Agenda Cover

Transcription

Agenda Cover

AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
October 28, 2008
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
Approval of Agenda
Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A.
Roll Call
B.
AM-1870
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 21, 2008.
C.
AM-1873
Approval of claim checks #107676 through #107803 for October 23, 2008 in the amount of
$679,188.90. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #47360 through #47394 for the
period of October 1, 2008 through October 15, 2008 in the amount of $785,607.58.
D.
AM-1860
Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Mike and Anne Meiers (amount
undetermined).
E.
AM-1861
Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report – October, 2008.
F.
AM-1867
List of Edmonds businesses applying for the renewal of their Washington State liquor
licenses, October 2008.
G.
AM-1872
Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to the On-Call and
Emergency/Disaster Response Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering Services
contract with Landau Associates, Inc. H.
AM-1874
Ordinance amending the provisions of Section 19.00.005 Section Amendments relating to the
amendments to the State Building Code to extend the life of building permit applications from
180 days to 360 days, and extensions from 180 days to 360 days.
AM-1868
(10 Minutes)
Proclamation in honor of the 20th anniversary of the Sister City relationship with
Hekinan, Japan.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings.
5.
AM-1876
(15 Minutes)
Annual report from the Library Board.
AM-1869
(15 Minutes)
Discussion and authorization of the aquatic center feasibility study contract.
6.
7.
AM-1875
Packet Page 1 of 123
7.
AM-1875
(10 Minutes)
Update on the Highway 99 Task Force.
(2 Hours)
Workshop on the 2009-2010 budget.
(15 Minutes)
Council reports on outside committee/board meetings.
(5 Minutes)
Mayor's Comments
(15 Minutes)
Council Comments
8.
9.
10.
11.
Adjourn
AM-1870
Approval of 10-21-08 Draft City Council Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Sandy Chase
Department:
City Clerk's Office
Review Committee:
Action:
2.B.
Time:
Type:
Consent
Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 21, 2008.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 10-21-08 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox
Approved By
1
City Clerk
Sandy Chase
2
Mayor
Gary Haakenson
3
Final Approval Sandy Chase
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Final Approval Date: 10/23/2008
Date
Status
10/23/2008 09:37 AM
APRV
10/23/2008 10:26 AM
APRV
10/23/2008 03:28 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/23/2008 09:35
AM
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
October 21, 2008
Following a Special Meeting at 6:30 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding negotiation of purchase of
real estate, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in
the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
STAFF PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Michael Plunkett, Council President
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
D. J. Wilson, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief
Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Kathleen Junglov, Finance Director
Debi Humann, Human Resources Director
Douglas Fair, Municipal Court Judge
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager
Ann Bullis, Building Official
Rob English, City Engineer
Debra Sharp, Accountant
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Megan Cruz, Video Recorder
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
ALSO PRESENT
Leif Warren, Student Representative
1.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Haakenson relayed Council President Plunkett’s request to move Item 9 to Item 3B.
COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Bernheim requested Items E and K be removed from the Consent Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A.
ROLL CALL
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 21, 2008
Page 1
B.
APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 7, 2008.
C.
APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #107347 THROUGH #107532 FOR OCTOBER 9, 2008
IN THE AMOUNT OF $312,528.33, AND #107533 THROUGH #107675 FOR OCTOBER
16, 2008 IN THE AMOUNT OF $410,660.86.
D.
ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM ERIC THUESEN
($750.00).
F.
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY SENIOR
CENTER KITCHEN UPGRADES CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO THE LOWEST
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER (CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES LLC) AS DETERMINED
OCTOBER 6, 2008.
G.
AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH JAMES G. MURPHY TO SELL A SURPLUS
CITY VEHICLE, UNIT #15, A 1995 CHEVROLET VAN.
H.
2007-2008 FIRE DEPARTMENT WORK PLAN UPDATE #3.
I.
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
AUTOMATIC FIRST RESPONSE AND MUTUAL ASSISTANCE.
J.
AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE LIGHT POLES AND ELECTRICAL
COMPONENTS FOR THE SR99 INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT ENHANCEMENT
PROJECT THROUGH US COMMUNITIES INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE
PURCHASING AGREEMENT.
ITEM E:
POLICE SUPPORT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT
Councilmember Bernheim inquired about the fiscal impact of the agreement. Finance Director Kathleen
Junglov responded the fiscal impact for 2008 was $10,000, $40,000 in 2009 and $40,000 in 2010.
Councilmember Bernheim questioned where those funds would come from.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT
FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM
ABSTAINED.
ITEM K:
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH SRI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR A
PART TIME CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGER.
Councilmember Bernheim pointed out the supporting materials referred to a $55,000 cap but that was not
in the contract. City Engineer Rob English responded the cost was anticipated to be $50,000 - $55,000 to
complete the construction contracts this year; a $55,000 cap could be added to the contract. City Attorney
Scott Snyder suggested doing a contract addendum to include a cap.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
WAMBOLT TO APPROVE ITEM K WITH A $55,000 CAP.
MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
3A.
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT - FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY
Judith Works, President, Friends of the Edmonds Library, announced the 28th annual book sale at the
Frances Anderson Center on October 25 which corresponds with National Friends of the Library Week,
October 19-25. She assured there was a great selection of books and most items were $1.00. She
expressed the Friends’ thanks to PCC who donated a large number of reusable bags. The proceeds of the
book sale are used to support the library, particularly children’s and teen programs as well as to sponsor a
October 21, 2008
Page 2
scholarship for a graduate student attending the University of Washington School of Information Science.
In honor of Edmonds Reads Month, she presented a copy of “The Whistling Season” by Ivan Doig to
Student Representative Leif Warren.
As has been done in previous years, she invited Councilmembers to report on the last book they read.
Councilmember Orvis reported he had recently read “How to Pour Cement Foundations,” and concluded
he would hire someone to do the work. Councilmember Wambolt reported he recently read a book about
Nortel Networks that also described the history of the telephone industry. Councilmember Dawson
recently read “Life is Elsewhere” and was looking forward to reading Richard Russo’s new book.
Mayor Haakenson recently read “Eat This and Not That” which describes what a person should and
should not eat in restaurants. He also recently read “The Hits Just Keep on Coming” about the top 40 hits
and disk jockeys in the 60’s and 80’s. Council President Plunkett reported the last book he read was
“Blood and Thunder,” the history of the southwest, centered around Kit Carson.
Councilmember Bernheim advised he recently read “Child Life in Colonial Days” and relayed a passage
about trapping wild turkeys. Councilmember Wilson reported in addition to reading “Brown Bear Brown
Bear” to his son numerous times, his company has developed a book on healthcare reform.
Councilmember Olson reported she has been reading books via the Kindle, an electronic reading device
that can store approximately 250 books.
3B.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - PROSECUTOR
Human Resources Director Debi Humann explained the term of the last Prosecutor agreement was three
years commencing in 2005 through April 1, 2008. The contract had a renewal clause for two, one year
extensions without action by either party. The contract was currently in one of the extensions while new
services and associated costs were being negotiated. Due to the significant increase in caseload as well as
adding a court date, the proposed costs with the new agreement are significant. The previous contract
included a monthly retainer of $6,000 and an hourly rate of $75 for any work outside the scope of the
agreement. The new contract includes a monthly retainer of $9,500 from April 1 through August 31 and
beginning September 1 it increases to account for the additional court date.
Ms. Humann explained the caseload had increased significantly over the past few years while the
prosecuting attorney’s average pay per case has dropped significantly. In 2005 they handled 1,078 cases;
in 2006 they handled 1,310 and 1,433 in 2007. As of July 1, 900 cases have been filed, which when
extrapolated over the remainder of the year would equate to 1,800 cases in 2008. In addition, with the
added court date, the amount of court time required of the prosecuting attorneys has increased effective
September 1.
Councilmember Wambolt explained the Finance Committee reviewed this contract and several questions
were addressed. Questions staff was unable to answer at the Committee meeting included, 1) why was
the City charged for each case rather than an hourly rate, and 2) how did the proposed fees compare with
other municipalities.
Prosecuting Attorney Jim Zachor referred to the sequence of letters as negotiations progressed that were
provided to Council. He explained negotiations originally began in March 2007 and due to events in the
Police Department, negotiations were postponed until July and then again until the end of their contract in
April 2008. It was not until August that the final figures were arrived at.
October 21, 2008
Page 3
With regard to why the City was charged for each case rather than an hourly rate, Mr. Zachor responded
if an hourly rate were used, the City’s costs would be well over $18,000/month. He explained in
Edmonds they not only negotiated and prosecuted cases, they talk with the Police Department, handle
forfeiture cases, represent the South Snohomish County Narcotics Task Force in forfeitures, and provide
officer training. He advised the cost beginning in September equated to approximately $72 per case but
did not take into account forfeitures, meeting with officers, making charging decisions, or dealing with
the media on their decisions as well as Police Department decisions.
Mr. Zachor reported in Mill Creek they did not do forfeitures but did conduct training every 90 days; their
fee was $132/case in 2006, $79/case in 2007 and $70/case in 2008. Mill Creek’s filings have also
increased substantially and they are in the process of negotiating an increase. In Mountlake Terrace
where they do not do forfeitures, the cost was $76/case in 2006, $85/case in 2007 and $89-$90/case in
2008. He summarized the prosecuting attorneys were on call 24 hours a day for officers. He also
represents Lynnwood, Arlington and Lake Stevens but did not provide figures for those cities but assured
they were higher than Edmonds.
Melanie Thomas Dane, Zachor & Dane, agreed charging on an hourly basis would be substantially
more than proposed, noting they typically average 35 hours a week for Edmonds for the prosecuting
attorney’s time, staff time, discovery, etc. She noted that cost would be burdensome on cities as well as
burdensome on them to track all the hours. They also prosecute infractions, abatement nuisance cases,
animal cases and appeals.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out the Court was extending its hours from 1 day to 1½ days. Ms.
Thomas Dane explained they used to conduct all court business on Wednesdays and trials on Fridays.
The pretrial calendars increased to more than 100 defendants per 4 hour period which ran into the noon
hour as well as the custody time that began at 1:00 p.m. which created a backlog in officers’ time as well
as a security issue with in-custody and out-of-custody defendants. As a result, arraignments were moved
to Tuesdays, leaving Wednesday mornings for pre-trail calendars, the largest calendar with the most
defendants. She summarized the additional ½ day was a positive change but has an impact on the Court,
the Prosecutor’s office as well as the Public Defender’s office.
Councilmember Bernheim asked if the prosecuting attorney contract was typically put out for bid. Mayor
Haakenson responded typically when the City was receiving good service from the Prosecutor, Public
Defender or Judge, staff would renegotiate their contract. Councilmember Dawson commented she was
on the team that selected Zachor & Thomas and they did an extensive search a couple years ago including
interviewing a number of people. They found Zachor & Thomas was only one with a full staff of
attorneys and support staff.
Councilmember Bernheim questioned the increase in cases from 1,078 in 2006 to more than 1,800 today,
and asked whether there were twice as many crimes being committed. Mr. Zachor answered there were
more crimes being committed, the Police Department had expanded, more suspects were being arrested
and the reporting of domestic violence had increased. Councilmember Bernheim pointed out there were
eight domestic violence arrests in 2008; his question was in regard to the increase of 800 cases in the past
2½ years. Mr. Zachor explained they did not make the charging determination on a majority of the cases;
they were filed directly by the Police Department because a crime had been committed. He
acknowledged they did charging reviews but they amounted to less than 20 cases a month.
Councilmember Bernheim commented he did not understand the basis for concluding the City was safer
merely because more crimes were being prosecuted. Mayor Haakenson suggested Councilmember
Bernheim pose the question to the Police Department. Councilmember Bernheim clarified his question
October 21, 2008
Page 4
was why were so many more cases were being prosecuted when Edmonds was a nice place and suggested
prosecuting fewer cases and paying less for the prosecuting attorney.
Councilmember Dawson asked if 2005 was the time period when Driving with License Suspended was in
abeyance which may account for the discrepancy in cases. Mr. Zachor explained the Supreme Court
stopped all Driving While License Suspended in the third degree (DWL3) until the Department of
Licensing established a protocol for notifying people. He noted DWL3 was the primary misdemeanor
crime in the State of Washington and led to a substantial number of drug cases as well as other infractions
such as driving without insurance.
Councilmember Dawson commented she had worked with both Mr. Zachor and Ms. Dane as well as
observed them in court and found they did a very good job for the City. She agreed the cost would be
substantial if billed on an hourly basis. She noted the cost of the contract was approximately
$130,000/year; not very much for the amount of attorney and staff time. She compared the cases handled
by Zachor & Thomas to the number handled by the District Court, concluding Zachor & Thomas handled
twice as many cases with half as much staff and had a higher conviction rate. She asked if they were
confident they could handle the heavy caseload with existing staff. Mr. Zachor answered they hired a
new attorney and 2 staff members for a total of 7 individuals in court. They have the staff to respond to
discovery requests and any other requests as well as act as Special Prosecutor for Snohomish County for
cases on which the Snohomish County Prosecutor has a conflict.
Councilmember Dawson commented Zachor & Thomas was also processing paperwork now that the
Police Department previously processed. She concluded even though the cost had increased, it was still a
good value. Councilmember Dawson asked how much the Public Defender’s office was paid. Mr.
Zachor answered the cost averaged over $10,500/month over a six month period with the highest month
$11,270 in July. Councilmember Dawson pointed out the Public Defender’s office handled
approximately 80% of the cases handled by the Prosecuting Attorney because there were some private
counsel cases. Mr. Zachor agreed, commenting although the Public Defender’s office had a difficult time
meeting with their clients, after the Public Defender met with them, his office must negotiate a settlement.
Councilmember Dawson concluded with this increase, the Prosecuting Attorney would be paid roughly
what the Public Defender was for being in court the same hours.
Council President Plunkett inquired whether prosecuting attorney costs were increasing in other cities.
Mr. Zachor answered everyone’s costs were increasing; Lynnwood’s prosecuting attorney costs had
increased substantially. He noted after a recent meeting with the Snohomish County Prosecutor’s office,
they indicated they may be rejecting felony cases and sending them to be prosecuted as misdemeanors.
Councilmember Dawson responded the Snohomish County Prosecutor assured her today that would not
happen; the cases they filed as misdemeanors would be handled via the Prosecuting Attorney’s office.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
APPROVE THE CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - PROSECUTOR. MOTION
CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM OPPOSED.
4.
2009-2010 BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING
A.
POTENTIAL BUDGET CUTS IN LIEU OF FORMING A REGIONAL FIRE
AUTHORITY
Finance Director Kathleen Junglov recalled as was presented to Council at the August 18 retreat, the
City’s General Fund was facing serious deficits. To balance the 2009-2010 preliminary budget, several
new revenue sources were included to keep the ending cash balance in the black without cutting services.
October 21, 2008
Page 5
Additionally, the long term forecast anticipated the formation of a Regional Fire Authority as of January
1, 2011.
Since the initial presentation of the preliminary budget, staff received updated sales tax revenue forecasts
and as a result reduced the 2008 sales tax expectation by another $300,000 and by $150,000 for 2009.
Additional revenues for the 2009-2010 budget include the following:
• Regular property tax levy was increased by 1% and the EMS levy increased by the voters to the
statutory limit of $0.50/1,000 AV.
• Utility Tax on water, sewer and storm was increased from 6% to 10% which will provide an
additional $405,000 revenue. Annual average impact to a residential customer would be $26.
The City does offer a low income discount program.
• Cable TV Utility Tax was increased from 1% to 6% which is estimated to generate $416,000
revenue. The estimated annual impact to a residential customer is $60/year.
• The increase in Business License Fees will provide an additional $87,000.
• Increased Development Service Fees will provide an additional $67,000.
• Formation of a Transportation Benefit District (TBD); revenues would begin collection July 1,
2009 which would provide $350,000 in 2009 and $700,000 per year thereafter. The cost to
taxpayers would be $20/vehicle. A separate process and public hearing is required to form a
TBD.
• Implementation of EMS Transport Fees is estimated to generate an additional $700,000/year.
Mayor Haakenson recalled when he presented the 2009-2010 budget on September 30 it included new
revenue sources as described by Ms. Junglov, no budget cuts and the possible creation of a Regional Fire
Authority (RFA) in 2011 if approved by the Council and a vote of the people. During the meeting of
October 7, Councilmembers Dawson and Wilson asked him to identify budget cuts as alternatives to the
proposed RFA to balance the budget and not reduce the services provided to the citizens of Edmonds.
The Council packet included a list of those budget cuts and their associated loss of services. Staff
assumed all projected new revenues for 2009 were acceptable to the Council as no opposition had been
voiced.
Mayor Haakenson explained the estimated revenue collections for 2008 and 2009 have been reduced
making the deficit even worse. Also for 2008, $157,000 in needed computer hardware purchases has
been eliminated. The affect of this cut would be if the City’s system went down, and it would be down
for a significant amount of time as there was not adequate protection for a computer hardware failure. He
also withdrew the requests for three new IT staff and a half FTE in the Human Resources Department.
This cut will not allow for needed upgrades to our website and will not allow citizens to do additional
business with the City online and Human Resources staff will continue to fall further behind in their
workloads.
And for 2009 and 2010, if the Council prefers these cuts over the RFA recommendation, the following
will no longer be included in the budget: The Economic Development cost center totaling $75,000. The
City would no longer perform any economic development work or advertising with the Chamber. This
cost center also pays for the printing and mailing of the “Update on Edmonds” quarterly citywide
newsletter which would be eliminated. The entire Crime Prevention cost center, totaling $120,000, would
be eliminated from the Police Department budget. The DARE program would also be cut from Police at
a reduction of $85,000. The Police Chief has also withdrawn his plan to add a third Assistant Chief,
along with dropping a sergeant position. Mayor Haakenson noted the loss of Crime Prevention spoke for
itself. The DARE program has been a great addition to the local schools; both the youth and greater
community have benefited from it. The Chief’s reorganization plan would not happen.
October 21, 2008
Page 6
From the Parks Department, cuts would be made in the Discovery Programs, eliminating Beach Rangers,
BirdFest, and other environmental programs at a reduction of $41,000. Yost Pool would be closed at a
savings of $108,000. The loss to the community of the Discovery Program and Yost Pool will be felt
across many ages of Edmonds residents. In Development Services, a Planning position would be cut,
saving $85,000; the result would be a slow-down in review times. He remarked although permit
applications have slowed due to the economy, the department was short-staffed during the busy time and
may now be correctly staffed.
In Finance, an Accounting position would be cut, saving $66,000, and a position in the City Clerk’s
Office would also be eliminated, saving $60,000. In Public Works the Engineering Tech position would
be eliminated, saving $61,000 which will also slow down permit review times. The City Attorney will
attend Council meetings only on the first and third meetings of the month, a cost savings of $10,000. In
2009, the fiber-optic cable project would be scrapped, reducing costs by $139,000. Mayor Haakenson
commented he believed in the eventual success of the project, but it was not something the City could
afford in these tough times.
Mayor Haakenson summarized these cuts total $1,041,000 for 2009 and would carry on into 2010 and
into the future. For the 2010 budget there would be one additional reduction, a one-third reduction in the
Parks maintenance budget, resulting in a savings of $500,000. The result of this cut would be no
maintenance performed in the City’s 31 neighborhood parks. Only the ballfields would continue to have
work performed because field rentals and joint agreements with the School District necessitate ongoing
maintenance and are a revenue source. Users will be asked to clean up their own trash in neighborhood
parks and hopefully neighbors would form their own maintenance crews for beautification.
Mayor Haakenson relayed he would also ask the Council President to set up a Council committee for
2009 to look at the possibility of eliminating the Municipal Court in 2010 and signing an agreement with
the County court system. Although no appreciable savings were evident when this was considered
several years ago, a cursory look indicates there may be savings from such a move. Although no cuts
were made from the Fire Department, Mayor Haakenson pointed out the Fire Marshall position had not
been filled while he was on active duty and the cost savings been significant.
Mayor Haakenson summarized with the reduction of $157,000 in 2008 purchases and the elimination of
new position requests adding up to $240,000, there was still a need to cut over $800,000 for 2009. He
referred to additional cuts he had identified totaling $800,000 in 2009 which would be made if the RFA
was rejected. For 2010 there was another $500,000 in cuts. The budget cuts and reductions for 20092010 identified to be made if the Council rejected a RFA total nearly $2.7 million over the two-year
budget period. Those cuts allow the ending cash balance to meet the GFOA recommended level through
2012; however, in 2013, the ending cash balance begins to fall below the threshold, and would continue to
decline. That would not be the case with the approval of a RFA. He summarized new revenues sustain
operations on a permanent basis while budget cuts were only a temporary fix. The Council’s choices
were new revenue streams or budget cuts that provide less service to citizens.
Mayor Haakenson explained it occurred to him this weekend there was a way to balance the 2009-2010
budget by moving the budget cuts from 2009 and 2010 to 2010 and 2011. He explained an informational
meeting was held last week regarding formation of a RFA. The meeting was well attended and including
representatives and elected officials from Everett, Mukilteo, Lynnwood, Brier, Woodway, Mountlake
Terrace, Edmonds, Mill Creek, Fire Districts 1 & 7, North County Fire, Stanwood Fire and Shoreline
Fire. His feeling as a result of that meeting was the formation of a RFA, especially one potentially as
large as this, could easily take a year to organize. The consultants at the meeting reported it could be
done in 6-8 months but Chief Tomberg and he feel that is optimistic.
October 21, 2008
Page 7
The draft budget presented on September 30 contained new revenues that would allow the City to operate
through 2010 while awaiting potential action on the creation of a RFA, option 1. Option 2 was the budget
cuts he identified at the request of Councilmembers should a RFA not materialize. Over the weekend he
identified the third option. If the Council approved the revenue streams in the draft budget the proposed
budget cuts from 2009 and 2010 could be moved out to 2010 and 2011 respectively. This would allow
for sufficient ending cash through 2013 and allow the work on a potential RFA to take place throughout
2009 culminating in a decision by the Council to either go to the voters with a RFA proposal or not to
pursue a RFA. He summarized Option 3 provided the Council another year to consider the proposed
budget cuts, to hear from their constituents about the proposed loss of services and consider either
alternative revenues or alternative budget cuts. Ms. Junglov distributed the ending cash statement with
budget cuts pushed out to 2010 and 2011.
B.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Wambolt observed unfortunately a lot of the cuts Mayor Haakenson identified would be
needed regardless of whether a RFA was formed simply to put money back in the bank. He explained
over the past two years the ending cash balance had been depleted by $5 million; $2 million in 2007 and
$3 million in 2008.
Councilmember Dawson asked which of the FTEs proposed to be eliminated were currently filled.
Mayor Haakenson answered there were four vacant positions and another eight currently filled that would
be cut. In addition, 2 part-time positions would be cut and 30+ summer positions would be cut.
Councilmember Dawson requested information identifying which of the positions were filled/vacant and,
possibly in Executive Session, how eliminating those positions might affect other positions in bargaining
groups. Mayor Haakenson advised the positions were listed on page 1 of the budget packet.
In response to Mayor Haakenson’s comment that staff had not heard from the Council and assumed they
agreed with the proposed revenue options, Councilmember Wilson pointed out this was the first
opportunity the Council had to make comment. After reviewing the budget as a member of the Budget
Review Team, he assured there was no waste, fraud or abuse to cut; cuts were now being made to the
bone. His expectation was that economic development funding, the DARE program, the Crime
Prevention program, Yost Pool, Beach Rangers, BirdFest and neighborhood park maintenance would not
be cut. Without maintenance, the City would be required to close many of the neighborhood parks. He
relayed that Councilmember Wambolt and he were prepared to move the motions to adopt the ordinances
to increase business license fees, Development Services fees, and utility taxes and set a public hearing for
the TBD, pointing out the importance of taking action rather than having impending cuts loom over staff.
Council President Plunkett referred to a suggestion he received that the City immediately renegotiate
existing union contracts, recognizing that employee labor was the highest cost in the budget. He advised,
after consulting with the Police Officers’ representative Steve Harbison, they were in complete agreement
there should be no Council discussion on renegotiating the existing union contracts.
Councilmember Dawson commented it was premature for the Council to take action on the ordinances
tonight as the agenda did not indicate the Council planned to take action. She preferred to allow the
public process to continue to ensure citizens were aware when action would be taken.
Councilmember Bernheim agreed with not renegotiating union contracts. However, when the contracts
are up for renegotiation in the future he suggested considering the City’s policy of paying the midpoint of
a group of Washington cities. He also suggested the community agree to impose a $30-50 TBD vehicle
October 21, 2008
Page 8
license fee and wished there was the flexibility to adjust the fee based on the type of vehicle. With regard
to increasing the cable TV utility tax, he suggested minimizing the tax on citizens with basic cable and
maximizing the tax on citizens with a large amount of television service. He requested staff provide
information regarding options for imposing a B&O tax, suggesting businesses in the city should pay some
kind of tax.
City Attorney Scott Snyder clarified the maximum TBD vehicle license fee the Council could impose
without a vote of the people was $20 per vehicle. Mayor Haakenson pointed out the budget he presented
assumed a $20 Council-approved TBD vehicle license fee.
Mr. Snyder suggested the Council pass the resolution to set the TBD public hearing, explaining formation
of a TBD required a public hearing, notice published in the newspaper and two readings. If the Council
passed the resolution tonight, the earliest the public hearing could be scheduled was November 18.
Councilmember Wambolt did not support a B&O tax because he feared the car dealerships on Hwy. 99
would be less competitive than dealerships in neighboring cities of Shoreline and Lynnwood who did not
have a B&O tax.
C.
PUBLIC HEARING ON 2009-2010 BUDGET AND REVENUE SOURCES
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Dave Page, Edmonds, asked if there would be other opportunities for public comment. Council
President Plunkett responded it was uncertain whether another public hearing would be scheduled;
comment could always be made during the Audience Comment portion of the agenda. Mr. Page
commended the budget document, remarking Edmonds was a wonderful City. He commented the
average household in Edmonds had earnings of $79,000; the highest in the State for a city of its size, yet
citizens act like they are extremely poor. He suggested asking the public to fund the City in a way that
would make everyone proud, recalling citizens had stepped up to fund good causes in the past.
Don Hall, Edmonds, commented a reduction in advertising and promotion of the City during difficult
economic times resulted in lost sales tax, particularly with the opportunity presented by the Winter
Olympics in Vancouver in 2010. He recommended the City advertise itself in travel magazines next year
as a place to stop on the way to/from the Winter Olympics. He pointed out the Downtown Edmonds
Merchants Association raised over $20,000 to fund a monthly generic Edmonds ad. He recommended the
City contribute more to promote Edmonds which would also increase revenue. He suggested additional
revenue could be raised via naming rights for City parks and playfields. He did not support
Councilmember Bernheim’s suggestion regarding a B&O tax, fearing it would drive car dealerships out
of the City. He suggested a new beautification and maintenance tax on service businesses such as
lawyers, brokerages, realtors, banks, etc. He also recommended citizens and/or businesses be invited to
maintain garden areas.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, asked if the budget was reduced by a percentage and if each department was
cut by the same percentage. Mayor Haakenson responded there was not an across-the-board percentage
reduction; the cuts represented approximately 10% of the entire budget. Mr. Hertrich commented the
Parks Department produced income and it was his understanding Yost Pool broke even. He suggested a
percentage reduction in the Police and Fire Department overtime, management salaries be cut including
the Mayor’s salary and that Councilmembers attend fewer outside committee meetings. He suggested the
Council reconsider the no bail policy that resulted in domestic violence suspects being held in jail several
days. He questioned whether the police motorcycles were as effective as officers in cruisers. He
October 21, 2008
Page 9
questioned Councilmember Wilson’s comment about eliminating the entire Parks Department. He
disagreed with raising utility taxes to 10% as that hurt the citizens who could least afford it. He suggested
response to 911 calls be reduced from three vehicles to one. He disagreed with Councilmember Wilson’s
suggestion to pass the ordinance in the Council packet without further public hearings.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the
public hearing.
Council President Plunkett supported passing the resolution setting a public hearing for the TBD. He
suggested scheduling a public hearing on the TBD and on the EMS transport fees on November 18.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out increasing the cable TV utility tax from 1% to 6% would generate
$460,000. Comcast recently increased their fees and the standard fee was now $60, further increasing the
cable TV utility tax for the average citizen. Increasing the City’s sewer, water and stormwater utility tax
from 6% to 10% would generate $405,000. He suggested approving those ordinances tonight or in the
near future along with the ordinances increasing Development Service fees and business license fees.
For Mayor Haakenson, Mr. Snyder advised formation of the TBD required a public hearing; the EMS
transport fee, the utility tax increases, the increase in the development service fees and business license
fees did not require a public hearing. Council President Plunkett suggested scheduling a public hearing
on all the new revenue sources either on November 3, following committee meetings, on November 10 or
on November 18. Mayor Haakenson suggested scheduling the public hearing as part of the workshop at
the October 28 meeting. City Clerk Sandy Chase advised there was not sufficient time to notice a public
hearing for next week.
Councilmember Orvis supported holding a public hearing on the EMS transport fee and the TBD. He
preferred to delay adoption of the utility tax increases as he planned to adjust the utility tax increases if
further cuts were identified. He spoke in favor of increasing property taxes by 1% and the increase in
Development Service fee increases.
Councilmember Wilson explained the Council had six ordinances; three were completely academic raising business license fees, a 1% property tax increase and setting a public hearing on November 18 for
the TBD. He agreed it was appropriate to schedule a public hearing regarding the EMS transport fees and
was uncertain whether a public hearing regarding the utility tax increases was necessary. He pointed out
all the cuts Mayor Haakenson outlined assumed all these revenues sources. The biggest, most complex,
time-consuming, controversial, challenging decisions were yet to come such as whether to create a RFA,
whether develop a levy to present to the voters, or whether to make substantial cuts to the budget; Council
leadership on those issues would be essential to garner the voters’ supports. He estimated the creation of
a RFA would require voters support for $1.50/$1,000 AV which for a house valued at $450,000, the
median home price in Edmonds, would be $675.
In response to Mr. Hertrich’s comment about closing the entire Park’s Department, Councilmember
Wilson clarified the scope of the problem was like closing the entire Park’s Department.
Mayor Haakenson commented if the Council rejected any of the proposed revenue streams, particularly
the EMS transport fee that generated $700,000, another round of cuts of approximately $1 million would
be required.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether scheduling public hearings on November 18 would require the
Council to delay action on the budget ordinance until November 25. Ms. Junglov advised staff could
October 21, 2008
Page 10
present a draft ordinance that Council could amend or provide different versions of the budget ordinance
for Council consideration. She pointed out the property tax ordinance must be provided to Snohomish
County by November 30.
Councilmember Dawson suggested public hearings would give the public an opportunity to weigh in on
these issues. Council President Plunkett suggested scheduling a public hearing on the property tax
ordinance, utility tax increases, business license fee increase, and EMS transport fee on November 18 and
take action on the budget ordinance on November 25.
Councilmember Wambolt disagreed a RFA would require voter approval of funding in the amount of
$1.50/$1,000 AV, recalling the cost to be approximately $4 million which would equate to a levy of
$0.50/$1,000 AV or $250/year for a house valued at $500,000. Mayor Haakenson cautioned the
formation of a RFA would be a long process and was too early to cite a cost.
Councilmember Orvis commented he was not in a hurry and would support holding additional Council
meetings if necessary to adopt the budget by yearend, recalling the Council typically held a Saturday
workshop. He remarked it took him awhile to digest the budget information.
Councilmember Wilson reiterated the most difficult discussion was yet to come - expenditures. Council
President Plunkett pointed out a 2-hour budget workshop was scheduled for the October 28 meeting.
Mayor Haakenson commented while he appreciated the Council’s willingness to digest the budget they
and the public had the budget for three weeks, yet no citizens had contacted him about any part of the
budget other than to make positive comments about revenue sources. He expressed frustration that the
Council was postponing action for four weeks when there were employees whose jobs were hanging in
the balance, commenting the Council could even make the situation worse on November 18 if they chose
not to accept the proposed revenue streams. He urged the Council to keep in mind when delaying action
until November 18 that they were dealing with real people and real jobs. He questioned what the Council
planned to discuss between now and November 18.
Councilmember Dawson responded that was why the Council must be careful in its deliberations. The
Council had only been aware of the proposed cuts since Saturday and only tonight the Council heard
those cuts could be moved out to 2010 and 2011 even if a RFA did not pass. She summarized there was a
great deal for the Council and the public to digest. She explained understanding the ramifications of not
taking action on the proposed revenue options helped inform the Council when discussing the revenue
options. She envisioned next week’s budget workshop would include discussion on the revenue options
as well as expenditures. She supported considering the revenue streams together at a public hearing on
November 18. She noted the Council appeared to support most of the revenue recommendations; the
question was whether the Council wanted to make cuts in the budget in 2009 or 2010 or assume a RFA or
other levy would pass.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1181 SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT ON NOVEMBER 18.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out the Council had more than adequate time to digest the proposed
revenue options, recalling they were presented at the Council mini-retreat in August. If any of the
proposed revenue sources were not approved, even deeper cuts to the budget would be required. He
questioned why a separate public hearing was necessary on the 1% property tax increase, finding it a
waste of the public’s time because the Council would pass that increase regardless of public comment.
October 21, 2008
Page 11
Council President Plunkett commented on the importance of the public process; the more the Council
included the public, the better everyone felt. He asked Mr. Snyder whether a public hearing on the
property tax increase was required. Mr. Snyder answered the 1% property tax increase was part of the
budget; the Council just held a public hearing on the budget this evening.
Council President Plunkett recommended holding a public hearing on the EMS transport fee, utility tax
increase, business license fee increase and the property tax increase on November 18.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the purpose of a public hearing was to learn from the public. He
was inclined to support the proposed revenue options but was willing to listen to the public’s input. He
recalled asking Mayor Haakenson to have the budget documentation prior to September 30 and was told it
would be available on September 30. He has been using the time since the budget was presented on
September 30 to learn more.
COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 3699, INCREASING THE BUSINESS LICENSE FEE.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT, OLSON AND
WILSON IN FAVOR, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT AND COUNCILMEMBERS
BERNHEIM, ORVIS AND DAWSON OPPOSED.
Council President Plunkett commented if the Council adopted the budget on November 25 that was right
on target. Mayor Haakenson commented the Council might be on target in a normal budget year but this
was a year when employees’ jobs were hanging in the balance; the sooner the Council adopted the budget
the better. With regard to Councilmember Bernheim’s request for a budget document before anyone else
received the budget, he explained the practice in Edmonds and other municipalities was to distribute the
budget to all Councilmembers at the same time. As Councilmember Wambolt pointed out, the Council
was told at their February retreat that these were the revenue options staff planned to propose; the Council
had eight months to digest these revenue options.
Councilmember Wilson expressed frustration that there was no plan to discuss any of the more weighty
topics. He expressed concern with deferring decisions that most of the Council found acceptable for one
month. He suggested scheduling a public hearing regarding forming a RFA or a levy as an alternative
funding source. Mayor Haakenson responded no one was prepared to make comments on the formation
of a RFA, there had only been one meeting and there was a great deal to learn. He envisioned it would be
at least a 6-8 month process and he did not expect the public to be able to provide feedback when staff
was not able to provide any information yet.
Mr. Snyder reiterated tonight’s public hearing was advertised on the 2009-2010 budget and revenue
sources and the ordinances referred to were included in the Council packet. He asked what additional
notification should be provided to the public regarding actions that were a typical part of the budget such
as the property tax ordinance. Councilmember Dawson pointed out the EMS transport ordinance was just
provided to the Council tonight and the Council must hold a public hearing regarding the creation of a
TBD. Although it was not necessary to hold another public hearing on the other revenue options, it
would not do any harm to hold a public hearing at the same time as the public hearing on the TBD. She
reiterated she did not want to take action on the ordinances tonight because it was not advertised that the
Council would take action.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the Council’s discussion tonight had informed the public.
Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess.
October 21, 2008
Page 12
5.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING CODE
CHANGES RELATED TO THE BD1 ZONES.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board’s discussion was summarized in the
Planning Board minutes on pages 29-30 of the Council packet. He explained this issue arose as a result
of a challenge to a staff interpretation regarding how the ground floor rules were interpreted. The Council
voted to affirm what staff understood to be the intent of the code, that the ground floor was completely
devoted to commercial uses in the BD1 zone. There was some question raised in the discussion and the
Council referred the issue to the Planning Board. He summarized the Planning Board’s recommendation
as follows:
1. Clarify that the 15-foot ground floor height requirement in BD1 only applies to the first 30 feet of
commercial space. Commercial uses or parking are still required on the ground floor, but the 15foot floor-to-floor requirement does not apply behind 30 feet.
2. Clarify that only those commercial spaces within 30 feet of the street front must have direct
access to the street.
3. Clarify that the 30-foot depth exception mentioned in 16.43.030(B)(e) was for unusual properties
in the BD2 and BD3 zones, not BD1.
4. Clarify that parking is allowed on the ground floor in BD1, if it is located behind the first 30 feet.
5. Clarify that for corner lots, the 30-foot requirement would not apply to street fronts of buildings
when they are located on side streets at the edge of the BD1 zone district. However, all street
fronts along Main and 4th will always have the 30-foot requirements applied, corner or not. A
map identifies the designated street front of each lot in the BD1 zone.
6. Clarify that existing space can be occupied by permitted commercial uses, regardless of whether
it meets the other ‘ground floor’ requirements.
Councilmember Orvis pointed out in BD2 and BD3 the 12-foot requirement extended 60 feet and the
proposal was to change BD1 so that the 15-foot requirement extended back only 30 feet. Mr. Chave
agreed.
Councilmember Wambolt noted staff preferred a 45-foot depth. Mr. Chave explained staff’s concern was
if the depth was too low, there was potential over time to erode commercial space. Staff’s survey of 40
retail locations downtown found the average was 60 feet and the literature indicates 60 feet was an
appropriate depth. The Planning Board was concerned that a depth of 45 feet might preclude smaller
retail spaces and were persuaded that even with a smaller depth, over time most people would provide
larger spaces. The Planning Board agreed if there was evidence that that was not happening, it could be
revisited and the code could be modified.
Councilmember Orvis observed parking was required for commercial spaces in BD2 and BD3 and not in
BD1. Mr. Chave answered parking was not required on the ground floor. He recalled the property owner
at 555 Main want to provide parking in their building for the retail uses as well as the office spaces above.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented an average lot was 120 feet long and if a row of 20-foot parking
spaces was provided along the back, 100 feet remained. He preferred the deeper commercial spaces as
they met the original intent and the smaller depth would allow a developer to achieve a third floor more
readily by stepping down the space. He suggested requiring a 45-foot depth. He noted there were
businesses with parking in the alley and there could even be businesses that faced the alley. He
concluded a 30-foot depth was not enough.
October 21, 2008
Page 13
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the
public hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BERNHEIM, TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO
IMPLEMENT THE PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION.
Councilmember Bernheim questioned the rationale for the 30-foot depth, noting that was a significant
change.
Councilmember Wambolt explained 30 feet was the minimum, it could be extended to the depth of the
building. He was willing to the give deference to the Planning Board’s recommendation.
Councilmember Orvis stated he would not support a 30-foot depth and preferred to 60 feet. He recalled
the reason the depths were changed was because quality commercial spaces were not being constructed
downtown. He acknowledged one of the issues was the ceiling height but the depth used to be 30 feet.
Further, if the Planning Board’s recommendations were adopted, the commercial standards in BD2 and
BD3, areas outside the core, would be stronger than within the core.
Councilmember Dawson commented she was willing to try 30 or 45 feet. She pointed out the
recommendation was for a 15-foot ceiling to a depth of 30 feet, envisioning a store could have space
behind their commercial area with a ceiling height of less than 15-feet such as dressing rooms. She
agreed with Councilmember Wambolt regarding giving deference to the Planning Board’s perspective.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
AMEND THE MOTION TO CHANGE THE 30 FOOT DEPTH TO 45 FEET. MOTION FAILED
(2-5), COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS AND BERNHEIM IN FAVOR.
MAIN MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS OPPOSED.
6.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Alan MacFarlane, Edmonds, commented there were important concepts to be studied before anything
was done to the senior center. This was likely the worst time in the past 78 years to be involved in this
very complicated proposal; it was the wrong proposal at the wrong time. He recalled the Depression
when everyone “made do” which was followed by World War II when because of shortages, everyone
again had to make do. He referred to the two proposals, 1) spend over $4 million to bring the senior
center into the 21st century, and 2) Bob Gregg’s proposal to demolish the existing senior center and
construct 22 condominiums on top of a senior center. He concluded neither proposal was the direction
the City should take. He recommended that for much less money, minor repairs could be made to shore
up the worst portions of the building and extend its life a few years. Further, the senior center parking lot
was inadequate for its membership and could not accommodate parking for the 22 condominium units.
He asked if the senior center membership had been contacted regarding Bob Gregg’s proposal and
whether the senior center building was old enough to qualify for historic preservation.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, agreed with Mayor Haakenson’s suggestion to move the municipal court out
of the City. He recommended the Council eliminate the domestic violence no bail policy, which was an
action that would save the City money. He admonished Mr. Snyder for questioning the Council’s desire
for additional public hearings.
October 21, 2008
Page 14
Dave Page, Edmonds, commented leaders have let the public down in a big way financially and the
ramifications will be felt for a long time. The American people were let down by people who pretended
to be on their side and who pretended to have integrity and ethics and were socially moral. This was a
wonderful opportunity to identify the phonies at the top. He concluded the free enterprise system could
not operate with people pretending to be honorable.
Mike Perry, Dimensions Architecture and Planning, Bellevue, relayed when speaking to staff about
height restrictions in the City, staff interprets the definition of a structure to also include most rooftop
equipment. Height exceptions are identified as church steeples, elevator penthouses, chimneys, vent
pipes and standpipes but do not include HVAC units, generators, or kitchen hoods which he noted were
substantial in height. He concluded this in effect lowered the building height in order to accept the
HVAC equipment that could be 6-7 feet in height. He was hopeful the Council could ask the Planning
Board to consider that issue.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7.
REPORT ON SENIOR CENTER PROPOSAL (BOB GREGG)
Bob Gregg, Edmonds, explained his intent was to describe the opportunity regarding the senior center,
noting he had been approached a few times over the years regarding structural issues with the Senior
Center and what could be done there. He assured the only thing that had occurred to date was he spoke
with Mayor Haakenson about the concept and was asked to make a presentation regarding the concept.
An acquaintance from Mithun Architects who was working with him on LEED certification on the
Skipper’s property looked at the site and they met recently with Senior Center Board President Cantwell
and Executive Director Hallie Olsen to introduce themselves and inquire about their wish list.
Jim Bedeau, Mithun Architects, Seattle, explained their firm believed in bringing a high level of
sustainability to every project and were very involved with urban place-making and opportunities to
weave together art, science and architecture in a project that was the best it could be. A week ago Mr.
Gregg contacted him to discuss this concept; a public-private partnership that would create a much better
facility for the seniors and take advantage of the real estate that was not needed for a first class Senior
Center. He noted the existing Senior Center building was tired, had been added on to over the years and
was never designed to take advantage of the spectacular site on the water. He noted much of the senior
center’s income was derived from weekend rentals for weddings; a facility designed to accommodate
those uses could generate top revenues and be booked years in advance.
Mr. Bedeau envisioned the senior programs would be located on the first floor and a portion of the second
floor with a developer using the air rights for the remainder of the building for senior housing and market
rate housing. He envisioned a series of charettes with representatives of the senior community and staff
to discuss a wish list. That information would then be used to create a number of options. He
commented on sustainability features that could be incorporated into the building such as improved
energy and water efficiencies, a design that utilized natural ventilation so that air conditioning was not
required, and taking advantage of daylight to minimize lighting requirements.
Mayor Haakenson asked how a public-private partnership could be accomplished when the City was
required to solicit bids. City Attorney Scott Snyder envisioned a process could be developed. Because
large portions of the construction would be subject to Washington bid laws, a competitive process would
be advisable. He noted the primary question was whether the Council wanted to proceed with reviewing
how this could happen. He advised Ogden Murphy Wallace worked with Issaquah on a similar project
where Gilman Village built a fire station; they were currently working with Monroe on a project where a
portion of their City Hall on public property was being constructed as part of a development project.
October 21, 2008
Page 15
Council President Plunkett asked whether, if the developer agreed, the City could write the CC&Rs for
the condominium units so that the City could control the residency. Mr. Snyder answered typically the
City was not involved in CC&Rs other than to determine financial responsibility. In a project such as this
the Council could impose a variety of restrictions such as some of the units being available for low
income housing. However it was structured, one of the primary considerations would be to ensure the
deed and the product had a public part and a private part and when construction was completed, no public
funds were used to support the private portion and visa versa.
Council President Plunkett envisioned the City being very involved such as writing the CC&Rs. Mr.
Snyder answered external requirements could be imposed if the intent was to ensure the use of the private
portion was compatible with the City’s use. Mr. Gregg commented this was a role reversal for him;
typically he built mixed use buildings, retained the commercial level and sold the residential space. He
typically was very involved in the CC&Rs for the residential space as it affected the commercial space of
which he retained long term ownership. In this scenario, the City would retain long term ownership of the
Senior Center and he recognized they would want to ensure the CC&Rs for the residential uses were
written and/or approved by the City. He noted there were other examples of senior center projects in the
country with housing above.
Council President Plunkett observed Mr. Gregg did not appear to object to the City being the ultimate
decision-maker with regard to a package of CC&Rs. Mr. Gregg agreed.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out one of the biggest issues was parking and asked how that would be
addressed. Mr. Gregg answered he did not have all the answers or even all the questions yet. He
recognized the existing parking was inadequate and the senior center would only get busier.
Councilmember Bernheim stated the public comment at the senior center this afternoon and here at the
Council seemed to presume this project would proceed. He pointed out the shoreline uses in this area did
not permit residential uses and the purpose of the Commercial Waterfront Zone was to reserve areas for
water dependent and water related uses, to protect and enhance the natural features of the waterfront and
to ensure visual access to the waterfront, purposes he found inconsistent with residential construction on
public property. Residential construction was also prohibited in the Commercial Waterfront Zone which
would require changes to be made to the purpose statements, the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning. He
thought it a huge mistake to sell public property in this area. He noted there was also a 30 foot height
limit in that area and Mayor Haakenson’s budget message did not specifically say the 30-foot height limit
would be maintained, only that any construction would not be as tall as the building next to the Senior
Center. Councilmember Bernheim pointed out there was a 50-foot building on the waterfront now.
Councilmember Bernheim recalled the Police or Fire Chief recommended a roadway be constructed over
the train tracks to provide access west of the tracks in an emergency. He did not support residential
development on the west side of the tracks and preferred to place development on the east side of the
tracks, envisioning a senior center on the top floor of a new development on the Antique Mall property.
The result would be City-owned, gold mine waterfront property without sharing any of it with private
developers. He concluded the City should not consider trading an irreplaceable asset such as the air rights
of public parks on the waterfront for financial gain.
Councilmember Bernheim questioned how Mr. Gregg’s proposal was consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. Mr. Gregg envisioned it would be difficult to relocate the senior center to another site.
Councilmember Bernheim commented he had talked with many seniors and they were open doing
whatever was best for the Senior Center. Mr. Gregg commented there were exceptions for senior and low
income housing. His goal was what the seniors wanted, what was best for the seniors and for the Senior
October 21, 2008
Page 16
Center. He suggested his attorney and the City’s attorney discuss what could be done. He remarked this
concept had been proposed to him via suggestions from a few people and while it had a great deal of
merit, he was certain there were numerous issues to be resolved.
Councilmember Wilson commented it was estimated $4 million in renovations would be needed to bring
the senior center up to an acceptable level. He asked how much it would cost to rebuild the existing
building. Mr. Gregg answered he would not get involved with a renovation again.
Councilmember Wilson asked if 22 condominiums were planned for the site. Mr. Gregg answered that
was the first he had heard of a number of units. In his experience seniors typically want smaller units,
700-100 square feet; however, Edmonds seniors want larger units such as 2,000 square feet. Although a
market study would need to be done, he anticipated unit sizes would range from 700 to 2,000 square feet
which equated to 10-20 units. Councilmember Wilson asked if the concept was a three story building
with the senior center on the first story, condominiums on the third floor and combination of Senior
Center uses and residential units on the second floor. Mr. Gregg agreed that was the preliminary concept.
Councilmember Wilson asked if the intent was to retain the same foundation footprint. Mr. Gregg
answered the City owned the property, the building and the air rights and controlled the codes and zoning.
The City could provide direction such as stay within the height and footprint or let the seniors work with
the architect to develop design alternatives. He commented terracing the building would be an option and
having the building all one height would be another option. He noted a number of senior centers had been
constructed in recent years and they tended to be a standard size; if the building was too big, the facility
was more expensive to operate. He recommended letting the seniors work with the architects to develop
design alternatives. Councilmember Wilson agreed.
Councilmember Wilson assured there were no secret negotiations between the Council and Mr. Gregg.
Councilmember Bernheim, Council President Plunkett, Mayor Haakenson and he attended today’s Senior
Center Board meeting where there was a lot of talk but not a lot of clarity. He encouraged Mr. Gregg to
get buy-in from the Senior Center. Mr. Gregg agreed the Senior Center was their ultimate client. He did
not expect the Council to take any action and envisioned the next step would be for the City’s and his
attorney to discuss how a private-public partnership could be structured. Councilmember Wilson urged
Mr. Gregg to do his homework with the Senior Center first.
Mayor Haakenson asked how much the Senior Center would cost the City. Mr. Gregg answered there
would be no cost to the City and hopefully they could reimburse the City Mr. Snyder’s time. Mayor
Haakenson envisioned a new building that belonged to the City that housed the Senior Center, property
and a beach that belonged to the City and condominiums above that belonged to the condominium owners
and Mr. Gregg was no longer involved once the project was complete.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 10 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING ECDC
LIMITATIONS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS
19.00.005
MODIFYING
THE
TIME
Building Official Ann Bullis explained staff had identified a way to assist permit applicants by modifying
current code language relating to current time limits on permit applications. Some projects that are in the
review stage or ready to issue have been temporarily put on hold by developers and homeowners due to
the current lending issues. Currently permit applications are good for six months and applicants can
request a six month extension for a total of one year. If the applicant wishes to continue the project after
one year, they must submit a new application and pay for plan review. The proposed ordinance would
October 21, 2008
Page 17
make permit applications good for one year and applicants can request a one year extension for a total of
two years. Increasing the application timeframe will assist applicants while nationwide lending issues are
being resolved.
Mayor Haakenson commented the reason this was before the Council was a call he received from a
mortgage banker concerned about clients who had gone through the City’s process, their permit was ready
to be issued and now were unable to proceed with their project and would have to refile in the future. If
an applicant’s plans have been approved, staff would prefer to allow them to be put on hold until the
environment was more conducive to building, saving the applicant permit fees and review time for staff.
He commented this was a way to assist applicants who have not yet had their permits issued.
Councilmember Bernheim asked how this affected permits that had already expired. Mayor Haakenson
answered it would not affect permits that had already expired. Councilmember Bernheim observed this
would only assist people who were caught by the current situation. Ms. Bullis advised there was
discussion of a two year sunset period.
Council President Plunkett suggested staff return in 6-9 months with a report regarding any issues or
problems that arose.
Councilmember Bernheim expressed support for a 2-year sunset. He inquired about the rationale for the
current time limitations. Ms. Bullis answered it was intended to ensure projects were built to current
codes in affect at the time.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON, TO
APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AMENDING ECDC 19.00.005 MODIFYING THE TIME
LIMITATIONS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS WITH A TWO YEAR SUNSET. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Snyder advised he would add an automatic sunset provision and place the ordinance on the Consent
Agenda for adoption.
10.
REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 14, 2008
Public Safety Committee
Councilmember Dawson reported the Committee reviewed the 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan
Update which she encouraged the public to read. The second item was an Interlocal Agreement for
Automatic First Response and Mutual Assistance which was approved on the Consent Agenda. Next, the
Committee discussed anti-idling signs and agreed this topic should be scheduled for discussion by the full
Council. The final item was a discussion regarding potentially dangerous dogs; no action was taken and
staff will provide further information at a future meeting.
Finance Committee
Councilmember Orvis reported the Committee discussed the contract for professional services with the
Prosecutor and requested the Prosecutor attend tonight’s meeting to respond to questions. The Committee
also discussed surplusing police property which will be placed on a future Consent Agenda.
Community Services/Development Services Committee
Councilmember Wilson reported the Committee discussed voluntary expansion of the fiber optic network
via development. The Committee also continued their discussion on the Community Sustainability
Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Next they discussed the metal pole in Seaview and recommended
draft language to be forwarded to the City Council for approval requiring that any future poles be
October 21, 2008
Page 18
constructed of wood. The last item was a discussion on commercial uses in residential zones related to
short term rental of single family homes that was disruptive to the neighborhood. He invited residents to
contact the City if they were renting their home on a short term basis.
11.
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson had no report.
12.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
City Attorney Scott Snyder commented there were several ways to structure a private-public partnership.
He could make a presentation regarding the options which would require approximately 5-10 hours to
prepare.
Council President Plunkett suggesting moving consideration of approval of the budget from the
November 25 meeting to the December 3 meeting due to Thanksgiving Week and the absence of one
Councilmember from the November 25 meeting.
Councilmember Bernheim commented pursuing the proposal for the Senior Center would be a waste of
City resources. He was opposed to selling City park areas even air rights as he felt park property should
be preserved for citizens rather than private residents. He requested staff report on how the Senior Center
could be converted to City park land making it eligible for REET funds as well as grant funds.
Councilmember Olson expressed her appreciation to everyone who came to the ALS movie night,
reporting they raised over $5,000.
In response to Councilmember Bernheim, Councilmember Wambolt pointed out there were limited REET
funds due to the slow real estate market.
Councilmember Orvis provided an update on the Health Board, advising they met last week and
determined cuts would be necessary. He volunteered to serve on a committee to review and recommend
potential budget cuts of approximately $2 million.
Student Representative Warren commented that residents may be upset if the Council changed the zoning
to pursue Mr. Gregg’s proposal. He suggested purchasing the Antique Mall or Skippers property for a
Senior Center.
13.
ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m.
October 21, 2008
Page 19
AM-1873
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Debbie Karber
Submitted For:
Kathleen Junglov
Department:
Administrative Services
Review Committee:
Action:
Approved for Consent Agenda
Time:
Type:
2.C.
Consent
Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #107676 through #107803 for October 23, 2008 in the amount of
$679,188.90. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #47360 through #47394 for the period
of October 1, 2008 through October 15, 2008 in the amount of $785,607.58.
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposit and checks.
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 2008
Revenue:
Expenditure: 1,464,796.48
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $679,188.90
Payroll: $785,607.58
Attachments
Link: Claim Cks
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq
1
2
3
4
Inbox
Admin Services
City Clerk
Mayor
Final Approval
Approved By
Date
Kathleen Junglov 10/23/2008 12:14 PM
Sandy Chase
10/23/2008 03:28 PM
Gary Haakenson 10/23/2008 03:29 PM
Sandy Chase
10/23/2008 04:12 PM
Status
APRV
APRV
APRV
APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 10/23/2008 10:55
AM
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107676
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
1
Page:
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
Invoice
261516
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
1-13992
PEST CONTROL
411.000.656.538.800.410.23
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.23
63.25
5.63
68.88
Total :
107677
10/23/2008 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND
NOV. 2008
KENNELING SERVICES/NOV. 2008/EDM PD
NOV. 2008 KENNELING SERV.
001.000.410.521.700.410.00
1,921.23
Total :
1,921.23
107678
10/23/2008 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE
2035
TREE REMOVAL
REMOVAL OF DEAD TREE # OLD WOODWAY PARK
001.000.640.576.800.480.00
300.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.480.00
26.40
TREE REMOVAL
REMOVAL OF LEANING ALDER TREE @ PINE
001.000.640.576.800.480.00
100.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.480.00
8.80
TREE REMOVAL
REMOVAL OF HAWTHORNE TREES @ YOST PARK
001.000.640.576.800.480.00
170.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.480.00
14.96
Total :
620.16
2036
2037
107679
10/23/2008 069751 ARAMARK
655-3898613
UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00
Page:
34.04
3.03
1
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
107679
10/23/2008 069751
107680
10/23/2008 069751 ARAMARK
069751 ARAMARK
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
655-3898616
Amount
Total :
37.07
18386001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00
96.61
8.60
105.21
Total :
107681
2
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 069751 ARAMARK
655-3891979
655-3898614
STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00
111.000.653.542.900.240.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00
3.51
3.51
0.31
0.31
40.44
3.60
Page:
2
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107681
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
3
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 069751 ARAMARK
Invoice
(Continued)
655-3900410
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
PW MATS
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00
1.75
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
0.16
0.59
0.59
0.59
0.59
0.60
6.65
89.80
Total :
107682
10/23/2008 072322 ARBOR VILLA LLC
BLD20070696
APPLICATION EXPIRED.REFUND FOR PERMIT
APPLICATION EXPIRED.REFUND FOR PERMIT
001.000.000.257.620.000.00
8,483.00
Total :
8,483.00
107683
10/23/2008 072517 ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTING LLC
2008-78-1
MATAYA PEER REVIEW & TREE TOPPING
MATAYA PEER REVIEW & TREE TOPPING
001.000.620.558.600.410.00
750.00
Page:
3
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
107683
10/23/2008 072517
107684
10/23/2008 069451 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
PO #
Description/Account
072517 ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTING LLC(Continued)
00100731
Amount
Total :
750.00
FS 17 - CV/RV RUBBER KIT
FS 17 - CV/RV RUBBER KIT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
WATER QUALITY SUPPLIES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
39.83
90.23
1.83
4.16
136.05
Total :
107685
10/23/2008 064343 AT&T
7303860502001
PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works Lines
001.000.650.519.910.420.00
Public Works Lines
111.000.653.542.900.420.00
Public Works Lines
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
Public Works Lines
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
Public Works Lines
511.000.657.548.680.420.00
Public Works Lines
411.000.652.542.900.420.00
1.84
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
6.98
36.82
Total :
107686
4
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
47508
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
Page:
4
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107686
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
UB Outsourcing area #100 PRINTING
411.000.652.542.900.490.00
411.000.654.534.800.490.00
411.000.655.535.800.490.00
UB Outsourcing area #100 POSTAGE
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00
UB Outsourcing area #100 POSTAGE
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
Total :
107687
107688
5
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST
10/23/2008 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
November 2008
682919
90.92
90.92
91.18
283.11
8.18
8.21
8.18
283.10
863.80
NOVEMBER 2008 AWC PREMIUMS
11/08 AWC Premiums
811.000.000.231.510.000.00
11/08 Fire Pension AWC Premiums
617.000.510.522.200.230.00
11/08 Retirees AWC Premiums
009.000.390.517.370.230.00
11/08 Gaydos AWC Premiums
001.000.510.526.100.230.00
Total :
288,696.38
4,372.20
25,172.60
1,107.13
319,348.31
INV#682919 - CRYSTAL/EDMONDS PD
BALLISTIC VEST/CRYSTAL
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
Page:
699.00
62.91
5
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107688
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
6
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
Invoice
(Continued)
684553
693550
693550-80
697853
702316
702993
703010
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
CREDIT INV#684553 - EDMONDS PD
RETURN OF UNIFORM PANTS
001.000.410.521.910.240.00
-59.99
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.240.00
-5.40
INV#693550 - EDMONDS PD
HANDCUFFS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00
71.16
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00
6.40
CREDIT INV#693550-80 - EDMONDS PD
HANDCUFFS NEVER ORDERED
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
-71.16
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
-6.33
FTO JACKETS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
263.96
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
23.49
SERVICE BAR/SGT. BLACKBURN - EDMONDS PD
SERVICE BAR/BLACKBURN
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
5.85
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00
0.52
SERVICE BAR/M.BARD - EDMONDS PD
SERVICE BAR/M.BARD
001.000.410.521.400.240.00
6.50
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.400.240.00
0.58
UNIFORM ITEMS/S.DIEHL - EDMONDS PD
UNIFORM PANTS/SHIRTS,ETC.~
001.000.410.521.110.240.00
191.89
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.240.00
17.08
Page:
6
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
Invoice
10/23/2008 002500
107689
10/23/2008 000935 BROMAN, MINDY A
002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
10/23/2008 069295 BROWN, CANDY
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
BROMAN
BROWN10134
Amount
Total :
1,206.46
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/BROMAN
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT~
001.000.410.521.400.430.00
Total :
BIRDS ARE AWESOME!
BIRDS ARE AWESOME!~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
107692
10/23/2008 067947 BROWNELLS INC
10/23/2008 071510 BUCK, ALICIA
05016411.00
BUCK10013
INV#05016411.00 - EDMONDS POLICE
ARMORY SUPPLIES/CLEANING AIDS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.400.310.00
Total :
ART FOR KIDZ
DOODLE DOTS #10013
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
MINI MARKERS #10015
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
107694
10/23/2008 068152 CADDY, OWEN T
10/23/2008 068484 CEMEX / RINKER MATERIALS
CADDY1022
9416096760
10.50
104.45
243.60
540.40
INTERPRETIVE DISPLAY PANEL
SIXTH PHASE: INTERPRETIVE DISPLAY
125.000.640.594.750.650.00
Total :
STREET - ASPHALT
STREET - ASPHALT
111.000.653.542.310.310.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
340.00
30.60
Page:
93.95
296.80
Total :
107693
87.75
87.75
28.00
28.00
Total :
107691
7
front
107688
107690
Page:
City of Edmonds
7
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107694
107695
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 068484 CEMEX / RINKER MATERIALS
10/23/2008 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
Invoice
(Continued)
9416120074
LY137073
LY137110
107697
8
front
LY137076
107696
Page:
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E
10/23/2008 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
CHAPUT9948
460267496
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
STREET - CONCRETE DUMP FEES
STREET - CONCRETE DUMP FEES
111.000.653.542.310.310.00
Total :
46.60
417.20
ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00
33.64
17.50
4.55
22.43
17.50
3.56
33.64
17.50
Total :
4.55
154.87
Total :
87.50
87.50
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #9948
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
UNIFORMS
Page:
8
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107697
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
Invoice
460268711
10/23/2008 070587 CITY OF KIRKLAND
10/23/2008 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
460268691
107699
9
front
460267497
107698
Page:
City of Edmonds
105
6473
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00
OPS UNIFORMS
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00
UNIFORMS
Stn. 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00
Stn. 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00
OPS UNIFORMS
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00
20.00
1.78
107.08
9.53
112.79
112.80
10.04
10.03
134.69
Total :
11.98
530.72
CHAMPS MEET
108 PEOPLE FOR CHAMPS MEET~
001.000.640.575.510.310.00
Total :
216.00
216.00
NEXTEL PHONE SERV.
104.000.410.521.210.420.00
53.13
Page:
9
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107699
107700
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
107702
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
10/23/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES
Invoice
(Continued)
6490
W1985493
W1986116
W1980571
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
JULY,AUG,SEPT -NARC SALARY/SGT
104.000.410.521.210.510.00
Total :
10,100.79
10,153.92
CLEANING SUPPLIES
LINERS, SEAT COVERS, CLEANER, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
1,357.46
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
120.81
CLEANING SUPPLIES
PAPER TOWELS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
69.82
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
6.21
Total :
1,554.30
FAC - NO TOUCH ROLL TOWELS
FAC - NO TOUCH ROLL TOWELS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Total :
292.32
26.02
318.34
OPS SUPPLIES
stations' supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00
7.78
0.69
8.47
Total :
107703
10
front
W1985493-1
107701
Page:
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
7403
TRAVEL/MOORS
Page:
10
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107703
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
TRAVEL/MOORS
411.000.656.538.800.430.00
PUBLICATION/INSTRUMENTATION
411.000.656.538.800.410.22
FILTERS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21
LATE FEE
411.000.656.538.800.490.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.430.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21
Total :
107704
107705
11
City of Edmonds
9237
3527
190.47
260.00
459.48
4.69
2.24
5.41
922.29
ACCT#9237 - LAWLESS
WINDOWS XP/VISTA DOWNLOAD
001.000.410.521.310.310.00
SKULL CAP
001.000.410.521.300.310.00
Total :
108.89
32.16
141.05
BEST BUY - CELL HEADSET - FAC MAINT
BEST BUY - CELL HEADSET - FAC MAINT
001.000.651.519.920.420.00
87.11
SETON NAME PLATE - ENTRANCE SIGN FOR PS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
184.85
DAYDEAL - BLUETOOTH CAR KIT - FAC MAINT
001.000.651.519.920.420.00
266.97
BLUEVOLT - GROUND & BONDING CLASS - G
001.000.651.519.920.490.00
50.00
MECHANICAL SALES - BURNERS FOR BOILER
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
230.04
US GREEN BUILD COUNCIL - LEED FOR
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
207.50
Page:
11
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107705
107706
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
12
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
5988
630164889380
630340709759
630627828884
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
MAGIC TOYOTA- FLEET MAINT
MAGIC TOYOTA- FLEET MAINT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00
221.24
SUBWAY - MEAL - D BROWNING - IMSA CLASS
111.000.653.542.900.430.00
9.96
DENNYS - MEAL - D BROWNING - IMSA CLASS
111.000.653.542.900.430.00
15.00
RED LION HOTEL - LODGING - G EVANS 111.000.653.542.900.430.00
289.27
WENDYS - MEAL - D BROWNING - IMSA CLASS
111.000.653.542.900.430.00
9.06
1056 RICHLAND GAS - FUEL FOR CITY
111.000.653.542.900.430.00
54.26
RED LION HOTEL - LODGING - D BROWNING 111.000.653.542.900.430.00
269.07
RUDD LIGHTING - LIGHTING FIXTURES FOR
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
1,181.54
RUDD LIGHTING - LIGHT POLES FOR SR
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
1,280.15
GUARDIAN SECURITY - OLD PW MONTHLY
001.000.651.519.920.420.00
55.00
SEWER - RAT BATE
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
317.97
Total :
4,728.99
UNIFORMS
Safety glasses
001.000.510.522.200.240.00
STARTZMAN
Office & BC eval supplies
001.000.510.522.100.310.00
TRAINING TRAVEL
FFs Beard & Turner LN Curtis training
001.000.510.522.400.430.00
374.00
145.81
167.24
Page:
12
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
13
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
107706
10/23/2008 069983
107707
10/23/2008 065891 CONLEY, LISA
107708
Page:
City of Edmonds
069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
10/23/2008 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
CONLEY10074
195924
SEPTEMBER 2008
Amount
Total :
687.05
Total :
100.80
100.80
CREEPY CRAWLIES
CREEPY CRAWLIES #10074
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
REF: 195924 - JAIL JUMPSUIT/EDP
JAIL JUMPSUIT CLEANED
001.000.410.521.220.410.00
2.94
DRYCLEANING SERVICES - EDMONDS POLICE
SEPTEMBER 2008 DRYCLEANING~
001.000.410.521.220.410.00
894.86
Total :
897.80
107709
10/23/2008 072145 DISTINCTIVE WINDOWS INC
20302
COURTS - EQC PROJECT - NEW DOOR GLASS
COURTS - EQC PROJECT - NEW DOOR GLASS
001.000.230.512.500.480.00
40.00
Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.500.480.00
3.56
Total :
43.56
107710
10/23/2008 007253 DUNN LUMBER
02327063
FAC - SUPPLIES
FAC - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
10.28
0.93
11.21
Total :
107711
10/23/2008 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
1592
SUPPLIES
RUST TREATMENT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
8.75
0.78
9.53
Total :
107712
1564
FAC MAINT - LPS-1 SUPPLIES
Page:
13
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107712
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
FAC MAINT - LPS-1 SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Total :
107713
10/23/2008 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC
E500161
E503396
77.94
6.94
84.88
Testing services (PD)
001.000.220.516.210.410.00
001.000.220.516.210.410.00
423.00
55.00
478.00
Total :
107714
10/23/2008 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL
15349
UPS/CHICAGO
UPS/CHICAGO
411.000.656.538.800.420.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00
51.03
4.54
55.57
Total :
107715
107716
107717
14
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 072306 EDMONDS ORAL SURGERY
10/23/2008 008550 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15
10/23/2008 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
EDMONDSOS1017
1008000028
1-00575
REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR EPR
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
Total :
PRINTING OF BIRD FEST POSTERS
Printing of Bird Fest Posters
120.000.310.575.420.410.00
Sales Tax
120.000.310.575.420.410.00
Total :
238.50
21.23
259.73
CITY PARK
CITY PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
184.61
Page:
200.00
200.00
14
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107717
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
15
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
1-00825
1-00875
1-05125
1-05285
1-05340
1-05675
1-05700
1-16450
107718
Page:
City of Edmonds
1-00650
1-00925
1-02675
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
SPRINKLER
SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
SPRINKLER
SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
GAZEBO IRRIGATION
GAZEBO IRRIGATION
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
CORNER PARK
CORNER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP
PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
EDMONDS CITY PARK
EDMONDS CITY PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
CITY HALL TRIANGLE
CITY HALL TRIANGLE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
Total :
649.32
26.72
44.96
21.25
37.66
572.76
108.77
147.53
1,793.58
LIFT STATION #7
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00
LIFT STATION #8
LIFT STATION #8
411.000.655.535.800.470.00
LIFT STATION #2
LIFT STATION #2
411.000.655.535.800.470.00
21.25
21.25
21.25
Page:
15
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107718
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
1-03950
1-05705
1-13975
1-14000
4-34080
107720
16
front
1-05350
107719
Page:
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
10/23/2008 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES
28822A 1
ENGLAND10024
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms
Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms
411.000.654.534.800.470.00
330.09
Public Works Meter Shop
Public Works Meter Shop
411.000.654.534.800.470.00
118.00
LIFT STATION #6
LIFT STATION #6
411.000.655.535.800.470.00
45.09
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00
350.08
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00
81.75
LIFT STATION #14
LIFT STATION #14
411.000.655.535.800.470.00
21.25
Total :
1,010.01
INV#28822A 1 - EDMONDS PD
TONER AND WASTE BOTTLE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
Total :
110.80
6.00
10.40
127.20
SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE CLASSES
Page:
16
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107720
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
DANCE CLASS #10024
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
DANCE CLASS #10025
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
DANCE CLASS #10026
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
DANCE CLASS #10027
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
450.00
384.00
120.00
420.00
1,374.00
Total :
107721
107722
10/23/2008 063953 EVERGREEN STATE HEAT & A/C
10/23/2008 069380 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER
7941
BARKER
LAWLESS
R.T. SMITH
107723
107724
17
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 070137 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
10/23/2008 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST
1598-576
90584441
CITY HALL - SERVICE REPAIR
CITY HALL - SERVICE REPAIR
001.000.651.519.920.480.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00
Total :
555.00
49.40
604.40
REGISTRATION/R.BARKER - EDMONDS PD
REGISTRATION/R.BARKER~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00
55.00
REGISTRATION - J.LAWLESS/EDMONDS PD
REGISTRATION/J. LAWLESS~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00
40.00
REGISTRATION/R.T.SMITH - EDMONDS PD
REGISTRATION/RT SMITH~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00
55.00
Total :
150.00
E6DA.Lawson Title Report, etc.
E6DA.Lawson Title Report, etc.
125.000.640.594.750.650.00
Total :
437.50
437.50
STREET - CONCRETE
Page:
17
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107724
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
STREET - CONCRETE
111.000.653.542.610.310.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00
331.50
29.84
361.34
Total :
107725
10/23/2008 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC
I2426125
I2434320
WATER INVENTORY-~
WATER INVENTORY-~
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
W-SETTER-0.75-012
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
W-VALVCURB-0.75-020
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
W-SETTER-0.75-012
W-SETTER-0.75-012
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
953.60
1,453.31
849.00
289.77
76.49
7.45
7.22
3,636.84
Total :
107726
107727
18
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 071417 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
10/23/2008 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED
7386258
1030-106
WATER - SUPPLIES - COUPLINGS
WATER - SUPPLIES - COUPLINGS
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
Total :
108.54
8.25
116.79
Drug Testing services 8/13/08
Page:
18
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107727
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
411.000.652.542.900.410.00
411.000.652.542.900.410.00
85.00
35.00
120.00
Total :
107728
2126-108
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TA,CK,LJ,DO fit-for-duty
001.000.510.522.200.410.00
BS,TF fit-for-duty
001.000.510.526.100.410.00
2,440.00
1,230.00
3,670.00
Total :
107729
19
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
1032441
1032552
1043999
1082903
FAC - MOUNTING STRIP, FASTENERS, CHROME
FAC - MOUNTING STRIP, FASTENERS, CHROME
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
34.97
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
3.14
FAC- RESURFACING SUPPLIES, PAINTERS TOOL
FAC- RESURFACING SUPPLIES, PAINTERS TOOL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
40.71
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
3.66
MCH - BULLETIN BOARD SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
11.58
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
1.04
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
13.40
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
1.20
Page:
19
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107729
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
20
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
2041641
2580648
2588997
3043557
32739
37708
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
FAC MAINT SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
YOST PARK - REPAIR SUPPLIES
YOST PARK - REPAIR SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
FAC - TOILET SEAT
FAC - TOILET SEAT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
MCH - SUPPLIES
MCH - SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.560.310.00
CITY HALL - GRAY SEAL, SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.560.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
FAC - PIPE INSULATION, GRAY SEAL
FAC - PIPE INSULATION, GRAY SEAL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
WADE JAMES - RESURFACE SUPPLIES
WADE JAMES - RESURFACE SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Page:
241.35
21.72
8.57
0.77
19.86
1.78
151.04
40.75
13.59
3.67
13.96
1.26
15.36
1.38
20
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107729
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
21
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
4033995
4034039
4034067
4256681
4560178
5033886
5041049
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
STREET - GLOVES, SUPPLIES
STREET - GLOVES, SUPPLIES
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
YOST PARK - SUPPLIES
YOST PARK - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
STORM - SUPPLIES
STORM - SUPPLIES
411.000.652.542.400.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00
STREET - RETURN
STREET - RETURN
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
FAC - WINDOW SCREEN MATERIAL
FAC - WINDOW SCREEN MATERIAL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
PLAZA ROOM - 2X4 PANELS
PLAZA ROOM - 2X4 PANELS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
CITY HALL - STAKES, PLASTIC BAGS
CITY HALL - STAKES, PLASTIC BAGS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Page:
51.54
4.64
12.54
1.12
16.31
1.46
-13.93
-1.26
12.90
1.16
9.58
0.86
24.15
2.17
21
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107729
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
22
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
5043120
5580276
6031384
6594883
7040557
8030958
8033201
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
FS 17 - 15' HOSE
FS 17 - 15' HOSE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
PLAZA RM - SUPPLIES
PLAZA RM - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
FAC - CONCRETE MIX SUPPLIES
FAC - CONCRETE MIX SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
WATER - HOSE
WATER - HOSE
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
PARKS - TEMP HDBD
PARKS - TEMP HDBD
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
SEWER - CONDUIT
SEWER - CONDUIT
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
6.97
0.62
11.67
1.05
38.56
3.47
71.82
6.46
9.94
0.89
74.45
6.70
4.07
0.36
Page:
22
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107729
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
23
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
8060166
8572295
8594682
9033048
9047730
9049966
9087021
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
WATER - SAWZALL, TORCH BLADE, CONCRETE
WATER - SAWZALL, TORCH BLADE, CONCRETE
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
95.90
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
8.63
PW - FITTINS, REDUCERS
PW - FITTINS, REDUCERS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
13.36
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
1.20
WATER - BARK
WATER - BARK
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
23.28
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
2.09
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - BITS, SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - BITS, SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
59.91
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
5.39
SEWER - ANCHOR SLEEVES
SEWER - ANCHOR SLEEVES
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
4.96
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
0.44
PW - SUPPLIES
PW - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
62.60
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
5.63
PW - REPAIR SUPPLIES
PW - REPAIR SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
63.87
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
5.75
Page:
23
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
Invoice
10/23/2008 067862
107730
10/23/2008 072466 HOME STREET BANK
067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
10/23/2008 072041 IBS INCORPORATED
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
E5MC.Ret Pmt 2
415845-1
Amount
Total :
1,358.04
E5MC.Premium Construction Retainage 2
E5MC.Premium Construction Retainage 2
125.000.640.594.750.650.00
Total :
SUPPLIES
SHOP SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
107733
10/23/2008 070508 ISLAND COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1
10/23/2008 065056 JOHNSON, TROY
08-145
TJOHNSON1019
7.09
2.14
26.19
INV#08-145 - EDMONDS POLICE DEPT.
REGISTRATION/~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00
Total :
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00
10/23/2008 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO
77664
FAC- HOFFMAN VENTS
FAC- HOFFMAN VENTS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
504.00
45.36
549.36
Total :
107735
10/23/2008 069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN
LAMPHERE10047
INFLAMMATION WITH FOOD
COOLING INFLAMMATION WITH FOOD~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
Page:
400.00
400.00
75.00
75.00
Total :
107734
6,879.57
6,879.57
16.96
Total :
107732
24
front
107729
107731
Page:
City of Edmonds
182.00
24
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
25
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
Amount
107735
10/23/2008 069083
107736
10/23/2008 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
0023870
ISAACSON GRADING/DRAINAGE GEOTECH
ISAACSON GRADING/DRAINAGE GEOTECH
001.000.620.524.100.410.00
3,400.00
Total :
3,400.00
107737
10/23/2008 072059 LEE, NICOLE
202
INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01
Total :
182.00
108.77
108.77
Total :
107738
10/23/2008 065791 LEIRA
BROMAN
REGISTRATION - M.BROMAN/EDMONDS PD
REGISTRATION/M.BROMAN~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00
175.00
Total :
175.00
107739
10/23/2008 072376 MALLORY CO INC
3299688
WATER/SEWER - 2 FULL SETS OF RAIN GEAR
411.000.654.534.800.240.00
160.87
411.000.655.535.800.240.00
160.87
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.240.00
5.89
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.240.00
5.89
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00
14.85
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00
14.84
Total :
363.21
107740
10/23/2008 019583 MANPOWER INC
18071616
RECEPTION COVERAGE FOR LINDA'S VACATION
RECEPTION COVERAGE FOR LINDA'S VACATION
001.000.620.558.800.410.00
81.15
Total :
81.15
Page:
25
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107741
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 061900 MARC
Invoice
0372055-IN
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
00-0902224
LAUNDRY DETERGENT
411.000.656.538.800.310.59
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.59
873.75
77.76
951.51
Total :
107742
10/23/2008 069362 MARSHALL, CITA
201
209
213
107743
107744
107745
26
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 069362 MARSHALL, CITA
10/23/2008 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
10/23/2008 020495 MIDWAY PLYWOOD INC
3869
12468388
C 56009
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01
108.77
108.77
Total :
108.77
326.31
INV#3869 - EDMONDS POLICE
INTERPRETER CS#08-3746
001.000.410.521.220.410.00
Total :
50.00
50.00
123106800
MOUNTING PLATE/STRUT CHANNEL
411.000.656.538.800.310.21
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21
Total :
PS - WOOD SUPPLIES FOR NEW DOORS
PS - WOOD SUPPLIES FOR NEW DOORS
001.000.230.512.500.480.00
Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.500.480.00
Total :
Page:
400.64
82.54
483.18
328.80
29.26
358.06
26
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107746
107747
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
27
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
10/23/2008 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC
Invoice
77210
WA23-230016
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
STREET - POLY-CUT BLADES
STREET - POLY-CUT BLADES
111.000.653.542.710.310.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.710.310.00
Total :
25.47
2.27
27.74
101690-01
TRI POWER BELTS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21
103.80
7.55
9.90
121.25
Total :
107748
10/23/2008 072495 NORBY COMPANY
57841
FS 16 - HEATING ELEMENTS AND BUSHINGS,
FS 16 - HEATING ELEMENTS AND BUSHINGS,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
225.00
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
7.97
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
20.73
Total :
253.70
107749
10/23/2008 070045 NORTHUP GROUP
1843
2/PRE-EMPLOYMENT PSYCH
001.000.410.521.100.410.00
Total :
107750
10/23/2008 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC
0832826
600.00
600.00
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00
180.29
180.29
Total :
107751
10/23/2008 025690 NOYES, KARIN
000 00 583
HPC MINUTES ON 10/9/2008.
Page:
27
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107751
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 025690 NOYES, KARIN
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
HPC MINUTES ON 10/9/2008.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00
Total :
107752
10/23/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
763628
763692
765213
172.00
172.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PENS, ENVELOPES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
STENO PADS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TONER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
63.84
5.69
17.04
1.52
108.58
9.66
206.33
Total :
107753
107754
28
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
10/23/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
001682
950189
520437
CALENDARS/POST IT/INK CARTRIDGES
411.000.656.538.800.310.41
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41
Total :
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00
25.78
315.43
119.34
10.63
129.97
Total :
Page:
289.65
28
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
29
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
107755
10/23/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
947740
PW ADMIN LABEL SUPPLIES
PW ADMIN LABEL SUPPLIES
001.000.650.519.910.310.00
27.81
WATER/SEWER - ERASABLE WALL CALENDARS
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
38.43
WATER/SEWER - ERASABLE WALL CALENDARS
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
38.43
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00
2.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
3.42
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
3.42
Total :
113.98
107756
10/23/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
013313
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES INCLUDING TONER
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES INCLUDING TONER
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
386.96
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
34.44
DAY TIMER REFILL - SHIPPED SEPARATELY
DAY TIMER REFILL - SHIPPED SEPARATELY
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
21.59
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
1.92
CALENDARS FOR PLANNING DEPT.
CALENDARS FOR PLANNING DEPT.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
256.15
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
22.79
CALENDARS SHIPPED SEPARATELY FROM
CALENDARS SHIPPED SEPARATELY FROM
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
70.53
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
6.27
441674
911567
911674
Page:
29
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
30
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
107756
10/23/2008 063511
107757
10/23/2008 072171 OLIVER, EDWIN
107758
Page:
City of Edmonds
063511 OFFICE MAX INC
10/23/2008 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
500013645
019355
022351
022353
022481
Amount
Total :
800.65
Total :
88.00
88.00
2596
IMMINIZATION/OLIVER
411.000.656.538.800.490.00
CREDIT FOR CHEMICALS
CREDIT FOR SODIUM HYPO
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
MISC. CHEMICALS FOR YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL CHEMICALS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00
Total :
-59.13
-5.26
305.00
27.15
1,480.05
131.72
97.50
8.68
1,985.71
107759
10/23/2008 071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS
PACNOWFLOAT10158
FLOAT TRIP
FALL COLORS & SALMON SPAWNING FLOAT
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
135.91
Total :
135.91
107760
10/23/2008 070091 PARROTT, CHERYL
PARROTT10084
STAINED GLASS SNOWFLAKES
Page:
30
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107760
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 070091 PARROTT, CHERYL
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
STAINED GLASS SNOWFLAKES~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
Total :
107761
107762
31
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 007800 PETTY CASH
10/23/2008 008400 PETTY CASH - EPD
tc petty
PETTY CASH
87.50
87.50
supplies for training
supplies for training
001.000.250.514.300.310.00
parking for meeting-English
001.000.620.532.200.430.00
coffee-2nd floor
001.000.620.558.800.310.00
cookies for neighborhood meeting
001.000.210.513.100.310.00
sccfoa meeting-Chase
001.000.250.514.300.490.00
postage
001.000.230.512.501.490.00
mileage reimb-Hauss
001.000.620.532.200.430.00
PARKING FOR MEETING-HAWKINS
001.000.620.532.200.430.00
FLU SHOT REIMB-SPELLMAN
001.000.220.516.100.410.00
MILEAGE REIMB-ESPINOZA
001.000.230.512.501.430.00
PARKING-BEARD
001.000.510.522.200.430.00
SCC MEETING-OLSON
001.000.110.511.100.490.00
MILEAGE REIMB-JURY DUTY-WATERS
001.000.310.518.880.430.00
Total :
5.00
44.33
8.98
12.00
13.48
14.63
14.00
20.00
88.11
5.00
35.00
49.14
348.66
PETTY CASH PD REIMBURSEMENT
Page:
38.99
31
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107762
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 008400 PETTY CASH - EPD
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
COOKIES/TAC MTG 10/15/08
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
PARKING/SNOH CTY/GANNON
001.000.410.521.400.430.00
PARKING/FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
001.000.410.521.400.430.00
DUES/PLOEGER & MORRISION~
001.000.410.521.210.490.00
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
BATTERIES/VIDEO CAMERA (DET)
001.000.410.521.210.310.00
HEAD PHONES/DET UNIT
001.000.410.521.210.310.00
COPY FEES/COURT RECORDS 08-2910
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
COOKIES/HOSTING NICS CLASS~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
ICE/WATER FOR TRAINING SHOOT
001.000.410.521.220.310.00
HEALTH CARDS/COMPAAN-LAWLESS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
WATER/ICE,BALLOONS,ETC./SHOOT
001.000.410.521.220.310.00
COOKIES/POLICE FOUND 06/24/08
001.000.410.521.100.310.00
LUNCH/FALK - NAMOA CONF.
001.000.410.521.400.430.00
Total :
107763
32
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
9/24-10/20/08
2.00
15.00
20.00
12.98
16.30
16.32
47.75
19.77
10.46
20.91
20.00
61.76
8.58
5.37
288.98
PW - STAMP SUPPLY - NOEL MILLER
Page:
11.78
32
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107763
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
33
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
PW - STAMP SUPPLY - NOEL MILLER
001.000.650.519.910.310.00
7.56
FAC MAINT - JULY & AUG 08 MILEAGE - R
001.000.651.519.920.430.00
21.94
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES - JIM STEVENS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00
27.21
STORM - 2008 BOOT ALLOWANCE - J WARD
411.000.652.542.900.240.00
108.87
PW - BATTERY SUPPLY
111.000.653.542.900.310.00
7.08
PW - BATTERY SUPPLY
411.000.652.542.900.310.00
7.08
PW - BATTERY SUPPLY
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
7.08
PW - BATTERY SUPPLY
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
7.08
PW - CLEANER FOR ICE MACH
111.000.653.542.900.310.00
2.37
411.000.652.542.900.310.00
2.37
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
2.37
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
2.37
511.000.657.548.680.310.00
2.36
Total :
205.74
107764
10/23/2008 064552 PITNEY BOWES
3833100
POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
Lease from 09/30 to 10/30
001.000.250.514.300.450.00
866.00
866.00
Total :
107765
10/23/2008 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
171060
FLEET - TITAN RETURN POSTAGE
Page:
33
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107765
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
Invoice
10/23/2008 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
0003870
04371
10/23/2008 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
171244
107767
34
front
171092
107766
Page:
City of Edmonds
108114
FLEET - TITAN RETURN POSTAGE
511.000.657.548.680.420.00
9.96
WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - DEPT OF L&I
111.000.653.542.900.420.00
3.08
411.000.652.542.900.420.00
3.08
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
3.08
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
3.09
111.000.653.542.900.420.00
2.27
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
2.27
411.000.652.542.900.420.00
2.27
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
2.25
Total :
31.35
CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER
Pier Electricity for
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
Stormwater Rent & Leasehold tax
411.000.652.542.900.450.00
UNIT F1 B1 FUEL
Fire Boat - Fuel
511.000.657.548.680.320.00
Total :
34.14
1,682.97
275.71
1,992.82
OPS REPAIRS & MAINT
Reimbrs M16 gate materials
001.000.510.522.200.480.00
1,081.14
Page:
34
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
107767
10/23/2008 029117
107768
10/23/2008 072444 PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION GROUP
029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
E5MC.Pmt 2
Amount
Total :
1,081.14
E5MC.Complete thru 09/30/08
412.200.630.594.320.650.00
125.000.640.594.750.650.00
18,703.93
123,616.94
142,320.87
Total :
107769
35
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 064088 PROTECTION ONE
291104
24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING-PARKS
001.000.651.519.920.420.00
001.000.640.576.800.420.00
Fire Monitoring F/S 16
001.000.651.519.920.420.00
Page:
44.93
44.92
90.00
35
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107769
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 064088 PROTECTION ONE
Invoice
(Continued)
730531
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
PW ALARM REPAIR
PW ALARM REPAIR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
PW ALARM REPAIR
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
PW ALARM REPAIR
411.000.652.542.900.420.00
PW ALARM REPAIR
111.000.653.542.900.420.00
PW ALARM REPAIR
511.000.657.548.680.420.00
PW ALARM REPAIR
001.000.650.519.910.420.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.420.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.420.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.420.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.420.00
24.00
24.00
21.00
27.00
12.00
12.00
2.14
2.14
1.87
2.40
1.07
1.06
310.53
Total :
107770
107771
36
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY
10/23/2008 071696 RANKINS, KATE
08084S-4
RANKINS1018
ACCOUNT NO. EDMO005
Q4 08 Clean Air Assessment per RCW
001.000.390.531.700.510.00
Total :
PLAZA ROOM/GYM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM AND ANDERSON CENTER GYM
001.000.640.574.100.410.00
105.00
Page:
5,711.75
5,711.75
36
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
Invoice
10/23/2008 071696
107772
10/23/2008 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SERVICES
107774
107775
107776
37
front
107771
107773
Page:
City of Edmonds
071696 RANKINS, KATE
10/23/2008 033300 SAFETY & SUPPLY CO
10/23/2008 072521 SAVAGE, JENNIFER
10/23/2008 065119 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LAB
10/23/2008 036955 SKY NURSERY
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
19911
134815-1
SAVAGE10113
0495061-IN
267246
Amount
Total :
105.00
PS - NEW SECURITY DOORS
PS - NEW SECURITY DOORS
001.000.230.512.500.480.00
Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.500.480.00
Total :
WATER/SEWER - MEN WORKING
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
Total
4,586.91
408.23
4,995.14
SIGNS
SIGNS
210.00
SIGNS
210.00
4.89
4.89
19.13
:
19.12
468.03
CARDIO KICKBOXING
CARDIO KICKBOXING #10113
001.000.640.575.540.410.00
Total :
312.00
312.00
INV#0495061-IN - EDMONDS PD
DFO SPRAY
001.000.410.521.220.310.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00
Total :
159.80
11.38
171.18
SEWER - LIFT ST 6 - BARK
Page:
37
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107776
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 036955 SKY NURSERY
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
SEWER - LIFT ST 6 - BARK
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00
53.94
4.85
58.79
Total :
107777
10/23/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2060028723
2710014701
YOST PARK POOL
YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
MAPLEWOOD HILL PARK
MAPLEWOOD HILL PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00
1,159.05
29.74
1,188.79
Total :
107778
10/23/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
178032911
958-001-000-8
WWTP POWER
411.000.656.538.800.471.61
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.61
21,974.52
Total :
107779
38
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2060014392
2540794324
2790012476
3380016422
1,318.47
23,292.99
SIGNAL LIGHT
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00
fire station # 16
fire station # 16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00
LIFT STATION #9
LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00
27.31
1,482.06
115.95
27.79
Page:
38
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107779
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
39
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Invoice
(Continued)
3460019262
3720012057
4680011956
4840011953
5390028164
5410010689
5510015661
7060000275
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK
FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK
411.000.654.534.800.470.00
LIBRARY
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
111.000.653.542.640.470.00
Public Works
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
001.000.651.519.920.470.00
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT
TRAFFIC LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00
Fire station #16
Fire station #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00
183.44
2,099.33
90.06
81.51
309.74
309.74
309.74
309.74
309.74
4,565.91
2,335.07
28.77
29.93
Page:
39
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Date
Vendor
Invoice
10/23/2008 037375
107780
10/23/2008 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER
037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
10/23/2008 072520 SNYDER, BROOKE
PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
2008139
SNYDER10130
Amount
Total :
12,615.83
INV#2008139 EDMONDS POLICE DEPT.
50.58/BOOKINGS
001.000.410.523.600.510.00
699.67 HOUSING DAYS
001.000.410.523.600.510.00
50.00 HOME DETENTION DAYS
001.000.410.523.600.510.00
Total :
4,588.62
41,819.28
800.00
47,207.90
SCRAPBOOKING CLASS
YOU CAN SCRAPBOOK!~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00
19.50
19.50
Total :
107782
40
front
107779
107781
Page:
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC
87952
E3JB/E3GB.Roberts thru 08/09/08
412.100.630.594.320.650.00
412.300.630.594.320.650.00
E5GA.Roberts thru 08/09/08
412.300.630.594.320.650.00
Planning Division services thru 08/09/08
001.000.620.558.800.410.00
Total :
520.00
520.00
260.00
162.50
1,462.50
107783
10/23/2008 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO
November 2008
NOVEMBER 2008 STANDARD INSURANCE
November 2008 Standard Insurance
811.000.000.231.550.000.00
19,176.82
Total :
19,176.82
107784
10/23/2008 046200 STATE OF WASHINGTON
Q3-08
Q3-08 Leasehold tax liability
Q3-08 Leasehold tax liability
001.000.000.237.220.000.00
4,127.57
4,127.57
Total :
Page:
40
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107785
107786
107787
107788
107789
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON
10/23/2008 071585 STERICYCLE INC
10/23/2008 072519 SWERVE FLEET TRAINING
10/23/2008 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
10/23/2008 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
Invoice
2008 Unclaimed
3000199429
9653
126500
1616926
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
2008 UNCLAIMED PROPERTY
Remit Check #93386 for Marian Bakke to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
Check #89979 for Jeffrey Thompson to
001.000.230.512.540.490.00
Total :
10/23/2008 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY
7980245
12.67
61.15
10.36
10.36
INVOICE #9653 - EDMONDS PD
2/HRS COACHING - L.MACK
001.000.410.521.220.490.00
Total :
198.00
198.00
AUCTION AD - EDMONDS PD
UNCLAIM & SURPLUS AUCTION AD
001.000.410.521.100.440.00
Total :
30.42
30.42
NEWSPAPER AD
Call for Bonds Notice
001.000.250.514.300.440.00
17.55
17.55
WATER INVENTORY -~
Page:
48.48
MONTHLY SERVICE FEE
001.000.410.521.910.410.00
Total :
Total :
107790
41
City of Edmonds
41
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107790
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
10/23/2008 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY
Invoice
PO #
Amount
WATER INVENTORY -~
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
W-FITCOMBR-0.75-010
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
W-VALVBR-0.75-020
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
W-VALVBR-02-010
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
WATER INVENTORY -~
WATER INVENTORY -~
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
NON INVENTORY SUPPLIES - ~
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00
WATER METER INVENTORY - ~
WATER METER INVENTORY - ~
411.000.654.534.800.342.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.342.00
Total :
8052721
10/23/2008 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE
Description/Account
(Continued)
7982796
107791
00211
250-00211
235.75
179.60
400.40
262.08
95.93
215.60
112.02
19.19
9.97
3,364.69
299.45
5,194.68
POSTAGE FOR METER
Postage for City Meter
001.000.250.514.300.420.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
Total :
107792
42
City of Edmonds
10/23/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
425-775-1344
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
001.000.640.574.350.420.00
53.08
Page:
42
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107792
107793
107794
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
43
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
425-775-2645
425 712-0423
425-206-7147
425-672-7132
425-775-1534
425-775-7865
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.640.575.510.420.00
Total :
57.76
110.84
Total :
55.92
55.92
AFTER HOURS PHONE
AFTER HOURS PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00
LIBRARY SCAN ALARM
LIBRARY SCAN ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00
FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE
FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE
511.000.657.548.680.420.00
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
Radio Line between Public Works & UB
Radio Line between Public Works & UB
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
Page:
14.93
79.12
160.64
298.34
52.45
43
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
107794
107795
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
(Continued)
425-RT0-9133
425-774-0944
PO #
Description/Account
Amount
PUBLIC WORKS CPNNECTION TO 911
Public Works Connection to 911
001.000.650.519.910.420.00
111.000.653.542.900.420.00
411.000.654.534.800.420.00
411.000.655.535.800.420.00
511.000.657.548.680.420.00
411.000.652.542.900.420.00
Total :
FS #20-FAX LINE
FS #20-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00
10/23/2008 046100 WA ST ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS INC
1153
WA FIRE CHIEF MBRSHPS
Fire Chief
001.000.510.522.100.490.00
Batt Chiefs
001.000.510.522.200.490.00
Fire Marshal
001.000.510.522.300.490.00
10/23/2008 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
41005
20.81
20.81
20.81
20.78
714.98
735.00
25.00
940.00
INV41005 - EDMONDS PD
TOWING 300/BLK CHRYSLER
001.000.410.521.220.410.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00
150.00
13.35
Page:
20.81
180.00
Total :
107797
5.48
50.20
50.20
Total :
107796
44
City of Edmonds
44
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
45
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Amount
10/23/2008 067917
107798
10/23/2008 066627 WASH ST CODE REVISOR
091708
RCW BOOKS FOR COURTROOM AND JUDGE
RCW BOOKS FOR COURTROOM AND JUDGE
001.000.230.512.500.310.00
479.16
Total :
479.16
107799
10/23/2008 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
I109002519
INV#I109002519 - EDMONDS POLICE DEPT.
SEPT. BACKGROUND CHECKS
001.000.000.237.100.000.00
115.50
Total :
115.50
107800
10/23/2008 070123 WOODARD, MARCIA
WOODARD1022
WRITE ON THE SOUND TEACHER
TEACHING WRITE ON THE SOUND
117.100.640.573.100.410.00
Total :
408.00
408.00
ADVERTISING WSHLA 2009 1/2 PAYMENT
2009 WA St Visitors Guide 1/2 payment
120.000.310.575.420.440.00
Total :
563.30
563.30
REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOST FOR EPR
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
Total :
500.00
500.00
107802
107803
10/23/2008 071523 WSH&LA
10/23/2008 072518 YI, JOYCE
10/23/2008 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC
128 Vouchers for bank code :
front
(Continued)
Description/Account
107797
107801
067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
PO #
1164
YI1013
0127077
Total :
163.35
STREET SIGN SHOP - BLANKS 30X12.080 ALUM
STREET SIGN SHOP - BLANKS 30X12.080 ALUM
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
296.25
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
15.02
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
27.70
Total :
338.97
Bank total :
679,188.90
Page:
45
vchlist
10/23/2008
Bank code :
Voucher
Voucher List
10:27:10AM
Page:
46
City of Edmonds
front
Date
Vendor
128 Vouchers in this report
Invoice
PO #
Description/Account
Total vouchers :
Amount
679,188.90
Page:
46
AM-1860
Claim for Damages
2.D.
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Linda Hynd
Submitted For:
Sandy Chase
Department:
City Clerk's Office
Review Committee:
Action:
Time:
Type:
Consent
Action
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Mike and Anne Meiers (amount undetermined).
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute
entry.
N/A
Narrative
A Claim for Damages has been received from the following individuals:
Mike and Anne Meiers
19016 94th Avenue West
Edmonds, WA 98020
(Amount undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Meiers Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox
Approved By
1
City Clerk
Sandy Chase
2
Mayor
Gary Haakenson
3
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Date
Status
10/23/2008 04:32 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 04:35 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 04:36 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/20/2008 11:29
AM
AM-1861
2.E.
Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report - October 2008
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Stephen Clifton
Department:
Community Services
Review Committee:
Action:
Time:
Type:
Consent
Information
Information
Subject Title
Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report – October, 2008.
Narrative
As requested by the City Council, this report provides an update on major projects currently
worked on by staff of the Community Services and Economic Development Departments.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Community Services & Economic Development October 2008 Quarterly Report
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox
1
City Clerk
2
Mayor
3
Final Approval
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Approved By
Sandy Chase
Gary Haakenson
Sandy Chase
Date
Status
10/22/2008 12:03 PM
APRV
10/22/2008 12:33 PM
APRV
10/22/2008 02:22 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/20/2008 03:14
PM
City of Edmonds
Community Services Department
Economic Development Department
Date:
October 22, 2008
To:
Mayor Haakenson and City Council members
From:
Stephen Clifton, AICP
Community Services and Acting Economic Development Director
Subject:
Community Services and Economic Development
Quarterly Report – October, 2008
As requested by the City Council, this report provides an update on major projects currently
worked on by staff of the Community Services and Economic Development Departments.
Community Services
I. EDMONDS CROSSING
Project Description
Edmonds Crossing is a regional project intended to provide a long-term solution to current
operational and safety conflicts between ferry, rail, automobile, bus, and pedestrian traffic in
downtown Edmonds and along State Route 104. The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) (including Washington State Ferries [WSF]), and City of Edmonds
propose to relocate the existing state ferry terminal from Main Street, in downtown
Edmonds, to Pt. Edwards, south of the downtown core. In the process, a multimodal center
would be established that would integrate ferry, rail, and transit services into a single
complex. A realigned SR 104 from its current intersection with Pine Street would provide
access. The new complex would provide an upgraded ferry terminal designed to meet the
operational requirements for accommodating forecast ferry ridership demand; a new rail
station designed to meet intercity passenger (Amtrak) and commuter rail (Sounder) service;
a transit center that would meet local bus system and regional transit system loading
requirements; facilities that allow both vehicular commuters and walk-on passengers to
utilize various transportation modes; parking, drop-off areas, retail/ concessionaire space,
waiting areas; and a system linking these facilities to allow for the safe movement of users.
City of Edmonds Z Community Services
Significant Activities Since July 10, 2008
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – In response to a Washington State
Legislature directive, WSF staff are exploring minimum build alternatives / options for
the Mukilteo and Edmonds multimodal terminals.
II. SOUND TRANSIT (PHASE 1, AKA SOUND MOVE)
Project Description
During the past few years, Sound Transit has been implementing what is called the Sound
Move Plan. One element calls for commuter rail services, otherwise known as Sounder.
Commuter rail will eventually link Everett in the north with Seattle, Tacoma and Lakewood in
the South, a total of 82 miles through three counties. Sounder is being implemented in
three phases, one of which includes Everett to Seattle. Three commuter rail stations are
planned along this corridor, i.e., Everett, Mukilteo and Edmonds.
Everett-Seattle Sounder, at full operation, now calls for 8 trains per day, i.e., four round trips,
and will include reverse trips. This is a reduction of two round trips from the originally
proposed operational plan. Initial service will be phased in. The first roundtrip train run
began in December, 2003.
Edmonds Station is currently located between Main and Dayton Streets along both sides of
the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) tracks. The station area is also co-located with
Amtrak’s Edmonds Passenger Station. The existing Sounder commuter rail station includes a
400-foot-long platform, ADA mini-high, two ticket vending machines and parking lot with 200
spaces.
Edmonds Station may be considered an interim facility until such time Edmonds Crossing
construction is completed. Circumstances related to the status of Edmonds Crossing could
effect whether the Sound Transit Edmonds Station becomes a permanent station. The
current Edmonds Station project budget is $13.1M. A total of $4.0 million has been spent to
date for agency administration, preliminary engineering, temporary improvements, and
property acquisition and permits. The remaining budget should be sufficient to develop final
design documents, acquire platform leases and construct the interim station.
In an attempt to address future needs in the area, a culvert is proposed to be installed near
the Marina Beach property beneath both BNSF Railroad tracks, concurrent with the
construction of a second track. This will allow for the eventual daylighting of Willow Creek at
the time the Edmonds Crossing project is constructed.
Significant Activities since July 10, 2008
• July, 2008 – Sound Transit Sounder North monthly ridership reached a high of 28,783, up
from a high of 22,368 in July of 2007. Average weekday ridership for the month of July
was 1,163, an increase of 42% from an average weekday ridership of 817 in July of
2007.
2
• August, 2008 – Sound Transit Sounder North monthly ridership reached a high of 26,739,
up from a high of 22,133 in August of 2007. Average weekday ridership for the month
of August was 1,083, an increase of 30% from an average weekday ridership of 834 in
August of 2007.
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – The City Attorney and staff continue to
work with Sound Transit on Interlocal and Development Agreements related to the
Sound Transit Edmonds Commuter Rail Station.
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – City staff have been meeting regularly with
representatives from BNSF, Sound Transit, Community Transit, Washington State
Department of Transportation, and Washington State Ferries to discuss and review plans
and coordinate construction schedules related to Sound Transit Edmonds Commuter Rail
Station, BNSF second rail line, and City of Edmonds Lift Stations 7 and 8.
III. SOUND TRANSIT 2
Expanding the regional mass transit system
Sound Transit has placed a mass transit expansion proposal on the November 4 ballot. The
plan describes expansion of the existing regional light rail line, increases in parking, and
improved rider access to transit. The following link from the Sound Transit website will
connect you to information about Sound Transit’s Mass Transit Proposal:
http://future.soundtransit.org/
• July 24, 2008 – The Sound Transit Executive Board voted to place Sound Transit Phase 2
Transportation Package on the November 4, 2008 general election ballot. Contained
within the Phase 2 transportation package is $30M to help fund future permanent Sound
Transit Commuter Rail Station improvements.
IV. UNOCAL AKA CHEVRON SITE CLEANUP
Project Description
The UNOCAL property currently consists of a lower yard which currently contains petroleum
contamination resulting from more than 60 years of operation. Chevron, which acquired
UNOCAL, is now the entity responsible for cleaning up the site.
Significant Activities since July 10, 2008
• July 22, 2008 –Arcadis, working on behalf of Chevron, mobilized for Phase II. A
paramount necessity was/is to extract contaminants from groundwater in and around
the Lower Unocal site. Arcadis and Chevron/Unocal have been working directly with the
Department of Ecology on cleanup activities. Phase II of the Former Unocal Edmonds
Interim Action mainly consists of removing 1-foot of sediment from approximately 460
linear feet of Willow Creek. Prior to excavation, earthen berms were built across the
creek channel, and ponded water pumped around the excavation area. A wildlife
3
biologist was onsite to remove fish (if any appeared) and transport to either side of the
work area. Once the sediment was/is removed, the excavation area was/will be
backfilled and re-planted with native vegetation.
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – Chevron contractors continued cleanup
activities.
V. EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
Overview
The City Council, pursuant to state law, approved the formation of the Public Facilities District
(PFD) at its April 24, 2001 meeting. A PFD is a separate municipal corporation that has
authority to undertake the design, construction, operation, promotion and financing of a
Regional Center in the city. The Public Facilities District board consists of five members
originally appointed by the City Council on June 19, 2001. Phase 1A renovation of the
original Edmonds High School Auditorium into a first class Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA)
and multipurpose facility was completed in September of 2006.
• September 2008 – Commencement of Edmonds Center for the Arts 3rd Season.
VI. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PAINE FIELD
Overview
On July 14, 2004, a Mead & Hunt Inc. Business Travel Survey was issued which focused on
the market potential and options for Paine Field. On August 20, 2004, a Snohomish County
Citizen Cabinet issued an Economic Development Final Report -Blueprint for the Economic
Future of Snohomish County. Both reports put Paine Field in the regional spotlight as they
highlight the possibility of using Paine Field for commercial aircraft operations, thus changing
its general aviation status.
• October 2, 2008 – Horizon Air announced that it intends to pursue plans to introduce daily
air service from Paine Field near Everett, Wash., before next summer. The
announcement came after a 6-0 vote last month by the Everett City Council in favor of a
resolution supporting scheduled commercial flights at Paine Field. Horizon is considering
flights to Portland and Spokane.
VII. RAILROAD QUIET ZONE
4
Overview
As discussed on a few occasions, there is an expressed desire of the City Council and Port of
Edmonds to establish a full or partial quite zone along the City's shoreline. A quiet zone is a
section of rail line that contains one or more consecutive public crossings at which locomotive
horns are not routinely sounded.
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – City staff contacted and discussed several
issues related to establishing a partial or full quiet zone with BNSF, Sound Transit, and
WSDOT and the Washington Utility Transportation Commission.
VIII. WASHINGTON STATE FERRIES – FINANCING LEGISLATION
Overview
As mentioned in past Quarterly Reports, during the 2007 legislative session, the Legislature
passed Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 2358 - “the Ferry Bill” - and an associated
biennial transportation budget ESHB 1094. Each piece of legislation contains specific policy
and operational directives to assess the efficiency and costs related to how Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT)/Washington State Ferries (WSF) provides service.
The results of the studies conducted to address the legislation are intended to derive
strategies for how WSDOT/WSF operates in the future.
The legislation identifies specific topics for study and requires new levels of cooperation and
collaboration among the Legislature (through the Joint Transportation Committee (JTC) and
the new JTC Ferry Policy Subcommittee), the Washington State Transportation Commission
(WSTC), and WSDOT/WSF. These directives follow the December 2006 JTC Ferry Financing
Study (also referred to as Ferry Financing Phase 1) and are next steps in the process of
developing a policy framework to address the long-term sustainability of WSDOT/WSF.
An overall approach to the Technical Work Program is to treat the Legislative directives and
initiatives as a single work program and design an organizational approach that accomplishes
two major objectives, (1) effectively deliver the work plan elements in a timely manner and
(2) engage external stakeholders throughout this program for an objective outcome.
The WSF internal staffing structure for the Ferry Bill Work Program has three components:
o WSF Ferry Finance Workgroup has responsibility for the entire WSDOT/WSF
program.
o WSF Technical Working Teams are defined for each major work element. The work
groups have line responsibility for individual work plan elements and report to the WSF
Ferry Finance Workgroup. One WSF Ferry Finance Workgroup member serves as team
lead for each of the work teams.
o WSF Technical Coordination Team: The work team leads are responsible to ensure
the integration of work teams analysis and outcomes.
5
Given the importance and visibility of this work program, it is necessary to keep key
stakeholders informed throughout this process. As work is developed and reviewed by these
advisory teams, the results are shared with the Joint Transportation Committee and
Washington State Transportation Commission members and staff. These interactions are
both to share findings and get feedback on progress. To assist with the process, the
following teams, committees, and other entities have been requested to meet and discuss
the work program.
o Local agency review team. An agency review team is being formed to bring key local
agency staff together on a regular basis in a facilitated forum to review and discuss work
products. This will be a broad based group that would consist of staff from potentially
affected jurisdictions for review and comment on technical analyses. Membership of this
group is intended to be staff from transit partners, community technical staff (counties
and/or cities) and Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs).
o Ferry Advisory Committees. The FAC’s will be engaged starting in September
through the regular FAC process by reporting progress, sharing work products, and
offering opportunities for discussion at monthly Executive Committee meetings and public
meetings.
o Webpage and E-mail Listserv. A webpage will be created to provide the public with
current information on WSDOT/WSF efforts and also serve as mechanism to review
information and provide feedback. An e-mail listserv will be maintained and updates will
be sent as new information becomes available.
o City/County Councils and Chambers of Commerce. WSDOT/WSF will contact city
and county councils, and local chambers of commerce at key milestones to share progress
and offer briefings.
The draft scopes of work were developed based on the direction in the legislation. All
revisions will be judged against the “legislative filter” or what is specifically required of
WSDOT/WSF in the legislation.
• September 18, 2008 – The Local Agency Review Team met to discuss a variety of
topics including community outreach, current financial situation and funding
sustainability challenges, operational challenges and pricing strategies, future capital
needs, vehicle reservation system, transit enhancements and potential service
changes.
• September 25, 2008 – Washington State Ferries hosted a public meeting at the South
Snohomish County Senior Center in Edmonds. David Moseley, Assistant Secretary
Ferries Division of the Washington State Department of Transportation, presented a
Ferries System update and financial situation. Two Washington State Transportation
Commission members then presented an overview and update of the Long Term Ferry
Funding Study. According to the information presented during the meeting, a
6
preliminary screening report was completed in July, 2008. A draft funding plan is to be
completed in November 2008, and a final funding plan is to be completed in January,
2009. Washington State Ferries representatives also discussed the building blocks for
the Long Range Plan, specifically, how the Legislature (through the Joint
Transportation Committee (JTC) and the new JTC Ferry Policy Subcommittee), the
Washington State Transportation Commission (WSTC), and WSDOT/WSF, are
responding to the requirement of ESHB 2358. Additional topics discussed included
approaches to meeting growth needs, key operational challenges, potential vehicle
reservation system, pricing strategies, ferry service changes, and next steps.
Highlighted during the meeting was a discussion of key operational challenges. Using
current level of service (LOS) standards for vehicle congestion as a baseline, one key
future service challenge on the Edmonds/Kingston route is that the LOS standard
would be exceeded by year 2015 from May through the summer. Part of the
presentation included a discussion on what types of changes might be needed if
proposed strategies such as reservations, pricing, transit enhancements, etc., are not
enough to address needs related to growth. According to page 19 of Exhibit 4, an
initial change (Level 1) might result in a need to add a 3rd boat that carries less than
100 cars to the Edmonds/Kingston route, and an additional change (Level 2) might
result in adding a 3rd boat that carries more than 100 cars to the Edmonds /Kingston
route, in year 2015. Information presented at the meeting can be found at
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ferries/planning/ESHB2358.htm
IX. CITY OF EDMONDS / VERIZON FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
Overview
Verizon is now delivering “triple-play” (cable TV, internet and phone service) to its customers
within the City of Edmonds. As in every other city, in order to market cable TV services over
Fiber to the Premises (FTTP) within the City of Edmonds, a cable TV franchise is required.
• July 23, 2008 – The City Council conducted a second reading of, and approved, an
ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington granting a nonexclusive franchise to
Verizon Northwest, Inc. to construct, maintain, operate and repair a cable system to
provide cable services in, across, over, along, under, upon, through and below the public
rights-of-way of the City of Edmonds.
X. CITY OF EDMONDS / COMCAST FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
Overview
On July 14, 2008, the City of Edmonds received a letter dated July 10, 2008 from Stan Finley,
Comcast Director of Franchising and Government Affairs (Exhibit 2) regarding renewal of the
existing franchise agreement. While Comcast is asking to reach a mutually satisfactorily
7
agreement through an informal negotiation process pursuant to Section 626 of the 1984
Cable Act, the second paragraph of the Comcast letter also states “to preserve our statutory
rights to this formal procedure, this letter is our official notice to you invoking that provision.”
With a record of successfully negotiating Verizon franchise agreements, several members of
the North Puget Sound Consortium wish to form a new Consortium for the purposes of
negotiating franchise agreements with Comcast. Jurisdictions which have been invited to
participate include: Snohomish County, the Cities of Bothell, Carnation, Edmonds, Kenmore,
Lake Forest Park, Mercer Island, Shoreline, Woodinville, and the Town of Woodway.
Benefits of a coordinated effort include: ensuring that the public receives the maximum
rights and benefits from their respective franchise agreements; better coordination of
negotiations with Comcast; sharing the costs of negotiations including hiring a national
consultant and attorneys to assure the citizens of each jurisdiction that their franchise is
competitive, both locally and nationally; and creating a common template and negotiation
strategy through the assistance of a national consultant and attorneys to maximize leverage
during the negotiations.
• October 7, 2008 – The City Council 1) approved an Interlocal Agreement Consortium For
Negotiations of Cable Television Franchising for the purposes of renewing the incumbent
Franchise Agreement related to Comcast, 2) authorized Mayor Haakenson to sign on
behalf of the City, a Joint Representation Agreement, and 3) authorized expenditures in
the amount not to exceed $35,000; based on one year of projected costs.
Economic Development
I. PARTNERSHIPS
Goal 1, Policy 1f of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan is to partner with business and
economic development organizations, and address feedback from the business community.
• July, August, September and October 2008 – The City of Edmonds, Greater Edmonds
Chamber of Commerce, Edmonds Community College (EdCC), and Port of Edmonds
continued to develop tools for strengthening businesses and the business climate within
Edmonds. Our initial focus has been to promote various ways the Edmonds Community
College Business Training Center can help Edmonds’ businesses. Initial efforts included
promotion of EdCC workshops and training related to business planning, financial basics
and marketing. Business retention and expansion are highly important and we are
working to better structure an overall education and training program. Participation in
an enhanced education and training program helps business owners learn about, and
better understand, how to manage business related finances, marketing, accounting,
personnel related issues, help business owners adapt to changes in the
marketplace, better understand the fundamentals of owning and managing a
business, and help strengthen our community's economic base by creating a more
healthy business climate.
8
• July, August, September and October 2008 – See Item VI. Tourism, July, August,
September and October, 2008.
II. BUSINESS EXPANSION, RETENTION, AND DIVERSIFICATION OF TAX
BASE
Edmonds Economic Development Plan Goal 1, Policy 1a states: Encourage and expand
business expansion and retention programs. Goal 3 calls for diversifying the tax base and
increasing revenues to support local services.
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – I’ve continued working with property and
business owners in attempts to help them start new and relocate existing businesses in
addition to discussing potential leasing and redevelopment of buildings and land.
III. IMPROVING BUSINESS CLIMATE
Edmonds Economic Development Plan Goal 2, Policy 2h states: Work to identify and “brand”
distinct business districts, where there is a natural synergy, such as the Highway 99
International District, the Stevens Hospital Medical Corridor, and the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor.
Highway 99 Enhancement Project
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – Frances Chapin, Bertrand Hauss, Rob
English, and I continue to work with a consultant to finalize civil engineering, electrical
plans and artwork components, and to procure light poles prior to soliciting bids for
installation of the poles. The project includes adding street lighting fixtures and artwork
along the portion of Highway 99 passing through the International District.
• October 21, 2008 – The Edmonds City Council authorized the purchase of light poles and
electrical components for the SR99 International District enhancement project through
US Communities Interlocal Cooperative Purchasing Agreement.
Firdale Village
• August 13, 2008 – As a follow-up to meeting with Development Services and Economic
Development staff about concepts for redevelopment, the property owners presented a
proposed concept to the Planning Board on August 13, 2008.
V. TECHNOLOGY
Edmonds Economic Development Plan Goal, Policy 3b states: Leverage technology assets, such
as existing fiber connections, to pursue new revenue streams.
9
• July, August, September and October 2008 – The Economic Development and Community
Services staff continue to meet with the City’s Community Technology Advisory
Committee regarding existing technology assets, e.g., fiber and communications
equipment. To date, the City has worked to execute agreements with Stevens Hospital
and Edmonds Community College.
VI. TOURISM
Edmonds Economic Development Plan Goal 3, Policy 3g states: Expand tourism efforts to take
advantage of regional trends, such as nature tourism.
• July, August, September and October, 2008 – Cindi Cruz, Frances Chapin and I have been
writing narratives for the 2009 Greater Seattle InfoGuide, Community Trade and
Economic Development Official Tourism Guide, Snohomish County Visitor’s Guide, and
Washington State Hotel and Lodging Association Official Tourism Guide.
• September 12-14, 2008 – The fourth annual Puget Sound Bird Fest took place for the first
time in September, rather than May, which is the month the first three festivals were
held. The change proved successful. Five Hundred participants (the highest level of
participation to date) of all ages attended the three day festival. Although most
attendees were from Edmonds and surrounding communities in Snohomish and King
Counties, some people traveled from Eastern Washington, Oregon, Utah, and Brooklyn,
New York. Bird Fest included an art show with artists’ reception on Friday evening along
with a keynote speaker. There were 10 different speakers on Saturday and special
activities for children, as well as five field trips and guided walks. Bird-viewing stations
were set up at the Edmonds Marsh on Saturday and Brackett’s Landing Jetty on Sunday.
Sunday also included four additional field trips and tours of seven Backyard Wildlife
Habitats in Edmonds. Exhibits by non-profit organizations and vendors of bird-related
arts and crafts occupied the Edmonds Plaza Room Saturday and Sunday.
Items of Interest

Community Transit SWIFT Project
o July, August, September and October, 2008 – Construction of the concrete pads to
support the Swift stations will begin this fall, with station construction slated for early
2009. Swift is scheduled to begin operation in late 2009.
10

Unocal Pier Removal
o Washington State Ferries has been working on plans and bidding documents related
to removing the existing UNOCAL Pier. The pier is being removed to mitigate for
future environmental impacts associated with proposed Edmonds Crossing capital
improvements.
As mentioned in the July 2008 Edmonds Update, the pier removal will provide both
environmental and safety benefits. The project will remove creosote piles, as well as
remove other hazardous wastes that reside on the pier including lead, pcb's and
mercury. This action has been reviewed and approved by National Marine Fisheries
Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, WA Department of Ecology and U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers as a part of the SR104 Edmonds Crossing Final Environmental
Impact Statement.
11
AM-1867
WSLCB October list
2.F.
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Linda Carl
Submitted For:
Gary Haakenson
Department:
Mayor's Office
Review Committee:
Action:
Time:
Type:
Consent
Action
Information
Subject Title
List of Edmonds businesses applying for the renewal of their Washington State liquor licenses,
October 2008.
Please approve the attached list of businesses.
Narrative
The City Clerk's Office, the Police department, and the Mayor's Office have reviewed the attached
list and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the liquor
licenses for the listed businesses.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: WSLCB List
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox
Approved By
1
City Clerk
Sandy Chase
2
Mayor
Gary Haakenson
3
Carl
Date
Status
10/22/2008 10:02 AM
APRV
10/22/2008 10:21 AM
APRV
10/22/2008 12:04 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/22/2008 09:56
AM
AM-1872
2.G.
On-Call Emergency/Disaster Response Geotechnical, Environmental, Engineering
Services
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Conni Curtis
Submitted For:
Robert English
Department:
Engineering
Review Committee:
Action:
Time:
Type:
Consent
Action
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to the On-Call and
Emergency/Disaster Response Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering Services contract
with Landau Associates, Inc.
Council authorize the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with Landau Associates, Inc.
None
Narrative
In 2007, Landau Associates was hired in accordance with City purchasing policies to provide
on-call geotechnical and environmental engineering services. Landau Associates is one of three
firms who provide this on-call service to the City. A supplement agreement was executed last year
to expand Landau’s scope of work to provide Peer Review for Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard
Permits and to extend the contract duration thru 2008.
The current expenditures for this contract are approaching the annual limit of $30,000. The
Engineering Division is requesting that Council approve Supplemental Agreement No. 2, to raise
the annual limit to $50,000. Approval will allow staff to use Landau Associates for general on-call
work and permit peer reviews that may be required thru 2008.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Landau Supplemental Agreement 2
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq
1
2
3
Inbox
Engineering
Public Works
City Clerk
Approved By
Robert English
Noel Miller
Sandy Chase
Date
10/23/2008 05:38 PM
10/23/2008 05:42 PM
10/24/2008 08:20 AM
Status
APRV
APRV
APRV
4
Mayor
Gary Haakenson
5
Form Started By: Conni
Curtis
10/24/2008 09:29 AM
APRV
10/24/2008 09:36 AM
APRV
Started On: 10/23/2008 10:37
AM
AM-1874
Building Permit Application Timeline Change
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Duane Bowman
Department:
Development Services
Review Committee:
Action:
2.H.
Time:
Type:
Consent
Action
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance amending the provisions of Section 19.00.005 Section Amendments relating to the
amendments to the State Building Code to extend the life of building permit applications from 180
days to 360 days, and extensions from 180 days to 360 days.
Adopt the proposed ordinance.
The City Council considered this matter at the October 21, 2008 council meeting. The Council
approved the proposed change and directed the City Attorney to add a sunset clause to the
ordinance.
Narrative
The City Attorney has revised the draft ordinance to include a sunset clause as directed by the
City Council. It is attached as Exhibit 1.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Building Permit Applications Ordinance
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq
Inbox
1
City Clerk
2
Mayor
3
Final Approval
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Approved By
Sandy Chase
Gary Haakenson
Sandy Chase
Date
Status
10/23/2008 04:12 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 04:14 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 04:29 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/23/2008 04:04
PM
0006.9000
WSS/gjz
10/15/08
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 19.00.005 SECTION AMENDMENTS RELATING
TO THE AMENDMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING CODE
TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATIONS FROM 180 DAYS TO 360 DAYS, AND
EXTENSIONS FROM 180 DAYS TO 360 DAYS, PROVIDING
FOR SUNSET AND REINSTATEMENT OF EXISTING
PROVISIONS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the process of construction and application review can be expensive
and time consuming, and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to permit
applications to be valid for and extended for periods of 360 rather than 180 days in order to
permit applicants and staff time for adequate review and supplementation of materials, NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 19.00.005
Section Amendments is hereby amended to read as follows:
19.00.005
Section amendments.
The following sections of the IBC have been added, amended,
deleted or replaced as follows:
A.
Chapter 1, Administration.
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-1-
1.
Section 104.3 Notices and orders. The building official
shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance
with this code. The building official is also authorized to use
Chapter 20.110 ECDC for code compliance in addition to the
remedies provided for in this code.
2.
Section 105.1.1 Annual permit. Deleted.
3.
Section 105.1.2 Annual permit records. Deleted.
4.
Section 105.2 Work exempt from permit.
ECDC 19.00.010.
5.
Replaced by
Section 105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application.
a.
Applications, for which no permit is issued within 360
days following the date of application, shall expire by limitation,
and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be
returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
b.
The building official may extend the time for action by the
applicant for a period not exceeding 360 days prior to such
expiration date.
c.
No application shall be extended more than once for a total
application life of 720 days. In order to renew action on an
expired application, the applicant shall submit a new application,
revised plans based on any applicable code or ordinance change,
and pay new plan review fees.
6.
Section 105.5 Permit expiration and extension.
a.
Every permit issued under ECDC Title 19 shall expire by
limitation 360 days after issuance, except as provided in ECDC
19.00.005(A)(6)(b) and 19.10.010(A)(4)(a).
b.
The following permits shall expire by limitation, 180 days
after issuance and may not be extended:
i.
Demotion permits required by ECDC 19.00.030;
ii.
Permits for Moving Buildings required by Chapter 19.60
ECDC;
iii.
Mechanical permits;
iv.
Tank removal, tank fill, or tank placement permits;
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-2-
v.
Grading, excavation and fill permits;
vi.
Water service line permits;
vii.
Plumbing permits;
viii.
Gas piping permits;
ix.
Deck and dock permits;
x.
Fence permits;
xi.
Re-roof permits;
xii.
Rockery and retaining wall permits;
xiii.
Swimming pool, hot tub and spa permits;
xiv.
Sign permits;
xv.
Shoring permits;
xvi.
Foundation permits.
c.
Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may
request in writing an extension for an additional year. If the plans
and specifications for the permit extension application are the same
as the plans and specifications submitted for the original permit
application and provided there has been at least one (1) required
progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior
to the extension, the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be
charged at a rate of one half the original building permit fee to
extend the permit.
d.
If the applicant cannot complete work issued under an
extended permit within a total period of two (2) years, the
applicant may request in writing, prior to the second year
expiration, an extension for a third and final year. Provided there
has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by
the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall
be extended for a third and final year. In lieu of permit fees for the
third year extension, inspection fees shall be charged for the
remaining work based on the number of required inspections
remaining for the project for all city departments.
e.
The maximum amount of time any building permit may be
extended shall be a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three
(3) year period starting from the original date of permit issuance,
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-3-
the permit shall become null and void and a new building permit
shall be required, with full permit fees, in order for the applicant to
complete work. The voiding of the prior permit shall negate all
previous vesting of zoning or building codes. Whenever an appeal
is filed and a necessary development approval is stayed in
accordance with ECDC 20.105.020(B), the time limit periods
imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision.
f.
The building official may reject requests for permit
extension where he determines that modifications or amendments
to the applicable zoning and building codes have occurred since
the original issuance of the permit and/or modifications or
amendments would significantly promote public health and safety
if applied to the project through the issuance of a new permit.
7.
Section 105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit.
a.
In order to recommence work on an expired permit, a new
permit application with full permit fees shall be submitted to the
building official.
b.
New permit applications shall be reviewed under current
zoning and building codes in effect at the time of complete
application submittal. If a new permit is sought to recommence
work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested under
the codes in effect when an application for a new permit is
submitted which fully complies with ECDC 19.00.015. When
additional plan review is required, plan review fees shall be
charged.
8.
Section 106.3.3 Phased approval for multi-family and
commercial development.
a.
The building official may issue partial permits for phased
construction as part of a development before the entire plans and
specifications for the whole building or structure have been
approved provided architectural design board approval has been
granted.
b.
Phased approval means permits for grading, shoring and
foundation may be issued separately, provided concurrent approval
is granted by the planning manager, city engineer and fire marshal,
when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless
approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site
improvements including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm
drainage have been signed as approved by the city engineer.
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-4-
c.
With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be
posted with the city pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the
estimated cost of construction to city standards for the
improvements.
9.
Section 107 Temporary structures for uses. Deleted.
10.
Section 108 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC.
11.
Section 112 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
B.
Chapter 5, General Building Heights and Areas.
1.
Section 501.2 Premises identification. Approved numbers
or addresses shall be installed by the property owner for new
buildings in such a position as to be clearly visible and legible
from the street or roadway fronting the property. Letters or
numbers shall be a minimum six (6) inches in height and stroke a
minimum of .75 inch of a contracting color to the building base
color.
C.
Chapter 31, Special Construction.
1.
Section 3103 Temporary structures. Deleted.
2.
Section 3108.1.1 Radio, television
communication related equipment and devices.
and
cellular
a.
A permit is required for the installation or relocation of
commercial radio, television or cellular tower support structures
including monopoles, guyed or lattice towers, whip antennas, panel
antennas, parabolic antennas and related accessory equipment, and
accessory equipment shelters (regardless of size) including roof
mounted equipment shelters.
3.
Section 3109.1 Applicability and maintenance. Swimming
pools, hot tubs and spas of all occupancies shall comply with the
requirements of this section and other applicable sections of this
code.
a.
It is the responsibility of the owner to maintain the
swimming pool, hot tub or spa in a clean and sanitary condition
and all equipment maintained in a satisfactory operating condition
when the swimming pool, hot tub or spa is in use. A swimming
pool, hot tub or spa that is neglected, not secured from public entry
and/or not maintained shall be determined to be a hazard to health
and safety and shall be properly mitigated to the satisfaction of the
building official.
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-5-
4.
Section 3109.1.1 Permit required. It shall be unlawful for
any person to install, remove, alter, fill with material other than
water, repair or replace any swimming pool, hot tub or spa in a
building or on premises without first obtaining a permit to do such
work from the building official. Reference ECDC 19.00.010(K)
for permit exemptions.
5.
Section 3109.3 Public swimming pools. Deleted.
6.
Section 3109.4 Residential swimming pools. Deleted.
7.
Section 3109.6 Fences and gates.
a.
The swimming pool area shall be completely surrounded by
a substantial fence at least six (6) feet in height. No openings shall
be greater than two (2) inches, and a self-closing, self-latching gate
shall be provided, with an inside lock inaccessible to children aged
five (5) years or younger.
b.
The gate shall be securely locked when the swimming pool
is unattended.
c.
Any swimming pool not presently fenced as required by
this section shall be fenced within sixty (60) days of this code
adoption.
8.
Section 3109.7 Location and setbacks. Swimming pools,
hot tubs, and spas shall meet requirements of the zoning code of
the city of Edmonds.
a.
Minimum setbacks are measured from property lines to the
inside face of the pool, hot tub or spa as required by the zoning
code for accessory structures.
b.
All other accessory buildings and equipment shall meet the
normally required setbacks for accessory structures in the zone in
which they are located.
9.
Section 3109.8 Equipment foundations and enclosures.
a.
All mechanical equipment supported from the ground shall
rest on level concrete or other approved base extending not less
than three (3) inches above the adjoining ground level.
b.
All heating and electrical equipment, unless approved for
outdoor installation, shall be adequately protected against the
weather or installed within a building.
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-6-
10.
Section 3109.9Accessibility and clearances. Equipment
shall be so installed as to provide accessibility for cleaning,
operating, maintenance and servicing.
11.
Section 3109.10 Tests and cross connection devices.
a.
All swimming pool, hot tub and spa piping shall be
inspected and approved before being covered or concealed.
b.
Washington State Department of Health approved cross
connection devices are required to be provided when used to fill
any swimming pool, hot tub or spa.
12.
Section 3109.1 Wastewater disposal. A means of disposal
of the total contents of the swimming pool, hot tub or spa
(including partial or periodic emptying) shall be reviewed and
approved by the public works director.
a.
No direct connection shall be made between any swimming
pool, hot tub or spa to any storm drain, city sewer main, drainage
system, seepage pit, underground leaching pit, or sub-soil drain.
b.
A sanitary tee (outside cleanout installed on the man
building side sewer line) shall be provided for draining of treated
water into the cit sanitary sewer system.
13.
Section 3109.12 Inspection requirements. The appropriate
city inspector shall be notified for the following applicable
inspections:
a.
Footing, wall, pre-form, pre-gunite, erosion control,
underground plumbing, sanitary extension and cleanout,
mechanical pool equipment, gas piping, mechanical enclosure
location, cross connection and final inspection.
b.
An initial cross connection control installation inspection is
required by the city cross connection control specialist prior to the
final installation approval.
c.
All backflow assemblies shall be tested by state certified
backflow assembly testers upon initial installation and then
annually thereafter. Copies of all test reports shall be submitted to
the city water division for review and approval.
D.
Appendix E, Accessibility Requirements.
1.
Section E107 Signage. Deleted.
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-7-
2.
Section E108 Bus stops. Deleted.
3.
Section E108 Airports, Deleted.
4.
Section E111, Referenced standards. Deleted
E.
Appendix H, Signs.
1.
Section H101.2 Signs exempt from permits. Replaced by
ECDC 19.00.010(A0.
2.
Section H101.2.1 Prohibited signs.
a.
It is unlawful for any person to advertise or display any
visually communicated message, by letter or pictorially, of any
kind on any seating bench, or in direct connection with any bench.
b.
All signs not expressly permitted by Chapter 20.60 ECDC.
c.
Signs which the city engineer determines to be a hazard to
vehicle or pedestrian traffic because they resemble or obscure a
traffic control device or pose a hazard to a pedestrian walkway or
because they obscure visibility needed for safe traffic passage.
Such signs shall be immediately removed at the request of the city
engineer.
d.
All signs which are located within a public right-of-way
and that have been improperly posted or displayed are hereby
declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to immediate
removal and confiscation per ECDC 20.50.090.
3.
Section H104 Identification. Deleted.
4.
Section H106.1.1 Internally illuminated signs. Deleted.
5.
Section H107 Combustible materials. Deleted.
6.
Section H108 Animated devices. Deleted.
7.
Section H109.1 Height restrictions. Deleted.
8.
Section H110 Roof signs. Deleted.
F.
Appendix J, Grading.
1.
Section J103.2 Exemptions. Replaced by 19.00.010(M).
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-8-
Section 2. Sunset Date. Section 1 of this ordinance amends limited provisions of
ECDC Section 19.00.005 contained in Subsection A(5). The changes to A(5) shall automatically
expire and be at an end two years from the effective date of this ordinance. Upon this expiration
date, the existing provisions of Section A(5) shall revive, to-wit:
A.
Chapter 1, Administration.
…
5.
Section 105.3.2 Time Limitation of Permit Application.
a.
Applications, for which no permit is issued within 180 days
following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and
plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be
returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
b.
The building official may extend the time for action by
applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days prior to such
expiration date.
c.
No application shall be extended more than once for a total
application life of 360 days. In order to renew action on an expired
application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised
plans based on any applicable code or ordinance change, and pay
new plan review fees.
...
Upon reinstatement of the prior provisions, all permits and extensions issued under
subsection 5(A) prior to the Sunset Date shall remain valid for 360 days, but extensions which
are approved or processed following the Sunset Date shall be governed by the newly reinstated
provisions. For example, an application which vested under the 360-day provision of Section
5(A) but which was extended under the revived revisions shall be limited to 540 days in total
application life. All applications pending at the effective date of this ordinance shall be governed
by its provisions as if vested by complete application after its effective date.
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
-9-
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
- 10 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2008, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 19.00.005 SECTION AMENDMENTS RELATING TO THE
AMENDMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING CODE TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FROM 180 DAYS TO 360 DAYS, AND
EXTENSIONS FROM 180 DAYS TO 360 DAYS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2008.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS708117.DOC;1/00006.900000/}-
11 -
AM-1868
Sister City Proclamation
3.
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Linda Carl
Submitted For:
Gary Haakenson
Department:
Mayor's Office
Review Committee:
Action:
Time:
Type:
10 Minutes
Information
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in honor of the 20th anniversary of the Sister City relationship with Hekinan,
Japan.
Narrative
This year is the 20th anniversary of the Sister City relationship between the City of Edmonds and
Hekinan, Japan. The Sister City relationship was established on April 5, 1988 to promote
goodwill, tourism, and trade between the two regions. Since that time there have been ongoing
exchanges of students, adult delegations, artists, and artwork that have united the two cities. In
April 2008 a delegation from Edmonds led by the Mayor visited Hekinan to celebrate the 20 years
of friendship, and in October 2008 a delegation led by the Mayor of Hekinan is visiting Edmonds.
The visitors will be engaged in a week of activities, including discussions with City officials,
cultural events, sightseeing, and participation in Edmonds Halloween. The delegation includes two
artist groups who will perform at the Edmonds Center for the Arts on Wednesday, October 29,
from 10 a.m. to noon as part of a Cultural Fair, presented by the Sister City Commission. The
Cultural Fair is free and open to the public.
Tonight, the delegation from Hekinan will be introduced at City Council and honored with a
proclamation recognizing the 20th anniversary of the Sister City relationship.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Proclamation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox
1
City Clerk
2
Mayor
3
Final Approval
Approved By
Sandy Chase
Gary Haakenson
Sandy Chase
Date
Status
10/22/2008 02:16 PM
APRV
10/22/2008 02:20 PM
APRV
10/22/2008 02:22 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/22/2008 01:59
Carl
Started On: 10/22/2008 01:59
PM
AM-1876
Annual Report of the Library Board
5.
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Brian McIntosh
Department:
Parks and Recreation
Review Committee:
Action:
Time:
Type:
15 Minutes
Information
Information
Subject Title
Annual report from the Library Board.
Acknowledge the efforts of the Edmonds Library Board.
None
Narrative
Assisted by Library Board members and Managing Librarian Lesly Kaplan, Board President
Wendy Kendall will present the Annual Report.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox
1
City Clerk
2
Mayor
3
Final Approval
Form Started By: Brian
McIntosh
Approved By
Sandy Chase
Gary Haakenson
Sandy Chase
Date
Status
10/23/2008 04:44 PM
APRV
10/24/2008 07:03 AM
APRV
10/24/2008 08:20 AM
APRV
Started On: 10/23/2008 04:41
PM
AM-1869
Aquatic Center Feasibility Study
6.
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Brian McIntosh
Department:
Parks and Recreation
Review Committee:
Action:
Time:
Type:
15 Minutes
Action
Information
Subject Title
Discussion and authorization of the aquatic center feasibility study contract.
Authorize Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with NAC / Architecture to conduct an
Aquatic Center Feasibility Study.
On August 5, 2008 City Council authorized staff to advertise for Statements of Qualifications
(SOQ's) from consulting firms to perform an Aquatics Center Feasibility Study.
Narrative
Through a comprehensive selection process a team of staff and citizens reviewed eight SOQ's,
interviewed four firms and their consultant teams, and selected one consultant and their team,
NAC / Architecture, as the preferred firm. NAC and their team have extensive experience
with feasibility studies throughout the country and the northwest, including Renton, Northshore,
and Lynnwood. All references for this firm were positive and expressed satisfaction.
To help guide the decision making process for Edmonds' aquatic future, this study will provide:
1. Market analysis, economic impact, site analysis, conceptual ideas, preliminary construction
costs, maintenance and operations costs and funding options.
2. Multiple opportunities for citizen involvement through public workshops.
3. An unbiased citizen survey.
Staff has negotiated the attached scope and fee schedule which is:
Fee
$62,690
Reimbursables (primarily travel)
$10,800
Total contract amount
$73,490
In addition, staff will secure a local independent survey firm to conduct a valid statistical survey to
gauge the general support of Edmonds' citizens. The cost is estimated to be approximately
$10,000.
Total project cost will be $83,490 to be paid from planning funds in the Parks Improvement Fund
125.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Aquatic Feasibility Consultant Agreement
Link: Aquatic Feasibility Scope & Fee
Link: Aquatic Feasibility Approach & Undersatnding
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox
1
City Clerk
2
Mayor
3
Final Approval
Form Started By: Brian
McIntosh
Approved By
Sandy Chase
Gary Haakenson
Sandy Chase
Date
Status
10/23/2008 03:28 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 03:29 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 04:12 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/22/2008 09:00
PM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter
referred to as the "City", and NAC/Architecture, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant";
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a
consulting firm to provide an Aquatic Center Feasibility Study.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and
between the parties hereto as follows:
1.
Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material
necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives (not including a city-wide public survey
that will be conducted separately by the City) in accordance with the Scope of Services that is
marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2.
Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for
services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,
equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be
on a percent of completion basis as set forth with the lump sum fee found in Exhibit A, provided,
in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of
$62,690 and with reimbursable expense not to exceed $10,800.
B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each
voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City biweekly during the
progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed
in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that
has not been submitted to the Parks & Recreation Director three days prior to the scheduled cutoff date. Such late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next
regular payment cycle.
C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three years after final
payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
3.
Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data
and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the
services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the
Consultant and shall not be considered public records, provided, however, that:
A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant
shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and
shall at that date become public records.
B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and,
subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product.
C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the
event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work
product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination,
shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The summary of work done shall be prepared
at no additional cost.
4.
Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by
this Agreement promptly in accordance with theschedule established by mutual agreement in the
Project Initiation Meeting, provided, however, that in no event shall the schedule provide for a
completion date later than March 20, 2009.
5.
Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City
and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all
claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant’s
negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing herein
shall require a Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims,
demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and employees;
and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent
negligence of (a) the Consultant’s agents or employees, and (b) the City, its agents, officers and
employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such
negligence (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and
enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence or the negligence of the
Consultant’s agents or employees.
The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics
laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by
municipal officers. The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by
the Consultant’s own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this
indemnification and defense, the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state
industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW.
6.
General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and
keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following
insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner
pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
2
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance as required by the State.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not
less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property
damage. The per occurrence amount shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one
million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000).
Excepting the Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured
by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The
Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the
Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State
of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within
fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the
City.
The Consultant’s professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under
this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified
elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant’s professional liability to third
parties be limited in any way.
7.
Discrimination prohibited.
Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin
or physical handicap.
8.
Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an
independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or
representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of
the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents,
employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this contract.
9.
City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's
status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this contract must
meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this agreement, the Consultant shall not
perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or
for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written
notification to the City and the City’s prior written consent.
10.
Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party
may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such
termination no fewer than ten days in advance of the effective date of said termination.
3
11.
Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document
and the Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A. These writings constitute the entire
Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties.
In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibit A, this
Agreement shall control.
The City may engage Consultant to perform
12.
Changes/Additional Work.
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to
additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be
liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation
is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are
encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a
revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in
this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for
services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment
to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties.
13.
Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary
knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and
any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a
professional manner consistent with sound engineering practices, in accordance with the
schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for
services of the type described in the Scope of Services.
14.
Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
15.
Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the contractor shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
16.
Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or
resulting from the award of making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from
the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
17.
Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement
shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including
regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and
licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to
assure quality of services.
The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes
which may be due on account of this Agreement.
4
18.
Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address:
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department
City of Edmonds
700 Main Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
NAC / Architecture
1203 West Riverside Avenue
Spokane, WA 99201-1107
Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the
U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed.
DATED THIS _______ DAY OF __________________, 2008.
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSULTANT:
By
By
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Its
ATTEST:
________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
City Attorney
5
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF
)
)ss
)
day of
, 2008, before me, the undersigned, a
On this
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared
, to me known to be the
of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said
instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
6
City of Edmonds
Aquatic Feasibility Study
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK OUTLINE AND FEE (DRAFT 4)
October 15, 2008
Design Team
NAC|Architecture – NAC
Water Technology, Inc. – WTI
Ballard King Associates – BKA
Project Overview
In preparation for the first meeting, relevant existing documents will be provided by the
Planning Committee to the Design Team to provide background information. Data review
includes:
Previously completed studies and documents from previous planning efforts
Existing aquatic center programs and services
Relevant plans, policies and procedures
List of service area providers
List of Potential Site Options (see Evaluate Site Options below)
Project Initiation Meeting (one trip- NAC, BKA, WTI)
Meeting attendees include the Planning Committee, NAC, BKA and WTI
Meeting minutes will not be produced; however, the following agenda items will be
documented:
Establish goals and objectives
Identify project constraints and parameters
Identify potential site options
Identify service area
Develop public participation strategy
This outline suggests components of the Public Participation process as a
starting point for discussion and may be modified as a result of the meeting.
The Planning Committee will assist in identifying all key stakeholders and
will be responsible for invitations and advertisements for public events.
Develop Work Plan and Schedule
This outline will be the basis for development of a Work Plan. The Work
Plan will identify tasks, specific work products or deliverables, meeting
dates and completion times.
Existing Facilities Review (tours same day as Initiation Meeting)
The Planning Committee will assist the Design Team in identifying service area providers,
preferably before the Initiation Meeting. Tours of Yost Park Pool and other facilities, if
necessary, will take place the day of the Initiation Meeting. Existing facility review
includes:
Tour Yost Park Pool and interview personnel
Tour service area aquatic facilities if necessary
Compile information
Existing data will be compiled by the Design Team in a format suitable for
presentation as needed.
Evaluate Site Options (site visits same day as Initiation Meeting)
Sites identified by the Planning Committee will be visited and evaluated. Potential site
options will be limited to 3-4 sites:
Visit potential sites identified by the Planning Committee
Yost Park Pool will be included as a potential site
Establish Site Criteria
Based on information generated thus far, criteria such as size, location,
proximities, adjacencies, topography, infrastructure, etc. will be established
by the Design Team for review and discussion with the Planning
Committee.
Analyze Site Options
Site options will be evaluated and catalogued by the Design Team. Site
analysis is limited to that information that can be determined visually or
from review of available existing documentation. The site analysis does not
include a site survey, soils analysis, traffic studies, verification of utilities,
property value appraisal, etc.
Determine Site Preferences
Based on the site analysis, preferences will be discussed to determine the
preferred site or sites. A strategy for addressing site alternatives with the
public will also be discussed.
Market Analysis
Based on the identified service area, a market analysis will be conducted. Components of
the market analysis are as follows:
Demographic characteristics/community profile
Population/age range/income
Businesses/schools
Trends
Review of existing city aquatic center/programs/services
Master plan/existing studies
Organizational structure/wage scales
Department policies and procedures
Existing aquatic program statistics
Demand for programs/services and facilities
Competitive market analysis
Alternative aquatic service providers
Facilities and services offered
Admission rates/attendance numbers
Comparison with national, regional and local participation statistics and trends
NSGA standards
Potential participation levels
Engage Public Participation (one trip- NAC, BKA, WTI- open house and stakeholder
interview to occur on the same day)
Components of the public participation process are as follows:
Review any existing public input from previous planning efforts
Conduct Public Survey
The public survey would be conducted through a separate agreement with
the City outside this Scope of Work. The survey is anticipated to be a
random statistically valid survey of potential users. The Design Team
would provide assistance in developing survey questions and in evaluating
and interpreting survey results.
Conduct Public Open House Meeting
The purpose of the initial Open House Meeting will be to determine the
level of satisfaction with current facilities, determine priorities and
concerns, educate the public, assess willingness to pay and to generate
excitement. The Planning Committee will be responsible for advertising
the Open House. Invitations to special interest groups will be included.
Conduct stakeholder interview (1 interview session)
Identify key community leaders and project influence individuals
Conduct interview to gain responses from these individuals/groups
Compile and interpret all information received
Develop Project Options (one trip- NAC, WTI)
In collaboration with the Planning Committee, options will be suggested and discussed to
respond to information gathered thus far, including site option preferences.
Program options to meet identified needs
Options for a functional program will be developed by the Design Team
Propose Project Concepts (2-4 options)
Utilizing all previous information as a foundation, the design will suggest
concepts for addressing aquatics needs. Concepts will be briefly identified
only as necessary to define the idea and general cost range with minimal
graphics or development. This information will be used for review with the
Planning Committee to determine concept preferences and to present to the
public.
Determine Public Reaction/Preferences (one trip- NAC, BKA, WTI)
Conduct second Public Open House Meeting
The purpose of the second Open House Meeting will be to update the public on the
planning process, describe the ideas and concerns that have been addressed (or not
incorporated and why), and present concepts that have been proposed to determine
public reactions and preferences. As with the previous Open House, the Planning
Committee will be responsible for advertising the Open House. Invitations to key
stakeholders and special interest groups will be included.
Develop Project Concept
With information from the Public Open House, results of Stakeholder Interviews and the
Focus Group Sessions, and input from the Planning Committee, a preferred concept will be
further developed. Concept development will include the following:
Conceptual site plan
Plan may be on a generic or specific site depending on the results of the site
options evaluation
Conceptual floor plan
Conceptual image for proposed facility
Simple 3D computer image
Project capital cost budget/estimate
Operations Analysis
Attendance estimates
Daily
Annually/seasonally
By facility and/or component
Fee structure
Drop-in
Multiple admissions/annual/season passes
Family, corporate, group
Rentals
Sources of income
Identification and verification of revenue sources
Operating cost projections
Develop a line item budget
Personnel by position
Contractual services
Commodities
Capital replacement
Revenue generation projections
Develop a line item accounting
Admissions
Annual/multiple admissions
Programs and services
Rentals
Other revenue sources
Revenue/expenditure comparisons
Project Funding Analysis
Identify possible funding sources
Tax increase
Fundraising
Donations
Grants
Partnerships
Determine possible funding scenario
Capital
Operations
Final Report (one trip- NAC, BKA)
Written final report
Information will be provided in format as desired by the City of Edmonds
Present Final Report to Edmonds Planning Board and City Council
Total Fee
Not including survey or reimbursables
$62,690
Estimated Reimbursables
$10,800
cl/P:\111-08072\100\102\102a\102a-Scope_of_Work-Draft4-081015.doc
AM-1875
Date:
10/28/2008
Submitted By:
Duane Bowman
Department:
Development Services
Review Committee:
Action:
7.
Time:
Type:
10 Minutes
Information
Information
Subject Title
Narrative
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director, will make a presentation on the Highway 99
Task Force covering the history of the task force and current activities.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq
Inbox
1
City Clerk
2
Mayor
3
Final Approval
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Approved By
Sandy Chase
Gary Haakenson
Sandy Chase
Date
Status
10/23/2008 04:12 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 04:14 PM
APRV
10/23/2008 04:29 PM
APRV
Started On: 10/23/2008 04:06
PM

Agenda Cover

Transcription

Similar documents

EDMONDS

616 Elizabeth Street

Event Flyer - City of Orange

Summer Work for Students Entering AP Calculus AB

Potty Break Rack Card-version2

Busy Lizzy Jan.indd