evaluation of wear and friction mechanisms of different piston ring
Transcription
evaluation of wear and friction mechanisms of different piston ring
EVALUATION OF WEAR AND FRICTION MECHANISMS OF DIFFERENT PISTON RING AND CYLINDER LINER MATERIALS A. KOMPA, A. KRATZSCH, H.-J. FÜßER DaimlerChrysler AG, Dept. FT4/ST, Wilhelm-Runge Strasse 11, D-89081 Ulm, GERMANY; e-mail: [email protected] A. HEUBERGER DaimlerChrysler AG, Dept. EP/MVO, D-70546 Stuttgart, GERMANY K.-H. ZUM GAHR University of Karlsruhe, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, WKII, Kaiserstrasse 12, D-76128 Karlsruhe, GERMANY SUMMARY In the field of engine development one has to meet constantly growing requirements due to fuel consumption restrictions, weight reduction and emission standards, often combined with supercharged motors. These requirements lead to higher stresses of material components. Especially contact stresses of cylinder liner / piston ring surfaces are increased. Particularly, dead center areas are highly stressed, since hydrodynamic friction changes into boundary friction. This paper deals with modelling boundary lubrication using a reciprocating test rig. The influence of different lubrication modes on friction and wear of selected cylinder liner and piston ring materials is examined. Keywords: tribological properties, reciprocating sliding conditions, boundary lubrication, gray cast iron, aluminiumsilicon alloys 1 INTRODUCTION Regarding cylinder liners, classical gray cast iron has shown great performances. A couple of years ago different aluminium based liner concepts have been introduced for different reasons like weight reduction and some thermal characteristics [1, 2]. Since aluminium-based crankcases are often part of these solutions, aluminium based liners would be advantageous considering the better match of material properties. The aluminium-silicon alloys applied to liners should proof sufficient friction and wear properties. Different authors consider eutectic alloy systems in general as promising [3, 4]. For future developments of these concepts more detailed information about friction and wear properties and basic tribological mechanisms is necessary. The aim of our work is to develop adequate test routines to evaluate the material properties with respect to the tribological stress at the dead centres under engine-like conditions. 2 2.1 MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Methods For all tests, a reciprocating test machine was used (Optimol, SRVIII) that has been modified and advanced for our specific requirements. The general experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 1. All test samples have been taken from engine components from series production. normal force FN driving linkage oscillation f opposing body active heating system bath lubrication basic body force sensor Figure 1: Schematic tribometer set-up for bath lubrication The adapted specimens are mounted in devices where liner segments and piston ring segments serve as basic body and oscillating opposing body, respectively (Fig. 2). Tribometer tests were carried out under varying loads (normal forces FN up to 200 N), whereas temperatures, stroke (∆x = 3 mm or 4 mm), frequency (f = 30 Hz) and test duration (t = 3 h) were kept constant. The temperature of the heating system is controlled and set to 180°C, which corresponds with an oil bath temperature of 165°C. Different modes of lubrication have been applied: bath lubrication (Fig. 1) and a flowing-through lubrication (lubricating oil flow rate about 3 ml/min). For the latter an inclined set-up (inclination angle 25°) was arranged (Fig. 3). During experiments friction values were recorded continuously. The final linear wear was measured using a stylus profilometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and me-tallographic sections were applied to evaluate tribologi-cally induced topographical and morphological changes in the near surface region. In the bath lubricated system the oil volume of approximately 1 ml has been analysed afterwards by means of atomic emission spectroscopy (AES). piston ring segment b a oscillating direction 10 µm 20 µm d c liner segment Figure 2: Arrangement of system liner/ring in bath lubrication f T 3 T FR flowing-through lubrication Figure 3: Inclined system with flowing-through lubrication 2.2 Materials In this work two different tribological systems have been investigated: liner made of gray cast iron versus chromium-ceramic coated piston rings and liner made of an hypereutectic aluminium-silicon alloy versus nitrided steel piston rings. b 4 50 µm 50 µm c RESULTS Considering kinematics, reciprocating test methods are well suited to model the engine’s piston stroke in the region of top and bottom dead centres, where relative velocities of piston ring versus cylinder liner are small, become zero and finally change direction The two dead centre areas therefore are highly stressed since hydrodynamic friction changes into boundary friction. Whereas loads on top and bottom dead centres caused by gas forces and/or ring tensions differ in real engine systems, in reciprocating test rigs usually two symmetric dead centre areas are generated. Since relative velocities are small, boundary lubrication is predominant which results in intensified test conditions. Nevertheless the same wear appearance can be produced. Fig. 6 compares the profiles of a real engine’s top dead centre area and a wear trace after an oscillating tribometer test. linear wear wlin [µm] a 20 µm Figure 5: SEM micrographs of surface topographies: a) aluminium-silicon alloy, b) nitrided steel, c) gray cast iron, d) chromium-ceramic coated cast iron FN oil supply system 200 µm 0 0 -2 -4 -4 -6 -6 -8 0 1 2 3 4 5 trace [mm] two overlapped dead centers 2 -2 engine test bench d 4 top dead center first compression ring 2 6 7 -8 0 1 2 3 4 5 trace [mm] 6 7 tribometer test Figure 6: Comparison of top dead centre’s wear trace: engine test bench versus reciprocating test rig 50 µm 50 µm Figure 4: Metallographic sections of used materials: a) aluminium-silicon alloy (liner), b) nitrided steel (ring), c) gray cast iron (liner), d) chromium-ceramic coated cast iron piston ring A lubricant of the viscosity class SAE 10 W-40 has been used for all experiments. Metallogra-phic sections and SEM micrographs of the original test samples can be found in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. Because of the small stroke, the two dead centres overlap with increasing wear. The final wear is determined as the maximum difference of the original and worn surface. The linear wear number wlin is formed by averaging the heights of three different measurements at each sample. When using bath lubrication linear wear of the liner segments is increased with higher loads as expected. Consequently, the oil volume is enriched with worn particles. Fig 7 shows the linear wear of the liner segments as well as the aluminium and iron content in the oil volume detected by AES. 8 7 6 5 90 80 70 60 50 4 40 3 30 2 20 1 10 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 0 normal force FN [N] Figure 7: Linear wear of liner segments and element content of oil volume versus load (∆x=3mm, f=30Hz, T=180°C, t=3h) Fig. 8 shows coefficients of friction of an aluminiumsilicon alloy in dependence of the mode of lubrication. The bath lubricated systems always result in higher coefficients of friction over a sliding distance of about 2500 m. This also holds for the system gray cast iron versus chromium-ceramic coated piston ring. During oscillating motion wear particles are produced and partly carried with by the piston ring over one or several amplitudes. If placed just into the tribological contact between ring/liner they can also be pressed into the upper surface region again. coefficient of friction µ [-] In order to check the reproducibility of the wear numbers, measurements of ten different samples at FN = 100 N, ∆x = 4 mm, f = 30 Hz, T = 180°C, t = 3 h were done, which resulted in a scatter range of 20% (also shown in Fig. 9). Within this scatter range all different applied test parameters show similar results. 10 bath lubrication Al-Si alloy, stroke " gray cast iron " flow Al-Si alloy gray cast iron 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 ∆x= 4 mm ∆x= 3 mm ∆x= 4 mm ∆x= 3 mm ∆x= 4 mm ∆x= 4 mm 2 0,30 Al-Si alloy vs nitrided steel 1 bath 0,25 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 normal force FN [N] 0,20 Figure 9: Linear wear of liner segments as a function of normal force: bath vs. flow lubricated system (f=30Hz, T=180°C, t=3h) 0,15 0,10 flow 0,05 0,00 Fig. 9 shows linear wear numbers of liner segments of different test runs as a function of load. The aluminiumsilicon alloy always shows higher wear rates than the gray cast iron system. Whereas wear rates of gray cast iron seems to be linear over the whole tested range, the Al-Si alloy shows a different and increased dependence on the applied load. In the region of lower loads (up to about 75 N) wear rates differ slightly in comparison to gray cast iron. In regions of loads higher than 75 N wear rates show a strong increase with load. This is consistent with Torabian et al. [5] who found three different regions with different but constant slopes of the wear curve (i.e. wear rate over load). linear wear wlin [µm] linear wear of liner segments Al-Si alloy, stroke ∆x= 3 mm gray cast iron, ∆x= 3 mm element concentration in oil volume Al Fe 9 element content [mg/kg] linear wear of liner segment wlin [µm] 10 0 500 1000 1500 sliding distance [m] 2000 2500 Figure 8: Coefficients of friction of Al-Si alloy, bath vs. flow lubrication (FN=100N, ∆x=4mm, f=30Hz, T=180°C, t=3h) Using the bath lubricated system, the amount of oil available for lubrication is highest, but it is not possible to remove wear particles produced during the test. Furthermore, since the arrangement of the bath lubrication facility is an open system, evaporation losses lead to a reduced oil volume resulting in an even higher concentration of wear debris. Altogether the phenomena mentioned above result in continuously changing lubrication conditions. These disadvantages can be avoided or lessened by using flowing-through lubrication. Because of the limited sensitivity of detection, AES cannot be applied here for element detection any more. Independent of the mode of lubrication, friction values recorded during experiments scatter in range of about ±5%. Fig. 10 shows SEM micrographs of the surfaces of the liner segments (Al-Si alloy and gray cast iron) after tribometer tests with the different lubrication modes. Considering the Al-Si alloy there are concise differences. In bath lubrication wear debris is produced but maybe not removed out of the contact area. Therefore the probability of being worked into the surface and/or to fill up pores is high which leads to a more `closed´ appearance of the surface. In contrast to this, the worn particles are being moved out of the tribological contact by the lubricating oil flow and the original surface shows a more porous appearance, which is similar to the original surface in Fig. 5a). Gray cast iron shows little wear in general in the applied range of test parameters. After the experiment often a polishing effect can be observed only by visual inspection under certain angles of incidence of light. This is due to a smoothing effect of surface roughness on the honing plateaus. We tried to examine the wear mechanism of the Al-Si alloy in more detail by applying a high load (FN = 200 N) under the servere condition of starved lubrication in the flow arrangement. a b 20 µm c 20 µm d 200 µm 200 µm Figure 10: SEM micrographs of surfaces of liner segments: a) Al-Si alloy, bath, worn surface; b) Al-Si alloy, flow, worn surface; c) gray cast iron, bath; d) gray cast iron, flow (FN=100N, ∆x=4mm, f=30Hz, T=180°C, t=3h). The arrows show the sliding direction; dashed lines on the gray cast iron liner segments show the transition to the original surface. The metallographic section of this sample in Fig. 11 clearly shows the enrichment of smaller Si particles in the near surface region which seems to verify the hypothesis, that silicon crystals are being fractured and pressed into the surface again. 20 µm Figure 12: SEM micrograph of top dead center area of a cylinder liner of a run engine 20 µm Figure 11: Metallographical section of Al-Si alloy under high load (FN=200N) and starved lubrication) Fig. 12 shows an aluminium-silicon alloy cylinder liner taken from a run engine. Wear appearance seems to be a transition between the tribometer tests with bath and flow lubrication shown in Fig. 10. 4 SUMMARY In this work a test method has been developed to model the tribological contact piston ring versus cylinder liner. Since wear appearances in the wear traces are similar to that of run engines, the test seems to model the real conditions at engine’s dead centres. More work has to be done to compare tribometer tests and engine test runs with respect to possible friction and wear mechanisms. 5 REFERENCES [1] Köhler, E. et al.: LOKASIL®-Zylinderlaufflächen – Integrierte lokale Verbundwerkstofflösung für Aluminium-Kurbelgehäuse. Sonderausgabe von ATZ/MTZ: Werkstoffe im Automobilbau (1996), S. 38-42. [2] Stocker, P., F. Rückert and K. Hummert: Die neue Aluminium-Silizium-Zylinderlaufbahn-Technologie für Kurbelgehäuse aus Aluminiumdruckguß. MTZ 58 (1997) 9. 502-508. [3] Sarkar, A. D. and J. Clarke: Friction and Wear of Aluminium-Silicon Alloys. Wear, 61 (1980) 157-167. [4] Jasim, K. M. and E. S. Dwarakadasa: Wear In Al-Si Alloys Under Dry Slyding Conditions. Wear, 119 (1987) 119-130. [5] Torabian, H., J. P. Pathak and S.N. Tiwari: Wear Characteristics of Aluminium-Silicon Alloys. Wear, 172 (1994) 49-58.