V11_p087-094 - Murray State University
Transcription
V11_p087-094 - Murray State University
FIREARMS ON THE 19th CENTURY URBAN LANDSCAPE: A VIEW FROM THE KENTUCKY HISTORY CENTER SITE (15FR115), FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY Donald B. Ball The analysis of a diverse sample of firearm related artifacts recovered from the heart of historic Frankfort - a portion of the city platted and built upon as early as the l 790's - has yielded several intriguing insights into the role of firearms in Kentucky's capitol from virtually the days of earliest settlement to the First World War. This assemblage has done much to illuminate from the urban vantage point attitudes toward and uses of handguns, shotguns, and rifles and their applications for purposes of self-defense, hunting, and rodent control, respectively. Archaeologists have long been aware of the presence of frrearms and ordnance related artifacts and through the years materials recovered from a variety of sites have yielded both interesting and useful insights into the appearance of these items since the early colonial period. Though these studies have recorded many examples of early gunparts, gunflints, bullets, and related materials as they appeared at various military facilities, fur trade related sites, and farmsteads, such remains from non-military and rural contexts have typically been poorly documented. Indeed, one's normal expectations regarding artifacts of this nature in urban areas is that they appear with such infrequency (if at all) that they were an unimportant aspect of a city's artifactual residuum. Previous archaeological studies conducted in Frankfort, however, have clearly demonstrated that far from being effectively non-existant on the urban landscape, firearms were - in the context of 19th century Frankfort generally commonplace, particularly handguns and shotguns. The analysis of materials recovered from Liberty Hall (1796-1956+ ), the stately Georgian style home of the Honorable John Brown located on the Corner of Celebrities near downtown Frankfort yielded seven gunflints, eleven lead balls and shot (variably .30 to .52 caliber), one roundnosed lead bullet (.30 caliber), one percussion cap, and ten cartridge cases reflecting the use of at least two pistols (a .38 S&W and a .32 Rimfire), two shotguns (12 and 16 gauge), and a small caliber rifle (.22 BB Caps). These remains spanned the gamut of firearms history from the age of flintlocks to after 1910 as evidenced by one cartridge case headstamp (Fay 1986:102-104). Studies conducted in conjunction with the construction of the South Frankfort Floodwall by the U. S. Army Corps Donald B. Ball 312 Iowa Avenue, Louisville, KY 402081427 of Engineers recovered three cartridge cases (two .22 Shorts and a single .38 S&W) from two houselots in that portion of town (Esarey et al. 1993:40, 53). Excavations on the grounds of the Old State Capitol yielded a total of 93 firearm related artifacts. Of these, 92 pieces of munitions were recovered including cartridges and cartridge cases (for both pistol and rifle), bullets (ranging from .22 to .58 caliber), two 12 gauge shotgun brass bases, and buckshot. One incomplete (hammer missing) Model 1839 single shot military pistol was also recovered (Deiss 1988:75-77). Significantly, firearm related artifacts have been uncovered in the course of every major archaeological project oriented toward the investigation of historic era remains conducted in the city. In this regard, the excavations undertaken in the summer of 1995 by the University of Kentucky at the Kentucky History Center Site in downtown Frankfort was no exception. These excavations - to be the subject of a much more detailed project completion report - were situated two blocks from the Old State Capitol and across the railroad tracks from Frankfoit's railroad depot. For purposes of orientation, it is appropriate to note that the project area consisted of onehalf of a city block oriented lengthwise to the nearby railroad track. Within this area, excavations were conducted in four lots, hereafter referred to as Blocks. Of these, three produced materials which will be discussed herein. Block l was the site of a hotel (later boarding house) which operated from the early 1800's until ca. 1950. Three areas are of present concern: a courtyard area and two filled and later capped privies behind the hotel. Block i was the site of a brick residence; this lot was frrst built upon in the l 790's. Block 3 was a comer lot and site of a former boarding house. The recovery of a small but informative sample of fireann related artifacts from excavations undertaken in the historic heart of the city has Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology 11(1996):87-94 87 Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology afforded a rare glimpse into the role and use of firearms in a turn-of-the-century urban context and, as shall be discussed in greater detail below, has resulted in some unexpected findings related to life in this neighborhood situated but two blocks from Kentucky's capitol. Volume 11 1996 flakes closely resembling secondary flake removal on the working edge of some prehistoric flake tools. The size of this broken flint suggests that it was used in a pistol rather than a larger musket or rifle. Gun flints of blond flint were likely made in France (cf Brown 1980:79; Hamilton, ed. 1982:135-146). THE ASSEMBLAGE A total of 64 firearm related artifacts were presented for analysis. Fur ready reference, all of these materials are inventoried by artifact type and the units in which they were recovered in Table 1. Metal preservation within the areas investigated was far from ideal. Iron and steel items were encrusted with rust, lead articles were heavily oxidized, and brass in particular was typically heavily deteriorated and corroded. Though this sample was relatively small numerically, it was surprisingly quite diverse in its composition and represented the gamut of firearms technology from flintlock weapons current in 1800 to the rimfire and centerfire cartridges in common use in 1900. The present comments and the following interpretive observations will address two straight forward but interrelated questions concerning this assemblage: "What was found?" and "What have we learned from it?". "Flintlock Rifle Lockwork". An item resembling the lock of a right handed flintlock rifle sans barrel was recovered from excavations in Block 3. This piece was largely encrusted with heavy rust and reflected only the outline of the artifact. Prior to examination, this object had been undergoing electrolysis for about one month. This process had successfully begun to remove a portion of the thick encrustation. Although the upper 90% or so of the object was still covered with rust, the lower edge of the piece afforded a small degree of visibility along the lower edge of the hammer and along the bottom edge of the lockplate. This area of bare metal revealed neither screwholes nor milled surfaces such as one would expect on an item of this nature. The rounded lower edge of the lockplate and the lack of any detectable gap between the plate's flat exterior surface and the hammer suggest that this piece was derived from a tum of the century cast iron toy rather than a firearm. Additional conservation efforts will continue on this artifact. Gunflints. Popularly associated with "flintlock" firearms, gunflints were in fact utilized in several distinct types of early weapons. A single broken "blond" gunflint was recovered in Block 2. Measuring 0.858" (21.8 mm) in width, this piece displays the typical trapezoidal profile expected in a gunflint made &om a carefully prepared flint blade. The striking surface exhibits a ca. 50 degree angle and clearly shows the use removal of numerous small 88 One black gunflint was found in Feature 1030 in Block 1. Fashioned from a flint with small fossiliferous inclusions, this piece measures (as is) 1.251" (31.8 mm) in width by 1.046" (26.6 mm) in height by 0.504" (12.8 mm) in thickness. Though roughly trapezoidal in profile, the crude workmanship of this piece and the context from which it was recovered strongly suggest that this item was locally produced and may well date to a period long after gunflints were commonly used. Cartridge Cases. The 25 cartridge cases recovered from the Kentucky History Center excavations reflected both rimfire and Boxer primed centerfire types. Present were cases representing pistol, rifle, and shotgun ammunition. The following comments will address rimfire, centerfire pistol, and centerfire rifle cartridges, and shotshells. Rimfire. A total of ten rimfire cartridge cases were recovered from various areas of Block 1 (seven cases) and Block 2 (three cases). A single .22 BB (Flobert) Cap in generally good condition from Block 2 bore no evidence of an identifying headstamp. Seven examples of .22 Short cases were found. One example bore an "F" headstamp indicating production by the Federal Cartridge Company. Another case displayed an "H" headstamp indicating manufacture by Winchester. Yet another case exhibited a "U" headstamp denoting manufacture by the Union Metallic Cartridge Company (purchased in 1911 by Remington Arms Company); this headstamp continued to be used under new ownership. Three .22 Short cases were too corroded to read as was a single .22 rimfire case head (the rim of the cartridge). One well preserved .22 Long (introduced 1871) or similarly dimensioned .22 Long Rifle (introduced 1887) case displayed a "US" headstamp consisting of raised letters nestled within a slightly concave circular panel. This case was made by the United States Cartridge Company which operated from 1869 to 1936 (Barnes 1993:407). Ammunition of this type was rapidly adapted to use in numerous makes and models of derringers, revolvers, and rifles (cf. Hogg and Weeks 1992; NRA 1981; Schwing and Houze 1996); it is not possible to determine the type of weapon in which these rounds were fired. A single example of a .46 Short in rather good condition (case mouth partially crushed) was recovered Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology Volume 11 1996 TABLE 1. FIREARM ARTIFACT INVENTORY AND BLOCK/FEATURE PROVENIENCE. I l Block 1 Ftr. 1001 ···--- I Courtyard ' [Group/Item ! Block2 Ftr. 1030 - ---- Block3 Yard Backyard -- . .. Firearms "Flintlock" (cast iron toy?) 0 0 0 .- Gunflints Blond Black 0 0 Cartridge cases Rimfire 22 BB Cap 22 Short - "F" 22 Short - "H" ·-----22 Short - "U" 22 Short - illegible 22 casehead - illegible 22 Longrifle - "US" ' - 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 ' 0 1 .. ' 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 146 Short 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ··-- ---- Centerfire i:iistol 32S&W 32 S&W L~n_Q_ (?) 38 Long Colt (?) 38 Special 38 Special (?) •. - 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 .. 0 1 - Projectiles Roundnose Bullets .365~' (142.3 gr)* .366" (127.1 gr) .570" (487.7 gr) 0 1 0 0 -- •Centerfire rifle [.45-70 Go'vernment j.45-70 "Dummy" §hotgun 12 Gauge 10 Gauge -- ·- 0 I ·- 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 B 89 Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology Volume 11 1996 TABLE 1. FIREARM ARTIFACT INVENTORY AND BLOCK/FEATURE PROVENffiNCE (CONTINUED). - -· ·-· I ---- - ·- ! Grou~/item - ---- -··---- Courtyard Projectiles (Continued) Roundball .174-.180" (7.9 gr)* J_._?68-.278" (31.0 g_~) lc280-.325" (39.0 gr) .294-.360" (50.0 gr) .298-.322" (47.0 gr) .309-.327" (46.8 gr) .309-.341" (47.3 gr) .310-.332" (48.0 gr) ,.314-.322"(47.3 gr) .315-.329" (46.0 gr) 1.322-.332" (49.9 gr) ,. 324-.331" (51.7 gr) .324-.341" (50.5 gr) _. 333-.350" (56.0 gr) .334-.350" (59.5 gr) .338-.345" (59.1 gr) .355-.365" (70.1 gr) .355-.369" (<53.2 gr) Deformed (66. 7 gr) Deforme<!_(68.6 gr) .380-.382" (<75.3 gr) .425-.484" (140.4 gr) .454-.462" (141.8 gr) .461-.471" (147._0 gr) ···.65?-.692" (<357.4 gr) Gun parts Buttplate (brass) Lockplate (?) . 0 1 1 -·0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block3 -Yard -0 - 0 0 ·- ··-- -··- 1 0 - 0 0 1 1 Block2 Backyard 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 - - - - -- - --· - - ------- 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 - 0 -0 -1 - 5 19 24 15 0 0 0 ·- 0 0 1 -· 0 ·- ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -· ·- -- Block 1 I Ftr. 1001 Ftr. 1030 ·- Miscellaneous Lead lump (429.1 gr) !Provenience Totals - - Total firearm related artifacts: 0 ---- 1 64 items "Gr" = grain. Commonly used as the industry standard in reference to bullet, shot, and powder weight, 1.0 lb. contains 7,000 grains (1.0 ounce= 437.5 grains). 90 Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology from the courtyard area of Block I. Prominently headstamped with a capital "H" denoting production by Winchester Repeating Arms Company, this cartridge was produced from ca. 1870 until the entry of the United States into World War I (Barnes 1993:376). The likely weapon in which this cartridge was used was the 1861 Model Remington Army revolver. Some 12,000 of these .44 caliber percussion cap ("cap and ball") revolvers were produced by Remington in 1862 under contract to the U.S. Army . (Schwing and Houze 1996:527); the number of these weapons subsequently converted to shoot rimfire cartridges is not known. Centerfire Pistol. A total of six cartridge cases were identifiable as centerfire pistol ammunition. All examples were straight walled, rimmed types indicating their use in revolvers. A single identifiable .32 S&W was recovered. This specimen bore a headstamp reading "WRACo" denoting manufacture by the Winchester Repeating Arms Company (cf Department of Defense 1989:163). Introduced in 1878, a number of tum of the century revolvers were chambered for this round (cf. Hogg and Weeks 1992; NRA 1981). Two possible .32 S&W Long cases were encountered. Representing an elongated version of the .32 S&W round, this cartridge was first produced in 1903 (ibid.:225). Both cartridges remain in production (Barnes 1993:224; NRA 1981:200-201). Three .38 caliber cases were recovered, all of which were in a poor state of preservation. One possible .38 Colt Long case bore no legible headstamp. This cartridge was introduced in 1875 and served as the official U. S. Army revolver cartridge from 1892 until 191 l(Barnes 1993:237). This round is no longer produced. Similarly dimensioned and contemporaneous handgun cartridges include the .38 S&W and .380 Revolver rounds (ibid. :257). A single .38 Special case carried a "UMC/ 38 S&W SPL" headstamp denoting production by the Union Metallic Cartridge Company (merged with Remington Arms Company in 1910; NRA 1981:166). Introduced in 1899 (NRA 1989:70) for use in the Smith and Wesson Military and Police revolver (Barnes 1993:237), both this cartridge and the weapon for which it was designed remain in active production. This cartridge was to serve as the primary "workhorse" of lawmen nationwide until the 1930's. One additional case - possibly a .38 Special - was recovered though the headstamp was illegible. Centerfire Rifle. Two varieties of .45-70 Government cases were retrieved. A single example of a "regular" case from the backyard of Block 2 bore a headstamp reading "U S C CO! 45 70" indicating manufacture by the United States Cartridge Company, a firm in business from 1869 to 1936 Volume 11 1996 (Barnes 1993:407). This cartridge was introduced in 1873 for use in the Model 1873 Springfield "trapdoor" single shot military rifle. During the period 1873-1893, the Springfield Armory in Springfield, Massachusetts, produced over 383,000 rifles and carbines chambered for the .45- 70 Government cartridge (Schwing and Houze 1996:673-674). It was replaced as a "frontline" round by the .30-40 Krag rifle and cartridge in 1892 but was used by Spanish-American War units in the later portion of that decade and among state militias units well after 1900 (ibid.:91). A total of nine .45-70 "Dummy" cartridges were recovered from Feature 1001 in Block 1. This sample consisted of the bodies of eight cartridge cases and nine bullets. The "heel" of each bullet was still surrounded by the uppermost portion ("neck") of a badly corroded cartridge case. These cases bore no primer and were never meant to be fired. Rather, these inert cartridges were intended to be used for training purposes and the outer edges of the base of these cases displayed numerous small scratches and indentations (likely caused by extractor abrasion) suggesting frequent insertion and removal from the action of a weapon. Each case was characterized by two shallow, elongated concave indentations just above the rim of the case near the lower portion of the wall of the cartridge. Each indentation extended almost - but not quite - half way around the base and served to indicate the special function of these rounds. One case bore a legible headstamp reading "R/6 80/F" indicating it was a rifle cartridge produced in June 1880 at the Frankford Arsenal in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Shotgun Shells. The remains of two shotgun shells were recovered. The basal portion of a 12 gauge shell from Block 2 bore a clear headstamp reading "UM C Col No (primer pocket) 12/ CLUB". Another base, this derived from a 10 gauge shell was excavated from Feature 1001 in Block 1. This badly deteriorated item carried a headstamp reading "U M C CO/ NO 10". Both shellheads were produced by the Union Metallic Cartridge Company and were of the wound paper base wad and paper wall variety. Each case exhibited a "high brass" configuration meaning that the hull was made to accommodate a "low" paper base wad which provided for greater powder capacity. Projectiles. Multiple examples of two types of projectiles were recovered: roundnosed bullets and roundball shot or bullets. All were fabricated from lead and none displayed evidence of a metal jacket or plating such as frequently encountered in the design of contemporary ammunition . 91 Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology Roundnose Bullets. Two expended roundnose lead bullets were recovered from Block 2. The configuration, size, and weight of these items suggests that both were fired in handguns, most likely revolvers. As expressed in caliber (bullet diameter), the smaller of the two pistol bullets had a diameter of0.365" and exhibited reverse land and groove impressions indicating it had been fired from a weapon with right-hand rifling suggesting a handgun manufactured by Smith and Wesson or any of a number of other American gunmakers (cf. NRA 1989:199). The dimensionally wider projectile had a diameter of 0.366" and evidenced left-hand rifling impressions indicating that it had likely been fired from a Colt or British made revolver (ibid.). The markedly rounded ogive of the noses of these bullets, the presence of concave bases, and machine marks appearing in the crimping groove recess of the heavier bullet indicate that these projectiles were swaged (formed from lead wire under pressure) rather than molded. This production method is consistent with the late-19th and early 20th century cartridge case types recovered from the History Center Site. In all likelihood, these bullets these bullets were fired from a rifled weapon with a nominal bore diameter of .38 caliber such as a handgun chambered for .38 Special or .38 Smith and Wesson cartridges. Three minie balls, typically associated with Civil War era longarms (cf. Coates and Thomas 1990; Madaus 1981), were recovered from Feature 1030 in Block 1. This bullet type, the invention of French army officer Major Claude Minie, was first used in conjunction with the special needle-fire bolt-action rifle developed in 1840 by Johann von Dreyse in Prussia (NRA 1989:39-40). None of the recovered examples exhibited any indication of either deformation or having been fired. All were retrieved from the same unit and it appears that they had been deposited at the same time. Each of these projectiles had a diameter of ca. 0.570", and weighed ca. 487.7 grains (1.11 ounce). Typically issued in the form of paper cartridged ammunition (cf Coates and Thomas 1990:67-68), such bullets were widely produced by both Union and Confederate armories and munitions contractors and used in weapons such as the Model 1861 and Model 1863 Springfield muskets. These paper cartridged bullets and their associated longarms continued to serve the U. S. Army into the 1870's and do not necessarily indicate Civil War era deposition. Roundball Shot and Bullets. The aggregate assemblage contained 25 lead roundball projectiles (see Table 1) ranging from ca. 0.174-0.180" (7.9 grains) to 0.656-0.692" (<357.4 grains) in diameter. The entirety of this sample exhibited varying degrees of deformation but none showed evidence of rifling imprints suggesting that all had been 92 Volume 11 1996 fired in either shotguns or large caliber smoothbore arms. In light of the wide range of ball sizes fired in 19th century firearms including derringers, pistols, muskets, and shotguns, it is not possible to definitively identify the weapon(s) which fired these projectiles. Largely based upon the context from which these items were recovered, it is not unreasonable to suggest that the majority of these items were used in shotguns for specific applications which will be discussed. Using contemporary specifications as guidelines for categorizing the recovered examples, the Frankfort excavations yielded (in ascending size) the following shot sizes (with quantities in parentheses): BB (1); 2 Buck (1); 1 Buck (1); 0 Buck (10); 00 Buck (4); and 000 Buck (4). Four larger roundballs ranged in size from 0.425-0.484" (140.4 grains) to 0.656-0.692" (<357.4 grains). It is not improbable that these projectiles were fired in older, smoothbore weapons. Two roundballs showed evidence of distinctive sprew marks clearly denoting production in a mold rather than manufacture in a shot tower. One roundball - the only such item found in the courtyard area of Block 1 - so produced was 0.355-0.365" in diameter and weighed 70. l grains. A larger, possibly musket, ball exhibiting a sprew mark was found in Feature 1001 in Block 1. This ball measured 0.454-0.462" in diameter and weighed 141. 8 grains. The balance of the examined roundballs showed no evidence of mold production. Gunparts. Gunparts were infrequently encountered during the conduct of the excavations. Only two such items, both from Block 2, were recovered. The most obvious such item was a heavy brass buttplate. Resembling a large inverted "L", the weapon from which this item was removed has not been identified although in general appearance it is likely that it was originally associated with a military longarm. This piece bore no identifying marks. One item generally resembling the elliptical rear portion of a lockplate was recovered. This item was obviously broken from a larger piece and in its present condition measures 1.502" (38.2 mm) in length, 0.955" (24.3 mm) in height, and ca. 0.132" 3.4 mm) in thickness. A single screwhole (0.205"/5.2 mm diameter) is located near the crest of the ellipse. Though heavily encrusted with rust and only partially cleaned by means of on-going electrolysis, the visible portions of this piece displays no identifying hallmarks. The source of this item is unknown and it may in fact have been derived from a non-firearm source such as a ca. 1900 cast iron toy gun. Miscellaneous. A single, roughly triangular, lump of lead weighing just under one ounce was recovered from Block Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology 2. Such material may have resulted from household plumbing repairs (sealing pipe joints) or other domestic activities and the relationship of this item to firearm related activities is problematical. INTERPRETIVE REMARKS The analysis of the numerically restrictive sample of firearm related materials from the Kentucky History Center excavations has produced several intriguing insights into the use and role of weapons in this urban area. Based upon both the nature of the items recovered and, importantly, their specific locational contexts, the following observations are possible. 1. The relative abundance of .22 caliber cartridge cases in conjunction with the frequent occurrence of rat bones in virtually all excavation areas suggests that the residents of this city block were not above taking some informal target practice at these disease carrying rodents. Such cartridges were widely used in both handguns and rifles. The use of relatively low powered .22 caliber cartridges (all of which would have propelled their projectile at sub-sonic velocities) would produce little noise yet be highly effective in controlling the resident pest population. 2. As represented by the diversity of the recovered cartridge cases, handguns were a popular form of selfdefense. In keeping with the types of firearms available at the time, these weapons were generally .32 or .38 caliber revolvers. The observation that six out of seven recovered cartridge cases (six centerfire pistol and a single .46 caliber rimfire case) were found at Block 1 - the site of a hotel and therefore an area associated with a large transient population - further suggests that it was not necessarily rare for people to travel armed. 3. The relative abundance of roundball projectiles recovered from feature context in Block 1 - significantly associated with large quantities of faunal remains suggests that hunting in the outlying areas around Frankfort was a popular activity. This aspect of shooting should not be construed as sport hunting but more likely represents the harvesting of hogs which were roaming the woods of the region in a day and age prior to the passage (and active enforcement) of laws requiring the fencing of farm animals (cf. Murrey-Wooley and Raitz 1992:74-75). Of particular note, the sheer size of the majority of the roundball projectiles recovered (various sizes of buckshot) clearly makes a statement that small fur bearing mammals and game birds were not the intended prey. Shot of this nature is best suited for larger game (deer, bear, or hog sized) and a shotgun loaded with large buckshot would have been ideal for taking game in dense woods or brush Volume 11 1996 where the likelihood of a long distance shot was minimal. Such hunting was likely done at distances of 50 yards (45.7 meters) or less. It may be anticipated that the majority of the shot pellets recovered were discarded along with the bones of the animal which they were used to kill in the features at the hotel at Block 1. 4. The recovery of a single crudely made black flint gunflint in a feature dating well past the era in which flintlocks were routinely used suggests that such weapons remained in active use in limited civilian circles long after their effective era of usage by both the military and civilian shooters. Further, it is not overly speculative to suggest that the person who likely deposited the recovered homemade gunflint in the Block l feature (a privy) may well have been the same individual who in fact had shot game for sale to the hotel's kitchen. 5. Specialized military hardware in the form of special production .45-70 "Dummy" (inert) cartridges reflect the comings and goings of army personnel assigned to or having business at the Kentucky Armory located near the downtown area and the hotel situated on Block 1. The present analysis of frrearm related artifacts recovered from the Kentucky History Center Site in conjunction with a review of similar materials excavated in other areas of Frankfort has served to establish that among the city's civilian population firearms were introduced effectively at the time of its settlement (as evidenced by early gunflints recovered from two residential lots) and remained a viable aspect of the urban landscape throughout the 19th century (as shown by late centerfire revolver cartridge cases at several lots). Excluding rifle related cartridges (typically military rounds), the relative frequency of non-military ammunition remains reflects that handguns (revolvers) and shotguns were the firearms of choice among the city's residents for personal protection and hunting, respectively. Late in the century, small bore (.22 caliber rimfire) rifles were likely used in an attempt to control the rat population which thrived because of the sanitation and food disposal practices of the period. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author gratefully acknowledges the kind assistance of Dr. Kim McBride and Mr. Jeffrey Watts-Roy of the University of Kentucky - Lexington in making these materials available for study. All materials discussed herein are curated by the Kentucky Historical Society. The comments presented herein have been extracted from a more detailed study of these artifacts scheduled to appear in the final report of excavations for the Kentucky History Center Site. 93 Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology REFERENCES CITED Barnes, Frank C. 1993 Cartridges of the World (7th edition). DBI Books, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois. Brown, M. L. 1980 Firearms in Colonial America: The Impact on History and Technology, 1492-1792. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. Coates, Earl J. and Dean S. Thomas 1990 An Introduction to Civil War Small Arms. Thomas Publications, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Deiss, Ronald W. 1988 Archaeological Investigations at Kentucky's Old State Capitol. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort. Department of Defense 1989 Identification Guide for Military Small Caliber Ammunition - Volume I: Small Arms Cartridges to 15mm. Manual RPC-822-243-860-88, Volume I (reprinted by Rhino Publishing Company, Seneca, South Carolina). Essary, Mark E., William A Huser, Jr., and John F. Scarry 1993 A Phase I Subsurface Cultural Reconnaissance of Portions of Seven City Blocks for the Proposed South Frankfort Floodwall, Franklin County, Kentucky. Archaeological Report No. 295, Program for Cultural Resource Assessment, University of 94 Volume 11 1996 Kentucky, Lexington. Fay, Robert P. 1986 Archaeological Investigations at Liberty Hall, Frankfort, Kentucky. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort. Hamilton, T. M. (editor) 1982 Indian Trade Guns. Pioneer Press, Union City, Tennessee (originally published 1960 as Missouri Archaeologist volume 22). Hogg, Ian and John Weeks 1992 Pistols of the World (3rd edition). DBI Books, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois. Madaus, H. Michael 1981 The Main Street Pocket Guide to American Longarms. Main Street Press, Pittstown, New Jersey. Murrey-Wooley, Carolyn and Karl Raitz 1992 Rock Fences of the Bluegrass. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington. National Rifle Association (NRA) 1981 American Handguns and Their Makers. National Rifle Association of America, Washington. 1989 NRA Firearms Fact Book (3rd edition). National Rifle Association of America, Washington. Schwing, Ned and Herbert Houze 1996 Standard Catalog of Firearms (6th edition). Krause Publications, Iola, Wisconsin.