australia has a big impact in Chicago
Transcription
australia has a big impact in Chicago
australasian Journal of AusBiotech Australia’s Biotechnology Organisation VOLUME 16 • NUMBER 1 • MAY 2006 AusBioFEATURE Australia has a big impact in Chicago BIO Chicago 2006 Debrief AusBioFEATURE Tasmania Emerging Bio - Extraction Hub REGULAR FEATURES: AusBioTALK Wallaby milk contains powerful weapon against Human super bugs AusBioBUSINESS Federal budget cements future for Australian Biotechnology AusBioSTOCKS Stock report with Joanna Hill from Lands Kirwan Tong Stockbrokers AusBioGRAPHY In depth interview with Dr Stewart Washer, CEO Phylogica Ltd. =dhi>cYjhign7dYn 89@:)''- =dhiHiViZEg^cX^eVaHedchdg JcadX`^c\i]ZediZci^Vad[ 6\g^XjaijgVa7^diZX]cdad\n BV_dgHedchdgh ABIC 2006 will deliver an outstanding event for all. Together with AusBiotech, the hosting state Victoria and our major sponsors, the ABIC Foundation looks forward to welcoming you to the beautiful city of Melbourne, Australia. ABIC 2006 will provide the opportunity for public and private organisations to explore the drivers of and barriers to research, development, innovation and commercialisation in this exciting and dynamic agbio sector. For more information and to register NOW visit www.abic2006.org 6\g^XjaijgVa7^diZX]cdad\n >ciZgcVi^dcVa8dc[ZgZcXZ +Ä.6j\jhi'%%+ BZaWdjgcZ8dckZci^dc8ZcigZ K^Xidg^V!6jhigVa^V lll#VW^X'%%+#dg\ Contents Welcome 4 AusBioFEATURE BIO Chicago 2006 Debrief 6 Australia has a big impact in Chicago 6 Highlights of Bill Clinton’s keynote address at BIO Chicago 2006 8 Asia Pacific to get its own ‘Virtual’ Biotech Marketplace 9 Tasmania – the Emerging BioExtraction Hub 10 Marinova 11 Tasmanian Alkaloids 12 Alternate sources of Omega-3 oils 13 Botanical Resources 14 AusBioTALK 15 AusBioBUSINESS 20 AusBioSTOCK 25 AusBioNEWSBOARD 30 AusBioINTERNATIONAL 36 AusBioEVENTS 39 AusBioSTATES 44 AusBioNICHE 48 AusBioPEOPLE 56 AusBioGRAPHY 62 Cover – Mr James C. Greenwood BIO President & CEO welcomes Bill Clinton as keynote speaker, Bio Chicago 2006 Advanced Labs Thomson Pharma ABIC2006 2 9, 14 AusBiotech 2006 41 AusBiotech 2006 47 Pathtech Level 1, 322 Glenferrie Road Malvern Vic 3144 Telephone: (03) 9828 1400 Fax: (03) 9824 5188 Email: [email protected] www: ausbiotech.org Advertising For advertising enquiries, please contact Andrew Jackson – Digital Image Level 2, 181 Fitzroy Street St Kilda Vic 3182 Telephone: (03) 9537 0588 Fax: (03) 9537 0577 Email: [email protected] www.digital-image.com.au Editorial Contributions Please contact the Editor: Jennifer Cook – AusBiotech Telephone: (03) 9828 1405 Facsimile: (03) 9824 5188 Email: [email protected] The information, opinions and advice in this journal are given in good faith and, while all care has been exercised to ensure that the information is accurate, no responsibility can be accepted for errors, or loss or damage from business decisions arising from the use of information contained in this publication, and the publishers hereby exclude all liability be it contractual tortious or otherwise. 21 37 QSV Biologics AusBiotech 34, 35 RMIT IMBcom Australasian Biotechnology reports on research and business news within the biotechnology arena and is published 4 times a year. AusBiotech members receive the journal as part of their membership benefits. Publisher’s Disclaimer Advertiser Index ABIC2006 Australasian Biotechnology is the official journal of AusBiotech – Australia’s Biotechnology Organisation. 55 Outside Back Cover Insert Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology Welcome From the Chairman Welcome to the first edition of the new look Australasian Biotechnology. International outreach and access to Australian biotechnology continues to expand. Later this year The Agricultural Biotechnology International Conference (ABIC) 2006 will be held in Melbourne in August 2006, hosted by AusBiotech and sponsored by the Victorian Government. This international congress will focus attention on agricultural biotechnology and new innovations in this sector. Australia has much to gain from these new technologies, particularly in the areas of soil health, reduction in topsoil erosion, advances in crop production in saltaffected areas and animal management and health. As former President Clinton explained to a packed auditorium at BIO2006 – society advances through science, argument and adoption. To do otherwise allows sectorial ideologies to inhibit the benefits to the community Stem cell research, genetically modified agricultural products and broad adoption of biodiscovery policies, are current examples where Australia has had leading scientific positions but has failed to translate this front running into economic and social advantage. Our challenge is to develop the forums for the “argument” that must be thrashed out before adoption of new science and technologies. To support this process, AusBiotech has formed a number of key alliances. One such alliance is with Medicines Australia and Generic Medicines Association in the Pharmaceutical Industry Council (PIC). This body enhances our advocacy role in one of the important sectors (nearly 50% of listed biotechs are in this space). Similarly, the AusBiotech Board is reviewing participation in other alliances that leverage the “argument”. Simon Carroll – Chairman Australia has a world-recognised strength in science and the development of new technologies. However, this leadership position is constantly eroded due to uncertainty on the road to adoption of these technologies by the community and regulatory bodies. How does Australia efficiently develop technologies that require community and regulatory approval along the path to market? Australia has one of the most attentive regulatory systems in the world. We are a key opinion leader in international discussions and debates governing regulatory systems and an early adopter of new policies and guidelines. Translating these policies into practice in a way that is supportive of innovation is our challenge. Dr Simon Carroll Chairman AusBiotech Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 From the CEO It is a pleasure to report to you that AusBiotech is strengthening its focus and influence in a number of key areas which support members. This year has seen an increase in AusBiotech’s engagement with media coverage of biotechnology and other issues that have broad impact such as legislation, regulation, taxation, government program changes and tendered projects. In the past months there has been demonstrable consolidation of the organisation and changes to staffing which reflect the needs of members. For example, a role dedicated to Medical Devices has been established and will support the work of the Medical Devices Action Agenda. Announcements from member companies have been very impressive during 2006 with great clinical trial results, successful mergers and new partnerships. AusBiotech is working hard to support members in all stages of the value chain and in all sectors from bioinformatics and human health through to agbiotech, fermentation and medical devices. From the Editor I can hear the cork being eased out of the champagne bottle as we go to print on the first new look edition of Australasian Biotechnology. There have been a number of big changes as AusBiotech has brought the production of the journal in-house including the management of the journal’s advertising. A new style has been applied to the journal with more indepth articles and dedicated sections to give our readers a full account of the biotech sector. Not only has the content changed but we have also changed the layout. The design is clear and uncluttered with increased white space, a clearer font and printed on satin stock to improve readability. In this issue we have also included as a special supplement a CD copy of AusBiotech’s 2006 Directory of Australian Biotech. We have also chosen Finsbury Green Printing – the first successfully established environmental printing brand in Australia. Finsbury uses inks that are vegetable based, the key components being soya, and linseed oil, which are made from renewable sources. The journal is produced on paper certified by the Forest Stewardship Council and carries the FSC trademark, the international benchmark for sustainable paper. This paper is produced using 55% recycled content and 45% 2006 has seen significant steps forward in all these areas of biotechnology. Our key upcoming events will provide an excellent opportunity to showcase Australian innovation and commercialisation of innovation to a very interested international audience. During the current company reporting period it will be interesting to observe price movements and also whether the AusBiotech ASX Code of Best Practice Reporting is useful for CEO’s. As you are aware, Professor Michael Vitale is examining the question of useability and impact. The results will inform the Review Committee when considering changes and the outcome will be communicated to member companies. You will find in this edition reference to announced government policy and a comment on the recent federal government budget. Government continues to demonstrate an active interest in biotechnology, this interest is evident at the research and development stage as well as the investment phase. You will also discover a number of regular features and two feature pieces; one on the BIO conference and the other showcasing a number of Tasmanian technologies. It is our intention to listen to your feedback about the new look and future features, so that any adjustments required can be made by July, when the next edition will be distributed. Anna Lavelle - CEO “If biotechnology and medical devices matter to your business, shouldn’t you be an AusBiotech member?” FSC certified fibre from softwood grown specifically for paper production and is elemental chlorine free. In the printing of this journal, no isopropyl alcohol and no solvent based cleaning products have been used which helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Finsbury Green Printing is Australia’s only carbon neutral printer and operates under world’s best practice ISO14001:2004 Environmental Management and ISO9001:2000 Quality Management Systems. We have continued our environmental focus through to the selection of an environmentally friendly mail house. Profile Marketing supports environmental printing and will mail out the journals in envelopes made from recycled paper to reduce the use of plastic wrap. The paper envelope will also reduce waste by eliminating a mailing cover sheet as all mailing information is printed directly on the covering envelope. Advertising is vital in order to support the publication of this dedicated industry journal. AusBiotech now manages all adverting in Australasian Biotechnology. Members who advertise in our journal receive a 10% discount on advertising rates. For more details see our Advertising rates on page 61. We hope you like our new look journal and look forward to your comments and continuing contributions. Jennifer Cook – Editor Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology AusBioFEATURE BIO Chicago 2006 Debrief – Australia has a big impact in Chicago Making News at BIO2006 In addition to providing an environment for deal making and knowledge transfer, BIO is often used by State and Federal Governments as an international backdrop for major biotech policy, funding and scientific announcements. This year was no exception with announcements from a number of state governments. The Federal Government did not make any major announcements at BIO, however an integrated package of initiatives that will impact across the biotech value chain was announced as part of the 2006 Federal Budget. For further information on the Federal Budget see Barry Marshall and Robin Warren had been chosen as ambassadors to promote WA’s biotechnology industry on the international stage. The funding for the initiative of $850,000 per year for three years will also support gastroenterology clinical work at Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital and related work at the University of WA as well as assisting in the establishment of the Office of Nobel Laureates that was founded by Barry Marshall. Professor Marshall’s first duty as ambassador was to accompany Premier Carpenter and the WA delegation of 24 companies to BIO2006. Just days before leaving for BIO, the Victorian Premier, Steve Bracks, together with Innovation Minister, John Brumby and Health Minister Bronwyn Pike announced a $230 million injection of funds into the Victorian life sciences sector. The policy statement, Healthy Futures, includes initiatives designed to support Victoria’s push to become one of the top 5 biotechnology locations in the world by 2010. Headline projects announced were: •$53 million to establish a new Australian Centre for Neuroscience and Mental Health Research; •$35 million for a new Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute; Crowds at the Australian Pavillion AusBiotech’s analysis “Federal Budget Cements Future for Australian Biotechnology” in the AusBioBUSINESS section of this journal. The Western Australian Premier, Alan Carpenter, used the run up to BIO to announce that Nobel Laureates Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 •$16 million for a new ‘Super Institute’ for infectious diseases with the merger of the Austin Research Institute and the Burnet Institute; •Support for the expansion of the WEHI; and •$1 million to support an industry partnership to establish a new bioprocessing facility in Victoria. With reports from companies that this year Australian exhibitors at BIO2006 have attracted in excess of $2 billion in deals and prospective leads, BIO’s apparent ability to encourage governments to focus on biotechnology and support needed programs is turning out to be an added annual bonus for the Australian biotechnology sector. San Diego, which will allow both centres access to research facilities and staff as well as undertaking a regular exchange program to fast-track research and knowledge transfer; •$3 million towards a collaborative research project between the Department of Primary Industries and the US Venter Institute to sequence the DNA of soil; and •a major expansion of medical device company Aortech Biomaterial’s manufacturing plant in Melbourne. During the conference the Queensland Government made several funding and policy announcements to add to its $1.5 billion investment in life sciences since 1998. These included: •the signing of a Statement of Intent between Queensland and Washington State to foster collaborative research and exchange of ideas between Queensland and Washington State universities; •the allocation of $2.2 million in major biotech project grants for joint university and business biotechnology projects to: These investments build on the $1.6 million that has been committed by the Victorian Government to life sciences infrastructure and capabilities over the past 6 years including the Synchrotron, Bio21 and the Australian Stem Cell Centre. The big question that wasn’t answered by Healthy Futures, is whether Victoria will join the bidding war for the mammalian cell production facility that is to be established somewhere in Australia with the assistance of a $10 million grant from the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth expectation is that the State that wants the facility will at least match their funding commitment. To date the Queensland Government has been preparing the way for a cell production facility and would be keen to see it based in Queensland. Industry has for sometime been pushing for a mammalian cell production facility as Australia badly needs this support to enable progress of clinical work in Australia. The Victorian Government also used BIO to announce: •the findings of an independent report – The Victorian Life Sciences Industry Update prepared by Blake Industry and Market Analysis - which shows that Victoria’s publicly listed life sciences sector is now valued at $16.4 billion, a 50% increase over 2004-05 figures; •the signing of a MoU between Victoria and the Canadian province of Manitoba, which will focus on building strategic alliances between research institutions and businesses working in biosecurity research, diagnostics and pest and disease management; •an agreement between the Australian Stem Cell Centre and Monash University and the University of California >University of Queensland and Bio-Layer to develop new technology to improve the diagnosis of CHD and other human diseases; >University of Queensland and private international partners for developing a set of new preclinical drug testing tools; and > Queensland University of Technology and its private partners to develop a pilot sugarcane-based biorefinery plant. •$3.3 million to fund three collaborative biotechnology projects involving national and international partners: >University of Queensland’s International Biomaterials Research Alliance received over $1 million to develop new technologies in dental bone repair, vascular regeneration, vision and medical imaging for monitoring biological processes inside the human body; > the Facility for Advanced Bioinfomatics alliance also based at the University of Queensland received $1.9 million to establish a new Queensland Facility for Advanced Bioinfomatics; and >the Eskitis Institute for Cell and Molecular Therapies at Griffith University received $300,000 for its Genome Network of Stem Cells. With reports from companies that this year Australian exhibitors at BIO2006 have attracted in excess of $2 billion in deals and prospective leads, BIO’s apparent ability to encourage governments to focus on biotechnology and support needed programs is turning out to be an added annual bonus for the Australian biotechnology sector. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology AusBioFEATURE Highlights of Bill Clinton’s keynote address at BIO Chicago 2006 President Clinton Highlights Use of Biotechnology to Improve Agriculture and the Environment, and Alleviate Disease Agricultural Biotechnology Will Play a Significant Role in Feeding and Healing Developing Countries. CHICAGO – Speaking on April 11 at the BIO 2006 International Annual Convention, Former President Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States, discussed the importance of biotechnology in addressing food security and health issues in the developing world. “The first obligation of society is to feed its people,” said Clinton. “Biotechnology can help us feed more people while addressing environmental concerns such as global climate change.” Clinton also discussed the importance of efficiently managing agricultural production. Climate change and top soil erosion are two key aspects of environmental health that agricultural biotechnology can address. The third is energy policy. “I’m proud to have supported the development of crops improved through biotechnology and the creation of sciencebased regulations during my Administration. These crops reduce inputs, allow us to grow more food on less land, and easily transfer technology to people in the developing world. When we empower individuals to feed and care for their families, it is a good thing.” “All of these applications of biotechnology – agricultural, environmental, energy, medical – have the potential to lift people out of poverty. This integration of communities will lead to greater global security.” Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Former US President Bill Clinton giving the keynote address. “President Clinton is a tireless advocate for many of the challenging issues that face mankind such as global health, and ending poverty and hunger in developing nations,” said James C. Greenwood, president and CEO of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO). “As President Clinton emphasized today, biotechnology has the potential to improve the world for future generations.” Seven thousand delegates attended the lunchtime address where President Clinton urged delegates to encourage their own politicians and other people of influence within their communities to support the industry. Asia Pacific to get its own ‘Virtual’ Biotech Marketplace While the scientific program at BIO is universally considered to be world-class, it is more often the deal-broking, networking and access to international dollars and expertise that pays real dividends for the delegations that attend. At this year’s conference, an idea to provide another forum for international networking and interaction moved a step closer to becoming a reality – the establishment of an Asia Pacific Biotechnology Network. During BIO, AusBiotech convened the first meeting of interested parties to discuss what such a Network might look like and how to move the idea forward that was first canvassed at AusBiotech 2005. Attending this inaugural meeting were Industry Association representatives from Australia, India, Taiwan, Thailand, New Zealand, Japan, Singapore and United Arab Emirates. Although not in attendance at this meeting, both South Korea and Malaysia have subsequently added their support. All participants agreed a number of specific guiding principles for the Network: •The Asia Pacific Biotechnology Network would be business focussed. •The Secretariat function for the Network could be based in Australia. •There would be membership reciprocity between member Associations. •An annual regional meeting would be convened and Australia expressed interest in hosting such an event. Central to the Network will be the development of a ‘virtual’ Asia Pacific Biotechnology marketplace. This marketplace will be facilitated through a web-based database and will be accessible to members of participating Associations and Organisations only. The database will provide information on a member company’s or institution’s product and R&D portfolio together with other relevant financial information. Other members seeking partners or services will be able to search the database and make direct contact with appropriate matches. The database will be accessed either directly through the Asia Pacific Biotechnology Network’s website or through each participating Association or Organisation’s own website. Over the next few months AusBiotech will coordinate the design and building of the website and together with the participating countries will develop terms of reference for the Network and confirm the milestones for establishing this exciting initiative. Updates on progress will be provided to AusBiotech members through its regular e-newsletter and future issues of Australasian Biotechnology. “We really should do business in China.” Need some help? China will soon be Australia’s largest trading partner. By 2012 they will be the 4th largest Pharma market in the world. Local biotechnology companies see the enormous market potential but hesitate at taking that first step. Advanced Labs can help companies over that first hurdle and plan strategies for winning a share of this lucrative market. We can help Australian companies capitalize on advantages such as: sharing the same time zone as China, being perceived as their only western friend in Asia and offering a conduit to the USA and Europe. Let Advanced Labs help create your business strategy that will allow you to say, ”We really do business in China”. For further information, contact: Advanced Labs Unit 8, 287 Middleborough Road Box Hill South 3128 VIC Tel: 03 9899 2428 Fax: 03 9899 2586 Mobile 0418 506334 Email: [email protected] Web: www.advancedlabs.com.au Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology AusBioFEATURE Tasmania – the Emerging BioExtraction Hub The island state of Tasmania is emerging as a key Australian biotech extraction hub. Tasmania’s natural advantages of biosecurity, biopurity, fertile agricultural land, clean temperate waters and climate, have attracted high value extract crop producers to the state, and have encouraged new internal businesses to flourish. Positioned in the southernmost latitudes of Australia, Tasmania enjoys long summer days which enables plants such as poppies, pyrethrum and hops to accumulate greater quanities of high value extractives. Activity is not limited to the land, with significant effort invested in biota present in the pristine Tasmanian waters. Tasmanian growers implement world’s best practice ensuring their products meet the exacting standards of the industry. This integrated network of bioextraction growers provides significant added value to the Tasmanian economy. Large international companies such as GlaxoSmithKline and Johnson & Johnson have been drawn to the state for the primary production and development of some of their key compounds. International interest in the ‘pure’ island state continues to grow. Tasmania has established itself as a state of environmental excellence and has sought to protect its environment from external disease, pollutants and foreign species inhabitation. The relaxed lifestyle, world class science facilities and expertise, unique flora and fauna and outstanding environmental conditions has set the scene for a globallycompetitive future for the state in the biotech sector. Three Tasmanian extraction businesses, Tasmanian Alkaloids Pty Ltd, Botanical Resources Australia Pty Ltd and Marinova Pty Ltd, are examples of innovative bioextration companies who are leaders in their field. Another outstanding example of world class science underway in Tasmania is work done by CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric Research on Omega-3 oils. 10 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Marinova Hobart based Marinova is a company that has fully embraced the concept of growth through independent equity. Under the guidance of CEO Paul Garrott, Marinova has evolved from a seaweed harvesting operation to an extraction and fractionation enterprise with a core R&D competency. The company’s focus is now set on expansion into both the human pharmaceutical and nutraceutical sectors. “The nutritional side of our business gives us a consistent cash flow, allowing us to pursue early stage pharmaceutical trials without a complete dependence on external capital,” commented Paul Garrott. “Part of the reason our company is profitable and doing quite well is that we have a diversified approach to how we do business. That’s our business model – we balance risk.” “Through fractionation of GFS, we have produced pharmaceutical grade novel molecules of varied molecular weights, and have the capacity to produce fucoidans targeted at specific therapeutic activity,” said Dr Helen Fitton, Senior Research Scientist at Marinova. In 2005 the successful production of a targeted GFS fraction led to collaboration with a Canadian medical device company, and a joint venture to develop a GFS based post-surgical device. Having successfully completed animal models and initial toxicity trials, Phase I trials are now being initiated. Marinova also has a substantial portfolio of anti-viral data on its fucoidan products, and is now capitalizing on the products’ unique combination of low toxicity and potent activity against Herpes and HIV. It is the North American nutraceutical market that provided Marinova with its early commercial success. Through successful extraction of galactofucan sulphate (GFS), a novel polysaccharide found in Undaria pinnatifida, Marinova formed a relationship with Mannatech, a leader in the world glyconutrition market. Following the successful commercialization of a GFS containing nutraceutical supplement in 2004, Marinova was in a position to invest in a preclinical program investigating the efficacy of GFS across a range of anti-inflammatory, oncological and anti-viral indications. Dried seaweed spores prior to extraction and the creamy coloured dried powder that is produced as a result of the extraction process. The seaweed powder can either be custom blended or undergo an extraction process to obtain a certain GFS percentage Harvesting Undaria pinnatifida off the East Coast of Tasmania. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 11 AusBioFEATURE Tasmanian Alkaloids Nestled near the historic town of Westbury in the state’s north, Tasmanian Alkaloids is an excellent example of integration between technology and the rural environment. Tasmanian Alkaloids is recognised as the largest manufacturer of active pharmaceutical ingredients in Australia and is the largest exporter of codeine and thebaine in the world. The company employs over 200 people including scientists, engineers, technicians, operators, tradespeople and administrative support. The team also includes farmers; contracted for the production of the annual poppy crops, and field officers who work closely with farmers throughout the year to ensure top quality harvest results. Poppies are grown on a three-year crop rotation cycle. Sowing is in spring (September), flowering in early summer (December) and harvest in mid-summer (February). Following harvest, the poppy seed is separated and sold in a clean, natural condition for the spice trade. Separated poppy straw, containing alkaloids, enters the extraction facility where the alkaloids are removed from the plant material by a warm solvent percolation system. The final product is called Concentrate of Poppy Straw. Tasmanian Alkaloids produces two types of Concentrate of Poppy Straw; one has as its main component morphine, the other main component is thebaine. Morphine is converted into codeine. Thebaine is converted into a range of strong analgesics such as oxycodone and buprenorphine. Agricultural Research Scientist Dr James Miller said that his team was working to better understand alkaloid production by the poppy plant in order to maximise the content of the required alkaloids in commercial crops. New technologies 12 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Poppy crop Papaver somniferum. are employed wherever possible to maximise the crop improvement program. In addition to research into poppy genetics and breeding methods, work is undertaken on crop nutrition, crop husbandry and crop protection. Processes are investigated in detail to define robust and capable manufacturing procedures which consistently deliver products with tightly defined and controlled quality characteristics. A dedicated KiloLab facility ensures smooth scale-up from the R&D laboratory to the manufacturing facility where the process is validated and locked-in. Tasmanian Alkaloids’ strategy for the development of new products and their desire to remain an innovative market force is realised by working closely with their customers and partners. CSIRO – Alternate sources of Omega-3 oils Long-chain Omega-3 oils are mainly derived from seafood and play an important role in human nutrition, including development in infants. These oils are beneficial against a range of human disorders such as coronary heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis and hypertension. Against an increasing understanding by nutritionists on the beneficial effects of these oils, global fisheries are generally acknowledged to be threatened and in some case unsustainable, indicating a need for new and sustainable sources of the Omega-3 oils. New sources of these valuable oils would reduce pressure on declining fish resources worldwide and provide Australian biotechnology companies with new microalgal derived products and grain growers with new high-value crops. The CSIRO Food Futures Flagship Omega-3 project involves research teams from Divisions based in Hobart, Canberra and other centres. In the short to mid term, single cell oilproducing microalgae are being examined, with a longer term approach involving development of high value grains and resultant oilseeds that provide substantiated health benefits to consumers. Omega-3 oils from fermentation Microalgae and other marine microorganisms are the natural Omega-3 factories of the sea. It is often not widely appreciated that fish do not make these beneficial Omega3 oils, rather the microalgae do; the beneficial oils are then passed up the food-chain to fish, and then humans. Microalgae therefore offer a renewable source of Omega-3 oils for use in human and animal diets, depending on how well they adapt to life in large-scale culture facilities. Marine micro organism strains which have been recently isolated by CSIRO are to be evaluated by an industry partner – Clover Corporation - for their potential to produce Omega-3 oils in large scale fermenters. Under laboratory conditions the strains are efficient producers of the valuable long chain Omega-3 oils docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) which are not produced by land plants. This research is being performed in collaboration with the Bioproducts CRC with funding from a Food Innovation Grant. Land plants The Food Futures Flagship project also aims to isolate, characterise and transfer new long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) genes from Australian microalgae to land plants. Research to date has surveyed a range of microalgal classes for their LC-PUFA profiles. A suite of desaturase and elongase genes have been successfully transferred to the model plant Arabidopsis, with EPA and DHA having been produced in seed oil, the latter for the first time. With further development, omega-3 LC-PUFA oils from higher plants – seed oil and grains - offer alternative sources of these essential PUFA for use in human nutrition, biomedical applications and aquaculture and other feeds. The incidence of type-II diabetes, colorectal cancer and cardio-vascular disease is increasing rapidly in developing nations. Therefore, these novel grains may provide significant health benefits to these nations, while opening up further market opportunities for Australia. Such novel grains are more suited to the needs of the processing industry and address growing consumer demands for healthy foods and raw ingredients. For the rural economy, they provide the opportunity for Australian farmers to move away from the intensely competitive, low price end of the grain market. They will allow Australian farmers to be among the first primary producers to capture emerging, high-value market niches. Thraustochytrids are a source of single cell oils. Individual species can show great diversity in cellular morphology and can occur in single cells to clusters of cells, with complex reticulate forms and motile stages also occurring. more info: http://www.csiro.au/csiro/content/standard/ps3u,,.html http://www.csiro.au/csiro/content/standard/pspx,,.html Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 13 AusBioFEATURE Botanical Resources Forty per cent of the world’s pyrethrum is grown and harvested by Botanical Resources Australia (BRA) in the stunningly scenic north-west of Tasmania. However, it is BRA’s research capability and focus on innovation, not its location that is breaking ground in the health biotech industry. Manager of Product Development Brian Chung said “BRA is continually working to be the best in the world in crop production and harvesting, in manufacturing process and quality control, and in product and market development”. In BRA’s core area of pyrethrum, the company is researching ways to improve crop storage and post-harvest management and to find more growth opportunities for A Pyrethrum crop growing in Tasmania. the product. It is developing more effective methods of using pyrethrum with particular emphasis on resistance management. Pyrethrum is the world’s oldest known naturally occurring insecticide and is used around the world to control all types of insects, including mosquitoes, flies, garden pests, and head lice. Operations Manager Matthew Greenhill said “a lot of existing pyrethrum products contain a synthetic form of pyrethrum synergist called piperonyl butoxide, but the presence of a synthetic ingredient restricts access to important markets, such as the organic markets”. Need to conduct a clinical trial? Consider the advantages of conducting clinical trials in China. Through our partnership with China’s pre-eminent clinical research organisation, we can offer Australian researchers high quality trials backed by processes that have been fully audited by international CROs. We have extensive experience and a track record of achievement in many therapeutic areas with sixty major international and sixteen chinese pharmaceutial corporations. A full range of services including product registration, global and Phase I to IV trials are conducted. Cost savings for clients on these trials can be substantial. For further information, contact: Advanced Labs Unit 8, 287 Middleborough Road Box Hill South 3128 VIC Tel: 03 9899 2428 Fax: 03 9899 2586 Mobile 0418 506334 Email: [email protected] Web: www.advancedlabs.com.au 14 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 BRA is also applying the specialist skills and resources it has developed in working with pyrethrum to other medicinal crops. The company grows Australia’s largest echinacea crop, a herb that has been proven to stimulate the body’s immune system. In addition, BRA has also been researching artemesia, since the World Health Organisation recently recommended it as a preferred treatment for malaria. There has been a lot of research done on tropical and sub-tropical plants but not a lot is known about the health applications of plants from temperate climates, such as native plants in Tasmania. BRA would like to take a whole lot of Tasmanian native plants and screen their extracts against a range of tests to determine what properties they may have, such as insecticidal, anti-bacterial and anti-fungal ingredients. In the long term the company plans to develop a database of the medicinal properties of a range of native plants, and work with other companies and research organisations to explore commercial opportunities. AusBioTALK A strong dose of regulation for pharmaceuticals sector Companies operating in the pharmaceuticals and medical devices sectors will need to be extra vigilant in maintaining good business and risk management practices following changes to the regulatory regime under which they operate, according to a leading corporate lawyer. Clayton Utz partner Ms Robyn Baker says amendments to the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 which come into effect this week present a serious corporate governance challenge for companies in affected sectors and warns them to ensure they properly understand the Act’s requirements or potentially risk severe consequences. A former adviser to government in the area of health, Ms Baker says one of the major changes to the regime is that company directors and managers are now exposed to personal liability where they fail to ensure the company’s employees, agents and contractors are across the Act’s requirements. Companies will also need to take extra care to ensure the accuracy of statements and information provided to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the regulatory authority that oversees compliance with the Act, or risk attracting heavy penalties. Companies also risk possible reputational damage given the TGA’s broader powers to release information to the public on breaches of the Act. Ms Baker says the personal liability provisions raise a particular concern for those involved in the day-to-day management of companies operating in these sectors. “In failing to take steps to adequately educate their own employees and ensure that their agents and contractors understand what the company’s obligations are under the Act, management may find themselves on the wrong end of the law,” says Ms Baker. The new provisions imposing personal liability are sections 54B and 54C of the Act. Under those sections, any-one involved in the management of the business may be found personally liable if they knew the company would breach the Act and were in a position to influence its conduct but failed to take ‘reasonable steps’ to prevent the breach. Possible breaches include a failure to comply with manufacturing standards and failing to inform the Therapeutic Goods Administration of issues with the quality, safety or efficacy of a pharmaceutical good or device. Certain breaches (such as non-compliance with standards) carry a maximum criminal penalty for individuals of $440,000 and up to 5 years imprisonment and a civil penalty of $550,000. In determining what are ‘reasonable steps’, the court will be asked to consider what action the director or manager took to ensure the company’s employees, agents and contractors had a ‘reasonable knowledge and understanding’ of the Act’s requirements. “Directors and managers who take a ‘head in the sand’ approach to compliance with the Act now stand to suffer enormous personal consequences. This is a very significant measure which places them at the front line of the increasingly demanding obligations of corporate governance in Australia,” Ms Baker says. “The new laws also stand to drastically impact the way in which companies in the pharmaceuticals and medical devices sectors do business. It may no longer be enough for the company to have a blanket provision in its underlying contracts (such as contract manufacturing agreements) that require a third party to comply with the Act and relevant standards. The company be it a pharmaceuticals manufacturer or sponsor should now ensure it has hard evidence that those acting on behalf of their business understand the Act’s requirements.” Ms Baker describes the new regime as a ‘carrot and stick’ approach aimed at encouraging companies to examine their own internal practices to ensure compliance with the Act rather than waiting for a breach to happen. “Affected companies would be well advised, if they haven’t already, to take all necessary steps to ensure they have the appropriate systems and documentation in place not only to ensure they avoid breaching the Act but also to protect their management from personal liability ,” Ms Baker adds. The proposed changes were prompted by the Pan Pharmaceuticals recall, which raised concerns that the existing regulatory regime was inadequate. Ms Baker says that while the amendments significantly strengthen the regime by expanding the power of the Therapeutic Goods Administration to enforce the Act’s provisions, they are a double-edged sword for companies and their management. “The full impact of the changes will not be clear however until the Act has been in operation for a while,” Ms Baker says. Other changes under the Act include a tiered regime of criminal offences with new maximum penalties of up to $440,000 and 5 years imprisonment, civil penalties of up to $550,000 for individuals and $5.5 million for companies applicable to certain existing offences, infringement notices as an alternative to prosecution and provision for enforceable undertakings. For further details contact Clayton Utz www.claytonutz.com Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 15 AusBioTALK The AusBiotech ASX Code of Best Practice for Reporting by Life Science Companies In late 2005, AusBiotech and the ASX launched the Code of Best Practice for Reporting by Life Science Companies, which for purposes of brevity can be shortened to ‘the Code’. The Code serves to guide listed life science companies as they observe a greater set of rules, otherwise known as the Listing Rules, including rules and principle of continuous disclosure. Adherence to the Code is voluntary. The continuous disclosure regime requires companies to immediately disclose information to the market that is likely to have a material effect on the price or value of a security. (Securities are shares or other traded instruments or derivatives, such as options). The stock market has one phenomenally powerful incentive for stock owners to buy and sell parcels of shares in companies or other entities: liquidity. Cash is the most liquid of assets. Property is very ill-liquid. Selling a residential property takes months. In contrast, shares in companies listed on a strong exchange such as the ASX can be sold in minutes, if not seconds, when buyers and sellers agree on a price. For the system to work, for the primary benefit of liquidity to be maintained, the exchange must have integrity. Buyers and sellers must have sufficient trust in the exchange so that process of buying and selling is not unduly and unfairly biased towards one set of participants over another, nor is it perceived to be so. By requiring listed companies to disclose information on a continuous basis, the market’s integrity is strengthened. No market, and no stock market is perfect, but the continuous disclosure requirement has worked well to the benefit of companies and investors. The development of a reporting code for life science companies is a practical means for listed life science companies to work sensibly and comfortably within the ASX’s listing rules, where the generality of the listing rules may have given rise to variability in interpretation of those rules. Hence, the Code is a reporting framework that will engender consistency in reporting. Is this a good thing? 16 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 CODE OF BEST PRACTICE for Reporting by Life Science Companies Absolutely, because the confidence of investors will increase as they receive announcements that make more sense, are subject to less hype, and include details that can be meaningfully compared and analysed. And as the Code it states “to provide investors and the market with full and accurate information on their activities”. reflection of the dynamic nature of the life sciences sector. An ongoing review mechanism means that both positive and negative feedback can be obtained in a timely and convenient manner so that any formal changes to the code in the future are effected quickly, simply and economically. The Code is more than a set of a words on paper. One could argue that it marks the transition of the listed Australian drug and device development sector from an immature, anything goes investment fad, to a sector with a real eye on building sustainable businesses over the long term that generate significant returns to the shareholders. David Blake David Blake is a Co-editor of Bioshares. He is a member of the ASX AusBiotech Biotechnology Company Reporting Code Review Committee. What is in the Code? The Code of Best Practice for Reporting by Life Science Companies discusses the reporting of intellectual property rights matters, licensing and other relationships of commercial significance, regulatory matters, research and development activities, clinical trials (and especially including the announcement of results), manufacturing, and key staff appointments and departures. Recognition is also made of the differences that apply to medical device, ag-biotech and animal health companies, and the consequent need for different reporting requirements. History The ASX AusBiotech Code of Best Practice for Reporting by Life Science Companies was formally launched in October 2005. A draft version of the code had been in circulation from April 2004. The draft represented the deliberations of a working group formed in 2003 that drew representatives from AusBiotech, the ASX, listed life science firms, the biotech analyst community and from other parties with an interest in the sector. What is happening now? The ASX and AusBiotech have established a committee to review the performance of the Code, with the first meeting held recently in Sydney. One more meeting is scheduled for 2006. The committee is chaired by Mike Hirshorn from Nanyang Ventures, and hosted by the ASX. The committee’s task is to review the scope, relevance and workability of the Code, co-incident with its uptake and day-to-day application by life science companies. The introduction of a review mechanism sooner, rather than later is sensible strategy for getting the best out of a voluntary reporting code, and is a Reporting Season Are you Prepared? What is Real and What is Hype? Tuesday 20th June 2006 11:00am – 12:30pm Melbourne Exhibition & Convention Centre, Victoria PANEL SESSION: AusBiotech is hosting a panel discussion on the Code of Best Practice as an affliated activity for the Commercialisation Expo 2006 www.expo2006.com.au AusBiotech invites industry members to a panel session which will focus on The AusBiotech/ASX Code of Best Practice for Reporting. The panel will be comprised of key people who were involved with the development of the Code, CEO’s as well as analysts examining the Code and its implications. The panel will encourage questions regarding the potential of changes in reporting practices, options to improve and examples of company experiences. Anyone who registers for this session will receive a complementary entry pass to the Commercialisation Expo 2006 Exhibition Hall SURVEY: AusBiotech has commissioned a study to examine the perceptions and reporting practices that relate to the development of the Code. We encourage industry feedback and have posted a brief survey on our website. www.ausbiotech.org AusBioTALK Wallaby Milk contains powerful weapon against human superbugs Researchers from the Department of Primary Industries (DPI) have discovered an antimicrobial compound 100 times more effective than penicillin in killing antibiotic resistant ‘superbugs’, Minister for Agriculture, Bob Cameron, announced recently. Mr Cameron said the DPI research team, led by Dr Ben Cocks, uncovered the super-potent compound - AGG01 - in wallaby milk. “Recent testing has revealed the extremely high potency of the AGGO1 compound, and Dr Cocks’ team have also discovered its potential to fight off bacteria and fungus is much broader than first estimated,” Mr Cameron said. “This includes a relative of the hospital superbug, MRSA - often referred to as ‘golden staph’- and other important disease-causing bacteria including E. coli; Streptococci, Salmonella, Bacillus subtilus; Pseudomonas spp; Proteus vulgaris; and Staphylococcus aureus,” Mr Cameron said. Dr Cocks said this scientific discovery, could have a profound impact on both animal and human health. “The discovery came from a “mammary gland genome” project at the DPI analysing bovine and wallaby lactation” Dr Cocks said. Funded through the Victorian Government’s $620 million Science, Technology and Innovation Initiative (STI Initiative), the project was a predecessor to the international kangaroo (Tammar wallaby) genome sequencing project. The compound has the potential to be commercially synthesised and may prove vital in the war against increasingly resistant human and animal diseases. The DPI scientists have been researching the chemical properties of the breast milk of Tammar wallabies to pinpoint how their immune-deficient newborns build up resistance to bacteria during their growth in the pouch. They identified more than 30 anti-microbial factors using an advanced computer system and bioinformatics technologies. The international kangaroo (Tammar wallaby) genome sequencing project is collaborative research between the Australian Genome Research Facility and the US National Institutes of Health. 18 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Taking the Sneeze out of Rye grass Relief may be close for the more than two million Australians who suffer from seasonal allergies to the pollen of perennial ryegrass, a crop widely grown in Australia and elsewhere as a feed or forage crop for dairy cattle and other animals. Their plight is shared by twenty million US allergy-sufferers. In an innovative use of biotechnology, a new variety of ryegrass that does not cause the sneezing and itchy eyes of hay fever has been developed by Melbourne researchers. The major allergens in ryegrass pollen are two proteins known as Lol p1 and Lol p2. Using ‘antisense’ gene-silencing technology, where a complementary strand of DNA to the gene of interest is used to inactivate the gene so that the protein is not expressed, the researchers have created new strains of ryegrass that do not express the Lol p1 and Lol p2 proteins. “The genes are almost fully silenced – it’s very effective,” says Professor German Spangenberg, from the Molecular Plant Breeding Cooperative Research Centre, part of the new $20 million Victorian Agribiosciences Centre (VABC) at La Trobe University in Bundoora, near Melbourne. Field trials of the new grasses are being conducted in the US. As well as reducing the allergen load, the researchers have improved several other traits, making the grass easier to digest and giving it a higher nutritional value. These traits can now be mixed and matched to create a variety of low allergen grasses suitable for different purposes. In addition, the same technology can be used to improve the quality and remove allergens from other species of grasses including the tall fescues, which are widely grown in the US. A new company, Gramina, has been established to commercialise the grasses both in Australia and worldwide. Other programs involving pasture grasses at VABC include the development of grasses with lower lignin content, making them softer and more digestible and hence more palatable for the cows that eat the grasses. Conversely, grasses with a higher lignin content may be suitable for use in situations where tough turf is required – such as on golf greens and playing fields. Techniques to transform ryegrass with all of the desired traits simultaneously are being developed to speed up the process. The improved traits can then be bred into a variety of elite ryegrass cultivars to create low allergy grasses suitable for many uses. The first low - allergy grasses are likely to be released for commercial use in 2013 – there are still field trials to complete before final cultivars can be selected and grown up in sufficient quantities. The VABC, which was funded by the Victorian State Government and by La Trobe University, is intended to be a one stop shop for academic, commercial research and development groups, according to Spangenberg, and comprises a consortium including La Trobe University, Department Of Primary Industries Victoria (DPIV), RMIT University, Monash University, Florigene Ltd - a division of Suntory, Molecular Plant Breeding CRC and GE HealthCare Biosciences. Web links http://www.molecularplantbreeding.com http://www.gramina.com.au More nutritious grasses are also in development, utilising the genetic pathways that control the production of fructan, a carbohydrate that provides an excellent source of energy for dairy cattle. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 19 AusBioBUSINESS Federal budget improves future for Australian Biotechnology By Dr Anna Lavelle commercialisation. The already-announced funding for an Adult Stem Cell Centre is also welcome as is the top up for the R&D Tax Concession program – although it is a pity that the Government did not take this opportunity to announce structural changes to the program as put forward by the industry and industry association, AusBiotech, to make it more useful for the biotechnology sector. Overall, though, this budget provides a framework for the future, which clearly indicates that Australia intends to develop its biotechnology industry across the value chain. The message to multinationals is that the Australian industry is not just a provider of intellectual capital but has the ability, the funding and the infrastructure behind it to ensure that in partnership negotiations it can leverage its R&D strengths and maximise investment in Australia. Federal Treasurer. The Hon. Peter Costello MP. Whether by accident or design, this year’s Federal Budget, has for the first time provided strategic targeted support for Australia’s burgeoning biotechnology industry with funding boosts right across the value chain – from discovery through to commercialisation. Spanning three portfolios – Health and Ageing, Industry, Resources and Tourism and Science, Education and Training – there are initiatives that will, to some extent, address the skills issues, research infrastructure gaps and the ambivalent venture capital support that has prevented the Australian biotechnology sector from realising its potential. In particular, the $700 million increase in medical research funding, the establishment of the Health and Medical Research Fellowship Scheme, the $10 million grant for the development of a mammalian cell production facility, and reforms to the venture capital sector certainly provide the right signals to international and domestic investors that Australia is serious about supporting and growing its biotechnology industry across all stages of development and 20 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 The benefits of this approach are evident – from maintaining quality researchers in this country through to early access to new treatments for the Australian population and a better return on taxpayers’ and investors’ investments in health and medical research. So, while this budget provides a useful blueprint for the future – and, for that the Government deserves acknowledgement – there is still much to be done. One of the biggest threats to the Australian industry is the growing skill shortage in the science and engineering areas. Keeping the scientists and the researchers we already have – through initiatives such as Medical Research Fellowship Scheme – is important, but the need for a long term strategy to attract secondary and tertiary students to these areas and to encourage retraining and upskilling of those already in employment is fundamental to the on-going growth and success of the industry. The development of transitional skills – particularly business and management skills – to support scientists in their move from the laboratory to the biotechnology start-up also needs to be addressed. Similarly, long awaited tax changes to the venture capital sector, which will exempt investors from income and capital gains tax on eligible investments made in early stage investment vehicles will no doubt encourage greater domestic and international investment and improve the investment opportunities of Australian biotechnology start-ups. If Australia can not find the correct balance in this area, then the investment money will not flow, researchers will leave in search of these imperatives elsewhere, social and economic benefits will be lost and the outcomes of the Government’s integrated biotechnology industry blueprint will not be realised. ...this budget provides a framework for the future, which clearly indicates that Australia intends to develop its biotechnology industry... The Government’s reticence in dealing with the recommendations of the Lockhart Review of cloning and embryo research legislation, together with some of the concerning amendments that have been made to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans in its recently released draft do not send useful signals. However, with some Australian superannuation funds advertising ethical investment products that specifically exclude companies that develop genetically modified organisms or products derived from these organisms, there continues to be a need to better educate the investment sector about the biotechnology sector and the risks and benefits of investing in this industry. It would be a pity if all of the Government’s work in providing an integrated framework to support the growth of Australia’s biotechnology industry, as illustrated in this Budget, comes to nothing because an important part of the blueprint has not been addressed. Finally, the importance of having a progressive legislative and tightly regulated research environment supporting the biotechnology industry cannot be underestimated. Pave the way for outstanding research Pharmaceutical R&D insight from Thomson PharmaSM All over the world, professionals working at all stages of the drug lifecycle rely on Thomson Pharma for the essential data that can justify and speed their decisionmaking, meet their critical business challenges, and keep them abreast of the market. Gather key data on investigational drugs n n n Identify gaps in the market Uncover new and emerging areas of research www.thomsonpharma.com Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 21 AusBioBUSINESS Is your company accessing the cash benefits to which it’s entitled? Many Australian businesses are missing out on significant research and development (“R&D”) concessions due to the lack of clarity with respect to the broad nature of eligible activities. Biotechnology by its very nature lends itself to meeting the requirements of the Federal Government’s principal initiative to enhance and support innovation and research. Amongst other things, the R&D Tax Concession (“the Concession”) allows eligible small companies in a tax loss position to access a cash equivalent of carry forward R&D deductions. This Tax Offset creates a huge opportunity for the Biotechnology sector and provides the incentive to register annually for the Concession, thereby opening the door to a myriad of Government Grant opportunities. Background to the Concession The Concession was introduced in 1985/86 and is the Federal Government’s flagship scheme to increase the amount of R&D being conducted within Australia. It is broadbased and available to all industry sectors. The Concession provides for eligible Australian companies to deduct up to 125% (175% on incremental expenditure subject to conditions) of eligible expenditure incurred on R&D activities against their taxable income, thereby reducing the after-tax cost of undertaking R&D for profitable companies. The Government has enhanced the Concession by providing small companies with a tax offset, or rebate, equivalent to the value of the Concession. The Concession is governed by section 73B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (“the Act”) and is jointly administered by the Industry Research and Development Board (“the Board”), through the Commonwealth Government’s business assistance agency, AusIndustry, and the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”). 22 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Maintenance of a R&D Concession registration history – Why bother? Particularly within the Biotechnology sector, R&D is central to the business competitiveness of industry participants. Australian R&D surveys taken over time have repeatedly highlighted that the majority of respondents in small enterprise have undertaken R&D to develop new products, services and markets and would have done so in the absence of the Concession. Given that R&D funds are often committed irrespective of associated incentives, the Concession offers “something for nothing”. Key benefits associated with the Concession are listed below: •Provides a certain, direct and timely return on R&D investment; •Can reduce tax payable and hence the net cost of projects; •Provides cash to eligible companies in a tax loss position when they need it most; •Acts as leverage to raise equity to support further investment in R&D – demonstrates successful R&D history to private equity & Government grants providers; •Maintenance of a registration history opens the door to 175% Premium deductions; •Helps identify valuable intellectual property; •Encourages companies to broaden the scope of R&D projects; and •Prompts a more structured approach to R&D and an increased recognition of the long-term benefits. Eligibility to register and claim Registration for the R&D Tax Concession is available to any eligible Australian company undertaking R&D. Eligibility to claim the concession is limited to: •Companies incorporated in Australia; Given that R&D funds are often committed irrespective of associated incentives, the Concession offers “something for nothing”. •Companies incorporated in Australia acting as trustees of a public trading trust; and The types of R&D expenditure that attract Concessional deductions include: •Eligible companies conducting R&D in partnership. •R&D expenditure (salary and other expenditure including consumables, materials, travel, overheads etc); The other key eligibility requirements include: •Activities claimed under the Concession are required to be the subject of a R&D plan prepared in advance of project initiation; •An Application for Registration of R&D activities must be lodged with the Board within 10 months after the end of the company’s year of income; •A minimum R&D expenditure threshold of $20,000 applies to companies claiming the Concession, except in certain circumstances; •The R&D activities must be carried out by or on behalf of the claimant company; •Where commercially practicable, an eligible company needs to employ Australian citizens or permanent residents of Australia and use plant and equipment, on Australian soil which is of Australian origin; •The results of the R&D must be exploited on normal commercial terms and in a manner which is to the benefit of the Australian economy; and •Companies must maintain records to substantiate the carrying on of R&D. Eligible Activities and Expenditure Eligible activities can either be “SIE” activities or “directly related activities”. SIE activities are those undertaken in a systematic, investigative and experimental manner and involve innovation or high levels of technical risk. Directly related activities are undertaken to support and facilitate the SIE activities. Additionally, the breadth of the legislation governing the Concession should be borne in mind. There is no need to generate tangible products. Development of systems, methodologies, new or improved techniques and knowledge can all meet the requirements of eligible activities. •Contracted expenditure; •Plant or pilot plant expenditure; •Core Technology expenditure; and •Eligible Feedstock expenditure. 175% Premium Concession The 175% Premium Concession is available for additional investment in R&D. To be eligible, companies must, on a grouped basis, increase their incremental R&D expenditure (excludes plant related expenditure) in a particular year above a base level equivalent to the average R&D spend over the previous three years. The R&D Offset The Offset appeals to smaller claimants as it is available to companies which, again on a grouped basis, have an annual turnover of less than $5 million and an aggregate R&D expenditure of less than $1 million. The Offset is paid at the rate of 30 cents for each dollar of deduction that would have otherwise been claimable. This is equivalent to a benefit of 37.5 cents per dollar of eligible R&D expenditure where expenditure is eligible for 125% deduction, and 52.5 cents per dollar of any expenditure eligible for the 175% Premium Concession. The refund is to be offset against any other Commonwealth tax liabilities owed by the company including GST, FBT and withholding taxes. Differing from other tax concessions, the R&D Offset allows for R&D tax deductions to be cashed out. It therefore appeals to smaller companies which may have perceived the Concession as an administrative burden. Particularly for those who are uncertain of their future ability to exploit tax losses, the cash-flow benefits of the Tax Offset represent an attractive alternative. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 23 AusBioBUSINESS A recent survey by the Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources in Canberra has shown that the Tax Offset has enabled: •Performance of continuous R&D by ironing out irregular cash-flows; •Direct funds increase on R&D investment; •Return on investment irrespective of project success; and •Employment of more staff to work on R&D. Practical Example Company “X” is a small Australian developer and manufacturer of therapeutical drugs for humans. Eligible R&D activities have been identified in connection with the development of enhanced production and management systems to improve efficiencies, productivity and yields. The project will modify existing systems/processes in a new way to provide a different and uncertain outcome that cannot be predicted in advance without undertaking iterative R&D. There is no precedent information to rely upon and company “X” will be developing an innovative body of knowledge. Eligible R&D expenditure associated with these activities includes apportioned salary, contract costs for process modifications, materials and consumables, attributable overheads and travel directly related to SIE activities. Total R&D spend came to $600,000 in the financial year ended 30 June 2005. Company “X” has met all the basic Concession eligibility requirements as well as those for the Tax Offset. It has registered its activities with the Board within the 10 month deadline and waited to receive its registration number from the Board prior to lodging its annual income tax return (“ITR”). Struggling with cash-flow, company “X” elects the offset in the R&D schedule that accompanies the ITR. The cash benefit (offset amount) associated with claiming the rebate is: 1.25% (R&D Uplift)*0.3 (Company tax rate) = 0.375 0.375*$600,000 = $225,000 Therefore, as no other Commonwealth tax liabilities were outstanding, company “X” is now waiting for an ATO cheque for $225,000 – money that is otherwise inaccessible as a deduction until company “X” is profitable. Conclusion Despite being claimed by many, the Concession is still eluding a vast number of eligible companies which are often trying to source equity through other sources. Using the Concession as an ongoing spring board to access cash and deductions as well as providing grounding for capital raising sounds too good to be true, however, nothing is without pitfalls. The ongoing number of Tax Offset applicants who make errors in the identification of eligible expenditure, registration and the election process has remained fairly constant since the program’s introduction in 2001. Although lucrative, the program is subject to Government claims review so it is advisable to commit time and attention to ensure that the benefits available come to fruition. In order to take full advantage of this opportunity, a proper understanding of the legislative requirements of the Concession is essential. Further information Brisbane Garry Waugh Partner Phone: +61 7 3257 8694 Email: [email protected] Perth James Edwards Senior Tax Manager Phone: +61 8 9238 3374 Email: [email protected] Sydney Sandra Mason Partner Phone: +61 2 8266 0470 Email: [email protected] Melbourne Tony Baxter Partner Phone: +61 3 8603 4209 Email: [email protected] 24 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 SPOTLIGHT AusBioSTOCK Australian Stock Market Report by Joanna Hill from Lands Kirwan Tong Stockbrokers Phylogica Ltd (ASX: PYC) $0.81 (up 34%) PEPLIN LTD (ASX:PEP) $0.785 Listed March 2005 Month H $0.86–L $0.56 (vol 8.7 m on 796 transactions) Issued capital OFP shares 74 m+34 m escrowed+options 17 m+4 m restricted Cash March ’06 $ 3.5 m Major shareholders: • Biotech Capital 26.9% • Institute of Child Research, WA 19% • Dr Paul Watt 3.7% Drug discovery company utilising proprietary Phylomer technology to develop “revolutionary new drugs” in treatment of stroke, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and burn injury. Key component of Phylomers is their ability to modulate the process of cell death implicated in inflammatory process. Listed Sep’2000 Month H $1.00 - L $0.69 vol 6.1m on 1,259 transactions Issued Capital 127 m OFP shares+19.6 m deferred+10m options Cash Dec ’05 $18.4 m Major shareholders • Acorn Capital Ltd 14.8% • Asia Union Investments P. L. 13.1% • Orbis Global Equity Fund 7.75% Peplin has grown from a small start-up to a drug development organisation, commercialising prescription human therapeutics for the treatment of cancer. Phylomers are stable fragments of naturally occurring proteins with properties that make them attractive as cost effective replacement for antibodies. The company’s Phylomer Libraries are collections of millions of Phylomers that represent a source of drug leads, which can be used for multiple diseases. First commercial partnership agreement with Ireland-based Opsana Therapeutics to develop Phylomer drugs, a collaboration in the area of Toll like receptors (TLRs) and T-regulatory Cells, implicated in inflammatory diseases including sepsis, asthma, atopic dermatitis and autoimmune diseases. Opsana Therapeutics is a partner of Wyeth Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: WYE) in discovery, development and commercialization of compounds to treat inflammatory diseases. Research collaborations: • Baker Heart Research Institute to develop a Phylomer drug that would improve outcomes of cardiac surgery. • Garvan Institute of Medical Research pilot research to assess Phylomer candidates using novel cell-based diabetes assays. • Telethon Institute of Child Health Research and the McComb Foundation trialing topical application of Phylomer-based treatment to speed up healing and reduce scarring in burn injuries. • Awarded commercial Ready Grant (Oct’05) of $2.2m to accelerate the development of its Phylomer drug candidates for Rheumatoid Arthritis, preclinical testing with Melbourne University. • Canadian biotech Axela Biosensor partnership to test Axela’s novel screening technology on a large pool of Phylomer drug candidates. Lead compounds: PYC 36 S – demonstrated to completely prevent damage in nerve cells in Stroke and Alzheimer’s animal models. It holds global proprietary rights for its lead compound PEP005 Topical for the treatment of actinic (solar) keratosis (AK) and nonmelanoma skin cancer, currently in Phase IIb clinical trails. PEP005 Topical works by killing most cancer cells and activating the local immune system to clean-up dead cancer cells and killing any remaining cancer cells. It is potentially a rapid acting and cosmetically attractive non-surgical topical treatment. Key Milestones: • Australian pilot Phase IIb clinical trails for PEP005 Topical for the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ to evaluate safety and efficacy. • Completed enrolment of patients into Phase IIa trail for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) most common form of skin cancer • Commenced construction of a new commercial scale manufacturing facility fort he production of GMP grade PEP005, an important component in planning for the final stage of product development and market launch. • Peplin granted US patent covering the use of its macrocyclic anti-cancer compounds to stimulate the immune system. • Two concurrent fundraising to raise approximately $40. Significant investment from international institutional investors to raise $26.5 m by an offer of 37.3 m shares @ $0.71 + 11.2 m options, lead by MPM Capital, and fully underwritten by ABN Amro Morgan & Wilson non-renounceable rights issue of 19.6 m new shares + 5.9 m options to existing shareholders to raise $13.9 m Pre-clinical stage pipeline is targeted at Leukaemia, using PEP005 in an intravenous formulation (PEP005 IV), and superficial bladder cancer using an intra-cavitory or intra-vesical formulation. PEP005 demonstrated selective and potent anti-leukemia activity in preclinical disease models. PEP005 induces apoptosis in leukemia cells via activation of PKC delta. The Board of Directors are implementing changes to the Board composition to reflect the company’s growth and international stakeholders, including the appointment of Jim Scopa, general partner at MPM Capital to the Board of Directors. This information which has been collated by company reports released to the ASX contains general information only and does not constitute financial product advice. Lands Kirwan Tong Stockbrokers and AusBiotech make no assertions as to the merits of any investment opportunities in the companies referred to in these articles. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 25 AusBioSTOCK Issuer Name ASX Principal Activity First List Date M Cap $m Last Price $ Yr Volume Yr H $ Yr L $ EPS c PER Asset B (c) Ambri Limited ABI Diagnostic Systems (SensiDX system & ION channel switcher) 16-Jun-00 10.1 0.05 799.0 0.16 0.05 -4 -2 4 0 AtCor Medical Holdings Limited ACG Developer & international marketer of Blood Pressure at the Heart device SphygmoCor 9-Nov-05 18.8 0.29 102.0 17 0 Alchemia Limited ACL Carbohydrate-based Therapeutic Agents 23-Dec-03 153.6 1.20 352.0 1.63 0.52 -11 0 22 0 Acrux Limited ACR Pooled Development Fund -Transdermal drug delivery platform technology 29-Sep-04 98.6 0.83 318.0 0.93 0.48 -5 -17 19 0 Avantogen Limited ACU Cancer Therapies 25-Aug-71 27.4 0.10 950.0 0.26 0.10 -7 -2 2 0 AFT Corporation Limited AFT Air Purification Products & Services 16-Jan-92 14.8 0.02 13,226.0 0.04 0.01 -0 -8 2 0 Agenix Limited AGX Blood Clots Diagnostic Kits (Molecular Diagnostic Imaging) 8-Oct-87 38.3 0.18 705.0 0.39 0.17 -8 -2 2 0 Analytica Limited ALT Production & Marketing Diagnostic Tests & Retractable Syringe Technology 25-Oct-00 4.3 0.03 282.0 0.06 0.02 -3 -1 0 0 Ansell Limited ANN Healthcare Barrier Protection Products 20-Nov-85 1,577.2 10.10 1,323.0 12.15 9.06 14 73 238 19 Advanced Nanotechnology Limited ANO Commercialising MCP nanopowder manufacturing technology 24-Feb-05 19.5 0.13 433.0 0.25 0.12 -1 -15 5 0 Antisense Therapeutics Limited ANP Antisense Pharmaceuticals. (Psoriasis, MS) 20-Dec-01 12.5 0.03 983.0 0.06 0.03 -2 -2 2 0 Anadis Limited ANX Gastrointestinal Therapeutics (bovine colostrum derived products) 30-Apr-99 249.0 0.28 98.0 0.47 0.24 -3 -9 0 0 Apollo Life Sciences Limited AOP Discovery & Commercialisation of proteins for therapeutic & cosmetic applications 29-Jun-05 28.3 0.45 67.0 1.03 0.40 -2 -23 5 0 Advanced Ocular Systems Limited AOS Dev treatment inflammatory eye diseases, AMD. Lead Visagen. Innovative. injection kit 16-Jun-04 19.0 0.12 162.0 4 0 Australian Pharmaceutical Industries Limited API Integrated Healthcare Services. Hospital supply. Healthcare logistics. Healthcare manufacturing 16-Jun-97 594.5 2.34 16,000.0 3.45 2.20 13 19 82 13 AquaCarotene Limited AQL Production of Natural Beta-Carotene 5-Jan-99 2.3 0.02 183.0 0.06 0.02 -1 -5 0 0 Australian Healthcare Technology Ltd AUH Healthcare Administration Systems 13-Aug-87 6.4 0.06 120.0 0.07 0.04 -1 -4 0 0 Avastra Ltd AVS Development & commercialisation biocompatible proteanbased wound closure technology (potential application for drug delivery) 24-Jun-04 5.4 0.20 196.0 0.28 0.10 -8 -2 16 0 Avexa Limited AVX Anti-infectives research & development Immunodeficiency virus; Hep B) 23-Sep-04 494.0 0.26 555.0 0.37 0.13 -13 -2 8 0 Biodiem Limited BDM Pharmaceutical development. Portfolio: Live attenuated influenza vaccine; retinal eye disease; animal feeder enhancer; treatment post heart attack 28-Jan-04 12.4 0.37 92.0 0.98 0.40 -9 -4 17 0 BresaGen Limited BGN Protein Pharmaceuticals & cell therapy (Cythera Inc) 21-Sep-99 12.1 0.09 321.0 0.12 0.05 -1 -19 3 0 Biotron Limited BIT Development & commercialisation of antiviral therapeutics & cancer diagnostics 24-Jan-01 23.8 0.27 371.0 0.44 0.10 -3 -9 2 0 Blackmores Limited BKL Manufacturer & Distributor of Herbal Supplements 2-May-85 228.2 14.30 23.0 14.88 12.49 76 19 197 60 Biolayer Corporation Limited BLS R & D Commercialisation of Medical & Veterinary Devices for Internal Examinations (Veda-Scope) 7-Apr-00 10.9 0.20 67.0 0.35 0.12 -15 -1 6 0 Benitec Limited BLT Gene Silencing Technology 17-Feb-97 10.5 0.06 919.0 0.22 0.06 -11 -1 3 0 Bone Medical Limited BNE Development & Commercialisation of therapeutics for bone & joint disease 24-Jan-85 7.5 0.32 19.0 0.42 0.14 -65 -1 4 0 Bionomics Limited BNO Gene Discovery associated with epilepsy, angiogenesis & breast cancer 21-Dec-99 24.0 0.19 433.0 0.26 0.10 -6 -3 3 0 bioMD Limited BOD Safety needle & Syringe devices 24-Mar-04 3.9 0.06 211.0 0.10 0.04 -2 -2 4 0 Biosignal Limited BOS Commercialisation of seaweed derived antibacterial & antifouling compounds - Furanones 28-Jun-00 12.7 0.19 422.0 0.27 0.14 -4 -5 0 0 BioPharmica Limited BPH Biomedical commercialisation company partnering with universities, medical institute & hospitals in diagnostics & devices 6-Aug-04 5.4 0.12 183.0 0.45 0.06 -1 -9 4 0 BioProspect Limited BPO Development & Commercialisation. Natural Insecticides 29-Jan-01 4.5 0.02 2,416.0 0.05 0.01 -1 -1 1 0 Brain Resource Company Limited (The) BRC Provider International Database for Human Brain Function 28-Aug-01 25.4 0.30 68.0 0.40 0.22 -1 -26 7 0 Biota Holdings Limited BTA Antiviral drug discovery & diagnostics (Relenza). Development & commercialisation second generation flu therapies 20-Dec-85 262.4 1.47 8,727.0 2.75 0.42 -12 -13 27 0 Biotech Capital Limited BTC Private Equity Fund. Selected Life Science Companies 29-Aug-00 40.0 0.45 198.0 0.50 0.32 -2 0 56 0 CollTech Australia Limited CAU Production and sale of natural proteins. Extract protean from sheep skin, collagen & wool by-products. 26-Feb-04 11.0 0.09 428.0 0.15 0.07 -2 0 4 0 Clinical Cell Culture Limited CCE Skin Technology & Treatment. Tissue-engineered products. 11-Aug-93 31.2 0.14 2,337.0 0.42 0.10 -8 -2 6 0 Cogstate Ltd CGS Diagnostic & therapeutic products for neurodegenerative diseases (also Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s) 13-Feb-04 129.0 0.28 163.0 0.30 0.09 -6 -5 7 0 Circadian Technologies Limited CIR Management & Funding Pharmaceutical Research & Development Projects 18-Apr-91 45.9 1.01 100.0 1.58 0.99 -15 -8 160 0 Clover Corporation Limited CLV Refines & Supplies Natural Oils 30-Nov-99 17.3 0.11 481.0 0.21 0.10 1 23 14 0 Compumedics Limited CMP Sleep Disorder Monitoring & Analysis Systems 21-Dec-00 98.0 0.07 270.0 0.29 0.06 -4 -2 4 0 Chemeq Limited CMQ Manufacturer & Marketer Veterinary Bio-Pharmaceuticals - antimicrobials 25-Aug-99 42.3 0.41 771.0 1.52 0.38 -62 -1 15 0 Cochlear Limited COH Manufacturer & Marketer Implants for Impaired Hearing 4-Dec-95 27,818.0 51.66 579.0 56.00 32.30 127 41 -27 90 26 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 -2 -9 Div (c) Compiled by Joanna Hill SDIA Practitioner Member SIA (Affil) Tel: 61 3962 9 5422 Email: [email protected] These figures are collated at the end of trading 31st of May 2006 Issuer Name ASX Principal Activity First List Date M Cap $m Last Price $ Yr Volume Yr H $ Yr L $ EPS c PER Asset B (c) Cryptome Pharmaceuticals Limited CRP Drug Discovery. Developer Innovative Platform Technology for Protean-Based Medicines 6-Nov-03 12.1 0.04 223.0 0.13 0.04 -6 0 4 0 CSL Limited CSL Supply Blood Products & Vaccines 8-Jun-94 9,627.4 52.96 1,924.0 59.39 28.55 96 55 644 58 Cellestis Limited CST Developer & Manufacture of Diagnostic Tests (Tuberculosis) 24-Apr-01 313.4 3.65 185.0 4.72 2.38 -3 -125 16 0 Cryosite Limited CTE Collection, Processing & Long Term Storage Blood Stem Cells 9-May-02 5.6 0.13 81.0 0.23 0.12 -1 -10 4 0 Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited CUV EX- EPITAN (EPT) Developer drug candidate Melanotan prevent skin damage from ultra-violate radiation 13-Feb-01 59.7 0.35 851.0 -8 8 0 CathRx Ltd CXD Catheters for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation 26-Oct-05 374.0 1.50 25.0 -5 45 0 Chemgenex Pharmaceuticals Ltd CXS Drug Disc & Dev. Cancer Ph2. P’ship pharm diabetes/ obesity & CNS. Ceflatonin Ph2 for CML 10-Jul-86 56.5 0.42 154.0 0.80 0.40 -7 -6 4 0 CyGenics Limited CYN Adult Stem Cell tech. Cord Tissue Bank. Cell therapeutics. Cytomatrix tech dev. 18-Jun-04 16.9 0.33 86.0 0.52 0.29 -11 -3 8 0 Cytopia Limited CYT Pooled Development Fund. Discovery & development of new drugs to treat cancer, immune disorders & cardiovascular diseases. 31-Mar-99 72.1 0.94 256.0 1.08 0.43 -13 -7 33 0 DenX Limited DNX Computerised Dental Training system. Suspended from official quotation 3/5/06 12-Nov-80 18.5 0.07 136.0 0.15 0.05 -11 -1 2 0 DCA Group Limited DVC Health Care Services - Diagnostic Imaging, Aged Care, Retirement 17-Dec-87 1,288.0 2.73 5,403.0 4.15 2.68 10 28 -43 8 EvoGenix Limited EGX Development of antibody therapeutic products based on proprietary technology platform; developing treatment fro bone loss, respiratory infections, primary liver cancer 11-Aug-05 31.3 0.47 122.0 0.60 0.25 -3 -15 6 0 Eiffel Technologies Limited EIF Drug Development & Drug Delivery. SuperCritical Fluid (SCF) (Insulin) 20-Aug-96 3.6 0.02 567.0 0.04 0.01 -1 -2 0 0 Ellex Medical Lasers Limited ELX Production of Ophthalmic Instruments for Treatment Impaired Vision 12-Sep-94 38.3 0.65 321.0 0.84 0.19 1 108 14 0 Eastland Medical Systems Ltd EMS Manufacturer & Marketer of New Technology for injection, infusion and blood drawing 24-Jan-02 17.3 0.14 306.0 0.20 0.11 0 45 6 0 Eqitx Limited EQX Research & Development of New Therapeutic Drugs for chronic diseases and age related conditions 14-May87 8.2 0.18 135.0 0.30 0.16 -5 -3 5 0 Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited FPH Manufacturer & Marketer of heated humidification systems for respiratory care & obstructive sleep apnoea 21-Nov-01 1,850.0 3.71 416.0 3.80 2.68 12 32 31 10.656 Genepharm Australasia Limited GAA Developer & distributor generic pharmaceuticals 10-Jun-04 323.0 1.20 245.0 1.59 0.81 -6 -19 10 0 Genesis Biomedical Limited GBL Development & Commercialisation Cell Bionics technology for osteoarthritis of the knee 11-Jun-99 9.5 0.06 700.0 0.12 0.03 -1 -8 1 0 Genesis Research and Development Corporation Limited GEN Genomics Tech. Partial gene sequence database. Functional Genomics. Spin off AgriGenesis (plant science) 22-Sep-00 5.6 0.22 8.0 0.35 0.20 -26 -1 22 0 Giaconda Limited GIA Commercialisation of therapies for for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. 2 lead compounds in ph III Myoconda (treatment Crohn’s disease) & Heliconda (resistant Helicobacter pylori infection). 28-Sep-05 79.0 0.46 45.0 7 0 GroPep Limited GRO Developer & manufacturer of biopharmaceuticals & cell culture growth factors 31-Aug-00 72.7 1.55 155.0 1.85 1.24 14 11 61 0 Genetic Technologies Limited GTG Genomics. Genetic Technology - Non-Coding DNA 30-Jul-87 134.1 0.36 1,069.0 0.60 0.32 -3 -11 4 0 Healthscope Limited HSP Hospital & Health Services 4-May-94 989.6 4.29 3,554.0 6.69 3.70 16 28 -24 13.391 Heartware Limited HTW Developer of a range of implantable circulatory assist devices for the treatment of congestive heart failure 31-Jan-05 102.2 1.00 435.0 1.45 0.35 -3 -34 0 0 Healthlinx Limited HTX 6-Nov-03 8.8 0.04 223.0 0.13 0.04 -6 -1 1 0 IBA Health Limited IBA Computer Software Services to Health Industry 31-Mar-00 249.2 0.89 2,130.0 1.27 0.37 5 18 2 1 ICSGlobal Limited ICS Internet-based transaction exchange for health industry 23-Dec-99 25.7 0.31 158.0 0.41 0.25 -4 -8 0 0 Institute of Drug Technology Australia Limited IDT Manufacturer specialised active pharmaceutical ingredients. Integrated drug development services for early stage. 24-Sep-93 52.3 1.15 130.0 2.06 1.03 7 16 61 8 IM Medical Ltd IMI Health IT services. Innovative signal & image processing, 3D graphics, data communication network inc Internet 6-Feb-97 7.0 0.01 11,292.0 0.03 0.01 -1 -1 0 0 Independent Practitioner Network Ltd IPN Healthcare Services Infrastructure Facilities management 6-Dec-99 145.7 0.15 1,040.0 0.16 0.06 1 26 -1 0 ITL Limited ITD Innovative Medical Devices Blood Collection and related markets 29-Oct-03 258.0 0.27 344.0 0.30 0.14 2 0 14 0 Living Cell Technologies Limited LCT Treatment for cell loss. Patented tech based on cell delivery system incl. alginate encapsulation 1-Sep-04 217.0 0.19 145.0 0.30 0.17 -7 0 3 0 Life Therapeutics Limited LFE International biotechnology Research & development of separation technology for life science market. Blood-clotting tests. Gradiflow patented technology simultaneseously purifies viral [athogens & infectious prion proteins. 8-May-86 156.8 1.65 524.0 2.11 0.58 -29 -6 -20 0 Lipa Pharmaceuticals Limited LIP Complementary healthcare contract manufacturer 29-Jul-04 65.2 0.70 515.0 1.80 0.58 9 0 38 7.59 Medec Limited MAA Developer Diagnostic Device Energy Monitoring 10-Oct-03 19.8 0.31 124.0 0.60 0.18 -9 0 13 0 Metabolic Pharmaceuticals Limited MBP Development pharmaceutical treatment metabolic diseases obesity, diabetes, 26-Nov-98 115.2 0.41 1,001.0 0.85 0.39 -4 -11 7 0 -1 Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology Div (c) 27 AusBioSTOCK Issuer Name ASX Principal Activity First List Date M Cap $m Last Price $ Yr Volume Yr H $ Yr L $ EPS c PER Asset B (c) MedAire Inc MDE International Medical Company. Healthcare and Evacuation services to overseas residence, corporations, resource industry, aviation, and maritime industries. 20-Jan-03 32.2 0.53 119.0 1.15 0.50 -1 -56 7 0 Medical Monitors Limited MDM Provider Medical Technology Vital Signs Monitoring 12-Mar-87 178.0 0.29 805.0 0.30 0.04 -1 -26 -1 0 Medigard Limited MGZ Medical Safety Devices. Lead products: retractable hypodermic syringes; blood collection device; IV cannula/ catheter introducer device 5-Feb-04 52.0 0.08 34.0 0.14 0.06 -1 -15 4 0 Monitor Holdings Ltd MHL Weight Gain & Energy Level solutions. Suspended from official quotation 15/1/04. 2-Nov-89 128.0 0.03 4,765.0 0.05 0.01 -0 -31 0 0 Medical Corporation Australasia Limited MOD Investment in Healthcare Research Development Commercialisation of medical products - Accumap Vision Measurement System & Cervi-Max Speculum 18-Dec-86 6.7 0.03 581.0 0.04 0.02 1 3 3 0 Mesoblast Limited MSB Commercialisation of adult stem cell technology with specific application in the regeneration of bone & cartilage 16-Dec-04 724.0 1.67 288.0 1.89 0.42 -2 -79 0 0 Meditech Research Limited MTR Development Carbohydrate-Based Therapeutics. Anticancer, asthma, inflammatory diseases (HyAct; GAGS technology) 21-Jan-94 17.0 0.14 687.0 0.18 0.09 -3 -5 1 0 Medical Developments International Limited MVP Medical & Veterinary Equipment. Lead Analgesic Agents (pre-hospital & emergency). Penthrox Inhaler. 15-Dec-03 199.0 0.36 160.0 0.87 0.33 1 0 3 0 Medical Therapies Limited MTY Developer of novel therapeutics for inflammatory diseases & cancer 9-Dec-05 8.5 0.29 104.0 -5 4 0 Mayne Pharma Limited MYP International pharmaceutical company, distributes injectable generic and speciality pharmaceuticals. Operations in Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, Americas. 21-Nov-05 1,697.7 2.72 4,099.0 -59 82 0 Norwood Abbey Limited NAL Developer Medical Technology Drug Deliver (laser, micro needle). Research Immune system Function & Treatment 2-Aug-00 57.4 0.29 552.0 0.63 0.29 -18 -2 -6 0 NeuroDiscovery Limited NDL Neurology R & D. Provider specialised electrophysiological assays to the biopharmaceutical industry 15-Aug-05 24.0 0.17 72.0 0.23 0.14 -0 -330 7 0 Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited NEU Developer of novel therapeutics in the fields of neuroprotection and metabolic disorders. Lead compound Glypromate (Phase I) 3-Feb-05 49.3 0.50 246.0 0.80 0.33 -8 -6 8 0 Narhex Life Sciences Limited NLS Developer of compounds for the treatment of HIV/Aids 12-Jan-05 70.0 0.10 166.0 0.14 0.07 -0 -23 4 0 Novogen Limited NRT Developer Pharmaceuticals. Isoflavones & Phenolic Therapeutic Compounds (dietary supplements, anticancer, cardiovascular) 1-Sep-94 263.7 2.66 274.0 6.00 2.59 -16 -17 57 0 NSL Health Limited NSL Distributor for Medical Technology. DenX Medical software (dental training simulator, dental implant navigator) 25-Feb-98 3.5 0.18 3.0 0.22 0.13 -4 -5 0 0 Optiscan Imaging Limited OIL Producer Optical Instruments Laser and Optical Fibre 8-Aug-97 50.1 0.51 299.0 0.65 0.28 -5 -9 10 0 Occupational & Medical Innovations Limited OMI Research & Development of Safety Technologies for Health Industry (safety scalpel, retractable syringe) 12-Oct-00 15.5 0.52 82.0 2.05 0.36 -11 -5 8 0 1300 Smiles Limited ONT Provides Dental services and management of dental surgeries 11-Mar-05 31.3 1.66 14.0 1.80 1.06 14 12 15 6.6 Premier Bionics Limited PBI Research & Development Medical Devices & Diagnostic Markets (respiratory illness, obstructive sleep apnoea) 29-May02 13.7 0.22 493.0 0.31 0.19 -13 -2 4 0 PanBio Limited PBO Development Manufacture Market Diagnostic Kits for Infectious Diseases (inc. Dengue, Ross River fever) 9-Apr-01 15.4 0.25 139.0 0.33 0.18 -1 -34 16 0 Prana Biotechnology Limited PBT R & D Drug for Treatment Age -Related Disease (inc. Alzheimer Crutzfeldt-Jacobs, MND, Parkinson’s), 28-Mar-00 26.3 0.20 180.0 0.30 0.15 -18 -1 12 0 Probiomics Limited PCC R & D Prediction & Prevention products for Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal & Respiratory conditions (biopharmaceuticals, therapeutic oral vaccines, in vitro diagnosis) 14-Dec-00 7.9 0.06 364.0 0.13 0.05 -3 -2 1 0 Peplin Limited PEP Discovery, development & commercialisation of prescribed pharmaceuticals cancer treatment (topical therapy for actinic keratosis & non-melanoma skin cancers. 22-Sep-00 96.8 0.78 410.0 1.00 0.27 -9 -8 14 0 Progen Industries Limited. PGL Discovery, development & commercialisation of small molecule pharmaceuticals cancer treatment 22-Dec-95 148.2 3.79 253.0 4.15 1.90 -17 -23 63 0 Pearl Healthcare Limited PHL Dental Healthcare. Dental labs, supplier to dental labs. 4-Mar-94 3.7 0.02 720.0 0.05 0.02 -11 -0 2 0 Portland Orthopaedics Limited PLD Developer, manufacturer & distributor of reconstructive orthopaedic devices 21-Dec-05 54.3 0.45 102.0 4 0 Primelife Corporation Limited PLF Development Marketing & Management Aged Care Facilities 6-Jun-91 139.6 1.04 728.0 1.46 0.71 -41 -3 36 0 Polartechnics Limited PLT Commercialisation Devices for detection of pre-cancer & cancer. Opto-electronic measurements of human tissue 8-May-87 4.1 0.04 460.0 0.31 0.04 -13 -0 2 0 Pro Medicus Limited PME Medical IT & e-health provider of integrated software products & services, including digital radiology 10-Oct-00 1,450.0 1.45 321.0 1.77 0.90 7 22 11 4 PharmaNet Group Limited PNO Provider Internet-based Network Systems for pharmaceutical industry. Paramedical supplies. 13-Mar-87 9.4 0.04 4,097.0 0.08 0.02 -1 -4 0 0 Phosphagenics Limited POH Pooled Development Fund. Vital Health Science. D & C patented phosphorylation technologies, nutraceuticals, dietary supplements, Vit E phosphate complex. 11-Aug-93 150.4 0.27 552.0 0.31 0.22 -1 0 2 0 Prima Biomed Ltd PRR Fund Biotechnology Research (inc. cancer immunotherapy, rheumatoid arthritis, vaccine technology preventing parasitic diseases in animals) 23-Jun-88 16.4 0.09 893.0 0.13 0.07 -5 -2 4 0 Primary Health Care Limited PRY Operator of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Centres 3-Jul-98 1,424.9 11.70 255.0 12.25 8.18 32 37 13 33 28 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 -5 Div (c) Compiled by Joanna Hill SDIA Practitioner Member SIA (Affil) Tel: 61 3962 9 5422 Email: [email protected] These figures are collated at the end of trading 31st of May 2006 Issuer Name ASX Principal Activity First List Date M Cap $m Last Price $ Yr Volume Yr H $ Yr L $ EPS c PER Asset B (c) pSivida Limited PSD Nano-technology. Dev & commercialisation of nanostructured porous silicon. BrachSil (treat liver cancer) 17-Sep-87 226.4 0.60 1,164.0 1.05 0.53 -8 -7 -8 0 Psiron Ltd PSX Development Platform Technology for treatment Autoimmune Disorders, skin disease (inc. Psoriasis) 15-Oct-86 26.1 0.15 433.0 0.24 0.13 -6 -2 3 0 Peptech Limited PTD Research Development & Commercialisation of Peptide Based products for Pharmaceutical & Veterinary Industry 23-Jan-86 211.7 1.31 1,358.0 1.65 1.22 16 8 45 8 Proteome Systems Limited PXL Development & Commercialisation of innovative tech. solutions for proteomics & glycomics research, discovery of protein biomarkers. 30-Sep-04 31.9 0.33 399.0 0.50 0.16 -9 -4 8 0 Pharmaxis Ltd PXS R & D & Commercialisation treatment autoimmune, chronic respiratory diseases (inc. MS, cystic fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis) 10-Nov-03 363.1 2.10 530.0 3.28 1.14 -8 0 62 0 Phylogica Limited PYC Discovery & Development novel peptide therapeutics for treatment of Asthma, Stroke, Diabetes 30-Mar-05 60.7 0.81 420.0 0.86 0.12 -2 0 4 0 Rockeby Biomed Limited RBY R & D Diagnosis & Treatment Human Fungal Infections 23-Dec-03 9.7 0.03 10,010.0 0.06 0.01 -2 0 0 0 Ramsay Health Care Limited RHC Development and Management Private Hospital 24-Sep-97 1,753.0 10.10 870.0 10.99 8.00 25 41 130 22 Resmed Inc RMD Developer Manufacturer Distributor Medical Equipment for Diagnosis and Management of Sleep Disordered Breathing 25-Nov-99 42,082.0 5.97 2,468.0 6.38 3.85 14 43 56 0 RiTract Limited RTL Developer Medical Device Technology (retractable syringes) 19-Dec-03 19.2 0.21 284.0 0.44 0.18 -8 0 2 0 Salus Technologies Ltd SAH Developer of products and processes in wound care & tissue engineering sectors. 14-Jul-00 2.0 0.06 77.0 0.15 0.05 -5 0 2 0 Solbec Pharmaceuticals Limited SBP Pharmaceutical Research (anti-cancer drug SBP002 - application in melanoma & mesothelioma 20-Jan-94 15.9 0.08 589.0 0.14 0.07 -2 -5 0 0 SDI Limited SDI R & D Manufacture Distribution Dental Materials (inc. amalgam, composite materials) 7-Nov-85 88.1 0.71 360.0 1.00 0.63 2 30 15 0.5 Safety Medical Products Limited SFP Developer of safety & retractable syringes Securetouch. Worldwide rights to technology of Meditag - monitor of temperature sensitive medical, pharmaceutical & veterinary products 30-Nov-05 4.4 0.16 30.0 5 0 Sunshine Heart, Inc. SHC Development & commercialisation C-Pulse heart assist device 28-Sep-04 10.7 0.14 143.0 0.37 0.12 -8 -2 11 0 Sonic Healthcare Limited SHL Diagnostic. Pathology & Radiology Services 30-Apr-87 4,135.6 13.97 1,657.0 16.12 11.46 45 31 -145 38 SciGen Limited SIE Development Marketing Sales Pharmaceuticals (inc. SciB-Vac Hepatitis B vaccine) 15-Nov-02 398.0 0.07 5,618.0 0.12 0.04 -1 -7 2 0 Solagran Limited SLA Development & Commercialisation of Bioeffectives - ingredients for human & animal pharmaceuticals, cosmetics & agricultural products 22-Dec-83 14.4 0.19 249.0 0.26 0.09 -1 -17 2 0 Select Vaccines Limited SLT Development & Commercialisation Diagnostics, Vaccines & therapeutic products for infectious diseases 26-May94 4.3 0.08 323.0 0.31 0.07 -12 -1 1 0 SomnoMed Limited SOM Specialises in products for sleep apnoea. Lead product SomnoMed mandibular advancement splint (MAS) 27-Aug-04 6.1 0.01 165.0 0.35 0.09 -3 -3 4 0 Starpharma Holdings Limited SPL Global R & D Funding for Biotechnology.. Commercialisation Dendrimer Nanodrugs (inc.treatment STD) 28-Sep-00 68.7 0.46 628.0 0.72 0.39 -6 -7 17 0 Sirtex Medical Limited SRX R & D Novel Technology for Cancer Treatment (radioactive particles SIR-Spheres for liver cancer treatment) 24-Aug-00 131.0 2.30 111.0 3.24 1.14 -0 -2300 28 0 Stirling Products Limited STI Development & Commercialisation of livestock growth promoter ST810 -decreasing fat, increasing muscle production 24-Jul-97 11.2 0.10 221.0 0.34 0.09 -6 -2 3 0 Symbion Health Limited SYB Healthcare provider: pathology, diagnostic imaging, pharmaceuticals 30-Jun-62 2,052.4 3.18 6,383.0 3.80 2.51 -3 -122 -49 7.771 Tissue Therapies Limited TIS Developer biomedical tech. wound healing, tissue regeneration, cell culture; VitoGro platform tech. enhancing cell growth & migration 19-Mar-04 9.5 0.60 45.0 0.90 0.40 -5 -13 30 0 Uscom Limited UCM Develop Supply Operate Medical Equipment - Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor 10-Dec-03 270.0 0.72 32.0 1.18 0.66 -8 0 25 0 Unilife Medical Solutions Limited UNI Development & Commercialisation Re-tractable Syringe 26-Jun-86 21.5 0.20 565.0 0.71 0.13 -11 -2 0 0 Ventracor Limited VCR Development & commercialisation heart pump Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) VentrAssist 17-Aug-93 202.5 0.78 3,750.0 1.69 0.76 -15 -5 12 0 Vision Group Holdings Limited VGH Provider of private ophthalmic services. Diagnosis & treatment of eye disorders & diseases 17-Dec-04 251.3 3.95 355.0 5.05 3.43 12 34 -104 10 Virax Holdings Limited VHL Early Stage Development Biopharmaceutical (immunotherapeutics inc. HIV/AIDS, cancers, infectious Hep B) 19-Dec-86 8.4 0.09 247.0 0.33 0.08 -6 -1 1 0 Visiomed Group Limited VSG Development & Commercialisation Therapeutic Devices Asthma inc.Funhaler, Peak Flow Monitor 1-Jun-87 6.2 0.02 833.0 0.03 0.02 -1 -4 0 0 Xceed Biotechnology Ltd XBL Life Science Investment company. PolyNovo Biomaterials PL (novel polymers) & Boron Molecular PL (specialist in organoboron chem) 28-Mar-96 16.6 0.20 399.0 0.31 0.13 -6 -3 9 0 Zenyth Therapeutics Limited ZTL Development and Commercialisation of antibody-based therapies in the areas of inflammation and cancer. 5-Dec-96 651.0 0.50 172.0 0.60 0.41 -2 -23 43 0 -3 Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology Div (c) 29 AusBioNEWSBOARD These articles posted on the AusBioNEWSBOARD are selected from AusBiotech member media releases. Mission Biofuels Lists on ASX two weeks early 4 May 2006 - Shares in Mission Biofuels Limited, (Mission Biofuels or the Company) commenced trading on the Australian Stock Exchange this morning two weeks earlier than planned under ticker code MBT following a significantly oversubscribed Initial Public Offering (IPO). The IPO of 27 million shares at $1 per share was strongly supported by institutional and retail investors. Prior to the IPO, the Company raised $13.6 million by way of a convertible note to Tiger Private Investment Partners (Tiger), a US based investment fund. Mission Biofuels’ Managing Director, Mr Nathan Mahalingam, said the Directors welcomed all investors, particularly international alternative energy investors Tiger, Tudor Capital and the Emerging Sovereign Group to the Company’s register amongst its top 10 shareholders. With corporate operations based in Perth, Mission Biofuels will construct a 100,000 tonne per annum biodiesel plant at Kuantan Port, Malaysia using crude palm oil as its primary feedstock. Biodiesel is suitable for use in most diesel engines and is a clean alternative to petroleum based diesel. Based on the 100,000 tonne per annum capacity of the plant, Mission Biofuels has forecast to generate $74.3 million revenue in FY2008, delivering NPAT of $27.7 million. Mr Mahalingam said the company will now work on expediting the implementation plan to respect the confidence of all investors. He said Hexagon, which is contracted to complete the balance of plant and civil works at Kuantan Port, has already commenced mobilisation of resources on the project site. Crown Iron Works, which is providing technology and equipment for the project, has also completed a significant amount of engineering for the plant. The Company will today issue Notices to Proceed to both Crown Iron Works and Hexagon. It also intends to exercise its option to lease an adjacent 24,000 sqm block of land at Kuantan port immediately. This additional land will cost approx. $80,000 per year in lease rentals. For more information visit: www.missionbiofuels.com.au or contact: Mr Nathan Mahalingam Mission Biofuels Limited +61 8 9218 9111 [email protected] Mr Greg Evans Director Investment Banking Argonaut Capital Limited +61 8 9224 6888 [email protected] Chemicon International and Australian Stem Cell Centre Announce Exclusive Agreement to Commercialise Stem Cell Products MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 21 April 2006 - Serologicals Corporation (NASDAQ: SERO) and the Australian Stem Cell Centre (ASCC) announced today that that they have signed an agreement whereby Chemicon International, Inc., Serologicals’ wholly owned subsidiary, has obtained exclusive rights to commercialise, market and distribute stem cell reagents developed at the ASCC to scientists all over the world. Initial products which will be available to researchers through Chemicon include a novel and proprietary stem cell isolation kit, various proteins and antibodies. The ASCC is assisting Chemicon in new product development in the research reagent area and expects that other life science tools will also become part of this exclusive research collaboration as they become ready to market. Chemicon will have the first right of evaluation to commercialise these new research reagents developed by the ASCC. In exchange, Chemicon will make an in-kind contribution of research tools for use by researchers in the ASCC laboratories as well as contribute funds, products and technical expertise to the new stem cell training program recently launched by the ASCC. “Chemicon is excited to partner with the ASCC to bring a vast array of novel stem cell products and technologies to the market,” said Jeffrey D. Linton, President of Chemicon and Upstate, which comprise Serologicals’ Research Segment. “This unique arrangement will benefit stem cell research worldwide by enabling access to the many innovative tools developed at the ASCC which will further accelerate research in this exciting area.” “The Centre has and will continue to develop high-quality research tools through its research programs, which we believe should be available to all scientists to support the development of the entire stem cell industry. Chemicon is an ideal partner given its extensive stem cell product portfolio, expertise in international distribution and marketing, and dedication to the realisation of the potential of stem cell research. In addition to distributing the ASCC’s research reagents, Chemicon is committed to providing novel reagents to our scientists, supporting our training programs, and, most importantly, advancing world-class stem cell research,” said Dr Hugh Niall, Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Stem Cell Centre. For further information contact Michelle Singe Public Affairs Director Australian Stem Cell Centre +613 9271 1115 or 0423 056 952 [email protected] www.stemcellcentre.edu.au 30 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 ASX Announcement: Medical Therapies Placement to Raise $2m 9 May 2006 – Medical Therapies Limited (ASX : MTY) will raise $2 million to fund potential acquisition opportunities of strategically aligned businesses, and human clinical trials. New shares will be issued following an agreement with Fresh Capital Pty Ltd (“Fresh Capital”). Firm commitments from sophisticated and professional investors to subscribe for approximately 7 million shares have now been received. The placement price of the shares is 29 cents each which represents a 20% discount on the volume weighted average trading price over the 10 trading days preceding the Company’s trading halt on 8 May, 2006. As the issue of these new shares represents less than 15% of Medical Therapies’ ordinary issued share capital, prior shareholder approval is not required. However, approval will be sought from shareholders at the Company’s next general meeting to enable the Company to issue further securities going forward. Fresh Capital will receive a placement fee plus options for successfully raising the new capital. The details of these components are a 5% fee plus 500,000 45 cent exercise price, December 2009 expiry options, and 500,000 0.5 cent Rights Issue Options, with a 20 cent exercise price, which have a December 2007 expiry date. The grant of the 45 cent options is subject to shareholder approval as it will take this issue over the 15% limit, and this approval will be sought at the next general meeting of shareholders. The issue of the 0.5 cent options is exempt as they fall under Exception 3 of ASX Listing Rule 7.2. “Medical Therapies is very pleased to have received such strong support both from Fresh Capital and their clients, and from some of our major shareholders who have invested additional money in this placement. We plan to use these funds to add further value for shareholders, particularly through acquisition of strategically aligned businesses and intellectual property” said Mr Llewellyn Casbolt, CEO and Managing Director of Medical Therapies. Execution of the placement is expected to be completed late next week, at which time an Appendix 3B will be lodged with ASX. Further positive results of phase IIa AK trial BRISBANE, Australia, 9 May 2006: Peplin Limited (ASX:PEP) today announced a 70% complete clearance rate in its US phase IIa dose escalation clinical trial of its proprietary drug PEP005 Topical in actinic (or solar) keratois (AK) a skin lesion which can progress into skin cancer. The preliminary result of this study (PEP005-004) was announced in February 2006 in which the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established at 0.05%. Subjects were then followed for four weeks (or until all local skin responses had resolved) post treatment. In the 10 patients who were treated at the MTD, two applications of PEP005 Topical (0.05%) gel on two consecutive days completely cleared 70% of AK lesions. Managing Director & CEO Michael Aldridge said these positive results were further confirmation of the ability of PEP005 Topical to clear actinic keratosis lesions following just two treatments, and indicate that a well tolerated dose is also effective. “The primary goal of the trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose for PEP005 Topical in treating an area of skin. We announced that in February 2006.” “Today’s announcement is very pleasing because it correlates closely with the clearance rates we have seen in previous studies. Interestingly we saw the clearance rates in this study just four to six weeks after treatment. That is very rapid,” Mr Aldridge said. AKs are the most common pre-cancerous skin lesions worldwide and the treatment of AK is the most common dermatologic procedure performed in an out-patient setting. Based on a 2005 study by The Lewin Group, Inc. in the US there were 8.2 million treatments of AK in 2004 and 58 million Americans have AK. Further information: Michael Aldridge Managing Director & CEO Tel: 07-3250 1234 [email protected] Media: Damian Karmelich Hill & Knowlton Tel: 02-9286 1215 Mobile: 0407 772 548 [email protected] Inquiries: Llewellyn Casbolt (02) 9889 1222 [email protected] Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 31 AusBioNEWSBOARD Metabolic completes enrolment for obesity clinical trial ahead of schedule Avexa’s Capital Raising Oversubscribed 2 May 2006 10 May 2006 – Avexa Limited (ASX: AVX) announced today, that through a combination of a placement to overseas investors and a fully underwritten rights issue to existing shareholders it has raised a total of $14.2M. • 5 36 subjects enrolled in the Phase 2B human clinical study; recruitment closed • Trial completion in December 2006; ahead of schedule • Results to be announced in March 2007 Metabolic Pharmaceuticals Limited announced today that it has completed recruitment for its Phase 2B obesity trial, the OPTIONS Study. The OPTIONS Study is designed to assess weight loss at lower doses of AOD9604 than previously tested. Dr Roland Scollay, CEO, commented “we are very pleased to have exceeded our enrolment target, and to have done it ahead of schedule. It was a great effort from our team to complete the recruitment early for such a large trial involving over 500 subjects and 16 clinical sites. Since the date of completion of the trial is determined by the date the last subject is enrolled, we are confident we will conclude the study in December 2006, and we expect to have the trial data analysed and available in early 2007”. The obese subjects participating in the OPTIONS Study will receive a placebo or one of three different dose levels of AOD9604 during the 32 weeks of the study. Until the completion of the study, neither the doctors nor the subjects (nor Metabolic) know which subjects are receiving drug or placebo (a double blinded study). The results can only be reviewed after all subjects have completed the study, and the data have been checked for integrity, “unblinded” and undergone extensive statistical analysis. Previous announcements regarding this trial, made on 18 October 2005 and 23 January 2006 are available at www.metabolic.com.au. Key milestones Phase 2B trial – all subjects recruited Q2 2006 – Completed Phase 2B trial – last subject completes the study December 2006 – Date now fixed Phase 2B trial – key results announced March 2007 – Expected Contact Information: Roland Scollay Chief Executive Officer [email protected] T: +61-3-9860-5700 Peter Dawson Chief Financial Officer [email protected] T: +61-3-9860-5700 Diana Attana Assistant Company Secretary/IRO [email protected] T: +61-3-9860-5700 www.metabolc.com.au 32 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 The 1 for 4 non-renounceable rights issue of approximately 39,500,000 ordinary shares closed on 5 May 2006, with subscriptions from approximately 64% of shareholders (totalling 25,366,601 shares of the shares offered). The rights issue was fully underwritten by ABN AMRO Morgans Corporate Limited and Wilson HTM Corporate Finance Limited. The shortfall of 14,163,501 shares will be placed to new institutional investors by the underwriters. Avexa Limited Chairman, Dr Hugh Niall said, “The take up of the rights issue by existing shareholders together with participation by North American investors has been very encouraging”. “Whilst a small number of shareholders including the Victorian State Government and Zenyth Therapeutics did not exercise their rights, this was more than balanced by the involvement of new overseas investors and strong demand for the stock. This has resulted in an oversubscription of the issue”. The CEO of Avexa, Dr Julian Chick said “I am delighted by the support of our existing shareholders and the interest from new local and US investors”. In commenting further he said that “The funds will be used to prepare for Avexa’s Phase III clinical trials of our lead compound AVX754 which is for the treatment of patients infected with HIV virus that has become resistant to existing drugs”. AVX754 also known as apricitabine is currently in an advanced Phase II clinical trial (Phase IIb) with the results of this trial expected to be known in the second half of 2006”. For further information, please contact: Dr Hugh Niall Chairman Avexa Limited +61 (0)419 331 788 Dr Jonathan Coates Chief Scientific Officer Avexa Limited +61 3 9208 4300 QSV Biologics, Ltd. Signs Supply Contract with Tissue Therapies, Ltd. for Manufacturing VitroGro® Components 22 March 2006 – QSV Biologics (QSV), Ltd. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, announced today that they have signed a contract with a biomedical company, Tissue Therapies Limited (ASX: TIS) for the process development and cGMP manufacture of clinical quantities of some of the therapeutic protein components of the VitroGro® platform for the accelerated healing of burns. cGMP means Current Good Manufacturing Practices - the quality level of production required for human treatment. These are some of the essential components of the VitroGro®, formulation that Tissue Therapies will use in a clinical trial later this year. Under the agreement, QSV will be responsible for technology transfer, process development, scaling-up and cGMP production in QSV’s manufacturing facility in Edmonton, Alberta. Terms of the final manufacturing contract remain confidential. Tissue Therapies Limited is an Australian company developing biomedical technologies for wound healing, tissue regeneration and various cell culture applications. Dr. Graeme Macaloney, QSV Founder & CEO said: “We are extremely pleased to be selected by Tissue Therapies to be their GMP manufacturer of choice for these components. The Tissue Therapies’ management and technical team represent a top notch international organisation developing a valuable therapeutic breakthrough for the treatment of burns and related conditions. Working with an Australian-based biopharmaceutical company represents a milestone for QSV in extending our global presence and underscores the benefit of the Health Canada Mutual Recognition Agreement with Australia and other jurisdictions like the European Union”. Medic Vision wins the Innovic, “Next Big Thing AwardTM” for Innovation 30 May 2006 – Premier Bionics’ wholly owned subsidiary, Medic Vision Pty Ltd (“Medic Vision”) is pleased to announce that its own, fully developed Mediseus Epidural Simulator has won the Innovic Next Big Thing Award. The 2006 Next Big Thing AwardTM is a national competition to identify and showcase new Australian products with the potential to become the ‘next big thing’. This award recognises and promotes Australian innovation and is a key event of the 2006 Australian Innovation Festival. The announcement was made on Friday 25th May by the Governor of Victoria, Professor David de Kretser, AO, in Melbourne. Commenting on the award, Medic Vision CEO, Mr. Ross Horley said, “The Mediseus Epidural Simulator is a new innovative product in an emerging and rapidly growing market of technology training products for health professionals. Winning this award is recognition of the creativity and ability of the Medic Vision team to identify real product opportunities and execute our strategy of being at the leading edge of this market”. For further information: Ross Horley, Managing Director, Medic Vision Tel: 03 8508-8288 or 0400 209 899 Peter Marks, Chairman, Premier Bionics Tel: 03 9824 8166 David Seal, Corporate Synergy Tel: 00 11 44 207 448 4416 See www.premierbionics.com.au for more details. See www.medicvision.com.au for more details. Dr. Steven Mercer, Tissue Therapies CEO said: “We are very happy to have established a commercial relationship with QSV for the supply of essential GMP components for our VitroGro® products. This agreement was the result of a careful international assessment of potential suppliers, with selection criteria including cGMP, technical and scientific experience, quality of production facilities and international health regulatory expertise. QSV impressed us in all these areas, particularly with their professionalism and scientific and regulatory expertise. We look forward to a long term, mutually beneficial relationship.” Dr. Mercer said “This represents an important milestone in Tissue Therapies’ progress towards our objective of the early release of approved products for burns and wound care, incorporating the VitroGro® platform.” For further information: Richard Hetrick Director of Business Development QSV Biologics Ltd (780) 438 7143 www.qsvbiologics.com Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 33 ABIC 2006 Unlocking the potential of Agricultural Biotechnology Agricultural Biotechnology International Conference 6 - 9 August 2006 Melbourne Convention Centre, Victoria, Australia Host Industry Body 34 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Host State & Principal Sponsor Conference Program Sunday 6th August 2006 Welcome Reception and Trade Fair Opening - Melbourne Convention Centre Monday 7th August 2006 Plenary – The importance of biotechnology in meeting global food requirements? Plenary – Advances in livestock biotechnology Plenary – The potential of aquacultural biotechnology to improve the world’s food resources • Commercialisation of innovative plant biotechnology • Livestock Biotechnology – Future Directions • Aquacultural biotech and its future contribution to world food production • Practical applications of genomics to cereal crops • Livestock Genomics • Innovative ways of using ag biotech Cocktail Function Tuesday 8th August 2006 Plenary – Progress towards transgenic livestock Plenary – Using genes to improve food crops Plenary – Improving Health and Nutrition through Agricultural Biotechnology • Major Plant Genome programs • Livestock Cloning and Reproduction • New wave technologies and applications • Battling the Elements – abiotic stress resistance • Investing in Ag Bio • The Australian/New Zealand Showcase – Opportunities for international collaboration and investment Conference Dinner Wednesday 9th August 2006 Panel Session – The last decade: How has agricultural biotechnology helped our society? Panel Session – Visionaries Caucus: Where will the agricultural biotechnology breakthroughs come in the 21st Century? • Biotechnology in Developing Countries • Advances in Molecular Marker Technology • The Regulation of Transgenic Technology • Ten Years of Cotton • Helping the Environment • Markets and Trade • Communications in Ag Bio – How do we get the right message out • Risk Management and Path to Commercialisation of Transgenic crops • Government and Policy Closing Ceremony – Handover to next ABIC Conference The Agricultural Biotechnology International Conference (ABIC) is the major global conference for agricultural biotechnology. First held in 1996 in Canada by the ABIC Foundation, Melbourne Australia will host the first conference to be staged in the Southern Hemisphere. The Victorian State Government as Principal Sponsor and Host State and AusBiotech, as the Host Industry Body invites you to join the ABIC Foundation at ABIC2006 from 6 – 9 August 2006. For more information on ABIC2006 please visit www.abic2006.org Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 35 AusBioINTERNATIONAL Biotech without Borders February heralded a very big week for New Zealand’s biotechnology sector, with NZBio’s second international conference and the launch of New Thinking 06. The week kicked off with NZBio’s “Biotech without Borders” Conference on 27 February. This year’s theme reflected the fact that biotechnology is now expanding across a number of dimensions, and that traditional and conceptual borders are quickly disappearing. For countries like Australia and New Zealand, it means that our remote geography is less of an issue than ever before. As a result of advances in communication technologies and expanding international networks, physical proximity is becoming less important. What is critical is the ability to partner effectively with the generators of breakthrough ideas and knowledge. Industry borders are also disappearing. Over the last 20 years the business of developing new human therapeutics based on novel proteins has attracted a lot of attention. Advances in the agricultural and industrial segments have been much slower and achieving returns has been far more challenging. We are now moving into an era where new offerings are bringing together technologies from across the spectrum. Examples of this include bioactives and functional foods for health and wellness, biofuels from specialist crops and new biopolymers for use in foods and healthcare. Simon Carroll Chairman, AusBiotech The borders between scientific disciplines continue to disappear as we move towards a more comprehensive understanding of systems biology. Similarly, where science and commerce were once quite distinct activities, the linkages and dependencies between the two are now strengthening. These disappearing borders bring opportunities for Australia and New Zealand to exploit our unique blend of agriculture, industry and world class health research, build on our diversity, take advantage of being small and agile, and leverage our reputation as good international partners. Many of the sessions in the NZBio Conference were based around traditional biotechnology segments, but they also profiled what is distinct and interesting about New Zealand’s broad view of the scope of possibilities. The Convergence Meeting on Wednesday 1 March built on the borderless theme, by focussing on technologies developed from mixing biotechnology with information technology, materials science, agriculture and advanced engineering. This is a very busy and interesting space and the Convergence Meeting was one of the highlights of the week. A one-day seminar on ‘go to market’ strategies for technology companies completed the week. Presented by Paul Wiefels of the Silicon Valley Chasm Institute, the seminar was relevant to all technology-based businesses and attracted participants from a wide range of private firms, institutions and research organisations. NZBio’s Conference, the Convergence Meeting and Crossing the Chasm seminar formed part of a wider programme of activities under the New Thinking banner. In partnership with New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, New Thinking 06 aimed to create opportunities to benefit from cross-overs between meetings being run at the same venue during the week by Incubators New Zealand and the Kiwi Expatriate Association. Biotechnology without Borders built on the success of last years’ inaugural event, while adding some new dimensions to increase the richness of the mix, and in doing so created what we believe was an exceptionally valuable programme. paekakariki-hill, New Zealand. 36 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Brian Ward CEO, NZBio The French medical technology industry in the vanguard of innovation With several major innovations to its credit, the French medical technology industry can be proud of its dynamic international profile. Over 20% of the projects supported by the French national council for the promotion of research in industry (Oséo-ANVAR) concern breakthrough innovations, i.e. Global or European firsts. Its cutting-edge medical technology has now placed France in the forefront of quality healthcare. A few words about SNITEM Cardiovascular medicine entered a new era with the advent of drug-eluting medical devices (prostheses that also release a drug). The new generation of coronary stents is a typical example: these metal-mesh “tubes” don’t only preserve arterial patency, they also release an active substance that prevents restenosis (recurrence of arterial lumen narrowing). SNITEM membership includes over 200 member firms, ranging from small and medium-sized manufacturers to large French companies and international groups, all serving a highly diversified platform of needs in healthcare technology and medical devices. SNITEM accounts for 85% of the total turnover in this industry. Parkinson’s disease is now treated at deep-brain level using electric neurostimulation where electrodes implanted in the brain are connected via a subcutaneous wire to a small pulse generator inserted just below the clavicle. Surgical robots coupled to 3D simulators allow surgeons to practise and refine the most complex surgical procedures. The main innovations involved in this system are an artificial wrist and a 3D camera. Sitting at the workstation, the surgeon uses a set of finger controls to manipulate the surgical instruments and perform “virtual” surgery. His motions are analysed and, after any hand tremor has been filtered out, translated to the robot’s articulated arms in contact with the patient. In the field of disabilities, industrial innovation is enhanced by medical partnerships. For instance, the technological innovation centre of the Garches hospital provides manufacturers with its clinical expertise and evaluation protocols to help them develop new technical solutions (stairclimbing wheelchair, puff-controlled alarm device...). Interventional radiology has changed radiologists into therapists. In this broad field, their role ranges from nodule aspiration (biopsy, sampling) to the complex treatments of vascular or tumoral lesions in various organs. These imagingguided procedures use minimally-invasive techniques and are usually performed under local anaesthesia. Telemedicine is a new approach that improves diabetic retinopathy screening and optimises cardiac-patient monitoring and follow-up. Neonatology uses increasingly sophisticated and efficient equipment in varied fields, including heating and humidifying devices or nosocomial infection prevention technologies for incubators and paediatric transport. SNITEM is a professional organisation that draws together the greater part of the medical technologies and devices industry. Set up in 1987, it is the first employer’s association in France to represent companies in this business sector and is the representative the authorities liaise with and refer to. Contact: Marelle Sassine French Trade Commission Level 35, St Martins Tower 31 Market Street, Sydney 2000 Tel: 61 2 9287 9225 Fax: 61 2 9264 5988 105801_RMIT_x3_AusB Page 1 16/5/06 11:44 AM Email: [email protected] RMIT POSTGRADUATE SCIENCE FOR THE REAL WORLD Mid year places are available for July 2006 start in the following programs: ➔ Master in Biotechnology & Business (incorporating Grad Dip and Grad Cert) ➔ Graduate Diploma in Bioinformatics- NEW for 2006 ➔ Graduate Diploma in Biomolecular Technologies- NEW for 2006 Contact: A/Prof Gina Nicoletti Phone 9925 7143 or 9925 2133 or email [email protected] ➔ Master of Biotechnology (incorporating Graduate Diploma and Graduate Certificate) with specialisations in: ➔ Clinical Microbiology ➔ Food Microbiology ➔ Food Science & Technology Contact: A/Prof Margaret Deighton Phone: 9925 7123 or email [email protected] ➔ Master, Graduate Diploma and Graduate Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety Contact: Mr Leo Ruschena Phone 9925 7472 or email [email protected] Visit www.rmit.edu.au/midyear for details. Make 2006 the year to build the career you want. hmaBlaze 105801 ➔ www.rmit.edu.au 37 Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology AusBioINTERNATIONAL New crop salt tolerance project links Australia and France Researchers from the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (ACPFG) have received a grant to work on salttolerant crops with French researchers. The grant will allow Australian researchers to work at the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), and French researchers to work at the ACPFG. Dr Emmanuel Guiderdoni from CIRAD will come to Adelaide in August, while ACPFG researchers Dr Alex Johnson, Dr Olivier Cotsaftis and Professor Mark Tester will head to Montpellier later this year. The grant also provides for French and Australian PhD students to exchange research institutions for up to six months. The joint research project is investigating genes involved in plants’ responses to salt, knowledge that could ultimately result in salt-tolerant crops. “This project is just the first of what we hope will be several collaborations between CIRAD and the ACPFG,” Dr Johnson said. The grant is through the Australian Government’s FrenchAustralian Science and Technology (FAST) Programme, part of the International Science Linkages Programme. The FAST Programme The objective of FAST is to promote and support scientific and technological cooperation between Australian and French researchers in both public and private sectors. FAST will provide financial assistance, on a competitive basis, for small, strategically-focussed workshops and for collaborative research projects in leading edge areas of research that seek support for eligible activities and which meet the objectives of the ISL programme. Workshops: the programme will support the following expenses: • the international travel and living expenses associated with participation in the workshop; •all workshop related organisational and logistical costs. Research Projects: the programme will support the following expenses for projects spanning up to three years: •the international travel and living expenses associated with participation in the research project. Facts About The Grant Funded by: the French-Australian Science and Technology (FAST) Programme element of the International Sciences Linkages (ISL) Programme Project title: Utilization of a cell type-specific transgene expression system in rice to investigate salinity tolerance mechanisms in cereals Project duration: 1/8/2006 to 1/10/2008 Collaboration: The project is a collaboration between ACPFG and CIRAD (Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), a national research institute in Montpellier, France. Project members are Alex Johnson (Australian project manager), Mark Tester (Australian project partner) and Emmanuel Guiderdoni (French project manager) Amount funded: $35,000 for the Australian side of the collaboration, equivalent amount given by the French government for their side. www.acptg.com.au Salt tolerance researchers from the Australian side of the FAST grant (from left) Dr Alex Johnson, Dr Olivier Cotsaftis, Professor Mark Tester and PhD student Darren Plett 38 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 AusBioEVENTS AusBiotech CEO Forum 2006 Proudly Sponsored by CEO Forum: Deals, Risks & Compliance – It can be windy at the top! Summary of Speakers Dr Jurgen Michaelis, CEO BioInnovation SA and Dr Anna Lavelle, CEO AusBiotech May 14 – 16 2006, Marriott Hotel, Gold Coast. Focused on the future would easily sum up the total of a roomful of Biotech CEO’s and top management at the recent AusBiotech CEO Forum. Their combined skills and energy contributed to some exciting discussions and debates on the way forward for the Biotech industry in Australia. Robin complimented the depth of management and excellence of science in the Australian biotech industry and felt the access to capital for Australian biotechs could be improved on by: Dr Anna Lavelle of AusBiotech took great pleasure in introducing an outstanding line up of speakers ensuring some excellent presentations. Steve Meller, Head of Global Bioscience Business Development of Procter & Gamble gave the delegates much food for thought on market opportunities. Our own Australian of the Year Professor Ian Frazer highlighted the fascinating HPV vaccine story, with all the bumps encountered along the way. • Go Global – find the right partner, not the nearest Igor Gonda facilitated some lively discussion and debate on Biotech Partnering with Global Organisations ably assisted by John Young Pfizer and David Kwasha of Actelion. The afternoon War Stories Session proved very useful and were directed by Dr Ian Nisbet and Sue MacLeman, who invited an inspired discussion on mergers and acquisitions, licensing, capital, the mechanics of a deal, Board/CEO relations. It was an open floor forum where everyone was encouraged to contribute, complain and compliment. Some useful pointers arose from this session for both early-start biotechs and those who’ve experienced the longer haul. Several issues were identified as key areas of attention: • Access to Capital • Access to Human Resources: > Management expertise > Research & Development skills • Support of Innovation to Commercialisation • Appropriate service industry relationships • Strategic linkages with international organisations •Awareness of Australia as a source of innovation and cutting edge science The latter point was raised loud and clear by guest speaker Robin Wright, Head of Corporate Advisory Services of Intersuisse Bioscience, based in London. Robin highlighted that the Australian Biotech industry did not often register on the Biotech screen in Europe, it was considered a disadvantaged market due to the factors of distance, time and being a relatively small market in global terms. •Start Early – tell potential partners that you have things coming, before you need them • Keep your promises, and communicate that you have • Recognise that you can compete with anybody Brian Anker of State Development gave an excellent dinner address, outlining how the AusBiotech CEO Forum offered an excellent opportunity for industry and government to work together for the common good of the Biotech industry. Peter Riddles of Perkins Resources shared some amusing anecdotes with the delegates during dinner. The final panel session for the morning was ably facilitated by Dr Roland Scollay of Metabolic who hosted a panel discussion with Dr Jurgen Michaelis of Terra Rossa Capital, Dr Michael Hirshorn of Nanyang Innovation Fund and Dr Michael Panaccio of Starfish Ventures. This gave all the delegates food for thought on accessing smart money, one of the major obstacles faced by industry today. Professor Paul Greenfield of UQ gave our final presentation prior to lunch on early stage development and had much experience to draw on with an excellent presentation. Dr Anna Lavelle firstly thanked the offices of State Development, Trade and Innovation for their very generous three year program, together with Clayton Utz, in support of the AusBiotech CEO Forum. Anna went on to thank the CEO community –both speakers and delegates for giving of their valuable time to contribute to the CEO Forum program, it was agreed much had been learnt in a compact, precise program within a mutually beneficial environment, which could only ensure the continuing development of the Biotech industry in Australia, both locally and overseas. Copies of selected CEO Forum speaker presentations are available on our website www.ausbiotech.org Queensland Government will sponsor the next CEO forum on the Gold Coast in 2007 and will build on the success of this years event. South Australia has agreed to sponsor a national business development forum to be held in Adelaide late February 2007. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 39 AusBioEVENTS ABIC2006 Spotlight on Melbourne for the Agbiotech conference of the year. The conference features international speakers, public events showcasing important agbiotech issues, interactive panel discussions and a major exhibition with over 80 exhibitors. Many of the sessions at ABIC2006 will discuss the future of food, for example Dr Jennifer Thomson, Head of Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town will discuss meeting global food requirements. Aquaculture will be discussed by Professor Yonathan Zohar from the Centre for Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland and Dr Wayne Knibb from Bribie Island Aquaculture Research Centre in Australia. The last day of the conference will provide thought-provoking reflections on what has been achieved in agricultural biotechnology over the past decade with Dr Derek Russell, National Resources Institute, UK and Prof Jennifer Thomson More than 1000 experts from 30 countries are expected to attend the Agricultural Biotechnology International Conference (ABIC) 2006, in Melbourne, Australia, August 6-9. ABIC2006 brings together the world’s top academic institutes, companies conducting leading-edge research and government agencies working in the sector. ABIC is the major global conference for agricultural biotechnology. First held in 1996 in Canada by the ABIC Foundation, its goal is to ensure ongoing opportunities for continuous learning and networking within the agbiotech community. AusBiotech is proud to host the conference along with the Victorian State Government as the Principal Sponsor. The theme of ABIC2006 is “unlocking the potential of agricultural biotechnology”. The conference will focus on innovation and commercialisation, the two processes that must go together to take smart ideas to the market. 40 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Delegates will also have the chance to consider the type of breakthroughs that will come in the 21st Century with input from Dr Juergen Logemann, BASF Germany who will be joined by Prof Steve Wesselingh, Burnett Institute, Australia and Prof Graham Mitchell, Foursight Associates, Australia. Australia is a good fit for ABIC2006, as Australia is an international leader in agricultural biotechnology with research strength in areas such as high-nutritional pasturegrasses, livestock and crop genomics, avian influenza and freshwater aquaculture. Registration for ABIC2006 can be carried out online www.abic2006.org Registration costs A$1,320 for delegates, $990 for academics, $495 for students. Full details about the program are available from the ABIC website. Looking Ahead to Sydney 2006 By highlighting opportunities and tackling issues constructively, AusBiotech 2005 demonstrated a successful formula for future conferences. “The delegates were able to reach many, many people through a number of forums,” said Dr Rathjen, Bionomics’ CEO. “Through the staging management for evolving biotech companies panel discussion, the theranostics stream and the partnering and investor forum we estimate that we reached almost, if not all, participants at AusBiotech - approximately 1000 people.” Many international delegations have already indicated that they will increase their presence at AusBiotech 2006 – Dr Lavelle hopes to make the November conference in Sydney larger and even more successful. 4428_Ausbio postcard DL 10/11/05 5:21 PM Page 2 “We would like to give people a more informed choice about which partnering sessions they would like to go to,” said Dr Lavelle. Dr Lavelle acknowledges the work of the organising committees and expressed a desire to encourage more involvement by students who will be the future faces of Australia’s biotechnology industry. The aim, above all, is to maintain the high quality of speakers and international plenaries. The plenary speakers for 2006 include senior investment and business development professionals such as Mike McCully, Director & Senior Analyst, Recombent Capital USA. AusBioEVENTS A Look Back at Perth 2005 AusBiotech National Conference 2005 With 1000 participants from 24 countries, AusBiotech 2005 delivered on its focus: “Linking the Region”. “Our aim was to encourage as many countries as possible to come to Australia and recognise the benefit of doing business here,” said Dr Anna Lavelle, AusBiotech’s CEO. Sponsored by the WA state government, the conference was opened by then, State Premier Dr Geoff Gallop and the Minister for State Development (now new Premier of WA), Dr Alan Carpenter. “Biotechnology is one of the most globally important, rapidly growing industries of the 21st century,” said Dr Gallop. “It is an industry with enormous potential.” Signing of a Memmorandum of Understanding with Korea – BAK “The quality of the participants and the presentations was excellent,” said Dr Deborah Rathjen, the CEO of Bionomics Ltd. “But also on the business side it was very active and productive. Many of the large pharma companies and top biotechs sent their business teams from the US, Europe and Japan.” “The Western Australian Government recognises the importance of the industry to the development of the State and is committed to supporting its growth into the future.” Two countries – Singapore and Korea – formalised their relationship with Australia’s biotechnology sector by signing Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with AusBiotech, forging new, strategic partnerships. Emerging biotech powerhouses – India, China and Korea – were represented alongside more established regional ‘hubs’: Singapore and Japan. The MOU provided for information to be exchanged about training, sources of financing and products as part of wider, co-operative agreements. “Our proximity to Singapore and other Asian cities was very important in terms of ‘Linking the Region’,” said Dr Ian Edwards, the chair of the conference. “Memoranda are an important step in the direction of relationship building, and leveraging regional connections” said Dr Lavelle. “Our organising committee put their heart and soul into it. They pulled up their sleeves and worked very hard to make sure the sessions, forums and other activities went well. We were very pleased with the feedback.” “By exchanging information and building trust you can strengthen your relationship with key countries in the region, bringing a bottom line benefit for businesses and the industry as a whole.” The conference offered networking, industry briefings and business partnering at a number of different levels. Over 140 speakers took the opportunity to share their expertise at the formal plenary sessions or as part of the Investment Partnering Forum. Calling Australia “a powerhouse of innovation”, she said the conference played an important role in raising awareness of the expertise different countries have to offer. 42 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 “Our conference gave Japan the opportunity to say that they are open for business and are interested in talking to Australians about potential partnering arrangements. They were very happy with the opportunities offered.” Individual companies have also given positive feedback. Dr Rathjen said the combination of panel sessions and targeted partnering gave her the opportunity to present her company as dynamic and innovative. “There was a level of awareness created regarding developing and emerging capabilities in the Asia Pacific region. I think there is clearly an opportunity to forge links between Australia/ New Zealand and India.” “In the past year, Bionomics has come through two acquisitions and now operates in three different locations: Adelaide, Melbourne and Europe. We have changed from having no marketed products to owning our first marketed product and substantial licensing agreements.” India signed an MOU with AusBiotech last year. Similarities in legal systems together with a common language – English – are proving to be an advantage in developing the partnership. “We were able to get our message out there and make new companies aware of what we do. We were also able to continue the dialogue that we have ongoing with a number of major companies. It was very productive for us.” Similarly, countries throughout the Asia Pacific region saw the conference as an opportunity to showcase their expertise and forge international partnerships. Keynote speaker, Dr Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw – a biotech entrepreneur once called “India’s Mother of Invention” by the New York Times – said the conference showed that there are vibrant, dynamic biotechnology communities outside North America. “India also has a strong manufacturing base which Australia does not have,” said Dr Lavelle. “Australia and India complement each other in terms of capabilities,” said Dr Mazumdar-Shaw. “Australia/New Zealand need to forward integrate in developing their discovery programs through scale up manufacturing and clinical development. India needs to backward integrate into discovery research.” “There is a mutual benefit in linking India and Australia in the area of drug development.” This idea is being progressed at present with India in terms of developing strong regional links that have a strong commercial focus. “It was successful because it made participants realize that there are exciting opportunities outside the biotech ‘Mecca’ – the USA,” she said. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 43 AusBioSTATES Victoria Queensland After a hiatus of twelve plus months, the Victoria Branch Committee of AusBiotech was re-established in late 2005. The Queensland Committee for 2006 have started an ambitious and action packed calendar of events for the year – which will be staged through the Breakfast Series, Workshop Series, ClubBio2006, BioPharma Careers Event and the BioFutures Science Boot camp to ensure all spectrums of our Biotech members interests are catered for. In addition, we will be co-hosting a number of events during the year. A key driver in setting up the composition of the re-established Victoria Branch Committee was to ensure a broad crosssection of the key areas within the Australian Biotechnology Industry sector were covered. Committee members include:• Igor Gonda • Sue MacLeman (EQiTX) • Jonathan Sanders (Monash Commercial) • Nick Gatsios (Teraform Ventures & Healthlinks) • Craig Newton (Cynata) • David Hudson (SGA Solutions) • Ric DeGaris (Kendle) with secretariat support coming from AusBiotech. The priority areas that will be the focus of Victoria Branch Committee going forwards include: • c reating a sustainable environment for funding in the Biotechnology sector • b uilding and strengthening government relationships to ensure ongoing support of the Biotechnology sector moving forward • p roviding professional development and up-skilling of the Biotechnology Industry workforce through events and workshops • improving/increasing our profile as an Industry • leveraging strengths and providing representation for all Australian Biotechnology Sectors • c ollaborating with and uniting the key stakeholders / groups of the Biotechnology Industry sector to put Australian Biotechnology on the ‘world map’ A number of events have been held or are planned for 2006. A ‘Welcome to 2006’ Reception was held at Monash in early February and bimonthly CEO Forums are being held across 2006 at which topics of interest will be presented/ discussed. ‘Commercialisation of Biotechnology: Hidden risks for Directors and Officers’ is a seminar that was held on 25 May 2006 (details are on the AusBiotech website), whilst an ‘Early Stage Money’ event is in the initial stages of planning. Another very important event that will be occurring in Melbourne later in the year is ABIC (6-9 August, 2006). Plans are well underway in relation to this international conference and early indicators are that it will be very successful. We look forward to welcoming many national and international attendees to Melbourne for this important conference. 44 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 The Queensland branch under the chairmanship of Trevor Neville of TranZition Recruitment, assisted by the vice-chair James Cameron of McCullough Robertson will guarantee a first class array of events are on offer for its members. Our first Breakfast for the year was hosted on 22 February at the delightful Hillstone St Lucia Golf Club, to start off the AusBiotech Ernst & Young Breakfast Series. We had Dr Ian Nisbet, CEO of Meditech as our guest speaker, sharing his wealth of experience under the topic of : “From Millennium to Meditech – a great journey but a bumpy road”. His frank and open discussion was much appreciated by the members. Don’t believe your own BS was the most telling message to take home! We hosted a second Breakfast in April at Victoria Park Golf Club, addressing “Deal making in the US and what Australian Biotechnology Companies need to do to Create and Validate Value”. This was a hard hitting address by Dr Gary Sams of Digene US and Michael Aldridge of Peplin, who had a great depth of experience and advice that they were willing to share. June and July will be busy months – with the first of our Workshop Series on 15 June under the popular topic of “Fuel the Fire – Capital Raising in 2006”. The committee have lined up four top speakers to address the topic from the legal, financial, vc and CEO perspective - we anticipate this Workshop will be oversubscribed as it touches on so many hot issues. Our third Ernst & Young Breakfast Series will be hosted on 5 July where the 3 new CEO’s on the block Neil Leggett of Agenix, Justus Homburg of Progen and Paul Nitz of Panbio, will be invited to give their fresh approach from a battlehardened industry perspective. The Biofutures Science Week - a Queensland initiative developed over the previous 5 years, will be hosted during the last week of June, it offers 80 senior secondary school students throughout Queensland the opportunity to further their interest in biotechnology and biomedical engineering and to experience university life. The Biofutures Committee and mentors are all members of the cross-institutional Australian Biotechnology Students Association (ABSA). Planned for the forum are talks by leading bioscience professionals from throughout Australia, a public Biofutures Hypothetical and Keynote Address, hands-on workshops, forums, social events and careers seminars. A highlight for Queensland in 2006 promises to be the Keynote Address which shall be given by Dr Sue McCoard, the recipient of the 2005 NZBIO Emerging Biotechnologist of the Year Award. The Queensland Biotech diary would not be complete without our annual Conference. ClubBio2006 will be held Thursday 21 and Friday 22 September with a tremendous range of Session topics: Biologics, Finance Strategies, Commercialisation, VETBio and Clinical Trials. The committee has put together a great program at the Hyatt Regency Resort at the Sanctuary Cove, Gold Coast. ClubBio2006 – “Breaking the Barriers” We look forward to welcoming old and new members alike to the AusBiotech Queensland Branch events. Visit the website www.ausbiotech.org for up to date information on events. AusBiotech wishes to thank Fiona Smith for her tremendous efforts in promoting Biotech in Queensland through the Queensland branch. Fiona will take up a new position at IMBCom. We welcome Anne Hartshorne-Smith as the new Development Officer for the Queensland branch. Tasmanian Biotech Business over Breakfast In conjunction with the Tasmanian Government’s Department of Economic Development and the University of Tasmania, AusBiotech Tas Branch held a very successful event late in 2005 titled ‘Biotech Business over Breakfast’. Thirty-five researchers and industry professionals attended the event at the picturesque Elizabeth Street Pier in Hobart. Presentations were given by Dr Graham Mitchell, one of Victoria’s Chief Scientists, CEO of Foursight Associates Pty Ltd and TIAB member, A/Prof Adrian West, co-leader of the NeuroRepair Group and Head of Molecular Biology at the University of Tasmania, and Mr Brian Chung, Product Development Manager, Botanical Resources Australia. Dr Mitchell spoke of the exciting future opportunities in the biotech space in Australia. This presentation was followed by A/Prof West’s account of the work of his research group and the steps they are considering regarding commercialisation of their findings. Mr Chung gave an overview of Botanical Resources Australia, highlighting the importance of diversification and R&D for business. Committee at Tasmanian Alkaloids Marinova specialises in the extraction of bioactive compounds from the seaweed Undaria pinnatifida harvested from Tasmania’s pristine waters. See our AusBioFEATURE on page 11. The committee would like to thank both Dr James Miller (Tasmanian Alkaloids) and Mr Paul Garrott (Marinova) for arranging the tour of their respective operations. South Australia 2005 Wrap Up The South Australian Branch wrapped up a very successful year with “Jingle Balls on the Green”; an opportunity for members to network and enjoy a game of petanque or lawn bowls. October saw the last of our successful series of BioBreakfast meetings for 2005. Dr Dudley Pinnock, Director, Microbial Products Pty Ltd spoke to us about the “Business of Bugs”. Dr Pinnock took us through the journey of the formation and development of Microbial Products and the regulatory barriers to be overcome when introducing a new technology and the tribulations of organising trials. Earlier in October Dr Rob Morrison gave a presentation titled “Trust me – I’m a Science Communicator”. Dr Morrison explained how to communicate complex scientific concepts to the media, how to deal with the media and make them work for you! During the morning, Dr Anthony Koutoulis, Chair of the Tasmanian Branch of AusBiotech, presented Mr Matthew Miller from the University of Tasmania and CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric Research, with the AusBiotech State ABSA Student Award. Mr Miller received the award for his work on ‘Alternate sources of dietary oil for Atlantic salmon grown under Australian conditions.’ This is the first time that Tasmania has participated in these awards. 2006 – Looking Ahead The Tasmanian Branch Committee was thrilled to be invited to tour two of the state’s most exciting biotech businesses; Tasmanian Alkaloids and Marinova. In conjunction with the Pharmaceutical Sciences group of RACI, the South Australian Branch also held a workshop on “Risk Assessment in GMP”. The therapeutics industry is undergoing profound changes in its approach to regulatory compliance. The presenters, Steve Williams and Dr Phillip Marshall will discuss the application of pharmaceutical risk management as it applies to quality systems and compliance. Located in northern Tasmania, Tasmanian Alkaloids manufactures controlled substances providing medicinal opiates from poppy varieties grown in Tasmania. See our AusBioFEATURE on page 12. The South Australian Branch are planning a return of the BioBreakfast series in 2006; which commenced in February with Dr Mike Hirshorm providing some insights to technology commercialisation from a VC’s perspective. This was followed in March by Dr Tom Duthy with a presentation on The Dynamics of Biotech and the Equity Capital Markets: A Love / Hate Relationship. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 45 AusBioSTATES Three more breakfast have been scheduled for the winter months: Tues 27 June Dr Hugh Niall, CEO Australian Stem Cell Centre “Ten Years In Geneland with Gun and Camera” Thurs 20 July John Riemelmoser, Safety Medical Products Ltd “Grab Your Lifejackets – We’re Floating” – A personal perspective on a company float stock exchange Thurs 24 August Craig Cormick, Manager of Public Awareness, Biotechnology Australia “Cloning in Hollywood” Committee News We sincerely thank Peter Bradley who has stepped down as Branch Chair and Executive Officer after more than 2 years in the role. Under Peter’s direction and enthusiasm AusBiotech in South Australia is recognised as delivering quality events relevant to the membership’s needs. Dr Anne Collins will be stepping into the role of Chair and Alison Bowman has been appointed as SA Development Officer. We also thank Catherine Hustwick who has stepped down from the committee and welcome Kea Dent. New South Wales The NSW Branch is proud to be hosting the 2006 AusBiotech Conference – Bridging Innovation & Investment – and look forward to welcoming colleagues and guests to a truly international event for the Asia-Pacific region. With almost 700 members across NSW, the Branch, its Committee and the special interest group advisory committee for the NSW Medical Device Network remain dedicated to delivering for the benefits of its members. Special networking events and business seminars, showcasing and presentation opportunities, as well as industry development issues are all part of the program of interest for NSW into 2006. In March 2006, the NSW Branch was pleased to host two expert professors from the Fraunhofer Institute, with an itinerary of specialist meetings planned to showcase the research and corporate strengths of NSW biotechnology. (A more indepth article on the visit follows.) During 2006, the NSW Branch will continue to develop programs for members covering Mentoring and Student work placement. Members will be pleased to note that other business development opportunities will also be offered, as they arise. The NSW Branch Committee and the Medical Device Network advisory committee will also be seeking new, enthusiastic representatives from industry, research and education members to contribute to the ongoing development of the Branch’s agenda. Of major focus in 2006 will, of course, be the AusBiotech Conference 2006 and early planning is already showing the wealth of biotech in the state to be on show during the Conference. Hamish Hawthorn NSW Branch Chair 46 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 From the rooftop at the CRC for Asthma [from left] Vikki Hine (DSRD/ AusBiotech), Prof Norbert Berend (Woolcock Institute of Medical Research), Philip Bert (CRC for Asthma), Dr Jurgen Borlak (Fraunhofer), Corinne Turner (DSRD) and Dr Uwe Heinrich (Fraunhofer) Fraunhofer Institute Visits Sydney, March 2006 First steps to cooperative scientific progress The NSW Branch of AusBiotech was delighted to recently host a visiting delegation from the Fraunhofer Institute’s Life Sciences Alliance and Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine in Germany. The Fraunhofer Life Sciences Alliance (VLS) pools the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft’s competencies in biology, biomedicine, pharmacology, and toxicology. Following the common principle of “Research for human health and the environment”, the Fraunhofer Institutes offer concentrated expertise both in the preventive areas of environmental and consumer protection and also in the regenerative areas of medical therapy and ecological recovery. The Alliance identifies ways to preserve human health and the environment in an industrialised world. In addition, it develops methods of disease diagnosis and therapy and environmental cleanup. The visit featured Professors Dr. Uwe Heinrich Chairman Fraunhofer Life Sciences Alliance and Managing Director Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Professor for Toxicology and Aerosol Research at the Medical School of Hannover with Dr. Jurgen Borlak Director Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine and Chair in Pharmaco- and Toxicogenomics at the Medical School of Hannover. The purpose of the visit was to explore possible opportunities for joint research and other collaborations between NSW biotech researchers and the Fraunhofer Institute. The itinerary of meetings featured visits to the Cooperative Research Centre for Asthma (with Philip Bert, CEO and Prof Norbert Berend, Director at the Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, a partner in the CRC for Asthma; Proteome Systems (Keith Williams, Founder and Nicolle Packer, Head of Glycoproteomics); Pharmaxis (Ian McDonald, Chief Technical Officer); ATP Innovations (Hamish Hawthorn, Director Life Sciences and Mark Bradley, CEO); the University of NSW and the Garvan Institute’s G2 (Fabienne Mackay). The visit was an excellent opportunity to profile some of the premier biotech research and commercial organisations in NSW, confirming for the Fraunhofer that NSW is indeed a wealth of biotech expertise. The meetings also confirmed the potential benefits of developing collaborative relations with the Fraunhofer Institute and it is hoped that there will be a return visit, to coincide with the AusBiotech Conference in Sydney in November 2006. For further information, please contact [email protected] Western Australia Congratulations to our local researchers Barry Marshall and Robin Warren who were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine. The WA Branch has had a very busy time over the past few months. We have seen the election of a new Premier – the Hon Alan Carpenter who has created a new portfolio in his government. Headed up by the Hon Francis Logan MLA, Minister for Science & Innovation, this new portfolio will specifically target the biotech sector in WA. WA AusBiotech branch co-Chairs, Janet Preuss and David Cox attended BIO2006 and assisted with the running of the WA Industry Booth. There was lots of interest in WA companies and also the wonderful WA wines that were available for tasting. Led by Premier Alan Carpenter, the WA contingent consisted of over 50 delegates with many WA companies exhibiting Noble Laureate Dr Barry Marshall accompanied the WA Government delegation and attended many high profile meetings with the Premier. Barry even had a special punch created in his honour. The Pylori Punch which turned out to be a hit with the West Australian biotechnology delegation in Chicago. Event Highlights Welcome to the New Year. This event was held on the 8th of February and was very well attended. Thank you to our sponsors Philips Fox and our guest speaker Pauline 4428_Ausbio postcard DL 10/11/05 5:21 PM Page 1 Charman of Murdoch College, who gave a talk on the specialist biotechnology program run by the college this year. 4428_Ausbio postcard DL 10/11/05 5:21 PM A CEO Breakfast Forum was held on the 8th of March. The special guest speaker was the Hon Francis Logan, Minister for Science & Innovation. The Minister took the opportunity to discuss the new portfolio and its implications for the WA biotechnology industry. Other events that were also well attended and well received were; The Practical Side of IP – 29th March and Recent Developments in Biotech Law and IP Licensing “Stuff Ups” 17 May. Thank you again to all our supporters and sponsors Wray & Associates, Pitchfork Winery, the Department of Industry & Resources and MinterEllison. The WA Branch appreciates the support of all our WA members, non-member associates and our sponsors. For further information contact: Helen Cheeseman – Branch Executive Officer 08 9470 1212 [email protected] Stephen Carter Director and David Sparling, General Manager – Solbec Pharmaceuticals. Page 2 Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 47 AusBioNICHE Student member news: Henry Ko wins grant from the Foundation for Young Australians Individual Grant ABSA paper at the 9th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST9) in Seoul, Korea AusBiotech Australian Biotechnology Students Association (ABSA) were selected to present a paper entitled “Nurturing the scientific leaders of tomorrow: Engaging the youth of today” at the 9th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST9) in Seoul, Korea, in May. With contributions from ABSA committee members in NSW and QLD, this paper outlined the work done by ABSA to help develop a supportive student network in biotechnology and biomedical engineering in Australia. The attendance of the conference, and the opportunity to explore the development of an international bilateral student network between Australia and Korea, has been funded with the generous support of the Australian Government’s Australia-Korea Foundation. Also at PCST9, ABSA NSW committee member Henry Ko, from the Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering at the University of New South Wales, presented a paper and an oral presentation entitled “The impact of tissue engineering on the high-tech society” This paper explores the implications of tissue engineering on the future of humanity, and how science communication and biological art can develop the public’s understanding of the area and provide new creative methods of research. Henry Ko, a PhD candidate studying tissue engineering, from the Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering at the University of New South Wales, won a Foundation for Young Australians Individual Grant worth $3,000 to attend the First World Forum on Science and Civilisation on “Tomorrow’s People: The Challenges of Technologies for Life Extension and Enhancement” held in March this year at the University of Oxford. Henry also received a University of Oxford James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization bursary worth approximately AU$1,200. Henry will also share his acquired knowledge of strategic, ethical and sociological issues regarding life extension and enhancement technologies with Australian students, peers and the general public through various seminars and publications. The forum was a rare opportunity to engage with leading scientists, scholars, business executives, policy makers, religious leaders, and citizens from around the globe on issues involving re-engineering the human body, living longer, living smarter, and the governance of human transformation. Henry gained an insight to the latest strategies from world leaders and plans to share this knowledge with students and other interested individuals from research, academia, science communication, and the general public. Henry is planning to report on the Forum through seminars organised though the University of New South Wales, AusBiotech Australian Biotechnology Students Association, the Australian Science Communicators. More information on the Foundation for Young Australians can be found at http://www.youngaustralians.org Information on the James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization can be found at http://www.martininstitute.ox.ac.uk/jmi/ ABSA 2005 ABSA 2005 has been another year of success. We have very active state committees who have contributed to the success of ABSA. At ABSA we have an aim to bring students and those interested in the industry in close proximity to the industry and the academic world. In ABSA-Qld, they have been active in organising events for both secondary and university students. The major events comprised of the BioFutures week, the Biotechnology/ pharmaceutical careers night and the Student Excellence Awards. The various committee members in the Queensland ABSA were responsible for the successful outcomes for these events. The BioFutures week had been very successful in hosting 70 students comprising year 11 and 12 students. Biofutures chair Alyssa Bates and her team were responsible for the week long event which comprised of workshops, hypothetical events, university visits and the key note address from the Nobel laureate Professor Peter Doherty. The next major event was the Careers Expo, which hosted some 350 students from various Queensland universities and 38 exhibitors representing the Queensland biotech/pharma industries and showcasing their infrastructure and their business interests. The event was addressed by the chief scientist of Queensland, followed by a panel discussion comprising eminent scientists from across the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The event ended with a networking session between industry representatives and the university students. The Queensland State Development Pharmaceuticals & Nutraceuticals department had been of great assistance in hosting the event. The Student Excellence Award attracted 5 quality entries and was sponsored by GSK and Freehills. The ABSA committee are very keen to host several small events during the course of next year, in addition to the current events. A successful and eventful year was seen for ABSANSW, not only had we recruited more new members for ABSA, we have also built up good relationships with all the major universities at Sydney. The year was kick started with HomeBrew, ‘Ace with Recruitment Process’, where professionals with technical backgrounds such as Gavin Recchia of Spruson & Fergusons (Principal of Chemical/Life Sciences Team) and Diane Heery (Director of Recruitment Agency, Science People) were invited to give us valuable advice on recruitment processes. The Student Excellence Awards followed the success of HomeBrew. Year 11 & 12 Students taking part in the Qld BioFutures program. All students from the biotechnology related disciplines are encouraged to apply by submitting a written application on the application of the thesis they worked on. Four finalists were selected to present at the NSW state conference, in which a winner was chosen to present their thesis at the national conference in Perth. Finally, it was the annual ABSA careers evening held at University of Sydney. Industry representatives from different areas of biotechnology were invited to share their experiences in looking for their first full-time position and also elements that all employers are looking for. The year then closed with the AusBiotech-NSW Christmas party, in which ABSA students were able to network with other industry people. ABSA has a very dedicated team around Australia who are working to ensure that the students and the industry have a close link. To raise awareness of the issues in the Biotechnology industry and to ensure that the future generations are interested in building up the future of the industry. I would like to dedicate my deepest gratitude for those on the committees and the hard work that they do. I would also like to thank Denise Furness from the South Australia branch of ABSA. Thank you for all the work that you have done in raising the profile of ABSA in SA, and we wish you all the best in your postgraduate studies. Hopefully we’ll be able to see you back on the ABSA team soon. Jean Hsu ABSA National Chair Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 49 AusBioNICHE Student Excellence Awards The Student Excellence Awards were a great success again in 2005, we saw many entries from each state and it was hard to just pick one winner from the bunch. However we had to select one winner from each of the states to attend the 2005 National Conference in Perth, thanks to the generous sponsorship of GSK. We would like to take this opportunity to introduce each of the State winners. From each of the state winners, we can see the very diverse and interesting projects that our students are undertaking. It is also important to note that these projects have commercial implications in our industry, and the diversity of these projects shows the diversity of the industry that AusBiotech represents. It’s great to see that Australia is producing many great scientists with great and valuable projects. The ACT winner for 2005 is Elizabeth Forbes, Australian National University for her work on “Understanding the immunopathogenesis of inflammatory diseases of the gut”. Thanks to all the students who entered the Student Excellence awards, thanks to the high calibre of work that was presented this year, and we wish you all the best in your future endeavours. Student Excellence Awards in New South Wales were very close, and the judges had a very hard time in deciding the winner for the state. There was a joint winner at the marking process, with Benjamin Ovenden, an Honours student from Charles Sturt University declared the winner for his work on “Genetic Improvement of Seeding Vigour in Rice using Diversity Array Technology”. Unfortunately Ben could not attend the National Conference due to a Rice Symposium, so we were fortunate enough to be able to send Phil Bougton, our joint winner to the National Conference. Phil is a PhD student at University of Sydney, whose project was “Functionally graded material for spinal disk prosthesis”. In Queensland, Bernadette McArdle, a PhD student at Griffith University was awarded the State winner for her work on “A Correlation between Biosynthetic Enzymes and Therapeutic Targets of Natural Products”. In Qld, Freehills patent and trademark attorneys sponsored the prizes for second place Madusha Peiris and Bianca Boseley, third. National Student Excellence Awards 2006 The National Student Excellence Awards are on again in 2006. The winner from South Australia was Joanne Reed from Flinders University with her work on “Programmed death ligand 1 delivered by adenoviral transduced dendritic cells inhibits T-cell proliferation” Winners from each State will be presented with their awards at the AusBiotech National Conference being held in Sydney, NSW. Our Tasmanian winner is Matthew Miller, from the University of Tasmania. His work was on “Alternate sources of dietary oil for Atlantic salmon growth under Australian conditions”. • Flights to the National Conference in Sydney Finally our winner from Western Australia is Craig Webster from the WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, part Murdoch University. His thesis and work was based on “Towards Highly Parallel Tests for Plant Virus Diagnosis”. 2006 winners – One from each State – will receive: • Accommodation close to the exhibition centre • Poster displayed to all Conference delegates at the National Conference • Abstracts posted to the AusBiotech website • One year complimentary Student Membership to AusBiotech For more details contact your state AusBiotech branch or visit our website www.ausbiotech to download an application form. 50 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 FBIG (The Fermentation & Bioprocessing Interest Group) The Fermentation & Bioprocessing Interest Group (FBIG) of Ausbiotech originated in Victoria to provide a forum where fermentation and bioprocessing professionals, scientists and students may come together to discuss the latest developments, share ideas and network. The FBIG conference in March 2006, hosted by the Box Hill Institute, is the 4th meeting with the same science oriented mission: to build links, interact and to provide an opportunity for people to participate at the beginning of their career in a cost effective way. Biotechnology continues to offer great opportunities for Australia to develop new medical therapies, novel solutions for the food and beverage industries and for environmental remediation. With the strong support from the governments the biotechnology industry is growing rapidly and there were 83 ASX listed companies as of February 2006. This presents a great opportunity for us, the practitioners in the field of fermentation and bioprocessing, to secure the growth of our industry and to enjoy our professional achievements. the non-invasive Cellscreen system from Innovatis which can be used for media optimisation and cell line development. The conference was an opportunity for researchers to present their work and here the organising committee would like to congratulate Scott Stansfield (UQ) on receiving his travel bursary to attend the conference to present a talk on his work on empirical modelling of mRNA translation and Angela Ziebell (CSIRO) and Richard Li (UNSW) on winning the poster award. Without the support of our corporate sponsors FBIG would not be able to run the conference at a low cost for the delegates. We would like to thank the Victorian Government for their major support of this conference. The organising committee would also like to acknowledge the following support from Box Hill Institute, John Morris Scientific, SAFC Biosciences, CSIRO Molecular & Health Technologies, GE Healthcare Biosciences, Bio-Rad Technologies, Sartorius Australia, CUNO Pacific Pty Ltd, DKSH Australia, Enztech, Fluid System Technologies, In Vitro Technologies, Millipore, Pall Life Sciences and Scientifix Pty Ltd. The two day conference covered topics such as: regulatory aspects pertaining to GMP production; biotechnology infrastructure from the Victorian Government’s perspective presented by Dr Amanda Caples, Director of Biotechnology DIIRD; vaccine production; microbial systems employed in the production of fine chemicals and of a novel enzyme LandguardTM to degrade pesticide; process optimisation and downstream processing and novel technologies such as Exhibition stands at the FBIG Conference March 2006. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 51 AusBioNICHE MDN (Medical Devices Network) News for the Medical Device Industry AusBiotech has been actively supporting the work of the MDIA. We would like to thank the chair Dr Geoffrey Vaughan who has lead the leadership group to conclude a critical set of recommendations which will underpin future work on the Action Agenda. The developmental stage of the Medical Devices Industry Action Agenda (MDIAA) is now completed with the next step being the implementation phase. An Implementation Group will be established to guide the implementation of the proposals. The Implementation Group will consist of industry leaders and other stakeholders who are committed to implementing the Action Agenda, and who have the expertise and are respected in the industry. Proposals The Leaders’ Group have refined the proposals they will make to Government. Proposals as they relate to the Mission themes are summarised below: Developing World-class Capability • D eveloping a business directory to identify medical device companies and capabilities; • S upporting business to enhance the commercial benefits of their patents and to better enable returns on publicly funded infrastructure and capability; The best outcome will be achieved by the involvement of the whole industry. • D eveloping a model for Australian industry to better access CSIRO and other publicly funded infrastructure; and Fourth Leaders’ Group Meeting • Identifying short and long-term skills needs and initiating tertiary training programs and other initiatives to address skill needs and career path flexibility. • Refined the proposals • Considered options for the launch of the Action Agenda; • C onsidered options for implementing the Action Agenda; and • R efined the Vision and Mission for the Australian medical devices industry. Vision and Mission Statement Increasing Speed to Market • F acilitating conformity assessment of devices supplied in Australia by October 2007, and proposing changes where appropriate to regulatory practices; • Increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of health technology assessment processes to reduce the time and cost of regulation; • S treamlining the ethics committee approval of clinical trials; The vision for the Australian medical devices industry is: • D eveloping a proposal that would ease the regulatory cost burden on early-stage medical device companies; and By 2015, Australia will have an internationally competitive medical devices industry, renowned for innovative and cost effective health outcomes, that provides quality solutions for Australia and the world. • Identifying, promoting and fostering training initiatives in commercialisation, regulatory science and processes and Quality Management Systems. The industry will achieve its vision by: • Developing World-class Capability; • Increasing Speed to Market; and • Expanding Market Opportunities. 52 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Expanding Market Opportunities Other Information • P romoting the use of a voluntary regulatory compliance mark; There are a number of government programs that provide assistance to industry, including: • P roposing strategies to attract investment into the industry; and The Industry Cooperative Innovation Program (ICIP) • D eveloping and implementing a model, including a cost benefit analysis, to assess new technologies and guide procurement decisions by health care providers. New Parliamentary Secretary On 27 January 2006, the Hon Bob Baldwin MP was sworn in as the new Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources. Mr Baldwin replaces Mr Warren Entsch in the role, and is now responsible for overseeing the Action Agenda. The industry looks forward to working with him as development of the Action Agenda nears completion. Action Agenda Initiatives The Action Agenda has been active in providing advice to government matters that affect the industry. To date submissions have been presented on behalf of the Leaders’ Group to: • T he Regulatory Burden Taskforce (provided to the Prime Minister and Treasurer) on the regulatory issues facing the medical devices industry in Australia. In our consultation meetings in October 2005, industry indicated that regulatory issues were by far the most pressing for the industry; The ICIP is a $25 million merit-based funding program aimed at supporting business-to-business cooperation on innovation projects, with a particular focus on meeting strategic needs identified through Action Agendas. Applications for round two will close on 15 June 2006. For more information please visit the AusIndustry website. The International Science Linkages (ISL)Program Medical device organisations undertaking international collaboration can apply to access the ISL program, which supports both public and private sector Australian scientists to collaborate with international partners on leading edge science and technology. The Government is providing $92.7 million over nine years for this program. For more information visit the ISL website. Timing The developmental stage of the Action Agenda is expected to be launched in mid-2006, with implementation taking 2-3 years. The Action Agenda is expected to be launched in mid-late 2006. • T he Therapeutic Goods Administration on clinical trials arrangements in response to the Report of the Review of Access to Unapproved Therapeutic Goods; • T he National Health and Medical Research Council’s Draft National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research; and • T he Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade on key issues relevant to the industry for their negotiations on a proposed Australia-China Free Trade Agreement. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 53 AusBioNICHE What do you have to do to be ready for the new medical devices regulatory system? Did you know that there was a new system? 1. Do you sell or manufacture a medical device 2. Do you understand the new regulatory system? 3. Have you started making the necessary changes so that you will comply with the new system by 4 October 2007? Do you sell or manufacture a medical device? In Australia, Medical Devices are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and are defined as; • Any instrument, apparatus, appliance, material or other article, (whether used alone or in combination, and including the software necessary for its proper application) intended, by the person under whose name it is or is to be supplied, to be used for human beings for the purpose of one or more of the following: > Diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease; > Diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or handicap; > Investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological process; or > Control of conception and that does not achieve its principal intended action in or on the human body by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, but which may be assisted in its function by such a means; or •An accessory to such an instrument, apparatus, appliance, material or other article Medical devices include a wide range of products such as medical gloves, bandages, syringes, condoms, contact lenses, X-ray equipment, heart rate monitors, surgical lasers, pacemakers, dialysis equipment, baby incubators and heart valves. 54 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Do you understand the regulatory system? OLD SYSTEM – Therapeutic devices were either LISTED or REGISTERED on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) NEW SYSTEM – Medical devices will need to be INCLUDED in the ARTG After the 4 October 2002 Therapeutic and Medical Devices fell into 1 of 4 regulatory categories: 1.Existing therapeutic devices on the ARTG as either Registered or Listed (old system) 2.Therapeutic Devices for which application for Listing or Registration had been made and were under review 3.Medical Devices for which applications had been received for ‘inclusion’ in the ARTG (new system) 4. Excluded and exempt therapeutic goods. Devices that are currently registered or listed in the ARTG can remain in those categories until 4 October 2007, at which time they will be automatically CANCELLED from the ARTG. Until 4 October 2007, the supply of all registered and listed therapeutic devices will remain subject to the conditions imposed when the entires were approved. Have you started making the necessary changes to comply with the new regulatory system? The new Regulatory System adopts a classification system to categorise medical devices. The system uses a set of classification rules based on: • The manufacturers intended use; • The level of risk; and • The degree of invasiveness in the human body There are five classes of medical devices: 1.Class I 2.Class IIa 3.Class IIb 4.Class III 5.Active implantable Medical Devices (AIMD) GOODS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED ARE SUBJECT TO NEW PROVISIONS AS OF 4 OCTOBER 2007. A process called Conformity Assessment must be performed BEFORE a device can be included in the ARTG. Conformity Assessment is the MANUFACTURERS responsibility. Any products listed or registered can remain in the ARTG until 4 October 2007. At that time the products will be automatically cancelled unless they are covered by an ‘included’ entry in the register and the listed or registered entries have been cancelled. 3.Manufacturers with the TGA CE certification The role of the TGA, or an overseas Notified Body, is to issue certification after they have confirmed that the conformity Assessment procedures by the manufacturer are appropriate and have been applied. A similar assessment by the TGA will be required to ensure conformity assessment if the products are to be supplied in Australia. However reduced assessment fees will be applied to: ASSESSMENT BY THE TGA IS REQUIRED for Australian manufacturers of medical devices intended for supply in Australia. • Review post market monitoring procedures Implications for Australian Manufacturers of Medical Devices: A manufacturer based in Australia supplying listed or registered goods has until 4 October 2007 to adopt the Conformity Assessment requirements of the new legislation. Until that time, the conditions that were imposed when the products were approved will remain in force. • Review conformity with the Australian essential principles • Issue of conformity assessment certification Steps you should take: •Identify your status and understand your obligations under the new system. 1.Manufacturers requiring a manufacturing license •Investigate and take stock of the products you have listed or registered on the ARTG and assess whether they are still an active part of your product range. If a license was required to manufacture the license will remain in effect until: •Decide whether you wish to continue to supply those products in Australia after 4 October 2007. •Conformity assessment requirements are established by the manufacturer and an application for inclusion n the ARTG for the goods has been approved prior to 7 October 2007; > If you do, you must start to make arrangements for their transition under the New Medical Devices Regulatory System to be ‘included’ in the ARTG. • Supply of the goods ceases; or • It is automatically revoked on 3 October 2007 2.Manufacturers are exempt from licensing •AusBiotech and the Medical Device Network can help you identify what you need to do to make sure that you achieve your transition as easily as possible. AusBiotech would like to welcome Sarah Evans who is dedicated to Medical Devices and will focus on strategic industry development. In the pursuit of knowledge of human, plant and animal biology, The University of Queensland’s Institute for Molecular Bioscience generates a fund of ideas, many of which lend themselves to innovation and commercialisation. This process can lead to new medical treatments, highly valuable heath diagnostic products and novel biomedical and other technologies. IMBcom is the value-adding innovation carrier for these ideas. We protect the discoveries of the IMB researchers, build alliances with organisations to promote them, and create partnerships with investors who help us to grow them into platforms for new enterprises. Knowledge is the currency of today’s and tomorrow’s global economy. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 55 AusBioPEOPLE Fiona Wood joins AusBiotech Board Australian of the Year for 2005, Clinical Professor Fiona Wood AO has joined the AusBiotech Board as a Director. Clinical Professor Fiona Wood is currently Director of the Western Australian Burns Service, Chairman of the McComb Research Foundation, co-founder of Clinical Cell Culture (C3), Chairman of C3’s Scientific Advisory Board and continues as a consultant Plastic Surgeon to the Royal Perth and Princess Margaret Hospitals. She is also a mother of 6. In 2005, Fiona was named Australian of the Year in recognition of her work in education and disaster response programs associated with her interest in burns. In the same year, she and C3 co-founder Marie Stoner, were awarded the prestigious 2005 Clunies Ross award for their contributions to Medical Science in Australia. In announcing the appointment, Dr Carroll (chairman) said that Fiona’s experience in bringing a medical device from research to market will inform her contribution to the Board and will be of particular value to members in the medical device sector. “Her contribution to the AusBiotech membership through the Board will no doubt benefit the Australian biotechnology industry, as it continues to realise growth and success in this important scientific and medical sector,” he said. Fiona Wood said that her decision to join the AusBiotech Board was based on a desire to assist in driving Australia ahead in biotechnology. “Biotechnology is a highly competitive area, with Governments across the globe providing financial and other resources to support an industry that has the potential to bring great benefit to the world population,” she said. “Australia has an extraordinary reputation for innovation within this sector, but we can not afford to be complacent – as a nation we must continue to respond rapidly to changes and developments. “We have many motivated school and university students whose talents are waiting to be applied to biotechnology and that will make a huge difference, but only if we have the infrastructure, resources and funding in place. “I know from my own work that biotechnology is making a fundamental difference to the quality of people’s lives – but there is so much more that can be done and here in Australia we have the people and the innovation to be a major part of that,” Fiona Wood said. Fiona Wood 56 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 New AusBiotech Members Louisa Abdo Robert Atwill Peter Bailey Stephen Birrell Mark Bishop Kerryn Bouyer Alison Bowman Jan Boyd Brendan Butcher Gary Butterworth Michelle Carden Sarah Chilcott Mark Davie John Devereux Peter French Ryan Gawel Amy Gibson Chris Glynn Rosemary Harrison Paige Hilditch-Maguire Cathie Hilton Philip Kearns Marie Kelly Gerry Lawson Paul Leo Pik Yan Leung Paul Magoffin Melanie McIntyre Allison McLean Trisha Munoz Paul Nitz Sarah Ochieng Richard Pash Katia Potter G Peter Robert Tim Rose David Schnider Silvana Sescillosu Michael Sheridan Joshua Simons Andrew Somogyi Lahn Straney Magdalena Suder Kathy Summerton Alex Szabo Jane Talbot Tony Thompson Simon Trickey Johnny Quoc Vuong Tu Paul Tuckley Philip Vickery Peter Walsh Lucia Walsh Grant Weyer Simon Wilkins Michael Winlo New AusBiotech Members Acrux Ltd,Brent Donovan Advent Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd,Nick Ede Advent Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd,Nigel Whittle AgResearch Limited, KenWindle AGSM, Jill Snell AJ Stewart Electronics, Alan Taylor Ascept, Laurel Fogarty Ascept, Michael Korver Ascept, Allen Goldenthal Attain People Solutions, Margie Murray Attain People Solutions, Adrian West Attain People Solutions, David Chin AusBiotech Ltd, Dahlia Catzel Ausindustry, Helder Marcal Ausindustry, Brian Damian Pethica Australasian Medical & Scientific Limited, Lance Sparrow Australian Institute for Commercialisation, Chit-Laa Pah Australian Institute for Commercialisation, Damir Hasagic Australian Stem Cell Centre, James Aylward Baker Heart Research Institute, Robert Marano Bayley Design, Marianne Claire Johnston Bioengineering Centre, Margaret Doherty Bioengineering Centre, LaurieHodgman Bioengineering Centre, Paul Wright BioQ Devices, Greg Rudd Blake Dawson Waldron, Shaun McRobert Botanical Resources Australia Pty Ltd, Ian Hughes Box Hill Institute, Ka-Chi Cheung BresaGen Ltd, Michael Patane BresaGen Ltd, Sue Lynn Wong BSP Pharma, Andrew Jarnicki Carlisle Partners, Anthony Davidson Carmichael Fisher, Monica Ogierman Cerebral Palsy Association of WA, Uta Bauer Cerebral Palsy Association of WA, Richard Hopkins Churchill Capital Services Pty Ltd, Alan Tough CSIRO, Gary Cobon Cullen and Co, Andrew Giddy Davies Collison Cave, Uli Schmidt Deacons Lawyers, Karen Kroeger Deacons Lawyers, Sharon Babaeff Deacons Lawyers, Jasmine Heng Department of Environment & Heritage, Diane Stark Department of Innovation Industry & Regional Development, Junhong Oscar Luo Dimerix Bioscience Pty Ltd, Kathryn Jones Dimerix Bioscience Pty Ltd, Tonny Joergensen Dimerix Bioscience Pty Ltd, Karen Dado Dimerix Bioscience Pty Ltd, Abigail Elizur Dr Reddy’s Laboratries Limited, Kate Lyndon Dr Reddy’s Laboratries Limited, Renee Dutton Dr Reddy’s Laboratries Limited, Wayne Sampson Dr Reddy’s Laboratries Limited, Natalija Gak Dr Reddy’s Laboratries Limited, Craig Neylon EngeneIC Pty Ltd, Tim Silk EngeneIC Pty Ltd, James Pyke Eqitx Limited, Kristin Groom Ernst & Young, Ravi Venkataramanan European Patent Office, Abhijit Mukherjee F B Rice & Co, Vilas Dahanukar Fisher Adams Kelly, Sharat Narasapur Genetic Technologies Limited, Satish Mahanti Ghantous Group, Megan Page GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd, David Powell Global Watch Service, Eilzabeth Forbes Grain Biotech Australia Pty Ltd, Benjamin Ovenden HWL Consulting Pty Ltd, Bernadette McArdle IMBcom Pty Ltd, Joanne Reed IMBcom Pty Ltd, Matthew Miller IMBcom Pty Ltd, Leanne D’Souza ITL Limited, Craig Webster J.T. Campbell, David Tokell Kelly Scientific Resources, John Arkwright Lions Eye Institute, Bhavyashree Suresh M+W Zander, Jason Armstrong Madderns Patent Attorneys, Andrew Lucke Madderns Patent Attorneys, Stuart Craig Mater Medical Research Institute, Geoff Randall Medevice Consulting, Kim Edwards Merit Merrell, Michael McLean Mimotopes Pty Ltd, Frank Yardley Minomic Pty Ltd, Heather Bray Minomic Pty Ltd, Su-Pi Sheu Minter Ellison, Johnsee Lee Minter Ellison, Yuki Ghantous Minter Ellison, Ayal Marek Molecular Plant Breeding CRC, Helen Vertoudakis Molecular Plant Breeding CRC, Rupert Saint Molecular Plant Breeding CRC, Tony Davis Narhex Life Sciences Limited, Andrew Stewart National ICT Australia Limited, Ryan Parlett Neuragenix Pty Ltd, Steve Harding NIH/NHGRI, Michael Cohen Open Sesame Consulting, Andrew Hyde PanBio Limited, Sander Bangma Perkins Resources Pty Ltd, Graham Jenkin Perkins Resources Pty Ltd, Chau Mai Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick, Rick Lord Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick, Basim Hamo Phoenix Eagle Pty Ltd, Vivian Chan Phoenix Eagle Pty Ltd, Praveen Kumar Madala Phylogica Ltd, Erik Helmerhorst Phylogica Ltd, John Bonacci Probiomics Limited, Jannette Sullivan Probiomics Limited, Julian Stephens Probiomics Limited, Hank Sciberras Probiomics Limited, David McCarthy Probiomics Limited, Curtis Crasto Probiomics Limited, Karen Heilbronn Protech Research Pty LTD, Melinda Barton Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Stephen Burnell Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Dominic Walker Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Darren Ryan Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Diana Cameron Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Jarrod Belcher Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Jennifer, MacDiarmid Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Himanshu Brahmbhatt Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Hedie Meka Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Emma McComb Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Bridget Maher Q-Gen Pty Ltd, Christine Gockel QSV Biologics, Dr Graeme Macaloney QSV Biologics, Mr Richard Hetrick Queensland Governmetn, Christine, Kit HwaYan Resonance Health Analysis Services, Angela Ritchie Resonance Health Analysis Services, James Ziogas Sienna Capital Ltd, Sharon Winslade Sonomat Pty Ltd, Gregory Martin Stark Consulting, Tony Formentin Stephens Lawyers & Consultants, Anne Pearce Tabasco Technology Lawyers, Christopher Wilkinson Taiwan Bio Industry Organisation, Rob Lister Taiwan Bio Industry Organisation, Jan Szubert UK Trade & Investment, Paul Ostrowski Uniquest Pty Ltd, Ze-Huai Zhong University of Queensland, Glenn Tighe University of Sunshine Coast, Debra Denise Yin-Foo University of Tasmania, Michael Squires Veterinary Encapsulation Biosciences Pty Ltd, Ravi Kaskana Veterinary Encapsulation Biosciences Pty Ltd, Elise Hogan Veterinary Encapsulation Biosciences Pty Ltd, Sue John Victorian Institute for Chemical Sciences (VICS), Andrew Dwyer VisoGene, Rebecca Menhinnitt VitalAire Healthcare, Christian Toouli WA Biomedical Research Institute, Dora Charalambous WABRI, George Ng Western Australian Department of Industry & Resources, Megan Portas Wray & Associates, David Beins Wray & Associates, Ian Christensen Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 57 AusBioPEOPLE Corporate & Institute Members of Ausbiotech AAP Media Net Access Macquarie Ltd Acrux Ltd Actelion Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd Adelaide Research & Innovation Pty Ltd Advanced Ocular Systems Limited Advent Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd Aegis Equities Research AGEN Biomedical Ltd Agilent Technologies Australia Pty Ltd AgResearch Limited Agrifood Awareness Australia Aimedics Pty Ltd Allens Arthur Robinson AMGEN Australia Pty Ltd Animal Resources Centre ANSTO Anutech Pty Ltd Aortech Biomaterials Applied Biosystems Pty Ltd APS Plastics Arnold Bloch Leibler Ascept ASDM Association & Communications Events Pty Ltd ATP Innovations Pty Ltd Attain People Solutions Austrade Australasian Medical & Scientific Limited Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics Australian Institute for Commercialisation Australian Institute of Marine Science Australian MedResearch Pty Ltd Australian Proteome Analysis Facility Australian Starter Culture Research Centre Ltd Australian Stem Cell Centre Australian Stock Exchange Limited Australian Technology Promotions Australian Venture Capital Association Ltd Australis Biosciences Avanti Events Avantogen Limited Avcare Limited Avexa Baker & McKenzie Bates Smart Science & Health Architects Bayer CropScience Pty Ltd Benitec Australia Limited Bio Electronics Pty Ltd Bio Nova International Pty Ltd Bio21 Australia Ltd Biocell Biocomm Services BioIncyte Advisory BioInnovation SA Bio-Layer Bio-Link Partners Ltd bioMD Limited 58 BioMelbourne Network Bionomics Ltd BioPacificVentures Bioprospect Ltd Bio-Rad Laboratories BIOSINGAPORE Biota Holdings Limited BIOTECanada Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Biotron Limited Biovite Australia Pty Ltd Blake Dawson Waldron Box Hill Institute BresaGen Ltd Brooker Consulting Buchan Communications Group Pty Ltd Business ACT CallStaff Australia Pty Ltd Canadian High Commission Carmichael Fisher Chemeq Ltd ChemGenex Pharmaceuticals Chemicon Australia Pty Ltd Chubb Insurance Company ofAustralia Ltd Churchill Capital Services Pty Ltd City of Melbourne Clayton UTZ Cleveland Biosensors Pty Ltd Clinical Cell Culture Pty Ltd Clinical Network Services Pty Ltd Clinical Trials Victoria CM Capital Investments Cognis Australia Pty Ltd Colltech Australia Limited Coridon Pty Ltd Corrs Chambers Westgarth Cortical Pty Ltd Covance Pty Ltd C-Qentec Diagnostics Pty Ltd CRC for Innovative Dairy Products Cryosite Ltd CSIRO CSIRO CSIRO Livestock Industries CSL Limited CyGenics Limited Cytopia Limited Daryl Alexander & Associates Datamonitor Datapharm Australia Pty Ltd Davies Collison Cave Deacons Lawyers Deakin University Definitive Events Pty Ltd Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Department of Business, Economic & Regional Development Department of Economic Development (TAS) Department of Innovation Industry & Regional Development Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Diabetes Vaccine Development Centre Dimerix Bioscience Pty Ltd DocBanq Pty Ltd Dr Reddy’s Laboratries Limited Dynamic Hearing Pty Ltd Ecobiotics Limited EG Capital Eiffel Technologies Ltd Ellis Insurance Brokers Enterix Australia Pty Ltd Environmental Biotechnology CRC Pty Ltd Epichem Pty Ltd EpiTan Limited Eqitx Limited ERA Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd Ernst & Young ES Cell International Pte Ltd EvoGenix Pty Limited F B Rice & Co Fairmont Medical Finnish Bioindustries Florigene Limited FLUOROtechnics Pty Ltd Freehills Freehills Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys Frost & Sullivan Gateway Capital Limited GBS Venture Partners Ltd GE Healthcare Gee Multimedia Gene Stream Pty Ltd Genesis Research and Develepment Corp Ltd Genetic Solutions Pty Ltd Genetic Technologies Limited Geneworks Pty Ltd Genzyme Australasia Pty Ltd GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd Global Markets Capital Group Godfrey Remuneration Group Gold Coast City Council Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering (UNSW) Grains R&D Corporation Grey Innovation Griffith Hack Griffith University GroPep Limited Ground Zero Pharmaceuticals Honeywell Ltd Hot Source Consulting Howard Florey Institute Hunter Immunology Pty Ltd Hunting Party Securities Ltd IBM ICP Firefly Pty Ltd IDG Communications IDT Australia Ltd i-lab Incubator Pty Ltd Imaginot Pty Ltd IMBcom Pty Ltd IMPLICIT BIOSCIENCE PTY LTD IMS Health Australia Industrial Research Limited Innovation Dynamics InnovationXchange Network Intersuisse Bioscience Invetech Pty Ltd Invitrogen ISPE ITL Corporation Pty Ltd J. Craig Venter Institute JobPharm Pty Ltd Johnson & Johnson Research Pty Ltd Kendle Pty Limited Laboratory Systems Group Pty Ltd Lander & Rogers LEK Consulting Life Therapeutics Lions Eye Institute Living Cell Technologies Ltd Logical Freight Solutions M7 Pty Ltd Mallesons Stephen Jaques Marsh Pty Ltd Maverick DCM Pty Ltd Mayne Pharma Pty Ltd McComb Foundation Meditech Research Limited Medvet Science Pty Ltd Melbourne Biotechnology Melbourne Business School Merck Sharp & Dohme Mercury Human Resources Merlin Biosciences Metabolic Pharmaceuticals Limited Microbial Screening Technologies Middletons Lawyers Millipore Australia Pty Ltd MiniFab (Aust) Ltd Minomic Pty Ltd Minter Ellison Molecular Plant Breeding CRC Monash Institutes of Health Mondo Medical Ltd Monsanto Australia Ltd. Monsoon Communications MPR Group Narhex Life Sciences Limited National ICT Australia Limited National Measurement Institute Neurosciences Victoria Ltd New Zealand Trade & Enterprise Nextec Biosciences Pty Ltd Nidor Pty Ltd Nova Systems Consulting Novapharm Research (Aust) Pty Ltd NSW Dept of State & Regional Development Nuplant Ltd NZBio Office of Eco Devt. For City of Brisbane OmegaBio International Pty Ltd On Q Recruitment Pty Ltd Origo Biotech Pty Ltd O’Sullivan PLLC Ozgene Pty Ltd Pakair Cargo Specialists Pty Ltd PanBio Limited Peplin Limited Peptech Limited Peptide Solutions Pfizer Australia PharmaVentures Pharmaxis Pty Ltd Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick Phoenix Biologix Phoenix Eagle Pty Ltd Phosphagenics Limited Phylogica Ltd Pillsbury Winthrop (International) Piper Alderman Lawyers Pizzeys Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys Plant Biotechnologies Tasmania Pty Ltd Portland Orthopaedics Limited Premier Bionics Ltd PriceWaterhouseCoopers Services Prima Biomed Ltd Probiomics Limited Progen Industries Pty Ltd Promics Pty Ltd Proteome Systems Limited Proteomics International Pty Ltd Psiron Ltd pSiVida Limited PureTech Development LLC Q-Gen Pty Ltd Q-Pharm Pty Limited QSV Biologics Queensland Biocapital Fund Queensland Investment Corporation Queensland University of Technology Radpharm Scientific Research Australia Limited Research Directions Pty Ltd Resmed Ltd Resonance Health Analysis Services Richard Craig & Associates Pty Ltd Ritract Ltd RMIT Drug Discovery Technologies Roche Diagnostics Australia Rockeby Biomed Australia Pty Ltd Russian Biotechnologies Ltd Saturn Biotech Limited Science People SciGen Pty Ltd Select Vaccines Limted Shelston IP Solagran Limited SOLBEC Pharmaceuticals SPAFAS Australia Pty Ltd Spencer Stuart & Associates Spruson & Ferguson Starpharma Pty Ltd Start-Up Australia Pty Ltd Statistical Revelations Stem Cell Sciences Ltd Stephens Lawyers & Consultants Stirling Products Stricent AB Symbion Pty Ltd Syringe Safe Technologies Pty Ltd Taiwan Bio Industry Organisation Taiwan Trade Centre Tasmanian Alkaloids Pty Ltd Tectura (Australia ) Pty Ltd Teraform Ventures TETRAQ TGR Biosciences Pty Ltd The Australian National University The British Midlands Thermo Electron Corporation Thomson Scientific Thorgard Pharmaceuticals (Aust) Pty Ltd Titan BioVentures Management Trident Clinical Research Pty Ltd Tripos Australia TSL Group Limited UK Trade & Investment Uniquest Pty Ltd Uniseed Management Pty Ltd Universal Biosensors Pty Ltd University of New South Wales University of Southern Queensland USCOM V2V Pty Ltd Ventracor Limited Veterinary Encapsulation Biosciences Pty Ltd Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing Virax Holdings Limited Virient Visiomed Group Ltd Vision BioSystems Ltd VUT Centre for Strategic Economic Studies VUT School of Life Sciences & Technology WA Biomedical Research Institute WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre WATERMARK Patent & Trade Mark Att. Welsh Development Agency West Pharmaceutical Services Western Australian Department of Industry & Resources Whitehorse Strategic Group Ltd World Courier (Aust) Pty Ltd Xceed Biotechnology Ltd Xenome Limited zektingroup Pty Ltd ZENYTH THERAPEUTICS Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 59 Australasian Biotechnology is the official journal of AusBiotech – Australia’s Biotechnology Organisation. Australasian Biotechnology reports on research and business news within the biotechnology arena. AusBiotech Staff and Office Bearers Chair: Dr Simon Carroll (Advanced Ocular Systems) Tel: (08) 9389 5933, Email: [email protected] Directors: Dr Mikael Hirsch (CSIRO), Tel: (02) 6246 4450, Email: [email protected] Dr Peter Devine (Uniseed Pty Ltd) Tel: (07) 3365 4037, Email: [email protected] Dr David Irving (Diabetes Vaccine Dev. Centre), Tel: (03) 8344 0753, Email: [email protected] Mr Michael Gilbert (Aust’n Centre for Plant Functional Genomics) Tel: (08) 8303 6740, Email: [email protected] Prof. Susan Pond (Johnson & Johnson Research) Tel: (02) 8396 5800, Email: [email protected] Ms Caroline Beasley (Stryker), Tel: 0409 663 107, Email: [email protected] Dr Sue Macleman (Eqitx), Tel: (03) 9811 9998, Email: [email protected] Mr David Crump (Zenyth Therapeutics), Tel: (03) 9208 4070, Email: [email protected] Dr Fiona Wood (McComb Foundation), Tel: 08 9202 1145, Email: [email protected] Chief Executive Officer: Dr Anna Lavelle, Tel: (03) 9828 1404, Email: [email protected] Manager, Business Development & Finance: Mr Glenn Cross, Tel: (03) 9828 1402, Email: [email protected] Events Manager: Ms Hayley Johnson, Tel: (03) 9828 1406, Email: [email protected] Executive Assistant: Ms Nicole Rickard, Tel: (03) 9828 1404, Email: [email protected] Queensland BIO Project Manager: Ms Shevaun Duncan, Tel: (03) 9828 1407, Email: [email protected] Anne Hartshorn-Smith Industry Development Officer [email protected] Finance Officer: Ms Rachel Jackson, Tel: (03) 9828 1408, Email: [email protected] Member Support & VIC Executive Officer: Ms Mandie Lammens, Tel: (03) 9828 1400, Email: [email protected] AusBiotech State Branches Victoria Mandie Lammens Executive Officer [email protected] Communications Manager: Ms Jennifer Cook, Tel: (03) 9828 1405, Email: [email protected] Strategic Industry Development – Medical Device Network: Ms Sarah Evans, Tel: (02) 9371 7760, Email: [email protected] BRANCH Chairs: South Australia Canberra Region Branch: Prof Arthur Brandwood (Brandwood-Biomed Pty Ltd) Tel: (02) 6291 3850, Email: [email protected] NSW Branch: Mr Hamish Hawthorn (ATP Innovations Pty Ltd) Tel: (02) 9209 4128, Email: [email protected] QLD Branch: Mr Trevor Neville (TranZition Professional & Executive Recruitment) Tel: (07) 3360 0233, Email: [email protected] SA Branch: Ms Anne Collins (Virient), Tel: (08) 8351 7902, Email: [email protected] VIC Branch: Dr Ric DeGaris (Kendle), Tel: 0412 193 350, Email: [email protected] WA Branch: Janet Preuss (Tessitura Pty Ltd), Tel: 0414 827 579, Email: [email protected] New South Wales David Cox (Jackson McDonald), Tel: 0412 003 200, Email: [email protected] Vikki Hine Manager, Innovation & Technology NSW Department of State & Regional Development [email protected] TAS Branch: Dr Anthony Koutoulis (University of Tasmania) Tel: (03) 6226-2737, Email: [email protected] Alison Bowman Branch Development Officer [email protected] Tasmania Leanne Barnes Tasmanian Department of Economic Development [email protected] Western Australia Helen Cheeseman Western Australia Department of Industry and Resources [email protected] Editorial Contributions Please contact the Editor: Jennifer Cook – AusBiotech Telephone: (03) 9828 1405 Facsimile: (03) 9824 5188 Email: [email protected] 60 ADVISORY GROUPS: Medical Device Network (MDN): Chair, National MDN: Mr Peter Taylor, Tel: (03) 9887 7066, Email: [email protected] Chair, Vic MDN: Mr Richard Walmsley, Tel: (03) 9782-7333, Email: [email protected] Chair, NSW MDN: Mr Anthony Ujhazy, Tel: (02) 9886 5458, Email: [email protected] AgBio: Dr Ian Edwards, Tel: (08) 9450 4804, Email: [email protected] Human Health Medicinals: Mr Graeme Blackman, Tel: (03) 98001 8888, Email: [email protected] INTEREST GROUPS Bioinformatics Australia Dr Jonathan Arthur, Tel: (02) 9036 3132, Email: [email protected] Fermentation & BioProcessing Interest Group (FBIG) National: Michael Godfrey, Tel: 03 9590 8800, Email: [email protected] Australian Biotechnology Student’s Association (ABSA): Jean Hsu, Tel: 0422 114 807, Email: [email protected] Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Support AusBiotech Advertise in Australasian Biotechnology. Members receive a 10% discount on the rates shown below. Publication Dates May 2006 - May 2007 Issue Advertising/ Booking Deadline Editorial Artwork Deadline Publication Date May 06 May 12 May 5 May 19 May 31 August 06 July 14 July 7 July 21 July 31 October 06 September 8 September 1 September 15 September 30 March 07 February 9 February 2 February 16 February 28 May 07 April 13 April 6 April 20 April 30 Rates Advert Space 1 publication 2 publications 4 publications Double page spread $2,150 $2,020 $1,950 Full page $1,400 $1,275 $1,150 $860 $760 $700 Quarter page $600 $520 $475 Outside Back Cover $1,750 Inside Front Cover $1,680 Inside Back Cover $1,620 Double sided A4 insert $960 4pp A4 insert $1,250 Half page (horizontal or Vertical) Our membership base includes biotechnology companies ranging from start-ups to mature multinationals, research institutes and universities, specialist service professionals, corporate, institutional, individual and student members from Australia and globally. AusBiotech produces an industry specific journal called Australasian Biotechnology. The journal is produced 4 times a year and contains articles, features, feedback and insights into the biotechnology industry. The journal has been in circulation for many years and is widely regarded as the pre-eminent resource for biotechnology in Australia. A new style has been recently applied to the journal with some edgier articles, greater industry overviews and more in-depth features. The journal is supplemented by a monthly email newsletter and a fortnightly Events Update bulletin. The newsletter will lead with the latest news items and state round-ups which will be fleshed out in the journal. This journal is circulated to our 2,400 strong member base as part of their membership benefits. The journal is also circulated to individual magazine-only subscribers. The journal is a focussed resource and of great value to our industry. All prices shown are inclusive of GST Advertising Size Advert Size Trim Size Bleed Size Image Size Double Page (with gutter bleed) 297 x 420mm 305 x 428mm 268 x 387mm Full page 297 x 210mm 305 x 218mm 268 x 180mm Half page (horizontal) 149 x 210mm 157 x 218mm 130 x 180mm Half page (vertical) 297 x 103mm 305 x 111mm 268 x 89mm Quarter page 149 x 103mm 157 x 111mm 130 x 90mm Artwork Specifications All ready made artwork should be supplied made up to the correct size and with bleed. CMYK files supplied in a high resolution (300dpi) PDF format (please make sure all fonts are embedded and/or outlined). All responsibility for correct artwork and colour reproduction remains with the advertiser. Artwork can be sent via email or via post on a CD to Digital Image. If you would like us to produce artwork for you or have any questions or need information please dont hesitate to call Andrew Jackson at Digital Image. Contacts: Editor: Jennifer Cook – Communications Manager – AusBiotech Level 1, 322 Glenferrie Road Malvern VIC 3144 Telephone: (03) 9828 1405 Facsimile: (03) 9824 5188 Email: [email protected] Advertising and magazine enquiries: Andrew Jackson – Digital Image Level 2, 181 Fitzroy Street St Kilda VIC 3182 Telephone: (03) 9537 0588 Facsimile: (03) 9537 0577 Email: [email protected] AusBioGRAPHY A Conversation with Stewart Washer, CEO Phylogica Ltd Western Australia is a big country. It must be something to do with the wide open spaces, a sense of not being reigned in by topography and geography that breeds biotech entrepreneurs like Stewart Washer. He is one of the new wave of Australian commercialisation entrepreneurs from the resource rich state of Western Australia who specialises in taking novel techniques to the market. Like his resource-based predecessors, Stewart takes a commodity that is plentiful on the ground; R & D from world class Australian research facilities and manages the commercialisation of these technologies to create spin-off companies with high quality assets. Stewart Washer is the CEO of Phylogica Ltd, the first commercial spin-out from the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Western Australia and Fox Chase Cancer Centre in the USA. Stewart joined Phylogica in 2004. He took the company through an IPO to list on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX: PYC) at a 30% premium. Phylogica has developed a library of unique peptide shapes called Phylomers® that can be used as drugs. Much like a Lego box of protein parts harvested from biodiverse bacteria; the Phylomer Technology is like a protein matching service. Using genetics, a disease molecule can be presented and binds with one of the Lego pieces to block the disease. This has lead to the development of drugs against stroke, burns and rheumatoid arthritis. Stewart joined Phylogica with over 12 years of senior executive and board experience in commercial technology companies in the healthcare, food, agricultural and environmental sectors. He has raised $25 million in private and public shareholder funds and $20 million in government funds to invest in his companies. Before becoming CEO of Phylogica, Stewart was the CEO of Celentis for 3 years and managed the commercialisation of intellectual property from AgResearch in New Zealand with 650 scientists and $130 million in revenue. During this time, he formed and governed a number of successful biotechnology company spin-offs that employed over 100 staff and realized profitable annual product revenues of $30 million. Stewart was born in WA and grew up in Perth. He studied for a Bachelor of Science at the University of WA in microbiology 62 Australasian Biotechnology Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 and biochemistry. He went on to complete his Honours year and PhD, a bit further south of the Swan River at Murdoch University. His PhD project looked at engineering root-knot nematode resistance in host plants. This was in the time before the great GM debate and Stewart and his co-workers were excited by their research results using genetic engineering. It appears that Stewart has been hard-wired from birth for entrepreneurial activity. Early on in his post doc years, he set up a company with Ian Edwards from Pioneer Seeds in the US called Grainbiotech to commercialise the products of these modified plants. However, soon after a GM moratorium was declared in most Australian states. Stewart has always believed that to establish a successful business you must to able to predict the needs of the customer. While this technology has great potential, it was ahead of its time in public acceptance and after seeing that GM wheat had little future in Australia he sold his shares in the company and moved on. Today Grainbiotech operates as a successful non GM wheat breeding company that still owns the IP to salttolerant GM wheat. His next venture was to create another company called Biotest which was the first GM food testing company in Australia. The company bought the licence to a test that had been used in agricultural crops and food in the US. The test was initially well received and was used by many food companies and seed producers to satisfy consumers that their products were GM free. After an initial flurry of activity by companies to create GM free credentials, the food companies soon established repeat suppliers and would forego further testing. Again this demonstrated the need to predict the customers. Biotest however, still had good value in several disease tests it had developed for plants and Stewart ended up selling the business to a local biotechnology company. From here, he moved to NZ to head up Celentis, a biotech company created by NZ Agresearch which was owned by the NZ government. In three years he took a company with $10 million in revenue and no profit to $30 million in revenue and $6.5 million profit. Here, Stewart honed his entrepreneurial skills; he matched new technologies to a business development plan, put together a team to carry it through to proof of concept and secured seed capital to produce a sellable biotech business. Stewart in fact developed the cookie cutter mould to take novel biotech ideas to market. Celentis’s success demonstrated Stewart’s belief in asking the question first- “what does the customer want?” He first asked the customers what they wanted and determined what was needed to take it to market. Then he went back to the lab and funded the research to prove that the technology could provide what the customer requested. He then put together a company with a business development plan and a management team to carry the project through to fruition. Together with the seed money investors, Celentis created and sold many biotech companies. Stewart believes there is no lack of great ideas or money just the expertise to carry these ideas to market. Much of this expertise is overseas as the critical activity mass is not yet in Australia to attract people here and pay them internationally competitive salaries. While in NZ with Celentis he formed a fund called Biopacific Ventures to back novel technologies in the food and agricultural life sciences that raised over $100 million from a range of investors including Inventages, the Nestle fund. Celentis was a successful marriage between government and private business but unfortunately the model fell apart as the NZ Government modified their view on their role in biotechnology and many of the key people were lost in the process. Stewart emphasises that the success of any biotech company is its people, “having key people in place is everything”. Stewart, his wife and their young son returned to Perth to begin again and refocus on what Stewart loves best and that is setting up successful biotechnology companies. Within two weeks of his return he had an offer to take up the CEO position at Phylogica. He knew Dr Paul Watt the key scientist at Phylogica and he found the technology had great potential. Phylogica had already been in operation for 6 years with preseed funding from the NIH in the US as well as other grants. Stewart was familiar with the history of the company and knew that it was a blue blood with depth of concept. Shortly after joining the company he raised seed capital and listed on the ASX in March 2005 for 20 cents. One year later Phylogica was trading at 75 cents and was voted as one of two speculative Australian shares in Bioshares publication of its “super six”, along with Avexa. Phylogica was the top performing biotechnology company in Australia in the first quarter of 2006. Stewart believes the Australian biotech sector is a bear market and is still in its infancy. He says “there are not enough biotech winners yet that have made it with values at around the one billion dollar mark. There is lots of potential for several to reach this size soon, most noticeably with Cochlear, Resmed, Biota, Alchemia and Pharmaxis”. Stewart predicts the Australian biotech sector will go through a growth phase and enter a phase of mergers and acquisitions to create more sustainable biotechs. Stewart is no stranger to the mix of politics and medicine. Stewart’s father Mal Washer, is a medical doctor as well as the Federal Member for Moore, an electorate north of Perth. Although he has no aspirations to enter politics, he is involved with the current debate between medical science and politics. He hopes that there will be state cooperation to deal with ethical issues in science. “The debate on RU486 and the stem cell debate should be carefully considered and not hijacked by emotive arguments. These are complex issues both scientifically and ethically and the right thing to do is to heed the advice from professionals in these fields who are on review committees and have extensively looked at all sides of the issues. Australians need to have confidence in the strength of the OGTR and TGA guidelines”. Stewart has an interesting view of the three coloured biotech sectors. Green being agricultural biotech, red being medical biotech and white being industrial biotech. Stewart says “Australia punches above its weight in the area of medical research and development. In the area of immunology and proteins we have more than our share of Nobel Laureates. What Australian biotech companies need to focus on, is value adding on-shore. We need to be competent in preclinical trials in particular, that add significant value to potential compounds arising from R&D for a relatively small investment”. In regard to green biotech sector, Stewart thinks Australia has probably missed the boat. “In the future, China and India will feed themselves and export surplus GM crop produce while the developed world will probably paying more for nonGM products. Australian consumers do not understand GM crops and generally do not want to eat them at this stage. In keeping with his philosophy of understanding the customers needs - it is time to move on and focus beyond GM foods to the red and white biotech sectors”. Perhaps the one area of the green biotech sector that Stewart thinks Australia should focus its attention is in the area of animal feed. “Animal feed is expensive and by using biotechnology we can improve the feed so there is less phosphate waste and greater uptake of nutrients. We need to replace world dependence on animal material as animal feed with plant crops which will reduce costs and the risk of prion diseases. Australia has the space and established broad acre farming practices to supply the world with clean value added animal feed”. Closely aligned to this area is the consideration of animal feed for use in aqua-culture. Stewart believes this is, as yet an untapped resource which has a massive potential to develop an all-in-one feed with a GM modified plant providing fish oil/meal equivalents. Again, Australia is in a prime position surrounded by ocean and temperate climates and with a fledgling aqua-culture industry. In the white biotech sector, Stewart points to the production of biofuels and materials production as another important area of focus for Australia. “By creating biodeisel and bioethanol we can supply the world with clean wastefree product. Biodiesel can be created from oil crops and recycling of waste cooking oil and bioethanol can be made from high starch and cellulose crops such as sugar. Australia should look to the next step and gear up to export biofuels. We know resources management and in Australia we have the sunlight and established broad-acre farming practices in crops such as sugar. In ten years time when the enzyme degradation of cellulose is streamlined, Australia should supply the world with a clean, renewable energy source”. Stewart sees a convergence of nanotechnology and life sciences in the area of materials production for medical applications. “In the non-medical materials area there are opportunities to improve cotton, wood and textiles to produce new materials. Europe is heavily investing in white biotech as it is environmentally sustainable and will replace plastics and oil based products”. For the time being, Stewart is happy to be back in Perth and at the reigns of a company that is geared-up and ready to ride the next biotech bull market wave when it comes later this year or early next year. Living in Perth has many lifestyle attractions. It has always been a resources rich state and is buzzing with the current boom in resources. Stewart accepts the tyranny of distance and that he will travel often to the east coast to talk with customers and investors, as well as the longer hauls to the US and Europe as a necessary part of doing business in Australia and globally. Volume 16 No 1 May 2006 Australasian Biotechnology 63