Plan - Cedar Hill, TX
Transcription
Plan - Cedar Hill, TX
25030 SW Parkway Ave. Suite 330 | Wilsonville | Oregon | 97070 | www.esci.us | 800-757-3724 | [email protected] Cedar Hill Fire Department Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan July 2014 Prepared by: Sheldon Gilbert Lane Wintermute Rob Strong Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................ iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Evaluation of Current Conditions ......................................................................................... 11 Organization Overview ........................................................................................................................... 11 Focus Group meeting .............................................................................................................................. 14 Governance and Lines of Authority .................................................................................................... 18 Organizational Design ......................................................................................................................... 19 Service Area and Infrastructure .......................................................................................................... 22 Finance and Budget ............................................................................................................................ 23 Budget, Funding, Fees, Taxation, and Financial Resources ................................................................ 24 Emergency Response Type and Frequency ........................................................................................ 28 Management Components ..................................................................................................................... 31 Mission, Vision, Strategic Planning, Goals, and Objectives ................................................................ 31 Management Documents and Processes ........................................................................................... 33 Record Keeping and Documentation .................................................................................................. 37 Staffing and Personnel Management ................................................................................................. 38 Administrative and Support Staffing................................................................................................... 39 Emergency Response Staffing ............................................................................................................. 42 Emergency Medical Services Support and Systems Oversight ............................................................... 49 EMS System Integrity .......................................................................................................................... 51 Emergency Management ........................................................................................................................ 54 National Incident Management System (NIMS) Compliance ............................................................. 54 Service Delivery and Performance .......................................................................................................... 56 Demand............................................................................................................................................... 58 Distribution ......................................................................................................................................... 63 Concentration ..................................................................................................................................... 72 Reliability ............................................................................................................................................ 76 Response Performance ....................................................................................................................... 79 Mutual and Automatic Aid Systems ................................................................................................... 83 Support Programs – Training .................................................................................................................. 86 General Training Competencies.......................................................................................................... 86 Training Program Administration ....................................................................................................... 91 Training Resources and Methodology ................................................................................................ 92 Support Programs – Life Safety Services (Fire Prevention) .................................................................... 96 Fire and Life Safety Code Enforcement .............................................................................................. 97 Existing Occupancy Inspection Program ............................................................................................. 99 Fire Cause and Origin Investigation .................................................................................................. 103 Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Programs.............................................................................. 105 Facilities ............................................................................................................................................ 105 Apparatus .......................................................................................................................................... 111 i Cedar Hill Fire Department Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Apparatus Maintenance and Repair ................................................................................................. 112 Capital Replacement Planning .......................................................................................................... 113 Future System Demand Projections ................................................................................... 117 Population Growth Projections............................................................................................................. 117 Population History ............................................................................................................................ 117 Population Projection ....................................................................................................................... 118 Service Demand Projection ................................................................................................................... 119 Community Risk Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 120 Future Delivery System Models ......................................................................................... 125 Development of Response Standards and Targets ............................................................................... 125 Critical Tasks, Risk, and Staffing Performance .................................................................................. 125 Response Time Performance Objectives .......................................................................................... 128 Short- and Mid-Term Strategies – One to Two years ........................................................................... 130 Response Deployment ...................................................................................................................... 130 Fire Prevention.................................................................................................................................. 131 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) .................................................................................................. 132 Emergency Management .................................................................................................................. 133 Comprehensive Tri-Cities Cooperative Service Agreement .............................................................. 133 Training ............................................................................................................................................. 134 Administrative Support Staff ............................................................................................................ 134 Organizational Development ............................................................................................................ 135 Recommended Long-Term Strategies beyond two years ..................................................................... 136 CHFD Station 212 Relocation ............................................................................................................ 136 New Joint Cedar Hill/Midlothian Fire Station 215 Development and Staffing ................................. 138 Training Facility Development .......................................................................................................... 142 Industry Best Practices and Standards ............................................................................................. 143 Conclusion......................................................................................................................... 145 Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 147 Appendix A: Table of Figures ................................................................................................................ 147 Appendix B: Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................................. 150 ii Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Acknowledgments Acknowledgments Without the considerable support of the leadership of the City of Cedar Hill, this project would not have been possible. Emergency Services Consulting International thanks and acknowledges the following representatives for their invaluable contribution to this undertaking. Rob Franke, Mayor Daniel C. Haydin Jr. Council Member Stephen Mason, Council Member Chris Parvin, Mayor Pro Tem Clifford R. Shaw, Council Member Jami McCain, Council Member Wallace Swayze, Council Member Alan Sims, City Manager Cedar Hill Fire Department John Ballard, Fire Chief Ricky Pendley, Deputy Fire Chief, Operations Kevin Cunningham, EMS Chief Randy Jordan, Fire Marshal Richard Dixon, Battalion Chief, A-Shift, Records Management John Denison, Battalion Chief, B-Shift, Facilities Maintenance & Pre Plans Mike Harrison, Battalion Chief, C-Shift, Training Coordinator Matthew Baker, Cedar Hill Professional Firefighters, President iii Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Executive Summary Executive Summary Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) was engaged by the City of Cedar Hill to provide a long-range plan for the delivery of emergency services within the Cedar Hill Fire Department (CHFD). This Emergency Services Master Plan will assist the department in future planning and provision of comprehensive emergency services to the citizens of Cedar Hill. This report is organized as an organizational master plan that evaluates current conditions; projects future growth, development and service demand; and provides recommendations to enhance current services or to provide an equal level of service over the next 10 to 20 years. ESCI thanks the Cedar Hill City Council, the City Manager, and the staff of the CHFD for their outstanding cooperation in the preparation of this report. All involved were candid in their comments and provided a tremendous amount of essential information. Special appreciation is offered to Fire Chief John Ballard in acknowledgement of the time, effort, and resources he provided for this plan. The audit and master plan begins with a community forum and review of the current service delivery provided by CHFD including its programs, administration, management, service delivery performance and financial health. All areas are evaluated and discussed in detail and specific recommendations are provided, where applicable. Community Forum In order to dedicate time, energy, and resources on the functions that are most desired by its customers, CHFD wants to understand the customers’ priorities and expectations. To better understand these priorities and expectations, a facilitated citizen forum was utilized to obtain community perspective regarding the CHFD. The community forum was conducted with community members invited to participate in the master planning process. Invitations were sent out from Neighborhood Services to 30 community leaders and 423 subscribers of the neighborhood service calendar. In addition, the police department sent out meeting notices through the “Neighborhood Door” which reaches approximately 80 of the city’s neighborhood watch group. Approximately 20 attendees were asked to fill out several survey instruments pertaining to how they think CHFD should plan for the future. The citizens represented were asked to identify the most important functions and services the fire department provides, based on the list of services currently provided, and rank those services as a critical priority, an important priority, or a low priority. In addition, participants were asked to rate a number of key indicators as they related to service levels, staffing and cost of service. Understanding what the community expects of its fire and emergency medical services organization is critical to developing an effective long-range perspective. Armed with this knowledge, the CHFD internal emphasis can be adjusted to better fulfill customer needs. The citizens group identified the following expectations: 1 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan • • • • • • • Executive Summary Adequate staffing and a timely response Maintenance of existing fire suppression and emergency medical service levels Well trained and response ready Professionalism and competency Continued integration and partnership with the communities served Employee retention Community access to stations and personnel Report Section I: Evaluation of Current Conditions An analysis of current conditions is documented in nine survey sections, reviewing the CHFD administration, governance, staffing, personnel management, service delivery, planning, support programs and capital assets. Each component of the evaluation includes an introductory explanation of the subject area and discussion of desirable outcomes and identified best practices. Criterion used to evaluate the fire department has been developed over many years. These gauges include relevant guidelines from national accreditation criteria, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards, federal and state mandates for fire and EMS systems, recommendations by various organizations such as the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE), and generally accepted best practices within the fire and EMS industry. The evaluation of current conditions offers the City a detailed assessment of existing fire department operations and also provides the ESCI project team with a snapshot in time, the basis from which the balance of the Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan is developed. The following discusses some of the key findings: Current and Future Service Demand The City of Cedar Hill and adjacent areas are experiencing consistent and significant population growth, which is expected to continue well into the future. With community growth comes increasing service demand and workload on the fire department, challenging the agency to keep pace with growing needs. Over the years, the department has evolved into the agency it is today providing fire prevention and suppression, technical rescue, hazardous materials and advanced life support (ALS), medical first response, and transportation services. The department operates from four strategically placed facilities using a fleet of two engines, two aerial ladders (two quints) with ALS capabilities, two brush units, three MICU ambulances and a number of ancillary and support vehicles. The department staffs entirely career personnel that include an administrative complement of six and an operations complement of 72 personnel. The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) prepares population and service demand projections for communities and regions throughout Texas to predict future water use and needs. Predicted population growth estimates have the population of Cedar Hill growing to approximately 77,000 by 2040. The average annual growth rate varies from 1.70 percent to 2.24 percent and is never negative in the time 2 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Executive Summary period displayed. Note that the 2008 Cedar Hill Comprehensive Plan projects a total population within Cedar Hill of 80,000 to 85,000 at build out (based on the vacant land available for development in Cedar Hill). 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Population 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 1980 1990 2000 2010 6,849 19,976 32,093 45,028 Percent Change 0 191.66% 60.66% 40.30% Average Annual Growth 0 19.17% 6.07% 4.03% 0% Service Delivery and Response Performance Response performance criteria and actual service delivery performance is analyzed in detail, providing information with which the Department can develop future deployment methodologies and identify desired levels of response performance and staffing. Response times in 2013 were found to average 6 minutes 21 seconds. Of all of the incidents to which the Department responded in the study year, 90 percent were answered in 9 minutes 4 seconds or less. 3 Frequency of Incidents Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Executive Summary 1000 100.00% 900 90.00% 800 80.00% 700 70.00% 600 60.00% 500 400 Average Response Time: 06:21 300 50.00% 90th Percentile Response Time: 9:04 40.00% 30.00% 200 20.00% 100 10.00% 0 0.00% Response Minutes Fire stations are generally well located to provide reasonable response time intervals. GIS analysis indicates that just over 90 percent of incidents occurring within the City are within 6 minutes 30 second “travel” time from an existing fire station. This 90th percentile, 6 minute 30 second coverage is considered acceptable, however absent defined response performance goals it is unknown if it meets community expectations. It is explained further in the report that some aspects of response performance are best developed locally based on identified risk, community expectations, and desired service levels. It is important that Cedar Hill develop and adopt response, performance, and staffing standards that best meet the city’s risk profile and needs of the communities served. To meet the identified standards and/or improve upon current response times with anticipated future growth, additional personnel and fire stations will be needed in the future. Staffing The staffing section of the report reviews both operational and administrative and support personnel deployment. In general terms, operational (emergency response) staffing of fire apparatus is found to be within acceptable parameters, though it is anticipated that staffing levels will fall behind based on anticipated community growth. In review of administrative and support staffing levels, several shortcomings are revealed. The ratio of administrative staffing to departmental operational manpower is lower than what ESCI’s experience finds to be adequate. Further, the Fire Chief’s position is assigned multiple responsibilities, exceeding the capacity of one individual. Additionally, it is found that the Training Division is under-staffed in consideration of the anticipated addition of new personnel, which directly impact training workload. 4 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Executive Summary Finally, the Department’s Emergency Management and Public Education Division is understaffed, a situation that has been partially addressed by utilizing fire prevention and line personnel. Several opportunities to address inadequate administrative staffing can be addressed through enhanced regional partnerships with the existing Tri-City jurisdictions. Additional assessment and recommendations are provided. Report Section II: Future System Demand Projections Following the evaluation of current conditions, the report continues to analyze the service delivery demands that can be expected to confront the CHFD in the future. Existing demographics are identified and compared to U.S. Census Bureau, Texas State Data Center, as well as local and regional planning resources for development of projected future needs. In evaluating the deployment of facilities, resources, and staffing, it is imperative consideration be given to potential changes, such as population growth, that can directly affect emergency workload. Changes in service demand may require changes and adjustments in the deployment of staffing and capital assets in order to maintain acceptable levels of performance. For the purposes of this study, ESCI uses the TWDB population projection for Cedar Hill, multiples this number by a per capita incident rate derived from historical service demand. This analysis provides a picture of potential service demand through 2040, based on population growth in Cedar Hill. The results are shown in the following figure. 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 9,126 7,714 6,009 6,302 5,221 2010 2013 2020 2030 2040 EMS 3,645 4,147 4,367 5,345 6,323 Other 1,369 1,663 1,699 2,079 2,460 207 199 237 290 343 Fire Report Section III: Future Delivery System Models The current conditions analysis and system demand projections form the foundation from which ESCI has developed strategies for the delivery of services in Cedar Hill for the future. 5 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Executive Summary This report cites multiple future system model modifications, included both short term and long term initiatives that are identified in the interest of improving and maintaining future system integrity. Each initiative is discussed in detail and guidance is provided. The discussion of future delivery systems begins with an explanation of the importance of developing response time standards and targets, viewed by ESCI as a critical step that is needed if CHFD is to be able to appropriately plan for the future. Guidance is offered regarding how the agency can assess critical tasking, risk analysis and staffing performance from which response time performance objectives can be established. Short and mid-term strategies and models are discussed next. The initiatives identified and explained include: Future resource deployment needs Fire Prevention and Public Education operations and staffing needs Emergency Medical Services system participation/engagement and future considerations Emergency Management program shortcomings and needs Administrative and Support program needs Training Program direction and ability to meet increasing training needs Tri-City regional cooperative expansion opportunities and benefits The report continues by discussing long-term strategies and needs, including: Future fire station construction considerations Future personnel and equipment deployment EMS service delivery challenges and future considerations Accreditation and industry best practices for dispatch, wildfire management, EMS, and Fire service delivery The strategies needed to meet future service demand do not come without cost. In the final discussion section of the report, ESCI provides information on the financial considerations that come with system expansion and modified delivery models. Financial projections are offered with regard to fire station construction costs as well as future personnel and fire apparatus expenses. The attached recommendations table provides a consolidated view of the key short, mid- and long-term recommendations. The recommendations table can serve as a tracking and progress report for the recommendations submitted as part of the Master Plan. 6 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Executive Summary Cedar Hill Fire Department Recommendations Summary Table Key Recommendations Started Status 50% Complete Establish a defined annual process for regular review and revision of rules, policies, and procedures that Includes labor participation Separate department policy documents from operating guidelines Establish written policy to address hiring/firing authority and notification criteria Establish written policy to address hiring/firing authority and notification criteria Complete the development of an updated strategic plan Develop a code of ethics Conduct scheduled review and updating of rules and regulations Assertively explore opportunities for functional service delivery collaboration with neighboring agencies Formalize the definition of the organization’s communications path in the rules and regulations Use caution and apply appropriate financial controls, particularly in regard to open purchasing and petty cash accounts and procedures Transition IT service responsibility from the fire department to the City IT department Fire Chief should increase delegation of operational and administrative responsibilities. Pursue Tri-Cities regional vehicle repair and maintenance services utilizing emergency vehicle technicians (EVT) Enhance special operations at tri-City and mutual aid group Engage engine companies in the fire higher risk/assembly inspections Explore enhanced partnerships for education and outreach programs (e.g. PD, nonprofits, public works) Establish a policy-participation and decision making process that includes all levels of the organization Explore implementation of a comprehensive recruitment program either at the City level, or for public safety, or for CHFD. Adopt entry-level physical ability testing using the CPAT model or similar Restore the practice of annual physical competence testing Implement established and validated evaluation criteria and process Develop and implement an agency-wide safety committee Conduct monthly chart review with established trending and targeted data elements determined by the medical director 7 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Key Recommendations Establish an internal peer review committee to review EMS incidents and trends to make EMS system recommendations. Committee to take a lead role in the formation of patient documentation standards, transfer of care and EMS operational policies. Committee should also compare local data against appropriate benchmark criteria Integrate the City emergency operations plan with community wildfire protection plan elements as appropriate Include specific mitigation measures in local plan for CHFD impacts Ensure all personnel have ICS training commensurate with their position and NIMS requirements. Document and maintain ICS training records. Establish a company officer training and development program Adopt a department safety policy that addresses LCES components. Implement a close call reporting and training system Develop and adopt response and staffing standards to serve the identified risk and desired service levels within the City of Cedar Hill. Define and document all wild land training levels. All personnel should be trained to awareness level and the NWCG S130/190 level and company officers to the engine boss level Regionalize EMS scenario-based training with Tri-Cities partner agencies Validate and implement regional fire training competency standards for high risk/low frequency operations, e.g. vertical ventilation standard Implement a culture of safety program e.g. “Just Culture,” “Everyone Goes Home,” or “Crew Resource Management CRM.” Upgrade fire code adoption to the 2012 International Fire Code Seek means by which to encourage or require the installation of fire sprinklers in new residential construction Develop practices to monitor the effectiveness of third party new construction plan reviews and cross check results periodically Establish a dedicated public education position, possibly as a collaborative initiative Based on risk exposure increase efforts to provide public education regarding wildland/urban interface concerns. Utilize the NFPA Firewise Community and Ready, Set, Go programs Consider the establishment of a regional fire investigation team Make pre-incident plans readily available in the field via electronic means Implement, adopt, and fund apparatus equipment replacement schedule 8 Executive Summary Started Status 50% Complete Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Mid-Term Recommendations Executive Summary Started 50% Complete Establish a CAD interface with Grand Prairie to eliminate delays and duplication of information flow to and from responding units Pursue a continued shared station/resource agreement with the Grand Prairie Fire Department to coordinate and provide services to the established shared Station 214 service area Implement complete boundary drops between Desoto and Duncanville to provide increased unit concentration and reliability in the north and eastern portions of the city, which have the highest level of service demand It is recommended the second quint be replaced with an “engine” and a engine apparatus be located with the designated truck company. This configuration will allow for more effective vehicle utilization, reduced purchase and maintenance costs, and maintain the current excellent Cedar Hill ISO rating of two Fire department leaders need to be aware of call processing time and work cooperatively with the dispatch agency to meet standards Seek to achieve an inspection frequency of at least annual completion and more frequently for higher risk occupancies Integrate local fire code adoption and amendments with the established wildfire management plan and fire wise community elements Appropriately staff the program to maintain the existing 88 percent inspection compliance rate and continue to work toward the 100 percent goal Prioritize implementation of a Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) and an appropriate tiered response to medical calls for service (right resource, right patient, right time) In coordination with local health care providers and related stakeholders, conduct a community needs assessment to identify future community paramedicine and health care services that can and should be provided by the CHFD Conduct a transportation billing “rate study” to increase revenue and pursue a cost neutral ambulance transportation service. CHFD should ensure the rate study is in compliance with Texas Medicaid Provider Procedures Manual (TMPPM) that utilizes the Texas Medicaid Healthcare Partnership (TMHP) claim system. This rate study should be conducted in accordance with the Federal Register, 2 CFR 200 cost determination, billing rates, and billing requirements Work with the Tri-Cities cooperative partners to fully integrate, training, equipment/supplies, quality assurance, and EMS administrative functions Incorporate a blended strategy of planning, mitigation, response and recovery initiatives such as NFPA “Firewise Community, Ready-Set-Go” and Federal Emergency Management Agency “Map Your Neighborhood” as well as other appropriate programs to the address the identified risks Appropriately staff the emergency management program with, minimally a program manager or coordinator Develop a “formal” multi-faceted cooperative services agreement that will equitably serve CHFD and their partners alike; and will produce consistent and defined support programs and services at a reduced cost for all partners Establish, implement, and manage a comprehensive training and professional development program for all CHFD employees Expand Tri-Cities cooperative services initiatives in the areas of recruit training, Multi-Company Tactical Operations (MCTO), technical rescue programs, incident command system (NIMS) training, and special operations training e.g. hazardous materials, technical rescue, etc. 9 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Mid-Term Recommendations Executive Summary Started 50% Started 50% Complete Consider adding one FTE with primary responsibility as an assigned CHFD administrative analyst and liaison to City Management The establishment of internal advisory committees is recommended in areas such as: • Safety Committee • Training Advisory Committee • Operations/Special Operations Committee • Apparatus Committee • EMS Committee It is recommended the City establish a pay policy that maintains pay scales in the “median” or “average” of the established North Texas comparison jurisdictions Long-Term Recommendations Relocate Station 212 to the proposed optimum station location in the general area of E. Beltline and Joe Wilson Road. In partnership with the city of Midlothian, develop a phased or staged implementation of a new-shared fire station 215. Implement in a manner that allows for a systematic and well-organized partnership that incrementally adds personnel and resources as the service level and risk demands presents themselves Construct and maintain a Tri-Cities regional training facility when funding and space becomes available. The following programs and accreditations be implemented and maintained: • Texas Fire Chiefs Association Best Practices recognition: An accreditation process that provides a well-defined, Texas Fire Chiefs Association recognized benchmark system for measuring the delivery of fire and emergency services in relation to Texas best practices. • Commission on Fire Accreditation recognition of accreditation: An accreditation process that provides well-defined, internationallyrecognized benchmark system for measuring the delivery of fire and emergency services in relation to industry best practices. • International Academies of Emergency Dispatch Accreditation (ACE Accreditation): An established high standard of excellence for emergency dispatch, by providing the tools to achieve this high standard at both the dispatcher level through certification, and at the communication center level through the accreditation program. • Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS Accreditation): CAAS accreditation signifies that your service has met the "gold standard" determined by the ambulance industry to be essential in a modern emergency medical services provider. These standards often exceed those established by state or local regulation. The CAAS standards are designed to increase operational efficiency and clinical quality, while decreasing risk and liability to the organization. 10 Complete Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Evaluation of Current Conditions Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) was engaged by the City of Cedar Hill to provide a long-range plan for the delivery of emergency services within the Cedar Hill Fire Department (CHFD) that will assist the department in future efforts and long-range planning. This report serves as the culmination of the project and is configured as an organizational master plan that evaluates current conditions; projects future growth, development, and service demands; and provides recommendations to enhance current services or provide an equal level of service over the next 10 to 20 years. Using organizational, operational, staffing, and geographic information system (GIS) models; this phase of the study provides recommendations for improvement in current services delivered to the community. The evaluation and analysis of data and other information is based on Texas State laws and regulations, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards, Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI)1 self-assessment criteria, health and safety requirements, federal and state mandates relative to emergency services, and generally accepted best practices within the emergency services community. Each section in the following report provides the reader with general information about that element, as well as observations and analyses of any significant issues or conditions that are pertinent. Observations are supported by data provided by CHFD and collected as part of the review and interview process. Finally, specific recommendations are included to address identified issues or to take advantage of opportunities that may exist. ORGANIZATION OVERVIEW The Organizational Overview component provides a review of the organization, discussing the agency’s configuration and the services that it provides. Data provided by the CHFD, Planning Department, and Southwest Regional Communications Center was combined with information collected in the course of ESCI’s fieldwork to develop the following overview. The purpose of this section is two-fold. First, it verifies the accuracy of baseline information along with ESCI’s understanding of the agency’s composition. This provides the foundation from which the Program and Services Audit and Master Plan is developed. Secondly, the overview serves as a reference for the reader who may not be fully familiar with the details of the agency’s operations. Where appropriate, ESCI includes recommended modifications to current observations based on industry standards and best practices. CHFD was formed in May 1941 as a municipal volunteer fire department and was tasked with providing basic fire suppression services to the central core of the City of Cedar Hill. In 1964, the CHFD took a step that no other department within hundreds of miles had taken when it established emergency medical services (EMS) response services within the fire department. Over the years, the department has 1 The CFAI organization is now a subsection of the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) but maintains its prime function of accrediting fire agencies. 11 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions evolved into the agency it is today providing fire prevention and suppression, technical rescue, hazardous materials and advanced life support (ALS), medical first response, and transportation services. The department operates from four strategically placed facilities using a fleet of two engines, two aerial ladders (two quints), two brush units, three ALS ambulances and a number of ancillary and support vehicles. The department staffs entirely career personnel that includes an administrative complement of six and an operations complement of 72 personnel. The primary service area of the department resides in the North Texas Metroplex region and encompasses 36 square miles of the City of Cedar Hill as well as a shared fire station and service area with the City of Grand Prairie, Texas. In addition, CHFD participates in a number of regional cooperative efforts including dispatch/communications, training, automatic aid, and emergency medical quality assurance with the cities of Duncanville and Desoto “Tri-Cities” cooperative. The total population of the primary service area is estimated at 49,278. The following figure illustrates the city’s primary service area boundaries. 12 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 1: Service Area Map 13 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions FOCUS GROUP MEETING In order to dedicate time, energy, and resources on the functions that are most desired by its customers, CHFD wants to understand the customers’ priorities The beginning is the most and expectations. A facilitated citizen forum was utilized to important part of the work. obtain community perspective regarding the CHFD. Invitations were sent out from Neighborhood Services to 30 community leaders and 423 subscribers of the neighborhood service calendar. In addition, the police department sent out meeting notices through the “Neighborhood Door” which reaches approximately 80 of the city’s neighborhood watch group. Feedback was solicited regarding: • • • • • The appropriateness of the current mission, vision, and guiding principles. A discussion of taxes, resource deployment, response times, service demand trends, and customer service. Expectations, concerns, and organizational strengths. Current services were prioritized. Cost, staffing, and response performance were surveyed. Approximately 20 attendees were asked to fill out several survey instruments pertaining to how they think CHFD should plan for the future. The citizens represented were asked to identify the most important functions and services the fire department provides, based on the list of services currently provided, and rank those services as a critical priority, an important priority, or a low priority. In this case, the participants could elect to assign a single priority to multiple services. In addition, participants were asked to rate a number of key indicators as they related to service levels, staffing and cost of service. The following figures describe the forum participants’ service priorities and opinions. Figure 2: Citizen Service Priorities Low Priority 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 High Priority 2.50 3.00 3.50 2.00 Fire Suppression 3.00 Emergency Medical Services/Ambulance… 3.00 Fire Code Enforcement/Fire Inspection… 2.20 Technical Rescue (Vehicle Extrication, Water… 2.70 Fire/Arson Investigations 2.40 2.50 Emergency Preparedness (Disaster… Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) Fire Explorer / Volunteer Progams 14 1.90 1.60 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 3: Citizen Ranking of Staffing Levels 12 10 10 8 Overstaffed 6 Appropriate Understaffed 4 2 0 0 0 Number of Respondents Figure 4: Citizen Ranking of Response Levels 6 5 5 4 3 3 Too Slow/Light Appropriate 2 Too Heavy 2 1 0 Number of Respondents 15 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 5: Citizen Ranking of Cost of Services 4.5 4 4 4 3.5 3 Expensive 2.5 Appropriate 2 1.5 Adopt New Fiscal Tools 1 1 0.5 0 Number of Respondents Discussion Based on the previous figures, there are a number of perceptions and trends that should be noted. The core services of fire and EMS response were clearly supported as essential services to the community and the most important services provided by the department. There was a strong acknowledgement that the costs of these services were and will be supported by the community as long as they were deemed as appropriate and efficient. There was concern over the amount of turnover and training costs related to CHFD personnel leaving the department due in part to a low salary range for the region. Lastly, the community was very supportive of looking for better and more efficient ways of providing essential services such as enhanced regional cooperation, alternative response, and apparatus options based on call type and need. Participants were thankful for the amount of innovation and regional cooperation that CHFD has already demonstrated, but encouraged continued exploration and expansion of beneficial regional partnerships. Customer Appreciation Customer views on the strengths and image of emergency service organizations must inform and impact any effective master plan. Needless efforts are often put into over-developing areas that are already successful. However, using and promoting customer-identified strengths may help the organization overcome or offset some of the identified weaknesses. 16 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions The citizens group identified the following strengths: • • • • • • • Impeccable professionalism Well-managed Strong in everything they do Great personnel and strong commitment to CHFD Highly committed and integrated within the community Regionally minded and committed to successful partnerships Strong community and department pride Customer Expectations Understanding what the community expects of its fire and emergency medical services organization is critical to developing an effective long-range perspective. Armed with this knowledge, the CHFD internal emphasis can be adjusted to better fulfill customer needs. The citizens group identified the following expectations: • • • • • • • Adequate staffing and a timely response Maintenance of existing fire suppression and emergency medical service levels Well trained and response ready Professionalism and competency Continued integration and partnership with the communities served Employee retention Community access to stations and personnel Customer Concerns The Customer Centered Master Planning process would be incomplete without expression from the customers and their concerns about the organization. Some concerns, in fact, identify weaknesses within the delivery system. However, others may be perceptions based on limited customer knowledge. The citizens group identified the following concerns: • • Sustainability in staffing? Is the pay so low CHFD cannot keep people? Is CHFD becoming a training ground for other fire service providers to hire from? Innovation and aggressive recruitment. Other Thoughts and Comments • “Do not know the cost but safety, prevention, and education is the number one concern.” • “I have always been impressed with response time and professionalism.” • “Because of the turnover, it is putting CHFD staffing sustainability at risk.” • “We will need more staff as the city grows.” • “The participation of our fire department in our small town setting is fundamental.” 17 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Governance and Lines of Authority Regardless of organization type, fire departments, like any other formal organization, are overseen by a governing entity. This entity can take the form of a City Council, County Commission, Board of Directors, or Executive Board. Since CHFD is a municipal fire department that is a standing department within the organizational structure of the City of Cedar Hill, the fire chief reports to the City Manager and ultimately answers to the City’s seven-member City Council. Survey Components Figure 6: Survey Table – Governance Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Comments and Recommendations Governance and Lines of Authority A. Governing body i) Head of governing body ii) Key employee of governing body iii) Meetings B. Elected official authority defined C. Fire chief position i) Hired by contract ii) Term of contract iii) Periodic performance evaluation D. Fire chief/authority defined E. Policy and administrative roles defined City Manager with mayor, council form of government. Mayor City manager Second and fourth Tuesday; sevenmember council. Reports to the City manager. At will employee. None No official evaluation process or work performance period. City Charter City personnel manual, department rules, regulations, standard operating procedures, and medical protocols. Establish a regularly scheduled written performance review Separate department policy documents from operating guidelines. Attributes of Successful Organizations A. Policy, rules, guiding documents i) Process for revision provided B. Legal counsel maintained i) Consultation available ii) Labor counsel C. Financial controls i) Financial control system 18 Rules regulations and standard operating procedures exist. As needed. Contract City attorney; human resource has separate contracted attorney. Both available upon request. HR attorney under separate contract. Less than three thousand, no purchase order necessary. Participate in regional cooperative purchasing agreements. Defined spending limits; fire chief or finance sign off. Fire chief limit at competitive bidding level. Establish a defined annual process for regular review and revision of rules, policies and procedures. Include labor input. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components ii) Financial review iii) Auditor iv) Frequency of review D. Governing body minutes maintained i) Availability of minutes Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Ongoing review via City Finance Department. Monthly and quarterly financial reporting is conducted. Annual City independent audit. Change firm periodically. Annual City budget process; midyear and annual budget submission and approval process. Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Yes. Available on-line at City Hall. Key Recommendations: Establish a defined annual process for regular review and revision of rules, policies, and procedures that Includes labor participation. Separate department policy documents from operating guidelines. Discussion The Cedar Hill governance configuration is typical of Texas cities, operating under the direction of a seven- member City Council and mayor. Within the organization itself, the department is structured in a typical top-down hierarchy and is separated into clear operating divisions consisting of administration (overseen by the fire chief), operations overseen by a deputy chief, prevention (overseen by a fire marshal), and EMS (overseen by a battalion chief). Each division has additional support positions as identified in the organizational chart that follows. Organizational Design The organizational design of an emergency services agency is vitally important to the agency’s ability to deliver service in an efficient and timely manner while providing the necessary level of safety and security to the members of the organization, whether career, paid-on-call, or volunteer. During an emergency, an individual’s ability to supervise multiple personnel is diminished; thus, industry standards recommend a span of control of four-to-six personnel under stressed situations. This recommendation is derived from military history and has shown to be effective in emergency service situations. 19 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 7: Survey Table – Organizational Design Cedar Hill Fire Department Comments and Recommendations Observations Organizational Structure A. Structure type B. Descriptions of all jobs maintained i) Job descriptions updated C. Employment agreements Chain of Command A. Defined chain-of-command B. Span of control C. Hiring/firing authority Formation and History A. Organization formed B. History maintained i). Individual or group responsible Top-down hierarchy. Descriptions are in place for safety and administrative positions. Updated since 2010; updated as needed. None Via organizational Chart. 4:1 Authority resides with the fire chief. Fire chief notifies the City manager and human resources in accordance with established practice. Establish written policy to address hiring/firing authority and notifications. May 1941 Partially. Key historical documents have been removed. Three volunteers. Identify department historian and attempt to return missing historical documents. Establish and formalize assignment and authority. Key Recommendations: 20 Establish written policy to address hiring/firing authority and notification criteria. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Organizational Chart To operate effectively, the structure of a fire department needs to be clearly defined in the form of an organizational chart. The chart institutionalizes the agency’s hierarchy, identifies roles and, most importantly, reporting authority. A well-developed chart helps to assure that communication flows appropriately and limits opportunities to circumvent the reporting structure. Figure 8: Organizational Chart Fire Chief Executive Secretary Deputy Fire Chief Battalion Chief A Shift Fire Marshal Battalion Chief B Shift Captain – Station 211 Battalion Chief C Shift Captain – Station 211 Inspector Captain – Station 211 Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic 5 Firefighter / Paramedics 5 Firefighter / Paramedics 5 Firefighter / Paramedics Captain – Station 212 Captain – Station 212 Captain – Station 212 Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic 4Firefighter / Paramedics 4 Firefighter / Paramedics 4 Firefighter / Paramedics Captain – Station 213 Captain – Station 213 Captain – Station 213 Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic 4 Firefighter / Paramedics 4 Firefighter / Paramedics 4 Firefighter / Paramedics Captain – Station 214 Captain – Station 214 EMS Chief Captain – Station 214 Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic Engineer / Paramedic 2 Firefighter / Paramedics 2 Firefighter / Paramedics 2 Firefighter / Paramedics While the chart above gives the impression that certain levels are of equal rank, there is a divergence in the titles applied to certain levels within the organizational structure. For example, the EMS chief position is considered to hold the rank of battalion chief, as does the fire marshal, but these positions are in line with the deputy fire chief. 21 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Service Area and Infrastructure The size and composition of a fire department’s service area affects the type and number of personnel, fire stations, and vehicles that are needed to provide services efficiently. Sometimes complex decisions need to be made regarding which deployment strategies should be employed to properly position resources based on land area, geography, risk and similar factors. Following is a summary of CHFD service area and service infrastructure resources. Figure 9: Survey Table – Service Area and Infrastructure Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations General Description of Agency A. Agency type Municipal subdivision. B. Area, square miles 35.8 Station 211, 1212 W. Belt Line Rd, C. Headquarters Cedar Hill, TX 75104 D. Fire stations Four E. Other facilities None F. Population served 49,278 Service Delivery Infrastructure G. Emergency vehicles 2 i) Engines Type 1 Reserve 1 ii) Engines Type 6 1 iii) Ladder truck/quint 2 iv) Ambulance/ MCI bus 3 v) Ambulance, reserve, 1 mass casualty vehicle 1 MCI bus vi) Air Light 1 vii) Hose tender 1 viii) Brush 2 xi) Command vehicles 2 Identify alternative delivery models Class 2, May 12, 2009, 86.13 points, H. ISO rating that realize efficiencies without divergent reduction 4.31. reducing existing ISO rating. I. Total fire department personnel, 78 uniformed and civilian i) Administrative and support 6 personnel, full-time ii) Administrative and support None personnel, volunteer iii) Operational personnel, full-time 72 iv) Operational personnel, None volunteer Key Recommendations: 22 Implement alternative delivery models that realize efficiencies without reducing existing ISO rating. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Discussion CHFD has been able to deploy people and apparatus in four strategically located fire stations, balancing the needs of providing effective coverage to both city and shared Grand Prairie service areas. However, the department is challenged to meet current and future service demand needs in the light of static service levels for the past five years with a 15.7 percent annual service demand increase during the same period. Based on an estimated 3-4 percent annual increase in service demand, additional and/or relocated fire stations, and alternative service delivery models will need to be considered and implemented. These types of efficiencies and innovations will be vital to address increased service demand with limited revenue and personnel resources. The ongoing test will be making the most prudent decisions based on multiple considerations including risk exposure, response times and deployment, community expectations, and fire department capacity. Those decisions are difficult given financial considerations that must be taken into account. ESCI understands the complexity that is confronting the City of Cedar Hill in terms of growth management, future risk exposure, fire department workload, and financial considerations. With those factors in mind, a detailed assessment of current service delivery and effectiveness is provided in the Service Delivery and Performance section of this report. Finance and Budget The fire service is dependent upon sufficient funding to provide the appropriate facilities, apparatus, and staffing to support service delivery. This funding2 forms the basis from which the agency is able to purchase the necessary equipment to fulfill its mission. Without adequate, sustainable funding, an organization is destined for failure. In the current economy, most communities are searching for ways in which to reduce expenditures while maintaining levels of service. Simultaneously, emergency services organization are finding it increasingly difficult to deliver the services that the community desires and are often asking for more funding to adequately supply the expected levels of services. ESCI reviewed financial information provided by CHFD to determine the adequacy of the organization’s funding and budgetary trends and policies. Figure 10: Survey Table – Operating Budget and Financial Resources Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Finance Overview A. Designated fiscal year B. Assessed property value, FY 2012-2013 C. Revised current year general operating fund budget, fire department 2 October 1 to September 30 $2,697,467,361.00 $8,118,770 Funding may come from a variety of sources such as ad valorem taxes, fundraisers, donations, etc. 23 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Survey Components D. General fund property tax, City levy – current budget year Comments and Recommendations $0.50963 (FY 12-13) i) Levy rate (FY 2008 through 2012) ii) General fund levy collection rate – prior year E. Bonds, fire department i) Levy rate F. Other tax levy, public safety i) Levy rate $0.45949 (FY 08,09,10) $0.48809 (FY 11) $0.49982 (FY 12) 100.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A Discussion The cost of providing fire and EMS services is highly variable in every community, based on the level of services provided, deployment practices, and community service-level expectations. While there is no established standard in terms of how much services should cost, ESCI has conducted an analyses and provided a number of observations and comparisons to industry benchmarks as a point of reference and comparison. Budget, Funding, Fees, Taxation, and Financial Resources ESCI reviewed financial information provided by the City and fire department to determine the adequacy of the organization’s funding. The department has seen an increase in annual budget over the last four years at a rate of 11.46 percent as illustrated in the following figure. Figure 11: Historical Budget $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 10-11 Actual 11-12 Actual 12-13 Actual 13-14 Budget In general, personnel costs have increased 13.24 percent over the four-year period while materials and services costs have increased approximately 3.39 percent. As with most career emergency services organizations, personnel costs comprise a vast majority of the department’s overall budget. As seen in 24 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions the following figure, personnel costs make up approximately 83 percent of the total department budget for fiscal year 13/14. Figure 12: Budget Distribution – FY 13/14 Although the FY 13/14 budget provided by the City contains approved capital expenditures in the narrative, the tabular information did not include a specific dollar amount for those items as it did in the FY 12/13 budget. During that year, personnel costs accounted for 82 percent of the total budget while capital only accounted for just over one percent. Based on FY 13/14, all public safety services made up approximately 64 percent of the total City budget, excluding enterprise funds. Included in this are the police department, fire department, code enforcement, animal shelter, municipal court, emergency management, and animal control. Within this subdivision, the fire department comprises 43 percent of the public safety total. This is illustrated in the following figures. 25 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Figure 13: City Budget Distribution – FY 13/14 Figure 14: Public Safety Subdivision Distribution 26 Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions There is no published criteria as to what an acceptable portion of a municipal budget should be used to support emergency services and national resources give little in the way of direction. The only published data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau Statistical Abstract and the U.S. Fire Administration pertaining to costs per capita. The following figure compares CHFD against North Texas and the national average for costs per capita. Figure 15: Comparison of Cost per Capita – FY 13/14 200 175 150 $167.47 $164.75 North Texas Cedar Hill 135.6 125 100 75 50 25 0 National The cost per capita figures in the previous chart compare the national average against a North Texas subset consisting of the thirteen comparable fire departments recognized by the Cedar Hill Fire Department as comparison agencies. The North Texas departments surveyed all provide EMS transport services and are comparable in size and complexity to the Cedar Hill Fire Department. Since CHFD is the primary provider of emergency medical services transport ambulance within the community, the organization charges for those services. While not specifically spelled out in the overall City budget, general fund revenue in the line entitled “charges for services” captures those revenues generated from the transport of sick and/or injured persons to local medical facilities. The following figure summarizes the general fund revenues for the public safety portion of the City budget. Figure 16: Public Safety Revenues – FY 13/14 FY 13/14 Revenue Source Budget Licenses and Permits $215,000 Grants $200,000 Charges for Services $1,464,100 Charges to other Governments $766,695 Fines and Forfeitures $918,680 Misc. $32,500 . 27 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions CHFD provides ALS transportation services utilizing three ambulances staffed with dual role crosstrained paramedic firefighters. ESCI was advised by the “Revenue Collection Solutions LLC” that it is estimated the CHFD allowable costs for providing ambulance transportation services is offset approximately 50 percent by the collection of ambulance transportation revenue. ESCI recommends CHFD explore additional revenue options, such as the Texas Health and Human Services Ambulance Services Supplemental Payment Program (ASSPP), enhanced Medicaid and indigent payments, increased rates, and/or subscription or other fees should be considered to cover the total costs of providing these EMS services. It is recommended the CHFD conduct a comprehensive rate study that is in compliance with Texas Medicaid Provider Procedures Manual (TMPPM) that utilizes the Texas Medicaid Healthcare Partnership (TMHP) claim system. This rate study should be conducted in accordance with the Federal Register, 2 CFR 200 cost determination, billing rates, and billing requirements. Finally, an identified area of concern by City leadership, CHFD management, labor representatives, and the community is the issue of high turnover at an average of 4-5 personnel or 7% of operational staff annually. This is universally believed to be in response to a base pay schedule that ranks in the lower third of comparable departments within the Dallas Metroplex region. However, this figure can be a bit deceiving based on the per capita spending being slightly above the average in the comparable region. It is ESCI’s observation that the benefit package and spending on equipment and infrastructure is above the regional average and contributing to the per capita spending level while CHFD personnel tend to focus on earnings and take home pay as the dominant measurement of funding, work place desirability, and appropriate employee satisfaction. ESCI has included a recommendation to bring pay scales in line with the median or average salary range of the established North Texas comparison jurisdictions. Emergency Response Type and Frequency CHFD responded to 6,009 requests for assistance from the citizens of the city and joint response areas in the 2013 reporting year. As is typically found, the vast majority of incidents are of an emergency medical nature. The department’s emergency calls for 2013 are listed in the following table. Figure 17: Survey Table – Emergency Response Type and Frequency Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Incidents Fire 199 3% Rescue 33 1% EMS/Fire response 2,535 42% EMS only 1,579 26% Good intent call/false call 826 14% Other 837 14% Total 6,009 100% 28 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Discussion 69 percent of 2013 incidents involved response to medical emergencies. The percentage is similar to, though slightly lower than, what is generally found in most fire departments. 199 incidents were reported as fires in the reporting year, which is consistent with that found in similar sized agencies. Additional detail on emergency response, service delivery effectiveness, and response performance is provided in the Service Delivery and Performance section of this report. ESCI compared the number and type of incidents CHFD responded to over a five-year period. The following figure displays the call volume, type numbers, and trend line for 2009 through 2013. A total increase of 15.7 percent in service demand is significant given the average 3.1 percent increase in service demand annually. Figure 18: Five-Year Call History 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EMS 3498 3645 3798 4019 4147 Other 1484 1369 1446 1470 1663 Fire 211 207 237 182 199 Total 5193 5221 5481 5671 6009 The following figure shows a 5.7 percent decrease in the number of fire calls over the past five years. Similar reductions in fire calls are consistent throughout the fire service as a result of enhanced fire prevention services, increased fire safe construction and adopted fire code standards. This fire call volume decrease is offset by double digit increase in EMS and other service demand resulting in a 15.7 percent increase in calls for service. ‘Other’ calls are representative of those not falling into the fire or EMS categories and include calls such as citizen assists, alarm sounding and other calls for assistance. Figure 19: Total Percent Change – 2009-2013 Incident Category Percent Change Fire Other EMS Total Demand -5.7% 12.1% 18.6% 15.7% 29 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions In total emergency incidents, CHFD falls at the high end of the incidents per 1,000 population, showing a robust unit hour utilization of resources. This shows the CHFD is utilizing their emergency response resources at a level that is 13 percent higher than the regional median. Figure 20: Total Incidents per 1,000 Population 150.000 121.9 107.0 105.8 100.000 83.0 66.5 56.0 50.000 0.000 The occurrence of fires for CHFD is slightly above the urban low range category and consistent with the regional median. A consistent range with the regional median is likely a result of a combination of similar growth patterns, construction, occupancy types, and fire incidents seen by other similar sized communities within the region. The fairly low number of fires “per-one-thousand” is indicative of a higher number of newer structures, effective new construction permitting practices, and effective fire prevention efforts that have been in place in past years. Figure 21: Fires per 1,000 Population 15.0 10.0 13.6 8.3 4.9 5.0 2.1 0.0 30 4.1 4.0 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions The following figure is based on 2012 and 2013 data, indicating that CHFD fire losses are slightly above the national and regional averages. Since the number of fires per capita is consistent with the regional average, the higher dollar loss in indicative of high fire loss incidents over the past two years. This is a variable that may be seen with similar types of jurisdictions and does not reflect a long-term trend or deficiency in fire protection. Figure 22: Fire Loss per Capita $36 $36 $35 $34 $34 $33 $32 $31 $31 $30 $29 $28 Regional Average National Average Cedar Hill Fire Dept MANAGEMENT COMPONENTS As a service provider to a growing community, CHFD faces challenges to organizational growth and management. Although community growth has slowed in recent years, it can be expected to accelerate again in the future and the organization must assure that it is adequately prepared in terms of the fundamental components of its management configuration to keep pace with future needs. In addition to the operational challenges of emergency response, the management of the business of a fire department always presents unique issues involving the administration of financial resources, the setting of goals and objectives, internal and external communications, information management, and security. This section of the report examines the department’s efforts in this area and preparation for the future health of the organization. Mission, Vision, Strategic Planning, Goals, and Objectives The process of strategic planning involves clarifying an organization’s mission, articulating its vision for the future, and specifying the values within which it will conduct itself. 31 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 23: Survey Table – Mission, Vision, Strategic Planning, Goals, and Objectives Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Mission, Vision, Strategic Planning, Goals, and Objectives A. Mission statement adopted i) Displayed ii) Periodic review B. Vision established and communicated C. Values of staff established D. Strategic or master plan Yes In stations, website. Currently under review. Statement is in place but not properly configured. None Strategic plan is under development. i) Adopted by elected officials None ii) Published and available None iii) Periodic review E. Agency goals and objectives established i) Date developed ii) Periodic review iii) Tied to division/personnel performance statements/plans iv) Objectives linked to programs v) Performance objectives established F. Code of ethics established No Being developed as a part of the current strategic planning effort. Currently under development. Has been reviewed on an as-needed basis in the past. Not directly tied back to the strategic plan. No None formally None Complete the review of the organizational mission statement. Re-visit and revise the department’s vision statement. Develop a statement of organizational values. Complete the development of an updated strategic plan. Once complete, adopt the strategic plan formally. Publish the strategic plan on the department’s website. Establish a schedule for periodic review of the strategic plan. Complete identification of agency goals and objectives. Establish a schedule for periodic review of the goals and objectives. Establish personnel performance objectives. Develop a code of ethics. Key Recommendations: Complete the development of an updated strategic plan. Develop a code of ethics. Discussion CHFD conducted a strategic planning process resulting in a plan for 2009-2014 and is currently developing a new plan targeting 2013-2018. The new plan is not yet complete. The department's mission statement has been established. A vision statement is also in place but the fire chief is not satisfied and is currently reviewing the statement. A statement of organization values has not been articulated in writing and ESCI recommends that the statement be developed. Through its current strategic planning process, the department is identifying specific goals and objectives whereby it intends to meet its vision. These goals and objectives will provide guidance in decision-making and focus the agency's efforts on the most critical issues that will impact its success in 32 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions the future. In addition, the plan will provide the members with direction on the future and how they each fit in. CHFD is to be acknowledged for its proactive efforts in developing the Strategic Plan. However the process is incomplete and ESCI strongly recommends that, upon completion of this Master Plan, the recommendations herein be processed for implementation in the form of an updated Strategic Plan. Management Documents and Processes Similarly, an organization should establish appropriate documentation, policies, procedures, and identification of internal and external issues that affect the agency. Processes must also be established to address the flow of information and communication within the fire department as well as with its constituents. Figure 24: Survey Table – Foundational Documents and Processes Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Availability of SOPs, Rules and Regulations, Policies A. Copies of rules provided Available electronically i) Last date reviewed B. Copies of SOGs or guidelines available i) Regular update None Available electronically Not scheduled ii) Process for development of new SOGs No defined process iii) SOGs used in training evolutions Not routinely C. Policy manual available i) Reviewed for consistency Conduct scheduled review and updating of rules and regulations. Schedule periodic review of Standard Operating Guidelines. Identify a written process for the development and adoption of new SOGs. Regularly incorporate SOGs into training evolutions and scenarios. No policy manual but a rules and regulations manual is available electronically. Inconsistently ii) Reviewed for legal mandates No iii) Training on policies provided Limited Establish a practice of regular update of rules and regulations. Any foundational documents should be subjected to legal review. Provide training on rules and regulations content. 33 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components Critical Issues A. Critical issues are identified i) First critical issue ii) Second critical issue iii) Third critical issue iv) Internal evaluation of critical issues Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Informally only Personnel retention/lack of experience Lack of training ground Resource deployment (Station 212 placement). Not a formally structured process but discussed at semi-annual officers meetings. Establish a personnel retention and succession planning process, based on a structured professional development program. Explore opportunities for cooperative development of a training facility in collaboration with neighboring agencies. Review and re-evaluate current facility and personnel deployment. Challenges of the Future A. Challenges are identified i) First challenge ii) Second challenge iii) Third challenge Apparatus replacement planning and funding. Service delivery changes, primarily EMS related as a result of changes in Medicare, ACA, etc. Increasing regional collaboration. Complete the development of a long-range capital replacement plan. Use this master plan and other resources to prepare for anticipated EMS service delivery challenges. Assertively explore opportunities for functional service delivery collaboration with neighboring agencies. Internal and External Communications A. Internal communications i) Regularly scheduled staff meetings (fire department) ii) Written staff meeting minutes iii) Memos iv) Member newsletter v) Member forums vi) Open door policy vii) Bulletin board 34 Weekly staff meeting with on duty BC, EMS chief, fire marshal, deputy chief and fire chief. Monthly meeting with on duty officers. Also a quarterly shift meeting with all on duty. There are also semi-annual meetings with all officers for a full day. No. BC may take notes and distribute. Email None Quarterly meeting with all on duty personnel serves as a community forum Yes Yes Continue current efforts to enhance communication via multiple meetings, applying care to avoid excessive meeting or a schedule that is not sustainable. Record and post minutes of staff meetings. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Comments and Recommendations viii) Vertical communication path clearly identified Loosely defined in departmental rules. Formalize the definition of the organization’s communications path in the rules and regulations. ix) E-mail x) Employee mail boxes xi) Voice mail xii) Issues taskforce B. External Communications Used extensively. No All members have voice mail box. None Survey Components i) Community newsletter ii) Website iii) Advisory committee(s) iv) Complaint process City news only that is sent with water bill. Yes, well structured. None Consider development of citizens’ advisory committees, as needed No internal process, but defined by state law. v) Social media (Facebook/Twitter) Yes vi) Community survey vii) Local community planning organizations None Establish clear rules for the use of social networking. None Key Recommendations: Conduct scheduled review and updating of rules and regulations. Assertively explore opportunities for functional service delivery collaboration with neighboring agencies. Formalize the definition of the organization’s communications path in the rules and regulations. Discussion Policies and Procedures CHFD policies and procedures are contained in a set of Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs), Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and Rules and Regulations. A City Policy Manual further defines guidance at the City level. A review of the rules, procedures, and guidelines reveals that they are well-developed and generally comprehensive. In addition, most indicate that they have been reviewed and/or revised recently, with review dates falling in 2012 and 2013. The periodic review is commendable and ESCI underscores the importance of establishing a regular schedule for future review of all foundational documents, which should be completed at least every three years. SOGs and SOPs are separated as two documents. They differ in their applicability to some extent and have been segregated intentionally. However, doing so makes it confusing for an employee to know where to go to find guidance. ESCI recommends that the two be combined into a single document. 35 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Critical Issues The process of taking time periodically to list the issues that are facing an organization can be invaluable as a checkpoint for the agency as it moves forward. Doing so on a periodic basis is recommended. In the course of ESCI’s fieldwork, the fire chief was asked to identify critical issues and challenges that face the organization. The critical issues identified are listed in the table above. A primary concern is that of retention of current employees, which are often lost to other larger or higher paying fire departments. Coupled with the issue is the need for succession planning to address the future retirements that are predicted. ESCI advises the establishment of a broadly based professional development program that will prepare and encourage employees to move forward in the organization. Information on programs is available upon request. Also identified was the need for an appropriate training facility. Constructing a training facility in compliance with industry standards is a costly undertaking and one that should not be borne on a standalone basis. The development of a facility, combined with the on-going cost of operating and maintaining it, should be approached as a cooperative effort, designed and constructed in collaboration with regional partners. The initiative is viewed as one of the most important, and achievable, ways to further develop cooperative efforts. Finally, the placement and staffing deployment of Station 212 was identified as a concern in multiple interviews. In the Service Delivery and Performance Section of this report, ESCI evaluates the current positioning and staffing approach and, later in the report, identifies future strategies related to the station. Challenges Also discussed during ESCI’s fieldwork were challenges that face CHFD today. Apparatus replacement planning was listed as one concern. ESCI underscores the critical importance of appropriate and full comprehensive capital asset replacement planning, given that fire stations and fire apparatus represent a substantial expense and have readily predictable life expectancies and replacement costs. The matter is discussed further in the Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Planning section, as follows. Changes in service delivery needs can be expected to occur, many of which can be anticipated in relation to EMS services such as National Medicare and Affordable Care Act initiatives, along with other influences. It will be essential that CHFD take a forward-looking approach to meeting changing demands and carefully monitor changes as they develop. Staying in front of these changes and engaging local health care and other service providers will help ensure appropriate and beneficial services are identified, provided, and appropriately compensated. Increasing partnerships and collaboration was a repeatedly mentioned theme. The City has a sincere interest in working more closely with its neighbors and the fire department has taken some solid steps in that regard, specifically by developing a shared fire station with Grand Prairie. While a Cooperative Efforts Feasibility Study is beyond the scope of this project, ESCI recognizes multiple opportunities for 36 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill to develop far more advanced shared initiatives including numerous functional strategies as well as operational collaboration and, conceivably, various other forms of merger and consolidation. Decision makers are strongly encouraged to consider future approaches to regional cooperative service delivery. Record Keeping and Documentation In any organization, documentation of activities is of paramount concern. The following table reviews the practices that are in place in the department. Figure 25: Survey Table – Record Keeping and Documentation Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Document Control A. Process for public access Request process in place per established statutes. Limited hard copies, kept in file B. Hard copy files protected cabinets in offices. Not generally Take steps to secure hard copy files. locked. Regular backup process is in place. C. Computer files backed up Password protected. Security A. Building security All buildings are locked after hours. Secure offices when not occupied or B. Office security Not always secured. during non-business hours. C. Computer security Password protection is in place. D. Vehicle security Limited locking capability. E. Capital inventory maintained Yes. System and process is currently i) Asset security system used being updated. Annual, associated with the budget ii) Inventory interval process. F. Monetary controls used Petty cash on-hand; locked in front i) Cash access controls office. Receipts mandatory. Battalion Chiefs and above are ii) Credit card controls issued City credit cards. Receipts mandatory. Purchase order process is only in Use caution and apply appropriate place for expenditures over $3,000. financial controls, particularly in iii) Purchasing controls Bid requirements based on regard to open accounts. minimum expense levels. Open accounts somewhat flexible. Reporting and Records A. Records kept by computer i) Type of platform PC ii) Operating system Windows based system. MS Office. B. Periodic report to elected officials i) Financial report Only reports maintained via finance. ii) Management report No 37 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components iii) Operational report iv) Distributed to others C. Annual report produced i) Distributed to others D. Required records maintained i) Incident reports ii) Patient care reports iii) Exposure records iv) SCBA testing v) Hose vi) Ladder vii) Pump viii) Breathing air Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Weekly report is posted on the website and sent to the City Manager. On the website. Yes Distributed to council and publicized. Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Yes Yes Process is in place. Annual FIT and flow testing. Annual Annual, aerial and ground ladders. Annual Quarterly Information Technology A. Computer platform B. Maintenance/IT support provided by C. Computer security Windows City IT department. A large portion of IT maintenance is done by FD personnel. Trying to shift more to City IT. Adequate Transition IT service responsibility from the fire department to the City IT department. Key Recommendations: Use caution and apply appropriate financial controls, particularly in regard to open accounts. Transition IT service responsibility from the fire department to the City IT department. Discussion CHFD’s reports and records practices are generally appropriate, with a few recommendations noted above. The importance of effective record keeping cannot be overstated and it was apparent from the data provided to ESCI in the course of this project that the agency has effective records management practices in place. It was noted that the majority of Information Technology (IT) services in the fire department are provided internally. Along with general record keeping, fire department personnel generally complete installation and maintenance of both software and hardware. As a result, valuable staff time is redirected to IT needs and consistency practices, equipment and software, and is not effectively coordinated with other City departments. Moving IT services to the City IT department is encouraged. Staffing and Personnel Management Although management and organization of an emergency services agency is important, the personnel that deliver those services are the backbone of the system. Without proper administrative and support 38 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions personnel to handle supervision, command and control, operational personnel may not be able to perform satisfactorily. Administrative and Support Staffing One of the primary responsibilities of a fire organization’s administration and support staff is to ensure that the operational entities of the organization have the ability and means to accomplish their responsibilities on an emergency incident. Efficient and effective administration and support are critical to the success of a fire agency. Like any other part of a fire department, administration and support require appropriate resources to function properly. Analyzing the administrative and support positions of a fire department facilitates an understanding of the relative number of resources committed to this important function. The appropriate balance of the administration and support components to the operational component is critical to the success of the department’s mission and responsibilities. This section reviews the staffing within CHFD and provides evaluation of the historical staffing performance. Figure 26: Survey Table – Administrative and Support Staffing Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Administration and Other Support Staff Increase delegation of primary A. Fire Chief 1 operational and administrative responsibilities. Increase authority and B. Deputy Fire Chief 1 accountability for operational and Emergency Management Oversight. C. Training Battalion Chief None handled by shift battalion chief. D. EMS Battalion Chief E. Fire Marshal F. Fire Inspector 1 1 1 G. Emergency Manager None handled by fire chief. H. Administrative Secretary I. Mechanic 1 None use City mechanics. Establish full time training position. Review personnel resource recommendations in the training section. Establish a dedicated emergency management coordinator position. Consider an analyst position to assist with program management, data evaluation, and technical administrative/financial functions currently being handled by the fire chief. Pursue Tri-Cities regional vehicle repair and maintenance services utilizing emergency vehicle technicians (EVT). 39 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components J. Total administrative & support staff K. Percent administrative & support to total Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations 6 8% Key Recommendations: Fire Chief should increase delegation of operational and administrative responsibilities. Add an analyst position to assist with program management, data evaluation, and technical administrative/financial functions currently being handled by the Fire Chief. Pursue Tri-Cities regional vehicle repair and maintenance services utilizing emergency vehicle technicians (EVT). Establish a dedicated emergency management coordinator position. Discussion ESCI notes that currently the level of administrative and support staffing represents 8 percent of CHFD total membership. It is our experience that typically effective administrative staffing totals range from 12 percent to 15 percent of agency totals. After reviewing the functions and responsibilities assigned to the work group, ESCI concludes that the number of FTEs assigned is below what is needed to appropriately accomplish the responsibilities of this division.3 A key component of the above conclusion relates to the fire chief’s position. The fire chief is tasked with multiple responsibilities, including emergency management, training oversight, support and logistic tasks, exceeding the capacity of one individual to address them all effectively. At the time of our fieldwork, ESCI learned that consideration was being given to a review of the current organizational structure, including the reallocation of these duties to designated personnel or the deputy fire chief where possible. ESCI concurs with that initiative. Fire Prevention The Fire Prevention functions of the CHFD appear to have a sufficient number of personnel assigned to match the inspection and enforcement workload. The primary new construction plan review function is handled by fire prevention staff with a third party contract agency handling large sprinkler and alarm system review, while the inspection and code compliance functions are situated within the fire department. This is an acceptable structure and is functioning at an above industry average rate of 88 percent annual inspection compliance with a 100 percent target. ESCI recommends peer and spot checks of contract plan review functions to ensure local standards and contract elements are met. 3 ESCI recognizes organizational goals, regulatory environment, and workload are the actual drivers that determine the number of administrative personnel required to deliver support services. The 12 to 15 percent ratio is the range ESCI typically sees in fire service organizations and is used for comparison purposes. 40 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Education of the public regarding relevant risks – including fire, disaster, and emergency medical – and their appropriate mitigation strategies is an essential component of a fire department’s mission. CHFD does have a defined public education strategy but there are not enough personnel resources dedicated to this effort to provide the desired level of service. ESCI encourages CHFD to evaluate this component of their overall prevention strategy and take the requisite steps to bolster this initiative. We also note that this is a very appropriate function wherein CHFD should consider a regional cooperative or consolidated strategy. The need to provide this service at the local and regional level justifies the need to establish a dedicated public education specialist or coordinator. Training CHFD assigns a shift battalion chief to the function of fire training. This places the functions of program needs assessment, design, coordination, and evaluation with the same single personnel resource that is also responsible for program delivery as well as shift operational and personnel responsibilities. This results in a significant workload and, as discussed further in the training section, ESCI encourages CHFD to reevaluate the resources and assign a dedicated position to this function. We also note that this is a very appropriate function wherein CHFD should consider an enhanced and formalized regional cooperative training strategy within their existing Tri-Cities cooperative services. All fire departments, nationally as well as within the Tri-Cities region, share essentially the same needs with regard to training their personnel. Further, the regional agencies respond to emergencies together via mutual aid procedures and, in the interest of safety of firefighters and effectiveness of response should be trained to common standards and practices. Finally, a regionalized, collaborative approach to training delivery, in addition to the benefits noted, can substantially reduce costs and increase efficiency of educational efforts. Emergency Management Currently, the City and CHFD are committed to the development of an appropriate strategy to deliver emergency management functions and services to their community. Within CHFD, the fire chief manages this function as part of “other duties.” CHFD and City officials acknowledge this issue and appear ready and willing to consider potential methodologies to best serve their constituency. To reach that goal, the City will need to place additional emphasis on the program, including that establishment of an emergency management oversight position, as is discussed later in this report. We note this also is a very appropriate function wherein CHFD should consider a regional cooperative approach to meeting emergency management needs. Administrative Support CHFD employs one FTE in an administrative support role; given the scope and depth of workload, this appears to be low. ESCI recommends the CHFD add an “Analyst” position or have one assigned by the City to assist with financial oversight, data collection and analysis, and project management currently being conducted by the fire chief and operational staff. We see this as a critical function in order for CHFD to strengthen their decisions and policy development through data-driven information. 41 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Emergency Response Staffing It takes an adequate and properly trained staff of emergency responders to put the appropriate emergency apparatus and equipment to its best use in mitigating incidents. Insufficient staffing at an operational scene decreases the effectiveness of the response and increases the risk of injury to all individuals involved. Tasks that must be performed at a fire can be broken down into two key components – life safety and fire flow. Life safety tasks are based on the number of building occupants, their location, status, and ability to take self-preservation action. Life safety related tasks involve search, rescue, and evacuation of victims. The fire flow component involves delivering sufficient water to extinguish the fire and create an environment within the building that allows entry by firefighters. The number and types of tasks needing simultaneous action will dictate the minimum number of firefighters required to combat different types of fires. In the absence of adequate personnel to perform concurrent action, the command officer must prioritize the tasks and complete some in chronological order, rather than concurrently. These tasks include: • • • • Command Scene safety Search and rescue Fire attack • • • • Water supply Pump operation Ventilation Back-up/rapid intervention The first 15 minutes is the most crucial period in the suppression of a fire. How effectively and efficiently firefighters perform during this period has a significant impact on the overall outcome of the event. This general concept is applicable to fire, rescue, and medical situations. Critical tasks must be conducted in a timely manner in order to control a fire or to treat a patient. CHFD is responsible for assuring that responding companies are capable of performing all of the described tasks in a prompt, efficient, and safe manner. The following table lists CHFD’s emergency response staffing configuration. Figure 27: Survey Table – Emergency Response Staffing Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Emergency Service Staff – Fire A. Battalion Chief 3 FTE/1 per shift B. Captain 12 FTE/4 per shift C. Engineers/Drivers 12 FTE/4 per shift D. Firefighters 45 FTE/15 per shift Emergency Service Staff – EMS A. Shift Paramedic 68 B. EMT-B 2 C. EMT-I None D. 40-hour EMT-P None E. Total operational staff 70 F. Fire department total 78 G. Percent of operational officers to 1:3 firefighters 42 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components Use of Career and Volunteer Personnel A. Career scheduling methodology i) Length of normal duty period ii) FLSA period iv) Residency requirements Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Yes Yes Yes Yes iv) Specialized rescue Yes, rope rescue. v) Fire prevention inspections Yes vi) Emergency management Yes vii) Public education Yes Yes. First Responder level. C. Volunteer services i) Chaplain ii) Civilian administrative volunteer Responsibilities and Activity Levels of Personnel A. Assignment of routine duties: i) By position ii) By areas of personal interest B. Special duties assigned by: i) Subject matter preference ii) Duty assignment C. Work groups/Committees i) EMS quality management ii) Chaplain Enhance special operations at tri City and mutual aid group Engage engine companies in the fire higher risk/assembly inspections. Engage suppression personnel in the disaster, mitigation, preparedness and recovery programs. Consider EM components integration with FP inspections. Involve career staff in the delivery of public education programs. Explore enhanced partnerships for education and outreach programs (e.g. PD, non-profits, public works). Conduct training with partner agencies providing haz-mat team response. Yes No Yes Yes Wildland, rope, etc. Yes No Yes No iii) Training No iv) Safety No v) Building development Comments and Recommendations 24 hour days 24 hours on, 48 hours off 56 hour work week/24 day FLSA cycle None B. Operational career services i) Fire suppression ii) EMS/rescue, first response iii) EMS, advanced life support viii) Hazardous materials response (level) Evaluation of Current Conditions Establish regional EMS committee. Establish training advisory committee. Committee should establish training elements and create an annual training calendar. Assign Officer and establish a safety committee to meet on regular basis with specified authority and responsibility. Yes, as needed. 43 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components vi) Standards/SOGs Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Comments and Recommendations No Establish a policy-participation and decision making process that includes all levels of the organization. Key Recommendations: Enhance special operations at tri-City and mutual aid group. Engage engine companies in the fire higher risk/assembly inspections. Explore enhanced partnerships for education and outreach programs (e.g. PD, non-profits, public works). Establish a policy-participation and decision making process that includes all levels of the organization. Discussion Considerable ongoing local, regional, and national discussion and debate draws a strong focus and attention to the matter of firefighter staffing. Frequently, this discussion is set in the context of firefighter safety. While there are published national standards regarding firefighter staffing, they generally speak in terms of the number of firefighters assigned to a particular response apparatus, often characterized as a “minimum of four personnel per engine company.” ESCI notes that the more critical issue is the number of firefighters that are assembled at the scene of an incident in conjunction with the scope and magnitude of the job tasks expected of them, regardless of the type or number of vehicles upon which they arrive. It is important to understand that the assembly of firefighters on an incident, also called an “Effective Firefighting Force” or “Effective Response Force,” is a determination that is made at the community level based on risk, capability, and citizen expectations. There is not mandated requirement, though there are standards that are discussed in detail in this report. In the Service Delivery section, resource concentration is evaluated in detail, finding that CHFD is capable of establishing an effective response in a timely manner in many areas of the response area, but also challenged to do so in other areas. Another means of comparison, also used on a national basis, is that of measuring the number of firefighters on staff per 1,000 population of the service area. The following figure illustrates the current comparison of CHFD staffing with both national and regional norms. 4 4 Data drawn from NFPA reports "U.S. Fire Department Profile- 2011" and "U.S. Fire Loss- 2011" (most recent available). 44 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 28: Firefighters per 1,000 Population 1.8 1.6 1.53 1.46 1.4 1.2 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Regional Median National Median Cedar Hill Fire Dept At minimum daily staffing levels, CHFD has 17 emergency personnel available to respond to all emergencies. CHFD has the capability to respond to one house fire at a time but the likelihood of simultaneous structures fires is low. As will be seen later in this report, a majority of the department’s workload is medical in nature and, given the current resources; the department is situated to handle existing workload. Using this comparison, CHFD appears to appropriately staff each of its engine and quint companies. ESCI notes that, given the slight lag in the current regional staffing ratio as well as the projected growth for the west side of the Cedar Hill community, CHFD should begin an incremental approach to increasing response staffing in the context of the projected growth and the deployment analysis. Given the limited training and support function resources currently in place, and the incremental growth in revenue that often lags actual real estate development, we recommend CHFD avoid attempting to staff an entire fire station facility at a single point in time, but rather build resources and capacity incrementally to parallel revenue and service demand growth. Personnel Management The following review relates to the baseline personnel management components typically found in an appropriately administered organization. Figure 29: Survey Table – Personnel and Staffing Management Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Disciplinary Process Update and revise policy in A. Disciplinary policy established Yes, department policy. cooperation with HR and Labor. B. Disciplinary process Policy communicated 45 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components C. Appeal process provided i) Recent litigation ii) Pending litigation Counseling Services A. Critical incident stress debriefing B. Employee assistance program C. Intervention program Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Appeal to fire chief. N/A N/A Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Available through EAP. City program; voluntary and referral. Random drug testing with positive results = termination Voluntary request for assistance = provided via EAP. Application and Recruitment Process A. Recruitment program Slight amount of recruiting at local paramedic classes. Flyers on occasion. No established comprehensive recruitment program. Advertise, fill out on-line application, and submit certifications. HR and deputy chief reviews apps i) Qualification check and make first cut. Bring background packet to written test. Fire marshal conducts background ii) Reference check checks, references included. Talk to candidates at physical agility iii) Background check test. Receive packets. Local design; internal validation not iv) Physical standards established currently done. No time standard. Pass/Fail v) Knowledge testing Written Yes, 5-person board. Chief’s vi) Interview interview after background. vii) Medical exam required Yes viii) Psychological exam required Yes + polygraph Testing, Measuring and Promotion Process Yes, annual company level skills e.g. A. Periodic competence testing air pack-timed drill. No. The practice has been B. Periodic physical competence undertaken in the past, but testing discontinued. Explore implementation of a comprehensive recruitment program either at the City level, or for public safety, or for CHFD. Adopt entry-level physical ability testing using the CPAT model or similar. B. Application process C. Periodic performance review Yes, annual. Desire to look at more effective evaluation criteria. D. Promotional testing Non-Civil Service, locally developed criteria. Scored by outside department subject matter experts. Health and Safety A. Medical standards established 46 Consider test validation process by third party subject matter expert. Restore the practice of annual physical competence testing. Implement established and validated evaluation criteria and process. Develop validating criteria and process for promotional testing. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components i) Periodic medical exam Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Annual; May-June annually; NFPA 1582 B. Safety committee established No i) Membership N/A ii) Meetings N/A iii) Function N/A iv) Meeting minutes N/A Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Develop and implement an agencywide safety committee. Select diverse safety committee membership; representing various groups, interests, and functions. Safety committee should meet at least quarterly. Safety committee should review accidents, injuries, near-miss incidents and workplace safety suggestions; report analysis and results to fire chief; promote member safety self-awareness. Key Recommendations: Explore implementation of a comprehensive recruitment program either at the City level, or for public safety, or for CHFD. Adopt entry-level physical ability testing using the CPAT model or similar. Restore the practice of annual physical competence testing. Implement established and validated evaluation criteria and process. Develop and implement an agency-wide safety committee. Discussion The personnel management functions for CHFD are handled primarily through the City’s human resources department in coordination with fire department management staff. As noted elsewhere, ESCI urges establishment of a regular review and updating of applicable fire department human resource rules, policies, and procedures to ensure currency and effective processes. Recruitment Currently, there appears to be no formal or structured recruitment program for or within CHFD, either for entry level or promotional opportunities. ESCI recommends CHFD pursue development of a professional, media-friendly recruitment program for both entry level and promotional opportunities. This program could be part of a citywide initiative, a public safety specific program, or a CHFD program exclusively. CHFD should not rule out the potential of developing such a program in concert with Tri-City partnering jurisdictions that share similar needs. Physical Ability Screening Currently, CHFD uses an internally designed physical standards screening process with internal validation. ESCI recommends CHFD explore adoption of an established and widely validated program. 47 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) and the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) teamed up through the Fire Service Joint Labor Management Wellness/Fitness Initiative to develop the IAFF/IAFC Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT).5 The Task Force successfully developed the Fire Service Joint Labor-Management Wellness-Fitness Initiative in 1997 to address the wellness and fitness needs in the fire service. In conjunction with this effort, the Task Force discovered that people were hired who would not be physically capable of a successful career in the fire service. The Task Force proceeded to develop the CPAT, resulting in a more consistent and valid test for hiring of candidate fire fighters. By virtue of the CPAT design and the agreements negotiated in its development, the CPAT is not authorized for use in the testing/screening of incumbent firefighting personnel. ESCI recommends CHFD restore annual physical fitness competency testing and, in conjunction and collaboration with the TriCity partners, develop a physical ability screening process to ensure responder fitness and career longevity. CHFD is commended for its establishment of annual medical health screenings in accordance with NFPA 1582. Safety Committee CHFD does not currently have a safety committee in place. ESCI strongly encourages the department to move expeditiously to design, staff, and implement this important function. We recommend a diverse representation from across the department; ensuring representation by shift, rank, function, and interest, and including representation from non-uniformed and staff members as well. The committee should meet at least quarterly and include in its mission raising awareness and modifying member behaviors that will result in a safe work environment. Additionally, the committee should review all accidents, injuries, near-miss incidents, and workplace safety suggestions. They should analyze the information before them and report their findings to the fire chief. They should foster member safety education and encourage members’ safety self-awareness. The committee should maintain regular and open meeting times and locations; minutes of the meetings should be recorded and made available to the entire department. 5 http://www.iaff.org/hs/CPAT/cpat_index.html. 48 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SUPPORT AND SYSTEMS OVERSIGHT EMS incidents constitute 69 percent of all responses for CHFD. CHFD serves as the primary first responding and ambulance transportation agency providing advanced life support to the City of Cedar Hill. CHFD has a long and established history as the first fire agency in the region to provide ambulance services. This integrated first responder and ambulance transportation system represents a large and vital component of the overall emergency services provided to the City of Cedar Hill. The recommendations are intended to ensure the CHFD EMS program provides a high level of management, performance, quality, and integration of system components. Figure 30: Survey Table – EMS Medical Control and Quality Assurance Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Medical Control A. EMS Service Delivery Level Four ALS engines, three ambulances. By Medical Director, Texas Emergency B. Written protocols adopted Medical Consultant, Inc. Conduct monthly chart review with Not on a regular basis. established trending and targeted C. Case reviews conducted regularly Verbal most of time. data elements determined by the medical director. New hires spend two days in ER with medical director, up to 10 shifts as a 3rd person on medic, 10 shifts as primary medic with FTO. Two-week D. EMS Officer conducts in service orientation with one day spent with training EMS Chief. Each new hire must complete adult and pediatric megacode. Task book completed for each shift. Q.A./Q.I. – (Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement) Establish an internal peer review committee to review EMS incidents and trends to make EMS system recommendations. Committee to take Yes, periodically looks at new a lead role in the formation of patient A. Internal committee techniques and equipment. Develop documentation standards, transfer of new equipment standards. care and EMS operational policies. Committee should also compare local data against appropriate benchmark criteria. Implement lessons learned and unusual occurrence lessons learned B. Lessons learned are shared? Not currently. procedure and communication methodology. C. Medical program director Yes, attends all meetings. participates? 49 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components D. Charts spot evaluated for accuracy? Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Comments and Recommendations No Establish program to review 100% of charts for completion and submission within the required time frame. Procedure should include spot checks of patient care reports and supporting documentation on a random basis that ensures all paramedic charts are reviewed periodically. Key Recommendation: Conduct monthly chart review with established trending and targeted data elements determined by the medical director. Establish an internal peer review committee to review EMS incidents and trends to make EMS system recommendations. Committee to take a lead role in the formation of patient documentation standards, transfer of care and EMS operational policies. Committee should also compare local data against appropriate benchmark criteria. Discussion EMS Program Supervision Currently, a single command staff member, holding the rank of battalion chief, predominantly oversees the department’s advanced life support and EMS program. This presents challenges as it relates to all aspects of supervision of an advanced life support responder program. Issues such as required on going continuing medical education, quality improvement, equipment and clinical research and development, infectious disease management, and on-scene supervision all compete for supervisory attention. The department may consider exploring on-shift EMS supervision, given that EMS represents a significant amount of the call volume. Some options may be to utilize on duty field training officers /preceptors, senior paramedics or elevating the incumbent battalion chiefs to paramedic level. This will address span of control issues, shift ALS supervision, and assist with program management of EMS. EMS Medical Direct and Clinical Protocols CHFD receives medical oversight under contract from Texas Emergency Medical Incorporated. The department’s EMS battalion chief works closely with the office of medical director in providing input in medical procedures, interventions, and protocols. The medical director is active in emergency medical services research and clinical innovations. EMS Quality Improvement The department’s EMS battalion chief and medical director review some EMS reports in the records management system and currently review data on a targeted or as needed basis. The EMS battalion chief and or medical director provide informal feedback to crews. The department also participates in regularly scheduled quality meetings with the medical director. 50 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions The department, through its medical director, is able to report some community out-of-hospital outcomes. However, there exists further opportunity to identify key performance areas that are essential to successful outcomes of EMS cardiac arrest survival and other system outcome performance indicators. Examples of such outcome-based measurements may include utilizing the well-accepted Utstein reporting template, STEMI, stroke and trauma system outcomes, reduction of pain scores for cardiac patients, and improvement in shortness of breath in difficulty breathing populations. The department should establish a peer review and committee process that makes recommendations of reports and trends for medical director review and establish monthly reporting metrics to include key performance indicators for EMS activities. Proper medical control, oversight, and proactive quality measures should include a prospective, real time, and retrospective elements. Prospective (Pre-Incident) Medical Control The EMS chief and/or assigned staff should participate in the development of local and state policy and procedures as well as data collection elements and system design. Staff should ensure the current and future needs of the CHFD and the growing service area are addressed. This will reduce the risk of the department being mandated to adhere to standards and system requirements that may be lacking input, customization, or key service elements for the CHFD service area. Concurrent (Real-Time) Medical Control The EMS chief should ensure the EMS system provides real-time feedback with relevant training and education. Having assigned and trained staff that can observe the integrated first responder and ambulance transportation system will provide valuable data on areas of strengths, deficiencies, and opportunities for the CHFD. Early identification of trends and field performance will reduce potential for clinical mistakes and provide for early intervention with responding personnel to create a proactive and cooperative learning environment. Retrospective (Post Incident) Medical Control The EMS chief and/or assigned staff should implement and monitor an internal review committee and retrospective medical control measures. The CHFD should implement a PEER review committee that performs random patient care report reviews and evaluates calls and trends to offer constructive feedback and educational improvement programs to individuals and the department as a whole. This committee should also take a leadership role in the development of patient documentation, transfer of care, and EMS operational policies. The CHFD should participate in appropriate pilot projects and focused studies approved by the department and medical director. Audits and study results need to be reported in a manner that clearly demonstrates the benefits to the patients and communities served. EMS System Integrity The department participates in a two-tiered EMS oversight system. First, the State of Texas provides statutory authority that enables counties and EMS service providers to establish local treatment protocols, EMS certification and other system components. Secondly, the CHFD under the direction of the medical director adopts localized policies and procedures to meet the needs of the Cedar Hill. These requirements are adhered to by the CHFD and managed and monitored at the department level. 51 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 31: Survey Table – EMS System Integrity and Logistical Support Services Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Certification/Recertification Provide periodic scenario-based Four hours from regional educator training. Implement integrated A. Ongoing training & evaluation provided monthly. Department certification tracking and notification system in place? handles recertification/licensure system with other department records. certifications and licenses. B. Skills assessment performed by Provide regularly scheduled skills Occasionally qualified evaluators? assessment at specified intervals. C. Recertification exams administered Implement regional Tri-Cities qualified No by qualified testing center? testing center. Medical Supplies Establish and implement a Tri-Cities Multiple points of ordering and A. Inventory controls in place EMS purchasing and restocking contact. consortium with single point ordering. Passed recent DEA audit, but disposal B. Controlled meds security program needs work. System in place but needs increased Establish a Tri-Cities capital EMS C. Replenishment system in place inventory accuracy and equipment inventory, maintenance accountability. and replacement program. Install temperature control D. Temperature controlled capabilities on engines or carry On ambulances, but not on engines. environment for liquids temperature sensitive supplies only on ambulances. Key Recommendation: Provide periodic scenario-based training. Implement integrated certification tracking and notification system with other department certifications and licenses. Establish and implement a Tri-Cities EMS purchasing and restocking consortium with single point ordering. Discussion Maintenance and currency of EMS certification, training, and equipment records is a vital component of an EMS program. Providing centralized control and monitoring of these functions reduces the risk of lapsed certifications and unnecessary costs of training and equipment to meet State of Texas requirements. The process of initial certification and recertification involves a variety of education and performance requirements at the department and state level. ESCI’s review of the current certification, EMS training records, and equipment tracking identified a number of areas that warrant review and system modifications or enhancements. 52 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Certification and Recertification Recordkeeping The department has maintained training and certification records in accordance with existing CHFD recordkeeping systems and policies. ESCI recommends CHFD centralize the responsibility for certification and EMS training and continuing education records under the EMS battalion chief as a single point of contact and centralized recordkeeping for all EMS certification, recertification, and continuing education records. ESCI further recommends CHFD conduct a detailed audit of all EMS continuing education and certification records to ensure currency and compliance. There needs to be established written policies that establish the procedures for certification and continuing education recordkeeping requirements by the EMS chief and individual personnel. Training and Continuing Education The CHFD provides EMS training in a decentralized manner and utilizes supplements training with a centralized classroom instruction. Skills testing is a crucial part of ensuring EMS personnel have a proper understanding of their scope of practice and protocols. Scenario based training ensures personnel have an adequate understanding of their EMS roles and responsibilities with the capacity to translate that from an understanding to demonstrated hands-on skills performance. ESCI recommends CHFD conduct half (50%) of EMS training in a centralized classroom environment. Hands-on, skill-based testing and training should be a significant portion of the classroom training requirements for BLS and ALS personnel. CHFD should also provide scenario-based training to simulate actual field conditions and enhance operational effectiveness and coordination between assigned engine company and ambulance personnel. Supplies and Materials Management CHFD maintains disposable EMS supplies in each station that are periodically inventoried. Inventories are not currently based on utilization or anticipated call or patient volume. There are differing levels of restock occurring from a single ordering point and authority. Heart monitors/defibrillators are on each apparatus but are not separately maintained as part of an amortized internal service replacement fund. ESCI recommends station supply par levels be established based on historical volume and utilization. Regular inventories should be conducted with single-point ordering and distribution coordinated by the EMS chief. ESCI recommends the CHFD establish a capital inventory and replacement program for EMS capital equipment with a regularly scheduled inventory. An amortized capital replacement program should be established that is annually funded to ensure adequate revenue exists for replacement of these items when they have reached their projected equipment life cycle. 53 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Emergency Management (EM) is the discipline of preparing for, responding to, recovering from, and mitigating natural and man-made disasters. The organization and management of resources is the responsibility of the EM director and includes dealing with all aspects of emergencies. The intent of EM programs is four-fold as mentioned above: preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation and these components of the program are cyclical in nature. The intent of this section of the report is to provide an overview of the CHFD EM functions as they relate to compliance, planning, documentation, coordination, communications, and facilities and equipment. National Incident Management System (NIMS) Compliance Compliance with NIMS requirements begins by adopting the Incident Command System (ICS) and NIMS principles and policies. In accordance with Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-5, the adoption of NIMS is a requirement to receive federal preparedness funding. The following figure summarizes current emergency planning efforts: Figure 32: Survey Table – Emergency Management Planning Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Preparedness and Response (EOP, EAP, RMP, radiological preparedness) Integrate the City emergency EM Plan. Annexes in place to meet operations plan with community A. Plans/documents Texas advanced criteria. wildfire protection plan elements as appropriate. B. Date developed 2005, advanced level around 2009. C. Adopted by elected officials Yes D. Published and available No . Yes, reviewed every 5 years and E. Periodic review submitted to TX DOEM for approval. Recovery and Mitigation (HMP) Annex P included in the City plan Include specific mitigation measures A. Plans/documents part of the Dallas County mitigation in local plan for CHFD impacts. plan B. Date developed 2014 C. Published and available Yes, to those included in the plan. D. Periodic review Every 5 years. Consider specific hazard E. Hazards identified Generally identification. Table top annually in accordance F. Plans exercised with TX DOEM requirements for grant eligibility. Key Recommendation: 54 Integrate the City emergency operations plan with community wildfire protection plan elements as appropriate. Include specific mitigation measures in local plan for CHFD impacts. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Discussion Within CHFD, the fire chief manages this function as one of many additionally assigned duties, which contributes to not having enough time for EM responsibilities. Due to limited staffing resources, fundamental EM planning is also limited. Plans such as a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan and Community Wildfire Protection Plan are either insufficiently developed or not integrated in a comprehensive mitigation plan. While general template hazard categories are identified the CHFD should develop and exercise specific Cedar Hill hazard mitigation annexes. It was also noted that the disaster mitigation plans are not widely distributed for access, review, and utilization by City and CHFD personnel. It is recommended an appropriate distribution, review, and exercise policy be established to maximize plan familiarization, effectiveness, and implementation.6 Figure 33: Survey Table – Emergency Management Resources Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Resources 1 fire chief, shared EM Administrator with surrounding Consider dedicated EM for regional A. Internal personnel resources cities for plan maintenance not EM needs. operations. B. External personnel resources CERT Teams, NCTCOG regional 16 i) Professional organizations county asset, coordinating agency, TDEM. Blackboard connect-phone ii) Community notification system notification system, outdoor siren warning (15 sirens). Emergency Management Critical Issues A. Critical issues are identified Trained City personnel to operate i) First critical issue EM functions, NIMS. ii) Second critical issue Communication with citizens. iii) Third critical issue Resource Management. Emergency Management Challenges of the Future A. Challenges are identified i) First challenge Resources to conduct training. ii) Second challenge Communicating with citizens. Mass shelter capabilities iii) Third challenge (facilities do not exist). Key Recommendation: 6 Consider dedicated EM for regional EM needs. http://emergency.portal.texas.gov/. 55 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Discussion The City has not provided the personnel resources needed to deliver emergency management services adequately. As stated, the fire chief manages this function as part of other duties. This approach, while potentially appropriate for interim or temporary situations, is insufficient to address the scope and content of this important public safety function. While the federal (FEMA) and Texas State government make significant planning and grant resources available to cities and counties, the majority of the work must be carried out locally and is labor intensive. The CHFD is uniquely positioned to conduct these emergency management functions on a regional basis with the already existing Tri-Cities cooperative. ESCI recommends that CHFD and City officials engage the Tri-City partners and elicit support for enhanced staffing and funding for the program. To adequately address the preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation needs of Cedar Hill, personnel resources should be assigned to ensure (1) development and regular review of the plan, (2) training of all City employees as to their roles and responsibilities and (3) regular and progressive exercising of the plan with “table top,” “partial,” and “full-scale” exercise activities. To accomplish the above, the establishment of an emergency management coordinator position is recommended. SERVICE DELIVERY AND PERFORMANCE The delivery of fire suppression, rescue and emergency medical services is no more effective than the sum of its parts. It requires efficient notification of an emergency and rapid response from well-located facilities in appropriate apparatus with a sufficient number of well-trained personnel following a wellpracticed plan of action. This section of the report provides an analysis of the current service delivery components of CHFD. Figure 34: Survey Table – Service Delivery and Performance Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Component Comments and Recommendations Observations Demand Current Service Demand Information is tracked and recorded Continue tracking incident data. i) Tracked by incident type and in RMS. NFIRS reports submitted to Develop consistent methodology for temporal variation state and FEMA tracking service demand. ii) Geographical call distribution Recorded in RMS iii) Demand zones based on Establish demand zones based on None population population, demand, and risk. Distribution Facilities i) Total area protected Approximately 36 square miles Number of fire stations ii) Number of stations staffed 4 iii) Number of stations unstaffed 0 Apparatus iv) Apparatus appropriate to risk (fire, medical, special) Staffing 56 Engine/quints at 211,212, 213 and 214. ALS transport medics at 211, 212, and 213. Develop plan to optimize deployment of apparatus. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Component v) Adequate for initial attack of predominant risk Concentration Effective Response Force i) Defined by call type ii) Actual performance monitored Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations 3 man minimum staffing on engine/quints. At least 1 paramedic on all first out fire apparatus-2 paramedics on transport medics. Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Defined in run cards. No response goal for full first alarm. Monitor response time for arrival of full first alarm. Information in RMS-not tracked. Monitor and record reliability information. Utilize data to make informed decisions. Reliability Workload Analysis i) Unit hour utilization ii) Failure rate by station area or response zone iii) Concurrent calls Performance Response Performance i) Call processing time Information in RMS-not tracked. Information in RMS-not tracked. 02:00 in 2013. Tracked at 911 center. Data provided on request. ii) Turnout time 01:29 in 2013. iii) Travel time 06:36 in 2013. 09:04 in 2013. Total Response TimeReceived at 911 to first on scene. Response goal stated in Strategic Plan. iv) Total response time Response time goals i) By response zone ii) By incident type iii) Actual response performance documented and published Mutual/Auto Aid Given/Received Balance i) Automatic aid incorporated in run cards/dispatch procedures ii) Inter-agency training and SOPs No response zones established. NFPA 1710 goals for fire and EMS responses. Annual Activity Report and Strategic Plan-available on web page. Work with 911 center to improve call processing performance Turnout time is satisfactory, but there is room for improvementcontinue monitoring. Explore alternative station location or additional station to reduce travel time. Work to improve response performance. Consider Response goals by demand zones (urban/suburban). Consider developing a Standard of Cover document. Keep current on web page. Given-604, Received-511. Automatic aid with drop border protocols for closest unit dispatch in specific area. Continue working with neighboring jurisdictions to strengthen and improve aid agreements. Look for other opportunities for cost savings through cooperative efforts. Periodic inter-agency training, county wide multiagency disaster training. 57 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Component iii) Signed mutual aid agreements and county plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations CHFD participates in county-wide plan (Dallas and Ellis County). Signed mutual aid agreements with all aid partners. Comments and Recommendations Discussion Demand In the demand analysis, ESCI reviews current and historical service demand by incident type and temporal variation for the CHFD. GIS software is used to provide a geographic display of demand within the study area. National Fire Incident Records System (NFIRS) data, incident response data, and apparatus response data collected by the department is used in this section of the report. The following figures demonstrate historical service demand for the last five full calendar years. Figure 35: CHFD Historical Service Demand, 2009 through 2013 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EMS 3498 3645 3798 4019 4147 Other 1484 1369 1446 1470 1663 Fire 211 207 237 182 199 Total 5193 5221 5481 5671 6009 The previous figure demonstrates that CHFD service demand increased every year from 2009 through 2013. Using the NFIRS incident type definitions, ESCI categorizes incidents as “Fires” (structures, vehicle, brush, any 100 series incident in NFIRS), “EMS” (all calls for medical service including MVA’s and rescues, any 300 series incident in NFIRS), and “Other” (false alarms, hazmat incidents, service calls, all other NFIRS incident series). The next figure demonstrates the percent change in service demand from 2009 through 2013, summarized by fire, EMS, and other incident categories. 58 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 36: CHFD Percent Change by Incident Category, 2009 through 2013 Total Percent Change 2009-2013 Incident Category Percent Change Fire Other EMS Total Demand -5.7% 12.1% 18.6% 15.7% Overall service demand increased by 15.7 percent during the time period displayed. Fire incidents decreased during this time; and EMS and other service demand increased between 2009 and 2013. Figure 37: CHFD Service Demand by Incident Category, 2013 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Fires Other EMS 3.3% 27.7% 69.0% Figure 37 displays the nature of service demand in the CHFD study area in 2013. EMS incidents represent the largest portion (69 percent) of 2013 service demand. Only slightly over 3 percent of CHFD 2013 incidents were fires. The data displayed in the previous figures reflect a nationwide trend for all hazard fire jurisdictions, especially jurisdictions such as CHFD that provide EMS transport services. Temporal Variation It is also useful to evaluate service demand temporally in order to determine if there are specific trends during certain periods where staffing can be modified to better fit the demand. The following figures display 2013 service demand within the CHFD study area; summarized by various measures of time. 59 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 38: CHFD Service Demand by Month, 2013 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% Overall service demand varies throughout the year, with the lowest demand in February (6.81 percent) and the highest number of calls for service in December (9.64 percent). The range is approximately three percent for the study area. The next figure looks at service demand by day of the week. Figure 39: CHFD Service Demand by Day of the Week 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% As with monthly service demand, service demand varies throughout the week. Again the range is relatively narrow (approximately two percent). The last analysis of temporal variation demonstrates workload by hour of the day. 60 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 40: CHFD Service Demand by Hour of the Day 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 Noon 11 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Midnight 0% Service demand directly correlates with the activity of people, with workload increasing during daytime hours and decreasing during nighttime hours as shown in the following figure. Incident activity is at its highest between 10:00 AM and 5:00 PM; and over 64 percent of calls for service occurred between 08:00 AM and 08:00 PM. There is a significant and predictable increase in service demand during the day. This provides an opportunity for CHFD to anticipate increased workload and improve response performance by deploying additional apparatus during periods of peak activity. Geographic Service Demand In addition to the temporal analysis of service demand, it is useful to examine the geographic distribution of service demand. Using dispatch center incident location data provided by CHFD, ESCI plots incident locations and calculates the mathematical density of 2013 service demand in the CHFD service area. 61 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 41: CHFD Incident Density, 2013 The above figure demonstrates the areas of highest incident density are located in the core area of Cedar Hill between stations 211, 212, and 213. Note the area to the west of Cedar Hill in Grand Prairie that is served by CHFD apparatus as part of an automatic aid agreement. This area is served by CHFD personnel stationed at Station 214; which was cooperatively constructed by Cedar Hill and Grand Prairie. As discussed earlier, EMS incidents represent the major of CHFD service demand. The next figure pinpoints “Fire” incidents in the 2013 CHFD data set. 62 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 42: CHFD Fire Incidents, 2013 Fire incidents are the least frequent incident type in the data set. However, “Fire” service demand is distributed throughout the study area in a pattern that is similar to the overall incident data. Distribution The analysis of distribution of resources presents an overview of the current deployment of fire department facilities, equipment, and personnel within the CHFD service area. 63 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 43: CHFD Service Area and Station Response Districts Figure 43 depicts the CHFD study area. The city encompasses an area of nearly 36 square miles, including approximately three square miles in Cedar Hill State Park. CHFD currently provides fire protection, emergency medical aid and transport, and rescue services from four stations located throughout the city. Highway 67 is a limited access, major transportation route through Cedar Hill. Highway 67 provides good north to south movement through the area, but inhibits east to west movement to some degree in 64 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Cedar Hill. The street network within Cedar Hill in some areas lacks direct routes and interconnectivity. This can negatively impact emergency response vehicles. Modern technology, such as the use of mobile data computers (MDCs), GPS units, and automatic vehicle location (AVL) technology; allows fire jurisdictions to dispatch the closest available apparatus to emergency incidents regardless of first due areas. This technology can provide a means to overcome shortcomings in the transportation network; and improve response performance. The following figure uses 2010 Census Block data to display population density throughout Cedar Hill. Figure 44: Cedar Hill Population Density 65 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions The US Census Bureau data estimates population of Cedar Hill as 46,461 (as of July 2012). This is a 3.2 percent increase from the 2010 census data. The overall population density of the city is 1,257 persons per square mile; which classifies Cedar Hill as an urban community. As evidenced in the previous figure, there is a mix of urban, suburban, and rural population densities in Cedar Hill. The Insurance Services Organization (ISO) is a national insurance industry organization that evaluates fire protection for communities across the country. A jurisdiction’s ISO rating is an important factor when considering fire station and apparatus distribution; since it can affect the cost of fire insurance for individuals and businesses. For ISO purposes, response areas are measured at 1.5 miles of travel distance for each engine company; and 2.5 miles for a ladder company (aerial apparatus) on existing roadways. For a structure to be in a protected rating for insurance purposes, it must be within five miles of a fire station. The next two figures examine current station and apparatus distribution based on credentialing criteria for the Insurance Services Organization (ISO). 66 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 45: CHFD Engine Company Distribution-ISO Criteria Nearly 43 percent (42.7 %) of the Cedar Hill road network is within 1.5 miles of a CHFD station. All of the currently developed portions of Cedar Hill are 5 miles or less from a fire station. CHFD staffs combination aerial/pumpers (quint) apparatus at stations 211 and 212. The following figure demonstrates the 2.5 mile service areas for these apparatus. 67 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 46: CHFD Aerial Company Distribution-ISO Criteria The ISO criteria for aerial apparatus distribution is based on the presence and number of buildings over three stories. ISO provided CHFD with an improvement statement after the last ISO evaluation in 2010. This statement explains that in order to receive full credit for aerial apparatus, CHFD needs one aerial apparatus and one ladder service company. ESCI believes there is an opportunity to reduce apparatus maintenance and replacement costs by removing one quint from service. A fully equipped engine company should replace the quint apparatus and an equipped engine apparatus should be co-located 68 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions with the designated truck company to sustain Cedar Hills’ excellent ISO rating. This option is discussed in the recommendations portion of this report. The ISO assigned Cedar Hill a public protection classification (PPC) of Class 2 (Class 1 represents exemplary fire protection) in 2010. The current distribution of stations and apparatus in the CHFD service area provides sufficient coverage to satisfy ISO criteria. Note that the ISO only addresses fire suppression activities and is primarily concerned with the geographic coverage of property. Of equal importance is the travel time required to respond from a fire station to a call for service. The analysis in the following figure is travel time over the current road network. Travel time is calculated using the posted speed limit and adjusted for negotiating turns and intersections. 69 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 47: CHFD Travel Time Capability-Current Station Locations The previous figure demonstrates travel time capabilities from the current CHFD station locations. The next figure displays 2013 emergency incidents and the travel time model to compare travel time capability to service demand. 70 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 48: CHFD Travel Time and Emergency Service Demand, 2013 National standards, such as the NFPA 1710,7 specify that career staffed, urban fire departments should deploy resources such that 90 percent of emergency service demand can be reached in four minutes travel or less. Nearly 69 percent of 2013 emergency service demand occurred within four minutes of a CHFD station. Over 98 percent of emergency incidents were within eight minutes of a CHFD fire station. 7 NFPA 1710, Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments (National Fire Protection Association 2010). 71 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Given the current number and location of fire stations, CHFD does not appear able to meet the NFPA 1710 standard for travel time; or the current CHFD response time goal. As demonstrated in the previous figure, over 800 emergency incidents primarily in the area east of Highway 67 and north of FM 1382 Road (Station 212 first due area) were beyond four minutes travel of a CHFD station in 2013. This represents nearly 20 percent of overall emergency demand and approximately 40 percent of the Station 212 emergency workload. Travel time is potentially the longest component of a number of elements, which create the response continuum that starts when a call for help is received at the 911 center and ends when emergency responders arrive on scene. In the 2013 CHFD draft Strategic Plan, travel time from the current station locations is identified as a factor affecting response performance and the possible relocation of Station 212 is discussed. ESCI examines station relocation and other methods to improve response performance later in this report. Concentration Accepted firefighting procedures call for the arrival of the entire initial assignment or effective firefighting force (sufficient apparatus and personnel to effectively deal with an emergency based on its level of risk) within a reasonable amount of time. This is to ensure that enough people and equipment arrive soon enough to safely control a fire or mitigate any emergency before there is substantial damage or injury. In this analysis, ESCI examines the ability of CHFD to assemble multiple resources across the study area. The following figure displays the concentration of CHFD stations in the study area in eight minutes travel. 72 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 49: CHFD Station Concentration-Current Station Locations The majority of the core area of Cedar Hill between stations 211, 212, and 213 is within eight minutes travel of three CHFD stations. The commercial and retail development on either side of Highway 67 is also served by three CHFD station in eight minutes. Note that there are only two small portions of the CHFD service area within eight minutes travel of all four CHFD stations. The next figure demonstrates the concentration of CHFD and mutual or automatic aid resources within eight minutes travel of the CHFD service area. 73 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 50: CHFD and Mutual Aid Station Concentration CHFD specifies a full first alarm assignment (ERF-effective response force) of four engine/quints, one medic, and a battalion chief for a reported structure fire. Eight minutes travel is the NFPA 1710 standard for travel time for a first alarm assignment. As seen in the previous figure, there is only a small percentage of the CHFD service area within eight minutes travel of all for CHFD stations. Eight minutes travel is the NFPA 1710 standard for travel time for a first alarm assignment. The previous figure demonstrates that utilization of mutual and automatic aid resources allows CHFD to improve the concentration of resources throughout Cedar Hill, especially the core area between stations 211, 212, 74 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions and 213. The next figure displays the concentration of personnel available in eight minutes travel from CHFD stations. Figure 51: CHFD Personnel Concentration-Minimum Staffing 17 75 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Fire service best practices documents recommend 14 to 16 personnel to safely and effectively mitigate a moderate risk residential structure fire.8 The previous figure illustrates that the Highway 67 corridor and a the core area of Cedar Hill; which contains the highest amount of risk and the greatest service demand, is served by 14 CHFD personnel in eight minutes travel. Note that for this analysis, the battalion chief is considered a mobile resource and is included in the personnel count for all portions of the CHFD service area. Reliability A review of workload by station and response unit can reveal much about response performance and a department’s ability to assemble adequate resources to mitigate simultaneous incidents. Although fire stations and response units may be distributed in a manner to provide quick response, that level of performance can only be obtained when the response unit is available in its primary service area. Unit hour utilization (UHU) analyzes the amount of time that a unit is not available for response because it is already committed to another incident. The larger the number, the greater its utilization and the less available it is for assignment to subsequent calls for service. The following figure displays the total time CHFD primary response apparatus (staff and utility vehicles are not included) were committed to an incident in 2013, and expresses this as a percentage of the total year. Figure 52: CHFD Unit Hour Utilization, 2013 Total Time Average Time Apparatus UHU Committed Committed BC210 174:13:00 33:37 1.99% E213 453:13:00 20:08 5.17% E214 167:13:00 24:25 1.91% M211 1126:55:00 43:06 12.86% M212 1272:49:00 43:07 14.53% M213 419:29:00 43:33 4.79% Q211 358:01:00 20:55 4.09% Q212 495:15:59 22:13 5.65% Not surprisingly, the CHFD transport medics display the highest UHU rates. These units respond to approximately 70 percent of the current CHFD service demand. Transport time to the hospital, patient handoff, and report writing; increases the time medic units are unavailable. The previous figure also displays the average time committed to an incident per apparatus during 2013. In general fire apparatus (engines and quints) are committed to an incident 20 to 25 minutes per incident. The average time committed for EMS units (medics) is approximately 43 minutes. The following figure illustrates average time committed and UHU for medic units for an EMS incident resulting in a transport. 8 See: National Fire Protection Association, Standard for Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, EMS Operations, and Special Operations (NFPA 1710 and NFPA 1720); and the Commission on Fire Accreditation (CFAI) Standards of Cover, 5th Edition. 76 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 53: CHFD Transport Medic Unit Hour Utilization, 2013 Total Time Average Time Apparatus UHU Committed Committed M211 842:47:00 55:38 9.62% M212 945:08:00 55:36 10.79% M213 284:40:00 57:07 3.25% The average time required for a medic unit to complete an EMS transport ranges from 55 to 57 minutes, over twice as long as the average time committed for fire apparatus responses. In the next figure, ESCI examines the average and total time CHFD apparatus are committed to an incident, summarized by incident category. Figure 54: Apparatus Average Time and Total Time Committed by Incident Category, 2013 Fire Responses – NFIRS Category 1, 2 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Apparatus BC210 Q211 Q212 E213 E214 M211 M212 M213 Average Time Committed 38:52 25:05 27:27 20:08 27:19 37:45 37:32 36:21 Total Time Committed 136:02:00 176:01:00 237:28:00 182:09:00 98:46:00 39:01:00 60:40:00 15:45:00 EMS Responses – NFIRS Category 3 Average Time Committed 22:41 18:01 18:53 20:08 21:10 43:19 43:27 43:53 Total Time Committed 38:11:00 182:00:00 257:47:59 271:04:00 68:27:00 1087:54:00 1212:09:00 403:44:00 Simultaneous or concurrent incidents can affect a fire department’s ability to muster sufficient resources to respond to additional emergencies. The following figure demonstrates the percentage of the time that CHFD resources were committed to more than one incident at the same time in 2013. Figure 55: CHFD Concurrent Incidents, 2013 Concurrent Incidents Percentage Single Incident 62.7% 2 28.5% 3 6.8% 4 1.6% 5 or More 0.4% Nearly 63 percent of CHFD service demand occurred as a single incident in 2013. Approximately 37 percent of incidents occur concurrently. The percentage of concurrent incidents is comparable to other fire jurisdictions with similar service demand and EMS transport responsibility. The following figure details the instances of multiple apparatus being committed to a single incident. Incidents are summarized by incident category. Apparatus cancelled prior to arrival and mutual aid apparatus are not included in the analysis. 77 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 56: CHFD Apparatus Drawdown, 2013 Multiple Apparatus by Incident Category Count of Apparatus Fire Response EMS Response Overall Single Apparatus 63.2% 50.1% 53.0% 2 3 4 16.1% 46.8% 40.0% 9.5% 2.2% 3.8% 5.9% 0.8% 2.0% 5 or More Apparatus 5.4% 0.1% 1.2% In this figure “Fire Response” refers to all incidents where the primary response apparatus is a fire apparatus; and “EMS Response” includes all incidents where a medic unit is the primary response apparatus. Two or more apparatus respond to over 50 percent of EMS incidents. Implementation of criteria based dispatch protocols for EMS incidents (dispatch of a single unit to non-emergency calls for medical assistance); provides an opportunity to reduce resource drawdown and improve response performance. The ability of a fire station’s first-due unit(s) to respond to an incident within its assigned response area is known as unit or station reliability. The following figure demonstrates the percentage of incidents that a first-due apparatus for each of the CHFD station areas was the first apparatus on scene in their particular station area. Figure 57: Station Reliability Station Station Station Station 211 212 213 214 91.6% 91.7% 89.8% 88.0% In ESCI’s experience, station reliability rates below 85 percent can lead to worsening response performance because back up apparatus must respond from outside the primary station area. This is affirmed in industry best practices publications such as the Commission on Fire Accreditation (CFAI) Standards of Cover, 5th Edition. The reliability rate for CHFD stations is greater than 85 percent. The next figure in the reliability study displays the workload of each of the four CHFD stations. 78 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 58: CHFD Workload by Station Area, 2013 50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Station 211 Station 212 Station 213 Station 214 All Incidents 21.3% 46.3% 27.2% 5.2% Priority Incidents 20.2% 47.5% 27.6% 4.7% As seen in the previous figure, Station 212 handles nearly 50 percent of CHFD service demand; while slightly over five percent of 2013 service demand occurred in the Station 214 area. Service demand is evenly distributed in the Station 211 and 213 first due areas. There are two concerns with the Station 212 workload. First, as discussed earlier, much of the current demand is beyond four minutes travel of the current Station 212; which affects response performance. Secondly, as demand in the Station 212 response area increases, Station 212 apparatus will be less likely to be available to respond; which will also negatively affect response performance. A possible solution is to move additional resources from an underutilized station, such as Station 214, into the Station 212 service area, especially during times of high demand. Response Performance Perhaps the most publicly visible component of an emergency services delivery system is that of response performance. Most citizens and policymakers alike want to know how quickly they can expect to receive services. In the performance summary, ESCI examines emergency response performance for the CHFD service area, using incident data from the Southwest Regional Communications Center (SWRCC), provided by CHFD. Non-emergency incidents, mutual or auto aid incidents outside the CHFD service area, data outliers, and invalid data are removed from the data set whenever possible. ESCI measured total response time from the time of the receipt of the alarm at the 911 center to when the first apparatus arrived on the scene of the emergency. ESCI calculated both average and 90th percentile data for these emergency incidents. The use of percentile measurement of total response time performance follows the recommendations of the NFPA standards and the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE/CFAI) Standards of Cover document. Fire department leaders and policy makers often use “average” response performance measures since the term is commonly used and widely understood. The most important reason for not using average for 79 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions performance standards is that it may not accurately reflect the performance for the entire data set, and can be easily skewed by data outliers. Percentile measurements are a better measure of performance since they show that the large majority of the data set has achieved a particular level of performance. The first figure in this section of the report displays overall emergency response time frequency throughout the CHFD study area. Frequency of Incidents Figure 59: CHFD Response Frequency, 2013 Priority Incidents 1000 100.00% 900 90.00% 800 80.00% 700 70.00% 600 60.00% 500 400 Average Response Time: 06:21 300 50.00% 90th Percentile Response Time: 9:04 40.00% 30.00% 200 20.00% 100 10.00% 0 0.00% Minutes The most frequently recorded response time for emergency calls is within the sixth minute. Specifically, the average is six minutes 21 seconds, with 90 percent (90th percentile) of all emergency incidents answered in nine minutes four seconds or less. The previous figure measures total response time. Total response time is comprised of several different components: • • • • Call Processing Time – The amount of time between when a dispatcher answers the 911 call and resources are dispatched. Turnout Time – The time interval between when units are notified of the incident and when the apparatus are en route. Travel Time – The amount of time the responding unit actually spends travelling to the incident. Total Response Time – Total Response Time equals the combination of “Processing Time,” “Turnout Time,” and “Travel Time.” The following figure examines CHFD 2013 performance for the various components of total response time. 80 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 60: CHFD Overall Response Performance, 2013 Priority Incidents Total Response Time Continuum Call Turnout Travel Total Response Processing Time Time Time Average 01:19 00:48 04:13 06:21 90th 02:00 01:29 06:36 09:04 Percentile Tracking the individual pieces of total response time assists with identifying deficiencies and areas for improvement. The NFPA 1710 standard specifies that call-processing time should not exceed 60 seconds (measured at the 90th percentile). Figure 61: NFPA Recommendations Response Element NFPA Recommendation Call Processing9 0:60 @ 95th% 0:60 @ 90th % for Medical Turnout 1:20 @ 90th % for Fire Response 4:00 @ 90th % Effective Response Force 8:00 @ 90th % The previous figure demonstrates that call-processing time exceeds the 60-second goal by a full minute at the 90th percentile. Most modern dispatch centers are regional multiagency, multidisciplinary (law enforcement, Fire, EMS) agencies, and call-processing time is generally not under the direct control of the fire department. Fire department leaders need to be aware of call processing time and work cooperatively with the dispatch agency to meet standards. The second component of the response continuum is turnout time. The following figure displays CHFD 90th percentile turnout time performance in 2013, summarized for fire and EMS responses. Figure 62: CHFD 90th Percentile Turnout Time, 2013 Turnout Time Performance Fire EMS 90th Percentile 01:44 01:26 CHFD turnout time performance ranges from one minute 26 seconds for EMS calls to one minute 44 seconds for fire apparatus. Recommended turnout time for all emergency incidents is less than 90 seconds, 90 percent of the time. Turnout time performance is slightly longer than current NFPA recommendations. Good training and properly designed facilities can minimize the time required to don appropriate equipment, assemble at the response vehicle, and begin travel to the incident. As discussed in the Distribution Analysis, travel time is potentially the longest component of total response time. The distance between the fire station and the location of the emergency influences total response time the most. The quality and connectivity of streets, traffic, and geography are also factors. 9 NFPA 1221: Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Emergency Services Communications Systems. 81 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions In the following figure, ESCI examines travel time and total response time for each of the CHFD station areas, measured at the 90th percentile. Figure 63: CHFD 90th Percentile Travel Time and Total Response Time by Station, 2013 12:00 10:00 08:00 06:00 04:00 02:00 00:00 Station 211 Station 212 Station 213 Station 214 Travel Time 05:47 06:38 06:28 08:13 Response Time 08:02 09:04 08:51 10:56 ESCI displays travel time performance and total response time performance together in Figure 62, to demonstrate the direct correlation between travel time and total response time. As travel time increases by station area, there is a corresponding increase in total response time. Total response time ranges from a low in the Station 211 area of eight minutes two seconds; to a high of 10 minutes 56 seconds in the Station 214 first due area. The last figure in the Response Performance analysis combines all four components of the overall total response continuum and tracks performance throughout 24 hours in 2013. 82 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 64: CHFD 90th Percentile Response Performance by Hour of the Day, 2013 Priority Incidents Midnight 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Noon 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 12:00 11:00 10:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 05:00 04:00 03:00 02:00 01:00 00:00 Call Processing Turnout Time Travel Time Total Response Time Calculating and tracking the components of total response time allows fire department leaders to identify trends and correct specific deficiencies. Note that total response time increases during the late night and early morning hours. This reflects the increased turnout time during these hours. Travel time ranges from slightly over six minutes to slightly over seven minutes throughout the day. Call processing time fluctuates from one minute 45 seconds to two minutes 18 seconds. The longest call processing times occur in the late afternoon through early evening hours when service demand for the fire department and the 911 center is the highest. In general, CHFD service delivery and response performance compares well to fire departments with similar service demand, area served, stations, apparatus, and personnel. Throughout the Service Delivery and Performance Analysis, ESCI has referred to the NFPA 1710 standards. Note that the NFPA standards are simply a point of reference against which performance can be measured. The standards are not mandates or requirements. However, they do represent industry best practices and should be viewed as desirable goals. The CFAI Standards of Cover, 5 th Edition is also regarded as an industry best practice. This document recommends adopting response goals and standards that are based on community risk and expectations, current response capabilities, and standards to maximize response effectiveness throughout the service area. Mutual and Automatic Aid Systems There are numerous mutual aid agreements, formal and informal, in place between fire, police, and emergency medical agencies in the Cedar Hill area. Mutual aid is typically employed on an “as needed” basis where units are called for and specified one by one through an incident commander. 83 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Automatic aid agreements differ from mutual aid agreements in that under certain mutually agreed upon criteria, resources from the assisting agency are automatically dispatched as part of the initial response. These agreements facilitate closest unit dispatch to emergencies in boundary areas and allow for the dispatch of additional apparatus and personnel to specific predefined emergencies. Automatic aid response areas are defined in the CHFD dispatch protocols. In 2013, CHFD received mutual or automatic aid 511 times and provided aid 604 times. CHFD provides service to the portions of the Lake Ridge area west of Station 214 that are located in Grand Prairie through an intergovernmental agreement. CHFD and the surrounding fire jurisdictions use mutual or automatic aid extensively and effectively. The following figure displays the portions of the CHFD service areas that are within eight minutes travel from a mutual/automatic aid station. 84 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 65: CHFD Mutual or Automatic Aid-8 Minutes Travel As discussed in the Distribution Analysis, mutual/automatic aid resources increase the concentration of resources available to the areas of highest demand and risk in Cedar Hill. 85 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions SUPPORT PROGRAMS – TRAINING Providing safe and effective fire and emergency services requires a well-trained workforce. Training and education of personnel are critical functions for each study agency. Without quality, comprehensive training programs emergency outcomes are compromised and emergency personnel are at risk. One of the most important jobs in any department is the thorough training of responders. The personnel have the right to demand good training and the department has the obligation to provide it. Initial training of newly hired firefighters is essential, requiring a structured recruit training and testing process. Beyond introductory training, personnel need to be actively engaged on a regular basis and tested regularly to ensure skills and knowledge are maintained. To accomplish this task, the fire department must either have a sufficient number of instructors within its own organization or work with their regional partners to provide those resources. The training program should be based on a structured annual plan and educational sessions should be formal and follow prescribed lesson plans that meet specific objectives. In the following pages, ESCI reviews CHFD training practices, compares them to national standards and best practices, and recommends modifications where they are found to be appropriate. General Training Competencies For training to be fully effective, it should be based on established standards. There are a variety of sources for training standards. CHFD uses the NFPA, the International Fire Service Training Association (IFSTA), and the Texas Commission on Fire Protection (TCFP) as the basis for its fire suppression training practices. Texas Emergency Medical Services/CHFD Medical Director standards are used as the baseline for medical training coursework. 86 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 66: Survey Table – General Training Competencies Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations General Training Competency Ensure all personnel have ICS NIMS 100 through 700 available for training commensurate with their all employees. Company and chief position and NIMS requirements. A. Incident command system officers trained to a higher level. Document and maintain ICS training Trying to get officers to NFA classes. records. Establish a company officer training and development program. Adopt and implement a personal B. Accountability procedures Train on Mayday drills. accountability system in accordance with NFPA 1500. Standardize high-risk low frequency Yes for high-risk low frequency C. Policy and procedures policies at the tri cities regional operations. level. Adopt a department safety policy Some training, “Courage to be Safe” that addresses LCES components. D. Safety procedures state mandate. Implement a close call reporting and training system. Certified FF two-week orientation and FTO 8 weeks with benchmarks and task books. Paramedics 5 shifts on ambulance with FTO, 10 shifts E. Recruit training with preceptor, adult and pediatric mega code, hospital orientation, non-certified FF sent to Desoto 16 week academy. Clearly define rope rescue program No confined space. Working on and procedure for confined space F. Special rescue (high angle, better rope rescue program. Dallas rescue, and what role CHFD will play confined space, etc.) TF 2 can be utilized. to support confined space rescue team. Conduct annual training with Trained to first responder level, no Hazmat team to demonstrate first G. Hazardous materials other training, use mutual aid for responder operations level Hazmat team functions with full team Define and document all wild land training levels. All personnel should 27 people trained through S130-90, be trained to awareness level and H. Wildland firefighting State type 6 engine training, 8 the NWCG S130/190 level and trained to higher level. company officers to the Engine Boss level. Local auto extrication using vehicles. Recently completed in-house I. Vehicle extrication training. Each engine carries spreaders, shears, and rams. Air bags. Occasional Certified Emergency Implement driver operator task Vehicle Operator, periodic driver book program to include J. Defensive driving training. Utilize task book for fire ambulances and other department apparatus. vehicles. 87 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components K. Use and care of small tools L. Radio communications & dispatch protocol? M. EMS skills and protocol Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Minimal training. Did produce YouTube video, care, and utilization covered in station training. Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Not on a regular basis. 4 hours a month with contract educator. Regionalize EMS scenario-based training with Tri-Cities partner agencies. Key Recommendations: Ensure all personnel have ICS training commensurate with their position and NIMS requirements. Document and maintain ICS training records. Establish a company officer training and development program. Adopt a department safety policy that addresses LCES components. Implement a close call reporting and training system. Define and document all wild land training levels. All personnel should be trained to awareness level and the NWCG S130/190 level and company officers to the engine boss level. Regionalize EMS scenario-based training with Tri-Cities partner agencies. Discussion New Personnel Training Proper training of emergency services personnel starts prior to being hired or joining an agency. Specific knowledge and skills must be obtained to achieve a basic understanding of the roles and responsibilities of an emergency responder. CHFD has addressed this need by providing Firefighter I and II certification level training at a recognized regional or state fire academy. CHFD will sponsor new employees who have not completed fire academy training as part of the hiring and initial field training requirements. Subsequent to initial hire, new hires are placed on a two-week orientation schedule of CHFD specific training that is supplemental to what they have obtained to meet the minimum requirements of Firefighter I and II education. New hires are place with a field training officer for eight weeks with established benchmarks and task book training requirements. The additional training is conducted to insure that the new hire is adequately familiarized with equipment and practices specific to the CHFD. Firefighter Accountability System Training Firefighter accountability is a safety-critical consideration, designed to track where personnel are during an ongoing fire event. Systems vary in configuration but are based on similar fundamental elements. The key to assuring safety of fire personnel is providing adequate training on a system that is consistent with best practices. 88 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions CHFD has adopted and periodically trained on a personnel accountability system, which is a widely accepted standard. However, in the course of stakeholder interviews, ESCI learned that the CHFD does conduct “mayday” drills to address fire scene search and rescue of firefighters in distress. ESCI recommends that CHFD seek to develop a standardized and commonly accepted accountability system in the region. Accountability practices found in NFPA 1500 are the best suited as an industry standard.10 Wildland Firefighting Training The CHFD area is subject to wildland-based fires, which sometimes present a risk of exposure to structures within the service area, referred to as “wildland-urban interface” areas. To address the need, a fleet of two brush fire vehicles is maintained and department personnel are equipped to combat wildland fires and protect exposed structures. Fighting wildland fires is highly dangerous, requiring specialized skills and knowledge and large coordinated regional and statewide response. Given Cedar Hill’s significant wildland and urban interface risk and possibility of significant wildfire event, it is imperative that all department personnel have a strong working knowledge of the Texas Interagency Mutual Aid System (TIFMAS), a state-wide response program which addresses large scale structural and wildland fire situations. Because any CHFD firefighter is likely to be called upon to fight this type of fire, baseline wildland training is necessary. ESCI recommends that the department adopt a minimum training requirement for all personnel at the S-130/S-190 level as defined by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG), a nationally accepted standard. In addition to ensure safe and reliable decision-making and leadership during these highly dynamic and dangerous events, all company officers should receive additional training to the NWCG “engine boss” training level. Firefighter Safety Training Firefighter safety is generally incorporated into routine training activities addressed in the course of regular training, but is not separated specifically as dedicated safety training. Safety education could be more effectively delivered by incorporating the national “Fire Safety Initiatives” and the “Firefighter Close Call” reporting system. A close call reporting and review system should be in place to ensure release of initial observation and recommendations relating to any significant safety or close call incident within 72 hours of occurrence. A program such as the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) “green sheet” near miss reporting system is a good model to review and replicate. Pre-Incident Planning A pre-incident (or pre-fire) plan is a simple document that is developed for commercial occupancies and target hazard buildings for the purpose of providing firefighters with information about a building, should a fire occur there. Information is typically gathered regarding a building’s configuration, exiting, protection systems, and hazards that may present themselves to a firefighter in the event of an incident. Pre-incident plans help to make firefighting more effective and to provide for increased firefighter 10 NFPA 1500: Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Program. 89 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions safety. CHFD has not established a pre-incident planning process. ESCI recommends the department develop a pre-incident planning program. Minimum Training Requirements CHFD personnel are generally trained to the Firefighter I and II level as defined by NFPA and TCFP standards. The department has not, however, established well-defined minimum training level requirements and associated task books for personnel or standards that are required at various levels of rank. ESCI was informed that establishing rank-based training requirements is currently being considered by the department, an undertaking that is recommended. Similarly, targeted training for department officers, which is now completed only periodically, should be conducted on a regular and ongoing basis and should be tied to establish TCFP and Texas Fire Chiefs best practices minimum requirements. The training should be structured in the form of an officer development program. Figure 67: Survey Table – Training Program Administration and Management Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Training Administration On-shift battalion chief assigned to Explore regional (Tri-Cities) training A. Director of training program manage training 16 hours of OT a officer. month. i) EMS Training BC dedicated to EMS. Instructor certifications through B. Education or background TCFP and DSHS. C. Program goals and objectives Safety and timed standards are identified reviewed/no requirement. D. Governing body support and City Manager has expressed belief in concurrence training as a priority. E. Personnel knowledge and Most personnel understand the understanding program. Recordkeeping Consider use of on-line training such A. Individual training files Yes as Target Solutions for appropriate maintained topics and training requirements. B. Records and files computerized Yes C. Daily training records Yes, Firehouse. D. Company training records Yes, Firehouse. Ensure lesson plans are in place and E. Lesson plans used Sometimes, not all. in electronic format for all training sessions. F. Pre-fire planning included in Include pre-fire plans in appropriate Not recently. training training sessions. 90 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components Administrative Priority A. Budget allocated to training B. Using certified instructors Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Yes, line item Yes C. Annual training report produced No D. Adequate training space/facilities and equipment No E. Maintenance of training facilities Establish a Training Advisory Committee (TAC) that produces an annual training plan and binder. Identify options for a regional tricities training site. Submit an AFG grant for a Tri-Cities burn trailer. Explore a regional training facility. Key Recommendations: Explore a full time regional (Tri-Cities) training officer. Establish a Training Advisory Committee (TAC) that produces an annual training plan and binder. Identify options for a regional Tri-Cities training site. Submit an AFG grant for a Tri-Cities burn trailer. Discussion The CHFD training program operates under the oversight of a single battalion chief assigned to a shift as an operational battalion chief. The position is a not dedicated to training and must perform the administration and coordination of training in addition to his shift battalion chief duties. The BC/training is well qualified with 20 plus years of experience and appropriate credentials for training program management. He works with no administrative support or other assistance with coursework delivery. Training Program Administration The training program is marginally staffed with one operational shift based battalion chief position managing training as an additional management responsibility. This staffing model has resulted in a significant workload when you consider providing requisite training for fire, EMS and disaster response services, professional development and operational oversight, and responsibility for managing a shift as a battalion chief. The City, having recognized the need to keep pace with community growth, plans to add a fire station and enhanced regional partnerships which will result in a significantly increased training workload by adding people that need to be trained. ESCI encourages CHFD to reevaluate the resources assigned to this function and add personnel and funding, as needed. ESCI recommends the City consider dedicating one FTE position to the training division. In addition, it is recommends that opportunities be explored for shared training delivery and cost sharing in partnership with Tri-City neighboring agencies to mitigate the current unmet and long-range future demands that will be placed on the training program. We also recommend CHFD consider developing a Training Advisory Committee including diverse representation from various ranks, stations, and subject matter experts. This group can be very effective 91 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions identifying training needs as well as recommending relevant strategies to meet departmental, shift, company, and individual needs. Training Program Planning While the training program operates effectively overall, it does so in the absence of a structured program planning process with input and contributions from members of the organization. To be fully effective, training delivery should be based on: • • • • • Periodic training needs assessments Defined annual program goals based on the needs assessment Specific delivery objectives addressing program goals A process of performance measuring and monitoring Periodic re-evaluation and modification ESCI recommends a “Training Advisory Committee” be utilized to develop the annual training plan based on the above criteria including clearly defined program goals and objectives. Training Resources and Methodology To be able to deliver effective training to fire and EMS personnel, some resources are necessary to arm the trainer with the tools needed to provide adequate educational content. In addition to tools, effective methodologies must be employed for delivery to be sufficient to meet needs. Figure 68: Survey Table – Training Resources, Scheduling and Methodology Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Training Facilities and Resources A. Training facilities (tower, props, pits) i) Live fire prop ii) Fire and driving grounds B. Classroom facilities C. VCR, projectors, computer simulations D. Books, magazines, instructional materials Inadequate Need Pursue a regional Tri-Cities training facility. Submit regional (Tri-Cities) AFG grant. Use parking lots. Good Good Adequate 2 copies of promotional books in stations, fire engineering digital with access for all personnel. Training Procedures Manual A. Manual developed and used Does not utilize local. B. IFSTA manuals used Training Scheduling A. Career training schedule B. Volunteer training schedule Yes 92 Yes, master calendar. N/A Establish local training manuals and task books by position. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components C. Minimum training hours, competencies Methodology Used for Training A. Manipulative B. Task performances C. Annual training hours D. Use of lesson plans E. Night drills F. Multi-agency drills G. Inter-station drills H. Physical standards or requirements I. Annual performance evaluation conducted Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Yes, 18 hours per year in general fire subjects state minimums. No, competency training for CHFD standards. Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Validate and implement regional fire training competency standards for high risk/low frequency operations, e.g. vertical ventilation standard. Yes Yes Yes Occasionally Yes Every November live burn training, night drills. Yes Yes Quarterly Quarterly or greater No Yes, electronic. J. Employee development program Yes Establish career development committee and career path policy for all positions within the CHFD. Operations and Performance A. Disaster drills conducted B. Attention to safety C. Post incident critique (After Action Review) D. Priority by management toward training Not in Cedar Hill, but participate in regional exercises. Not practiced regularly. Yes, every working fire and other major incidents, not conducting tailgate debrief. Number one priority. Host annual disaster drill in Cedar Hill. Implement a culture of safety program e.g. “Just Culture,” “Everyone Goes Home,” or “Crew Resource Management CRM.” Implement consistent AAR process with a consistent method of review and lessons learned. Utilize TAC Committee to assist with development. Aware of young inexperienced department. Need to train. Key Recommendation: Pursue a regional Tri-Cities training facility. Validate and implement regional fire training competency standards for high risk/low frequency operations, e.g. vertical ventilation standard. Implement a culture of safety program e.g. “Just Culture,” “Everyone Goes Home,” or “Crew Resource Management CRM.”. 93 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Discussion CHFD has made a recent focused commitment to training. Specifically, the fire chief has taken a leadership role in clearly defining the desire and commitment for a strong and relevant training program. Training Manual A departmental training manual is the foundation upon which the delivery of educational content is based. In the absence of this kind of document, personnel will tend to train in “the way we do it here,” rather than in a manner that is consistent with the department’s established operational practices and standards. Some components of a training manual are in place. However, none are fully complete and all are standalone documents. The development of a single, comprehensive, departmental training manual will prove to be invaluable in meeting growing training demands. ESCI recommends the CHFD identify highrisk low-frequency elements and develop subsequent training components for inclusion in the training manual. It is further recommended that the training manual be developed in coordination with the previously recommend training advisory committee and Tri-City regional partner participation. Professional Development Beyond the regular training offered to general staff, certain individuals should be offered specific officer development training in order to prepare them for more responsibility as they progress through the agency’s command structure. Placing individuals in positions of authority without first giving them the tools to succeed often ends in failure and discouragement by both the officer and their subordinates. ESCI recommends that the CHFD work with their Tri-City partners to establish standardized professional development programs and conduct them on a regional basis. Training Delivery Methodology – Competency-Based Training The amount of training delivered to CHFD personnel is currently based on contact hours. The fundamental objective is to deliver 240 hours of training annually, a measure used by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) for purposes of fire department ratings. Other minimums are in place including those related to state certification maintenance. An hours-based approach is appropriate and generally effective. However, the shortcoming of this methodology is that sometimes training will be delivered simply to meet minimum hour requirements when, in fact, the individuals receiving the training are already fully versed in the subject matter. Time in this instance would be better spent by 1) subjecting the students to a skills performance demonstration and 2) once competency in the skill area is demonstrated, use the remaining time to address new skills or subject areas. Under a competency-based system, an evaluation of skill performance is conducted at scheduled intervals to determine if the person being evaluated can perform the tasks in accordance with predetermined standards. Those skills that are performed well require no additional training. Those skills not performed well are practiced until the standard is met. This approach maximizes the time used for 94 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions effective training. Further, it ensures that members are performing at an established level. Specialty skills can be evaluated in the same manner with further training provided as needed. Ideally, the competency-based training approach is used on an ongoing basis. For example, each quarter different skills are evaluated on an individual basis. To institute a competency-based approach to training, all of the needed skills must be documented to describe the standard of performance expected. This would include all skills such as hose handling, apparatus operation, EMS procedures and protocols, use of equipment and tools, forcible entry, ventilation, tactics and strategy, and others. As discussed above, CHFD’s training program is generally designed around training content that is identified as necessary to meet ISO criteria while also making use of the TCFP standards and continuing education requirements. Implementation of a competency-based approach to identifying training needs, using Job Performance Requirement (JPR) guidelines as a foundation, offers a more effective and efficient method of training program management, which will also address ISO standards. Physical Standards and Periodic Skills Evaluation It is important that a fire department adopt appropriate standards that set minimum physical capability levels and that demonstration of skills competence is required periodically. As has been discussed earlier in the Personnel Management section, CHFD uses an internally designed physical standards screening process. When screening is performed, an internal validation process is used which may not be fully consistent with best practices. Adoption of a nationally recognized standard, such as the CPAT program, is recommended.11 Regular testing of hands-on skills competency is essential to assure not only that personnel are receiving adequate training, but they also are able to put their knowledge and skills into practice. A program of periodic skills testing will not only enable the department to verify personnel possess the necessary capabilities, but it also provides a valuable tool for assessing the effectiveness and subsequent training calendar needs of the organization’s training program. CHFD does not routinely undertake a skills testing process. Doing so can be accomplished by completing an annual evaluation process. Alternatively, skills assessment can be incorporated into the ongoing training plan on a weekly or monthly basis. ESCI recommends a system of annual individual skills proficiency testing be established. Training Facilities and Resources ESCI learned that hands-on training facilities are limited in the area. As a result, most training has to be completed using available buildings and parking lots. ESCI has included a recommendation for the longterm development of a training site, when funding and space becomes available. 11 http://www.iaff.org/hs/CPAT/cpat_index.html. 95 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Classroom instruction is an essential component of preparing emergency responders with knowledge and skills. A training facility or drill ground is a second indispensable element. Training facilities provide a controlled and safe environment to simulate emergencies, developing and testing the skills of emergency workers. It is recommended that the CHFD work with its regional Tri-City partners in establishing a location and design of a suitable training location to meet the current and future training needs for the region. In conclusion, ESCI finds that the CHFD training program lacks many of the foundational structural elements that are expected to be seen in a fully effective program in an organization the size of the CHFD. This is not to say that personnel are not capable and appropriately educated, but that a need exists for improved structure, management, and establishment of clear standards and requirements. The department is encouraged to assign a high level of priority to training program improvements. SUPPORT PROGRAMS – LIFE SAFETY SERVICES (FIRE PREVENTION) It is widely acknowledged that it is far more effective to prevent fires than it is to fight them. The financial impact of a fire goes far beyond the cost of extinguishment, representing a larger cost in the loss that is incurred by an individual building owner and that of lost revenue to a community. A strong fire prevention program, based on effective application of relevant codes and ordinances, reduces loss of property, life, and the personal disruption that accompanies a catastrophic fire. The fundamental components of an effective fire prevention program are listed in the following table, accompanied by the elements needed to address each component. Figure 69: Fire Prevention Program Components Fire Prevention Program Components Elements Needed to Address Program Components Fire Code Enforcement Public education. Specialized education. Public Fire and Life Safety Education Juvenile fire setter intervention. Prevention information dissemination. Fire cause and origin determination. Fire Cause Investigation Fire death investigation. Arson investigation and prosecution. Discussion CHFD has developed a healthy appreciation for the importance of fire prevention and public education. The fire marshal understands that, through assertive code enforcement, a fire department should actively promote the use of fire resistive construction, built-in warning and fire suppression systems and maintenance of fire safe buildings to minimize risk to fire and health challenges. 96 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions In the following data tables, the program components listed in the chart above are compared to the initiatives under way in Cedar Hill. Figure 70: Survey Table – Fire Prevention Code Enforcement Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Code Enforcement A. Fire codes adopted i) Code used – year/version 2009 International Fire Code. B. Local codes or ordinances adopted, amendments Multiple amendments based on the North Central Texas COG included in code adoption. C. Residential sprinkler ordinance in place No Upgrade fire code adoption to the 2012 International Fire Code. Seek means by which to encourage or require the installation of fire sprinklers in new residential construction. Key Recommendations: Upgrade fire code adoption to the 2012 International Fire Code. Seek means by which to encourage or require the installation of fire sprinklers in new residential construction. Discussion Fire and Life Safety Code Enforcement The City of Cedar Hill has adopted the 2009 edition of the International Fire Code detailed in Section 6.21 of the City’s Code of Ordinances, and has supplemented the code with multiple local code amendments. The amendments are regionally developed via the North Central Texas Council of Governments and are appropriately developed. Fire code enforcement and administration in CHFD is the responsibility of the Cedar Hill fire marshal that is supported by one inspector and is also able to use line personnel for inspection work. Adoption of the most current available fire code assures that fire and life safety efforts are consistent with current standards and best practices. ESCI recommends that the City adopt the 2012 International Fire Code for this reason. The Cedar Hill area is primarily residential and commercial in nature and the surrounding area, generally, does not experience a high degree of wildland fire exposure. However, within Cedar Hill, ESCI observed some areas that may present a wildland/urban interface risk exposure. For this reason, it is recommended the City evaluate the applicability of the Wildland Urban Interface Code to the jurisdiction and consider adoption. 97 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions New Construction Plan Review and Inspection It is imperative that plans for construction of new buildings be subjected to a fire and life safety plan review process. When a new building is proposed within a fire department’s boundaries, the new structure becomes the protection responsibility of that department for the life of that building. If it is not constructed according to code, it may become a problem for the firefighters in the future and a risk to the community. Consequently, the fire department has a fundamental interest in ensuring a structure is properly constructed. Figure 71: Survey Table – New Construction Plan Review and Inspection Cedar Hill Fire Department Comments and Survey Components Observations Recommendations New Construction Inspections and Involvements A. Consulted in proposed new construction B. Perform fire and life safety plan review C. Sign-off on new construction D. Charges for inspections or reviews Third party contractor conducts sprinkler and alarm plan reviews. Fire marshal does plan reviews on some commercial and City buildings. Fire marshal sign off is required on third party plan review. No. Included in the building permit fees. Develop practices to monitor the effectiveness of third party new construction plan reviews and cross check results periodically. Key Recommendation: Develop practices to monitor the effectiveness of third party new construction plan reviews and cross check results periodically. Discussion CHFD’s new construction practices are appropriately developed. The fire prevention staff completes most of the reviews, with the exception of large sprinkler and alarm reviews. Sprinkler and fire alarm reviews consisting of over 20 detection or suppression devices are conducted by an external third party contract provider. The practice of doing so is commonly found and is appropriate. The department reports that 60 inspections were completed by CHFD personnel in reference to new construction plan reviews during the period of May through December of 2013 (the only data available). The inspections are those that are necessary to assure compliance in the building process, subsequent to the fire and life safety plan review. They are completed by the fire department staff rather than by the plan review contractor. 98 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Because of the importance of assuring the new buildings are designed and constructed properly, it is essential that an agency assure that the sprinkler and alarm plan review contractor is completing the process properly. For this reason, random or periodic sampling and review of work is recommended. Existing Occupancy Inspection Program Existing property inspections, to find and eliminate potential life hazards, are an essential part of the overall fire protection system. These efforts are most effective when completed by individuals having the proper combination of training and experience, and when completed with appropriate frequency. Figure 72: Survey Table – Existing Occupancy Inspection Program Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations General Inspection Program Performed by the fire marshal and A. Perform existing occupancy inspector. By line personnel on inspections lower risk occupancies. B. Special risk inspections Yes C. Storage tank inspections Yes D. Key-box entry program in place Knox Box program is in place. Fire Department typically flow test E. Hydrant flow records maintained hydrants as needed relative to building permits only. F. Self-inspection program in place None Goal of annual inspection of all . G. Frequency of inspections commercial occupancies. Estimated 80% success. H. Citation process in place and Yes formally documented/adopted i) Court-cited to Municipal Court. I. Inspections computerized Tracked in Firehouse Software. J. Community feedback system in None place Fire marshal, 1 inspector, shift K. Number of personnel devoted to personnel. Only driver is certified as program an inspector (12 drivers). L. Fees for specialty inspections None Discussion The department has made a strong commitment to the completion of inspections in existing occupancies. There are 1,577 occupancies in the City subject to periodic fire and life safety inspections. In the 2013 reporting year, the fire marshal and his staff report that 1,775 inspections were completed in the inspectable occupancies, which calculates to an 88% annual inspection rate. The percentage is better than what is found in many fire departments. The fire marshal has indicated a goal of 100 percent annual inspection completion in all commercial occupancies and is well on the way to achieving what is viewed as a commendable goal. 99 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions As a point of reference, the recommended frequency for commercial fire safety inspections varies by the type of property, classified by degree of hazard. NFPA provides a standard for recommended inspections by hazard class, as listed in the following table: Figure 73: Recommended Fire Inspection Frequencies Hazard Classification Example Facilities Recommended Inspection Frequency Low Apartment common areas, small stores and offices, medical offices, storage of other than flammable or hazardous materials. Annual Moderate Gas stations, large (>12,000 square feet) stores and offices, restaurants, schools, hospitals, manufacturing (moderate hazardous materials use), industrial (moderate hazardous materials use), auto repair shops, storage of large quantities of combustible or flammable material. Semi-annual High Nursing homes, large quantity users of hazardous materials, industrial facilities with high process hazards, bulk flammable liquid storage facilities, facilities classified as an “extremely hazardous substance” facility by federal regulations (SARA Title III). Quarterly Using the above as a reference, and given the fire department’s estimate of inspectable occupancies, ESCI concludes that the current existing occupancy inspection practices at CHFD are appropriate and can be further developed in the future to seek to achieve the inspection frequency listed. Fire and Life Safety Public Education Providing fire safety education to the public to minimize the occurrence of fire and train the community in appropriate actions to take when faced with an emergency is a particularly important fire protection strategy. Life and fire safety education provides the best chance for minimizing the effects of hostile fire. 100 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 74: Survey Table – Fire Safety and Public Education Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Fire Safety and Public Education Establish a dedicated public A. Public education/information Fire marshal, as an additional education position, possibly as a officer in place assigned duty. collaborative initiative. B. Feedback instrument used C. Public education in the following areas: i) Calling 911 Yes ii) EDITH (exit drills in the home) Yes iii) Smoke alarm program Yes iv) Fire safety (heating equipment, chimney, electrical equipment, Yes kitchen/cooking, etc.) v) Injury prevention (falls, burns/scalding, bike helmets, Limited drowning, etc.) vi) Fire extinguisher use Limited classes vii) Fire brigade training None viii) Elderly care and safety To some extent. NFPA materials and internally ix) Curriculum used in schools developed curriculum. x) Baby-sitting classes offered No xi) CPR courses, blood pressure Blood pressure checks routinely. checks offered CPR classes not normally provided. Available in stations and taken to D. Publications available to public public events. E. Bilingual information available Yes Not formally, is currently a limited F. Annual report distributed to report as part of CHFD annual community report. G. Juvenile fire setter program Certified intervention personnel offered are on staff. Program is in place. Based on risk exposure, increase efforts to provide public education H. Wildland interface education Limited wildland public education regarding wildland/urban interface offered outreach. concerns. Utilize the NFPA Firewise Community and Ready, Set, Go programs. Key Recommendation: Establish a dedicated public education position, possibly as a collaborative initiative. Based on risk exposure increase efforts to provide public education regarding wildland/urban interface concerns. Utilize the NFPA Firewise Community and Ready, Set, Go programs. 101 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Discussion Public education outreach is performed by the fire marshal as an additional assigned duty, in the absence of a dedicated public education officer. As a result, public education efforts compete with other priorities and may be limited in their scope and effectives. ESCI encourages the designation of a public education officer which may be from within existing line staffing or, optimally, may be created as a part of a cooperative undertaking with neighboring agencies. Given the limitation above, the fire marshal and his staff are able to complete a number of public education initiatives annually. They include the establishment of “LAFS” Team (Life and Fire Safety Team) that routinely visits area schools, delivering content based on identified needs relative to local and regional incident occurrences. Multiple school outreach efforts are enhanced by annual Fire Prevention Week activities and an annual open house that is hosted by the fire department. The City of Cedar Hill is located in an area that poses a significant wildland fire risk that could result in a catastrophic fire. While there are significant protections in the adopted building and fire code to protect structures during a wildland fire, there are additional comprehensive efforts that should be pursued. The National Fire Protection Association's (NFPA) Firewise Communities program encourages local solutions for wildfire safety by involving homeowners, community leaders, planners, developers, firefighters, and others in the effort to protect people and property from the risk of wildfire. An added element to the Firewise program is the Ready, Set, Go (RSG) program: • • • Ready – Be ready, be Firewise. Take personal responsibility and prepare long before the threat of a wildland fire so homes are ready in case of a fire. Create defensible space by clearing brush away from homes. Use fire-resistant landscaping and harden with fire-safe construction measures. Assemble emergency supplies and belongings in a safe place. Plan escape routes and make sure all those residing within the home know the plan of action.12 Set – Situational awareness. Pack emergency items. Stay aware of the latest news and information on the fire from local media, local fire department, and public safety. Go – Act early! Follow an established personal wildland fire action plan. Doing so will not only support safety, but will allow firefighters to best maneuver resources to combat the fire. The RSG! Program works in complimentary and collaborative fashion with Firewise and other existing wildland fire public education efforts. It amplifies their preparedness messages to individuals to better achieve the common goal we all share of fire-adapted communities. The efforts overall are appropriate and CHFD is encouraged to continue to prioritize and build upon public education outreach. Included in future efforts should be increased emphasis on public education regarding wildland/urban interface concerns given the exposure observed. 12 National Fire Protection Association, Firewise Community Program, Ready Set Go Program, 2014. 102 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Fire Cause and Origin Investigation It is important that a fire department is able to accurately determine the cause of a fire as an element of a complete fire prevention program. The results of fire investigations, if used accordingly, directly reflect public education focus areas, the need for code modifications and changes, and modification of fire department deployment and training emphasis. Definition of the community’s fire problem can be achieved via effective fire cause determination. When fires are set intentionally, identification and/or prosecution of the responsible offender is critical if additional fires are to be prevented. Further, if the cause of fires is accidental, it is also to identify the source of the problem because knowing and understanding how accidental fires start is the most effective way to identify fire prevention and public education requirements. Survey Components Figure 75: Survey Table – Fire Investigation Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Comments and Recommendations Fire Investigation A. Fire origin and cause determination B. Arson investigation and prosecution i) Arson investigation training provided C. Person responsible for investigations D. Local FIT membership (fire investigation team) E. Process for handling juvenile suspects F. Liaison with law enforcement G. Scene control practices in place H. Photographer available I. Adequate and appropriate equipment issued/supplied J. Evidence collection process in place K. Reports and records of all incidents made L. File, record, and evidence security Line officer initially. Determines need for additional investigation services. Fire Marshal is a certified peace officer and conducts investigations in coordination with the Police Department. Fire Marshal, inspector, and one captain are certified in arson investigation. Fire Marshal No structured team, agreements are in place for investigation related mutual aid. Consider the establishment of a regional fire investigation team. Via Juvenile Court Fire marshal Yes Investigator Yes Yes, collected by Fire Marshal and staff. Yes Reporting via City police department. Secured field reporting system. Pre Incident Planning A. Pre-plans completed Yes, limited. B. Frequency of review Poorly defined. Increase pre-incident planning efforts. Schedule regular review of pre-incident plans. 103 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components C. Accessibility of plans Statistical Collection and Analysis A. Records kept by computer i) Type of operating platform ii) Software used B. Information collected in the following areas: i) Fire incidents ii) Time of day and day of week iii) Method of alarm (how received) iv) Dispatch times v) Response times C. Information analyzed & used for planning D. Reports made & distributed E. FTE’s used in data collection & analysis Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations In BC vehicle only in hard copy. In RMS but not accessible in the field. Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Make pre-incident plans readily available in the field via electronic means. Yes Windows Firehouse incident reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Only in the fire department annual report. Fire marshal and fire prevention staff only. Key Recommendations: Consider the establishment of a regional fire investigation team. Make pre-incident plans readily available in the field via electronic means. Discussion Fire cause and origin determination at CHFD is initiated by the company officer on the scene of a fire. At a small incident, it may be a company officer that determines whether a fire is accidental or warrants further assessment. If questionable, company personnel will call for the fire marshal, inspector, or the captain on staff that carries investigation capabilities. Accidental fires will be processed by the CHFD Fire Marshal. Suspicious fires will be handled by the Fire Marshal in cooperation with the City Police Department and other agencies as appropriate. The Fire Marshal is also certified as a peace officer. A Fire Investigation Team (FIT) is not in place in the area. FIT teams are regional groups that pool resources and training for fire cause and origin determination purposes and are found to be highly beneficial in exposing investigators to more and varied types of fire incidents. CHFD has access to neighboring investigators via mutual aid agreements. However, development of a FIT would prove to be more beneficial. Pre Incident Planning A pre-incident (or pre-fire) plan is a simple document that is developed for commercial occupancies and target hazard buildings for the purpose of providing firefighters with information about a building 104 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions should a fire occur there. Information is typically gathered regarding building’s configuration, exiting, protection systems and hazards that may present to a firefighter in the event of an incident. Pre-incident plans help to make firefighting more effective and to provide for increased firefighter safety. CHFD has established a pre-incident planning process, but its use and development is limited. ESCI recommends the department develop a more robust pre-incident planning program and establish a means by which to make plans readily available in the field. Tablet-based systems are currently available, along with other options. CAPITAL ASSETS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Aside from personnel, capital assets can be a department’s most critical expense. Without proper upkeep and replacement planning, facilities and apparatus can fall into disrepair and fail at a critical time. This section evaluates the capital assets of CHFD and provides recommendations as necessary. Facilities Fire stations play an integral role in the delivery of emergency services for a number of reasons. A station’s location will dictate, to a large degree, response times to emergencies. A poorly located station can mean the difference between confining a fire to a single room and losing the structure. Fire stations also need to be designed to adequately house equipment and apparatus, as well as meet the needs of the organization, its workers, and/or its members. It is important to research need based on call volume, response time, types of emergencies, and projected growth prior to making a station placement commitment. The following figures summarize ESCI’s non-engineering/non-architectural review of each facility within the study area. Figure 76: Survey Table – Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Planning Cedar Hill Fire Department Survey Components Comments and Recommendations Observations Fire Stations/Structures A. Replacement Plan maintained No plan. B. Construction or improvement 2012 – $170,000 fire station plans renovation. i) 2013 N/A ii) 2014 N/A iii) 2015 N/A iv) 2016 N/A Apparatus Implement, adopt, and fund Capital replacement schedule in A. Replacement plan maintained apparatus equipment replacement place, intermittent contributions. schedule. $550,000 bonds for engine in 2013, i) Period of plan (from – to) purchase occurred in 2012. ii) Funding mechanism B. Purchase or refurbishment Not funded due to economic schedule downturn. i) 2013, planned N/A ii) 2014, planned N/A iii) 2015, planned N/A 105 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Survey Components Cedar Hill Fire Department Observations Evaluation of Current Conditions Comments and Recommendations Support Equipment A. Replacement Plan maintained i) Period of plan (from – to) Methods of Financing A. General revenue B. Reserve fund(s) C. Revenue fund(s) D. General obligation bond E. Lease-Purchase Capital replacement schedule in place, intermittent contributions. Estimated life of equipment. Update, adopt, implement, and fund support equipment schedule. Equipment fund N/A N/A N/A In-house lease program Key Recommendations: 106 Implement, adopt, and fund apparatus equipment replacement schedule. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 77: CHFD Station 211 Station 211 is a facility of approximately 12,800 square feet in space, which houses an engine/aerial (quint) apparatus along with a reserve engine, a brush vehicle, an MICU, a hose tender, and a number of command staff vehicles. The facility consists of four, double-depth apparatus bays of a drive through configuration. Accommodations are present in the station for up to nine personnel. However, sleeping rooms are not dual gender appropriate. The station does not present any significant long range maintenance concerns and no storage tanks or other potential liabilities were observed. Structure Construction type Date Built Masonry and steel frame roof structure. 1986 Seismic protection/energy audits Yes Auxiliary power Yes Condition Special considerations (American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), mixed gender appropriate, storage, etc.) Square Footage Good Facility is ADA compliant and is not mixed gender appropriate. Storage is limited. 12,800 Facilities Available Lockers/showers A good-sized exercise room is provided, but is lacking in cardio equipment. A large kitchen is equipped with commercial grade appliances. Sleeping is in seven-bed dorm room, plus a captain’s office and quarters. Battalion chief sleeping quarters. Three individual shower rooms are available. Training/meetings A good-sized classroom seats 40. Exercise/workout Kitchen/dormitory Washer/dryer Available Protection Systems Sprinkler system None Smoke detection Alarm system is throughout. Security Apparatus exhaust system Key-lock exterior doors. Yes 107 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 78: CHFD Station 212 Built in 1979, Station 212 is CHFD’s oldest facility. There are three, single-depth, drive-through apparatus bays housing a quint apparatus, an MICU, a brush vehicle and a reserve MICU. The station, while in fair condition, is aging and likely to present future maintenance challenges. Storage space is maximized, as are crew facilities and the facility was not designed for dual gender use. Although no significant maintenance concerns were articulated by fire department personnel, the station is likely to present future maintenance challenges. No storage tanks or other potential liabilities were observed. Structure Construction type Date Built Seismic protection/energy audits Masonry with a wood frame, flat roof with metal rafters. 1979 When remodeled in 2008. Auxiliary power Yes Condition Fair Special considerations (American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), mixed gender appropriate, storage, etc.) Square Footage Facility is ADA compliant and is not mixed gender appropriate. Space and storage is maximized with no room for future expansion. 6,700 Facilities Available Exercise/workout A small exercise room is fairly equipped, needs cardio equipment. Kitchen/dormitory A small kitchen is equipped with commercial grade appliances and a small day room is present. Sleeping accommodations are in a shared, six-bed dorm room, plus a captain’s office and quarters. Lockers/showers Two individual shower rooms are available. Training/meetings Kitchen table only. Washer/dryer Available Protection Systems Sprinkler system None Smoke detection Smoke detectors in the living areas only. Security Apparatus exhaust system 108 Key-lock exterior doors. Yes Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 79: CHFD Station 213 The smallest of CHFD’s facilities, at 5,800 square feet Station 213 was originally constructed in 1987 and extensively remodeled in 2010. It houses three pieces of apparatus in two bays that are of a drivethrough configuration. Quarters for the emergency responders are provided and well appointed, but are not designed for dual gender use. The station does not present any significant maintenance concerns and no storage tanks or other potential liabilities were observed. Structure Construction type Date Built Seismic protection/energy audits Auxiliary power Condition Special considerations (American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), mixed gender appropriate, storage, etc.) Square Footage Facilities Available Concrete block construction on concrete slab with a steel frame, flat roof. 1987, remodeled in 2010. When remodeled in 2010. Yes Good Facility is compliant with ADA and related building codes. It is not mixed gender appropriate and the available space for storage and expansion is maximized. 5,800 Exercise/workout An exercise room is fairly equipped. Need cardio equipment. Kitchen/dormitory A kitchen and day room area are available and well equipped. Sleeping accommodations are provided in a common, six-bed dorm room which is not dual gender suited, plus a captain’s office and quarters. Lockers/showers Training/meetings Washer/dryer Protection Systems Sprinkler system Smoke detection Security Apparatus exhaust system Three individual shower rooms are available. Kitchen table only. Available None Alarm system protects the building throughout. Key-lock exterior doors. Yes 109 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 80: CHFD Station 214 CHFD’s Station 214 was constructed as a collaborative effort with the neighboring City of Grand Prairie. Construction costs were shared and an ongoing agreement for partial sharing of operating costs is in place. The facility is good sized, consisting of 10,330 square feet and two, double-depth bays of a drive through configuration along with one, single, backin bay. Accommodations are in place to house six response personnel plus a station captain, which are well designed and appointed. The quarters are dual gender designed. The station is in excellent condition and nearly new, having been constructed in 2008. Significant maintenance concerns around soil movement were reported. Structure Construction type Date Built Seismic protection/energy audits Auxiliary power Condition Special considerations (American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), mixed gender appropriate, storage, etc.) Square Footage Facilities Available Exercise/workout Kitchen/dormitory Lockers/showers Training/meetings Washer/dryer Protection Systems Sprinkler system Smoke detection Security Apparatus exhaust system 110 Concrete block construction on concrete slab with metal framed, pitched, roof. 2008 When designed. Yes Excellent Facility is compliant with ADA and related building codes. It is mixed gender appropriate and has adequate storage capacity for its current use. 10,300 An exercise room is large and well equipped. A large kitchen and day room area is provided. Sleeping accommodations are in place for six in separate bedrooms, plus a captain’s office and quarters. Four individual toilet/shower rooms are available. Kitchen table only. Available None Alarm system protects the building throughout. Electronic card lock exterior doors. Yes Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Apparatus Along with fixed facilities, the City of Cedar Hill has made substantial investments in fire engines, ladder trucks, medic units, brush vehicles, and other rolling stock commonly referred to as “apparatus.” Other than the emergency responders, response vehicles are the next most important tool in the emergency response system. If emergency personnel cannot arrive quickly due to unreliable transportation, or if the equipment does not function properly, then the delivery of emergency service is likely compromised. Fire apparatus are unique and specialized pieces of equipment, customized to operate efficiently for a narrowly defined mission. For this reason, fire apparatus are very expensive and offer little flexibility in use and reassignment. As a result, communities always seek to achieve the longest life span possible for these vehicles. The following figures provide an overview of CHFD’s apparatus fleet. Figure 81: CHFD Station 211 Major Apparatus Type Year Make/Model Condition Seating Capacity Pump Capacity Tank Capacity Medic 211 MICU Ambulance 2010 Frazer Type I Fair 2 N/A N/A Quint 211 Quint 2000 Fair 4 1500 424 Engine 219 Type I Pumper 1999 Good 4 1500 500 Command 2011 Excellent 2 N/A N/A Good 5 N/A N/A Apparatus Designation BC 210 Hose Tender 211 Brush 211 Squad 211 Hose Tender Brush Truck Command /Squad 1997 Pierce Dash 75’ Aerial Pierce Dash Top Mount Chevrolet Suburban Ford F-350 Crew Cab 2004 Ford F-350 Fair 2 150 250 2001 Ford Excursion Fair 5 N/A N/A Figure 82: CHFD Station 212 Major Apparatus Type Year Make/Model Condition Seating Capacity Pump Capacity Tank Capacity Medic 212 MICU Ambulance 2010 Frazer Type I Fair 2 N/A N/A Quint 212 Quint 2006 Fair 6 1500 500 Brush 212 Brush Truck 1999 Fair 5 150 250 Medic 219 MICU 2008 Fair 2 N/A N/A Apparatus Designation Pierce Dash 75’ Aerial Ford F-350 4X4 Crew Cab Frazer Type 1 14’ Box 111 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 83: CHFD Station 213 Major Apparatus Apparatus Designation Type Year Medic 213 MICU Amb. 2013 Engine 213 Type I Pumper 2012 Rescue 213 Utility 2013 Make/Model Condition Seating Capacity Pump Capacity Tank Capacity Frazer Type I 12’ Box Pierce Dash CF PUC Ford F-350 Air/Light Excellent/ New 2 N/A N/A Excellent 5 1500 500 Excellent 2 N/A N/A Figure 84: CHFD Station 214 Major Apparatus Apparatus Designation Engine 214 E3-64 (B214) Ambus 214 Type Type I Pumper Type VI Engine Multi Patient Bus Year Make/Model Condition Seating Capacity Pump Capacity Tank Capacity 2008 Pierce Velocity Good 6 1500 500 2011 Ford F550 Skeeter Excellent 2 300 400 2012 Sartain Excellent 6 N/A N/A Front line vehicles are in fair to excellent condition; one critical issue was identified with quint 211 having significant frame damage. ESCI was impressed with what we found to be a very high level of cleanliness and organization in all of the district‘s apparatus—well above what we typically observe. Apparatus Maintenance and Repair Fire apparatus, by its very nature, is expensive and complex to operate and maintain. The more specialized a piece of equipment is, the higher its maintenance costs can be expected. A prime example is an aerial ladder or quint apparatus as compared to more standard fire engines. For this reason, the deployment of quint apparatus should be carefully reviewed for necessity in regard to risk exposure that necessitates elevated (ladder) devices and insurance rating effects of changing current deployment. The subject is discussed in further detail elsewhere in this report. Maintenance of fire department vehicles in Cedar Hill is largely performed by external repair shops. CHFD does not have its own apparatus maintenance facilities or personnel. An analysis of ongoing repair and maintenance costs and effectiveness is beyond the scope of this project. However, ESCI was informed that the cost of contracted services is high. A key component of an adequate apparatus and equipment maintenance program, in addition to the technicians that perform the work, is the availability of needed supplies and the logistics associated with managing a repair and maintenance operation. These functions are not well developed in the City, or in the neighboring region and indications are that other fire departments in the area share similar needs. Recognizing a common need in Cedar Hill and the neighboring areas, ESCI recommends that a regionalized approach to apparatus repair and maintenance be explored. Multiple advantages can be realized by combining efforts to meet the need including reduced costs, the ability to share reserve apparatus for back-fill and increased maintenance effectiveness, potentially leading to reduced long term expenses. 112 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Capital Replacement Planning Unfortunately, no piece of mechanical equipment can be expected to last forever. As a vehicle ages, repairs tend to become more frequent, parts are more difficult to obtain, and downtime for repair increases. Given the emergency mission that is so critical to the community, downtime is one of the most frequently identified reasons for apparatus replacement. Because of the expense of fire apparatus, most communities develop replacement plans. To enable such planning, communities often turn to the accepted practice of establishing a life cycle for the apparatus that results in an anticipated replacement date for each vehicle. The communities then set aside incremental funds during the life of the vehicle so cash is available when needed. This decision is influenced by many factors: • • • Actual hours of use of any specific piece of equipment can vary significantly in comparison to other similar apparatus, even within the same fire department. Attempts to shuffle like apparatus among busy and slower fire stations to distribute hours of use more evenly have proven difficult. Frequent changes in apparatus create familiarity and training challenges. In addition, certain response areas may have equipment and tool requirements that are not common to others. Actual hours of use, even if evenly distributed, do not necessarily equate to intensity of use. For example, a pumper making mostly emergency medical responses will not age as rapidly as a pumper with a high volume of working fire incidents that require intense use of the pump or hydraulics. However, for every hour you idle an engine it is equivalent to driving 33 to 35 miles of wear and tear. Likewise, road mileage can also be a poor indicator of deterioration and wear. Technology, which is increasingly a factor in fire equipment design, becomes outdated even if the apparatus wear is not as significant. In some departments, crews at different fire stations deal with widely different technology on pumpers simply because of the age of the equipment. These differences can be significant, affecting everything from safety and lighting systems to automated digital pump pressure controls and injection foam generation. NFPA 1901: Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus is a nationally recognized standard for the design, maintenance, and operation of fire suppression apparatus.13 The issue of replacement cycles for various types of apparatus has been discussed in the committee that develops the standard for many years. In developing its latest edition, the NFPA Fire Department Apparatus Committee called for a life cycle of 15 years for front-line service and five years in reserve status for engines; 15 years in front-line service and five years in reserve status for ladder trucks. Does this mean that a fire engine cannot be effective as a front-line pumper beyond 15 years? A visit at many departments in the United States might prove otherwise. Small, volunteer fire departments with only a hundred or so calls per year often get up to 25 years from a pumper, though the technology is admittedly not up to date. Likewise, busy downtown fire stations in some urban communities move their engines out of front-line status in as little as eight years. 13 NFPA 1901: Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, 2009 edition. 113 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions The reality is that it may be best to establish a life cycle for use in the development of replacement funding for various types of apparatus; yet, apply a different method (such as a maintenance and performance review) for actually determining the replacement date in real life, thereby achieving greater cost efficiency when possible. CHFD has developed a well thought out approach to vehicle replacement scheduling. First, service lives have been established as follows: • • • • • Engines/quints Ambulances Type VI (brush) engines Specialty vehicle (Ambus) Staff vehicles 12 years 5 years 15 years 15 years 8 years Further, the department has recognized that service time is not the only factor that should be considered in deciding when a vehicle needs to be replaced. Planning is also based on a scoring system; assigning points relative to observations that are revisited annually as a part of the budget process. The criterions evaluated are: • • • Reliability Maintenance Cost Condition ESCI reviewed the vehicle replacement planning documentation provided and finds that CHFD has established a fully adequate and well developed strategy. We offer the following as a general discussion only to provide some additional input on vehicle replacement approaches. A conceptual model that may be used when a replacement cycle is considered is the Economic Theory of Vehicle Replacement. The theory states that, as a vehicle ages, the cost of capital diminishes and its operating cost increases. The combination of these two costs produces a total cost curve. The model suggests the optimal time to replace any piece of apparatus is when the operating cost begins to exceed the capital costs. This optimal time may not be a fixed point, but rather a range of time. The flat spot at the bottom of the total curve in the following figure represents the replacement window. 114 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 85: Economic Theory of Vehicle Replacement Cost Operating Capital Total Time/Usage Shortening the replacement cycle to this window allows an apparatus to be replaced at optimal savings to the department. If an agency does not routinely, replace equipment in a timely manner, the overall reduction in replacement spending can result in a quick increase of maintenance and repair expenditures. Officials who assume that deferring replacement purchases is a good tactic for balancing the budget need to understand two possible outcomes that may happen because of that decision: 1) Costs are transferred from the capital budget to the operating budget. 2) Such deferral may increase overall fleet costs. Regardless of its net effect on current apparatus costs, the deferral of replacement purchases unquestionably increases future replacement spending need. As stated above, CHFD has developed an appropriate vehicle replacement schedule and ESCI commends the department for its thoughtful approach in doing so. Purely as a point of comparison, the following replacement schedule was developed for reference. The schedule is based on the following service life estimates: Figure 86: Apparatus Life Expectancies Vehicle Type Life Expectancy Replacement Cost Ambulance 5 $155,000 Light Rescue Truck 10 $140,000 Med Rescue Truck 15 $350,000 Custom Pumper 12 $550,000 Ladder 15 $1,200,000 Wildland 15 $140,000 Using the above, the following replacement schedule was developed. 115 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Evaluation of Current Conditions Figure 87: Apparatus Replacement Schedule Unit Year Current Age Life Expectancy Engine 219 Brush 212 Engine 213 Brush 214 Quint 212 Medic 211 Medic 212 Brush 211 Medic 213 Medic 219 Quint 211 TOTALS 1999 1999 2012 2011 2006 2010 2010 2004 2013 2008 2000 15 15 2 3 8 4 4 10 0 6 14 12 15 12 15 12 5 5 15 5 5 12 Replacement Year Reserve OVERDUE 2024 2026 2018 2015 2015 2019 2019 Reserve 2012 Replacement Cost $550,000 $140,000 $550,000 $140,000 $1,200,000 $155,000 $155,000 $140,000 $155,000 $155,000 $1,200,000 Annual Fund Contributions Current Cash Requirements $9,333 $45,833 $9,333 $100,000 $31,000 $31,000 $9,333 $31,000 $140,000 $91,666 $28,000 $800,000 $124,000 $124,000 $93,333 $31,000 $100,000 $366,832 $1,200,000 $2,631,999 Based on the above example, were the City of Cedar Hill to fully fund their apparatus replacement planning, a current cash replacement fund balance of $2,631,999 would be needed, with an additional annual contribution planned in the amount of $366,832. 116 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Future System Demand Projections Future System Demand Projections In this section, ESCI projects and analyzes future system demand in the CHFD service area. Future demand is largely dependent on changes over time to population, demographics, economics, and the local infrastructure. This analysis utilizes data from the US Census Bureau, the Texas State Data Center, the Texas Water Development Board, the Cedar Hill Planning Department, and local demographic data. POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTIONS Population History The US Census Bureau estimates the population of Cedar Hill as 46,556 as of January 2013 (the latest estimate available). The following figure illustrates historical population change from 1980 to 2010. Figure 88: Cedar Hill Historical Population Change, US Census Bureau Data 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Population 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 1980 1990 2000 2010 6,849 19,976 32,093 45,028 Percent Change 0 191.66% 60.66% 40.30% Average Annual Growth 0 19.17% 6.07% 4.03% 0% The previous figure demonstrates the rapid growth in Cedar Hill and the surrounding area from 1980 to 2010. The city nearly tripled in population between 1980 and 1990. Although the rate of growth has slowed; the population of Cedar Hill has more than doubled between 1990 and 2010. A review of census data reveals that the average annual growth rate from the 2010 census to January 2013 is 1.7 percent. 117 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Future System Demand Projections Population Projection In the following figure, ESCI presents a projection of population growth in Cedar Hill through 2040. The projection was prepared by the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB); and uses historical data, the latest Texas State Data Center population projection, and local development data. Figure 89: TWDB Population Projection for Cedar Hill, 2010-2040 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 2010 2013 2020 2030 2040 45,028 46,556 53,200 65,119 77,038 Percent Change 0 3.39% 18.15% 22.40% 18.30% Average Annual Growth 0 1.70% 1.81% 2.24% 1.83% Population 0% The TWDB prepares population projections for communities and regions throughout Texas to predict future water use and needs. The previous figure illustrates the population of Cedar Hill growing to approximately 77,000 by 2040. The average annual growth rate varies from 1.7 percent to 2.24 percent and is never negative in the time period displayed. Note that the 2008 Cedar Hill Comprehensive Plan projects a total population within Cedar Hill of 80,000 to 85,000 at build out (based on the vacant land available for development in Cedar Hill). 118 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Future System Demand Projections SERVICE DEMAND PROJECTION In evaluating the deployment of facilities, resources, and staffing, it is imperative consideration be given to potential changes, such as population growth, that can directly affect emergency workload. Changes in service demand may require changes and adjustments in the deployment of staffing and capital assets in order to maintain acceptable levels of performance. For the purposes of this study, ESCI uses the TWDB population projection for Cedar Hill and multiples this by a per capita incident rate derived from historical service demand. This analysis provides a picture of potential service demand through 2040, based on population growth in Cedar Hill. The results are shown in the following figure. Figure 90: CHFD Projected Service Demand by Incident Category, 2010-2040 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 9,126 7,714 6,009 6,302 5,221 2010 2013 2020 2030 2040 EMS 3,645 4,147 4,367 5,345 6,323 Other 1,369 1,663 1,699 2,079 2,460 207 199 237 290 343 Fire In this figure, ESCI includes historical data from 2010 and 2013. The projected population growth is applied to the historical data to calculate projected service demand for 2020 through 2040. Fires (includes all types of fires) demonstrate the lowest rate of increase. This reflects a national trend and can be attributed to improvements in building codes and fire prevention over the last several decades. EMS is expected to continue to be the predominant factor affecting service demand. Other emergency service calls not involving actual fires are predicted to increase in part due to the use of automatic alarm systems; which decrease the number of actual fires, but increase service demand. It is not the intent of this study to be a definitive authority for the projection of future population in the service area but rather to base recommendations for future fire protection needs on a reasonable association with projected service demand. Since human activity is a primary driver of emergency service demand, it is important to have a population-based projection of the future size of the community. Although population projections can vary, and may change over time, it is clear that CHFD will continue to be an emergency service provider to a growing population, likely reaching over 77,000 by 2040 (by some estimates by 2030); and responding to over 9,100 calls for service. Planning should begin now to maintain the resources needed to meet the continuing demand for services. 119 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Future System Demand Projections COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS Community risk is assessed based on a number of factors: the service area population and population density, the demographics of the population served, and local land use and development. In the following figure, ESCI re-examines the population density map used earlier in the distribution study to display population density in the CHFD service area. Figure 91: CHFD 2010 Census Data Population Density Map 120 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Future System Demand Projections Population density varies throughout Cedar Hill. Population tends to be clustered in suburban neighborhoods, with undeveloped or more sparsely populated areas separating higher density populations. A review of census data reveals that approximately 60 percent of Cedar Hill residents reside east of Highway 67, with the remaining 40 percent living west of the highway. The median age is approximately 32, similar to the median age of Dallas County. Census data shows that over 11 percent of the population of Cedar Hill is over the age of 60. This population group tends to be frequent users of EMS services. Perhaps even more significant than the current population over 60 is the approximately 21 percent of the CHFD population in the 45 to 59 age group that be more likely to require emergency services in the next 10 to 15 years. ESCI uses GIS software and current zoning classifications in the City of Cedar Hill to examine current land use. Risk is assigned to the zoning classifications to present a view of relative community fire and life risk. • • • Low Risk – Areas zoned and used for agricultural purposes, open space, low-density residential and other low intensity uses. Moderate Risk – Areas zoned for medium-density single family properties, small commercial and office uses, low-intensity retail sales, and equivalently sized business activities. High Risk – Higher-intensity business districts, mixed use areas, high-density residential, industrial, warehousing, and large mercantile centers. The following map displays community risk within Cedar Hill using the criteria listed above. 121 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Future System Demand Projections Figure 92: Cedar Hill Relative Community Risk Cedar Hill is zoned predominantly for single-family dwellings. For the purposes of this analysis, singlefamily dwellings are classified as a low level of relative risk. Note that some of the clustered neighborhoods in Cedar Hill could be regarded as moderate risk residential areas due to population density and the density of homes in these neighborhoods. Areas of moderate risk are concentrated along the major transportation routes through Cedar Hill and the retail area around Highway 67 and FM 1382 interchange. The Old Town area east of Station 211 is classified as high risk primarily due to newer 122 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Future System Demand Projections high density residential and retail development. There is also an industrial area east of Highway 67 and the railroad tracks that is classified high risk. No doubt, the distribution of community risk in Cedar Hill will change as the community grows. A review of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan shows that Cedar Hill intends to focus on developing a primarily residential community with similar land use to that currently in place. Cedar Hill is surrounded by incorporated cities; therefore, population and development density will increase within Cedar Hill. It is clear that future development and population growth will change the nature and demand for CHFD services. 123 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Future Delivery System Models Although the foregoing sections of this report focused primarily on the conditions that currently exist within the CHFD, the intent of this study is to combine that evaluation with a look into the future and provide policy makers with information necessary to carry the system forward over the next 10 to 20 years. This portion of the report provides recommendations related to the deployment of facilities, apparatus, and personnel with a focus on future service delivery and an improvement in overall efficiency within the system. DEVELOPMENT OF RESPONSE STANDARDS AND TARGETS Throughout this report, ESCI has emphasized the importance of the establishment of response performance metrics by the CHFD. Once established, these standards establish measurable goals for service delivery which then form the baseline upon which planning for deployment of resources is based. Absent these processes, the organization is not able to determine where it needs to go, nor is it able to know when it is achieving its goals and meeting its community’s expectations. Response standards must be developed by the individual community, based on the expectations of elected officials and citizens, balanced against the financial aspect of what a community is able and willing to afford. For this reason, ESCI cannot establish these standards for CHFD, but rather will provide guidance and examples of what we consider to be acceptable metrics. Critical Tasks, Risk, and Staffing Performance As explained earlier, tasks that must be performed at a fire can be broken down into two key components: life safety and fire flow. Life safety tasks are based on the number of building occupants, and their location, status, and ability to take self-preservation actions. Life safety-related tasks involve search, rescue, and evacuation of victims. The fire flow component involves delivering sufficient water to extinguish the fire and create an environment within the building that allows entry by firefighters. The number and types of tasks needing simultaneous action will dictate the minimum number of firefighters required to combat different types of fires. In the absence of adequate personnel to perform concurrent actions, the command officer must prioritize the tasks and complete some in chronological order, rather than concurrently. These tasks include: • Command • Water supply • Scene safety • Pump operation • Search and rescue • Ventilation • Fire attack • Back-up/rapid intervention The fire service assesses the relative risk of properties and occurrences based on a number of factors. Properties with high fire risk often require greater numbers of personnel and apparatus to effectively mitigate the fire emergency. Staffing and deployment decisions should be made with consideration of 125 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion the level of risk involved. The level of risk categories used by Commission for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) relate as follows (See Figure 85: Cedar Hill Relative Community Risk Map): • • • Low Risk – Areas and properties used for agricultural purposes, open space, low-density residential and other low intensity uses. Moderate Risk – Areas and properties used for medium density single-family residences, small commercial and offices uses, low intensity retail sales and equivalently sized business activities. High Risk – Higher density business districts and structures, mixed use areas, high density residential, industrial, warehousing, and large mercantile structures. The CPSE has a sample critical tasking analysis for the number of personnel required on scene for various levels of risk. This information is illustrated in the following figure as an example of critical tasking only and is not intended to conclusively define the actual personnel necessary based on risk.14 Figure 93: Sample of Critical Task Staffing by Risk Sample Critical Tasking Analysis Firefighter Personnel Needed Based On Level of Risk Structural Maximum Risk Structure Significant Risk Structure Moderate Risk Attack line 4 4 2 2 Back-up line 4 2 2 (2) Support for hose lines 4 3 2 Search and rescue 4 4 2 Ventilation 4 2 2 Rapid intervention team 4 4 2 Pump Operator 2 1 1 2nd apparatus/ladder operator 1 1 (1) Command 2 1 1 Safety 2 1 1# Salvage 4 Rehabilitation 2 23 14-16 Division/group supervisors Total NonStructure Low Risk 1 1# (2) 37-39 3-6 () indicates tasks may not be required at all such incident. # indicates task may, at times, be completed concurrently with other position. The first 15 minutes is the most crucial period in the suppression of a fire. How effectively and efficiently firefighters perform during this period has a significant impact on the overall outcome of the event. This general concept is applicable to fire, rescue, and medical situations. 14 Note: Based on examples provided in the publication Commission on Fire Accreditation International, Inc. (now Center for Public Safety Excellence), Creating and Evaluating Standards of Response Coverage for Fire Departments, 4th edition. 126 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Critical tasks must be conducted in a timely manner to control a fire or to treat a patient. Three scenarios of commonly encountered emergencies are routinely utilized by fire departments when conducting field validation and critical tasking: a moderate risk structure fire, a traffic collision with a trapped victim, and a cardiac arrest. Each scenario is conducted using standard operating procedures and realistic response times based on actual system performance. Each scenario is normally run multiple times with a variety of fire companies to validate and verify observations and times. To further validate the analysis process, results are compared with records from actual working fires and similar incidents from previous years. Overall results are reviewed to determine if the actions taken within the early minutes of an incident resulted in a stop loss or not, and if additional resources were required. The critical task analysis process demonstrates the rate in which the current deployment plan results in stopping loss a high percentage of time within initial critical time goals. Again, critical tasks are those activities that must be conducted in a timely manner by firefighters at emergency incidents in order to control the situation, stop loss, and to perform necessary tasks required for a medical emergency. CHFD is responsible for assuring that responding companies are capable of performing all of the described tasks in a prompt, efficient, and safe manner. All Risk Critical Resource Tasking Fire departments respond to many incidents other than structure fires, including hazardous materials (dangerous goods) releases, motor vehicle collisions, basic and advanced life support medical emergencies, and non-structural fires. Personnel responding to these types of incidents should be assigned tasks similar to structure fires. The following figures are provided as an example for these types of incidents, although ESCI recommends CHFD conduct field validation exercises with its crews to verify the critical tasking analysis provided. After field validation is complete, the department may find that the critical tasking can be adjusted appropriately upward or downward for each incident type. Figure 94: Non-Structure Fire Critical Tasking Task Personnel Command 1 Pump Operator 1 Primary Attack Line 2 Total 4 Figure 95: Hazardous Materials Incident Critical Tasking Task Personnel Command 1 Pump Operator 1 Primary Attack Line 2 Back-Up Line 2 Support Personnel 7 Total 13 127 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Figure 96: Motor Vehicle Collision with Entrapment Critical Tasking Task Personnel Command 1 Pump Operator 1 Primary Attack Line 2 Extrication 3 Patient Care 2 Total 9 Figure 97: Emergency Medical Incident Critical Tasking Task Personnel Ambulance Transport 2 First Responder 4 Total 6 The aforementioned minimum staffing criteria should be used in setting specific service level objectives for each of the incident types. Response Time Performance Objectives The process of setting response time performance objectives will include two sets of questions: • • What are the expectations of the community and elected officials in regard to initial response times of the fire department to an emergency incident? What is the public’s perception of quality emergency services where response time is concerned? What response time performance would be reasonable and effective in containing fire, stopping the loss, and saving lives when considering the common types of incidents and fire risks faced by CHFD? To initiate the process of considering the expectations of the customer, the historical travel time and loss history needs to be examined from the data that was submitted by CHFD. Then, historical service levels are compared to known and anticipated service demand and community growth projections. Considering these projections, suggested response time standards are created to ensure CHFD is meeting local service demand expectations in accordance with relevant industry standards and best practices. Cedar Hill is a fully career department and therefore references the industry standard for the Center of Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) and the NFPA 1710 performance measures. These response time measures are displayed in the following table: 128 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Figure 98: NFPA Performance Measurement Recommendations Response Element NFPA Recommendation Call Processing15 0:60 @ 95th% 0:60 @ 90th % for Medical Turnout 1:20 @ 90th % for Fire Response 4:00 @ 90th % Effective Response Force 8:00 @ 90th % NFPA 1720 provides direction for variable density response performance measures that are intended for volunteer or combination fire departments, but can be used as guidelines for career departments that provide services to a wide range of population densities and geographic areas. Figure 99: Additional NFPA Response Performance Objectives by Population Density Categories Response Element Response Performance Objective Call Processing 0:60 @ 95th Percentile 0:60 @ 90th Percentile for Medical Turnout 1:20 @ 90th Percentile for Fire Urban Zone 4:00 @ 90th Percentile Suburban Zone 8:00 @ 80th Percentile Rural Zone 14:00 @ 80th Percentile Although NFPA performance recommendations are considered an industry standard, departments working with their governing bodies have the authority to implement performance measures that are better suited to their communities. This is known as the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). The CHFD 90th percentile for call processing is two minutes, turnout time is one minute 20 seconds and travel time is six minutes 21 seconds resulting in a nine minute and four seconds overall response time. Given the current response time performance, ESCI recommends that Cedar Hill adopt performance measures that, for the most part, adhere to NFPA 1710/1720 standards methodology although some of the adopted measures deviate from those standards as illustrated below. To most accurately reflect system performance in accordance with identified risk, ESCI recommends tiered response performance objectives for the City based on population density. This methodology will effectively segregate the service area into three distinct response zones: urban, suburban, and rural (Figure 84: CHFD 2010 Census Data Population Density Map). The first example is the “first due” response of a single utilizing standard reflex time from dispatch to arrival 90 percent of the time: Figure 100: First Due Response Standard Example First Due, Single Unit Response Urban (> 1000 per square mile) 7 minutes to 90 percent of incidents Suburban (500-1000 per square mile) 11 minutes to 90 percent of incidents Rural (<500 per square mile) 15 minutes to 90 percent of incidents The next example represents a first alarm response to a moderate risk structure fire, utilizing standard reflex time from dispatch to arrival 90 percent of the time: 15 NFPA 1221: Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Emergency Services Communications Systems. 129 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Figure 101: First Alarm Response Standard Example First Alarm, Response of 3 Engines, 1 Truck and 1 Battalion Chief Urban (> 1000 per square mile) 11 minutes to 90 percent of incidents Suburban (500-1000 per square mile) 19 minutes to 90 percent of incidents Rural (<500 per square mile) 23 minutes to 90 percent of incidents The above discussion is intended to provide the CHFD with the information necessary to begin the process of establishing response standards and targets. The department is encouraged to begin the process as soon as possible, especially in light of the potential for the addition of a fire station and personnel in the future. SHORT- AND MID-TERM STRATEGIES The previous sections of this report detail a considerable volume of observations and recommendations relating to CHFD current conditions relating to management and operations. The process of understanding, prioritizing and implementing the recommended enhancements can be daunting simply due to the amount of work that may be involved. To help the organization navigate through the process, the following discussion further defines the short- and mid-term priorities that ESCI has identified. Response Deployment Growth projections for the City of Cedar Hill continue to be strong and current activity supports that picture. ESCI concludes that while the projected growth and expected service demand will likely justify an increase in response resources in the future, there is not an urgent need for new resources or an additional fire station today. Response times are tracking within acceptable ranges and incident outcomes are generally acceptable. The following are recommendations that will enhance current response and service delivery levels and efficiencies until additional resources are deemed necessary by increased risk and service demand. • • • 130 In the joint response area served by the shared fire station with Grand Prairie, the first company is arriving in a timely manner. However, the challenge can be traced to travel times for next due companies. Specifically, delays in notification and dispatching of resources between Grand Prairie and Cedar Hill are present based on extended call processing time, separate dispatch centers, and separate computer aided CAD systems that are not integrated. All information exchanges between the centers are being relayed by phone. It is recommended that a CAD interface be pursued to eliminate delays and duplication of information flow to and from responding units. It is recommended that the CHFD pursue a continued shared station/resource agreement with the Grand Prairie Fire Department to coordinate and provide services to the established shared Station 214 service area. If this agreement can be sustained as is or in a new configuration, it will allow for shared or alternative staffing of Station 214 so existing resources can be redeployed to provide quick response vehicle (QRV) coverage to high demand areas and or staffing of the proposed additional fire station in the future. There is opportunity to enhance automatic aid by implementing complete boundary drops between Desoto and Duncanville to provide increased unit concentration and reliability in the Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan • • Conclusion north and eastern portions of the city, which have the highest level of service demand. Currently, unit requests are based on CAD recommendation utilizing geographic coordinates and run cards. The technology does exist to utilize GIS based CAD recommendations for the closest unit to respond. This technology should be accessed and complete boundary drops implemented as soon as possible. These response assignments can be further improved through expanded use of a traffic signal preemption system that will work for all responding units regardless of the jurisdiction. This is especially important for companies that must travel congested arterials and significant traffic volume. The CHFD currently runs two quint apparatus (apparatus with a pump, aerial ladder, hose, and tank), which have extensive equipment, training, and maintenance needs. ESCI has concluded maintaining one quint as a “truck company” at the centrally located station (Station 211) will result in the best truck coverage, optimum performance, and significant cost savings. It is recommended the second quint be replaced with an “engine” and an engine apparatus be located with the designated truck company to meet ISO criteria. This configuration will allow for more effective vehicle utilization, reduced purchase and maintenance costs, and maintain the current excellent Cedar Hill ISO rating of two. Current dispatch call-processing time exceeds the 60-second industry standard goal by a full minute at the 90th percentile. Most modern dispatch centers are regional multi-agency, multidisciplinary (law enforcement, Fire, EMS) agencies; and call-processing time is generally not under the direct control of the fire department. Fire department leaders need to be aware of call processing time and work cooperatively with the dispatch agency to meet standards. Fire Prevention Consistent with its general mission, the CHFD is responsible to manage a significant portion of public safety risk within its service area. In managing the risk, a well-designed and properly managed fire prevention program has consistently served communities well and measurably reduced risk. As has been discussed in detail in the Fire Prevention and Public Education section, the CHFD fire prevention program will need to adapt to the ever increasing work load and future anticipated growth. ESCI recommends that CHFD undertake a comprehensive planning process that will: • • • • • • Identify and assess pertinent risks. Prepare and enable the Fire Prevention Division the ability to manage the additional workload that will come with adoption of recommended fire codes. Incorporate a blended strategy of education, engineering and enforcement to mitigate as much of the risk as practical. Seek to achieve an inspection frequency of at least annual completion and more frequently for higher risk occupancies. Integrate local fire code adoption and amendments with the established wildfire management plan and fire wise community elements. Provide strong direction for the program; and 131 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan • Conclusion Appropriately staff the program to maintain the existing 88 percent inspection compliance rate and continue to work toward the 100 percent goal. Within the fire prevention program, ESCI recommends CHFD specifically explore cooperative services initiatives in the areas of public education and fire/arson investigation. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Advanced life support (ALS) emergency medical transportation is provided by CHFD. The Cedar Hill system includes three ALS ambulances staffed by two credentialed paramedics under medical supervision, strategically stationed throughout the city. In addition to the ALS ambulances, there are four first responder ALS engine companies that respond within their service areas to provide rescue and clinical care. CHFD is the primary provider of EMS within its service area; and there is one dedicated battalion chief dedicated to the planning, delivery, evaluation, and overall effectiveness of CHFD resources. The EMS delivery system overall within the city is very well integrated and provides a high level of EMS. CHFD has not established identified outcome based EMS system performance benchmarks which could serve as a measure of efficiency and effectiveness. EMS response constitutes a very significant portion of CHFD’s response activity and is also a critically important service. ESCI recommends CHFD enhance the current EMS program and planning process that will: • • • • • • • • 132 Identify and assess system performance benchmarks, training requirements, equipment requirements, and skills gaps. Incorporate a blended strategy of system integration, outcome based performance measures, training, and skills development and assessment. Prioritize implementation of a Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) and an appropriate tiered response to medical calls for service (right resource, right patient, right time). Incorporate first responder Peak Activity Units (PAUs) to include BLS or ALS Quick Response Units to maintain adopted response time standards. In coordination with local health care providers and related stakeholders, conduct a community needs assessment to identify future community paramedicine and health care services that can and should be provided by the CHFD. Conduct a transportation billing “rate study” to increase revenue and pursue a cost neutral ambulance transportation service. CHFD should ensure the rate study is in compliance with Texas Medicaid Provider Procedures Manual (TMPPM) that utilizes the Texas Medicaid Healthcare Partnership (TMHP) claim system. This rate study should be conducted in accordance with the Federal Register, 2 CFR 200 cost determination, billing rates, and billing requirements. Work with the Tri-Cities cooperative partners to fully integrate, training, equipment/supplies, quality assurance, and EMS administrative functions. Provide strong direction for the program; and Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan • Conclusion Appropriately staff the program with the establishment of shift EMS supervisors or lead personnel to ensure adequate oversight and supervision are present for current and future EMS delivery needs. With EMS services representing 69 percent of the calls for service, it is imperative that the CHFD adequately staff and manage this vital community service. Emergency Management CHFD is responsible to manage a significant portion of public safety risk within its service area that results from disaster preparedness. In managing the risks resulting from both natural and human-caused disasters, a well-designed and properly managed emergency management program has consistently served communities well and measurably mitigated risks and improved public preparedness. Currently, the CHFD emergency management program lacks planning, design, and staffing. ESCI recommends that CHFD undertake a comprehensive planning process that will: • • • • Identify and assess pertinent disaster risks; Incorporate a blended strategy of planning, mitigation, response and recovery initiatives such as NFPA “Firewise Community, Ready-Set-Go” and Federal Emergency Management Agency “Map Your Neighborhood” as well as other appropriate programs to the address the identified risks; Provide strong direction for the program; and Appropriately staff the program with, minimally, a program manager or coordinator. Within the context of the emergency management program, ESCI recommends CHFD aggressively explore cooperative services initiatives with neighboring Tri-City jurisdictions to ensure area-wide planning, interoperable plans and equipment, common public messages, and distributed program cost. Comprehensive Tri-Cities Cooperative Service Agreement ESCI is concerned CHFD lacks some critical support resources necessary to effectively support and facilitate consistent fire protection and EMS delivery as the department experiences steady growth and increased service demand. We strongly recommend CHFD take the opportunity now to bolster and solidify these programs and resources even as they prepare to strengthen their response resources in the future. Several of these key programs can be significantly improved and fortified through building upon the existing Tri-Cities cooperative services initiatives with CHFD’s adjacent jurisdictions and service partners. ESCI encourages CHFD to develop a “formal” multi-faceted cooperative services agreement that will equitably serve CHFD and their partners alike; and will produce consistent and defined support programs and services at a reduced cost for all partners the address at a minimum: • • Regional EMS administration, quality assurance/medical direction, training, supplies, and supervision in the field. Vehicle maintenance and repair services at an identified location with mobile capabilities to meet the needs of department vehicles in the field. 133 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan • • • • Conclusion Fire Investigation to ensure trained, certified fire investigators available 24/7/365 days a year. Emergency management functions to address preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery plans, and services to all participating agencies. Joint training staff and facility services to meet the training mandates and needs of all participating agencies. A regional purchasing cooperative that ensures competitive bidding and purchasing requirements are in place resulting in economies of scale and timely purchase and delivery of goods and services. Training CHFD has devoted significant focus and attention to the enhancement of training programs and standards within the organization. The program staffing, however, lacks the depth necessary to handle the significant mandated training standards and mandates and steady influx of new response personnel due to turnover and growth. ESCI believes the existing training staff model will rapidly exceed its capabilities based on anticipated growth over the next 10 years combined with the need to handle the ongoing training, skills maintenance and recertification, and the expectations for professional development within a growing organization. Successful fire and EMS training programs typically incorporate a leadership/managerial component and also a delivery and evaluation specialist. ESCI recommends CHFD work to ensure effective incorporation of both components within their training program. ESCI recommends that CHFD undertake a comprehensive planning process that will: • • • • • • Identify and assess training requirements, developmental needs, and skills gaps. Establish, implement, and manage a comprehensive training and professional development program for all CHFD employees. Incorporate a blended strategy of education, training, and practical skills development and assessment. Provide strong leadership for the program. Provide effective training delivery and skills assessment; and Appropriately staff the program with the addition of at least one FTE training position. Within the training program, ESCI recommends CHFD specifically explore Tri-Cities cooperative services initiatives in the areas of recruit training, Multi-Company Tactical Operations (MCTO), technical rescue programs, incident command system (NIMS) training, and special operations training e.g. hazardous materials, technical rescue, etc. Administrative Support Staff The roles of administrative support personnel include the critical functions of: • • 134 Planning Data and information analysis Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan • • • Conclusion Documentation and reporting Logistical support Process guidance and support As noted, the present roster of support staff represents eight percent of the CHFD total staffing and ESCI regards this as a minimal amount. Successful organizations more typically use a roster totaling 12 percent to 15 percent of agency total staffing. Currently, CHFD office/administrative staffing functions are carried out by three FTE safety positions with operational and policy level responsibilities and an administrative assistant. ESCI notes that, while these employees are flexible and capable in multiple areas, they are frequently stretched to accomplish the range of tasks and duties before them. In such circumstances, the functions of data/information analysis and reporting are most frequently short-changed; we believe this is also true at CHFD. ESCI also notes a majority of fire and EMS agencies focus training, educational and development resources on operational response personnel, often to the exclusion of key support staff personnel. It is not uncommon for capable administrative support personnel to enlarge skill sets and improve efficiencies, given agency support for their development. CHFD is encouraged to look for opportunities to further develop incumbent support personnel. It is further recommended CHFD undertake a comprehensive planning process that will: • • • • Identify and assess administrative support functional requirements, developmental needs, and skills gaps. Incorporate a blended strategy of education, training, and practical skills development and assessment. Provide strong leadership for the program. Appropriately staff the program; and specifically consider adding one FTE with primary responsibility as an assigned CHFD administrative analyst and liaison to City Management. Organizational Development CHFD is in a state-of-transition, in part due to the vision and leadership of a new executive team. As a result, the membership is in the process of navigating its way through a set of new priorities and paradigms, which is often a difficult process. To assist in the transition, ESCI recommends internal communications be enhanced in an effort to increase ownership in decisions and appreciation for organizational changes. The establishment of internal advisory committees is recommended in areas such as: • • • • • Safety Committee Training Advisory Committee Operations/Special Operations Committee Apparatus Committee EMS Committee 135 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Committees should include the participation and oversight of a departmental chief officer as well as labor representation. Another identified area of concern by City leadership, CHFD management, labor representatives, and the community is the issue of high turnover at an average of four-to-five personnel or seven percent of operational staff annually. This is universally believed to be in response to a base pay schedule that ranks in the lower third of comparable departments within the Dallas Metroplex region. It is ESCI’s observation that the benefit package and spending on equipment and infrastructure not normally seen in fire departments operational budgets is contributing to the per capita spending level. While CHFD personnel tend to focus on earnings and take home pay as the dominant measurement of funding, work place desirability, and appropriate employee satisfaction. • ESCI recommends the City and CHFD explore a realignment of spending priorities as well as the pursuit of new revenue and efficiencies as recommended in this report. It is recommended the City establish a pay policy that maintains pay scales in the “median” or “average” of the established North Texas comparison jurisdictions. ESCI has observed that departments that develop pay policies that keep pay rates in the medium or average for the comparable areas and agencies tend to not have excessive turn over based on pay scales and wages. RECOMMENDED LONG-TERM STRATEGIES CHFD Station 212 Relocation Station 212’s current service area represents some of Cedar Hill’s most dense population and highest service demand areas. Due to the lack of street network connectivity, Station 212 resources cannot serve much of the first due area within an industry best practice “four-minute” travel time. A comparison of coverage of 2013 emergency incidents shows that current station is capable of reaching 29.6 percent of 2013 emergency incidents in four minutes. However, if the station were to be relocated to the proposed station location in the general area of E. Beltline and Joe Wilson Road, Station 212 resources would reach 56.6 percent of 2013 emergency incidents within a four-minute travel time. The proposed relocated Station 212 will serve a much larger portion of the current station response area within a four-minute travel time. The proposed relocation area of E. Beltline and Joe Wilson Road is an intersection of major east-west and north-south routes through Cedar Hill. This location will not only increase service levels to the Station 212 area, but will also allow good access to west side of the city. As was discussed in Distribution analysis, apparatus responding from all current Cedar Hill stations can reach 68.9 percent of 2013 emergencies in four minutes travel time. Moving Station 212 to proposed location increases the department wide coverage of four minutes to 79.4 percent 136 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Figure 102: CHFD Station 212 Relocation 137 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Figure 103: CHFD 4 Minutes Travel and Emergency Service Demand with Relocated Station 212 New Joint Cedar Hill/Midlothian Fire Station 215 Development and Staffing ESCI recommends CHFD develop a phased or staged implementation approach that allows for a systematic and well-organized growth in personnel in order to begin full operation of new company or station as the service level and risk demands presents themselves. In this following figure, ESCI has geo-referenced the “Future Thoroughfare Map” from the Cedar Hill Fire Department 2008 Comprehensive Plan to the GIS data to provide a picture of the future road network in Cedar Hill and the surrounding area. Regional growth and development will no doubt affect future 138 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion growth in Cedar Hill. The Loop Nine Project is a limited access toll way that will run east west roughly along the southern border of Cedar Hill. According to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, this project is targeted for implementation in the next 10 years. Along with the Loop Nine Project, the thoroughfare plan shows Lake Ridge Parkway extending to the east side of Highway 67 and connecting to several north south arterials in Cedar Hill. The extension of Lake Ridge Parkway to the east and the extension of Clark Road south greatly enhance the connectivity of the road network in Cedar Hill. Additionally, examination of the Cedar Hill comprehensive plan reveals future land use goals of mixed-use areas for areas between the Lake Ridge extension and Loop Nine. In general, this sort of land use brings increased activity and service demand for emergency services. ESCI recommends that CHFD consider a long-range goal of placing a fifth fire station in the area of the future intersection of Clark Road and Lake Ridge Parkway. ESCI has observed a number of jurisdictions open new fire stations in newly developed areas by partnering with developers. These partnerships have utilized development agreements to secure land, construction, equipment, and incremental operational costs. In some cases these development agreements have resulted in securing land at a designated location in accordance with established master and service delivery plans. They also covered construction and equipment costs. Stations have been built to fire department specifications with the construction managed by the department or jurisdiction having authority. In cases where stations have a geographic need and risk requiring opening of a new fire station before tax or assessment revenue covers the cost, developers have covered the gap for a period of time until dedicated revenues are realized. ESCI recommends Cedar Hill consider a similar type of arrangement or agreement to ensure timely and efficient implementation of Station 215. The proposed new fire station and location lends itself well to a shared station and service area arrangement with the Midlothian Fire Department. ESCI has identified that the growth patterns and timing of development in Cedar Hill’s southern areas and the Midlothian northern areas will create significant opportunity to share resources in the form of a shared service delivery area and fire station. 139 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Figure 104: CHFD Future Fifth Station Location As the city grows in population and service demand, tax revenue increases incrementally and may even lag behind. ESCI recommends CHFD’s deployment strategy be based upon adding one-third of company staffing personnel annually, i.e. a new company is fully staffed and ready for deployment at the end of a three-year effort. This will allow time for revenue to match personnel expense, allow time for CHFD support staff to recruit, select, train, equip, and prepare new personnel for deployment, minimize the impact of deploying a large contingent of new personnel at one time, and ensure facilities and apparatus are prepared for the deployment. 140 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion As new personnel come on line, they can be rotated into existing companies to gain critical experience; while incumbent personnel may be shifted to an interim strategy using Quick Response Units (QRUs) or Transitional Response Vehicles (TRVs) to maintain target response times and customer service.16 As full companies become ready for deployment, CHFD may choose to stop staffing the EMS response units and deploy a full company in the planned response area. The following figure illustrates one example of the chronology for a phased hiring and deployment process. By using this approach, the City budget is less stressed compared with full company hiring process. The support staff, especially the training program, is less stressed than with full company numbers; and the process allows time for new firefighters to gain important experience before moving into primary company deployment. FY 01 Company A CHFD Hire 4 FTE Figure 105: Example Incremental Staffing Concept FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 Midlothian CHFD Hire Hire 4 FTE 2 FTE and Deploy and Midlothian Company Deploy Hire 2 FTE QRV/TRV 4 FTE FY 06 FY 07 - - NOTE: ESCI recommends hiring approximately four FTE for each company position, i.e. three FTEs per shift plus one additional FTE to account for coverage of accrued leave. The following two figures provide a breakdown of the cost to construct a 9,900 square foot fire station. The example is a cost projection for a fire station located in the market area of central Texas. While the City may choose different design, materials, square footage, and amenities, the illustration provides an idea of the costs to construct a modern fire station. Figure 106: Illustration Project Information 9,900 Projected Size – Square Feet 217,800 Site Size $223.51 Square Foot Cost $758,091 Non-Building Costs TX - Houston Project Location June 2014 Project Date CON Foundation MAS Exterior Wall MAS Interior Wall MET Roof Type CON Floor Type 16 "Last Word: The Ups and Downs of EMS," JEMS, April 2012. 141 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Figure 107: Fire Station Construction Cost Illustration Targeted Building Costs Name Percent $/ft^2 Bidding Requirements 0.78% $1.73 General Requirements 6.22% $13.90 Concrete 11.60% $25.93 Masonry 11.55% $25.82 Metals 6.29% $14.06 Wood & Plastics 15.45% $34.52 Thermal & Moisture Protection 4.49% $10.04 Doors & Windows 5.39% $12.04 Finishes 14.18% $31.69 Specialties 3.36% $7.51 Equipment 0.00% $0.00 Furnishings 0.16% $0.35 Special Construction 0.00% $0.00 Conveying Systems 0.00% $0.00 Mechanical 10.50% $23.46 Electrical 10.04% $22.44 Total Building Costs 100.00% $223.51 Conclusion Cost $17,171 $137,758 $256,969 $255,895 $139,362 $342,102 $99,522 $119,267 $314,020 $74,367 $0 $3,491 $0 $0 $232,502 $222,347 $2,214,774 Construction costs vary widely with property acquisition, materials, and labor often being unknown until the time of a bid announcement. Over the last two-years building costs have decreased significantly in Texas as with much of the rest of the country. However, as the market recovers costs are likely to return to their pre-recession levels. Training Facility Development ESCI learned that hands-on training facilities are limited in the area. As a result, most training has to be completed using available buildings and parking lots. Consideration is recommended for the long-term development of a training site when funding and space becomes available. Classroom instruction is an essential component of preparing emergency responders with knowledge and skills. A training facility or drill ground is a second indispensable element. Training facilities provide a controlled and safe environment to simulate emergencies and develop and test the skills of emergency workers. NFPA 1402: Guide to Building Fire Service Training Centers is a standard that addresses the design and construction of facilities for fire training.17 The document covers the features that should be considered when planning a fire training facility. Absent the availability of suitable training facilities, some fire departments may forego essential training. 17 National Fire Protection Association, Standard 1402: Guide to Building Fire Service Training Centers, 2002 Edition. 142 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Proficient emergency responders have confidence in their own abilities to handle the emergencies they encounter. Best practices suggest that emergency workers have regular access to training grounds for repetitive drills and to develop new skills. An effective and continuous training program results in safer, more efficient, and effective emergency operations. Constructing a modern training facility to comply with industry standards concerning classrooms, practice grounds, training tower, live-fire building, and training props is a significant investment of capital. In addition, the on-going cost of operating and maintaining a training facility further advances the case for joint ownership. CHFD has a clear need, but will be challenged to finance the full build-out of the training facility on its own. The following alternatives are available: First, entering into a cooperative partnership with regional perspective, including not only fire agencies, but also law enforcement, emergency management, and other neighboring agencies can be valuable by sharing costs. Secondly, grants and private funding combined with in-kind donations can be pursued. The likelihood of success in receiving grants is dramatically increased when an effort is cooperative and inclusive of regional partners. Examples of recently constructed basic fire training facilities illustrated in the following figure show that these facilities need not be complicated or ornate to be quite functional. Figure 108: Sample Training Grounds With in-kind donations and grant funding, these fire departments were able to construct the basic buildings with very limited agency expense. Industry Best Practices and Standards As the CHFD continues to move toward a high performing agency that meets or exceeds system best practices, ESCI recommends the following programs and accreditations be implemented and maintained. These programs will ensure the CHFD is at the forefront of industry innovation and efficiencies. In addition, these best practices will position the department to minimize risk while 143 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion maximizing opportunities for partnerships and grant programs as well as maintaining and/or increasing ISO ratings, supplement funding, resources, and services provided. • • • • 144 Texas Fire Chiefs Association Best Practices recognition: An accreditation process that provides a well-defined, Texas Fire Chiefs Association recognized benchmark system for measuring the delivery of fire and emergency services in relation to Texas best practices. Commission on Fire Accreditation recognition of accreditation: An accreditation process that provides well-defined, internationally-recognized benchmark system for measuring the delivery of fire and emergency services in relation to industry best practices. International Academies of Emergency Dispatch Accreditation (ACE Accreditation): An established high standard of excellence for emergency dispatch, by providing the tools to achieve this high standard at both the dispatcher level through certification, and at the communication center level through the accreditation program. Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS Accreditation): CAAS accreditation signifies that your service has met the "gold standard" determined by the ambulance industry to be essential in a modern emergency medical services provider. These standards often exceed those established by state or local regulation. The CAAS standards are designed to increase operational efficiency and clinical quality, while decreasing risk and liability to the organization. Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Conclusion This document provides an enormous amount of technical data, much of which was provided by the department, and allows the reader to gain a clear understanding of the services provided by CHFD as well as an indication of how well those services are being provided. The intent of this document is not intended to be a critical evaluation of the organization but rather provide fire department personnel and City policymakers’ information from which to make informed decisions about the future of the department. Based on information obtained throughout this process, CHFD is functioning at a level commensurate with community expectations and are providing services to the city in line with adopted objectives. While response performance analysis indicates that the department could improve, it is possible that the adoption of the tiered performance recommendations will show that the department is performing much better than presented here based on a single objective. Given the method of funding the fire department, the organization is well resourced and should be commended for undertaking this project to initiate a formal plan for future service delivery. ESCI began collecting data and information for this project in March 2014 and the analysis presented in this report is comprised of months of data review and evaluation including one-on-one interviews with department and City personnel, evaluation of internal documents, policies, rules and regulations, assessment of current service delivery, and the creation of projected service demand and alternative service delivery models. It is ESCI’s sincere hope that the information contained within this document is found to be useful and provides policymakers with the information necessary to meet the emergency services needs of the citizens of Cedar Hill. 145 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Appendices APPENDIX A: TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Service Area Map ......................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 2: Citizen Service Priorities............................................................................................................... 14 Figure 3: Citizen Ranking of Staffing Levels ................................................................................................ 15 Figure 4: Citizen Ranking of Response Levels ............................................................................................. 15 Figure 5: Citizen Ranking of Cost of Services .............................................................................................. 16 Figure 6: Survey Table – Governance ......................................................................................................... 18 Figure 7: Survey Table – Organizational Design .......................................................................................... 20 Figure 8: Organizational Chart .................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 9: Survey Table – Service Area and Infrastructure........................................................................... 22 Figure 10: Survey Table – Operating Budget and Financial Resources ....................................................... 23 Figure 11: Historical Budget ........................................................................................................................ 24 Figure 12: Budget Distribution – FY 13/14 .................................................................................................. 25 Figure 13: City Budget Distribution – FY 13/14........................................................................................... 26 Figure 14: Public Safety Subdivision Distribution ....................................................................................... 26 Figure 15: Comparison of Cost per Capita – FY 13/14 ................................................................................ 27 Figure 16: Public Safety Revenues – FY 13/14 ............................................................................................ 27 Figure 17: Survey Table – Emergency Response Type and Frequency ....................................................... 28 Figure 18: Five-Year Call History ................................................................................................................. 29 Figure 19: Total Percent Change – 2009-2013............................................................................................ 29 Figure 20: Total Incidents per 1,000 Population ......................................................................................... 30 Figure 21: Fires per 1,000 Population ......................................................................................................... 30 Figure 22: Fire Loss per Capita .................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 23: Survey Table – Mission, Vision, Strategic Planning, Goals, and Objectives ............................... 32 Figure 24: Survey Table – Foundational Documents and Processes .......................................................... 33 Figure 25: Survey Table – Record Keeping and Documentation ................................................................ 37 Figure 26: Survey Table – Administrative and Support Staffing ................................................................. 39 Figure 27: Survey Table – Emergency Response Staffing ........................................................................... 42 Figure 28: Firefighters per 1,000 Population .............................................................................................. 45 Figure 29: Survey Table – Personnel and Staffing Management ................................................................ 45 Figure 30: Survey Table – EMS Medical Control and Quality Assurance .................................................... 49 Figure 31: Survey Table – EMS System Integrity and Logistical Support Services ...................................... 52 Figure 32: Survey Table – Emergency Management Planning ................................................................... 54 Figure 33: Survey Table – Emergency Management Resources ................................................................. 55 Figure 34: Survey Table – Service Delivery and Performance .................................................................... 56 Figure 35: CHFD Historical Service Demand, 2009 through 2013 .............................................................. 58 Figure 36: CHFD Percent Change by Incident Category, 2009 through 2013 ............................................. 59 Figure 37: CHFD Service Demand by Incident Category, 2013 ................................................................... 59 Figure 38: CHFD Service Demand by Month, 2013 ..................................................................................... 60 Figure 39: CHFD Service Demand by Day of the Week ............................................................................... 60 Figure 40: CHFD Service Demand by Hour of the Day ................................................................................ 61 Figure 41: CHFD Incident Density, 2013 ..................................................................................................... 62 Figure 42: CHFD Fire Incidents, 2013 .......................................................................................................... 63 Figure 43: CHFD Service Area and Station Response Districts .................................................................... 64 147 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Appendices Figure 44: Cedar Hill Population Density .................................................................................................... 65 Figure 45: CHFD Engine Company Distribution-ISO Criteria ....................................................................... 67 Figure 46: CHFD Aerial Company Distribution-ISO Criteria ........................................................................ 68 Figure 47: CHFD Travel Time Capability-Current Station Locations............................................................ 70 Figure 48: CHFD Travel Time and Emergency Service Demand, 2013 ........................................................ 71 Figure 49: CHFD Station Concentration-Current Station Locations ............................................................ 73 Figure 50: CHFD and Mutual Aid Station Concentration ............................................................................ 74 Figure 51: CHFD Personnel Concentration-Minimum Staffing 17 .............................................................. 75 Figure 52: CHFD Unit Hour Utilization, 2013 .............................................................................................. 76 Figure 53: CHFD Transport Medic Unit Hour Utilization, 2013 ................................................................... 77 Figure 54: Apparatus Average Time and Total Time Committed by Incident Category, 2013 ................... 77 Figure 55: CHFD Concurrent Incidents, 2013 .............................................................................................. 77 Figure 56: CHFD Apparatus Drawdown, 2013 ............................................................................................ 78 Figure 57: Station Reliability ....................................................................................................................... 78 Figure 58: CHFD Workload by Station Area, 2013 ...................................................................................... 79 Figure 59: CHFD Response Frequency, 2013 Priority Incidents .................................................................. 80 Figure 60: CHFD Overall Response Performance, 2013 Priority Incidents ................................................. 81 Figure 61: NFPA Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 81 Figure 62: CHFD 90th Percentile Turnout Time, 2013 ................................................................................ 81 Figure 63: CHFD 90th Percentile Travel Time and Total Response Time by Station, 2013......................... 82 Figure 64: CHFD 90th Percentile Response Performance by Hour of the Day, 2013 Priority Incidents ..... 83 Figure 65: CHFD Mutual or Automatic Aid-8 Minutes Travel ..................................................................... 85 Figure 66: Survey Table – General Training Competencies ........................................................................ 87 Figure 67: Survey Table – Training Program Administration and Management ........................................ 90 Figure 68: Survey Table – Training Resources, Scheduling and Methodology ........................................... 92 Figure 69: Fire Prevention Program Components ...................................................................................... 96 Figure 70: Survey Table – Fire Prevention Code Enforcement ................................................................... 97 Figure 71: Survey Table – New Construction Plan Review and Inspection................................................. 98 Figure 72: Survey Table – Existing Occupancy Inspection Program ........................................................... 99 Figure 73: Recommended Fire Inspection Frequencies............................................................................ 100 Figure 74: Survey Table – Fire Safety and Public Education ..................................................................... 101 Figure 75: Survey Table – Fire Investigation ............................................................................................. 103 Figure 76: Survey Table – Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Planning.......................................... 105 Figure 77: CHFD Station 211 ..................................................................................................................... 107 Figure 78: CHFD Station 212 ..................................................................................................................... 108 Figure 79: CHFD Station 213 ..................................................................................................................... 109 Figure 80: CHFD Station 214 ..................................................................................................................... 110 Figure 81: CHFD Station 211 Major Apparatus ......................................................................................... 111 Figure 82: CHFD Station 212 Major Apparatus ......................................................................................... 111 Figure 83: CHFD Station 213 Major Apparatus ......................................................................................... 112 Figure 84: CHFD Station 214 Major Apparatus ......................................................................................... 112 Figure 85: Economic Theory of Vehicle Replacement .............................................................................. 115 Figure 86: Apparatus Life Expectancies .................................................................................................... 115 Figure 87: Apparatus Replacement Schedule ........................................................................................... 116 Figure 88: Cedar Hill Historical Population Change, US Census Bureau Data........................................... 117 Figure 89: TWDB Population Projection for Cedar Hill, 2010-2040 .......................................................... 118 Figure 90: CHFD Projected Service Demand by Incident Category, 2010-2040 ....................................... 119 Figure 91: CHFD 2010 Census Data Population Density Map ................................................................... 120 148 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Conclusion Figure 92: Cedar Hill Relative Community Risk ......................................................................................... 122 Figure 93: Sample of Critical Task Staffing by Risk .................................................................................... 126 Figure 94: Non-Structure Fire Critical Tasking .......................................................................................... 127 Figure 95: Hazardous Materials Incident Critical Tasking ......................................................................... 127 Figure 96: Motor Vehicle Collision with Entrapment Critical Tasking ...................................................... 128 Figure 97: Emergency Medical Incident Critical Tasking .......................................................................... 128 Figure 98: NFPA Performance Measurement Recommendations ............................................................ 129 Figure 99: Additional NFPA Response Performance Objectives by Population Density Categories ........ 129 Figure 100: First Due Response Standard Example .................................................................................. 129 Figure 101: First Alarm Response Standard Example ............................................................................... 130 Figure 102: CHFD Station 212 Relocation ................................................................................................. 137 Figure 103: CHFD 4 Minutes Travel and Emergency Service Demand with Relocated Station 212 ......... 138 Figure 104: CHFD Future Fifth Station Location ....................................................................................... 140 Figure 105: Example Incremental Staffing Concept.................................................................................. 141 Figure 106: Illustration Project Information ............................................................................................. 141 Figure 107: Fire Station Construction Cost Illustration............................................................................. 142 Figure 108: Sample Training Grounds ....................................................................................................... 143 149 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Appendices APPENDIX B: GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHFD – Cedar Hill Fire Department Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) – A national fire and emergency services consulting, recruitment, and management services firm. Neighborhood Door – A Cedar Hill police distribution system for neighborhood watch leaders and program participants. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) – A national fire service standard setting body which utilizes a broad committee system of industry stakeholders to set standards and recommendation for fire service providers. Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) – A national agency setting standards and criteria for volunteer and professional fire departments to achieve best practice criteria. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) – Responses by the Cedar Hill Fire Department and other entities for the purpose of providing care and treatment of the sick and injured. Mobile Intensive Care Unit (MICU) – An emergency response ambulance that provides a full range of advanced life support equipment and capabilities. Advanced Life Support (ALS) – Equipment and protocols utilized by paramedics and advanced EMTs that include drug therapy, Electrocardiogram, and advanced airway and other patient care management techniques. Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) – A Texas based water and natural resource organization tasked with providing population and natural resource utilization for the State of Texas. Geographic Information Services (GIS) – Computer aided mapping and information analysis systems utilized to produce maps, projections, and recommendations. Fractile Response Time – Response time performance reporting utilizing percentile measurement to ensure accurate performance measurements. 150 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Glossary of Terms Tri-City Cooperative – The existing regional fire service cooperative between the Texas cities of Cedar Hill, Duncanville, and Desoto. Texas State Data Center – The Texas agency charged with collection analysis and participation with the U.S. Census Bureau regarding Texas census data and demographic information. Key Recommendations – Recommendations identified in the agency evaluation to assist CHFD in meeting or exceeding regional and industry best practices that should be addressed within twelve months. Mid-Term Recommendations – Recommendations with complexity and significant resource allocation that should be accomplished in 12-24 months. Long-Term Recommendations – Recommendations with significant resource, policy, and service level implications that may be accomplished in excess of two years. Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI) – A national commission that establishes standards, conducts evaluations, and recognizes volunteer and career fire service providers meeting accreditation standards. Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) – A national commission that establishes standards, conducts evaluations, and recognizes public and private ambulance providers meeting accreditation standards. Texas Fire Chiefs Best Practices – A series of best practices recognized by the Texas Fire Chiefs Association. International Academies of Emergency Dispatch Accreditation (Authorized Center of Excellence ACE Accreditation) – Established standards of excellence for dispatch services including call triaging and pre arrival instructions standards. Engine – A fire apparatus which has water, hose, and pumping capabilities and carries a variety of equipment to address an all-risk response capability. Quint – A fire apparatus which has water, hose, pumping capabilities, and aerial ladder capabilities as well as carrying a variety of equipment to address an all risk-response capability. 151 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Appendices Truck – A fire apparatus that has aerial ladder capabilities and a minimum standard set of two hundred and sixteen feet of ground ladders as well as carrying a variety of equipment to address an all-risk response capability. Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) – A computerized system of mapping and dispatch data to provide response recommendations, maintain and monitor unit status, and store and report response data. U.S. Fire Administration – The United States government fire agency responsible for data collection, monitoring, training and recommendations to the US Fire Service and citizens on behalf of the Executive Branch. Texas Health and Human Services Ambulance Supplemental Payment Program (ASSPP) – A Texas statutory supplemental payment system available to public ambulance providers for indigent and medicaid patients transported by the public agency. Texas Medicaid Healthcare Partnership Claim System (TMHP) – The regulatory framework and standards for billing and collecting under the ASSPP. Standard Operating Procedures – Procedures adopted and enforced by the CHFD. Emergency Vehicle Technicians (EVT) – Mechanics trained and certified to work on fire apparatus and fire suppression vehicle pumps and system. Full Time Equivalent – The equivalent of one full time position working two thousand and eighty hours on a forty hour work week, or two thousand nine hundred and twelve hours on a fifty six hour work week. Emergency Management (EM) – Citywide coordination and management of mitigation measures, preparedness initiatives, response plans, and recovery protocols from disasters. Participation and Decision Making Process – A process which utilizes committee, labor, and organizations input in the development and implementation of policies and procedures. Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT) – A nationally vetted physical ability test seen as a best practice that was jointly developed between the Internationals Association of Fire Chiefs and the International Association of Fire Fighters. 152 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program and Service Audit and Master Plan Glossary of Terms NFPA Standard 1582 – A national standard for medical and fitness for duty requirements for firefighting personnel. National Incident Management System (NIMS) – A nationally adopted standard requiring and prescribing training and utilization of the incident command system by local, regional, state, and national agencies in response to emergencies and disasters. Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) – Local community teams receiving between 16 and 20 hours of basic training to become resources during or after a disaster at the local, state, or national level. National Fire Incident Records System (NFIRS) – A national fire service data set submitted by local fire agencies for the purpose of establishing a national data stream and trending capability. Mobile Data Computer (MDC) – A mobile computer terminal located in all fire department responding apparatus and vehicles for the purpose of receiving and sending incident data and information to the dispatch center. Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) – Computer and graphic positioning technology that collects and displays real time data of vehicle location, travel routes, and status. Insurance Service Organization (ISO) – A national insurance rating agency that rates fire protection services based on staffing, training, water, and other capabilities from one (the highest) to ten (the lowest). ISO ratings are used in determining commercial and residential insurance rates. National Fire Protection Association Standards 1710 and 1720 – Standards that specify staffing levels and response requirements for fire and EMS calls by professional and volunteer fire departments. Texas Commission on Fire Protection (TCFP) – A Texas fire service commission that determines training and certification standards for Texas fire service agencies and personnel. Firewise Communities/Ready Set Go – Nationally adopted standards and a comprehensive urban interface and community preparedness and response standard to prevent and combat wildfires. Life and Fire Safety Team (LAFS) – A team of fire safety professionals that routinely visit schools and community forums to increase fire and life safety education and preparedness. 153 Cedar Hill Fire Department, Texas Fire Department Program Service Audit and Master Plan Appendices Fire Investigation Team (FIT) – A team of fire investigation professionals from a number of jurisdictions that converge to assist with the cause and origin determination of fires. Just Culture and Crew Resource Management (CRM) – Industry best practice training and risk management programs intended to create a culture of safety that encourages and rewards due process, self-reporting, and teamwork. 154 Corporate Offices 25030 SW Parkway Avenue, Suite 330 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 800.757.3724 Eastern Region Office 111 Kilson Drive, Suite 208 Mooresville, North Carolina 28117 704.660.8027 © Copyright 2014. Emergency Services Consulting International. All Rights Reserved. National Capital Region Office 4025 Fair Ridge Drive Fairfax, Virginia 22033 703.273.0911