BIM implementation on Stockholm Bypass Project Using PowerCivil

C9 - BIM implementation on Stockholm
Bypass Project Using PowerCivil.
Trafikplats Akalla och Häggvik, ÅF-URS.
Track:
Civil
Presenter: Mateusz Nettmann
AGENDA
„Using Bentley’s software makes 3D a Work-In-Progress tool,
and not only final illustration product”
1. Introduction:
A. URS Company
B. People involved
2. Project description
A. FSK06 Contract of Stockholm Bypass project
B. Project goals
3. Starting design in MX* and moving over to PowerCivil
4. BIM implementations on the Stockholm Bypass Project:
A. Files/models naming convention (chaos system)
B. CAD layers and components naming convention (Client BIM system)
C. 3D objects – level of details and informations
D. Headroom and swept path analyses done in 3D
E. Using 3D contour plans for checking corridor integrity
F. Design workflow chart (from 2D to i-model)
5. What Stockholm Bypass Project requires
(more) from the software?
6. Questions
1. INTRODUCTION
1A. URS COMPANY
URS - More than 54,000 People in nearly 50 Countries
1A. URS COMPANY
URS - More than 54,000 People in nearly 50 Countries
URS Continental Europe - Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Kazakhstan,
Lithuania, The Netherlands, Poland, Serbia, Spain -1,230 employees in mainland Europe.
1A . URS COMPANY
URS - More than 54,000 People in nearly 50 Countries
URS Continental Europe - Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Kazakhstan,
Lithuania, The Netherlands, Poland, Serbia, Spain -1,230 employees in mainland Europe.
URS Poland – Gdańsk, Kraków, Łódź, Poznań, Warsaw, Wrocław – 330 employees
`
URS Poznań office – 100 employees
1B . PEOPLE INVOLVED
HOW DID WE GET INTO 3D & BIM
ANNA LEŚNIEWSKA – NOWAK
MIKE CLARKE is based in the UK
is the Technical Director and Poznan
Office Manager with responsibility for
international projects across the
Infrastructure Division of URS Poland.
Anna has 18 years of experience
in major road schemes and used to work
for many years as a highway designer
using MX and Microstation.
She is currently managing the Polish
input of all disciplines to the Stockholm
Bypass project.
and works in the Technology & Data
Solutions Group. He is the Technical
Director with responsibility for
ProjectWise development across
the Infrastructure & Environment Division
of URS. Mike has more than 25 years
of experience with Bentley and Autodesk
technologies and has worked on many
high profile projects across the globe.
He is also working with Trafikverket on
the implementation of ProjectWise for
the Stockholm Bypass.
STEFAN HAGMAN works with BIM
JOHAN ASPLUND works as a BIM
and Model development for ÅF
Infrastructure. He has a background
in Civil engineering. Working together
with Swedish Transport Administration
Engineering Department to defining how
to use BIM and models regarding
collaboration, reviewing between
technical disciplines also how to use
data from models.
specialist at the Swedish Transport
Administration Engineering Department
for Major projects. He is specialized
in object-oriented design and digital
project management towards complex
infrastructure projects where he has
been active in all phases of the design
process. Quality and optimization has
always been the main focus.
1B. PEOPLE INVOLVED
FSK06 ROADS TEAM
MATEUSZ NETTMANN
KENT CEDERHOLM
MARCIN ABEL
MACIEJ KIŚLUK
MICHAŁ BIEŃ
FUNCTIONAL
MANAGER - URS
ASSISTANT FUNCTIONAL
MANAGER - ÅF
ASSISTANT FUNCTIONAL
MANAGER - URS
DESIGNER 1 - URS
DESIGNER 1 - URS
PAWEŁ ŚLESIŃSKI
ŁUKASZ WASIK
EMILIA AUGUSTYNIAK
MAŁGORZATA PRYSIAŻNA
DESIGNER 2 - URS
DESIGNER 2 - URS
DESIGNER 2 - URS
3D & BIM COORDINATOR, URS
1B. PEOPLE INVOLVED
MATEUSZ NETTMANN
MATEUSZ NETTMANN
TEAM MANAGER
is the Road Design Team Manager based in Poznan office
of URS Poland with responsibility for international designs.
Mateusz has more than 11 years of experience in major
road projects in Poland (including 100 km motorway
project) and in the UK (both as a designer and site
engineer/supervisor). At the moment he is involved
in the Stockholm Bypass project as a Functional Manager
of Roads for FSK06 contract. Mateusz is highly
concentrated around the latest 3D techniques and BIM
process „In Roads”.
Working on a similar project and having some issues?
Do not hesitate to contact. We will share our experience
and try to help you if we can. [email protected]
The Bentley LEARNing Conference 2013 – BCR2LC15
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2A. FSK06 CONTRACT OF STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
Project Packages:
•
•
•
•
•
FSK01
FSK02
FSK03
FSK04
FSK05
Kings Curve Interchange
Rock Tunnels
Lovö Interchange
Vinsta Interchange
Hjulsta Interchange
•
FSK06 Akalla and Häggvik Interchanges
•
•
•
FSK07 Tunnel Systems
FSK08 Installations
FSK09 Towers and Stations
ÅF Consult / URS Joint Venture
For further information of Stockholm Bypass please refer to presentation: BC3LC12 ‐
Implementing ProjectWise as a Foundation to BIM on the Stockholm Bypass (BeTogether 2012)
2A. FSK06 CONTRACT OF STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
3 main tender documents to be produced:
- FSE61 – Akalla interchange area (Design and Build)
- FSE62 – Häggvik interchange area (Client Design)
- FSE623 – Ex. bridges widening (Client Design, Framework)
2A. FSK06 CONTRACT OF STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
2A. FSK06 CONTRACT OF STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
2A. FSK06 CONTRACT OF STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
- 3 km section including 27 road alignments of total length over 22 km
2A. FSK06 CONTRACT OF STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
- 11 bridges (including 3 tunnels) + number of retaining walls
2A. FSK06 CONTRACT OF STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
- Complex water & drainage and electrical & ducting networks
2B. PROJECT GOALS
- Common Data Environment
(Project Wise platform and Design Workflows)
- Intelligent model base with meta-data
(BIM coded and object oriented i-models)
- Asset management
(using Microstation item set search tool; BIM coded elements)
- Eliminate all the interdisciplinary clashes, continuous review and mark-up process
(2D multi-disciplinary normal sections and clash detection exercise in 3D, i-model and overlay file in Navigator)
-Minimize number of drawings
(1:2 000 overview plans only; 3D models take priority)
- Quantity take off directly from 3D models
(very high level of details in 3D models; using InRoads quantity manager tool)
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX
(WITHOUT USING ROADWAY DESIGNER)
AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX* ( * WITHOUT USING ROADWAY DESIGNER) AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
Getting MX models into PowerCivil DTMs
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX* AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
Getting MX alignments into PowerCivil ALG
Paved width geometry
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX* AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
Problem of importing vertical alignment directly from models
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX* AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
MX alignment export to XML and import to PoverCivil ALG
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX* AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
Using MX strings as DTM point control
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX* AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
Getting MX reverse curves into PowerCivil
3. STARTING DESIGN IN MX* AND MOVING OVER TO POWERCIVIL
The way we got MX data connected with PowerCivil
1 – directly from models
2 – via XMLs
4. BIM IMPLEMENTATIONS ON THE
STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
4A. FILES/MODELS NAMING CONVENTION (CHAOS SYSTEM)
’discipline’
’geographical zone’
4A. FILES/MODELS NAMING CONVENTION (CHAOS SYSTEM)
’structural object’
’technical system’
4A. FILES/MODELS NAMING CONVENTION (CHAOS SYSTEM)
’serial number’
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
Naming convention is based on documents:
• BH90 (Part7, Part8)
• SB11 CAD layers
• BSAB (Build Parts 96)
List of Art:
A – Architecture
B – Rock Engineering
…
K – Structures
N – Envronment
T – Roads & Traffic
W – Water & Drainage
Z – Surveying
…
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
Elements – Based on BSAB Build Parts 96
31-- – Superstructures
31B- – Superstructures for the road (universal
code for a hard surface)
31BB – Hard Strip
31BC – Carriageways
31BD – Hard shoulder
31BE – Support Strip
31E- – Superstructures for slopes
32E- – Kerb
32FB – Road ditches
…
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
Building Part – Type of Elements
Examples:
31BC61 – Carriageways pavement Type 1
31BC62 – Carriageways pavement Type 2
31BC63 – Carriageways pavement Type 3
…
31CG61 – Concrete barriers Norrortsleden type
31CG62 – Concrete barriers Stockholm Type
31CG63 Steel barriers double sided N1
…
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
Presentation – sprcifies how an object
is presented in the model
Examples:
EZ – 3D Graphics
EJ – 2D Graphics
EP – Profile
ES – Section
ED – Details
EE – Ilustration
…
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
Status – Indicates whether the item is:
N – new
E – existing
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
Location – Specifies the
exact position
of the projected information
within an object:
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
Construction ID – Assed ID
4B. CAD LAYERS AND COMPONENTS NAMING CONVENTION (CLIENT BIM SYSTEM)
Construction Stage – Used to
devide the project in terms of time
4C. 3D OBJECTS – LEVEL OF DETAILS AND INFORMATIONS
4C. 3D OBJECTS – LEVEL OF DETAILS AND INFORMATIONS
4C. 3D OBJECTS – LEVEL OF DETAILS AND INFORMATIONS
BIM CODE
AMA CODE
BoQ SUB-ZONE
CORRIDOR
CAD PROPERTIES
MATERIAL
INFORMATIONS
START STATION
STOP STATION
VOLUME
4C. 3D OBJECTS – LEVEL OF DETAILS AND INFORMATIONS
4C. 3D OBJECTS – LEVEL OF DETAILS AND INFORMATIONS
 COMPONENT NAME INTO LEVEL NAME
4C. 3D OBJECTS – LEVEL OF DETAILS AND INFORMATIONS
 CUT AND FIL PRESENTED AS 3D COMPONENTS
4D. HEADROOM AND SWEPT PATH ANALYSES DONE IN 3D
4D. HEADROOM AND SWEPT PATH ANALYSES DONE IN 3D
4E. USING 3D CONTOUR PLANS FOR CHECKING CORRIDOR INTEGRITY
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
T6010444_.3
K6010444_.5
W6010444_.2
G6010444_.3
E6010444_.4
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model)
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model), CLASH DETECTION
4F. DESIGN WORKFLOW CHART (from 2D to i-model), CLASH DETECTION
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS PROJECT
REQIURES MORE FROM THE SOFTWARE
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
A.
3D Cut and Fill representation as components
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
B.
Reporting component’s properties directly at DTM or DGN level
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
B.
Reporting component’s properties directly at DTM or DGN level
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
B.
Reporting component’s properties directly at DTM or DGN level
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
C.
Using ’rounding length’ with components and alternate surfaces
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
C.
Using ’rounding length’ with components and alternate surfaces
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
D. ’Draw slope direction pattern’ indication at ITL level
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
D. ’Draw slope direction pattern’ indication at ITL level
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
E.
SS2 (ALG, ITL, IRD) Project Wise and issue of many designers
5. WHAT STOCKHOLM BYPASS REQUIRES (MORE) FROM THE SOFTWARE
F.
Overlay/Stripping component’s properties
(Follow lowest/Follow lowest)
„Using Bentley’s software makes 3D a Work-In-Progress tool,
and not only final illustration product”
6. QUESTIONS
[email protected]
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION