Agenda

Transcription

Agenda

Mayor
WILLIAM CAPOTE
Deputy Mayor
KEN GREENE
120 Malabar Road, SE - Palm Bay, FL 32907 (321-952-3400)
www.palmbayflorida.org
Councilmembers
KRISTINE ISNARDI
MICHELE PACCIONE
HARRY SANTIAGO JR.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING NO. 2014-08
THURSDAY
April 3, 2014 - 7:00 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER:
INVOCATION:
Pastor Ken Delgado – The House, Palm Bay
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Four (4) vacancies on the Youth Advisory Board (represents students grades 9-12).++
One (1) vacancy on the Utilities Advisory Board (represents utility customer or resident).++
One (1) vacancy on the Building and Construction Advisory Board (represents general
contractor).++
One (1) vacancy on the Recreation Advisory Board.++
One (1) vacancy on the Library Advisory Board.+
AGENDA REVISIONS:
CONSENT AGENDA:
There will be no separate discussion on those items listed under Consent Agenda (indicated with
asterisks(*)). They will be enacted by the City Council on one motion. If discussion is desired by
the City Council, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda by Council and will be
considered in the order that it appears on the agenda.
RECOGNITIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Recognizing employees for their years of service with the City of Palm Bay.
Recognizing City employees for their assistance with the 2013 United Way Campaign.
National Public Safety Telecommunications Week, April 13-19, 2014.
Administrative Professionals Week – April 20-26, 2014.
Arbor Day – April 25, 2014.
Water Conservation Month – April 2014.
DollarWise Month – April 2014.
THIS MEETING IS BROADCAST LIVE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE
TELEVISED ON THE SPACE COAST GOVERNMENT TV CHANNEL.
AND
City of Palm Bay, Florida
Regular Council Meeting No. 2014-08
Agenda - April 3, 2014
Page 2 of 3
PRESENTATIONS:
1.
2.
Javier Molinares – development of park site to be known as ‘America’s Cultural Park’.
a) Consideration of supporting the development of the park site.
Yvonne McDonald, Finance Director – February 2014 financial report.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT:
1.
Fire Department – update.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES:
* 1. Regular Council Meeting No. 2014-07; March 20, 2014.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/RESPONSES: (Non-agenda Items Only)
Public comments will be heard by the City Council on non-agenda issues. Speakers must
complete ‘Public Comment Cards’ (orange) and are limited to 3 minutes each.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1.
Ordinance No. 2014-10, amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 185, Zoning Code,
by establishing standards for the keeping of pigeons in single family residential zoning
districts (Case No. T-1-2014, Space Coast Racers), for first reading.
2. Ordinance No. 2014-11, amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 185, Zoning Code,
by creating and providing criteria for a new zoning district entitled PMU (Parkway Mixed
Use District) (Case No. T-2-2014, Willard Palmer), for first reading.
♣3. Ordinance No. 2014-12, rezoning property located in the vicinity northwest of the
intersection of Malabar Road and the Palm Bay Parkway from GU (General Use Holding
District to PMU (Parkway Mixed Use District) (202.9 acres)(Case No. Z-3-2014, Willard
Palmer), for first reading.
4. Request by Vacation Finance, LLC for approval of a final subdivision to be known as Palm
Island on property located at the southwest corner of Malabar Road and Allison Drive
(32.73 acres)(Case No. FS-1-2014)(RESCHEDULED TO P&Z – 04-02-13).
PROCUREMENTS:
Award of Bids:
* 1. SHIP rehab projects – ITB Nos. 15-0-2014, 16-0-2014, 17-0-2014 – Growth Management
Department (Smith Development & Construction; Armstrong Custom Homes, Inc. $103,947).
Miscellaneous:
* 1. Heavy equipment and truck parts, increased purchasing authority – Public Works (Kelly
Ford, Inc. – additional $15,000; Maudin International Trucks – additional $20,000).
* 2. Biosolids disposal and transportation, payment ratification – Utilities Department (H&H
Liquid Sludge Disposal, Inc. - $51,110).
THIS MEETING IS TELEVISED ON THE SPACE COAST GOVERNMENT TV
CHANNEL AND IS BROADCAST LIVE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE.
Agenda - April 3, 2014
Page 3 of 3
* 3. Other agency contract, network infrastructure (Department of Management Services
contract) – Communications and Information Technology Department (CDW-G - $34,162).
COUNCIL BUSINESS:
NEW BUSINESS: (Ordinances are for first readings.)
* 1. Ordinance No. 2014-13, amending the Code of Ordinances, by repealing Chapter 75,
Dangerous Intersection Safety Act, in its entirety.
* 2. Consideration of the overhire of entry-level firefighters.
* 3. Consideration of the addition/reinstatement of certain positions; authorize procurement of
a vehicle for the Deputy Fire Chief position.
* 4. Consideration of the public service agencies to receive funding from the Fiscal Year 20142015 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan.
* 5. Consideration of travel and training for specified City employees.
* 6. Acknowledgement of the City’s monthly financial report for February 2014.
7. Consideration of councilmembers attending the 82nd Annual United States Conference of
Mayors conference in Dallas, Texas, June 20-23, 2014.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REPORTS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS/RESPONSES: Speakers are limited to 3 minutes.
ADJOURNMENT:
♣Quasi-judicial proceeding.
Councilmembers who are members of the Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization
(TPO) may discuss TPO issues which may subsequently be addressed by the TPO.
If an individual decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any
matter considered at this meeting, a record of the proceedings will be required and the individual
will need to ensure that a verbatim transcript of the proceedings is made, which record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based (FS 286.0105). Such person must
provide a method for recording the proceedings verbatim.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing special accommodations
for this meeting shall, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting, contact the Office of the City Clerk at
(321) 952-3414 or Florida Relay System at 711.
THIS MEETING IS TELEVISED ON THE SPACE COAST GOVERNMENT TV
CHANNEL AND IS BROADCAST LIVE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE.
P o t e n t ia l P a r k
D e v e l o p m e n t P r o je c t
C o u n c i l Me e t i n g
A p r i l 3 , 2 0 14
A n id e a
Community wanted a place to celebrate music, food and culture
with family and friends
2
A n id e a
3
A n id e a
4
L a n d / S p a c e Ne e d e d
5
S t a ff R e c o m m e n d a t i o n
Staff Recommendation:
20-50 acre site
needed for America’s Cultural Park Idea
6
A n id e a
7
S o u t h Ea s t C o m m u n it y
P a r k S it e
South East Community Park – Bill Madden Park
2860 Eldron Blvd SE Palm Bay, FL 32909
• Already a Park that was supposed to be further developed
Potential for all sorts of amenities on the site:
o Pavilion with stage for music
o Path system
o Soccer Field
o Room for Parking
o Fishing Pier
8
P r e v io u s
Co n ce p t u a l
P la n
9
R A B Me e t i n g - Ma r c h
• Staff brought the presentation and idea
to the RAB
• At the meeting two local residents
attended and were supportive
10
Ne x t S t e p s
• Staff will continue to look into the Park Development
– Community Meetings will be held
– Grant Funding Opportunities Explored
– Possible written partnership/agreement with Javier’s group who
will solicit private funding
11
Q u e s t io n s / C o m m e n t s
Heidi Lapin
Director of Parks & Recreation
321-953-8912
[email protected]
12
FY 2013/2014
FINANCIAL UPDATE
February 28, 2014
GENERAL FUND MAJOR REVENUES
ACTUAL & BUDGETARY COMPARISONS
2
FY 13 YTD Actual
*LocalOption Gas
Charges for Svcs
*StateShared Rev
Interf Transf & Otr Sources
*Comm Svc Tax
$623,665
$629,340
$1,017,636
$1,012,662
$2,884,029
$705,043
$774,255
$3,531,973
$2,626,298
$572,034
$4,147,823
$957,370
$775,869
$3,185,818
$1,167,415
$1,206,925
*Half Cent Sales Taxes
$1,260,637
$1,308,137
Ad Valorem Taxes
FY 14 Budget
$3,506,071
**FranchiseFees
**Utility Taxes
FY 14 YTD Actual
$4,883,798
$1,883,852
$2,083,287
$5,281,011
$7,712,620
$18,784,342
$18,760,885
$21,960,744
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES
ACTUAL & BUDGETARY COMPARISONS
3
FY 14 Actual
FY 13 Actual
HR
$140,328
$159,611
$443,018
Legislative
$179,502
$230,870
$543,153
Growth…
$200,047
$222,446
$584,845
CityAttorney
$255,099
$331,408
$824,879
CityMgmt
$349,152
$336,485
$879,922
Info Tech
$527,239
$651,147
$1,632,776
Finance
$656,024
$676,705
$1,653,633
Parks & Rec
Public Works
Fire
Police
FY 14 Budget
$1,214,519
$1,353,849
$3,780,659
$1,740,904
$1,745,253
$4,686,039
$5,353,141
$5,473,512
$7,493,581
$7,654,928
$13,426,056
$20,225,875
2014 GF REV & EXP PROJECTIONS
Revenues
Expenditures
70,000,000
70,000,000
60,000,000
60,000,000
50,000,000
50,000,000
40,000,000
40,000,000
Projection
$30,622,226
20,000,000
Actual
$28,023,691
10,000,000
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
-
4
30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000
Projection
$25,322,226
Actual
$23,569,662
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
30,000,000
GENERAL FUND
CASH & INVESTMENTS
5
General Fund
$16,330,077
$18,000,000
Cash Advanced to:
CDBG
$20,000,000
(230,323)
Code Nuisance
(12,351)
HOME Grant
(32,498)
2008 Bonds
(46,622)
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
Comm Invest Prog
(426,522)
$6,000,000
Total Advances
$(748,316)
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
Total Available C&I @
02/28/14
$15,581,761
$0
February
CASH BALANCES IN OTHER GENERAL
FUNDED FUNDS
6
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
($500,000)
($1,000,000)
($1,500,000)
Feb 2013
Feb 2014
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
FUND
RISK MGMT
FUND
$2,065,090
$1,545,645
$238,706
$933,480
OTHER
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
FUND
($949,746)
($443,858)
FLEET
SERVICES
FUND
$984,315
$842,549
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
7
YTD Revenues
YTD Expenditures
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
FY14
Revenues
$1,384,184
$2,000,000
FY14
Budget
$3,293,194
$1,000,000
FY14
Expds
$1,275,068
$1,500,000
FY14
Budget
$3,293,194
$500,000
$0
Chrg for Other
Svcs Misc Rev
FY13
Expds
$1,337,661
Personal
Svcs
Operating
Expends
OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND
8
YTD Expenditures
YTD Revenues
$3,000,000
$1,600,000
$2,500,000
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$2,000,000
FY14
Revenues
$2,155,663
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
FY14
Budget
$3,721,935
$500,000
$0
Chrg Other
for Svcs Sources
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$0
FY13
Expds
$1,106,875
FY14
Expds
$1,023,731
FY14
Budget
$3,721,935
BUILDING FUND
9
February
YTD Revenues &
Expenditures
FY13
FY14
$300,000
$290,000
$1,047,159 $1,051,940
$288,179
$280,000
$270,000
FY 14
Revenues
$260,000
FY 14
Expenditures
$255,018
$572,343 $591,431
$250,000
$240,000
$230,000
FY 14 Budget
$1,068,792
Cash
Total Fund Equity
STORMWATER FUND
10
YTD Revenues &
Expenditures
Accounts Receivables
$2,500,000
$2,287,999
$1,886,711
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
FY 14
Revenues
$2,011,183
FY 14
Expds
$1,380,176
$1,000,000
$1,403,314
FY 12
FY 13
FY 14
$734,508
$500,000
$0
FY14 Budget
$3,967,600
FY 11
February
SANITATION FUND
11
YTD Revenues &
Expenditures
Accounts Receivables
$2,500,000
$580,662
$528,907
$2,000,000
$481,337
FY 14
Revenues
$2,323,606
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
FY 11
FY 12
FY 13
FY 14
FY 14
Expds
$1,854,696
$500,000
$0
$397,803
FY14 Budget
$4,941,728
February
RED LIGHT CAMERA FUND
12
YTD Expenditures
YTD Receipts
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
FY14
Revenues
$90,685*
FY14
Budget
$356,520
$0
*Gross Receipts – Pymts to
vendor/State not reflected
$180,000
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
FY14
Expds
$56,700*
FY14
Budget
$356,520
* Does not include all fees due
to vendor/State from receipts
COMMENTS/QUESTIONS
13
CITY OF PALM BAY, FLORIDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING NO. 2014-07
Held on Thursday, the 20th day of March 2014, at the City Hall Council Chambers, 120
Malabar Road, SE, Palm Bay, Florida.
This meeting was properly noticed pursuant to law; the minutes are on file in the Office of
the City Clerk, City Hall, Palm Bay, Florida.
The meeting was called to order at the hour of 7:01 P.M.
Pastor Troy Robinson, Lifepoint Church of Palm Bay, gave the invocation, which was
followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MAYOR:
DEPUTY MAYOR:
COUNCILMEMBER:
COUNCILMEMBER:
COUNCILMEMBER:
CITY MANAGER:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY CLERK:
William Capote
Ken Greene
Kristine Isnardi
Michele Paccione
Harry Santiago Jr.
Sue Hann
Andrew Lannon
Alice Passmore
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
CITY STAFF: Present was Chad Shoultz, Deputy City Manager.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Deputy Mayor Greene announced the following vacancies and solicited applications for
same:
1. Four (4) vacancies on the Youth Advisory Board (represents students grades
9-12).
2. One (1) vacancy on the Utilities Advisory Board (represents utility customer or
resident).
3. One (1) vacancy on the Building and Construction Advisory Board (represents
general contractor).
4. One (1) vacancy on the Recreation Advisory Board.
AGENDA REVISIONS:
There were no agenda revisions.
Minutes – March 20, 2014
Page 2 of 7
CONSENT AGENDA:
All items of business marked with an asterisk were considered under Consent Agenda and
enacted by the following motion:
Motion by Deputy Mayor Greene, seconded by Mrs. Paccione, that the Consent Agenda be
approved as presented. Motion carried with members voting as follows: Mayor Capote,
Yea; Deputy Mayor Greene, Yea; Councilwoman Isnardi, Yea; Councilwoman Paccione,
Yea; Councilman Santiago, Yea.
RECOGNITIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS:
The proclamations were read and individuals recognized.
1. American Cancer Society Relay for Life – April 5-6, 2014.
2. Palm Bay Police Department: a) ceremony to administer police officer’s oath;
b) recognizing the retirement of Lynne Nungesser, Executive Assistant.
PRESENTATION:
1. Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A. – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for
Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2013. Carl Hofmann, Jr., CPA, Engagement Manager,
presented the audit to the City Council and provided highlights of same.
a)
Consideration of forwarding report to the Auditor General.
Motion by Mrs. Isnardi, seconded by Mr. Santiago, to accept the annual financial report
and forward it to the Auditor General. Motion carried with members voting as follows:
Mayor Capote, Yea; Deputy Mayor Greene, Yea; Councilwoman Isnardi, Yea;
Councilwoman Paccione, Yea; Councilman Santiago, Yea.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES:
* 1. Regular Council Meeting No. 2014-06; March 4, 2014.
The minutes, considered under Consent Agenda, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/RESPONSES: (Non-agenda Items Only)
Individuals commented on various issues.
Page 3 of 7
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
♣1. Ordinance No. 2014-07, rezoning property located at the intersection of U.S.
Highway No. 1 and Ridge Road, in the vicinity south of Worth Court, from HC
(Highway Commercial District) to RS-1 (Single Family Residential District) (0.34
acres)(Case No. CPZ-1-2014, Azzuri Property Holdings, Inc.), for final reading.
The City Attorney read the ordinance in caption only. The public hearing was opened and
closed as there were no comments.
Motion by Mr. Santiago, seconded by Mrs. Isnardi, to adopt Ordinance No. 2014-07.
Motion carried with members voting as follows: Mayor Capote, Yea; Deputy Mayor
Greene, Yea; Councilwoman Isnardi, Yea; Councilwoman Paccione, Yea; Councilman
Santiago, Yea.
2. Ordinance No. 2014-08, amending the Fiscal Year 2013-2014 budget by
appropriating and allocating certain monies (second budget amendment), for final
reading.
Motion by Mrs. Paccione, seconded by Deputy Mayor Greene, to adopt Ordinance No.
2014-08. Motion carried with members voting as follows: Mayor Capote, Yea; Deputy
Mayor Greene, Yea; Councilwoman Isnardi, Yea; Councilwoman Paccione, Yea;
Councilman Santiago, Yea.
3. Ordinance No. 2014-09, amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 52, Boards,
Subchapter ‘Youth Advisory Board’, by expanding the duties of the adult advisory
members and clarifying the liaison positions, for final reading.
Motion by Mrs. Isnardi, seconded by Mr. Santiago, to adopt Ordinance No. 2014-09.
Motion carried with members voting as follows: Mayor Capote, Yea; Deputy Mayor
Greene, Yea; Councilwoman Isnardi, Yea; Councilwoman Paccione, Yea; Councilman
Santiago, Yea.
BOARD AND COMMITTEE REPORTS:
The Greater Palm Bay Chamber of Commerce provided an update; councilmembers
provided updates on activities of various agencies and boards on which they served as
members.
Page 4 of 7
PROCUREMENTS:
Award of Proposals:
* 1. Emergency generators, preventative maintenance and repair – RFP No. 08-02014 (Power Pro-Tech Services - $40,510).
Staff Recommendation: Award the proposal for emergency generators, preventative
maintenance and repair to Power Pro-Tech Services, Altamonte Springs, in the amount of
$40,510.
The item, considered under Consent Agenda, was approved as recommended by City
staff.
* 2. Janitorial services – RFP No. 11-0-2014 (W & G Maintenance - $132,212).
Staff Recommendation: Award the proposal for janitorial services to W & G Maintenance,
in the amount of $132,212; in the event W & G Maintenance did not perform within a 180day period, authorize the cancellation of the agreement and award the proposal to
American Facility Services.
staff.
Miscellaneous:
* 1. Wastewater facility operating permit renewal, Troutman Wastewater Treatment
Plant and Water Reclamation Facility – Utilities Department (Wade Trim Inc. $47,552).
Staff Recommendation: Approve the task order with Wade Trim, Inc. for the wastewater
facility operating permit renewal for the Troutman Wastewater Treatment Plant and Water
Reclamation Facility, in the amount of $47,552.
staff.
UNFINISHED AND OLD BUSINESS:
1. Appointment of two (2) members to the Police and Firefighters Retirement
Pension Plan, Board of Trustees (representing one (1) Councilmember and one (1)
City Resident).
Page 5 of 7
Motion by Deputy Mayor Greene, seconded by Mrs. Paccione, to reappoint James Brock to
the Board. Motion carried with members voting as follows: Mayor Capote, Yea; Deputy
Motion by Deputy Mayor Greene, seconded by Mrs. Paccione, to reappoint Mayor Capote
to the Board. Motion carried with members voting as follows: Mayor Capote, Yea; Deputy
COUNCIL BUSINESS:
Councilmembers addressed various subject matters.
1. Mr. Santiago stated he was appointing Jeff Bailey to the Road Maintenance Ad Hoc
Working Group to replace Joe Aguiar.
2. Mrs. Paccione said Brevard County had adopted a strong fertilizer ordinance and
would like to see the fertilizer ordinance reconsidered by Council.
After some discussion among councilmembers, Council concurred to reconsider the
ordinance previously presented, with the three (3) conditions, at one of the regular Council
meetings in May.
NEW BUSINESS:
* 1. Resolution No. 2014-08, authorizing the financing for the Advance Refunding
Local Option Gas Tax Bond, Series 2004.
The City Attorney read the resolution in caption only. The resolution was approved under
Consent Agenda.
* 2. Resolution No. 2014-09, supplementing Resolution No. 2014-08, to authorize
and approve the negotiated sale of Local Option Gas Tax Refunding Revenue Note,
Series 2014.
Consent Agenda.
* 3. Resolution No. 2014-10, authorizing the financing for the refunding of the Utility
System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 2003 and 2004.
Consent Agenda.
Page 6 of 7
* 4. Consideration of an agreement with the Brevard County Board of County
Commissioners for Emergency Medical Services Assessment to assist Primary First
Responders with emergency medical care.
Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
staff.
* 5. Consideration of travel and training for specified City employees.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the travel and training as specified.
staff.
* 6. Consideration of request from the American Cancer Society to utilize the mobile
stage; consideration of City’s co-sponsorship of the Relay for Life event.
Staff Recommendation: Authorize the rental of the City’s mobile stage and co-sponsorship
of the American Cancer Society/Relay for Life in Palm Bay.
staff.
7. Consideration of amending the Palm Bay Code of Ordinances as it relates to the
conversion of garages to living areas.
Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City staff to prepare a textual amendment removing
the requirement that a garage door remain in place when converting garages to living area.
The City Council concurred to move forward with the textual amendment.
8. Discussion on Chapter 75, Dangerous Intersection Safety Act (red light
cameras), of the Code of Ordinances. (Councilwoman Isnardi)
Mrs. Isnardi provided her reasons as to why she felt the ordinance should be repealed.
Mayor Capote and Councilmembers Paccione and Santiago concurred. Deputy Mayor
Greene stated he was in favor of keeping the red light cameras and gave his reasons for
same.
Motion by Mrs. Isnardi, seconded by Mr. Santiago, to direct City staff to not renew the
contract with GATSO and prepare paperwork to repeal Chapter 75 of the Code of
Ordinances. Motion carried with members voting as follows:
Page 7 of 7
Mayor Capote
Deputy Mayor Greene
Councilwoman Isnardi
Councilwoman Paccione
Councilman Santiago
Yea
Nay
Yea
Yea
Yea
ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REPORTS:
1. Mrs. Hann advised Council that Palm Bay Road at Minton Road would not be closed
on March 24th as previously announced; the new date for closure would be Monday,
April 7th, at 10:00 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/RESPONSES:
Individuals commented on various issues.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at the hour of 8:49 P.M.
___________________________________
William Capote, MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Alice Passmore, CITY CLERK
* Identifies items considered under the heading of Consent Agenda.
♣Indicates quasi-judicial proceeding.
Indicates item was considered out of sequence or added to the agenda.
ORDINANCE NO. 2014-10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BAY, BREVARD COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TITLE XVII,
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 185, ZONING CODE,
SUBCHAPTERS ‘GENERAL PROVISIONS’ AND ‘SUPPLEMENTARY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS’, BY INCLUDING A DEFINITION FOR
PIGEONS; PROVIDING CRITERIA FOR KEEPING/MAINTAINING
PIGEONS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE CITY OF PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BAY,
BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
SECTION 1.
The City of Palm Bay Code of Ordinances, Title XVII, Land
Development Code, Chapter 185, Zoning Code, Subchapter ‘General Provisions’, Section
185.006, Definitions, is hereby amended and shall henceforth read as follows:
“Section 185.006 DEFINITIONS.
For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the
context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning.
***
LANDING BOARD. A device placed on a pigeon aviary for the intake of birds into
any loft or aviary.
***
LOFT. Any house, dovecote, structure, or enclosure for the keeping and housing of
any kind of pigeon.
***
PIGEON. A bird of the order Columbidae and includes racing pigeon, carrier
pigeon, homing pigeon, fancy pigeon and sporting pigeon.
PIGEON AVIARY. An accessory use structure used for the keeping and housing of
racing, homing, and ‘fancy’ or seamless banded pigeons.
***
Ordinance No. 2014-10
Page 2 of 4
SEAMLESS BAND. A plastic or metal identification band that contains a series of
letters or numbers that is permanently attached to the pigeon at birth. The band is issued by
a nationally recognized birding association, and is to remain with the animal throughout its
natural life.
* * *”
SECTION 2.
Development Code, Chapter 185, Zoning Code, Subchapter ‘Supplementary District
Regulations’, Section 185.136, Backyard Chickens, is hereby amended and shall
henceforth read as follows:
“Section 185.136 BACKYARD CHICKENS.
(A) No person shall keep or maintain in, on or upon any lot, building, premises or
property any farm animal in any zoning category outside of the RR and GU districts except
as provided for in this section or Section 185.137.
* * *”
SECTION 3.
Development Code, Chapter 185, Zoning Code, Subchapter ‘Supplementary District
Regulations’, is hereby amended by including as Section 185.137 the following language:
“185.137 PIGEONS
(A) No person shall keep or maintain in, on or upon any lot, building, premises or
property any farm animal in any zoning category outside of the RR and GU districts except
as provided for in this section or Section 185.136.
(B) Pigeons may be kept on single family lots in the RE, RS-1, RS-2, RS-3, SF-1,
SF-2 and SRE Zoning Districts subject to adherence to the following criteria:
(1) The keeping of pigeons is allowed in the RE, RS-1, RS-2, RS-3, SF-1,
SF-2 and SRE Zoning Districts as an accessory use.
(2) A maximum of one hundred (100) pigeons may be kept on a parcel
containing at least one (1) primary structure.
(3) Restrictions on flights.
(a) Maximum number to be released. No more than forty (40) pigeons
may be released at any one time for exercise or training purposes.
Page 3 of 4
(b) Maximum number of flights per twenty-four (24) hour period. No
more than two (2) flights shall be allowed within a twenty-four (24) hour period.
(c) Pigeons shall only be released to fly between the hours of Sunrise
to Sunset. When pigeons have been released from a distant location, they shall be allowed
to fly into their home aviary upon their return- regardless of which day or time of day.
(4) Enclosure requirements. Pigeon Aviaries shall meet the provisions of
185.118 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, Subparagraph (F), Animal Cages or Enclosures.
(5) Aviary Maintenance and Cleaning Requirements:
(a) Structures where pigeons are housed shall be kept and
maintained in a sanitary condition. Refuse and droppings shall be removed from the
premises at least twice each calendar week. No aviary or loft shall create a nuisance onto
adjacent properties.
(b) The owner shall comply with the rules and regulations of the
Brevard County Health Department and/or Animal Control pertaining to the sanitary
conditions and maintenance of the premises.
(c) The owner or person in charge of keeping the pigeon aviary shall
maintain the property and all features of the property, including roofs, driveways and
walkways in a clean manner, void of any visible pigeon droppings.
(d) Pigeons shall not be allowed to land or perch on the structures or
property of others. Birds shall be trained not to land anywhere except on the landing board to
the loft within four (4) weeks after the pigeon is first let out of the loft (first flight). The landing
board shall be constructed in such a manner that allows for the entire flying flock to land at
the loft at one time. The minimum loft size shall be regulated to a minimum of one (1)
square foot per bird.
(e) Pigeon businesses or breeding activities for commercial purposes
shall not be conducted in the RE, RS-1, RS-2, RS-3, SF-1, SF-2 and SRE Zoning Districts.
(f) No training flight shall occur two (2) hours before sunset or sunrise,
and that training flights not be conducted until four (4) hours after the feeding of birds.
(g) Any bird that is deemed diseased be removed from the loft and
from the premises immediately.”
SECTION 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances not in conflict herewith are hereby
continued in full force and effect.
Page 4 of 4
SECTION 5. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Palm Bay that the
provisions of this Ordinance shall be made a part of the City of Palm Bay Code of
Ordinances and the sections may be renumbered to accomplish such intention.
SECTION 6. If any portion, clause, phrase, sentence or classification of this
ordinance is held or declared to be either unconstitutional, invalid, inapplicable, inoperative
or void, then such declaration shall not be construed to affect other portions of the
ordinance; it is hereby declared to be the express opinion of the City Council of the City of
Palm Bay that any such unconstitutional, invalid, inapplicable, inoperative or void portion or
portions of this ordinance did not induce its passage, and that without the inclusion of any
such portion or portions of this ordinance, the City Council would have enacted the valid
constitutional portions thereof.
SECTION 7. The provisions within this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
the enactment date.
Read in title only at Meeting No. 2014- , held on
only and duly enacted at Meeting No. 2014- , held on
, 2014; and read in title
, 2014.
ATTEST:
Reviewed by CAO:
Applicant:
Case No.:
Space Coast Racers
T-1-2014
Words stricken through shall be deleted; underscored words shall be included. Deletions
and additions constitute the proposed amendment. Words remaining are now in effect and
remain unchanged.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BAY, BREVARD COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TITLE XVII,
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 185, ZONING CODE, BY
CREATING A NEW ZONING DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS THE
PARKWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT (PMU); PROVIDING CRITERIA
FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF
ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CITY OF PALM
BAY CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SECTION 1.
Development Code, Chapter 185, Zoning Code, is hereby amended by including as
Section 185.057 the following language:
"SECTION 185.057 PMU – PARKWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT.
(A) Intent. The Parkway Mixed Use (PMU) zoning district is a Planned Development
intended to establish types of development and arrangements of land uses that are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, but which are not otherwise provided for or
allowed in the zoning districts set out in this chapter. Subsequent development within the
PMU district is implemented by the approval of one or more site and development plans,
known as Final PMU Development Plans. The purpose of planned developments is to
encourage the creation and of designed neighborhoods and communities that provide a full
range of residence types, as well as commercial uses that serve the inhabitants of the
immediate community and surrounding neighborhoods.
The standards for creating a new PMU district set out herein are intended to
promote flexibility of design and diversification and integration of uses and structures. The
process set out herein allows the City Council to evaluate applications to establish new
PMU districts and to render final determination as to whether applications should be
approved, approved with conditions, or denied. In addition, the City Council may establish
such additional limitations and regulations as are deemed necessary to protect the public
health, safety, and general welfare. Specifically, the PMU district is intended to:
(1) Promote more efficient and economical uses of land.
(2) Provide flexibility to meet changing needs, technologies, economics,
and consumer preferences.
Page 2 of 7
(3) Encourage uses of land which reduce transportation needs and which
conserve energy and natural resources to the maximum extent possible.
(4) Preserve to the greatest extent possible, and utilize in a harmonious
fashion, existing environmental features and amenities; with an emphasis on preserving
existing exceptional specimen trees, to be incorporated into the development.
(5) Lower development and building costs by permitting smaller networks
of utilities and streets and the use of more economical building types and shared facilities.
(6) Simplification of the procedure for obtaining approval of proposed
developments through the combining and coordinating of land uses, building types, and
building relationships within a planned development, which otherwise would not be provided
under a conventional zoning district.
(B) Establishment of a new PMU district.
(1) Eligibility for application. Applications for establishment of a new PMU
zoning district shall demonstrate compliance with the following minimum eligibility criteria:
(a) Minimum area for a PMU zoning district. The minimum area
required for an application to a PMU district shall be twenty (20) acres and there shall be a
minimum of 40 square feet of commercial space provided for each residential unit proposed
within the PMU.
(b) Maximum density. The maximum overall residential density within
a PMU district shall be ten (10) dwelling units per acre.
(c) Commercial uses. Permitted uses are retail (free-standing or
combined in a plaza); personal service establishments, daycare centers, church/religious
uses, restaurants, financial institutions, office uses, service stations with fuel sales, food
service, theaters, professional office uses, medical and/or veterinary clinics and other uses
approved by City Council during the development approval process.
(d) Configuration of the PMU zoning district. The PMU zoning
district shall consist of a discrete area of land of sufficient size to accommodate the
proposed uses. Multiple parcels may be combined for purposes of establishing the PMU
boundaries provided they are contiguous and under common ownership by the applicant(s).
Separation by roadways, canals or similar dividers shall be considered contiguous for
purposes of this section.
(e) Unified control/ownership. All properties included for the purpose
of application to amend the official zoning map to create a PMU district shall be under the
ownership or control of the applicant(s).
(2) Review process. The approval of a PMU zoning map amendment and
associated application rests with the City Council. An application for a PMU zoning district
shall include a Preliminary Design Plan (PDP); a PMU zoning district shall not be
Page 3 of 7
established unless and until an associated PDP is approved by the City Council. Review of
an application for a PMU zoning map amendment and associated concept plan shall be
processed as follows:
(a) Preliminary design plan (PDP) application. A PDP application
shall be submitted in accordance with the submittal requirements set forth in subsection
(3).
(b)
Planning and Zoning Board Public Hearing and
Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Board shall conduct a public hearing on the
PMU zoning map amendment and PDP and formulate findings supporting a
recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
application. The Board's recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Council for final
action.
(c) City Council Public Hearing and Disposition. The City Council
shall conduct a public hearing on the PMU zoning map amendment and PDP application.
The Council's final action to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application shall
be based upon the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board, city staff, public
testimony, and findings made at the public hearing. The decision of the City Council shall
be final.
(d) Adoption of Implementing Ordinance. C ity Council approval or
approval with conditions for a PMU zoning map amendment and PDP application shall be
adopted into an implementing ordinance. The ordinance shall be adopted pursuant to
state statutes and shall include a legal description of the property, a copy of the PDP layout
and any conditions placed on the approval by City Council.
(3) Application content and submittal requirements.
(a) Preliminary design plan (PDP). A PDP is a generalized plan that
establishes the allowable land uses and the allowable development density or intensity
ranges as well as any corresponding development and design standards for all lands within
the PMU zoning district.
The PDP shall consist of the graphic and/or textual information
itemized in subsections 1 through 4 below.
1. A general plan for the use of all lands within the proposed
PMU. Such plans shall indicate the general location of residential areas (including
maximum density and unit types), open space, parks, passive or scenic areas, and
nonresidential areas (including maximum building square footage or other intensity
maximums).
2. A plan of vehicular and pedestrian circulation showing the
general locations and right-of-way widths of roads, sidewalks, the capacity of the system
and major access points to the external and internal thoroughfare network.
3. A summary of allowable development. The summary shall
provide:
Page 4 of 7
a. The total acreage of the PMU district and each
phase, as may be proposed;
b. The acreage of areas proposed for specific land
uses to be allowed within the PMU district and phases proposed in the concept plan, as
may be applicable;
c. The acreage of open space or conservation areas
within the PMU district and phases proposed in the concept plan;
d. The minimum and maximum allowable residential
density to be allowed within the PMU district and each phase proposed in the concept plan,
measured in residential dwelling units per acre; and
e. The minimum and maximum allowable
nonresidential development intensity to be allowed within the PMU district and each phase,
measured in gross building square footage or other appropriate intensity measure.
(b) Site condition map(s) and data that include:
1. A legal description of the properties included in the
application with an associated boundary survey signed and sealed by a registered Florida
land surveyor.
2. Name of the PMU; the owners of all properties included in
the PMU district; the agent for the PMU application, and address and phone number of the
agent; and, date of drawing and of any subsequent revision.
3. Scale, north arrow, and general location map showing
relationship of the site to external uses, structures, and features.
(c) An Environmental Assessment of the property identifying major
environmental features of the site and endangered wildlife and vegetation.
(C) Final Development Plan. The PMU Final Development Plan is a site and
development plan consistent with and intended to implement a PMU preliminary
development plan. The final plan may pertain to an entire PMU district or one or more
phases of the project. Final subdivision approval may be combined as part of the PMU
Final Development Plan.
(1) Review process. The approval of a PMU Final Development Plan rests
with the City Council. An application for a Final Development Plan shall be processed as
follows:
(a) Final design plan (FDP) application. An FDP application shall be
submitted in accordance with the submittal requirements set forth in subsection (2).
(b)
Planning and Zoning Board Public Hearing and
Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Board shall conduct a public hearing on the
PMU zoning map amendment and FDP and formulate findings supporting a
Page 5 of 7
recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
application. The Board's recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Council for final
action.
(c) City Council Public Hearing and Disposition. The City Council
shall conduct a public hearing on the PMU zoning map amendment and FDP application.
The Council's final action to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application shall
be based upon the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board, city staff, public
testimony, and findings made at the public hearing. The decision of the City Council shall
be final.
(d) Adoption of Implementing Ordinance. C ity Council approval or
approval with conditions for a PMU zoning map amendment and FDP application shall be
adopted into an implementing ordinance. The ordinance shall be adopted pursuant to
state statutes and shall include a legal description of the property, a copy of the FDP layout
and any conditions placed on the approval by City Council.
(2) Required exhibits.
(a) If the applicant intends to subdivide land as part of their
application of the PMU district than they shall meet the requirements of Chapter 184
Subdivisions.
(b) A schematic layout of the proposed development shall be
submitted on which structures shall be located in relation to each other and to major
entrances into and off the site; internal circulation ways; parking and service areas; a
landscaped areas. The site plan and supporting data shall also show proposed standards for
development, including restrictions of the use of property; plans for the provision of utilities,
including water, sewer and drainage facilities; plans for protection of abutting properties.
(c) Identification of planned maintenance responsibility for all
aspects of the development. Specifically identify all facilities proposed for maintenance by
the City or other governmental entities.
(d) Declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be submitted for
individual subdivisions and commercial areas that govern such items as accessory uses,
architectural requirements (if any), and other items not covered by the PMU zoning
standards.
(e) A Traffic Study meeting generally accepted engineering practices
examining the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding roadway network.
(D) Joint preliminary development and final development plan application. At the
option of the applicant, a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) may be reviewed
simultaneously with a Final Development Plan (FDP). In addition, modifications to an
approved PDP may be made as part of the approval process for an FDP. All applicable
requirements for both the PDP and the FDP submittal applications must be addressed.
Page 6 of 7
(E) Administrative Process following Final Development Plan Approval. Physical
development of the property must be consistent with the approved Preliminary
Development Plan and the Final Development Plan for the PMU project. Administrative
review and approval processes for subdivisions, site plans, building permits other land
development regulations shall ensure such consistency. Substantial changes, as
determined by the Growth Management Director, shall require re-submittal for Final
Development Plan approval. Minor changes not deemed to be substantial may be
approved administratively.
(F) Development Standards. Standards for development shall be provided by the
applicant at the time of submittal for a Preliminary Development Plan. These standards shall
include such items as minimum lot sizes; minimum lot widths and depths; minimum yard
areas (setbacks) for all types of uses; minimum living areas; minimum building areas (if
applicable); maximum height of structures; and such other items as will be needed to
facilitate construction of the proposed community.
(G) Signage. Standards for signs shall be provided by the applicant at the time of
submittal for a Preliminary Development Plan. These standards shall address allowable sign
locations; size; height; maximum number of signs permitted; lighting and landscaping
requirements; etc.
(H) Landscaping and Tree Preservation. Standards for landscaping shall be provided
by the applicant at the time of submittal for a Preliminary Development Plan. These
standards shall address the number of trees, shrubs and other plantings for both residential
and nonresidential uses. A project developing under the PMU zoning category must follow
the requirements for tree preservation and mitigation found in Chapter 180, of the Palm Bay
Code of Ordinances.
(I) Walls and Fences. Standards for walls and fences shall be provided by the
applicant at the time of submittal for a Preliminary Development Plan. These standards shall
address the size, type and placement of walls and fences. Careful consideration shall be
given to the site visibility of the motoring public, while protecting the rights and property
values of the property owners of the PMU community.”
SECTION 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances not in conflict herewith are hereby
continued in full force and effect.
provisions of this Ordinance shall be made a part of the City of Palm Bay Code of
Ordinances and the sections may be renumbered to accomplish such intention.
Page 7 of 7
ordinance is held or declared to be either unconstitutional, invalid, inapplicable, inoperative
or void, then such declaration shall not be construed to affect other portions of the
ordinance; it is hereby declared to be the express opinion of the City Council of the City of
Palm Bay that any such unconstitutional, invalid, inapplicable, inoperative or void portion or
portions of this ordinance did not induce its passage, and that without the inclusion of any
such portion or portions of this ordinance, the City Council would have enacted the valid
constitutional portions thereof.
SECTION 5. The provisions within this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
the enactment date.
, 2014.
ATTEST:
Reviewed by CAO:
Applicant:
Case No.:
City of Palm Bay
T-2-2014
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BAY, BREVARD
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
TITLE VII, TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES, CHAPTER 75,
DANGEROUS INTERSECTION SAFETY ACT, BY REPEALING
CHAPTER 75 IN ITS ENTIRETY; PROVIDING FOR DELETION
FROM THE CITY OF PALM BAY CODE OF ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SECTION 1.
Development Code, Chapter 174, Floodplain and Stormwater Management, Subchapter
‘Floodplain Management’, is hereby repealed in its entirety:
“DANGEROUS INTERSECTION SAFETY ACT
§ 75.01 TITLE.
This chapter shall be known as the "Dangerous Intersection Safety Act".
§ 75.02 INTENT.
The purpose of this chapter is to authorize the use of traffic infraction detectors to
promote compliance with red light signal directives as proscribed by this chapter, and to adopt
an enforcement system for red light signal violations, all in accord with general law, including
Chapter 2010-80, Laws of Florida (2010) (the “Mark Wandall Traffic Safety Act” or “Act”). This
chapter will also supplement law enforcement personnel in the enforcement of red light signal
violations and shall not prohibit law enforcement officers from issuing a citation for a red light
signal violation in accordance with normal statutory traffic enforcement techniques.
§ 75.03 USE OF TRAFFIC INFRACTION DETECTORS.
The city shall utilize traffic infraction detectors pursuant to general law as a
means of monitoring compliance with laws related to traffic control signals, while assisting law
enforcement personnel in the enforcement of such laws, which are designed to protect and
improve public health, safety and welfare. This section shall not supersede, infringe, curtail or
impinge upon state laws related to red light signal violations or conflict with such laws. The city
may utilize traffic infraction detectors as an ancillary deterrent to traffic control signal violations
and to thereby reduce accidents and injuries associated with such violations.
Page 2 of 6
§ 75.04 DEFINITIONS.
The following definitions shall apply to this chapter.
CAREFUL AND PRUDENT MANNER. The operation of a motor vehicle having
due regard for width, grade, curves, corners, traffic, actual and potential hazards, and all other
attendant circumstances so as not to endanger pedestrians, other motor vehicles, bicycles and
other non-motorized vehicles, or the property of another.
INTERSECTION. The area embraced within the prolongation or connection of
the lateral curb line; or, if none, then the lateral boundary lines, of the roadways of two (2) roads
which join or intersect one another at, or approximately at, right angles; or the area within which
vehicles traveling upon different roads joining at any other angle may come in conflict.
MOTOR VEHICLE. Any conveyance meeting the definition set forth in F.S. §
316.003(21), or its successor provision.
OWNER/VEHICLE OWNER. The person or entity identified by the Florida
Department of Motor Vehicles, or other state vehicle registration office, as the registered owner
of a vehicle.
RECORDED IMAGES. Images recorded by a traffic infraction detector which is
operated in accordance with the Act.
RED ZONE INFRACTION. A traffic offense whereby an infraction detector
indicates a violation of F.S. § 316.074(1) or F.S. § 316.075(1)(c)(1).
TRAFFIC INFRACTION DETECTOR. Vehicle sensor(s) installed to work in
conjunction with a traffic control signal and one (1) or more cameras synchronized to
automatically record two (2) or more sequenced photographic or electronic images or streaming
video of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle fails to stop behind the stop bar,
clearly marked stop line, or crosswalk, when facing a traffic control signal displaying a steady
red light or steady red arrow.
TRAFFIC INFRACTION ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. A Police Department
employee designated, pursuant to subsection 75.08(B) herein, to review recorded images and
issue a notice of violation and a uniform traffic citation based upon those images.
§ 75.05 ADHERENCE TO RED LIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS.
(A) Pursuant to general law, motor vehicle traffic facing a traffic control signal's
steady red light indication shall stop before entering the crosswalk on the near side of an
intersection or, if none, then before entering the intersection and shall remain standing until a
green indication is shown on the traffic control signal; however, the driver of a vehicle which is
approaching a clearly marked stop line, the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection or, if
none, is approaching the point nearest the intersecting roadway where the driver has a view of
approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway before entering the intersection in obedience of
a steady red traffic control signal, may make a right turn in a careful and prudent manner
Page 3 of 6
(unless such turn is otherwise prohibited by posted sign or other traffic control device) but shall
yield right-of-way to pedestrians and other traffic proceeding as directed by the traffic control
signal at the intersection.
(B) Pursuant to general law, motor vehicles facing a traffic control signal that is
malfunctioning, inoperable or is emitting a flashing red light shall stop at a clearly marked stop
line, but if none, before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection, or if none,
then at the point nearest to the intersection roadway where the driver has a view of approaching
traffic on the intersecting roadway before entering the intersection, and the right to proceed shall
be subject to the rules applicable after making a stop at a stop sign. In the event that only some
of the traffic control signals within an intersection are malfunctioning, inoperative or emitting a
flashing red light the driver of the vehicle approaching the malfunctioning, inoperative or flashing
red traffic control signal shall stop in the above prescribed manner.
§ 75.06 VIOLATION.
A violation of this chapter, known as a red zone infraction, shall occur when a
vehicle does not comply with the requirements of § 75.05. Violations shall be enforced pursuant
to F.S. § 316.0083.
§ 75.07 IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL LAW.
Within the city, the City Manager is authorized to implement the provisions and
requirements of Chapter 2010-80, Laws of Florida (2010), as may be amended from time to
time, and may take any action which is necessary for such purpose.
§ 75.08 REVIEW OF RECORDED IMAGES.
(A) The owner of the vehicle which is observed by recorded images committing
a red zone infraction, shall be issued a notice of violation no later than thirty (30) days after the
red zone infraction occurs. The recorded image shall be sufficient grounds to issue a city notice
of violation.
(B) The city shall designate one (1) or more Traffic Infraction Enforcement
Officers, who shall be sworn police officers of the city and who shall meet the qualifications set
forth in F.S.§ 316.640(5)(A), or any other relevant statute. A Traffic Infraction Enforcement
Officer shall review recorded images prior to the issuance of a notice of violation to ensure
accuracy and the integrity of the recorded images. A Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer shall
also verify that the traffic infraction detector which captured the recorded images was
functioning properly at the time the recorded images were captured. Once the Traffic Infraction
Enforcement Officer has verified the accuracy of the recorded images and functionality of the
traffic infraction detector, he or she shall complete a review of the violation and authorize
enforcement action, and a notice of violation shall be sent to the vehicle owner at the address
on record with the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.
Page 4 of 6
§ 75.09 NOTICE OF VIOLATION.
(A) Within thirty (30) days after a violation, notification must be sent to the
registered owner of the motor vehicle involved in the violation specifying the remedies available
under F.S. § 318.14, and that the violator must pay the penalty of one hundred fifty-eight dollars
($158.00) to the city or furnish an affidavit supporting an exemption that complies with F.S. §
316.0083, in accordance with paragraph (11) within thirty (30) days following the date of the
notification in order to avoid court fees, costs, and the issuance of a traffic citation. The
notification shall be sent by first-class mail, and shall include at a minimum:
(1) The name and address of the vehicle owner;
(2) The license plate number of the vehicle;
(3) The make of the vehicle;
(4) Images depicting the infraction, showing the license tag of the
offending vehicle and the traffic control signal being violated;
(5) The location of the intersection where the violation occurred;
(6) The date and time of the red zone infraction;
(7) A statement that the owner has the right to review the recorded
images that constitute a rebuttable presumption against the owner, together with a statement of
the time and place or internet location where the evidence may be examined and observed;
(8) Instructions on all methods of payment of the penalty;
(9) A statement specifying the remedies available under F.S. § 318.14;
(10) A statement that the owner must pay a penalty of one hundred fiftyeight dollars ($158.00) to the city or provide an affidavit that complies with F.S. § 316.0083,
within thirty (30) days of the date the notice is issued in order to avoid court fees, costs, and the
issuance of a Uniform Traffic Citation;
(11) A signed statement by the Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer
that, based on inspection of recorded images, the vehicle was involved in a red zone infraction
constituting a violation of F.S. § 316.074(1) or F.S. § 316.075(1)(c)(1).
§ 75.10 UNIFORM TRAFFIC CITATION.
If an owner receives a notice and fails to pay the penalty imposed by F.S. §
316.0083, or to provide an affidavit supporting an exemption that complies with the provisions of
F.S. § 316.0083 within thirty (30) days of the date the notice is issued, then a Uniform Traffic
Citation shall be issued to the owner as provided by general law. The Uniform Traffic Citation
shall be issued no later than sixty (60) days after the date the red zone infraction occurs. The
owner shall be responsible and liable for paying the Uniform Traffic Citation unless the owner
Page 5 of 6
furnishes to the city, within thirty (30) days after the date of issuance of the Uniform Traffic
Citation, an affidavit supporting an exemption that complies with F.S. § 316.0083. Upon receipt
of an affidavit, the person designated as having care, custody, and control of the motor vehicle
at the time of the violation may be issued a Uniform Traffic Citation under this Article, and shall
be responsible and liable for paying the citation. The submission of a false affidavit is a
misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in F.S. § 775.082 or F.S. §
775.083.
§ 75.11 SIGNAGE.
At any intersection at which the city has installed a traffic infraction detector, it
shall erect signage at the intersection sufficient to notify the public that a traffic infraction
detector may be in use at the intersection and shall include specific notification of intersection
safety camera enforcement of violations concerning right turns. Such signage shall meet the
specifications for uniform signals and devices adopted by the Department of Transportation
pursuant to F.S. § 316.0745.
§ 75.12 CONSISTENCY WITH STATE LAW.
(A) This chapter shall be interpreted and applied so that it is consistent with state
law, specifically, the Mark Wandall Traffic Safety Act; CS/CS/HB 325.
(B) Any amendment to an applicable state law shall automatically apply to the
enforcement and application of this chapter, whether or not this chapter or any provision hereof
has been amended to specifically address such amendment to state law. Without limitation, any
future amendment regarding the amount of the civil penalty or the apportionment of the
proceeds thereof shall be deemed applied in the enforcement of this chapter, even prior to a
specific amendment to this chapter to make the chapter expressly consistent with such change
in state law with respect to the amount of the penalty or the apportionment of proceeds thereof.”
provisions within this Ordinance shall be deleted from the City of Palm Bay Code of
Ordinances.
ordinance is held or declared to be either unconstitutional, invalid, inapplicable,
inoperative or void, then such declaration shall not be construed to affect other portions
of the ordinance; it is hereby declared to be the express opinion of the City Council of
the City of Palm Bay that any such unconstitutional, invalid, inapplicable, inoperative or
void portion or portions of this ordinance did not induce its passage, and that without the
Page 6 of 6
inclusion of any such portion or portions of this ordinance, the City Council would have
enacted the valid constitutional portions thereof.
SECTION 4. The provisions within this ordinance shall take effect on April 20,
2014.
, 2014.
ATTEST:
Reviewed by CAO:
TO:
Sue Hann, City Manager
FROM:
Yvonne McDonald, Finance Director
DATE:
March 23, 2014
RE:
Monthly Financial Report for the month of February 2014
Attached for your information is the monthly financial report for February 2014 which will provide
you with an overview of the City’s financial activities during the month of February 2014.
February is the 5th month of the fiscal year and represents 42% of the annual budget.
February 2014 Cash & Investments Highlights
General Fund
•
Total General Fund cash and investments decreased by $1,431,856 or -8.1% from the
same period last year. General Fund Cash & Investments at 02/28/14 totaled
$16,330.077.
•
From its primary General Fund revenue source, the City has received through February
28th, $18.7 million or 83.1% of the budgeted Ad Valorem Taxes for FY 14. Ad Valorem
Taxes budgeted for FY 14 is $21.8 million. An additional $31,954 in delinquent ad
valorem tax revenue was received through February 28st.
Capital Improvement Fund
•
At February 28, 2014, $1.3 million of General Fund’s funds had been advanced towards
capital improvement projects. Funds reimbursable to the General Fund are for the
Parkway, Troutman/Clermont and Palm Bay Landscaping projects.
Other Employee Benefits (OEB)
•
Used primarily for the payout of benefits and insurance premiums, the OEB Fund’s cash
remained negative by $443,858 at the end of February 2014.
Employee Benefits
•
The Employee Benefits Fund’s cash balance is down from last month. The fund had a
cash balance of $1.5 million at the end of February 2014.
Citywide
•
The City’s overall cash and investments portfolio, increased by $1.7 million or 2.9% from
$60.1 million in February 2013 to $61.9 million in February 2014.
Attachments: February 2014 Financial Report
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT (UNAUDITED)
FEBRUARY 2014
The City of Palm Bay, Florida’s (the “City”) monthly financial report presents an overview and analysis of
the City’s financial activities during the month of February 2014. February is the fifth month of the fiscal
year and represents 42% of the annual budget.
Contents
Financial Report Summary


Citywide revenues of $110.3 million (including $50.9
million in bond proceeds) are at 53% of the annual
budget. Citywide expenditures (including capital, debt
service, and payment for the defeasance of the 2008
Pension Bonds and the related swap termination) of
$104.3 million are at 50% of the annual budget.
Traditionally revenue collections are two months in
arrears. For this reason, certain revenues for grants
and other governmental resources are accrued at year
end to reflect the period in which it represents.
Citywide cash and investments increased by $1.77
million, or 2.9%, in comparison to the prior year.
Citywide - Cash & Investments
2/28/2014
$ 61,921,558.50 2/28/2014
2/28/2013
60,148,009.08 2/28/2013
Increase
2.9% $
1,773,549.42 Increase
 General Fund
YTD Revenues
Monthly Revenues
YTD Expenditures
Monthly Expenditures
YTD Budget Comparison
Cash & Investments
Fund Balance
 Utilities Fund
YTD Revenues
Monthly Revenues
YTD Expenses
Cash & Investments
 Building Fund
YTD Revenues
YTD Expenses
Cash & Fund Equity
Citywide - Revenues
$ 110,259,570.42 2/28/2014
57,625,417.36 2/28/2013
91.3% $ 52,634,153.06 Increase
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Citywide - Expenditures
$ 104,336,165.58
50,317,446.43
107.4% $ 54,018,719.15

General Fund revenues of $28.0 million are at 48% of the annual budget. This is a decrease of
$2.1 million, or 7.0%, in comparison to the prior year.

General Fund expenditures of $23.6 million are at 40% of the annual budget. This is an increase
of $2.2 million, or 10.4%, in comparison to the prior year.

General Fund cash and investments decreased by $1.4 million, or 8.1%, in comparison to the
prior year.
General Fund - Cash & Investments
General Fund - Revenues
General Fund - Expenditures
2/28/2014
$ 16,330,077.25 2/28/2014
$ 28,023,691.17 2/28/2014
$ 23,569,661.32
2/28/2013
17,761,933.46 2/28/2013
30,145,410.50 2/28/2013
21,343,149.69
Decrease
-8.1% $ (1,431,856.21) Decrease
-7.0% $ (2,121,719.33) Increase
10.4% $
2,226,511.63
The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund and is used to account for all resources except
those that are required to be accounted for in another fund. The following information depicts the history
of the revenues and expenditures for the General Fund from fiscal years 2011 to 2014.
This report contains unaudited information. If you have any questions or comments on the financial reports, please contact Yvonne
McDonald, Finance Director or Ruth Chapman, Assistant Finance Director.
City Website: http://www.palmbayflorida.org/
Finance Website: http://www.palmbayflorida.org/government/departments/finance-acct-btr-liens-passportspurchasing-
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
FEBRUARY 2014
General Fund Revenues – At a Glance
February 2014
General Fund Revenues-YTD
$70,000,000
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
FY 2011
$30,000,000
FY 2012
$20,000,000
FY 2013
FY 2014
$10,000,000
$0
FY2014 YTD Change in GF Revenues as Compared to Prior Year
Ad Valorem Taxes
Local Option Fuel Tax
Utility Service Taxes (1)
Communication Service Tax (2)
Franchise Fees
State Shared Revenues
Half Cent Sales Tax
Licenses and Permits
Grants and Other Entitlements (3)
Charges for Services
Fines and Forfeitures
Interest, Rents & Other Revenues (4)
Interfund Transfers & Other Sources (5)
Prior
Current
YTD
YTD
$ 18,784,342 $ 18,760,885
623,665
629,340
1,883,852
2,083,287
957,370
775,869
1,167,415
1,206,925
705,043
774,255
1,260,637
1,308,137
493,266
507,079
133,122
38,788
1,017,636
1,012,662
225,914
222,088
266,852
132,343
2,626,298
572,034
$ 30,145,411 $ 28,023,691
Percent
Change
-0.1%
0.9%
10.6%
-19.0%
3.4%
9.8%
3.8%
2.8%
-70.9%
-0.5%
-1.7%
-50.4%
-78.2%
-7.0%
Annual
Budget
$ 21,960,744
3,506,071
7,712,620
3,185,818
4,883,798
3,531,973
5,281,011
581,902
199,748
2,884,029
480,500
532,860
4,147,823
$ 58,888,897
(1) Increase due to higher year-to-date collection of Utilities Service Tax.
(2) Decrease due to lower year-to-date collection of Communication Service Tax.
(3) Decrease primarily due to no year-to-date collection of Safer grant.
(4) Decrease primarily due to derivative settlement received in FY13.
(5) Decrease due primarily to FY13 budgeted transfer from Employee Benefits Fund not budgeted in FY14.
2
FEBRUARY 2014
General Fund Revenues-Monthly Comparison
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
FY 2011
$10,000,000
FY 2012
FY 2013
$5,000,000
FY 2014
$0
Monthly GF Revenues as Compared to Prior Years
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
$ 1,040,621 $
977,777 $ 1,048,437 $
911,630
2,503,728
2,461,538
3,846,416
3,425,400
19,248,230
19,057,223
18,439,244
15,683,359
3,177,108
2,913,461
3,531,439
4,802,728
3,610,095
3,291,148
3,279,875
3,200,574
3,415,818
2,935,536
2,917,572
3,995,164
3,347,753
3,616,551
2,997,920
3,378,842
3,276,506
4,004,244
3,949,309
3,611,729
2,711,961
2,579,340
3,046,753
3,909,861
3,105,114
3,393,534
8,083,483
8,015,068
7,561,669
$ 58,698,233 $ 56,012,110 $ 57,569,724 $ 28,023,691
Overall General Fund revenues for the month of February 2014 have decreased $79,301 (2.42%) when
compared to February 2013.
The major sources of revenues for the General Fund are taxes, franchise fees, intergovernmental
revenues, licenses, permits, fines, forfeitures and charges for services. With a recovering economy and
most of the City’s revenues derived from ad valorem taxes, the revenue budget is essential for existing
and critical City services. The City is conservative in budgeting revenues to account for the current
economic condition.
3
FEBRUARY 2014
General Fund Expenditures – At a Glance
February 2014
General Fund Expenditures-YTD
$70,000,000
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
FY 2011
$30,000,000
FY 2012
$20,000,000
FY 2013
FY 2014
$10,000,000
$0
Legislative (1)
City Manager
City Attorney (2)
Finance
Information Technology (3)
Human Resources (4)
Growth Management (5)
Parks and Recreation (6)
Police
Fire
Public Works
Non-Departmental (7)
Transfers (8)
Prior
Current
YTD
YTD
$
179,502 $
230,870
349,152
336,485
255,099
331,408
656,024
676,705
527,239
651,147
140,328
159,611
200,047
222,446
1,214,519
1,353,849
7,493,581
7,654,928
5,353,141
5,473,512
1,740,904
1,745,253
498,251
1,613,575
2,735,364
3,119,871
$ 21,343,150 $ 23,569,661
Percent
Change
28.6%
-3.6%
29.9%
3.2%
23.5%
13.7%
11.2%
11.5%
2.2%
2.2%
0.2%
223.8%
14.1%
10.4%
Annual
Budget
$
543,153
879,922
824,879
1,653,633
1,632,776
443,018
584,845
3,780,659
20,225,875
13,426,056
4,686,039
3,804,979
6,403,063
$ 58,888,897
(1) Increase primarily due to new memberships in Florida League of Cities, National League of Cities, and U.S. Conference of Mayors.
(2) Increase primarily due to increased year-to-date other attorney cost.
(3) Increase due primarily to P.I.O. paid from I.T. budget in FY14 and to costs of website redesign.
(4) Increase due primarily to increased year-to-date costs of salaries and training.
(5) Increase due primarily to increased year-to-date costs of salaries, partially due to posting past Acting Director’s wages to Growth Mgt.
(6) Increase due primarily to increased year-to-date costs in recreation programs and facility maintenance.
(7) Increase due to Stormwater and Fleet transfers from non-departmental in FY14 instead of from individual departments in prior years.
(8) Increase primarily due to increased year-to-date transfers to Debt Service Fund and $750k transfer to CIP as per BA#1.
4
FEBRUARY 2014
General Fund Expenditures-Monthly Comparison
$9,000,000
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
FY 2011
$4,000,000
FY 2012
$3,000,000
FY 2013
$2,000,000
FY 2014
$1,000,000
$0
Monthly GF Expenditures as Compared to Prior Years
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
$
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
3,344,227 $ 3,176,499 $ 2,928,572 $ 3,279,274
4,203,995
4,383,784
5,357,915
4,445,312
6,824,605
5,709,190
4,385,251
4,931,871
7,848,626
4,264,866
4,576,388
5,653,811
4,141,651
4,313,018
4,095,023
5,259,394
4,118,263
5,278,330
5,452,911
5,850,270
3,964,498
4,230,477
4,118,482
3,940,153
4,504,552
4,243,882
3,891,791
4,321,706
2,924,476
4,009,168
4,248,739
4,396,125
4,805,418
5,769,101
6,396,695
5,752,634
5,244,300
-
$ 58,411,296 $ 53,489,350 $ 55,114,935 $ 23,569,661
February General Fund expenditures were $1,164,372 (28.43%) more when comparing February 2014 to
February 2013. Year-to-date expenditures are $2,226,512 more.
5
FEBRUARY 2014
General Fund Expenditures-Budgetary Comparison by Category
YTD Actual
Debt Service
$ 3,119,871.09
Personnel
Operating
Capital
Contributions
Transfers
Reserves
Total
16,316,193.48
4,095,229.37
38,292.38
75.00
$ 23,569,661.32
$45,000,000.00
$40,000,000.00
$35,000,000.00
$30,000,000.00
$25,000,000.00
$20,000,000.00
$15,000,000.00
$10,000,000.00
$5,000,000.00
$-
YTD Budget
$
2,667,943
$
17,353,635
4,372,025
79,904
18,333
45,200
24,537,040
Annual Budget
% Spent
$
6,403,063
48.72%
$
41,648,723
10,492,860
191,770
44,000
108,481
58,888,897
39.18%
39.03%
19.97%
0.17%
0.00%
0.00%
40.02%
YTD Actual
YTD Budget
Annual Budget
The total budgeted expenditures for 2014 are $58,888,897 (includes encumbrances from prior year and
2014 budget amendments). Of this amount, $41,648,723, or 70.7%, is related to personnel costs.
6
FEBRUARY 2014
General Fund Cash & Investments – At a Glance
February 2014
General Fund Cash & Investments-YTD
$20,000,000.0
$18,000,000.0
$16,000,000.0
General Fund Unrestricted Cash & Investments
$14,000,000.0
Prior Month Ending Balance
$12,000,000.0
$
18,196,916.21
FY 2011
$10,000,000.0
FY 2012
$8,000,000.0
Cash Increase (Decrease)
(1,866,838.96)
FY 2013
FY 2014
$6,000,000.0
Ending Balance 2/28/14
$
16,330,077.25
$4,000,000.0
$2,000,000.0
$0.0
General Fund Cash & Investments
General Fund Available Cash & Investments
0%
0%
1%
3%
Code Nuisance Fund
0%
February 2014 Ending Balance
$
16,330,077.25
HOME Grant
Cash Advanced to Other Funds:
Debt Service - 2008 Pension Bond
Code Nuisance Fund
(12,350.83)
HOME Grant
(32,497.81)
Debt Service - 2008 Pension Bond
CBDG
Community Investment Program
(46,622.00)
(230,323.07)
(426,522.74)
Total Advances
Total Available Cash & Investments
CBDG
96%
Community Investment Program
Net Available GF
(748,316.45)
$
15,581,760.80
7
FEBRUARY 2014
General Fund Balance – At a Glance
February 2014
PRIOR YTD
CURRENT YTD
REVENUES
Ad Valorem Taxes
$
Local Option Fuel Tax
Utility Service Taxes
Communication Service Tax
Franchise Fees
State Shared Revenues
18,784,342
$
18,760,885
623,665
629,340
1,883,852
2,083,287
957,370
775,869
1,167,415
1,206,925
705,043
774,255
1,260,637
1,308,137
Licenses and Permits
493,266
507,079
Grants and Other Entitlements
133,122
38,788
Charges for Services
1,017,636
1,012,662
Fines and Forfeitures
225,914
222,088
Interest, Rents and Other Revenues
266,852
132,343
Half Cent Sales Tax
Interfund Transfers and Other Sources
2,626,298
572,034
30,145,411
28,023,691
Legislative
179,502
230,870
City Manager
349,152
336,485
City Attorney
255,099
331,408
Finance
656,024
676,705
Information Technology
527,239
651,147
Human Resources
140,328
159,611
Growth Management
200,047
222,446
Parks and Recreation
1,214,519
1,353,849
Police
7,493,581
7,654,928
Fire
5,353,141
5,473,512
Public Works
1,740,904
1,745,253
498,251
1,613,575
Total Revenues
EXPENDITURES
Non-Departmental
Transfers
Total Expenditures
2,735,364
3,119,871
21,343,150
23,569,661
8,802,261
4,454,030
8,600,610
12,005,802
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over
Expenditures
Fund Balance - Beginning
Prior Period Adjustment
Fund Balance - Beginning as Restated
Fund Balance - Ending
$
934,175
-
9,534,785
12,005,802
18,337,046
$
16,459,832
The minimum General Fund balance, as established by Resolution 2011-34, is ten percent (10%) of the
subsequent fiscal year’s budgeted expenditures less capital outlay and transfers out as originally adopted
by ordinance in September. The following is a history of the City’s General Fund balance.
FY 2013
FY 2012
FY 2011
FY 2010
FY 2009
FY 2008
General Fund Balance - History
Minimum
Actual Fund Balance
Required Fund Balance Percentage
$ 5,059,293 $ 12,005,802
23.73%
4,941,647
9,534,785
19.29%
5,046,518
6,077,849
12.04%
5,223,284
5,790,912
11.09%
5,490,474
6,688,010
12.18%
5,811,769
5,915,136
10.18%
8
FEBRUARY 2014
Utilities Revenues – At a Glance
February 2014
Water & Sewer Revenues-YTD
$5,000,000
$4,500,000
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
Water
Sewer
FY 13 - February
FY 14 - February
Overall year-to-date Water revenue in February 2014 has increased $149,553 (3.61%) when compared to
February 2013.
Overall year-to-date Sewer revenue in February 2014 has increased $207,225 (7.49%) when compared
to February 2013.
Fire Protection for FY14 was billed at 100% of the budgeted amount. The majority of the Fire Protection
Service Charges are billed annually in November.
Meter Installation Fees are recorded at 34% of the budgeted amount. Utility Lien Costs are recorded at
7% of the budgeted amount.
Operating Interest Income is recorded at 12% at this time. The interest for Palm Bay Estates Loan
($25,003) will be recorded in June 2014.
Excluding Fund Balance, the total FY 14 Operating Revenue is recorded at 32.90% of the budgeted
amount compared to FY 13 which was at 33.16%.
Water Connection Fees are recorded at 10% of the budgeted amount, and Sewer Connection Fees are
recorded at 26% of the budgeted amount.
Water MLEs are recorded at 9% of the budgeted amount, and Sewer MLEs are recorded at 68% of the
budgeted amount.
9
FEBRUARY 2014
Water & Sewer Revenues-Monthly Comparison
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
Water
Sewer
$400,000
$200,000
$February 2013
February 2014
Overall Water revenue for the month of February 2014 has decreased by $70,188 (6.16%), when
Overall Sewer revenue for the month of February 2014 has decreased by $1,424 (0.18%), when
10
FEBRUARY 2014
Utilities Expenses – At a Glance
February 2014
Water & Sewer Expenditures-YTD
Overall expenditures (excluding encumbrances) are as follows:
Actual
Debt Service
Personnel
Operating
Capital
Transfers
Reserves
Total
$
Budget
-
$
2,895,853.94
2,108,253.68
61,836.06
3,125,250.40
$
8,191,194.08
4,322,188
7,712,511
6,987,419
521,646
7,513,316
$
27,057,080
% Spent
0.00%
37.55%
30.17%
11.85%
41.60%
30.27%
$9,000,000.00
$8,000,000.00
$7,000,000.00
$6,000,000.00
$5,000,000.00
$4,000,000.00
YTD Actual
$3,000,000.00
Budget
$2,000,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$-
11
FEBRUARY 2014
Utilities Cash & Investments – At a Glance
February 2014
Water & Sewer Cash & Investments-YTD
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
Feb-13
Feb-14
$-
Overall the Water & Sewer Funds cash and investments were $0.7 million (2.5%) more as of February
2014 as compared to February 2013.
12
FEBRUARY 2014
Building Revenues – At a Glance
February 2014
Building Revenues-YTD
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
Fees & Permits
$300,000
Charges for Svc
Misc Revenues
$200,000
Transfers
$100,000
$February 2013
February 2014
Fees and Permits revenue in February 2014 is down $275,152 (55.48%) from February 2013.
Charges for Services revenue in February 2014 is down $117,646 (80.31%) from February 2013.
Overall, Building revenues in FY 14 (at February) have decreased by $388,680 (60.38%) when compared
to FY 13 (at February).
The total FY 14 Building revenues are recorded at 24% of the budgeted amount compared to FY 13
which was 63%.
13
FEBRUARY 2014
Building Expenses – At a Glance
February 2014
Building Expenditures-YTD
Overall expenditures (excluding encumbrances) are as follows:
Actual
Personnel
Operating
Reserves
Total
$
$
217,033.23
71,146.12
288,179.35
Budget
% Spent
$
588,973
151,405
328,414
$ 1,068,792
36.85%
46.99%
0.00%
26.96%
$700,000.00
$600,000.00
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
YTD Actual
$300,000.00
Budget
$200,000.00
$100,000.00
$Personnel
Operating
Reserves
14
FEBRUARY 2014
Building Cash & Fund Equity – At a Glance
February 2014
Building Cash & Fund Equity-YTD
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
February 13
February 14
$400,000
$200,000
$Cash
Fund Equity
Overall the Building cash was $19,088 (3.3%) more as of February 2014 as compared to February 2013.
Overall the Building fund equity was $4,781 (0.5%) more as of February 2014 as compared to February
2013.
15

Agenda

Transcription

Similar documents

West Palm Beach, Florida

a flyer

Lake Wisconsin Map - Lodi and Lake Wisconsin

Syagrus romanzoffiana (Arecastrum romanzoffianum)

Luminere Collection

Coccothrinax crinita

Corypha umbraculifera

marstonmyers

GOL DE N B A Y

Sales Sheet for Tocobaga