NIEPER - Rex Research

'lryE.,o'
R E XR E S E A R C H
P O B O X1 9 2 s 0
JEAN
NV 89019
USA
N R , N 5 -N I E
I'tLE:
N t EPER , l{^\,
Ehi.lJ,n3Crc*vl{7 T[.ory
N I E ' E R ,D r . H a n s : E N E R G ' _ S H I E L
NVGI T
GDRIA
EyF F E C_T_S- R e v i e w s
t h e . b a c k g r o u n^ d
.
r
'
e
r
.
i
g
y
s
h
i
e
l
d
i
n
ga s i t r e r a t e s t o
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
s
t
h
e
t
h
e
o
y
;
i
t
n
g r a v i t a t i o n a l e f f e c t s , u n 9 s u p p o r t st h i s
s
e
v
e
r a l e x a m p l e sT
. he
concrusion
of several
i! tnat ipii.
ii ririeo-wiirr
ii,'i'";nioionur
F i e l d " t h a t p e n e t r a t e st h3ytfgrs
e r a r g e m a s s e so i t h e u n l v e r s ea n d i s s u b s e q u e n t r y
r e r a d i a t e d a s ' , R a d i o n s , , f. n e d i f f e r e n c e beiween
a b s o r b e cr a d i o n sr e s u l t s i n . g r a v i t a t i o n a l a c c e r e r a t i oenm l t t e d r a d i o n s a n d
in the direction of
lt lhge r g r : . . T h es r a v i t a t i o n a t ' a c c e i e i ; i i ; ; ; ; - ; ; ; p o r t r o n a r t o t h e p
D'rvouduuLcLtn r
b o d y ' sd i a m e t e ar n d i t s a v e r a g ed e n s i t y . . 6A . t i i i e i . . r s ; :
(
T H E O ROYF E N T R GSYH I E L D I NAGS A C A U S E
G R A V I T A T I O HEAFLF E C T S
H a n sA . N i e p e r , t i . D .
D r . N i e p e r r e v i e w s t h e b d c k g r o u n d ,e x p l a i n s t h e t h e o r y o f
energy shielding
as It
relates to gravitational
effects,
and supports this
theory with several
e x a m o) e s .
5everal authors (Nieper, llagyari,
Stanyukovlch, and Schneiderov) have
drawn similar conclusions concerning the mechanism
of hi-ohenergy gravrtational
effects.
The assunption is that all
space is filled
magnetic radiation called the
"radional f ield.,,
this
(
radional field
by highly energetic electro-
Nieper and others believe that
p e n e t r a t e s t h e l a r g e m a s s e so f t h e u n i v e r s e
and that there is
a s u b s e q u e n te n i s s i o n o f r a d i o n s absorbedradions results
T h e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e ne m i t t e d r a d i o n s a n d
in gravitationar
accereration in the direction of the
m a ss .
The shielding theory tells
us that the gravitational
acceleration is Dro_
portional to the product of the body's diameter
and its average density.
two factors thus determine the penetrating
abil ity of the radional figld
in turn determines the extent of gravitat ional
effects.
are caused by differences
theory are the core ternperatures of
(
which
B e c a u s et h e s e e f f e c t s
in absorbed and emitted energy, temperature rises
are
expected proportional to shielding abilities.
J U Di t e r .
These
E x a m p l e su s e d t o s u p p o r t t h i s
the moon and earth and the energy emission of
r
l
T w o p o s s i b il i t i e s
f
I
are presented: (l)
t h a t s i m i l a r m e c h a n i s mm
s aybe
o p e r a b l e f o r g r a v i t a t i o n a l , m a g n c t i c , e l e c t r o m a g n e t i c ,a n d r a d i e s t h e t i c
acceleration; and (2) that gravitat;onal
acceleration for a body may not be
constant but may be changingas the density of the radional f ield changes,
The secondpossibility
could explain the anatonyof saurian creatures and
provide an explanation for changesin volcanic activity,
earthquakes,and
continental drifts.
,,r,4&l
I
DR. HANS A. NIEPER
2l, Sedanstrasse
3000 Hannover
Dear Dr.
Cray,
You rnade a well
understandable
extract
out
of
the
gravity
papers.
The point is that gravitational
energies have to be sought in
range and not in the low one (as Einstein had anticipated).
the high
energy
The results corning in from Venus probe research al1 indicate
the rikelihood
of Ey theory, including
the concept of the 'perisolar
cushion field'
nhich you
should perhaps also make subject of exrracting.
one correction:
rhe 'radional'
field
not say too much.
I do not use it.
is
I assume that the gravity
field
belongs
as it pentrates mass, undergoes 'elastic
Dr. Ilead adapted this expression).
(
a nomination
by shneiderov
vbich
does
to the Feinberg Tachion Energy rfiich,
(Feinberg wrote io, also
relations,
It r.'as Dr. stuhlinger,
space physicist
with l.lernher von Braun, who connected
the Feinberg Theory to rny shielding
theory of gravity,
This entire aspect of gravity
and grav, conversion research now becomes
extrenely
drarnatic, as a possible po\rer source and as high speed propulsion
(uFo's).
Lt
?
(J
Theory oJ Enerqg Shieldinq
Gravitational
As a Cause of
H a n s N i e p e r , M .D .
Et fect s
(Translation)
Boden-Ilensch, No. L4, I972
gravitation
The law of
century
and by' Albert
in 1917, in
gives
spite
no information
of gravitational
in
of
Einstein
its
theory
not seriously
Also
today,
the ITth
of
relativity
disputed validity,
the experiments,
the arising
placed
often
Joseph vJeber (1) do not illuminate
of
but demonstrates at best a minirnal
inhomogeneity of gravitationaf
effects,
the general
about the actual- mechanism of
question,
definitive
in
so far
forces.
the foreground
this
enuncibted by Isaac Newton in
as such, doubtless
forces
although gravitational
belong in
the very bigh energy
ran9e.
According
far
to our
research,
a very
few scientists
given serious thought to a hypothetjcat
tationaf
effects
the existing
and criticize
larv, occasionally
seated structural
crises
are A. Maqvari (2),
Anatol J.
a forerunner
IlSfglr
(4).
forward
already
has created
in
with
m e c h a n i s mo f g r a v i deficiencies
a side glance at
theoretical
Independently
similar
research.
of
ideas since
1954 of
a stir
Itova"as weLl as by his
thL' Budapest radio
of
the practical
have so
of
the deep-
Such authors
K. P. Stanvukovich (3) and the group of
Shneiderov
rr"ieper has put
td
only
with
tlre theory
his
gravitation
tower and its
critical
these authors,
1953 and published
set
forth
here.
comments on "l!ylrr:
experiment with
antenna during
the aid of
the eclipse
on
t
6
.,,is power absorptive
particularlY
Pertinent'
The assumption of
in
as improbable for
in
the form of
(
tf
of masses and no earth attraction'
also be no attracLion
All
of
the aforementionecl
and in
directions
a somewhat smaller
radiation
(radional
reflection
dence,
field)
emission of
creates
conneclion
betvreen electrostatic,
to schneiderov,
Stanvukovich
field"
but
(1962) believe
penetrates
bocly after
Schneiderov
penetration
is
that
liowever'
than incj'-
smaller
already
draws a rnental
forces'
Ilaqvari
(I959),
and
the "radional
the radiation
of
the tnasses of
the universe'
The radional
-2-
Iarge nasses'
magnetic and gravitational
Ni-ePer (I954),
the body, also
loses energy thereby.
this
thinks
between the masses whereby they
an irnpulse deficit
each other'
about I0-37'
which nay be smaller
"radions",
towards
In contrast
of
Schneiderov
cannot penetrate
accel-erate
energetic'
and are extremely
frequency'
by
filled
waves of which go from all
assumes a ltave Iength
hyPothetically
Schneiderov
Nieper
directions
alt
space is
assume that
authors
the electromagnetic
an ellergy fie1d,
can
reason there
For that
excLuded by this'
for-
attracting
an impulse momentum. In any case'
ces are completely
by
energy only
their
waves which can inpart
electromagnetic
means of
gravitational
a cohesivenesa
makes probable
tight
lies
above aIl
this
the outward spreading of
that
speed of
v,tith the
forces
a long time by Nieper '
The reason for
and 9!3nlu!evigh'
the reflection
attraction"
of masses or an "earth
an attraction
has been rejected.also
Shneiderov
is
of ucavari
The lecture
character".
in
gravitation
t h e m e c h a n i s r no f
m o m e n t u n ta n d t h a t
an interceptive
or
a consequende of a pressure effect
is
gravity
of
acceleration
the
that
result
Maqvari comes thereby to the
Felrruar)' 15, l96f'
energy which leaves a
than that
from outside'
whereby
I
argument for
( )
the thcor-y of encrgy shielding
gravitational
(shielding
effects
theorv),
as a cause of
as it
was set forth
above.
The theory
of
gravity
of
energy shielding
on tbe surface of
diarneter times its
would imply that
a body be proportional
average density.
moon case amounts to about 6:l
A
shielding
with
'J
of
theory
and the
diameters
noon also
that
that
in
into
have been carried
exhibits
I/6
all
the molten
Of particufar
that
(14) of
he takes
connected
their
in-
In spite
of
in which
temperarure measurement should
temperature
zone is
in
to
now that
the interior
be expected
of
the
and
at a
the moon.
This
(8) from observations
the rnascons.
por the earth:
the molten zone about 2.5 x l-04 below surface.
interest,
bowever, are the studies
(11) on energy ernission from Jupiter.
Jupiter
the
in proportion
undertaking
about 2 x 105 n below the surface
bourrdary of
Wildey
turn
adequately established
an elevated
peculiarities
drift
their
in
average densities.
was concluded by OrKeefe among others
of
Further,
masses experience
indeed in
is
orr
energy absorption
the Apol1o XIII
it
acceleration
(162.5 mgal).
g
the moon with
out,
the boundary of
depth of
in the earth-
This value correspondsin fact
times their
the disappointments
deeper drilling
its
(1.275:. x 107m . 5.5I x 1031 :
interceptive
a temperature rise
their
ratio
to a gravitational
the moon of
would require
it
teriors
to
x I0').
approximation
the surface
This
to
?
d.476 x 10"m.3.342
as a first
the acceleration
gives off
some three
up from the sun.
Jupiter
to
in
Trafton
The authors
and
state
times more energy than
must be subject
+) Not necessarily
in mathematics but
1 > u b il c u n d e r s t a n d i n g .
-4-
four
of
to a constant
the presentation
for
additional
(9
supply of
energy from the outside
recognize him as a planet like
stands beyond doubt.
of
the earth
is,
Jupiter
if
one wants to
the other planets.
has about 12-fol-d the diamecer
and may havr: 317 times the mass of
therefore,
in
energy and is
a position
And this
the earth.
to absorb substantially
heatred up correspondingly,
lte
rnore radional
From the reported
daLa (10), the product of the dianreter times the average density
fo.
Jupiter
is
about 2.7
These are some 6f
would speak for
rel,ations
the most important
the fikelihoocj
has already
E!-!eigg4y
allowed
than that
findings
shielding
to be aroused that
gravity
and other
such as magnetic and electrostatic
The principle
of
simpricity
that
the fact
of
static
"magnetism', of
induction
of
field
preferred
to relate
to an intensified
radiation,
interception
of
is
comprehensibl-e that
idea of
"attraction".
For a longer
a nagnetic
opposite
I reject
deviate.
of
. cinematographically
I
core or
for
its
radiation
Likewise,
like
of
we
the nagnetic
the gravitationar
charge
pole charges together.
like
"attraction,'
r assume
the electrostatic
It
Magvari and Stanvukovich
or
These Likeraise can only
time
an iron
and deviation
the divining
Accordingry,
acceleration
by the fact
the two respective
to
the transparency
electrostatic
or
the
alters
and makes this
conditioned
exist.
arone induces me to assume rikewise
]i.ke the pendurum.
erectromagnetic
the radional
could
hypobhesis about acceleration
devices
the earth.
theory.
the supposition
of
for
and data which
accelerati.ons
rod and simiLar
)
of
between the acceleration
and to extend this
(
times greater
of
an electrostatic
be int.erceptive
have concerned myself
experimentally
with
the divining
t h e p h e n o m e n ao f
phenomena.
and
rod.
-5-
1
gravitational
(
)
acceleration
the direction
toward the mass is
resulting
The interaction
of
of
the very short
p h e n o m e n o ni s
shorter
this
radiation
wave lengths
with
the atomic rnasses, because
does not lead to ionization.
known to every roentgenologist.
wave length
absorption
i n c o m p a r i s o n t o g a m m ar a d i a t i o n
besides
to
thi
with
the aid of
interesting
During
greater
of
mass densities
in
(7),
mascons is
not
Newton.
is
sufficiently
on here.
in
since
set proportiona]
changes in
orbj.tal
below the surface
of
the Maria,
of
path
$/as steadily
left
accel-eration of
the law of
to
the total
the acceleration
gravity
also
The f ind j.nqs on the mascons are a very
not
is
a body.+)
gravity
mascons were not anticipated
un-
over the
gravity
mass of
of
mascons
practically
of
-
frequentfy
!_g$g_! and is
the acceleration
the moon
the lunar
these nascons e/as already
It
implicit
theory
which are produced by areas rvith
the elevated
those over the lunar
in
data from space research of
the result
directly
(9).
in by Einstein
Topographical
of
energy" in a nass,
the noon by satetlites,
the vicinity
(B),
that
always only
that
of
tube-
i m p u l s e m o m e n t u m ,s e e m s t o l e a d
some experimental
were discovered
considered
fitted
from an x-ray
l " J eh a v e e n d e a v o r e d t o p r o v e t h i s
The significance
studied
"radional
meantime to be reported
and as a rule
(6).
it,
the orbiting
deviations
of
a vectorial
years and believe
recent
considerably
Brownian rnolecular motion and to a rise
tenperature
with
absorption
imparting
amplified
already
In the use of
tha
"ouaaa,
retarded by mass
effect
is
This
from a 60Co
i n g a m m ar a d i a t i o n
ionization
By contiast,
(J
in
like
in
the law
strong
-?-
B
on the basis
of
a change in the transparcncy for
(
",
person musL be accepLed (5).
in
that
cfusion
led
to
a dispersion
The fact
of
that
surface
'd
persion
up a gravitation
purpose,
the idea of
magnetic,
possibility
out of
is
(propulsion)
in
assumption.
reason for
Bouquer (12) if
the gravitational
A disnegative
(Bouquer had set
acceleration-
further
gravitational
and for
energy for
energy production,
already
gravitat.ional,
it
suggests the
and technological
initial
Anyway,
and radiesthetic
to me since
experimental
For
the volcano).
in
electrostatic
appears valuable
of
would
no insufficient
it.
for
the
in
large
exaltation
a commonfundamental rnechanismfor
of
arises.
only
acceleration.
he assumed big cavities
imaginabLe and anyway is
form of
be the
the problem from different
Utilization
this
responsible
efectromagnetic,
acceleration
affected,
experiment on the volcano Chimborazo in 1740
and found no increase
that
Iiquid
radiation
such as the equatorial
the experiment of
neasurernent technique
in
This
media electrically
gravitational
speaks for
phenomenon coul-d also
outcome of
must exist.
Particularly
a changed gravitational
in
the con-
mascons are not adequately effective
the funar
displacements
then result
solid
the penetrating
position
counterpolar
in
of
enhanced interception
character
the acceptance that
and gaseous media. buE also
I came to
At others,
from orthograde
radiation
that
the radiesthetic
of
the rod a mechanismof
and/or deviation
conclusion
gravitational
the rod under the influence
t h e t r ' , a s so f
the opinion
one time I an of
the studies,
working
positions.
flight
and space travel
at any rate
omnipresent
is
today in
thus
the
hot spr i ngs.
-6-
q
(
J
the present state
of our physical
interpretation
the shielding
of
theofy of gravitation
here feaves open the possibility
radional
field.
field
of
of
gravity.
lead also
Theoretically,
energy would produce a reduction
-
gravity
factor
arso at
the surface
becomes smaller
up of
.In Fact,
the earth,
which basically
the limited
eating
strength
saurian
confronts
have been previously
living
biologicaf
doubtfuf
tissue.
pteranodon attained
It
the earth,
that
it,s
too light
capacity
the smaIl bonelets
this
finding
for
the size
into
accord with
of
problems
of
such a
on the basjs of
The flyin9
fish_
I rn, but the
the large
animal
answer this
about 100 million
years
of
present
the age set at
A change in the density
seems statically
the aninal
Egeyf
the present data on the earth.
acceleration
question,
on the other
The pteranodon Iived
back
the earth.
or energy of
a consequence, moreover,
I
to bring
ago, somewhat over two percent
for
and
and the load
in principle
tried
lower gravitaEional
hand would easily
for
lifting
activrty.
must be insufficient.
(13) have futilely
A substantially
of
Diplodccus
a wing span of
skeleton
dynamically
and lrrhitf ield
the
not to mention from the water.
comes to the fact
of
in
the absorption
us with
but the capacity
wing g.eometry appears inadequate for
from
since
unaswered.
on the land is
of
an increase
increased volcanic
the saurian
may have reached about 35 tons,
co1 ossus for
to a change in
This would mean augmentated
possibly
the anatomy of
the
to the energy, however, in_
creases in absolute magnitude.
heating
of
in the accereration
earth -
of the
relative
conceived
a change in density
This would forcibly
the acceleration
(d
knorvledge and the theoretical
the raclional
a change in
-7-
field
has
the compression factor
Lo
'l=
r^r
( )
This can lead to incrcased volcanic activitv.
q v L 4 v r L . ) / .
drift,
earthquakes, to continental
masses, for
rigid
example in the form of
In connection with
which result
content
of
in
above al1
radiona]
field
can provide
valid
wilI
sufficient
for
be the one that
to
absoluLe sense is,
penetrate
nucfear
carbon -
iron,
the energy of
incident
starting
fusion
density.
is
assumption probable,
example of
In J.arge bodies,
of
the mass.
center
(;
of
of
liquid
I!.25,
is
fusion
variation
Iarge
a field
in
heliurn -
however,
off
The other
energy of
smaller
which nake this
the field
lead to
mentioned
energy in
the
The density
of
-8-
in
a compression
amounts to l-.8 for
when one assumes that
the average density
according
masses can give
processes.
forces
The compression factor
iron.
this
the saurian.
gravitational
the earth
conceivable,
are some findings
the anatomy of
in
masses are hypothesized
to conceive from the already
a greater
of
it
pstulating
the one of
mass than ours
suns: hydrogen -
energy in
nuclear
the radional
This supposition
sequence in
And here there
possibility
svsEem
not much doubt about the energy
At any rate,
energy for
alternative
is
gravitational
greater
suns of
and moreover, .Iarge cold
the. universe.
that
our solar
not very probable since
therefore,
knowledge, there
yielding
in
for
or energy
it.
and to heat them up correspondingly.
{J
the density
such a measurement, we are consiqned to
observations
One al-ternative
to current
speculations
Since, according to our current. knowledge, no
to stell-ar
f iel-d is
theory,
in the
Lhe canals on Mars.
an approximate esbimate of
are tempting.
turn
shielding
the actual
instrument
and to great rifts
the center
the
the core consists
of
the earth
the earth may be 5.5I7,
is
*)
ac
the
lr
average surface density
13
a planet
?he larger
factor
2.6 (f0) .
its
is, the higher
central
must be.
Although for Mercury an average density of
Venus of
5.12 x 1g3, 6nd for
Jupiter,
twelve
density
of
times
on his
.
centril
below 0.24 x 103.
acceleration
density
of Jupiter
according
cleared
to
the radional
Jupiter
without
gravitational
in
is
field
acceleration
of
than his
inertial
leading
observatory
had not been studied
gravi tational
and inertial
The fact
Mars (0.6 times
corresponds t.o
the
of
the earth
nay be
energy
great to penetrate
factor.
Thereby the
toward the sun is
mass is
and are,
masses **).
previously
srnall value,
than that
The stated
have revealed
the density
the gravitational
Jupiter
ballistically,
317
a con-
This contradiction
that
mass.
understood as gravitationa.l
\
(1"0),
loss
this
(2700 mgal) on the
not sufficiently
a very great
an average
thc diameter X the average
2.7 times greater
is
only
even because of
2.7 9
of
through the fact
{10) are calculated
t
just
other words, his gravitational
smaller
to a very
(The product. of
the data reported
up only
t^lith this,
t^lhether thrs
is more than questionable,
of Jupiter.
or
he nrust exhibit
the earth.
for
5.51 x ]03 are reported,
Since he possesses with
nould be constrained
surface
5.12 x I03,
diameter, exhibits
compression factor.
high gravitational
of
in
(I0).
mass of
surface
reality
)
1
I.25 x 10-
theoretically
\
the eartb of
times greater
the total
siderable
(
compression
tbat
smaller,
substantially
masses and densities
therefore,
Inguiries
the orbit
at
to be
a
of Jupiter
$,it.h a differentiation
of
nass.
l
"'
that
the diameter
of
the earth)
has
-9-
ta
of
an average density
aa
here, so that
clusions outlincd
average density
a decrease in
the periphery
for
indicate
and Saturn and PIuto on the other
also
phenonenon.
decrease in
Therefore,
f in.ting does not suffice,
This
the present point
at
the shielding
direction.
this
here,
in
time,
of gravitational
theory
increasi.nq
the identity
heavy and inertial
of
the theorv
of
this
however, to refute
I see no objection
however, from
effects,
mentioned, see myself
-
as an example.
Jupiter
the conclusions
in
into
f iel-d with
the radional
the argument expounded above with
)
the solar
from the sun can be cliscussed as the cause for
dislance
(
of
put forward
to LhL. thcory
corrcspon.ling
a certain
to a standard di.ameter,
retativc
Also the values for mercury on one side
s)'stemmust be assumcl.
In addition
against the con-
3'9 speaks a little
1ed to doubt tbe axiom of
masses which is
Isaac Nevrtonand also
in that
of
accepted both
Albert
Einstein.
For support
to
in
the condensation of
this
tbeory
thank D. Stokes and Dr. Ilenclrix, TeIluron
Santa }lonica,
Alexander
City,
CaIif ,,
M. Poniatoff
Calif.,
as weII
Arch i ves, Offenburg,
Dr. t'lax Presidski,
and some of
his
I am obliged
Research Co,,
San Francisco,
ltmpex coworkers'
Redwood
as Dr. Peter Schmiddberger add the Burda
FRG.
Posrt scr i pt :
The recording
of
the text
was done Christmas'
1971 the k nown data on Jupiter
(-)
in view of
tbe Pioneer satellite
started
I972 for
date.
in
were published
mentioned her e for
some other
data
Jupiter,
speak for
In June,
by NASA, lrhich
experiment which may be
the study of Jupiter
r n a d d i t ion to the positive
1970.
was brought
up to
hcat balance already
which no pfanet besides manifests,
the arguments of
shielding
theory.
t3
The very
strong
volcanic
A considerable
belongs among thr'nr.
Jupiter
in great
allows
to appear erroneous rather
greal
to be noted that
The planet
rotates
considerable
the eguator
in
reduction
in
in
comparison
the interceptive
the poles
is
It
is
axis
still
so thaE a
acceleration
is
of
suspected on Jupiter.
the gravitational
mass in Jupiter
blown out
density
than realistic-
than I0 hours on its
to
is
iron
0.24 on the surface
ice sheets are also
less
sulfur
the theoretical
t.he present universe of
for
requisiLe
Jupiter
clouds -
volcanic
occurence of
-
on the surface of Jupiter
also
and suLfur
vrhich must be assumedon
activity
above
to be expected
distributed
rather
if
homo-
geneously,
The present theory
half
(q
of
I97f
(shielding
physicists
.The comments made on it
value
Dr.
Ernst
for
Science,
viIle,
l97l
was only
Stulinqer,
are very
Professor
theory.
energy content
(15)
[
-1 which is
The proposal
their
of
evaluation.
for
Physics,
Associate
in his
Center,
letter
the shielding
Director
bel,ongs not only
a new sort. of mass for
the def in'ition
of
Hunts-
of April
?,
t.beory cor-
energ!' which Feinberq presents
To it
but also
inLroduced a graviton,
factor
for
comment, and indeed from
Stuhl-inger indicates
form of
the first
revealing.
one detailed
that. the energy necessary for
responds to the
p
as a manuscript
in
a nurnberof
N A S A , G e o r g e C . I q a r s h a I . l .S p a c e F I i g h t
AIabama.
tachyion
gravitation)
of
was brought to the knowledge of
distinguished
Of great
theory
in his
a very high
which Feinberg
which includes
the
irnaginary.
StuIinqeL. to Lrse Feinberq's
tachyion
theory
-r1-
lr 4\
thcory of gravitation
in Lhe shielding
PossibIy,
(q
forces
'
is
in facE convincing.
o n e m u s t t h e n a b a n d r . r nt h p a x i o m t h e n t h a t
are transmitted
with
the spced of
light.
sul)stanceof Ieinberg's
Lheory of a highly
really
field
rnass-equivalent,
Because tlre
energetic,
the supposit j.on of
is
form which is more rapid than Iigtrt.
gravitation.rl
Ite tries
but not
an energy
to demonstrate
t h i s m a t h e n r a L j c a l l y( 1 5 ) .
A tliscussion
physicists
earliest
of
the tidal
has shown that
with
appears not only
the side
turned
height.
On this
at
in
was difficult
on the side
turned
deformation
the axis
cause of
the tides.
the side
turned
of
of
of
since
aII
such an oval
supposition
is
of gravity
assumed that
by the moon experiences
as purely
the tides
not possihle
of
deformation
is
a f s o < . r st h e
the flood
dispenses further
de facto,
on
vrith the
hydrodynamic
and brings
out a
the rnoon and earthguakes.
the earth 6.9
Whenone assigns to the interior
the values
theories
it
on
a somewhat lower
can explain
away from the rnoon; it
Density at the surface of
(density
at
tbe compression pressure
*)
nickel
the flood
the moonrs position.
This
explaining
the
tovrard the moon but also
shielding
between the effect
(cold).
reason since
theory
relation
Iron:
that
phenomenon, previously
phenomena, which is
()
for
aday from the moon, however,
One must assume accordingly
necessity
also can be efucidated
theory.
under the influence
a small oval
smaller
this
Accordj-ng to shietding
fotrndered.
the earth
critical
the shielding
The interpreiation
(a
phenomenon (ebb-f loorJ) with
of
(molten),
7.86
the eart.h a core of
8,0 molterr, 8.9 cold) , or a nickel_-iron alloy,
are changed correspondingly.
-12-
-
.r
{* ) Atso
al1'Lov6't^
t
Wr7
hZ4'\
?
I
c<,.l\'r-tJlr.r\
dg-hr-rs
a..rc qrs,r.^e.l
I
,
15
Lrterature:
I
(3
(I)
l4eber, J.. cravitational
498 (L967).
+{
12)
s c i e n c e N e w sV o I . 9 8 , 4 4 - 4 6
I'lagyari, E. Power and energy transfer
Hungarian Exporter
9, t'tO. I,
used as gravitation
priv.
stanyukovicb'
K. p-,
Specials
.
(4J
Shneiderov,
radional
les
A. J.,
)a. (4 prefactory)
fietd
(5)
Nieper,
not
of
*_
(6)
les
J.
:roc.
la
1962.
nucLear forces
Speciale
in
the
Centre Europeen pout
publication
the radional
cravitational
field
,,G,, 24_29
,
theory,
refative
fields.
The hiqh
IRE t6g9_1690 (I961).
H. A. Theory rad.
the divining
ff,
4 (1962c1,
Djuric,
snarl
IluIIer,
of
tower
Notar.
Recherches sur
,'G',, 3,
Notar-
IX,
theory.
g*porter
the nature of gravit.ation.
Theory. of
An outline
Astronautica
I' 1D
Broadcasting
lg"9urlg"
,,phvsica Nova".
Recherches sur La Gravitation,
(I952r,
*+
brief ,
publication
field,
by penetration,
4 (1959),
Centre European pour
cravitation,
(1970).
laboratory.
(1961).
No, I
(3)
p _ h y s .R e v . L e t t e r s I g ,
radiation.
syndrome in men moving at speeds
to c/so.
rod.
phB 354, March 1954.
l,tedHeute v,
P . 1 " 1 .a n d W . L . S j o g r e n ,
9,
The probrem
459_461 (1956).
Lunar nascons.
Science
161, 680 (r958).
(7)
Conel, J.
E. and G. B. Holstrom.
surface interpretation.
(8)
OrKeefe, J.
(9)
Urey,
Luna
nascons.
A near
Science 162, l4O3 (I969)-
A. Isostasy of
the Moon.
H. C. Mascons and the history
of
Science 162, 1405 (I968)..
the moon, Science
162 1408 (1968).
)
l\o
tlnt
\ J W '
f)oc ments of
(11)
coidv
S.ipnt i fic
TableS and References
P. 205-206, Basel 1960.
Sixth edition,
Literature,
{\
thp
L. M. and R. L. I'lildey, Jupiter:
Trafton.
and Lhe magnitude of
his
His Iinb
energy source.
internal
darkening
Spience
168,r214(r970).
(12)
Todhunter, J. A. History
and the figure
attraction
Bramwel-I, C.D. and lvhitf ield,
^ - ^ ^ ^ !
r1 q
!},s-!
(14)
of
Baldwin,
the earth.
l'lacmillan 1973,
Dover, New York, 1962, p. 248.
reprinted
(I-3)
of Methem. Theories of
- ^ -
i
^ l
vertebrate,
c.
R.
Nature
R. B. Arguments for
Flying
225,
speed of the
660 (I970).
a hot moon, Science )-70,
No. 3964, 1264 (1970).
(I5)
Feinberg, G. Possibility
llv=j:CI_3ggSlLI5e,
of
faster
than light
particles.
No. s 10Be-II05 (JuIy, 1e57).
L,
i'-)
\ t
n l
Annex to the Shielding Theory of Gravity
("$
Fcrnbcrg Interceptive
Potentials
i n I l i o . lo c t i c . ] S v s t e m s .
H. A. Nlc!,cr, M. D.
rn the siiierdrng Lheory of gravity which I presentcd in it,s
finaf
form in I912, I outlrned that most likely ..llf non-mechanicac_
celerations
a r e d u e t o a c o m m o nm e c h a n i s n : N a m e l y , t h e i n t e r c e p t r . o n
of -Feinberg energy vrhich, as it undergocs 'elastii,
relations gives
off monent.un. (Gravitational accelerition,
erecLric, electrostatlc,
electromagnetic, magnetic.)
Also the accelerationof the divining
rod is attributed to a change in the transparency of the rod's
matter
for the gravity field energy.
I ' , ' ea s s u i l e t h a t t h i s
of gravity energy transparency is caused
b y a f l o w o r l o a d o f- c ch ha an rggee s w h i c h a i e e m i f t e d b y t h e r i s p e c t r v e
and suitabl,e person once he himserf staysi in a flow of emitted
charges, e.9., from underground water dipolessince an efectric current or an electric potentiar of t.he common
kind applied to t.he rod would not change it,s
gravitationai
oe_
haviour the energy florv produced by the 'activited,
person nust be
of a kind that differs
from the convenLional electri.c load or
current.
r'q
!{e f ee.} that in his original
paper teinl)erq hirnself thinks of a
non-guantitized
charge 'superinrposed' on the rver.t known ereccromagnetic field
rather than of an entirely
n e r . ,ki i n d o f e n e r g y .
Thus,
he feels that the Tachyion-Theory is welr in agreement witrr the
princj.ples of relativity.
The guestion which actuarr)' intrigucs rnc is : I.rhatkind of energy
rnput is it that causes a change in the qravitational
transparency
o f t h e r o d ? I f h a t k i n d o f r o a c ' r i s i t t h . r t . t a k e s u p m o m e n t . u mf r o m
Feinberg energy, or helps the rod's matter to inLercept more?
My opinion is - just for reason of
ing load i.s Feinberg energy itself
simpricity,
that this interceptfed in by- the 'activated, person.
O r , i n o t h e r w o r d s : F e i n b c r q l o a d m a v . ln t c r c e ! ) t i n t r u d i n g
F ei n b er g
field.
T h i s a s s u m p t i o n i s w e l l i n a i r eentent with the fact that the
gravj tat ional field finds iLsel f in j remarkable steady stare.
The fact that the 'activated'
person obviously produces loads vrhich
are Fernberg gravity fierd interceptive imposes the need to consider
n o w S u c h s u p e r r m p o s e d F e i n b e r g e n e r g y c a n b e f o r m e d i n qa vbriv^r lv ^Y ^r ri--o-r r
SYS tem.
,fi1
(
since we know from Ritchie's revitating
c o n c l e n s re ( r 9 4 1 ) . f r o m t h e
Gray machine, and from the experiments tistcd in llassel's paper
on gravrty conversion that essentiarly condenser foad phenomena
are
connected with gravity interaction
I assumethat the condenser
s y s t e m o f t h e c e I ] m e m b r a n e sa c c o u n t s f o r t h e ' f o r m u l a t i o n '
of
Feinberg energy,
L8
such a.moder would perrnit us to understancl a variety of inportant
b i o r o g i c a l p h e n o m e n a ;p o s s i b l y n o n r q u a n t i t i z e d ' e l a i t i c '
eiectric
resonance which plays a role in immune interaction,
immune re_
connaissance, in biotogical effecLs of very high but ,rhythmized,
dirutions
in homeopathy, smell reactions over ia.ge distinces
(insects), focusing the direction of a small source, etc,
AIso the
abiLity of the shark Lo immeciiately direct himself toward a far
distant blood source may be explai-ned by this kind of electrtc
,second,s phenomenon,
resonance.
The neuro-therapeutic
as well as
the imnediate activation
of the thymus p=O rlsonating
system by
bee propolis may thus be explained.
And the transmiision
or certain
psychj.c or mental function or reactions likewise.
It is also. imaginable that we could learn more about Feinberg
suoercharging of biological
condenser membranesystems and maybe
artif icaJ-ly manipulate this.
possible results would be the
following:
Without interfering
into his fundamental bioloqical
behaviour such a man would Ievitate or gravitate differentiy,
he
would deflect light
and, therefore,
become invisible
if not very
nearby (as documented by the photo series of approaching ,old man
type peoplet astronauts taken by !,trs. Cumber, he would 6eco*"
m a s s - r e p e l l e n t ( r e s i s t a n t a g a i n s t p u n c h i n g , c a s e o f U S A FS e r g .
NN. against 'baby face people, asLronautsj and he would be cipable
to manipulate alI kinds of menta] reactions in nearbyor even
distant people.
{
s
H. A. Ni eper , l'1D
. .
Med. Dept.
S i l b e r s e e H os p i t a I
Hannover
P.S,
ft is remarkable that for inmune interaction it needs the
resonating activation
of both the intruder and the immune system.
Neutrality of the intruder (e.g. plastic, oiI,
surgical implants)
as well as of the thynic p=O system results in immune paralysis.
Thi.s observation again speaks ?or a Feinberg -:- Feinberg interacting principle resulting in a steady state.
Literature:
Feinberg, G. phys. Rev. 159 No.
Nieper. H. A
1 0 8 9 - l I 0 s .( r 9 6 7 )
B .M . 1 4 , I 9 7 2 ( G e r m)
(a
-2l a
l l
B R O A D C A S T I N CT O W E RU S E D A S
(3
GRAVITATiON LARORATORY
perhaps recall
Our readers will
that in January I959 the Hungarian Exporter
9, No. l, 1959 p. 4) gave an account of a new theory in physical gravication, elaborated by Dr. E. Magyari, Eng. and described as "Power and Energy
TrAnsfer by Penetration. "
(vol.
It has now been reported that during the eclipse on Febrtrary the l5rh, 1951,
Dr. llagyari put his theory to the test, using the 314 metre seriaL broadcasEing
tovrer ai Lakihegy near Budapest for his gravitation
experiment uhich inrpressively
proved the truth of his ideas.
The theory suggested that during eclipse the toi.rer vould display certain
inclination
phenomena Lhat would establish
the physical character of gravitation,
a problem unsettled since Newton's conception of classical pbysics.
In the
light
of our current physical knowledge it seernedinpossible
to "predict"
uhat
sort of phenomenatas to ensue but, basing himself on the theory he had evolved,
Dr. Magyari put down in advance his calculations
and these eere sealed in an
envelope and placed in an official
depositThe envelope was only opened after
the measurements had taken place and his calculations
r^,ere then compared with
the facts established on the basis of the tower's inclination.
Agreernent betr,,reen
the two was strikins.
(
, J,
Leaving out mathernatical deductions,
Energy Transfer" is not very difficult
to
thought.
the theory of "Penetration
Force and
grasp by a rnere logical train of
A s t o n o n e r G a m o \ ra s s e r t e d ( P h y s - R e v . l 9 4 l )
that the celestial
bodies in the
Milky tlay, Iike in all galactic
systems of the Universe, are undergoing a continuous process of energization
in lrhich they burst asunder into neutrinos or
still
srnaller particles
under the developmenf of energies so immense that they
defy human imagi nat i on.
This al.so proves that the omnidirectional,
uniforrn and statistical
flow of
energy in the interior
of a galactic
systern is not a supposition but a consequence.
Of the Milky l.lay which measures nearly I00,000 light years in dianeter,
the Solar
system occupies about one third and its onn diameter is not more than 1/1000 of
(One light year equals approxirnate l0 biltion
a light year.
kilometres).
Thus
the physical and nathematical
including
stabilities
for local equalization,
considerations of past millions
of years, seem to be sufficient.
To the view of Zehnder, Swiss physicist,
pervade the
that these particles
heavenly bodies wirhout impedirnent, Dr- Magyari's theory has added the following
points:
l.
If a spherical body is placed in the described kind of dynamical space
(see Fig. l),'the
input power level Ein cannot be anything but symmetrical in
rel at ion
to the sphere.
(d
2.
sipation,
particles
Since the penetrating
probably suffer a uni form pover disthe output level Eout nanifests
the same type of splrerical syrr,n)etry.
'2 /r'\
3.
The diffcrence
in povcr lcvel bctweerr input an(l output (AE =
.
Ein
Eout) remains entrapped in the body and acts rnostly in the forrn of
energy or is bound in some other nay.
4.
Owing to the
remains motionless
in
spherical
s)"nmetry betr.'een the energy levels,
spite of theAE por.,er increase.
thermal
the body
From these points it is evidence that the forces of gravity acting on rwo
bodies show the Pattern illustrated
in Fig. 2tinder the influence of rnutual power
disipation,
the greatest losses occur at the inner side of the Ein and on the outer
sides the Eout pover level surfaces, r.rith a certain surplus resulting in input
level.
This surplus determines the rrature of the P forces as penetrating
forces
of opposite tendency, driving the bodies, in inverse proportion to their masses,
tovrard the commoncentre of gravityis interesting.to
note that Newton hirnself seems to have guessed something
for in a letter
he mentioned the "ctlrerflux"
as a source of force that
Penetrates across the bodies while "it
exercises some kind of Dressure'r on them.
of
It
this
Thus there is direct
evidence that the approach of bodies to each other
always occurs in the direction
of an absorbing sheet or absorbing mass, thrown
in the path of the intacr
power flux Eo.
All
rhis
holds
true
for
the interrelation
of
tlre masses.
What about three bodies situated
What happens on the Earth's
in one line?
surface to the large mass of a tall vertically
erected object during eclipse,
especially
during one q'hich occurs in the horizontal
plane early in the rnorning,
like the one on the l5th February?
Classical
physics and modern have only one ans!,,er to offer:
when three
bodies line up in the same straight,
the gravitation
forces of the heavenly bodies
sum up and exert their
influence
upon the terrestrial
object -- say on a tall
chimney -- with the result
of a plain East deviationDr- Magyari's forecast for
the complete eclipse
period was a different
one:
For the beginning phase of the Sun-ltoon coverage he predicted that, if
unforseen wind conditions
did not interfere,
there would be a marked deviation
uith
increasing
tendency from the normal state to the East, oging to the mutual
compensation of the spherical
dispersions,
followed as the eclipse grew
fuller,
by a fairly
sudden swingover to the l.Jest; this position
would persist during
the greater part of the eclipse period, with an East redeclination
and a return
to normal only tor.rard the end of the contact.
Neittrer classical
nor modern physics corrld have accounted for sucn predictions
Lrithout the penetration
and absorption theory of therrno-gravitation.
The measurements were taken under t h e d i r e c t i o n
Urania Ob6ervatory.
of
Dr
Gy Xulin,
head of
the
RESULTS
c
The tower i.nclinations
exactly agreed in direction
and size r^'itll the
predetermined course.
Taliing 100 to nark the total time-inclination
area.
-2-
there
D , t. : . : r v r C - 1 r . i Jt . t i i :
t,a
Fr!.!.,
l!J.r.r.
l.
rlE:ior.
tr
.'5r
iarr''D
!
r5
!at105a
J it,r: 4i x
"
x.,/
I
o/
Ba6sleraZion
, 7 1a S S e S c a - u S e d Z g
/,':1.,
I
1
na.rtzc(e-peneLra
Qo= a.ceZ e rn7 iort
'l4e_e:_,/grtLg
(
:rb
ol r.h. l=.ltrIto,
ot r!. lla E.:,.
.,s:|=, (L. ..rrrrt o! F.H';,.l"..it*.-
D..'
f{ mags , bat pmTcr
t ia a aZlg pilh the
AE qbsorbe-d e-tet '
qn4 ?he f. foZEr
of Vr', e! riti oa.
rru.t;,dr
pp?rtrtt\-//.
7.oof
7i
').
.
t-9
= sPe
Q
'C=
/hearu
af
F
/t.?,^!,
Irt|r/
'I! .
fo-/
t e
c.ri.,,;27 j 7'r;g
/-.2 cl er-g,
n.o.1-t, c ls,
otaict^
o r/ z'?s
fleq,rou's
/a
y->-.
t,'e/oc;tl af Y"'f *;'
K= spzc.rlens;ty of
ya 1! :j'/: s .
"f'i
' ' - I
,
r,
^1.
l'(
-
T,ta-
.t ; t /' y?t^s.1:-l c ai t i te rT! rfgra ri
,t = lr,
$r
* S u l ! n e / r i r € _ - : g a . r - o 7e f
/,;hls za-
*f:,t.<d
Qy u'fZ:ftgtnslon
!uL'/.?17o
..>
'.1 ?
U
/-
; . . 1a
df
?rn t'i!:'- ta;t s!etz:
e tr cJg
.1"z:,.erSeS..
__q'
i
aZo,.e-.
C. r,;-299
a{J.,si t y
e,{ p7:t,ze!g
c?.7t, c la
Zs .
_"@
.:.€.
.atti
a/-
p'r38:-7; : Jne cln.
energl
of sPo-cz
gp 2 = '-nr
fa. c/e r o f.zp erte/ralt'en
2
/
7-t ^'27
f(1,* ' - /!,)
' = ^ ,"'7vn,l,'2n
./2"
5.2'?e anJTesifron
of bodz es'
-.s
t
.Q.i 4iot
ec*ni/ft
I
,f
,
o
(
tra.s a 17 per cent deviation
(insread of the I00 taught by physics)
to the East
and a 83 per cent deviation
t o t h e W e s t ( r n s t e a d o f n o n e) .
The results
fuinished indisputable
proof for the power absorbing nature
gravitation
phenomena on the basis of the potenton penetration
theory.
of
The peak-to-peak deviation was as large as
ttro times 650 rnm(see Fig. 3).
The two ten-rninute swings of the tolrer gavJ
a dramatic and awe inspiring
spectacle.
The experience of these feu ,nsrngnls
tepi ttre research tearn and the entire
technical
staff
of the B. c- transrnitter
in exciiernent as they forloved the movement of the
tower through binoculars.
These observati ons provi de evidence
that
l.
pouer absorptive
The mechanism of
gravitation
is
in
character-
2'
The significant
west decrination during the eclrpse must have been
.
due
to a preliminary
polrer absorption by the Sun which deprived the
Moon of a propor_
tron of its mass effect,
3'
The mass effect
'rattractive"
telekinetic
thought so ).
induced by absorption must have had the character
not of
',pressure,, (Newton
force but of a penetrating
himserf
4.
Nothing except the phenomenon o f p e n e t r a t i o n
polrer transfer
_
can account
tor the mass-independent equal rate of accel
erat i on --the ,'gravitational
accelera_
cion"--in
the field
of gravrty.
5.
fiost. aberations
constellation.
in
the
Sputnik
orbits
are due to
the Sun-to-Itoon to
Apart from these five p o i n t s a s d i r e c t
consequences of
there are measurements and t h e o r e t i c a
I considerations
vhich
thought:
l,
1.
The results
2.
They call
have revealed
for
entirely
a ner, aspect
new physi cal
for
unquestionable validity,
leave much room for
the "three-body"
basi s to
tackle
Earth
the
probIem.
"ether
theory',.
a
I
,f
n
o
(
!ra.s a l7 per cent deviation
(instead of
Lo the East
and a 83 per cent deviation to the West (
r nstead of
the 100 taught by physics)
none)-
The results
fuinished indisputable
proof for the poner absorbing nature
gravitation
phenomena on the basis of the potenton penetration
tbeorv.
of
The peak-to-peak deviation lras as large
as tu,o times 650 nrn (See Fig. 3).
The t!,o ten-minute surings of
the tower gavi a dranatic and awe inspiring
spectacle.
tne experience of these few moments
kept the research team and the entire technical
staff of the B. C. transmitter
i n e x c i t e m e n t a s t h e y f o l l o w e d t h e r n o v e r n e n to f
the
lol'er through binoculars.
These observations
l.
provide
The mecbanisrn of
evidence
gravitation
is
that
povrer absorptive
in
character.
2'
The significant
west decrination during ihe eclipse must have
.
been due
to a preliminary
por.'erabsorption by the sun which deprivLd
the Moon of a proportron of its mass effect_
3'
The mass effect
telekinetic
"attractive"
thought so).
induced by absorption must have had the character
not of
force but of r pnn.tr-rting
"pressure,, (Newton hirnself'
a
4.
Nothing except the phenomenon o f p e n e t r a t i o n
_
por.'er transfer
can account
tor the mass-independent equal rate
of acceleration --the,'gravitational
accelera_
tion"--in
the field of gra.rity.
5.
Most aberarions
constellation.
in
the
Sputnik
orbits
are
due to
the
,,rrr-ao-roon
to
Earth
Apart from these five p o i n t s a s d i r e c t
consequences of unquestionable validity,
there are measdrements and t h e o r e t i
ca I considerations
w h i c h leave rnuch roorn for
thought:
t.
The results
2.
They call
have revealed
for
entirely
a new aspect
new physi cal
for
basis
the
to
"three-body"
tackle
the
probl ern.
"ether
theory'l
t
73
SECONDS
I5.835
T"-
'
u'r > ' 3 5 . 8 3
=
F '
o
tu
tr
35.833
all
o
(o
'
-r
t2
:
.----t' 35.831
9 ; . 1 2 , 1l58 2 l 2 {
5 |
AUGUST
'l
S 2l HOURS
. A U G U S7T
A U G U S6T, :
'AU6UST
5-7. 1975.' -t
MOON
: NEYI
:
I
i
I SAXL& ALLEN.
i FIGURE{-
O ' L; ' ..L -.;
I
L - _
\s, tr.r,+
c,-..t/
/-r.-,-/
-/, i--- :If ',;, n4""-. (o /,r"f
i{"rt'| ef
21
1../t,
(,
Annex to the Shielding
Theory of
Gravity
Fierd of a Dirferent Kind (Perisorar cravitv
"t"";tt=""ii;"::;;ttt
Magyari, by his radio antenna experlment
conducted in 196r. during
an eclipse made a very interesting
discovery: he was able to show
that the attractive
forces of llooi una-srn do not combine
as one
should postulate when following
the Newtonian and Einsteinian
laws'
rnstead, rhe sun during"rhe
deprives r;;-M;;.
a parr
of itrs mass effect.
"t h
" iei p "t -ut a g y a r i p r , e n o m e n o n - i n e p e a k
we calr-this
o f w h i c h p r e c e d e ss l i g h t l v
rhe peak
"i
'.'"'ecri;;;;';"iiiiit'.rr."t.
From his observation Magyari has concluded
a c c e l e r a t i o n i s 1 ) a p r e s s u r e p h e n o m e n o n , .tzhl a t g r a v i t a t i o n a l
pti".-ii'
a n d 3 ) d e f i n e d b v t h e q u a l i t v i r ' r . g . " r i i " t i " ;a" iu' "S"6. .i e
y"rierd "r.',".a
an
c tde r ,
n o t b y t h e g r a v i t a t i n g r n a s s e sa n d t h e i r o r s r a n c e s
arone.
(J
Hassel in his p3per. on gravity conversion
has listed
resuft sinilar
to that reported by Maqvari.
an experimental
For me it presented a certain charrenge
to incorporate the Magyari
p h e n o m e n o ni n r o r h e s h i e l d i n g t n . " i v
6- ;i. g r a v i r y ; h i ; ; ;
in"it,"
final
forr,r, r had oublished in ltii:
rhe Magyari phenomenon
is definitely
i.n c3ntradiction
with Nentonian and Einsteinian laws
r , r ef o u n d i t e v e n t u a l l y i n a g r e e m e n t w i t h
the shielding theory.
r have to confess that for a certain time
r neglected the need to
compry with the Maqyari phenomonen. onty
sinc. it became obvious
that there wilr- be-no. chince roi-a p.iri""ion
of a nucrear brow in
outer
space in order-to measure
i,ity fierd profe;ai;;-:
e x p e r i m e n t a t p r o p o s a r m a d eb y D a9h. u
y u n b h e n - r ^ = t u r l u J - [ o c .o. n _
on the. Magyari phen6menon
: :rI o
t tpt ue:r:t i e s
p
of the qravity
to be most f ruitf ui.
f ier-d.
in order to learn more about the
r feel that this effort
turned out
A s r n e n t i o n e d i n m-ya b' so hu it e l d i n g
Theory' r had calcurated that the
Darth intercepts
4 - 4:5?, oi ii,"-pun"trati.n9
gravitational
energy whereas JuDiter may intercept
about 25g.
?his means that
J u p i t e r ' s n n a s sw o u t a . b e = ; r . t ; ; - ; ; i n l i
( e
\ay
tnun originarty
carcurared
from it's
ballistic
data.
The pion6er satellites
d
i
d
n
o
t provide
data irhich permir ro clefine trpii"i;"-r;I;;it;;;;,";;";;:.:
a prus
of 253 for the masses of jovian rn"oni u,
reported in the Ames
NASA compendium on Jupitei
woutrd perfe"try
iuppo.t
ry
"on"irsrons.
A s s u m in g t h a t J u p i t e r a b s o r b s s o m e . 2 5 t
of the penetrating energy _
vrnrch resul.ts in its important radiating
of heat - the Sun woui6
J2
surely intercept and absorb the intruding gravity Peinberg energy
b y 1 0 0 3 . H o r , r e v e r ,t h e S u n d o e s n o t b e h a v e l i k e a t o t a l g r a v i t y
shielder,
otherrvise it rvould probably not emit light
and it $ouId
not produce the observed eruPtions,
llow can this be explained?
When we look at the preceding of the peak of the l'lagyari gravity
phenomenon over the peak of the Eclipse's
phenomenon we come
light
to the conclusion that by the time tl)e soLar gravity energy arrives
at the Earth its speed is only slightly
faster than that of light,
m a y b e l . 5 - 3 c .
However, for certain reasons we assume that the speed of the
Feinberg gravity energy in the bac{groundrspace of our solar system
should be in the range of aboul l0- to l0'c.
The gravity effect
of the Sun on the Earth and its moon may, therefore,
be connected
to a gravity field of a different
qual ily
My assumption is the following:
The Sun absorbs all intruding
gravity
energy by its mass (or by a dense perisolar
Peinberg field)?
In exchange, it produces and emits a newly formed Feinberg f iel-d of
the same energy content, or even more.
It is likeLy that it
produces rnore than it has absorbed since the characteristics
of
light
emission and the dynamics of solar eruptions indicate that the
Sun is repelJ-ent on its surface and not attractive.
This assumption
i s a l s o w e l l i n a g r e e m e n t v r i t h t h e f a c t t h a t M i c h e l s e n a n d M . 1 r 'al '
f a i l e d r o p r o v e r h e d e ft e c r i o n o f l i 9 h t
thus correcting
the earlier
Einstein's postulat ion.
opinion
of
i""irra rffiy-;;
Eddinqton who tried
ffi",
to prove
I assume the Sun to emit a gravity Feinberg field which in it'..
beginning is only slightly
fasLer than the speed of 1ight, however,
it is very dense and thus rich in energyAs it ftees from the
Sun it nay dilute and also gain speed and diffuse.
This, of course,
would also say that Suns are fecders of energy and gravity fields.
According to this rnodel the orbits of the solar planets are defined
by the compromise between the solarpetal
pressure of the outer space
fieLd and the repellent effect of the perisolar
fieId.
This would
resulL in 1) an orbit dependent from the average specific density
of the respective planets, and 2) in a high pressure and heat on
planets near to the Sun.
As one know, these tvro requirenents
seem
to be perfectly
It is true for the reported average
fulfilled.
densities of the planets as welI as for the physical data reported
fron the surface of Venus.
l'lost iTnportanbly. however, this model
explains perfectly
positi.on
the Magyari phenomenonsince in ecliptic
the Moon would be exposecl to a more powerful (perisolar)
gravity
radiation
and, therefore,
Iose a part of its mass effect on the
Earth.
This model, in addition. throws an explaining light on
certain terrestial
reactions counected with solar happenings.
Again, we may play the game by imaqining a change in the energ),
density (or speed) of 'our' outer space gravity field,
as I did
-2-
2L
in
the original
paper on the Shiel<ling Theory in
I97I.'
J-) An increase in the energy content of the outer field would 1ead
to: a)-decrease of gravitational
acceleration on Earth, e.g.
about 0.28 g at the time of the dinosaurs and the highly giowing
flora.
b) higher geothermal temperature, volcanic ac[iviti,
c).a. deeper impression into the perisolar
(repellent) gra;ity field
which woutd result in an orbit nearer to the sun.
The-surface of
the Earth would be tvarmer.
2) A decrease of the energy content of the outer field
would l-ead
to: a) Increase of gravitational
acceleration on Earth, because of
an increasing percentile shielding differential.
IIor ses having
the size of dogs? b) Lower geothermal temperature, and c) a drifting
into an orbit rnore distant from the Sun because of the repel lent
effect of the perisolar
field.
This would result in glacial ages
on Earth.
D r . H , A . Ni eper
Med. Dept.
Silbersee Hosp.
Hannover
FRG
(3
(r,
-3-
27
LIBRARY
A. KEITHBREWER
SCIENCEAND RES:,ARCHDEPARTMENT
ADMIRALRUGEARCHIVES
RichlandCenrer,Wisconsin53581
(
608.647-6513
rtllgll-gl-ql4ylll
LIsr oF SHTELDTNG
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
;.
T.
8.
8a.
9.
10.
ll.
12.
t3.
14.
(
Ouotations
Bi ography-Dr. Hans NiePer
Theory of .rr"tgy
"nr.iiing
?ages
PAPERS
1
.,
as a cause of gravitational
effects
Prlc
i.t)
by Dr'
1 )
Hans NrePer
2
Dr. Grayis synopsis of theory of energy shielding
3
Gravity Field Cushion Theory
Perisolar
2
slstems
frorn Siological
Porentials
lnterceptive
f"iltu.tg
2
cause of gravitatiol
Rendel'i quocations--the
-.
Iuture Physics and ani 1and article'
P
h
D
.
b
iography
I'li11iam F. Hassel,
l)
grav ity
1
Power
Gray's l'lotor - A New Electric
2
K
o
o
y
speed and unmanned space flight--J'N'J'
Gravitational
Kooy and
abberation by J'M'J'
oi a gtavitational
on the possibility
3
J . B er g h u i s
m
e
c
h
in celestial
speeJ of gravitation
of a finite
on ii""i.,tr".nce
5
E
e
r
g
h
u
i
s
J
o
h
a
n
a
n
d
anics by Johan H.J. Kooy
J
Particles--Feittb":g
toss ibii i ty of Faster-than-Light
..
4
Broadcasti-ngtoverusedasgravitationlaboratorybY.}1'8Y".'._-.--,
concepts ano
Base-Coruoents on gravity
froi Ed"ards Air loice
Article
I
spacevehicles
2
letter to Dr' NiePer
15. National Aeronautics and Space Adninistration
I
I976
2
6
'
NiePer letter to Alexander dated December
i6.
I
1976
'17. liieper letter to Alexander dated January 8'
J
29' 1979
,
18. Nieper letter to va1 Rychly dated January
l0' 1979
19. Nieper letter to v81 Richlt dated February
to v8l Rychli dated Febr-uary 27 ' 1979
io.. Nieper letter
I
15' 1979
2I . liiepe! letter to val Rychly dated Harch
15' 1979
22. Nieper letter to Dah Yu Cheng dated March
I
2
5
' 1979
23. NiePer letter to Va1 Rychly dated March
I
1979
24. NiePer letter to va1 Rtchly dated Harch 31'
2
1
979
8'
25. Nieper letter to val Rychly dated APril
2
1979
26. Nieper letter tp val Rtchly dated April ?6'
z
f979
27. Nieper letter to Val Rychly dated Usy 6'
2
1979
2 8 . r ' , * i e p e rl e t t e r t o V a l R y c h l y d a t e d M a y 1 9 '
2
1979
29- Nieper letter to Val Rychly dated June 3'
4
1979
30.. liieper letter to Val Rychly d€ted June 24'
4
'|
3l.
Nieper letter to Val Rycbly dated July 9' 1979
1
9
7
9
1
9
'
A
u
g
u
s
t
d
a
t
e
d
32. NiePer letter to Val Rychly
I
26' 1979
33. Nieper letter to Val Rychly dated August
I
l' 1979
34- Nieier letter to val Richly dated sePtember
8' 1979
35. Nieper letter to val Rtchly dated sePtember
3 6 - M a g n e t o s P h e r e so f t h e G a l i l e a n S a t e l l i t e s
T
l0' 1979
31. Nieper letter to Va1 Rychly dated November
I
3 8 - C o n m e n t so n t h e J - U . J . K o o y G r a v i t o n T h e o r y
I
5' l9A0
39. Nieper letter to val Rychly dated.January
?
26' f980
4 0 . N i e p e r l e t t e r t o T o w n s e n db r o t n d a t e d J a n u a r y
I
'
1980
41. Nieper letter to val Rychly dated February 2'
I
' 42. NiePer letter to Val Rychly dated Uarch t5' 1980
(
"
N
"
r
n
a
c
h
i
n
e
)
'43. uachine gathers energy from space, Physicist clairns
I
ro val Rychlv dated l'lay 3' 1980
N
i
e
p
e
r
1\
for U'S- mailing add $ 2 . 0 0 .
,i6ru, Postage for foreign rnailing add $5'00 and
t . )
1.0
1 . 5
l.c
Li
t - )
J . a
) . i
? . :
l . :
2 - (
i.i
.:
.:
I _l
l.(
i.(