here. - Power Electronics
Transcription
here. - Power Electronics
Closed-Loop Control Benefits AC Motors By Larry Grover Grover, Senior Design Engineer Engineer, and Jonathan Guy Guy, Vice President Engineering, AirCare Automation, Austin, Texas Feedback control methods implemented using low-cost microprocessors enable significant gains for single-phase ac motor speed controls. M ore than 80% of the motors bought each year continue to be low-cost single-phase ac motors. Because these motors are not very efficient when controlled using conventional means, the industry has focused much of its energies on displacing the single-phase motors with higher-efficiency varieties. However, when higher efficiency is desired, there is an alternative to changing motors. Combining low-cost ac motors with low-cost smart controls can improve performance, efficiency and system implementation. It is estimated that 40% to 60% of the ac motor applications would benefit from some form of closedloop, smart speed control. Closed-loop control allows single-phase ac motors to close the gap in performance and efficiency that exists between these motors and other higher-performance, higher-cost motors. These control techniques enable design solutions that are competitive for a wide range of applications while maintaining their low-cost appeal. This paper explores several key aspects of these speed controls utilizing a traditional low-cost phase-control (TRIAC-drive) technique. Speed-Control Linearity The staple of speed control for a single-phase ac motor remains a nonintelligent, TRIAC-driven phase control. It should be mentioned from the outset that this discussion relates to permanent split-capacitor and shaded-pole singlephase ac motors as a product family. The cap-start motor (Fig. 1) uses a centrifugal switch to allow the auxiliary winding to be taken out of the power loop after the motor comes up to speed. The difficulty is that the motor needs to maintain a fairly high speed to keep the centrifugal switch out. The traditional TRIAC control for a single-phase ac Fig. 2. In a single-phase ac PSC motor, a TRIAC is driven to change the trigger phase angle for the ac voltage, reducing speed by reducing RMS voltage. An RC network adjusts the phase angle, approximating a linear phase change over the range of speeds. Fig. 1. In a single-phase ac cap-start motor, a centrifugal switch allows the auxiliary winding to be taken out of the power loop after the motor comes up to speed. Power Electronics Technology June 2005 18 www.powerelectronics.com CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL a challenge. With a smart co n t ro l l e r, t h e phase angle can be adjusted to provide a linear control feedback. With a Phase angle varies closed-loop, smart Nonlinearly controller, a true 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 linear speed change (%) RPM Adjusted 0 40 68 83 94 102 111 121 can be provided. Phase Angle Phase-Angle Cutoff (°) The speed sensor (i.e. a hall sensor) will provide an Fig. 3. The nonlinear relationship between phase angle and RPM is shown for a 230-V, 60-Hz 1660-RPM ac fan motor accurate measure controlled by a conventional TRIAC driven, phase control (a). Smart control of the phase angle produces linear RPM of the RPM, which control (b). is then fed back into the speed control to provide the results seen in Fig. 3b. permanent-split-capacitor (PSC) motor is shown in Fig. 2. As the single-phase ac motor is inherently open loop, RPM The TRIAC is driven to change the trigger phase angle for measurements must be provided by an external sensor. the ac voltage, reducing speed by reducing RMS voltage. A resistor-capacitor network is used to adjust the phase angle, Startup Dynamics approximating a linear phase change over the range. However, Single-phase ac motors experience a surge in current the speed of the motor does not change linearly with the phase during startup that is significantly higher than their run angle, as depicted in Fig. 3a. The nonlinearity creates problems currents. We have measured startup currents of two to three as small control adjustments can create very small effects or times the rated run current listed on the motor. In many cases, large speed changes, making accurate speed adjustments 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 (%) Linear RPM Change With Input Tribotek LowPro Power Connectors Deliver Greater Airflow Efficiency. ™ The LowPro family of power connectors make use of the innovative LowR ®contact technology from Tribotek to deliver: • High current density • Low voltage drop • Low insertion forces • High reliability At approximately half the height of a conventional SSI style connector, LowPro can still deliver up to 35A per line, thanks to the LowR power contact technology that uses pure copper alloy and massively parallel points of contact. 30 North Ave., Burlington, MA 01803 Tel. (781) 270-0900 • Fax. (781) 270-0929 [email protected] • www.tribotek-inc.com LowR high-performance power contacts Features Benefits ● 35A per contact ● Very low profile ● Low V drop ● Low insertion force ● Various terminations ● Airflow efficiency ● Competitive advantage ● High reliability ● Lower system cost ➠ LowR is a registered trademark of Tribotek, Inc. Tribotek and LowPro are trademarks of Tribotek, Inc. CIRCLE 227 on Reader Service Card or freeproductinfo.net/pet Power Electronics Technology June 2005 20 www.powerelectronics.com CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL where one motor (i.e. fan) is on the breaker line, the surge can be tolerated and is generally overlooked. However, we have seen many ac systems where there are grouping of motors on the same breaker line. At startup, the surge Soft-start - 1.25 A pk, <7 sec. currents can exceed Soft-start - 0.7 A pk, <40 sec. the breaker rating by -65 mV 250 mV 250 mV -65 mV two times or greater, and these are often overlooked until the Fig. 4. A 277-V, 0.65-A rated fan motor experiences much lower surge currents in a smart-controlled startup (a) than in breaker trips during an uncontrolled startup (b). installation. With a smart controller, users can create a controlled delay to allow the phase to go to full throttle more slowly, giving the motor time to gain “back PID EMF” and reduce the current drain. Loop Controllers can be designed so that users Control can customize the ramp-up period for the Temperature type of motor and system being driven. Pressure (We have found significant differences Humidity Sensor Airflow between the performance of an external RPM rotor motor and a traditional internal rotor motor during startup). Fig. 4 provides an example of an uncontrolled Fig. 5. Closed-loop control of single-phase ac motors requires the use of external sensors. and smart-controlled startup. Fig. 4 shows that with soft-start, the but will not inherently eliminate the drawbacks of the lowpeak current is reduced to just slightly more than the rated torque drive. High-torque applications need to move toward motor current. The time scales on the above graphs are variable frequency drives (VFDs) to address low-speed/highdifferent (soft-start extends the time to reach full speed from torque applications. Single-phase VFDs are not often a viable less than 7 sec to over 30 sec). The soft-start shows a double option, as they add cost and complexity and also can cause ridge that is the result of a novel three-wire control topology motor failure through winding insulation breakdown and not covered in this paper. The ability to tailor the startup pitted bearings. Only special single-phase ac motors can be characteristics of a motor can extend the use of the power reliably driven from a VFD. that is available and results in better-performing systems that With most low-cost microcontrollers, the key ingredients can only be achieved through smart closed-loop control. of a closed-loop system can be implemented. They are closed-loop feedback algorithms (i.e a PID control loop), a System Closed-Loop Control second feedback node to compare the external error signal Once you’ve added smarts to the basic TRIAC control to the desired setpoint and the availability of an external topology, for negligible cost you can incorporate sophisticated sensor that can provide the error signal in the appropriate closed-loop controls and accommodate more demanding form needed by the controller ( i.e. 0 V to 5 V, 4 mA to applications. In the case of fan controls, controlling fan speed 20 mA, etc.). Fig. 5 is a simple block diagram of the desired as a result of a measured temperature, pressure or airflow system. is very common. These applications have historically been An example of a closed-loop system is the use of a addressed by more sophisticated and expensive motor/drive thermistor for temperature feedback, with results shown platforms (three-phase ac or dc). in Fig. 6. The smart control allows for setpoint control The low-speed/low-torque requirements of a fan lend (desired temperature), slope of speed versus temperature themselves well to TRIAC phase control. The closed-loop (system sensitivity and reaction), and the PID setting control can help overcome higher-torque startup issues, www.powerelectronics.com 21 Power Electronics Technology June 2005 Drive Output (V) CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL Temperature (°C) Temperature (°F) Fig. 6. In a closed-loop system using temperature feedback, smart control of a fan allows setpoint control at a desired temperatue and adjustment of the slope of fan speed versus temperature (a). The selected settings lead to the control loop response shown (b). Key: Ch1: Setpoint Signal Ch1 2.00 V Ch3 2.00 V Ch2: Sensor Feedback Signal 00 s Ch1 Ch3: Fan Speed 840.mV Ch1 2.00 V Ch3 2.00 V Fig. 7. A low-cost microcontroller incorporates a PID control loop that is applied to a fan system maintaining a set differential air pressure. Measurements reveal the responses to a stepup request going from 0-in. to 0.5-in. pressure (a), a stepdown request from 0.8-in. to 0.4-in. pressure (b), and a significant drop in chamber pressure (c). controls the response time and overshoot (not shown) when temperatures shift at the targeted load. The resulting system is low cost and easy to implement. A final example is shown in Fig. 7. The same low-cost microcontroller incorporates a PID control loop that is applied to a fan system maintaining a set differential pressure. The system is a small chamber being driven by a fan filter unit driven by an ac fan and controlled with an AirCare VariPhase speed controller. This controller has two analog inputs and contains a full PID control feature. The differential pressure is measured by a SETRA 265-type sensor with a 0-in. to 1-in. range. In setting a strong “P” term and very weak “I” and “D” terms, the following responses were observed. These settings reflected customer requests for slow system response so that turbulence and major airflow changes would not be felt by the chamber occupants. Fig. 7a shows a step request (Ch1 waveform) going from 0-in. to 0.5-in. pressure. The chamber pressure comes up with no noticeable overshoot, and fan speed (Ch3 waveform) comes up uniformly to adjust pressure. Next, Fig. 7b shows that a stepdown request from 0.8-in. to 0.4-in. pressure also provides a stable response. Finally, Fig. 7c depicts a system Power Electronics Technology June 2005 where the setpoint is unchanged but the chamber sees a significant drop in chamber pressure (i.e. a door opening causing a large drop in pressure) and the resulting system response. In general, the airflow system had a slow response, so loop stability was not hard to achieve. However, a bigger challenge was dealing with small-chamber air turbulence that caused measurement error. Proper attention to the sensor placement and adjusting PID helps stabilize the flow against the chamber air turbulence. High-End Results In conclusion, the above examples show how low-cost solutions can be applied to single-phase ac motors to provide high-end results. The above evaluation demonstrates a smart system that enhances the performance of single-phase (PSC) ac fans. Based on the traditional low-cost power control topology (TRIAC phase control) and adding a low-cost microcontroller, designers can create closed-loop control and feedback to achieve efficiency and performance that closes the gap with other, more expensive motor/drive topologies. PETech 22 www.powerelectronics.com