The Direction Sensitive Locking Differential (DSLD)
Transcription
The Direction Sensitive Locking Differential (DSLD)
THE DIRECTION SENSITIVE LOCKING DIFFERENTIAL (DSLD) - EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF A PROTOTYPE FOR A FWD SAAB 93 Aero V6 Jonas Alfredsona, Mathias Lidbergb atechno model tm AB, SWEDEN bVehicle Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, SWEDEN Informationsmöte Volvo Cars 040824 DSLD@Vehicle Dynamics Expo 2010p. 11(29) (40) Outline Introduction – Background – The limitations of the open differential – The Cross-over point – The Direction Sensitive Locking Differential (DSLD) Basic DSLD Control Strategies – Cornering Performance Mode – Yaw Stability Mode Transient Cornering Results – Step Steer in Throttle On (Cornering Performance) – Sine with Dwell (Yaw Stability) Experimental Results Conclusions and Future Work DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 2 (40) Background Steering kinematics and lateral force distribution for an axle: The lateral load transfer during cornering increases (decreases) the normal force of the corner outer (inner) wheel. Due to the steering kinematics, the slip angles of the wheels of one axle will be almost equal side to side. The lateral force of each tire is then proportional to the normal force of that tire. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 3 (40) Background Steering kinematics and lateral force distribution for an axle Conclusion: The kinematics of the steering system causes the wheels of an axle to contribute to the total lateral force of the axle in accordance to their ability. Front axle in cornering, with no longitudinal forces DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 4 (40) Background Ideal differential for longitudinal force distribution for an axle: Taking the traction circle into account it would be beneficial to distribute the longitudinal forces in a similar way. To get equal longitudinal slip at both drive wheels of a driven axle requires a forced differentiation equal to the theoretical differentiation (track width/cornering radius). Forced differentiation in general can be accomplished by a torque vectoring system, e.g. redistributing drive force from a slower to a faster rotating wheel. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 5 (40) Background Ideal differential for longitudinal force distribution for an axle. Front axles in cornering, with different amounts of longitudinal forces DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 6 (40) The Limitations of the Open Differential The majority of cars are equipped with open axle differentials. The open differential divides the incoming torque evenly between the two output shafts by letting them differentiate freely. Individual slip rate of each drive wheel can vary almost infinitely. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 7 (40) The Limitations of the Open Differential The open differential only give the drive wheels the same individual rotational speed as the previously mentioned ideal differential when there is no incoming torque to the differential. For a positive torque the differentiation will be less than the theoretical differentiation. For negative engine torque or braking the differentiation will exceed the theoretical differentiation. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 8 (40) The Limitations of the Open Differential Conclusion: The open differential forces both drive wheels to contribute equally to the generation of longitudinal forces without taking their individual capability into consideration. t DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 9 (40) The Cross-over point The differentiation is changing direction when the difference of the slip of the inner wheel and the outer wheel is as big as the theoretical differentiation. The point where the differentiation is changing direction can be called the cross-over point, because at this point the locked differential changes from producing an understeeringto an oversteering yaw moment. At the cross-over point the drive forces of the axle are equal. A differential that is open below the cross-over point and locked above it can avoid many of the inherent weaknesses of the open differential. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 10 (40) The Direction Sensitive Locking Differential (DSLD) The DSLD is designed to react to the cross-over point by switching between the open or locked position. This gives the DSLD the ability to give the same basic advantages that electronically controlled limited slip differentials (eLSD) can give. But with less need for advanced control, less complicated and hence cheaper mechanical design. 2 Working Prototype 1 1 5 3 4 2 53 64 5 of DSLD: 9 2 1 0 1 4 12 3 1 21 01 1 6 4 9 7 68 7 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 11 (40) The Direction Sensitive Locking Differential (DSLD) By default, the DSLD works like an open differential below the Cross-over point. Above the cross-over point the DSLD locks and thereby lets both wheels contribute to overall force generation in close accordance to their individual capability. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 12 (40) The Direction Sensitive Locking Differential (DSLD) The DSLD can also be controlled to not allow differentiation below the cross-over point in order to give yaw damping for example in collision avoidance maneuvers. The DSLD can be used more preemptively because it gives yaw damping without the unwanted net speed decrease associated with ESC interventions. Additionally, the yaw damping from a locked differential (such as the DSLD or the eLSD) is mechanically self regulating (the more yaw motion the more yaw damping). DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 13 (40) Basic DSLD Control Strategies The main control of the DSLD is divided into two control modes: Cornering Performance Mode (default) Self locking above the cross-over point gives a yaw moment that counteracts the inherent understeer tendency. Yaw Stability Mode Gives a yaw moment that counteracts the yaw motion. The yaw stability control mode can be entered for negative engine torque indicated by throttle position or steering reversals. Special Control Mode: Brake Based DSLD Control Unlocking of the DSLD from its locked state in yaw stability mode can be accomplished by a brief brake pulse at the corner outer wheel. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 14 (40) Transient Cornering Simulations The performance of the DSLD with various control strategies is illustrated for transient cornering maneuvers. All the maneuvers are simulated with open loop inputs with the FWD SAAB 93 in third gear on a high µ surface with ESC inactive. The maneuvers are performed with an open differential as a reference (indicated by dashed curves) and the DSLD in various control modes (indicated by solid curves). DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 15 (40) Step Steer in Throttle On DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 16 (40) Step Steer in Throttle On DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 17 (40) Step Steer in Throttle On DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 18 (40) Step Steer in Throttle Off DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 19 (40) Step Steer in Throttle Off DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 20 (40) Step Steer in Throttle Off DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 21 (40) Sine with Dwell DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 22 (40) Sine with Dwell DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 23 (40) Sine with Dwell DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 24 (40) Experimental Results Maneuvere: Throttle On in a right hand curve Cornerning Radius: ~30m Test input: High but modulated throttle in 2nd gear starting at ~4m/s2 latreral acceleration. Objective: Maximazing speed with maintained cornering radius. Main results: The DSLD gives better and more consistent cornering performance. Test vehicle: Saab 93 Aero V6 FWD Test Site: Stora Holm outside of Gothenburg Instrumentation: CAN, DL1 (Mathworks XPC Target) DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 25 (40) DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 26 (40) DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 27 (40) DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 28 (40) r [ Open Differential d e e 900 p S 800 l a 700 n o i 600 t a t 500 o R 400 l e 300 e h W 200 Left Right 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 29 (40) r [ DSLD Cornering Performance Mode d e e 900 p S 800 l a 700 n o i 600 t a t 500 o R 400 l e 300 e h W 200 Left Right 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 30 (40) / m [ n o i t a r e l 2] e c c A l a r e t a L Open Differential 2 CAN Bus DL1 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 31 (40) / m [ n o i t a r e l 2] e c c A l a r e t a L DSLD Cornering Performance Mode 2 CAN Bus DL1 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 32 (40) e d [ n o i t i s o P r o t a r e l e c c A Open Differential 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 33 (40) e d [ n o i t i s o P r o t a r e l e c c A DSLD Cornering Performance Mode 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 34 (40) Open Differential 0 ] s / g e d [ e t a R w a Y -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 35 (40) DSLD Cornering Performance Mode 0 ] s / g e d [ e t a R w a Y -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40 0 2 4 6 8 Time [s] 10 12 14 16 DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 36 (40) DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 37 (40) DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 38 (40) Conclusions and Future Work The DSLD opens up the possibility to significantly increase the cornering performance of front wheel drive passenger cars. To verify the performance and the stability of the DSLD in more detail it is needed to continue the experimental work with more maneuvers as well as deeper analysis of existing results. DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 39 (40) Thank you for your attention! DSLD@ Vehicle Dynamics Expo2010 40 (40)