Alliancing in Tampere, Finland The Tunnel of Rantaväylä

Transcription

Alliancing in Tampere, Finland The Tunnel of Rantaväylä
Alliancing in Tampere, Finland
The Tunnel of Rantaväylä
Viikko 39/2012
1
Tunnel allows
built new
housing to the
city center
2





2 one-way 2,3 km road tunnels
Interchange in both ends
Provision for one in the middle
Daily traffic volume Over 40 000
In the future 54 000
 Target costs 180,3 M€ (May 2013)
 Development period (in
Alliance) July 2012 – autumn
2013
 Implementation period (in
Alliance) has been started
October 2013
 Ready to use in 2017
 Finishing 2018
3
The time scale for the project
New target
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Development phase
• Design
• Key targets
• Target price
• Impl. plan
Implementation
phase
• Construction
Defects correction
period
4
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rantatunneli/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icDCsRvIDVM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlADkzBww7w&list=HL1394197708
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlADkzBww7w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss8egC1qCRI
http://seuranta.rantatunneli.fi/
4th October 2013
5
IPD –Integrated Project Delivery
The owner and service
providers combine an
integrated project team to
implement the project
Target is to provide value for the
owners money
6
Why IPD ?
We were not satisfied to:
 Risks Management
 Costs Control
 Operational transparency between
owner and contractor
 Lack of innovations
 The construction sector's productivity
7
One way to do IPD is Alliance
Project Delivery
Some Key words:
The commercial model of Alliance
encourage everybody to do everything for
the best of the project
You can not succeed by optimizing only
your own delivery
9
Alliance key words
Risks will be shared collectively
 If participant can’t control some risk, then it is owners risk
No blame between participants
 except if it is question about wilful default
Open book method with payments


Direct costs will be paid by the open book method
Fee is based of actual costs
10
Unanimous desicion making
 We all must agree
Project team has been selected so that
there is the best person for the right job
11
Integrated Project Delivery
Allianssin pääpiirteet
Traditional Project Delivery
12
Tampere tunneling alliance
partners
WE DO EVERYTHING
TOGETHER
WE SHARE ALL IDEAS
TO ALL OTHERS
OWNERS
• Finnish Transport Agency
• Tampere City
SERVICE PROVIDERS
• Lemminkäinen Infra Oy
• Saanio & Riekkola Oy
• A-Insinöörit Suunnittelu Oy
13
Not like this
14
Lessons learnt
APPROVED
• Clear evidence of innovation
promotion
• No contractual barriers
which prevents changes
• Explode the innovations
systematically
• We can plan and prepare
right things in the right time
• Time table is not stretching
because of the changes
UNFINISHED
FROZEN
CAST OFF
More than 50 ideas  More than
20 innovations  ~ 20 M€ value
ROAD
BRIDGE
TUNNEL
• One Big room is better tha
several
• Rather workshop than
meeting
TECNICAL SYSTEMS
Tecnology groups takes
responsibility
to explode the ideas
Liikennevirasto
15
Tunnels safety Dir: 2004/54/EU
and equipment
Safety lane through the whole tunnel
13.3.2014 Tapani Toivanen
Rantatunnelin tekniset järjestelmät
ALSO:
 Interchange near the tunnel end increases need to
change lanes inside the tunnel
 Ventilation with high traffic volume is much easier if
the tunnels are designed to be only one-way roads
 If there is a reasonable vice road, think very carfefully
the reasons why there is a need for automatic fireextinguishing
 Road tunnels maintenance should be planned and
modeling before
Optimizing
Minimum requirements
or ?
Improving the productivity
Module building enables Lean
Lean improves quality and quality improves safety
Tunnel tube and the technology
corridor
Modular building
 15 + 1 moduulia
 Every gateway between tunnel tubes is
standard module
 150m long tunnel is own module which is
going to be repeated
1. Extraction
2. Reinforcement
3. Groundworks
4. technology installation
Modular building
N
N-1
N-2
N-3
With innovative methods you can:
 Increase productivity and efficiency
 Make more room for quality and safety
 Design life-cycle costs to be more meaningful
 Ensure better functionality of the various
technical systems and design more flexible
22
Thank you
23