Final Report

Transcription

Final Report

Final Report
Orica Botany Environmental Survey
Air Emissions Sampling Program
November 2013 – February 2014
27 AUGUST 2014
Prepared for
Orica Australia Pty Ltd
16-20 Beauchamp Rd
Matraville NSW 2036
43218429
General Air Emissions 2013
Project Manager:
URS Australia Pty Ltd
……………………………
Stephen Bowly
Senior Associate Scientist
Level 4, 407 Pacific Highway
Artarmon NSW 2064
Australia
T: 61 2 8925 5500
F: 61 2 8925 5555
Principal-In-Charge:
……………………………
Peter Storch
Principal Chemical
Engineer
Author:
……………………………
Stephen Bowly
Senior Associate Scientist
Reviewer:
……………………………
David Adams
Senior Principal
Environmental Scientist
Date:
Reference:
Status:
27/08/2014
43218429/01/03
Final
Document delivery
URS Australia provides this document in either printed format, electronic format or both. URS
Australia considers the printed version to be binding. The electronic format is provided for the client’s
convenience and URS Australia requests that the client ensures the integrity of this electronic
information is maintained. Storage of this electronic information should at a minimum comply with the
requirements of the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (Cth).
j:\syd\43218429\5 works\05 report\final report\43218429_sy - gsc - rep - 001 -3 _general_air_emissions_2013_final.docx
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................ vii
1 Introduction............................................................................................................. 1
1.1
General................................................................................................................ 1
1.2
Background to Air Emissions Sampling ......................................................... 1
1.2.1
Requirements and Objectives ........................................................................................1
1.2.2
Previous Surface Emission Sampling Rounds .............................................................2
1.2.3
Soil Gas Sampling ...........................................................................................................3
1.2.4
Ambient Air and Surface Water Sampling.....................................................................3
2 Sampling Methodology .......................................................................................... 5
2.1
Overview ............................................................................................................. 5
2.2
Target Chemicals ............................................................................................... 5
2.3
Sampling Program ............................................................................................. 5
2.4
Sampling Conditions ......................................................................................... 7
2.5
Surface Flux Emissions Sampling ................................................................... 8
2.6
Soil Gas Sampling ............................................................................................. 8
2.6.1
General ..............................................................................................................................8
2.6.2
Field Measurements ........................................................................................................8
2.6.3
Sample Collection ............................................................................................................9
2.7
Sample Duration ................................................................................................ 9
2.8
Analysis .............................................................................................................. 9
2.8.1
Evacuated Canister Vacuum Pressure ..........................................................................9
2.8.1
Gas Analysis ..................................................................................................................10
2.8.2
Surface Emission Calculations ....................................................................................11
3 Results................................................................................................................... 13
3.1
General.............................................................................................................. 13
3.1.1
Overview of Results.......................................................................................................13
4 Discussion of Results .......................................................................................... 17
4.1
General.............................................................................................................. 17
4.2
Surface Emissions Data .................................................................................. 17
4.2.1
Western Margin of Northern Plumes ...........................................................................17
4.2.2
Main Plumes ...................................................................................................................18
43218429/01/03
i
Table of Contents
4.3
Soil Gas Concentrations at Botany Golf Course .......................................... 20
4.4
Ambient Air from Springvale Drain ................................................................ 21
5 Uncertainties ......................................................................................................... 25
5.1
General.............................................................................................................. 25
5.2
Uncertainties in Surface Emission Rates ...................................................... 25
5.2.1
Changes in Water Table ................................................................................................25
5.2.2
Changes in Air Pressure ...............................................................................................26
5.2.3
Changes in Soil Moisture ..............................................................................................26
5.2.4
Changes in Air Temperature .........................................................................................26
5.3
Uncertainties Associated with the Flux Hood Methodology........................ 27
6 Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 29
7 References ............................................................................................................ 31
8 Limitations ............................................................................................................ 33
Tables
Table 1-1
Concentrations of vinyl chloride in shallow groundwater at WG154S (Orica 2013) ......... 3
Table 2-1
Sampling Program ............................................................................................................ 6
Table 2-2
Southlands and Springvale Drain Ambient Air Sampling Locations ................................. 6
Table 2-3
Summary of Daily Weather Conditions at Sydney Airport for each Sampling Mobilisation
(Bureau of Meteorology 2014) .......................................................................................... 7
Table 2-4
Field Screening Results at AS88SG (2m Soil Gas Implant) February 2014 .................... 8
Table 2-5
Sample Duration ............................................................................................................... 9
Table 2-6
Evacuated Canister Vacuum Pressures ......................................................................... 10
Table 4-1
Review of Emissions from Western Margin of Northern Plumes - Residential Areas .... 17
Table 4-2
Review of Emissions from Main Plumes - ARTC (formerly SRA) Area .......................... 18
Table 4-3
Review of Emissions from Main Plumes - Commercial/Industrial Area (including
Southlands) ..................................................................................................................... 19
Table 4-4
Review of Emissions from Main Plumes – Recreational Area........................................ 20
Table 4-5
Soil Gas Data at AS88 .................................................................................................... 21
Table 4-6
Summary of Ambient Air and Surface Water Data ......................................................... 22
43218429/01/03
Table of Contents
Figures (attached)
Figure 1: General Air Emissions Sampling Program 2013 – 2014
Plates
Plate 1: Sampling at location AS05, and QC02, located on the northwest corner of Southlands
Plate 2: Sampling at location AS06, located on the south end of Southlands
Plate 3: Sampling at location AS08, located at Botany Golf Course
Plate 4: Sampling at location AS09, located close to the north east boundary fence of Southlands,
adjacent to ARTC property
Plate 5: Sampling at location AS11, adjacent to Stephen Road
Plate 6: Sampling at location AS12, on the corner of Botany and Foreshore Roads
Plate 7: Sampling at location AS13, located on the southwest side of Southlands, adjacen to the
Southlands entrance
Plate 8: Sampling at location AS14, on the corner of Excel and Greenfield Streets
Plate 9: Sampling at location AS15, adjacent to Southlands on the southern end along McPherson
Street
Plate 10: Sampling at location AS17, located on Botany Golf Course along Botany Road.
Plate 11: Sampling at location AS18, located on Botany Golf Course adjacent to Foreshore Road
Plate 12: Sampling at location AS88
Plate 13 Soil gas sampling at AS88
Plate 14: Flux hood sampling – Field Blank
Appendices
Appendix A
URS Procedures for Flux Emission Sampling
Appendix B
Laboratory Certificates
Appendix C
Data Validation
Appendix D
Emission Calculations
43218429/01/03
iii
Abbreviations
Abbreviation
Description
ARTC
Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd
BIP
Botany Industrial Park
CHC
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
CHHRA
Consolidated Human Health Risk Assessment
CoPC
Chemicals of Potential Concern
CPWE
Car Park Waste Encapsulation
EDC
1,2 dichloroethane
GAE
General Air Emissions
GC/MS
Gas Chromatograph / Mass Spectrometry
GTP
Groundwater Treatment Plant
HCBD
Hexachlorobutadiene
HHRA
Human Health Risk Assessment
ICI
Imperial Chemical Industries
LCS
Laboratory Control Spike
LEL
Lower Explosive Limit
LFG
Landfill Gas
LOR
Limit of Reporting
NMI
National Measurement Institute
PCE
Tetrachloroethene
PID
Photo Ionisation Detector
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
QA/QC
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
RPD
Relative Percentage Difference
SG
Soil Gas
SRA
State Rail Authority
SVD
Springvale Drain
SVOC
Semi Volatile Organic Compound
TCE
Trichloroethene
TVOC
Total Volatile Organic Compounds
VOC
Volatile Organic Compound
43218429/01/03
v
Executive Summary
URS Australia Pty Ltd (URS) was commissioned by Orica Australia Pty Limited (Orica) to conduct an
air emissions sampling program surrounding the Botany Industrial Park (BIP). Between November
2013 and February 2014 various air sampling was undertaken as part of the General Air Emissions
(GAE) monitoring program. Under this program, monitoring events have occurred approximately every
15 months since 1995.
The most recent monitoring event provides additional data for use in assessing potential risks to
residential, recreational and occupational receptors in the Botany area. Such risks include inhalation
of vapour generated from the underlying contaminated groundwater plume, and the plume’s potential
discharge into Springvale Drain.
The sampling program undertaken for this project included surface emissions and soil gas, whilst
ambient air and surface water sampling results along Springvale Drain conducted as part of separate
project, have also been included in this report. The sampling program included collection of surface
emission fluxes from 12 locations surrounding the BIP. These locations were selected as being
representative of key receptor group areas. The surface flux emission sampling was conducted in
November 2013 and involved the use of an isolation flux hood, and collection of samples in evacuated
canisters for subsequent off-site analysis for 13 chlorinated Chemicals of Potential Concern (CoPC).
The same analytical method was used for the soil gas and ambient air samples. The majority of
sample locations showed limited detections of the CoPC and two locations, AS18 or AS88, both
located at Botany Golf Course showed no measurable concentrations of CoPC. The measured
surface emissions were compared to values used in the Consolidated Human Health Risk
Assessment (CHHRA) (ERS, 2010) conducted for the area and the following differences were noted:

1,1,2-trichloroethane at AS17 of 0.5 µg/min/m2. This emission rate was higher than the value
used in the CHHRA for the main plume of 0.019 µg/min/m2;

PCE at AS13 and AS15, both measured at 0.12 µg/min/m2. These emission rates are lower
than the PCE values used in the CHHRA for the main plume of 4.2 µg/min/m2;

Dichloromethane at 10 of the 12 locations with measured emission rates ranging between
0.19 and 0.81 µg/min/m2. These emission rates were consistently below the values used in
the CHHRA.
In addition, soil gas samples from a depth of 2m at AS88 were collected at Botany Golf Course during
November 2013 and February 2014. The results showed detections of three CoPC, namely
chloroform (4 µg/m3), tetrachloroethene (570 µg/m3) and trichloroethene (19 µg/m3). These
concentrations are consistent with historical results from this location, however none of the CoPC
were able to measured above the limit of reporting in the flux hood at the same location, suggesting an
incomplete pathway to the ground surface.
Ambient air samples (AS20 and AS62) and surface water samples (SW065) alongside Springvale
Drain were collected during May and June 2013 as a response to elevated groundwater. The two
rounds showed elevated levels of CoPC in both the ambient air and surface water, however, ambient
air concentrations in AS62 dropped to low concentrations during the second round, consistent with
other recent measurements for this location.
Overall, the data collected reflect low concentrations in the surface emissions, soil gas and ambient
air, consistent with similar data from recent years and are considered suitable for use in ongoing
human health risk assessments for the area.
43218429/01/03
vii
Introduction
1
1
1.1
General
Following the completion of the Stage 2 ICI Botany Groundwater Survey in 1996, URS Australia Pty
Limited (URS) was commissioned by Orica Australia Pty Limited (Orica) to collect additional data on
air and surface emissions on an ongoing basis as part of the Stage 3 and Stage 4 monitoring and
remediation programs. This ongoing sampling work was incorporated into the Voluntary Management
Proposal (VMP) issued in 2010, as part of Orica Botany’s Groundwater Cleanup Project. The main
purpose of the sampling program was to collect data for use in the Consolidated Human Health Risk
Assessment - 2010, prepared by Environmental Risk Sciences (ERS) (2010), hereafter referred to as
the Consolidated Human Health Risk Assessment (CHHRA) (ERS, 2010). The CHHRA has been
performed to assess the potential risks presented to residential, recreational and occupational
receptors resulting from inhalation of vapour from contaminated groundwater. It is understood the
CHHRA will be updated, as required.
The groundwater contains dissolved volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that have the potential to
volatilise, migrate through the soil and be emitted into the atmosphere. Therefore, the collection of
surface emissions data is an appropriate method for characterising the potential for inhalation
exposures in areas overlying the groundwater plumes. Flux emission sampling has been conducted
since 1995, thereby generating a consistent data set that allows evaluation of the surface emissions
over time. The sampling program has been conducted approximately every 15 months so that data
are collected during various seasons of the year.
The flux emission sampling conducted in 1995 was associated with the original Human Health Risk
Assessment (HHRA) undertaken for the BIP and titled Groundwater Stage 2 Survey, ICI Botany
Contract C5. Human Health Risk Assessment, (Woodward-Clyde, 1996). Between 1996 and 2005,
several HHRAs were prepared for specific areas around the BIP, which were combined with updated
data to form the Consolidated Human Health Risk Assessment (URS, 2005). As required under the
Voluntary Management Plan (VMP) for the Site, the latest CHHRA (2010) was an update of the
CHHRA (2005) which included the most recent flux emission data at the time of reporting.
This report presents the findings of surface emissions monitoring carried out at the Botany site and
surrounding areas during November 2013 and February 2014. The report also presents a comparison
of the results with respect to the assessment of potential risks to human health as presented in the
HHRA.
1.2
Background to Air Emissions Sampling
1.2.1
Requirements and Objectives
The emissions of VOCs to air was identified during the Stage 2 survey as an important pathway for
many of the receptor groups in the Botany area, as detailed in the Health Risk Assessment
(Woodward-Clyde (1996), the CHHRA (URS, 2005) and the recent CHHRA (ERS, 2010). In some
cases, this is the only pathway that is currently complete. The main receptor groups of interest
identified in the health risk assessment are:
 Residents (both adults and children);
 Recreational users of the Botany Golf Course (both adults and children);
 Commercial workers in Discovery Cove, Botany Road;
43218429/01/03
1
1 Introduction
 Workers along the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) property adjacent to the Botany site
and Southlands;
 Other industrial workers on the industrial areas above the plume; and
 On-site workers on the Botany site.
The objective of the air emissions sampling program was to measure the emission rate of volatile
chemicals from the ground surface at locations adjacent to representative receptor groups in off-site
areas. In addition, the monitoring program served to:
1. Provide data to assess spatial and temporal variations in air emissions; and
2. Compare emission rates to those used in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).
1.2.2
Previous Surface Emission Sampling Rounds
Samples have been collected from the Botany area during the following 13 previous rounds of
sampling:
–
1995 air emissions sampling undertaken as part of the Stage 2 Health Risk Assessment (and
reported in Appendix D of the Stage 2 Health Risk Assessment Report, Woodward-Clyde
1996);
–
1996 air emissions sampling program carried out prior to the commencement of the Stage 3
monitoring rounds. The data from this monitoring is presented in the Air Emissions Report,
Woodward-Clyde 1997;
–
1998 air emissions sampling round completed as part of the Stage 3 monitoring program
(reported in the progress report WCIE-233, March 1999, Woodward Clyde 1999a);
–
(reported in the progress report WCIE-298, December 1999, Woodward Clyde 1999b);
–
(reported in the Air Emissions Sampling Program July 2001 Report, URS 2001);
–
(reported in Air Emissions Sampling Program November 2002 Report, URS 2002); and
–
(reported in Air Emissions Sampling Program March 2004 Report, URS 2004).
–
(reported in Air Emissions Sampling Program July 2005 Report, URS 2006).
–
(reported in Air Emissions Sampling Program November 2006 Report. URS 2007b).
–
(reported in Air Emissions Sampling Program August 2008 report. URS 2008a).
–
(reported in Air Emissions Sampling Program July 2009 report. URS 2009).
–
2010 - 2011 air emissions sampling round completed as part of the Stage 3 monitoring
program (reported in Orica Botany Environmental Survey Air Emissions Sampling Program
December 2010 - April 2011. URS 2011)
43218429/01/03
2
1 Introduction
(reported in Orica Botany Environmental Survey Air Emissions Sampling Program August
2012. URS 2012)
–
1.2.3
Soil Gas Sampling
Concentrations of vinyl chloride have been reported in shallow groundwater at WG154S, located at
the Botany Golf Course. Groundwater concentrations for WG154S from recent sampling events are
presented in Table 1-1. Surface flux emissions and soil gas sampling was undertaken at AS88,
located adjacent to WG154S, to establish if the fluctuations of vinyl chloride in shallow groundwater
were reflected in the emissions data.
Table 1-1
Concentrations of vinyl chloride in shallow groundwater at WG154S (Orica 2013)
Sampling Period
Vinyl Chloride (mg/L)
June 2011
2.93
September 2011
0.39
December 2011
0.52
May 2012
4.51
June 2012
2.63
March 2013
0.05
June 2013
0.068*
September 2013
0.22
Note: *The higher of two values has been reported.
1.2.4
Ambient Air and Surface Water Sampling
Regular monitoring of air and surface water at Springvale Drain (SVD) has been undertaken in recent
years. Two rounds of data were collected from SVD on 10 May 2013 and 6 June 2013 as a response
to elevated groundwater levels, which had the potential to increase the ambient air concentrations of
volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHC). These two ambient air and surface water sampling rounds
were included as part of the data set for this report.
43218429/01/03
3
Sampling Methodology
2
2
2.1
Overview
The monitoring was conducted using a methodology consistent with sampling and analysis methods
used in previous rounds of testing. The surface emission sampling was conducted using an isolation
flux hood (i.e. flux chamber). Air samples from the flux hoods and soil gas wells were collected into
evacuated canisters and analysed for the target chemicals using relevant US EPA methods.
2.2
Target Chemicals
The target chemicals for this program were identified in the Stage 2 Health Risk Assessment
(Woodward-Clyde, 1996) and CHHRA (URS, 2005) and consist of the following chlorinated Volatile
Hydrocarbons (CHCs).













chloroethene (vinyl chloride);
carbon tetrachloride;
1,2-dichloroethane (EDC);
dichloromethane (methylene chloride);
chloroform;
tetrachloroethene (PCE);
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane;
trichloroethene (TCE);
1,1,2-trichloroethane;
cis-1,2-dichloroethene;
trans-1,2-dichloroethene;
1,1-dichloroethene; and
hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD).
2.3
Sampling Program
The sampling methods used allowed accurate measurement of low levels of the target compounds in
the receptor areas, to meet the needs of the exposure assessment. These included:
1.
Isolation flux hood method, which was used to measure emission fluxes from surfaces above
groundwater plumes. Samples were collected from 12 locations representative of different
receptor areas off-site; and
2.
Soil gas sampling, which collected soil gas from one location, AS88. Two sampling rounds
were carried out as part of the sampling program, one in November 2013 and one in February
2014. Summary information on the program is presented in Table 2-1 and sampling locations
are shown in Figure 1. Photographs of the sampling being undertaken have been presented
in the Plates Section.
43218429/01/03
5
2 Sampling Methodology
Table 2-1
Sample Location
Flux
Emissions
Sampling Program
Ambient
Air
Soil
Gas
Surface
Water
Analytes
Date
Collected
Field Samples
AS05

VOC
07/11/2013
AS06

VOC
07/11/2013
AS08

VOC
08/11/2013
AS09

VOC
06/11/2013
AS11

VOC
08/11/2013
AS12

VOC
07/11/2013
AS13

VOC
06/11/2013
AS14

VOC
06/11/2013
AS15

VOC
06/11/2013
AS17

VOC
07/11/2013
AS18

VOC
07/11/2013
AS88FH

VOC
07/11/2013
AS88SG (Nov 2013)

VOC
07/11/2013
AS88SG (Feb 2014)

VOC
21/02/2014
QA / QC Samples
QC01 (method blank)

VOC
06/11/2013
QC02 (duplicate at AS05)

VOC
07/11/2013
QC03 (duplicate at AS88)


QC04 (February duplicate
at AS88)
VOC
07/11/2013
VOC
21/02/2014
Note: NA = Not Applicable (sampling locations discontinued)
The sampling methods and sampling conditions are discussed in the following sections.
Historical Ambient Air and Surface Water Sampling
As part of a separate monitoring program, ambient air sampling was undertaken along the SVD on 10
May, and 06 June 2013 in conjunction with surface water sampling. The sampling locations are listed
in Table 2-2. These locations are consistent with sampling locations from previous General Air
Emissions work.
Table 2-2
Southlands and Springvale Drain Ambient Air Sampling Locations
Sampling Location ID
Location Description
Ambient Air Sampling Locations
AS20
Adjacent to SVD and commercial / industrial receptors south of Southlands.
AS62
Located adjacent to stormwater pit within the Discovery Cove business area
located south of sampling location AS20.
Surface Water Sampling Locations
SW065
43218429/01/03
Southern portion of SVD (within commercial / industrial receptors, south of
Southlands).
6
Ambient air samples were collected as 8-hr, time-integrated samples using evacuated, stainless-steel
canisters fitted with flow regulators. The samples were analysed using modified US EPA Method TO15.
Surface water samples were generally collected from mid-stream at a depth of approximately 0.1 m
below the water surface using standard water sampling procedures. Surface water samples were
collected in laboratory supplied 40 mL amber vials and stored at approximately 4C until arrival at the
laboratory under standard chain of custody procedures.
2.4
Sampling Conditions
Surface emission sampling was performed after several days of dry weather, during November 2013.
The soil gas samples were collected in November 2013 and February 2014. Table 2-3 presents a
summary of the weather conditions prior to and during the November and February sampling
programs as recorded at the Bureau of Meteorology, Sydney Airport Weather Station. There was
rainfall prior to the soil gas sampling, but this is not expected to have an effect on concentrations at
the sampling depth (2m bgs).
Table 2-3
Date
Summary of Daily Weather Conditions at Sydney Airport for each Sampling Mobilisation
(Bureau of Meteorology 2014)
Day of Week
Maximum
temperature
(°C)
Rainfall
(mm)
Evaporation
(mm)
9 am MSL
pressure
(hPa)
3 pm MSL
pressure
(hPa)
1st Sampling Mobilisation (Surface emission sampling)
30/11/2013
Wednesday
20.9
0.6
7.4
1019.7
1018.3
31/10/2013
Thursday
24.1
0
5.4
1021.9
1019.4
1/11/2013
Friday
23.2
0
8.0
1023.7
1020.1
2/11/2013
Saturday
30.8
0
5.6
1018.0
1018.0
3/11/2013
Sunday
34.9
0
7.6
1010.1
1006.4
4/11/2013
Monday
18.4
0
11.2
1022.6
1023.8
5/11/2013
Tuesday
19.9
0
9.8
1028.1
1026.7
6/11/2013
Wednesday
1024.2
1019.2
Thursday
0
0
4.6
7/11/2013
23.7
30.3
8.0
1017.0
1011.7
8/11/2013
Friday
34.0
0
9.4
1010.8
1005.7
nd
2
Sampling Mobilisation (Soil gas sampling)
14/2/2014
Friday
25.7
0
8.8
1008.2
1006.4
15/2/2014
Saturday
27.1
2.2
2.2
1003.6
999.3
16/2/2014
Sunday
24.4
4.2
2.4
999.4
1001.4
17/2/2014
Monday
25.3
17.4
7.0
1013.6
1013.6
18/2/2014
Tuesday
25.1
0
2.4
1013.1
1009.8
19/2/2014
Wednesday
29.3
0
2.2
1004.8
1002.2
20/2/2014
Thursday
27.8
23.2
4.2
1007.6
1008.0
21/2/2014
Friday
25.5
0
11.4
1016.0
1015.9
Note:
Shaded days indicate sampling events.
43218429/01/03
7
2.5
Surface Flux Emissions Sampling
The emission flux of VOCs was measured from the ground surface at 12 locations using an emissions
(isolation) flux hood. The sampling procedures are detailed in Appendix A and photographs of the
individual sampling locations are shown in the Plates section.
Air samples were collected using evacuated, stainless-steel canisters fitted with one hour regulators.
In addition, three QA/QC samples were collected as part of the program:

QC01 (flux hood field blank);

QC02 (duplicate at AS05); and

QC03 (duplicate at AS88).
Guidance in US EPA (1986) suggests flux hood sampling be conducted after several days of dry
weather and that rainfall in excess of 0.1 inches (2.5 mm) would result in a temporary decrease in
emission rates. As shown in Table 2-3, no rainfall was recorded leading up to, nor during the flux
hood sampling event.
2.6
Soil Gas Sampling
2.6.1
General
The soil gas sample (and duplicate QC04) was collected on 21 February 2014 from the permanent soil
gas well installed as part of the vinyl chloride soil gas sampling program undertaken in November
2007 (URS 2007a). There are four different depths of soil gas sampling implants at AS88, namely 0.15
m, 0.75 m, 1.0 m and 2.0 m. The February 2014 sample was collected at the 2m sampling depth,
consistent with previous rounds. This is the implant closest to the shallow groundwater table. The
well was sampled previously on 7 November 2013, however, as no duplicate sample was collected,
therefore an additional sample was required to comply with QA/QC requirements, necessitating
additional sample collection.
2.6.2
Field Measurements
Prior to the sampling of soil gas, the well was screened for methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2) and
oxygen (O2) using a landfill gas (LFG) analyser. VOCs also were measured with a photoionisation
detector (PID). The results are shown in Table 2-4. The results indicate that there were no elevated
levels of VOC or flammable gases (methane) at the sample location at the time of sampling. Whilst
the oxygen levels are higher than would normally be expected at depth, which can suggest ambient air
ingress to the soil gas well or a leak in the sampling equipment, it is more likely to be attributable to
the porous matrix of the sandy soil. Integrity testing (leak testing) of the soil gas wells was performed
during installation (URS, 2007a) and confirmed ambient air was not entering the soil gas wells.
Table 2-4
Location
AS88
Field Screening Results at AS88SG (2m Soil Gas Implant) February 2014
Prior to Sampling
After Sampling
TVOC
(ppm)
O2 (%)
CH4 (%)
CO2 (%)
TVOC
(ppm)
O2 (%)
CH4 (%)
CO2 (%)
0.2
18.0
0.0
3.2
1.9
19.7
0.0
1.1
43218429/01/03
8
2.6.3
Sample Collection
Collection of the soil gas samples were undertaken using evacuated canisters fitted with 1 hour flow
regulators. One primary sample (AS88_SG) and one duplicate sample (QC04) were collected.
2.7
Sample Duration
Table 2-5 lists the duration for each sample. It is noted that these durations exclude the time in which
samples are purged. The purging method is further discussed in Appendix A, which followed US EPA
(1986) guidance.
Table 2-5
Sample Duration
Sample ID
Sample Duration (Minutes)
Field Samples
AS05
116*
AS06
60
AS08
60
AS09
113*
AS11
55
AS13
120*
AS12
60
AS14
113*
AS15
110*
AS17
111*
AS18
180*
AS88FH
120*
AS88SG
67*
QA / QC Samples
QC01 (method blank)
102*
QC02 (AS05 duplicate)
116*
QC03 (AS88 duplicate)
120*
QC04 (AS88SG, duplicate)
67*
Note: *Sampling time extended beyond 1 hour due to sufficient remaining vacuum.
2.8
Analysis
2.8.1
Evacuated Canister Vacuum Pressure
Table 2-6 below summarises the vacuum pressure for each canister prior to sampling, after sample
collection and upon receipt at the laboratory. A vacuum pressure after sampling of between -5 and 10 inches of mercury (“Hg) is considered to be ideal.
A vacuum pressure difference of less than 3 “Hg between sample dispatch (after sample collection)
and sample receipt is generally deemed acceptable and attributable to differences in the gauges used
plus any effects of temperature and pressure. The table below indicates all canisters were received
43218429/01/03
9
by the laboratory with the appropriate level of pressure vacuum. Further discussion of the QA/QC
undertaken for the evacuated canisters is provided in Section 3.2 and also presented in Appendix C
Table 2-6
Evacuated Canister Vacuum Pressures
Vacuum Pressure ("Hg)
Canister
ID
Prior to
Sample
Collection
After Sample
Collection
Upon
Laboratory
Receipt
Canister
Pressure
Difference
AS05
G1243
<-30
-8
-8
0
AS06
2436
-28.5
-7
-9
2
Sample ID
Field Samples
AS08
H2919
-30
-6.5
-7
0.5
AS09
G1242
<-30
-8.5
-7
1.5
AS11
H3193
-29.5
-8
-9
1
AS12
H2917
-29.5
-8
-9
1
AS13
G1247
<-30
-8.5
-7
AS14
G1245
<-30
-8
-7
1.5
1
AS15
G1244
-30
-7.8
-8
0.2
AS17
G1246
<-30
-8.5
-8
0.5
AS18
H3186
-32
-14
-13
1
AS88FH
G1238
<-30
-8.5
-7
1.5
AS88SG (Nov 2013)
H2920
-28.5
-6
-7
1
AS88SG (Feb 2014)
CAN066
<-30
-8
-6
2
G1235
-30
-8.5
-9
1.5
QA / QC Samples
QC01 (method blank)
QC02 (duplicate AS05 )
1
QC03 (duplicate AS88
flux hood)
QC04 (duplicate AS88 soil
gas )
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
G1236
-30
-6
-6
0
CAN067
<-30
-7
-6
1
Notes:
1.
2.8.1
Sample was erroneously emptied by the laboratory prior to analysis.
Gas Analysis
Samples collected into evacuated canisters were sent under chain of custody to the National
Measurement Institute (NMI) for analysis of selected compounds by a modified US EPA Method TO15 which is a Gas Chromatograph / Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) based method. The limit of
reporting (LOR), otherwise known as the practical quantitation limit (PQL) for each canister and
chemical can vary in TO-15 analysis due to a number of factors that include the level of moisture in
the air sample and the presence of elevated levels of compounds that require dilution of the sample
prior to analysis.
The surface emission and soil gas analytical results for the November 2013 and February 2014
samples are presented in Appendix B.
43218429/01/03
10
The ambient air and surface water analytical results for the May and June 2013 samples were
analysed by NMI and ALS respectively, consistent with previous sampling programs. These data
were initially reported as part of a separate project1, hence only summary data are presented in this
report.
2.8.2
Surface Emission Calculations
The emission flux2 of the target chemicals from the surface of the ground to the enclosed hood area
was calculated using Equation 1 (US EPA, 1986).
Emission
Flux ( g / min/ m 2 ) 
Ca  FR
Area
(Equation 1)
Where:
1
2
Ca
= concentration of target chemicals (µg/m3);
FR
= flow rate of sweep air into the emissions flux hood (m3/min);
Area
= area enclosed by the flux hood (m2).
Email from S Bowly of URS to J Wright of ERS on 3 July 2013 titled 43218405 SVD air and surface water sampling.
A flux is an emission rate per unit area and thus has units of mass/time per area.
A series of emission flux measurements
can be averaged or otherwise used to develop an overall emission rate for a given area or site. .
43218429/01/03
11
Results
3
3
3.1
General
The results for the sampling program, including comparisons with historical emission data, are
attached in the Tables Section, as follows:
 Table 3-1 presents flux emission rates calculated for the 2013 sampling program;
 Table 3-2 presents historical and current flux emissions for all sampling locations;
 Table 3-3 provides a summary of the measured soil gas concentrations at AS88 for the 2013 and
2014 sampling program;
 Table 3-4 presents a summary of the measured ambient air concentrations at AS62 and AS20 for
collected during May and June 2013;
 Table 3-5a provides historical and current measured ambient air concentrations at AS20;
 Table 3-5b provides historical and current measured ambient air concentrations at AS62; and
 Table 3-6 provides historical and current surface water results at SW065 collected during May and
June 2013.
Additional information relating to the analytical results is presented in the following appendices:
 Appendix B presents the laboratory analytical reports for all gas samples collected;
 Appendix C provides data validation for the sampling program; and
 Appendix D provides the calculation spread sheets for generating flux emissions data from
analytical reports.
An overview of these results is provided in the following section (Section 3.1.1) and a detailed
discussion of the results is presented in the following chapter (Chapter 4).
3.1.1
Overview of Results
The following can be observed from the flux emissions results presented in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2:
 Measured CoPC:
Dichloromethane was present in most samples at low concentrations, aside from two
sampling locations at the golf course;
A single measurement of 1,1,2-trichloroethane (1.2 µg/m3) was detected above the reporting
limit at AS17 (0.8 µg/m3) resulting in a surface emission rate of 0.05 µg/min/m2;
PCE was present at two locations (AS13 and AS15) in close proximity to each other. The
emission of PCE at AS13 of 0.12 µg/min/m2 was slightly higher than historical
measurements at that location (0.081 µg/min/m2 in March 2008);
There was no measurable detection of any CoPCs in the method blank sample during the
2013/2014 sampling round.
 Southlands. Minor concentrations of dichloromethane at all locations, with surface emission rates
ranging between 0.19 and 0.42 µg/min/m2, and minor concentration of PCE at AS15 and AS13,
both reporting surface emission rates of 0.12 µg/min/m2.
 Off-site Industrial and Commercial Areas – No CoPC detections were present in the fluxhood
analytical samples taken at AS18 and AS88, both located at the golf course. There were minor
concentrations of dichloromethane present at all other samples from these areas (AS12, AS14,
AS17 and AS09) with surface emission rates ranging from 0.31 µg/min/m2 at AS17 to 0.7 at AS12.
An additional minor concentration of 1,1,2-trichloroethane (1.2 µg/m3) was measured marginally
above the LOR (0.8 µg/m3) concentration at AS17, resulting in an emission rate of 0.05 µg/min/m2.
43218429/01/03
13
3 Results
 Off-site Residential – Minor concentrations of dichloromethane were present at both residential
sampling locations with AS08 and AS11 having surface emission rates of 0.25 µg/min/m2 and 0.81
µg/min/m2 respectively
An overview of the soil gas, ambient air and surface water results presented in Table 3-3 through to
Table 3-6 follows:
 Table 3-3 Soil Gas at AS88 (Botany Golf Course). Minor concentrations of chloroform and TCE
were detected in the samples, however, concentrations of PCE were elevated, with a peak value of
570 µg/m3. The highest concentration of PCE previously measured at this location was in May
2008, with a value of 460 µg/m3 (refer Table 4-5).
 Table 3-4 Ambient Air Concentrations at AS20 (formerly MCS, now Toll Holdings) and AS62
(Discovery Cove). These two samples were taken during May and June 2013 as part of a
separate sampling program investigating ambient air after elevated groundwater was reported
along Springvale Drain. Concentrations appear elevated in the May sampling event, with
measurable concentrations of EDC, cis-12, dichloroethene, vinyl chloride, TCE and chloroform.
Subsequent sampling in June showed low concentrations of EDC, chloroform, cis-12,
dichloroethene, and TCE at AS20 with no CoPC above the LOR reported at AS62.
 Tables 3-5a and 3-5b Current and Historical Ambient Air Results at AS20 and AS62
respectively. Since 2007 (post GTP commencement), the measured concentrations at both
AS20 and AS62 have generally been low, with the majority of analytes not detected above the
LOR. The sampling round collected in May 2013 at both locations showed measurable
concentrations of chloroform, EDC, TCE, cis-1,2 dichloroethene and vinyl chloride. Whilst the
concentrations for the June round were lower in concentration compared with the May round at
AS20, the concentrations are still considered higher when compared with recent years. The
concentrations in the June round at AS62 were all lower than the LOR, consistent with recent
results.
 Table 3.6 Current and Historical Surface Water Results at SW065. Location SW065 is situated
adjacent to AS20 and has been chosen to represent surface water concentrations of CoPC close to
the ambient air locations. Consistent with the ambient air analyses at AS20 and AS62, the surface
water analyses demonstrate that concentrations above the LOR are generally detected in the
ambient air samples. Whilst the concentrations of CoPC in the surface water appear similar
between the May and June analyses, the ambient air samples from the June round at both AS20
and AS62 show lower concentrations. The surface water results also showed several compounds
showing marginally elevated when compared with historical peaks including chloroform, EDC,
PCE, TCE, cis-1,2 dichloroethene and vinyl chloride.
Overall the emission fluxes reported in 2013 generally appear to be consistent with previous rounds as
shown in Table 3-2, with the key finding of the 2013 sampling program being that the majority of
sampling locations had no measurable emissions of CoPC, with the exceptions noted above. There
were no measurable emissions of the measured CoPC at AS18 and AS88.
The health risk assessment undertaken in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010) considered potential exposure to
target chemicals for a number of receptor groups: residents, recreational users of the area,
commercial works and industrial works (off-site). The risk assessment utilised air emissions data to
quantify potential vapour migration into key areas (indoors and outdoors) above the groundwater
plumes. The assessment undertaken adopted emission rates (from data collected from 1995 to 2009)
relevant for key receptor areas, namely:
43218429/01/03
14
3 Results
1) Residential exposure associated with the Western Margin of the Northern Plumes (includes
sample locations AS08 and AS11); and
2) Recreational and occupation exposures associated with the main plume areas, comprising the
following:
a. ARTC (former SRA area), includes sample location AS09;
b. Commercial Industrial Area (including Southlands), includes sample locations AS05,
AS06, AS12, AS13, AS14, AS15, AS17, AS18 and AS88.
The discussion in Chapter 4 presents a comparison with the emission rates adopted in the CHHRA
(ERS, 2010), and the emissions rates established from the sampling undertaken in November 2013.
3.1.2
Sample Measurement QA/QC
Assessment of the accuracy and precision of surface emission, ambient air and soil gas analytical
data was achieved by the collection and/or analysis of the following QC samples:






Field and Trip Blanks;
Surrogates;
Laboratory Control Spikes (LCS);
Laboratory Blank;
Field and Laboratory Duplicates; and
Certification documentation.
Additionally vacuum pressures, transit times and temperatures were a measure of quality control.
Data validation summary tables and relative percentage difference (RPD) reports are provided in
Appendix C. The outcome of this validation indicated the data collected was within acceptable levels
of precision and accuracy. Similarly, evacuated canister certification documents are also provided in
Appendix C, which certifies the canisters as free from CoPC. Non-conformances identified during the
data validation are further detailed below:



The LOR for Dichloromethane was raised from 0.2 ppbv to between 0.4 ppbv and 6 ppbv in all
samples due to background concentration (Crough,R 2013 pers. comm).
The soil gas sample taken in November 2013 (Sample AS88_SG_20131107) required dilution
due to the high level of target/non-target compounds. The LOR was raised as a result.
Two field duplicates were originally collected in the field, however one of duplicate (QC05)
was mistaken as a spare canister by the laboratory and cleaned without analysing the sample.
Equipment Background Concentration
As discussed in Section 5.3, background concentrations of dichloromethane (methylene chloride) are
associated with the flux hood equipment and may exist in the range of 2 µg/m3 to 4 µg/m3, equating to
an emission rate of up to 0.16 µg/m2/min (URS 2009). Whilst field decontamination procedures were
used to minimise the potential for dichloromethane contamination, it is acknowledged that background
dichloromethane may be present in the flux hood at these concentrations / emission fluxes. It is likely,
however, that background contamination of volatiles present in past years has since decayed to
negligible levels. Dichloromethane was not detected in the method blank sample in the 2013 sampling
event.
43218429/01/03
15
4
Discussion of Results
4
4.1
General
This section provides a discussion of the data obtained in November 2013 and February 2014, and
the values used within the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).
In general, the emission flux is a function of the soil gas concentration, the air-filled porosity of the soil
and the soil depth. However, a number of factors have the potential to affect both soil gas
concentrations and emission rates of volatile chemicals into the ambient air, including the nature of the
contamination at the top of the saturated zone, soil properties (soil composition, temperature, moisture
and porosity) and ambient meteorological conditions (including temperature, relative humidity and
barometric pressure). The variation of these factors is discussed further in Section 5 and is expected
to contribute to the variability of the emission flux reported during the different air sampling programs.
It should be noted that all flux emission calculations are undertaken on measured parameters and
provide a measurement of actual emissions from the surface of the ground. This method does not
provide data on the subsurface processes that may be involved in the movement of target chemicals
from the subsurface groundwater source to the surface of the ground. Furthermore it should be noted
that no criteria are available to directly compare with the flux emissions.
4.2
Surface Emissions Data
4.2.1
Western Margin of Northern Plumes
Table 4-1 presents a summary of the emission rates considered in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010) and the
maximum emission rates established from the samples collected during the 2013 sampling round, for
the Western Margin of the Northern Plumes area.
Table 4-1
Review of Emissions from Western Margin of Northern Plumes - Residential Areas
CoPC
Value Considered in CHHRA
2010 (µg/min/m2)1
Maximum Flux Emission
Rate 2013 (µg/min/m2)2
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)
0.045
ND (< 0.03)
Carbon tetrachloride
0.017
ND (< 0.04)
4.2
0.81
Methylene chloride
Trichloroethene (TCE)
0.037
ND (< 0.04)
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
0.78
ND (< 0.04)
Notes:
1
2
Table 4.3 of consolidated HHRA, ERS (2010)
URS sample locations AS08, and AS11
Review of the above table indicates that the data collected in 2013 do not show increases in
emissions of volatile CoPC, and emissions are generally below that considered in the CHHRA (ERS
2010). Whilst not measured above the LOR, the detection limits of TCE (<0.04 µg/min/m2) and carbon
tetrachloride of (<0.04 µg/min/m2) are above the values considered in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010),
therefore required further consideration in relation to the current CHHRA (ERS, 2010).
For the Western Margin of the Northern Plume, ERS (2010) presented the inhalation of volatiles as
follows:
43218429/01/03
17
4 Discussion of Results

For non threshold risk, EDC represents 89% of total non-threshold risk, with TCE representing
11% using the HHRA values in Table 4-1. Other CoPC were not present at levels warranting
further consideration. As the EDC surface emission rate would be reduced by 33% (based on
the LOR value 0.03 µg/min/m2 over the HHRA value of 0.045 µg/min/m2) and the TCE surface
emission rate would be increased by <1% (based on the LOR value) the calculated risk would
be lower than presented in the HHRA.

For chronic hazards, PCE represents 58% of the Hazard Index, with methylene chloride,
carbon tetrachloride and TCE representing 35%, 6% and 1% respectively. On basis of the
values presented in Table 4-1, the PCE and methylene chloride surface emission rates would
be reduced by approximately 95% and 80% respectively. The significant reduction of the two
main compounds would offset the potential increases in carbon tetrachloride and TCE (based
on LOR values) consequently the calculated risk would be lower than presented in the HHRA.
4.2.2
Main Plumes
Table 4-2, Table 4-3 and Table 4-4 present summaries of the emission rates considered in the
CHHRA (ERS, 2010) and the maximum emission rates established from the samples collected during
the 2013 sampling round for: ARTC (formerly the State Rail Authority) area; commercial/industrial
areas; and recreational areas located above the main groundwater plumes respectively.
Table 4-2
Review of Emissions from Main Plumes - ARTC (formerly SRA) Area
CoPC
Value Considered in
CHHRA 2010 (µg/min/m2)1
0.7
ND (< 0.03)
6.5
ND (< 0.04)
Chloroform
1.3
ND (< 0.04)
Dichloromethane
5.4
0.54
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.1
ND (< 0.04)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.2
ND (< 0.04)
2.5
ND (< 0.04)
20
ND (< 0.04)
Vinyl chloride
1.2
ND (< 0.02)
0.032
ND (< 0.08)
Hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD)
Notes:
1
2
Table 5.4 of Consolidated HHRA, ERS(2010)
URS sample location AS09
A review of Table 4-2 indicates the data collected in 2013 do not show increased emissions of
measured CoPC, and emissions are below that considered in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010). It should,
however, be noted that the detection limit of HCBD of <0.08 µg/min/m3 is above the value of 0.032
µg/min/m2 considered in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010). The inhalation of volatiles from HCBD represents
only 1% of the chronic hazards risk calculated for this area, with carbon tetrachloride and PCE
representing 58% and 36% of the risk. As both carbon tetrachloride and PCE were not detected
above the LOR and are thus present at concentrations more than 2 orders of magnitude those values
used in the HHRA, the potential presence of HCBD at the LOR (0.08 µg/min/m3) would not affect the
43218429/01/03
18
risks associated with this area. Consequently the total risk would be less than the value presented in
the HHRA and the outcomes in relation to inhalation of volatiles from this area remain relevant.
Table 4-3
Review of Emissions from Main Plumes - Commercial/Industrial Area (including Southlands)
CoPC
Value Considered in
0.8
ND (< 0.03)
0.04
ND (< 0.04)
Chloroform
0.36
ND (< 0.04)
Dichoromethane
1.8
0.7
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.33
ND (< 0.03)
0.019
0.05
0.03
ND (< 0.04)
0.69
ND (< 0.04)
4.2
0.12
Notes:
1
2
Table 5.4 of Consolidated HHRA (ERS 2010)
URS sample locations AS05, AS06, AS12, AS13, AS14, AS15, AS17, AS18, AS88
A review of Table 4-3 indicates that the data collected in 2013 do not show increased emissions of
measured CoPC, and emissions are below that considered in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010) (for the
commercial/industrial sampling locations), with the exception of 1,1,2-trichloroethane. The 1,1,2trichloroethane surface emission rate of 0.05 µg/min/m2 is above the value of 0.019 µg/min/m2
considered in the CHHRA (ERS 2010). In addition, the detection limit of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane of
<0.04 µg/min/m2 is marginally above the value of 0.03 µg/min/m2 considered in the CHHRA (ERS,
2010).
For the Commercial / Industrial Area of the Main Plume (Adult workers in Basement Building), the
CHHRA (ERS, 2010) presented the inhalation of volatiles as follows:

For non threshold risk, EDC represents 85% of total non-threshold risk, with TCE and 1,1,2,2
tetrachloroethane representing 11% and 3% respectively, based on the CHHRA values in
Table 4-3. Other CoPC were not present at levels warranting further consideration. The EDC
and TCE surface emission rates are reduced by >95% and 94% respectively (based on LOR
values). The significant reduction of the two main compounds would offset the potential
increase of 1,1,2,2 tetrachloroethane, thus the calculated risk would be lower than presented
in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).

For chronic hazards, PCE represents 83% of Hazard Index, with 1,1,2 trichloroethane
representing 0%. On basis of the values presented in Table 4-3, the PCE surface emission
rates would be reduced by > 95%. The significant reduction in PCE would offset the minor
increase in 1,1,2 trichloroethane, consequently the calculated risk would be lower than
presented in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).
43218429/01/03
19
Table 4-4
CoPC
Review of Emissions from Main Plumes – Recreational Area
Value Considered in
Rate 2013 (µg/min/m2)
0.046
ND (< 0.03)
0.023
ND (< 0.04)
Chloroform
0.037
ND (< 0.04)
Dichloromethane
4.2
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.33
ND (< 0.03)
0.035
ND (< 0.04)
0.78
ND (< 0.04)
Notes:
1
2
Table 5.4 of Consolidated HHRA (ERS 2010)
URS sample locations AS08, AS11, AS12, AS17, AS18 and AS88
A review of Table 4-4 indicates that the data collected in 2013 do not show increased emissions of
measured CoPC, and emissions are below that considered in the CHHRA (ERS 2010). It should,
however, be noted that carbon tetrachloride, chloroform and TCE all have detection limits marginally
above those considered in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).
For the Recreational Users of the Golf Course (Adults) above the Main Plume, ERS (2010) presented
the inhalation of volatiles as follows:

For non threshold risk, EDC represents 90% of total non-threshold risk, with TCE representing
10%, based on the the HHRA values presented in Table 4-4. Other CoPC were not present
at levels warranting further consideration. As the EDC surface emission rate has been
reduced by approximately 35% (based on LOR values) and the TCE surface emission rate
would be potentially increased by 15% (based on the LOR values) the calculated risk would
be lower than presented in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).

For chronic hazards, PCE represents 55% of the Hazard Index, with chloroform, carbon
tetrachloride and TCE representing, 1%, 8% and 1% respectively. On basis of the values
presented in Table 4-4, the PCE surface emission rates would be reduced by approximately
95% (based on LOR values). The significant reduction in PCE would offset the potential minor
increase in chloroform, carbon tetrachloride and TCE, consequently the calculated risk would
be lower than presented in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).
4.3
Soil Gas Concentrations at Botany Golf Course
One soil gas sample was collected at AS88 at 2m depth in November 2013, located adjacent to
WG154S. An additional primary sample was collected at AS88 in February 2014. Table 4-5 presents
the soil gas concentrations reported (using an active sampling method) in 2013 and 2014 with
comparison to soil gas data collected from previous sampling rounds.
43218429/01/03
20
Table 4-5
CoPC
Soil Gas Data at AS88
Soil Gas Concentration from 2 m depth (µg/m3)
Max
2006
2
May
2008
July
2009
April
2011
August
2012
Nov
2013
February
20143
Vinyl chloride
< 0.36
< 1.0
< 0.10
< 0.57
<1
<6
<1
1,1-Dichloroethene
< 0.55
< 1.6
< 0.6
< 0.88
<2
<9
<2
2.2
< 2.8
0.56
< 1.5
<5
< 20
<3
< 2.8
< 8.0
< 0.6
< 4.4
<2
<9
<2
1.6
16
< 0.74
< 1.1
<2
< 10
4
< 0.87
2.6
< 0.26
< 1.4
<3
< 10
<3
< 0.56
< 1.6
< 0.26
< 0.90
<2
<9
<2
Dichloromethane
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
6.7
110
0.98
7.7
<5
19
13
< 0.76
< 2.2
< 0.83
< 1.2
<3
< 10
<3
18
460
< 1.0
120
77
570
370
< 0.95
< 2.8
< 1.0
< 1.5
<3
< 20
<3
Hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD)
< 7.4
< 21
< 1.6
< 12
<5
< 20
<5
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
< 0.55
< 1.6
< 0.6
< 0.88
<2
<9
<2
Notes:
1. Samples were taken from the soil gas implants at several depths and the maximum value of either the active of passive
sampling method are reported.
2. Data for 2006 has been taken from Table 3-2 in URS (2007a);
3 Maximum values from the primary and duplicate samples have been reported.
< = The analyte was not detected above the reported PQL
Bold Values indicate that the compound was detected above the LOR
The data presented in Table 4-5 indicate that only TCE, PCE and chloroform were detected above the
laboratory LOR. The detections of these CoPC are consistent with previous rounds.
PCE was measured at its highest concentration in November 2013 at a concentration of 570 µg/m3,
however it was subsequently measured at a lower concentration of 370 µg/m3 during the February
2014 sampling round. The CHHRA (ERS, 2010) notes that the concentration of TCE (110 µg/m3) and
PCE (460 µg/m3) in soil gas beneath the golf course were evaluated in conjunction with flux emissions
data, as the soil gas concentrations of TCE and PCE were “…not sufficiently elevated to be
considered of significance that warrants detailed evaluation…” and flux emissions data is considered a
more appropriate source of data (ERS, 2010 p.61) Therefore, the rationale that further assessment is
not warranted is still based on : 1) the maximum concentration of TCE (recorded in November 2013)
was below that used in the CHHRA; 2) the concentrations of PCE (recorded in November 2013 and
February 2014) are considered similar in concentration to the value used in the CHHRA; and 3) the
flux emission sample at the same location (AS88_FH) showed no measured CoPC.
4.4
Ambient Air from Springvale Drain
Table 3-4, 3-5a and 3-5b presents a historical comparison of air concentrations reported at locations
AS20 and AS62. A summary of the data for the May and June rounds is provided below in Table 4-6.
43218429/01/03
21
Table 4-6
Summary of Ambient Air and Surface Water Data
May 2013
Sample Location
Unit
SW065
AS20
3
ug/L
ug/m
June 2013
AS62
3
ug/m
SW065
AS20
3
ug/L
AS62
ug/m
ug/m3
<2
<1
Analyte
<1
<1
<1
<1
<2
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1-Dichloroethene
<1
< 0.8
<1
<1
< 0.8
<1
1,2-Dichloroethane
39
3.6
12
46
2.1
<1
<1
<1
<2
5
<1
<2
Chloroform
3
<1
1.3
16
1.2
<1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
66
6.3
21
55
2.9
<1
Dichloromethane (methylene chloride)
<5
<2
<2
<5
<2
<2
Hexachlorobutadiene
<1
<2
<3
<1
<2
<3
Tetrachloroethylene
<1
<1
<2
6
<1
<2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
2
< 0.8
<1
2
< 0.8
<1
Trichloroethene
6
<1
2.5
15
2
<2
Vinyl chloride
10
1.6
3.6
20
< 0.9
< 0.6
Review of the data presented in the referenced tables indicates the following:
 Since 2007, following commissioning of the GTP, the concentrations of CoPC in ambient air
adjacent to SVD, based on data collected at locations AS20 and AS62 are low with few detections
of CoPC above the LOR. There have been instances of elevated CoPC in ambient air e.g. May
2013. These instances are likely to be due to elevated groundwater resulting from rainfall events
and potentially associated with the temporary shutdown of the GTP. As evidenced by the June
2013 data, elevated concentrations do not appear to be long lasting and low ambient air
concentrations are re-established shortly thereafter.
 Since 2007, low concentrations of CoPC have been reported in surface water at SW065. Data
collected from 2013 are elevated compared with historical data; and this is understood to be
associated with elevated groundwater; and
 The non-detects (i.e. below LOR) of CoPC in ambient air adjacent to SVD generally coincide with
low concentrations in surface water.
As the June sampling was undertaken when surface water was at representative levels i.e. not
elevated, it is considered that these samples are more representative of long term ambient air
concentrations along Springvale Drain, consideration of these concentrations in relation to the
inhalation by Adult workers adjacent to Springvale Drain (both at MCS and Discovery Cove), as
presented in the HHRA (ERS, 2010), follows:

For non threshold risk, EDC represents 86-90% of the total non-threshold risk, with vinyl
chloride and TCE and representing 7% and 3% respectively. Other CoPC were not present
at levels warranting further consideration. The measured EDC in June (<1 µg/m3 and 2.1
µg/m3) is less than the EDC values (6.1 µg/m3 at Discovery Cove and 7.7 µg/m3 at MCS) used
to generate the non threshold risk. The measured vinyl chloride (<0.6 µg/m3 to <0.9 µg/m3)
when compared against the values used to derive the non threshold risk (0.37 µg/m3 to 0.56
µg/m3) would not have significantly affected the total non threshold risk. Similarly, the
43218429/01/03
22
measured TCE values (<2 µg/m3 to 2 µg/m3) when compared against the values used to
derive the non threshold risk (0.96 µg/m3 to 1.8 µg/m3) would not have significantly affected
the total non threshold risk. Thus it is considered that the calculated risk would be lower than
presented in the CHHRA (ERS, 2010).

For chronic hazards, carbon tetrachloride PCE, TCE, cis-1,2 dichloroethene and methylene
chloride represented a total risk of between 0.083 and 0.09. The values presented in Table
4-5 show mostly values below the LOR, with the presented LOR marginally above the values
used in the Table 5.6 of the CHHRA (ERS, 2010). To approach an unacceptable risk, the
measured concentrations presented in Table 4-5 would need to increase by at least one order
of magnitude. On basis that none of the measured CoPC are present in concentrations one
order of magnitude greater than values presented in Table 4-6 of ERS (2010), it is considered
that calculated risk would be lower than the target risk of 1 presented in the CHHRA (ERS,
2010).
43218429/01/03
23
Uncertainties
5
5
5.1
General
This section outlines the key areas of uncertainty associated with the measurement of surface
emissions and soil gas concentrations reported in the sampling program.
5.2
Uncertainties in Surface Emission Rates
There are a large number of factors that affect the emission rates of volatile chemicals from any
subsurface source to the air. These factors include (Batterman et al, 1995):
1
1. The physical and chemical properties of the contaminant, such as Henry’s Law constant, vapour
pressure and solubility;
2. The initial concentration and distribution of the contaminant;
3. Soil characteristics which affect permeation such as air-filled porosity;
4. Soil characteristics which affect partitioning of the contaminants between the soil/water and soil/gas
phases, such as organic matter, and;
5. Environmental variables such as soil moisture, airflow rates over the surface of the soil, barometric
pressure and soil temperature.
Vapour-phase diffusion generally is the major transport mechanism for controlling movement of
vapours through the soil to the air, (Karimi et al. 1987) though advective transport may be important at
times in the top metre of soil due to pressure differentials caused by barometric pressure, surface
winds, etc. Factors noted in points 1 to 4 above are complex topics, but are reasonably well
understood and are dependent on physical properties of the chemical and the subsurface soils that
are less variable than environmental variables. The environmental variables can have a significant
effect on the vapour transport process, but the effects are not well quantified in literature since the
factors are highly dependent on site specific variations. The following presents a discussion on some
of the important environmental factors that may affect vapour emissions in the area assessed.
5.2.1
Changes in Water Table
During times of rising water table elevation, the transport distance between the contaminated water
(top of the groundwater table or the top of the capillary fringe) and the ground surface is reduced. This
will, in general, increase the emission flux at the ground surface. There may, however, also be higher
levels of soil moisture during times of rising water table elevation and this will serve to decrease the
air-filled porosity and thereby reduce the emission flux. For these competing mechanisms, experience
suggests that the changes in soil moisture tend to predominate and emission fluxes are more likely to
be reduced than to be increased.
Rising water table elevation tends to be associated with periods of higher precipitation. Rainwater
infiltrating down through the soil to the groundwater table can reduce the concentration of VOCs at the
interface of the groundwater table and the vadose zone. This will reduce the driving force for vapour
transport and will reduce the emission flux at the ground surface. Such an effect can be slow to
change due to the diffusivity in water rates that result in relatively slow mixing of groundwater
(Diffusivity in water is much lower than diffusivity in air for the CoPC).
During times of falling water table elevation, the transport distance between the contaminated water
and the ground surface is increased. This may be off-set, however, by an increase in the “smear
zone” of contaminated soil immediately above the groundwater. The larger smear zone has more
43218429/01/03
25
5 Uncertainties
surface area for volatilisation to occur and this may lead to an increase in the emission flux at the
ground surface unless the drop in water table elevation is unusually large.
5.2.2
Changes in Air Pressure
Barometric effects may play a role in controlling the vapour flux as changes in wind speed, pressure
and temperature will impact surface release concentrations (the soil vapour concentration a few
metres below ground surface will not be impacted).
The summary of volatilisation processes provided by Markey & Anderson (1996) indicates that
barometric changes associated with frontal movements may enhance vapour emissions by
approximately 13% and radon emissions by 20-60%. Barometric pressure was observed to be stable
throughout the period of sampling and temperature was observed to be approximately 20 to 35°C
during the sampling events. Small changes in barometric pressure are not expected to be significant
with respect to the emission of volatiles, however they do add to the environmental conditions which
result in diurnal variations in emissions.
2
The effect of changes in air pressure will depend on the depth of the vapour source and the properties
of the overlying soil strata. The overall rate of vapour transport in the soil is limited by the slowest rate
for any given strata or layer. If the rate is controlled by some factor at depth such as a low-porosity
clay layer, changes in air pressure can only have a relatively limited effect on the emission flux.
3
No significant changes in barometric pressure were reported during the sampling, as shown by
generally small changes in atmospheric pressure between 9am and 3pm in Table 2-3. It should be
noted that any increase in vapour emissions which may occur during a major frontal change are
expected to be of short duration, and hence are not expected to have a significant effect on the
potential long-term exposure to volatile chemicals on the site.
4
5.2.3
Changes in Soil Moisture
Karimi et al. (1987) note the following: “vapour-phase diffusion is the major mode of benzene
movement through unsaturated soil. Benzene molecules will have to diffuse through the air-filled pore
space of the soil. Thus, the effects of soil-water content and soil bulk density on benzene volatilisation
flux through a soil cover can be attributed to their effect on the air-filled porosity, which in turn is the
major soil parameter controlling benzene volatilisation through soil. Air-filled porosity is defined as that
portion of the total soil volume not occupied by either solid soil particles or by soil water.” The study
showed that the air-filled porosity has an exponential effect on the volatilisation flux through soil for
benzene and similar volatile organic chemicals. Since the soil bulk density is not expected to change
significantly, the soil moisture content is expected to be the major variable in the air-filled porosity and
hence the volatilisation rate. An increase in soil moisture would be expected to result in a decrease in
air-filled porosity and hence volatilisation. The mathematical relationship was established by Millington
and Quirk in the early 1960’s. Sampling during 2013 was undertaken following a period of warm and
dry conditions to minimise adverse impacts of surface moisture.
5.2.4
Changes in Air Temperature
If the source of the vapours is at depth, changes in air temperature will have little direct effect on the
emission flux because the temperature of the bulk soil is relatively independent of short-term
43218429/01/03
26
5 Uncertainties
fluctuations in air temperature. In any event, diffusion and other transport processes are related to the
absolute temperature, which may vary by only about 10% from winter to summer (e.g., 270 to 300 K).
Increasing temperature is expected to increase the rate of volatilisation, mainly indirectly by reducing
the soil moisture content near the surface and hence increasing emissions. The data utilised for this
study was from the end of spring and expected to provide representative vapour emission potential.
However, given the depth of contamination within the shallow groundwater plume to the surface of the
ground, the temperature variation of the subsurface materials is expected to be substantially less than
the variation in air temperature, resulting in small changes to the volatilisation rate (Markey &
Anderson 1996). The seasonal temperature variations do add to the potential diurnal variations in
emission rates.
5.3
Uncertainties Associated with the Flux Hood Methodology
There are a number of uncertainties associated with the use of the flux hood in collecting samples for
measuring the flux emission rate from the surface of the ground. The uncertainties include:
Use of the Flux Hood to measure emissions from the ground
This may underestimate or overestimate the emissions from the surface of the ground. The use of a
flux hood creates an artificial environment within the hood for sampling. While the technique adopted
aims to minimise any effects of the artificial environment, there is the potential that emissions from the
surface of the ground will be enhanced or suppressed within the hood environment. For example, the
effective surface wind speeds within the flux hood are relatively low and this may reduce emission
fluxes compared to nearby uncovered areas.
Use of several sampling locations to cover a large emission area
One of the limitations of using the flux hood is that it is difficult to measure emissions from a large
source area in a cost effective manner. The measurement of emissions using the flux hood, however,
is the only suitable method for directly measuring the undisturbed emissions from the surface of the
ground and hence, a compromise between the collection of data from relevant receptor areas and
costs. The limited number of sampling locations utilised may increase the uncertainty in the estimated
overall emission rate from the area above the identified groundwater plume.
Use of samples taken at only one point in time
As noted in Section 5.2.4 emissions of volatiles from the surface of the ground will vary with
meteorological conditions, particularly the seasonal temperature variation. If there is a significant
short-term temporal variability in emission flux, the data collected on different days may not be directly
comparable. Data have been collected from 12 air emissions sampling programs from 1995 to 2013,
encompassing all seasons. The data indicates some degree of seasonal variability. Historically,
sampling generally occurred during a one month period to ensure all samples were captured during a
limited timeframe i.e. during one season. All surface emission sampling during this event was
consistent with this approach. Additional uncertainty is introduced when sampling is conducted over
an extended period i.e. several months, which could be due to changes in a number of factors such as
variation in weather, groundwater levels or GTP operational efficiency. The uncertainty is reduced
with each sampling round conducted.
43218429/01/03
27
5 Uncertainties
Potential contamination of the flux hood from methylene chloride
One of the recommendations contained in the 2008 air emissions monitoring program (URS 2008a)
was to further investigate the source of methylene chloride from surface emissions. URS performed a
study in 2008 to further investigate sources of methylene chloride in flux emissions data collected
using the flux hood (URS 2009). The results of the investigation suggested the most likely source of
low level methylene chloride detections is from the flux hood and that background concentrations of
methylene chloride (associated with the flux hood equipment) may exist in the range of 2 to 4 µg/m3,
equating to an emission rate of up to 0.16 µg/m2/min. Field decontamination procedures are used to
minimise the potential for methylene chloride contamination, however, background methylene chloride
may be present in the flux hood at these concentrations / emission rates.
43218429/01/03
28
Conclusions
6
6
The air emissions monitoring program undertaken in 2013 and 2014 provides additional data for
assessing potential risks to residential, recreational and occupational receptors in the Botany area
from inhalation of vapour arising from the underlying groundwater plumes. The flux emission sampling
program collected air emissions data from 12 locations surrounding the BIP which were representative
of key receptor group areas and provided an indication of the potential variability of the measured
emissions over time and area. Soil gas samples at one location were also collected at Botany Golf
Course during this sampling program. Ambient air and surface water samples were also collected
along Springvale Drain during mid 2013 as part of a separate sampling program, however have also
been discussed in this report.
The majority of the surface emission samples showed no detection of the CoPC and if CoPC were
detected, they were low in concentration. Where relevant, the measured emissions were compared to
values used in the latest consolidated human health risk assessment (ERS, 2010) and the overall
risks associated with inhalation of CoPC were found to be lower than values presented in the CHHRA
(ERS, 2010). This indicates that emissions from the groundwater plumes are low and limited.
The soil gas samples at AS88 showed detections of three CoPC. Whilst chloroform and TCE were
lower than historical maximum concentrations, the PCE concentration was measured up to 570 µg/m3,
which is above the historical maximum of 460 µg/m3. Whilst PCE was measured above the historical
maximum, none of the CoPC, including PCE, were able to measured above the limit of reporting in the
flux hood at the same location suggesting emissions to the surface of the CoPC are limited.
Ambient air samples (AS20 and AS62) and surface water samples (SW065) alongside Springvale
Drain were collected during May and June 2013 following a period of elevated groundwater levels.
The two rounds showed measurable concentrations of CoPC in both the ambient air and surface
water, primarily in the May round, however, ambient air concentrations dropped to low concentrations
during the second round, with most compounds not detected above the reporting limit, generally
consistent with recent measurements for these locations.
The surface emissions, soil gas and ambient air measurements demonstrate that emissions from the
groundwater plumes are generally low and consistent with recent measurements. The data is
considered suitable for use in ongoing human health risk assessments.
43218429/01/03
29
7
References
7
Batterman S., Kulshrestha A. and Cheng H.Y., 1995. Hydrocarbon Vapor Transport in Low Moisture
Soils. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol 29, p171-180, 1995.
Bureau of Meteorology 2012 Sydney Airport, New South Wales August 2012 Daily Weather
Observations. Available at: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/dwo/IDCJDW2125.latest.shtml
Environmental Risk Sciences 2010 Consolidated Human Health Risk Assessment.
Orica Australia Pty Ltd.
Prepared for:
Karimi AA., Farmer W.J. and Cliath M.M., 1987. Vapor-Phase Diffusion of Benzene in Soil. Journal of
Environmental Quality, Vol 16, No. 1, p38, 1987.
Markey B. and Anderson B., 1996. Volatilisation from Soil and Exposure Assessment. Presented in
Contaminated Sites Monograph Series, No. 5, 1996.
Orica, 2013 Voluntary Management Proposal Progress Report No. 13 Report No. EN.1591.61.PR055
Quarterly groundwater monitoring reports, available at: www.oricabotanytransformation.com.
Accessed 27 February 2014
URS, 2001. Orica Botany Environmental Survey, Stage 3 - Remediation, Air Emissions Sampling
Program July 2001. Prepared for Orica Engineering Pty Ltd by URS, 2001.
Program November 2002. Prepared for Orica Engineering Pty Ltd by URS, 2002.
Program March 2004. Prepared for Orica Engineering Pty Ltd by URS Australia Pty Ltd, 2004.
URS, 2005 Consolidated Human Health Risk Assessment. Prepared for Orica Engineering Pty Ltd by
URS Australia Pty Limited 2005
URS, 2006 Orica Botany Environmental Survey, Stage 3 - Remediation, Air Emissions Sampling
Program July 2005. Prepared for Orica Engineering Pty Ltd by URS Australia Pty Ltd, 2006.
URS 2007a Measurement of gaseous vinyl chloride through the soil profile – Botany Golf Course.
Prepared for Orica Australia Pty Ltd 8 March 2007.
URS 2007b, Orica Botany Environmental Survey - Air Emissions Sampling Program November 2006.
6 September 2007.
URS, 2007c Proposed Car Park Waste Encapsulation Remediation Human Health Impact
Assessment. Prepared for the Environmental Assessment by URS Australia Pty Ltd, May 2007.
URS 2008a, Orica Botany Environmental Survey - Air Emissions Sampling Program March 2008. 19
August 2008.
URS 2008b. Surface Water and Ambient Air Monitoring for Springvale Drain. Prepared for Orica
Australia Pty Ltd, 12 December 2008.
URS 2008c Orica Botany Environmental Survey Stage 4 - Remediation, Groundwater Treatment Plant
(GTP), Quarterly Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Report, December 2007. Final Report.
Prepared for Orica Australia Pty Ltd, 29 February 2008
URS 2009 Orica Botany Environmental Survey - Air Emissions Sampling Program July 2009. 24
December 2009.
43218429/01/03
31
7 References
URS 2011 Orica Botany Environmental Survey Air Emissions Sampling Program December 2010 April 2011. URS 2011
URS 2012 Orica Botany Environmental Survey Air Emissions Sampling Program August 2012. URS
2012
USEPA, 1986. Measurement of Gaseous Emission Rates from Land Surfaces Using an Emission
Isolation Flux Chamber - User’s Guide. EPA/600/8-86/008. Prepared by Radian Corporation for
USEPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, 1986.
Woodward-Clyde, 1995. 4432 Groundwater Stage 2 Survey, ICI Botany Contract C3, Soil/Water
Phase 2. Prepared for ICI Engineering by Woodward Clyde, May 1995.
Woodward-Clyde, 1996. 4432 Groundwater Stage 2 Survey, ICI Botany Contract C5, Health Risk
Assessment. Prepared for ICI Engineering by Woodward Clyde, June 1997.
Woodward-Clyde 1999a Air Emissions Monitoring 1998 Groundwater Stage 3 Remediation WCIE 233.
Prepared for SHE Pacific Pty Ltd. 18 March 1999
Woodward-Clyde 199b Air Emissions Monitoring 1999 Groundwater Stage 3 Remediation WCIE 298.
Prepared for SHE Pacific Pty Ltd. 22 December 1999
43218429/01/03
32
Limitations
8
8
URS Australia Pty Ltd (URS) has prepared this report in accordance with the usual care and
thoroughness of the consulting profession for the use of Orica Australia Ltd and only those third
parties who have been authorised in writing by URS to rely on this Report.
It is based on generally accepted practices and standards at the time it was prepared. No other
warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report.
It is prepared in accordance with the scope of work and for the purpose outlined in the contract dated
4 October 2012 and extended to 31 December 2014.
Where this Report indicates that information has been provided to URS by third parties, URS has
made no independent verification of this information except as expressly stated in the Report. URS
assumes no liability for any inaccuracies in or omissions to that information.
This Report was prepared between November 2013 and August 2014 and is based on the conditions
encountered and information reviewed at the time of preparation. URS disclaims responsibility for any
changes that may have occurred after this time.
This Report should be read in full. No responsibility is accepted for use of any part of this report in any
other context or for any other purpose or by third parties. This Report does not purport to give legal
advice. Legal advice can only be given by qualified legal practitioners.
Except as required by law, no third party may use or rely on this Report unless otherwise agreed by
URS in writing. Where such agreement is provided, URS will provide a letter of reliance to the agreed
third party in the form required by URS.
To the extent permitted by law, URS expressly disclaims and excludes liability for any loss, damage,
cost or expenses suffered by any third party relating to or resulting from the use of, or reliance on, any
information contained in this Report. URS does not admit that any action, liability or claim may exist or
be available to any third party.
Except as specifically stated in this section, URS does not authorise the use of this Report by any third
party.
It is the responsibility of third parties to independently make inquiries or seek advice in relation to their
particular requirements and proposed use of the site.
Any estimates of potential costs which have been provided are presented as estimates only as at the
date of the Report. Any cost estimates that have been provided may therefore vary from actual costs
at the time of expenditure.
43218429/01/03
33
Figures
43218429/01/03
34
Legend:
ORICA PROPERTY BOUNDARY
AMPOL
AMPOL
AMPOL
AMPOL
AMPOL
AMPOL
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
w
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
)
CIG
CIG
CIG
CIG
CIG
CIG
LEASE
LEASE
LEASE
A.L.A.
A.L.A.
A.L.A.
A.L.A.
A.L.A.
A.L.A.
LEASE
LEASE
LEASE
LEASE
LEASE
SOIL GAS SAMPLING
LOCATION (AS88 ONLY)
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
w
KELLOGGS
KELLOGGS
KELLOGGS
KELLOGGS
KELLOGGS
KELLOGGS
SURFACE EMISSION SAMPLING
LOCATION BY ISOLATION
FLUX HOOD
AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE LOCATION
AUSTRALAND
AUSTRALAND
AUSTRALAND
AUSTRALAND
AUSTRALAND
AUSTRALAND
M
M
M
M
M
AA
AA
AM
HHHA
N
NN
NN
NHHH
DDDEEE
YY
YY
YDDD
SSSY
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING
LOCATION
TTTTTTOOO
VALAD
VALAD
VALAD
VALAD
VALAD
VALAD
YY
YY
Y
NNNY
A
AA
AA
ANNN
OOOTTT
B
BB
BB
BOOO
NUPLEX
NUPLEX
NUPLEX
NUPLEX
NUPLEX
NUPLEX
SSS
D
DD
DD
DSSS
OOOOOO
G
GG
GG
GOOO
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
YYY
AAAYYY
W
W
W
W
W
LLLW
AAAIIIILIILL
RRRAAA
w
WG72S/I/D
WG72S/I/D w
AS11
AS11
N
N
WG61
w
wWG61
AS05
AS05
w
w
SOLVAY
SOLVAY
SOLVAY
SOLVAY
SOLVAY
SOLVAY
AS09
AS09
PAPERWASTE
PAPERWASTE
PAPERWASTE
PAPERWASTE
PAPERWASTE
PAPERWASTE
PONDS
PONDS
PONDS
SOUTHLANDS
SOUTHLANDS
SOUTHLANDS
SOUTHLANDS
SOUTHLANDS
SOUTHLANDS
w
w
BP21
BP21
w
w
AS06
AS06w
w
w
wWG88S/I
WG88S/I
BP58
BP58
AS08
AS08
AS14
AS14
ORICA AUSTRALIA
PTY LIMITED
SW065
SW065
AS20
AS20
Project
ORICA BOTANY GENERAL AIR
EMISSIONS SAMPLING PROGRAM
w
w
)
WG154S/D
WG154S/D
AS88
AS88
w
w
AS18
AS18
WG23S
WG23S
w
w
AS12
AS12
AS62
AS62
Title
GENERAL AIR EMISSIONS
SAMPLING PROGRAM
2013 - 2014
Figure:
T:\JOBS\43218429\Workspaces\43218429.004.wo
File: 43218429.001.wor
GAZAL
GAZAL
GAZAL
GAZAL
GAZAL
GAZAL
w
wBP41
BP41
AS17
AS17
Date: 13/03/2014
Client
BP77
w
wBP77
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
BAY
BAY
BAY
AO/STB Approved: SB
AS15
AS15
w
w
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
BOTANY
GOLF
GOLF
GOLF
COURSE
COURSE
GOLF
GOLF
GOLF COURSE
COURSE
COURSE
COURSE
Drawn:
Job No: 43218429
WG74S/I/D
WG74S/I/D
w
w
This drawing is subject to COPYRIGHT. It remains the property of URS Australia Pty Ltd.
AS13
AS13
Source: NSW Dept of Lands 2009
Datum: GDA94, Projection: UTM, Grid: MGA Zone 56
1
Tables
43218429/01/03
35
43218429 Orica General Air Emissions 2013
Table 3-1: Flux Hood Concentration Results
Sample Location
Sample I.D.
Sample Date
Sample Type
Compound
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
AS05
AS06
AS08
AS09
AS11
AS12
AS13
AS14
AS15
AS17
AS05_20131107
AS06_20131107
AS08_20131108
AS09_20131106
AS11_20131108
AS12_20131107
AS13_20131106
AS14_20131106
AS15_20131106
AS17_20131107
7/11/2013
P
7/11/2013
P
8/11/2013
P
6/11/2013
P
8/11/2013
P
7/11/2013
P
6/11/2013
P
6/11/2013
P
6/11/2013
P
7/11/2013
P
7/11/2013
P
7/11/2013
P
7/11/2013
FD
6/11/2013
MB
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
8.6
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
4.3
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
6.5
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
14
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
21
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
18
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
11
<2
3.1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
8.4
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
4.9
<2
3
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
1.2
<0.6
<0.6
<0.6
<1
<0.8
<0.6
8.1
<2
<1
<0.6
<0.8
<0.4
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
<2
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
<3
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
<3
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
<1
<1
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8
<1
<1
<0.8
<3
<2
<1
<0.8
<1
<0.5
Notes:
PQL = Practical quantitation limit for the analytical method
Refer to report for details on the equations used to calculate air concentrations and flux emission rates
Bold values indicate analyte detected above reporting limit.
FD - Field Duplicate
MB - Method Blank
AS88_FH
AS88_FH
QC01
QC01_20131106
Units
< = Analyte was not measured at the level of detection; reported value is the PQL
PS - Primary Sample
AS18
AS18_20131107 AS88_FH_20131107 QC03_20131107
43218429 Orica General Air Emissions 2013
Table 3-2 : Current and Historical Flux Hood Emission Rates (µg/min.m2)
Location
Chemical
Southlands
May-95
Oct-96
Dec-98
Aug-99
Jul-01
Nov-02
Mar-04
Oct-05
Nov-06
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
na
< 0.02
< 0.02
0.6
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
0.26
na
0.019
na
0.022
0.057
< 0.0089
< 0.0089
na
na
0.057
0.055
< 0.0089
na
< 0.0089
na
< 0.0089
na
0.01
< 0.0089
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
0.063
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
0.02
na
0.017
na
< 0.0099
< 0.2
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
na
< 0.02
0.016
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
0.016
< 0.02
<0.018
<0.018
na
na
<0.018
<0.018
<0.018
na
0.044*
na
<0.018
na
<0.018
<0.037
<0.02
0.027
na
na
1.44
<0.02
<0.02
na
<0.2
na
0.622
na
<0.02
<0.2
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
na
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
1.6454
na
< 0.0161
na
< 0.0161
< 0.1613
<0.0463
<0.0355
<0.0258
na
0.15
<0.0386
<0.0316
<0.0258
<0.0463
<0.3475
0.05
<0.1274
<0.0347
<0.0166
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
na
< 0.02
< 0.02
1.9
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
0.22
na
< 0.016
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.0089
< 0.0089
na
na
0.038
0.013
< 0.0089
na
0.039
na
0.017
na
0.012
< 0.0089
< 0.0099
0.013
na
na
0.44
0.015
0.018
na
< 0.0099
na
0.054
na
0.063
< 0.2
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
na
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
0.048
< 0.02
nr
nr
na
na
nr
nr
nr
na
nr
na
nr
na
nr
nr
<0.022
<0.022
na
na
<0.022
<0.022
<0.022
na
<0.215
na
0.0472
na
<0.022
<0.215
< 0.0163
< 0.0163
na
na
< 0.0163
< 0.0163
< 0.0163
na
0.2606
na
< 0.0163
na
< 0.0163
< 0.1629
<0.1177
<0.0946
<0.0675
na
<0.0695
<0.1081
<0.0849
<0.0675
1.24
<0.9269
<0.1158
<0.3475
<0.0926
<0.0444
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
0.22
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
0.013
< 0.2
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
na
0.1
0.024
< 0.02
na
0.072
na
0.016
na
0.048
< 0.02
<0.018
<0.018
na
na
<0.018
<0.018
<0.018
na
0.022*
na
<0.018
na
<0.018
<0.037
<0.02
<0.02
na
na
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
na
<0.2
na
<0.02
na
<0.02
<0.2
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
na
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
0.4816
na
< 0.0161
na
< 0.0161
< 0.1605
<0.0502
<0.0386
<0.0293
na
<0.0297
<0.0463
<0.0359
<0.0293
7.72
<0.3862
0.06
<0.1467
<0.0386
<0.0189
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Off-Site Industrial Commercial Area
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
<0.022
<0.022
na
na
<0.022
<0.022
<0.022
na
<0.22
na
0.18
na
0.053
<0.22
< 0.0164
< 0.0164
na
na
< 0.0164
< 0.0164
< 0.0164
na
0.2619
na
< 0.0164
na
< 0.0164
< 0.1637
0.04
<0.0328
<0.0231
na
0.03
<0.0366
<0.0289
<0.0231
2.12
<0.3089
7.72
<0.1177
<0.0328
<0.0152
<
<
<
WG23S/
AS12
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
0.24
na
0.025
na
1.33
< 0.016
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
0.062
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
0.077
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
0.02
0.017
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
0.01
na
0.011
< 0.2
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
0.059
< 0.0099
<0.021
<0.021
na
na
<0.021
<0.021
0.041
na
1.1
na
0.058
na
0.074
<0.041
<0.021
<0.021
na
na
<0.021
<0.021
<0.021
na
<0.211
na
0.084
na
<0.021
<0.211
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
na
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
0.3211
na
< 0.0161
na
< 0.0161
< 0.1605
<0.0212
<0.0162
<0.0117
na
<0.0121
<0.0189
<0.0146
<0.0117
<0.0212
<0.1602
<0.0193
<0.0598
<0.016
<0.0077
<
<
<
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
<0.021
<0.021
na
na
0.083
<0.021
<0.021
na
0.42
na
0.045
na
0.045
<0.041
<0.021
<0.021
na
na
<0.021
<0.021
<0.021
na
<0.21
na
<0.021
na
<0.021
<0.21
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
na
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
< 0.1613
na
< 0.0161
na
< 0.0161
< 0.1613
<0.0463
<0.0386
<0.0278
na
<0.0285
<0.0463
<0.0343
<0.0278
2.51
**na
<0.0463
<0.139
<0.0378
<0.0181
<
<
<
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
<0.016
<0.016
<0.16
na
<0.016
<0.016
<0.016
<0.016
na
<0.16
<0.016
na
<0.016
na
<0.019
<0.019
0.644
na
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.0502
<0.0386
<0.0285
na
<0.0293
<0.0463
<0.0351
<0.0285
2.32
<0.3862
<0.0502
<0.1428
<0.0386
<0.0185
<
<
<
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
<0.016
<0.016
na
na
<0.016
<0.016
<0.016
na
<0.16
<0.016
<0.016
na
<0.016
<0.16
<0.023
<0.023
<0.023
na
<0.023
<0.023
<0.023
<0.023
1.52
<0.023
<0.023
<0.023
<0.023
<0.23
<0.0231
<0.0189
<0.0137
na
<0.0139
<0.0212
<0.0168
<0.0137
0.50
<0.1834
<0.0231
<0.0675
<0.0185
<0.0088
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
WG74S/
AS06
WG79S/
AS05
AS13
WG19/
AS15
BP41/
AS14
AS17
AS18
AS88
Mar-08
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.042
0.032
0.024
na
0.024
0.038
0.029
0.024
0.042
0.32
0.15
0.12
0.032
0.015
0.075
0.060
0.044
na
0.044
0.070
0.054
0.044
0.17
0.60
0.075
0.21
0.060
0.029
0.046
0.036
0.026
na
0.026
0.039
0.032
0.026
0.046
0.35
0.081
0.13
0.035
0.017
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.025
0.021
0.015
na
0.015
0.023
0.019
0.015
0.19
0.19
0.037
0.075
0.019
0.010
<
<
<
0.027
0.021
0.015
na
0.016
0.025
0.11
0.015
0.14
0.21
0.027
0.077
0.039
0.010
<
<
<
0.037
0.030
0.022
na
0.022
0.034
0.027
0.022
0.16
0.29
0.042
0.11
0.050
0.014
0.050
0.039
0.029
na
0.029
0.046
0.062
0.029
0.46
0.39
0.050
0.14
0.039
0.019
March-11
Jul-09
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.071
0.056
0.041
na
0.042
0.066
0.050
0.041
0.19
0.54
0.070
0.21
0.056
0.027
<
<
<
na
na
na
na
na
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.023
0.019
0.014
na
0.014
0.006
0.017
0.014
0.023
0.037
0.023
0.014
0.028
0.0023
0.042
0.035
0.025
na
0.026
0.011
0.031
0.025
0.028
0.068
0.042
0.025
0.009
0.0042
0.039
0.032
0.023
na
0.024
0.010
0.029
0.023
0.031
0.062
0.039
0.023
0.021
0.0039
0.023
0.019
0.014
na
0.014
0.006
0.017
0.014
0.032
0.037
0.018
0.014
0.013
0.0023
0.023
0.019
0.014
na
0.014
0.0060
0.017
0.014
0.032
0.037
0.023
0.014
0.020
0.0023
0.039
0.032
0.023
na
0.024
0.010
0.029
0.023
0.042
0.062
0.062
0.023
0.0085
0.0039
0.023
0.019
0.014
na
0.014
0.006
0.017
0.014
0.032
0.037
0.023
0.014
0.014
0.0023
0.039
0.032
0.023
na
0.024
0.010
0.029
0.023
0.20
0.062
0.042
0.023
0.042
0.0039
0.039
0.032
0.023
na
0.024
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.03
0.02
0.02
na
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.23
0.19
0.03
0.08
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.03
na
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.42
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
na
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.18
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.03
na
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.23
0.39
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
na
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.19
0.02
0.07
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.02
na
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.21
0.03
0.08
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.03
na
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.24
0.39
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.03
na
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.09
0.42
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
na
0.01
Aug-12
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.12
0.12
0.08
na
0.08
0.12
0.08
0.08
0.15
0.19
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.04
0.12
0.12
0.08
na
0.08
0.12
0.08
0.08
0.15
0.19
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.04
0.12
0.12
0.08
na
0.08
0.12
0.08
0.08
0.15
0.19
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.04
na
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.14
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.04
na
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.19
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.04
na
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02
Nov-13
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.2
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.3
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.42
0.08
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.19
0.08
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.7
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.32
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.12
0.12
0.08
na
0.08
0.12
0.08
0.08
0.15
0.19
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.04
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.31
0.08
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.12
0.12
0.08
na
0.08
0.12
0.08
0.08
0.19
0.19
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.04
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.12
0.12
0.08
na
0.08
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
<
<
<
<
<
<
Location
Chemical
May-95
Oct-96
Dec-98
Aug-99
Jul-01
Nov-02
Mar-04
Oct-05
Nov-06
Mar-08
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
ATRC Area (formerly SRA)
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
<0.01
<0.01
na
na
<0.01
13
2.5
na
10.5
na
0.1
na
0.5
<0.01
< 0.016
0.041
na
na
1.37
< 0.016
0.089
na
0.73
na
0.14
na
0.64
2.38
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
0.079
na
0.4
< 0.0099
0.38
0.026
na
na
0.34
< 0.0099
0.011
na
< 0.0099
na
0.069
na
0.34
< 0.2
0.024
< 0.0099
na
na
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
0.018*
na
0.014
na
0.01
< 0.0099
<0.017
0.19
na
na
<0.017
<0.017
<0.017
na
0.100*
na
39
na
5
<0.035
<0.019
<0.019
na
na
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
na
<0.19
na
0.25
na
0.11
<0.19
< 0.01645
< 0.01645
na
na
0.1217
< 0.01645
< 0.01645
na
0.2961
na
< 0.01645
na
< 0.01645
< 0.1645
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
0.29
na
< 0.016
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
0.046
na
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
0.01
na
0.018
na
< 0.0099
< 0.2
0.018
0.018
na
na
0.073
0.016
< 0.0099
na
0.18
na
0.014
na
0.018
< 0.0099
<0.021
<0.021
na
na
<0.021
<0.021
<0.021
na
0.083*
na
<0.021
na
<0.021
<0.041
<0.019
<0.019
na
na
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
na
<0.19
na
<0.019
na
<0.019
<0.19
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
na
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
< 0.0161
na
0.2581
na
< 0.0161
na
< 0.0161
< 0.1613
<0.0251
<0.0193
<0.0142
na
<0.0146
<0.0231
<0.0175
<0.0142
0.93
<0.1931
<0.0251
<0.0714
<0.0193
<0.0092
<
<
<
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
na
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
na
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.016
na
0.06
na
< 0.016
na
< 0.016
< 0.016
< 0.0089
< 0.0089
na
na
< 0.0089
< 0.0089
< 0.0089
na
< 0.0089
na
< 0.0089
na
< 0.0089
< 0.0089
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
0.077
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
< 0.0099
na
0.013
na
< 0.0099
< 0.2
< 0.0099
< 0.0099
na
na
< 0.0099
0.022
< 0.0099
na
0.018
na
0.012
na
0.028
< 0.0099
<0.021
<0.021
na
na
<0.021
<0.021
<0.021
na
0.71
na
0.029
na
<0.021
<0.041
<0.021
<0.021
na
na
<0.021
<0.021
<0.021
na
<0.21
na
<0.021
na
<0.021
<0.21
< 0.0165
< 0.0165
na
na
< 0.0165
< 0.0165
< 0.0165
na
0.2976
na
< 0.0165
na
< 0.0165
< 0.1653
<0.054
<0.0424
<0.0308
na
<0.0312
<0.0502
<0.0378
<0.0308
7.70
<0.4248
1.54
<0.1544
<0.0424
<0.0196
<
<
<
WG70S/
AS09
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Residential Areas
WG72S/
AS11
WG88S/
AS08
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.038
0.030
0.022
na
0.022
0.035
0.027
0.022
0.039
0.30
0.038
0.11
0.030
0.014
Due to interference from sample (moisture) no analytical result reported.
Emission rate of methylene chloride (dichloromethane) which is reported is at a level, which is below the emission rate of methylene chloride detected in the field blank.
Hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD) was detected in surface flux emissions at this location (AS14) during the General Air Emissions (GAE) sampling round, undertaken in November 2006. The presence of HCBD was
reported (in URS, 2007) as being likely from cross-contamination of the sampling equipment (fluxhood). Re-sampling of this location (AS14) in November 2007 and reported in a letter to Orica (URS 2008)
confirmed that HCBD was not present above the method LOR. On this basis HCBD is not considered a COPC in this area.
Values marked with "<" are those reported to be less than the analytical limit of reporting.
Values in bold were detected during analysis.
The higher measured value of the original or (field / laboratory) duplicate is presented.
AS02 and AS47 not measured from 2011 - 2012 due to remediation at the CPWE.
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Not assessed (i.e. not part of the monitoring round or not analysed).
0.06
<
0.037
0.030
0.022
na
0.022
0.034
0.027
0.022
0.12
0.29
0.037
0.11
0.029
0.014
nr
*
< 0.2
<
<
<
<
na
**
<
0.023
0.019
0.014
na
0.014
0.023
0.017
0.014
0.15
0.19
0.023
0.070
0.019
0.0091
Notes:
March-11
Jul-09
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.010
0.029
0.023
0.046
0.062
0.035
0.023
0.054
0.0039
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.023
0.016
0.014
na
0.021
0.030
0.017
0.014
0.016
0.032
0.23
0.014
0.032
0.0023
<
<
<
0.039
0.032
0.023
na
0.024
0.010
0.029
0.023
0.050
0.062
0.046
0.023
0.046
0.0039
<
<
<
0.039
0.032
0.023
na
0.024
0.010
0.029
0.023
0.12
0.062
0.042
0.023
0.0085
0.0039
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Aug-12
Nov-13
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.06
0.19
0.03
0.07
0.02
0.01
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.12
0.08
0.08
0.19
0.35
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.04
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.03
na
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.16
0.39
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
0.06
0.06
0.04
na
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.17
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.54
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.04
na
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.05
0.04
0.03
na
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.15
0.39
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.03
na
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.27
0.42
0.05
0.16
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.06
0.06
0.04
na
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.81
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.25
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
Table 3-3 : 2013 General Air Emissions Sampling
Program - Soil Gas Concentrations at AS88 (µg/m3)
Compound
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
AS88
(Nov)
20
10
9
9
9
10
10
20
9
20
570
9
19
6
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
AS88
(Feb)
3
3
2
2
2
3
3.3
3
2
5
300
2
11
1
Notes:
< = Analyte was not measured at the level of detection; reported value is
the PQL
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
QC04
(Feb)
3
3
2
2
2
3
4
3
2
5
370
2
13
1
Table 3-4 : 2012 General Air Emissions Sampling Program - Ambient Air
Concentrations (µg/m3)
AS20
Sample Location
Sample I.D AS20_10/05/13
Sample Type
Unit
AS62
AS20_6/6/13
AS62_10/05/13
P
P
P
AS62_6/6/13
P
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
ug/m3
Analyte
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1
<1
<1
<1
< 0.8
< 0.8
<1
<1
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
3.6
2.1
12
<1
<1
<1
<2
<2
Chloroform
<1
1.2
1.3
<1
6.3
2.9
21
<1
Dichloromethane (methylene chloride
<2
<2
<2
<2
Hexachlorobutadiene
<2
<2
<3
<3
Tetrachloroethylene
<1
<1
<2
<2
< 0.8
< 0.8
<1
<1
Trichloroethene
<1
2
2.5
<2
Vinyl chloride
1.6
< 0.9
3.6
< 0.6
Notes:
Bold - Results exceeds Limit of Reporting
< - not detected above the Limit of Reporting
P - Primary Sample
Table 3-5a
Current and Historical Ambient Air Analytical Results - AS20
Location
Date Sampled
AS20*
9/02/2005
Sample Type
10/05/2005
20/03/2006
12/05/2006
23/08/2006
5/09/2006
19/09/2006
26/09/2006
5/10/2006
11/05/2007
13/06/2007
Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample Primary Sample
13/07/2007
Primary
Sample
13/09/2007
Primary
Sample
17/10/2007
Primary
Sample
15/11/2007
Primary
Sample
18/12/2007
Primary
Sample
24/01/2008
Primary
Sample
19/03/2008
Primary
Sample
16/04/2008
Primary
Sample
16/05/2008
Primary
Sample
06/23/2008
Primary
Sample
07/28/2009
Primary
Sample
17/03/2011
Primary
Sample
24/08/2012
Primary
Sample
10/05/2013
Primary
Sample
6/06/2013
Primary
Sample
Chemicals likely to be associated with Springvale Drain
Analyte
Units
µg/m3
< 1.2
< 1.0
1.4
1
2.8
1.1
1.3
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 1.4
< 1.2
1.1
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1
< 1.0
< 0.26
< 2.4
0.69
<1
<1
Chloroform
µg/m3
1.1
4
3.4
1
1.8
0.77
4.2
0.86
1.4
< 0.80
< 0.8
< 0.83
< 0.89
< 1.0
< 0.91
< 0.87
< 0.96
< 0.91
< 0.98
< 0.82
< 0.80
< 0.74
< 1.8
<0.5
<1
1.2
Methylene chloride
µg/m3
1.7
< 1.1
< 1.6
< 1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.4
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1.5
< 1.3
< 1.2
1.4
< 1.3
< 1.4
< 1.2
< 1.1
0.99
< 2.6
<1
<2
<2
Chloromethane
µg/m3
1.1
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.4
2
1.3
1.4
2.1
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.2
1.2
0.64
1.2
0.83
1.7
1.8
1.8
-
-
-
-
-
3
3.5
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.74
2.6
0.83
1.7
1.8
1.8
0.99
ND
0.69
ND
1.2
3.6
< 1.5
Total Chlorinated Methanes
Pentachloroethane
µg/m
3.9
8.9
4.7
2.4
6
4.27
10.2
4.46
5.2
3
µg/m
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 1.1
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.5
< 1.3
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1.3
< 1.4
< 1.2
< 1.1
< 1.00
< 2.6
<0.7
<1
<1
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.89
< 0.89
< 0.93
< 1.0
< 1.2
< 1.0
< 0.98
< 1.1
< 1.0
< 1.1
< 0.92
< 0.89
-
-
-
-
-
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.89
< 0.89
< 0.93
< 1.0
< 1.2
< 1.0
< 0.98
< 1.1
< 1.0
< 1.1
< 0.92
< 0.89
< 0.83
< 2.0
<0.5
<1
<1
< 0.66
< 0.66
1,1-Dichloroethane
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
µg/m
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.69
< 0.74
< 0.88
< 0.76
< 0.72
< 0.79
< 0.76
< 0.81
< 0.68
< 0.66
-
-
-
-
-
1,2-Dichloroethane
µg/m3
23
80
1.5
30
44
15
110
16
26
< 0.66
< 0.66
6.7
< 0.74
< 0.88
< 0.76
< 0.72
< 0.79
< 0.76
< 0.81
< 0.68
< 0.66
< 0.62
< 1.5
<0.4
3.6
2.1
Chloroethane
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.43
< 0.43
< 0.45
< 0.48
< 0.57
< 0.49
< 0.47
< 0.52
< 0.49
< 0.53
1.3
< 0.43
-
-
-
-
-
Total Chlorinated Ethanes
Tetrachloroethene
µg/m3
23
80
1.5
30
44
15
110
16
26
ND
ND
6.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.6
2.1
3
µg/m
< 1.2
6.4
< 1.6
1.3
2.7
1.1
4.8
1.1
1.7
< 1.1
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1.2
< 1.1
< 1.1
< 1.00
< 2.5
<0.7
Trichloroethene
µg/m3
< 1.0
3.3
< 1.3
1.4
2.3
2.2
5.8
0.9
1.7
1.9
< 0.88
< 0.92
< 0.98
< 1.2
< 1.0
< 0.96
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 1.1
< 0.9
< 0.88
< 0.60
< 2.0
<0.5
<1
2
1,1-Dichloroethene
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.65
< 0.65
< 0.68
< 0.72
< 0.86
< 0.74
< 0.71
< 0.78
< 0.74
< 0.80
< 0.67
< 0.65
< 0.60
< 1.5
<0.4
< 0.8
<0.8
µg/m3
1.8
3.4
< 0.9
0.8
2.2
0.92
5.3
1.4
3
< 0.65
< 0.65
< 0.68
< 0.72
< 0.86
< 0.74
< 0.71
< 0.78
< 0.74
< 0.80
< 0.67
< 0.65
< 0.60
< 1.5
<0.4
6.3
2.9
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.65
< 0.68
< 0.68
< 0.72
< 0.86
< 0.74
< 0.71
< 0.78
< 0.74
< 0.80
< 0.67
< 0.65
< 0.60
< 7.4
<0.4
< 0.8
<0.8
Vinyl chloride
µg/m3
1.6
2.8
< 0.6
0.6
1.7
0.72
3.8
0.76
1.2
< 0.42
< 0.42
< 0.44
< 0.47
< 0.55
< 0.48
< 0.46
< 0.50
< 0.48
< 0.51
< 0.43
< 0.42
< 0.10
< 0.96
<0.3
1.6
<0.9
3
µg/m
3.4
15.9
ND
4.1
8.9
4.94
19.7
4.16
7.6
1.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.9
4.9
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
8.4
9
9
8.3
< 8.7
< 8.7
< 9.1
< 9.8
< 12
< 10
< 9.5
< 10
< 10
< 11
< 9
< 8.7
< 1.60
< 20
<1
<2
<2
µg/m
30.3
104.8
6.2
36.5
58.9
24.21
139.9
24.62
38.8
5.4
1.3
8.1
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.74
2.6
0.83
1.7
3.1
1.8
0.99
ND
ND
11.5
8.2
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.7
< 2.6
-
-
-
Total Chlorinated Ethenes
Hexachlorobutadiene
Total Volatile CHCs
Carbon disulfide
Legend:
< - Indicates a concentration less than the accompanying value
ND = non detect
- = not reported
3
< 2.7
< 2.8
< 1.5
< 3.4
< 2.9
< 2.8
< 1.3
3.5
< 1.3
< 2.9
< 1.4
< 3.1
6.8
< 2.6
-
-
<1
<1
Table 3-5b
Current and Historical Ambient Air Analytical Results - AS62
AS62
Location
Date Sampled
Sample Type
23/08/2006
Primary
Sample
5/09/2006
Primary
Sample
19/09/2006
Primary
Sample
26/09/2006
Primary
Sample
5/10/2006
Primary
Sample
11/05/2007
Primary
Sample
13/06/2007
Primary
Sample
13/07/2007
Primary
Sample*
AS91
13/07/2007
Primary
Sample*
AS62
13/09/2007
Primary
Sample
17/10/2007
Primary
Sample
3/12/2008
Primary
Sample
24/01/2008
Primary
Sample
19/03/2008
Primary
Sample
16/04/2008
Primary
Sample
16/05/2008
Primary
Sample
06/23/2008
Primary
Sample
07/28/2009
Primary
Sample
17/03/2011
Primary
Sample
24/08/2012
Primary
Sample
10/05/2013
Primary
Sample
6/06/2013
Primary
Sample
Chemicals likely to be associated with Springvale Drain
Analyte
Units
µg/m3
< 1.3
2.8
0.58
0.59
1
< 1.0
2.4
28
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.1
< 1.0
< 1.1
< 0.98
< 0.26
< 1.2
<0.8
<2
<2
Chloroform
µg/m3
< 0.98
8.6
4.9
4.9
3.4
< 0.80
4.6
78
< 0.85
< 0.96
< 0.87
< 0.76
0.74
< 0.89
<0.6
1.3
<1
< 1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.8
< 1.2
< 4.1
< 1.2
< 1.4
< 0.89
< 1.3
< 0.82
µg/m3
< 0.93
< 1.3
< 0.87
Methylene chloride
< 0.87
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.2
2.1
1.2
< 1.3
<1
<2
<2
Chloromethane
µg/m3
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.9
2.0
1.1
1.5
< 0.36
1.6
1.0
1.3
1.6
0.84
1.7
1.6
1.8
-
-
-
-
-
3
µg/m
1.5
13.9
8.1
8.1
7.5
3.8
8.1
107.5
ND
ND
1
1.3
1.6
0.84
1.7
1.6
3.9
1.94
ND
ND
1.3
ND
Pentachloroethane
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 4.1
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1.2
< 1.1
<2
-
-
-
< 0.89
< 0.98
< 3.2
< 0.92
< 1.1
< 0.98
< 0.92
< 0.98
< 0.84
< 1.2
-
<2
-
< 1.00
-
<0.8
-
< 1.2
< 1.0
< 1.2
µg/m3
< 1.3
< 1.0
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 0.98
-
-
-
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.89
< 0.98
5.9
< 0.95
< 1.1
< 0.98
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 0.98
< 0.92
< 0.98
< 0.84
< 1.0
-
<0.7
<1
<1
-
-
-
< 0.74
<0.5
12
<1
1,1-Dichloroethane
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.66
< 0.72
2.4
< 0.71
< 0.79
< 0.72
< 0.77
< 0.74
< 0.71
< 0.68
< 0.72
< 0.63
< 0.83
-
1,2-Dichloroethane
µg/m3
14
1.7
0.93
0.93
0.94
< 0.66
20
930
< 0.71
< 0.79
< 0.72
< 0.77
-
< 0.72
< 0.68
1.8
< 0.63
< 0.62
Chloroethane
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.43
< 0.47
< 1.6
< 0.44
< 0.52
< 0.47
< 0.50
< 0.48
< 0.47
< 0.44
< 0.47
< 0.41
-
-
-
-
-
Tetrachloroethene
µg/m3
14
1.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
ND
20
938.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
µg/m3
< 1.4
4
1.1
1.2
1.1
< 1.1
6.5
38
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.1
< 1.2
< 1.0
< 1.00
< 1.2
<0.8
<2
<2
Trichloroethene
µg/m3
< 1.1
3.3
1
1
1.9
2.2
12
130
< 0.94
< 1.0
< 0.96
< 0.71
< 1.0
< 0.76
< 0.98
< 0.72
< 0.96
< 0.9
< 0.96
1
< 0.22
2.9
<0.6
2.5
<2
< 0.67
< 0.71
< 0.61
< 0.60
< 0.72
<0.5
<1
<1
< 0.76
< 0.76
1.7
< 0.72
0.94
1.0
2.5
0.87
< 0.60
< 0.72
<0.5
21
<1
< 0.71
< 0.67
< 0.88
< 0.76
< 0.60
< 3.6
<0.5
<1
<1
1,1-Dichloroethene
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.65
< 0.71
< 2.4
< 0.67
< 0.78
µg/m3
0.95
2.4
3.8
3.8
5.8
< 0.65
15
100
< 0.69
< 0.78
µg/m
-
-
-
-
-
< 0.65
< 0.71
< 2.4
< 0.67
< 0.78
< 0.71
< 0.71
Vinyl chloride
µg/m3
0.77
4.5
2.2
2.2
1.6
< 0.42
2.4
43
< 0.45
< 0.50
< 0.46
< 0.49
1
< 0.46
< 0.43
< 0.46
< 0.40
< 0.10
< 0.47
<0.3
3.6
< 0.6
µg/m3
1.7
14.2
8.1
8.2
10.4
2.2
35.9
311
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.7
0.94
1
2.5
1.87
ND
2.9
ND
27.1
ND
Hexachlorobutadiene
µg/m3
-
8.6
9
9.1
9
< 8.7
< 9.5
< 32
< 9.3
< 10
< 0.95
< 10
< 9.8
< 9.5
< 9.0
< 9.5
< 8.3
< 1.60
< 9.8
<1
<3
<3
Total Volatile CHCs
Carbon disulfide
µg/m3
17.2
29.8
17.1
17.2
18.8
6.0
64
1356.8
ND
ND
1
1.3
4.3
1.78
2.7
5.9
5.77
1.94
ND
ND
40.4
ND
µg/m3
-
-
-
-
-
< 2.6
8.2
10
< 2.7
< 3.0
< 2.8
< 3.0
< 2.8
< 2.8
9.5
< 2.8
< 2.4
-
-
-
-
-
3
Legend:
< - Indicates a concentration less than the accompanying value
ND = non detect
- = not reported
* = Samples at AS91 and AS62 collected on 13/7/2007 may have been 'mixed up'. AS91 is situated in Southlands and is more likely to have resulted in higher concentrations compared with AS62. Both results are presented in this table for completeness.
Table 3-6
Current and Historical Surface Water Analytical Results - SW065
SW065
Sample ID
Date Sampled
15/11/2007
19/03/2008
16/04/2008
16/05/2008
23/06/2008
28/07/2009
17/03/2011
24/08/2012
10/05/2013
6/06/2013
Sample Type
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Primary
Sample
Analyte
LOR
Units
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.007
0.002
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.002
< 0.001
0.005
Chloroform
mg/L
0.002
0.007
0.004
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.002
0.003
0.016
mg/L
< 0.005
-
0.005
Methylene chloride
0.005
0.001
< 0.001
< 0.005
NA
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
<0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
Chloromethane
0.05
mg/L
< 0.05
< 0.01
< 0.010
< 0.050
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
<0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
ND
0.002
< 0.001
0.014
< 0.005
0.006
< 0.001
ND
< 0.001
ND
< 0.001
0.003
0.021
< 0.005
0.005
< 0.001
0.004
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Pentachloroethane
0.005
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.005
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.005
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
< 0.001
0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.005
0.01
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.05
0.003
< 0.001
0.027
0.008
0.003
<0.001
<0.001
0.039
0.046
mg/L
< 0.01
< 0.010
< 0.050
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
<0.001
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.005
0.003
0.005
ND
0.001
0.027
< 0.005
0.008
0.001
0.003
< 0.001
ND
< 0.001
ND
mg/L
0.002
0.040
< 0.001
0.046
0.006
Chloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
0.001
ND
Trichloroethene
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
0.005
0.002
0.009
0.004
0.002
< 0.001
0.003
0.006
0.015
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
0.034
0.005
0.048
0.026
0.014
< 0.001
0.005
0.066
0.055
0.005
0.01
mg/L
< 0.001
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
0.002
0.002
mg/L
< 0.005
< 0.05
< 0.001
< 0.01
< 0.010
< 0.050
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
<0.010
0.010
0.020
ND
mg/L
< 0.005
0.044
< 0.001
0.008
< 0.001
0.057
< 0.005
0.031
< 0.001
0.016
< 0.001
ND
< 0.001
0.01
0.001
<0.001
0.084
< 0.001
0.098
< 0.001
0.001
mg/L
< 0.005
0.052
< 0.001
0.01
< 0.001
0.098
< 0.005
0.045
< 0.001
0.019
< 0.001
ND
< 0.001
<0.001
ND
< 0.001
ND
< 0.001
Vinyl chloride
Hexachlorobutadiene
Total Volatile CHCs
Carbon disulfide
ND
Legend:
mg/L = miligrams per litre
LOR = limit of reporting
ND = not detected (above analytical LOR)
NA = not analysed
ND
Plates
43218429/01/03
36
Plate 1: Sampling at location AS05, and QC02, located on the northwest corner of
Southlands.
Plate 2: Sampling at location AS06, located on the south end of Southlands.
J\JOBS\43217795\6000-Deliverables
Plate 3: Sampling at location AS08, located at Botany Golf Course
Plate 4: Sampling at location AS09, located close to the north east boundary fence of
Southlands, adjacent to ARTC property
Plate 5: Sampling at location AS11, adjacent to Stephen Road
Plate 6: Sampling at location AS12, on the corner of Botany and Foreshore Roads
Plate 7: Sampling at location AS13, located on the southwest side of
Southlands, adjacent to the Southlands entrance
Plate 8: Sampling at location AS14, on the corner of Excel and Greenfield Streets
Plate 9: Sampling at location AS15, adjacent to Southlands on the southern end
along McPherson Street.
Plate 10: Sampling at location AS17, located on Botany Golf Course along
Botany Rd.
Plate 11: Sampling at location AS18, located on the Botany Golf Course adjacent to Foreshore Road.
Plate 12: Sampling at location AS88
Plate 13: Soil gas sampling at location AS88
Plate 14: Flux hood sampling – Field Blank
Appendix A URS Procedures for Flux Emission Sampling
43218429/01/03
A
Flux Emission Sampling
Fieldwork Procedure
STATUS
: Final
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION
: 17 May 2011
Page 1 of 5
1. Introduction
1.1. This procedure outlines the approach to fieldwork for the collection of surface flux emissions
samples.
1.2. Surface flux emissions samples are collected from a surface using an isolation flux hood.
1.3. This methodology enables the quantification of emissions to air from the surface of the
ground without the influences of ambient air.
1.4. The methodology generally follows US EPA Guidance for Measurement of Gaseous Emission
Rates from Land Surfaces Using an Emission Isolation Flux Chamber (US EPA, 1986 and
Reinhart, 1992). This method is applicable to the measurement of air emission rates at the
ground surface from undisturbed sites where contaminants have been released to the surface
or subsurface (US EPA, 1986). The flux hood method is generally considered the most
appropriate method for estimating surface emissions, and it is listed as the preferred testing
technique for the direct measurement of volatile organic compounds (VOC) vapour emissions
by the US EPA in the Air/Superfund Technical Guideline Series (US EPA, 1990) and it is also
included by the NSW EPA as test method OM-8 on the list of Approved methods for the
sampling and analysis of air pollutants in New South Wales (DEC, 2005).
1.5. Once the sample is collected it is analysed by the accredited laboratory for the selected
analytes e.g. VOC, PAH or odour, using the most appropriate analytical technique. The
analytical technique should be able to provide a sufficiently low limit of detection as required
for the outcome of the sampling program.
1.6. This procedure includes a description of the field testing, equipment and recording
requirements, as well as health and safety issues associated with collecting the required
samples.
2. Health and Safety
2.1. The collection of flux emissions samples does not require any penetration of the ground
surface, nor is the technique typically used within confined spaces. However all works
undertaken should be in accordance with the site-specific Health Safety and Environment
Plan (HSEP).
2.2. The methodology, however, does require the use of compressed gas cylinders. Hence
transport of the cylinders must be undertaken using a utility with the cylinders transported in
the open tray/back. In addition precautions must be taken to ensure safe handling, securing
and storage of the cylinders on-site, within the vehicle and at any other off-site location.
3. Sampling Methodology – Flux hood
3.1.
The following describes the approach for the collection of surface flux emissions
samples using a flux hood:
3.1.1.
The sampling locations should be determined prior to the fieldwork. The locations
should be chosen to best reflect potential pathways of exposure. Where possible, the
samples should be collected in areas that are likely to be preferential vapour
migration pathways. These areas include gardens or other exposure soil areas,
grassed areas or if sampling is to be undertaken on a sealed surface, then the
samples should be collected from areas where there are visible cracks, service
trenches etc;
3.1.2.
Since the sampling is being undertaken from the surface of the ground and soil
moisture is a key factor influencing the availability of soil gas/ vapour emissions, then
sampling should be undertaken after a minimum of 3 days of dry weather. In winter a
longer period of time may be required to ensure surface and subsurface conditions
are as dry as possible. A light sprinkle of rain, which does not penetrate the surface
of the ground, is not considered to be of concern if it occurs during the sampling.
Prepared By: N. Ballard
Updated By: JP Carey
Approved By: S Bowly
J:\SYD\43218352\6 DELIV\APPENDIX A URS PROCEDURES - FLUX EMISSIONS SAMPLING REVISED.DOC\1-MAR-13
Fieldwork Procedure
STATUS
: Final
: 17 May 2011
Page 2 of 5
More rain, which does penetrate the surface of the ground, may affect the results
and sampling should stop;
3.1.3.
Where possible sampling should be planned to collect samples from locations where
low concentrations/emissions are expected first and sampling from areas of high
concentrations/emissions should be undertaken last;
3.1.4.
All pumps used should be calibrated at the beginning and end of every sampling
day;
3.1.5.
Any site clearances or access permission should be obtained prior to the start of
fieldwork;
3.1.6.
The flux hood should be wiped clean or decontaminated (inside and out) as per URS
standard operating procedures prior to sampling (equipment may have been
contaminated during transport or storage or previous work). Care must be taken to
ensure teflon tubing is not wet as it will not dry and the moisture may compromise
sampling and analysis. Cleaning the flux hood between locations is generally not
considered to be necessary, unless visible dirt or contamination is present or
relatively high concentrations were encountered at the previous monitoring location;
3.1.7.
At each location the flux hood shall be placed on the surface of the ground. In areas
where there is exposed soil, the flux hood should be gently pushed into the surface
soils, with the rim being approximately 1cm below the surface of the ground. In areas
where the soils are not exposed, a seal of clean sand can be used around the base
of the flux hood;
3.1.8.
Once placed at the desired location, then the flux hood must be purged and allowed
to establish equilibrium. This requires the connection of the sweep gas (pure
nitrogen) to the sweep inlet of the flux hood using flexible teflon tubing. The sweep
gas should be set at 5L/min (determined prior to sampling). Purging/flushing is only
required at the establishment of each location. It does not need to be repeated
between sample collection at the same location. Purging/flushing must be
undertaken if the sampling location is changed. Given the flux hood volume of 30 L
and an (input) nitrogen flow rate of 5 L/min, one purge volume should be take 6
minutes and four purge volumes, 24 minutes. Sampling should not begin until
purging/flushing has been completed and steady-state conditions are present within
the flux hood. If a portable analyzer is used (e.g., PID or FID), the readings can be
used to establish when steady-state conditions have been established;
3.1.9.
The sweep gas must remain constant throughout the purging and sampling;
3.1.10.
Ensure the pressure valve of the flux hood is open to ensure that a significant
positive pressure does not build up within the flux hood. This valve (opening) is to
remain open throughout the sampling;
3.1.11.
The sampling media and sampling time should be determined prior to the collection
of the samples and must reflect the objectives of the sampling program. The
sampling flowrate should be set at a rate typically determined by the sampling
media, however the rate must not exceed half the sweep gas flowrate to ensure that
a slight positive pressure is maintained and ambient air is not drawn into the flux
hood;
3.2.
Collect the soil gas sample using a suitable technique. If using evacuated canisters, US
EPA Method TO-15):
3.2.1.
Attach the canister and flow controller to the line using Swagelok (or equivalent)
fittings. Open the canister valve. Collect a grab sample or a short, time-integrated
sample (e.g.,5 minutes). After the sample is collected, close the canister valve.
Remove the one-quarter inch line from the canister.
Fieldwork Procedure
STATUS
: Final
: 17 May 2011
3.2.2.
Page 3 of 5
A schematic of the sampling set up using an evacuated canister is provided in the
following diagram.
PRESSURE
RELEASE
OUTLET LINE
INLET
REGULATOR
FLOW
Flow
METER
Meter
SWEEP
Sweep
AIR
Air
STAINLESS STEEL
OR FLEX
3.3.
Evacuated
SUMMA
CANNISTER
Canister
If using thermal desorption tubes (US EPA Method TO-17):
3.3.1.
Ensure all pumps used are calibrated at the beginning and end of every sampling
day and preferably at the beginning and end of every sample location;
3.3.2.
Connect pump to sampling tube using silicon tubing (ensuring an air tight seal) or
appropriate Swagelok fittings;
3.3.3.
Connect the flow calibrator to the inlet end of the sampling tube;
3.3.4.
Following the manufacturers instructions, adjust the flow on the pump until the
desired flow is achieved consistently for a short period of time (~30 seconds);
3.3.5.
Collect a time-integrated sample (e.g., 1 hour). After the sample is collected, seal
the tube, wrap in aluminium foil and store in a dark and cool location.
3.3.6.
A schematic of the sampling set up using tubes is provided in the following diagram.
Fieldwork Procedure
STATUS
: Final
: 17 May 2011
Page 4 of 5
3.3.7.
The sampling flow rate should be measured and monitored during the collection of
the sample using a flow meter (generally placed in series between the sampling
media and the pump);
3.3.8.
Where sampling is undertaken using sorbent tubes, duplicate samples (preferably
sampled in parallel) should be taken at different volumes (the difference in sample
volume should preferably be an order of magnitude). This gives the laboratory the
ability to analyse the duplicate sample in the event that unexpected high
concentrations are reported.
4. Documentation and QA Requirements
4.1.
Information which must be recorded during each sampling event includes:
4.1.1.
time and date;
4.1.2.
location;
4.1.3.
description of the sampling location (i.e. soils, vegetation, landuse, type of buildings
etc.) and type of sample collected;
4.1.4.
weather conditions/observations;
4.1.5.
sampling media and ID;
4.1.6.
sweep air flow rate (L/min);
4.1.7.
purge time (min);
4.1.8.
sampling rate (L/min);
4.1.9.
sampling time (minutes);
4.1.10.
odour, presence of any moisture within the fluxhood or any other observations.
4.2.
The unused storage time and conditions of each sampling media (particularly sorbent
tubes and evacuated canisters) must be determined and the media must not be stored
for longer than the maximum time prior to sampling;
4.3.
Once samples are collected on site, they should be prepared for analysis at the relevant
laboratory. This procedure shall ensure the integrity of the samples and includes:
4.3.1.
Ensuring the end-caps of the samples (where tubes are used for sampling) are
replaced and are firm (as required) at the completion of the collection of each
sample;
Fieldwork Procedure
STATUS
: Final
: 17 May 2011
Page 5 of 5
4.3.2.
Tedlar bags should not be used if transport the laboratory required air freight;
4.3.3.
Samples should be kept in a cool, dry place (as required for the relevant sampling
media) following collection and at all times up to shipment to the laboratory;
4.3.4.
Maximum storage time should not exceed 48 hours following collection of the
samples to submission to the laboratory, however, if samples are being analysed for
odour, the odour samples must be analysed within 30 hours of collection, as
specified in AS 4323.3:2001;
4.3.5.
A COC must accompany the samples sent to the laboratory.
4.4.
Field QA samples must also be collected. These include:
4.4.1.
Analysis of a field blank. This can be collected by placing the fluxhood over a clean
Teflon or plastic surface and collecting the sample using the same methodology;
4.4.2.
Sampling and analysis of one duplicate sample per day or every 8 samples
collected;
4.4.3.
Collection and analysis of one sweep air sample (to determine integrity of sweep air);
4.4.4.
Analysis of one trip blank and one trip spike (where possible) per sampling round;
4.4.5.
The above QA measurements refer primarily to collection of VOC samples and there
are no current standards for the collection of QA samples in relation to odour flux
hood sampling.
5. Equipment Required
5.1.
Listed below is the equipment required to conduct soil gas sampling:
5.1.1.
Flux hood;
5.1.2.
Sweep gas – ultra high purity nitrogen (industrial grade nitrogen can be used for
odour)(if measurements are to be made using an FID analyzer, ultra high purity air
should be used);
5.1.3.
Flexible Teflon tubing (sufficient for the sampling required);
5.1.4.
Air flow meter;
5.1.5.
Decon solution;
5.1.6.
Sampling media (sorbent tubes, evacuated canisters, tedlar or nalophan bags);
5.1.7.
Sampling pump/s (fully charged and pre-tested with relevant media to ensure flow
rates and sampling times can be achieved);
5.1.8.
Sampling worksheet;
5.1.9.
Small screwdrivers (to adjust pump flow rates) and small shifting spanners;
5.1.10.
Esky, aluminium foil and ice bricks (only when using Thermal Desorption tubes);
5.1.11.
Camera;
5.1.12.
Notebook;
5.1.13.
Site map and sampling plan.
Appendix B Laboratory Certificates
43218429/01/03
B
Appendix B - Laboratory Certificates
November 2013 Sampling Round
43218429/01/03
Page 1 of 15
Australian Government
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Report No. VOC13_329
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled : 6-Nov-2013
Date Received : 12-Nov-2013
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
Your Client Services Manager
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
Laboratory Reg. No. :
NV13/00956
Method:
VOC_01
Client Sample Ref. :
AS14
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1245
Description :
06/11/13 09:43 06/11/13 11:36
Receipt Vac/Press ("Hg):
-7
Dilution :
1.1
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
2.4
2
8.4
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
Internal Standard: BCM (%Rec.)
1
80
74-97-5
Internal Standard: 1,4-DFB (%Rec.)
1
76
540-36-3
Internal Standard: MCB-d5 (%Rec.)
1
92
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
Accreditation No. 198
19-Nov-13
This report is issued in accordance with NATA's
accreditation requirements.
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
Results relate only to the sample(s) tested.
This report is issued in accordance with NATA's accreditation requirements
105 Delhi Road, North Ryde NSW 2113 Tel: 02 9449 0111 Fax: 02 9449 1653 www.measurement.gov.au
Page 2 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00957
Method:
VOC_01
AS09
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1242
Description :
06/11/13 13:33 06/11/13 15:26
-7
Dilution :
1.1
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
3.9
2
14
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.3
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
84
74-97-5
1
76
540-36-3
1
93
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 3 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00958
Method:
VOC_01
QC03
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1236
Description :
07/11/13 TO 07/11/13
-6
Dilution :
1.0
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.7
2
<3
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
85
74-97-5
1
77
540-36-3
1
95
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 4 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00959
Method:
VOC_01
AS88
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1238
Description :
07/11/13 12:25 07/11/13 14:25
-7
Dilution :
0.7
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.8
2
<3
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
86
74-97-5
1
77
540-36-3
1
96
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 5 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00960
Method:
VOC_01
AS17
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1246
Description :
07/11/13 15:16 07/11/13 17:07
-8
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.4
<0.4
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.6
<0.6
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.4
2.3
1
8.1
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.6
<0.6
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.6
<0.6
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.6
<0.6
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.6
<0.6
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
79-01-6
0.2
0.22
0.8
1.2
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
83
74-97-5
1
75
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 6 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00961
Method:
VOC_01
AS13
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1247
Description :
06/11/13 16:23 06/11/13 18:23
-7
Dilution :
0.7
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
3.3
2
11
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
0.46
1
3.1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
88
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
96
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 7 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00962
Method:
VOC_01
AS05
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1243
Description :
07/11/13 08:56 07/11/13 10:52
-8
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
2.5
2
8.6
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
88
74-97-5
1
79
540-36-3
1
96
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 8 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00963
Method:
VOC_01
AS15
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1244
Description :
06/11/13 13:54 06/11/13 15:44
-8
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
1.4
2
4.9
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
0.44
1
3.0
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
86
74-97-5
1
77
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 9 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00964
Method:
VOC_01
QC01
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1235
Description :
06/11/13 TO 06/11/13
-9
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.8
2
<3
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
91
74-97-5
1
79
540-36-3
1
95
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 10 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00965
Method:
VOC_01
AS08
Date Analysed :
14-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H2919
Description :
08/11/13 08:42 08/11/13 09:42
-7
Dilution :
0.7
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
1.9
2
6.5
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
86
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
93
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 11 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00966
Method:
VOC_01
AS11
Date Analysed :
14-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H3193
Description :
08/11/13 10:52 06/11/13 11:47
-9
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
6.1
2
21
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
88
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
95
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 12 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00967
Method:
VOC_01
AS88
Date Analysed :
15-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H2920
Description :
07/11/13 14:22 07/11/13 15:22
-7
Dilution :
22#
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
2
<2
6
<6
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
2
<2
9
<9
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
6
<7
20
<20
75-09-2
2
<2
9
<9
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
2
<2
9
<9
75-34-3
2
<2
9
<9
156-59-2
Chloroform
2
<2
10
<10
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
2
<2
9
<9
107-06-2
2
<2
10
<10
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
2
3.6
10
19
79-01-6
2
<2
10
<10
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
2
84
10
570
127-18-4
2
<2
20
<20
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
2
<2
20
<20
87-68-3
1
114
74-97-5
1
98
540-36-3
1
111
3114-55-4
# Sample required dilution due to the high level of target/non-target compounds. The limit of reporting (LOR)
was raised as a result of this dilution.
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 13 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00968
Method:
VOC_01
AS12
Date Analysed :
14-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H2917
Description :
07/11/13 12:56 07/11/13 13:56
-9
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
5.2
2
18
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
83
74-97-5
1
73
540-36-3
1
90
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 14 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00969
Method:
VOC_01
AS06
Date Analysed :
14-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
2436
Description :
0711/13 09:39 07/11/13 10:39
-9
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
1.2
2
4.3
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
101
74-97-5
1
86
540-36-3
1
100
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 15 of 15
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00970
Method:
VOC_01
AS18
Date Analysed :
14-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H3186
Description :
07/11/13 15:10 07/11/13 18:10
-13
Dilution :
1.0
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.6
2
<2
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
97
74-97-5
1
80
540-36-3
1
98
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 1 of 3
QUALITY ASSURANCE CERTIFICATE VOC13_330
LABORATORY BLANK
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
Lab Blank V193
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H3194
Description :
Batch Blank
Dilution :
Compound
1.0
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
µg/m3
µg/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
78
74-97-5
1
76
540-36-3
1
92
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 2 of 3
CONTINUING CALIBRATION
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
CC 10ppbv
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H3190
Description :
Batch Continuing Calibration
Dilution :
1.0
Recovery
Meets
Lower Limit
%
Criteria
%
%
Vinyl chloride
111
yes
70
130
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
102
yes
70
130
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
110
yes
70
130
75-09-2
107
yes
70
130
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
112
yes
70
130
75-34-3
101
yes
70
130
156-59-2
Chloroform
116
yes
70
130
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
113
yes
70
130
107-06-2
118
yes
70
130
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
107
yes
70
130
79-01-6
115
yes
70
130
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
110
yes
70
130
127-18-4
121
yes
70
130
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
122
yes
70
130
87-68-3
116
74-97-5
103
540-36-3
98
3114-55-4
Compound
Higher Limit CAS Number
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 3 of 3
LABORATORY DUPLICATE
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00956
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1245
Description :
Laboratory Duplicate
-7
Dilution :
1.1
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
2.5
2
8.6
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
83
74-97-5
1
77
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 1 of 4
LABORATORY BLANK
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
Lab Blank V193
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
15-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H3194
Description :
Batch Blank
Dilution :
Compound
1.0
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
µg/m3
µg/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
86
74-97-5
1
80
540-36-3
1
96
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 2 of 4
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
CC 10ppbv
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
15-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H3190
Description :
Dilution :
1.0
Recovery
Meets
Lower Limit
%
Criteria
%
%
Vinyl chloride
118
yes
70
130
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
106
yes
70
130
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
118
yes
70
130
75-09-2
112
yes
70
130
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
120
yes
70
130
75-34-3
105
yes
70
130
156-59-2
Chloroform
124
yes
70
130
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
121
yes
70
130
107-06-2
128
yes
70
130
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
112
yes
70
130
79-01-6
122
yes
70
130
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
115
yes
70
130
127-18-4
126
yes
70
130
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
129
yes
70
130
87-68-3
122
74-97-5
105
540-36-3
98
3114-55-4
Compound
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 3 of 4
LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
Project Name
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
LCS 50ppbv
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
15-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
H3190
Description :
Batch Control Spike
Dilution :
1.0
Recovery
Meets
Lower Limit
%
Criteria
%
%
Vinyl chloride
93
yes
70
130
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
99
yes
70
130
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
89
yes
70
130
75-09-2
103
yes
70
130
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
91
yes
70
130
75-34-3
102
yes
70
130
156-59-2
Chloroform
89
yes
70
130
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
91
yes
70
130
107-06-2
89
yes
70
130
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
95
yes
70
130
79-01-6
91
yes
70
130
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
95
yes
70
130
127-18-4
97
yes
70
130
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
93
yes
70
130
87-68-3
78
74-97-5
92
540-36-3
91
3114-55-4
Compound
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Page 4 of 4
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00964
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
13-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
G1235
Description :
-9
Dilution :
0.8
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
0.5
<0.5
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.8
2
<3
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
0.8
<0.8
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-01-6
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
127-18-4
0.2
<0.2
1
<1
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
2
<2
87-68-3
1
94
74-97-5
1
81
540-36-3
1
96
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-13
Appendix B - Laboratory Certificates
February 2014 Sampling Round
43218429/01/03
Page 1 of 2
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/140224
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled : 21-Feb-2014
Date Received : 24-Feb-2014
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV14/00073
Method:
VOC_01
AS88-SG
Date Analysed :
25-Feb-2014
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
CAN066
Description :
21/02/14 11:29 21/02/14 12:36
-6
Dilution :
1.4
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.5
<0.5
1
<1
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
1
<1
3
<3
75-09-2
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-34-3
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.5
0.67
2
3.3
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
107-06-2
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.5
2.0
3
11
79-01-6
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.5
44
3
300
127-18-4
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.5
<0.5
5
<5
87-68-3
1
74
74-97-5
1
72
540-36-3
1
89
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
26-Feb-14
Page 2 of 2
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/140224
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV14/00074
Method:
VOC_01
QC04
Date Analysed :
25-Feb-2014
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
CAN067
Description :
21/02/14 11:29 21/02/14 12:36
-6
Dilution :
1.5
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.5
<0.5
1
<1
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
1
<1
3
<3
75-09-2
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-34-3
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.5
0.81
2
4.0
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
107-06-2
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.5
2.4
3
13
79-01-6
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.5
55
3
370
127-18-4
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.5
<0.5
5
<5
87-68-3
1
89
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
95
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
26-Feb-14
Page 1 of 3
LABORATORY BLANK
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/140224
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
Lab Blank V205
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
25-Feb-2014
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
CAN040
Description :
Batch Blank
Dilution :
Compound
1.0
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
µg/m3
µg/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.5
<0.5
1
<1
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
1
<1
3
<3
75-09-2
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-34-3
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
107-06-2
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-01-6
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
127-18-4
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.5
<0.5
5
<5
87-68-3
1
76
74-97-5
1
76
540-36-3
1
90
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
26-Feb-14
Page 2 of 3
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/140224
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
CC 10ppbv
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
25-Feb-2014
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
CAN036
Description :
Dilution :
1.0
Recovery
Meets
Lower Limit
%
Criteria
%
%
Vinyl chloride
95
yes
70
130
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
91
yes
70
130
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
82
yes
70
130
75-09-2
89
yes
70
130
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
91
yes
70
130
75-34-3
88
yes
70
130
156-59-2
Chloroform
97
yes
70
130
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
95
yes
70
130
107-06-2
94
yes
70
130
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
99
yes
70
130
79-01-6
96
yes
70
130
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
99
yes
70
130
127-18-4
97
yes
70
130
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
105
yes
70
130
87-68-3
124
74-97-5
116
540-36-3
108
3114-55-4
Compound
Robert Crough
Chemist
26-Feb-14
Page 3 of 3
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/140224
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Sampled by : CLIENT
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV14/00073
Method:
VOC_01
AS88-SG
Date Analysed :
25-Feb-2014
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Canister No. :
CAN066
Description :
-6
Dilution :
1.4
Compound
LOR
Level
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
ug/m3
ug/m3
CAS Number
Vinyl chloride
0.5
<0.5
1
<1
75-01-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
1
<1
3
<3
75-09-2
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
75-34-3
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
156-59-2
Chloroform
0.5
0.71
2
3.5
67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.5
2
<2
107-06-2
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
56-23-5
Trichloroethene
0.5
2.1
3
11.0
79-01-6
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-00-5
Tetrachloroethylene
0.5
46
3
310
127-18-4
0.5
<0.5
3
<3
79-34-5
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.5
<0.5
5
<5
87-68-3
1
77
74-97-5
1
74
540-36-3
1
89
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
26-Feb-14
Appendix C Data Validation
43218429/01/03
C
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data
variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this
form.
Orica General Air
Emissions
Project/Task Number:
Analytical Laboratory:
National Measurement
Institute
Batch/Ref. Number(s):
Date Sampled:
6/11/2013 - 08/11/2013
Sample Type:
Project Name:
Sample Handling, Receipt and Holding Times
Certification Documentation
COC completed adequately
Samples analysed within appropriate holding times per
analytical methods
43218429
URS04/131114
Air - Evacuated canister
Yes/No
Yes
Yes
Comments
All canister results below LOR
-
Yes
Samples analysed within 8 days.
Final sample pressure between -5 and -10 "Hg
No
Final sample pressures for the following
samples were outside the acceptable
range: AS18 (-13"Hg)
Pressure difference between sample dispatch and
sample receipt less than 5"Hg
Yes
Pressure difference between dispatch and
receipt at the laboratory varied from 0 "Hg
to 2"Hg.
# of Primary Samples
12
# of Duplicate Samples
1
Blanks
Method Blank (MB), Laboratory Method Blank (LMB)
Comments
Type
The laboratory method blank (batch blank) had acceptable results less than the limits of reporting
LMB
(LOR).
The field method blank (QC01) had acceptable results less than the limits of reporting (LOR).
FMB
Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV)
Analyte
CCV
Comments
CCV recoveries are within laboratory control limits.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
Type
Comments
All LCS recoveries were within laboratory control limits.
LCS
Duplicates
Laboratory Duplicates
QC01
Comments
All lab duplicate analysis had results less than the LOR
Field Duplicates
AS88_FH & QC03
Comments
All field duplicate analysis had results less than the LOR.
Surrogate Monitoring Compound Analyses
Comments
Analyte
All surrogate recoveries were within reporting limits (70 - 130%).
All samples
Overall Comments
As stated by NMI:
The LOR for Dichloromethane was raised from 0.2 ppbv to between 0.4 ppbv and 6 ppbv in all samples due to background
concentration (Crough 2013 pers. comm).
Sample AS88_SG_20131107 required dilution due to the high level of target/non-target compounds. The LOR was raised as a
result.
Two field duplicates were originally collected in the field, however one of duplicate (QC05) was mistaken as a spare canister by
the laboratory and cleaned without analysing the sample.
Results are considered acceptable for interpretive use.
Performed By:
Date:
Kristen Foley
20-Nov-13
Reviewed By (PM):
Date:
Stephen Bowly
04-Dec-13
43218429 _ SY - GSC - REP -Page
001 _1 0ofAppendix
3
C Part 1a Data Validation Fluxhood November 2013.xls
DATA VALIDATION
RPD Calculations
Orica General Air Emissions
URS Job No. 43218429
Location
Sample ID:
Date Sampled:
AS88_FH
AS88_FH
QC03
7/11/2013
7/11/2013
Primary
Secondary
Sample Type:
Analyte
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Dichloromethane
Chloroform
Hexachlorobutadiene
Trichloroethene
Tetrachloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
Unit
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
RPDs (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Compliance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Legend:
Pass
Pass-1
Pass-2
NC
ND
<
UJ
J
RPD <= 30%
RPD > 30%, Analysis result < 10 times LOR
RPD <= 50%, Analysis result > 10 times LOR and < 20 times LOR
Not Calculated
Results below the laboratory reporting limits
Not detected above limit of reporting
Non-detected compounds associated with low bias in the CCV
Estimated value due to bias in CCV
J:\SYD\43218429\6 Deliv\Draft Report\43218429 _ SY - GSC - REP - 001 _ 0 Appendix C Part 1a Data Validation Fluxhood November 2013.xls
Preprared By:KF
2 of 3
Checked By:SB
DATA VALIDATION
RPD Calculation
Location
Sample ID:
Date Sampled:
Field Blank
Sample Type:
Analyte
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Dichloromethane
Chloroform
Hexachlorobutadiene
Trichloroethene
Tetrachloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
QC01
QC01
6/11/2013
Primary
6/11/2013
Lab Duplicate
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Unit
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
µg/m 3
RPDs (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Compliance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Legend:
Pass
Pass-1
Pass-2
NC
ND
<
UJ
J
RPD <= 30%
Not Calculated
J:\SYD\43218429\6 Deliv\Draft Report\43218429 _ SY - GSC - REP - 001 _ 0 Appendix C Part 1a Data Validation Fluxhood November 2013.xls
Prepared By:KY
3 of 3
Checked By:SB
Project Name:
Orica GAE
Analytical Laboratory:
Date Sampled:
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation
variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form.
43218429
Project/Task Number:
NMI
Batch/Ref. Number(s):
21/02/2014
Sample Type:
Soil Gas
Sample Handling, Receipt and Holding Times
Does COC match the proposed analytical schedule
in proposal or sampling plan?
Yes/No
COC completed adequately
Samples analysed within appropriate holding times
per analytical methods
Yes
Final sample pressure between -5 and -10 "Hg
Yes
Pressure difference between sample dispatch and
sample receipt less than 5"Hg
Yes
Comments
Yes
Yes
Sample pressure at receipt was -6"Hg for both
canisters.
Pressure difference was 2"Hg for sample
AS88_SG and 1"Hg for sample QC04
# of Duplicate Samples
1
# of Primary Samples
1
Blanks
Method Blank (MB)
Type
Laboratory Blank
URS04/140224
Comments
The laboratory method blank (batch blank) had acceptable results less than the limits of reporting (LOR).
Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV)
Analyte
Continuous Calibration
Verification (CCV)
Comments
CCV recoveries are within laboratory control limits (70% - 130%).
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
Type
Comments
LCS not undertaken.
Duplicates
Laboratory Duplicates
AS88_SG
Comments
All lab duplicate analysis had results less than the LOR with the exception of: Trichloroethene at 11ug/m3,
Chloroform at 3.5ug/m3 and Tetrachloroethylene at 310ug/m3.
Comments
Field Duplicates
QC04
All field duplicate analysis had results within RPD acceptance criteria.
Surrogate Monitoring Compound Analyses
Comments
Analyte
All surrogate recoveries were within reporting limits (70 - 130%).
All samples
Overall Comments
Results are considered acceptable for interpretive use.
Performed By:
Date:
Kristen Foley
28-Feb-14
Checked By:
Date:
S Bowly
24-Mar-14
43218429 _ SY - GSC - REP
Page
- 001
1 of_30 Appendix C Part 1b Data Validation Soil Gas February 2014.xls
Location
Sample ID:
Date Sampled:
Sample Type:
Analyte
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Dichloromethane
Chloroform
Hexachlorobutadiene
Trichloroethene
Tetrachloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
AS88_SG
AS88_SG
21/02/2014
Primary
QC04
21/02/2014
Secondary
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.3
ND
ND
11
ND
300
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
ND
13
ND
370
ND
Unit
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
3
µg/m
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
µg/m3
Legend:
Pass
Pass-1
Pass-2
NC
ND
<
UJ
J
RPD <= 30%
Not Calculated
RPDs (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
19.18
NC
NC
16.67
NC
20.90
NC
Compliance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Appendix C - Data Validation
Canister Certification Documents
43218429/01/03
Page 1 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00739/1
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
27-Aug-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1245
Description :
CLEANLINESS CERTIFICATION
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.8
<0.8
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
Trichlorofluoromethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2 trifluoroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
Methyl-tert-butylether (MTBE)
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 2 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
Bromodichloromethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
Dibromochloromethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
82
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
92
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 3 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00676/1
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
9-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1242
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 4 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
78
74-97-5
1
74
540-36-3
1
92
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 5 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00828
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
4-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1236
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 6 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.3
<0.3
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
78
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
92
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 7 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00427/1
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
22-May-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1238
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 8 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
94
74-97-5
1
74
540-36-3
1
100
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 9 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00830
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
4-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1246
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 10 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
84
74-97-5
1
80
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 11 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00831
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
4-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1247
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 12 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
86
74-97-5
1
82
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 13 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00854
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
29-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1243
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.7
<0.7
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 14 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
70
74-97-5
1
80
540-36-3
1
92
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 15 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00838/1
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
4-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1244
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.3
<0.3
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 16 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
90
74-97-5
1
84
540-36-3
1
100
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 17 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00874
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
4-Nov-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
G1235
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 18 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
90
74-97-5
1
84
540-36-3
1
100
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 19 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00741/1
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
27-Aug-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
H2919
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 20 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
88
74-97-5
1
76
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 21 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00721/1
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
12-Aug-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
H3193
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 22 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
88
74-97-5
1
90
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 23 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00824
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
24-Sep-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
H2920
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 24 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
84
74-97-5
1
76
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 25 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00825
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
4-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
H2917
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 26 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
76
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
90
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 27 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00826
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
24-Sep-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
2436
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 28 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
88
74-97-5
1
76
540-36-3
1
94
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 29 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00827
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
4-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
H3186
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 30 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
78
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
92
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 31 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00846
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
17-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
2433
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 32 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
84
74-97-5
1
76
540-36-3
1
96
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 33 of 34
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/131114
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 2013 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV13/00847
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
17-Oct-2013
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
2434
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 34 of 34
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
88
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
96
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
19-Nov-2013
Page 1 of 4
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/140224
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV14/00022
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
19-Feb-2014
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
CAN066
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 2 of 4
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
76
74-97-5
1
78
540-36-3
1
90
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
26-Feb-2014
Page 3 of 4
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Client
:
URS AUSTRALIA P/L
Job No. : URS04/140224
LEVEL 4
Quote No. :
407 PACIFIC HWY
Order No. :
ARTARMON NSW 2064
Date Sampled :
Sampled by :
Attention
:
STEPHEN BOWLEY
Project Name
:
ORICA GAE 43218429
:
DANNY SLEE
Phone : (02) 9449 0111
NV14/00023
Method:
VOC_01
Date Analysed :
19-Feb-2014
Matrix :
Air Canisters
Serial No. :
CAN067
Description :
Dilution :
Compound
LOR
Level
ppbv
ppbv
1.0
CAS Number
Propene
0.2
<0.2
OK
115-07-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-71-8
Chloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
74-87-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-14-2
Vinyl chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-01-4
1,3-Butadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-99-0
Bromomethane
1
<1
OK
74-83-9
Chloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-00-3
Acrolein
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-02-8
Acetone
0.5
<0.5
OK
67-64-1
Ethanol
0.5
<0.5
OK
64-17-5
2-Propanol
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-63-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-69-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-35-4
Dichloromethane
0.5
<0.5
OK
75-09-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
76-13-1
Carbon disulfide
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-15-0
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-60-5
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-34-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
1634-04-4
Vinyl acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-05-4
2-Butanone (MEK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-93-3
0.2
<0.2
OK
156-59-2
Hexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-54-3
Chloroform
0.2
<0.2
OK
67-66-3
Ethyl Acetate
0.2
<0.2
OK
141-78-6
Tetrahydrofuran
0.2
<0.2
OK
109-99-9
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
107-06-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
71-55-6
Benzene
0.5
<0.5
OK
71-43-2
0.2
<0.2
OK
56-23-5
Cyclohexane
0.2
<0.2
OK
110-82-7
Page 4 of 4
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.2
<0.2
OK
78-87-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-27-4
Trichloroethene
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-01-6
1,4-Dioxane
0.2
<0.2
OK
123-91-1
Heptane
0.2
<0.2
OK
142-82-5
Methyl methacrylate
0.2
<0.2
OK
80-62-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-01-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-10-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
10061-02-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-00-5
Toluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-88-3
2-Hexanone (MBK)
0.2
<0.2
OK
591-78-6
0.2
<0.2
OK
124-48-1
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-93-4
Tetrachloroethylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
127-18-4
Chlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-90-7
Ethylbenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-41-4
Bromoform
0.2
<0.2
OK
75-25-2
m & p-Xylenes
0.4
<0.4
OK
108-38-3 / 106-42-3
Styrene
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-42-5
0.2
<0.2
OK
79-34-5
o-Xylene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-47-6
4-Ethyltoluene
0.2
<0.2
OK
622-96-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
108-67-8
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-63-6
Benzyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2
OK
100-44-7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.2
<0.2
OK
95-50-1
0.2
<0.2
OK
120-82-1
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.2
<0.2
OK
87-68-3
Naphthalene
0.2
<0.2
OK
91-20-3
1
76
74-97-5
1
74
540-36-3
1
88
3114-55-4
Robert Crough
Chemist
26-Feb-2014
Appendix D Emission Calculations
43218429/01/03
D
Flux Emissions Sampling Results
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
QC01_20131106
Collection Date:
6/11/2013
2
Flux Hood Area (m ):
Flowrate into Flux Hood (m3/min)
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Method Blank Sample
Results and Calculations:
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
Calculations Performed By:
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
3
<
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Refer to report for details on the equations used to calculate flux emission rates
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS05_20131107
Collection Date:
7/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
8.6
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.33
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS06_20131107
Collection Date:
7/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
<
1
0.8
<
4.3
<
2
<
1
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.17
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS08_20131108
Collection Date:
8/11/2013
2
3
Flowrate into Flux Hood (m /min)
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
Calculations Performed By: K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
6.5
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.25
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS09_20131106
Collection Date:
6/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
14
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.54
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS11_20131108
Collection Date:
8/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
21
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.81
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS12_20131107
Collection Date:
7/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
18
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.70
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS13_20131106
Collection Date:
6/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
11
2
<
3.1
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.42
0.08
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS14_20131106
Collection Date:
6/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
8.4
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.32
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS15_20131106
Collection Date:
6/11/2013
2
3
Flowrate into Flux Hood (m /min)
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
Calculations Performed By: K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
3
(microg/m )
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
4.9
2
<
3
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.19
0.08
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.02
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS17_20131107
Collection Date:
7/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
1
0.8
0.6
1
2
1
0.6
0.8
0.4
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1.2
0.6
<
0.6
<
0.6
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.6
<
8.1
2
<
1
<
0.6
<
0.8
<
0.4
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.31
0.08
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.02
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS18_20131107
Collection Date:
7/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
2
<
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
AS88_FH_20131107
Collection Date:
7/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Flux hood sample at AS88
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
3
<
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Project:
Sample ID:
File Data:
QC03_20131107
Collection Date:
7/11/2013
2
Fluxhood size:
Comments:
0.129
0.005
30L
Field duplicate at AS88_FH
Chemical
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
PQL
(microg/m3)
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
1
0.8
2
2
1
0.8
1
0.5
K Foley
Date: 20-Nov-13
Reported Lab
Concentration
(microg/m3)
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
0.8
<
1
<
1
<
0.8
<
3
<
2
<
1
<
0.8
<
1
<
0.5
<
Reviewed By:
Date:
Calculated Flux
Emission Rate
(microg/min.m2)
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
S Bowly
04-Dec-13
Notes:
Level 4, 407 Pacific Highway
Artarmon NSW 2064
Australia
T: 61 2 8925 5500
F: 61 2 8925 5555
www.urs.com.au

Final Report

Transcription

Similar documents

Summary Report Air Purifier Project (VOCs)