2008-87 endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
Transcription
2008-87 endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
(2008)79,772-776 in 0totaryngotogy 0perativeTechniques OperativeTechniquesin Otolaryngology E LS E V I E R Endoscopic nostomy dacryocystorhi RajSindwani, MD,"RalphB. Metson,MDb'' From the "Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology & Sinus Surgery, St. Loui,s University, St. Louis, Missouri; bDepartmentof Otolaryngology, MassachusettsEye and Eai lryfirmary, Boston, Massachusetts;and the 'Department of Otology and l-a.ryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. KEYWORDS Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy ; EDCR; Epiphora; Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) With the recent proliferation of endoscopic surgical techniques, there has been renewed interest in performing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) via an intranasal endoscopic approach. Advantages of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) include: excellent visualization, the ability to thoroughly evaluate the location and size of the rhinostomy site, and the avoidance of a facial scar. EDCR is a safe and effective alternative to raditional external DCR surgery, and offers comparable successrates. O 2008 Elsevier tnc. All rishts reserved. Intranasal approachesto correct nasal lacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) were first described more than a century ago.l-3 These techniques were limited becausethey provided poor visualization of the lacrimal sac in the superior nasal cavity and lacked effective instrumentation to adequately open the sac. With the recent proliferation of endoscopic surgical techniques,there has been renewed interest in performing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) via an intranasal endoscopic approach.a-6In addition to avoiding a facial scar,endoscopicDCR (EDCR) enablesthe surgeonto identify and correct common intranasal causes of DCR failure, such as adhesions, an obstructing middle turbinate, or an infected ethmoid sinus. Patientselection Primany EDCR may be indicated in the management of epiphora or dacryocystitis associated with either primary acquired NLDO or obstruction secondaryto specific inflammatory, infiltrative, congenital, or traumatic causes,including injuries from sinus surgery.7This procedure is most effective when the level of obstruction is determined to be at or distal to the junction of the lacrirnal sac and duct, although more proximal pathology may also be managed endoscopically.The use of EDCR is particularly advantaAddress r:eprint requests and correspondence: Raj Sindwani, MD, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinoiogy & Sinus Surgery, St, Louis University. 3635 Vista Avenue. 6 FDT, St. Louis. MO 63104. E-maiL address: [email protected]. 1043-t810/$ -scc front matter O 2008 F,lsevier Inc. AII rishts reserved. doi : | 0. t0l 6/j.otot.2008.09.009 geous in patients with concomitant sinonasaldisease,patients with a previous history of radiation therapy to the head and neck, pediatric patients, and in revision procedures. For patients who require endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in addition to EDCR, this proceduremay be convenientiy and efficiently performcd with use of the same instrumentation during the same setting. EDCR is contraindicated in patients with a suspectedneoplasm involving the lacrimal apparatusor in those in whom such a lesion cannot be excluded. Relative contraindications to EDCR include the presenceof a large diverticulum lateral to the lacrimal sac, common canalicular stenosis,or retrieval of laree lacrimal system stones. SurgicaItechnique EDCR may be .performed under either local or general anesthesia.The nasal cavity is decongestedwith 0.05Vo oxymetazoline spray, and a 4-mm diameter zero degree endoscopeis used for the injection of lVo Xylocaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrinejust anterior to the attachment of the middie turbinate along the lateral nasal wall. Pledgets soaked tn 4Vococaine solution may then be placed along the lateral nasal wall and middle meatus for further decongestion, if preferred. Lacrimalsaclocalization From an endoscopic,intranasalperspective,the lacrimal sac can be found beneath the bone of the lateral nasal wall just anterior to the attachment of the middle turbinate (Fig- Dacryocystorhinostomy Sindwaniand Metson Endoscopic L73 Bone removal To expose the lacrimal sac, the bony lacrirnal fossa must be uncovered. Bone removal may be achieved with a variety of instmments and should commence at the maxillary [ine, proceeding anteriorly. Although the lacrirnal bone located posterior to the maxillary line may be taken down with minimal force, the authors recommend the use of a highspeed drill with a cutting burr or an ultrasonic surgical aspirator for removal of the dense frontal process of the maxilla which is situated anteriorly (Figure 5). Adequate exposure of the sac is confirmed by blotting of the medial canthus and movement of a lacrirnal probe which has been passedby the assistantthrough a canaliculusinto the sac. A well-placed,generousbony rhinostomy (at least8-12 mm in diameter) will facilitate a successful outcome. Openingof the lacrima[sacand intubation Figure 1 The lacrimalsacis locatedbeneaththeboneof the lateral nasalwall just anteriorto the attachmentof the middle tLrbinate. ure l). The maxillary line is the key intranasal landmark for endoscopic DCR (Figure 2).8 It is readily identified as a curvilinear eminence along the lateral nasal wall that runs from the anterior attachment of the middle turbinate to the root of the inferior turbinate, Its location corresponds to the suture line between the maxillary and lacrimal bones which runs in a vertical direction through the lacrimal fossa. The maxillary line bisects the lacrimal sac such that the frontal processof the maxilla covers the anterior half of the sac, and the thin lacrimal bone covers the posterior half. The uncinate processlies just medial to the lacrimal sac and must be removed to accessthe thin lacrimal bone covering the posterior portion of the sac. In contrast, exposure of thc anterior sac necessitatesremoval of thicker bone locatedjust anterior to the maxillary line. Sac localization in difficult cases may be facilitated through transillumination using a 20gauge fiberoptic endoilluminator introduced through the superior or inferior canaliculus, or with the aid of a surgical navigation system (Figure 3). After removal of the overlying bone, the lacrimal sac is incised with a sickle knife (Figure 6). It is often helpful for the assistantto "tent out" the medial wall of the lacrimal sac with the previously inserted lacrimal probe(s). The medial wall of the lacrimal sac may then be removed with forceps and submitted for histopathologic examination. After the media-l sac wall has been resected, a bicanalicular tube is placed by intubating both canaliculi, with subsequentretrieval of the probes from the rhinostomy site endoscopically (Figure 7). The tubing is then tied at the nasalvestibule forming a closed-loop stent (Figure 8). The stents are usually removed at 6 weeks postoperatively, but intervals tbr stent removal ranging from 4 weeks to 6 months have been advocatedbv others.e'to MucosaI incision Surgical dissection is begun with removal the uncinate processlocatedposteriorto the maxillary line (Figure 4). An air space is often entered which corresponds to the infundibulum or an anterior ethmoid air cell overlying the lacrimal sac. Next, an incision is made in the mucosa on the lateral wall with a sickle-knife and it is elevated with a Freer elevator. It is helpful to place this incision well anterior to the location of the lacrimal sac to allow for full exposure of the overlying bone. After the mucosa is widely elevated from the underlying bone, thru-cutting forceps are used to remove it. Figure 2 The maxillary line bisects the lacrimal sac such that the lrontal process of the maxilla covers the anterior half of the sac, and the thin lacrimal bone beneath the uncinate process covers the posterior half. 774 2008 Vol 19, No3, September in Qtotaryngology, Techniques 0perative Location of the lacrimal fossa (cross-hairs) relative to anterior ethmoidal air celis demonstrated in 3-dimeirsions using an image Figure 3 guidance system. (Kolibri system, BrainLAB, Munich, Germany). (Color version of figure is available online.) Mitomycin-C and adjunctiveprocedures Some surgeonselect to apply topical mitomycin-C to the intranasalrhinostomy site. Mitomycin-C is an antimetabolite that inhibits fibroblast function and has been used to modulate postsurgical fibrosis in a variety of applications. Figure 4 Surgical dissection begins with the removal of the uncinate process located posterior to the maxillary line. An incision is next made in the mucosa on the lateral wall over the reeion of tlre lacrirnal fossa/sac. Reports on the utility of mitomycin-C in prevention of postoperative mucosal fibrosis and rhinostomy closure have demonstratedmixed results.tt-t+ 1g used, mitomycin-C is applied to the rhinostomy site in a concentration of 0.4 mglmL with the use of a cotton-tip applicator, for a period of 4 minutes, after which copious saline irrigation is performed. Figure 5 A high-speed drill with a cutting burr is used to remove the thick frontal processof rhe maxilla, which overlies the anterior oortion of the lacrimal sac. 176 Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology, Vo|.].9, No 3, September 2008 Conclusions Endoscopic surgery for lacrimal outflow obstruction is a safe and effective alternative to traditional external DCR surgery. EDCR is particularly advantageousin patients with concomitant sinonasaldisease,patientsWith a previous history of radiation therapy, pediatric patients, and in revision procedures. Advantages include excellent visualization, the ahility to thoroughly evaluate the location and size of the rhinostomy site, and the avoidanceof a facial scar. Recent studiessuggestthat the successratesof endoscopicDCR are comparable to those achieved through external approaches. References 1. Caldwell GW; Two new operations for obshuction of the nasal duct, with prcservation of the canaliculi. Am J Ophthalmol l0:189-192, 1893 2. West .IM: A window resection of the nasal duct in cases of stenosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 12:654, 1.914 3. Mosher HP: Re-establishing intranasal drainage of the lacrimal sac. Laryngoscope 3I :492-521, l92l 4. Mctson R: The endoscopic approach for revision dacryocystorhinostorny. Laryngoscope I0O: 1344-1347, 1990 5. Massalo BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ: Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy: A new approach to nasolacrima.l duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 108:I 172-l t76, 1990 6. Woog JJ, Sindwani R: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and conjuncti vodacryr:cystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39: I 00 I 1 0 1 7 .2 0 0 6 7. Bartley GB: Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction; an etiologic clas_ sification system, case reports, and a review of the literature. part l. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 8:237-242, 1992 8. Chastain JB, Cooper MH, Sindwani R: The maxillary line: anatomic characterization and clinical utility of an important surgical landrnark. Laryngoscope L 15:990-992, 2005 9. Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S: Endoscopic inferior dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 23:152- 157, 1998 10. Morl"imore S, Banhegy CY, Lancaster JL, et al: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone steuting. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44: 37t-373.t999 11. Deka A, BhattacharjeeK, Bhuyan SK, et al: Effect of mitomycin C on ostium in dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 34:557-561, 2006 12. Chan KO. Gervais M, Tsaparas Y, et al: Effectiveness of intraoperative mitomycin C in maintaining thc patency of a frontal sinusotomy: A preliminary report of a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Rhinol 20:295-299,2Q06 i3. Zilelioglu G, Ugurbas SH, Anadotu Y, et al: Adjuncrive use of miromycin C on endoscopic lacrimal surgcry. Br J Ophthalmol 82:63-66. 1998 14. Camara JG, Bengzon AU, Henson RD: The safety and efficacy of mitomycin C in endonasal endoscopic laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg l6: I 14-l 18, 2000 15. Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ: Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20:50-56, 2004 16. Apaydin KC, Fisenk F, Karayalcin B, et al: Endoscopic transnasal 17. 18. 19. 20. dacryocystorhinostomy and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Ophthalmologica 2 18:306-3I l, 2004 Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA: Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 104:269-274, 1994 Orrerci M, Orhan M, Ogrchnenoglu O, et al: Long-term results and reason$ for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostorny. Acta Otolaryng ol 120:319-372, 2000 Ityet ts, Racy E, Assnuline M: Complications of standardizedendonasal dacryocystorhinostonry with unciformectomy. Ophthalmology I I l:837-845, 2004 Migliori ME: Endoscopic evaluation and management of the lacrimal sump syndrome. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg l3:28 l-284, lggT