LINKING JKIA TO NAIROBI NATIONAL PARK USING
Transcription
LINKING JKIA TO NAIROBI NATIONAL PARK USING
LINKING JKIA TO NAIROBI NATIONAL PARK USING LANDSCAPING AS A GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT PLAN. BY: MWANG’A KEZIAH MWELU REGISTRATION NO. B65/0371/2006 A PLANNING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE AWARD OF BACHELORS DEGREE IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI JULY 2010 DECLARATION I declare that this is my original work and, has never been submitted in any form in any university or any other research institution for the award of a degree or any other qualification. Signature………………………….………………………Date……………………………… Mwang’a Keziah Mwelu - B65/0371/2006 (Candidate) Supervisor This work has been submitted for examination with my approval as the assigned University Supervisor. Signature………………………….………………………Date……………………………… Prof. George Ngugi Njuguna (Supervisor) Department of Urban and Regional Planning University of Nairobi DEDICATION To Mrs G. Gichoga, former Principal Kaaga Girls High School, for believing in me, and giving me a chance to acquire education, My sweet Parents Mwang’a and Nzwili, for your love and support, Pastor Kitetu for your prayers, my Siblings, Sisters-in-law and Friends. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am sincerely indebted to the many public and private institutions and, individuals that have provided resource material from which I was able to shape this work. Special thanks to my supervisor Prof. George Ngugi for his unrelenting guidance in the development of this project. Great thanks to the staff at Kenya Airports Authority, Kenya Wildlife Service, City Council of Nairobi and the Kenya Railways Corporation and especially Fred Odawo of KAA and Michael Wanjau of KWS. Sincere thanks to my research assistants David Zinny and Daniel Koech (DK) My earnest thanks go out to my friend Tom for always printing my works, and to Dr. Filbert Musau for guiding me in developing my Project. Finally, most special thanks to my family, friends and colleagues, especially my parents, lecturers in DURP, and former teachers whose emphasis on the importance of education and the sacrifice to offer it to me has penned an indelible mark on my personal and professional life. Above all glory to the Almighty God for His everlasting grace, love and guidance. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page iii ABSTRACT Kenya’s urban areas are growing at an unprecedented rate as more and more people move to cities and towns in search of employment and other opportunities urban areas offer. Kenya’s urban population is at present 40 percent of the total population. Nairobi being the capital city hosts the highest urban population in Kenya. The annual growth rate of the city of Nairobi currently stands at 4% with a total population of approximately 3.2 Million. This population is putting a lot of pressure on the available resources within the city including green infrastructure. This has in turn led to deterioration of green spaces within the city, encroachment to land reserves and ecologically sensitive areas which serve as green infrastructure. Even with such growth, there seems to be no management plans to safeguard green infrastructure within the city. A study was carried out to investigate the land use challenges facing green infrastructure within the city of Nairobi with an aim of providing working solutions. Following the study, it was clear that green infrastructure is under serious threats and needed urgent interventions. The study focussed on a stretch along the Mombasa road corridor with an emphasis on Jomo Kenyatta International Airport land reserve, Railway line reserve and the Nairobi National Park. Various challenges were identified and recommendations put forward to deal with the same. The recommendation selected for the purpose of implementation involves integration of urban green infrastructure with urban development. A project site was selected from the former research study area and a landscaping project will be carried out to enhance the quality of green infrastructure within the site. The landscaping project will run from the JKIA terminal to the edge of the park. It will involve the use of tree buffers along the transportation channels (Mombasa road and railway line) within the site. Other functions to be included will be: a green park; a nature walk trail from the airport terminal to the park; a cultural centre; a tourist guide centre along the trail walk; a mini zoo at the edge of the park; and a theme park. The project report is organized into five chapters. The Introduction (Chapter 1) deals with the background to the development project. It outlines some of the research findings and recommendations from the research project. It also contains a statement of the selected recommendation for implementation within the development project. Statements of justification for the development project, location, objectives, assumptions and scope of the project have also been outlined in same chapter. The chapter also presents the methodology used for the development project; data needs and requirements; data sources; methods of data Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page iv analysis and presentation and the limitations. Chapter 2 presents review of relevant literature outlining the policies; planning designs and standards guiding the implementation of the project. In addition, it lays out the conceptual framework for the study and discusses various case studies on landscaping in respect to airport environs. Chapter 3 presents the situational analysis of the project area in terms of the location; physical characteristics; physical boundaries; developments and population. Chapter 4 presents the planning and design of the project; design alternatives; evaluation of alternative plan proposals; site planning, design process stages and implementation schedule. It also states the expected outcomes of the project. Chapter 5 provides monitoring and evaluation guidelines for the project and the guidelines for the implementation process and Environmental management plan. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page v T ABLE OF C ONTENTS DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................... i Dedication ......................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................................ iii ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ................................................................................................................................... x List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... xi ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. xii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.0 OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background to the Development Project .................................................................................. 1 1.2 Summary of Research Findings of Planning Research Project .................................................. 1 1.3 Summary of Recommendations of Planning Research Project .................................................. 1 1.4 Selected Development Project .................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Justification of the Project ........................................................................................................ 2 1.5.1 Airports Redevelopment Programme ................................................................................. 2 1.5.2 Character .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.5.3 Sustainability .................................................................................................................... 3 1.5.4 Ecology............................................................................................................................. 3 1.5.5 Function ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.5.6 Management ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.5.7 Economic Payback ............................................................................................................ 4 1.5.8 Policies and Strategies ....................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Location of Project Area and Coverage .................................................................................... 4 1.8 Project Assumptions ................................................................................................................ 6 1.9 Scope of Development Project and Organization of Chapters ................................................... 6 1.10 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 7 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page vi 1.10.1 Data Needs ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.10.2 Data sources .................................................................................................................... 7 1.10.3 Data Collection Methods ................................................................................................. 7 1.10.4 Data Analysis and Presentation........................................................................................ 8 1.10.5 Methods of Data Presentation .......................................................................................... 8 1.10.6 Limitations ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.10.7 Definition of Key Terms and Concepts ............................................................................ 8 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................... 11 2.0 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Policy Legal and Institutional Framework .............................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Policy Framework Review .............................................................................................. 12 2.1.2 Legal Framework Review ............................................................................................... 13 2.1.2.3 The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act, 1999 ..................................... 14 2.1.2.4 The Kenya Airports Authority Act (Cap 395) ............................................................... 14 2.1.2.5 The Kenya Civil Aviation Authority Act (Cap 394) ...................................................... 15 2.1.3 Institutional Framework .................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Planning and Design Standards and Regulations .................................................................... 17 2.2.1 Physical Planning Handbook (2008) ................................................................................ 17 2.2.2 The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) .................................................... 19 2.2.3 International Air Transport Association (IATA) .............................................................. 19 2.3 Landscaping Guidelines ......................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Past and Future Development Plans For Project Site............................................................... 20 2.5 Relevant Case Studies ............................................................................................................ 21 2.5.1 Case One: Brisbane International Airport Landscape Master Plan .................................... 21 2.5.2 Case Two: The O’Hare Modernization Program (OMP) - (O’Hare International Airport) 31 CHAPTER THREE: SITUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 34 3.1 Location Context of Project Area ........................................................................................... 34 3.2 Background and Historical Development of Project Area ....................................................... 35 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page vii 3.2.1 Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) .................................................................... 35 Source: Author, 2010 ................................................................................................................... 37 3.2.2 Nairobi National Park...................................................................................................... 37 3.3 Site Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.1 Climate ........................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.2 Vegetation....................................................................................................................... 39 3.3.3 Soils................................................................................................................................ 40 3.3.4 Terrain .......................................................................................................................... 40 3.4 Population and Demographic Characteristics ......................................................................... 42 3.5 Land Use Analysis ................................................................................................................. 43 3.6 Compatibility of the Uses with Airport Operations ................................................................. 44 3.7 Institutional, Legal and Financial Issues of the Project Area ................................................... 46 3.7.1 Institutional and Legal Organization of Project Area........................................................ 46 3.7.2 Financial Organizations for the Project Site ..................................................................... 46 CHAPTER FOUR: PROJECT PLANNING, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ........................ 47 4.1 Planning and Design of Projects (Expected Outcomes and Outputs) ....................................... 47 4.1.1 Objectives of the Project ................................................................................................. 47 4.1.2 Development of the Spatial Plan and Design of Alternatives ............................................ 48 4.1.3: Evaluation of the Plan proposals..................................................................................... 55 4.1.4: Preferred Plan ................................................................................................................ 58 4.2 Site Planning/ Design Process Stages ..................................................................................... 59 4.2.1 Detailed Design Formulation Stage and Development of Detailed Action Plans ............... 61 5.0 CHAPTER FIVE: MONITORING AND EVALUATION...................................................... 74 5.1 Monitoring and Evaluation Stages in the Implementation of the Projects ................................ 74 5.1.2 Tools and Techniques of Monitoring and Evaluation to be used ....................................... 75 5.1.3 Objectives of the Monitoring and Evaluation Process .......................................................... 76 5.2 Guidelines for the Implementation Process ............................................................................. 76 5.2.1 Adoption of Planning and Landscaping Standards ........................................................... 76 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page viii 5.2.2 Stakeholder Participation and Involvement ...................................................................... 76 5.2.3 Institutional Linkages ...................................................................................................... 77 5.2.4 Memorandum of Understanding ...................................................................................... 77 5.2.5 Establishment of an Enforcement Task Team: ................................................................. 77 5.2.6 Reporting ........................................................................................................................ 77 5.2.7 Continuous Consultative Meeting .................................................................................... 77 5.2.8 Community Involvement/Awareness ............................................................................... 77 5.2.9 Communication ............................................................................................................... 78 5.3 Site/ Environmental Management Plan................................................................................... 78 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page ix L IST OF F IGURES Figure 1: Quick Bird Image (resolution 60cm) showing Location of Project Site…………... 5 Figure 2: Pillars of Sustainable Development…………………………………………………9 Figure 3: Walking trail and cycling Trail.................................................................................10 Figure 4: Land Use Sensitivity Matrix....................................................................................12 Figure 5: Typical Examples of Compatible Land Uses around Airports……………………18 Figure 6:.Current layout of the Domestic Terminal and surroundings of Brisbane Airport....21 Figure 7: Highly detailed landscape patterns made up of drought tolerant plants to enhance clear way finding pedestrian pathway......................................................................................22 Figure 9: Trees and landscaping at entrance to balance the International Terminal built-form. ..................................................................................................................................................23 Figure 10: Tall Bunya Pines at the entrance to the International Terminal.............................23 Figure 11: Screen front car parking from street.......................................................................25 Figure 12: Dense shade trees to car parks................................................................................25 Figure 13: Sculptural plantings help to provide interest and character....................................25 Figure 14: Integrate landscape between streets and leasehold land, including street planting to provide shade and character................................................................................................26 Figure 15: Plaza space between buildings to incorporate artwork for interest and to provide a cultural context to the site.....................................................................................................27 Figure 16: Brisbane Airport Site Analysis Map.......................................................................28 Figure 17: Brisbane Airport Biodiversity and Landscape Connectivity..................................30 Figure 18: Conceptual Framework...........................................................................................33 Figure 19: Google Image Showing Location of Project Area................................................. 34 Figure 20: Study Area in National, Regional and Local Context............................................35 Figure 21: JKIA Proposed Expansion Land Use Plan ............................................................36 Figure 22: Proposed Airport Expansion in Relation to Project Site........................................37 Figure 23: Mean Monthly Rainfall (mm) in Study Area.........................................................39 Figure 24: Monthly Temperature (Maximum and Minimum).................................................39 Figure 25: Map Showing Nairobi Vegetation and Land Cover..............................................40 Figure 26: Existing Wind patterns, sun path and drainage Situational Analysis.....................41 Figure 27: Map Showing Population Densities and Distribution in Nairobi...........................42 Figure 28: Residential at Kyangombe Settlement...........................................................................................................................43 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page x Figure 29: Light Industry along Mombasa road.......................................................................43 Figure 30: Livestock grazing at project Site............................................................................43 Figure 31: A dam in project site just next to the park..............................................................43 Figure 32: Activities carried out in the study area...................................................................44 Figure 33: Summary of Land Use Analysis............................................................................45 Figure 34: Model Showing Nil Intervention............................................................................49 Figure 35: Layout Plan for Alternative 1.................................................................................51 Figure 36: Context and Layout Plan for Alternative 2.............................................................54 Figure 37: 2D Proposed Layout Plan for the Landscaping Project.........................................59 Figure 38: Proposed Layout Plan in Relation to Action Plans.................................................60 Figure 39: Floor Plan for the Proposed Theme....................................................................62 Figure 40: 3D Model of Proposed Theme Park.......................................................................62 Figure 41: Poster and Maps Branding Kenya at the Tourist Guide centre...............................64 Figure 42: 3D Model of Proposed Cultural Park, Tourist Guide and the General Park next to the Airport................................................................................................................................65 Figure 43: 3D Model of Proposed Mini Zoo........................................................................... 67 LIST OF T ABLES Table 1: Evaluation of Alternatives Plan Proposals Based on Strengths and Weaknesses......57 Table 2: Project Implementation Matrix..................................................................................68 Table 3: Project Costing and Resource Requirements.............................................................71 Table 5: Roles of Various Stakeholders...................................................................................72 Table 6: Goal achievement matrix…………………………………………………………...75 Table 7: Site/ Environmental management plan Table..........................................................78 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page xi ACRONYMS CCN-City Council of Nairobi EMCA-Environmental Management and Coordination Act GI- Green infrastructure IATA - International Air Transport Association ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization JKIA- Jomo Kenyatta International Airport KAA- Kenya Airports Authority KENSUP- Kenya Slum Upgrading Programme KPA- Kenya Ports Authority KRC-Kenya Railways Corporation KWS- Kenya wildlife Service MoNMD- Ministry of Nairobi metropolitan Development NEAP-National Environment Action Plan Committee NEC -National Environmental Council NEMA-The National Environmental Management Authority NNP-Nairobi National Park Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page xii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW 1.1 Background to the Development Project This development project builds upon a research project (conducted by the author in early 2010), which aimed at investigating the land use challenges that are facing green infrastructure within the city of Nairobi. It focuses on the stretch of land along Mombasa road covering Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) land reserve, Railway line reserve, and the Nairobi National Park. The research project report identified various challenges and suggested recommendations as indicated below. The theme of the development is ‘Integration of Green Infrastructure with Urban Development’. 1.2 Summary of Research Findings of Planning Research Project The study found different challenges facing urban green infrastructure, namely: · encroachment by informal settlements; · Illegal allocation of green infrastructure land · Uncontrolled dumping of waste within green infrastructure · Ignorance by members of public on green infrastructure · Lack of proper records on green infrastructure by relevant authorities/City Council of Nairobi. · Inadequate laws and policies on green infrastructure · Deficient management of existing green infrastructure. 1.3 Summary of Recommendations of Planning Research Project Based of the findings, the study put forward a number of recommendations that include: · Recognition and promotion of urban green infrastructure as an important pillar of sustainable development by the City Council of Nairobi and other development partners. · Involvement and co-ordination of multiple stakeholders in planning and management of green infrastructure by the Planning and enforcement agencies within the city. · Recognition of urban green infrastructure as a land use in its own respect by the City Council and developers. · Integration of urban green infrastructure with other urban functions. · Entrenchment of urban green infrastructure in a more appropriate and stronger legal and institutional framework which address, among other issues, governance and funding needs. 1.4 Selected Development Project For the purpose of the Development Project, ‘integration of green infrastructure with other urban uses’ is the recommendation selected, among the recommendations of the Research Planning Project. The theme of the project is “integration of green infrastructure with urban development for sustainable development”. The development project explores ways in which the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport and the Nairobi National Park can be integrated and linked by way of landscaping the land between them. The proposed landscaping comprises of recreational parks (a general park, a theme park, and a cultural park) and a mini zoo. Transportation links will be provided. These include a road, walk ways, cycling paths, and a tram system in the long run. The recreational parks will help improve the land quality. It will also increase the amount of land that can be counted as green spaces. The parks will then be linked to the Nairobi National Park (NNP). This will help achieve the idea of green infrastructure. Green infrastructure typically consists of a network of interconnected, multi-functional natural and managed open spaces that are strategically planned and managed in both urban and rural settings to: conserve ecosystems; maintain natural ecological processes; and contribute to the general health and quality of life of plants, animal and human communities. 1.5 Justification of the Project 1.5.1 Airports Redevelopment Programme Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) is in the process of redeveloping its airports within Kenya, including JKIA. The redevelopment process will need to take in to consideration proper planning that will ensure integration of the airport with various land uses within the vicinity of the airport. This will also help safeguard the airports land that is not currently in use. During the research it was evident that encroachments within the airport land were due to a Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 2 perception that the land was idle. The landscaping of the airports land will therefore give it added value and keep off encroachments such as the ones that have been happening. The linking of the park to the airport will improve both local and foreign tourism. This is because it will open the park to tourists easily and also the residents living in estates along Mombasa road. Owing to the potentially green land that airports take up, and their pollution effects to the environment around them, it is only fair that they are able to compensate for such effects. One way of doing so is by the provision of Green Infrastructure and other services that are beneficial to the adjacent communities which may include recreational parks etc. 1.5.2 Character Landscape works contribute directly to the character and identity of any place and the experience of users. The landscaping will provide consistency, and enhance the distinctive character of the airport, and the city at large through branding and greening. Nairobi is known as the “green city in the Sun”. The landscaping will result in greening which will well reflect the green character of a tropical city. One of the key objectives of the plan is to integrate the principles of sustainable development, economic viability and operational efficiency into decision making at all levels. 1.5.3 Sustainability Kenya is a signatory to treaties that are committed to sustainable development. This thus means providing sustainable landscapes that contribute to biodiversity, manage water resources effectively, reduce energy requirements, and minimises waste production. The EMCA requires that all developments should be sustainable enough and should not affect the environment adversely, thus the need to ensure sustainable airport expansion. 1.5.4 Ecology Improvements of environmental conditions within the open space on the selected site; and effective control of the ecology will add to the positive contribution of the site within a wider context of the airport region and related catchments. 1.5.5 Function The proposed landscape works will support the operational and functional requirements of air transport, and facilitate movement and controlled access to facilities. Aviation safety is paramount to all activities occurring within the airport thus landscaping will ensure controlled access and better definition of the territory of the airport space. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 3 1.5.6 Management Landscaping of the airport land will promote effective management. This will ensure new works are consistent with environmental objectives, and provide resources to maintain an appropriate quality standard. 1.5.7 Economic Payback Linking the two areas will improve both domestic and foreign tourism. The trail and road from the airport to park will make it easier for visitors to access the national park, without having to pass through the busy town. It will also open up to residents living along the same area. This will improve earning from tourism. The losses that would have been caused by the encroachments such as degrading land value, and quality will be minimised. The proposed activities will add value to the land and generate income to the airport operations. 1.5.8 Policies and Strategies According to the vision 2030 the airport and the Nairobi National Park are some of the major flagships that are going to be used to bring about development. The park is also one of the unique aspects of the city of Nairobi and is among the projects that can be used to brand the city. Thus the airport being the channel that brings about foreigners and being near the park it would be of great value to utilize the two together to give the city an instant character for foreigners. 1.6 Location of Project Area and Coverage The project will utilise part of JKIA land along Mombasa road stretching from the flight terminal to the border of the park and measuring 2.9 Km long. The railway reserve buffering the park and the airport is also within the project area and will be utilised for the same. The project site is as indicated in the Quick Bird image below. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 4 Figure 3: Quick Bird Image (resolution 60cm) showing Location of Project Site JKIA Terminal Project Site Source: http://www.bing.com/maps (accessed on 10th march 2010) 1.7 Project Objectives · To link Nairobi National Park to JKIA, in a bid to encourage human interaction with nature and improve conservation of green infrastructure. · To provide a sustainable green Infrastructure management plan using landscaping as a green infrastructure management tool. · Landscape the seemingly idle JKIA land between the airport and the park. · To improve the quality of green spaces along Mombasa road and improve its desirability. · To create a character that provides awareness of the park existence right from the airport. · Link the green infrastructure (Mombasa Road Reserve, Railway reserve, Airport land reserve and NNP) along Mombasa road to create a network of green spaces. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 5 1.8 Project Assumptions The project assumes that: · The land belonging to JKIA is available for planning and development. · The proposals made through the development project will be implemented by the relevant authorities who include Kenya Airports Authority, Kenya Wildlife Service MoNMD and City Council of Nairobi among others. · The relevant stakeholders’ i.e Kenya Airports Authority (KAA), Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), Kenya Railways Corporation (KRC), and City Council of Nairobi (CCN) will work together in realizing the project and will commit their resources in to the same. 1.9 Scope of Development Project and Organization of Chapters The development project focuses on the improvement and provision of green spaces within the city. This involves planning and integrating of green spaces within every development. This specific project will focus on land reserves along Mombasa corridor. These land reserve are; JKIA land reserve, Railway reserve, and Nairobi National Park. The project will cover an area of an approximate 7Km2. The project report is organized in 5 chapters. Chapter one outlines the focus of the research project and its findings. It also highlights the main recommendations of the research project and the preferred recommendation for implementation within the development project. It also gives reasons for the selection of the development project; the objectives; assumptions, and scope of the development project. The methodology used in developing the project is also part of this chapter. Chapter two contains review of relevant policies; plans; regulations; strategies; planning design guidelines and standards. It also contains references to case studies and the projects conceptual framework. Chapter three covers the location context of study area; background of project area and historical context; site analysis; land use analysis; institutional, legal and financial issues of the project area. Chapter four contains the planning and design of project; design alternatives; evaluation of alternative plan proposals; site planning; design process stages and implementation schedule. Chapter five provides monitoring and evaluation guidelines for the project, it also contains guidelines for implementation process and Environmental management plan. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 6 1.10 Methodology This section focuses on the procedures and techniques that were used in the development project. It includes the methods that were used to collect data, instruments of data collection, techniques of analysis, and presentation. 1.10.1 Data Needs The project data needs included; land use data within the vicinity of the project site, physical environmental data of site, policy data, past, present and future planning and development trends within project area, institutional data, land tenure and ownership data and demographic data. 1.10.2 Data sources Various sources were utilised to acquire data and they include among others: Published and unpublished relevant books in Libraries, Government and Non-government institutions, Media and internet sources, field surveys which involved observations and photography. 1.10.3 Data Collection Methods Both primary and secondary methods were used to obtain data. Primary methods involved observation and photography during site visits. Secondary data was collected through literature review of both relevant policies, plans, regulatory guidelines, handbooks, manuals and analysis of past relevant case studies. 1.10.3.1 Primary Data Primary data was obtained using different methods. During field visits observations were made and recorded. This involved careful observation of the subjects and phenomena relevant to the study. Information was also got from key and relevant informants who included Persons from City Council of Nairobi, Nairobi National Park, Kenya Railways, Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, and University of Nairobi (DURP) among others. Photographs were taken in the project site to enhance data analysis and give firsthand information on the activities in the study area. Mapping was also used. Existing maps were used to mark out the existing physical boundaries and spatial distribution of activities of the study area. Oral Interviews were carried out focussing on relevant stakeholders. This was used to get general information from various respondents. Written questionnaires were administered to key stakeholders who include Kenya Airports Authority, KWS and the City Council of Nairobi. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 7 1.10.3.2 Secondary Data Secondary data was collected through literature review of both published and unpublished works by different authors on airport land use planning and related subjects. Other sources included relevant documents and publications in libraries, government and non- government institutions records, KWS and JKIA publications, media and internet sources and case studies. 1.10.4 Data Analysis and Presentation Data collected was analysed using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Data obtained was in different categories and involved spatial data, descriptive data. Spatial data was analyzed through mapping and trend analysis. Quantitative techniques were used to analyze data through the use of statistical package for social scientists especially for the questionnaires. 1.10.5 Methods of Data Presentation The data presentation is in the form of maps, figures, graphs, tables, charts and a written report. The development project is presented in the form of a planning development project report. Proposed designs have been shown in form of images. Photos have also been used to explicitly explain issues regarding the project. 1.10.6 Limitations Limitations in the Development Planning Project were as follows; Ø Limited information on the subject of landscaping with respect to Kenyan context and developing countries in general. Ø Time constraints in data collection and ease of access to information Ø Limited access to landscaping projects to relate as relevant case studies especially from developing countries. Ø Bureaucracy in the relevant organizations which led to more time in accessing data. 1.10.7 Definition of Key Terms and Concepts Some terms used in the development project which might require definition are as below; 1.10.7.1 Green infrastructure “Green infrastructure is the physical environment within and between our cities, towns and villages. It is a network of multi-functional open spaces, including formal parks, gardens, Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 8 woodlands, green corridors, waterways, street trees and open countryside. It involves natural and managed green areas in both urban and rural settings”. (http://www.greeninfrastructure.eu/section=006.002&page=39 last accessed on 06/10/2009) “Green infrastructure is strategically planned and managed networks of natural lands, working landscapes and other open spaces that conserve ecosystem values and functions and provide associated benefits to human populations.” (http://www.greeninfrastructure.net/content/definition-green-infrastructure last accessed on 06/10/2009) “Green infrastructure is an interconnected network of protected land and water that supports native species, maintains natural ecological processes, sustains air and water resources, and contributes to the health and quality of life ………communities and people.” (http://www.csc.noaa.gov/magazine/2009/03/article2.html last accessed on 09/10/2009 1.10.7.2 Sustainability Sustainability is the capacity to endure. In ecology the word describes how biological systems remain diverse and productive over time. There are three pillars of sustainability according to the brunt land commission which are social, environmental and economic. Figure 4: Pillars of Sustainable Development Source: http://www.uneporg/categories.asp?catid=270 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 9 1.10.7.3 Theme park A theme park is an amusement park in which all the settings and attractions have a central theme. Such themes may include the world of the future, the airport city among others. In this case, the theme of the park will be based on wildlife. 1.10.7.4 Zoo A zoo is a facility in which animals are confined within enclosures, displayed to the public for the purpose of entertainment or education. They are also used as homes to protecting endangered species. 1.10.7.5 Cultural Bazaar/Park A bazaar is a market area, especially a street of small stalls. 1.10.7.6 Trail walk A trail, or track, is a simple thoroughfare used for travel. Trail systems may be used for community travel in less developed villages, for commercial purposes such as moving cattle herds, or recreational purposes such as hiking, cycling, or cross-country skiing. Below are examples of trails. Figure 3: Walking trail and cycling Trail Bicycle trail Source: http://www.greenspaces.asp?catid=231 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 10 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 Overview This section reviews relevant Plans, policies and legislations that will guide the planning, design, implementation and administration of the proposed project. Various policies regarding planning within the vicinity of airports, green infrastructure and recreational parks have been reviewed. Guidelines and standards borrowed from such policies will be used to enhance the proposed project. Kenya however lacks clear and specific policies and guidelines on green infrastructure and landscaping. There is no single policy on such. The few standards that are available are only mentioned in a few legislations and strategies. This means for the project to be attained and to be sustainable, guidelines will have to be developed and adhered to. Airports are sensitive areas and the land uses adjacent to them should be given careful attention. There is therefore need to carefully plan these areas and ensure that only compatible uses are allowed near airports to ensure safety, preservation and environmental protection. Generally, the compatibility of existing and planned land uses in the vicinity of an airport is usually associated with the extent of the airport’s noise impacts. There are though, land uses that are not related to noise but may have adverse effects to the operations of aircrafts. Some of these are municipal landfills and wetlands that attract wildlife species hazardous to aviation. The degree of compatibility of different uses differs. Figure 4 below indicates the degree of compatibility of different uses with aviation operations. The compatibility is based on the ability of the different uses to accommodate noise, promote aviation safety etc. According to airport Planning and Management 5 th edition, there are different categories of planning in airport planning and one of the major ones is environmental planning. This concentrates on maintaining or improving existing environmental conditions in the face of changes in future airport activity. Environmental planning includes land use planning, noise mitigation, wetland reclamation and wildlife preservation. Recreational uses such as golf courses and picnicking areas are quite suitable for airport land and might in effect serve as good buffer areas. (Young et al, Airport Planning and Management, 2004, pg 405,) Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 11 Figure 4 : Land Use Sensitivity Matrix Source: Land Use Compatibility and Airports, Page V-10 Following the above chart recreation is among the most compatible activities that can be carried out within airports vicinity. 2.1 Policy Legal and Institutional Framework The idea of landscaping/ greening areas within airports is not clearly articulated in any legislation within Kenya but there are various legislations and policies that govern planning and development of green infrastructure and development within the vicinity of airports. 2.1.1 Policy Framework Review 2.1.1.1 Vision 2030 According to the Kenya Vision 2030, the Kenyan government plans for the rehabilitation, maintenance of airstrips, airport expansion and modernisation. This will involve rehabilitation and expansion of airstrips and airports serving tourist and commercial sites in the country. This therefore requires careful planning and management of land uses around the Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 12 airports to ensure comprehensive planning of the airports. Thus, in the expansion of the JKIA airport it would be fit to consider it in relation to its surrounding areas which include the NNP which is a major tourist attraction site. 2.1.1.2 Nairobi Metro 2030 Nairobi metro 2030 is a strategy that seeks to optimise the role of the Nairobi Metropolitan region in the national development effort contained in the vision 2030. The strategy aims to spur development within the region by making use of the strengths of within the metro region. According to the strategy the JKIA and the NNP are some of the strengths that are going to be utilised to achieve development. The strategy is also going to use unique qualities within the region for branding the city. The location of the NNP near the city and the airport is one of the unique qualities of the region. Tourism is one of the leading income earners for the country and thus linking the JKIA which is the major channel for international transport to the NNP means promoting international tourism. 2.1.1.3 Millennium Development Goals Kenya is committed to the achievement of the aspirations of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The principles guiding development and improvement of green infrastructure is encapsulated in the United Nations Millennium Development Goal number 7 (Ensuring Environmental Sustainability). It aims at integrating the principle of sustainable development into country policies and programmes; reversing the loss of environmental resources which include parks and green spaces. 2.1.2 Legal Framework Review 2.1.2.1 The Physical Planning Act (Cap 286), 1996 This act of parliament provides for the preparation and implementation of physical development plans. It emphasizes the need for local physical development plans to provide the framework for development control, land use planning and other planning issues. It gives the Director of Physical planning the powers to make plans “in reference to any government land, trust land or private land within the authority of a county council, for the purpose of improving the land and providing for the proper physical development of such land including parks, open spaces and reserves. This Act empowers local authorities to grant development approvals, formulate building by-laws and carry out development control in their areas of Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 13 jurisdiction. All development planning applications for airports therefore, have to be submitted to the respective local authorities for consent. The Act also gives local authorities the power to reserve and maintain all the land planned for open spaces, parks, urban forests and green belts in accordance with the approved physical development plan. The Act also gives power to Local Authorities to require developers to submit EIA reports for developments that the authority thinks may have adverse effects to the environment. 2.1.2.2 The Local Government Act (Cap 265) This is an act of parliament that guides the operation of local authorities in relation to development. Section 166 gives local authorities mandate to prohibit and control the development and use of land and buildings in the interest of proper and orderly development of its area of jurisdiction. Local authorities are empowered to formulate building by-laws and relevant guidelines or development control regulations for their areas of jurisdiction. JKIA and NNP lies within the jurisdiction of the Nairobi City council. 2.1.2.3 The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act, 1999 This is Kenya’s framework environmental law. The legislation provides a new approach to environmental management and recognizes modern environmental principles and concepts like public participation, international cooperation, the precautionary principle, and cultural and social principles traditionally applied by any community in Kenya for the management of natural resources. The Act outlines projects to undergo environmental impact assessment which include among others; establishment or expansion of recreational areas; establishment or expansion of recreational townships in mountain areas; national parks and game reserves; railway lines; airports and airfields. 2.1.2.4 The Kenya Airports Authority Act (Cap 395) This Act establishes the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) and outlines its functions. Kenya Airports Authority is the body responsible for management of airport operations. According to this Act, the property of airports is under KAA including land. This Act empowers KAA to administer land in its jurisdiction, control and prohibit development. KAA is also empowered to grant permission to developers in the airports environs to ensure development does not interfere with aerodrome operations. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 14 2.1.2.5 The Kenya Civil Aviation Authority Act (Cap 394) Legal notice No.60 signed in May 1998 by the minister for transport for the purpose of the Cap 394 restricts buildings in restricted/declared areas within airport grounds. The notice in effect defines obstacles limitation and prohibits development within airport ground without permission of the Director-General Kenya Civil Aviation Authority. The Act also establishes the Kenya Civil Aviation Authority which should provide accurate, timely, comprehensive and relevant airport operations information for proper planning and decision making purposes. 2.1.2.6 Wildlife (Conservation and Management) Act This Act addresses laws related to the protection, conservation and management of wildlife in Kenya. Provisions of National Parks and all wildlife habitats are contained in this Act. 2.1.3 Institutional Framework 2.1.3.1 The Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) KAA is mandated to establish and manage airports. It has direct control of land under its jurisdiction. It works in co-ordination with local authorities to ensure proper land use planning in the immediate environs of airports. The authority seems to have failed to effectively perform its duties because there are so many encroachments that are facing airports within the city, especially high rise developments and informal settlements. In the project site there are two informal settlements within the airport land and various high rise developments coming up. 2.1.3.2 Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) Kenya wildlife service is a state corporation which manages wildlife on behalf of the state through a system of protected areas. National parks are part of these protected areas. The NNP is one of the major conservation areas in the country and also acts as a rescue centre for endangered species. 2.1.3.3 The Kenya Civil Aviation Authority KCAA’s main role is to safeguard security and safety in the aviation sector especially as regards airspace. Development applications inside the airport or its immediate environs are Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 15 scrutinized by KCAA to ensure that desired heights are achieved. It also ensures that there are no obstructions or animal hazard on flight approaches. 2.1.3.4 The Physical Planning Department This is the department in charge of formulation and approval of physical development plans. It lies under the ministry of lands. According to the findings of the research project, there does not seem to be any plan that guides development within the airport vicinity. This has led to encroachments and incompatible uses within the airport, railway reserve and the park. There seems to be poor coordination between the department and various development institutions like Kenya Airports Authority. This has caused disorder and lack of clear and updated plans to guide development along the JKA airport. 2.1.3.5 The City Council of Nairobi The project area is under the jurisdiction of Nairobi City Council. The NNC is mandated to grant development plan approvals for all land under its jurisdiction. Working with the Civil Aviation authority and the Kenya Aviation Authority, they should formulate building by-laws and carry out development control in areas around airports in order to ensure that all neighbouring developments are compatible with the airport operations. 2.1.3.6 Kenya Railways This is the body responsible for the maintenance of railway operations. They are charged with management of land along the rail line i.e. the railway reserve and are governed by Kenya Railways Corporation Act (Cap 397) and The Kenya Railways (Amendment) Act 2005. 2.1.3.7 The Local Community The project is going to affect various settlements which include KPA and Kyangombe informal settlements. There are also other users within the vicinity of the airport which include commercial and industrial and agricultural uses. They bear the inconveniences of being close to the airport and their input is important in establishing ways in which they can co-exist peacefully with the airport and the proposed development. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 16 2.2 Planning and Design Standards and Regulations 2.2.1 Physical Planning Handbook (2008) The physical planning handbook stipulates guidelines that should be observed in the planning of airports and the location of uses within the vicinity of airports. Safety and noise compatibility are some of the concerns highlighted in the handbook and the land uses around airports are zoned according to such considerations. The standards and guidelines in this handbook have been adopted from ICAO guidelines on land use planning. The compatibility of an airport with its environs is made possible by proper planning of the airport, control of pollution generating sources and land use planning of the area surrounding the airport. The aim is to provide the best possible conditions for the needs of the airport, community in the surrounding area and the ecology of the environment. It gives considerations that should be taken in the planning of airports. Some of the considerations are outlined below. 2.2.1.1 Considerations in Airport Planning A number of considerations need to be taken when planning for airports. They are: · Atmospheric pollution: Emissions from aircraft and ground vehicle engines, incinerators, terminal buildings and other sources contribute to the air pollution in the vicinity of airports. · Flora and Fauna: Utilization of land for airport purposes inevitably creates disturbances to flora and fauna. Development works frequently entails clearing and cutting back of trees and other vegetation. Developments around airports should have the least disturbance on ecological services of the surrounding areas. · Noise: The activities proposed around airports are supposed to be noise tolerant or are not immensely affected by noise. Trees may be planted to screen certain areas from some airport noise. When proposing trees to be used for the development of a sound insulating forest considerations should be given to species which: (a) Are suitable to the climatic conditions of the airport site. (b) Have effective sound insulation properties (e.g. do not shed their leaves or needles grow rapidly and densely, etc (c) Do not generate a bird hazard. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 17 (d) Are easy to care for after their growth (e.g. normally healthy and not readily affected by blight or noxious insects etc. · Environmental Impact Assessment Studies: Detailed study of the impact of airport and airport related developments on the environment is an essential part of the assessment for any major project. Social ecological impacts should also be investigated. Figure 5: Typical Examples of Compatible Land Uses around Airports Examples of ZONE compatible land uses or developments A B C Unrestricted land uses Some restrictions on Most land uses and and developments land uses developments Agricultural Crop farming Industrial Machine shop Commercial - Ware housing and shipping - Office and banking Residential - Low density housing Public facilities - Schools Source: Draft Physical Planning Handbook (2008) Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 18 and developments permitted not The length of the bar indicates where the uses might be permitted without restriction in relation to aircraft noise exposure only, and excluding other planning considerations. With respect to certain uses, e.g. housing, commercial a development might be allowed in a zone of higher restriction when other planning considerations indicate a need and where suitable building techniques, sound insulation, etc., can reduce the aircraft noise exposure to an acceptable level. 2.2.2 The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Internationally, the recommended standards for the operation and management of civil – use airports are provided by ICAO. ICAO was formed in 1944 as part of the Chicago convention on international Civil Aviation for the purpose of providing a source of communication and standardization among participating states with respect to civil aviation operations. Kenya is a signatory to ICAO. ICAO publishes a series of recommended policies and regulations to be applied by individual states in the management of their airports and civil aviation systems. Its signatories are required to adhere to specific standards and regulations in order to ensure that civil aviation is developed in a safe and orderly manner. Specific standards and guidelines governing land use planning are set; dealing with land use issues and environmental management in and around airports. The airport planning manual part two details out land uses compatible with the airport and planning tools to be adapted for compatible land use planning in and around airports. 2.2.3 International Air Transport Association (IATA) This is an international association of scheduled carriers in international air transportation. It represents airlines which are the main users of airports. This therefore requires the association to be fully involved in airport planning with regard to design and development to ensure effective, safe, efficient and secure air transport. 2.3 Landscaping Guidelines There are no specific airport landscaping guidelines in Kenya. The specifications that are provided in the physical planning handbook just dictate generally what can be allowed within airports for compatibility purposes. This therefore means that the guidelines to be used in this project will be borrowed largely from the case studies and other countries that have been able Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 19 to landscape successfully within their airports. The case studies that were considered are Brisbane Airport Master Plan Landscaping and O’Hare International Airport Landscaping Programmes. 2.4 Past and Future Development Plans For Project Site There has never been a comprehensive plan for the project site covering the airport land and its environs. There is however a proposed redevelopment land use plan for the airport, which is a 20 year development plan. This is one of the major tools that are going to guide the design of the project. The plan has proposed the expansion of the runway and inclusion of commercial activities within the airport. The plan did not though take in to consideration a detailed environmental management plan. Source: JKIA Redevelopment Plan, 2009 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 20 2.5 Relevant Case Studies 2.5.1 Case One: Brisbane International Airport Landscape Master Plan 2.5.1.1 Introduction Brisbane Airport is located in Australia in Brisbane city. In the context of Brisbane City, the airport lies on the eastern edge of the city limits to the north of the Brisbane River, and is approximately 15km from the CBD. A key priority for Brisbane Airport Management in developing the Airport Precincts is ensuring a balance between built form and landscape. Central to this balance is promoting environmentally responsible landscape design and facilitating a publicly accessible open space network. The landscaping master plan of the airport took in to consideration all aspects of the airport ranging from the terminal, access ways, industrial parks, business parks to the open green spaces. Figure 6:.Current layout of the Domestic Terminal and surroundings of Brisbane Airport. Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 21 2.5.1.2 Airport Planning Principles used in the Master Landscaping Project The Airport Planning Principles guiding the Landscaping process and providing a reference point for the plan’s landscape sustainability objectives, strategies and actions are as below. 2.5.1.2.1 Planning principle 1: Landscape Sustainability Brisbane Airport used sustainable landscape and open space planning and design. Some of the components include: Drought tolerance species and Non-bird attracting plant species. Figure 7: Highly detailed landscape patterns made up of drought tolerant plants to enhance clear way finding pedestrian pathway Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 2.5.1.2.2 Planning principle 2: Landscape Values Landscape values were managed to minimise adverse environmental impacts, balance the airport’s built-form and complement biodiversity values. Landscape values used were; Biodiversity and landscape connectivity, Scenic amenity, Design for water, Separation of Urban Areas and Buffering as discussed below. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 22 Figure 8: Strong street character and balancing built-form with subtropical landscape design Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 • Biodiversity and landscape connectivity - A high landscape priority was to protect biodiversity values. The Landscape Master Plan recognises that majority of the airports surrounding Biodiversity Zone will remain in a natural state to preserve the biodiversity of this regional landscape management area which also forms part of a broader inter-urban break. • Scenic amenity- Areas of significant scenic amenity existing along the waterways, coastline and vegetated areas on Airport, including the Biodiversity Zone were to be enhanced using landscape techniques. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 23 Figure 9: Trees and landscaping at entrance Figure 10: Tall Bunya Pines at the to balance the International Terminal built- entrance to the International Terminal. form. Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 • Design for water Biodiversity and scenic amenity value can be enhanced by designing for water, including water conservation and recycling. As a significant scenic amenity feature, designing for water within the airport site was integrated into design layouts to balance the built-form and provide sustainable drainage solutions to the increased hard surfacing occurring with development. A high priority in sustainable landscape design is minimisation, conservation and reuse of water. Designing for water in the landscape incorporates sustainability techniques, including using drought tolerant native plant species and using recycled water as the primary water source available for irrigation. • Separation of Urban Areas and Buffering This was done by buffering the airport. Some of the buffers include Moreton Bay and BAC’s Biodiversity Zone. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 24 Figure 11: Screen front car parking from street. Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 2.5.1.2.3 Planning principle 3: Open Space Network An open space network facilitates public access through an attractive and innovative landscape setting for the enjoyment of the community. The open space network consisted of; • Landscape character The open space network was enhanced through the landscape character, identity and sense of place, strengthened with social and cultural aspects. Landscape character themes included creating interpretive and distinctive landscapes, ensuring public safety, maximising surveillance and incorporating subtropical design. Examples of subtropical design included shade and cover from the sun and wet weather integrated into new developments and landscape to reduce temperatures and glare. Figure 12: Dense shade trees to Figure 13: Sculptural plantings help to provide car parks interest and character Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 25 Figure 14: Integrate landscape between streets and leasehold land, including street planting to provide shade and character Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 • Cultural connection Cultural connection in landscape and open space design helped create special character, culture and sense of place at Brisbane Airport. Recognition and expression of artwork was used to enhance the open space network, including promoting the Brisbane Airport’s distinctly Australian landscape character. The character, identity and sense of place were strengthened with cultural aspects, expressed through artwork reflections. Managing access to landscapes of significance to the community, such as a biodiversity boardwalk encourages education and cultural connection. The historic Kingsford Smith Memorial also provides a cultural connection to the origins of aircraft design. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 26 Figure 15: Plaza space between buildings to incorporate artwork for interest and to provide a cultural context to the site. Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 • Outdoor recreation and connectivity Brisbane Airport contributed to outdoor recreation activities for the enjoyment of the onairport workforce and community through providing a publically accessible open space network. Outdoor recreation activities include walking and cycling. To support outdoor recreation opportunities, including walkways and cycleways, publicly accessible linkages were provided between activity nodes. A key design principle used was connecting the airport cycle network to regional cycleways. Walkway and cycleways connections were maximised between and within Airport precincts to produce a safe and secure on-Airport publicly accessible open space network. • Sport and recreation The primary sport and recreation area is located within the Airport Village, which is to accommodate a golf course and driving range, including a clubhouse. • Community focus and tourism The landscaping contributed to the on-airport and wider community through best-practice urban design practices that reflect a local sense of place. A priority was to provide pedestrianfriendly streets, outdoor recreation opportunities and community focus places where people can meet. For example, locations of high public use are designed with outdoor centres and meeting places including outdoor dining, entertainment and recreation, around public transport nodes. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 27 2.5.1.2.4 Planning principle 4: safety Safety issues were also key in this project. Some of the safety issues in the Landscape Master Plan, from an operational perspective include; · Minimising bird attraction - Landscape methods to minimise likelihood of bird and flying fox attraction included selecting trees that do not produce the type of flowers and seeds sought by birds and maintaining the grass at a length which deters birds · Lighting - The lighting to be used should not cast past the horizontal so as not to provide conflicting light sources for planes in their landing approach. 2.5.1.3 Outcomes of the landscaping Programme The landscaping process was comprehensive taking in to consideration all aspects of the airport. Some of the outcomes of the landscaping are outlined below in form of images and maps as shown above and below. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 28 Figure 16: Brisbane Airport Site Analysis Map Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 29 Figure 17: Brisbane Airport Biodiversity and Landscape Connectivity Source: Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 30 2.5.1.4 Lessons Learned · Comprehensive Planning is Paramount for Any Project to Succeed. The landscaping plan took in to consideration all aspects of the land which include; Landscape Sustainability, Landscape Values, Biodiversity and landscape connectivity, Scenic amenity, Design for water, Cultural connection, Separation of urban areas, Outdoor recreation and connectivity. · Detailed Study Of Existing Aspects Detailed study of the existing situation and site analysis is necessary to be able to effective deal with all issues. Proper analysis of the airport environment was done as shown in figure 16 above. This ensures that all proposed interventions are well informed and fit well in to the airport operations and environment. · Use Of Existing Features The plan to a large extent made use of the natural space to enhance the character of the place. Areas of importance and great biodiversity were maintained as they were. This minimised cost and ensured fewer disturbances to the natural environment. · Policy Guidelines The plan made extensive use of existing legislature including environmental strategies in planning for ecological sensitive areas which ensured compatibility and acceptance of the plan by different agencies. 2.5.2 Case Two: The O’Hare Modernization Program (OMP) - (O’Hare International Airport) 2.5.2.1 Introduction O’Hare International Airport is located in Chicago in the United States of America. The O’Hare Modernization Program (OMP) was a programme of landscaping the O’Hare International Airport in Chicago. The landscaping took effect within few basic requirements. The three main criteria for sustainable landscaping at ORD for both Airside and Landside areas were: Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 31 · Minimizing Wildlife Hazards The landscaping focussed on minimizing wildlife hazards with particular emphasis on large birds (e.g. waterfowl, gulls, raptors), small mammals that may attract raptors, and small birds that congregate into large flocks (e.g. blackbirds, starlings). Landscape that provides food or shelter to these types of birds and small mammals was avoided. The acceptable trees to be used for the landscaping were also specified. The spacing between the trees was also clearly indicated in the plan. For instance the guidelines stipulate that; trees must be spaced apart at such distances that do not allow their canopies to grow together. The minimum distance between trunk centrelines for trees is supposed to be equal to one and a half times the spread/width of the crown of the tree at maturity. (i.e. two trees that have a 30’ spread at maturity cannot be placed closer than 45’ between each trunk centreline). When two different tree species are placed near each other, the tree with the larger canopy width at maturity must be used to calculate the minimum distance. · Increase Landscape Sustainability In concert with wildlife management, Airport landscaping must be low-maintenance and environmentally sound. Plants that have little or no maintenance requirements were to be used. Plants that minimize or eliminate fertilization, mowing, pest control, and irrigation were to be used whenever possible. · Safety and Security All Airport safety and security protocols related to the placement of landscape features were to be adhered to in all cases. These include sight lines for security sensitive areas (i.e. guard posts) and the line-of-sight for the air traffic control towers and runway approaches. The lessons learnt from case study two therefore, is that it is important to take in considerations aspects of Minimizing Wildlife Hazards, Landscape Sustainability, Safety and Security in development processes around airports. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 32 Figure 18: Conceptual Framework Sustainable landscape Wildlife management Principles INTERVENTION Kenya Airports Authority and GoK Actors Safety and security Kenya wildlife Landscaping Tree and grass planting Use of lighting Creation of recreation parks, zoo, theme park, trail Kenya Railways Corporation Service Actions Enforcement of and adherence to regulations Nairobi City Council, MoNMD Land profiling Measuring Mapping Registration Containing current encroachment Relocation of residents to slum upgrading programmes in Kibera Mapping to stop further encroachments Implementation Economic benefits Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Sustainable management of Green Infrastructure Ecological benefits Page 33 Social benefits CHAPTER THREE: SITUATION ANALYSIS 3.1 Location Context of Project Area The project site lies along Mombasa road. It comprises of a stretch of land belonging to Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, Kenya Railways and Kenya Wildlife Service. The project area stretches from the Jomo Kenyatta Airport to the Nairobi National Park and crosses Mombasa road and the railway line just near the edge of the park. The land covers an approximate 7 km2. Along Mombasa road it stretches from city Karbanus and ends at Kapa industries covering a distance of 3.14 km. From the airport to the Nairobi National Park it covers a length of 2.9 km long. The project area is almost undeveloped except for the two informal settlements Kyangombe and KPA and a few industrial developments along Mombasa road. Below is a quick bird image showing the extent of the project area. Figure 19: Google Image Showing Location of Project Area Embakasi Pipeline KPA Nairobi Depot JKIA Terminal Project Site Syokimau Source: http://www.bing.com/maps (accessed on 10th May 2010) Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 34 Figure 20: Study Area in National, Regional and Local Context Source: Author, 2010 Source: Author, 2010 3.2 Background and Historical Development of Project Area 3.2.1 Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) The Jomo Kenyatta International Airport has been in operation since May 1958. Until the 1970s the airport was named "Embakasi", reflecting the area on the outskirts of the city where it is located. Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) is East Africa’s largest airport. The airport is strategically located 20 minutes from Nairobi’s Central Business District. It is mainly accessed through Mombasa road and Outering road. The Jomo Kenyatta Airport Land covers an area of 10,000 Ha of which part of it is the project area. This land was among the assets handed over to the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) by the Aerodromes which used to operate the airport until 1991. Most of the land is vacant with the runway and the building space occupying less than a quarter of the land. The rest of the land is left bare as the flight path and for future development. The project area covers a stretch of 2.9 Km from Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 35 the runway to the Nairobi National Park. This is part of the land that has been set aside for future development and the flight path. 3.2.1.1 Proposed Redevelopment for the JKIA Airport There is already a proposed development plan which is supposed to guide development and management of the airport within the next 20 years. The plan also gives guidance for the assessment and implementation of potential land uses within and adjacent to the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport. The plan proposes expansion of the runway and maximising the commercial activities within the airport. Below is an image indicating the proposed land uses within and around the terminal. The project site according to the proposed expansion is set aside as land for future development and expansion. Figure 21: JKIA Proposed Expansion Land Use Plan Source: JKIA Redevelopment Plan, 2009 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 36 The development project seeks to complement the existing and proposed land uses as much as possible. The map below shows the relationship of the proposed land use expansion to the project site. Figure 22: Proposed Airport Expansion in Relation to Project Site Source: Author, 2010 3.2.2 Nairobi National Park The Nairobi National Park (NNP) was officially gazetted in the year 1946. The park lies to the west of the JKIA airport. It is located just five miles south of the city centre and covers an area of 117-square-kilometer (45-square-mile). Today, Nairobi National Park is the country’s most successful Rhino Sanctuary – in 2009, several of the endangered White Rhino species were moved to the park. Nairobi National Park is still a huge and protected expanse of green space close to the city. It serves a vital role in recreation, conservation, and education Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 37 resource for young Kenyans. It also provides critical ecosystem services such as purifying the air and sequestering carbon and plays a major economic role as one of the most commercially viable conservation areas in Kenya. The park is a home to a variety of animal, bird and plant species. The location of the park next to the airport creates an opportunity that can be utilised to improve the quality of green spaces within its context. This can form an ecosystem or a network of conservation areas 3.3 Site Analysis This section deals with the Physical, topographical and demographic characteristics of the project site. The climate, rain patterns, wind patterns have been analysed to check their impacts to the proposed development. It also examines the land uses within the airport and their relation to the proposed project. 3.3.1 Climate The trees and grass to be used for the landscaping will mostly be determined by the climate of the area. Climate greatly influences vegetation types and distribution that in turn affect the quality of landscaping materials. The maintenance practices to be done on the landscaping for instance will be determined by the rainfall patterns and amounts which are part of climate. 3.3.1.1 Rainfall Rainfall in the area is strongly influenced by altitude and ranges between 500mm and 1250mm per annum. Rainfall distribution in the area as in most other parts of Kenya is bimodal with alternating dry and wet seasons. Short rains occur between November and December while long rains occur between March and May. In between the rainfall seasons are intermediate periods of dry spells between January and March and between June and October. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 38 Figure 23: Mean Monthly Rainfall (mm) in Study Area Source: Meteorological Department, 2005 3.3.1.2 Temperatures Temperatures in the area vary with altitude in addition to the rainfall seasons. Annual mean temperatures range from 25C and 13.5 C at maximum and minimum respectively. The coldest months are July and August while November and April are the hottest months (Government of Kenya, 2002) Figure 24: Monthly Temperature (Maximum and Minimum) Source: Meteorological Department, 2005 3.3.2 Vegetation The most dominant vegetation in the area is savannah grass and shrubs. Part of the land is covered with vegetables and food crops. The grass and the shrubs are all natural. The map below shows the distribution of vegetation within Nairobi and the vegetation in the study area. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 39 Figure 25: Map Showing Nairobi Vegetation and Land Cover Source: Centre for Urban and Regional Planning, 2010 3.3.3 Soils The area is characterised by black cotton soil. The soil type will highly influence the type of trees to be planted within the area during the landscaping process. It will also influence the depth of planting the trees. 3.3.4 Terrain The area is generally flat savannah that experiences flooding in some sections during heavy rains. It also has sections with very gentle slopes especially within the park, near the river valleys. . Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 40 Figure 26: Existing Wind patterns, sun path and drainage Situational Analysis Drainage flow/Slope analysis. Sun Path Wind direction LEGEND Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 41 3.4 Population and Demographic Characteristics The population within the project area varies during the day and night. Most of the population is contained in within the informal settlements and the industries along Mombasa road. According to the settlements chairmen, there are an approximate 21,000 people in the two settlements (KPA and Kyangombe). Most of these people moved in to the settlements in between 2000-2010. For efficiency to be achieved, the strategies to be adopted in landscaping the area need to take in to considerations the settlement area. The daytime population is great compared to the night population due to the industries along Mombasa road that has workers during daytime from different places. Figure 27: Map Showing Population Densities and Distribution in Nairobi Source: KNBS, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 42 3.5 Land Use Analysis The various activities carried out within the vicinity of the project site include: residential, commercial, industrial urban agriculture, safety, and conservation. Residential and commercial are found within the informal settlements KPA and Kyangombe. The other activities include transportation through the railway line and the JKIA flight path. Farming includes both crop and animal farming. The crops grown are mainly horticulture and include Sukumawiki, Spinach, tomatoes, kunde etc and a few food crops like maize and beans. Industrial uses are found within the Wallstreet Park and along Mombasa road. Conservation areas are within the park. 80% of the activities are temporary as shown in figure 32 below. Figure 28: Residential at Kyangombe Settlement Figure 29: Light Industry along Mombasa road Source: Author – Field Survey, 2010 Figure 30: Livestock grazing at project Site Source: Author – Field Survey, 2010 Figure 31: A dam in project site just next to the park Source: Author – Field Survey, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Source: Author – Field Survey, 2010 Page 43 Figure 32: Activities carried out in the study area Nature of activities 100 Percent 80 60 40 20 0 Semi-permanent Temporary Nature of activities Source: Author – Field Survey, 2010 3.6 Compatibility of the Uses with Airport Operations Some of the uses are compatible with the operations of the airport while others are not. Commercial, industrial and agriculture are some of the most accepted uses around airport operations but with some degree of control. There is therefore need for those that are not compatible to be stopped and enhance compatible uses. Though agriculture is allowed in the vicinity of airports food that attract birds like grains are not allowed. There are though some grain crops which were found within the project site and these should be discouraged to avoid attracting birds which are hazardous to planes. Others uses like the residential within the informal settlements should also be discouraged because they pose security risk to the operations of the airport. Part of the lands where these settlements sit on is within the project site. The settlements will need to be done away with using the best way possible. This will involve mapping of the size of the informal settlements and containing them to stop further expansion. The residents already there will then be accommodated in the Kibera Slum Upgrading Programme due to the fact that the project site falls within Kibera Division. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 44 Figure 33: SUMMARY OF LAND USE ANALYSIS Wall Street Industrial park Kenya Ports Authority Nairobi Depot Residential in Informal settlements Flight Path Commercial in informal settlements Grazing on project site Farming activities within project site Nairobi National Park Railway line Mombasa Road Source: Author – Field Survey, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 45 3.7 Institutional, Legal and Financial Issues of the Project Area 3.7.1 Institutional and Legal Organization of Project Area The project site is under the jurisdiction of the City Council of Nairobi. It is within Kibera district and Lang’ata constituency. Most of the land where the project site lies is owned by KAA. The rest belongs to the Kenya Railways in form of railway reserve, the Kenya Highways Authority in form of road reserve and the KWS in form of the National Park. The project site has been encroached by two informal settlements which are KPA and Kyangombe. There are also industrial and agricultural uses. These have made it difficult to manage land and have compromised the state of green infrastructure within the project site. Achievement of the proposed project will depend entirely on these institutional linkages. 3.7.2 Financial Organizations for the Project Site Implementation of the project will be greatly determined by the financial resources available. The involved institutions generate income through the activities they operate. The KAA generates income from flights while the NNP generates income from tourism both domestic and international. The NNP generates an average of Kshs 45 million every year. The railway Corporation also generates income through transportation of both human traffic and cargo. The funds to be used for implementing the project will be shared among these institutions among others. The MoNMD will also be among the financiers of the project. Outsourcing from donors will also be another way of getting funds which will be done by KAA, KWS and the MoNMD. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 46 CHAPTER FOUR: PROJECT PLANNING, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 Planning and Design of Projects (Expected Outcomes and Outputs) The expected outcomes for the project are · Improved quality of the green spaces at the airports land and conservation of the park · Enhanced character of the project site and the city of Nairobi at large as the “green city under the sun”. · Increase in the number of tourists visiting the park by improving access to the park from the airport and for the people living in estates along Mombasa road. · Increased income levels at the park and the airport due to enhanced economic activities. · Enhanced management of the airports land reserve, the Nairobi National Park., railway reserve and all green infrastructure within Nairobi in the long run. 4.1.1 Objectives of the Project · To provide sustainable ways of green infrastructure management that can be adopted elsewhere. · To ensure sustainable co-existence of green infrastructure along Mombasa road with neighbouring land uses. · To improve the quality of green infrastructure along Mombasa road. · To ensure rehabilitation and repossession of green infrastructure along Mombasa road and safeguard public institutional land. · To raise the economic returns of the KWS at NNP and JKIA through branding Kenya. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 47 4.1.2 Development of the Spatial Plan and Design of Alternatives The project took in to considerations three different plan proposal and the Nil Intervention. The plan proposals are as indicated below. The key focus of the landscaping design elements is that it will be aesthetically pleasing and at the same time, low maintenance, ecologically and financially sustainable yet does not compromise Airport security and aircraft safety. 4.1.2.1: Nil intervention With nil intervention, the state of the activities within the project site is expected to continue as they are. This will lead to continued environmental deterioration due to the poor waste management within the informal settlements. The informal settlements are bound to grow extensively and more encroachments develop, endangering aviation operations. This will lead to aircraft accidents and less green spaces. The level of pollution at the park and at the airport land is bound to increase degrading the quality of green spaces. Below is a model showing the extent of the growth of the informal settlements and other uses within the project site if nothing is done. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 48 Figure 34: Model Showing Nil Intervention With nil intervention the informal settlements will spread further encroaching more in to the green spaces JKIA JKIA The industries are also bound to spread along the road and railway line Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 49 JKIA Airport 4.1.2.2 Alternative 1: Eviction of People from Informal Settlements and Simple Landscaping The alternative assumes that all the encroachments at the site will be done away with immediately. The encroachments include the informal settlements within the project site and the farming activities. Design The informal settlements Kyangombe and KPA will be demolished from the site and people evicted. The project will involve having a buffer along Mombasa road and the railway line reserve in form of tree planting. These buffers will also act as carbon sinks for the gases released by the motor vehicles. Just next to the business park proposed at the airport will be a recreational park where people can sit and rest. The park will also have sitting benches. Trees and Grass will be planted at the stretch from the airport to the park in the whole land. This grass will be of such calibre that it does not bear grains that will attract birds at the site. The people farming at the site will also be meant to stop their farming at the project site. This will be done in an attempt to safeguard the airports land and also provide land for the landscaping process. A retail park in form of a shopping mall will be built at the site where the informal settlements were located. Parking will be provided at the retail park for people coming to shop. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 50 Figure 35: Layout Plan for Alternative 1 Retail Park in the place where informal settlements were located initially Parking at the retail park JKIA NNP Grassed Vegetated arealand thatusing has trees trees and grass from the Airport to the park Tree buffers along Mombasa road and the Railway line Path leading from the airport to the NNP Source: Author, 2010 4.1.2.3 Alternative 2: Relocation of Informal Settlements and Intensive Landscaping The alternative will involve participatory approach as much as possible and will ensure stakeholder involvement at all levels. The informal settlements will be dealt with in a more humane manner as opposed to eviction. The people in the settlements will be relocated and they will be factored in the Kibera Slum Upgrading Programme. Assumptions of the Alternative · The alternative assumes that the slum dwellers will cooperate in the project and will be willing to stop further encroachments as they wait to be resettled. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 51 · That the process will be as participatory as possible and all stakeholders will contribute all that is expected of them. · That the KENSUP will agree to accommodate the idea of relocating the residents of the two informal settlements in the Kibera Upgrading Programme and that there is enough space to do so. Design This will involve buffering Mombasa road and along the railway line reserve using tree planting. The trees will be spaced in such a manner that their canopy does not interact with each other. The minimum distance between trunk centerlines for trees will be equal to one and a half times the spread/width of the crown of the tree at maturity (i.e. two trees that have a 30’ spread at maturity cannot be placed closer than 45’ between each trunk centerline). The trees to be planted have a 4metres spread of canopy during maturity. The spacing between the trees will be 6 metres apart. When two different tree species are placed near each other, the tree with the larger canopy width at maturity must be used to calculate the minimum distance. The trees to be planted will be trees that do not bear seeds that can attract birds and that do allow bird perching. The trees to be planted will be tropical in nature due to the climate of the project site. A nature walk trail from the airport to the park will be created. The walk trail will stretch from the airport to the park connecting the two areas. An edge which will be maintained at 0.5 metres high will be planted along the trail walk with trees inserted in between at a distance of 10 metres apart. The walk trail measures 2.9 Kilometers. People will be able to walk along the nature trail as they enjoy the various activities in between the park and the airport. The activities along the path will involve a tourist guide centre which will consist of maps showing various tourist destinations within Kenya, areas of cultural and national importance and areas where tourists can access different items. They will also show direction to various places. Just next to the tourist guide centre will be a cultural park/bazaar which will involve people parading items from different cultures. Curio stalls will also be located along the same path. The walk trail will also be used as a cycling path. A flyover will be provided along Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 52 Mombasa road to ensure that people are not affected by motor traffic along Mombasa road as they cross over to the park. The trail will end at the entrance to the National Park. Just next to the airport will be a recreational park. The park will measure 0.384 km2. This will be used by people who simply want to relax as they wait for their flight or as they bid their friends bye. The park will be located next to the airport hotel, Business Park and the piazza in the proposed airport expansion land use plan. People from the business park and the Piazza will be able to access the same. The project seeks to compliment the proposed plan as much as possible. The cultural bazaar will be located just next the airport and adjacent to the tourist guide centre. All these will measure 0.896 km2. A mini zoo will be provided at the railway reserve just adjacent to the park. This will serve both recreation and education purpose. Next to the zoo will be a theme park. Parking will be provided at the theme park and the entrance to the zoo. Along the railway line will also be both a cycling and foot path. The informal settlements will be demarcated and mapped to stop more people from entering in to the settlements. A census will be taken and the people will be accommodated in the Kibera Slum Upgrading Project. This is because the area lies within Kibera division and is also within Lang’ata constituency. Within the first few phases before they are relocated the settlements will be separated from the other land by the use of a tree buffer and bumps of soil dug to create different levels or staircases. This will be also to stop further encroachment. After they have been relocated, the area they are occupying will be used to extend the zoo. Below is a map showing the layout plan for alternative 2. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 53 Figure 36: Context and Layout Plan for Alternative 2 Informal settlements will be demarcated within the first 3 months and buffered using a live fence and soil levels. They will later be relocated to the Kibera Slum Upgrading Programme. After the relocation the zoo will be expanded to cover the area initially covered by the Informal settlements KWS offices at gate to the park at the end point of the trail walk connecting the airport to NNP Trail walk Connecting the Airport to the National Park Zoo and theme park next to Railway line Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 54 The park next to the airport and the cultural centre will be open to everyone for free while to enter the theme park people will be required to pay. The money generated will be used for the maintenance of the zoo and the parks Cultural Park Motorable Road leading to the National park from Mombasa road Parking at the theme park and zoo Tree buffers will be planted along Mombasa road along the railway line and along the National Park. 4.1.2.4 Alternative 3: Compromise Approach - Relocation of Informal Settlements and Intensive Landscaping This alternative assumes that the KAA will allow the informal settlements to be accommodated within the landscaping process. The settlements will be planned for and all services required provided to the residents. The assumption is based on the premise that people get attached to where they live and any alteration done to such social units’ causes unquantifiable loses and costs to those involved. Design The only difference between alternative 2 and 3 is the retention of the informal settlements. The design of alternative 3 will involve the retention of the informal settlements as opposed to relocation or eviction. The settlements will be upgraded and planned in a way that they can co- exist peacefully with airport operations. They will be separated from the other functions through use of levels which will include use of staircases that will be dug to provide various levels. The levels will ensure that the settlements do not grow beyond the current state. The other landscaping designs will be as it is in alternative 2. 4.1.3: Evaluation of the Plan proposals The development options were appraised using the cost benefit analysis, the financial investment appraisal and the goal achievement matrix. The merits and demerits were assessed and appraised to select the preferred plan. 4.1.3.1: Financial Investment Appraisal This method of appraisal primarily analyses the cost implications of the development option with the main revenue considerations being the capital and operating costs. This method is solely limited to financial implications and places no considerations on other hidden costs e.g. social and environmental costs. This analysis would then adopt the nil intervention Strategy as no financial costs will be incurred by any agency. In addition the residents of the informal settlements will not be Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 55 evicted or relocated from their residence based on the environmental and safety risk they pose to the green infrastructure and aviation operations respectively. 4.1.3.2: Goals Achievement Matrix The method seeks to address the level to which each plan alternative achieves the specified operational objectives identified during the planning process. From the plans proposals, the Nil alternative will not achieve the main objectives of providing sustainable green infrastructure. Alternative 1 and 3 seems to also not fully achieve the desired goals. Alternative two seems to achieve most of the goals and objectives stated for the plan. 4.1.3.3: Cost Benefit Analysis The method assumes that all costs can be quantified. It equally assumes that the main objective of any project is to maximize the returns and benefits gotten. The proposals were ranked according to the balance between the costs and benefits. It emerged that though the Nil Intervention will be cheap to implement though it will incur more safety, environmental and social costs in the long run. Alternative seemed to accrue many benefits than any of the other alternatives. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 56 Table 1: Evaluation of Alternatives Plan Proposals Based on Strengths and Weaknesses Alternative Nil Intervention Strengths · Weaknesses Maintenance of status quo for the slum dwellers Alternative 1 · The process will take less time to implement · Continuous loss and degradation of green infrastructure. · Compromised aviation safety · The eviction may lead to property loss or death. Forced as there will be no time used to negotiate eviction compromises the dignity of people and it is against with residents at the site to vacate. human rights. · The proposed retail park may occupy more space which is contrary to the objective of the projects theme which is to safeguard as much green space as possible. The project seeks to reduce the built space as much as possible. Alternative 2 · It will ensure the protection of the green infrastructure · The plan is wholly comprehensive and takes in Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) to account Page 57 all aspects(social, · Project will require more money to implement · It will involve relocation of people which might have high social and cost implications. environmental) · Will make the green infrastructure more economical as people will be pay to access some of the facilities as the zoo · Will create employment for the people working in the zoo and the cultural centre. Alternative 3 · Will uplift the living standards of the slum · dwellers through the upgrading programme · It will not involve relocation of people and will therefore not interfere largely with the social fabric of the settlement It will be costly especially to upgrade the informal settlement and provide decent services. · It will also take more time to achieve the plan · It will might pose a safety risk to the aviation activities because in might give room for bombers to hide within the settlements Source: Author, 2010 4.1.4: Preferred Plan Due to the many merits of alternative 2, it will therefore be adopted as the preferred plan for implementation Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 58 4.2 Site Planning/ Design Process Stages Figure 37: 2D Proposed Layout Plan for the Landscaping Project Existing informal settlements to be relocated IN DU Cultural Park ST AL PROPOSED CULTURAL PARK ES TA TE ist Ex ing ar as mb Mo UM SL A KP T N NG E TI M IS LE EX ETT S RI d oa EXISTING KPA SLUM SETTLEMENT ED OS OP PR PROPOSED GENERAL PARK E EM TH RK PA ED OS OP PR O ZO Ex ng i ist Proposed pedestrian and cyclists link ay ilw Ra e lin Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 59 Figure 38: Proposed Layout Plan in Relation to Action Plans People in the informal settlements will be relocated in to the Kibera Slum Upgrading Program and the zoo expanded PROPOSED CULTURAL PARK ES TA TE t is Ex ing d oa ar as mb Mo UM SL A KP T G EN TIN M IS LE EX ETT S IN DU ST RI AL EXISTING KPA SLUM SETTLEMENT PROPOSED GENERAL PARK ED OS OP PR Tree Buffers along Railway Line Proposed Cultural, Tourist Guide Centre and Park EM TH RK PA E Tree Buffers along Mombasa Road ED OS OP PR O ZO ng i ist Ex ay ilw Ra Proposed pedestrian and cyclists link e lin Theme park Proposed Mini Zoo Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 60 4.2.1 Detailed Design Formulation Stage and Development of Detailed Action Plans · Road reserve buffers/ tree planting The trees will be planted along all the transportation routes (Mombasa road, railway line reserve, proposed trail and road joining Mombasa road from the airport). The trees will be planted in a width of 20 metres on each side of the transportation channels. The length of Mombasa road on covered on the project site is 3.14 km while that of the railway line is 3.2 km. The kind of trees to be planted will be Eucalyptus macrocarpa, Angophora costata or any of their species. This is because they do not spread too much and thus do not allow bird perching. They also do not bear seeds or flowers that attract birds and are well suited toKenyan climate. The trees will be spaced in such a manner that their canopy does not interact with each other. The minimum distance between trunk centerlines for trees will be equal to one and a half times the spread/width of the crown of the tree at maturity. The trees will be planted at a distance of 6 meters from each other. These trees are drought resistant trees which are able to bear long spells of drought and do not require irrigation. · Recreation Park/Theme Park The theme park will be based on wildlife as its theme. It will involve activities like riding on tamed wild animals like the elephants, children slides, children open play areas, parent activity areas, leisure walk areas around water features with fish and other water life, open grass, shrubs and trees. A man playing with lions at a Zoo in South Africa Elephant riding in Singapore Source: http://www.animalmanagement.baia=286 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 61 Figure 39: Floor Plan for the Proposed Theme Figure 40: 3D Model of Proposed Theme Park Parent activity areas, leisure walk areas around water features with fish and other water life. Proposed Path from Airport Shrubs and trees. Proposed Path Children Open Play Areas Railway Line Water features Path to the Pak passing through the zoo Mombasa Road Mombasa Road Nairobi National Park Railway Line Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 62 Children slides · Cultural Bazaar/Park The cultural bazaar/park will be located just next the airport and adjacent to the tourist guide centre. The cultural park together with the tourist guide centre will measure 0.896 km2. Its location near the airport and the trail walk will be to make it accessible to the people passing along the path going towards the park and those within the airport precincts. This will be used as a place where people will showcase and market Kenya’s rich and diverse culture mostly to the tourists. Dustbins will be provided within the park for waste disposal and they will always be closed to avoid attracting birds. Some of the things that can be exhibited are shown below. Kikuyu Woman Pounding Maize Outside Homestead Mijikenda Woman Grinding Pokot Man Playing Traditional Instrument Source: http://www.kenyaculture · Tourist Guide Centre This will be a section near the airport along the walking trail where guidelines will be given to tourists regarding various things. This will be done by the use of maps showing different tourist destinations within Kenya and areas of cultural and national importance. The maps can indicate the different parks within Kenya and how to access them and charges. They could display best hotels to visit while in each part of Kenya and their costs. They maps and other items will be mounted on boards. The sign boards will be 2 metres high so as to be accessible. Any illuminations that can distract pilots and affect operational lights at the airport will be avoided. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 63 Posters of different animals to be found within the park will be placed along the walking trail alongside the maps. This will bring about the character of the place and bring the image of the park closer to the airport. The image below shows how the posters will be placed along the path. An image of how the posters will is shown below in figure 41. Figure 41: Poster and Maps Branding Kenya at the Tourist Guide centre Source: http://www.animalmanagement.baia=286 · General Recreational Park This will be located adjacent the airport next to the proposed business park, airport hotel and Piazza. The park will be as simple as possible and will involve mostly grassed areas and a few trees. Inside the park will be seats where people can sit. There will provision of 2 sanitation facilities in form of ablution blocks. Dustbins will be provided within the park for waste disposal and they will always be closed to avoid attracting birds. The park will be separated from the South airport road by the use of a buffer which will be in form of planted shrubs. the shrubs will be maintained at a minimum height of 2 metres. Lighting will be provided but at the ground level and should not be higher than 1 metre to avoid confusing planes. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 64 Figure 42: 3D Model of Proposed Cultural Park, Tourist Guide and the General Park next to the Airport Tree Buffers along Mombasa Road Cultural Park Maps and Images Tourist Guide Centre JKIA Path to the National Park General recreational Park next to the Airport Mombasa Road Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 65 · Trail Walk/ Cycling path The trail walk will stretch from the park to the airport. It will be a dual carriage corridor. It will be 2.9 km long. It will be 10 metres wide, 5 metres on each lane. In The carriages will be separated by use of shrubs which will be maintained at a minimum of 0.5 metres. This will be to ensure maximum interaction among the people walking along the path and the activities along the path. Dust bins with lids will be placed at an interval of 30 metres along the path for waste disposal. The path will be combined with a cycling path to enable people who wish to cycle to do so. · Mini Zoo This will be located at the edge of the park alongside the railway reserve. Inside the zoo will be animals that are easy to manage while contained and that do not require great maintenance. The animals could also be domesticated and used at the theme park for riding activities. The zoo will measure 4 km2. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 66 Figure 43: 3D Model of Proposed Mini Zoo Path leading to the park from the airport Evergreen dense tree planting around the zoo and a densely planted soil mound are expected to prevent encroachments. External landscaped public open spaces and water features Cages where animals will be housed Tree Buffer along the Railway Line Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 67 4.2.2 Implementation Strategies With Reference To Project Objectives, Strategies Programmes, Projects The implementation of the project will be facilitated by the KAA and KWS and City Council MoNMD, Kenya Railway Corporation, Donors among other stakeholders. The community within the informal settlements and the developers along the road will be sensitised of the intended project. Achievement of the project will therefore require a lot of stakeholder consultation. It will also involve community participation. The people in the settlements will have to be informed of the intention of KAA to recover their land for landscaping purpose. They will also be informed of the need to stop other people from encroaching in to the airports land. They will be charged with the responsibility of ensuring that no more people come in to the settlement. They will also be informed of the plan to incorporate them in the Kibera Slum Upgrading Programme. This will help to stop them from being suspicions that they might be forcefully evicted from the site. Table 2: Project Implementation Matrix Project Objective · Action To link Nairobi National Park with JKIA · Actor · Nature trail · Kenya Airports Authority · Cycling path · Kenya Wildlife Service · Tram system · City Council of Nairobi · Road System · Ministry of Nairobi Metropolitan Development · Ministry of Roads · Kenya Railway Corporation To create awareness · Tourist of the park right Centre by use from of the airport through the landscaping process and provision of · Guide · Kenya Airports Authority · Kenya Wildlife Service images · City Council of Nairobi Zoo · Ministry of Nairobi Metropolitan Development Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) maps and Page 68 · images and maps. · Landscape between · NEMA Tree planting · Kenya Airports Authority · Grass planting · City Council of Nairobi · Use of cultural · the · seemingly idle JKIA land Cultural centre the airport and the park. Developers along Mombasa Road images · To improve quality of spaces the · Recovery green encroached along land Mombasa road of · · City Council of Nairobi · KENSUP · Kenya Wildlife Service · NGOs landscaped and · CBOs by informal settlements · Kenya Airports Authority Proper management of reclaimed land · Mapping and fencing. Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 69 4.2.3 Implementation Schedule Phase 1 (3 months) This will involve stakeholder consultation. The key stakeholders will be Kenya Airports Authority and the Kenya Wildlife Service, City Council of Nairobi and the MoNMD. The stakeholders will seek how to finance and manage the project within this period. The community living in the slums will be informed of the intention to plan and landscape the land they are occupying and how they are going to be relocated. The Kenya Slum Upgrading will be informed of the need to factor in the people in these settlements in the Kibera upgrading programme. The MoNMD will also be informed of the intended branding of the city which is part of their objectives so as they can partner in doing so. The roles of each stakeholder will be defined at this moment and the expectations of each stated. A memorandum of understanding will be drawn. Phase 2 (3 Months) The implementation of the project will begin with land profiling. KAA will secure their land and stop further encroachment. This will be done through mapping and fencing of the land under their jurisdiction. The slums will also be mapped and the last structure demarcated to stop further encroachment. The landscaping layout plan will be deliberated upon by all stakeholders. An EIA will be carried to determine the impacts of the intended project. Phase 3 (9 Months) The trees and grass to be planted will be acquired at this point and planted. Landscaping along the road reserves will commence. The trees will be planted as indicated earlier within the given specifications. The demarcation of the parks to be created will be done and the necessary trees and grass planted. The nature trail will be created with the specifications indicated earlier. Road connecting Mombasa road to NNP will be tarmacked. The resettlement of the people will be carried out at this point. Phase 4 (2 Year) The mini zoo will be put in to place and the cultural bazaar and curio stalls developed. Vendors will be invited to bring in their wares. The vendors will pay revenue which will go in to maintenance of the stalls and other activities within the project site. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 70 Phase 4 (2 Years) The establishment of the tram system from the park to the airport will be carried out at this phase. Phase 5(Continuous) Cost recovery will also be done at this point. The theme park and the zoo will generate income by setting a minimum entrance fee. The cultural centre will generate by renting out the various stalls to vendors. The money got from the project will go in to maintaining the same. The project will thus be self sustaining. Table 3: Project Costing and Resource Requirements PROJECT COST · Stakeholder consultation and creation of awareness on project 200,000 · Mapping and fencing of land to be landscaped 600,000 · Trees and Grass Planting 3 Million · Creation of the Theme and General parks 2 Million · Cultural Park/Bazaar 3.4 Million · Mini Zoo 1 million · Cycling path 20 Million · Tourist Guide Centre 8 Million · Road connecting Mombasa road to NNP 25 Million · Tram System 30 Million · Relocation of Residents in the Informal settlements 30 Million TOTAL 123.2 Million Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 71 Table 5: Roles of Various Stakeholders Stakeholder Role Kenya Airports Authority · Finance the landscaping · Scrutinize the materials to be used for landscaping to ensure they are in line with international standards and do not pose risk to aviation functions · Set up landscaping guidelines and standards together with CCN Kenya Wildlife Service Kenya Railways Corporation · Financing the project · Setting up and Managing the zoo · Financing the project · Giving up the reserve land for landscaping · Managing the landscaped railway reserve · Setting up and maintaining the tram system Ministry of Nairobi Metropolitan · Development City Council of Nairobi Financing project · Branding the Project · Scrutinize development plans around the airport · Verification and approval of Development plans NEMA Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) · Provide guidelines and standards · EIA Page 72 · KENSUP Verification of Development plans Relocation of the residents from the informal settlements Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 73 5.0 CHAPTER FIVE: MONITORING AND EVALUATION 5.1 Monitoring and Evaluation Stages in the Implementation of the Projects Monitoring of the project will begin as soon as the project implementation commences and continue through each phase. Each phase implementation will be reviewed by professionals and feedback given to the relevant stakeholders. This will be to ensure that the plan implementation runs as planned. It will also be a way of getting to find out what else might be needed in the plan implementation that might have been have been overlooked during the planning period. An EIA will be carried out before implementation begins to ascertain the impacts of the proposed project especially the Mini zoo. 5.1.1 Evaluation Approach Evaluation will be done in three phases which are mid-term, Terminal and Post Implementation evaluations which will be to check impacts after implementation 5.1 .1 .1 Mid-Term Evaluations Mid-term evaluations will be evaluations undertaken within the progress of each phase of landscaping as well as the end of each phase. They will be organized and conducted by the stakeholders. In case an evaluation clearly points out undesirable components, it will be taken into consideration for address with immediate effect, as other implementation works continue. 5.1 .1 .2 Terminal Evaluations Terminal evaluations will be undertaken at the end of the each phase of project implementation. This will measure the level of goal achievement. In case there are goals that are not been achieved a way will be resolved to achieve them or compensate for their achievement. It will take in to considerations all the aspects of the project which will include environmental, social, economic and state of the finished project. Negative scores will be mitigated by a holistic involvement of stakeholders. 5.1 .1 .3 Post Implementation/Impact Evaluations Impact evaluations will be done after the project implementation and will seek to consider the effects of the project to the state and quality of green spaces. It will also seek to find out the effects of the landscaping project on the returns of the airport and the park based on the client turnover. The attitude of people of green spaces will also be checked and how they react to Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 74 such space. The effects of the project environmental, social and economic will be weighed against each other. The negative effects will be mitigated while positive effects will be enhanced. 5.1.2 Tools and Techniques of Monitoring and Evaluation to be used 5.1.2 .1 Goals Achievement Matrices Goals achievement matrices will be used at the end of each year, each construction phase and also at the end of the whole project. It will be prepared by professionals and relevant stakeholders. The goals of the plan will be evaluated against their achievement by a table. A template of how the table will be is shown below: Table 6: Goal achievement matrix Goal Score (Out of 10) Environmental Social context Economic Total context context score To provide sustainable ways of green infrastructure management that can be adopted elsewhere. To ensure sustainable coexistence of green infrastructure Mombasa along road with neighbouring land uses. To improve the quality of green infrastructure along Mombasa road. To raise the economic returns of the KWS at NNP and JKIA through branding Kenya. Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 75 5.1.3 Objectives of the Monitoring and Evaluation Process a) To ensure that the programs and implementation schedule runs as planned b) To ensure that available resources for the project are properly utilized c) To measure the level of goal achievement by assessing whether the activities and events undertaken in the project implementation and after project implementation have been effective in achieving set goals. d) To give an opportunity for widespread and inclusive participation in the sequential phases of the project. e) To foster awareness of the people and institutions about any new developments that may emanate in the course of the plan implementation. f) To stimulate appropriate and effective actions in line with the stated objectives and goals of the plan. 5.2 Guidelines for the Implementation Process The project implementation will be guided by various guidelines which will ensure that it is successfully implemented and managed for posterity. These guidelines will involve among others; 5.2.1 Adoption of Planning and Landscaping Standards The landscaping project will refer to available standards as much as possible. Some of the standards to be used will be adopted from both local and international standards. Some of the local standards will be from the physical planning handbook on land use planning around the vicinity of airports and recreational standards. 5.2.2 Stakeholder Participation and Involvement The approach to be used in implementing the project will be participatory. It will start at the onset of the project. All the stakeholders will meet and agree on the roles and the contributions they make towards the project. Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 76 5.2.3 Institutional Linkages The airport land where the project site is drawn shares boundaries with other institutional land and residential estates such as the Kenya Railways, Kenya wildlife Service and Syokimau estates. This institutional land is also part of the project site. Collaboration between such land-owning institutions and developers will go a long way in effective implementation and management of the landscaped green infrastructure. 5.2.4 Memorandum of Understanding All the stakeholders involved will have to agree on pertinent issues concerning the project. The agreement will be written down with the help of a lawyer and conditions given and terms of penalty stated in case of breach of agreement. For instance the informal settlements resettlement program will have to be agreed upon by the KAA, Kenya Slum Upgrading and the community itself to avoid derailing the project and misunderstanding which might arise in the course of project implementation. 5.2.5 Establishment of an Enforcement Task Team: There will be established an enforcement task team that will comprise of members from the relevant institutions. This task force will ensure proper implementation of the proposed landscaping project. It will also carry out constant inspection and monitoring of development within the project site and airport vicinity to ensure that development that is out of character is addressed in good time. 5.2.6 Reporting Reports will be made and circulated to all relevant stakeholders stating the state and progress of project implementation. Any issues or new developments will be highlighted. The actions to be taken will be highlighted in the reports and discussed at the stakeholder meetings. 5.2.7 Continuous Consultative Meeting Stakeholder meetings will continue throughout the implementation period. This will be to discuss the progress of the project implementation and deliberate on any new developments that might arise during project implementation. 5.2.8 Community Involvement/Awareness It will be necessary to involve the local communities in management of the landscaped green infrastructure and land use around the airport. These communities will also need to be Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 77 sensitised on how they can co-exist harmoniously with airport functions. This calls for constant communication on matters of physical development projects, environmental conservation, and abatement of adverse environmental impacts. Extensive outreach on the landscaping project and the proposed airport master plan within the above framework will be necessary. 5.2.9 Communication The various stakeholders should make a deliberate effort to promote the landscaping program; this should target both international and local the community through various popular media such as print (newsletters, magazines, journals) and electronic (radio, television, and internet/website) and the tourist guide next to the airport. 5.3 Site/ Environmental Management Plan The project will be done in such a way that it will maintain the serenity of the environment as much as possible and will have minimal negative effects to the environment. Every impact will be mitigated as much as possible. Waste generation will be minimal and the waste generated will be well taken care of by the relevant stakeholders. Waste water generated will be used to water the grass in the parks. Table 7: Site/ Environmental management plan Table Expected Impacts Mitigation Measure(s) Actor(s) Waste generation at · Dust bins with lids will be placed at City the parks and Zoo strategic places at the parks and signs Nairobi boards put to sensitize people on the Council KAA need to use them for waste disposal. · KWS Penalty measures set to discipline those who litter the parks and the zoo Visitors to the parks Increase in Surface · Trenches to be dug along the path and KAA run off due to the the road to collect water and channel it hard surface at the to reservoirs so as it can be used for Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 78 KWS of trail walk and the irrigating parks and grassed areas. road to the park City Council Nairobi Disturbance of social The people will be located in to the Kibera KENSUP fabric of the people Upgrading Program where they will have KAA living in the informal security of tenure and have close relatives settlements put close to each other. KWS CCN Source: Author, 2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 79 of Bibliography 1. Alexander T Wells, Ed.D& Seth B. Young,(2004) Airport Planning and management, 5th Edition, Ph.D. McGraw-Hill companies 2. Cleary, E.C. And R.A. Dolbeer. (July 2005). “Wildlife Hazard Management At Airports”, Faa And Usda, 2nd Ed. 3. B. Washburn, B.E. and T.W. Seamans. (2004) “Management of Vegetation to Reduce Wildlife Hazards At Airports.” Faa Worldwide 4. Land Use Planning And Management Report- JKIA, 2009 5. Brisbane Airport 2009 Landscape Master Plan, July 2009 6. O’hare Modernization Program, Sustainable Airport Landscaping Master Specifications Volume Iiia Rev. 6, Issued 08/08/08 7. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, “Airport Master Plans,” Advisory Circular 150/5070-6A, June 1985, 62 pages. 8. Florida Department of Transportation, Aviation Office, “Airport Compatible Land Use Guidance for Florida Communities,” 1994, 85 pages. 9. Florida Statues Chapter 333, “Airport zoning,” dated July 1, 1994, 9 pages. 10. Nick Grayson and Richard Coles, Improving the Quality of Life in Urban Regions Through Urban Greening Initiatives – EU URGE-Project 11. Kosta Tzoulas & Philip James (2004) Multifunctional Urban Green Space Networks, The Research Institute for the Built and Human Environment, University of Salford 12. Government of Kenya (1996) ,The physical planning Act cap 286, Government Printer 13. Draft Physical Planning Handbook 2008 14. Government of Kenya (1999) Environmental Coordination and Management Act of 1999, Government Printer 15. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_a_zoo last accessed on 11/03/2010 16. http://www.google.co.ke/search?hl=en&q=what+is+found+in+theme+park&aq=o&aqi=& aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= last accessed on 01/06/2010 17. http://www.csun.edu/~vcpsy00h/domestic.htm last accessed on 08/04/2010 18. http://www.cza.nic.in/guidelines6.html last accessed on 17/02/2010 Mwang’a K.M (B65/0371/2006) Page 80