MPW Industrial Services experts discuss labor-intensive dry
Transcription
MPW Industrial Services experts discuss labor-intensive dry
ROFIN-BAASEL’S MPS Laser Workstation SCHUNK’S PGN-Plus Permanent Gripper JENOPTIK’S Opticline Shaft Measurement November/December 2015 • TodaysMotorVehicles.com MPW Industrial Services experts discuss labor-intensive dry-scrub paint removal systems and wet-scrub options that require less manpower but generate more waste. BMW spent $1 billion upgrading its Spartanburg, South Carolina, plant last year. Part of that investment was for an Eisenmann SE dry-scrub system for removing overspray from its paint booths. MPW Industrial Services experts discuss labor-intensive dry-scrub paint removal systems and wet-scrub options that require less manpower but generate more waste. BY GREG ARMSTRONG AND SHANE DEFAZIO coatings D ealing with paint overspray and waste removal can be a costly, time-consuming effort, something that most automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and their top tier suppliers turn over to facility managers such as MPW Industrial Services. The wet-scrub, water-based technique for paint booth cleaning systems has long been the standard, but MPW engineers have seen an increasing number of companies turn to dryscrub systems that have been embraced mostly by European manufacturers. More U.S. manufacturers are beginning to test the waters in dry-scrub systems as well. By our estimation, OEMs still favor wet scrub systems 90% to 10% or more. It’s 75% to 25% in plants we manage. Based upon observations from these plants, however, we predict it will shift closer to 60% to 40% in the next 10 years. Because we’re on the floors and in the shops for manufacturers such as Volkswagen, BMW, Ford, and Honda, we’ve adapted to managing and maintaining both platforms, so the following comparison might be helpful for automakers considering whether to stand pat or shift to a different system. Traditional wet-scrub systems It’s important to recognize that paint shop management is not a core component of the automotive manufacturing process. However, it’s essential in the finished product, and the work is highly specialized. Automotive spray booths often use wet-scrub systems that feature a chemically treated water curtain to capture contaminants from paint overspray. In this process, air is drawn through a continuous curtain of moving water and suspended paint particles are scrubbed out and flushed into a collection pan. The paint shop management for a wet-scrub system might include water blasting, cleaning supply pipes, filters and exhaust systems, and ensuring waste sludge travels into the pit through the sluiceway, which is an artificial water channel for carrying off overflow. Chemical, sludge, and other waste must also MPW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES MPW Industrial Services has been assisting in paint shop management, maintenance, cleaning, and overall quality control since 1979, when it began working in Honda’s Marysville, Ohio, motorcycle plant. With $40 million in annual revenue, the company works with 14 automakers in 15 original equipment manufacturer (OEM) plants across North America to set up, manage, and maintain automotive paint booths and the systems on assembly lines that carry vehicle shells through the painting process. be disposed of at a frequent and often expensive rate within the traditional wet-scrub process. Vacuum trucks suck up all the overspray, paint waste, water, and sludge into a vacuum box. Discarded substances are dewatered so the manufacturer is not paying for water waste, reducing sludge disposal costs. The OEM typically has a company that takes care of the rest of the waste. Otherwise, MPW handles everything from when fresh air comes into the paint shop space to when it leaves the exhaust system. Newer technology dry-scrub systems In contrast, dry-scrub systems recirculate spray booth air by directing it into scrubber chambers where a plastic filter protected by a pre-coat of calcium carbonate captures the wet paint particles. The resulting dry waste material, similar to limestone or marble, is collected and removed, and often recycled into cement. Newer technology dry-scrub systems can be more efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost effective compared to water blasting wet-scrub sludge into a pit. However, dry-scrub systems are more labor intensive. The two paint shop environments are similar, but the difference rests with the manpower necessary to coatings HONDA TURNS TO DRY SCRUBBING Honda of America Manufacturing Inc. will invest $210 million throughout the next two years to overhaul the paint shop at its Marysville, Ohio, Auto Plant (MAP). That upgrade will include the largest dry-scrub overspray removal system in North America. Honda estimates that the new system will: • Eliminate more than 255 tons of sludge per year • Reduce CO2 emissions by 18%, 12,000 metric tons • Cut water use by 2 million gallons per year “Honda is committed to delivering products that have outstanding quality and low environmental impact,” says Tom Shoupe, executive vice president and COO of Honda of America Mfg. “Our Ohio operations are once again raising the bar for quality and environmentally responsible manufacturing operations.” Other Honda paint shop improvements include: Short process and new primer coat – A 4-coat, 2-bake process replaces a 4-coat, 3-bake method, eliminating one primer-coat curing oven. The primer coat and waterborne base coat will reduce volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions nearly 66%. Two-step curing – A more-automated, two-step temperature curing process supports paint finish appearance improvements. Increased capacity – Replacing a paint line built in 1985, the facility will be able to coat 229,000 vehicles per year. set up and maintain a contaminant-free environment for dry-scrub systems. Manpower differences In a traditional wet-scrub system, one person can apply a protective grease coating on surfaces before water blasting the overspray, paint sludge, and waste below grates where the vehicles are painted. It’s simply a process of grease, rinse, and repeat. With a newer dry scrub system, everything under the grates needs to be coated, covered, or protected by plastic to collect the limestone dust residue. Multiple workers also need to hang plastic on walls and water pipes, and more safety issues arise when they need to move hundreds of heavy 2ft x 3ft grates that line the pit beneath the car being painted. Because it doesn’t produce the volume of cars the other manufacturing plants must construct, one luxury brand uses a unique dry paint booth that collects the overspray in filters that are simply replaced when they get full. A common link Both wet- and dry-scrub systems rely on optimally functioning regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) systems, which take exhaust out of facilities. Automotive paint fumes release high levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere. Without an RTO system, certain automakers can’t paint. An effective paint shop management team cleans RTOs to extend their lives and ensure continued high-level performance. An underperforming RTO system might result in a manufacturer’s inability to produce its expected quota of cars during a given timeframe. Because of air quality standards outlined in the plant’s permits, RTOs operating below safety standards could result in hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines. Decision-making process Dry-scrub systems require 25% more manpower to prep the booth. However, we also estimate that the 25% increase in manpower is more than offset by reductions in chemical and waste disposal costs. We’ve already seen several domestic and import automakers making the switch to dry-scrub systems. Although the dry-scrub paint booth setup is similar to the wet-scrub paint booth setup, the coffers underneath the grates collect the limestone dust waste, removing the need to transport and dispose of potentially toxic sludge collected in wet-scrub systems. Despite the environmental benefits associated with reduced waste, OEMs have been reluctant to make the switch from wet-scrub systems to dry-scrub systems. The technology is still new, relatively unproven, and manufacturers previously had issues with disposing of the limestone that wasn’t recycled, because some landfills were unsure that this type of waste was non-hazardous. Those concerns have since been alleviated, with the bulk of the limestone now sent to a location in Alabama. At MPW, we are happy to offer opinions, but the say on which system to use is up to the OEM’s environmental teams. MPW Industrial Services www.mpwservices.com About the authors: Greg Armstrong is business development and regional operations manager for facility management support services at MPW Industrial Services, and can be reached at [email protected]. Shane DeFazio is director of operations for facility management support services at MPW Industrial Services, and can be reached at sdefazio@ mpwservices.com. Reprinted with permission by Today's Motor Vehicles Magazine, November/December 2015