VIE EN RO SE

Participatory design
Non acoustic post operam data analysis comparing
appreciation results of intervention realized with a process
of participatory design vs others
VIE EN.RO.SE. Ingegneria - Firenze
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
A method for comparing appreciation results of interventions realized with a process of
participatory design and a “traditional” intervention for noise reduction one, has been
evaluated.
The comparison has been carried out through the definition of objective and subjective
criteria.
The case-study used for the comparison is the intervention in "M. L. King" School, consisting in
a noise barrier, realized in 2007.
“Don Minzoni” (2012)
“M.L.King”(2007)
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
COMPARATIVE METHOD
- post-operam Data Analysis
“Don Minzoni” School
“M.L.King” School
INTERVENTION FOR HUSH PROJECT
(PARTECIPATORY DESIGN)
«TRADITIONAL» INTERVENTION
FOR NOISE REDUCTION
OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE
CRITERIA
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
ran
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
1- TOOLS
2- LEVELS
3- SCORE - CRITERIA
1
0,5
The objective evaluation is
based on the analysis of all
documents (reports and
technical drawings) of the
several phases of the project,
implementation and testing.
0
Completeness of
the phases:
Completeness
Completeness of phase is not
1 Completeness of the of the phases:
the phases: phase present
phases (analysis, design, phase is present is not present, but Effectiveness of
Effectiveness of implicitly
implementation and
the intervention:
the intervention: considered
post-operam);
no problems
all the problems Effectiveness of
connected to the
2 Effectiveness of the
connected to
the intervention: criteria are
intervention.
the criteria are only some
solved
solved
problems
connected to the
criteria are solved
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
1 COMPLETENESS OF THE PHASES
ANTE-OPERAM ANALYSIS
DESIGNING
IMPLEMENTATION
POST-OPERAM ANALYSIS
2 EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERVENTION
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
COMPLETENESS OF THE PHASES
Don Minzoni
M.L.King
URBAN PLACEMENT
ACCESSIBILITY (bus line, proximity to residential areas)
1
0,5
1
0
SITE ANALYSIS (building / green staff / flooring / streets)
1
0
IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS
1
0
ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC CLASSIFICATION PLAN
1
1
ANALYSIS OF THE SOUND SOURCES (traffic sources, human sources, natural
sounds, other mechanical sounds)
1
IDENTIFICATION OF HOMOGENOUS ACOUSTIC SUB-AREAS
1
0
ACOUSTIC SURVEY (acoustic measures and traffic count)
1
1
ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC MAP – scenario ANTE -OPERAM
1
1
SOUNDSCAPE ANALYSIS (soundwalks and binaural recording)
1
0
PSYCHO ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS (subjective maps based on perception by
questtionnaires and interviews about expecions of the users )
1
0
CONSIDERATION OF OTHER FACTORS ( visual aspects, air quality, well
maintenance, safety,, ecc…): multi-sensorial approach of the landscape
1
0
12
3
PHASE 1 – ANTE-OPERAM ANALYSIS
ANTE-OPERAM ANALYSIS
0,5
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
COMPLETENESS OF THE PHASES
PHASE 2 – DESIGNING
ATTENTION IN DESIGNING FOR DESIRES AND EXPECTATIONS OF THE END-USERS,
ACCORDING TO RESULTS OF ANALYSIS PHASE
ATTENTION IN DESIGNING FOR PROBLEMS EXPRESSED BY MUNICIPALITY
ATTENTION TO OTHER COMPLEMENTARY NON ACOUSTIC FACTORS CONNECTED
TO GLOBAL WELLNESS
MORE DIFFERENT SOLUTION CONSIDERED FOR NOISE REDUCTION
ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSAL SOLUTIONS WITH END-USERS AND MUNICIPALITY
FOR THE CHOISE OF THE BEST SOLUTION
ATTENTION TO MATERIALS
Don Minzoni
1
M.L.King
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
ATTENTION TO COLORS
1
0
ATTENTION TO SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION ACCORDING TO ACOUSTIC CLIMATE
1
0
SHARING WITH END-USERS OF CHANGES IN THE PROJECT
0
0
8
3
DESIGNING
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
COMPLETENESS OF THE PHASES
Don Minzoni
M.L.King
ASSESSMENT OF CHANGE IN THE PROJECT ACCORDING TO ISSUES RAISED IN THE
PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS
1
n.c.
SHARING WITH END-USERS OF CHANGES IN THE PROJECT DURING THE
IMPLEMENTATION
0
n.c.
1
n.c.
PHASE 4 – POST-OPERAM ANALYSIS
Don Minzoni
M.L.King
ACOUSTIC TEST CONSIDERING ALSO THE COURTYARD
QUESTIONNAIRES FOR POST-OPERAM ASSESSMENT
1
1
1
0
2
1
PHASE 3 – IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION
POST-OPERAM ANALYSIS
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
COMPLETENESS OF THE PHASES
Don
Minzoni
M.L.King
TOTAL
SCORE
ANTE-OPERAM ANALYSIS
12
3
12
DESIGNING
8
3
9
IMPLEMENTATION
1
n.c.
2
POST-OPERAM ANALYSIS
2
1
2
23 (22*)
7
25
PHASE
COMPLETENESS OF THE PHASES
* Not considered the score of the phase considered n.c. (not classifiable) for «M.L.King» School
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERVENTION
DON
MINZONI
M.L.KING
1
0,5
n.c.
n.c.
APPROPRIATE SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT
1
n.c.
STATE OF THE PAVING
VISIBILITY OF THE NOISE SOURCES
AREA OF ACOUSTIC EFFICACY
1
1
1
1
0,5
0,5
0,5
1
1
1
1
0,5
n.c.
n.c.
0,5
1
10 (5,5)*
4
CRITERIA
ACCESSIBILITY
APPROPRIATE GREEN STAFF
ACHIEVEMENT OF THE QUALITY ACOUSTIC VALUES
ANALYSIS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE USERS IN THE AREA
ANALYSIS OF THE ACTIVITIES ATTENDED IN THE AREA
CLEANLINESS AND MAINTENANCE
SAFETY
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERVENTION
* Not considered the score of the phase considered n.c. (not classifiable) for «M.L.King» School
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
COMPARATIVE METHOD
- post-operam Data Analysis
“Don Minzoni” School
“M.L.King” School
«TRADITIONAL» INTERVENTION
FOR NOISE REDUCTION
INTERVENTION FOR HUSH PROJECT
(PARTECIPATORY DESIGN)
SCORE
SCORE
COMPLETNESS OF THE PHASES
COMPLETNESS OF THE PHASES
7
22
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERVENTION
5,5
27,5
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERVENTION
OBJECTIVE
CRITERIA
4
11
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
SUBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
1- TOOLS
2- SCORE - CRITERIA
1
0,5
The subjective assessment
is based on the results of
the end-users
questionnaires
Improvement of the
perception on the
criteria or
no problems
emerged in the
ante-operam
analysis
0
only some
problems
connected to the
criteria are solved
no problem
connected to
the criteria
are solved
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
SUBJECTIVE CRITERIA - post-operam Data Analysis
CRITERIA
ACCESSIBILY
APPROPRIATE GREEN STAFF
APPROPRIATE SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT
STATE OF THE PAVING
TAXONOMY OF THE NOISE SOURCES
CLEANLINESS AND MAINTENANCE
DON
MINZONI
M.L.KING
1
n.c.
0
n.c.
0,5
0,5
0,5
1
n.c.
n.c.
1
n.c.
SAFETY
FUNCTIONALITY OF THE SPACES
1
n.c.
0,5
0,5
SOUNDSCAPE
0,5
0,5
1
1
7 (2,5)*
2,5
GLOBAL SATISFACTION
SUBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
* Not considered the score of the phase considered n.c. (not classifiable) for «M.L.King» School
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
COMPARATIVE METHOD
- post-operam Data Analysis
“Don Minzoni” School
“M.L.King” School
TRADITIONAL INTERVENTION
FOR NOISE REDUCTION
INTERVENTION FOR HUSH PROJECT
(PARTECIPATORY DESIGN)
SCORE
SCORE
OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
27,5
11
SUBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
SUBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
2,5
2,5
30
OBJECTIVE AND
SUBJECTIVE
CRITERIA
13,5
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Workshop HUS
AIA-DAGA 20
H
13 Conferenc
e on Acoustic
s
18th M
arch 2013, Me
CONCLUSION
The OBJECTIVE COMPARISON shows that:
the intervention for "Don Minzoni" School is certainly positive;
the intervention for "Don Minzoni" School shows a deepen and critical analysis of the acoustic
and non-acoustic situation in the scenario ante-operam;
the intervention for "Don Minzoni" School has been useful to consider and solve also nonacoustical critical issues;
The “traditional” intervention design for “M.L.King” School is certainly useful to reduce the noise,
but it has not considered other issues and factors connected to the use of the courtyard.
The SUBJECTIVE COMPARISON shows that:
the subjective analysis is not so representative for “M.L.King” School because the users haven’t
joined to the design and implementation of the intervention (date: 2005-2007);
However it is possible to make a general assessment of the effectiveness of the intervention in
“Don Minzoni” School: almost all the criteria are considered as at least adequate and in most
cases also as good, attesting the effectiveness of the participatory design method.
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community
ran
Thanks to European Commission
that contributed to this project
considering and co-financing it
into the LIFE+2008 Financial Programme.
http://www.hush-project.eu
LIFE08 ENV/IT/000386 with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community