to view results - Moore Research Services

The Commonwealth Institute South Florida’s
2014 Women-Led Business Survey Results
Research Report Sponsored By:
Knowing which path to
take can be a bit
...WE MAKE IT CLEAR.
Looking for information
to guide your company’s
future? Moore Research
can help you…
in
in
•
•
•
•
•
Focus Groups
Online & Web-Based Research
New Product & Service Testing
Mobile Marketing Research
Package Testing
•
•
•
•
•
Understand your customers
Find targeted solutions
Make confident and reliable business decisions
Advertising Research
Industry Trends Analysis
Brand Awareness
Customer/Employee Satisfaction
Price Sensitivity
•
•
•
•
•
Market Feasibility
Positioning Research
Website Usability Testing
Competitive Intelligence
Exploratory Research
Moore Research Services, Inc.
A global market and opinion research company • moore-research.com • 877-88-MOORE
METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE
Other
9%
Industry ClassificaUon Retail
2% and successes experienced by women
The goal of the survey was to capture challenges
leaders. Email invitations were
Education
2%
Service sent to individuals selected by survey partners’ internal lists of providers, members and
member affiliates. In addition, the14% I.T.
4%
Engineering/ConstrucUon surveyLegal
was sent to women’s organizations and
Florida as well as posted on social11% media.
4%chambers of commerce throughoutConsulUng 9% Recipients
were
also
invited
to
forward
the
invitation
to
other
women
leaders.
As
an
incentive,
respondents
were
offered
a
Wholesale/Distribution
5%
Not-­‐for-­‐profit 8% AdverUsing/MarkeUng 7% complimentary
copy of the 2014 research results.
Manufacturing
6% From these invitations, a total of 241 usable responses were obtained.
Healthcare 7% Financial
6%
Real E
state 6% Real state
6%
Listings
of Ethe
Top 50 Women-Led For-Profit Organizations
and the Top 10 Women-Led
Not-For-Profit Organizations
in
Financial 6% Healthcare
7%
Florida are included in this report. The lists, ranked by 2013 revenues, are comprised
of companies in which
Manufacturing 6% a woman is the
Advertising/Marketing
7%
Wholesale/DistribuUon 5% organization’s
chairwoman of the board, CEO/president,
owner and/or senior
level executive. Only companies
for which
Not-­‐for-­‐profit
8%
Legal 4% revenues
were
reported
in
the
survey
are
included
in
the
overall
ranking.
The
respondents
represent
numerous
industries
Consulting
9%
I.T. 4% and size
of companies as illustrated in the following
graphs.
Engineering/Construction
11%
EducaUon 2% Service
14%
Retail 2% Other 9% 100%
Industry
Industry Classification
ClassificaUon Service 14% 11% Engineering/ConstrucUon Under $ConsulUng 500,000
35%
9% $500,000 to $2,000,000
8% 24%
Not-­‐for-­‐profit 7% 17%
AdverUsing/MarkeUng $2,000,001 to $4,000,000
7% 5%
Healthcare $4,000,001 to $6,000,000
6% Real Estate $6,000,0001 to $8,000,000
4%
6% Financial $8,000,001 to $10,000,000
3%
6% Manufacturing Over $10,000,000
12%
5% Wholesale/DistribuUon 4% Legal 4% I.T. 2% EducaUon 2% Retail Other 9% Revenue
Revenue Categories
Categories 12% Over $10,000,000 $8,000,001 to $10,000,000 $6,000,0001 to $8,000,000 $4,000,001 to $6,000,000 $2,000,001 to $4,000,000 $500,000 to $2,000,000 Under $500,000 3% 4% 5% 17% 24% 35% 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
For the third year, The Commonwealth Institute South
Florida (TCI) and Moore Research Services, Inc. have
partnered to survey women-led organizations in Florida
with this year’s sponsor being CBRE. The survey is used
to obtain information and insights to better understand
how these organizations are faring compared to a year
ago, what business challenges they are facing, and their
outlook for the next 12 months.
BUSINESS & ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
•
2013 was a good year for women-led organizations in Florida. They are optimistic about economic conditions, with many expecting continued improvement through 2014; over three-quarters of women leaders look for significant growth in their organizations.
LEADERSHIP
2
•
Women spend time mentoring other women, but most report that this is something they do on
their own, outside of any formal organizational
program. Connecting to a professional women’s organization and having a mentor both remain
important, but less so than 24 months ago.
•
Approximately 60% of Florida women leaders serve on a board of directors. However, there is a large gap
between serving on a for-profit board and serving on a non-profit board. Research suggests when a
business owner is involved on a corporate board, it directly impacts their company’s bottom line. They network and learn new business skills by volunteering outside their normal sphere of influence. About a
quarter would like to serve on a board but have not
had the opportunity. In addition, most (80%) who are currently serving on a board are doing so because
they were asked, rather than actively seeking the opportunity for themselves.
CHALLENGES & TRENDS
•
Women-led organizations continue to show concern about being able to find ways to continually grow their business as well as their cash flow. In addition,
their ability to hire employees with the proper fit for
their organization remains challenging.
•
In 2014, leaders are exploring new opportunities for growth, focusing on entry into new markets as well as considering new product lines/services and
technology innovation. A large majority will also concentrate on existing business lines and expansion of current markets.
•
The impact of the Affordable Care Act is expected to have a significant effect on leader’s employment
strategy in 2014 and beyond, even those with less than 50 employees.
CURRENT & PROJECTED BUSINESS & ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
2013 was a year of growth for Florida women
2011
2012 reported
2013
leaders; 50% of businesses
growth,
up0%
from 45% in 2012
and
42%
in
2011.
0%
0%Of
those
(33%)
14% reporting higher
13%revenues, most
10%
experienced increases over 20%, while 30%
16%
14%
13%
experienced increases between 11-20% and
28%
28%
27%
37% in the range of 1-10%.
Revenue
from
previous
year
2011-2013
Revenue from previous year 2011-­‐2013 Grow substanBally 28%
31%
30%
14%
14% are feeling20%
Women-led
organizations
100%
1
considerable optimism1regarding the current
Decrease substanBally Not sure 20% Decrease substanBally Not sure 1% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 13% 14% 16% 10% 13% 14% Decrease moderately 2014 2013 2012 0% 0% 0% 2013 2012 2011 Looking forward to 2014, there is
a trend of increased confidence;
almost 78% of respondents look
for modest or substantial growth
in their organizations, up from
70% in 2013 and 67% in 2012.
Revenue expectations for 2012-2014
9% 8% 30% 31% 28% 27% 28% 28% Stay about the same 2012 Revenue 2013
2014for 2012-­‐ 2014 expectaBons 2%
1%
2% 24% 16% Grow 3%
substanBally 3%
1%
8%
9%
3%20% 20%
16%
Grow moderately 17%
47%
54%
54%
16% 20%
16%
24%
17% Stay 100%
about the same 100%
100%
3% 20% Grow moderately business and economic conditions in Florida.
This builds on the last two year’s favorable
results, and reverses the previous downward
trend of growth noted between 2008 and
2011. Their outlook has improved 15% from
just one year ago, with well more than half
(68%) responding they think conditions have
improved. When looking forward 12 months,
61% expect improvement with an economic
recovery or rapid growth.
Decrease moderately 14% 14% 47% 54% 54% Although there is much
confidence in current conditions
there are some who are less
optimistic, projecting no growth,
but this is not widespread and
trending downward. Only
16% project flat revenue and
those projecting a moderate or
substantial decrease in revenue
is only 4%, down considerably
from 11% in 2012 and 2013.
This caution is reinforced in their
outlook for 2014, as 34% state
they believe the economy will
remain at the status quo.
3
BIGGEST CHALLENGES IDENTIFIED FOR 2014
HIRI
EXPA
NDIN
NRGNMENT
FEES
G
S
R
E
TOM
S
E
G
LENSALES
CUS
CY
GRO
Q
FIED
UALI
STAF
EXPE
F LO W
CARSEGHULATIONS
L
A
H
C WTH
S
TA XE
POLI
Not surprisingly, many mentioned taxes and regulatory compliance costs as
barriers to expanding their business; concern over government, policy and
tax issues filled out the top rankings. Organizations also indicated that they
find hiring to keep up with demand and hiring qualified staffing as a challenge.
This is also found elsewhere in the survey, where many point to hiring talent
that aligns with the organization’s culture as an on-going difficultly.
GOVE
While women-led organizations are more optimistic about business and
economic conditions in Florida than they were 12 to 24 months ago, there
remains significant concern about being able to find ways to grow their
business and cash flow. These are the top challenges indicated by leaders,
followed by a corresponding concern with gaining and maintaining customers
and keeping up with demand.
NSES
F
“Growing and hiring in a still somewhat uncertain economy - the fear of the unknown (fueled
by the recent downturn) can be paralyzing at times. Growth and hiring is essential; however,
keeping growth in check when demand is great is difficult.”
CONSIDERING NEW OPPORTUNITIES
In terms of major areas of
concentration,2012
leaders are2013
feeling 2014
Construction of new locations
6%
7%
10%
confident and will focus on
Acquisition of new business
18%
12%
14%
entering
into new markets19%
as well 21%
Technology innovation24%
Internal estructuring 24%
23%
as rconsidering
new product
lines/ 22%
New product lines/services
34%
36%
39%
services and technology
innovation.
Entry into new markets49%
38%
43%
67% oalso
indicate
they will63%
Expansion f existing m67%
arkets
61%
Growth in existing products/services
concentrate
on58%
expanding64%
existing 67%
business lines, up from 58% in the
2012 survey. To finance these areas
of concentration, by far most are
planning on using internally generated
funds (63%) over the second choice of
borrowing from a financial institution
(10%).
4
Leaders will focus on several strategies
to enhance their profitability and
deal with the challenges they face as
they are predicting an upward trend
of new possibilities. The top two
strategies are extremely close, with
market demand/growth ranked in the
lead followed by networking (50% and
49% respectively). At 40%, diversifying
services rounds out the top three.
Areas of ConcentraMon AREAS OF CONCENTRATION
67% 64% Growth in exisMng products/services 58% 61% 63% 67% Expansion of exisMng markets 43% 38% Entry into new markets 39% 36% 34% New product lines/services Internal restructuring Technology innovaMon AcquisiMon of new business ConstrucMon of new locaMons 22% 23% 24% 21% 19% 24% 14% 12% 18% 10% 7% 6% 49% 2014 2013 2012 JUGGLING RISK WITH CAUTION
When looking at taking a risk in 2014, responses were varied and mixed. Personnel/organizational structure and finances
were the two top areas indicated for risk taking, with a risk-adverse “none/not sure” coming in third. Rounding out the
top four responses, many predict they will take risks involving expansion and creating/developing new markets.
When looking at taking a risk in
their business, many identified
organizational changes related to:
• Hiring new talent
• Increasing training
• Restructuring roles
“I will purchase and introduce many new
product lines. My hope is that these
product lines will increase business,
however there is always a financial risk.”
They also emphasized the importance of hiring employees
that offer additional expertise.
Those mentioning financial security as a risk talked about increased
pricing, minimizing expenses and/or obtaining financing or investors.
There is not one prominent financial risk option noted, rather they
are varied, with a mix of loans, use of equity lines, obtaining a private
equity investor and investing capital to develop new products as
options listed.
Over half (55%) of leaders are expecting to moderately or
substantially increase their workforce in 2014. This is up from 43%
in 2013 and demonstrates another source of significant optimism for
the year ahead.
“We are planning to expand to
new locations. This would be a
major risk because we need to
make sure that we choose the
right location, the right personnel,
implement the operations to
mirror the main office.”
5
LOOMING CONCERNS
Cash flow and adverse economic conditions remain on top of the list of concerns for women leaders in 2014, setting a
pattern of three years in a row. The concern over adverse economic conditions is down 8% since last year. Rounding out the
top concerns are: existing U.S. competition, government regulation, and difficulty in responding to evolving customer needs.
In addition, difficulty in hiring and recruiting employees who fit in the company culture was also ranked as a significant
concern.
For three consecutive years, when asked what business issue keeps them up at night, growing and maintaining profitability
as well as keeping customers happy were the top causes for restless nights.
4
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
AREAS OF CONCERN
38% 36% Cash flow 36% Adverse economic condiUons ExisUng U.S. compeUUon Difficulty in finding employees who fit culture Difficulty in responding to customer needs Governmental regulaUon Health care costs TaxaUon Rising supplier costs Difficulty in hiring ImplementaUon of health care law (new 2013) Management issues PoliUcal gridlock Ability to obtain financing 6
21% 15% 12% 12% 20% 27% 31% 25% 19% 17% 23% 18% 16% 21% 22% 15% 24% 16% 11% 13% 13% 11% 2013 2012 8% 9% 10% 12% 9% 8% 11% 7% 9% 8% 5% 13% 2014 17% 46% 44% 46% HEALTH BENEFITS AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
In general, there is continued uncertainty and confusion surrounding the Affordable
Care Act (ACA) and its implementation. Changes and delays are adding to this
uncertainty, so it is not surprising to have some seemingly conflicting responses to
the questions regarding the ACA and healthcare.
The top two responses regarding the ACA were close but divergent. 43% stated
they do not expect the ACA to impact their business while the next highest
response at 39% indicated they expect to experience increased costs. When
looking further at the data, however, of the 43% not expecting any impact, 92%
are businesses that by definition are not covered by the Act as they have 50 or
fewer employees. What is interesting is that many of these same businesses with
less than 50 employees indicate that they will experience some negative impact in
various areas stemming from the ACA. The ability to add new employees, inability
to keep current staffing levels, investing in the business, and even dropping health
care for employees are among their concerns.
Main concerns regarding the impact of the ACA
when looking at those companies with more
than 50 employees:
• Inability to keep current employee levels
• Drop in full-time employees
• Cost increases
Overall, of those responding, 41% currently do not offer health care and by default
would not expect to experience any impact.
FINDING BALANCE
There is heightened discussion around the issue of “work-life balance” with wellrespected women leaders weighing in from different perspectives. Some support the
statement that it is possible for women to achieve a balance between work and their
personal lives while others object to the concept that women can have it all, and the
remaining are somewhere in the middle.
This year’s survey reflects this push-pull dialogue with just over half of women leaders
(51%) stating they are satisfied with their time split between work and their personal
lives, and 42% stating they are spending more time on their business than they would
prefer.
Clearly, women continue to strive towards finding balance in their work and private life. It is not always easy, as women
leaders continue to report taking on additional job responsibilities including marketing, sales, project management and
human resources in an effort to manage their business and control expenses.
7
WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP
connection to a women's professional network
2012
2013
2014
17% There are no
24%
22%
big changes in the
13% opinions expressed
13% around 12%
women’s
ortant 30% leadership 35%
36%
from 2013. Overall,
women40% led organizations
28% believe that
30%
having a
a women’s professional
1 connection to 1
1
mentors
2012
5%
3%
ortant 33%
59%
1
network is important, 66%, which is up
slightly from 63% last year. Complementing
this trend,2013
the majority of women
2014 view
having a mentor as being important to
16%
21%
their organization, currently at 76% of
5%
3%
respondents. This is a significant drop from
31%
30%
92% in 2012, but only down slightly from
48%
46%
79% in 2013.
1
Importance of a connection to a
women’s professional network
12% 13% 13% Not important 92
2012 2014 2013 22% 24% 17% No connecCon 1
22% 24% 17% 2012 Importance of mentors
46% 48% Very important 30% 31% 33% Somewhat important Not important No connecCon 3% 5% 3% 5% 2014 21% 16% 2013 2012 RECOGNIZING WOMEN’S CONTRIBUTIONS
Women-led organizations remain divided on whether they believe that business and community leaders recognize their
contribution to the economic health of Florida. Most state they do not feel properly recognized and included specific
suggestions on improving this impression, such as creating awareness of women-led businesses through more awards,
women being appointed to higher-profile positions in the community and on corporate boards, and an increase in overall
media coverage.
An overwhelming number of women-led organizations have been philanthropic
and/or given back to their community. Over three-quarters (78%) have financially
supported a charity/charities, 46% allow their employees to volunteer during
working hours and 36% have held collection drives for charities. Aligning with
their corporate mission, leadership within the community as well as personal/
employee fulfillment are the main reasons for donating and giving back.
8
40% 36% 35% 30% Somewhat important When asked about developing women
leaders in their organization, the majority
(78%) report spending time developing
other women in their organization, yet only
30% 15% indicate they have a formal program
Very important 28% in place to do so. Women-led organizations
40% are closely split on whether they would
36% 21%
have an interest in a program for grooming 35% Somewhat important 3%
30% emerging women leaders, with 55% stating
30%
they would and 45% indicating
12% no interest. 2014 46%
Not important 13% 2013 13% No connecCon 30% 28% Very important “More events, more
opportunities and
more women in high
level positions helping
other women owned
businesses.”
59% INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
For the past two years, women-led organizations remain consistent regarding whether owning intellectual property (IP) is
an asset for their business. This year, slightly more (45%) responded they find it important, versus 36% who do not. When
asked why they hold that view, many who said it was not important stated their business is their intellectual property or they
are service providers and thus have no need to own intellectual property. For those who own or plan to own IP, they viewed
it as good for the future of the business, creates protection for services and products, and can aid in attempts to diversify
revenue.
While the National Women’s Business Council views owning intellectual property as an indicator of strong entrepreneurial
activity, there seems to be confusion regarding what intellectual property is and what role it might play in organizations’
competitiveness. However, many state it is good for the future of their business and either currently own intellectual
property or have pending intellectual property.
GETTING ON BOARD
According to the Alliance Board for Diversity’s recent
report, “Missing Pieces: Women and Minorities on
Fortune 500 Boards,” men hold a bulk of the board seats
at American companies, with women representing just
17% of board seats, a percentage that hasn’t changed
since 2004. The 2013 Catalyst Census: Fortune 500
Women Board Directors confirms the same percentage,
announcing that while companies based in other countries
are moving ahead with plans to advance women to top
leadership, progress in the Fortune 500 remains flat.
Research suggests that involvement on corporate boards
directly impacts the bottom line for companies. According
to the Credit Suisse Research Institute, companies with
women on their boards outperformed companies with
no women on their board by an average of 26%. Raising
women’s profile by raising a company’s profitability
and performance goes a long way in establishing the
important role of women business leaders. Currently,
54% of Florida women leaders serve on a non-profit board
of directors while 8% serve on a for-profit board. This
significant disparity between serving on a non-profit and
corporate board reflects the lack of gender diversity at the
Fortune 500 companies.
Serving on corporate boards often differs in significant
ways from being on a non-profit board. For-profit
boards may be compensated and be closely involved in
important decisions regarding disbursement of profits
and financial resources, including stock equity and
dividends. While serving on a non-profit board is an
important way to increase a woman leader’s profile and
network in the community, for-profit board service is
viewed differently in the private sector and may be a tool
to increase credibility in the business community.
About a quarter, 23%, would like to serve on a board but
have not had the opportunity and 35% have encouraged
other women to get on boards. Further, of those who
serve on a board, 80% were asked to serve instead of
volunteering themselves.
In light of the lack of women on for-profit boards, it
may be more difficult to break into this arena but the
opportunity to increase gender diversity is high.
9
FEATURED LEADERS
Anne Deli,
Chief Marketing Officer,
American Road Group
Anne Deli has metamorphosed from
Advertising Executive in New York
City to Chief Marketing Officer of
one of the worlds most recognized
brands to a successful business
entrepreneur. Along the way she
was recognized early as one an elite
“40 under 40,” and later as Business
Woman of the Year and Most
Influential Women in Orlando, the
headquarters today. All the while
she has raised a family; focused
her philanthropy on children in need and the arts; and maintained a
balance that keeps her both happy and challenged. For the last decade,
she has co-owned and run American Road Group, which she has built
into the premier Harley-Davidson dealerships as well as a unique
business of 17 Harley merchandise stores in major tourist destinations
across the U.S. To this Anne credits the loving support of her husband
and business partner and a fantastic team of people who are totally
dedicated to our company and the Harley brand!
Mary Jo Eaton,
Executive Managing
Director, CBRE
As Executive Managing Director
for CBRE Florida, Mary Jo Eaton
leads more than 900 professionals
in seven (7) offices across the
state and oversees all lines of
business within the state. With
over 24 years of experience in
commercial real estate, Ms. Eaton
is experienced in virtually every
aspect of the real estate business,
including brokerage, management
and operations, construction
management, asset management, acquisition and disposition and
contract negotiations. Prior to relocating to the Florida market in
January 2011, she had oversight for CBRE’s Asset Services business in
the Baltimore- Washington, D.C. region.
Ms. Eaton has been recognized by the South Florida Business Journal as
one of the “Top 100 Power Leaders” (2013, 2014) and a “Heavy Hitter in
Real Estate” (2012). IREM also named her one of the “Women Changing
the World of Real Estate” (2013). Ms. Eaton is Executive Sponsor of
CBRE’s Hispanic Networking Group and active in CBRE’s Women’s
Network, which provide mentoring, professional development and
personal enrichment to CBRE professionals. Ms. Eaton is a member of
the South Florida Board of Advisors for The Commonwealth Institute
and sits on the board of The Beacon Council, Miami-Dade’s official
economic development partnership.
10
Judy Leibovit,
Owner, Sweet Endings
Starting out from her home kitchen,
Judy Leibovit, owner of Sweet
Endings, did the unthinkable to
many and conquered her dreams.
For more than 25 years, Sweet
Endings has been a mouthwatering staple to restaurants,
hotels, country clubs and public
establishments through food service
distributors, QVC and the U.S.
Military overseas. Sweet Endings
is incomparable to any other
nationally known dessert company
because of their innovative “nitch” desserts.
It all started in 1989, when a courageous young mom, Judy Leibovit,
took the risk and started what is widely known today as Sweet Endings.
Being the eldest of four children, it is in Leibovit’s character to help
others. Therefore, when a less fortunate family needed desserts for a
Bat Mitzvah, Leibovit took charge, baked and provided the family with
delicious deserts. With raves from all guests, Leibovit knew desserts
were her calling.
Donna E. Shalala,
President,
University of Miami
An accomplished scholar, teacher,
and administrator, University of
Miami President Donna E. Shalala
personifies outstanding leadership
and dedication to public service.
Since becoming president of UM in
2001, UM has advanced into the top
tier of U.S. research universities.
Shalala received her A.B. degree
from Western College for Women
and Ph.D. degree from the Maxwell
School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University. She
served as president of Hunter College from 1980 to 1987 and chancellor
of the University of Wisconsin-Madison from 1987 to 1993. Shalala
was assistant secretary for policy development and research at the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development during the Carter
administration. In 1993 President Bill Clinton appointed Shalala U.S.
secretary of health and human services. During her eight-year tenure,
she directed welfare, FDA, and Medicare reform and greatly expanded
children’s health insurance coverage and immunization rates.
Shalala continues to play a prominent role to improve the quality of life
in cities and health care on the national and international level. She was
appointed by President George W. Bush to co-chair with Senator Bob
Dole the Commission on Care for Returning Wounded Warriors, and in
2008 received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest
civilian award. In 2009 she was appointed chair of the Committee
on the Future of Nursing at the Institute of Medicine of the National
Academy of Sciences. In 2010 she received the Nelson Mandela
Award for Health and Human Rights, which recognizes individuals for
outstanding dedication to improving the health and life chances of
disadvantaged populations in South Africa and internationally. Shalala
serves as a distinguished senior fellow in the Economic Studies Program
and the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings
Institution.
The Commonwealth Institute of South Florida
The Commonwealth Institute (TCI)
is a vibrant nonprofit organization,
founded to help women-led businesses
become and stay successful. Our
mission is to help women CEOs, Entrepreneurs and Senior Executives grow
their business through peer mentoring,
education, development and high-level
networking. The cornerstone of TCI’s
approach is peer to peer mentoring in
a confidential, small group atmosphere
called forums. TCI also raises money
to provide scholarships for emerging
women business owners and executive
directors of other not-for-profits.
TCI supports members’ leadership
efforts, gives them an opportunity to
share in each other’s networks and
provides a path for success through
collaborative business relationships.
The organization is “community-based” and the programs and events
are varied, motivational and uniquealways focused on helping participants
develop personally and professionally.
Our two signature events are our
Leadership Luncheon and our Top
50 Women. These annual luncheon
events draw 300+ women CEOs and
Senior Executives. Our Top 50 Women
event is where we release the list of top
50 women-led businesses and top 10
non-profits in Florida and recognize
Since its inception, TCI has worked
these outstanding women. We offer
with several hundred women-led
several levels of membership, our
companies. TCI currently has more
general membership and our forum
than 300 members whose companies
memberships as well as development
have annual revenues ranging from
programs for emerging and high
$100,000 to more than $200 million.
potential women managers, highTCI has chapters in South Florida
energy business seminars and member
and Boston. The South Florida region
gatherings where members learn,
serves Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm network, share information and inspire
Beach Counties.
each other.
W e are now celebrating a milestone of ten years in South Florida! We wouldn’t have made it this far without the
amazing women that have given their time and talents to our organization.
A special thanks to our TCI South Florida 2014 Advisory Board:
Sandra Finn
Linda Alexander
Doris Neyra
Wells Fargo
Private Supporter
Cross Country Home Services
Amparo Bared
Sara Herald
Barry University
Carlton Fields, P.A.
Mary Carroll
Akerman-Senterfitt
Laura Kaplan
Linda Paresky
Ryder
U.S. Trust
Treasurer
Diane Davis
Lisa Kauffman
Merrill Lynch Wealth Management
President
Donna Dickey
Miami Herald Media Co.
Mary Jo Eaton
CBRE, Inc.
Dorothy Eisenberg
Gerson, Preston, Robinson
Celebrity Cruises
Jennifer Knight
Newport Board Group, LLC
Edith Osman
Private Supporter
EC at Large
Toni Randolph
Private Supporter
EC at Large
Sue Romanos
Christine Kotler
CAREERXCHANGE
Aimee LeWinter
Founding Chairperson
Baptist Health South Florida
PNC Bank
Naomi Nixon
Lois Silverman
Phyllis Swersky
The MelTech Group
University of Miami
Visit our website: www.commonwealthinstitute.org
11
TOP 50 WOMEN-LED FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN FLORIDA
TOP 50 WOMEN-­‐LED FOR-­‐PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN FLORIDA 12
Rank Name Title Organization City Industry Number of Employees 1 Kathleen Crampton President, CEO UnitedHealthcare Community Plan of Florida Sunrise Healthcare 300 2 Mary Jo Eaton 3 4 5 CBRE, Inc. Miami Real Estate 901 Anne Deli Nancy Batchelor Robin Ranzal Knowles Executive Managing Director President Sales Associate President American Road Group EWM Edgewater Ranzal Kirsten Dolan COO One Parking, Inc. 7 8 9 Olga Ramudo Lisa Somerville Barbara Bibas Montero President, CEO President, CEO Founder, COO Express Travel Restor Telecom, Inc. SafetyPay 10 Catherine Colan Muth CEO O. R. Colan Group, LLC Tallahassee Retail Real Estate Information Technology Parking Management and Consultation Service Service Financial Acquisition Services for Public Infrastructure 300 6 191 6 Orlando Miami Beach Boca Raton West Palm Beach Miami Leesburg Miami Beach 11 Claudia Londono President Miami Wholesale and Distribution 27 12 13 Adela Gonzalez Teresa Meares President President Kim Sweers Managing Partner Miami Lakes Jacksonville Pompano Beach 15 Christine Franklin President 16 Sue Romanos President, CEO Service Wholesale and Distribution Marine Sales, Service, Parts, and Storage Engineering and Construction Service 1013 25 14 EYMAQ / EYMAQ PROJECT MANAGEMENT Future Force Personnel DGG Tactical Supply FastBoats Marine Group Cherokee Enterprises, Inc. CAREERXCHANGE 17 Rachel A. Sapoznik President, CEO Sapoznik Insurance Consulting 57 18 Lorraine Celestino Wilde CEO Service 61 19 Michele Sutton President 365 20 Angela Petrakis President Manufacturing Engineering and Construction 21 Pernille Ostberg President, CEO Matrix Home Care, LLC Healthcare 671 22 Ginger Martin President, CEO Financial 35 23 Kay Stephenson President, CEO Tallahassee Information Technology 69 24 Celeste Notardonato, CPA MBA President, CFO Rockledge Engineering and Construction 14 25 Laura Masella President Orlando Manufacturing 92 26 April Salter President American National Bank Datamaxx Applied Technologies, Inc. The Integration Factory, Inc. New York International Bread Co. Salter>Mitchell Tallahassee 30 27 JoAnn P. Forance President J P and Concepts Co. Fort Myers Advertising / Marketing Engineering and Construction 28 Sandra Foland Owner, CEO The Baron Group, Inc. dba Baron Sign Manufacturing Riviera Beach Signage 45 29 Linda Watson Owner, President Rainmaker, Inc. Food and Beverage 4 30 Ann Sabbag Founder, CEO Health Designs Workplace Wellness 116 31 Madelaine Lock President Mount Dora Security Systems Integrator 30 32 Celine de la Sierra President Hialeah Engineering and Construction 10 33 Bonnie Crabtree Managing Director Miami Consulting 17 GO Airport Shuttle & Executive Car Service Sutton Ferneries, Inc. Diversified Window Solutions, Inc. SmartWatch Security & Sound, LLC Sierra Commercial Construction, Inc. Korn Ferry Miami Lakes Miami North Miami Beach Fort Lauderdale Miami Longwood West Palm Beach Oakland Park Fort Lauderdale Ponte Vedra Beach 375 31 159 85 147 23 47 2823 27 33 Rank Name Title Organization City Industry 34 Lisa Davis CEO Analytics Partners Information Technology 35 Rank 36 34 37 Jennifer Cramer Name Miranda Monahan Lisa DRavis Susana obledo President Title CEO CEO CEO Founder, Wholesale and Distribution Industry Information Technology Information Technology Manufacturing 25 Number of Employees 6 29 28 35 38 Jennifer ramer Meg GCreen President Founder, CEO Wholesale and Distribution Financial 25 11 36 39 37 Miranda Monahan Tanya RM
eyer Susana obledo CEO President Founder, CEO Information echnology Temporary ETmployment Manufacturing Agency 6 1006 28 38 40 Meg Green MD Leslie Baumann, Founder, CEO CEO Miami Miami Financial Healthcare 11 27 39 41 Tanya Meyer Lane Hickey-­‐Wiggins President CEO Mount Dora Lakeland Temporary Employment Manufacturing Agency 1006 28 40 42 Leslie Baumann, Christina Hite MD CEO President Miami Longwood Engineering Healthcare and Construction 27 21 41 43 Lane Sally Hickey-­‐Wiggins Hayes CEO President 28 8 Christina Hite Betsy McGee President President Engineering and Wholesale and Distribution Construction 21 8 43 45 Sally HCayes Judith uppy President Owner, President Saint Lakeland Petersburg Fort Longwood Lauderdale Saint Sarasota Petersburg Manufacturing Wholesale and Distribution 42 44 Wholesale and Distribution Healthcare 8 905 44 46 Betsy M
Annie McGee ecias President President Wholesale and Distribution Construction 8 60 45 47 Judith Cuppy Judy Leibovit Owner, President President Healthcare Manufacturing 905 24 46 48 Annie MFecias Deborah uddy President President The Spice Lab Organization M-­‐PowerTech, LLC Analytics CUBE PCartners ARE Meg G
reen & The Spice Lab Associates M-­‐PowerTech, LLC ACE Staffing Unlimited, CUBE C
ARE Inc. Meg GCreen & & Baumann osmetic Associates Research Institute ACE Douglass Staffing USnlimited, creen Inc. Printers Baumann Cosmetic & Dix.Hite + Partners, Research Institute Inc. Douglass creen Federal ESastern Printers Inc. International, Aluminum istributing, Dix.Hite + PD
artners, Inc. Inc. dba ADI Metal Federal Senior EHastern ome International, Companions, Inc. Aluminum istributing, JA & M DDeveloping Inc. dba ADI Metal Corp. Senior Home Sweet Endings Companions, Inc. JA &
M
D
eveloping MediaSource Corp. Worldwide Jacksonville Pompano Beach City Bradenton Jacksonville Miami Lakes Pompano Miami Beach Bradenton Mount Lakes Dora Miami Number of Employees 29 Construction Advertising / Marketing 60 5 47 49 Judy Leibovit Debbie Margolis Horwitz 24 4 48 50 Deborah Fuddy Ann Duncan Manufacturing Production and Content Creation Advertising / Marketing Real Estate President, President Sweet Endings Executive Kreative Kontent Co MediaSource Producer President Worldwide Founder, President Vertical Integration, Inc. President, Executive Kreative Kontent Co Producer Founder, President Vertical Integration, Inc. Fort Pembroke Lauderdale Pines West Palm Sarasota Beach Pembroke Tampa Pines West Palm Fort Beach Lauderdale Tampa Tampa 5 16 Fort Production and Content 49 Debbie Margolis Horwitz 4 Lauderdale Creation Ann Duncan Tampa Real Estate 16 50 TOP 10 WOMEN-­‐LED NOT-­‐FOR-­‐PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN FLORIDA TOP 10 WOMEN-LED NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN FLORIDA
Number of Rank Name Title Organization City Industry Employees 1 Donna E. Shalala President University of Miami Coral Gables Education 13710 TOP 10 WOMEN-­‐LED NOT-­‐FOR-­‐PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN FLORIDA North 2 Rank 3 1 4 5 2 Dr. Barbara Weinstein Name Sister Linda Bevilacqua Donna Shalala Gillian ET. homas Kristi MWollis Dr. Barbara einstein President, CEO Title President President President, CEO President, CCEO EO President, 6 3 4 7 5 8 6 Kim L. Cavendish Sister Linda Bevilacqua Gillian Thomas Deborah Spiegelman Kristi Mollis Tina Philips Kim L. Cavendish President, CEO President President, CEO CEO President, CEO President, CEO President, CEO 9 7 Ellyn SOpiegelman krent Deborah CEO CEO 8 10 Philips Eileen Tina Maloney-­‐Simon President, CEO CEO 9 10 Ellyn Okrent CEO Eileen Maloney-­‐Simon CEO Family Central, Inc. Organization Barry University University f Miami Museum of Socience, Inc. Everglades University Family Central, Inc. Museum of Discovery and Barry University Science Museum of Science, Inc. Miami Children's Museum Everglades University Palm Beach Habilitation Museum oCenter f Discovery and Science Florence Fuller Child Miami Children's CM
useum Development enters Palm B
each H
abilitation YWCA of Greater Miami-­‐
Center Dade, Inc. Florence Fuller Child Development Centers YWCA of Greater Miami-­‐
Dade, Inc. Not-­‐for-­‐profit Industry Education Education Not-­‐for-­‐profit Education Not-­‐for-­‐profit 410 of Number Employees 1792 13710 77 Not-­‐for-­‐profit Education Not-­‐for-­‐profit Not-­‐for-­‐profit Education Not-­‐for-­‐profit Not-­‐for-­‐profit 120 1792 77 130 250 122 120 Not-­‐for-­‐profit Not-­‐for-­‐profit 110 130 Lake Worth Miami Not-­‐for-­‐profit Not-­‐for-­‐profit 122 180 Boca Raton Not-­‐for-­‐profit 110 Miami Not-­‐for-­‐profit 180 Lauderdale City Miami Coral Gables Miami North Boca Raton Lauderdale Fort Miami Lauderdale Miami Miami Boca Raton Lake Worth Fort Lauderdale Boca Raton Miami 250 410 13
CBRE
CBRE CBRE
E
R
CB
RE
BRE
E CB
CBRE
RE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE
B
C
C
CBR
CBRE
BRE
E
BRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E
E
R
E
C
B
R
E
C
R
C
B
R
B
E
C
B
E
C
R
E
C
R
CB
CBR
RE
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE
B
E
C
E
C
R
R
B
E
B
C
CB
RE
BRE CBRE C RE CBR
CBRE
CBRE
BRE
E CB
RE C
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
C
E
CB
CB
RE
CBR
BRE CBRE C RE CBR
RE
CBRE
E CB
CBRE
BRE
RE C
E CB
CBRE
B
RE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE E
B
C
R
R
C
B
CBR
CBRE
CBRE
RE C
BRE
E CB
CBRE
E CB E CBRE
RE C
BRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB BRE CBR
R
B
C
E
R
C
C
CBRE
C
E
RE
CB
RE
BR
E
RE
CB
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE
C
E
B
C
CB
CB
CB
RE
CBR
RE
BRE CBRE C RE CBR
RE
BRE
CBRE
E CB
CBRE
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE
BRE
RE C
E CB
CBRE
B
RE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE E CBRE
B
E
C
B
E
C
R
C
R
B
E
C
CB
C
BR
CB
BRE
E
CBR
CBR
BRE
RE
E C
CBR
BRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C E CBRE E
RE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE E CBRE
E
R
E
R
R
B
C
R
C
B
E
R
C
CBR
CBR
CBRE
E CB
E CB E
RE C
BRE
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE BRE CBR BRE CBR
BR
B
E
C
C
R
B
E
C
E
R
E
C
B
R
R
B
E
R
C
E
C
C
B
C
B
E
B
E
R
C
B
R
C
CB
CB
RE
RE
E C E CBRE CBRE C RE CBR
RE
RE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
BRE
BRE
B
B
E
B
E
C
B
E
C
S
C
C
R
C
S
R
E
B
A
B
E
R
E
E
E
R
E
C
B
C
E
R
H
B
R C
R
R
E
C
B
RE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE TALLA CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR I L L E CB CBRE CB E CBRE CBRE CB E
R
E
R
V
C
R
C
B
E
R
C
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE J A C K S O N RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB
R
B
E
B
E
C
B
B
R
E
E
C
B
R
E
C
E
R
C
C
E
B
R
E
R
C
B
R
R
B
E
R
C
R
B
B
C
B
CB
CB
CB
E C
CBR
BRE
BRE
RE
E C
CBRE
BRE
E C RE CBRE CBRE C
CBRE RE CBRE
RE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
E
B
B
E
R
C
C
R
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
RE
BRE
BR
RE
CB
E
RE
BR
E C
BRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE BRE CBR BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE
E
R
E
E
C
R
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
B
CBR
CBR
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
BRE
RE C
E CB
CBRE
BRE
RE C
BRE
RE C
BRE
BRE
E
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB LANDO C CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
C
E
R
R
E
C
B
E
E
C
C
B
R
E
O
B
R
E
C
R
E
C
B
R
E
C
R
B
R
B
E
E
E
C
R
B
C
B
E
C
CBR
B
R
E
R
E
R
C
B
C
C
BR
CB
BR
CB
CB
BRE
E C
CBR
BRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
RE C
RE C
BRE
BRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
BRE CBRE CB E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE E CBRE
C
E
C
R
C
E
R
B
R
B
E
E
C
B
R
R
B
E
C
CB
CB
RE
CBR
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
RE
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
BRE
E CB RE CBRE
C
CBRE CBRE CB RE
CBRE
C
BRE
E
CB
BRE
RE C BRE CBR
E
CB
RE
E
R
B
B
B
R
E
C
B
C
E
C
B
E
R
B
C
R
C
R
E
C
B
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
CBR
RE
E CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE E CBRE
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
B
C
B
R
E
E
C
B
C
E
C
R
B
R
C
R
C
B
E
B
B
C
R
E
C
B
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE
BRE
CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE E CBRE
B
E
CB
E
C
R
E
R
B
E
R
B
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
E
C
B
R
B
C
R
E
R
B
B
E
C
RE C CBRE CB E CBRE CBRE CB E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE
RE C BRE CBR
B
B
C
C
CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
B
C
E
R
BR
CBRE
CBRE
AMPA
BRE
E CB
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE T BRE CBR E CBRE
E
C
R
E
C
R
B
R
B
B
E
E
E
C
C
B
E
C
E
C
R
R
R
C
R
B
R
CB
CB
RE
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
B
E
C
E
C
C
R
R
B
B
E
E
E
C
C
B
BR
CB
CBR
BRE
BRE
E CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
CBRE
CBRE
RE C
CBRE
RE C
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
C
CB
RE
CB
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE
RE
B
E
C
B
E
C
R
E
C
E
C
R
E
C
B
R
E
R
R
B
E
C
B
R
CBR
B
C
B
R
CB
CB
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
RE C
CBRE
E CB
BRE
RE C
RE C
BRE
E CB
CBRE
BRE
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C RE
B
B
E
C
CB
CBR
RE
CBR
BRE
E C
RE
CBRE CBRE CB BRE
CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
C
C
B
E
C
E
R
C
R
RE
R
B
E
B
B
C
CB
CB
CBRE
E C
CBR
BRE
BRE
E C
RE
CBR
E C
CBRE
BRE
E CB
RE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE BRE CBR RE CBRE CBRE
B
C
CB
CBR
RE
BRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBR A C H C BRE CB E CBRE CBRE C
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
CBRE
BRE
E
CBRE
E CB
B
RE C
C
CBR
RE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C A / PA L M B E CBRE
E CB
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE RE B O C BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CBR E CBRE
BRE
B
C
E
B
R
C
R
L
E
C
B
CB
CBR
RE C B
RDA E CBRE
CBR
RE
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C CBRE C E CBRE
B
E
E
B
C
E
C
D
R
C
R
B
U
B
E
C
E
C
R
B
E
LA
E
R
R
B
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR BRE CBR CBRE CB RE CB FT CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE
E
C
E
R
C
E
R
C
B
B
B
E
E
C
B
E
R
B
C
C
E
C
R
C
B
E
BR
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
CBRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE BRE CBR BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB E CBRE
CBRE
RE C
C
CBRE
CBRE
C
BRE
C
E
C
BRE CBRE CB RE CBRE
BRE
BR
BR
E
I
C
C
E
C
R
E
R
M
B
R
E
B
E
A
E
C
B
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
CB
CBR
CBR
CBR
RE
B
E C
RE C
BRE
B MI
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR BRE CBR CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C
C
E
E
C
B
C
B
E
E
C
C
B
E
R
E
R
C
C
R
E
R
C
R
R
B
B
E
R
B
B
C
C
B
R
CB
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
CBRE
RE C
E CB
CBRE
RE C
RE C
BRE
BRE
E CB
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE BRE CBR BRE CBR E CBRE CBRE CB E CBRE CBRE CB E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE
C
BR
CB
BR
E
CBR
BRE
BRE
E CB RE CBRE
CBRE CBRE C CBRE C
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
E
E
E
R
CB
R
R
E
B
E
C
E
C
B
B
R
C
R
R
C
C
C
C
B
E
CB
CB
RE
RE
BRE
BRE
CBRE BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
BRE CBRE CB E CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C
C
E
R
E
E
C
B
R
C
R
B
R
C
C
CB
CB
CB
RE
CB
RE
BRE
BRE
CBRE
CBRE
BRE
BRE
E CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
B
B
E
E
B
C
E
C
R
R
C
R
B
B
B
E
C
E
C
CBR
RE
CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
BRE
E CB
RE C BRE CBR
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
B
C
B
C
B
E
C
CBRE
CBRE CBRE C RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR E CBRE
BRE
CBRE CBRE C
E
R
CBRE CBRE CB RE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
B
CBRE
C
CB
RE C
CBRE
CBRE
BRE
BRE
E CB RE CBRE
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
E CB
CBRE CBRE C BRE CBRE CBRE C BRE CBR
E
C
E
C
R
R
B
E
CB
CBRE
RE C BRE CBR
C
CBRE CBRE CB FT.
E
BOCA/PALM BEACH
LAUDERDALE
JACKSONVILLE
MIAMI
ORLANDO
R
B
E
C
CBR
CBRE
561.394.2100
954.462.5655
904.634.1200
305.374.1000
407.404.5000
E
R
B
C
ADDED VALUE. PROVEN RESULTS.
CBRE FLORIDA
www.cbre.com/palmbeachcounty
www.cbre.com/ftlauderdale
www.cbre.com/jacksonville
www.cbre.com/miamidt
TAMPA
813.229.3111
TALLAHASSEE
904.630.6344
www.cbre.com/tampa
www.cbre.com/tallahassee
www.cbre.com/orlando
ASSET SERVICES • BROKERAGE SERVICES • CAPITAL MARKETS • DEVELOPMEnT & InVESTMEnT • InDUSTRIAL
SERVICES • LAnD SERVICES OFFICE SERVICES • PROJECT MAnAGEMEnT • RETAIL
SERVICES • RECOVERY & RESTRUCTURInG SERVICES • VALUATIOn & ADVISORY SERVICES
www.cbre.com/florida