THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm…
Transcription
THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm…
Hmmm… THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO A walk around the fringes of finance For A FREE Subscription to Things That Make You Go Hmmm..... click HERE ““The anarch is (I am simplifying) on the side of gold: it fascinates him, like everything that eludes society. Gold has its own immeasurable might. It need only show itself, and society with its law and order is in jeopardy.” – ERNST JüNGER “Gold was not selected arbitrarily by governments to be the monetary standard. Gold had developed for many centuries on the free market as the best money; as the commodity providing the most stable and desirable monetary medium.” – Murray Rothbard “The road to hell isn’t paved with gold, it’s paved with faith. Faith in a dollar that’s backed by a belief that people have faith in other people’s belief in it.” – Jarod Kintz “Who knows? Not me I never lost control You’re face, to face With the man who sold the world” – David Bowie, The Man Who Sold The World 02 June 2012 1 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 2. That $70,000 payment - which in today’s inflation-decimated dollars, would be worth roughly $1,500,000 - secured the Homestake Deposit which would turn out to be the largest and deepest gold mine in North America, producing more than 40 million ounces of gold over its life until it was finally closed in 2002. In the middle of South Dakota’s Black Hills, near the Wyoming state line, lies the tiny town of Deadwood (population – according to the 2010 census, 1,270). Despite its evocative name, it’s probably fair to say that, without the recent eponymous HBO TV series, few people would have even heard of a settlement that, in the 1870s took its name from the dead trees found in its gulch (yes, ‘gulch’). Amazingly enough, despite its size, Deadwood is the county seat of Lawrence County which is described thus by the US Census Bureau: “…the county has a total area of 800 square miles, of which 800 square miles is land and 0 square miles is water”. Dead wood indeed. A little more than two miles south-west of Deadwood lies another town of which few will have heard; Lead (that’s ‘Lead’ as in ‘feed’ not ‘Lead’ as in ‘dead’), and Lead has a claim to fame all of its own. Lead was founded on July 10, 1876, after four men; Fred and Moses Manuel, Alex Engh and Hank Harney discovered a gold deposit that they would sell the following year for $70,000 to a trio of mining entrepreneurs which included George Hearst, future father of William Randolph Hearst the publishing magnate and James Ben Ali Haggin, for whom the prestigious Ben Ali Stakes horse race is named. 02 June 2012 A year after acquiring the mine, Hearst and his partners sold shares in the Homestake Mining Company and listed it on the New York Stock Exchange. Homestake would go on to become the longest continuously-listed NYSE stock in history until it finally merged with Barrick Gold in 2001. The story of Homestake Mining has been on my mind a lot lately as I have watched precious metal mining stocks get decimated over the past 6 months - reaching levels that they haven’t witnessed since the very depths of 2008 - when gold was trading a little below $800. It’s hard to get away from gold these days as the bears rejoice in gold’s ‘demise’ whilst the bulls rationalize a healthy correction in an ongoing bull market, but the one thing everybody who follows gold is confused about is the performance of the mining stocks. A look at the NYSE Arca Gold BUGS (HUI) index (anecdotally, the BUGS in the name of this particular index, for those who aren’t familiar with it, stands for Basket of Unhedged Gold Stocks) as a proxy for the mining sector shows just how extraordinary the collapse in the mining sector has been (chart, top, next page). The senior gold miners, as a group, lost over 40% from their September peak when gold hit $1900 to their recent trough against a comparative fall of only 15% in the underlying commodity which, even by the standards previously set by this particularly skittish group, is quite something. If we overlay the gold price and add the junior miners we find that, not only have the juniors 2 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 3. I have spoken at length previously in these pages about the dangers of listening to the wrong voices when seeking commentary on gold but for the benefit of anyone who missed that, here are the dos and don’ts of the gold space: DO listen to: Eric Sprott, Richard Russell, Jim Sinclair, Bill Murphy, James Turk, Harvey Organ, John Embry, Pierre Lassonde, Ben Davies, Egon von Greyerz, Rick Rule, Marc Faber, John Hatthaway and Bill Fleckenstein (amongst others) SOURCE: BLOOMBERG (perhaps understandably) underperformed further still, but that, as a group, they managed to lose over half of their value in the same period (chart, below). Do NOT listen to: Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Bill Gates, Jim Cramer, Jon Nadler, anyone speaking on CNBC about gold whose name does not appear on the list above, your broker (unless he has heard of AT LEAST 50% of the names on the list of ‘Dos’), the FT, the Wall Street Journal and (sorry Dennis) Dennis Gartman. There are many commentators who have been right about gold for 12 straight years and there are many who have arrived at the party late and proceeded to apply the wrong metrics to gold when attempting to predict its future movements. My advice? Listen to the former and ignore the latter. But I digress... Let’s get back to Homestake Mining, shall we? Specifically, its performance during The Great Depression. SOURCE: BLOOMBERG Now, for many latecomers to the world of gold mining stocks, these moves have been enough to send buyers scurrying for cover, vowing never to touch these stocks again. As gold hit $1,900 last year, hot money that wanted nothing to do with gold at $800, thought it was expensive at $1,200 and were convinced that the gold ‘bubble’ had burst at $1,500, flocked to the yellow metal in sure and certain hope of a bonanza. But a funny thing happened on the way to the ore... um...the price of gold corrected. Fast. 02 June 2012 By 1930, Homestake Mining had been paying continuous dividends for 50 years but during the period 1929-1935, when the US stock market was in a tailspin as Depression gripped the world, Homestake’s performance was nothing short of staggering—its share price (particularly in 1930, 1931 and 1932—before Roosevelt’s Executive Order 6102 confiscated gold from US citizens) soaring as the Dow Jones nosedived. In that six-year period, as the price of Homestake’s shares leapt 3 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... Homestake Mining vs Dow Jones Industrial Average Percentage Performance 1928 - 1949 +700% +600% Homestake Mining Co. Dow Jones Industrial Average +500% +400% +300% +200% +100% 0 -100% 49 48 19 47 19 the US on a gold standard, the price of gold traded in an incredibly narrow range between $20.69 and $20.63 and it was this stability which surely drove many into the welcoming arms of 46 Between 1924 and 1930, with 19 45 Now, when this discussion arises, many people like to point out the fact that the official price of gold in US dollars at that time was fixed, and that surely this helped drive investment dollars into gold mining shares as it limited the downside in the price of the metal and there is a lot of merit in that argument —after all, who WOULDN’T feel happy investing in mining shares if they knew for certain that the price of gold would not go down? Unfortunately, where the price of anything is ‘fixed’ by certain parties, that ‘fixing’ can go in both directions and that is exactly what happened in the late-1920s/early-1930s. 02 June 2012 19 44 19 43 19 42 19 41 19 40 19 39 19 38 19 37 19 36 19 35 19 34 19 33 19 32 19 31 19 30 19 29 19 28 19 19 almost 600%, it was accompanied by similar performance in both earnings AND the company’s dividend payout—the former going from $4.16 in 1929 to $32.43 in 1935 (that’s compound EPS growth of 41% annually) while the latter, by the time 1935 rolled around, had jumped from $7 in 1920 to $56 by 1935 as the company continued to pay out 8-10% of its earnings as a dividend. 4. gold mining shares as the world around them began to implode. But then came 1931 and, with deleveraging and deflation the order of the day, the gold ‘price’ fell from an average of $20.65 in 1930 to an average of $17.05 in 1931—a decline of almost 20% in a year. As you can see from the chart (left), during that time the price of Homestake Mining almost doubled as the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost around 90% of its value and it kept on rising the following year as gold recovered all its losses and added a few extra pennies for good measure— averaging $20.69 in 1932 while the Dow continued to languish. As 1932 turned into 1933, there was a whiff of panic in the air and so it was, on April 5th, 1933, that President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 6102 “forbidding the Hoarding of Gold Coin, Gold Bullion, and Gold Certificates within the continental United States” and forcing holders to sell their gold to the government at the mandated price of $20.67 ($371 in today’s dollars): (Wikipedia): Executive Order 6102 required all persons to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, all but a small amount of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned by them to the Federal Reserve, in exchange for $20.67 per troy ounce. Under the Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917, as amended by the recently passed Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933, violation of the order was punishable by fine up to $10,000 ($167,700 if adjusted for inflation as of 2010) or up to ten years in prison, or both. Most citizens who owned large amounts of gold had it transferred to countries such as Switzerland. Order 6102 specifically exempted “customary use in industry, profession or art”—a provision that covered artists, jewellers, dentists, and sign makers among others. The order 4 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... further permitted any person to own up to $100 in gold coins (a face value equivalent to 5 troy ounces (160 g) of Gold valued at about $7800 as of 2011). The same paragraph also exempted “gold coins having recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins.” This protected gold coin collections from legal seizure and likely melting. And that’s how these things tend to go, folks. The twist, however, came immediately after the enactment of Executive Order 6102: The price of gold from the Treasury for international transactions was thereafter raised to $35 an ounce ($587 in 2010 dollars). The resulting profit that the government realized funded the Exchange Stabilization Fund established by the Gold Reserve Act in 1934. The ‘resulting profit that the government realized’ could have been worded in another way, so let’s run it through Google Translate and convert it from Officialese into Realitish: ‘the resultant 40% overnight devaluation of the dollar’ So what did this 40% devaluation in the price of the dollar do to gold mining shares? Well, using Homestake Mining as our proxy again, we can see from the chart on the previous page that , at the time of the confiscation, it was up roughly 400% in value over the previous five years, but from there it climbed relentlessly higher as the price of gold was revalued upwards, increasing its profits by around 50% almost overnight— peaking around 600% higher mid-1938 than it had been ten years prior, with the Dow Jones still floundering 50% below its 1928 level. So, gold miners proved to be an acutely smart investment through the Great Depression, completely disavowing the notion that owning such stocks in a deflationary environment was a foolish way to invest one’s money. The performance of gold and the mining stocks during the inflationary vortex of the 1970s is far fresher in the collective memory and, seemingly, far easier for the average investor to get their head around—likely because a rising tide floats all boats so people have a far easier time getting their heads around rising prices being good for this particular corner of the investment universe. So now let’s fast-forward to 2012 and take a look at the current state of the world and, in particular, gold and gold-mining stocks Since its ‘peak’ The Great Depression $2,000 The Great Recession $1,500 1933 FDR Revalues Gold At $35 1968 Gold ‘Free Float’ Market Established 5. 1973 Nixon Revalues Gold At $42.22 $1,000 at $1,900 in September of 2011, gold has undergone a correction of perfectly healthy proportions—roughly 18% to the recent low print of $1,539—and is in the process of building a base before it makes another move higher. (NB I began writing this piece on Thursday BEFORE gold’s stunning breakout performance on Friday after the disappointing US data) Why the certainty? Let’s recap just a couple of the factors that affect the price of gold (and by extension the mining stocks) and try to make an assessment of the situation. $500 $0 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 02 June 2012 2011 Any attempt to figure out the likely movement of the gold price should begin with the actions of the 5 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... world’s central banks as they are both the biggest holders of gold and tend to move largely in lockstep in long, trending motions. Some would say that they also have both the most to lose by a strengthening gold price as well as the means with which to drive the price lower but that is a discussion for another day. What IS certain, is that central banks are, generally speaking, all buyers or all sellers at the same time and, once they set a course in one direction, they tend to stay that course for decades. had overwhelmed the market and drove gold to its low of $252. The Washington Agreement stipulated that signatories could sell a maximum of 400 tonnes between them over the next 5 years. It was re-signed again in 2004 and again in 2009. In fact, central bank gold holdings slid continuously from around 1974 through the tail end of 2009 (chart, bottom left) as the need for gold diminished (at least in the eyes of the stewards of global finances whose judgement is being shown to be less than prudent in many cases). Coincidentally, the selling of gold holdings accelerated right around the time the gold price hit its na- September 1999 saw the signing of the Washington Agreement on Gold which was intended to set limits on the amount of central bank gold that could be sold into the market in a given 5-year period. It was precipitated by the extraordinary decision by Britain’s then-Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, to announce to the market that he would be selling roughly 60% of Great Britain’s gold holdings through a series of public auctions as well as simultaneous sales by the SNB, The Netherlands, Austria and proposed sales by the IMF. Central bank selling pressure SOURCE: WGC dir in 1999. Against every seller, however, there stands a buyer so the gold being disposed of by the central banks was simply finding its way into private hands—smart money, if you will— as ETF and private bullion holdings climbed aggressively (chart, above). 1,350 Central Bank Gold Holdings 1965 - 2010 (oz mm) 1,300 1,250 1,200 1,150 1,100 1,050 1,000 950 900 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 6. 2010 It will hardly cause the sharpest collective intake of breath amongst readers when I point out that, by the time the Chinese central bank announced in late 2009 that their gold holdings (which had remained unpublished for several years) had doubled to 1,054 tons, the juggernaut had turned and central banks had become net buyers of gold for the first time in almost 40 years. That pattern has continued—despite plenty of rhetoric to the contrary from these august institutions—and it WILL continue for many years to come while the world unrav- SOURCE: TTMYGH 02 June 2012 6 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... els the Gordian Knot of debt with which it has bound itself over the last thirty years—as the latest report from the World Gold Council highlighted this month: (Sharps Pixley): Mexico, Kazakhstan and Ukraine added about 204,000 ounces in April. The Philippines added a whopping 1.033 million ounces in March with gold now at 13.6% of its total reserves. UBS highlighted the Philippines’ gold purchase is significant as this is the second largest monthly Central Bank’s purchase after Mexico’s purchase of 2.5 million ounces in March 2011. World Gold Council (WGC) reported that central bank purchases were 80.8 tonnes in Q1 2012 or around 7% of global gold demand. What is more interesting is that WGC is now confident that central banks will continue to buy gold and has added official sector purchases as a new element of gold demand while eliminating official sector sales as a negative supply factor. The other key driving factor is investment demand and, as we highlighted above, traditionally this source of demand has been the other side of the equation to central bank selling—now the two are aligned and that spells higher gold prices 7. (WGC): The value measure of gold demand was 16% higher year-on-year at US$59.7bln, 11% below the record from Q3 2011 of US$67.1bln. The average gold price of US$1,690.57 was 22% higher than the average of Q1 2011. In value terms, virtually all sectors of gold demand posted year-on-year increases, with the exception of physical bar demand, which was broadly flat, and the official sector, where purchasing activity was below Q1 2011’s exceptional levels. Investment demand was the only sector of the gold market to register year-on-year growth in the first quarter, which was led by solid demand for ETFs and similar products. So, with that as a background, let’s take a look at gold mining shares and the extraordinary value they appear to offer at these levels after six months of fear and loathing. Whilst I was writing this piece, the chart below hit my inbox from Wesley Legrand in Australia and it highlights beautifully just how oversold the gold mining shares have become. Originally culled from a piece by James Turk, it seems only fair to let James do the talking: (James Turk): “I want readers to take a look at the following 30 year chart (see below), which I believe is the most important and extraordinary chart for 2012. It presents the XAU Gold Mining Index measured in terms of gold, not dollars. We’re making history here. Gold stocks have never been this undervalued before. We’ve had a 12 year bull market in gold, but we’ve also had a 15 year bear market in the mining shares that began with the Bre-X collapse. It’s very rare in market history to see an outlier like this. This is an extraordinary event. Years from now we are going to look back and shake our heads in disbelief at how undervalued gold stocks were in 2012.” SOURCE: JAMES TURK 02 June 2012 7 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... This chart shows that, despite rebounding after 2008’s decimation, mining shares, when priced in ounces of gold have hit new and unprecedented lows. But in case you think I’m cherrypicking, a matter of a couple of hours later, Nick Laird of the 8. Newmont Mining currently trades near a 52week low and has a dividend of just over 3%. Newmont’s dividend is indexed each quarter to the average price of the gold it sells in that quarter with step-up provisions of a further 7.5c if the average gold price exceeds $1,700 in a given quarter and a further 2.5c should those sales average in excess of $2,000. The company has a cash cost of gold mined of around $650/oz and is working hard to lower that figure. Analysts figure that earnings will hit an all-time high this year of close to $5 per share. The P/E ratio? That would be 11x. The same metric in 2008? 30x. Newmont Mining is currently trading roughly $20, or 40% below the average analyst target price of $67.23 with a yield 50% higher than that of the S&P500 and a P/E ratio 30% lower, while its priceto-book ratio, at 1.8x, is also extremely close to the 2008 lows If we revisit the performance of NEM, GDX and GDXJ when priced SOURCE: SHARELYNX in ounces of gold, it becomes apwonderful Sharelynx website (one of THE best parent just how beaten up this particular sector resources for gold and silver charts on the web), has become. sent me this chart (above) of the Barron’s Gold Mining Index vs gold and the similarity is eerie: To illustrate the point further, I am going to use a specific stock, Newmont Mining (NEM) as an example along with the ETFs that follow the senior and junior miners (and, at this point, I should disclose that the Vulpes Testudo Fund has a long position in NEM). SOURCE: BLOOMBERG 02 June 2012 8 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... NEM and GDX are at levels comparable to the very depths of 2008 (chart, previous page) and, when comparing the state of the world now versus then, it is incredibly difficult to understand just why that would be. Remember, in the Autumn of 2008, panic was at its zenith and good stocks were being thrown out along with bad as deleveraging took hold of the world. Since then, a number of key metrics that directly affect the price of gold and gold miners have changed so it makes sense to see where we stand: Sep 2008 Gold Price May 2012 There may well be a period of deflation or deleveraging prior to inflation taking hold, but with inflation the central bankers’ firehose of choice, we can be fairly certain that inflation is in our future and inflationary environments are good for gold. As for the period of deflation/deleveraging which we are seeing now, using the greatest deflationary period in history as our example would seem to suggest that gold stocks will perform extremely well under those conditions also. The fact that gold stocks are behaving so poorly seems to be as a result of both misunderstanding and inadequate knowledge of history on the part of the vast majority of investors and, as we have seen with subprime, Greece, Spain, Italy and, one Change day, Japan, the UK and the US, +80% nothing matters to anybody un+30% til it matters to everybody. $870.95 $1,564 $480/oz $640/oz Fed Balance Sheet ($trln) $0.943 $2.86 +300% ECB Balance Sheet (€trln) €1.50 €3.02 +100% Real Rates (US$ 5yr) 2.01% -1.22% US Govt. Bailout Commitments (CNN) $29bln $11trln Average Cash Cost/oz (ABN est.) Now, with that as a backdrop, and with the understanding that, as we approach the endgame for Europe, the choice facing those empowered to make decisions about how it ultimately plays out is actually a fairly simple one—allow massive, widespread sovereign defaults and a continent-wide bank-run or print unlimited amounts of Euros—is anyone still confused about how this will all play out? Europe’s ‘leaders’ will NOT arbitrarily choose to inflict the pain necessary to deal with the current debt crisis when they have the means to print free money at their disposal and the only impediment to doing so is an as-yet undetermined percentage of 81 million German citizens. If Germany has to leave the EU in order for the moneyprinting to happen, then mark my words, they will leave—either because they choose to or because the ‘Latin-bloc’ (which now includes France) force them to. Either way, the end will come in a shower of confetti paper money. 02 June 2012 9. When the need for gold as protection dawns on everybody, they will realise that +$10.99trln owning it through gold mining stocks will provide tremendous upside gearing—particularly from these bombed-out levels—and, with gold making up such a tiny percentage of global financial assets (the bulk of the increase over the last ten years has been due to price appreciation), it will become a race to own ounces of gold in the ground. -323bp The recent (April) Thomson Reuters GFMS survey laid things out perfectly: (UK Daily Telegraph): Rising fears about [Spain] will send a fresh flood of investment towards the “safe haven” metal, according to the annual report from Thomson Reuters GFMS. Philip Klapwijk, global head of metals analytics at the consultancy, said: “We could easily see last September’s record high [a closing high of $1,900.23 on September 5] being taken out. “A push on towards $2,000 is definitely on 9 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 10. 10 9 everybody at the same time..... look out! 8 Gold As % Of Global Financial Assets 1968 - 2010 7 6 % 5 4 3 2 1 0 Now, as I explained earlier, I began writing this piece earlier this week in between shifts driving a taxi for my daughters and, last night, in the wake of appalling US payroll data, gold finally busted loose - taking the gold stocks with it as the NYSE Gold BUGS Index added 7%. This may or may not be the dawning of a collective realization (we have seen many false examples), but, if the deteriorating data leads to the inevitable appearance of QE3 (and it’s hard to see how the Fed, in an SOURCE: TTMYGH election year, could take any action AFTER the cards before the year is out, although a June’s meeting) the price of gold (and with it, the clear breach of that mark is arguably a more price of mining shares) will head for new highs likely event for the first half of next year.” once again. Demand for gold often sees a boost when Count on it. fears about the situation in Europe intenBut I will leave you this week with the words sify. The metal can likewise benefit from the of a gentleman for whom I have a tremendous prospect of more quantitative easing (QE), amount of admiration, Raoul Pal. as investors seek to protect their wealth from the inflationary effects of central bankers’ acIn a recent presentation entitled The End Game, tions. Mr. Pal had the following to say about the next stage of the crisis: The potential pitfalls? Well, they lay them out too: We don’t know exactly what is to come, but we can all join the very few dots from where In the shorter term, GFMS thinks the apparwe are now, to the collapse of the first major ent abatement of the eurozone crisis and rebank… duced expectations for a third round of quantitative easing or “QE3” in the US could drive With very limited room for government bailthe gold price lower, perhaps below $1,550 in outs, we can very easily join the next dots the next couple of months. from the first bank closure to the collapse of the whole European banking system, and Anybody see an abatement in the Eurozone crithen to the bankruptcy of the governments sis? Less chance of QE3 after this week’s GDP themselves. revision and the weakening jobs market in the USA? There are almost no brakes in the system to stop this, and almost no-one realises the seriMe neither. ousness of the situation. Gold stocks offer tremendous value and, while Got Gold (miners)? it is perfectly possible that they could get even cheaper in the next few months if fear leads to panic which in turn leads to indiscriminate selling, at some point they will be appreciated for a recap of what’s in the value they offer and, if like everything else store for you this week so dive in, folks... in the last few years, that realization dawns on 1968 1980 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ************ No space for 02 June 2012 10 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... Contents 11. 02 June 2012 Did We See A Bottom In Gold Today? All Eyes Turn To The Policy Makers Wall Street Food Chain The End Of The Euro: A Survivor’s Guide Spain Faces ‘Total Emergency’ As Fear Grips Markets Wall Street Journal Says Comex Has Been Classified As ‘Too Big To Fail’ Eurozone Is ‘Unsustainable’ Warns Mario Draghi China To Restart Nuclear Power Programme The Fear Factor: Preventing A Big European Bank Run A Gold Anchor Standard? Alexis Tsipras Is the Greek Who Makes Europe Tremble Charts That Make You Go Hmmm..... Words That Make You Go Hmmm..... And Finally..... 02 June 2012 11 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... Quite a few of the uncivilized entered the markets today, and sparked a rally in gold and silver in what appeared to be an obvious ‘flight to safety’ and also a powerful relief rally after the awful pounding the metals and the miners had taken into the Comex expiries and delivery dates. Some of the dividend paying gold and silver stocks had impressive gains even moreso than the metal, with at least one royalty trust up 11 percent or so. Yes I flipped one from yesterday, and even trimmed my entirely outsized bullion positions bought on the dips back to something a little more ‘normal’ and comfortable. Of course I never touch my long term holdings in place since 2000. It is not raining nearly hard enough yet. During hard times a solid dividend paying miner is hard to beat, unless you get lucky with one of those lottery tickets known as junior miners. When the right time comes I hope to be there. But for now I will play it a bit more safe. I see more potential downside in stocks until the banks step up and print it up harder. No telling how well they will fare against the splash from across the sea. After a triple spiked test of support, the gold market went vertical today, marking perhaps 12. what might be regarded by some of the more astute as a well-rounded bottom. I live for days like today. Much of this was due to a reversal of the sheer manipulation for short term gains, that broke in the face of the unfolding global currency crisis. Bam! Never underestimate the power of the CFTC to stand idly by while the markets, taken in hand by the titans of Wall Street, degenerate into something that resembles a round of golf at the Piedmont Driving Club, or an impromptu fight club meeting at the New York Athletic Club. Well, boys will be boys, in proportion to their toys. Chart-wise follow through is everything. Yes we have a short term rounded bottom, and the potential for much larger formations including a broad cup and handle the likes of which we have not seen in quite some time. But do not underestimate the baseness of desperate men accustomed to having their way. But first things first. We must see if gold can break the intermediate downtrend and then establish at least a broad trading range, which will form the lid of the potential cup. It could happen in a rush, given some exogenous trigger event and the right convergence of circumstances, but I suspect it will be a long and arduous climb, fought in stages and levels. Chart porn-wise, the cup and handle, should it work, would take gold well over $2,000 by year end or so, and probably set up a new leg into the 3’s. But that now is all speculation. Time to do the hard climbing work for now, one day at a time. O O O JESSES CAFE AMERICAIN / LINK The eurozone crisis has moved in definite cycles. Markets deteriorate, policy makers to take action; markets rally, policy makers relax – only for the turmoil to resume as confidence ebbs away again. After a week in which Spain’s borrowing costs SOURCE: JESSE 02 June 2012 12 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... approached euro-era highs, US bond yields sank to record lows, equities tumbled and the euro suffered sharp swings, some strategists think 2012 is looking like a rerun of 2011. This time, it is Spain moving closer to a bailout, rather than Italy, while a strong result for the far-left in Greece’s repeat elections this month could push Athens towards a euro exit. The market turmoil has focused attention on a possible response from governments and central banks. “... It feels that we’ve now moved into the ‘intervention zone’ where all paths lead to the next major round of action from the authorities” “It feels that we’ve now moved into the ‘intervention zone’ where all paths lead to the next major round of action from the authorities. It’s difficult to see how the market regains its poise without it,” says Jim Reid, a senior strategist at Deutsche Bank. “The authorities can’t afford to get this wrong or we will likely have another crisis on our hands.” The range of possibilities is wide, though there is no sign yet that action will be taken. Short-term measures include a rate cut by the European Central Bank, which holds its next rate-setting meeting next week, a resumption of government bond-buying under its securities market programme and another round of ultra-cheap ECB loans for banks. Some are looking for political progress on a pan-European deposit guarantee, bank recapitalisations, government investment to stimulate growth and, potentially, a banking licence for the European Stability Mechanism, Europe’s permanent bailout fund, to boost its firepower. Hard decisions are unlikely before the Greek election on June 17, but this week’s volatility has sparked speculation the ECB could act sooner. One possibility could be to restart the SMP to stem the rise in Spain’s borrowing costs. “They could blow the cobwebs off the SMP,” says a senior government bond trader. “It’s the only thing they can do to calm things down in the short 02 June 2012 13. term.” But the ECB is unlikely to resume bond-buying unless the difference between Spanish and German benchmark 10-year yields widens further. It is now at 535 basis points, and Pavan Wadhwa, global fixed-income strategist at JPMorgan, estimates the spread would have to climb another 25-50 basis points before the SMP could be reactivated. Interest rate cuts are not expected at next week’s ECB meeting, nor for now is another dose of cheap three-year money under the central bank’s longer-term refinancing operation, or LTRO. Most economists surveyed by Bloomberg believe the ECB will keep its policy rate on hold at 1 per cent. Jonathan Loynes of Capital Economics expects Mario Draghi, ECB president, to hold open the prospect of further banking assistance should the threat of a funding crisis become acute, but says he is unlikely to announce any measures at Wednesday’s meeting. Investors and analysts are pessimistic that politicians will make meaningful headway in other areas, such as a pan-European deposit guarantee, an ESM bank licence or capital injections into Spanish banks. O O O FT / LINK The global monetary system which has evolved and morphed over the past century but always in the direction of easier, cheaper and more abundant credit, may have reached a point at which it can no longer operate efficiently and equitably to promote economic growth and the fair distribution of its benefits. Future changes, which lie on a visible horizon, may not be so beneficial for our ocean’s oversized creatures. The balance between financial whales and plankton – powerful creditors and much smaller debtors – is significantly dependent on the successful functioning of our global monetary system. What is a global monetary system? It is basically 13 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... how the world conducts and pays for commerce. Historically, several different systems have been employed but basically they have either been commodity-based systems – gold and silver primarily – or a fiat system – paper money… The global monetary system seemed to be working smoothly, and instead of Shamu, it was labeled the “great moderation.” The laws of natural selection and modern day finance seemed to be functioning as anticipated, and the whales were ascendant. 14. either perceive too much risk or refuse to accept near zero-based returns on their investments. As they question the value of much of the $200 trillion which comprises our current system, they move marginally elsewhere – to real assets such as land, gold and tangible things, or to cash and a figurative mattress where at least their money is readily accessible. O O O BILL GROSS / LINK In every economic crisis there comes a moment of clarity. In Europe soon, millions of people will wake up to realize that the euro-as-we-know-it is gone. Economic chaos awaits them. SOURCE: BILL GROSS/BLOOMBERG Functioning yes, but perhaps not so moderately or smoothly – especially since 2008. Policy responses by fiscal and monetary authorities have managed to prevent substantial haircutting of the $200 trillion or so of financial assets that comprise our global monetary system, yet in the process have increased the risk and lowered the return of sovereign securities which represent its core… Now, however, with even the United States suffering a credit downgrade to AA+ and offering negative 200 basis point real policy rates for the privilege of investing in Treasury bills, the willingness of creditor whales – as opposed to debtors – to support the existing system may soon descend. Such a transition occurs because lenders 02 June 2012 To understand why, first strip away your illusions. Europe’s crisis to date is a series of supposedly “decisive” turning points that each turned out to be just another step down a steep hill. Greece’s upcoming election on June 17 is another such moment. While the so-called “pro-bailout” forces may prevail in terms of parliamentary seats, some form of new currency will soon flood the streets of Athens. It is already nearly impossible to save Greek membership in the euro area: depositors flee banks, taxpayers delay tax payments, and companies postpone paying their suppliers – either because they can’t pay or because they expect soon to be able to pay in cheap drachma. The troika of the European Commission (EC), European Central Bank (ECB), and International Monetary Fund (IMF) has proved unable to restore the prospect of recovery in Greece, and any new lending program would run into the same difficulties. In apparent frustration, the head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde, remarked last week, “As far as Athens is concerned, I also think about all those people who are trying to escape tax all the time.” Ms. Lagarde’s empathy is wearing thin and this is unfortunate – particularly as the Greek failure mostly demonstrates how wrong a single currency is for Europe. The Greek backlash reflects 14 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... the enormous pain and difficulty that comes with trying to arrange “internal devaluations” (a euphemism for big wage and spending cuts) in order to restore competitiveness and repay an excessive debt level. Faced with five years of recession, more than 20 percent unemployment, further cuts to come, and a stream of failed promises from politicians inside and outside the country, a political backlash seems only natural. With IMF leaders, EC officials, and financial journalists floating the idea of a “Greek exit” from the euro, who can now invest in or sign long-term contracts in Greece? Greece’s economy can only get worse. Some European politicians are now telling us that an orderly exit for Greece is feasible under current conditions, and Greece will be the only nation that leaves. They are wrong. Greece’s exit is simply another step in a chain of events that leads towards a chaotic dissolution of the euro zone. “...Some European politicians are now telling us that an orderly exit for Greece is feasible under current conditions, and Greece will be the only nation that leaves. They are wrong.” During the next stage of the crisis, Europe’s electorate will be rudely awakened to the large financial risks which have been foisted upon them in failed attempts to keep the single currency alive. If Greece quits the euro later this year, its government will default on approximately 300 billion euros of external public debt, including roughly 187 billion euros owed to the IMF and European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF). O O O SIMON JOHNSON / LINK Spain is facing the gravest danger since the end of the Franco dictatorship as the country is frozen out of global capital markets and slides towards an epic showdown with Europe. “We’re in a situation of total emergency, the worst crisis we have ever lived through” said ex-premier Felipe Gonzalez, the country’s elder statesman. 02 June 2012 15. The warning came as the yields on Spanish 10year bonds spiked to 6.7pc, pushing the “risk premium” over German Bunds to a post-euro high of 540 basis points. The IBEX index of stocks in Madrid fell 2.6pc, the lowest since the dotcom bust in 2003. Chaos over the €23.5bn rescue of crippled lender Bankia has led to the abrupt resignation of central bank governor Miguel Ángel Fernández Ordóñez, who testified to the senate that he had been muzzled to avoid enflaming events as confidence in the country drains away. Markets are on tenterhooks as Spanish yields test levels that forced the European Central Bank to respond last November with its €1 trillion liquidity blitz. “Nobody is short Spanish debt right now because they are expecting ECB intervention,” said Andrew Roberts, credit chief at RBS. “If it doesn’t come -- if we take out 6.8pc -- we’re going to see a hyberbolic sell-off,” he said. Italy felt the full brunt of contagion from Spain on Wednesday, with 10-year yileds back near 6pc. The euro fell to a 2-year low of $1.239 against the dollar. Crude oil and metal prices plummeted and save-haven flight pushed rates on 2-year German debt to zero. Gilt yields fell to 1.64pc, the lowest in history. Mr Roberts said the collapse in Spanish tax revenues is replicating the pattern in Greece. Fiscal revenues have fallen 4.8pc over the last year, and VAT returns have slumped 14.6pc. Debt service costs have risen by 18pc. The country is caught in a classic deflationary vice: a rising debt burden on a shrinking economic base. “Once you get into such a negative feedback loop, you can move beyond the point of no return quickly,” he said. The European Commission has softened its stance, giving Madrid an extra year until 2014 to cuts its budget deficit from 8.9pc to 3pc of GDP, though this still amounts to a fiscal shock. Brussels told premier Mariano Rajoy to widen the VAT base and speed retirement at 67. There is no sign so far that the ECB is ready to relent as Frankfurt and Madrid cross swords in 15 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... an escalting test of will. The ECB has scotched Mr Rajoy’s tentative plans to recapitalize Bankia by drawing on ECB funds. “It is dangerous to play chicken when you are driving a Seat and the ECB is driving a tank,” said professor Luis Garicano from the London School of Economics (LSE). O O O UK DAILY TELEGRAPH / LINK President Obama’s standard gripe is that the economy has performed so poorly during his term because of the financial crisis he inherited from George W. Bush. But this week it is Mr. Obama who has bequeathed to his successors a landmark in financial regulation. It is bound to haunt them, though not as much as it will haunt taxpayers. J.P. Morgan’s recent trading loss and the resulting Washington blather about tighter regulation have grabbed headlines. Little noticed is that on Tuesday Team Obama took its first formal steps toward putting taxpayers behind Wall Street derivatives trading -- not behind banks that might make mistakes in derivatives markets, but behind the trading itself. Yes, the same crew that rails against the dangers of derivatives is quietly positioning these financial instruments directly above the taxpayer safety net. “... The Financial Stability Oversight Council secretly voted to proceed toward inducting several derivatives clearinghouses into the too-big-tofail club. After further review, regulators will make final designations” As we noted in May 2010, the authority for this regulatory achievement was inserted into Congress’s pending financial reform bill by then-Senator Chris Dodd. Two months later, the legislation was re-named Dodd-Frank and signed into law by Mr. Obama. One part of the law forces much of the derivatives market into clearinghouses that stand behind every trade. Mr. Dodd’s pet provision creates a mechanism for bailing out these 02 June 2012 16. clearinghouses when they run into trouble. Specifically, the law authorizes the Federal Reserve to provide “discount and borrowing privileges” to clearinghouses in emergencies. Traditionally the ability to borrow from the Fed’s discount window was reserved for banks, but the new law made clear that a clearinghouse receiving assistance was not required to “be or become a bank or bank holding company.” To get help, they only needed to be deemed “systemically important” by the new Financial Stability Oversight Council chaired by the Treasury Secretary. Last year regulators finalized rules for how they would use this new power. On Tuesday, they began using it. The Financial Stability Oversight Council secretly voted to proceed toward inducting several derivatives clearinghouses into the too-big-to-fail club. After further review, regulators will make final designations, probably later this year, and will announce publicly the names of institutions deemed systemically important. We’re told that the clearinghouses of Chicago’s CME Group and Atlanta-based Intercontinental Exchange were voted systemic this week, and rumor has it that the council may even designate London-based LCH.Clearnet as critical to the U.S. financial system. U.S. taxpayers thinking that they couldn’t possibly be forced to stand behind overseas derivatives trading will not be comforted by remarks from Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Gary Gensler. On Monday he emphasized his determination to extend Dodd-Frank derivatives regulation to overseas markets when subsidiaries of U.S. firms are involved. Readers know Mr. Gensler as the chief regulator of MF Global, which was run into bankruptcy by his old Beltway and Goldman Sachs pal Jon Corzine. An estimated $1.6 billion is still missing from MF Global customer accounts. What an amazing feat Mr. Gensler will have performed if, through his agency’s oversight, he can manage to have U.S. customers eat the cost of Mr. Corzine’s bets on foreign debt and have U.S. taxpayers un- 16 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... derwrite bets in foreign derivatives trading. If there’s one truth we’ve learned about government financial backstops, it’s that sooner or later they will be used. So eventually taxpayers will have to bail out one derivatives clearinghouse or another. It promises to be quite a mess. And if the 45th president spends his first term whining about his predecessor’s mistakes, he’ll have a point. O O O WSJ (VIA GATA) / LINK The head of the European Central Bank hit out at the political paralysis gripping the region as he warned the eurozone’s set-up was “unsustainable”. Mario Draghi said the central bank could not “fill the vacuum” left by member states’ lack of action as it was claimed the zone is on the point of “disintegration”. Amid escalating talk of a potential bail-out for Spain, the pres“...In a thinly disguised demand for ident of the action from Germany, Mr Draghi ECB said the central bank said leaders had to decide whether was powerto stand by the current eurozone. less to stop the debt tornado. “The sooner the vision is clarified the better for the European Union,” “It’s not our duty, it’s not in he told the European Parliament.” our mandate” to “fill the vacuum left by the lack of action by national governments on the fiscal front,” he said. Christine Lagarde, the head of the International Monetary Fund, last night denied that an IMF bail-out of Spain was being prepared. “There is no such plan. We have not received any request to that effect and we are not doing any work in relation to any financial support,” she said, following a meeting with Spain’s deputy prime minister, Soraya Saenz de Santamaria. Olli Rehn, the EU’s top economic official, called for urgent action to “avoid a disintegration of the eurozone.” The economic affairs commissioner 02 June 2012 17. said that politicians had made progress but it had been “uneven and seemingly inefficient.”... Italy’s prime minister Mario Monti warned of the “huge possibilities of contagion”. Ireland looked set to approve the Fiscal Pact in its referendum but in Greece the anti-austerity Syriza party took the lead in some polls. In a thinly disguised demand for action from Germany, Mr Draghi said leaders had to decide whether to stand by the current eurozone. “The sooner the vision is clarified the better for the European Union,” he told the European Parliament. Pointing at the chaotic and ongoing rescue attempts of Bankia in Spain, Mr Draghi said the handling of the raging bank crises was the “worst possible way of doing things.” He said politicians and regulators repeatedly underestimated the scale of their banks’ problems. “This is the worst possible way of doing things,” he said “Everyone ends up doing the right thing, but at the highest cost.” Data showed investor confidence draining from the eurozone. Nearly €100bn of deposits was withdrawn from Spain in the first three months of the year. O O O UK DAILY TELEGRAPH / LINK Beijing has indicated that it will lift its year-long moratorium on new nuclear projects in a move that will breathe life into an industry plagued by uncertainty since the disaster at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi reactor last year. China’s cabinet announced it had approved the 2020 nuclear strategy, finalised new safety standards and finished inspecting the country’s existing nuclear plants. After the Japanese nuclear crisis China suspended approvals of new reactors while it conducted safety inspections and drafted new regulations. As the world’s largest energy user China is key to setting the direction of future global nuclear expansion. Beijing’s latest announcement marks 17 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... a major step towards the full resumption of its nuclear building programme, which accounts for 40 per cent of global reactors under construction today. “This is the main hurdle,” said Guo Shou, energy analyst at Barclays. “Approvals for new nuclear reactors are around the corner, they are going to come very, very soon.” “... Beijing’s latest announcement marks a major step towards the full resumption of its nuclear building programme, which accounts for 40 per cent of global reactors under construction today” Restarting nuclear approvals will help boost growth and create jobs in China’s nuclear sector at a time when Beijing is weighing options on how to prevent a further slowdown in the economy, although the plans are not formally part of any stimulus programme. China draws most of its energy from burning coal but Beijing is building up wind, solar, hydropower and nuclear power as it seeks to shift toward non-fossil fuel sources. The country is targeting 60GW of nuclear capacity in 2020, according to comments by Chinese officials, which would put China’s reactor fleet on par with that of France. In the aftermath of the Japanese nuclear crisis in March 2011, several European countries abandoned or postponed plans for nuclear expansion. However many emerging economies, including China, remained committed to nuclear power and are setting the pace of global nuclear growth. China’s new safety regulations are expected to provide a boost worldwide for the latest nuclear technologies, especially for “third-generation” reactors being built in China by Westinghouse of the US and Areva of France. Chinese nuclear companies are also trying to expand their presence overseas and have bid for reactor contracts around the world. “The combination of technical experience, operational experience and support that can come 02 June 2012 18. out of China will make China a leader in the global nuclear industry,” said George Borovas, head of the nuclear practice at global law firm Pillsbury. “We are starting to see it already. Chinese companies are in the international marketplace much more aggressively than they were one or two years ago.” O O O FT.COM / LINK In continental capitals and bank boardrooms there is a common fear. It is that the slow jog of deposits leaving banks in Greece and, more recently, Spain, may turn into a full-blown run that quickly spreads from bank to bank, and then from country to country. There have already been some warning signs, such as a sudden acceleration of deposit outflows from Greek banks in May. A fierce debate is now taking place as to the best way to avert a run that, if it started, might be difficult to contain and could lead to massive capital flight from the euro zone’s peripheral countries, which have €1.8 trillion ($2.2 trillion) in household deposits (see chart). Increasing numbers of people think the answer is greater financial integration. On May 30th the European Commission said there ought to be “full economic and monetary union, including a banking union; integrated financial supervision and a single deposit guarantee scheme”. The first step is to shore up confidence in the region’s banks by making sure they have enough capital to withstand a crisis. It is far cheaper to recapitalise banks, after all, than to stand behind all of their deposits. Yet such efforts have been bungled time and again. Europe has twice over the past two years tried to reassure depositors and investors that its banks are sound by subjecting them to “stress tests” that were supposed to mimic an economic downturn. In each case the tests were soon followed by revelations of deep capital holes in some banks (newly nationalised Bankia among them). Since some national regulators have lost the confidence of markets, they are having to bring in outsiders to assess how much capital their banks need. 18 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 19. as something quite profound is happening that could propel gold to record new highs. Yes, potentially the biggest thing since the birth of the gold ETF and the liberalization of the Chinese gold market in 2003. A decade on and we have grounds for saying that gold may well see a significant leg higher... the big new thing in gold. I’ll explain... SOURCE: ECONOMIST/CITI Actually raising the capital is the next big problem for countries such as Spain or Italy, which are already struggling to convince markets that their public debt is sustainable. Ideally it should come from the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), Europe’s new bail-out fund, as a direct capital injection into banks rather than as loans to governments, which then use the money to recapitalise their ailing lenders. Injecting capital is politically difficult. Core countries such as Germany fret they will lose a lever of influence over government policies in peripheral countries by handing over equity. They also stand a greater chance of losing money if the ESM takes on the risk of bank investing, not least because they know even less about the balance-sheets of individual lenders than those of national governments. Peripheral countries are less than keen on handing ownership of important banks to bureaucrats in Brussels. And unless the capital is accompanied by supervisory reforms, local regulators may encourage banks to lend more freely at home since the risk of loss will have been exported. O O O ECONOMIST / LINK “Forgive the hyperbole in the headline but we wanted to get your attention 02 June 2012 Banking capital adequacy ratios, once the domain of banking specialists are set to become center stage for the gold market as well as the wider economy. In response to the global banking crisis the rules are to be tightened in terms of the assets that banks must hold and this is potentially going to very much favour gold. The Basel Committee for Bank Supervision (or BCBS) as part of the BIS are arguably the highest authority in banking supervision and it is their role to define capital requirements through the forthcoming Basel III rules. In short, they are meeting to consider making gold a Tier 1 asset for commercial banks with 100% weighting rather than a Tier 3 asset with just a 50% risk weighting as it does today. At the same time they are set to increase the amount of capital banks must set aside as well. A double win potentially. Hitherto banks have been much dis-incentivised to hold gold while being encouraged to hold arguably riskier assets such as equity capital, currencies and debt instruments, none of which have fared too well in the crisis. With this potential change in capital adequacy requirements, bank purchases of gold would drive up its value relative to other high quality qualifying assets, increasing its desirability for regulatory purposes further. This should result in gold being re-priced to bring it on a par with all other high quality assets. Currently banks have to have core Tier 1 capital ratio of 4% of which will rise to 6% from the beginning of next year. In addition to its store of value merits, central to the argument in favour of gold as a bank reserve is its countercyclical nature to most other assets in that it tends to be 19 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... inversely correlated. Gold is ideal as it bears no credit risk, it involves no other counterparty and it is no one’s liability. It is a reserve asset diversifier if you like. This is a treble win for gold - it would be a major endorsement of its role in preserving wealth and as a store of value from the highest financial authority, it would lead to significant purchases of gold by major financial institutions and it would lead to a reappraisal of its value with respect to other Tier 1 capital such as quality sovereign debt. Under the new rules gold could become a very significantly larger proportion of a reserve pool which is about to grow very much larger. The 2 questions that come to my mind are when and how much metal - on timing Basel III kicks in from January 2013 with a further tightening in capital adequacy ratios in 2018. That said, it is not yet clear when gold’s re-rating to Tier 1 might take place. In terms of amount of gold that could be purchased that is harder still - if we thought that say 2% of total current Tier 1 capital held by commercial banks globally might be converted into gold (forgetting for a moment about the increases in capital yet to be seen) - this would suggest that 2% of the $4,276,000,000,000 would be converted to gold. That is equivalent to $85,000,000,000 in gold which at current market prices is equivalent to 1,700 tonnes of gold. Another way of looking at this is to consider that commercial banks would be holding gold for precisely the same reason that central banks do and the largest 110 central banks in the world have 16% of their reserves as gold - as such a figure of just 2% is really quite a modest expectation - ultimately it will be a question of price and expectations of price change that would determine the rate of uptake in the short term. O O O ROSS NORMAN / LINK Just weeks ago, Alexis Tsipras, 37, was an obscure opposition politician. Now, he’s unnerving the powers that be in the European Union because he and his leftist party Syriza — a 02 June 2012 20. group whose membership ranges from hardline Communists to moderate socialists — have the potential of forming a government after the June 17 elections. A teenage member of the Communist Youth of Greece, Tsipras has executed a dramatic and canny political metamorphosis, transforming himself fromthe leader of a radical leftist coalition to a left-of-center standard bearer for anti-bailout and anti-austerity populism. And in so doing, he has confounded the ossified poltiical class of Greece, which acceded to the strictures imposed by the E.U. in order for Athens to receive the funds it needs to satisfy its creditors. Now, Tsipras may hold the future of the euro and the E.U. in his hands. All he needs to do is win enough seats to govern. Tsipras spoke to TIME’s Joanna Kakissis at the Syriza office on Koumoundourou Square in Athens. Following is the transcript of the interview: TIME: Are you willing to make the necessary structural reforms in Greece to revive the economy? ALEXIS TSIPRAS: It is obvious that Greece — and the Greek economy — has its own particularities that played a role in making this economic crisis deeper and longer. Indeed, we must make structural reforms which will the public sector more reliable, create an effective and fair taxation system, and fight the black economy which has been like a kind of gangrene on the Greek economy. As far as I know, the underground economy represents 30% of the GDP. At the same time, we will try to restore faith in the law and convince people that the state is equitable and effective. We will destroy corruption and the interconnection of political and economic power from its roots. 20 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... Without the contribution of the citizens, these reforms cannot take place. But in order to contribute, the citizens want to know that these reforms will not be implemented only to those who have low incomes but those who have high incomes and come from the upper class. There is a Greek saying: “The fish always stinks from its head,” (which means, roughly, corruption starts at the top). So if we don’t fight the problem at its roots, then we won’t be able to establish positive morale that can encourage all Greeks to also fight against it. But you need a long time to make such reforms... Some things need time, but some other can change quickly. For instance, I can’t understand why the last two and half years we are chasing our tail when it comes to taxation. We taxed poor people again and again, but no one talked about what we really needed, which is an assets register by which every Greek will be obliged to register their properties, their bank accounts in Greece or abroad, as well as their mobile assets, such as the shares of a company they possibly have. Only in this way, we will be able to tax everyone according to their real capability of paying taxes and we will create a system which will share the responsibilities in a fair way. Of course, for these policies to be effective, we should also create a high-penalty system for those who break the law. Whoever 02 June 2012 21. makes a false statement about his assets should be punished by having a bit part of these assets confiscated. There is no magical way out of the crisis. However, there are for sure solutions, tough but fair, in order to share in a just way the responsibilities, establish a positive morale and give a boost to the Greek economy. There are some outside Greece who say Greece wants it both ways... It’s a paradox to think Greece can stay in the euro zone if the austerity policies continue to be implemented. The austerity policy, and especially this extreme policy based on the term “internal devaluation”, is exactly what we should have avoided. It’s the wrong prescription, the wrong medicine for the patient, because Greece has a production base with a special characteristic: 90% of the small businesses’ production, which are the foundation of the Greek economy, is not exported. It is sold on the domestic market. So, when you make a horizontal cut of the wages and the pensions, inevitably there is an impact on the consumption. Hence, 200,000 small Greek businesses have closed down!... O O O TIME / INTERVIEW 21 CHARTS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 22. In keeping with this week’s gold-based theme, this presentation from Business Insider entitled ‘The Truth About Gold’ contains a series of excellent charts that offer several perspectives on the yellow metal... CLICK TO VIEW PRESENTATION SOURCE: BUSINESS INSIDER A look at a longterm chart of US 10-year treasury yields offers stark perspective CLICK TO ENLARGE 02 June 2012 SOURCE: THE BIG PICTURE 22 CHARTS THAT MAKE YOU GO Courtesy of my Hmmm... 23. SOURCE: RITHOLTZ/THE CHART STORE friend Barry Ritholtz comes this great chart (above) that demonstrates just how lackluster the employment recovery has been since January 2008—despite what the BLS might have you believe...whilst below, Soc Gen’s Albert Edwards shows the severity of the decline in labor force participation in the US along with what the real unemployment rate WOULD be had so many not given up looking for work... not good. SOURCE: BLS/SOC GEN 02 June 2012 23 CHARTS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 24. Triggered by another ECRI commentary, Why Our Recession Call Stands, I’m now focusing initially on the year-over-year growth of the WLI rather than ECRI’s previously favored, and rather arcane, method of calculating the WLI growth series from the underlying WLI (see the endnote below). Specifically the chart immediately below is the yearover-year change in the 4-week moving average of the WLI. The red dots highlight the YoY value for the month when recessions began. SOURCE: DOUG SHORT As the chart above makes clear, the WLI YoY is currently at a lower level than at the starting month for five of the seven recessions during the published series. Of course, the same can be said for its interim YoY trough in 2010. In any case, the behavior of this indicator over the next quarter or so will be especially interesting to watch. A key argument in ECRI’s latest reaffirmation of its recession call is seen in the longterm pattern of yearover-year real personal income (illustrated below, which I updated with the latest PCE data released this morning)...The commentary includes explanations for a couple of anomaSOURCE: DOUG SHORT lies in this series, such as the downward spike in December 2004, which was the YoY oscillation from Microsoft’s one-time dividend payout 12 months earlier. O O O 02 June 2012 DOUG SHORT / LINK 24 WORDS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 25. Focusing back on what could happen if the market were allowed to think for itself, Rick Santelli & Gary Kaminski deface the edifice of central banker largesse and blame it for the actual demise we face - noting that it is now clear that whether it is QE or actual rate easing, using jobs as the argument for excessive intervention is a failed concept... they ask and answer the question: “Have rates been too low for too long?” and how those who played by the ‘rules’ continue to be the ones who are penalized. CLICK TO WATCH (via zerohedge) He’s back and he’s still angry. What’s more, he’s still the only MEP prepared to speak the truth about Europe. Nigel Farage (who will, I believe, one day be seen as the lone voice in the wilderness that he is) pleads for the breakup of the euro and the restoration of human dignity... another tour de force. Incidentally, the quality of the question asked by the Greek representative demonstrates the level of understanding in the European parliament CLICK TO WATCH On the subject of gold and mining stocks, I chatted with Geoff Candy of Mineweb last week about those very subjects and, for those amongst you with a few minutes to spare after wading through this week’s Things That Make You Go Hmmm..... click on the mugshot (left) to hear that conversation... 02 June 2012 25 and finally… For any non-Europeans struggling with the concept that the Eurozone could possibly split apart, this great video (courtesy of the good folks at ZeroHedge) shows that this wouldn’t exactly be an unprecedented event in Europe’s history which has been spotty at best..... Hmmm… SUBSCRIBE UNSUBSCRIBE COMMENTS © THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMM..... 2012 02 June 2012 26 THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO Hmmm... 27. Grant Williams Grant Williams is a portfolio and strategy advisor to Vulpes Investment Management in Singapore - a hedge fund running $200million of largely partners’ capital across multiple strategies. In 2012, all Vulpes funds will be opened to outside investors. Grant has 26 years of experience in finance on the Asian, Australian, European and US markets and has held senior positions at several international investment houses. Grant has been writing ‘Things That Make You Go Hmmm.....’ for the last three years. For more information on Vulpes please visit www.vulpesinvest.com As a result of my role at Vulpes Investment Management, it falls upon me to disclose that, from time-to-time, the views I express and/or the commentary I write in the pages of Things That Make You Go Hmmm..... may reflect the positioning of one or all of the Vulpes funds - though I will not be making any specific recommendations in this publication. Grant www.vulpesinvest.com 02 June 2012 27