Simple Multi-body System Models of Bolted Connections to
Transcription
Simple Multi-body System Models of Bolted Connections to
TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Multibody dynamics for analyzing limit-states in structural engineering B-1000 Brussels, Wednesday 5 November 2014 Simple Multi-body System Models of Bolted Connections to Consider all Relevant Nonlinearities of Failure mechanisms Detlef H.-J. F. Neuenhaus post spacer guardrail AFB20 2014 cover plate TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Simple multi-body system models of bolted connections to Detlef Neuenhaus consider all relevant nonlinearities of failure mechanisms Detlef Neuenhaus Contents Introduction to Multi-Body Systems (MBS) Used Strategy in MEPHISTO Typecast Body Groups Depiction of the demonstration example MBS model of single fastener connection Determining spring parameter Outlook Contents 2 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Multi-body System Formalisms Synthetic Method, based on Analytic Method, based on NEWTON / EULER’s equations LAGRANGE’s equations (2nd kind) or Euler-Langrange equations • Principle of linear momentum · • Principle of angular momentum where · · where 1,2, ⋯ , represents the th degree of freedom : mass of the body : acceleration of the center of mass 1,2, ⋯ , # 1 ! 2 " : total force acting on body : moment of inertia represents the th degree of freedom " " · " : total kinetic energy of the system : total potential energy of the system $" : generalized coordinates : angular acceleration of the body : angular velocity of the body $" : generalized velocities : total torque acting on body Calculation of the equation of motion by synthesizing the single parts of forces and moments. + : Very efficiently in case of large systems. - : Kinematical constraints have to be described by additional constraint equations Calculation of the equation of motion by analyzing of the total energy to generalized forces and displacements. + : It’s clear and transparent procedure. - : Expensive differential process, in particular to many degree of freedoms Introduction to MBS (base Formalisms) 3 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Used Formalism in MEPHISTO axis of a virtual rotation The JOURDAIN‘s principle of virtual power (based on NEWTON-EULER‘s equations, but with dependency on velocities) # body ! % &' ' · d -. () d &+ 0 center of mass The differential equation of virtual power is: # !& & -. / &+ inertial reference base 0 ' y Notation in matrix-form: & 0 & 0 &+ 0 z < ; ; x With the generalized coordinates $ of the system and the relationships & 1 &$, &+ 5 0 &$ &$ 0 1 0 1 & we get 3 &$, 1 $ 2, &$ 0 56 57 3 $ 3 0 3 $ 8 4, 10 total virtual power of all generalized forces and moments 2 30 4 5 9 Introduction to MBS (used Formalism) 0 ⟹ 8$ 9 4 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Typecast Body-Group body 4 Hinge-Beam – Element 3D YZ[ \]^ _X ` ; Yef \g^ Yeh \g^ Yef \n^ Yeh \n^ Ya[ \]^ body 3 bcd ` >? @ 6jkg 1 2m ? l 6jkn 1 2m ? l 2? @ body 2 y where l : total length of the beam element . . m ? 1 : divisional coefficient A body 1 x z =. 4 =A 4 =A ' =. ' Tyre – Element 3D longitudinal: O lateral: # vertical: P longitudinal: Q RS lateral: T vertical: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T⁄cos O 0 T · tan O 0 0 tan O 1⁄cos O T · tan O 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 W# 0 0 0 · Q WX 1 0 0 W QW# 0 1⁄cos O 0 QWX 0 tan O 1 Coordinate system, unit vectors and velocity vectors of the wheel Typecast Body-Groups 5 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Analysis of Road Restraint System MBS model for the restraint system GS2 5 7 8 3 7 9 7 5 Rz, Lz 8 3 4 4 2 7 Ry, Lz Rx, Ry 6 7 8 5 7 Ri : free rotation Li : free translation 9 Rx, Ly 3 7 5 8 3 1 Rx, Rz 2 y 4 Lx,Ly,Lz 7 Rx,Ry,Rz, Lx,Ly,Lz 5 3 4 Ry 1 4 2 x z 1 2x4[m] segments of the MBS model for the GS2 restraint system with a post distance of 2.0[m] MBS modelling of bolted connection (demonstration example) MBS-model of the restrained systems 6 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Demonstration example of MBS modelling of bolted connection: post-spacer; rail-spacer Guardrail System: GS2 (steel guardrail of the Round Robin benchmark test example) MBS modelling of bolted connection (demonstration example) 7 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Demonstration example of MBS modelling of bolted connection: post-spacer; rail-spacer Guardrail System: GS2 (steel guardrail of the Round Robin benchmark test example) Post distance: 2.0[m] MBS modelling of bolted connection (demonstration example) 8 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Demonstration example of MBS modelling of bolted connection: post-spacer; rail-spacer Guardrail System: GS2 (steel guardrail of the Round Robin benchmark test example) Post distance: 2.0[m] Posts: C100x50x5 Guardrail-beam: A-profile Spacer MBS modelling of bolted connection (demonstration example) 9 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Demonstration example of MBS modelling of bolted connection: post-spacer; rail-spacer Guardrail System: GS2 (steel guardrail of the Round Robin benchmark test example) Post distance: 2.0[m] Posts: C100x50x5 Guardrail-beam: A-profile Spacer One single bolt M16,5.8 (at rail with nut and cover plate instead of a washer) MBS modelling of bolted connection (demonstration example) 10 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Springs for the bolt M16 Ultimate limit state analysis to define nonlinear springs Bolt M16x40, 5.8 and slotted hole at the post and guardrail The kinematic movements are separated, so that for each kinetic property an internal force element can act separately Nonlinear spring with hysteretical characteristic for the shear between the post and spacer and the spacer and guardrail. post spacer guardrail Syz-shear cover plate Syz-shear MBS modelling of bolted connection (ultimate limit state analysis) 11 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Springs for the bolt M16 Ultimate limit state analysis to define nonlinear springs Bolt M16x40, 5.8 and slotted hole at the post and guardrail The kinematic movements are separated, so that for each kinetic property an internal force element can act separately post Nonlinear spring with hysteretical characteristic for the tensile bolt load between the post and spacer and the spacer and guardrail. Sx-tensile spacer guardrail Syz-shear cover plate Syz-shear Sx-tensile MBS modelling of bolted connection (ultimate limit state analysis) 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Springs for the bolt M16 Ultimate limit state analysis to define nonlinear springs Bolt M16x40, 5.8 and slotted hole at the post and guardrail The kinematic movements are separated, so that for each kinetic property an internal force element can act separately post Linear spring for the vertical slip of the slotted hole (max 50[mm]) between the post and spacer and the horizontal slip of the slotted hole (max.64[mm]) between the guardrail and the spacer. Sx-tensile spacer guardrail Syz-shear cover plate Sy-slot Syz-shear Sx-tensile Sx-slot MBS modelling of bolted connection (ultimate limit state analysis) 13 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Determining the spring parameters To capture the failure state close to reality, the characteristic values have to be adjust: The relevant material data can be taken from steel standards such as EN 10025, or if available, from the steel producer‘s factory production control; Resistance calculations are carried out according to Eurocode design rules; Neglecting partial safety factors (accidental loads); The resistances and the elastic limits could be increased by the factor 1.1 (constructions are able to resist higher loads as defined by ultimate limit state, if it is excited by a suddenly applied nonperiodic excitation); MBS modelling of bolted connection (resistances) 14 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Spring characteristics Spring characteristics for bolt M16, 5.8 Lyz7_1M16_5-8.hys (7) post: hole slot of 50 [mm] Ly7_1M16_l50.lin (4) rail: hole slot of 64 [mm] 90 Lx7_1M16_5-8_sp.hys Lyz4_1M16_5-8.hys 80 Lz4_1M16_l64.lin Lx4_1M16_5-8_sp.hys spring force F [kN] 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,04 0,05 0,06 0,07 0,08 spring-strain s [m] Shearing: Hole bearing: Tension: Punching shear: Typ: nS = (TH M16x40) fub = γM2 = A= AS = d= dm = αv = (post/spacer | rail/spacer) d0,ǁ = (post/spacer | rail/spacer) d0,⊥= e1 / e2 = (spacer) e1 / e2 = p1 / p2 = min{2.8∙e2/d0,⊥;2.5} = k1 = min{e1/(3∙d0,ǁ ); fub/ fu;1} = αb = k2 = (spacer | cover plate) tp = (post | guardrail) fu = (spacer) fu = (post | guardrail) t = Post 1M16 1 728 1.25 201 157 16 25 0.6 50 / 20.7 17 / 20.7 110 / 50 100 / 50 0/0 2.5 1.0 0.9 2.98 432 478 4.98 Guardrail 1M16 1 728 1.25 201 157 16 25 0.6 64 / 17 19.5 / 17 158 / 235 60 / 50 0/0 2.5 1.0 0.9 5.00 387 478 3.03 Fv,Rd = nS αv 1.1∙fub A / γM2 = 77284.99 77284.99 [N] Fb,Rd = nS k1 αb 1.1∙fu d t / γM2 = 50140.29 50140.29 [N] Ft,Rd = nS k2 1.1∙fub AS / γM2 = 90522.43 90522.43 [N] Bp,Rd = nS 0.6 π dm tp 1.1∙fu / γM2 = 59956.19 81446.20 [N] MBS modelling of bolted connection (characteristics) 5.8 [-] [N/mm^2] [-] [mm^2] [mm^2] [mm] [mm] [-] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [-] [-] [-] [mm] [N/mm^2] [N/mm^2] [mm] 15 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 10 Simple MBS model of bolted connection in use Post 11 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Post 9 Neuenhaus Post 11 Post 10 Post 12 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Copyright © Neuenhaus Engineering 2014 Detlef Neuenhaus - MultiBody dynamics for analysing LImit states in Structural Engineering GS2 Test TB11 – Level N2 (900 [kg] – 100 [km/h] – 20 [°]) lateral front lateral back Test item took place on the 28th June 2007 0,140 [sec] GS2 Test TB11 – Level N2 (900 [kg] – 100 [km/h] – 20 [°]) top view Test item took place on the 28th June 2007 0,280 [sec] TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Comparison between test and simulation results Wp (m) Diff 0,34 0,44 0,64 0,86 ±0.16 1.04 ±0.21 1,02 ±0.24 0,87 ±0.20 0,71 ±0.15 0,62 0,45 0,36 0,34 ASI THIV 0,63 18 (0.6 … 0.8) (20 … 26) (km/h) 38 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Outlook Only the application of simulation techniques allows the important issue of changing parameters. The use of MBS where the viscoelastic and elastic-plastic characteristics are defined directly by internal force elements, is the easiest and quickest way to analyze modifications of road restraint systems. Replacing full-scale impact tests by means of computational simulations, reduce the costs for classifying and certifying a VRS An easy manageable and still flexible classification of VRS can only be achieved by tolerance ranges, which are well defined in the EN 1317. Drawback is, sometimes a VRS got by coincidence no certification and unfortunately also vice versa. It is for this reason that numerical simulations shall be also prescribed to analyze the effects of the tolerance ranges and to isolate better the risks. Statistical methods, e.g. DOE, could help to localize the reason of possible unexpected results. In combination with multi-body CAE approaches this lead to efficiently robustness design of VRS. Outlook 39 TRB AFB(20)2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design Detlef Neuenhaus Thank you very much for your attention Simple Multi-body System Models of Bolted Connections to Consider all Relevant Nonlinearities of Failure mechanisms 40