Case F-119/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd
Transcription
Case F-119/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd
EN 4.8.2014 Official Journal of the European Union C 253/67 EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — BN v Parliament (Case F-24/12) (1) (Civil Service — Officials — Action for annulment — Official of grade AD 14 occupying a post as Head of Unit — Allegation of psychological harassment against the Director-General — Mobility exercise — Refusal to accept appointment to a post of Advisor in another Directorate-General with the loss of the salary increase for Heads of Unit — Decision on a temporary transfer to another Advisor post — Interest of the service — Principle that the post to which an official is assigned should correspond to his grade — Action for compensation — Harm arising from non-decision-making conduct) (2014/C 253/93) Language of the case: French Parties Applicant: BN (represented initially by: S. Rodrigues, A. Tymen and A. Blot, and subsequently by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers) Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and J.F. de Wachter, and subsequently by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and V. Montebello-Demogeot) Re: Application for annulment of the decision adopted by the President of the European Parliament reassigning the applicant within the same Directorate-General of the Parliament from the post of Head of Unit to a post of Advisor to the Director of a Directorate and the claim for compensation for psychological harassment. Operative part of the judgment The Tribunal: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders the European Parliament to bear all of its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by BN. (1) OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 36. Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 25 June 2014 — Sumberaz SotteWedemeijer v Europol (Case F-119/12) (1) (Staff cases — Europol Staff — Europol Convention — Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees — Decision 2009/371/JHA — Application of the CEOS to Europol agents — Non-renewal of a fixed term contract as a member of the temporary staff — Refusal to grant a fixed term contract as a member of the temporary staff) (2014/C 253/94) Language of the case: French Parties Applicant: Stephanie Sumberaz Sotte-Wedemeijer (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer) EN C 253/68 Official Journal of the European Union 4.8.2014 Defendant: European Police Office (represented initially by D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and then by J. Arnould, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents) Re: Application for annulment of the decision of Europol not to renew the applicant’s contract for an unlimited duration and for Europol to be ordered to pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration which she could have continued to receive at Europol and any other compensation that she actually received Operative part of the judgment The Tribunal: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Declares that Ms Sumberaz Sotte-Wedemeijer is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay those incurred by the European Police Office. (1) OJ C 379 of 08/12/2012, p. 36. Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 25 June 2014 — Coutureau v Europol (Case F-120/12) (1) (Civil Service — Europol staff — Europol Convention — Europol Staff Regulations — Decision 2009/ 371/JHA — Application of the CEOS to members of the staff of Europol — Non-renewal of a fixed–term contract as a member of the temporary staff — Refusal to grant a contract for an indefinite period as a member of the temporary staff) (2014/C 253/95) Language of the case: French Parties Applicant: Christèle Coutureau (Rijswijk, the Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer) Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: initially, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents, then J. Arnould, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents) Re: Application to annul Europol’s decision not to renew the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period and an application to order Europol to pay the difference between the remuneration which she could have continued to receive at Europol and any other damages which she actually received. Operative part of the judgment The Tribunal: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders Ms Coutureau to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office. (1) OJ C 379, 8/8/2012, p. 36.