Kirin Beer Case – Marketing Engineering and Analytics
Transcription
Kirin Beer Case – Marketing Engineering and Analytics
and other higher end restaurants (i.e. steakhouses). In addition, retails sales will be focused on premium grocery markets (i.e. Wegman’s, Dean and DeLuca), select liquor stores, and beer distributors. Finally, the promotions used for the new product introduction will happen on a local/regional level. These will include unique and memorable experiences for the consumer in order to establish the brand image and encourage consumer recall. Such promotions involve tasteful window clings (Exhibit 5), displays for in-store attention, and beer tastings. A signature promotional tool that we recommend utilizing is an in-person marketing spectacle at bars. A member of a promotions team will dress as a Japanese Samurai warrior and will work with the promotions team to create an experience for the bargoers. When a customer orders a Kendo beer, the Samurai warrior will use a Samurai sword to remove the bottle cap for the customer. This unique experience draws the attention of other bar clients and makes the consumer feel special and exclusive, which is directly in line with the premium and unique image of the beer. Rationale and Supporting Analysis: Kirin Kendo will be established as a premium beer. There are several reasons that we chose to position the beer in this manner. First, when using conjoint analysis, the market share did not differ much between the two price points. If both Kirin products are priced at $5.49, Kendo will have a market share of 1.44%, Kirin’s original beer will have a market share of 1.246%, and Sapporo will have a market share of 1.52%. If Kendo is priced at $6.19, Kendo will have a market share of 1.39%, the original Kirin beer will have a market share of 1.251% and Sapporo will have a market share of 1.53%. Before the introduction of Kendo, the original Kirin beer held a 1.26% market share and Sapporo held a 1.54% market share (Exhibit 6). In addition, based on the expressed needs of our target consumer (which matched closely with the optimum product profile described below), the beer should be high quality, good tasting and rich, full-bodied. This customer values a high quality beer more than the price, and has the highest knowledge of beers and values a prestigious brand. This consumer would likely be attracted to a high status brand and would be willing to pay a higher price. Using conjoint analysis, we analyzed the data to develop an optimum premium profile. Originally, the optimum beer was of European origin, however since we will be selling a Japanese beer (we need Japanese beer in the U.S. to beat Sapporo in Japan), we reanalyzed the data with only Japanese beer as an option. As a result, the optimum product profile is: Japanese Beer, $5.49 per six pack, rich/full-bodied flavor, mild aftertaste, low calorie, six 12 oz. large bottles in a six-pack, and brown bottles with painted labels. As mentioned above, we analyzed the data for increased price and ultimately decided to go with the higher margin price of $6.19 per six-pack. In segmenting the market to find our target consumer, we observed three clusters. We chose Cluster 3 as our target segment based on its beer preferences and taste. There is a clear difference between segments in the area of flavor, good taste and high quality; in all of these categories, Cluster 3 had a much higher preference than the other groups. In addition, this segment drinks the most beer. From the data provided, we know that 20% of consumers drink 80% of the import beer. Furthermore, the consumption patterns of this consumer (more likely to drink in restaurants, bars, and with guests), lends itself to effective product marketing with more consumer touch points. In addition, there may be opportunities for sales to permeate into other segments because the personality traits of all three clusters are very similar; the other segments may also be attracted to our promotional activities (Exhibit 7). We have used a positioning map to determine where the Kendo brand will fall in comparison to competitors. Exhibit 8 shows Kendo’s predicted position. 2 We recommend test launching the product in New York and Los Angeles, where sales of Kirin Beer have previously been successful. Reaching out to large markets on both coasts will provide insights for expansion. Provided that results in New York and L.A. are positive, we will expand to eight other metropolitan areas across the U.S. These areas have been identified by a leading brew publication as “top beer cities”1. If the initial program does not heed positive results, we will use the launch data to analyze the situation and implement a new solution. It is critical to determine whether the current Kirin product and the new product will surpass Sapporo sales in the U.S. After the introduction of Kendo, Kirin (both products) will capture 2.64% of the import beer market in New York and L.A. At 2.64% market share, Kirin will sell a total of 2.1 million cases (approximately 1.1 million cases of Kendo and 993,000 cases of the original Kirin beer). This results in a 1.1 million increase in cases sold for Kirin, with the assumption that 20% awareness and 50% distribution are achieved. In reality, we do not expect that full awareness and distribution will be attainable within the first year. Exhibit 9 demonstrates the expected sales of Kendo after six, nine, and twelve months. If marketing efforts begin one month prior to the release of the Kendo beer in the U.S., we expect to achieve approximately 60% of the projected yearly sales of Kendo in the first year, which equates to approximately 663,000 cases of Kendo beer. The introduction of Kendo will cause a slight cannibalization of sales for the original Kirin beer. We can expect to see a decrease of approximately 7,000 cases of the original Kirin beer in the first year. We also expect to see a drop in about 12,000 cases of beer for Sapporo per year. This places Kirin in the number one Japanese beer position in the U.S. Kirin has a limited budget for marketing efforts geared towards the Kendo launch. Based on last year’s revenues from the original Kirin product, Kirin has just $1 million to spend on marketing for Kendo. If the Kendo launch is successful, Kirin can expect to allocate approximately $2 million to marketing in the second year. Contingencies and Other Issues: This analysis and recommendation were performed without access to full information regarding past marketing and sales tactics. Multiple tools within the Marketing Engineering for Excel software were used to perform a complete analysis with the information provided. A segmentation analysis was utilized as a means to target the appropriate market and a positioning analysis was used to position the product appropriately within the market. A conjoint analysis was used to predict the preferences of potential consumers based on a number of different attributes and then demonstrate how the consumer may react if the new product was introduced to the market. There are several alternatives that have been rejected. The first was the decision not to enter the U.S. market with a new product. After performing the appropriate analyses, we determined that the introduction of Kendo in the U.S. market would achieve the objective of surpassing Sapporo as the number one Japanese beer in the U.S. based on additional cases of Kirin beer sold per year. A second rejected alternative was the use of mass marketing as a channel of reaching the target segments. The high costs and low penetration of mass marketing efforts could not be justified, especially considering its past failure. It is ineffective and inefficient to reach out to such a wide range of consumers, many of whom will never be targeted or have access to the beer. Also, Kirin’s limited budget does not allow for such expensive marketing. A final alternative that was rejected was the development of a non-premium beer versus a premium beer. A premium beer was aligned with the selections of the optimum product, and selling a premium beer allows for larger margins for Kirin. The non-premium beer is disconnected from the optimum product. 2 3 REFERENCES 1 Celebrator Beer News. June/July 2006. Top Ten Beer Cities in America. http://celebrator.com/archives/0606/0606reviews-topten.html 2 All data and information extracted from “Kirin USA, Inc.: Ichiban Shibori” case by Robert J. Thomas 4 APPENDIX Kirin Kendo Japanese Beer $6.19 Price Rich Full-bodied Flavor Mild Aftertaste Low Calorie 6 x 12oz Large Bottles Brown Painted Bottles Exhibit 1: Kendo Beer Product Profile Self-Identified Demographics of Target Consumer (Segment 3) Consumed average of 9.8 beers last week Age: 30-40 Income: around 45-70K per year Education: Trade/technical school or college Gender: Male Exhibit 2: Target Consumer Profile 5 Exhibit 3: Kirin Kendo Beer Product Samples from left to right: beer bottle, six-pack case, beer case window cling in a retail refrigerator, and beer mug. Exhibit 4: Kirin Kendo product launch map highlighting New York, NY and Los Angeles, CA as trial cities. 6 Exhibit 5: A window cling used in retail locations. The window cling will be placed on the glass in front of the cases of Kendo beer. The center region of the window cling will be clear and consumers will see through the “mouth” of the dragon to the beer. Percentage Comparison of Current Market Share vs. Predicted Market Share 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Current $6.19 Pricing Exhibit 6: Change in Market Share with the introduction of Kirin Kendo 7 Exhibit 7: Personality traits of each of the three clusters Dimension II (29.9%) Bass Masculine Rich full-bodied Gives buzz taste after For home work Good taste Country with Drink at bar Becks brewing Heineken Kirin Drink with Sapporo St. Pauli Molson Good value for tradition Dos Equis friends money Moosehd Corona To serve guests Lower price at home PrestigiousFor young Drinkpopular at picnics Amstel Light Refreshing & outings people Light No aftertaste Dimension I (39.8%) Exhibit 8: Positioning Map for Kirin Kendo 8 Exhibit 9: Expected Sales for Kirin Kendo beer during the first year on the market in the US 9 ADDITIONAL SUPPORTING DATA: Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 10 Aware * Awareness Distribution Distro Heineken 1.00 Becks 0.50 Bass/Guiness 0.30 Amstel Light 0.25 Molson 0.65 Corona 0.60 Kirin 0.20 Saporro 0.20 Kirin Kendo 0.20 1.00 0.80 0.70 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.40 0.21 0.25 0.55 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.10 Segmentation Effect Raw 0.341 13.15 12.44 11.52 11.91 9.43 14.31 4.86 5.94 16.45 Index Normalized 13.15 4.98 2.42 2.98 5.21 8.59 0.49 0.59 0.56 33.75 12.77 6.21 7.64 13.37 22.04 1.246 1.52 1.44 Index Normalized 13.23 4.98 2.42 2.98 5.27 8.68 0.49 0.60 0.55 33.76 12.72 6.17 7.60 13.44 22.14 1.251 1.53 1.39 Exhibit 12: Adjustments for awareness and availability based on $5.49 Aware * Awareness Distribution Distro Heineken 1.00 Becks 0.50 Bass/Guiness 0.30 Amstel Light 0.25 Molson 0.65 Corona 0.60 Kirin 0.20 Saporro 0.20 Kirin Kendo 0.20 1.00 0.80 0.70 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.40 0.21 0.25 0.55 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.10 Segmentation Effect Raw 0.341 13.23 12.46 11.51 11.92 9.53 14.46 4.90 5.99 15.99 Exhibit 13: Adjustments for awareness and availability based on $6.19 11