Little Rock Facilities Master Plan

Transcription

We promise to put children first!
Board of Education
Work Session
Fanning Howey • Stuck Associates • Brailsford & Dunlavey • Woods Group • RDI
May 27th, 2014
Agenda
1. Facilities Master Plan Overview
• Planning Process
• Project Status
2. Determination of Needs
• Demographics/Capacity/Utilization
• Physical Adequacy
• Educational Adequacy
• Security
• Child nutrition
• Athletics
3. School Summary Sheets
4. Community Engagement
• Summary of responses
• Overall questions/comments received
5. Options
6. Scenarios
• Approaches for addressing needs
7. Next Steps
8. Closing Remarks
Facilities Master Plan Overview
Facilities Master Plan Process
Roles, Goals,
and Controls
Workshop
Steering
Committee
Meetings
Educational
Adequacy
Evaluations
Projected
Enrollment &
Capacity
Analysis
Board of
Directors
Monthly
Update
Action
Options
Development
School
Community
Meetings and
Online
Surveys
Facility
Condition
Assessments
Finalize
Recommendations
& Facilities
Master Plan
Board of
Directors
Facilities
Master
Plan
Presentation
Facilities Master Plan Overview
Facilities Master Plan Status











Demographic projections - completed
Capacity – completed
Utilization - completed
Physical adequacy assessment - completed
Educational adequacy assessment - completed
Non-negotiable elements - completed
Options for each school - completed
Community meetings - completed
Scenarios - developed and being reviewed
Draft plan to be prepared
Facilities Master Plan will be finalized
Needs – Demographics/Capacity/Utilization
NEEDS – Projected Enrollment
 Student enrollment is projected to be stable or slightly increasing
over the next ten years.
LRSD Enrollment
30,000
29,000
28,000
26,650
26,462 26,558
27,000
26,000
25,720
25,800 25,837 25,685
25,537
26,076
25,874 25,962
25,726
25,445 25,553
25,097 25,149 25,029 25,065 25,118 25,269
25,000
24,000
23,000
22,000
21,000
20,000
Actual
Projected
NEEDS - Capacity
 The actual capacity of each school was determined
based on a square footage per student
 Little Rock has many smaller classrooms
 Considering the capacity based on square feet per
student (typically 30 sf/student) is a better measure
of capacity than just the number of classrooms
 Capacity of each school was determined without
factoring in the capacity of the portable classrooms
 Goal is to eliminate portables so the capacity of the
building alone needed to be calculated
NEEDS - Utilization
 Utilization – Dividing the enrollment by the capacity
provides the utilization percentage.
Elementary Schools
Capacity
10-year Enrollment (projected)
Utilization
15,552
13,572
87.3%
Middle Schools
Capacity
Utilization
4,332
5,319
122.8%
High Schools
Capacity
Utilization
6,351
6,652
104.7%
NEEDS - Utilization
 Utilization – What does this tell us?
 Elementary Schools
 Some limited excess capacity
 Need to consider additions or reallocation of students to
address needs
 Middle Schools
 Over-crowded
 Should consider an additional school as well as additions
where appropriate
 High Schools
 Over-crowded but not as much as the middle schools
 Should consider a new school as well as additions where
appropriate
Needs – Physical Assessment
NEEDS – Physical Assessment
 Conducted on each facility including non-educational
facilities
 Considered all aspects of the building including:









Foundation
Structure
Exterior and interior walls, windows and doors
Ceilings, floors and cabinetry
Electrical system
Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning system
Plumbing system
Roof
Kitchens
 Information collected electronically by assessment
teams of local architects, engineers and designers
 Overall, buildings have been very well maintained
 Most needs are simply a result of age
 Physical needs were categorized into one of four
categories:
1. Priority 1 – Items that need immediate attention
2. Priority 2 – Items some of which should be addressed in 2-5
years, some can be deferred longer
3. Priority 3 – Items that can be deferred a minimum of 5-10
years
4. Priority 4 – Items that can wait more than 10 years
1. Priority 1 – Items that need attention in the next 2
years
 $68,063,451
2. Priority 2 – Items which should be addressed in 2-5
years
 $55,031,149
3. Priority 3 – Items that can be deferred a minimum
of 5-10 years
 $145,650,623
4. Priority 4 – Items that can wait more than 10 years
 $25,040,043
Needs – Educational Adequacy Assessment
NEEDS – Educational Adequacy
 Educational adequacy based on a 2,000 point scale
 Factors evaluated directly influence the learning
environment
 Factors include but not limited to:
 Size, number, type and location of classrooms and labs
 Student Centered Sustainable Design™
 Daylighting
 Indoor air quality
 Ventilation
 Thermal comfort
 Acoustics
 Programming
 Technology
Needs – Educational Adequacy Assessment
NEEDS – Educational Adequacy
Positive Factors
 Technology
 Media centers
 Furniture (adequate and in reasonable condition)
 Elementary – good playgrounds and some have “extra
rooms” such as science rooms
Negative Factors
 Lack of daylighting
 Small classrooms
 Lack of flexible learning spaces
 Open space environment not appropriately converted to
enclose spaces
Needs – Security
NEEDS – Security
Security Rating
 Rated on a 1-5 scale
 School received a rating of 5 if the main entrance is
secure with a locking vestibule physically connected to
the main office
 School received a rating of 1 if there was no locking
vestibule and the office could not be easily relocated to
near the main entrance.
 New school (Roberts received a 5)
 Most schools were in the 2 category
 All schools have entrance control even if not ideal with
a locking vestibule
Needs – Child Nutrition
NEEDS – Child Nutrition
Food Service
 Air-conditioning all kitchens not presently served is
planned for
 The equipment in each kitchen was assessed
 The size of the cafeteria and kitchen was compared to a
“model size”
 Model was based on serving all of the students in
three (3) lunch periods
 Model was based on actual records of the number
of students using the food service
 The costs shown are preliminary ten-year total costs not
prioritized
Needs – Athletics
NEEDS – Athletics
Elementary
 “Student activity centers” planned for each school
where possible
Middle and High Schools
 Efforts made to improve playfields and gyms
Options Overview
District-Wide Options Overview
#1 – CAPACITY ACCOMMODATION
The alignment of enrollment and existing capacity involves removing all portables,
matching enrollment and building capacity by adding additions where needed and
adding student activity centers, art rooms and music rooms at schools where
feasible.
#2 – REDISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS
The redistribution of student enrollment involves all actions listed in Option 1,
however, where possible students would be redistributed to other schools that have
capacity rather than building additions.
Options Overview
District-Wide Options Overview
#3 – SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION
The school consolidation option includes all actions listed in Option 1 and creating
efficiency through the consolidation of under-enrolled schools. Would require additions
at the “receiving” schools. Schools that would be considered for closing would only be
those with the greatest need for investment. Also includes consolidating classrooms to
create art and music rooms at the elementary level.
#4 – SCHOOL REPLACEMENT
The school replacement option includes all actions listed in Option 1 for most
schools. Schools considered for replacement are schools that exceed the two-thirds
guideline (improvement cost exceeds two-thirds of the replacement cost) plus the
costs associated with improving educational adequacy and security.
#5 - RIGHTSIZING
The rightsizing option includes all actions listed above and aligning schools with the
elementary, middle, and high school models developed as part of LRSD Facilities
Master Plan Process.
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Scenarios
Attendance Areas
Attendance Areas
Attendance Areas
Next Steps
Next Steps
 Draft plan will be prepared and presented in June
 Community Meetings will be held to present final Facilities
Master Plan Recommendations

Little Rock Facilities Master Plan

Transcription

Similar documents

utilizing popular websites for malicious purposes using rdi

The WoodsRock Music Festival

At-Sea Mobile Data Collection

Great North Woods Sleddog Challenge

punching-bending-2013

SE-GOT-386

File

Optima Camelview Village