Epeiric Seas and Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Transcription
Epeiric Seas and Global Biogeochemical Cycles
School of Earth & Environment Epeiric Seas and Global Biogeochemical Cycles (or, Palaeogeography Matters!) Rob Newton Collaborators: Nefeli Kafousia, Eoghan Reeves, Paul Wignall, & Simon Bottrell. Structure 1. C isotopes in; A modern analogue – Florida Bay & Bahama Banks An ancient example – Late Ordovician, Laurentia 2. Mo/TOC relationships modern anoxic environments 3. Early Jurassic European Epicontinental Sea. A sulfate isotope proxy Mo/TOC relationships 4. How might epeiric seas modify GBC’s? What do we mean by Epeiric Seas? The flooded margins and interiors of the continents. Modern examples are the Baltic, the North Sea, Hudson Bay Their extent is dependent on sea level The areal extent of Epeiric Seas through time The proportion of the continents whose surface is flooded is at an all time Phanerozoic low → So we don’t know if modern environments are good analogues. Hay et al, 2006 Modern analogues Little Bahama Bank Atlantic Reef Tract • Deeper water very close to open ocean. Bahama Banks • Not laterally disconnected Florida Florida Bay Atlantic Reef Tract Great Bahama Bank from open ocean. Andros Florida Bay • Partially isolated from open ocean by barrier islands. δ13C & δ18O Florida bay molluscs - Lloyd, 1964 δ13C DIC Florida bay, Bahama Banks - Patterson & Walter, 1994 Modern analogues - δ13C DIC Atlantic Reef tract Great & Little Bahama Banks Florida Bay Florida -1‰ difference -4‰ difference -6‰ difference Differences read at average ocean salinity (blue vertical line = 35‰) Red shading = range of open ocean DIC δ13C values (Broecker & Maier-Raimer, 1992; Kroopnick, 1985) Data from Patterson & Walter, 1994 La ur en tia Late Ordovician Palaeogeography Ia tu pe s Image from University of Northern Arizona website. Author - Ron Blakey (http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/global_history.html) Late Ordovician – study area • Samples constrained in time by two laterally extensive Kbentonite layers (altered ash layers) • Bentonites have identical Ar-Ar ages of 454 within error • Thought to represent no more than 0.5 Ma although sampling designed to reduce this substantially Holmden et al, 1998, Panchuk et al, 2005 Late Ordovician δ13C timeslice Iapetus = +1.3 to +1.4‰ Range = -2.0 to +2.5 ‰ • Analysed bulk carbonate samples • Both +ve and –ve gradients in δ13C away from the Iapetus ocean. • Isotopic relationships are also preserved in organic matter suggesting that they are not the result of diagenesis Iapetus Panchuk et al, 2005 Late Ordovician δ13C timeslice -ve relative to Iapetus Lower productivity, shallow water, affected by org-C remineralization +ve relative to Iapetus Higher productivity, deeper water, affected by burial export of org-C. Fanton & Holmden, 2007 Late Ordovician sea level rise Low stand As sea level rises the balance of processes affecting the δ13C of DIC changes From Fanton & Holmden, 2007 Late Ordovician sea level rise High stand The change of C cycling regime around circled site promotes a positive shift of up to 4‰ From Fanton & Holmden, 2007 Comparisons with global δ13C curve Indiscriminate measurements without reference to palaeogeography lead to large deviations in perceived global signal Panchuk et al, 2005 Mo in the modern ocean Residence time ~800 Kyr Concentration ~105 ±5 nmol/kg OXIC environments – behaves conservatively. Present as the stable unreactive molybdate ion (MoO42-) ANOXIC environments - transformed to particle reactive thiomolybdate (MoOxS2-(4-x), x=0-3). Removed by adsorption to humics/oxyhydroxides and precipitated into Fe-sulfides. Fastest removal under sulfidic conditions. Oxic-suboxic facies most important sink for Mo in modern ocean, BUT the burial flux much greater under anoxic conditions. Mo/TOC in modern anoxic basins Algeo & Lyons, 2006 Clear relationship between Mo and TOC but varies depending upon location Saanich inlet > Cariaco Basin > Framvaren > Black Sea Mo/TOC in modern anoxic basins • Good correlation between deepwater dissolved Mo concentration and Mo/TOC in sediments Algeo & Lyons, 2006 Mo/TOC in modern anoxic basins • Independent estimates of deepwater renewal co-vary with Mo/TOC • Long renewal = low Mo/TOC • Short renewal = high Mo/TOC This relationship between deepwater renewal time and Mo/TOC promises to provide important new information for ancient systems and is of special importance to the study of Eperic Sea dynamics. Algeo & Lyons, 2006 Application of Mo/TOC to ancient environments. • Open shelf location • Approximate slope of Mo/TOC would imply deepwater restriction similar to the Black Sea (!). • Surface samples, not core from single location → incorporates lateral variations in conditions. Algeo & Lyons, 2006 • Anoxic setting – but water column only rarely euxinic. • Moderate levels of H2S are → Need to demonstrate euxinicity important for Mo removal before interpreting deepwater renewal times in ancient systems. Early Toarcian palaeogeography YORKSHIRE Image from University of Northern Arizona website. Author Ron Blakey (http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/global_history.html) TIBET Early Toarcian anoxic event (Data from Kemp et al, 2005; Newton & Bottrell, 2007; McArthur 2000; Cohen et al, 2004) Sections: Yorkshire coast and Tibet CAS analysed as a marine-SO4 isotope proxy • Yorkshire: belemnites • Tibet: whole rock carbonates Yorkshire SO4 isotope data δ34S • Stable background at ~16-17‰ • ~+6‰ excursion starts in the middle of the OAE interval Excursion occurs over a maximum time interval of 1.5 Ma. VERY RAPID Low early Jurassic seawater sulfate concentration? Modern 29 Early Jurassic 12-16 Yes, but is it low enough? Horita et al, 2002 Low early Jurassic seawater sulfate concentration? Modern ocean residence time = ~20 Ma Early Jurassic residence time = ~8-11 Ma Still too slow to reconcile with a 6‰ shift in 1.5 Ma → Yorkshire data on their own argue for an isolated European Sea Tibet SO4 isotope data δ34S No systematic change in δ34S, but same average as Yorkshire (+19.1 vs +19.3‰) Grey shading denotes tentative estimate of the timing of the anoxic event based on C isotopes & biostrat. Data comparison • Comparison of δ34S • consistent with common S source but different isotopic evolution δ18O differences consistent with increased internal S cycling within the European Sea compared to open ocean Vertical dashed line & shading denotes Tibetan average ±1sd Early Toarcian Mo/TOC • Data from same • • • Yorkshire section as CAS isotope data Interval 2 = OAE (shaded) Interval 3 = post OAE sediments Evidence for euxinia at this level. Pearce et al argue that this is a signal of global euxinia, but it is much more likely that this represents evidence of regional deepwater isolation. Pearce et al, 2008 Early Toarcian summary 1. Both a seawater sulfate isotope proxy and Mo/TOC relationships are consistent with extremely slow deep water renewal during the OAE interval in the European eperic sea. 2. Watermass isolation can occur even in apparently well connected shallow seaways and even affect the second most abundant anion in seawater. How might epeiric seas modify global biogeochemical cycles? Eperic Seas: • Maintain a crucial position between weathering fluxes & the open ocean. • Have shorter timescale of burial than continental margin sediments – A shorter return to the Earths surface environment controlled by sea level. • May well respond differently to the effects of climatic events, so the response of earth system will be different depending on the areal extent of epeiric seas. E.g. A warming climate might induce anoxia & carbon burial in Eperic seas but not necessarily in other marine environments. Conclusions 1. Epeiric Seas were not just extensions of the open ocean: A large difference in chemistries should be considered the norm rather than the exception. 2. Their geochemical response to environmental change is extremely variable and related to palaeogeography and sea level and can amplify or diminish the magnitude of changes seen in proxies for GBC’s. 3. Because of their role as conduit for weathering fluxes between the land and the oceans Epeiric sea environments may act as modifiers of GBC’c but we have yet to fully understand their effect.