Regional Growth Forecast 2010-2040
Transcription
Regional Growth Forecast 2010-2040
Regional Growth Forecast 2010-2040 PROJECT STAFF Jim Kemp ........................................................................Executive Director Peter Imhof .......................................................... Deputy Director, Planning Brian Bresolin ....................................................... Regional Analyst, Author Adopted, December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 1 GEOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................................. 8 FORECASTS AND METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 9 CENSUS DEMOGRAPHICS ..................................................................................................... 22 BIRTHS, DEATHS AND MIGRATION ....................................................................................... 46 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT .......................................................................................................... 48 GROWTH FORECAST COMPARISONS .................................................................................. 66 APPENDICES 1 Santa Barbara County Association of Governments Roster .............................. 70 2 Technical Planning Advisory Committee Roster ................................................ 71 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1, Countywide Population, Employment and Housing Forecasts 2010-2040 Figure 2, Sub-county Population Forecasts 2010-2040 Figure 3, Sub-county Employment Forecasts 2010-2040 Figure 4, Sub-county Household Forecasts 2010-2040 Figure 5, 2010 to 2040 Employment, Population and Household Forecasts Figure 6, Santa Barbara County Jobs as a Percentage of the Nation Figure 7, Santa Barbara County Jobs as a Percentage of California Figure 8, SBCAG Forecast 2010-2040 Employment Change by Economic Sector Figure 9, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Information, Financial Activities, Other Services Figure 10, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Professional Business, Education and Health, Leisure and Hospitality, Government Figure 11, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Farming, Mining, Construction, and Manufacturing Figure 12, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Wholesale/Retail Trade, Transportation, Warehousing, Utilities Figure 13, Population and Job Growth 2007-2040 Figure 14, Population Growth 2000-2010 Figure 15, Proportion of Countywide Population, 2010 and 2000 Figure 16, Population Distribution for Santa Barbara County Regions 2000 and 2010 2000 Census, Total 399,347 Figure 17, Housing Unit Change 2000-2010 Figure 18, Housing Unit Distribution in 2010, 152,834 Total Units Figure 19, Countywide Race and Hispanic Origin in 2010, 423,895 Total Population Figure 20, 2010 Countywide Age Distribution, 423,895 Total Population Figure 21, 2000 and 2010 Countywide Age Distribution Figure 22, 2010 Countywide Age Distribution Summary, 423,895 Total Population Figure 23, 2000 Countywide Age Distribution Summary, 399,347 Total Population Figure 24, 2010 Median Age Figure 25, 2010 Household Size Estimates Figure 26, Household Size Change 2000 to 2010 Figure 27, 2010 Household Size Estimates for Renter and Owner Occupied Units Figure 28, Percentage of Renter- and Owner-Occupied Households Figure 29, 2010 Vacant Units, Seasonal, Recreational or Occasional Use, 3,354 Total Figure 30, 2010 Countywide Group Quarters Distribution, 17,782 Total Figure 31, 2000 Countywide Group Quarters Distribution, 16,617 Total 2 3 4 5 10 12 12 14 15 15 16 16 17 22 23 25 26 27 29 31 32 33 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 40 Figure 32, 2010 Group Quarters, for County Communities, 17,782 Total 41 Figure 33, 2010 Countywide Household Types, 142,104 Total 42 Figure 34, 2010 Over 65 Living Alone, 14,837 Total 43 Figure 35, 2010 Single Mothers with Children Under 18 Years of Age, 8,092 Total 44 Figure 36, Comparison of Countywide Births and Deaths, 1990 -2011 46 Figure 37, Countywide Net Migration, 1990-2011 47 Figure 38, Historical Countywide Enrollment 50 Figure 39, 2009/10 Santa Barbara County School Enrollments by Grade 51 Figure 40, 2000/01 Santa Barbara County School Enrollment by Grade 51 Figure 41, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10. Hope Elementary 55 Figure 42, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10. Cold Spring Elementary 55 Figure 43, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10. Carpinteria Unified 56 Figure 44, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10. College Elementary 56 Figure 45, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10, Goleta Union 57 Figure 46, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10, Santa Barbara High School District 58 Figure 47, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10, Santa Maria Elementary and Joint Union High School 59 Figure 48, Ethnic Distribution of the Student Population in Santa Barbara County, 2009, 65,960 Total Enrollments 60 Figure 49, Historic and Forecast Enrollment Data 64 Figure 50, Santa Barbara County Proportion of Enrollment by Grade 1975-2020 65 Figure 51, Countywide, 2010-2040 Employment Forecast Comparisons SBCAG/CCSCE and California Economic Forecast 66 Figure 52, Comparison of SBCAG and the California Economic Forecast, 2040 Employment by Sector (1,000’s) 67 Figure 53, Population Forecast Comparisons, SBCAG/CCSCE, California Economic Forecast, and DOF 68 Figure 54, Historic Growth and Past Predictions 69 LIST OF TABLES Table 1, Employment Forecast and Change by Sector Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 Table 2, Ratio of Population to Jobs Table 3, Population Forecast Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 Table 4, SBCAG and DOF 2010-2040 Population Forecast Comparisons Table 5, Santa Barbara County 2006-2010 ACS Headship Formation Rates Table 6, Household Forecast Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 Table 7, Trend-based Allocation Methodology Subject to Land Use Capacity Population, Household and Employment Forecast Table 8, Santa Barbara County Jurisdictions, Total Population Table 9, Unincorporated Places Population Change from 2000 to 2010 Table 10, Jurisdictions Housing Unit Change from 2000 to 2010 Table 11, Occupied, Vacant Units and Vacancy Rate in 2010 Table 12, Census 2000 and 2010 Housing Vacancy Rate Comparison Table 13, Percentage of Hispanic Population 2000 and 2010 Table 14, Land Area and Population Density, 2010 Census Table 15, Annual Enrollment Comparison, 2008/09 and 2009/10 Table 16, Unified School District Enrollment 2008/09 and 2009/10 Table 17, Private School Enrollment Table 18, Total Public and Private School Enrollment, 2008/09-2009/10 Table 19, 2006/2007, 2007/2008 Inter-district Transfers 21 22 24 26 27 28 30 45 52 53 61 62 63 LIST OF MAPS Map 1, Locations of Incorporated and Unincorporated Communities Map 2, Santa Barbara County School Districts 8 49 13 17 19 19 20 20 Summary This forecast is a requirement of the Federal Highway Administration for long-range transportation planning. Regional Growth Forecast 2012 (RGF 2012) presents forecasts of population and employment between 2010 and 2040 for Santa Barbara County, its major economic and demographic regions and its eight incorporated cities. Population and employment forecasts are prepared for all incorporated cities and the surrounding unincorporated areas. The county-wide forecast is for 5-year periods between the calendar years 2010 to 2040. The sub-county forecasts are for 2015, 2035 and 2040. In addition to forecast estimates, this report also provides additional, related information regarding births and migration, census demographics, and school enrollment. The purpose of the Regional Growth Forecast is to provide a consistent forecast to the year 2040 for use in long-range comprehensive planning. The forecast will serve as an input towards the development of the SBCAG Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy, traffic forecasts, air quality impact analysis, housing needs for Housing Elements of General Plans, and demand estimates for sewer treatment plants and other facilities. Also important is the use of the forecast as a database for social service agencies, marketing studies, and analysis of growth-related issues. The SBCAG Board adopted previous Regional Growth Forecasts in 1985, 1989, 1994, 2002 and 2007. The forecast is updated as new data or policy changes occur to ensure that it provides the most accurate assessment of future growth. For example, the current RGF 2012 integrates updated data from recent Housing Element and General Plan updates and 2010 Census data. Local jurisdictions modify and revise land use plans and growth management policies that impact long-range forecasts. Periodic review of these land use and policy changes is conducted to determine if revisions to the forecast are necessary. Comparison with other estimates of current population and county-level, long-term population forecasts help track the accuracy of the SBCAG forecast. SBCAG hired a consultant, Stephen Levy, from the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy (CCSCE), to provide technical guidance and assist staff in the development of countywide forecasts of employment, population and households. The SBCAG region-wide employment projections were based on a top-down approach using national and State projections developed in 2011. The forecast is based on a two-step growth forecast methodology, involving a county-wide, top-down employment and population forecast in the first step and the allocation of both employment and population forecasts to the sub-regional level in the second step, using a bottom-up method considering local General Plan land uses. This twostep methodology is consistent with that utilized by most MPOs and is generally accepted by State agencies, including Housing and Community Development. The following figures provide a summary of the county-wide and sub-county population, employment and household forecasts. Over the course of the forecast period, the county-wide population is forecast to increase by 96,200 from 423,800 to 520,000 people or 23 percent. Employment is forecast to increase by 60,000 from 197,400 to 257,600 jobs or 30 percent. The City of Santa Maria has the highest forecast growth with an increase in population of 41,500 people or 42 percent and employment of 28,700 jobs or 84 percent. 1 Figure 1, County-wide Population, Employment and Housing Forecasts 2010-2040 2 Figure 2, Sub-county Population Forecasts 2010-2040 (note dual axis) 3 Figure 3, Sub-county Employment Forecasts 2010-2040 4 Figure 4, Sub-county Household Forecasts 2010-2040 (note dual axis) Summary Points Job growth to 2040 in the nation, state and SBCAG region will be affected by two broad trends: recovery of employment lost during the recession by 2015 or shortly thereafter. After 2020, job growth slows everywhere as baby boomer retirements slow the growth in the working age population and labor force even with the longer working lives expected for older workers. The region has a comparatively high share of employment in agriculture and government, which are projected to experience below-average job growth to 2040. At the same time, the region has below-average shares in professional and business services and internet-related information services, which are expected to experience above-average job growth. 5 The county has concentrations in leisure and hospitality (tourism) and self-employed jobs compared to the national average and these two sectors are projected to have above-average job growth prospects. The manufacturing job losses, following the national pattern, are the result of strong productivity gains. Actual production and export levels are expected to increase in the state and nation, but not enough to offset productivity growth as firms are able to produce more with fewer people. A commuting assumption projects the number of net in-commuters will double over the 30-year forecast period from 11,000 in 2010 to 22,000 in 2040, slower than the historical rate, but still acknowledging limits to how far growth in in-commuting can be feasibly reduced. With historically high unemployment rates in the county, and elsewhere, there exists a resident labor force that in theory will be available to take new jobs as the unemployment rate declines. Allocating region-wide forecast population and job growth to the sub-regional level is based on an approach using a trend-based allocation methodology subject to land use capacity. Of all county jurisdictions, the City of Santa Maria experienced the largest population increase of 29 percent or 22,130 people, from 77,423 in 2000 to 99,553 in 2010. The unincorporated area of the county currently constitutes the largest proportion of the 2010 Census population of 423,895 people with 31 percent, followed by the City of Santa Maria with 24 percent. North County regions increased from 50 percent of the total population in 2000 to 52 percent in 2010. Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic-origin population showed a significant increase. County-wide, its proportion increased from 34 percent to 43 percent of the total population. A comparison of the age distribution over the 10-year period from 2000 and 2010 shows an overall increase in the population 45 years and over, which includes members of the baby boomer generation approaching retirement. The total number of births has declined somewhat during the 1990 to 2010 period, ranging from over 6,500 to 5,500 annually. The number of deaths is more constant, ranging from between 2,500 to 3,000 annually. As a result, the annual natural increase in the population has ranged from a high of 4,000 to a low of 2,500 and is approximately 3,000 currently. Net migration has been negative for the majority of reporting years and most recently reflects the loss of jobs in the economic slowdown as workers left the area for other employment opportunities elsewhere. 6 Continued school enrollment decline in the South Coast suggests that young families may be migrating out of the area. If they continue to leave the South Coast, family size and the subsequent number of overall births would decline to some extent as well. Grade level enrollment in the 2009/10 school year shows the kindergarten level as the highest of all other grades. The increase in kindergarten enrollment is occurring predominantly in North County schools, for example, Santa Maria Elementary increased 35 percent over the 2000 to 2010 period, while Santa Barbara Elementary increased by 1.4 percent and other South Coast schools declined. Enrollment between the 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 academic years increased countywide by 40 students, from 65,920 to 65,960, an increase of 246 students in North County school districts and a decrease in South Coast school districts by 206 students, over this two-year period down from an all-time high of 67,500 students in the 2003/2004 academic year. According to Carpinteria student transfer data, approximately 250 Carpinteria students reside in Ventura County jurisdictions, representing children of parents who still work in the area but have moved to obtain more affordable housing. In the North County, the Santa Maria Bonita School District continues to increase enrollment, suggesting that families are moving into the area and/or new births are contributing to the new student enrollments. Future school enrollment is forecast by the Department of Finance to experience a gradual increase of 2,165 students from 65,960 in 2010 to 68,175 in 2020. High school graduates are forecasted to decrease by 224 students from 4,287 in 2010 to 4,063 in 2020. The SBCAG employment and population forecasts compare favorably with other forecasts. 7 Geography The county boundaries are identical to the Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Lompoc Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), including the Channel Islands, which together comprise nearly 2,750 square miles of land and inland water area. Approximately rectangular in shape, Santa Barbara County is bordered on the north by San Luis Obispo County, on the east by Ventura County, and on the south and west by 107 miles of Pacific coastline. Much of the county is mountainous. The Santa Ynez, San Rafael and Sierra Madre mountains extend in a predominately east-west direction. Within the county, there are numerous fertile agricultural areas, including the Santa Maria, Cuyama, Lompoc, and Santa Ynez Valleys, and the southeast coastal plain. These areas, which include most of the developed land, also accommodate the majority of the population. Los Padres National Forest, in the eastern part of the county, covers approximately 44 percent of the total county area. Vandenberg Air Force Base is in the Lompoc region, while UCSB is on the South Coast. “North County” refers to the area west and north of Gaviota and includes the Lompoc, Santa Maria, Santa Ynez and Cuyama valleys. “South Coast” refers to the Goleta, Santa Barbara, and Carpinteria coastal plain. The forecasts are prepared for the eight incorporated cities and the adjacent unincorporated areas surrounding them. The following map provides the geographical locations of the cities referenced in this report and the surrounding unincorporated communities. Map 1, Locations of Incorporated and Unincorporated Communities 8 Forecast Methodology The forecast is based on a two-step growth forecast methodology, involving a County-wide, topdown employment and population forecast in the first step and allocation of both employment and population forecasts to the sub-regional level, using a bottom-up method considering local General Plan land uses, in the second step. This two-step methodology is consistent with that utilized by most MPOs and is generally accepted by State agencies, including Housing and Community Development. At the request of the SBCAG Technical Planning Advisory Committee, SBCAG hired a consultant, the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy (CCSCE), to provide technical guidance and assist staff in the development of County-wide forecasts. CCSCE was founded in 1969 to provide an independent assessment of economic and demographic trends in California and its major economic regions (for more information, see CCSCE - Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy). Stephen Levy, CCSCE’s founder and director, holds degrees in economics from MIT and Stanford University and is a leading economist and recognized expert on long-term trends in California. SBCAG staff, with Stephen Levy’s input, assistance and guidance as well as review by the SBCAG Technical Planning Advisory Committee completed the first step of the regional growth forecast: the development of region-wide employment, population and household forecasts. In the second step of the regional growth forecast, these region-wide forecasts were allocated subregionally using a trend-based approach limited by land use capacity as determined by local land use plans. The Santa Barbara County employment forecast follows the CCSCE methodology, which determines the County’s share of California statewide employment forecasts and national trends. The population forecast is based on the ratio of population to jobs predicted by the employment forecast, while considering assumptions for increased net commuting (in- minus out-commuting) and excess labor force due to current high unemployment. The household forecast is based on application of household headship rates (the rates at which new households are formed) to the population forecast. The County-wide population and household forecasts depend on two important policy and technical assumptions regarding net incommuting and absorption of excess labor force that are discussed later. 9 The following summary figure shows the employment, population and household forecasts to 2040, based on these assumptions. Figure 5, 2010 to 2040 Employment, Population and Household Forecasts 10 Employment Forecast The SBCAG region-wide employment projections were based on national and State projections developed in 2011 using the following inputs and steps: A national projection of total employment was based on a new post-2010 Census set of U.S. population projections by age and sex with updated immigration assumptions developed by John Pitkin and Dowell Myers of the Population Dynamics Research Group at USC. Their findings and assumptions are described at http://www.usc.edu/schools/price/futures/. National population projections were combined with projections of labor force participation rates from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to develop a national projection of total employment to 2040. CCSCE developed the industry detail (i.e., manufacturing, agriculture, etc.) based on available national forecasts. California employment projections were developed using CCSCE’s long-term projection model, which analyzes the share of U.S. job growth that will be located in California by detailed industry. SBCAG projections were developed assuming that each major industry in the SBCAG area would generally follow the projected state growth path. As a result, the final job projections depend on the structure of employment in the SBCAG region and the projected growth for each industry in the nation and state. Job growth to 2040 in the nation, state and SBCAG region will be affected by two broad trends: Recovery of employment lost during the recession by 2015 or shortly thereafter. All forecasts reviewed by CCSCE have the national and state economy returning to full employment in this time period. Some employment lost during the recession will not come back in exactly the same industry, but it will be replaced by other jobs. Recovery from recession makes the 2010-2020 growth rate higher than it would otherwise be, for example, if job growth to 2020 were measured from the 2007 pre-recession peak. After 2020, job growth slows everywhere as baby boomer retirements slow the growth in the working age population and labor force even with the longer working lives expected for older workers. The SBCAG region’s share of U.S. employment fell during the early 1990s as a result of the recession at that time and permanent job losses related to cutbacks in defense spending and military bases. The region regained some of these losses in the following decade as the state and region experienced above-average job growth during the latter part of the 1990s. Since 2002, the region has maintained a relatively stable share of U.S. employment, meaning that the regional and national job growth rates were similar. The detailed industry job projections developed for the SBCAG region indicate a slightly higher share of national employment for the region between 2020 and 2040 compared to the region’s share in 2010, as the following figures show. 11 Figure 6, Santa Barbara County Jobs as a Percentage of the Nation The region grew more slowly than the state during the late 1990s as the state’s job growth occurred mostly in the large urban regions with concentrations in technology and foreign trade. On the other hand, the region was less hard hit during the construction downturn in the most recent recession so the region’s share grew temporarily between 2007 and 2010. The long-term projections show the region returning to the share of state employment observed in the period from 2000 to 2006. Figure 7, Santa Barbara County Jobs as a Percentage of California 12 Table 1, Employment Forecast by Sector Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 (1,000’s) Economic Sector Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transp., Warehousing and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional & Business Services Educational & Health Services Leisure & Hospitality Other services, except public administration Government Self Employed 2010 18.7 1.0 7.0 11.2 4.0 17.9 2.8 3.4 6.3 21.7 20.9 22.0 5.4 38.1 17.0 2015 18.6 1.0 8.2 11.5 4.4 18.9 3.1 3.8 7.0 25.2 23.8 24.4 5.9 38.8 19.1 2020 18.6 1.0 9.4 11.8 4.7 19.9 3.4 4.1 7.6 28.8 26.7 26.9 6.5 39.4 21.2 2025 18.0 1.0 9.7 11.5 4.7 20.0 3.4 4.2 7.7 30.5 28.3 28.0 6.6 40.2 21.8 2030 17.4 0.9 9.9 11.2 4.7 20.1 3.4 4.2 7.7 32.3 30.0 29.0 6.8 41.0 22.4 2035 17.0 0.9 10.3 11.0 4.8 20.5 3.5 4.3 7.9 34.5 32.0 30.5 7.1 42.4 23.3 2040 16.6 0.9 10.7 10.8 4.8 20.8 3.6 4.4 8.0 36.6 33.9 31.8 7.3 43.5 24.1 Total Jobs 197.4 213.7 229.9 235.6 241.3 250.0 257.6 Employment Forecast Change by Sector Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 (1,000’s) Economic Sector Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transp., Warehousing and Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional & Business Services Educational & Health Services Leisure & Hospitality Other services, except public administration Government Self Employed Total Jobs 2010‐2040 2010‐2015 2015‐2020 2020‐2025 2025‐2030 2030‐2035 2035‐2040 Change Change Change Change Change Change Change ‐2.1 ‐0.1 ‐0.1 ‐0.6 ‐0.6 ‐0.4 ‐0.5 ‐0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 1.2 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 ‐0.4 0.3 0.3 ‐0.3 ‐0.3 ‐0.2 ‐0.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.9 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 14.9 3.5 3.5 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.0 13.0 2.9 2.9 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.9 9.8 2.4 2.4 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.9 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 5.4 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.1 7.0 2.1 2.1 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 60.1 16.2 13 16.2 5.7 5.7 8.7 7.6 Economic Sector Growth Assumptions The Santa Barbara County region has a different job composition by economic sector compared to the state and nation, which explains the trends in overall job growth. The region has a comparatively high share of employment in agriculture and government, which, compared to the previous state growth rates, are projected to experience below-average job growth to 2040. At the same time, the region has below-average shares in professional and business services and internet-related information services, which are expected to experience above-average job growth. On the other hand, the region has higher concentrations in leisure and hospitality (tourism) and self-employed jobs compared to the national average and these two sectors are projected to have above-average job growth prospects. The region, like the state and nation, will experience some initial recovery of the employment in retail trade and finance lost during the most recent recession, but will experience slow job growth in these sectors in later years as technology and internet shopping constrain job growth. The region is expected to show a small recovery in manufacturing employment before the longterm trend of declining job levels returns in the years between 2020 and 2040. The manufacturing job losses, following the national pattern, are the result of strong productivity gains. Actual production and export levels are expected to increase in the state and nation, but not enough to offset productivity growth as firms are able to produce more with fewer people. Figure 8, SBCAG Forecast 2010-2040 Employment Change by Economic Sector 14 The following figures show countywide historic employment growth from 1990 to 2010 by economic sectors. The farming sector employment continues to increase both short and long term, as do the government and health care sectors. Due to the most recent recession, a number of sectors have experienced short-term declines, including manufacturing, construction, education, leisure and hospitality, financial, professional and business services, among others. Figure 9, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Information, Financial Activities, Other Services Figure 10, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Professional Business, Education and Health, Leisure and Hospitality, Government 15 Figure 11, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Farming, Mining, Construction, and Manufacturing Figure 12, 1990-2010 Sector Growth, Wholesale/Retail Trade, Transportation, Warehousing, Utilities 16 Population Forecast Methodology and Assumptions The SBCAG population was projected using a ratio of population to employment based on CCSCE figures and the CCSCE employment forecast. The table below shows the ratio of population to employment for 1990, 2000, 2007 and CCSCE’s projected ratios for 2040. The 2010 ratio is omitted because, with high unemployment, 2010 is not an equilibrium year and does not help to assess future years. The California and SBCAG projections for 2040 initially assume that their population/employment ratios will change by the same amount as the national change. This is equivalent to assuming no increase for in-commuting or that all new jobs are filled by people who live in the region. The basic trend between 2007 and 2040 is that employment grows more slowly than population as a result of the large wave of baby boomer retirements, with retirees continuing to reside locally. The table below shows that California has a higher population/job ratio compared to the nation as a result of the higher birth rate and the resulting additional children. The SBCAG region has a ratio that is closest to the national average, but the gap shrank between 1990 and 2007 as a result of the growing in-commute. Table 2, Ratio of Population to Jobs U.S. CA SBCAG 1990 2.041 2.111 2.081 2000 1.953 2.087 2.008 2007 2.008 2.125 2.018 2040 2.133 2.250 2.143 Using these ratios, the calculated 2040 SBCAG population consistent with the forecasted 257,600 jobs would be a population of 552,000. The population and job growth rates for 2007-2040 calculated using these ratios are shown below. Figure 13, Population and Job Growth 2007-2040 17 Two important assumptions must be discussed with respect to the population forecast: net incommuting and excess labor force absorption. Net In-Commuting The population forecast requires an assumption regarding net in-commuting. The assumption about net in-commuting concerns how many people working in the region will also live in the region and relates to jobs/housing balance. If, for example, SBCAG were to assume that 10,000 of the added jobs would be filled by residents living outside the county and that average household size for these workers would be 3.0 persons/per household, then that would reduce the county resident population in 2040 by 30,000. SBCAG staff considered a range of options concerning net in-commuting, including: (1) no net increase in in-commuters, (2) in-commuting increasing at a constant proportion based on current in-commuting, and (3) in-commuting doubling over the study period. Historically, in Santa Barbara County, in-commuters have more than doubled in the 20-year 1990-to-2010 timeframe from 5,000 to 11,000. The existing population projections developed by Department of Finance for Santa Barbara County appear to assume a continuation of increasing levels of incommuting such that an increasing number of regional jobs will be filled by residents living outside the region. In the previous SBCAG forecast, adopted in 2007, there was also an implicit commute assumption of approximately 36,000 in 2040. Given the growth in net in-commuting that occurred over the last 20 years, it is probably unrealistic to assume that net in-commuting can be held constant at current levels for the next 30 years. Fundamental differences in housing affordability will still result in workers locating outside the region and commuting in. While improving the jobs/housing balance is desirable, some increase in net in-commuting is almost inevitable and must be taken into account. A commuting assumption projects that the number of net in-commuters will double over the 30year forecast period from 11,000 in 2010 to 22,000 in 2040, slower than the historical rate, but still acknowledging limits to how far growth in in-commuting can be feasibly reduced. This assumption is used in SBCAG’s calculation of County-wide regional growth. Excess Labor Force The population projection also must make an assumption about the currently unemployed excess labor force. With historically high unemployment rates in the county, and elsewhere, there exists a resident labor force that in theory will be available to take new jobs as the unemployment rate declines. This labor force will fill some of the new jobs and reduce the short-term demand for new in-commuting workers and the population and household growth otherwise associated with these new jobs. The excess labor force assumption includes a reduction of the unemployment rate from 9.4% in 2010 to 7.5% in 2015 and 5.5% in 2020. This assumption results in absorption over this period of an excess resident labor force of approximately 7,100 workers. 18 Population Forecast The resulting population forecast, based on the population to employment ratios, and including the commuting assumption and the excess resident labor force, is shown below. Table 3, Population Forecast Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 Forecast Year Population 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 423,800 428,614 445,891 470,445 495,000 507,482 519,965 Assumptions: Doubling of commuters and use of excess resident labor force. Population Forecast Change Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 Forecast Period 2010-2040 2010-2015 2015-2020 2020-2025 2025-2030 2030-2035 2035-2040 Population Change 96,165 4,814 17,277 24,554 24,555 12,482 12,483 The SBCAG population forecast is conservative in comparison with the most recent interim forecasts produced by the Department of Finance and with the previous SBCAG forecast in the short term to 2025 as compared in the following table. The differences in the forecasts are due to their varying methodologies. The previous SBCAG 2007 forecast applied a bottom-up approach applying housing constraints to population growth. The SBCAG forecast follows a top–down, employment-driven approach, while the Department of Finance employs a demographic-based approach using births, deaths and migration. Table 4, SBCAG and DOF 2010-2040 Population Forecast Comparisons Population Forecasts 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 SBCAG 423,800 428,614 445,891 470,445 495,000 507,482 519,965 SBCAG 2007 Forecast 430,200 444,900 459,600 473,400 481,400 487,000 492,800 DOF Interim 425,391 432,660 443,934 N/A N/A N/A N/A 19 Household Forecast To determine the countywide household forecast, forecast population growth is disaggregated into age and race using the Department of Finance forecast age, race data. (Hispanic Origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race and is treated as a separate category.) This step is done so that the SBCAG household forecast makes assumptions consistent with the Department of Finance regarding future race and age distributions, which have an influence on future household formation. The population by age and race for the various forecast periods is then applied to Santa Barbara County-specific age and race household headship formation rates from the 2006-2010 American Community Survey. These are the rates at which new households are formed, a method that is used by Department of Finance and others. The headship formation rates multiplied by the household population (minus group quarters) give an estimate of household demand. Table 5, Santa Barbara County 2006-2010 ACS Headship Formation Rates SB County Headship Rates Other Mixed Race Age Total White Only 15-24 0.128193 0.159789 0.083035 0.090635 0.160968 25-34 0.389536 0.457935 0.253025 0.348125 0.366251 35-44 0.478574 0.509246 0.334684 0.453995 0.494866 45-54 0.538998 0.557183 0.602389 0.510952 0.491395 55-64 0.561934 0.596292 0.479475 0.496631 0.424143 65-74 0.593537 0.624546 0.715200 0.472754 0.524206 75+ 0.6322 0.6633 Black 0.6943 Hispanic 0.5078 0.5204 Table 6, Household Forecast Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 Forecast Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Household Forecast 142,100 143,500 149,900 159,600 170,200 177,400 183,600 Household Forecast Change Santa Barbara County 2010-2040 Forecast Period Household Change 20102040 41,500 20102015 1,400 20152020 6,400 20 20202025 9,100 20252030 11,200 20302035 7,200 20352040 6,200 Sub-regional Allocation Allocating region-wide forecast population and job growth to the sub-regional level is based on an approach using a trend-based allocation methodology subject to land use capacity. In the absence of other policy or market changes, it is reasonable to expect that past growth trends will continue into the future, subject only to existing land use constraints. The land use constraints are determined by the local jurisdictions’ general plan capacity and integrated into the SBCAG land use model. The forecast periods for the sub-regional allocation are 2020, 2035 and 2040, which coincide with the SBCAG Regional Transportation Plan. Note that the growth resulting from the UCSB Long Range Development Plan is allocated to the South Coast Unincorporated area, increasing the past growth trend in population for that area. A significant proportion of the UCSB population growth is in group quarters, which are not considered households. Table 7, Trend-based Allocation Methodology Subject to Land Use Capacity Population, Household and Employment Forecast 2010 2020 2035 2040 Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Santa Maria City 99,989 27,079 34,333 108,839 30,060 49,800 135,071 39,230 59,934 141,529 41,512 63,010 Guadalupe City 7,080 1,810 686 7,501 1,952 723 9,309 2,584 1,729 9,660 2,708 1,754 Solvang City 5,230 2,167 3,364 5,333 2,202 3,538 5,922 2,408 3,547 5,958 2,421 3,547 Buellton City 4,811 1,755 1,884 5,550 2,003 3,877 7,088 2,540 3,980 7,403 2,652 3,980 Lompoc City 42,092 13,242 10,686 42,100 13,246 11,643 46,975 14,949 12,765 47,723 15,213 12,777 Goleta City 29,824 10,880 21,120 29,954 10,924 25,247 33,912 12,307 25,285 34,588 12,546 25,297 Santa Barbara City 87,396 34,996 62,912 87,813 35,112 64,597 94,876 37,578 66,449 96,000 37,976 66,667 Carpinteria City 13,029 4,756 6,075 13,284 4,841 6,666 13,825 5,030 6,693 13,893 5,054 6,693 Santa Maria Unincorporated 32,737 11,642 6,345 32,751 11,647 7,759 39,244 13,917 8,849 39,829 14,123 10,220 Guadalupe Unincorporated 265 93 283 271 95 283 320 112 296 388 136 296 Cuyama Unincorporated 1,241 447 366 1,241 447 366 1,484 532 366 1,507 540 366 Solvang‐Santa Ynez Unincorporated 12,633 4,761 7,558 12,646 4,764 7,944 15,110 5,625 10,036 15,426 5,736 11,658 Lompoc Unincorporated 15,652 5,407 9,449 15,652 5,407 9,833 18,652 6,455 10,563 18,949 6,560 11,244 Santa Barbara Unincorporated 67,216 21,185 24,754 78,320 23,299 27,071 80,913 24,204 27,628 82,161 24,645 27,661 Carpinteria Unincorporated 4,689 1,907 2,292 4,700 1,911 2,524 4,865 1,968 2,588 4,996 2,014 2,588 Total Unincorporated 134,433 45,442 51,047 145,581 47,570 55,779 160,588 52,813 60,324 163,257 53,754 64,032 Total County 423,885 142,127 192,107 445,955 147,910 221,870 507,564 169,439 240,706 520,011 173,835 247,757 Notes: Includes the UCSB Long Range Plan Population growth of 11,105, household growth of 2,113 and employment growth of 1,634 Subregional forecast does not included self‐employed growth of approximately 7,000 that is in the countywide forecast. The 2010 employment baseline consists of the InfoUSA address based employment that is approximately 5,000 less than the countywide total. Subregional Household forecast is calculated by dividing population growth by census 2010 household size. Jurisdiction Population, Household and Employment Forecast Change Jurisdiction 2010‐ 2020 Change 2020‐2035 Change 2035‐2040 Change 2010‐2040 Change Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Santa Maria City 8,850 2,981 15,467 26,232 9,170 10,135 6,458 2,282 3,075 41,540 14,433 28,677 Guadalupe City 421 142 37 1,808 632 1,006 351 124 25 2,580 898 1,068 Solvang City 104 35 174 588 206 9 37 13 0 729 254 183 Buellton City 738 248 1,993 1,538 537 103 315 111 0 2,592 897 2,095 Lompoc City 8 4 957 4,875 1,702 1,121 748 264 13 5,631 1,971 2,091 Goleta City 129 44 4,126 3,958 1,383 38 676 239 13 4,763 1,666 4,177 Santa Barbara City 417 116 1,686 7,062 2,466 1,851 1,125 397 218 8,604 2,980 3,755 Carpinteria City 255 85 591 541 189 27 68 24 0 864 298 618 Santa Maria Unincorporated 14 5 1,414 6,493 2,270 1,090 585 206 1,372 7,092 2,481 3,875 Guadalupe Unincorporated 6 2 0 49 17 13 68 24 0 123 43 13 Cuyama Unincorporated 0 0 0 243 85 0 23 8 0 266 93 0 Solvang‐Santa Ynez Unincorporated 13 3 386 2,464 861 2,091 317 112 1,622 2,794 975 4,100 Lompoc Unincorporated 0 0 384 3,000 1,049 731 297 105 680 3,297 1,153 1,795 Santa Barbara Unincorporated 11,104 2,114 2,317 2,593 905 524 1,248 441 33 14,945 3,460 2,907 Carpinteria Unincorporated 11 4 231 165 57 64 131 46 0 307 107 295 Total Unincorporated 11,148 2,128 4,732 15,008 5,243 4,512 2,669 942 3,707 28,824 8,312 12,985 Total County 22,070 5,783 29,763 61,609 21,529 18,803 12,447 4,396 7,051 96,126 31,708 55,650 21 Census Demographic Trends Population Overall, Santa Barbara County population increased by 6 percent, or 24,548 people, from 399,347 in 2000 to 423,895 in 2010. Of all county jurisdictions, the City of Santa Maria experienced the largest population increase of 29 percent or 22,130 people, from 77,423 in 2000 to 99,553 in 2010. The smaller Cities of Buellton and Guadalupe also experienced a significant population increase of 26 and 25 percent, respectively. The Cities of Carpinteria and Santa Barbara experienced a population decline of -8 and -1 percent respectively. 90% of the county’s population growth occurred in the City of Santa Maria. Table 8, Santa Barbara County Jurisdictions, Total Population County / City April 1, 2010 Change % Change 399,347 423,895 24,548 6% 3,828 4,828 1,000 26% Carpinteria 14,194 13,040 -1,154 -8% Goleta (1) 28,788 29,888 1,100 4% Guadalupe 5,659 7,080 1,421 25% Lompoc 41,103 42,434 1,331 3% Santa Barbara 89,600 88,410 -1,190 -1% Santa Maria 77,423 99,553 22,130 29% 5,332 5,245 -87 -2% 133,420 133,417 -3 0% Santa Barbara County Buellton Solvang Unincorporated April 1, 2000 (1) City incorporated after 2000 Census. 2000 Census data not available, however an estimate from the City of Goleta is substituted Figure 14, Population Growth 2000-2010 22 An analysis of the 2010 population distribution indicates that the unincorporated area of the county constitutes the largest proportion of the 423,895 total population with 31 percent, followed by the City of Santa Maria with 24 percent. The City of Santa Maria’s proportion increased from 19 to 24 percent over the 10-year census period. The unincorporated total decreased from 33 to 31 percent. Both the Cities of Santa Barbara and Carpinteria declined in their proportion by several percent. Figure 15, Proportion of Countywide Population, 2000 and 2010 23 The unincorporated total can be disaggregated into individual unincorporated places to provide more detail. Some of the communities that indicate population increases over the 10-year period include Isla Vista, Los Alamos, Mission Hills and Vandenberg Village. Communities that decreased in population include Mission Canyon, Montecito, Toro Canyon and Vandenberg Air Force Base. Communities that were newly designated by the Census Bureau and so only have a 2010 estimate include the communities of Ballard, Casmalia, Cuyama and New Cuyama, Garey, Los Olivos and Sisquoc. Table 9, Unincorporated Places Population Change from 2000 to 2010 Unincorporated Place Isla Vista Total Population 2000 2010 Change, 2000-2010 Number Percent 21,069 23,096 2,027 10% Los Alamos 1,372 1,890 518 38% Mission Canyon 2,610 2,381 (229) -9% Mission Hills 3,142 3,576 434 14% Montecito 10,000 8,965 (1,035) -10% Orcutt 28,830 28,905 75 0% Santa Ynez 4,584 4,418 (166) -4% Summerland 1,545 1,448 (97) -6% Toro Canyon 1,697 1,508 (189) -11% Vandenberg AFB 6,151 3,338 (2,813) -46% Vandenberg Village 5,802 6,497 695 12% Ballard N/A 467 Casmalia N/A 138 Cuyama N/A 57 Garey N/A 68 Los Olivos N/A 1,132 New Cuyama N/A 517 Sisquoc N/A 183 Note: Unincorporated Goleta Valley did not meet census criteria to be designated as a place. 24 Aggregating the census estimates into regions indicates an increase in the distribution of population to North County versus the South Coast over the 2000 to 2010 period. North County regions increased from 50 percent of the total population in 2000 to 52 percent in 2010. The South Coast declined proportionately. Figure 16, Population Distribution for Santa Barbara County Regions 2000 and 2010 2000 Census, Total 399,347 2010 Census Total, 423,895 North County lies north of Gaviota to the San Luis Obispo County Line, and the South Coast area refers to the area south of Gaviota to the Venture County Line. 25 Housing Units A comparison of the change in housing units over the 2000 to 2010 period indicates the largest numerical increase in the City of Santa Maria of 5,447 units and the largest percentage increase in the City of Guadalupe of 30 percent. The City of Carpinteria experienced a decline of 35 units or -1 percent. The countywide increase is 9,922 units or 7 percent. Table 10, Jurisdictions’ Housing Unit Change from 2000 to 2010 Jurisdiction Santa Barbara County Buellton Carpinteria Goleta (1) Guadalupe Lompoc Santa Barbara Santa Maria Solvang Unincorporated 2000 Total Units 142,901 1,483 5,464 10,000 1,450 13,621 37,076 22,847 2,288 48,672 2010 Total Units 152,834 1,845 5,429 11,473 1,887 14,416 37,820 28,294 2,485 49,185 Change 9,933 362 -35 1,473 437 795 744 5,447 197 513 (1) City incorporated after 2000 Census. City of Goleta estimate Figure 17, Housing Unit Change 2000-2010 26 % Change 7% 24% -1% 15% 30% 6% 2% 24% 9% 1% The unincorporated areas had the largest proportion of housing units with 34 percent of the county-wide total. The City of Santa Barbara had the second largest proportion with 24 percent of the county-wide total. Figure 18, Housing Unit Distribution in 2010, 152,834 Total Units Vacancy Rates Vacancy rates varied between county jurisdictions, indicating a high of over 12 percent for the Cities of Solvang and Carpinteria and a low of 4 to 8 percent for the remaining county jurisdictions. Table 11, Occupied, Vacant Units and Vacancy Rate in 2010 Jurisdiction Santa Barbara County Buellton city Carpinteria city Goleta city Guadalupe city Lompoc city Santa Barbara city Santa Maria city Solvang city Unincorporated Total Total Housing Units Occupied Units (Households) 152,834 1,845 5,429 11,473 1,887 14,416 37,820 28,294 2,485 49,185 27 142,104 1,761 4,759 10,903 1,810 13,355 35,449 26,908 2,173 44,986 Vacant Units Vacancy Rate 10,730 84 670 570 77 1,061 2,371 1,386 312 4,199 7.0% 4.6% 12.3% 5.0% 4.1% 7.4% 6.3% 4.9% 12.6% 8.5% Over the 2000 to 2010 period, vacancy rates indicated a significant increase, likely due to the comparatively low rates reported in 2000 and the result of the most recent economic recession and the associated job losses that may encourage doubling-up in existing housing and outmigration for new employment opportunities. The largest increase occurred in the Cities of Solvang and Carpinteria as well as the unincorporated area of the county. Table 12, Census 2000 and 2010 Housing Vacancy Rate Comparison Jurisdiction Santa Barbara County Buellton Carpinteria Goleta (1) Guadalupe Lompoc Santa Barbara Santa Maria Solvang Unincorporated 2000 Vacancy Rate 4.4% 3.4% 8.7% 2.4% 2.5% 4.1% 4.0% 3.1% 4.5% 4.9% 2010 Vacancy Rate 7.0% 4.6% 12.3% 5.0% 4.1% 7.4% 6.3% 4.9% 12.6% 8.5% Numeric Change 2.6% 1.2% 3.6% 2.6% 1.6% 3.2% 2.3% 1.8% 8.1% 3.6% % Change 60% 35% 42% 107% 64% 78% 58% 60% 179% 74% Note: The City of Goleta vacancy rate in 2000 is estimated from the Goleta Valley prior to incorporation. Note: Census 2010 includes sold- or rented-not occupied units as part of the vacant housing stock; Census 2000 treated them as occupied. In most cases, the difference will be less than 0.02% 28 Race and Hispanic Origin Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic Origin population showed a significant increase. Countywide, the proportion increased from 34 percent to 43 percent of the total population. For 2010, “Other” racial categories constituted only 9 percent of the total and those categorized as “White” constituted the largest proportion with 48 percent. Figure 19, Countywide Race and Hispanic Origin in 2010, 423,895 Total Population Note: For definition purposes, Race and Hispanic Origin are separate categories. All jurisdictions indicated an increase in the proportion of their population that is of Hispanic Origin. Growth in the Hispanic Origin population was greatest in the Cities of Goleta, Lompoc, Santa Maria, and Solvang, experiencing over 10 percent increases from 2000 to 2010. The Cities of Santa Maria and Guadalupe have the highest proportion, with 70 and 86 percent respectively. The unincorporated communities in the South Coast have lower proportions, for example, Montecito at 6.7 percent and Isla Vista at 22.8 percent. 29 Table 13, Percentage of Hispanic Population 2000 and 2010 2010 Hispanic or Latino 181,687 2000 % of Total Pop 34.0% 2010 % of Total Pop 42.9% Change 9% Buellton 1,451 25.0% 30.1% 5% Carpinteria 6,351 43.0% 48.7% 6% Goleta 9,824 22.0% 32.9% 11% Guadalupe 6,103 84.0% 86.2% 2% Isla Vista 5,265 20.0% 22.8% 3% Lompoc 21,557 37.0% 50.8% 14% Los Alamos 773 34.0% 40.9% 7% Mission Canyon 198 7.0% 8.3% 1% 1,137 20.0% 31.8% 12% 605 5.0% 6.7% 2% 6,870 14.0% 23.8% 10% Santa Barbara 33,591 35.0% 38.0% 3% Santa Maria 70,114 59.0% 70.4% 11% Santa Ynez 639 9.0% 14.5% 5% 1,530 19.0% 29.2% 10% Summerland 192 7.0% 13.3% 6% Toro Canyon 293 16.0% 19.4% 3% Vandenberg AFB 616 11.0% 18.5% 7% 1,216 9.0% 18.7% 10% Ballard 46 N/A 9.9% Casmalia 58 N/A 42.0% Cuyama 40 N/A 70.2% Garey 21 N/A 30.9% Los Olivos 125 N/A 11.0% New Cuyama 234 N/A 45.3% 58 N/A 31.7% Jurisdiction Santa Barbara County Mission Hills Montecito Orcutt Solvang Vandenberg Village Sisquoc 30 Age Distribution In the figure below, the countywide population of 423,895 is distributed in five-year age increments. With the presence of a major university and other educational institutions in the county, the college aged 20 to 24-year olds are the largest five-year increment with a population of 43,000 or 10 percent of the total population. The 15 to 19-year old, high school-age group is the second largest five-year increment with a population of 38,000 or 8.9 percent of the total. The 25 to 55-year old 30-year increment, representing the primary working-ages, has a population of 163,168 or 38 percent of the total. The 55 to 85+, 30-year increment of retirement-age population represents a smaller proportion compared to the 25 to 55–year old increment, with a population of 99,413 or 23 percent of the total. Figure 20, 2010 Countywide Age Distribution, 423,895 Total Population 31 A comparison of the age distribution over the 10-year period from 2000 and 2010 shows consistent proportions for most age groups. The significant differences are for the 35 to 44-year old age group, which shows a decline of approximately 10,000 from 2000 to 2010 and the overall increase of the population 45 years and over, which includes members of the baby boom generation approaching retirement. Figure 21, 2000 and 2010 Countywide Age Distribution 32 To show change in the proportion of significant population groups, they can be combined to represent school aged (<19), working (20–54), and retirement aged (55+). These groups are loosely defined as there are many working age adults returning to school to enhance their job skills and retirees that may be working to supplement their fixed incomes. The <19 year old school aged population declines 1 percent, the working aged declines 2 percent and the retirement age increases 3 percent from 2000 to 2010. Figure 22, 2010 Countywide Age Distribution Summary, 423,895 Total Population Figure 23, 2000 Countywide Age Distribution Summary, 399,347 Total Population 33 A comparison of the median age for Santa Barbara County Communities illustrates the significant differences in age for county jurisdictions. The county-wide median is age 33.6 years. The highest median age of 51 occurs in Mission Canyon. Other communities with a high median age (over 45) include the unincorporated areas of Ballard, Garey, Los Olivos, Mission Canyon, Montecito, Santa Ynez, Summerland, Toro Canyon and Vandenberg Village. The City of Solvang has a similarly high median age of 45. The lowest median age of 20.7 occurs in Isla Vista due to the high proportion of college-age students. Other communities with a lower median age (under 35) include Cuyama, Vandenberg AFB, and the Cities of Guadalupe, Lompoc, and Santa Maria. Figure 24, 2010 Median Age 34 Household Size Household size is an indicator of population density. It is determined by dividing the household population by the number of occupied housing units. The countywide household size is 2.86 persons/household. The Cities of Guadalupe and Santa Maria have the highest household sizes of 3.91 and 3.66 respectively. The unincorporated communities of Mission Canyon, Montecito and Summerland have the lowest household sizes of 2.33, 2.34, and 2.11 respectively. Figure 25, 2010 Household Size Estimates 35 Household size is also an indicator of housing demand. From 2000 to 2010, the county-wide household size increased by 0.06 and county-wide population increased as well. The household size increased for the communities of Isla Vista, Los Alamos and the City of Santa Maria and the population growth in these jurisdictions was significant. The household size declined for the Cities of Santa Barbara and Carpinteria and both cities experienced an accompanying decline in population. Figure 26, Household Size Change 2000 to 2010 36 Household size can vary by a number of factors, including tenure (renter- or owner-occupied). For renter-occupied housing, the household size is significantly higher when compared to owner-occupied housing. Renter-occupied household sizes are highest for the Cities of Guadalupe and Santa Maria. Figure 27, 2010 Household Size Estimates for Renter and Owner Occupied Units 37 The county-wide proportion of owner-occupied housing units is 52 percent. Communities with proportions of owner-occupied housing units over 70 percent are concentrated in the unincorporated areas of the county and include Ballard, Los Olivos, Garey, Mission Canyon, Mission Hills, Montecito, Orcutt, Santa Ynez, Toro Canyon and Vandenberg Village. The communities with the lowest proportion of owner-occupied housing units (less than 40 percent) are Isla Vista, Vandenberg AFB, and the City of Santa Barbara. Figure 28, Percentage of Renter- and Owner-Occupied Households 38 The number of vacant seasonal, recreational and occasional use housing units provides an indication of vacation rental units, which are popular especially on the South Coast of Santa Barbara County. There are a total of 3,354 seasonal, recreational and occasional use units county-wide. The communities of Montecito, Summerland, Toro Canyon and the Cities of Carpinteria, Santa Barbara and Goleta constitute the majority with 2,023 units or 60 percent of the total. Other unincorporated areas county-wide contain 808 of these units. Figure 29, 2010 Vacant Units, Seasonal, Recreational or Occasional Use, 3,354 Total 39 Group Quarters Group quarters are considered housing facilities that have over 10 unrelated persons living together. These are not considered housing units, but are categorized as institutionalized and non-institutionalized group quarters. Institutionalized group quarters include correctional facilities for adults, juvenile facilities, nursing facilities/skilled-nursing facilities and other institutional facilities. The non-institutionalized group quarters categories include college/university student housing, military quarters and other non-institutional facilities. The majority of the total of 17,782 county-wide group quarters is in student housing. College dormitories comprise 50 percent of total group quarters, correctional facilities 25 percent, nursing homes 6 percent, military and juvenile facilities 2 percent and other group quarters 15 percent, respectively. The other category includes emergency and transitional shelters for homeless that counted 402 persons in 2010. From 2000 to 2010, the group quarters population increased by 1,165 or 7 percent. The proportion of college/university student housing increased 10 percent and nursing homes decreased by 3 percent. Figure 30, 2010 Countywide Group Quarters Distribution, 17,782 Total Figure 31, 2000 Countywide Group Quarters Distribution, 16,617 Total 40 The group quarters population is concentrated in two communities. In the community of Isla Vista, there are a significant number of student dormitories and in the City of Lompoc there are a significant number of inmates in the federal correctional facility. Figure 32, 2010 Group Quarters, for County Communities, 17,782 Total 41 Household Characteristics Family households consist of a householder and one or more other persons related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. Non-family households consist of people living alone and households that do not have any members related to the householder. The countywide distribution of 142,104 households includes 48 percent husband-wife families, 11 percent female households with no husband present, 5 percent male households with no wife present, 25 percent householders living alone, and 11 percent non-family householders living with other unrelated persons. Figure 33, 2010 Countywide Household Types, 142,104 Total 42 The location of the population over 65 and living alone is useful to help identify residents potentially dependent on social services, transportation and other assistance. County-wide there are 14,837 persons over 65 and living alone. The communities with the largest number include the Cities of Santa Barbara and Santa Maria. Figure 34, 2010 Over 65 Living Alone, 14,837 Total 43 The location of the population that contains single mothers with children is also useful for identifying those areas with residents potentially dependent on social services, transportation and other assistance. County-wide there are 8,092 single mothers with children. The cities with the largest number of single mothers with children include Santa Maria, Lompoc and Santa Barbara. Figure 35, 2010 Single Mothers with Children Under 18 Years of Age, 8,092 Total 44 For comparison purposes, an assessment of existing population density is provided. Note that the density and land area totals include all uses, such as commercial and open space, etc. As a result, the density calculations are just approximations using all area contained within the boundaries of the jurisdiction as determined by the Census Bureau in the year 2010. Table 14, Land Area and Population Density, 2010 Census Community Santa Barbara County Ballard Buellton city Carpinteria city Casmalia Cuyama Garey Goleta city Guadalupe city Isla Vista Lompoc city Los Alamos Los Olivos Mission Canyon Mission Hills Montecito New Cuyama Orcutt Santa Barbara city Santa Maria city Santa Ynez Sisquoc Solvang city Summerland Toro Canyon Vandenberg AFB Vandenberg Village Total Population Land Area in Square Miles Population Per Square Mile (Land Area) 423,895 467 4,828 13,040 138 57 68 29,888 7,080 23,096 42,434 1,890 1,132 2,381 3,576 8,965 517 28,905 88,410 99,553 4,418 183 5,245 1,448 1,508 3,338 6,497 2,735.1 1.2 1.6 2.6 0.2 0.5 1.3 7.9 1.3 1.8 11.6 3.9 2.5 1.5 1.2 9.3 0.7 11.1 19.5 22.8 5.1 2.2 2.4 2.0 3.6 22.0 5.2 155 396 3,052 5,043 732 126 54 3,782 5,407 12,492 3,659 489 460 1,569 2,910 968 733 2,598 4,541 4,375 860 82 2,163 730 422 151 1,238 45 Births, Deaths and Migration The figure below shows the 1990–2010 countywide numbers of births and deaths, and the difference between the two that is considered the natural increase in population. The total number of births has declined somewhat during this period, ranging from over 6,500 to 5,500 annually. The number of deaths is more constant, ranging from between 2,500 to 3,000 annually. As a result the natural increase, the population has ranged from a high of 4,000 to a low of 2,500. According to the California Department of Finance, while California women’s fertility rates are anticipated to be lower in the next few years, continued differences in the number of births and the fertility rates among racial/ethnic groups, especially at younger ages, will be evident. In general, while births to women 30 and older will continue to increase, births to younger women are projected to continue to decline. Despite total birth gains, fertility rates will drop for most ethnic groups. For example, the fertility rate for Hispanics will drop from 2.27 in 2010 to 2.12 in 2020. The fertility rate for Whites will go from 1.71 in 2010 to 1.65 in 2020. Although mortality rates are not anticipated to change substantially, the proportion of older residents resulting from the aging of the baby boomer generation will increase the overall number of deaths. Figure 36, Comparison of Countywide Births and Deaths, 1990 -2011 Source: State of California, Department of Finance, County Population Estimates and Components of 46 The figure below shows the 1990-2011 county-wide net migration. Net migration has been negative for the majority of reporting years and most recently reflects the loss of jobs in the economic slowdown as workers leave the area for other employment opportunities elsewhere. Figure 37, Countywide Net Migration, 1990-2011 Source: State of California, Department of Finance, County Population Estimates and Components of Change. 47 School Enrollment The State of California as well as the County Education Office tabulates annual enrollment characteristics. Recent reports have shown an enrollment decline in some school districts that warrants a more detailed review. Declining school enrollment has implications for potential population growth or decline, changing age distribution, workforce characteristics, and other demographic factors influencing assumptions about future growth. The County Education Office provides the most recent public school enrollment data to the State of California Education Office, which maintains a state-wide enrollment database. Additional enrollment data for private schools was also obtained from the State of California Educational Data website www.cde.ca.gov, which also provides a detailed breakdown of current and past private school enrollment tabulations. Enrollment data by grade level was also tabulated to help identify any trends for individual grades. This tabulation was done for the following South Coast school districts: Santa Barbara High, Hope, Carpinteria Unified, College Elementary, Goleta Union, Cold Springs Elementary, and Santa Barbara Elementary. For comparison purposes, data for the Santa Maria Elementary and Junior High Districts were summarized in this way as well. Private school enrollment is also reviewed and then a forecast of county-wide enrollment by the Department of Finance is provided. Continued school enrollment decline in the South Coast suggests that young families may be migrating out of the area. If they continue to leave the South Coast, family size and the consequent number of overall births would decline to some extent as well. Recent population estimates from the Department of Finance show a continuing decline in population growth rates for South Coast cities that seems to confirm this trend. A past publication, the Economic Community Project’s “Regional Impacts of Growth” study suggests a similar trend, due to high housing costs: a trend of a continued out-migration of young families and their replacement by older households with fewer or no children at all. The subsequent decline in household size could result in a population growth rate decline on the South Coast. 48 Figure 1 shows the school district locations in Santa Barbara County so that the enrollment can be compared across regions. Map 2 Santa Barbara County School Districts 49 Past and Present Enrollment The county-wide K-12 school enrollment trend has fluctuated over time. In the mid-1970’s, a dramatic decline in enrollment occurred, decreasing from a high of 56,000 to 44,000 in the early 1980’s. Both employment and population during this period were showing continuing increases. However, population growth had slowed significantly as compared to past decades. The age distribution of the population potentially included fewer school age children from the baby boomer years (1946 to 1964), resulting in lower enrollment levels. This decline in enrollment ended in the early 1980’s, increasing until mid-2000, since which time a small decline in enrollment levels has occurred. Recently, this decline has slowed, with enrollment levels stabilizing at approximately 65,000 students county-wide. Figure 38, Historic Countywide Enrollment 50 Grade level enrollment in the 2009/10 school year shows the kindergarten level as the highest of all grades. This high proportion of kindergarten students indicates higher enrollment for the later grades as the students progress through the school system. As the next figure shows, the 2000/01 grade level enrollment, including kindergarten, was much more consistent across each grade. The increase in kindergarten enrollment is occurring predominantly in North County schools. For example, Santa Maria Elementary increased 35 percent over the 2000 to 2010 period, while Santa Barbara Elementary increased by 1.4 percent and other South Coast schools declined. Figure 39, 2009/10 Santa Barbara County School Enrollments by Grade 5,500 5,400 5,300 5,200 5,100 5,000 4,900 4,800 4,700 4,600 4,500 Figure 40, 2000/01 Santa Barbara County School Enrollment by Grade 51 Enrollment between the 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 academic years increased county-wide by 40 students, an increase of 246 students in North County school districts and a decrease in South Coast school districts of 206 students over this two-year period. Table 15, Annual Enrollment Comparison, 2008/09 and 2009/10 District Elementary Schools Ballard Elementary Blochman Union Elementary Buellton Union Elementary Cold Spring Elementary College Elementary Goleta Union Elementary Guadalupe Union Elementary Hope Elementary Los Alamos Elementary Los Olivos Elementary Montecito Union Elementary Orcutt Union Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Maria‐Bonita Solvang Elementary Vista Del Mar Union Academic Year 2008 to 2009 Total Enroll Academic Year 2009 to 2010 Total Enroll 108 479 693 198 395 3,608 1,127 980 221 670 399 4,655 5,791 13,226 597 89 115 483 672 181 404 3,697 1,118 972 226 730 392 4,713 5,780 13,787 576 90 7 4 ‐21 ‐17 9 89 ‐9 ‐8 5 60 ‐7 58 ‐11 561 ‐21 1 6.5% 0.8% ‐3.0% ‐8.6% 2.3% 2.5% ‐0.8% ‐0.8% 2.3% 9.0% ‐1.8% 1.2% ‐0.2% 4.2% ‐3.5% 1.1% 9,905 7,752 1,162 9,883 7,608 1,114 ‐22 ‐144 ‐48 ‐0.2% ‐1.9% ‐4.1% 2,463 10,327 275 2,332 10,125 261 ‐131 ‐202 ‐14 ‐5.3% ‐2.0% ‐5.1% 800 701 ‐99 ‐12.4% Total 65,920 65,960 Source: California Department of Education Educational Demographics Unit 40 High Schools Santa Barbara High Santa Maria Joint Union High Santa Ynez Valley Union High Unified Schools Carpinteria Unified Lompoc Unified Cuyama Joint Unified County Education Office Santa Barbara County Office Of Education 52 2009/10 Change % Change The Unified School District data has been disaggregated to show enrollment for individual schools. This information is useful especially since the Carpinteria and Lompoc Districts have recently been experiencing enrollment declines, so the additional detail helps to determine which specific schools may be declining in enrollment. Both the North County and South Coast experienced a small decline of approximately 2% in the unified school districts with some individual schools such as Carpinteria Senior High and Middle School and Camino Real Community School in the Lompoc Unified District showing higher percentage declines. Table 16, Unified School District Enrollment 2008/09 and 2009/10 Lompoc Unified District Arthur Hapgood Elementary Buena Vista Elementary Cabrillo High Camino Real Community Partnership Academy Clarence Ruth Elementary Crestview Elementary La Canada Elementary La Honda Elementary Leonora Fillmore Elementary Lompoc High Lompoc Valley Middle Los Berros Elementary Manzanita Public Charter Maple High Miguelito Elementary Mission Valley Vandenberg Middle Total Carpinteria Unified District Aliso Elementary Canalino Elementary Carpinteria Family Carpinteria Middle Carpinteria Senior High Foothill Alternative High Rincon High (Continuation) Summerland Elementary Total Academic Year Academic Year 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 2009/10 Total Enroll. Total Enroll. Change 432 430 ‐2 528 547 19 1524 1,508 ‐16 90 661 577 760 507 684 1462 798 474 244 124 574 31 857 10,327 56 625 653 700 482 663 1,436 746 453 324 149 546 41 765 10,124 392 534 66 542 783 24 48 74 15,094 53 ‐34 ‐36 76 ‐60 ‐25 ‐21 ‐26 ‐52 ‐21 80 25 ‐28 10 ‐92 ‐203 395 520 71 513 721 17 43 52 14,734 % Change ‐0.5% 3.6% ‐1.0% ‐37.8% ‐5.4% 13.2% ‐7.9% ‐4.9% ‐3.1% ‐1.8% ‐6.5% ‐4.4% 32.8% 20.2% ‐4.9% 32.3% ‐10.7% ‐2.0% 3 ‐14 5 ‐29 ‐62 ‐7 ‐5 ‐22 ‐205 0.8% ‐2.6% 7.6% ‐5.4% ‐7.9% ‐29.2% ‐10.4% ‐29.7% ‐1.4% Cuyama Unified District Cuyama Elementary Cuyama Valley High Sierra Madre High (Continuation) Total North County South Coast Total 184 75 2 261 185 88 2 275 1 13 0 14 0.5% 17.3% 0.0% 5.4% 10,588 15,094 25,682 10,399 14,734 25,133 ‐189 ‐205 ‐394 ‐1.8% ‐1.4% ‐1.5% Source: California Department of Education, Educational Demographics Unit School District Enrollment Reviewing selected school districts’ enrollment over time provides a more detailed trend analysis. It is important to note that inter-district transfers and enrollment at private schools are also important enrollment indicators that are evaluated later in this section. Also, schools close and merge. Students are potentially enrolled at neighboring schools. Records from the California Department of Education show that in the Carpinteria Unified District since 1989 three schools were merged or closed. Other districts had closed or merged schools as well. For example, Goleta Union closed six schools, Lompoc Unified closed ten schools, County Office of Education closed twenty three schools, Santa Barbara Elementary/Secondary closed eighteen schools, and the Santa Maria Elementary closed thirteen schools. In some South Coast K-8 schools, enrollment continues to decline. This trend includes the Hope School District, which had been increasing in enrollment due to a considerable number of transfer students. The decline in the Hope Elementary School has since leveled off, dropping only 0.8 percent or 8 students, maintaining an enrollment of approximately 970. Cold Springs Elementary declined by 8.6 percent or 17 students; it is maintaining an enrollment of approximately 190 students. The Carpinteria Unified School District has been experiencing ongoing enrollment declines. During the 2009/10 period, there were 1.4 percent or 205 fewer students in the district. According to Carpinteria student transfer data, approximately 250 Carpinteria students are currently residing in Ventura County jurisdictions, representing children of parents who still work in area but have moved to obtain housing at more reasonable costs. There were no significant drops in student enrollment in other South Coast K-8 schools. There is no obvious distinction between K-8 grade levels, where one particular grade is losing more students than any other. 54 Figure 41, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10 Hope Elementary 1,600 Hope Enrollment 1,400 1,600 6 1,400 1,200 5 1,200 1,000 1,000 4 800 800 3 600 600 2 400 400 1 200 200 0 92 92 93 93 94 94 KGarden 95 95 96 96 97 1 97 98 98 K 99 2 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 3 4 5 6 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Figure 42, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10 Cold Spring Elementary 300 Cold Springs Elementary Enrollment 300 250 250 200 200 6 150 150 4 5 3 100 100 2 50 50 0 1 92 93 92 93 94 94 95 KGarden 95 96 K 96 97 98 99 3 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2 97 198 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 42004 2005 52006 2007 62008 2009 55 Figure 43, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10 Carpinteria Unified 3,500 3,000 12 11 2,500 10 9 2,000 8 7 1,500 6 5 4 1,000 3 2 500 1 K 0 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Figure 44, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10 College Elementary 800 Collage Elementary Enrollment 700 8 600 7 500 6 400 5 300 4 200 3 100 2 0 1 92 92 93 93 94 95 KGarden 94 95 96 196 97 97 98 3 99 42000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 5 2004 6 2003 8 982 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 20067 2007 2008 2009 56 Figure 45, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10 Goleta Union 5,000 Ungraded 4,500 6 4,000 3,500 5 3,000 4 2,500 2,000 3 1,500 2 1,000 1 500 0 K 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 57 In the past, the Santa Barbara High School District increased its enrollment, suggesting that more established families with older children, who may already own their housing and are not as susceptible to increasing housing costs, are staying in the area and their children continue to be enrolled. However, the trend of increasing enrollment has subsided since 2007, showing declines in recent years. This change also suggests that less established families may be seeking housing in other, less expensive areas. Figure 46, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10 Santa Barbara High School District 12,000 10,000 12 8,000 11 6,000 10 9 4,000 8 2,000 7 6 0 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 58 In the North County, the Santa Maria Bonita School District continues to increase enrollment, suggesting that South Coast families and families from other areas may be moving to the area where they can more easily afford housing and continue to commute to their jobs elsewhere. New births as well contribute to the overall enrollment over time. Figure 47, Annual School Enrollment from 1992/03-2009/10 Santa Maria Elementary and Joint Union High School 25,000 12 20,000 11 10 9 15,000 8 7 6 10,000 5 4 3 5,000 2 1 K 0 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 59 Ethnic Distribution The ethnic distribution of the county-wide student population is primarily Hispanic, with 63 percent of the total 69,960 enrollments, compared to 29 percent White. African Americans and Asians together represent approximately 4 percent of the student population. This is a change from 2006, when 58 percent of the total 66,695 enrollments were Hispanic and 33 percent were White. Figure 48, Ethnic Distribution of the Student Population in Santa Barbara County, 2009 65,960 Total Enrollments Ethnic Distribution of the Student Population in Santa Barbara County, 2006 66,965 Total Enrollments 60 Private School Enrollment School enrollment data is currently tabulated for private schools with enrollment of more than six students and is available from the California Department of Education. All private schools must file an affidavit with the state. The table below shows the enrollment for the 1999/00 and 2009/10 academic years. Note that in some cases a new school opened or closed in that period, which can result in a significant percentage change. County-wide, during the period between 2000 and 2010, an enrollment decline from 6,639 to 5,069, or 1,570 students, was observed. This represents a decline of approximately 24 percent. During the same period, South Coast private schools declined by 914 students or -25 percent, while North County private schools declined by 587 students or -20 percent. California Department of Education enrollment data for private schools typically only lists schools with six or more students. However, to obtain enrollment information for private schools of fewer than six students, a special request for individual affidavits of enrollment was made to the Department of Education. The edited information was provided in a detailed database for Santa Barbara County schools. The resulting county-wide data for the 2002/03 and 2005/06 academic years shows that there was a decline from 350 to 262 students during this period at these smaller schools. The South Coast enrollment dropped from approximately 125 students to 100 students. Table 17, Private School Enrollment Public School District School Name Carpinteria Unified College Elementary Goleta Union Elementary Goleta Union Elementary Goleta Union Elementary Hope Elementary Lompoc Unified Lompoc Unified Lompoc Unified Los Olivos Elementary Montecito Union Elementary Montecito Union Elementary Montecito Union Elementary Orcutt Union Elementary Orcutt Union Elementary Orcutt Union Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Cate School S Y Valley Christian Academy Coastline Christian Academy Montessori Center School St. Raphael Elementary Laguna Blanca School Children's House Montessori La Purisima Concepcion Elem New Life Christian Academy Family School, The Crane Country Day School El Montecito Early Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Elementary Central Coast Preparatory Pacific Christian St. Louis De Montfort Elementary Marymount Notre Dame Orca San Roque Elementary Santa Barbara Christian Waldorf School of Santa Barbara SANTA BARBARA MONTESSORI 61 2008/09 2009/10 2009-2010 Percent Enrollment Enrollment Change Change 277 106 102 191 242 422 12 136 33 57 255 92 179 31 275 248 217 144 18 138 90 66 152 277 97 89 167 237 381 15 132 23 58 258 72 189 21 282 251 0 148 12 130 76 74 129 0 -9 -13 -24 -5 -41 3 -4 -10 1 3 -20 10 -10 7 3 -217 4 -6 -8 -14 8 -23 0% -8% -13% -13% -2% -10% 25% -3% -30% 2% 1% -22% 6% -32% 3% 1% -100% 3% -33% -6% -16% 12% -15% Public School District School Name Santa Barbara High Santa Barbara High Santa Maria Joint Union High Santa Maria-Bonita Santa Maria-Bonita Santa Maria-Bonita Santa Ynez Valley Union High Goleta Union Elementary Orcutt Union Elementary Santa Ynez Union Santa Ynez Union Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara High Lompoc Unified Lompoc Unified Lompoc Unified Lompoc Unified Lompoc Unified Santa Maria-Bonita Anacapa School, The Bishop Garcia Diego High School St. Joseph High Crossroads Christian Junior High St. Mary of the Assumption Valley Christian Academy Dunn Saint John of Damascus Academy The Youngblood Academy Cachuma Elementary School Covenant Christian School of SY Abundant Life Academy Providence Hall High School Northgate Christian Academy Breeze Hill Academy Children's Montessori School Fountain of Life Christian Academy Central Coast Learning Academy Lighthouse Baptist School Agape School of Christian Education Christ the King Howard Carden, The Santa Maria-Bonita Santa Maria-Bonita Carpinteria Unified County-wide South Coast North County 2008/09 2009/10 2009-2010 Percent Enrollment Enrollment Change Change 61 301 599 69 222 296 271 0 0 0 0 0 39 6 0 0 0 0 0 53 295 562 0 220 349 228 34 6 14 8 6 75 6 10 12 6 18 8 -8 -6 -37 -69 -2 53 -43 34 6 14 8 6 36 0 10 12 6 18 8 -13% -2% -6% -100% -1% 18% -16% 9 6 62 11 6 63 2 0 1 22% 0% 2% 5,424 3,048 2,376 5,108 2,765 2,343 -316 (283) (63) -6% -9% -3% County-wide combined public and private school enrollment decreased over the 2000 to 2010 period by 1,507 students or 0.1 percent. North County school districts alone experienced an increase of 2,231 students or 5.3 percent. South Coast jurisdictions however, declined by 3,160 or 10.2 percent. Table 18, Total Public and Private School Enrollment, 2008/09-2009/10 2008/09 2009/10 Change Percent Countywide 71,344 71,068 (276) -.3% South Coast 27,192 26,703 (489) -1.7% North County 44,152 44,365 213 .4% 62 92% 0% Inter-district transfer data provides additional detail showing enrollment variances between districts. These transfers are for students transferring into the specific school. The data does not provide the district from which the students are transferring. The Carpinteria Unified (258 students), Hope Elementary (362), Santa Barbara Elementary (417) and Secondary (394) districts were the recipients of the majority of transfers on the South Coast, while Orcutt Union (578) received the most student transfers in the North County. In general the transfer policy for county districts is to allow intra-district school transfers for students within the district but not from inter-district transfers from students outside the districts. Table 19, 2006/07, 2007/08 Inter-district Transfers 2006/07 School District Ballard Elementary Blochman Union Elementary Santa Maria‐Bonita Buellton Union Elementary Carpinteria Unified Casmalia Elementary College Elementary Goleta Union Elementary Guadalupe Union Elementary Hope Elementary Lompoc Unified Los Alamos Elementary Los Olivos Elementary Montecito Union Elementary Orcutt Union Elementary Santa Barbara Elementary Santa Barbara Secondary Santa Maria Joint Union High Santa Ynez Valley Union High Solvang Elementary Cuyama Joint Unified Vista del Mar Union Total City Solvang Santa Maria Santa Maria Buellton Carpinteria Casmalia Santa Ynez Goleta Guadalupe Santa Barbara Lompoc Los Alamos Los Olivos Santa Barbara Orcutt Santa Barbara Santa Barbara Santa Maria Santa Ynez Solvang New Cuyama Gaviota Number of Transfers In 12 7 44 40 1 23 43 43 253 258 4 4 6 5 79 31 12 10 254 362 32 22 19 13 53 47 9 14 578 1 417 0 394 0 6 8 5 1 84 60 0 1 46 0 950 63 2007/08 2,351 Department of Finance School Enrollment Forecast The Department of Finance provides a year 2020 forecast of Santa Barbara county-wide school enrollment. Note the decreasing enrollment from 1974 to 1980 (56,400 to 45,500) as the influence of the baby boomers declined. Enrollment increased starting in the late 1980’s through 2000 from 46,600 to 65,200 students as new residential development and job opportunities increased the number of families and the population of school-age children. Future enrollment is forecast to experience a gradual increase of 2,165 students, from 65,960 in 2010 to 68,175 in 2020. High school graduates are forecasted to decrease by 224 students from 4,287 in 2010 to 4,063 in 2020. Figure 49, Historic and Forecast Enrollment Data The Department of Finance enrollment projections are developed using a grade progression ratio (GPR), cohort-survival, projection model. 64 Figure 50, Santa Barbara County Proportion of Enrollment by Grade 1975-2020 State of California, Department of Finance, California Public K-12 Enrollment and High School Graduate Projections by County, 2011 Series 65 Forecast Comparisons Employment Forecast Comparison For comparison purposes, the California Economic Forecast Project projection (by Mark Schneipp under contract to CalTrans) is reviewed as the only available, viable alternative to the SBCAG/CCSCE forecast, since only these two forecasts go out to 2040 at the County-level by economic sector. Both county-wide employment forecasts are very close, with SBCAG/CCSCE slightly higher from 2020 onward. The California Economic Forecast employment by individual sector leaves out the category of self-employed. With self-employed workers included in the SBCAG/CCSCE forecast, the SBCAG/CCSCE forecast predicts some 24,000 more workers in 2020 than the California Economic Forecast Project. Figure 51, Countywide, 2010-2040 Employment Forecast Comparisons SBCAG/CCSCE and California Economic Forecast. 66 Employment Forecasts by Economic Sector While the distributions among industries in Santa Barbara County are different than the nation and state for some major sectors, the SBCAG/CCSCE projections are in line with national and state industry growth trends. Also, the specific SBCAG/CCSCE sector-by-sector predictions are aligned with the California Economic Forecast Project’s 2011 sector-by-sector predictions. The SBCAG/CCSCE county-wide jobs and population forecasts are in line with actual historic growth and based on a recognized forecast source. The following figure compares the 2040 employment by economic sectors for the 2040 SBCAG/CCSCE forecast and the California Economic Forecast. The two forecasts are quite similar with some differences of varying degree. The forecasts are essentially the same for construction, information, and government. The SBCAG/CCSCE forecast is higher for transportation and utilities, financial activities and professional services, health and education, and leisure. The SBCAG/CCSCE forecast is lower for manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade and agriculture. Figure 52, Comparison of SBCAG and the California Economic Forecast, 2040 Employment by Sector (1,000’s) 67 Population Forecast Comparison Both the SBCAG/CCSCE and the California Economic Forecast Project’s county-wide population forecasts are very close, with SBCAG/CCSCE slightly higher from 2020 onward. However, a revised (and to date unpublished) California Economic Forecast shows a reduced forecast by approximately 20,000. This lower forecast is due in part to an assumed higher commuting assumption. Also included for comparison are the prior 2007 SBCAG forecast, which is lower than the current adopted forecast and the shorter term Department of Finance forecast to 2020, which is right in line with the current SBCAG/CCSCE forecast. Figure 53, Population Forecast Comparisons, SBCAG/CCSCE, California Economic Forecast, and Department of Finance 68 Historic Growth Comparison In the figure below comparing the prior SBCAG forecasts to historic growth in Santa Barbara County, the SBCAG/CCSCE forecast is in line with actual, historic population growth. The percent change noted in the figure represents the change from 1990 to the forecast horizon for each forecast noted. The forecast predicts 0.76%/year population growth over the thirty-year period to 2040, nearly identical to the 0.73%/year growth actually experienced since 1990. With respect to jobs growth, the forecast predicts 1.02%/year growth, compared to the historical 0.56% growth from 1990 to 2010. If the five-year period from 2005-2010 including the historic recession is omitted, however, the historic rate of jobs growth becomes 1.05%, also in line with growth experienced since 1990. Figure 54, Historic Growth and Past Predictions 69 Appendix 1 2012 MEMBERSHIP ROSTER – Revised 3/20/12 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS SUPERVISORS Member Supervisorial District SALUD CARBAJAL FIRST DISTRICT JANET WOLF SECOND DISTRICT DOREEN FARR THIRD DISTRICT JONI GRAY (Chair) FOURTH DISTRICT STEVE LAVAGNINO FIFTH DISTRICT CITIES Member Alternate BUELLTON HOLLY SIERRA Mayor DAVE KING Mayor Pro Tem CARPINTERIA AL CLARK Mayor KATHLEEN REDDINTON Councilmember GOLETA ROGER ACEVES Councilmember (Vice-Chair) EDWARD EASTON Councilmember GUADALUPE LUPE ALVAREZ Mayor ARISTON JULIAN Councilmember LOMPOC JOHN LINN Mayor BOB LINGL Councilmember SANTA BARBARA HELENE SCHNEIDER Mayor GRANT HOUSE Councilmember SANTA MARIA LARRY LAVAGNINO Mayor ALICE PATINO Councilmember SOLVANG JIM RICHARDSON Mayor JOAN JAMIESON Councilmember EX-OFFICIO (NON-VOTING) MEMBERS CALTRANS DISTRICT 5 15th SENATE DISTRICT 19th SENATE DISTRICT TIM GUBBINS SAM BLAKESLEE TONY STRICKLAND 33rd ASSEMBLY DISTRICT KATCHO ACHADJIAN 35th ASSEMBLY DISTRICT DAS WILLIAMS 70 Appendix 2 TECHNICAL PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2012 MEMBERSHIP ROSTER JURISDICTION MEMBER ALTERNATE BUELLTON MARC BIERDZINSKI (Chair) Planning Director ANGELA PEREZ Assistant Planner JACKIE CAMPBELL Community Development Director DAVE DURFLINGER City Manager ANNE WELLS Advanced Planning Manager SARA IZA Associate Planner RICHARD DAULTON Consulting Planner, Rincon Consultants TIM NESS City Administrator LUCILLE BREESE Planning Manager KEITH NEUBERT Principal Planner JOHN LEDBETTER (Vice Chair) Principal Planner, Community Development Department IRMA UNZUETA Project Planner, Community Development Department LARRY APPEL Director BILL SHIPSEY Planner III ARLENE PELSTER Planning Director LISA MARTIN Associate Planner JEFF HUNT Director Long Range Planning ALLEN BELL Supervisory Planner Long Range Planning 107 West Highway 246 Buellton, CA 93427 (805) 686-0137 CARPINTERIA 5775 Carpinteria Avenue Carpinteria, CA 93013 (805) 684-5405 GOLETA 130 Cremona Goleta, CA 93117 (805) 961-7500 GUADALUPE 918 Obispo Street Guadalupe, CA 93434 (805) 343-1340 LOMPOC 100 Civic Center Plaza Lompoc, CA 93436 (805) 736-1261 SANTA BARBARA 630 Garden St. Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (805) 564-5470 SANTA MARIA 110 East Cook Street Santa Maria, CA 93454 (805) 925-0951 SOLVANG 1644 Oak St. Solvang, CA 93463 (805) 688-5575 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 123 E. Anapamu St. Santa Barbara, CA 93101 71 SPECIAL DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES SB COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT MEMBER ALTERNATE MOLLY PEARSON Air Quality Specialist III ERIC GAGE Air Quality Specialist I 260 N. San Antonio Rd., Ste. A Santa Barbara, CA 93110 (805)961-8800 72