Alapaha - Georgia Municipal Association
Transcription
Alapaha - Georgia Municipal Association
Demographic Profile: Alapaha [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] Contents • Decennial 2010 Profile • Technical Notes, Decennial Profile • ACS 2010-14 Profile • Technical Notes, ACS Profile [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] ALAPAHA Decennial 2010 Profile Sex and Age Alapaha 85 and over Males 80−84 Females 75−79 70−74 65−69 60−64 55−59 50−54 45−49 40−44 35−39 30−34 25−29 20−24 15−19 10−14 5−9 Under 5 40 20 0 20 40 Georgia 85 and over Males 80−84 Females 75−79 70−74 65−69 60−64 55−59 50−54 45−49 40−44 35−39 30−34 25−29 20−24 15−19 10−14 5−9 Under 5 400,000 200,000 0 2 200,000 400,000 Decennial 2010 Profile ALAPAHA Race and Latino Origin Alapaha 0%3%1% 35% Non−Hispanic White Non−Hispanic Black Non−Hispanic Asian Hispanic/Latino Other 61% Georgia 9% 2% 3% Non−Hispanic White Non−Hispanic Black Non−Hispanic Asian 56% 30% Hispanic/Latino Other 3 ALAPAHA Decennial 2010 Profile Housing Tenure Alapaha 20% 22% Owner−occupied with mortgage Owner−occupied free and clear Renter−occupied Vacant 24% 34% Georgia 12% 43% Owner−occupied with mortgage Owner−occupied free and clear Renter−occupied 30% Vacant 15% 4 Decennial 2010 Profile ALAPAHA Households by Type Alapaha 37% 38% Husband−wife family Single−headed family Non−family 25% Georgia 31% Husband−wife family 48% Single−headed family Non−family 21% 5 ALAPAHA Decennial 2010 Profile Children by Household Type Alapaha 1% 21% 39% Own parent(s), husband−wife family Own parent, single−parent family Other relative Non−relative or group quarters 40% Georgia 2% 12% Own parent(s), husband−wife family Own parent, single−parent family Other relative 28% 57% 6 Non−relative or group quarters Decennial 2010 Profile ALAPAHA SEX AND AGE Total population Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 10 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 24 years 25 to 29 years 30 to 34 years 35 to 39 years 40 to 44 years 45 to 49 years 50 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 to 69 years 70 to 74 years 75 to 79 years 80 to 84 years 85 years and over Number 668 44 41 45 50 34 37 39 44 40 46 48 44 39 40 34 21 12 10 Percent 100.0% 6.6% 6.1% 6.7% 7.5% 5.1% 5.5% 5.8% 6.6% 6.0% 6.9% 7.2% 6.6% 5.8% 6.0% 5.1% 3.1% 1.8% 1.5% Median age (years) 40.0 (X) 16 years and over 18 years and over 21 years and over 62 years and over 65 years and over 526 510 480 139 117 78.7% 76.3% 71.9% 20.8% 17.5% Male population Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 10 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 24 years 25 to 29 years 30 to 34 years 35 to 39 years 40 to 44 years 45 to 49 years 50 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 to 69 years 70 to 74 years 75 to 79 years 80 to 84 years 85 years and over 306 21 17 24 31 18 12 16 24 17 21 20 17 16 17 13 9 8 5 45.8% 3.1% 2.5% 3.6% 4.6% 2.7% 1.8% 2.4% 3.6% 2.5% 3.1% 3.0% 2.5% 2.4% 2.5% 1.9% 1.3% 1.2% 0.7% Median age (years) 38.0 (X) 16 years and over 18 years and over 21 years and over 234 35.0% 227 34.0% 210 31.4% Continued on next page... 7 ALAPAHA Decennial 2010 Profile SEX AND AGE (Continued) 62 years and over 65 years and over Number 57 52 Percent 8.5% 7.8% Female population Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 10 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 24 years 25 to 29 years 30 to 34 years 35 to 39 years 40 to 44 years 45 to 49 years 50 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 to 69 years 70 to 74 years 75 to 79 years 80 to 84 years 85 years and over 362 23 24 21 19 16 25 23 20 23 25 28 27 23 23 21 12 4 5 54.2% 3.4% 3.6% 3.1% 2.8% 2.4% 3.7% 3.4% 3.0% 3.4% 3.7% 4.2% 4.0% 3.4% 3.4% 3.1% 1.8% 0.6% 0.7% Median age (years) 42.6 (X) 16 years and over 18 years and over 21 years and over 62 years and over 65 years and over 292 283 270 82 65 43.7% 42.4% 40.4% 12.3% 9.7% RACE Number Percent 668 100.0% 665 99.6% 242 36.2% 411 61.5% 1 0.1% 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 1.5% 3 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.3% 0 0.0% Continued on next page... Total population One Race White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Native Asian Asian Indian Chinese Filipino Japanese Korean Vietnamese Other Asian Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander Some Other Race Two or More Races White; American Indian and Alaska Native White; Asian White; Black or African American White; Some Other Race 8 Decennial 2010 Profile ALAPAHA RACE (Continued) Race alone or in combination with one or more other races: White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Some Other Race Number 244 414 2 1 0 10 36.5% 62.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 1.5% HISPANIC OR LATINO Total population Hispanic or Latino (of any race) Mexican Puerto Rican Cuban Other Hispanic or Latino Not Hispanic or Latino Number 668 23 17 3 1 2 645 Percent 100.0% 3.4% 2.5% 0.4% 0.1% 0.3% 96.6% HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population Hispanic or Latino White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some Other Race alone Two or More Races Not Hispanic or Latino White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some Other Race alone Two or More Races Number 668 23 9 4 0 0 0 10 0 645 233 407 1 1 0 0 3 Percent 100.0% 3.4% 1.3% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 96.6% 34.9% 60.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% RELATIONSHIP Total population In households Householder Spouse Child Own child under 18 years Other relatives Under 18 years 65 years and over Nonrelatives Under 18 years 65 years and over Number 668 668 290 107 200 124 58 33 5 13 1 2 Percent 100.0% 100.0% 43.4% 16.0% 29.9% 18.6% 8.7% 4.9% 0.7% 1.9% 0.1% 0.3% 10 1.5% Unmarried partner In group quarters Institutionalized population Male Female Noninstitutionalized population Percent 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Continued on next page... 9 ALAPAHA Decennial 2010 Profile RELATIONSHIP (Continued) Male Female Number 0 0 Percent 0.0% 0.0% HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE Total households Family households (families) With own children under 18 years Husband-wife family With own children under 18 years Male householder, no wife present With own children under 18 years Female householder, no husband present With own children under 18 years Nonfamily households Householder living alone Male 65 years and over Female 65 years and over Number 290 180 64 107 32 8 1 65 31 110 102 48 13 54 22 Percent 100.0% 62.1% 22.1% 36.9% 11.0% 2.8% 0.3% 22.4% 10.7% 37.9% 35.2% 16.6% 4.5% 18.6% 7.6% 78 86 26.9% 29.7% 2.30 3.03 (X) (X) Number 364 290 74 12 2 6 5 6 43 Percent 100.0% 79.7% 20.3% 3.3% 0.5% 1.6% 1.4% 1.6% 11.8% 2.8 11.8 (X) (X) Number 290 202 461 2.28 88 207 2.35 Percent 100.0% 69.7% (X) (X) 30.3% (X) (X) Households with individuals under 18 years Households with individuals 65 years and over Average household size Average family size HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units Occupied housing units Vacant housing units For rent Rented, not occupied For sale only Sold, not occupied For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use All other vacants Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) Rental vacancy rate (percent) HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units Owner-occupied housing units Population in owner-occupied housing units Average household size of owner-occupied units Renter-occupied housing units Population in renter-occupied housing units Average household size of renter-occupied units Notes: ∞ Data could not be computed (see Technical Notes). Report prepared by Emory University’s Policy Analysis Laboratory and Terra Cognita Consulting, LLC in cooperation with Neighborhood Nexus. 10 Technical Notes, Decennial Profile This report features demographic profiles based on the Census Bureaus 2010 Census of Population and Housing. These profiles follow precisely the order, format, and content of the DP-1 profiles available via the Census Bureaus American Fact Finder online system. Why is there so much less data in this report than in the 2000 Demographic Profiles? The short answer is that the 2010 Census form asked only 10 questions, and that many items of interest (e.g. income, educational attainment, employment status, rents paid) no longer appear on the questionnaire. A longer answer involves a bit of history to understand recent changes in how the Census Bureau collects data. First, it is worth noting that the decennial census is a constitutional requirement– Article I, Section 2 requires an enumeration of inhabitants once every 10 years to determine apportionment of the House of Representatives. But the only constitutional requirement is the count itself; the government has long seen fit to gather other data about the nation as an add-on to this process. Indeed, from 1940 until 2000, the Census Bureau actually conducted a census (counting of the entire population) simultaneously with a survey (measuring a sample of the population) simultaneously: most households received a ”short form” with basic questions (e.g. age, sex, race), while a ”long form” with everything contained on the ”short form” plus many other topics (e.g. educational attainment, occupation, income) was administered to a sample of households (varied by year and other factors, but roughly 1 in 7 households). Because the decennial census takes place only once every ten years, it provides a single ”snapshot” of the country. But policymakers wanted to have more timely data, so the Census Bureau moved to a new ”continuous measurement” model followed by the American Community Survey (ACS), which had its nationwide launch in 2005. The ACS is a nationwide survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau on a continuous, rolling basis. It is intended to replace the ”long form” that has been a component of the decennial census for the last several decades. So will the most recent ACS fill in for the missing 2010 data? Though the ACS is intended to replace the decennial long form, it is not a direct substitute. The two differ in many important ways, but we will focus on a few key points. First, as mentioned above, the ”continuous measurement” model means that the ACS is not a snapshot for any particular point in time. So while the decennial census measured where people lived on Census Day (historically April 1st of years ending in 0), the ACS looks at where people live on the day they are surveyed. For example, ACS income measures look at the 12-month period preceding the survey date, while the decennial looked at the previous calendar year. Second, the ACS sample is much smaller than that of the decennial census: roughly 2.5% each year. Even pooling the data over a 5-year period yields a combined sample of only about 12.5%, considerably smaller than the roughly 16.7% sampled in the decennial census; the implications of this smaller sample on the margin of error for estimates is discussed below. Third, the pooling across years required to yield a decent-sized sample for smaller areas creates complications for interpretation. Whereas the decennial census allowed one to say, ”on April 1, 2000, X% of the population in region Y was unemployed,” we must now say ”over the course of the period 2005-2009, on average X% of the population in region Y was unemployed.” When faced with a period of rapid change such as the onset of the ”Great Recession,” having a pooled estimate over a 5-year period is much less helpful than having a firm snapshot at a single point in time. So while the ACS has been of great help to policymakers interested in the effects of the Great Recession on large geographies such as states, counties, and major cities (areas for which 1-year or 3-year estimates are available), it has created new challenges for people interested in small cities and neighborhoods within larger cities. To learn more about the ACS, how to use it, and how it differs from the decennial census, please refer to the 1 Census Bureau’s publication A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What General Data Users Need to Know. How do you estimate medians, and why cannot they be estimated all of the time? The median is that value that marks the 50% line in a population: 50% of the population is above the median and 50% is below. With individual level data, one can simply sort the data and find the middle value (if the number of items is odd) or take the average of the two middlemost values (if the number of items is even). However, the Census Bureau reports grouped data, e.g. how many households fall into a particular income range. Estimating medians from grouped data involves finding the range that contains the middlemost value, then estimating the point within that range that the middlemost value would occupy. The median cannot be estimated if it falls within a range lacking a minimum or maximum value. Why do you note that some figures are based on tract-level data? The Census Bureau reports most of the data used in this report at the census block level, a very granular level of geography. However, some data are reported only for census tracts, which are generally much larger. Because the geographic areas in this report are built from blocks, data reported only for tracts must be re-estimated to the block level. We do this by assigning tract-level data to blocks based on the proportion of the tract population residing within each block comprising that tract. Why do you note that certain fields in this report may differ slightly from DP-1 totals? A very small number of data fields were reported differently in the SF1 release (where block-level data are made available) and in the DP-1 release (data released no lower than the tract. For example, the question of whether Chinese and Taiwanese are the same nationality was handled differently in the two releases. Though minor, these differences are flagged in our reports. 2 ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile Percent without a High School Diploma or GED 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Georgia Percent with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Note: Bars represent the margin of error around each estimated value. 2 Georgia ACS 2010-14 Profile ALAPAHA Percent Foreign-Born 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Georgia Percent Speaking a Language other than English at Home 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Note: Bars represent the margin of error around each estimated value. 3 Georgia ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile Percent Owner-Occupied 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Georgia Median Value of Owner-Occupied Housing Units 500,000 400,000 Dollars 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Alapaha Berrien County Note: Bars represent the margin of error around each estimated value. 4 Southern Georgia Georgia ACS 2010-14 Profile ALAPAHA Homeowner Vacancy Rate 100 80 Rate 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Georgia Rental Vacancy Rate 100 80 Rate 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Note: Bars represent the margin of error around each estimated value. 5 Georgia ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile Percent of Homeowners for whom Selected Monthly Owner Costs Exceed 30% of Income 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Georgia Percent of Housing Units Built Since 2000 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Note: Bars represent the margin of error around each estimated value. 6 Georgia ACS 2010-14 Profile ALAPAHA Percent of Persons Living outside Home County 1 Year Earlier 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Georgia Median Household Income 160,000 Dollars 120,000 80,000 40,000 0 Alapaha Berrien County Note: Bars represent the margin of error around each estimated value. 7 Southern Georgia Georgia ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile Percent Civilian Unemployed 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Georgia Percent in Poverty 100 80 Percent 60 40 20 0 Alapaha Berrien County Southern Georgia Note: Bars represent the margin of error around each estimated value. 8 Georgia ACS 2010-14 Profile ALAPAHA Selected Social Characteristics HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE Total households Family households (families) With own children under 18 years Married-couple family With own children under 18 years Male householder, no wife present, family With own children under 18 years Female householder, no husband present, family With own children under 18 years Nonfamily households Householder living alone 65 years and over Estimate 231 148 67 70 31 17 0 61 36 83 71 31 Margin of Error ±63 ±47 ±40 ±30 ±25 ±22 ±13 ±31 ±28 ±40 ±38 ±29 Percent 231 64.1% 29.0% 30.3% 13.4% 7.4% 0.0% 26.4% 15.6% 35.9% 30.7% 13.4% Margin of Error (X) ±10.4 ±15.3 ±10.0 ±10.2 ±9.3 ±5.6 ±11.3 ±11.4 ±14.3 ±14.2 ±12.0 93 87 ±37 ±39 40.3% 37.7% ±11.7 ±13.4 2.96 3.85 ±0.10 ±1.57 (X) (X) (X) (X) RELATIONSHIP Population in households Householder Spouse Child Other relatives Nonrelatives Unmarried partner Estimate 684 231 70 266 86 31 20 Margin of Error ±188 ±62 ±28 ±119 ±64 ±23 ±17 Percent 684 33.8% 10.2% 38.9% 12.6% 4.5% 2.9% Margin of Error (X) ±12.9 ±3.0 ±13.7 ±8.7 ±3.1 ±2.4 MARITAL STATUS Males 15 years and over Never married Now married, except separated Separated Widowed Divorced Estimate 160 48 74 2 0 36 Margin of Error ±55 ±31 ±32 ±3 ±13 ±27 Percent 160 30.0% 46.3% 1.3% 0.0% 22.5% Margin of Error (X) ±16.4 ±11.9 ±1.8 ±8.1 ±15.0 380 190 87 37 23 43 ±113 ±83 ±33 ±37 ±28 ±35 380 50.0% 22.9% 9.7% 6.1% 11.3% (X) ±16.0 ±5.3 ±9.3 ±7.1 ±8.6 Households with one or more people under 18 years Households with one or more people 65 years and over Average household size Average family size Females 15 years and over Never married Now married, except separated Separated Widowed Divorced FERTILITY Number of women 15 to 50 years old who had a birth in the past 12 months Unmarried women (widowed, divorced, and never married) Per 1,000 unmarried women Per 1,000 women 15 to 50 years old Per 1,000 women 15 to 19 years old Per 1,000 women 20 to 34 years old Per 1,000 women 35 to 50 years old Estimate 9 0 Margin of Error ±13 0 0 0 0 0 0 ±13 ±76 ±53 ±634 ±128 ±255 Percent 0 Margin of Error (X) .% (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) ±. (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile GRANDPARENTS Number of grandparents living with own grandchildren under 18 years Responsible for grandchildren Years responsible for grandchildren Less than 1 year 1 or 2 years 3 or 4 years 5 or more years Estimate 31 Margin of Error ±24 19 Number of grandparents responsible for own grandchildren under 18 years Who are female Who are married 31 Margin of Error (X) ±18 61.3% ±33.5 0 0 0 19 ±18 ±13 ±13 ±18 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 61.3% ±59.3 ±41.9 ±41.9 ±33.5 19 ±18 19 (X) 19 0 ±18 ±13 100.0% 0.0% ±0.0 ±68.4 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT Population 3 years and over enrolled in school Nursery school, preschool Kindergarten Elementary school (grades 1-8) High school (grades 9-12) College or graduate school Estimate 210 2 17 95 39 57 Margin of Error ±112 ±5 ±19 ±68 ±30 ±63 Percent 210 1.0% 8.1% 45.2% 18.6% 27.1% Margin of Error (X) ±2.3 ±8.0 ±21.6 ±10.3 ±26.5 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Population 25 years and over Less than 9th grade 9th to 12th grade, no diploma High school graduate (includes equivalency) Some college, no degree Associate’s degree Bachelor’s degree Graduate or professional degree Estimate 424 34 29 152 98 71 24 16 Margin of Error ±109 ±47 ±25 ±61 ±40 ±39 ±25 ±33 Percent 424 8.0% 6.8% 35.8% 23.1% 16.7% 5.7% 3.8% Margin of Error (X) ±10.9 ±5.7 ±11.0 ±7.5 ±8.2 ±5.6 ±7.8 85.1% 9.4% ±30.9 ±9.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) Estimate 526 28 Margin of Error ±146 ±17 Percent 526 5.3% Margin of Error (X) ±2.9 Estimate Margin of Error Percent Margin of Error Percent high school graduate or higher Percent bachelor’s degree or higher VETERAN STATUS Civilian population 18 years and over Civilian veterans DISABILITY STATUS OF THE CIVILIAN INSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION Total Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population With a disability NON- Percent 684 87 ±188 ±46 684 12.7% (X) ±5.8 Under 18 years With a disability 158 5 ±67 ±24 158 3.2% (X) ±15.3 18 to 64 years With a disability 431 49 ±101 ±27 431 11.4% (X) ±5.8 95 33 ±42 ±29 95 34.7% (X) ±25.9 65 years and over With a disability 10 ACS 2010-14 Profile ALAPAHA RESIDENCE 1 YEAR AGO Population 1 year and over Same house Different house in the U.S. Same county Different county Same state Different state Abroad Estimate 684 652 32 23 9 9 0 0 Margin of Error ±188 ±181 ±35 ±30 ±18 ±13 ±13 ±13 Percent 684 95.3% 4.7% 3.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±3.7 ±5.0 ±4.3 ±2.7 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 PLACE OF BIRTH Total population Native Born in United States State of residence Different state Born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island areas, or born abroad to American parent(s) Foreign born Estimate 684 682 682 538 144 0 Margin of Error ±188 ±188 ±178 ±153 ±91 ±13 Percent 684 99.7% 99.7% 78.7% 21.1% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±2.1 ±37.8 ±5.7 ±12.0 ±1.9 2 ±4 0.3% ±0.6 U.S. CITIZENSHIP STATUS Foreign-born population Naturalized U.S. citizen Not a U.S. citizen Estimate Margin of Error ±4 ±13 ±4 Percent 2 0 2 YEAR OF ENTRY Population born outside the United States Estimate Margin of Error ±4 Percent 2 Native Entered 2010 or later Entered before 2010 0 0 0 Foreign born Entered 2010 or later Entered before 2010 Margin of Error (X) ±650.0 ±0.0 2 Margin of Error (X) ±26 ±13 ±23 0 .% .% (X) ±. ±. 2 0 2 ±4 ±13 ±19 2 0.0% 100.0% (X) ±650.0 ±919.2 2 Margin of Error ±4 WORLD REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN Foreign-born population, excluding population born at sea Europe Asia Africa Oceania Latin America Northern America Estimate 0 0 0 0 2 0 LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME Population 5 years and over English only Language other than English Speak English less than ’very well’ Spanish Speak English less than ’very well’ Other Indo-European languages Speak English less than ’very well’ Asian and Pacific Islander languages Speak English less than ’very well’ Other languages Speak English less than ’very well’ Estimate 671 641 30 4 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 0.0% 100.0% Percent 2 Margin of Error (X) ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±4 ±13 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% ±650.0 ±650.0 ±650.0 ±650.0 ±0.0 ±650.0 Margin of Error ±186 ±162 ±47 ±77 ±26 ±37 ±23 ±39 ±23 ±39 ±23 ±39 Percent 671 95.5% 4.5% 0.6% 4.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±35.8 ±6.9 ±11.5 ±3.7 ±5.5 ±3.4 ±5.8 ±3.4 ±5.8 ±3.4 ±5.8 ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile ANCESTRY Total population American Arab Czech Danish Dutch English French (except Basque) French Canadian German Greek Hungarian Irish Italian Lithuanian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Russian Scotch-Irish Scottish Slovak Subsaharan African Swedish Swiss Ukranian Welsh West Indian (excluding Hispanic origin groups) Estimate 684 217 7 0 0 3 57 6 0 25 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 22 0 0 0 0 2 Margin of Error ±188 ±100 ±12 ±13 ±13 ±6 ±73 ±9 ±13 ±22 ±13 ±13 ±81 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±30 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±4 Percent 684 31.7% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 8.3% 0.9% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% Margin of Error (X) ±11.7 ±1.7 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±0.9 ±10.4 ±1.3 ±1.9 ±3.1 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±11.2 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.8 ±1.9 ±4.3 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±0.6 Selected Economic Characteristics EMPLOYMENT STATUS Population 16 years and over In labor force Civilian labor force Employed Unemployed Armed Forces Not in labor force Estimate 526 232 232 211 21 0 294 Margin of Error ±146 ±87 ±87 ±84 ±68 ±58 ±98 Percent 526 44.1% 44.1% 40.1% 4.0% 0.0% 55.9% Margin of Error (X) ±11.0 ±11.0 ±11.4 ±12.9 ±11.1 ±10.2 232 9.1% ±87 ±29.2 232 (X) (X) (X) Females 16 years and over In labor force Civilian labor force Employed 371 144 144 129 ±110 ±73 ±73 ±71 371 38.8% 38.8% 34.8% (X) ±16.1 ±16.1 ±16.0 Own children under 6 years All parents in family in labor force 16 13 ±17 ±26 16 81.3% (X) ±135.7 Own children 6 to 17 years All parents in family in labor force 117 68 ±75 ±66 117 58.1% (X) ±41.9 Civilian labor force Percent Unemployed 12 ACS 2010-14 Profile COMMUTING TO WORK Workers 16 years and over Car, truck, or van – drove alone Car, truck, or van – carpooled Public transportation (excluding taxicab) Walked Other means Worked at home ALAPAHA Estimate 209 174 25 3 7 0 0 Margin of Error ±80 ±72 ±25 ±5 ±12 ±13 ±13 Percent 209 83.3% 12.0% 1.4% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±13.1 ±11.1 ±2.3 ±5.6 ±6.2 ±6.2 28.3 ±3.6 (X) (X) OCCUPATION Civilian employed population 16 years and over Management, business, science, arts occupations Service occupations Sales and office occupations Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations Production, transportation, and material moving occupations Estimate 211 56 19 83 9 Margin of Error ±84 ±33 ±14 ±56 ±18 Percent 211 26.5% 9.0% 39.3% 4.3% Margin of Error (X) ±11.5 ±5.7 ±21.5 ±8.2 44 ±26 20.9% ±8.9 INDUSTRY Civilian employed population 16 years and over Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale trade Retail trade Transportation and warehousing, and utilities Information Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services Educational services, and health care and social assistance Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services Other services, except public administration Public administration Estimate 211 8 9 37 13 31 7 0 0 16 Margin of Error ±84 ±18 ±18 ±21 ±24 ±31 ±9 ±18 ±18 ±26 Percent 211 3.8% 4.3% 17.5% 6.2% 14.7% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 7.6% Margin of Error (X) ±8.2 ±8.2 ±7.4 ±11.0 ±13.3 ±4.0 ±8.7 ±8.7 ±12.2 42 8 ±33 ±10 19.9% 3.8% ±13.3 ±4.6 0 40 ±18 ±37 0.0% 19.0% ±8.7 ±15.9 CLASS OF WORKER Civilian employed population 16 years and over Private wage and salary workers Government workers Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers Unpaid family workers Estimate 211 142 53 8 8 Margin of Error ±84 ±57 ±40 ±15 ±18 Percent 211 67.3% 25.1% 3.8% 3.8% Margin of Error (X) ±5.0 ±15.9 ±7.1 ±8.2 Mean travel time to work (minutes) 13 ALAPAHA INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2012 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS) Total households Less than $10,000 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $34,999 $35,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 or more Median household income (dollars) Mean household income (dollars) ACS 2010-14 Profile Estimate Margin of Error Percent Margin of Error 231 43 12 49 27 19 47 15 15 4 0 30,221 40,953 ±63 ±28 ±11 ±33 ±25 ±22 ±31 ±20 ±17 ±7 ±13 ±13,948 ±8,986 231 18.6% 5.2% 21.2% 11.7% 8.2% 20.3% 6.5% 6.5% 1.7% 0.0% (X) (X) (X) ±11.0 ±4.5 ±13.1 ±10.2 ±9.1 ±12.3 ±8.5 ±7.2 ±3.0 ±5.6 (X) (X) 142 51,715 87 15,133 32 21,159 ±51 ±13,098 ±40 ±2,687 ±20 ±7,044 61.5% (X) 37.7% (X) 13.9% (X) ±14.4 (X) ±13.9 (X) ±7.8 (X) 7 8,057 8 800 57 ±9 ±14,185 ±10 ±790 ±36 3.0% (X) 3.5% (X) 24.7% ±3.8 (X) ±4.2 (X) ±14.1 Families Less than $10,000 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $34,999 $35,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 or more Median family income (dollars) Mean family income (dollars) 148 8 10 11 22 23 40 15 15 4 0 48,750 55,320 ±47 ±12 ±11 ±11 ±24 ±24 ±31 ±20 ±17 ±7 ±13 ±19,361 ±12,811 148 5.4% 6.8% 7.4% 14.9% 15.5% 27.0% 10.1% 10.1% 2.7% 0.0% (X) (X) (X) ±7.9 ±7.1 ±7.3 ±15.6 ±15.2 ±18.8 ±13.1 ±11.0 ±4.7 ±8.8 (X) (X) Per capita income (dollars) 15,718 ±2,843 (X) (X) Nonfamily households Median nonfamily income (dollars) Mean nonfamily income (dollars) 83 13,125 13,454 ±40 ±11,458 ±4,870 83 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Median earnings for workers (dollars) Median earnings for male full-time, year-round workers (dollars) Median earnings for female full-time, year-round workers (dollars) 26,957 45,962 ±7,585 ±15,864 (X) (X) (X) (X) 26,385 ±3,436 (X) (X) With earnings Mean earnings (dollars) With Social Security Mean Social Security income (dollars) With retirement income Mean retirement income (dollars) With Supplemental Security Income Mean Supplemental Security Income (dollars) With cash public assistance income Mean cash public assistance income (dollars) With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the past 12 months 14 ACS 2010-14 Profile HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE Civilian noninstitutionalized population With health insurance coverage With private health insurance With public coverage No health insurance coverage ALAPAHA Estimate 684 507 371 232 177 Margin of Error ±188 ±129 ±120 ±71 ±74 Percent 684 74.1% 54.2% 33.9% 25.9% Margin of Error (X) ±27.7 ±9.2 ±4.7 ±8.1 Civilian noninstitutionalized population under 18 years No health insurance coverage 158 ±67 158 (X) 30 ±27 19.0% ±14.8 Civilian noninstitutionalized population 18 to 64 years In labor force: Employed: With health insurance coverage With private health insurance With public coverage No health insurance coverage Unemployed: With health insurance coverage With private health insurance With public coverage No health insurance coverage Not in labor force: With health insurance coverage With private health insurance With public coverage No health insurance coverage 431 224 203 173 171 11 30 21 6 0 6 15 207 109 74 47 98 ±101 ±84 ±80 ±72 ±72 ±11 ±26 ±25 ±11 ±13 ±11 ±22 ±99 ±50 ±53 ±26 ±62 431 224 203 85.2% 84.2% 5.4% 14.8% 21 28.6% 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 207 52.7% 35.7% 22.7% 47.3% (X) (X) (X) ±11.4 ±12.5 ±5.0 ±11.4 (X) ±39.8 ±61.9 ±39.8 ±61.2 (X) ±34.9 ±19.1 ±6.3 ±19.6 PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE WHOSE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS IS BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL All families With related children under 18 years With related children under 5 years only Married couple families With related children under 18 years With related children under 5 years only Families with female householder, no husband present With related children under 18 years With related children under 5 years only Estimate All people Under 18 years Related children under 18 years Related children under 5 years Related children 5 to 17 years 18 years and over 18 to 64 years 65 years and over Related people in families Unrelated individuals 15 years and over 15 Margin of Error Percent Margin of Error 14.2% 17.2% 0.0% 8.6% 5.7% .% 24.6% 24.1% 0.0% ±9.8 ±19.0 ±225.2 ±7.6 ±7.5 ±. ±20.3 ±19.8 ±130.0 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 21.9% 22.8% 22.8% 0.0% 24.8% 21.7% 20.0% 29.5% 15.4% 54.4% ±12.4 ±27.6 ±20.5 ±173.2 ±26.0 ±7.6 ±8.5 ±16.3 ±10.9 ±19.5 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile Selected Housing Characteristics HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units Occupied housing units Vacant housing units Estimate 320 231 89 Margin of Error ±71 ±63 ±35 Percent 320 72.2% 27.8% Margin of Error (X) ±11.4 ±9.0 Homeowner vacancy rate Rental vacancy rate 0.0 0.0 ±8.7 ±14.6 (X) (X) (X) (X) UNITS IN STRUCTURE Total housing units 1-unit, detached 1-unit, attached 2 units 3 or 4 units 5 to 9 units 10 to 19 units 20 or more units Mobile home Boat, RV, van, etc. Estimate 320 131 0 22 11 3 0 0 153 0 Margin of Error ±71 ±45 ±13 ±22 ±18 ±6 ±13 ±18 ±52 ±13 Percent 320 40.9% 0.0% 6.9% 3.4% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 47.8% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±10.7 ±4.1 ±6.7 ±5.6 ±1.9 ±4.1 ±5.7 ±12.3 ±4.1 YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT Total housing units Built 2010 or later Built 2000 to 2009 Built 1990 to 1999 Built 1980 to 1989 Built 1970 to 1979 Built 1960 to 1969 Built 1950 to 1959 Built 1940 to 1949 Built 1939 or earlier Estimate 320 0 18 76 68 48 26 53 12 19 Margin of Error ±71 ±13 ±14 ±39 ±35 ±27 ±21 ±36 ±11 ±20 Percent 320 0.0% 5.6% 23.7% 21.3% 15.0% 8.1% 16.6% 3.8% 5.9% Margin of Error (X) ±4.1 ±4.2 ±11.0 ±9.9 ±7.8 ±6.3 ±10.6 ±3.3 ±6.1 ROOMS Total housing units 1 room 2 rooms 3 rooms 4 rooms 5 rooms 6 rooms 7 rooms 8 rooms 9 rooms or more Median rooms Estimate 320 3 0 6 71 66 35 78 26 35 5.9 Margin of Error ±71 ±6 ±13 ±8 ±41 ±40 ±23 ±34 ±22 ±25 ±0.9 Percent 320 0.9% 0.0% 1.9% 22.2% 20.6% 10.9% 24.4% 8.1% 10.9% (X) Margin of Error (X) ±1.9 ±4.1 ±2.5 ±11.8 ±11.6 ±6.8 ±9.1 ±6.6 ±7.4 (X) BEDROOMS Total housing units No bedroom 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms 5 or more bedrooms Estimate 320 6 11 92 167 30 14 Margin of Error ±71 ±8 ±18 ±44 ±51 ±29 ±13 Percent 320 1.9% 3.4% 28.7% 52.2% 9.4% 4.4% Margin of Error (X) ±2.5 ±5.6 ±12.2 ±11.0 ±8.8 ±3.9 16 ACS 2010-14 Profile HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units Owner-occupied Renter-occupied ALAPAHA Estimate 231 150 81 Margin of Error ±63 ±53 ±40 Percent 231 64.9% 35.1% Margin of Error (X) ±14.6 ±14.4 2.82 3.22 ±0.48 ±2.17 (X) (X) (X) (X) YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Occupied housing units Moved in 2010 or later Moved in 2000 to 2009 Moved in 1990 to 1999 Moved in 1980 to 1989 Moved in 1970 to 1979 Moved in 1969 or earlier Estimate 231 41 85 32 31 33 9 Margin of Error ±63 ±28 ±40 ±27 ±22 ±31 ±12 Percent 231 17.7% 36.8% 13.9% 13.4% 14.3% 3.9% Margin of Error (X) ±11.0 ±14.3 ±11.2 ±9.0 ±12.8 ±4.9 VEHICLES AVAILABLE Occupied housing units No vehicles available 1 vehicle available 2 vehicles available 3 or more vehicles available Estimate 231 14 93 74 50 Margin of Error ±63 ±15 ±39 ±43 ±35 Percent 231 6.1% 40.3% 32.0% 21.6% Margin of Error (X) ±6.4 ±13.1 ±16.3 ±14.0 HOUSE HEATING FUEL Occupied housing units Utility gas Bottled, tank, or LP gas Electricity Fuel oil, kerosene, etc. Coal or coke Wood Solar energy Other fuel No fuel used Estimate 231 9 24 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 Margin of Error ±63 ±13 ±18 ±63 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 Percent 231 3.9% 10.4% 85.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±5.5 ±7.3 ±14.0 ±5.6 ±5.6 ±5.6 ±5.6 ±5.6 ±5.6 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS Occupied housing units Lacking complete plumbing facilities Lacking complete kitchen facilities No telephone service available Estimate 231 3 0 19 Margin of Error ±63 ±6 ±13 ±19 Percent 231 1.3% 0.0% 8.2% Margin of Error (X) ±2.6 ±5.6 ±8.0 OCCUPANTS PER ROOM Occupied housing units 1.00 or less 1.01 to 1.50 1.51 or more Estimate 231 229 2 0 Margin of Error ±63 ±66 ±14 ±26 Percent 231 99.1% 0.9% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±8.7 ±6.0 ±11.3 VALUE Owner-occupied units Less than $50,000 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $300,000 to $499,999 $500,000 to $999,999 $1,000,000 or more Median (dollars) Estimate 150 74 51 18 0 3 4 0 0 50,600 Margin of Error ±53 ±51 ±31 ±15 ±18 ±14 ±15 ±18 ±13 ±12,566 Percent 150 49.3% 34.0% 12.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% (X) Margin of Error (X) ±29.0 ±17.1 ±8.9 ±12.3 ±9.0 ±9.8 ±12.3 ±8.7 (X) Average household size of owner-occupied unit Average household size of renter-occupied unit 17 ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile MORTGAGE STATUS Owner-occupied units Housing units with a mortgage Housing units without a mortgage Estimate 150 56 94 Margin of Error ±53 ±37 ±40 Percent 150 37.3% 62.7% Margin of Error (X) ±20.8 ±14.9 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS (SMOC) Housing units with a mortgage Less than $300 $300 to $499 $500 to $699 $700 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 or more Median (dollars) Estimate 56 0 8 23 15 10 0 0 625 Margin of Error ±37 ±18 ±18 ±28 ±15 ±9 ±13 ±23 ±304 Percent 56 0.0% 14.3% 41.1% 26.8% 17.9% 0.0% 0.0% (X) Margin of Error (X) ±32.8 ±30.1 ±41.8 ±19.2 ±12.0 ±23.2 ±40.2 (X) 94 0 2 40 32 20 342 ±40 ±13 ±13 ±26 ±30 ±23 ±82 94 0.0% 2.1% 42.6% 34.0% 21.3% (X) (X) ±13.8 ±14.2 ±21.5 ±28.5 ±23.0 (X) Housing units without a mortgage Less than $100 $100 to $199 $200 to $299 $300 to $399 $400 or more Median (dollars) SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI) Housing units with a mortgage (excluding units where SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 20.0 percent 20.0 to 24.9 percent 25.0 to 29.9 percent 30.0 to 34.9 percent 35.0 percent or more Estimate Margin of Error Percent Margin of Error 45 ±44 45 (X) 21 0 21 0 3 ±23 ±13 ±27 ±13 ±19 46.7% 0.0% 46.7% 0.0% 6.7% ±23.1 ±28.9 ±38.7 ±28.9 ±41.3 Not computed 11 ±11 (X) (X) Housing unit without a mortgage (excluding units where SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 10.0 percent 10.0 to 14.9 percent 15.0 to 19.9 percent 20.0 to 24.9 percent 25.0 to 29.9 percent 30.0 to 34.9 percent 35.0 percent or more 94 ±43 94 (X) 40 15 13 7 3 2 14 ±25 ±21 ±15 ±9 ±6 ±5 ±20 42.6% 16.0% 13.8% 7.4% 3.2% 2.1% 14.9% ±18.3 ±21.1 ±14.7 ±9.0 ±6.2 ±5.2 ±19.9 0 ±13 (X) (X) Estimate 60 11 21 7 13 8 0 0 250 Margin of Error ±33 ±25 ±23 ±24 ±25 ±22 ±18 ±18 ±335 21 ±19 Not computed GROSS RENT Occupied units paying rent Less than $200 $200 to $299 $300 to $499 $500 to $749 $750 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 or more Median (dollars) No rent paid 18 Percent 60 18.3% 35.0% 11.7% 21.7% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% (X) Margin of Error (X) ±40.5 ±33.5 ±39.9 ±39.3 ±35.8 ±30.6 ±30.6 (X) (X) (X) ACS 2010-14 Profile ALAPAHA GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI) Occupied units paying rent (excluding units where GRAPI cannot be computed) Less than 15.0 percent 15.0 to 19.9 percent 20.0 to 24.9 percent 25.0 to 29.9 percent 30.0 to 34.9 percent 35.0 percent or more Estimate Not computed Margin of Error Percent Margin of Error 41 ±36 41 (X) 13 14 0 8 3 3 ±17 ±19 ±13 ±10 ±6 ±19 31.7% 34.1% 0.0% 19.5% 7.3% 7.3% ±31.3 ±35.0 ±31.7 ±17.2 ±13.1 ±46.0 40 ±32 (X) (X) Selected Demographic Characteristics SEX AND AGE Total Population Male Female Estimate 684 231 453 Margin of Error ±188 ±73 ±134 Percent 684 33.8% 66.2% Margin of Error (X) ±5.3 ±7.2 Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 10 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 24 years 25 to 34 years 35 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 to 74 years 75 to 84 years 85 years and over 13 78 53 42 74 110 38 89 64 28 53 12 30 ±13 ±51 ±35 ±29 ±56 ±56 ±25 ±49 ±38 ±22 ±29 ±17 ±29 1.9% 11.4% 7.7% 6.1% 10.8% 16.1% 5.6% 13.0% 9.4% 4.1% 7.7% 1.8% 4.4% ±1.9 ±6.8 ±4.7 ±3.8 ±7.7 ±6.9 ±3.3 ±6.2 ±4.9 ±3.1 ±3.7 ±2.4 ±4.1 Median age (years) 30.9 ±7.5 (X) (X) 18 years and over 21 years and over 62 years and over 65 years and over 526 479 121 95 ±118 ±111 ±48 ±45 76.9% 70.0% 17.7% 13.9% ±27.3 ±25.1 ±5.1 ±5.3 18 years and over Male Female 526 155 371 ±118 ±58 ±102 526 29.5% 70.5% (X) ±8.9 ±11.3 65 years and over Male Female 95 43 52 ±45 ±27 ±35 95 45.3% 54.7% (X) ±19.5 ±26.7 19 ALAPAHA ACS 2010-14 Profile RACE Total population One race Two or more races One race White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Native Cherokee tribal grouping Chippewa tribal grouping Navajo tribal grouping Sioux tribal grouping Asian Asian Indian Chinese Filipino Japanese Korean Vietnamese Other Asian Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander Some other race Two or more races White and Black or African American White and American Indian and Alaska Native White and Asian Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native Race alone or in combination with one or more other races Total population White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Some other race Estimate 684 684 0 684 314 370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Margin of Error ±188 ±188 ±13 ±188 ±154 ±142 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±18 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±43 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±34 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 Percent 684 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 45.9% 54.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±0.0 ±1.9 ±0.0 ±18.6 ±14.5 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±2.7 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±6.3 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±5.0 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 684 314 370 0 0 0 0 ±188 ±154 ±142 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 684 45.9% 54.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (X) ±18.6 ±14.5 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population Hispanic or Latino (of any race) Mexican Puerto Rican Cuban Other Hispanic or Latino Not Hispanic or Latino White alone Black or African American alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Asian alone Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone Some other race alone Two or more races Two races including Some other race Two races excluding Some other race, and Three or more races Estimate 684 0 0 0 0 0 684 314 370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Margin of Error ±188 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±26 ±188 ±154 ±142 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 ±13 Percent 684 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 45.9% 54.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Margin of Error (X) ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±3.8 ±0.0 ±18.6 ±14.5 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 ±1.9 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010-2014 American Community Survey Values marked with a period denote estimates that could not be computed. Values marked ***** denote ’controlled’ estimates for which statistical tests for sampling variability are not appropriate. Report prepared by Emory University’s Policy Analysis Laboratory and Terra Cognita Consulting, LLC in cooperation with Neighborhood Nexus. 20 Technical Notes, ACS Profile This report features demographic profiles based on the Census Bureaus 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. These profiles follow precisely the order, format, and content of the ACS-based ”fact sheets” available via the Census Bureaus American Fact Finder online system. What is the American Community Survey, and What is a 5-Year Estimate? The American Community Survey is a nationwide survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau on a continuous, rolling basis. It is intended to replace the ”long form” that has been a component of the decennial census for the last several decades. From 1940 until 2000, the Census Bureau actually conducted a census (counting of the entire population) and a survey (measuring a sample of the population) simultaneously: most households received a ”short form” with basic questions (e.g. age, sex, race), while a ”long form” with everything contained on the ”short form” plus many other topics (e.g. educational attainment, occupation, income) was administered to a sample of households (varied by year and other factors, but roughly 1 in 7 households). As the name implies, the decennial census took place only once every ten years, providing a single ”snapshot” of the country. But policymakers wanted to have more timely data, so the Census Bureau moved to the new ”continuous measurement” model of the ACS, which had its nationwide launch in 2005. Though the ACS is a replacement for the long form component of the census, it is not a direct substitute. The two differ in many important ways, but we will focus on a few key points. First, as mentioned above, the ”continuous measurement” model means that the ACS is not a snapshot for any particular point in time. So while the decennial census measured where people lived on Census Day (historically April 1st of years ending in 0), the ACS looks at where people live on the day they are surveyed. For example, ACS income measures look at the 12-month period preceding the survey date, while the decennial looked at the previous calendar year. Second, the ACS sample is much smaller than that of the decennial census: roughly 2.5% each year. Even pooling the data over a 5-year period yields a combined sample of only about 12.5%, considerably smaller than the roughly 16.7% sampled in the decennial census; the implications of this smaller sample on the margin of error for estimates is discussed below. Third, the pooling across years required to yield a decent-sized sample for smaller areas creates complications for interpretation. Whereas the decennial census allowed one to say, ”on April 1, 2000, X% of the population in region Y was unemployed,” we must now say ”over the course of the period 2005-2009, on average X% of the population in region Y was unemployed.” When faced with a period of rapid change such the onset of the ”Great Recession,” having a pooled estimate over a 5-year period is much less helpful than having a firm snapshot at a single point in time. So while the ACS has been of great help to policymakers interested in the effects of the Great Recession on large geographies such as states, counties, and major cities (areas for which 1-year or 3-year estimates are available), it has created new challenges for people interested in small cities and neighborhoods within larger cities. To learn more about the ACS, how to use it, and how it differs from the decennial census, please refer to the Census Bureau’s publication A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What General Data Users Need to Know. What is a Margin of Error, and Why is its Calculation so Important? It is not feasible to administer the long form or the ACS to the entire population. Fortunately, this is not necessary: just like a single spoonful can tell you if a pot of soup has enough salt, a reasonable estimate of a population may be derived from a quality sample. The quality of a sample depends on two factors: its representativeness and its size. In some sense, the representativeness is the more important of the two: a biased sample, however large, can never yield a good estimate. After adding salt to your soup but before tasting, you stir the soup. Otherwise you’ll get 1 a spoonful of extra-salty soup not representative of the pot as a whole. Randomly sampling the population has the same effect as stirring the soup: you get a sample that is representative of the population from which it was drawn. But the spoonful of soup doesn’t have exactly the same proportion of salt as the rest of the pot: it contains the ”true” amount, plus or minus some amount due to chance. We call that chance variation from the true amount ”sampling error.” The larger the sample, the smaller that error is likely to be, though the marginal reduction in sampling error of increasing the sample size by a unit declines as the number of units goes up. Proper reporting of a sample-based estimate, therefore, requires three pieces of information: a ”point estimate” (our best estimate of the actual value), plus a margin of error, given a particular confidence level (which allow assessment of the quality of the estimate): we are 90% confident that the pot of soup has 8,500 milligrams of salt, plus or minus 500 milligrams. Holding a sample size constant, increasing the confidence level forces us to increase the margin of error (we would have to increase the size of the range to be 99% confident that our range contains the true value). When applying this concept to the ACS, we should first note that the Census Bureau typically reports a 90% confidence interval: we are 90% certain that the true number lies within the reported range. When looking at counties or large cities, the samples are large and the confidence intervals small. But for smaller cities and geographies such as census tracts, even the five-year pooled sample is quite small– yielding a rather large confidence interval. When the confidence intervals for two areas overlap, we cannot tell whether the difference we observed is real or an artifact caused by sampling error (or, to use the technical term, the differences are not ”statistically significant”). Although you can simply add the raw population of two census tracts together, estimating the margin of error for the resultant area is somewhat more complicated. To estimate the margin of error for numbers and proportions, we follow the method recommended in Appendix 3 of the Census Bureau’s publication A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What General Data Users Need to Know. To estimate the margin of error for medians, we follow the method recommended on pages 16-17 of 2005-2009 ACS 5-year PUMS Accuracy of the Data. 2 What tables from the ACS were used to compile these Demographic Profiles? SOCIAL Indicators Households by Type Average Household Size Relationship Marital Status Fertility Grandparents School Enrollment Educational Attainment Veteran Status Disability Status Residence 1 Year Ago Place of Birth Year of Entry, Native World Region of Birth of Foreign Born Language Spoken at Home Ancestry Table(s) B11001 B09019, B11001 B09019 B12001 B13002 B10050 B14001 B15002 B21001 B18101 B07003 B05002 B05005 B05006 B16004 B04006 ECONOMIC Indicators Employment Status Employment for parents of Own Children Commuting to Work Mean Travel Time to Work Occupation Industry Class of Worker Household Income Median Household Income Mean Household Income Households with Earnings Mean Earnings Households with Social Security Mean Social Security Households with Retirement Income Mean Retirement Income Households with SSI Income Mean SSI Income Households with Public Assistance Income Mean Public Assistance Income Table(s) B23001 B23008 B08101 B08013, B08101 C24010 C24030 B24080 B19001 B19013 B19025, B19001 B19051 B19061, B19051 B19055 B19065, B19055 B19059 B19069, B19059 B19056 B19066, B19056 B19057 B19067, B19057 Continued on next page... 3 ECONOMIC Indicators Households with Food Stamp/SNAP Income Family Income Median Family Income Mean Family Income Per Capita Income Median Non-Family Income Mean Non-Family Income Median Earnings for Workers Health Insurance Coverage Poverty: Families Poverty: People Poverty: Related Children Poverty: Related People in Families Poverty: Unrelated individuals 15 years and over HOUSING Indicators Housing Occupancy Homeowner vacancy rate Rental vacancy rate Units in Structure Year Structure Built Rooms Median Number of rooms Bedrooms Housing Tenure Average Household size of occupied units Year Householder Moved into Unit Vehicles Available House Heating Fuel Selected Characteristics: Lacking Plumbing Selected Characteristics: Lacking Complete Kitchen Selected Characteristics: Lacking Telephone Occupants per Room Value of Housing Unit Median housing unit value Mortgage Status Selected Monthly Owner Costs Median Selected Monthly Owner Costs Table(s) B22001 B19101 B19113 B19127, B19101 B19313, B01001 B19202 B19214, B19201 B20017 B18135, B27011 B17010 B17001 B17006 B17021 B17007 Table(s) B25002 B25003, B25004 B25003, B25004 B25024 B25034 B25017 B25018 B25041 B25009 B25008, B25003 B25038 B25044 B25040 B25048 B25052 B25043 B25014 B25075 B25077 B25081 B25087 B25088 Continued on next page... 4 HOUSING Indicators Selected Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income Gross Rent Median Gross Rent Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income DEMOGRAPHIC Indicators Sex and Age Median Age Race Tribal Groupings Asian Groupings Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Groupings Race Alone or In Combination with One or More Other Races Hispanic or Latino and Race Table(s) B25091 B25063 B25064 B25070 Table(s) B01001 B01002 C02003 B02005 B02006 B02007 B02008, B02009, B02010, B02011, B02012, B02013 B03001, B03002 5
Similar documents
Attapulgus - Georgia Municipal Association
Report prepared by Emory University’s Policy Analysis Laboratory and Terra Cognita Consulting, LLC in cooperation with Neighborhood Nexus.
More information