The TOSCA project
Transcription
The TOSCA project
The TOSCA project Towards an Optimalestimation Snow Characterization Algorithm DFG funded project (German Science Foundation) 2008 - 2011 • • • • from the ground @ the UFS (= Environmental Research Station Schneefernerhaus, 2650m MSL) from space A. Battaglia (Univ. Bonn) U. Löhnert (Univ. Cologne) M. Hagen (DLR) G. Peters (MPI Meteorology) TOSCA: Motivation No single instrument is solely capable of describing the microphysical properties of snow! combine many state-of-the-art remote sensing instruments into a prototype of a physically consistent framework Î final goal: Develop a modular optimal-estimation algorithm and evaluate the potential for deriving columnar snow microphysics If the evaluation of the TOSCA goal from the ground is negative, it will be difficult to retrieve the snow from space at all! Integration of atmospheric sensors @ UFS DPR (RS passive): high accuracy LWP, ice microphysics Disdrometer PARSIVEL: In-situ fall speed, particle size HATPRO (RS passive): T&q profiles, LWP Integration = physically consistent combination of all employed measurement information Need knowledge on: • instrument characteristics (theory, error) • forward model, i.e. radiative transfer • inversion methods Ceilometer (RS active): backscatter profile Cloud radar (RS active): cloud boundaries, droplet fall velocity, cloud vertical structure MicroRainRadar: Doppler velocity spectrum of precipitation Workshop questions addressed by TOSCA Session “New Technology”, WG3/WG4 • TOSCA possesses something close to a “dream set” of instruments for retrieving snow from the ground, missing instruments: 2D video-spectrometer, high power lidar (depolarization, Raman technology) Î contributors still welcome for the coming winter season! • Within TOSCA we hope to be able to ¾ quantify how accurately parameters such as ice water content, snowfall rate or PSD parameters can be retrieved ¾ estimate the influences of crystal habit and orientation on the retrieved parameters ¾ understand which instruments contribute the most/least to the results – what is the benefit of sensor synergy? Session “Ground Validation” 1. & 4. TOSCA could fit into the proposed “physical validation”: influences of certain assumptions concerning crystal habit, PSD and thus single scattering properties can be examined in detail; sensitivity studies w.r.t. to the inclusion of different instruments can be carried out 2. We plan to carry out such synthetic retrieval sensitivities using model output from cloud resolving models (e.g. Lokal Modell, Meso-NH) Impact of single scattering properties on TB Sensitivity study (simulation): • 5 km layer of snow with the lowest 3 km at constant rate and the upper 2 km with linearly decreasing rate (Sekhon & Srivastava SD) • atmosphere with lapse rates : 6K/km & 5%RH/km • surface at 0°C & 100% RH and emissivity equal to 0.85 Descrimination of snow and ice signals Sensitivity study (simulation): • 5 km layer of snow with the lowest 3 km at constant rate and the upper 2 km with linearly decreasing rate (Sekhon & Srivastava SD) • atmosphere with lapse rates : 6K/km & 5%RH/km • surface at 0°C & 100% RH and emissivity equal to 0.85 First measurements @ UFS (Jan. 27, 2008) First measurements @ UFS (Jan. 27, 2008) Exploit the role of ice in the microwave region A. Battaglia, Univ. Bonn • above ~90 GHz ice crystals are more and more effective scatterers • however single scattering properties strongly depend on the size distribution & habit Impact of single scattering properties on TB Sensitivity study (simulation): • 5 km layer of snow with the lowest 3 km at constant rate and the upper 2 km with linearly decreasing rate (Sekhon & Srivastava SD) • atmosphere with lapse rates : 6K/km & 5%RH/km • surface at 0°C & 100% RH and emissivity equal to 0.85 A. Battaglia, Univ. Bonn Large differences between different habits