. & Thomas, F.G. (1984). Residues related to agricultural chemicals in the groundwaters of the Burdekin River delta, north Queensland. Environmental Pollution (Series B) 8, 187-215. Brodie, J.E. & Mitchell, A. (1992). Nutrient composition of the January, 1991 Fitzroy River plume. In: Workshop on the Impacts of Flooding, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Workshop Series No 17, GBRMPA, Townsville. pp56-74. Brodie, J., McKergow, L.A., Prosser, I.P., Furnas, M., Hughes, A.O. & Hunter, H. (2003). Sources of sediment and nutrient exports to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. ACTFR Report No. 03/11, Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University, Townsville, 191p. Bun, Y., King, T. & Sherman, P. (2004). China’s impact on Papua New Guinea forestry industry. In: China and Forest Trade in the Asia-pacific Region: Implications for Forests and Livelihoods. UK Department for International Development, UK. Chappell, N.A., McKenna, P., Bidin, K., Douglas, I. & Walsh, R.P.D. (1999). Parsimonious modelling of water and suspended sediment flux from nested catchments affected by selective tropical forestry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London 354, 1831-1846. Chappell, N.A., Yusop, Z., Rahim, N.A., Tych, W. & Kasran, B. (2004). Spatially significant effects of selective tropical forestry on water, nutrient and sediment flows: a modellingsupported review. In: Bonnell, M. and Bruijnzeel, L.A. (Eds.) Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics UNESCO. Corley, R. (2003). Oil palm: a major tropical crop. Burotrop Bulletin 19. Dallmeyer, D. G., Porter, J.W. & Smith, G.J. (1982). “Effects of particulate peat on the behavior and physiology of the Jamaican reef-building coral Montastrea annularis.” Marine Biology 68: 229-233. Day, M. (1980). Landslides in the Gunong Mulu National Park. Geog. 146, 7-13. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 90 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 DeVantier, L.M., De’ath, G., Done, T.J. & Turak, E. (1998). Ecological assessment of a complex natural system: a case study from the Great Barrier Reef. Ecological Applications 8: 480-496. DeVantier, L.M., Turak, E., Al-Shaikh, K. & De’ath, G. (2000). Coral communities of the central-northern Saudi Arabian Red Sea. Fauna of Arabia 18: 23-66. Devlin, M., Waterhouse, J., Taylor, J. & Brodie, J. (2001). Flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef: spatial and temporal patterns in composition and distribution. GBRMPA Research Publication No 68, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, Australia. Devlin, M. & Brodie, J. (2005). Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Nutrient behaviour in coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 51(1-4), 9-22. Dillon, P.J. & Kirchner, W.B. (1975). The effect of geology and land use on the export of phosphorus from watersheds. Water Research, 9, 135-148. Done T.J. (1982). Patterns in the distribution of coral communities across the central Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 1: 95-107 Douglas, I. (1999). Hydrological investigations of forest disturbance and land cover impacts in South-East Asia: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London 354, 1725-1738. Downing, J.A. (1997). Marine nitrogen:phosphorus stoichiometry and the global N:P cycle. Biogeochemistry 37, 237-252. Edinger, E.N., Jompa, J., Limmon, G.V., Widjatmoko, W., & Risk, M.J. (1998) Reef degradation and coral biodiversity in Indonesia: Effects of land-based pollution, destructive fishing practices and changes over time. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36: 617-630 Eyre, B.D. & Pepperell, P. (1999). A spatially intensive approach to water quality monitoring in the Rous River catchment, NSW, Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 56, 97118. Fabricius, K. (2005). Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: review and synthesis. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50, 125-146. Fabricius, K. & Wolanski, E. (2000). Rapid smothering of coral reef organisms by muddy marine snow. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50: 115-120. Fabricius, K. & De’ath, G. (2001a). Biodiversity on the Great Barrier Reef: Large-scale patterns and turbidity-related local loss of soft coral taxa. In: Wolanski E (Ed.) Oceanographic processes of coral reefs. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 127-144 Fabricius, K. & De’ath, G. (2001b). Environmental factors associated with the spatial distribution of crustose coralline algae on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 19: 303-309. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 91 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Fabricius, K.E., Wild, C., Wolanski, E. & Abele, D. (2003). Effects of transparent exopolymer particles and muddy terrigenous sediments on the survival of hard coral recruits. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57,613-621. Fabricius, K., De’ath, G., McCook, L., Turak E. & Williams. D.B. (2005). Changes in algal, coral and fish assemblages along water quality gradients on the inshore Great Barrier Reef. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51(1-4), 384-398. FAO (1998). Forest harvesting case study 15. Forest harvesting operations in Papua New Guinea. The PNG logging code of practice. FAO, Rome. Foltz, R. (2003). Environmental impacts of forest roads: an overview of the state of knowledge. ed. M. Wide & B. Baryd. Proceedings of the Second International Forest Engineering Conference, The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala, Sweeden: 121128. Forests Monitor & Individual and Community Rights Advocacy Forum Inc.(ICRAF). (1999). Environmental and social impact assessment of logging operations in the Vanimo Timber Area, Sandaun Province, Papua New Guinea, May 1999. Forests Monitor Ltd, PNG. Access: http://www.forestsmonitor.org/reports/vanimo/summ.htm. Hamdan, J., Bernham, C.P. and Ruhana, B. (2000). Degradation effect of slope terracing on soil quality for Elaeis guineensis Jacq. (oil palm) cultivation. Land Degradation and Development 11(2), 181-193. Harris, G.P. (1999). Comparison of the Biogeochemistry of lakes and estuaries: ecosystem processes, functional groups, hysteresis effects and interactions between macro- and microbiology. Marine and Freshwater Research 50, 791-811 Harris, G.P. (2001). Biogeochemistry of nitrogen and phosphorus in Australian catchments, river and estuaries: effects of land use and flow regulation and comparisons with global patterns. Marine and Freshwater Research 52, 139-149. Henson, I. (2003). Oil Palm- Can it substitute the tropical rainforest?. The Planter, Kuala Lumpur, 79, 437-450. Hodgson, G. & Dixon, L. (1988). Logging versus fisheries and tourism in Palawan. Occasional Paper No. 7, East-West Environment and Policy Institute, Honolulu, US. Hodgson, G. & Dixon, L. (2000). El Nido revisited: Ecotoursim, logging and fisheries. In: Cesar, H. (Ed.) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs. CORDIO, Kalmar University, Kalmar, Sweden. Holland, E.A., Braswell, B.H., Lamarque, J.F., Townsend, A., Sulzman, J., Muller, J-F., Dentener, F., Brasseur, G., Levy, H.II, Penner, J.E. & Roelofs, G.J. (1997). Variations in the predicted distribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition and their impact on carbon uptake by terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Geophysical Research 102 D13, 15849-15866 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 92 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Holmes, T., Blateb, G., Zweedec, J., Pereira, R., Barretod, P., Boltz, F. & Bauchf, R. (2002). Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 163:93-110. Hopkinson, C.S. and Vallino, J.J. (1995). The nature of watershed perturbations and their influence on estuarine metabolism. Estuaries 18, 598-621. Howarth, R.W. (1998). An assessment of human influences on fluxes of nitrogen from the terrestrial landscape to the estuaries and continental shelves of the North Atlantic Ocean. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 52, 213-223. Howarth, R.W., G. Billen, D. Swaney, A. Townsend, N. Jowarski, K. Lajtha, J.A. Downing, R. Elmgren, N. Caraco, T. Jordan, F. Berendse, J. Freney, V. Kudeyarov, P. Murdoch, and Z.L. Zhu. (1996). Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry 35, 75-139. Huber, M. (1994). An assessment of the status of the coral reefs of Papua New Guinea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 29, 69-73. Hunter, H.M. and Walton, R.S. (1997). From land to river to reef lagoon. Land use impacts on water quality in the Johnstone Catchment. Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Indooroopilly, Australia. 10pp Jenkins, A. (2000). The freshwater-estuarine fish fauna of the Kimbe Bay region, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea. Unpublished Technical report. Wetlands International- Oceania, Canberra, Australia. Jones, G.P., McCormick, M., Eagle, J. & Munday, P. (1999). Community marine conservation areas, Kimbe Bay, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea: an ecological monitoring program. Inception report – July 1999. Unpublished report for the Nature Conservancy. Jones, G.P., McCormick, M., Eagle, J. & Munday, P. (2000). Community marine conservation areas, Kimbe Bay, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea: an ecological monitoring program. Report 1 – January 2000. Unpublished report for the Nature Conservancy. Jones, G., McCormick, M., Eagle, J. & Srinivasan, M. (2001). Tamane Puli marine conservation area, Kimbe Bay, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea: an ecological monitoring program. Report 2 – January 2001. Unpublished report for the Nature Conservancy. Keating, B.A., Bauld, J., Hillier, J., Ellis, R., Weier, K.L., Sunners, F., Connell, D. (1996). Leaching of nutrients and pesticides to Queensland groundwaters. In: Hunter, H.M., Eyles A.G., Rayment, G.E. (Eds.) Downstream effects of land use. Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane. pp 151-163. Keefer, D. (1994). The importance of earthquake-induced landslides to long-term slope erosion and slope-failure hazards in seismically active regions. Geomorphology 10: 265-284. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 93 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Keefer, D. (2002). Investigating landslides caused by earthquakes – A historical review. Surveys in Geophysics 23, 473-510. Keu, T. (2003). An estimate of the ecological effects of spreading agricultural land-uses on soil, water and vegetation in the Stettin Bay basin in West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea. The Nature Conservancy, Boroko. KGIDP (1993). Natural reforestation in Papua New Guinea – Experience from the Kandrian Gloucester integrated development project. AusAID Report, Canberra. Kinsey, D. (1988). Responses of coral reef systems to elevated nutrients. Galaxea 7: 113-128. Lapointe, B. & Clark, M. (1992). Nutrient inputs from the watershed and coastal eutrophication in the Florida Keys. Estuaries 15, 465-476. Lewis, W. (1998). Evaluating the impact of logging activities on Erosion and suspended sediment transport in the Caspar Creek watersheds in USDA Forest Service. Technical Report PSW-GTR p55-69. Lewis, W.M. Jr., Melack, J.M., McDowell, W.H., McClain, M. & Richey, J.E. (1999). Nitrogen yields from undisturbed watersheds in the Americas. Biogeochemistry 46, 149-162. Likens, G.E. (2001). Biogeochemistry, the watershed approach: some uses and limitations. Marine and Freshwater Research 52, 5 – 12. Lord, S., Tavaperry, M., Tangole, W. & Alumedi, R. (2003). The role of EFB compost in New Britain Palm Oil Ltd (NBPOL) nurseries. New Britain Palm Oil Ltd, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea. Lord, S., Hoare, M. & Thompson, N. (2002). Composting for zero discharge- NBPOL’s Solution. New Britain Palm Oil Ltd, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea. Maragos, J., Evans, C. & Holtus, P. (1985). Reef corals in Kanoehe Bay six years after termination of sewage discharges. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Coral Reef Symposium, Tahiti, French Polynesia, 577-582. Maragos, J. (1994). Kimbe Bay rapid ecological assessment: the coral reefs of Kimbe Bay (West New Britain, Papua New Guinea). Volume 2: Biodiversity of stony corals. Unpublished report to the Nature Conservancy. Marfo-Ahenkora, E. and Nuertey, B.N., (1999). The role of leguminous cover crops in sustainable production of oil palm (Elaeis guinensis) – a review. Journal of the Ghana Science Association 1(2), 148-157. McClanahan, T.R. (2002). The near future of coral reefs. Environmental Conservation 29(4), 460-483. McClanahan, T. R. & Obura, D. (1997). Sedimentation effects on shallow coral communities in Kenya. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 209 (1-2): 103-122. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 94 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 McClanahan, T.R., Hendrick, V., Rodrigues, M. & Polunin, N. (1999). Varying responses of herbivorous and invertebrate-feeding fishes to macroalgal reduction on a coral reef. Coral Reefs 18, 195-203. McKee, L., Eyre, B. D and Hossain, S. (2000). Intra- and interannual export of nitrogen and phosphorus in the subtropical Richmond River catchment, Australia. Hydrological Processes 14, 1787-1809. Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G. &d Swift, M.J. (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277, 504-509. Moody, P., Reghenzani, J., Armour, J., Prove, B. & McShane, T. (1996). Nutrient balances and transport at farm scale- Johnstone River catchment. In: Hunter, H., Eyles, A., Rayment, G. (Eds.) Downstream Effects of Land Use. Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane, pp. 347-351. Moss, A. J., Rayment, G. E., Reilly, N. & Best, E. K. (1992). Sediment and nutrient exports from Queensland coastal catchments, a desk study. Department of Environment & Heritage, Brisbane, Australia. Motha, J., Wallbrink, P., Harsine, P. & Grayson, R., (2003). Determining the sources of suspended sediment in a forested catchment in southeastern Australia. Water Resources Research 39(3):1056. Munday, P.L. (2000). The status of coral reefs in Papua New Guinea. Global coral reef monitoring network. Australian Institute of Marine Science, unpublished report. Munday, P. (2003). Report on Kimbe Bay Reef Survey February 2003. Unpublished report for the Nature Conservancy. Nelson. (2003). Agronomy Report. PNGOPRA Annual Research Report. Orrel. (2003). Oil Palm Research Association Report, Papua New Guinea, June 2003. Dami Research Station, West New Britain. Paerl, H.W. (1997). Coastal eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: Importance of atmospheric deposition and groundwater as ''new'' nitrogen and other nutrient sources. Limnology and Oceanography 42(5), 1154-1165. Papua New Guinea (1996). Logging Code of Practice (1st Ed.). Forest Authority and Department of Environment and Conservation, Papua New Guinea. Perakis, S.S. & Hedin, L.O. (2001). Fluxes and fate of nitrogen in soil of an unpolluted old growth temperate forest, southern Chile. Ecology 82, 2245-2260. Perakis, S.S. & Hedin, L.O. (2002). Nitrogen from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds. Nature 415, 416-419. Pinard, M., Putz, F., Tay, J. & Sullivan, T. (1995). Creating timber harvest guidelines for a reduced-impact logging project in Malaysia. Journal of Forestry 93, 41-45. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 95 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Pinard, M., Barker, M.. & Tay, J. (2000). Soil disturbance and post-logging forest recovery on bulldozer paths in Sabah, Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 130, 213-225. PNG Eco-forestry Forum, (2004). Submission on the draft individual reports (1-10) from the Review of Current Logging Projects. PNG Eco-forestry Forum, PNG. Pwesei, C. (2001). Environmental and social impact assessment of logging operations in the West Coast of manus Province, Papua New Guinea. World Rainforest Movement Paper, Montevideo, Uruguay. Rasiah, V. & Armour, J.D. (2001). Nitrate accumulation under cropping in the Ferrosols of Far North Queensland wet tropics. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 329-341. Rawlins, B., Ferguson, A., Chilton, P., Arthurton, R. Rees, J. & Baldock, J. (1998). Review of agricultural pollution in the Caribbean with particular emphasis on small island developing states. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36(9), 658-668. Rice, R. (1981). Erosion and Sediment Transport in Pacific Rim steeplands. I.A.H.S. Publ.No.132, Christchurch. Richmond, R. (1993). Effects of coastal runoff on coral reproduction. Colloquium on Global Aspects of Coral Reefs: Health, Hazard, and History, Rosentiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami. Selig, E., Dumbacher, J., DeGroot, K., Leimgruber, P., Cheuk, M. L. & DeWitt, P. (2003). Oil Palm Plantations in Papua New Guinea Phase I: Building a Database Degradation from Oil Palm in Kimbe Bay and Oro Province. Smithsonian Institution National Zoological Park AND California Academy of Sciences. Sheaves, M. (2002). A Rapid Environmental Assessment of Mangrove Systems of Western Kimbe Bay. Report to TNC, School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld., Australia Sheng, T. (1990). Runoff plots and erosion phenomena on tropical steeplands. Intl Assoc. of Hydrological Science Publ. 190: 154-161. Sidle, R. (2002). An overview of water and related hazard issues in Southeast Asia. In: Present situation on the water resources and water related disaster and the role of agroenvironmental education. University of Tsukuba, Japan. Nov 6-12. Sidle, R., Sasaki, S., Otsuki, M., Noguchi, S. & Nik, A. (2004). Sediment pathways in a tropical forest: effects of logging roads and skid trails. Hydrological Processes 18:703-720. Sinun, W., Douglas, I., Wong, W. & Spencer, T. (1992). Throughfall, stemflow, overland flow and throughflow in the Ulu Segama Rain Forest, Sabah. Phil. Trans. R. Sco. Lond. B335, 389-395. Smith, S. and Hollibaugh, J. (1997). Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance. Reviews of Geophysics 31, 75-89 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 96 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Smith, S., Kimmerer, W., Laws, E., Brock, R. & Walsh, T. (1981). Kaneohe Bay sewage diversion experiment: Perspectives on ecosystem response to nutritional perturbation. Pacific Science 35: 279-395. Taupa, B. (2003). Papua New Guinea case study. In: Proceedings of international expert meeting on the development and implementation of national codes of practice for forest harvesting – issues and options, 17th – 20th November, 2003, Kisarazu, Japan. Timperley, M.H. (1983). Phosphorus in spring waters of the Taupo Volcanic Zone, North Island, New Zealand. Chemical Geology 38, 287-306. Tomascik, T., Mah, A., Nontju, A. & Moosa, M. (1997). Jakarta Bay: The way of the future? Periplus Editions, Hong Kong. Turak, E. & Aitsi, J. (2002). Assessment of coral biodiversity and status of coral reefs of East Kimbe Bay, New Britain, Papua New Guinea, 2002. The Nature Conservancy report, Papua New Guinea. van Breeman, N. (2002). Natural organic tendency. Nature 415, 381-382. van Woesik, R., Tomascik, T. & Blake, S. (1999). Coral assemblages and physio-chemical characteristics of the Whitsunday Islands: evidence of recent community changes. Marine and Freshwater Research 50: 427-440. Verberg, K., Keating, B.A., Probert, M.E., Bristow, K.L. & Huth, N.I. (1998). Nitrate leaching under sugarcane: Interactions between crop yield, soil type and management strate.g.ies. In: Michalk, D.L., Pratley, J.E. (Eds.) Agronomy – growing greener future. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Agronomy Conference, Wagga Wagga, NSW. pp 717-720. Vitousek, P.M., Aber, J.D., Howarth, R.W., Likens, G.E., Matson, P.A., Schindler, D.W., Schlesinger, W.H. & Tilman D.G. (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7, 737-750. Walling, D. E. & Webb, B. W. (1985). Estimating the discharge of contaminants to coastal waters by rivers: some cautionary comments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 16, 488-492. Walling, D. E. 7 Fang, D. (2003). Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world's rivers. Global and Planetary Change 39(1-2), 111-126. Wilkinson, C. (Ed.) (2002). Status of Coral Reefs of the World. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia. Wolanski, E., Richmond, R., McCook, L. & Sweatman, H. (2003). Mud, marine snow and coral reefs. American Scientist 91, 44-51. Young, W.J., Marston, F.M. and Davis, J.R. (1996) Nutrient exports and land use in Australian catchments. Journal of Environmental Management 47, 165-183 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 97 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Ziegler, A., Sutherland, R. & Giambelluca, T. (2000). Runoff generation and sediment production on unpaved roads, footpaths and agricultural land surfaces in northern Thailand. Earth Surface processes and Landforms 25(5), 519-534. Ziegler, A., Sutherland, R. & Giambelluca, T. (2001). Interstorm surface preparation and sediment detachment by vehicle transport on unpaved mountain roads. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26: 235-250. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 98 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Appendix 1. The effect of land use on water quality and aquatic ecosystems 1. Land use and water quality 1.1 Catchment characteristics Damage to coral reef systems from land-based pollution is one of the worldwide issues facing the continuing existence of reefs. Well known examples include the Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii sewage discharge story (Smith et al., 1981) and pollution of Jakarta Bay, Indonesia (Tomasik et al., 1997). Even very large reef systems such as the Florida Keys, USA (Lapointe & Clark, 1992), the Caribbean (Rawlins et al., 1998) and Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (Brodie, 2002) have been damaged and are further threatened by land-based pollution. Changed land use on catchments inevitably leads to changes in the amounts, forms and types of material exported to the marine environment. Changed land use on catchments worldwide, particularly clearing of forest and woodland and its conversion to grazing, cropping and urban uses, has led to sedimentation and eutrophication in both fresh and coastal marine waters. The relationship of land use and sediment and nutrient export has been considered for a long period eg review of Beaulac and Reckhow (1982). The idea of using the catchment (watershed) as the explanatory geographic unit also has a long history (e.g. Likens, 2001). Sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus, along with carbon, iron and silicon, are essential components in shaping the biotic status of waterways from mountain streams to the ocean. Site characteristics of catchments are usually not subject to significant change on the time scale of years to decades. The most prominent static characteristics are: 1. Relief (affects hydrological patterns, storage capacity, transit time). 2. Altitude (vegetation type, air temperature, rainfall). 3. Climatological variables (rainfall, relative humidity, temperature, flood event frequency). 4. Bedrock geology (mineralogy, chemical composition, weathering rates and hence supply of nutrients). 5. Soil cover (depth, chemical characteristics, particle size, permeability). 6. Vegetation cover. 7. Human impact (atmospheric deposition, land use). 1.2 Export of nutrients from pristine forest systems The initial studies in what were thought to be forests with no/little anthropogenic inputs in temperate northern hemisphere forests showed high losses of nitrogen (N) often as nitrate (refs). However in later studies it was realised that these losses were due to atmospheric deposition of N from fossil fuel burning (note connection to acid rain) and fertiliser use/volatilisation and rainout. Further studies in South American temperate forests (mainly in Chile) with no/little atmospheric N deposition showed low losses of N with what is lost dominated by dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) (Perakis and Hedin, 2001; 2002). It is now known from a range of studies, in both temperate and tropical forests (and grasslands and woodlands), that runoff and subsurface drainage from pristine systems has low concentrations of N (in range 50 – 200 µg/L) dominated by DON with low concentrations of particulate nitrogen (PN) and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN made up of nitrate, ammonia and Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 99 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 nitrite). Much of the N draining forested catchments, with low atmospheric inputs, is in the form of DON and C:N ratios are high and bioavailability may be low. Pristine forests on South America are known to export considerable concentrations and loads in flow events of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus (Perakis and Hedin, 2002) but very low concentrations and loads of dissolved inorganic and particulate N and P (Lewis et al., 1999). In contrast north American forested ecosystems considered pristine, export considerable amounts of nitrate but this is now considered to be a result of atmospheric deposition of nitrogen from fossil fuel burning (Paerl, 1997). Similar patterns of nutrient loss to the South American examples have been measured in temperate Australia, also with little anthropogenic atmospheric loading, and have been summarized by Harris (1999; 2001). The effects of atmospheric deposition are well shown in comparisons of nitrogen exported from north-east USA forests, with high levels of atmospheric N deposition, and forests in Argentina and Chile with low levels. In the USA cases nitrogen is found to be exported in inorganic form (19% nitrate, 2% DON, rest not exported by river). In the South American cases exports are dominated by DON (70%) with smaller proportions of DIN (13% ammonia and 4% nitrate) (van Breeman, 2002; Perakis and Hedin, 2002). 1.3 Phosphorus losses and geology The underlying geology, and its effect on soil type and composition, may have significant effects on the nutrient status of waters draining the landscape. Volcanic rocks (eg basalts) are richer in phosphorus than granitic rocks and this factor is evident in the concentrations of P in water running off areas dominated by one of these rock types (Timperley, 1983; Eyre and Pepperell, 1999). Dillon and Kirchner (1975) observed that forested watersheds with sandy soils overlying granitic formations had one half the TP output of forested watersheds with loam soils overlaying sedimentary formations. 1.4 Runoff changes with catchment development In general conversion of land from forest to other land uses increases overland flow of storm runoff and suspended sediment and nutrient exports (Hopkinson and Vallino, 1995). As land is cleared and landuse changes towards more agricultural and urban uses the total amounts of N and P exported rise rapidly (Young et al., 1996). Particulate matter exports increase relative to dissolved loads. Forested catchments lose little N and what losses there are are largely in the form of DON that is presumed to be largely unavailable for algal growth (in the short term) (Smith and Hollibaugh, 1997; Aitkenhead and McDowell, 2000; but see Sitzinger and Sanders, 1997). Land use change however leads to rapid increases in N exports and increases in N concentrations in receiving waters and the form of N changes from DON to nitrate and ammonia. These forms are much more bioavailable (Harris, 2001). Thus DOC:POC ratio is highest in forested catchments and lowest in agricultural catchments (Harris, 1999). Rivers in tropical areas which have episodic high flows and high turbidity after intense rainfall (often associated with cyclone systems) tend to export organic matter with a low labile fraction and thus low bioavailability in the short term. Fluxes of N from the land via rivers to the coast range from 50 kg N /km2/year in pristine forested catchments to nearly 1500 kg N/km2/year from catchments draining into the North Sea from Europe (Howarth, 1998). Rates of atmospheric deposition of N range from 1 to Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 100 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 nearly 1000 kg N/km2/year (Holland et al., 1997). Atmospheric deposition is highest in the industrial areas of the Northern Hemisphere (200 – 400 kg N/km2/year) where urban, industrial and transport sources dominate. Atmospheric deposition is elevated, through anthropogenic inputs, over all the continents except Australia, but deposition is generally lower over the Southern Hemisphere continents (50 – 150 kg N/km2/year). Forested catchments often retain a large proportion of the atmospheric N load. In rivers affected by anthropogenic nitrogen loading a rise in DIN as a proportion of TN as the TN increases is found throughout the world (Howarth et al., 1996). Forested catchments exported mostly DON while urban proportionally more DIN while as catchments were increasingly affected by deforestation and urbanization the stoichiometry of the more available forms of N and P rose above Redfield. TN:TP ratio drops towards the Redfield ratio (16:1) with catchment development. Landuse change and reduction of forest cover also affects P exports (Harris, 2001). TP is overwhelmingly associated with the particulate load. A considerable proportion of P exported downstream may be not available and the proportion of available: non-available varies widely in waterways depending on geology, soil type, hydrology and P sources (Dillon and Kirchner, 1975; Oliver et al., 1993). 1.5 Losses of sediment and nutrients from different land uses Extensive studies of loss of sediments, nutrients and pesticide residues from a range of crops under various management regimes have been reported worldwide. Only a few examples are given in this review. Studies have focussed on the losses of suspended solids, nitrogen and phosphorus and of various forms of N and P from different landuse types including forests, dairy grazing lands, rangeland grazing lands, cropping lands, urban lands and aquaculture under a large range of management regimes. The effects of climate, soil type, hydrology, atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and terrain have been included in the analyses (e.g. Dillon and Kirchner, 1975). There has also been a large number of studies examining the processing and losses of suspended solids and nutrients during stream flow and during water passage through riparian vegetation and wetlands (Arheimer and Wittgren, 1994; Behrendt and Opitz, 2000; Cooper et al., 1987; Dosskey, 2001; Hillbricht-Ilkowska and Bajkiewcz-Grabowska, 1991; House and Warwick, 1998). Much of the recent work, particularly in the USA and Europe, has focussed on using land runoff information from different land uses to model and budget watershed nitrogen and phosphorus loads and exports (Beaulac and Reckhow, 1982) and the models have been regularly evaluated (e.g. Alexander et al., 2002). A good summary of landuse-nutrient export relationships is found in Beaulac and Reckhow (1982) where results from a large range of cropping (row crops)and grazing studies in the US are compared. Total nitrogen export values range from 2 to 80 kg/ha/year and phosphorus from 0.2 to 18 kg/ha/year for cropping systems and 1.5 to 30 kg/ha/year N and 0.1 to 5 kg/ha/year P for grazing systems. McKee et al., (2000) in their studies on nutrient exports from the Richmond catchment (northern NSW) summarise factor increases in nitrogen and phosphorus exports from different land uses using global data. This is reproduced in Table 1. In Table 2 absolute values Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 101 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 of erosion and sediment loss from different land uses with examples from the wet tropics of north Queensland and elsewhere are shown. Table 1 Comparison of exports of nutrients from different land uses as a factor increase compared to forest land (from McKee et al., 2000). Landuse Crop land Horticulture Improved pasture Pasture Urban Forest Nitrogen (factor increase) World median Tropical Australia 13.7 13.7 20.8 28.9 4.6 5.6 2.8 3.3 6.7 7.3 1.0 1.0 Phosphorus (factor increase) World median Tropical Australia 21.1 23.8 50.7 88.8 7.9 13.8 5.6 1.3 8.5 12.5 1.0 1.0 Table 2 Soil loss from various land uses types (north Queensland) Paddock scale Undisturbed rainforest (NEQ) 4.8 tonnes/ha/yr Selectively logged rainforest 10.9 Cleared rainforest in first year 59.6 Sugarcane - Johnstone R. – Burnt (Conventional Cultivation) - Zero tillage, 0% trash “ 50% trash “ 100% trash 150 (70-500) 15 10 5 Sugarcane - Pioneer R. - Burnt (Conventional Cultivation) 56-390 City average (Victoria) 200 City construction sites 400 Gravelled roads 140-250 Pineapple farms (SE Queensland) 0.1 - 105 Catchment Scale Rainforest 0.2-0.3 Woodland / Grassland 0.5-1.4 Cleared catchment 20-30 Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 102 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 1.6 Low intensity land uses (grazing, selective logging) As catchment development proceeds and low intensity land uses such as grazing (eg rangeland beef grazing) and selective forestry (not clear felling) replace pristine forest/woodland/grasslands the fluxes of sediment, N and P lost from the landscape increase and the forms of N and P change (still excluding large anthropogenic atmospheric inputs). The principal change is to higher rates of soil erosion and hence considerably higher concentrations of PN and PP in runoff (but obviously not in subsurface losses). As PN and PP are mobilized into the water column some desorption of species such as ammonia and phosphate occurs and so DIN and DIP concentrations rise, albeit, slightly compared to pristine conditions. Thus runoff from forests under selective forestry has moderate/high concentrations of PN and PP, moderate concentrations of DON and DOP and low concentrations of DIN and DIP. Forestry operations increase particulate matter exports greatly through widespread soil disturbance. Thus suspended solids loads and associated particulate nitrogen and phosphorus loads increase relative to the natural export of primarily dissolved organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. In grazed systems the added factor (besides increased soil erosion) of an increased rate of mineralization of N and P due to digestion and excretion of vegetation means that increased losses of dissolved nutrients also occur compared to pristine. Thus in general from grazed systems runoff has moderate concentrations of PN and PP, moderate concentrations of DON and DOP and low/moderate concentrations of DIN and DIP. 1.7 Cropping Modern cropping and fertiliser use, particularly since about 1950 in the developed world and since the 1970s in the third world (the ‘green revolution’) saw N and P dynamics of cropping systems dominated by artificial fertilisers (Vitousek et al., 1997; Matson et al., 1997; Holland et al., 1997). In general only about one third of fertiliser N and P is incorporated into that part of the crop removed from the field for use. The other two thirds may be left in the field as crop residues (stubble, trash), in the plant itself if it is a multi-year crop (sugarcane roots/stalks in ratoon crops; the trees themselves in tree crops); in the soil; or lost from the field through volatilisation (mostly of ammonia from N fertilisers); denitrification (loss of nitrogen gas or nitric oxide); leaching to subsurface or groundwater (commonly nitrate); or as runoff (all forms of N and P). Thus cropping systems tend to lose high concentrations and produce large fluxes of N and P often as DIN and DIP as well as high soil erosion in some cases producing high runoff concentrations of PN and PP. Thus overall runoff from fertilised cropping contains high concentrations of PN and PP, moderate concentrations of DON and DOP and high/very high concentrations of DIN and moderate/high concentrations of DIP. Subsurface water will contain elevated concentrations of nitrate. 1.8 Urban The largest source of nutrient input from coastal urban areas is in the form of sewage treatment plant discharges. Effluent from secondary standard treatment plants has relatively Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 103 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 constant composition, while discharge volumes are closely related to population numbers. Thus estimates of probable nutrient inputs from sewage are relatively easy to calculate. In general in urban areas people dispose of approximately 500 litres per day per person to the sewerage system. This includes industrial and other uses. This effluent contains approximately 1.5kg phosphorus and 5kg nitrogen per person per year (Murdoch, 1971) with up to half the phosphorus deriving from cleaning agents. Some of the nitrogen and phosphorus content of the raw sewage is removed in a secondary treatment process but most can be removed in nutrient-removal tertiary treatment plants. Many smaller coastal communities still use septic tank systems with absorption or evaporative trenches adjacent to waterways. These systems have limited ability to remove nutrients from the final effluent but much of the nutrient may be taken up in plant growth where absorption trenches are employed. Typical composition of different stages of sewage treatment are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Effluent composition from various stages of sewage treatment. Component Raw Sewage Biological Oxygen Demand (mg/l) 300 Primary Treatment 200 Secondary Treatment 15 Tertiary Treatment 2 Suspended Solids (mg/l) 300 120 20 2 Total Nitrogen (mg/l) 50 45 20 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/l) 10 9 7 0.6 Surfactants (mg/l) 2 2 1 <1 Pollution of sub-surface waters with nutrients, particularly nitrate, from unsewered rural residential land uses and subsequent contamination of stream waters after the sub-surface water leaches into streams has been noted in many catchments. Unsewered residential is a significant contributor to nitrate loads in the Johnstone River, north Queensland considering the comparatively small area occupied by this land use (Hunter and Walton, 1997). High nitrate concentrations in small number of bore waters in the Bundaberg region were associated with non-sewered settlements (Keating et al., 1996). Urban stormwater runoff contains significant concentrations of nutrients, sediments, metals, oil, synthetic organic chemicals and plastics. The nutrient concentrations may be up to 10% of the concentrations found in sewage effluents. The quantity of runoff from an urban area depends on the extent of impermeable surface and the intensity, duration and frequency of rainfall events. The types and concentrations of pollutants contained in the runoff depend on the types of urban and industrial development present. In some urban areas sewage overflow from the mains can be a significant source of contamination to stormwater during intense rainfall. While the actual concentrations of contaminants in runoff may not be particularly high, the volumes involved may mean that the mass loadings may exceed sewage loadings in the same area. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 104 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Nutrients in stormwater flow may derive from garden fertiliser, animal feed lots, land disturbance during construction activities and pet animal wastes. Trace metals originate from vehicle emissions (particularly lead), wear metal fallout and industrial activity while synthetic organic chemicals include pesticides, solvents, paint residues and in harbour areas, antifouling paint residues containing copper and organo-tin compounds. 1.9 River transformations and transport of materials through waterways All the soil which is lost from a paddock does not reach the main river system or even less to the coast. The greater part, especially the coarser fractions (sand & silt), is redeposited within the catchment. This explains the difference in the figures for soil loss measured on a small area (eg paddock) basis versus a sub-catchment or catchment scale as shown in Table 2. The percentage of eroded material actually delivered to the river mouth varies with the catchment size and type and may range from a few percent up to forty percent. C:N:P ratios and the forms of nutrients vary in downstream transport due to instream processes such as carbon metabolism, sedimentation, species transformations mediated by bacterial action and denitrification (Downing, 1997). This will be a minor factor in small wet tropics rivers due to their fast flow in major events and subsequent lack of time for such processes to occur. In anoxic conditions (in sediments or bottom waters) DON is converted to ammonia and then to nitrate and is exported downstream. Reservoirs export nitrate which has originally entered the reservoir as PN or DON and, in time, been converted to nitrate in the reservoir (Harris, 2001). Reservoirs thus often export nitrate in far greater concentrations than the intake water. Tropical rivers have, in general, highly irregular flow regimes and transport of materials, such as suspended sediments, nutrients and pesticide residues, in both dissolved and particulate forms occurs almost completely in major flow events. In these conditions, while some trapping of coarser washload sediments may occur within the catchment, there is almost no trapping of the finer sediments, with their PP and PN component, or dissolved nutrients. Rivers flush fresh to the sea in the major flow events. The salt wedge reaches the coast under river plumes in major flows but does not penetrate any distance up the rivers. A large proportion of nutrients mobilised in the catchments in major flood events are completely exported to the marine environment. Some trapping of finer sediments from the washload occurs in the estuary of rivers but trapping is minimal compared to temperate rivers and larger tropical rivers. 1.10 Sub-surface and groundwater Significant quantities of groundwater often underlie coastal river floodplains. In areas of significant fertiliser use these groundwaters are often contaminated with elevated nitrate concentrations (e.g. Brodie et al., 1984; Biggs et al., 2001 in Australia). While natural sources of nitrate in groundwater do exist, groundwaters with nitrate concentrations > 1 mg/l NO3 – N are generally a sign of fertiliser or sewage effluent contamination. The Nutrient Balance project on the Johnstone Catchment, north Queensland showed that a considerable proportion of applied nitrogen fertiliser passed below the root zone (>0.75m) of sugarcane and banana crops. For sugarcane the losses to drainage average 30 to 50 kg N/ha/year and for bananas 70 to 130 kg N/ha/year. (Moody et al., 1996) from fertilser application rates of 150 – 400 kg/ha/year. This nitrate is believed to be the source of the Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 105 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 ‘nitrate bulge’ found at some depth (4 - 10 m) in many parts of the Johnstone Catchment (e.g. Rasiah and Armour, 2001). Concentrations of nitrate in soil of up to 72.5 mg/kg NO3 – N have been found in this ‘bulge’ under sugarcane compared to concentrations of only up to 0.31 mg/kg NO3 – N under rainforest. High application of nitrogen fertilisers on sugarcane crops can lead to substantial leaching of nitrate below the root zone (Verberg et al., 1998). Significant leaching of nitrate in alluvial soils under sugarcane in the Herbert floodplain is reported (Bohl et al., 2000) and believed to be a significant contribution to elevated levels of nitrate in streams after horizontal flow of nitrate rich subsurface flow in to streams. 1.11 Acid sulphate soils runoff Soils containing iron sulphides are commonly referred to as potential acid sulphate soils (PASS). These soils occur naturally in water logged situations in low-lying areas near the coast, typically in areas below 5m AHD. Potential ASS is harmless when it remains below the water table. However, when these soils are drained or disturbed, iron sulphides become exposed to air, and are oxidised. The soil becomes actively acid forming and is then called acid sulphate soil (ASS). This oxidation produces sulphuric acid, which may leach into waterways. The consequences, which can be severe, include acidification of water bodies (pH as low as 2), lowering of dissolved oxygen (DO), smothering of benthic organisms, and increased concentrations of toxic metals (iron and aluminium) that are mobilised by the low pH. The impacts on coastal biota and habitats can be severe, and have been linked to fish-kills and red-spot disease in fish. 2 Susceptibility of marine ecosystems and specifically coral reefs to runoff 2.1 Pollutants of concern Sources of coastal pollution in tropical areas can be grouped into several main classes: agriculture, sewage, industrial discharges, urban stormwater, shipping activities, aquaculture and mining. The principal contaminant classes which may be present in discharges from these sources are sediment, nutrients, toxic metals, pesticides, oxygen depleting substances, acid sulphate runoff (low pH, oxygen depletion and metals), pathogenic organisms, larvae of exotic species, litter and other toxic chemicals. The input of many of these contaminants to coastal waters has changed dramatically in many states over the last few decades. Increased sewage discharges are closely correlated with population increases while nutrient inputs from agriculture have risen sharply with the increased fertiliser use in many locations over the last fifty years. The effects of runoff of sediments and nutrients from agricultural and urban development on adjacent catchments have been documented in many tropical regions. Edinger et al., (1998) documented land-based pollution and destructive fishing practices as having led to severe widespread loss of coral reefs in Indonesia. Similarly, in the Philippines reef destruction is associated with sedimentation, over-fishing and destructive fishing practices. Increased nutrient supply can enhance the growth of phytoplankton, turf algae and macroalgae. This effect has been demonstrated in numerous coral reef systems worldwide such as the Red Sea, Barbados and Indonesia (Edinger et al., 1998) with the best documented example in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii (Smith et al., 1981). Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 106 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 2.2 Dispersal and fate of runoff in the marine environment In the estuarine mixing process as salinity and pH rise clay materials in the river plume flocculate and tend to settle out close to the coast. For example most of the terrestrial sediment deposited on the floor of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) lagoon does so in a band within 15 km of the coast. However nutrients such as phosphate associated with the sediment may travel much further offshore than the sediment itself. This occurs as the phosphate desorbs off the sediment particles in the estuarine mixing process and is then in a dissolved form able to move greater distances in the prevailing current. Similarly dissolved components of the river discharge such as nitrate may also travel large distances before biological uptake or chemical transformation occurs (Devlin and Brodie, 2005). 2.3 Effects of sediment Increased sediment discharge from land associated with logging, forestry, overgrazing by stock, cropping on slopped land and urban and road construction may lead to severe effects on coastal ecosystems including sedimentation, turbidity-related light reduction and eutrophication. Benthic communities such as coral reefs and seagrass beds are particularly susceptible to sedimentation and smothering. Coral reefs in the Ryuku Islands (southern Japan), particularly on Okinawa and Ishigaki, have been almost destroyed by land runoff of red mud associated with construction activity and agriculture. Similarly on the Great Barrier Reef (Australia) general loss of coral on the reef flats of inshore reefs is considered to be associated with a fivefold increase in sediment discharge from the adjacent coast in the 130 year period since European settlement. In Westernport Bay (southern Australia) 80% (20,000 ha) of the total seagrass beds have been lost since 1973, blame being generally ascribed to increased sediment discharge from the surrounding catchments (Brodie, 1995). A second impact of sediment discharge is increased turbidity in the water column. Turbidity cuts light penetration through the water and inhibits the growth of organisms requiring light. The effects are most severe on benthic communities where the viable depth range for a community, such as seagrass, may be narrowed by loss of light. Particulate matter in the water column may also interfere with the feeding behaviour of zooplankton. In freshwater systems increased sediment leads to muddier rivers with less light for bottom communities, disturbance to bottom fauna due to siltation and river aggradation. River aggradation in the lower reaches of the river may lead to increased flooding and boating problems due to lack of depth. In north Queensland both the Pioneer River and the Johnstone River have dramatically increased sedimentation and aggradation in recent years blamed in both cases on land use practices in their catchments. Seagrasses are more to susceptible to sedimentation damage than mangroves, suffering from both the lack of light caused by more turbid water and direct smothering from deposited mud. In recent times large areas of seagrass meadow has been lost in muddy flood events. Over 1000 square kilometres of seagrass were lost in Hervey Bay in February, 1992 following two large floods in the Mary River. As a result the population of dugongs in the area, dependent on the seagrass for food, crashed from an estimated 1466 animals in 1988 to 92 in November 1992 with both mortality and migration. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 107 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 Turbid water from sediment runoff causes impacts to coral reefs by reducing light levels. Corals need light for their symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) to function. A common response of corals to prolonged exposure to turbid water is expulsion of the zooxanthellae so that the coral appears white or bleached. In the long-term, depending on the level of stress, bleached corals may recover and reestablish their zooxanthellae or die. Coral reefs may be severely effected by even moderate increases in sedimentation and turbidity (Fabricius, 2005) but paradoxically some corals thrive in the quite muddy conditions found on inshore reefs in many parts of the world. This depends on oceanographic conditions where waves and currents may remove sediment quickly after deposition and the corals tolerance for low light conditions and their sediment rejection and removal mechanisms. Corals can live and grow in turbid waters which have previously been assumed to be incompatible with reef growth and survival, but in high turbidity conditions, these corals may not accrete significant reef structures. There is a variety of evidence that increased sediment loading can damage corals (e.g. Fabricius, 2005). The effects of sediment loading can be exacerbated under conditions where aggregates of organic matter and fine sediment (‘muddy marine snow’) are formed. However, at least some coastal reef corals are known to use the organic matter in sediment aggregates as a food source so that suspended particulate matter may have both positive and negative implications for corals and other reef animals. Broad-scale distributions of the diversity of soft corals (Fabricius and De’ath, 2001a) and coralline algae (Fabricius and De’ath, 2001b) are inversely correlated with the turbidity (suspended particle load) of GBR waters. 2.4 Effects of nutrients, principally nitrogen and phosphorus Eutrophication occurs when the nutrient supply (particularly nitrogen and phosphorus) to an aquatic system increases to an amount beyond that useable by the normal photosynthetic community in the system. The productivity of many aquatic systems is limited by the supply of a nutrient element, often phosphorus in freshwater systems but more often nitrogen in marine systems. An enhanced supply of the limiting nutrient will remove the restriction on plant growth. The definition of eutrophication used by the European Union "The enrichment of water by nutrients, especially compounds of nitrogen and phosphorus, causing accelerated growth of algae and higher forms of plant life to produce an undesirable disturbance to the balance of organisms present in the water concerned" encapsulates the idea. When enhanced input occurs algae and phytoplankton whose growth is normally limited by the supply of nitrogen and/or phosphorus flourish, often at the expense of the resident photosynthetic community. Thus phytoplankton may bloom and the species present change to 'undesirable' types associated with 'red tides' and toxicity in fish and shellfish. In other ecosystems corals are replaced by macroalgae while seagrass may be overgrown by epiphytic organisms. With phytoplankton blooms an increase in the presence of filter-feeding organisms such as boring sponges, tube worms and barnacles which feed on plankton may replace coral. With enhanced productivity comes increased organic matter in the water column and the potential for removal of oxygen from the water, particularly near the bottom. In conditions of zero oxygen (anoxia), anaerobic processes occur producing sulphides and methane. Fish kills and changes in benthic community structure may then result. Red tides occur when pigmented algae forms blooms under favourable meteorological and nutrient supply conditions. These blooms can be natural but may also be enhanced by Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 108 Land use practices in the Stettin Bay catchment area and their relation to the status of coral reefs – ACTFR Report No. 04/01 anthropogenic nutrient inputs. Many such blooms are ecologically benign but others may consist of algae containing potent toxins. Toxins from algae such as Pyrodinium bahamense may then be incorporated into bivalve molluscs and pose a serious threat to humans when consumed. It is believed that toxic red tides are increasing in frequency around the world and in the Western Pacific. Effects of runoff, sediment and nutrients on coastal reef communities are complex and incompletely understood. Reefs and established coral communities can be found at many sites along the coast, often with naturally high levels of turbidity and sedimentation. At a number of locations, nearshore reefs or sections of reefs disturbed by various processes (eg. cyclones or floods) have failed to recover, even after extended periods (e.g. van Woesik et al., 1999). All occur in locations directly influenced by runoff from agriculturally and urban developed catchments. Macroalgae are a conspicuous element of nearshore reef communities near developed and undeveloped catchments and typically exhibit a positive growth response to nutrient enrichment. Algae were regarded as indicators of eutrophication on coral reefs. Recent studies however, show that algal dominance is influenced by complex interactions between nutrient availability, growth and grazing pressure (Fabricius et al., 2005). The best documented example of the effects of nutrients and organic loading delivered via a sewage discharge on a coral reef is Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii (Smith et al., 1981). Sewage discharges into the Bay from the end of the Second World War to 1978 saw the waters become increasingly rich in phytoplankton and reefs closest to the outfall become overgrown by filter-feeding organisms, such as sponges, tube-worms and barnacles. Reefs in the centre of the Bay further from the outfalls were overgrown by the green alga Dictyosphaeria sp. (Smith et al., 1981). After diversion of the outfalls into the ocean in 1978, the reefs have slowly recovered. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Page 109