Transcription
PDF
NJ Judiciary Technology Case Management Mobile Infrastructure Information Collaborative Design Anywhere Access Office, Email, Lync 2013 Provide Information To People Agile & Flexible Processes Multi Device View of Information Mainframe & Network Upgrades Real-time Collaboration Mission Critical Performance Secure Access to Your Data Windows 7 & ADLDS Analytics & Trends Seamless Case Integration All Development With Mobile in Mind Simplified Management Efficient Access #PegaGovt Simplified View of NJ Judiciary #PegaGovt NJ Judiciary – Case Management Silos Municipal Courts Superior Court Criminal Superior Court Family Superior Court Probation FACTS – Family DV CAPS – Probation PCI – Probation Client Interview ATS - Traffic Ticketing Promis Gavel – Criminal Complaints (Indictable) ACS - Criminal Complaints (DP/PDP) UDIR/PSI Uniform Intake, Pre Sentence Investigation CIC – Children in Court MACS - Municipal Automated Complaints CABS - Central Bail System JUVENILE E-CDR Law Enforcement Complaint Entry CCIS – County Corrections Information System NJMCdirect.com Credit Card Payment Website #PegaGovt Not Pretty, But it Works • What's wrong? – The Courts core business systems were developed 20-35 years ago – Applications developed as silos – Databases developed as silos – Significant redundancy of: • • • • • Case Management Functions Services Database tables and data Staffing and support services Resources (Infrastructure and hardware) #PegaGovt 6 WE CAN’T AFFORD TO KEEP DOING THIS! #PegaGovt Areas of Reuse at NJ Judiciary #PegaGovt Build For Reuse – Case Management Framework COMMON CASE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS COMPLAINT ENTRY WARRANT PROCESSING NOTICES ATTORNEY SCHEDULING AND CALENDARS PAYMENTS EVENTS COURT INFORMATION PARTY PROCESSING BAIL PROCESSING DISPOSITION (SENTENCING) LAW ENFORCEMENT CHARGE AND STATUTE PROCESSING DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT #PegaGovt Build For Reuse – Case Management Framework COMMON CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES CODE TABLES FORMS/PDF SECURITY SOR SP’s PRINTING WEB SERVICES MQ SERIES LOGGING #PegaGovt NJ Judiciary Framework REUSE MACS UCE PG CIVIL Case Management Functions Case Management Services Pega 7 - PRPC #PegaGovt FAMILY NJ Judiciary – Case Study UNIFIED COMPLAINT ENTRY #PegaGovt Estimated Savings from Reuse of MACS Time taken for MACS (Days) Reusable Functionality from MACS Elaboration Construction Total Implementation Projected UCE Estimate (Days) Elaboration Construction Total Implementation Time savings (days) 4 3 MCUC_02_0001_ComplaintAddFirstAppearance 2 5 7 MCUC_02_0002_ComplaintAddOrModifyChargeInfo 4 15 19 2 3 5 14 MCUC_02_0003_ComplaintAddOrModifyComplaintInfo 2 5 7 2 3 5 2 MCUC_02_0004_ComplaintAddOrModifyDefendantInfo 2 5 7 2 3 5 2 MCUC_02_0005_ComplaintAddOrModifyInvolvedPerson 3 10 13 2 2 4 9 MCUC_02_0006_ComplaintAddOrModifyNarrative 3 10 13 1 3 4 9 MCUC_02_0015_ComplaintCopyChargeAndNarrativeOnly 2 5 7 1 2 3 4 MCUC_02_0016_ComplaintCopyChargesWithinSameOffense 2 2 2 5 7 1 2 3 4 MCUC_02_0017_ComplaintCopyDefendantInfoOnly 1 4 5 1 2 3 2 MCUC_02_0018_ComplaintCopyEntireComplaint 3 10 13 1 2 3 10 MCUC_02_0019_ComplaintCopyNarrative 2 5 7 1 2 3 4 MCUC_02_0020_ComplaintCreate 8 15 23 3 4 7 16 MCUC_02_0029_ComplaintPrePrint 4 10 14 0 0 0 14 MCUC_02_0030_ComplaintPrint MCUC_02_0036_ComplaintSaveToSOR 4 4 20 15 24 19 2 3 3 12 5 15 19 2 MCUC_02_0038_ComplaintSetBail 3 15 18 2 3 5 13 MCUC_02_0041_ComplaintStatePoliceInterface 3 15 18 3 10 13 5 Security (Authentication & Authorization) 10 30 40 6 20 26 14 Total Savings (Team/Calendar Days) 146 Team Days #PegaGovt ROI From Reusing MACS for UCE • Assumptions – 146 Team Days – Team of 5 developers/contractors – 8 hours per day – $70 p/ hour rate • Benefits and ROI – 5,840 hours saved – $408,880 in savings #PegaGovt Courts Case Management Framework Estimated time savings across Criminal, Probation, Family, Civil Courts MACS Function/ Feature Inquiry Scheduling Calendaring Purpose Projected/Estimated Time to Build (days) Projected time savings for similar court implementations (days/each) • Allows searching of Court Cases using multiple identifiers including Case ID, Defendant Name, Involved Persons etc. • Provides sorting and filtering capabilities. • Allows for scheduling/rescheduling of court cases and sessions. It executes complex validations, updates and notifications to reschedule courts cases and entire sessions. Below are the high level modules implemented: • Validating eligibility criteria for rescheduling court cases and their associated cases. • Scheduling and Rescheduling of cases or entire sessions. • Configuring additional required updates for notifications and audit in the system of record. • Basic calendar search and validation • Implementation of a complex algorithm (Search by Rule) to display search results in a desired order. • Generation of PDFs with dynamically changing layouts based on search results. 90 60 180 120 120 60 PDF Generation Framework • Allows rapid development of dynamic PDFs. This is a framework built inhouse which: • Reduces time taken to implement requirements related to PDF generation for Pega applications Organization wide by 50‐60%. • Creates a consistent approach for PDF generation throughout the Organization. • Makes it easier for developers to understand the approach for PDF generation through framework documentation. • Reduces defects related to implementation of requirements relating to PDF generation by over 50%. 90 60 Single Sign On • A Pega application that implements single sign on. This includes infrastructure configuration to allow the end user to access a Pega application without having to sign on. The windows credentials are propagated to Pega and the fine grained authorization is achieved through LDAP integration. 60 30 Total Savings in Days for similar court implementations 330 #PegaGovt ROI From Reusing Courts Framework • Assumptions – 330 Team Days per each court – Team of 5 Developers – 8 Hours per day • Benefit and ROI – 13,200 total hours saved – $924,000 in savings per court – Total Savings to the Judiciary by applying Courts framework to Criminal, Probation, Family, Civil Courts • $924,000 x 4 courts = $3,696,000 #PegaGovt Q&A